/vqc/ - Virtual Quantum Computer

>>11679

I've started composing the follow up music to the youtube video (collective yawn maybe hahaha), Part 2 of finding n for an arbitrary n in length. I knew it had to be once PDJT was assured a second term.

The video will never intentionally show anything not disclosed in our forum way ahead and wont be released until you are happy to. Gotta have some fun first, right? You've earnt it.

The clock is ticking.

Two causes, same problem.

Day 1 Contact with aliens who are honest and have been watching…

REPORTER: Did Hillary kill children and launder trillions?

Day 1. The most powerful AI is released for questions with full access to everything.

REPORTER: yes, er, same question as to the aliens.

Problem. Just who can handle the Truth?

Some truths are difficult.

Either way, one day, we get up, dust ourselves off, remember the fun, the bruises, especially the ones that hurt where did not cry and were measures by how we got up, how we kept going. We especially remember those who carried us at times when we had nothing left, utterly nothing, and gave us some of there's when there was almost none to share.

Even Darth Vader came right at the final choice.

I sat and talked to one of most violent offenders in the prison system, indefinite incarceration is what he ended up with (preventitve detention). I had been denied bail after protecting my children from a pedo (arrested for discharging a firearm in a public place), that pedo was protected through their family connection to the Gov General (who I met before he was made that rep of the CROWN, Indian guy, had broken his neck and was coming out of depression). The violent offender looked out for me, i couldnt see for three months, never asked for anything and I never knew what he had done until I left.

Moral of the story. When you have your fun, I am going to fuck John Key, Jacinda Ahern and Helen fucking Clark so hard, they are going wish they were Obama after Trump's finished. Their corruption and collateral is only dwarfed by just how far I will fuck them up. I don't normally talk like this, we will finish this, you can go play, get rich or build (i'll do the same), hopefully we can work together. I will gift all future tech to the Trump Org or Foundation. I will also follow my oath to destroy Key, Clark, and Jacinda, legally until they dont even exist. Wipe the smug faces clean.

We're almost ready.

By the way Jacinda and Clarks money kicked back from the Clinton Foundation and the last murder John Key was involved in… should be interesting. Where's Maddie?

>>11680

Exsherllent Mish Money Penny.

This isnt exactly that (metal means) but it's an extension (otherwise it would be known).

If we do this the right way, they will come to you to understand this.

Hard to think of a square with sides of the golden ratio where you add one to make a square or subtract one to get the area's reciprocal???

This is where the think starts… was for me… how can the pre decimal point be preseved???

There's a lot more to this.

>>11680

>Can you clarify 'nm1'?

Oh, see from your screenshot it's "n - 1"

Which is first number displayed (as n ends in ..0936, and you show ..0935).

Your 2nd value you list as "### xT nm1",

but this looks more like the remainder for the (2*d) / x ratio (showing addt'l sign digits that match yours):

0.655950384207043355158762451836444039853141761609'6551627073

Will need to go through the screenshot thoroughly.

>>11682 ty

ps, if you're sitting on a ton of bitcoin. perhaps one or two to spare?

btw, did you know Mr. Patrick Byrne did a contest for best essay to expose the DeepState (summarizing his Deep Capture articles on the subject), and gave away 2 bitcoins to the essay winners? Cool stuff, now he's funding math folks to expose the election fraud, helping Ms. Powell behind the scenes.

>>11683

>>11683

>>11683

I love the first 73 pages of the Art of the Deal, PDJT talks about (if i remember correctly) having 400 million in the 80s or enough for his family forever, then it became about playing hi-score, he LOVED making deals. One of the best investments you can make is the time it takes to read, at least the first 72 or 74 pages.

I have never asked for money or directly offered money. Once PDJT is inaugurated things can accelerate. If you honestly just want BTC then and not how to get increase what you have, we can talk, I'll like the original youtube video and we can communicate, if that enables comms. It will be insecure, so bear that in mind. Bear in mind I will try and show you how to accumulate income using your existing talent stack, since you will DEFINITELY enjoy that more.

I came from a poor background, no one went to uni. My grandmother (widowed at the end of the war when my grandfather dived on my toddler uncle as a wall collapsed less than three weeks before my dad arrived, nine months on from xmas eve) told me at 12, you never see a poor doctor. That was it, my parents couldnt afford £1000 pounds in the late 80s for a C compiler and the dream of making computer games got further and further away so medicine, money and even the potential of being a fanny mechanic (OBGYN) was up for grabs. Like music, everytime I heard something cool or something new that was in a game, all I ever wanted, all I ever needed was to recreate why it was so cool. Medicine was not for me when med school started, needed a large scraper to remove me from the Silicon Graphics workstations I shouldnt be using.

