>>16316982
There's probably a few dozen posts a day, maybe more. I only pop into the MTG threads every few days.
>>16316994
>Just admit the game is dead
I have about $3,000 US worth of cards, I don't want it to go belly up. Granted, I didn't spend nearly that much on it. Maybe over the last 15 years, I put about $1,900, maybe more into it, and most of the value I have is from buyfags and whales making old cards spike hard, thankfully. I can comfortably cash out have some spending money if need be.
That sad, it's very sad to see them take a 10-year old card type, and only now try to innovate on how it works. At least they're out of the 118 ability template for walkers.