a7ce9c No.16583445
What's the best games based on Star Trek? No JJ Abhrams reboot allowed.
bb2b13 No.16583581
770c8c No.16583609
The Interplay Adventure games ones are probably the best, Judgement Rites especially.
I haven't played many actually. I'm surprised there was never a Klingon hack-and-slash. They need a fighting game set in the comic book Swoleverse.
cb872c No.16583623
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
There's also Honor Guard, which seems pretty neat ot play as a Klingon.
e5f779 No.16583629
Should i start with season 1 on TNG and bear through it because i've heard it's bad, or skip it
8725af No.16583630
There are no good Star Trek games. They're all action games which totally miss the point of the franchise
9b6e82 No.16583633
>>16583630
>They're all action games
What a maroon.
cb872c No.16583635
>>16583629
Season 1 is not so bad, it's just awkward at best, season 2 gets good halfway through, and season 3 is the start of the GOOD TNG, so you could start from there if you don't mind swimming through some awkwardness.
This thread is now /strek/
d84e8d No.16583696
>>16583629
Don't skip the first season.
bb2b13 No.16583705
>>16583629
Watch TOS or ENT. TNG, DS9 and VOY are too soy.
cb872c No.16583710
>>16583705
>DS9 is too soy
4d5f8d No.16583718
bb2b13 No.16583719
>>16583710
The side plots were really neat at times, but mainly the show is all about sucking nigger dick. The good stuff was stolen from Babylon 5 anyway and unlike in that show they had to make the former occupying force blatantly evil towards the end. If VOY was muh feminism then DS9 was muh groid rights. TNG was just generic pozz, not offensive but also boring.
e48053 No.16583732
Reminder that Kirk is responsible for the fall of the Terran Empire and the deaths of millions.
cb872c No.16583734
>>16583719
>sucking nigger dick/muh groid rights
There's literally only one episode which could be considered like that, and it wasn't even the main point of the episode. Everyone knows DS9 is Pro cardassian propaganda
>TNG generic poz
Pretty much confirmed you haven't watched any Star trek at all.
de174a No.16583739
>>16583445
Honestly? Mass Effect 1 and only 1.
bb2b13 No.16583754
>>16583734
I've watched all series and all seasons. Well, not STD, but the previous ones. TNG is dull and the characters are pure cardboard. And I don't mean that they have no depth, which they don't, but that they have very little passion. There's never any conflict. Instead beta Picard, the gay captain, just jerks off about liberalism while taking it in the ass from half the galaxy.
As for DS9 it was very niggerish, like 35-50% of the show was just monkey business. I did like the spy stuff and the bajoran holohoax getting some nuance but eh… Babylon 5 blows it out of the water.
36756a No.16583764
>>16583754
>TNG is dull and the characters are pure cardboard.
Glad I'm not the only one who feels this way. I watched TNG right after finishing Babylon 5 and the difference between the two was staggering.
cb872c No.16583778
>>16583754
>There's never any conflict
Perhaps in the first 2 seasons when Roddenberry was still jerking off about his humanitarian views, outside of that there are plenty of conflicts, if you mean between the crew, there's not as much of that, but outside of the crew, you have plenty of episodes, between the best of both worlds two parter Where picard is forced into a borg , then there's "brothers" where picard visits his asshole brother on earth and engage in a fist fight , hell, just look at all the klingon episodes regarding worf's dishonored family and klingon politics, and now that I remember, there'd be conflicts with some of the crew, I remember the Nth Degree in which Barkley inserts his mind into the ship's computer, now there was conflict there, there's plenty of it. I just remembered The episode where Geordi is tortured into becoming a sleeper agent for the romulans and tries to pull a false flag to get the federation and the klingon empire to fight
>35-50% of the show was just monkey business
I dunno how that makes it nigger sucking material, if anything it shows that DS9 is not as uptight as TNG when it comes to giving their characters some leisure time.
bb2b13 No.16583789
>>16583764
That must be quite the contrast. I don't think I would have been able to sit through TNG if I had just come from B5. I mean going from Londo and G'Kar to Gary Stue Wesley, "beard is character arc" Riker, diversity combo man La Forge and bald sleeping pill Picard. Both in terms of how they are written and in delivery they're so dull. The TOS cast was better in this regard as their acting was more theatrical and enjoyable. And the main trio had very distinctive personalities even if the writing was not that great nor deep.
bb2b13 No.16583846
>>16583778
Of course there's conflict due to anomaly/encounter of the week but the characters are incredibly bland and relies on one gimmick each. There's very little enjoyable or interesting interplay between them. I did shit on DS9 but you have much better characters and relationships there. Like the space jew bartender or Garak. You know, characters with aspirations and motivations. Not just crew member who does X with gimmick Y. Furthermore TNG lacks internal conflict, it does have some attempts at it but nothing substantial.
cb872c No.16583855
>>16583846
Yes that's true, I am not refuting that, however I'd hardly paint someone like Picard as this globohomo type man, he's someone that has proven to get into action and fight back when the time comes even if he gets pushed around by Q like a lil sperg everytime Ultimately the characters can be rather bland, but the situations they're thrusted in make up for that in my opinion.
bb2b13 No.16583876
It just hit me, TNG is like TOS but all the characters are the side characters and there's no main trio. That's exactly what it was like.
>>16583855
Eh, he's globohomo man and a stickler for protocol and the prime directive. Just the late 80s and early 90s version of it. It's funny though, because these days he comes off as a cuckservative.
As for the situations and stuff, well, yeah, that's why the show wasn't cancelled. The crew was bland as fuck but it had some neat ideas. I mean I watched the entirety of it, so it must have done some things right.
cb872c No.16583886
>>16583876
>stickler for the prime directive
He's had plenty of prime directive violations, and he's been one to question the prime directive in at least one ocation from what I can remember.
>these days he comes off as a cuckservative
I wouldn't say that, I'd say he's more of a sensible thinker in a, ask questions first shoot later kind of way, which has always been the star trek ideal. I don't care much for calling a show "pozzed" or "cucked" without seeing any evidence of it first, and in the case of TNG, I don't think it's pozed, unless you're one of those that think if a show is not overtly right wing then it must be pozzed. Also I think Worf and Data are far more complex than anyone else in the show
bb2b13 No.16583936
>>16583886
Eh, Star Trek was from the inception a far-left progressive series promoting liberalism. TOS was the STD of its time. If you want a less politically correct show you'd have to watch something like Lexx, or Babylon 5. None of which align with my own political views by the way.
>He's had plenty of prime directive violations
Yeah, typical globalist, always preaching and then not following those rules he forces others to abide by.
cb872c No.16583979
>>16583936
>far-left progressive series promoting liberalism
It'd be far left if it promoted communism, which it clearly didn't, at most it promoted classic liberal ideas like, racism bad, etc. You don't see anything that can be considered far left, specially these days, Star trek if anything always had a humanitarian angle, with all of humanity working together to explore space etc. There are people who say "hurr in the world of star trek there's no more currency, therefore it's communist". Motherfucker, if people have acess to replicator technology, who needs money?
>>16583936
>Yeah, typical globalist, always preaching and then not following those rules he forces others to abide by
The fuck are you talking about? His violations were forced upon him, he had no choice but to act in every one of those situations.
