>>56214
>I just explained that that occurs if you don't masturbate.
Which is irrelevant because neither of us are talking about that.
>Again, just get more in your diet.
Again, it's funny how now you suddenly care about diets.
>just move onto something else.
Point taken.
>Not really, while they do have extra things that help make them more appealing, "cause it's fun" is still a good reason to do them.
"Good reason" is subjective. Murder and drug addiction can be fun to some people, but that's never a good reason to do it because there's other outcomes to it. Same with all of your other examples: each of them at least has some benefit besides feeling good, so they're all irrelevant.
>Which is fun and satisfying.
<Omitting that it saves money
>So for fun.
<Fulfilling the heirarchy of needs is the same thing as escapism
>One,I didn't say that, two, are you implying that you need coffee/beer to survive?
You're the one who tried to equate it to drinking fluids to hydrate the body, which, yes, is a necessity.
>I'm not advocating to do it excessively
Wow, almost exactly what I've been saying this whole time...
>you can have a beer every night without having an addiction to it.
Nice 180
><Doesn't know what the term "outside" means.
<You're not allowed to cite that what I said proves me wrong because I excluded it
>Being compelled to do something and being addicted to it are two different things.
No comment.
>Hentai isn't mainstream, it's mainstream to know it exists,but not mainstream to jerk off to it.
Nigger what? If people were uncomfortable jerking off to cartoons, then Marge Simpson wouldn't have appeared in Playboy. Unless you're trying to propose that there's some Advent Garde hipster cafe out there where all they do is masturbate in public, then I think that exposure and demand can safely be enough to conclude alone that hentai is mainstream as far as porn goes, especially with a generation fucking raised on Toonami
> really sounds like you're picking and choosing what you believe here
<If you say this thing that I say you say, then you would be wrong.
No you faggot, anyone with a grasp at logic would have realized that the entire crux of my point was to let the body build testosterone naturally instead of depleting it at unhealthy levels. Your comparison would only hold true if I advocated straight up injecting it, and since this is a good time to mention why you've yet to make any valid point and you've deliberately omitted my points in the past, I'm going to redtext because I don't want to restate this.
Instead of actually addressing what I've been saying, the only defense that you have is that the other extreme is bad, so the basis of your argument in defense of excessive fapping has been to try desperately to twist and pervert whatever I say to the point where it doesn't even exist in the same context anymore before addressing a few classes of it.
>That's why you're condescending
>>56155
I did. You tried to turn this into a debate and got rude, and I commenced turnabout since you're advocating behavior that's unhealthy because it "feels good."
>didn't say it "improves"
You said it was like exercise, so I'm holding it to the execution after practice of exercise.
>it does improve your ability in the bed,
AHAHAHAHA
>does go to the gym once a fortnight
>>hence builders rotate their routines
It's almost like in the cooldown for one group of muscles, they're working out others.
Unless you're advocating alternating between monkey spanking and shoving peas up you ass, there's no comparison.
>A marathon runner trains every two days
Notice you needed to word that so you didn't shoot yourself in the foot by saying "runners take days to rest"
<Someone whose knowledge of exercise ends at "bodybuilders go to the gym" trying to give advice
>didn't even mention the 2 week thing
I literally mentioned "the two week thing" in my first post on this thread and never betrayed that idea. You're blatantly lying at this point.
>You're just desperatly trying to make me look like a jerk
I don't need to make you look like a jerk; you're doing that on your own
>Jerking off is as bad as not inflating your tires?
Are you saying that actions on a small scale towards a larger goal should be ignored because a larger goal exists, because that was the point of the comparison.
>I wanted to reel it back in.
If that were true, then you would have stopped posting about it