You can do anything you want. The CORE thing I learned from President Trump augmented a maturing design philosophy… check their assumptions, the first design is the worst, and THINK BIGGER.

In summary, i'll say what I said to my first wife. You can have everything I have. I can always more money. I can always start from scratch (my mother read If at the wedding; Rudyard Kipling). All my money is under my dependents, so you and I could make a shit-ton of new money together? You like math problems there's a bunch of others too :)

The worst thing about bucket loads of money. I'm not Chaucer but this is Cautionary Tale. You get a hundred million. Isnt your first thought, what if someone knows and they take my precious things or people? Instead of enjoying it, your first month is picking the right security. Too much money too quickly is AIDS. You need to get past falling in love with hookers first ;)

>>11684

Yes :)

When did Satoshi Nakamoto disappear?

When did the video appear on Youtube?

Feb 2011, March 2011 (Japan not Yoga Flame! Aquarius),..,…, August 2011.

What happened to Satoshi Nakamoto?

Who haz all the BTC?

"We cannot contribute to the destruction on the scale that our Revelation will bring, your people need to prepare and be prepared. The sheer size will terrify them. The crimes under their watch will ruin even those with almost no conscience."

Imagine how Tony Blair feels right now. Will they free Assange?

There are no one way functions.

We will see AnyPlayback in this generation, it terrifies the worst, the most.

We will see what we would call magic, it is so advanced.

We will learn that there is little difference between a simulation and God, we will care more about short cuts and Easter Eggs (only a shit creator would neglect to include short cuts and level ups). In the book "Turning Off the Autopilot" I was going to talk about how simple it can be to turn off your own autopilot (every sport, yoga, martial art, meditative practice share a common tenet, which can turn off your auto-pilot) as well as four other 'shortcuts' inc (martial arts in a day, nutrition short cut, finding the 'sweet spot' where others dont know what they dont know giving a competitive advantage (generalised horizontally to apply in any industry) and how to shortcut success in relationship. Never finished writing it, since those short cuts are put to use, you simply give that info away, since game theory implies that explicit construction of the "win win" benefits the whole over time.

Scott Adams covered most of that as well.

Thanks for listening my waffle, hope some of that helps, apologies for anything that looks blatantly like 3rd part messaging.

And thank you Mr President for my new contract. If it was not our lot, it's great all the same.

Just want to be clear on motivation.

Money only interests me to the amount plus wHatever is sensible and I already have that. Plus.

Offers of any kind would have to be cleared through the only 3rd anyone trusts, the Trump Admin. Anyone who doesnt understand that, especially now, is easily certifiable or not serious.

The people who have been in this thread would be in charge of everything, should it be worth their while, except liability, this will be at the service gate. You need the private key, you atest that you own it.

Some BTC wallets where the private key is lost are substantial. Commission?

The question you will be asked…

How do I know the team from VQC will give me the private key?

Answer. The team will type your name in a file. The file will be encrypted with the private key created from the public key. This is called signing. You can decrypt with the public key and see I have the private key.

The only time we ever feel free and when truly are a WE.

For General Flynn, President Trump and all of Us.

If the Heavens Seem About to Fall, We Apologise for the Inconvenience.

One example.

Another.

Customer: hi, I hear you have a trillion server farm for BTC. Whats the energy hit?

Answer: we dont compete for the transaction. When we see one that is large, we execute, we win the transaction (search replc by calc). No node can compete, you could be sensible and control just below the network threshold, really, there are bigger fish.

Another example.

We are bombarded with extra terrestrial communications. Saturated. The guys that run SETI can barely keep a straight face. And intra-terrestial.

There's a simple win. Understand what is needed in this event. There are several things straightaway. Then we go… t'da. Simple signal processing across several frequencies its liks the Dawn Chorus.

"Seriously SETI guys. Only search this band. We keep it clear because we think its the only one they will use. Noooo, they didnt suggest everyone keeps it clear so use it. Noooo. We keep that hydrogen band clear because they will contact us on it. Yeah. We keep it clear to stop that. So they wont. Ok?"

This was in response to money.

I think its better to give this away piece by piece as pre-sales for later. President Trump literally schooled EVERYONE on the long game. What a guy.

>>11693

"But youre not broadcasting?"

No

"So, you're holding an old school phone, connected to one line and just listening on that"

Yes.

