/32/ - Psychopolitics

>How do you educate people about this without sounding crazy?

It's a very sensitive subject, so people should be careful when bringing it up. You should always try to estimate how much a person knows about global politics and how much they believe in a scam called modernity. Then you should prepare "the redpill" that's appropriate for their level of knowledge. Feed them little bits of information, otherwise you're overload and frighten them (but that also depends on the person - some could be shocked into researching on their own if you present enough solid evidence). Generally, I would recommend giving people vague hints about a certain topic and then, as the time passes by and they get accustomed to the idea, providing them high quality data, but also in small amounts at first. Pic related or Conspiracy of Silence is a good start. Don't use buzzwords like "pedowood". Don't mention satanic rituals outright and don't bring up vague, unprovable stuff like the green daycare case or other rumour-based bullshit. And be ready to provide many examples if asked.

>secret societies use pedophilia to induce compliance among the "elites "

Use this argument often. It's a good and logical one. Remind people of the mafia and how they intiate people to their power structures.

Although >>1791 already covered the main points, I would like to add something.

Regular people are naturally distrustful of the elite, especially the economic elite. This stems from two factors.

First, individuals think of themselves in a positive way, i.e. they see themselves as honest, hardworking, ethical, etc. When they look at their current situation and see that they are not as successful as they wish, they have a tendency to shift blame. Add to that the constant corruption scandals that show up on the news and the average person soon starts believing that those who are rich have become so through illegitimate means (because they are honest and hardworking and can't get rich, so the rich guys must be rich because they are dishonest and leach on others!). This establishes the notion, either consciously or subconsciously, that rich people abide by a different moral code than the rest of us, one that allows and encourages them to take advantage of those less powerful.

The second factor is the perception of how rich people enjoy themselves. The elite is shown to have a tendency to seek our exclusive and exotic means of entertainment, which is likely due to the social expectation. It would also make sense to assume that much like pleasure junkies, the rich need to constantly seek out more exclusive and exotic entertainment to satisfy their desires, because mundane things like regular monogamous sex just don't cut it anymore.

Put those two together and with a minimal nudge the audience will believe that the rich are engaged in practices such as pedophilia, cannibalism, sadistic games and so on.

Basically, make use of your audience's already present internal image of the elite and make it so that they reach the conclusions you want them to reach in an almost autonomous way. If they don't have that internal image, help them develop one by making use of the natural psychological tendencies in humans, such as envy and distrust of outsiders of your group (such as social class).

>>1790

>secret societies use pedophilia to induce compliance among the "elites"

You can always use the Godfather as a reference to connect with normies while using this example. It makes it easier I've found. Once they see it somewhere, it is easier to believe someone could apply it in real life.

>>1790

This will be the last hurdle to overcome before humanity can truly reign sovereign from tyranny. The very last one. This act is not just destroying the child, but it is sabotaging the next generation. This along with wide spread first-world abortion is arresting the development of us as a species.

We will need a Nuremberg style court hearing, but from the looks of things, we are a very long way from this.

Since this board seems like they can handle it I'll bring up Douglas Dietrich and the 1980's Presidio Military day care scandal involving none other than Col. Micheal Aquino, the first open Satanic military chaplain.

>>2061

It's very interesting what the Presidio campus is now.

http://www.crossroad.to/text/articles/starwar6-99.html

>the former army base overlooking San Franciso's Golden Gate bridge. Lucasfilm and Lucas Learning Ltd. will share this prize piece of San Francisco real estate with the Gorbachev Foundation, the Thoreau Center for Sustainability, FEMA, the United Religions Initiative (URI), the United Nations Resource Center, radical left Tides Foundation (the largest of all -- featuring a Hindu/Buddhist-type altar and funding a community organizers that believe in revolutionary change), and a host of other environmental, spiritual, educational, and governmental organizations.1 Together they share a common crusade: to build a unified, socialist, earth-friendly global civilization based on "new" universal beliefs and values.

