/32/ - Psychopolitics

A while ago I was browsing through the depths of the internet and stumbled across a certain statement. A statement which was in itself very simple, but for me it held great meaning.

Did you ever felt a moment of clarity? A moment where you suddenly understood something which was clouded before? I did when I read that statement. I did understand something, in a train of thoughts, just by a few words. That simple statement was the following:

"Feminism IS about helping us women achieve rights that will make us finally be recognized as being equal to men in every way."

At the first glance this sounds like any other equality phrase we have read thousands of times specifically on websites like Tumblr. On a closer look it becomes evident what deep meaning lies in those few words. “Being equal to men” is the confession of an entire movement and their motivation. It’s the confession that feminists do feel inferior to men.

After realising it, it seems as obvious as it gets. They value their own worth on masculine attributes. For some reason they put men on a pedestal and they try to compete and fight them on their homesoil. Naturally they will have the genetical disadvantage there and as a result feel inferior and self-loathing. Vice versa it would naturally be the same outcome with men having the disadvantage and feeling inferior. It is made to disappoint and end in disaster.

But why these girls and women feel like that? Why is it mainly one gender doing it that excessively? In order to answer this and due to the recent football (soccer for the americans) world cup, I will use an analogy on based off this sports. Most other teamsports work equally well though.

The common notion in most teamsports is that there are both offensive and defensive-minded players, and roles. Yet in the majority of cases the world stars are the ones being considered offensive players. It’s the offensive getting the most attention by being the most spectacular to watch. We pay more attention to a random goal than to a world-class tackle by a defender. We pay more attention to a meaningless dribbling on the sidelines than a good positioning to disrupt the opponents attacking. The list would go endlessly on, but that is the simple nature of things.

That doesn’t mean that defending players are of less importance. It just means they receive less attention. The very same issue happens for women in our society and in humanity as a whole. Typical male actions are just more attention gaining.

Men are the offensive and women the defensive players of our society. As in sports we pay more attention to the offensive players. We pay more attention to what is flashy. We pay more attention to that one out of ten times that dribbling worked than we pay attention to the ten out of ten times where the defensive tackling was done successfully. We pay more attention to that one in a million billionaire than we pay attention to the loving housewife of 5 children. We pay more attention to the male president than to all those hard-working nurses out there.

Naturally that lack of attention and approval can lead to a sense of inferiority and repulsion towards ones own strengths. It is fully understandable that a woman might feel undervalued by this human approach and that feeling can easily result into wanting the same as men in hope of having the same appreciation and attention. That is a false conclusion though. A vicious spiral going downhill.


Maybe Freud’s penis envy theory was indeed right. Not in a literal, but a metaphorical sense. The penis itself is a symbol of power. It is the active sexual organ, the one penetrating. Maybe he was right that in the life of most girls comes the realisation of feeling inferior by physical strength, but also by attention and approval of humanity as a whole.

Additionally Freud stated as well that denying the own “being without penis” will result in taking over male behaviour and (gender-)role patterns. I observed as well that this sense of inferiority can result in an overcompensation of common male stereotypes. Hypersexuality, because men only think about sex (“slutshaming”). Overly competitive behaviour, because men only compete. If violent, violent crimes by women turn out to generally be more sadistic than of men, because men are violent by nature. And so on. Eventually it is even distorted and they see these actions of men in the same intensity as they practice it themselves.
In addition to the feeling of inferiority this can also lead to the denying of the possibility that men can become victims of domestic violence, rape and other such violent crimes at the hands of a woman. By seeing men as above themselves and specifically as being physically stronger, they can’t comprehend such crimes as that would let their mindset collapse.

As a result these girls and women will be drawn a lot more to feminism and other social justice causes as they see morals, emotionality and ethical arguments as part of their own homesoil. It is a sense of last resort of not feeling inferior. Admitting to lose there would therefore be a huge issue and could result in dealing the finishing blow to an already broken self-worth.
The feminist fight is an act of deeply ingrained loathing for themselves. By now they have all the rights and even more than men have, yet still they feel oppressed. It is a self-made problem by projecting their inner self-loathe on a certain group being made into the perpetrator. It is safe to say that they will never be satisfied, even if they had all the advantages in the world. The entire fight is a lost cause as long as it remains symptom fighting without getting to the core of the problem.

It easily explains why women get more and more unhappy in liberalising western countries. While they are fighting windmills by trying to compete more and more with men to become “equal”, they disregard their own strengths and needs of being women. It is not only resulting in feeling inferior to men, but also results in losing the connection to their own feminine self as well as the intimate and complementary bond a man and a woman can share.

How some people called it already. Feminism is a hate-movement. But it is not a hate-movement towards men, it is a hate-movement towards femininity which is projected on men being the culprit.


To finish the article with the football analogy I started above, I will translate a saying of my native language:
"Offence wins games, defence wins championships."

Male traits might win “games, might bring society forward at times. However, without the feminine traits, without offspring, there will be no championships being won.




Note: This is purely based on my own personal observations out of western countries. I don’t have a degree in psychology nor sociology. What you take out of this text is up to you as an individual and I am open to factual critism.