"This should be our strategy when conquering worlds dot com"

As everyone stupid enough to fight, dumb enough to go all on a busted flush against five aces, is busy putting out old guard self immolation fires, be good to chat. I start a new contract in nine hours.

Perfect window.

Here until 1amZ

>>11690

>>11690

>>11690

That first picture describes both self similarity and the non repeating. Like Escher (sp?). Also helps understand manifolds rather than looking puzzled at EFEs. I.e. a flat rhomboid. That curves in the middle. Then then twists. EFE are great for a shit understanding of how a skull is shaped.

The picture just shows it.

EFEs are also good if you dont want to look at the elephant in the room. The big one. That I cannot understand not discussing unless deliberate.

>>11690

Let's do it.

Find a context in a couple of words, i'll say something in that context, it will be hard for anyone to fake given your post, grammar and awesome, when discussing later on how to find a proper comms channel, we can do soft e handshake on something that draws on what we about each other.

Last time I did this exercise it was…

1. Worldwide

2. Horizontal market penetration

3. Hard to do

4. Easy to check

5. Frequently used

Thats how I came up with integer factorisation. They said no one had done it. It was the easy to check bit and the used by 3 billion people that sold me. I think its between 4 and 5 now.

>>11678

>Reminder (x+1)(x+1) -1 is divisible by x

>(x+1)(x+1) - f is divisible by (n-1) and a

>x squared is divisible by x, add e and it's divisible by n and a.

>(x+2n)(x+2n) + e is divisible by b, a+2n+2x, and n

>(x+2n-1)(x+2n-1) - f is divisible by b, a+2n+2x, and n-1

Validated all with RSA100:

# (x+1)(x+1) -1 is divisible by x

xp1sqm1divx = ((x+1) * (x+1) -1) / x

=1045343918457591589480700584038743164339470261997

# (x+1)(x+1) - f is divisible by (n-1) and a

xp1sqmfdivnm1 = ((x+1) * (x+1) - (-f)) / (n - 1)

=75950455873887347845617745510891255709131073276398

xp1sqmfdiva = ((x+1) * (x+1) + f) / a

=28775177062023928913461369238354205970422561870

# x squared is divisible by x, add e and it's divisible by n and a.

xsqplusedivn = (x * x +e) / n

=75950455873887347845617745510891255709131073276398

xsqplusediva = (x * x +e) / a

=28775177062023928913461369238354205970422561872

# (x+2n)(x+2n) + e is divisible by b, a+2n+2x, and n

xp2nsqplusedivb = ((x+2n) * (x+2n) + e) / b

=28775177062023928913461369238354205970422561872

xp2nsqplusedivap2np2x = ((x+2n) * (x+2n) + e) / (a+2n+2x)

=28775177062023928913461369238354205970422561872

xp2nsqplusedivn = ((x+2n) * (x+2n) + e) / (n)

=80189381901841762061367470585522936778429799448122

# (x+2n-1)(x+2n-1) - f is divisible by b, a+2n+2x, and n-1

xp2nm1sqmfdivb = ((x+2n-1) * (x+2n-1) - (-f)) / b

=28775177062023928913461369238354205970422561870

xp2nm1sqmfdivxp2nm1 = ((x+2n-1) * (x+2n-1) - (-f)) / (a + 2n +2x)

=28775177062023928913461369238354205970422561870

xp2nm1sqmfdivnm1 = ((x+2n-1) * (x+2n-1) - (-f)) / (n-1)

=80189381901841762061367470585522936778429799448122

And how important is that MINUS ONE in the denominator? Quite Important to get these clean results with no remainders!

xp2nm1sqmfdivn = ((x+2n-1) * (x+2n-1) - (-f)) / (n)

8.0189381901841762061367470585522936778429799442548489072230816215643818212954797090709084968222846378484153786020202791179316048741861384283951731442007725982272799477574194296936792559629641084152506181685032570568994478938143615941621164996268600409863886046084895470151184975270310257198845158659658332061876767707619957845160537054789173519017228152239317462452544074829988614963154773010534200565112221218295658500706732355087249073744145115601505809900355460272984229671523660893673925971073030126597604596815810548353485309099329100866628422281837147258140343398821628615292598571776309814625714656910772794190451237941242657481419668806423605860795040893813902422900463012486856390685579564350351269995978939127316188769426298560572174501255112277303436998965453979330729389091923614709120804263683191336780282358208591892242849144619420408757100968924950210111367906963024092228637434711011821794256738637307787094579261869428376377795869626647144113122677130906022195966488659782904148363573324252850473416271558538469930556675139753053514500259228563725737763843978082448015788…e+49

>>11698 Not 100% following exercise

Fresh water comes to mind (structured perhaps, as is case within our cells).