>>1792

>no action is to be taken on the basis of this report.

Oh my god.

>>1815

Also, there are mind kontrol ties here. The forcing of the children to disassemble the goats and receive a head, etc - this would cause intense trauma, likely the prime sort that mk studies would deem necessary to render an experience as a subdued memory. A split personality.

>>2746

God damn this guy is hilarious. So what is his reason for posting I LOVE BIG TITTIES on his twitter. I mean who doesn't love big titties but was he doing for publicity? To prove a point?

>>1790

>how do we convince people of a questionable worldview by using moral panic propaganda?

Do whatever feminism did.

Also, when did this become an Alex Jones Tinfoil board? I came for academic study and discussion of propaganda, parketing, and PR. you guys aren't supposed to swallow the kool-aid. This is a tasting.

>>2748

So we're supposed to remain Pollitically correct and within the overton window?

>Tinfoil

A word actually used by agents. Why are you here?

>>2748

>I came for academic study and discussion of propaganda, parketing, and PR.

No one cares about what you came for. We're here to discuss psychopolitics, regardless of how much it conflicts with your Overton Window programming.

>>3145

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_mindconMKULTRA.htm

hello pizza gate!

>>1790

>secret societies use pedophilia to induce compliance among the "elites "

I really think this is not real.

Let's analyze it.

There are two ways of looking at pedophilia. The main and most mainstream one is that pedophilia is a deviant attitude. According to this theory, not everyone is a pedophile, and not everyone can become a pedophile. There are a lot of factors involved in the making of a pedophile. Sexual abuse as children and lack of socialization and so on. This would mean that, in order for secret societies to use children as compliance inducing tools, somehow the "elites" should be more prone to pedophilia. It follows, then, that most of their ranks were abused as children, and poorly socialized and so on? (Cue the satanist bloodlines and rites BS). That would be a very inefficient way to get control. It would only work on a very small portion of the population. "Elite" or not. And it would only need the one guy that is not attracted to children to stop the compliance chain.

Then there is another focus on pedophilia. One that is not mainstream and somewhat controversial. It says that there are pedo drives in all of us. That most humans are somewhat attracted to infants. The reason would be that in prehistoric times, humans would live 18 years at most and start copulating around 11 or 12 years old. This is partially proven by experiments with sexually active men. They find the faces of 14 years old women more attractive than the same face in older ages (and sure, that's ephebophilia, but it proves that youth is sexually attractive). In that case, secret societies using children as compliance inducing tools would have a lot of power, because almost anyone could be corrupted like that. There is a caveat on this proposal though: then anyone, under the right circumstances, would and could have sexual contact with children. Inthis scenario, the moral panic and absolute denial around pedophilia would be a generalized social projection (in the freudian way) of our own pedophile tendencies. See why this theory is not mainstream? But this focus would give the conspiracy theory more credence. Because it could work. But, at the same time, if real, it would ascertain that most of us have pedo tendencies and therefore should discuss how society should change around this. (Which I believe is detrimental to the present social landscape) (cue the accusations of me being a pedo)

See the problem with both scenarios? One is unlikely, the other has us admitting to awful tendencies and humanizing the "elite". And I think the premise of the phrase is: " secret societies use pedophilia to induce compliance among the "elites "" is to actually dehumanize the elites.

>>1790

Pedowood is an overblown moral panic. Pedophile moral panics are cyclical and more often than not, they are just big pile of fucking nothing.

Has anyone here read the Dutruoux affair depositions? This girl X1, the main witness on the case, talked about stuff that I believe is not even physically possible. Like being repeatedly raped with a knife. That is an actual knife stuck inside her pussy and jiggled in there. I'm not doctor but I think you can't survive something like that. According to her, she was also raped while giving birth, as in dick stuck in her coochie while a baby is coming out in the opposite direction. Then, said baby was sacrificed in her presence by the police chief and the Belgian first minister and eaten. In a country barn. I'm not even kidding. Another girl said that she witnessed a soiree of several hundred persons in which several dozens children were fed to dogs. Their corpses left to rot on the top of a castle. C'mon. Not even serial murderers are that insane or that common. Hundreds of people watching this out of pleasure. Not believable, I think.