>TOS was the STD of its time
Bullshit, STD is a trainwreck with gay interracial relationships, trump references, and so on written by non-sci fi writers. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about, I bet you're the kind of person to think something is pozzed because it does not go out if its way to adhere to your politics, fuck out of here.
643680 No.16584006
When is he going to get his own show?
bb2b13 No.16584114
>>16583979
>at most it promoted classic liberal ideas like, racism bad, etc.
Yeah, far-left stuff. Don't fall for the marxist meme that only communism is leftism.
>Star trek if anything always had a humanitarian angle, with all of humanity working together to explore space etc.
Yeah, far-left internationalism and homogenising American cultural domination. Progressivism is always far-left. Traditionalism is right-wing. These are not hard concepts to grasp. Globohomo is progressive, aka radical leftist.
>There are people who say "hurr in the world of star trek there's no more currency, therefore it's communist". Motherfucker, if people have acess to replicator technology, who needs money?
Getting rid of currency altogether was one of the end goals of communism. We live in a time where you could easily cut down working hours a lot and yet we work more than ever and money is still a thing despite industrial output and mass production.
Doesn't matter, capitalism is equally leftist. These days commies are gone and only corporate marxism is left, capitalist cultural and racial marxism.
>You clearly have no idea what you're talking about
On the contrary, I know more than I want to. The first interracial kiss on television and all that jazz.
You really ought to stop being such a brainlet. Especially with the dumb leftism = communism crap. Jacobins are just as leftist. Progressivism is pure leftism.
1abe06 No.16584129
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16583445
Do Star Trek inspired games count too?
bb2b13 No.16584261
>>16583979
>I bet you're the kind of person to think something is pozzed because it does not go out if its way to adhere to your politics, fuck out of here.
I already addressed this. No science fiction show adheres to my political stance. I do like several of them anyway and I did watch all of Star Trek. You do need to think about what kind of ideas shows are espousing though, if you want to talk about pozz. If you're a zoomer, or not very well read I suppose, then your standard is already jewish pozz and what you're seeing as pozz is just the latest hellish abomination they've cooked up. Star Trek was always pozzed. Doesn't mean you can't watch it and TOS in particular is a nice respite from the latest agitprop they've shat out.
But yeah, like it however much you want, Star Trek is still extremely leftist.
f2f227 No.16584371
Who cares about Star Trek when you got rightwingers in space, also known as Stargate.
bb2b13 No.16584735
>>16584371
Nah, that was we wuz kangz tier. If you want even slightly right-wing science fiction one should either watch the original Battlestar Galactica or Dune.
0cbd2a No.16584777
i don't know how it holds up today but i really enjoyed elite force, think i still have the big box somewhere bought on a whim at compusa
22ae45 No.16584866
>>16584735
>SG1
>kangz-tier
They don't depict the ancient Egyptians as even slightly niggerish, so I don't see how you come to this conclusion. All of the ancient Egyptians in th show are either arab/levantine-looking, or White-looking.
bb2b13 No.16585104
>>16584866
Well, to be fair they aren't all groids, but it's still ancient aliens and the alien guy on the crew is a gay nigg.
22ae45 No.16585183
>>16585104
Yeah the whole premise of the show is basically ancient aliens + gnosticism, but that doesn't detract from it I don't think.
And while Teal'c is indeed a nigger, he's still entertaining enough. There were a couple lefty episodes, but for the most part it seemed to steer clear of that stuff.
d84e8d No.16585280
>>16584006
Hopefully never. The guy is a great actor but the STD version of Pike was awful.
cb872c No.16585482
>>16584114
>Yeah, far-left stuff. Don't fall for the marxist meme that only communism is leftism.
And what kind of stuff is that? Show me what you're talking about, because from watching TNG I don't remember a single thing that could be considered marxist.
>far-left internationalism and homogenising American cultural domination
Bullshit, in Star trek you can celearly see people of all nationalities who still uphold their native cultures, just look at Picard, O'Brien's wife, hell, they even let Worf uphold his own culture, etc. They just don't rub it in your face "muh diversity" style
>Getting rid of currency altogether was one of the end goals of communism. We live in a time where you could easily cut down working hours a lot and yet we work more than ever and money is still a thing despite industrial output and mass production.
Again, you don't see that they have vast technological advancements like Replicators that allow for people to get their hands on food and other products at the press of a button, who needs money? Now what communism and by extension marxism want to get rid off is privary property, and people on earth still own property, look at Picard's brother who not only owns a manor, but also vinyards for his own amusement.
>On the contrary, I know more than I want to. The first interracial kiss on television and all that jazz.
What was on TOS, not TNG, dont' change the subject.
cb872c No.16585488
>>16584866
Don't even worry about it, that's all this guy ever says about whatever show he watches, he either says it's overtly leftist, or nigger kissing tier.
83d5a2 No.16585532
>>16585482
>I don't remember a single thing that could be considered marxist.
Stop being so dense, leftism was a thing before that kike wrecked the east. Liberalism is leftism.
40ff7d No.16585565
>>16585488
But Star Trek is pozzed leftist propaganda and always was. It's basically the masturbatory fantasy of a cuck imagining his ideal communist society.
cb872c No.16585585
>>16585532
However it was never overtly political, it often commented on topics like morality and ethics more than it did on politics, and even then, it's more liberal ideas were never outrageous like something you'd find in current year, hell, if anything, Star Trek's earth would be impossible under current liberal ideologies:
Liberals tend to hate the military and giving the military a huge role in their government, so why would their agenda ever lead to the formation of Starfleet? Race and sex-based politics have been abolished in the afforementioned Federation. Hard to see liberals agitating for that either. Forcing communities to accept gay marriage or plastic straw bans or whatever would both be gross Prime Directive violations.
81d456 No.16585597
>>16583629
Any episode that has Q in it, skip it.
Any episode that has Data in, unzip your pants.
cb872c No.16585612
>>16585597
>Skipping Q Who
That episode is the literal introduction of the borg.
40ff7d No.16585656
>>16585585
How can you be this full of shit? Star Trek is maximum pozz. It promotes globalism, anti-racism, gender equality, tolerance, multiculturalism, pacifism, etc.
Where the fuck do centrist vermin like you even come from?
83d5a2 No.16585762
>>16585585
>Liberals tend to hate the military and giving the military a huge role in their government
Lol no. Obongo bombed so many nations to shit. Liberals love war.
>Race and sex-based politics have been abolished in the afforementioned Federation. Hard to see liberals agitating for that either.
Welcome to the slippery slope of all kike ideas and concepts. Stop viewing things as isolated happenings and instead see the greater whole, the continuum. In the natural world and in tradition family and your people are the most important identity. This is the core of your being after all. The first step of liberalism was to dismantle this and make whites stop having an in-group preference. Early Star Trek is rather heavy handed propaganda for this. Then as time goes on and white people start losing cohesion then people with strong coherence can start exploiting that. So it went like this.
>Stop only caring about your tribe and calling out (((our))) tribe, everyone are individuals
>Good goyim, now that you aren't racist anymore you need more diversity and enrichment. I mean you're not a racist or anything, are you?
>Oy vey, you're still privileged since you have good education and wealth, it's time to put quotas so half of everyone are brown brainlets!
