[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/qresearch/ -  Q Research

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


Welcome Page | Archive | qnotables archive | Q's Board: /projectdcomms/ | Legacy Boards: /CBTS /TheStorm | TOR link
Practice Bake HERE: /comms | /qrn |

File: 79844a5ed2ade13⋯.jpg (180.82 KB,1200x600,2:1,OZ_Q_PAIN.jpg)

afc5f0 No.19487470 [Last50 Posts]

Welcome To Q Research AUSTRALIA

A new thread for research and discussion of Australia's role in The Great Awakening.

Previous thread

>>19188850 Q Research AUSTRALIA #31

Q's Posts made on Q Research AUSTRALIA threads

Wednesday 11.20.2019

>>7358352 ————————————–——– These people are stupid.

>>7358338 ————————————–——– All assets [F + D] being deployed.

>>7358318 ————————————–——– What happens when the PUBLIC discovers the TRUTH [magnitude] re: [D] party corruption?

Tuesday 11.19.2019

>>7357790 ————————————–——– FISA goes both ways.

Saturday 11.16.2019

>>7356270 ————————————–——– There is no escaping God.

>>7356265 ————————————–——– The Harvest [crop] has been prepared and soon will be delivered to the public for consumption.

Friday 11.15.2019

>>7356017 ————————————–——– "Whistle Blower Traps" [Mar 4 2018] 'Trap' keyword select provided.....

Thursday 03.28.2019

>>5945210 ————————————–——– Sometimes our 'sniffer' picks and pulls w/o applying credit file

>>5945074 ————————————–——– We LOVE you!

>>5944970 ————————————–——– USA v. LifeLog?

>>5944908 ————————————–——– It is an embarrassment to our Nation!

>>5944859 ————————————–——– 'Knowingly'

Q's Posts referencing Australia

https://qanon.pub/?q=AUS

https://qanon.pub/?q=australia

https://qanon.pub/?q=koala

https://qanon.pub/?q=HouseOfCards

https://qanon.pub/?q=boomerang

https://qanon.pub/?q=45HarisonHarold

https://qanon.pub/?q=6572656

https://qanon.pub/?q=RAT%20BAIT

https://qanon.pub/?q=VERY%20important

https://qanon.pub/?q=remain%20in%20the%20light

https://qanon.pub/?q=news.com.au

Q's Posts referencing Australian citizens

Malcolm Turnbull (X/AUS)

Former Prime Minister of Australia, 2015 to 2018

https://qanon.pub/?q=X%2FAUS

https://qanon.pub/?q=call%20details

https://qanon.pub/?q=Threat%20to%20AUS

Alexander Downer

Former Australian Liberal Party politician and former Australian High Commissioner to the United Kingdom

https://qanon.pub/?q=Downer

Cardinal George Pell

Australian Cardinal of the Catholic Church and former Prefect of the Vatican Secretariat for the Economy

https://qanon.pub/?q=Pell

https://qanon.pub/?q=cardinal-george-pell

https://qanon.pub/?q=pecking

Julian Assange

Australian activist, founder, editor and publisher of WikiLeaks

https://qanon.pub/?q=assange

https://qanon.pub/?q=JA

https://qanon.pub/?q=Under%20protection

https://qanon.pub/?q=WL

https://qanon.pub/?q=wikileaks

https://qanon.pub/?q=crowdstrike

https://qanon.pub/?q=server

https://qanon.pub/?q=Seth

https://qanon.pub/?q=SR

https://qalerts.app/?q=snowden

https://qalerts.app/?q=roadmap

Virginia Roberts Giuffre

American-Australian survivor of the sex trafficking ring operated by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

