/x/ - Paranormal

Results:

Obviously no quake happened in the Osaka region around the specified time. However, about 18 hours later than the predicted time, there was a 7.3 mag quake in the Indonesia area. There seems to be a great deal of variability in the length of time it takes a magna flow to travel from the edge of the core of the Earth to the crust. In the case of the Oregon swarm, it seemed to take about 38 hours. In this case, it took 57 hours.

Timing is quite difficult to predict, as is latitudinal position. The method seems to work well for predicting the longitude of a quake, which although a breakthrough, does not provide location-specific information. It should, however, still follow logically that flow times should be roughly consistent from region to region.

For example, we can now speculate that when a magnetometer plunge occurs when the Pacific coast of the U.S. is facing the Sun, the activity follows about 38 hours later (that's only the beginning of the swarm.) The swarm continued for a couple of days, suggesting that the pressure exerted continued over time, starting about 38 hours after the discharge, but requiring about 48 hours from that time for pressure to abate.

Over in the Pacific RIm, the pathway that magma takes to reach the surface may be more convoluted, which would result in a longer delay between core discharge and seismic event. The delay may also be longer depending upon whether the event is a swarm or a single major quake. The 57-hour timeframe would seem to be more typical particularly for the Pacific Rim.

To further test this theory, we will watch for magnetometer plunges of a particularly rapid nature and with out any upticks in the line graph during that plunge.

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000gc2a/executive

Rather than pointing to a particular city or even region, we would only be able to predict longitude with this system, with a margin for error, and the time window would be more than likely be anywhere from 48-60 hours centered on a time 57 hours after a core discharge.

Magma flow paths could be influenced by currents in the mantle, with exact epicenters determined ultimately, as was laid out on December 8th, by which sections of fault contain air pockets, something which could be estimated by analyzing the history of smaller quakes along the faults. The area of greatest vulnerability to major quakes will be those areas where there are the greatest volume of small quakes with plate-shift direction running perpendicular to the fault line.

Correction, the small quakes that prime faults for larger quakes would be exerting force PARALLEL TO the fault line, sorry I had that flipped.

A good way to visualize this would be to imagine the fault boundary as jagged instead of smooth. Sections of plates can protrude "into" the side of another plate due to pockets of magma around 10km in depth. These are the same small flows that cause gradual eruptions in Hawaii or in the case of underwater volcanoes. These flows are causing protrusions that cause plates to "melt into" one another in a way mimetic of cilia. Tensor moments that run PARALLEL TO the overall fault line cause these protrusions to snap off, essentially, leading to the formation of air pockets. City-sized air pockets collapsing suddenly under great force are what cause the once-in-a-generation quakes that cities on fault lines are notorious for.

Hope this helps everyone to understand what is actually going on. I think it's pretty clear that the people at USGS are too stuck in their ways to theorize anything that goes against the last few decades of doctrine on this subject.

I am not an artist, but if anyone wants to draw up diagrams that illustrate my theorized dynamic of seismology it would probably go a long way toward helping people to understand what I am describing.

The doctrine of the last several decades has been that the small quakes actually relieve pressure on faults and it's just the opposite. These people have no idea what they're talking about.

Okay, it looks as though nothing happened in the window of peak danger although that doesn't mean something isn't right around the corner. They delayed JWST again, now set for Christmas morning.

https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-weather-delay-christmas-launch

6:22pm EST today (12/22) there was a 6.0 quake off the western coast of Mexico, so we seem to be a trend towards increased activity. Will continue to monitor.

I can provide a meme theory as to why this works if you don't have one already.

All of this should work well from what I've been looking at as well.

>>60803

I already laid out the underlying theory in another thread. Solar magnetism decreases during discharge events which deposit electricity into the Earth's core through induction. The duration and intensity of the discharges dictate the power of the seismic events, but even moreso do the size of air pockets in the Earth's crust affect magnitude, and those pockets grow in size and number over time as lower-magnitude events with moment tensors that run parallel will open up pockets over decades.

I just want to know how to cash in on these ideas because I cannot afford to patent them and I am a little surprised that the media hasn't taken notice of it at this point, given that theories about earthquakes are the least of the theoretical work.

>>60804

thats close but not what I had.

when the suns magnetic field drops, the earths magnetic field drops.

when the earths magnetic field drops, the earths convection currents drop.

when the earths convection currents drop, the core cools

when the core cools, it shrinks.

when the core shrinks, the surface falls down which creates earthquakes.

i dont think you can cash in, its probably already known but kept secret from the public.