>Haha, now that we have all the power and you're a dying minority we will humiliate you and be open about how much we've hated you from the very beginning
>A single white person is one white person too many #cancel whitey
cb872c No.16585772
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16585656
Except it never overtly pushed those things in your face, how did it promote globalism when nations are still a thing in the world of Star Trek? Same with cultures, in fact, funny thing is that you don't see shit like, black people claiming to be french, or russian, almost all black characters are from african nations, while white characters are from european nations, they're just working together in exploring the galaxy, and not overtly stripping themselves of their identities in order to racemix into a hodgepodge of mixed brown mutts. And when it comes to gender equality, it never really made a point about women being as good or better than men, you see men and women of different ranks but it never spat on the face of feminity or delivered any feminist messages about "femininity bad" or "toxic masculinity". And about multiculturalism, check the related video.
83d5a2 No.16585789
>>16585656
>Where the fuck do centrist vermin like you even come from?
American education system or Something Awful. Maybe ResetEra.
40ff7d No.16585828
>>16585772
>when nations are still a thing in the world of Star Trek?
>Earth is under the thrall of a communist one world government
>it's depicted as a paradise
>but that's not pushing the globalist agenda
>they're just working together in exploring the galaxy
Oh, yes, all the races working together and racemixing totally isn't pushing leftist politics, no sir.
>and not overtly stripping themselves of their identities in order to racemix into a hodgepodge of mixed brown mutts
Star Trek was the first show that had an interracial kiss on television. Please stop embarrassing yourself you pathetic cuck.
>And when it comes to gender equality, it never really made a point about women being as good or better than men
At no point does any of the Star Trek shows portray women as physically weaker than men. It doesn't even pretend like the sex of a given Starfleet character is a thing, and there's plenty of women as part of security.
cb872c No.16585837
>>16585762
I don't need an explanation on how these things work, I'm pretty right wing and a white indetitarian, but I'm not somebody to not enjoy a piece of media if it does not align with my politics exactly, if Star trek was propaganda like many tv shows these days, I could not enjoy it as a I do, star trek always focused way more on questions related to morality and ethics, or just have the crew engage in space mysteries or phenomena, I particurarly enjoy the in-universe war politics between all the factions. I'm not going to be like those that can't enjoy anything that does not overtly try to align itself with my own set of beliefs.
40ff7d No.16585877
>>16585837
>I'm pretty right wing and a white indetitarian
cb872c No.16585886
>>16585828
>Earth is under the thrall of a communist one world government
There are still nation states, with their indvidual identities and goverments, like the United States, Europe, Canada, Russia etc.
>Oh, yes, all the races working together and racemixing totally isn't pushing leftist politics, no sir.
Only racemixed relationship I can think of was that of a potato nigger and an asian chick, and that's only because they were already married in real life.
>Star Trek was the first show that had an interracial kiss on television. Please stop embarrassing yourself you pathetic cuck.
I really don't care, it never made a point about racemixing, and even if I don't like the act itself,
it did ruin the show for me
>At no point does any of the Star Trek shows portray women as physically weaker than men. It doesn't even pretend like the sex of a given Starfleet character is a thing, and there's plenty of women as part of security.
However more men have been shown to be part of security and other more physical activities.
>>16585877
>I'm gonna call him a jew, that will show him
Pathetic, because I like something you don't like I guess that makes me the bad guy. Go back to reddit
cb872c No.16585892
>>16585886
*it didn't ruin the show for me
83d5a2 No.16585900
>>16585837
>if Star trek was propaganda like many tv shows these days
But it was. You say you don't need it explained to you and yet you fail to see previous series were just as STD only a step on the road to hell. You say that STD is more pozzed and claim this makes the precious series fairly apolitical. But it doesn't. By that logic STD will be apolitical once the white genocide and explicit cock in man ass is the new leftist norm in television.
bb79a0 No.16585907
>But Star Trek is pozzed leftist propaganda and always was
Why i have feeling like a was already read this thread like a 5-6 years strait with a same arguments and a same strawman?
40ff7d No.16585919
>>16585907
Because it's true? Or are we going to sit here and pretend Roddenberry didn't have an agenda when he shat out his communist masturbatory fantasy?
83d5a2 No.16585926
83d5a2 No.16585946
>Hey guise, look, STD is centrist since every other scene isn't a closeup of a diseased nigger dick going up into a white ass. I mean the characters don't even use pejoratives for white characters. Stop calling STD leftist! It's not like that new show at all.
cb872c No.16585962
>>16585900
>TOS, TNG, DS9 just as bad as STD
Oh I'm laughing here. You have not seen STD have you? While in the main star trek timeline the federation is a rather peaceful but firm alliance of planets that respect the soverignty of individual peoples, in the STD timeline the federation is practically like the USSR anexing territory of even those who do not want to be annexed, with the klingons being portrayed as the bad guys for wanting to remain independent, I could explain more, but honestly you haven't even seen any star trek to begin with.
>>16585907
Same shit different day, it's all mostly people who haven't seen star trek anway
>>16585946
>STD is centrist
Nobody has said that, also STD has nothing to do with the previous shows, nor its writers and producers, you know that right? It's based off of JJ's star trek. So clearly you've shown to not know what you're talking about, dumbass.
40ff7d No.16585975
>>16585962
>the other shows aren't as leftist as STD
>that means they're apolitical
I guess you'd need to have brain damage to be a trekkie.
81d456 No.16585985
83d5a2 No.16585989
>>16585962
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just baiting and not as completely retarded as you seem to be.
8463b6 No.16586012
>>16585962
Literally called "STD." Trekkies eternally btfo.
cb872c No.16586021
>>16585975
Nobody has said that, again, Star trek has always been more liberal in terms of politics and I stated that before, however it's never been as overtly political or as propagandist as whatever marxists are coming up these days with STD which is way more political and partisan than any previous Star Trek show by a longshot.
>>16585989
>Resorting to namecalling
Clearly you've shown already to not know what you're talking about, so it's ironic you're the one calling me retarded.
bb79a0 No.16586024
>>16585962
> it's all mostly people who haven't seen star trek anway
Have a same feeling. Also i find DS9 more enjoyable then TNG because you can clearly see how characters develop instead of a stale characters (except c. Data) in TNG.
>>16585919
> when he shat out his communist masturbatory fantasy?
Likely you dont even know what a communism was. I'm a snow nigger and can clearly see you never watched Star Track and after seeing a nigger in DS9 and knowing autor was a jewish just jumped ITT to mock "EBIN GOMMIES AMIRITE :DDDD".
cb872c No.16586054
>>16586024
>Have a same feeling. Also i find DS9 more enjoyable then TNG because you can clearly see how characters develop instead of a stale characters (except c. Data) in TNG.
Agreed, although I think Worf is just as interesting as Data, specially when it came to his Klingon ancestry and the politics of his family, Picard too.
83d5a2 No.16586081
>>16586021
>however it's never been as overtly political or as propagandist
If you would have been alive when any of those series aired then you would know that they were, you zoomer pipsqueak. However as the pozz becomes even worse so does the media.
The politics that Star Trek pushed so hard gave us the politics STD now pushes. And it will get worse and worse with every generation.
cb872c No.16586109
>>16586081
>The politics that Star Trek pushed so hard gave us the politics STD now pushes. And it will get worse and worse with every generation.