Extract from ocean? Purify if polluted?

>>11698

If you check .net's history, BigInteger came later.

What helped the most was going in naive thinking I was clever. If you can survive finding out just how little you know about something that you thought you were clever in and still keep going. Still have the balls to say, erm your maths language is really shit and not fit for purpose, needs more pictures, I'm going to check your working, ok? I thought I could find a bandwangon assumption, the Mecca of low hanging fruit. Like Dr 24 Chromosomes.

I got given a grant when I was 16 to attend the BA Science festival in Plymouth in 91 in the summer after submitting an essay on the potential affects to the energy industry should fleishman and pons cold fusion experiments be repeatable paraphrasing from Frank Close (i think) book, Too Hot to Handle, the Race for Cold Fusion. I must have seemed a know it all swotty twat. I didnt care. I did not want to be poor.

40 hours of lectures. I went to three. Two by Douglas Adams. I got his autograph while he was hailing a cab. He was so chuffed. Most of his work was radio. Nice guy. Tall. Anyway, the rest of the time was spent discovering different ways to drink and that girls were obssessed with fingering. Hairier days, youd probably need a snorkle now.

40 hours of lectures. 3 worth going. Every decent scientist that you can name would have done the same. The best scientists can spot a waste of time plus being knee deep in clunge is rarer.

The point is… if you want to make money AND you want to happy, make as many mistakes as you can. Its never the money, its always how you are in a beating, how you get up from a beating and how many of your children arent happy when you die.

I havent read ANYTHING much in science of any intetest in YEARS. In any field.

It's crazy.

So, I didnt have a BigInteger library. I wrote one from scratch to handle any length number as a string. It was shit at first. And clunky. It had EVERY feature I use today, except my ancient from scratch UNIQUE sqrt function (mine used a pattern difference in binary when multiplyimg by all 111111s). I thought that was clever. No.

If you write an integer of anylength libray and only use numbers on execution, I would always be interested how you did it. Mine was just doggedness. BigInteger library was great. I missed mine until i rewrote method overloads with the same names as mine. So much faster with BigInteger.

I wasnt going to give up because Wiles didnt.

>>11700

>I wasnt going to give up because Wiles didnt.

Listened to this recently.

The Abel Prize Interview 2016 with Andrew Wiles

Was interesting. He spoke about how it's risky to go after a single endeavor (Fermat Proof), and he would have papers pre-written, ready to roll out as needed, to take the pressure off ('cause you always got to deliver!).

Also how the the work of others had shown him there WAS a path to the solution, just needed to chase it down like a dog!

>So, I didnt have a BigInteger library. I wrote one from scratch to handle any length number as a string.

Perhaps explains naming of operators in your code screenshot? Figured out Sub (subtract), Mul (multiply) and so on. Assuming that "A" means add (please correct if not).

Question: to the right of 73^2, for test_vx1, what follows the 14..?

Also, regarding 0.65595.. vs 0.65995.., can see it probably doesn't matter as you're using 2/3 (last line showing)?>>11700

>So, I didnt have a BigInteger library. I wrote one from scratch to handle any length number as a string.

>>11699

Brilliant. Absolutely brilliant.

You got it in one.

How important is the minus one or not?

You get this, you are surrounded by it when you get to that.

You've got RSA100. The best answer is to play with just that one, try it, MORE answer come out when you do.

This is kinda of important… Euler tortient function. Kinda. We're coming to it backwards. Normally people look at that and it throws them. We have avoided it, it will come out as an equivalence.

E.g.

Two numbers. Any two. Both prime (to each other as well)

p and q.

p^q-1 - 1 is divisible by q.

All primes have a tortient value of p-1. E.g. c = ab, if a and b are coprime, tortient is (a-1)(b-1) which is c-a-b+1. Any number raised to that number mod c will be the inverse of raising it to c mod c. We are short cutting that impossible backwards step unless you know a and b. Essentially we generate (a-1)(b-1) the private key from c, the public key.

We are going to see how you do that from d and e. Actually f and e but its equivalent. No need for any modular exponentian YAY! Youre missing nothing. All it means we spend our time finding remainders, they run the show. So its the same but much easier.

What you've done is gold in your post. You can see it, because you asked the question.