https://qanon.pub/#4568

https://qanon.pub/#4728

https://qanon.pub/#1054

https://qanon.pub/?q=chandler

https://qanon.pub/?q=epstein

https://qanon.pub/?q=island

https://qanon.pub/#1001

https://qanon.pub/#1861

https://qanon.pub/#3145

https://qanon.pub/#3147

https://qanon.pub/#4578

https://qanon.pub/#3432

https://qanon.pub/#3497

https://qanon.pub/#4727

https://qanon.pub/#4797

https://qanon.pub/?q=wexner

https://qanon.pub/#4576

https://qanon.pub/#4577

https://qanon.pub/?q=maxwell

https://qanon.pub/#4569

https://qanon.pub/?q=spacey

https://qanon.pub/#4570

https://qanon.pub/?q=normalize

https://qanon.pub/?q=Prince%20Andrew

https://qanon.pub/#4579

https://qanon.pub/#4907

https://qanon.pub/#4911

https://qanon.pub/#4921

https://qanon.pub/?q=Welcome%20aboard.

https://qanon.pub/?q=dershowitz

https://qanon.pub/?q=Dearest%20Virginia

Q's Posts referencing The Five Eyes intelligence alliance (FVEY)

An anglophone intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States

https://qanon.pub/?q=FVEY

https://qanon.pub/?q=Five%20Eyes

https://qanon.pub/?q=Interesting%2C

https://qanon.pub/?q=RAT%20BAIT

"Does AUS stand w/ the US or only select divisions within the US?"

Q

Nov 25 2018

https://qanon.pub/#2501

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487472

Notables

are not endorsements

#31 - Part 1

Australian Politics and Society - Part 1

>>19190812 Peak obstetricians’ body warns women at risk after abortion pill access expanded - Anthony Albanese’s expansion of abortion pill access puts women at risk of complications, or even death, an obstetrician body says, raising alarm over the government not properly considering the unintended consequences of the policy.

>>19199832 Doctors’ plea for answers on transgender treatment in Australia - The specialist youth and adolescent arm of the nation’s peak psychiatry college is pushing for national guidelines on the care of young people with gender distress and gender dysphoria as doctors around the country say they feel muzzled and fearful of expressing professional views on gender medicine.

>>19199925 Video: Daniel Andrews reveals Victoria’s 2026 Commonwealth Games will not go ahead - Australia’s Commonwealth Games chief has slammed Victoria’s decision to pull out of the event, questioning the sums used to justify the call. Premier Daniel Andrews on Tuesday morning confirmed the event would not go ahead in Victoria in 2026 and blamed a higher-than-forecast cost for the sudden cancellation.

>>19204858 Video: Yumi Stynes and Dr Melissa Kang’s sex book for kids sold at Big W sparks debate - Disgruntled parents have raised concerns about a “graphic” sex book targeted at children as young as eight being sold at Big W. Dr Melissa Kang and Yumi Stynes’ book, Welcome to Sex: Your no-silly-questions guide to sexuality, pleasure and figuring it out, released in May, is billed as a “frank, age-appropriate introductory guide to sex and sexuality for teens of all genders”. “Why is Big W selling this GRAPHIC SEX GUIDE FOR KIDS in Aus which includes how-tos for anal/oral sex, masturbation & heavily pushes gender ideology?” Rachael Wong, chief executive of Women’s Forum Australia, wrote on Twitter, sharing the video.

>>19205022 USS Canberra strengthens ties with US, littorally - They’re derided by many as ­“Little Crappy Ships”, but a senior US Navy officer says the Littoral Combat Ship USS Canberra will play an important role in the ­contested Indo-Pacific. The US Navy vessel cruised into Sydney Harbour on Tuesday ahead of its official commissioning on Saturday. The vessel, designed by Australian-owned Austal USA, will be the second US ship to be named in honour of the original HMAS Canberra, sunk by the Japanese in 1942.