Except STD has almost nothing to do with Star trek beyond the name and some of the imagedry, Star trek was always about humanity dealing with the unknown out in space and the morality and ethics that would come with such, STD is about queers in space battling EVIL MAGA HAT WEARING WHIT- KLINGONS!!!
You're just trying to draw a connection between the two because you want to feel justified on your hatred for something you don't even know anything about, the people writing old star trek were science fiction writers, the people writing for STD are teen literature writers i.e twilight and the like.
f9c6ce No.16586122
>>16586081
>The politics that Star Trek pushed so hard gave us the politics STD now pushes
I though STD is just a "wacky" low budget SCI-FI show because i watched it after Babylon 5.
d84e8d No.16586163
>>16585828
>>Earth is under the thrall of a communist one world government
A world government is bound to happen once you start leaving Earth and establish a peaceful contact with extraterrestrial civilizations.
>>16586081
>The politics that Star Trek pushed so hard gave us the politics STD now pushes.
Not really. The people who are making STD have never watched Star Trek.
c99b7c No.16586166
>>16584777
Elite Force is one of the only good things to come out of star trek.
83d5a2 No.16586213
>>16586109
>he doesn't know about leftism in science fiction
At this point I'm 100% sure you must either be from /trannypol/ or trolling.
>>16586163
>The people who are making STD have never watched Star Trek.
Doesn't matter, they are pushing the natural continuation of liberal ideas. Just like how France getting niggered is the natural conclusion of "liberté, égalité, fraternité".
8a8493 No.16586230
Since the majority of this thread is shitflinging, I just wanted to get this out of the way:
Is Babylon 5 unpozzed and what other Sci-Fi would you anons recommend?
5c6afc No.16586238
Is this normal for a startrek thread because I expected way more fun shitposting and less political autism
cb872c No.16586274
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16586238
Yes, I wish we could just funpost about star trek and its games, but some faggots just got to virtue signal about their politics So those what about Star trek themed doom mods?
40ff7d No.16586285
>>16586163
>A world government is bound to happen once you start leaving Earth and establish a peaceful contact with extraterrestrial civilizations.
Is that what you tell yourself when you take your estrogen pills at night? Leftists are truly the greatest imbeciles on Earth. Not even niggers with an IQ of 60 are as retarded as you.
>>16586230
Not really. It pushes the whole "kumbaya we all come together" bullshit, but at least it's not done out of some muh feels reason, but because the ancient big bad is coming to fuck everyone over, and while it does give the evil humans Nazi-esque uniforms, at least it shows why a one world government is bad and depict humans falling into civil war, while other races engage in war crimes and genocide.
At the end of the day you'll be watching it for Lando and G'kar, the human characters are bland and the overarching plot is pretty cliche.
36756a No.16586322
>>16586230
The first season has some pretty pozzed moments and is terrible in general but the rest of the series drops it and becomes excellent, seasons 2 and 3 in particular with 4 being almost as good. Follow this guide or you're gonna have a bad time. I was shocked at how much better season 2 was compared to 1.
40ff7d No.16586324
>>16586213
>At this point I'm 100% sure you must either be from /trannypol/ or trolling.
He knows, he's just playing dumb to fool people into believing Star Trek isn't political. He'll likely pretend (((Asimov))) and his fellow kikes didn't warp science fiction into a propaganda tool and that Star Trek isn't a direct result of that movement that tainted science fiction forever, because telling white nerds that tolerance and enlightened centrist cuckery are the way of the future totally isn't brainwashing.
>Doesn't matter, they are pushing the natural continuation of liberal ideas. Just like how France getting niggered is the natural conclusion of "liberté, égalité, fraternité".
Well said. The Federalist had an excellent article that cites episodes and overarching plots in Star Trek to show how the pozz steadily increased in Star Trek with each new iteration.
https://thefederalist.com/2015/09/15/how-star-trek-explains-the-decline-of-liberalism/
>In “Errand of Mercy,” they attempt genocide to enslave the Organians. In “The Trouble with Tribbles,” they try to poison a planet’s entire food supply. The dungeon in which Kirk is imprisoned in this film is on a par with Stalin’s jails. Yet never does the Klingon leader, Gorkon, or any of his people, acknowledge—let alone apologize for—such injustices. Quite the contrary; his daughter tells a galactic conference, “We are a proud race. We are here because we want to go on being proud.” Within the context of the original “Star Trek,” such pride is morally insane.
>Yet in service to Spock’s mission of elevating peace over right, the film portrays the Klingons not as thugs, but as misunderstood casualties of human bigotry. Kirk and his crew, says Gorkon’s daughter at the Enterprise banquet, represent a “homo sapiens-only club,” devoted to such chauvinistic values as “inalienable human rights.” “Why, the very name,” she quips, “is racist.” Gorkon’s pacific overtures are stymied by conspirators who assassinate him, and while pursuing the murderers, Kirk decides that he, too, is at fault—because he has not simply let bygones be bygones.
cb872c No.16586372
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16586213
>>16586324
>Everyone I disagree with is /trannypol/
>Anything that is not obvertly right wing is marxist propaganda
>I don't watch Star trek because but let me explain to you what Star trek is about because I heard that star trek is leftist propaganda, so it must be true! Look they have a nigger in the show! This proves me right.
At this point I'm convinced you two are summerfags that just came here not to discuss star trek vidya but to shit up the thread to show off how "based and redpilled" you are.
>inb4 no true scotsman falacy "no true right winger would enjoy star trek, therefore you must be a tranny
Yeah no, fuck off, I already made my arguments, and I'm not passing up a star trek vidya thread because of you 2 faggots.
Star trek the fallen is a pretty neat third person action game
40ff7d No.16586392
>>16586372
>Everyone I disagree with is /trannypol/
You are /leftypol/, though.
>Anything that is not obvertly right wing is marxist propaganda
Good job strawmanning for lack of an actual counter-argument. No one said anything remotely like that, people merely pointed out that Star Trek is leftist.
>I don't watch Star trek because but let me explain to you what Star trek
You keep saying this again and again because you seem to believe that if you kvetch something enough times it automatically makes it true. I've watched Star Trek shows and movies, and played the games. It doesn't take a genius to see the show is heavily skewed towards glorifying leftist politics. Star Wars also pushes a similar agenda, as do most sci-fi books and shows, yet most don't do it as blatantly as Star Trek.
>I already made my arguments
You keep saying it's not political, and then turn around and claim shit like muh tolerance, muh egalitarianism and muh anti-racism are "universal" concepts that transcend the political divide.
The simple truth is that you're another leftist fuckwit that can't argue worth shit.
74a791 No.16586412
>>16586322
b5 becomes a gigantic turd after the shadow war, everything feels like a shitty cheap tacked-on cash-grab.
cb872c No.16586432
>>16586412
Dpes Babylon 5 have any games? Also Who here has played the Star Trek MMO, was it any good?
a1ef1f No.16586449
>>16586432
>was the Star Trek MMO any good
honestly i fucking hate ST as a franchise and STO was one of the most fun MMOs I've ever played.
