/random/ - random

The only thing that interests me concerning this topic is I want to utilize the technology and techniques behind this on myself to enhance my mind. Yet I can not find anything actually useful in terms of technological mind control. Psychology, especially as taught by William James, is useful to me. I don't really know of any tech that can actually work other than inserting a subliminal every 25th frame of a video you're watching.

>>31614

Good luck, professor, but don't you think that you are a little late, like 80 years late with this?

>>31618

Mind control was not about enhancement, only control, manipulation. What you may be looking for is Jose Silva's methods, you need to make yourself aware, confidence is a key, believe in your abilities and develop them. You may only use a tiny part of your consciousness for every day tasks, that can be represented by a golf ball, in contrast, every intelligent human being has a whole ocean of consciousness ready to be used.

You limit yourself.

>>31624

>Mind control was not about enhancement, only control, manipulation.

Arbitrary distinction. If I can better control and manipulate my mind than I can accomplish great things.

>What you may be looking for is Jose Silva's methods, you need to make yourself aware, confidence is a key, believe in your abilities and develop them. You may only use a tiny part of your consciousness for every day tasks, that can be represented by a golf ball, in contrast, every intelligent human being has a whole ocean of consciousness ready to be used.

>You limit yourself.

Supposedly, according to every schizo I've run into on the streets and in the psych ward, there exist technological means to control the mind. Supposedly they are being controlled or influenced by technology. If that is so I'd like to start using technology to exert control over my own mind including anything from inducing certain emotions involuntarily, to forcing thoughts to be played or projected in my mind, or any other changes/influences that could be made.

Personally I do not believe in technologically enabled mind control. I think the idea that technology can alter moods or in any way control a person's mind is bullshit.

then*

>>31643

I was not saying anything about technology, it is all about focus, dedication and effort.

>>31650

According to MK Ultra LARPers there are technological means to control peoples thoughts.

>>31653

Yes, but that will not give you superpowers like radioactive spiders

>>31643

The mind can be altered with subtle changes in it's electrical activity. What's hard to believe?

US gov in the 60s during the Cold War:

-"the USSR claims they have mind control drugs. let's do experiments to see if mind control is real and if they're telling the truth"

-"ok, good idea, it pays to be cautious"

US gov in the 1970s:

-"nothing we've tested works. turns out the USSR were lying. let's stop wasting money on this."

-"oh well, too bad. let's keep this info under wraps until the Cold War is over, then we'll make knowledge of this research program public"

Conspiratards in the present day:

-OmG tHe uS GoVeRnMeNt wErE sTuDyInG mInD CoNTrOl dRugS, thEy mUst bE uSinG iT tO cOntRol peOpleS minDs!!!

>>31716

I'm aware of that and here's an article about why it isn't interesting: https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4373

Or, summarized in the last paragraph:

>The lesson learned from a skeptical study of MKULTRA is that this was experimental research done within the context of what we knew in the 1950s and 1960s. We have 50 years of knowledge built up since then, and we now know that just about everything they tried wouldn't have worked. The human brain is just a little too complex for the type of precise control the CIA had hoped for. The best type of mind control, as Cardinal Mindszenty discovered, is the good old rubber truncheon.

https://webmcollection.blogspot.com/2020/12/porn-webm-collection-48-submissive.html