Short answer. Mod nm1 (n-1) since the "first" line is f-1, not 2d. Then its all 2d. Run both to understand.

Your target is f-1 + enough two d to make a square. The base has to be the reciprocal on height of the width. This is why n is an interdimensional number. Its not a square root, but its ratio to x+2n, is x ratio to 2d. The number of n in 2d is the square of the number of x in 2d. Because there is no whole number x in 2d, that ratio has a fractional part, completely congruent to n having the same size fraction relatively.

It is the smaller size of n that means the same ratio applied as k = (2d%x)/x = (x+2n)/(n-1)

Means kxn and knx are different. All numbers are integers. Because of this,

kxn - knx = fm1, when intuitively ot should be zero.

This is important. fm1 or f-1 can makes a set of n into a set of x and otherway round.

This gives us the ratio.

Once we really under RSA100, RSA110 is lovely, very similar everything should work the same except the whole number is in the 80s not the 70s. Its a great number to check change in patterns.

>>11699

>xp1sqmfdiva = ((x+1) * (x+1) + f) / a

>=28775177062023928913461369238354205970422561870

Should be a minus f for x+1 squared to give (n-1)a

When x+1 involved, usually the rare time using f, not f-1 simply because the two x in f are sometimes a "corner" i.e. two x share one at the corner becomes x + x - 1. Then f becomes f - 1.

>>11703

Also, depending on the size of x…

2d = 2a + 2x

a = g + 2z + x

f=2z + 2x

e-d=g

Its the two z you take from (x+1)(x+1) that make div by n-1 (its why it works in halves).

Night! See you tomorrow:)

>>11702

Will digest.

>>11703

>Should be a minus f for x+1 squared to give (n-1)a

Just didn't edit that one.

It's because in my code, I calculate f as:

f = c - D1;

# distance to next root floor above c, the (d+1)^2, f is negative on left side of grid

where D1 = (d+1)^2;

#next largest square, above c, check that larger than c.

So that leave a negative f value. I could also just take ABS value. So, it's really MINUS f, if f were positive.

>>11704

>Night! See you tomorrow:)

Ok then, rest well! At this rate, we'll have to bake a fresh bread soon..

ps - the structured water is a reference to Dr. Gerald Pollack, University of Washington professor of bioengineering. EZ Water is Exclusion Zone water. You may find it of interest…

>>11689

Kek

Schizo mode

>>11698

How much fucking dope are you on buddy?

>>11672

>kx(n-1) - k(n-1)x = f-1

>>11702

>kxn-knx=f-1

(k times x times n-1) minus (k times n-1 times x) = f-1? You want to explain that a bit more? I know k's the ratio but if you're going to use k for both and make it technically equal 0 it's going to be more difficult to understand.

>>11673

I'd still like to know what this was about, hatred of what?

>>11677

Dunno if you've noticed but Teach hasn't been here in well over a year.

>>11681

>When you have your fun, I am going to fuck John Key, Jacinda Ahern and Helen fucking Clark so hard, they are going wish they were Obama after Trump's finished.

What's the dirt on Jacinda? Other than the Clinton Foundation thing you just mentioned. I know back in 2017 when you started posting you were talking about John Key being involved in pedo shit. I've also read that Helen Clark has a lot of connections with China.

>>11705

>At this rate, we'll have to bake a fresh bread soon..

See >>11618

Can only stay a minute.

The pic below shows 2d with all x removed to leave theta x. Now, if you add (f-1) to (n-1) lots of those theta x, you have x lots of theta (n-1).

We know 72(n-1) + theta (n-1) makes an x.

We know therefore that (f-1) is made up of zero to many x (including minus x for some c!) And whatever is left out of f-1 provides the requisite number of theta n (apologies for flipping between n and n-1 it actually doesnt matter too much, column e uses n, column f uses n-1).

Why would we need and n-1 since we have two d multiplied by n-1.

However, fm1 added to these (n-1)2d creates a rectangle with sides x and theta n-1.

What we know is that (1-theta n) lots of n-1 as a sum with fm1 creates a stack of theta n that is exactly (1-theta x) high.

We also know that theta x is 72 lots of theta n-1 plus double-theta n-1.

We now know that we dont need any theta n.

Would that mean fm1 MUST be divisible by double-theta n-1?

Does that mean if we factor fm1 (an order of magnitude less than c) we get an answer? Will it be sped up by factoring the fm1' from fm1?????????? Could this be starting to show a recursive factoring solution approach?

(Had to cut the pic)

Cant post pics.