>fun space combat
>tons of reputations to grind, but you grind them by providing materials to them that you can find anywhere, so it's not the typical WoW rep grind and gives you great rewards
>customize your entire bridge crew and away team into delicious lolis and tomboys
>occasionally get free lootboxes, which nearly always contain a super powerful universal ship console or a ship itself or something, which you can then sell to whales for tens of millions
>fun daily/weekly quests
>yuge cooperative space raids where an entire fleet flies around phasering the shit out of people
if it was any other franchise i'd still be playing it, it really was fantastic
40ff7d No.16586467
>>16586432
>Dpes Babylon 5 have any games?
No official ones. Go play the Freespace 2 mods.
83d5a2 No.16586474
>>16586377
>gay 5head facepalming
Wew
d84e8d No.16586544
>>16586432
It was ok until they added more STD shit.
e48053 No.16588033
>>16586544
To be fair I suspect the devs are pretty much forced to add std against their will.
>release 2 new episodes
>no fanfare
>no weekly rewards
>no events
>make a bigger deal out of level scaling ships than the episodes
697e52 No.16588264
I think a game somewhat similar to LA Noire would work great for something like Star Trek. For example, one mission/level/whatever has you investigate the death of a klingon on your space station/starship. Your chief medical officer tells you after the autopsy that the klingon died due to foul play, probably another alien did it. You find out that the klingon was blackmailing the alien. It turns out if the alien didn't do illegal stuff for the klingon, the klingon would kill the alien or something. So the player is now put in a moral dillema about whether or not they should put the alien in prison or say the murderer got away.
TL;DR: Basically, a game where you get moral dillemas and puzzles.
cb872c No.16588522
>>16586467
>He's still going at it
Yeah nah, fuck off.
>>16586544
What kind of STD shit did they even add?
ad4996 No.16588821
79bad8 No.16588851
>>16588522
ships, weapons, traits with referential names, and every new mission/PvE queue after the DS9 expansion.
Thankfully this year's First Contact Day gave us something of value in this sea of STDs.
bb319e No.16591276
>reading a thread on star trek vidya
>haven't even watched any of it myself aside from brief climpses of the OG show with some CGI added on tv
First of all, what the fuck am I doing with my life? Second of all, while I'm here I might as well ask where does one start in the like 20 shows of it, all I know is that TNG is great because picard and first one is great because kirk and spock and that the new one is muh waman nigger garbage
4665d8 No.16591553
>>16583629
power through it. while kinda "eh" it's still somewhat comfy and really picks up later. or follow the guide.
>>16586122
STD is tryhard GOT in space with the writing talent of a scripted reality show
>>16585828
you sound like a brainlet that thinks mein kampf is zionist subversivion just because it talks about jews
4665d8 No.16591629
Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16591276
highly depends. usually it's either people liking the campy feel of TOS or the more "sophisticated" TNG acting/writing. then there's the DS9 faction which like the babylon5 feel of star trek.
VOY is usually considered the weakest due to writing and scripts (crew outright hated each other and working on the series, which really dragged the quality down sometimes). that said the good VOY episodes are only slightly worse than the good TNG episodes, you just have far less of it.
ENT is a prequel but was the last show for a while and was produced after all the others so it kinda tries to connect the old with the new, not always successful but definitely miles ahead of STD. starts kinda iffy but really picks up later and had the potential to be great if it wouldn't have been canceled.
STD can be outright ignored, it's the equivalent of your favourite game getting a mobile sequel.
jjtrek is literally just jarjar's promo vid for getting into star wars. not bad in itself but not really star trek either.
so best is usually to figure out which kinda scifi feel you want, then go with TOS/TNG/DS9.
or watch a bit of orville if just want the comfy star trek feel without going all in
ae0661 No.16591726
>>16583705
>DS9 is too soy
32c192 No.16591738
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Star Trek Away Team is pretty descent. Isometric real-time tactics game kind of similar to Commandos and whatnot, but with star trek. Don't know if it's the best one but the only one I've enjoyed. Then again I don't care much about star trek.
289654 No.16591747
>>16591726
every trek is full of soy.
there are moments they forget to soy it up for the sake of the plot, but they never miss a chance to show the PROGRESStm of society.
84bb96 No.16591759
>>16591553
>First 2 'bad' ones complaining about black stereotypes and matriarchal society being portrayed as bad
That guide seems pretty cucked.
289654 No.16591760
>>16586432
STO is mostly forgettable, but we used to have a nice little community in the borg invested pvp zones. And even the queues were kinda fun. Then they did a 'balance' pass, took out everything that made it fun and made it more 'offense focused' so that the whales could buy ships and win without having to gitgud.
Both this game and neverwinter were both ruined at the same time to aim for that warframe-esque pve whale/grind audience.
cc43a6 No.16591850
Shattered Universe is pretty damn good.
Doesn't get a lot of praise though.
4665d8 No.16591879
>>16591759
pretty sure the bad comes from other aspects than MUH NOGS, especially when the scat/shota incest episodes are labeled bad as well.
cc43a6 No.16591909
>>16583705
>DS9
>Soy.
>Sisko constantly committing war crimes.
>Gul " It's not a war crime if there's no survivors" Dukat.
>Garak is just a tailor He just wants to live in peace and if that means he has to slit a few throats and cause some people to have "accidents" so be it.
>Odo delivering pure unbiased justice.
>Quark, jewing things up - - but then subverting the entire process for maximum profit.
>Worf regaining all the honor he lost in TNG.
83d5a2 No.16591913
>>16591276
Watch Babylon 5, Lexx and Farscape instead of wasting your time on Trek. If you absolutely have to see Star Trek then either watch Enterprise since it kind of got all the good parts from earlier series and not that much pozz or the orginal series for the most concentrated experience of pure Star Trek.
TNG is overrated bland shit, more a sleeping pill than a series. DS9 is an inferior B5 clone. VOY is radical feminism.
cc43a6 No.16591948
>>16591913
>Legitimately recommending Lexx in the same sentence as Farscape and Babylon 5
Lexx is alright, but it's not comparable to Trek in anyway. Especially that it went to complete and absolute shit with Season 3 Fire/Ice and Season 4's Earth bullshit. The first two seasons of Lexx are masterpieces in their own right, but you'd find it more comparable to Farscape or Firefly if that's your sort of thing.
>Voy is radical feminism.
What? I've read some reaching shit when it comes to complaining about Voyager, but being radical feminism has never been one of them. An insane female lead that's rendered powerless to the situation 80% of the fucking time is hardly feminist. You could make the case about 7 of 9 , but the issue there is. She was an absolute eye candy mary sue designed to replace a better written character, Kes.
83d5a2 No.16591979
>>16591948
>Lexx is alright, but it's not comparable to Trek in anyway.
Were you dropped on the head as a wee lad? Season 2 is just like Trek, episodical planet and anomalies and all. Except it's actually fun to watch. Farscape is more or less a ripoff of Lexx, which started airing before it. Big living ship, selfish conflict prone crew and all that.
>Especially that it went to complete and absolute shit with Season 3
Season 3 was slow but even so it was pure quality. It was by season 4 it went to shit but even that was enjoyable shit.
>I've read some reaching shit when it comes to complaining about Voyager, but being radical feminism has never been one of them.
Have you been living under a rock or something? It's a show all about stronk womyn taking charge and a bunch of soygoys following them and getting berated from time to time. Of course it's not current year tier, but that's only because it wasn't yet the current year yet when they made the show. VOY even turned Q and the borg soy.
