/x/ - Paranormal

How can we explain the incredible energy created by the melding of two atoms? One possible explanation is the awesome force with which two atoms collide with each other thanks to the attractive force of these gluons. Take the example of two refrigerator magnets. Hold them closely together and feel their attraction. As anyone who has ever played with magnets knows, if you let go of the magnets, they strike each other forcefully. When atomic nuclei do the same, the effect is thousands of times more intense. This is due to the fact that when two objects such as magnets collide, it is not the nuclei that collide, but instead, the electron field that interacts. This field acts as a cushion, resulting in impacts more akin to a person jumping off of a building and landing on a trampoline than to landing on the pavement. After a few bounces, an equilibrium is found. In the case of fusion, two nuclei are pulled into each other and collide with nothing to blunt their impact. Since nuclear excitement is the essence of thermal energy, this collision provides excitement to the extent of the absolute theoretical maximum temperature for any atom. Since we know that extremely high temperatures are one means of achieving fusion, we can surmise that once a nucleus achieves a certain maximum temperature, its oscillation is sufficient to shake loose the gluon bonds that hold it together. This means that, as a rule, any time room-temperature fusion is achieved, we can measure the precise temperature at the moment of gluon impact to determine the utmost maximum temperature an intact atom may attain while maintaining atomic integrity. Simply put, scientific papers written to date that describe temperatures in the trillions of Kelvin (in relation to intact atoms) are absurdities that are doomed to be debunked. Determining the exact maximum temperature at which an atom may remain intact will require further experimentation, but it is certainly a number that is less than 100 million Kelvin, and it is certainly a finite number. Just as chemical compounds combust at a specific temperature, atoms themselves can indeed be ripped apart by the oscillatory force of extremely high-temperatures.

Gluons and their availability determine the ease with which atoms of any element may achieve fusion. Since gluons are that which hold protons and neutrons together, the greater the availability of these gluons, the more likely atoms are to ‘want’ to fuse.

I have devised a method for achieving a gluon field of sufficient density to support room-temperature fusion. It is as follows:

First, twin linear proton accelerators are required in order to liberate gluons, which are found naturally within protons. By directing two proton beams at each other, the resultant collisions generate free gluons. However, not enough free gluons will be generated at any one time to sustain a fusion reaction. In addition, gluons will disperse in an omni-directional fashion and only a fraction will travel in the desired direction. The solution is to shunt generated gluons into a circular accelerator that serves as a gluon trap. The combined device has the appearance of a lowercase letter ‘p’ the loop of which is halfway down the “spine” of the “p.”

By trapping gluons in an infinite loop, gluon density may be increased gradually until it is sufficient to support room-temperature fusion. Once this level has been achieved, a valve somewhere on the circular accelerator may inject fusible material into the loop, which will begin to fuse, generating immense heat that may be converted into electricity using any existing thermoelectric conversion method (even the novel one delineated by this author elsewhere on this board.)

IMPORTANT: Previous experiments into fusion have failed, in part, because of the use of hydrogen. While hydrogen may be more "easily" fused than other elements, any atoms of any element may be fused. HYDROGEN IS NOT A SUITABLE MATERIAL FOR FUSION. Hydrogen is COMBUSTIBLE which means that it will combust at a far lower temperature than the temperature than that at which it will fuse under ordinary circumstances. It is highly advisable to experiment with Helium Fusion (2). Both Lithium (3) and Beryllium (4) are capable of combustion at high temperatures. One of the keys to fusion is the use of an element that may maintain its integrity at extreme temperatures. This new method opens the door to the use of a variety of elements to achieve fusion. In theory, any element may be fused so long as it is not prone to pre-fusion combustion.

Gluons have the power to attract atomic nuclei to each other and to provide nearly limitless energy to our world. Fusion, supported by this method, indeed has the power to quite literally turn lead into gold. I long ago abandoned hope that I might receive due credit for my achievements. I have fulfilled my moral duty by freely sharing this knowledge. However, know this: A great many powerful people stand to lose a great deal should this technology see the light of day. ATTEMPT TO PATENT THIS TECHNOLOGY AT YOUR OWN PERIL. I may be selfless, but I am no fool. It is plain to see that anyone who attempts to bring this technology to light will be hunted. My hope is that a clever person might be able to fight back and win so that, one day, we all might profit.

Excelsior.

>>54187

DAFUQ? Did someone just post the key to free limitless energy anonymously on a chan board?????

>>54268

Yeah, with President Stealth Muslim I doubt that'll be happening.

>>54187

Nobody can prove that the sun is a physical object, a sphere, or that it is a certain size or distance away from us.

Nobody can prove that the moon is a physical object, a sphere, or that it is a certain size or distance away from us.

Nobody can prove that the earth is a sphere, or that we are able to leave it.

Nobody can prove that atoms are real, and nobody has ever actually seen one.

Facts.

I know nothing about nuclear physics, but I sent this to a friend of mine who is much more knowledgeable than I. Here's what he sent back. tl;dr, this is bullshit.

>So… There's a ton of problems.

>Lets start with the first.

>"Hyrdrogen nuclei are drawn more closely to each other … Hydrogen nuclei … 196 time closer to electron orbit."

>That's called cooling.

>It's true, but completely irrelevant.

>Ah, but the basis here.

>The idea that Gluons are responsible for the release of energy when fission or fusion is achieved.

>This is false, Gluons are a particle that are part of neutrons and protons.