>>19205027 Video: USS Canberra arrives in Sydney to be commissioned for the US Navy - Today saw a historic moment in Australia's military alliance with the US, as an American warship arrived in Sydney to be commissioned into the US Navy. The USS Canberra will be named in honour of a piece of our own military history. - 7NEWS Australia

>>19205037 USS Canberra arrives in Sydney to be commissioned - USS Canberra has arrived in Sydney ahead of the first ever commissioning of a US navy ship in an allied country, making it a historic moment for Australia’s military alliance. - Sky News Australia

>>19205053 USS Canberra arrives in Sydney - Australia welcomed the USS Canberra to Sydney Harbour, with HMAS Canberra guiding the Independence-variant littoral combat ship to berth alongside Fleet Base East ahead of the formal commissioning on 22 July. - Defence Australia

>>19211309 ADF captain's choice to wear female army uniform overhauls gender diverse policy - When Captain Jesse Noble realised they were gender diverse, it "was kind of like getting hit in the face with a truck". "I really associate with both genders," Captain Noble said. Captain Noble told their boss the female dress standards provided a greater range of gender expression in terms of who they were as a person. Captain Noble's boss gave immediate interim approval to wear the female uniform, and the request was then escalated up the chain of command. In April, the forces command issued a new directive stipulating that gender-fluid, non-binary and intersex people could choose the uniform, grooming, physical standards and accommodation that best aligned with their gender identity.

>>19211365 Welcome to Sex guide for kids rockets to No. 1 after Big W removes it from the shelves - A sex education guide for children has shot to No. 1 on the Amazon online sales charts after being pulled from the shelves at Big W and Target. Welcome to Sex by the former “Dolly Doctor” Melissa Kang and ABC presenter Yumi Stynes contains frank descriptions of sex, alongside cartoon drawings. It has been the subject of a boycott movement by some parents who say the sex tips it offers are far too graphic for children.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487478

#31 - Part 2

Australian Politics and Society - Part 2

>>19211387 'No, your kids shouldn't send nudes even with their faces removed. Here's why' - A cyber safety expert has condemned a controversial book written for children as young as eight, describing it as “dangerous” and “complete misinformation”. The book, Welcome to Sex: Your no-silly-questions guide to sexuality, pleasure and figuring it out by Yumi Stynes and Dr Melissa Kang, has sparked debate around sex education for children, with many parents furious. One section of the book discusses sending nude pictures and sexting, which Dr Kang likens to love letters that were once sent before phones, ignoring the innocence of those letters, which were generally written by adults, compared to the explicit pictures and videos that can be sent today and shared to the world instantly. Cyber safety expert with 27 years in law enforcement, Susan McLean, said she was concerned about the peddling of misinformation on such an important topic. “These people haven’t a clue about the reality of the digital world,” she stresses. “They are encouraging behaviour which is likely to cause a young person to be arrested and charged and that is not ok.”

>>19220977 Victorian MP sent ‘hit list’ letter threatening critics of Cambodian leader Hun Sen - Police in Australia are investigating a threatening letter received by a Victorian state MP which warned that he and other critics of Cambodian strongman Hun Sen in Australia would be targeted by an assassination team. The letter was sent to the Melbourne office of Labor’s Meng Heang Tak before Sunday’s election in Cambodia, and said his name appeared on a hit list, along with other vocal opponents of the government in Phnom Penh.

>>19221187 ‘Taking a leaf out of Trumpism’: Yumi Stynes on the ‘misguided’ backlash to sex book - A new Australian sex education book has topped Amazon’s bestseller list and some local bookshops are running out of copies, after a conservative backlash led to it being pulled from the shelves of major retailer Big W. Welcome to Sex, written by Yumi Stynes and Dr Melissa Kang, the longest-serving expert behind Dolly Doctor, reached the top of the Amazon charts on Thursday, two months after its release on May 17. Stynes said she was surprised by the backlash. “We really have a lot of credentials,” she said. “We’ve got an army of professors, who fact-checked and contributed to the book. So for people to try and shame us or make us feel like we haven’t done the work, it’s just really misguided. It does make me think that they’re taking a leaf out of the book of Trumpism and fearmongering there.”

