/v/ - Video Games

>>14350717

>I'm big on open world sandbox style MMOs like UO and Eve

Take it from someone who knows anon, you are wasting your life. Play games that are fun or something, god damn

>>14350735

Lol what? I don't play for hours a day or anything. It's something I log in, do my own thing, then log out. Occasionally I come up with a special project and binge for a bit, but I don't have the time or energy for playing "hardcore". I was always a soloist who played when I felt like it, not out of some obligation.

So yeah. UO and Eve were fun. I could do my own thing.

Isn't that the game that was supposed to be free to play but has been staying in a "Paid Beta" sort of state for almost two years now?

>>14350717

Albion requires a decent sized party to be able to do stuff. The single player content is literally close to nonexistant in higher tiers. You CANNOT play by yourself endgame The weapons in the game are also very niche. If you want to do X you can ONLY do X. (Weapons with a stun, or form of CC will hit trash damage, for example)

The game is fun, but theres a few things that I would change if i could

If the pay model is the as it was at launch, it's awful. It offers less content than your average free to play while demanding a $30 base purchase, a $15 subscription to play, and a $10 premium subscription to have any action you preform yield reasonable rewards.

Fun for what it is, not worth $25 a month. Oh and I also forgot, it's pay to win and allows you to buy all the currency you could ever desire. $30, $25 monthly subscription, that's also pay to win.

I honestly don't think there is a more kiked game than Albion online. Feel free to prove me wrong.

>>14350717

Albion is alright up to a point, then its just the same shit over and over. And if guild vs guild stuff doesn't interest you, it has absolutely 0 merit.

>>14350717

Isn't this that one mmo for android and pc that is severely limited due to that fact? Looks like shit, has nothing but tiny rat-trail sections of the world?

>>14350735

this. play a fighter or something. at least you're increasing your skill and talent at something. not wasting your time playing a life simulator and getting into shitty politics with a bunch of brain addled shut ins

>>14350717

>UO and Eve

Those both had/have massive populations in their prime. MMO's live and die on population, it's in their very mechanics; and if you have to ask then the answer isn't good.

albion seems good until you actually play it for 2 days and quit in horror after you figure out theres absolutely nothing fun waiting for you

here is the pvp

does this look fun?

i think it looks like shit