>If they were "released" then fusion, fission, and matter would be impossible.

>Gluons bind together quarks to make protons and neutrons.

>So if they're released in a fission reaction, it would produce no radiation, and would actually be converting matter to energy directly.

>But it's definitely neither of those things.

>if we ignore all the ways this guy doesn't do his research, (and obviously hasn't actually thought this through) he's right. companies don't want us to have this technology, because they want to continue existing. physically. as matter.

>when you "create free gluons to encourage fusion of nearby nuclei" you destroy matter.

>or rather you make it not matter.

>the thing about both fission and fusion reactions is they encourage surrounding material to do the same. that's why they're so efficient.

>because you just get the initial reaction and it continues itself.

>this is actually a concept in basically any reaction.

>fire, mercury amalgamation, soap.

>so. suppose you manage to use this method to covert matter directly into energy.

>the reason fusion is so much harder to sustain than fission is BECAUSE it releases more energy.

>and thus is harder to contain.

>so, we convert the charge directly to energy.

>mc^2 = e.

>and then we collect that energy. ah, wait, the energy collecting device is made of matter.

>welp, THAT converts to energy.

>huh, the casing was ALSO made of matter…

>and so on.

>real easy way to see, even if you know nothing about the subject, if something is absolute BS, is if you look at the the last paragraph.

>"I have fulfilled my moral duty by freely sharing this knowledge. However, know this: A great many powerful people stand to lose a great deal should this technology see the light of day. ATTEMPT TO PATENT THIS TECHNOLOGY AT YOUR OWN PERIL. I may be selfless, but I am no fool. It is plain to see that anyone who attempts to bring this technology to light will be hunted. My hope is that a clever person might be able to fight back and win so that, one day, we all might profit."

>if it reads like a crummy fantasy novel, it most likely is.

>>54317

You are just insane and lazy. You can prove all of those things with a consumer-grade telescope and basic math, except atoms, which do require more specialized equipment. But since a lot of our current science is based on atomic theory, and that science does in fact work, I think it's a pretty solid hypothesis.

>>54318

>>54317

It is amazing how fast the glowniggers come out of the woodwork to try to shut people down who stumble upon these things… So it begins.

>>54187

I'm going to cherry pick just a few things, but basically everything here is nonsense.

>For fusion power to be practical, it should not require excessively high or low temperatures for ignition

Sure that would be nice.

>and it should produce significantly more power than is required to initiate a reaction.

Spoken as if this is an insightful new fact about generators.

>Once separated, a large amount of energy is released. What is this energy? From whence does it come?

Same way exothermic reactions give off energy - the product is in a more stable state.

>In pondering this

You could have lied and said "researching" but I appreciate the honesty

>I then remembered that gluons are so powerful that they can hold protons and neutrons together. It is this atomic bond that must be broken to achieve fission.

Actually yes, gluons are in charge of holding quarks together, and the residual attraction between quarks of different baryons causes the baryons to hold together in the nucleus (it's all very complicated chromodynamics that I don't fully get). Point is every physicist knows the role gluons play in this. They are holding the unstable nucleus together, they are the mountain that the boulder rests on before it's pushed.

>Fusion generates zero radioactivity.

What do you mean zero radioactivity? Zero radioactive waste? It does produce tritium so that's not Totally true.

>How can we explain the incredible energy created by the melding of two atoms?

Stable product. Potential energy. Exothermic reactions.

>This is due to the fact that when two objects such as magnets collide, it is not the nuclei that collide, but instead, the electron field that interacts.

You got something almost right. When ANY two objects collide, the interaction is mediated by the electron field (a la pauli exclusion principle) and also the electromagnetic field (which is a different field). I have to ask why you have involved magnets here though, do you think non-magnets collide with their nuclei?

>Since nuclear excitement is the essence of thermal energy

It really isn't.

>Gluons and their availability determine the ease with which atoms of any element may achieve fusion. Since gluons are that which hold protons and neutrons together, the greater the availability of these gluons, the more likely atoms are to ‘want’ to fuse.

You're saying.. some atoms are just chock full of gluons and some aren't?

>By directing two proton beams at each other, the resultant collisions generate free gluons.

I prefer putting my protons in a juicer. Squeeze them gluons right out.

>The solution is to shunt generated gluons into a circular accelerator that serves as a gluon trap.

Did you know gluons cannot be isolated, and always come in pairs? Did you know gluon pairs don't fly around willy nilly like photons, but basically only exist in "flux tubes" between quarks? Did you know any single fact about gluons before typing this?

> Previous experiments into fusion have failed, in part, because of the use of hydrogen. While hydrogen may be more "easily" fused than other elements, any atoms of any element may be fused. HYDROGEN IS NOT A SUITABLE MATERIAL FOR FUSION. Hydrogen is COMBUSTIBLE which means that it will combust at a far lower temperature than the temperature than that at which it will fuse under ordinary circumstances. It is highly advisable to experiment with Helium Fusion (2). Both Lithium (3) and Beryllium (4) are capable of combustion at high temperatures. One of the keys to fusion is the use of an element that may maintain its integrity at extreme temperatures. This new method opens the door to the use of a variety of elements to achieve fusion. In theory, any element may be fused so long as it is not prone to pre-fusion combustion.

Absolute rage.

>Excelsior.

I actually love this god bless you. You're making some great discoveries here. Don't ever try to learn anything about thermodynamics or quantum mechanics, it's all boring math for normies.