4665d8 No.16591992
>>16591979
>It's a show all about stronk womyn taking charge and a bunch of soygoys following them and getting berated from time to time.
except they are all borderline unlikeable, get btfo every second episode, full of stereotypes SJWs would endlessly tweet about and all of that doesn't even include fucking fapbait 7of9
83d5a2 No.16592011
>>16591992
Back then feminists were allowed to be hot. Even so, you didn't notice how emasculated the male crewmembers were or how blatant it was with the womyn in charge thing? Of course they're unlikeable, but I don't think that was intended.
83d5a2 No.16592022
The only two good things about VOY was 7of9's buttocks and the doctor. Everything else was ass.
d6c55b No.16592038
>>16591948
>complaining about Voyager
I just cant watch Voy only because weak plot like and unlikeable actors and overacting. Med and nigger vulkanian was alright while reast of actor team is just meh.
b24192 No.16592065
you can enjoy something even if you dont agree with its views, how hard is that to understand
bb2b13 No.16592086
>>16592065
Yeah, as long as the forced and ham-fisted political protelyzing is old and not extreme far-left anymore I love choking on jew dick. Fuck yeah, equality! We're all individuals and we don't need obsolete things like borders or in-group loyality.
4665d8 No.16592098
>>16592011
<Back then feminists were allowed to be hot.
>feminist
>hot
pick one. that shit didn't even fly in the 90s. what's next, 7of9's skintight suit is a statement about body positivity?
>you didn't notice how emasculated the male crewmembers were or how blatant it was with the womyn in charge thing?
yes. because kim didn't save the day almost every episode, the doctor and most other male crewmembers never called out shit being stupid (and proven right), paris literally never giving a fuck while still coming out on top all the time, meanwhile janeway can't even the follow the first rule of star fleet and women in general are walking stereotypes (like everybody else btw, so MUH FEMINISM makes zero fucking sense).
nevermind it was still fucking star fleet meaning it had a military command structure and every trek series had "strong" women (which were written better) in one or more command position.
so following your own argument every other show is radical feminism as well since it either has women giving orders, winning a fight or just being on the show and not getting beaten and raped constantly. and those shows can't even get a away with the hierarchy excuse.
>Of course they're unlikeable, but I don't think that was intended.
ofc not, but fun fact: propaganda doesn't work when no one falls for it.
83d5a2 No.16592116
>>16592098
Wew, could you ride that show's dick any harder?
>so following your own argument every other show is radical feminism as well
Yes, actually. Most shows are progressive propaganda, but Star Trek was almost singularly about it. I don't care if Janeway fucked up in that one episode, back then writers didn't automatically make all female characters into Mary Sues. Doesn't mean anything. Overall it was one of the most soy shows I've ever watched. Can't think of a science fiction show that was more castrated.
cc43a6 No.16592141
>>16591992
Have you been on Tumblr? All they do is complain about Voyager. They want to love it because "muh female lead and implied headcannon lesbians" but they can't love it because the women don't solve all the problems and everyone is presented equally or attempting to pull their weight. Something that doesn't sit well with the really progressive strong feminist types.
Enterprise, you don't get the weight of what Engineering did for the ship. Outside of what Tucker tells you. The later seasons bring command and security into the spotlight, especially the Makos and the Section 13 arc. (Faggots never finished the time travel bullshit. What a rip.)
DS9? The entire staff meetings consisted of the same people, three of which were from the same department and two fucking civilians ( Quark and technically Garak). For all of it's stationary , forced to deal with it's problems situations that went down on DS9, there was very little exploration of the people on DS9.
VOY, everyone suffers together. That loser from Engineering nobody likes? That bitch from Medical that doesn't even have a name? Everyone suffers as a family.
>>16592038
The writers were shit but they tried. Pure and simple. They used the same fucking "Crew of Voyager is incapacitated, XYZ is all alone and has to save the day" spotlite plot several times. My favorite reused plot is the out of phase shit.
>There's races of aliens all around you.
>There could be one behind you right now.
>Some are casual observers, others are malicious assholes.
>They're out of phase, so you never know they're there.
>You could end up out of phase too.
>And nobody could ever find you again.
>The only thing keeping you from falling out the ship is the artificial environment.
It's shit, but at least it can be interesting shit if the right people get a hold of it.
>>16592022
>The Doctor
Man. Kes and the Doctor was some of the best written shit outside of DS9.
>>16592065
These days everyone has to share their political views. I don't care for liberal faggots or conservative cucks, but they just can't seem to enjoy things unless it meets their inflexible standards.
c2181a No.16592144
>>16592116
In the latest Star Trek series, men literally died for not believing w*men.
83d5a2 No.16592190
>>16592144
Yeah, but that's current year. Current year when you can openly call for a white genocide in public and not get fired. I wouldn't be surprised if there was explicit sex scenes and they were all forced pegging. But just because new turds reek that doesn't mean old ones are edible.
>>16592141
>I don't care for liberal faggots or conservative cucks, but they just can't seem to enjoy things unless it meets their inflexible standards.
You might think you're a reasonable centrist or whatever, but you're really just an extreme liberal leftist from 10 or 20 years ago. What you need to understand is that the cultural war has been an ongoing thing for very long, now more intense than ever. But think about it, are you going to say STD isn't so bad and that it's not agitprop in ten years when things are even worse and more radical left? Relativism has fucked with your perspective.
d6c55b No.16592215
>>16592196
Never notice this.
cc43a6 No.16592273
>>16592190
Nah. I'm just a regular liberal. Most people would call me a Green Commie or a filthy Nazi because of what I believe in.
I get called a Leftist for saying I believe that there should be goverment mandated and controlled health care and education.
I believe that we need to drop race-American.
If you are third generation, you are American. You are not German. You are not Chinese. You are not Canadian. You are a fucking American. Your loyality should be to America regardless of how slanty of your eyes or the pigment of your skin.
We're better than the rest of the world and all this divide over pointless bullshit is allowing them to bypass us. But nah, faggots rather call me a Nazi for saying we need to put America's interests first.
But anyway, that's not important.
>STD
>Good
Oh hell nah. Nigger I -liked- Voyager and the only redeeming part of STD was Lorca. Discovery shit the bed when they went out of their way to explain to us shit we didn't need to see lore wise. Then their hurr durrr SPOCK shit is really what pissed me off. I don't give a fuck about prequels. I want something that takes place after the Dominion War. DS9 completely changed up how the Federation behaves, I want a fucking Trek that explores that shit. I want to see the Trek that Enterprise time traveled to. I want to see the FUTURE. I don't want to see "I BET YOU DID NOT KNOW THIS" retellings of shit. That's what the fucking novels and comics are for.
548904 No.16592291
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16583629
Never skip anything just because someone else told you to, you can't appreciate why it would be considered skippable until you've watched it. The same applies to vidya.
As for TNG, season 1 isn't as horrible as many people make it out to be, it's just dull most of the time with a few good episodes in there. Pay close attention to the music too, the first three seasons had a really excellent soundtrack.
