/asatru/ - Asatru / Heathenry / Paganism

>>10429

That reminds me.

The Third Reich had some very good archaeologists writing about the subject of our presence in Asia and America in ancient times.

I don't remember their names right now, sadly.

http://thorvald.is/?page_id=392

A fairly decent and decently sourced article on the theory that Quetzalcoatl may have been a Viking.

I don't think I remember hearing that the heathens practiced human sacrifice. Animal sacrifice, yes, but not human. He says that Björn Breiðvíkingakappi of the Eyrbyggja saga disliked it because he was somewhat Christian.

But other than that. It is a decent examination of two myths that seem to correlate.

https://genetiker.wordpress.com/

Found this blog to be quite decent on the topic of White presence in Pre-Columbian America amidst a sea of Jewish rewriting of History, niggerism, mormonism and ayy-giantism.

Found this. Seems like Assyrian/Akkadian language is actually a fairly unique Indo-European language.

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=B69C394D2D4E6C831A1D754B06E216E4?doi=10.1.1.516.4147&rep=rep1&type=pdf

>>10435

Just 40-50 years ago if you had said the vikings had colonised the americas you'd be a SS nazi babykiller right out of indiana jones with your nordicist bigotry… Right up until they found the ruins in newfoundland. So there's that.

>>10439

The hittites being an IE-group is a common theory but I've no idea how rooted in fact it is.

Very interesting I myself had that theory for years. Quetzalcoatl being a feathered serpent could have been Drakkars or something.

>>10412

I forgot where (I think Arizona) but some Natives have lore about a race of "Red haired Giants". And also there is this ancient stone road built here in the US (think maybe in the south) that dates back a thousand years and the Native story about it was "A race of white people built it".

OP you literally wrote that like a we wuz kangz nigger

>>10519

>Either way. I am in the process of downloading and converting this book from the Norwegian national digital library.

Excellent.

>Rapa Nui stones

Tangential, but do you happen to know anything about supposed celtic symbols/artifacts/colonies in new zealand?

>>10499

>Name of book please.

I'll do you one better. ;)

>>10513

And you are..? The regulars here do not post one line shitposts.

>>10499

>>10523

>Name of book please.

>I'll do you one better. ;)

Fugging file limit.

https://mega.nz/#!p1QQwToQ!Hb9R4CkYe9P7WjrVPSf7nSrD52MaqeUcV1dL-AnA6L4

>>10434

Hans Gunther wrote about it extensively. He was an athropologist though, not an archaeologist.

>>10560

>Hans Gunther

What book of his exactly?

>He was an athropologist though, not an archaeologist.

Anthropology is also very important here. It isn't that difficult to see the racial character that made up these civilizations.

>>10434

Franz Altheim, and Yrjö von Grönhagen by any chance?

They both worked with the Ahnenerbe.

>>10528

Is the stone fort in its original condition (obv the stair case, and doorway are not) but i mean has it been rebuilt? Or was it found standing like that?

I ask because its masoned together. From what I know, and from what other historical sits tell us, most Stone buildings were freestanding. No "cement" was used.

>>10412

There are SO many historical stories with this narrative happening.

Whether they are true or not, is 100% up for debate.

Many Indigenous peoples have tales about "tall, fair" people. and other mystical sounding names that can be attributed to Germanic folk.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Amazonian_Indians

A lot of this stuff does sound like WE WUZ, but from a time when politically it was pertinent to create this narrative for White Americans to then kinda get all "muh manifest destiny"

Now you could say, its politically pertinent to give Blacks the whole "r stolded histry bruh smh" because they are being militerized to help kill us off culturally, and genetically.

>>10572

The Racial Elements of European History.

http://www.theapricity.com/earlson/reeh/reoehchap8a.htm

>>10412

>Since the Jews do this, they have a motive. Should we at least not get to the bottom of it?

agreed

>>10607

>The Racial Elements of European History.

I have that book in PDF form. Two different scans. Never read it though.