Additionally I am generalising to sum up a general issue without getting into individual cases which obviously differ.


And a good read to the offensive/defensive player analogy: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/15/magazine/15Battier-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=2&

That's an intresting way to look at it, and it certanly explains the movement's existence. As another anon posted on this board, however, if we are wrong, we could spend a lot of time fighting in the wrong way.

Intriguing way of looking at it, OP.

How do you propose we counter that? How can we show women (and more specifically feminists) that the traditional female role isn't necessarily one of submission and inferiority?

>>266
Man, proofread your work before posting it, please. It's an ok point, I guess, but it unravels more things than it ties up.

>How some people called it already. Feminism is a hate-movement. But it is not a hate-movement towards men, it is a hate-movement towards femininity which is projected on men being the culprit.

I agree with this wholly, however.

>>280
Submission doesn't necessarily equal inferiority. The worst things in life are the prisons we are thrust into; the greatest things in life are the prisons we enter into on our own volition.

>>295
It's easy, I think, to find examples to countenance that belief. Most religions, for example, include submission as a major facet of their structure ("Islam" means surrender in Arabic). While this can be abused when religions become institutionalized, I believe that it's good on a personal level.

The ideal traditional western family unit (something that most here probably support) also involves submission from all involved. The parents sacrifice their time and freedom to spend time with one another and their children.

In both cases, the submission results in a net gain. The believer strengthens his or her faith, and the family members enjoy a more stable existence.

>>267
>Maybe Freud’s penis envy theory was indeed right. Not in a literal, but a metaphorical sense.
Are you aware of the current drive backed wholeheartedly by radical feminists to achieve the medical science of female sperm and thus rid themselves of need for the male sex completely?

They literally want females to be able to produce viable sperm for fertilization. I can't say I agree with much of what Freud wrote, but this is one example where feminists really do envy male genitalia. Feminist separatists do not just have penis envy (and often utilize strap-on dongs), they're also jealous of a Man's balls.

Personally, I try not to get too caught up in feminism and the divisive gender war (except to co-opt it as a tool for my own PSIOPs). It is a divide and conquer strategy if I ever saw one.

Essentially, Feminisms is the devaluation and shame of the mother role with the aim of getting more women to adopt productive male roles and to cow men in fear of being harmful to women. The appeals made to women can not be this honest though. Instead they use phrases like, "have your own money" (as if wives didn't rule the roost and spending regardless of their employment), or "I don't need a man to make me happy" whilst merely replacing husbands with the state as their surrogate protective fathers/husbands (instead of "a man" they need many men). The envy of desirable male-dominated positions (e.g., politician or CEO) is never balanced with the duty to fill the less desirable male positions (janitor or conscripted soldier).

Male Obligations are seen as Privileges, even though they are sacrifices. Feminists want the rewards without the effort (despite what the useful-idiot adherents say).

The effect of feminism is twice the workers in the work force; The economy adjusts to two income homes so women can't afford not to work, then you get twice the work for the same pay per home. Thus, Communists and Capitalists alike love Feminism.

You're correct in thinking Feminism is just suborning women to other more radical women through placing excessive value on traditional male roles and devaluing and shaming those who fill traditional female roles. I doubt women naturally feel inferior as in the Victorian era women were considered to the more virtuous and fairer sex; Instead I see evidence that women are primarily being conditioned to feel inferior to men.

Whatever the original intention of the feminist movement was it has been subverted by other powers to achieve different (globalist) ends. Sadly, the rights of women are not adequately served by feminism. Women's Rights needs a divorce from feminism.

Most dangerously, Feminism dupes females into the depopulationist agenda. There's a reason abortion acceptance, is fought for so strongly. It's the primary method for performing eugenics today.

>>265
>>266
>>267
>>794
Great reads.

>>265
>why women have their inferiority complex

You appear to be making an unfounded assumption there m8. Let's see why that might be:

>you've been lurking on chans
>these sites are typically populated by those shunned from mainstream social circles
>a large number of these will be lonely males
>these males hey will tell each other (and themselves) what they need to hear to save their egos

I realize this sort of groupthink might fly on boards like /r9k/, but /32/ is supposed to have an emphasis on critical thinking.

I agree with >>1037
Not only you made a grand claim that doesn't have any clear hard evidence, but you are also making a big generalization.
Any argument could stand on the question "why is there a big feminist movement?" if the said argument were to be put in nice words and outline a clear picture of what and why it's happening.
The picture is never clear, there is no always black and white and things aren't as easily explainable as you might think.
Feminists have wide range of personalities, and not all women react the same under same factors. Sure, there are stereotypes for a reason, but there is a bell curve around the stereotype too.

>>266
Men also have a factual tendency to take more risky behaviors, which sometimes pay off, and people like hearing about or praising risky stuff and big gambits, I think.


Generally I'd say both sexes have plenty of people with 'inferiority complexes'. Fundamentally this is because, in their youth, they are treated as inferiors, so naturally they grow up into this mindset. Then these people, for example men especially, will go do something like strive to make a bunch of money, because then they feel they will finally be 'superior', only then able to find comfort/happiness.