>>16586322
>>16591553
>Needing a guide to watch a TV show
JUST WATCH THE SHOW
JUST SIT DOWN AND FUCKING WATCH THE SHOW
>>16591913
>>16591948
>Lexx
Mah niggas. I'm always amazed that something so fucking weird managed to make its way onto TV. It's not always an especially good show, but it's worth watching just for how unique it is.
c2181a No.16592301
>>16592196
First kinda looks like this, second just looks gay.
ae0661 No.16592305
>>16592215
It's like in the first episode of TNG, never to be seen again.
83d5a2 No.16592393
>>16592273
If you're white then you're cucked as hell, this is why white people are going extinct and jews rule you, if you're not white then I acknowledge your agenda and simply wish you'd be open about your intentions. Like yeah, it's easy for exalple spics to say white people shouldn't have ethnic cohesion when your group is going to outbreed everyone else and form the new majority.
And liberalism is a far-leftist ideology. Americans tend to be retarded about that since your country was founded in a masonic revolution against the crown and thus Lockean faggotry and jewery is all you ever knew. You left Tradition in the old world. But old leftism is still leftism.
Your entire ideology makes a point of ignoring ethnic groups and then you are all surprised when racial strife destabilise your nation. The worst part is that European governments have that same ideology and run it with an iron fist. Blatantly denying the reality that fighting age semitic and negroid low IQ men from barbaric cultures and countries don't suddenly turn into a hard working and national because they get an approval stamp on a paper. This is why they make knives blunt in England now and Stockholm is the capital of rape. Soil and blood are the most important matters.
83d5a2 No.16592437
>>16592393
>and national
*and productive nationals
People aren't equal nor exchangeable and the most precious thing of a nation is its people. The people who once made America a great nation are now fading into oblivion and without them there can be no America. The people who are replacing them do not share heritage, culture, values nor even religion with the anglos who founded the nation. This is why America is self-destructing this very moment.
Star Trek is all about this progression and tries to make it look good.
a79b95 No.16592547
Star trek the original series with kirk was a very redpilled right wing show. You had episodes with set pieces that looked like something from the wild west, that episode with the hippies who constantly said ,,herbert,, who are an incarnation of todays sjws, and literally the last episode there was a woman who wanted to be a man and switched bodies with kirk, an allusion to feminists, btw kirk ends up slapping the delusional wench. What im saying is the liberals saw the potential of the series, took over and started pozzing it up to today.
03de92 No.16592617
>>16591909
TNG is enjoyable for some exemplary character moments, but DSP is the true patrician's Trek series.
e986a2 No.16592624
>>16583705
quark_laugh.webm
2e6097 No.16592633
Nah, Star Trek is shit sci-fi that stole all of its ideas from the science fiction of the 50s and 60s. Television shows and films are for micro-brained retards.
cb872c No.16592787
>>16592196
All of this butthurt
I still don't understand how some people feel this much anger over Star Trek, specially when they haven't seen it. Because then you'd knew that faggot uniform was only seen in the first episode and was never used again
d84e8d No.16593325
>>16592190
> I wouldn't be surprised if there was explicit sex scenes and they were all forced pegging.
Worse: there was a rape scene. The female klingorc raped a guy and the writers never really acknowledged it later since it's one of their strong female characters.
e5f779 No.16593356
>>16593325
>interspecies female on male human rape
This is my fetish.
79bad8 No.16593403
>>16593356
Sadly mine as well, but fuck these STD "klingons" are ugly.
8b9141 No.16593497
>>16583710
DS9 is trash. I can never undestand people who worship it..
It was badly written, static, led by an terrible actor and the only good thing in it were space battles
4cf9ae No.16593653
>>16583754
>bajoran holohoax
muh cardassian mining stations
79bad8 No.16593657
>>16593653
MUH EVIL SPOONHEADS
4cf9ae No.16593676
>>16593657
please mister federation, we need your latinum for rebuilding
cb872c No.16593705
WHAT DO YOU MEAN THE CARDASSIANS DIDN'T COMMIT ANY WAR CRIMES? WE DEMAND ASYLUM NOW!!! NOW!!! NOW!!! NOW!!! YOU STUPID FEDERATION!!! THIS IS LIKE ANOTHER CARDASSIAN OCCUPATION
89b5e8 No.16593715
The only one I've played is a bit of Armada II. I couldn't say really if it was great but I remember it had a few interesting mechanics for an RTS, like ships having crew, and the ability to move on the Z axis too.
>>16593325
This looks like a job for Goblin Slayer.
36756a No.16593876
>>16586412
The biggest problem I had with season 4 was that G'kar and Londo basically ceased to exist despite their conflicts being the best part of the show. It also felt rushed, which makes sense since season 5 was cancelled (at the time) so they had to cram as much stuff in as possible.
>>16591913
>Watch Babylon 5, Lexx and Farscape
Excellent taste. I highly recommend all these shows. Farscape was consistently great from start to finish, the practical effects were fantastic for a TV show thanks to Jim Henson Company. Unfortunately the Peacekeeper Wars was pretty crap, I like to think the final episode of season 4 is the canon BAD END.
>>16592291
>JUST WATCH THE SHOW
Nigger I fucking love season 2 and 3 of Babylon 5, it is my all time favorite bit of television, but I cannot stress just how absolutely fucking garbage season 1 is. If they sit down and watch like you say then they will most likely fucking hate the show, drop it and completely miss out on the fantastic 2 and 3. They will think everyone who recommended Babylon 5 was just trolling the living shit out of them. I challenge anyone to watch Season 1 episode 14 "TKO" and episode 15 "Grail" and try your hardest to make it to the end. They are pure unmitigated shit, not even the fun "so bad it's good" just fucking retarded and awful. The guide I posted is excellent and completely cuts out all the crap from Season 1.
d84e8d No.16593905
>>16593705
>WAR CRIMES
How could there be war crimes when there hasn't been a war?
cb872c No.16593911
>>16593905
Reported for anti-bajoranism
00d49a No.16593967
I liked how they had to turn Dukat into a moustache-twirling villain because people started to like Cardassians and started to hate the whiny Bajorans. Dumb decision that could've been handled a lot better without making the show poorer for it. Also Dukat never was a good guy and was never really all that ambiguous about not being a good guy. Just had a charismatic on screen presence. People are just easily manipulated like that.
e48053 No.16593969
>>16593905
>>16593911
Both of you need to be quiet, I'm trying to do business.
566513 No.16594006
>>16583581
Armada was an incomplete mess.
Armada 2 was better in every way.
566513 No.16594009
>>16593905
This.
Gul Dukat did nothing wrong.
566513 No.16594015
>>16583629
Absolutely skip it.
Nothing of value will be lost.
566513 No.16594017
>>16583719
>The good stuff was stolen from Babylon 5
This was debunked YEARS AGO.
I love B5, but JMS is a lying faggot.
6f8890 No.16594186
>>16583445
The Stellaris mod New Horizons is pretty good. I don't even play the vanilla game anymore, but New Horizons is a very faithful adaptation.
It's the absolute best Star Trek game I've played since the old Starfleet Command games from the early 00's.
They have included every nearly single race from the older series
they have faction specific ship models for all of the main races
lore accurate starting positions
included the mirror universe as an alternative option for play
Story events that are inspired by (or directly ripped) from the TV shows
And finally, it's specifically designed to not require any DLC.
It's a great mod, highly underrated really. Could be it's own standalone game at this point (and probably should be given how fucking retarded Paradox has become)
6f8890 No.16594208
>>16591909
It's a curious thing.