There are like 4 different pedo panics.

1. A sexual abused woman comes forward after the abuse ended. She has dissociative disorders and a weak grip on reality thanks to said disassociation. People give credit to her declarations because she was a victim of sexual abuse and "listen and believe". The poor woman has delusions and even she is convinced that even the pope fucked her. Moral panic ensues. In this one, there is sexual abuse. Just not in the levels people want to believe. Sure, uncle creepy fucked her niece while watching the news. But there is a big gap between the truth and her being raped by the president.

2 Then there are the pedo panics supported on nothing at all. Like that pedophile ring that had a thread on /x/ and the main proof was the abandoned building, a phone number in an abandoned web page and the graffitti of a rabbit on the door. Of course it was an MKUltra facility. Right now /pol/ is chasing their own asses looking for a pedophile ring in a pizza place. Because the shop has weird-looking murals, a cryptic podesta mail about nothing and a picture of a girl taped to a ping pong table. Several months of "investigative" work has led them to a comfy place where all /pol/ can suck their dicks mutually and dismiss any hard incriminating fact. Confirmation bias is simply enough. Wanna bet absofucking-lutely nothing will come out of there?

3. The Cosby show. Which in fact is the Jimmy Savile show. Sure, there was abuse. But not in the amounts they say. Because a lot of people will take any opportunity to be on the spotlight. Y'kniw how a lot of fellas confess in their death bed that they are the zodiak killer? It's the same. "Jimmy Savile touched me in the bathing suit area when I was young. I swear"

4. An actual pedo ring. More often than not they are /rk9/ freaks actually fucking their nieces and nephews and exchanging the videos online. Somehow, this ring don't cause the same amount of moral panic that the others cause, despite being the ones factually proven with convictions. Why? I don't know. Maybe because they are devoid of reptilian overlords and ultra seeecret societies.

Pedowood is a mix of the first two, with the a little bit of the third sprinkled in. What actual facts do we have? Britney Spears' sister giving birth to an ugly baby, a guy discussing in a thread and everybody thinking he is Robert Downey jr. because because and cracked article. For the life of me I don't find a link to MK projects or sects or global conspiracies.

>>3233

Disinfo leave.

If pedowood didn't convince you, Podesta/Pizzagate should.

Breitbart calling Podesta out years in advance gives an air of solidity to the entire thing that raises it above the level of pedowood.

Early confirmation YEARS in advance of findings and supposition is huge.

The fact that it isn't ripping up the modern world right now is a testament to the strangle-hood these monsters have over the media.

>>3233

I think they pad it out with hysteria and fakes to counterpose the extreme examples to milder cases of lascivious teenagers and adults. While these scandals keep coming out, so do scandals of footballers supposedly being convicted for having consensual sex with underage teens.

Incredible stories of abuse focus on the extremity of the crime, which downplays the 'plain' crime of adult men not respecting the boundaries between childhood and adulthood, which makes those cases of adult men convicted for consensual underage sex seem sympathetic by comparison.

>>3232

>Because it could work. But, at the same time, if real, it would ascertain that most of us have pedo tendencies and therefore should discuss how society should change around this. (Which I believe is detrimental to the present social landscape) (cue the accusations of me being a pedo)

If your society is about fulfilling lurid desires and sharing in a pornographic imagination, then you don't need to discuss how it should change, because it already is seemingly.

