>>96313
Not that anon, but the day they delete something that isn't images of children and infants in provocative positions for the consumption of grown adults to jerk off to, I think we can all agree they have gone too far and will happily jump ship.
I mean the threads are literally called loli and shota. There are whole websites for this hosted in russia for obvious reasons.
It wasn't like the threads were filled with 12 year old looking anime girls that were actually 9000 year old demons, they weren't misty from pokemon or yoko from gurren lagan who look like they are legal.
They were adolescent children, drawn as adolescent children, for the purpose of being adolescent children, on the grounds of turning on and being consumed by someone that was into adolescent children with some adjacency to diapers playing a role in the images depicted.
I wouldn't count that art as something for someone just into diapers to fap to, but for someone into adolescent children wearing diapers to fap to. Just like if you took those same types of images with more emphasis on their feet wouldn't make it an image for a regular foot fag.
You may disagree because I also do agree internet censorship should be opposed, but until they do something more than oppose art a pedophile would be looking for, I don't think they have really dont anything wrong yet.
I do expect something wrong to happen as it always does, but l'd rather see it happen before I bail.