Pic one. The end of two d. All x removed.

Rectangle wider than high. Theta x by (n-1). Add f. You get tall skinny rectangle exactly x by theta n.

A dashed line across the bottom third of theta x (n-1) and dashed line two thirds up the next of n-1 by x.

>>11710

Remeber to make it 2n+x / n-1 to give the extra two on the end. In the case below..75 becomes ..77

>>11713

>A dashed line across the bottom third of theta x (n-1) and dashed line two thirds up the next of n-1 by x.

Looks like "diff_thetas" is is 2x-2 ? (going by the //2x-2 comment in the line)

Will see how that relates to your "theta" descrition.

Does the 1/3 and 2/3 come from / relate to the 0.655950.. ?

ty for keeping promise to drop back in today!

>>11711

>>11711

>>11711

Yes. Everything we discussed previously is relevant. This is excellent work.

The ratio between 2d and x, 2n+x and n-1 are the same…

IT CAN BE EXPRESSED AS A CONTINUED FRACTION.

Already late, will call in as soon as possible.

>>11716

>The ratio between 2d and x, 2n+x and n-1 are the same…

Checked.

2d/x = 74.655950384207043355..

(2n+x)/(n-1) = 74.655950384207043355..

Also:

2d/(2n+x) = 72.655950384207043355..

(So same remainder, 2 integers smaller)

>>11718

Well done.

We are focusing on the square of x+n without the corner square of n.

This is: x(x+2n)

Starts to fall into place.

Thank you re: contract

Related to all of this.

I will call it the demand curve. Q in parallel with waking people up, he's doing what President Trump did in his Art of the Deal book, which reads as a Third testament, if you really read it. Informing and implanting a skill in the good people.

If you are ahead of the demand curve (meaning you see ahead of where it is), you can ALWAYS make money.

What causes the shape of the demand curve (a curve can be a surface or object depending on dimensions or attributes, curve just means a surface with a non-negative rate of change).

1. Moving large sums around

2. Starting a war

3. Creating a shortage

4. Enabling a surplus

5. Any global unexpected change at scale

Etc

If you are ahead of the demand curve, your wealth simply grows. You have to be ahead of it with certainty.

There was thought to be only one true way to do this. To cause those things.

Once you truly know about the demand curve, you see it everywhere. Q is training an audience to see events hidden by the media of such magnitude, it is inevitable that despite attempts to hide, they become public.

The demand curve has an intricate surface and also some bold features.

Generalising that, you can start to see the strings of all the puppeteers. They cause features on the curve for profit. Gaming the system.

It's why its banned for everyone else in the financial markets.

What you see here and what Q is doing is giving us a fair way of using the demand curve by giving an advantage to those who are willing and want to work at something.

This is not public because YOU GET IT FIRST. For that to happen and it not look or even be given, how else could we do this?

By the end, I do not doubt for a single second you could think you hadn't earned it. A hundred per cent earned it.

>>11720

It'd be cool if you could reply to me >>11708

>>11720

And it will be the first example of the future solution sets to P = NP.

Working backwards from the future. In this, it is inevitable that the truth comes out, releases,AI technogy, aliens who wont lie etc. The answers that certain problems evaded so well, will school us all in discovering the solutions were equally camoflaged.

The future emerges from the patterns 9f today and equally we are now just echoes of that happened future.

We are not allowed to know if have free will. Hence it is given to us by God and only taken by the hand of man.

TL;DR TWO TERMS

>>11722

Having free will by not knowing whether you have free will.

The truth is elegant or beautiful and rarely a slut.

>>11720

There's a shortcut to the demand curve called remote viewing the stock market

Another example.

A new person goes on a talk show clAiming they have the ultimate key to lasting longer in the marrital bed, no more thinking about dying parents or pets. Intrigued the host asks what it is. You get out a picture.

Meghan Markle.

Before the shock wears off, you immediately ask what rhymes with MeAgain Markle?

Kipper Trench.

You then 100% commit to Meghan Markle rhyming with Kipper Trench.

This is squaring "thinking past the sale". You plant the negative thought. You then associate it with something negative and cause an argument over whether it is true.

Second order.

Result: everyone who watched MeAgain Markle be called the free anti climax service now, through random arguments about rhymes, associates her fanny with nasty niffs and all hated things about fish.

Its always about rates of change, however abstract.

>>11725

I have questions too but they're less math-related so I'll try not to interrupt, although for whatever reason he seems keep missing my posts.

Might as well fill the thread

>>11728

bloop

( >>11618 )