>>14593
>And at Tlon they are risking it all because CY couldn't bring himself to design a more conventional VM and programming language or to make the implementation easier for an outsider to comprehend and work on.
There's no low-risk way to attempt a coup of Big Tech, so it looks like you're arguing that the particular risks he chose to take are misguided.
I think that while Yarvin does love the obscure for its own sake, he is using it instrumentally in the case of Urbit. Many verysmart HackerNews commenters argue that Urbit is like a cult but fail to specify why a cult is a bad thing. Having a uniquely dedicated group of early adopters seems like a potential strength. (And the tech does work. The cultists aren't drinking snake oil.) The tradeoff is that any casually interested programmers won't be able to contribute the odd bug fix or suggestion. I think 80/20 suggests that this isn't a huge detriment.
>a more conventional VM
My impression so far is that the unconventional aspects of Arvo are improvements rather than mere changes compared to current operating systems. If the Urbit network is actually going to replace the current paradigm, might as well break multiple things at once within a single period of chaos.