Young teenage girls are glamourising themselves to look like models, adult men are using beauty products and buying fashion, women in their early and mid twenties tend (in my experience) to come off as cold and unreceptive. It's a very good time to be a young man, if you were looking to have sex with sixteen year olds, because you have a comparative advantage with them over girls your own age. At the same time, as good and as tempting as young girls can look, it's obviously a cause of contention with other men, and presumably deeply wrong in a hypothetical heavenly kingdom; of youth chaste, innocent and demarcated from adulthood. Those two considerations mean that breaking the social taboo or trying to change it is overstepping every man who did not, while if one thinks of life after death, or that life is a gift from God to be lived under certain rules, or in good versus evil, then who knows how far the offense goes.

>>3233

>Pedowood is an overblown moral panic.

Found the satanist.

>>3233

This is some incredible piece of sophistry.

Yeah, there is talk about Government doing bad things is overblown conspiracy theories. Look at how those New World Order idiots, they think the whole world is ALREADY OWNED! We should tone down our own opinions of government to dissociate ourselves form them.

This is ancient method

1> You setup pedophile groups

2> You place people recruited from the pedophile group into positions of power (sponsor). This is to screen out people who are not sociopaths or who have morality or ethics.

3> The pedophile is easily controlled through blackmail. They represent the interests of the sponsor.

This is how Rockefeller/Rothschilds stay in power. This method of social control began by the 1800s in Germany and spread to Britain. From there it was heavily employed in America from the 1980s. Today 80% of the congress and nearly all government appointees are pedophiles.

Podesta oversaw the NSA.

>>3325

False and made up stories are gonna be promoted to muddle people, especially people who don't know about their 'confirmation bias' when trying to judge whether thing X is true or false.

Anyone who doesn't account for that will judge an outright fabrication to be true because it aligns with a prior belief, which is understandable but means one may be lead into seeming ridiculous, even if they are not far off from some truth or another.

There's 'fake news' Onion knock off websites that have conspiracy bait articles like 'Lord Rockefeller is having his eleventh heart transplant', which are similar to this, in the way that belief or disbelief in something is used to divide people. There seems to be some agency designing and promoting a falsehood to cover every 'truth'.

It's my theory that a similar agency is trying to steal GETs by staging false flag conversations, which then lead into a traumatising GET-snatch, which is an application of psychological warfare against a native population.

>>3327

>last line

I should proofread more. The GET snatch is the false flag, the conversations staged.

>Let's talk about what to do about the pedowood question.

You should setup pedophile rings and feed small children to the congress. You should recruit people from the pedophile rings into positions of power so that they can serve you.

You should use the pedophile cells to funnel billions of dollars of government contracts, subsidies and tax rebates to your corporations.

You should "corrupt in order to rule".

Morality is a handicap in this game.

If you are willing to sacrifice your children's virginity and offer them up as sexual sacrifices to 80 year old men, then you can win the favor of those in power and receive the benefit and just rewards of their blessing and patronage.

Sometimes, a small and attractive child can be the price of a lucrative contract and the admission price to the halls of power.

A mutual hidden sin, is the seal and invitation to the establishment.

>>3334

I'm not going to. The pizza thing was as far as I care to look. If there's a summary of key facts and sources which you can give, I will check. If not then nevermind, as what's happening to the world is far stranger than the lurid scandals regularly appearing every couple of months.

>>3339

Besides, the intent of these elites isn't paedophilia; they got bored of that in De Sade's day, but of course they'd rather have people think it's still that. Nowadays they've acquired the kink of the Cenobites in Hellraiser, and they want to put enough hooks like pedowood, pizzagate and rotherham into peoples minds until they can mass reenact that scene with the guy covered in hundreds of hooks, which they then peel back and flay him by.

Maybe not though.

>>3339

>>3340

I assume you don't care to explain anything you just said either?

>>3232

>there are two ways

por que no los dos?

>>3343

>ass u me

You can give people power over your mind by trusting in things orchestrated for you to believe.

>>3337

This is well said.

Sin, perhaps the exposing of a weakness, but most importantly vulnerability, produces total compliance and ensures the pursuit of common-cause.

Sin is like the currency in which souls are traded via the appeasement of carnal desires.