Star Trek novels

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Flag
Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki	Show oekaki applet (replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

File (hide): 58e4c6527551e4f⋯.jpg (308.18 KB, 1200x900, 4:3, 4.jpg) (h) (u)

▶Star Trek novels Anonymous 01/02/18 (Tue) 18:25:44 70baa7 (2) No.15288 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

I recently saw a big pile of Star Trek novels looking depressed and alone in the corner of a charity shop, probably the former belongings of some Boomer nerd who's dead now, and it got me wondering, are any of these things actually worth reading?

▶Anonymous 01/02/18 (Tue) 18:39:39 4f2978 (1) No.15290>>15291

Unless it's the tech manuals, no. Supposedly they are mostly trash.

▶Anonymous 01/02/18 (Tue) 18:44:12 70baa7 (2) No.15291>>15347

>>15290

Yeah, that's what I expected. Even Doctor Who novels have a dedicated following, but no one mentions these things ever,

▶Anonymous 01/02/18 (Tue) 21:24:23 40a078 (1) No.15301

File (hide): efda7055c7d9424⋯.jpg (63.96 KB, 600x375, 8:5, efda7055c7d9424cc6f132c47d….jpg) (h) (u)

If they aren't too expensive, the Marshak and Culbrath ones are hilariously horrible. Shatner's bio is also worth a read.

People say the Alan Dean Foster stuff is good, but I didn't care for it.

Weirdly, I've found most of the people who were really into Star Trek books were women, but that's just anecdotal data.

▶Anonymous 01/03/18 (Wed) 02:59:46 528700 (1) No.15330

I used to read trek novels when I was like 14, but it was TNG era mostly.

I enjoyed them for the most part, for what it's worth.

▶Anonymous 01/03/18 (Wed) 05:48:00 12083d (2) No.15339>>15341

Funfact: A Stich In Time is the only Star Trek novel not written with a ghost writer.

▶Anonymous 01/03/18 (Wed) 05:58:59 12083d (2) No.15341

>>15339

Oops, I meant novel eritten by an actor.

▶Anonymous 01/03/18 (Wed) 11:40:00 793d36 (1) No.15347>>15846 >>15854

>>15291

Partly it’s because there’s no point. All ST novels and comic books are not canon, so I think it makes it hard to invest in a book when there isn’t even a guarantee what was mentioned in it will matter in the next one you read.

▶Anonymous 01/08/18 (Mon) 16:39:53 83da62 (1) No.15846

>>15347

As opposed to SW back when Lucas was in charge where everything was considered canon when you wish half of it wasn't.

▶Anonymous 01/08/18 (Mon) 17:42:15 89a557 (1) No.15854

>>15347

I don't think it matters if the material is good. The Red Dwarf novels aren't canon, but they're better than the show in a lot of ways.

/strek/ - Star Trek ★

General

WebM

Theme

User JS

Do not paste code here unless you absolutely trust the source or have read it yourself!

Favorites

Customize Formatting

Filters