Here are different files of the same book.

https://8ch.pl/pdfs/src/1461571717017-1.pdf

http://web.archive.org/web/20130814151312/http://greatwhitedesert.org/documents/Gunther_-_Racial_Elements_of_European_History.pdf

Good channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0gkKMGpCgyun7OoEOseryg/videos

>>10412

>I know this sounds like "We wuz kings" - White edition.

Yeah, a little bit. Some of it seems like a real stretch.

>see this pile of rocks?

>the indians said a group of people with light skin made it

>WE WUZ KANGS!

The difference, though, is that niggers need to claim to be kangz because they have nothing else to point to. Whites have tons of things to point to already, we don't really need to make up stories or get all crazy when we hear an ancient legend about some people with pale skin.

It's not that what you're saying is impossible, most of it just seems unlikely, and I'm not particularly desperate to try to hype it up.

>>11475

>The difference, though, is that niggers need to claim to be kangz because they have nothing else to point to. Whites have tons of things to point to already, we don't really need to make up stories or get all crazy when we hear an ancient legend about some people with pale skin.

this, most of the stuff in this thread seems based on legends and vague stories, sure i'm willing to believe that there was a white pressence throughout central asia and europe, but claiming to have built the pyramids is just silly

>>11488

on a side note, central africa had some pretty cool civilisations, like the one of timbuktu ect, but for some reasons the niggers won't claim that one

also holy shit check'em

>>11489

Do most niggers in America know where their ancestors came from? I've been wondering this for a while. They may not actually have a clue, hence latching onto the whole revisionist black history shit.

>>11500

Anyone with some common Sense would conclude that they came from africa's armpit (the moist, warm stinky area, with countries like Senegal and Ghana ) but to them an south african nigger is equal to a moor, it's like they're "racist" to their own kind, i find it funny and sad at the same time

>>11488

You truly believe the afro-centric "WE WUZ KANGZ" nonsense? Countless mummies of Egyptian Pharaohs have been found with Caucasoid skulls and blonde hair.

https://hiddenincatours.com/the-mystery-of-ancient-egypts-red-haired-mummies/

http://www.celticnz.co.nz/Nazca/Ancient%20Caucasoid%20Egyptians.htm

>ancient white history

Define this "white" maymay.

Calling blacks as blacks is an insufficent anglo/new world wordplay too when you want to talk about history and the migration and mixing of people and cultures.

An african american who claims he descents from kangs /but did his homework and uses nubian pyramid builders who indeed existed/ is wrong, not because nubians are not "black" but because they are a distinct eastafrican ethnic group with a quiet different heritage in contrast to the congotribes which were enslaved by westafrican kangdoms (look them up, they are kinda cool) and sold to america.

>>11516

There are blonde berbers in northafrica and it is known that they warred against the egyptians and sometimes won and ruled over them.

The egyptians are such an old people that it sometimes happened that they got shafted and ruled by a foreigner, there was even a nubian pharao as far as I know, that of course does not mean that all egyptians turned black under his rule, just as they did not turn into maghrebian redheads under the rule of berbertribes whose origin isnt quiet clear yet.

Hell, the gene for blonde hair is a mutation that is quiet recent and spread among different peoples-it may even have happened independently because why should the genetic diceroll only fall on one of thousand of populations in that way?

There are blonde mongols with some tocharian/indoeuropan influence are they "white"?

Physically yes, but if you are an american white-that means descending from brits and germans mainly then your particular indoeuropean branch can hardly be brought in conncetion to these very very very distant "relatives" neither can their culture be connceted to yours.

We werent Khans.

Pan-white achievment measuring is as retarded as Pan-black one and while it is indeed interesting to learn about how people and tribes looked back then, you cannot connect them after a few cherrypicked phenotypes.

Or in other words:

if bears could speak and have pride in their crude claw-scratching patterns we would laugh at the icebears and blackbears struggling over appropiating pandamarks to their respective subspecies, while a kodiak bear claiming to descent from the common brown bears would be in the right.

WE WAS KINGS UND SCHEISSE

>>11521

oh boy finally someone with some sense of nuance