/ratanon/ -The Church Of Satan

Name
Email
Subject	REC STOP
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive	Archive [500 char limit]
* = required field	[▶Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki	Show oekaki applet (replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf Max filesize is16 MB. Max image dimensions are15000 x15000. You may upload5 per post.

File: 0556c524a0f0893⋯.jpg (37.92 KB,445x459,445:459,HS.jpg)

The Church Of Satan Anonymous 09/21/17 (Thu) 19:02:44 No.10638

I became an atheist at 14, and I've been searching for a new moral community ever since. Every single atheist community eventually gets subverted by SJWs, unless it explicitly defines itself as not being left wing. I was a New Atheist, then Atheism+ happened. I joined secular humanist associations, but they are just anti-conservative circle jerks.

What I am about to tell you is uncommon knowledge, because the Church forbids proselytizing. I am not a member of the Church, but I think I am going to join after graduating from university.

The Church of Satan is basically an atheist organization that embraces sexual liberation, but rejects most of egalitarianism and other forms of cuckoldry. It was founded in 1966, before any of the SJW bullshit got started. It judges members based on their merits, not by their race, color, or sexual orientation. It was the first Church in the world to allow LGBT members to join and become clergy. Mark my words, "effective altruism" is going to go the way of New Atheism. It will turn into cucked, SJW bullshit in less than 5 years.

The reason I am telling you is because it's not normal to spend this much time thinking about politics outside of election years. Humans need a moral community instead of constantly reasoning their way through every little new moral dilemma. Thinking is expensive, but the Church encourages independent, free thought. I think Scott Alexander would fit in well with the Church of Satan. The Church is needed now more than ever as Christendom falls apart.

Since I have decided to join, I have felt an inner peace. I feel like I have found a religious community that would understand me. They may or may not accept me, but knowing that there is a moral community in which I would not be banned for being a "racist" or a "sodomite" feels nice. I hope that you also learn to feel the same feeling, and find some inner peace from it. I am done with effective altruism, Lesswrong, transhumanism, and every other desperate attempt at atheists escaping Christian slave morality. I have found my religious center. Goodbye.

To give you an idea of what the Church is like:

http://www.churchofsatan.com/nine-satanic-sins.php

____________________________

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/21/17 (Thu) 20:42:58 No.10639

File: e8ffd830b66d750⋯.jpg (120.2 KB,446x631,446:631,35896jbng.jpg)

>>10638

Probably a bundle of cucks as well, initiate yourself into the O9A instead.

Likely to be a CIA op but you get to actually kill normies and otherwise cultivate your sinister nature. "Insight Roles" are kewl.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/22/17 (Fri) 04:13:10 No.10642

File: 190685c806870d0⋯.jpg (204.84 KB,1920x1080,16:9,kickstarter.jpg)

>>10639

O9A are the most hardcore organization in existence. I can't even conceive of something more hardcore than executing the members of less hardcore cults. The fact that there are people calling themselves satanists when O9A exist is ridiculous.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/22/17 (Fri) 11:51:47 No.10645

>>10642

It's no more hardcore than an Islamic extremist organization and a lot less "organized".

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/22/17 (Fri) 14:10:02 No.10647

>>10639

>>10642

>ONA members practice magick, believing that they are able to do so through channeling energies into our own "causal" realm from an "acausal" realm where the laws of physics do not apply, with such magical actions designed to aid in the ultimate establishment of the Imperium.

Sounds to me like a bunch of confused larpers.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/22/17 (Fri) 16:20:35 No.10650

>>10638

>Church of Satan

Last time I came across those people was back in high school. I remember them being total losers.

The guy was a left extremist "male feminist" (the term SJW wasn't coined yet). He ended up marrying an old fat dyke and join our country's communist party (or at least they used to be communists, now they seem to have merged the worst parts of communism with the worst parts of identity politics).

The girl was a mentally ill hambeast with even more extreme left-wing views. The only notable thing about her was her constant "suicide attempts". I have no idea what happened to her. Maybe she finally succeeded.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/23/17 (Sat) 12:16:51 No.10661

>>10647

All religion is confused larping, it's still better to be hardcore than a fucking casual.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/23/17 (Sat) 17:42:57 No.10667

Are we on belief or on belief in belief here ?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/24/17 (Sun) 19:53:13 No.10673

"Sexual liberation" was a grave disaster for the world; society was much better when contraception, sex outside of wedlock, and divorce were all seen as immoral and disgraceful. Embracing it is a strongly negative sign.

Also, lol? Use the outside view a bit bro. "Let's literally actually join the Church of Satan, that's much better and more moral than Christianity"? Come on.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/24/17 (Sun) 20:35:25 No.10681

>>10673

I agree that sexual liberation is retarded. Civilizations erode if freedom of picking heterosexual partners exist.

Can we have a more stable system without forcing sons, especially us smart ones, to obey their parents? Women may or may not be independent beings. I prefer that they do but don't really care if they don't. However men certainly are. Any attempt to subjugate a man is cruel.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/24/17 (Sun) 21:21:40 No.10682

Sexual liberation could be for the best long term, the alternatives were not sustainable and they're the reason we ended up as degenerates unfit for liberated sexuality in the first place.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/24/17 (Sun) 21:27:54 No.10683

>>10682

I doubt it. I think we can have both women's rights and anti-adultery laws at the same time. It's economically unfeasible to impose a new patriarchy anyway.

However we do need to control seduction. Sexual freedom destroys civilizations genetically by preferring sexy people over productive people.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/24/17 (Sun) 21:39:05 No.10686

>>10683

> Sexual freedom destroys civilizations genetically by preferring sexy people over productive people

Only as far as we have blood paid by our ancestors left to waste. Eventually shit gets real and selection for interesting traits comes back by necessity.

There must be a way to ensure organisms find the more productive to be sexier. It happens this way in most animals, peacocks and such are the exception.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/24/17 (Sun) 21:56:21 No.10688

>>10686

This is an interesting approach. We can call it "take back our girls". How shall we implement it though?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/26/17 (Tue) 01:35:33 No.10702

File: 817e7bceda20af1⋯.png (536.29 KB,800x444,200:111,1415938633676.png)

>>10638

Atheistic Satanism is weak shit, and the fact that "the" "church of satan" is just a mix of warmed-over objectivism and generic secular humanism that seized the iconography is the most depressing thing about this timeline.

How can you possibly support the affront to all things metal that this pussified excuse for a satanic cult represents while calling leftists "cucks"?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/26/17 (Tue) 06:38:42 No.10710

>>10702

Objectivism seems pretty satanic, but why are them humanist? Is that by design or they have an entryist takeover?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/26/17 (Tue) 19:07:43 No.10722

>>10702

They're Epicureans, not humanists, you faggot cuck.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 09/27/17 (Wed) 15:36:59 No.10732

>>10710

>>10722

"generic secular humanism" is what I'm calling the sprinklings of boring conventional morality added to the objectivism, which I maybe shouldn't because it's still not generic enough for what I actually mean.

Shit like "don't rape people" should follow from principles, not specific injunctions, and the place those injunctions come from without principles is the surrounding conventional morality.

Also, the Eleven Rules of the Earth are cringey as fuck, I mean come on, "mating signal"?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.