DS9 is a conservative/reactionary view of the ST universe (despite having the le' nigger captain).
TNG is a liberal/utopian view of the ST universe.
And yet I see liberals defend DS9 and conservatives defend TNG far more than the opposite.
I'm not implying you're specifically of one political opinion or another, just a general observation I've realized over the years.
00d49a No.16594340
>>16594186
Does it even work? How does it solve the problem of the AI being braindead? In vanilla stellaris I solved the problem by myself with gracious cheat events for the AI. Yeah I know but wow, it makes a huge difference in how interesting the session will be if the AI literally can't bankrupt itself.
5f290e No.16594400
>>16592141
you must have confused me with that ass pie, I was merely pointing out why calling it radical feminism is retarded.
d84e8d No.16594469
>>16594208
Maybe by today's standards DS9 is seen as a conservative take. DS9 was a deconstruction of Trek. I don't think it was the original intent. I see it as the consequence of the main focus of the show: the characters.
f813c3 No.16594524
>>16583445
Sacrifice of Angels 2 mod for Sins of a Solar Empire
top notch shit
6f8890 No.16594628
>>16594340
Well I'm pretty sure they have worked on the AI to handle the mod, they do recommend "aggressive" AI to handle their changes.
The project is a massive overhaul. It's more than just some skins. Check it out.
c99b7c No.16594733
>>16594469
> I see it as the consequence of the main focus of the show: the characters.
It's more that DS9 is so shitty the only good thing about it was the side charters.
c0eedb No.16594805
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16583445
>best games based on Star Trek
Star Trek Bridge Crew was pretty good but the game is currently running on a skeleton playerbase after the whole Stage 9 drama. Outside of that though your best bet is Eve Online.
d84e8d No.16594919
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16594805
>Stage 9
They're working on The Orville now. They even got a shout out from MacFarlane.
0fa1e0 No.16594932
>>16594805
>Star Trek Bridge Crew
always small playerbase, even worse with the dlc splitting lobbies. at least it has crossplay, but it doesn't take long till you've seen all the content. there's also bridge commander.
>>16594919
this. must sting cbs even more now considering std is directly competing with the orville. serves those fucks right.
83d5a2 No.16595126
>>16594017
No it wasn't. Prove it. But even if you do, and not with the word of some sneaky jew, then DS9 is still an inferior version of B5. The very same elements are present in both shows, only much better done in B5.
17bc90 No.16595214
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16593497
>badly written
DS9 gets fucking great after the first three seasons, peaking in 5 and 6. Ending was dogshit, but it has some of the best episodes.
>static
The whole show is about the changing politics.
>led by an terrible actor
Like that changes anything. Everyone still like TOS and that casted Shatner. DS9 is sold on Alaimo and Robinson's superb performances, which are the best in the franchise and some of the best TV characters in general.
67906c No.16595407
How are the fan made ST series?
b3225c No.16596237
>>16594186
Sorry to bother you anon but your post made the mod sound very interesting so i pirated stellaris and the mods but i'm having a bit o trouble getting it to work
The mods show up in the launcher and when i launch with them selected there's no difference to the game, it's just vanilla stellaris.
I don't suppose you can offer me any guidance?
291672 No.16596316
Removing Bajorans in an Excelsior was my best Trek experience. The Federation was comically represented in STO, the shit you could get away with was pretty fun. Too bad it sucks now.
6f8890 No.16597262
>>16596237
Strange, I haven't had that issue, but then I just use the Workshop.
It should be putting them in the mod folder.
Also have you made sure you've actually selected the mods you want in the launcher before starting the game?
When selected, they have a very faint green glow around the corners, it's not obvious, so you may just not have them selected.
9bfc73 No.16597338
>>16594805
>>16594919
>not just continuing work on the project
>not just releasing it anyway
Pathetic fucking cowards. What do they think is going to happen? They’re anonymous retards on the Internet. CBS can’t fucking FIND them.
e38797 No.16597344
79bad8 No.16597349
>>16597344
Is pretty fucking shit.
2fd155 No.16597479
>>16597338
>CBS can’t fucking FIND them.
they already did, how do you think they got the c&d letter?
plus, as the video states they thought they were in the clear since the head honcho literally said they want fan shit since it's basically free marketing and up until bridge crew there wasn't even a product that it remotely competed with.
>>16597344
>>16597349
the small as fuck planets always triggered me, looked like I was flying around a blue asteroid. pic related is planets done right.
da74f8 No.16598034
>>16597262
The version of the game I pirates is 2.3.something and the mods were last updated on 2.1.something, when I launch with them selected the game even gives me a warning about outdated mods and how they might be unstable.
I’ve placed them in the paradox/stellar is/mod folder with the .mod file pointing to the zip so I think I got it right
829a7d No.16598287
>>16595451
Charls should've watched more than one episode.
>>16597338
>CBS can’t fucking FIND them
They got a cease & desist letter from CBS.
9bfc73 No.16599105
>>16598287
>>16597479
>letter
Like, physically? Or email? That's why you don't fucking organize a "company" for this shit.
2fd155 No.16599284
>>16599105
>Like, physically?
physical probably, if not in person to avoid "lol didn't read"
>That's why you don't fucking organize a "company" for this shit.
implying you need a company for it. they can check the hosted site via registry. depending on the country they're in they have to put their names on there directly and they sound like bongs so they probably got no privacy anyway.
83d5a2 No.16602009
>>16598223
Y'know, that chart really made me think. Star Wars license games were so far superior it isn't even funny. Star Wars got Dark Forces, Star Trek got Elite Force. Star Wars got Galactic Battlegrounds and Empire at War, Star Trek got Star Trek Armada and Starfleet Command. Star Wars got Galaxies, Star Trek got STO.
It could just be that Lucasarts were god-tier, but it might also be that the IP just doesn't lend itself to great games.
b440d3 No.16603032
>>16602009
Star Trek has some solid hits to it, Bridge Commander was basically a Starship simulator, and Elite Force while not being groundbreaking gameplay wise had some great moments where you can explore Voyager, especially in the expansion. Those two games were developed by Totally Games and Raven Software, who also developed X-Wing/TIE Fighter and the JKO, Jedi Academy respectively.
I think why Star Wars games tend to be remembered more fondly than Trek, is that they were mostly multiplatform where most of Trek's hits vidya wise are PC only. It's also partly nostalgia goggles, as while people gush over hits like Battlefront 2 or KOTOR, they forget that there were a lot of mediocre/bad games under Lucasart's belt. Galactic Battlegrounds was AoE 2 reskin, and while SW did have Galaxies, it went to shit rather quickly and got replaced by TOR.
a0d2a0 No.16615952
>>16602009
The OC of these edits deserves a medal.
83d5a2 No.16616454
>>16603032
>Galactic Battlegrounds was AoE 2 reskin
>implying this was a bad thing
631fbe No.16616508
>>16593703
The only good thing about DS9 is Dukat.
Kira is insufferable cunt.
Odo is a transfags wet dream
Sisko is overacting gorilla with the brain power of a fly and plot shields the size of the galaxy
>>16595214
TOS was campy as hell. Everyone was overacting (but none like shatner), the costumes and coreography was riot.
In DS9 however, Sisko stands out like a sore thumb, because others are doing at least a decent job.