>>19226413 USS Canberra Commissions in Rare Overseas Ceremony - Leaders of the U.S. Navy joined their Australian counterparts on a windy winter day at the ancestral home of the Royal Australian Navy to welcome USS Canberra (LCS-30) to the American fleet. Moored at the RAN naval base HMAS Kuttabul in the middle of Sydney harbor, Littoral Combat Ship Canberra (LCS-30), was commissioned in a rare overseas ceremony on Saturday. The LCS’ commissioning was a “celebration” and demonstration of the alliance between Australia and the United States, Australia Governor-General David Hurley said at the ceremony.

>>19226422 Video: USS Canberra officially launched into duty in Australia making history - A US warship has been officially launched into duty in Australia making history. The new USS Canberra will be based on this side of the Pacific but the all-American celebration was overshadowed by a stoush over submarines. - 7NEWS Australia

>>19226423 Video: US Navy warship USS Canberra commissioned in Sydney - Combat ship USS Canberra has been officially commissioned in Sydney on Saturday, making it the first-ever commissioning of a US Navy ship in an allied country. Australian and American dignitaries have reflected on the significance of the event. - Sky News Australia

>>19226427 Video: USS Canberra (LCS 30) Commissioning on 22 July, 2023. - USS Canberra (LCS 30) has arrived at the Royal Australian Navy’s Fleet Base East in Sydney for a one-of-a-kind commissioning later this week. The United States Navy’s 16th Independence Class littoral combat ship arrived on 18 July ahead of its commissioning on 22 July, before returning to its homeport of San Diego. Canberra is the first US Navy warship to be commissioned in an allied country and the second US Navy ship to bear the namesake of Canberra. The ship, launched in June 2021, was named Canberra after the Australian cruiser HMAS Canberra which was sunk following the Battle of Savo Island against Japanese forces on 9 August 1942. - Defense Now

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487479

#31 - Part 3

Australian Politics and Society - Part 3

>>19226500 ‘Don’t wait until one of us dies in a pool of blood’: MPs on hit list for criticising Cambodian leader - A former Victorian Labor MP named on a “death list” of Australian critics of Cambodian strongman Hun Sen says the Albanese government is still allowing the dictator’s enforcers to enter Australia despite promises to crack down on foreign interference by the regime. Former Clarinda MP Hong Lim was among several community leaders targeted in an anonymous letter sent to his successor in the seat, Labor MP Meng Heang Tak, who was also warned he would be killed if he did not stop his criticism of Hun Sen.

>>19231951 Australia to buy 20 C-130 Hercules aircraft from the US for $6.6 billion - Australia said Monday it will buy 20 new C-130 Hercules from the United States in a 9.8 billion Australian dollar ($6.6 billion) deal that will increase by two-thirds the size of the Australian air force’s fleet of its second-largest heavy transport aircraft. The announcement follows the U.S. Congress' approval last year of a larger sale of 24 of the Lockheed Martin-manufactured propeller-driven aircraft.

>>19232078 Donald J. Trump ReTruth: @KickDreaming - "NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING. NOTHING." - https://truthsocial.com/@KickDreaming/posts/110767012220636077

>>19232078 Q Post #4944 - Are you ready to finish what we started? 'Nothing can stop what is coming' is not just a catch-phrase. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4944 - https://qalerts.pub/?q=nothing+can+stop - https://qalerts.pub/?q=NCSWIC

>>19237718 Transgender swimmers to compete in world-first test event later in 2023 - International swimming bosses are preparing to take the plunge and push ahead with a world-first event for elite transgender competitors. The details of where and when the test event will take place remain top secret, at least for now, because World Aquatics, the global governing body for the swimming, knows just how politically divisive the issue is. However, highly-placed sources have told this masthead that the sport’s leaders have made the decision to proceed with a test event later in 2023.

>>19243683 Facebook owner Meta ordered to pay $20m fine to Australian government - Two subsidiaries of Facebook parent company Meta have been ordered to pay the federal government $20m in penalties for contraventions of Australian consumer law, over claims the subsidiaries secretly collected and aggregated users’ personal data for Facebook’s commercial benefit.

>>19250307 Julia Gillard’s ex Tim Mathieson to plead guilty to sexual assault - Julia Gillard’s former partner, Tim Mathieson, will plead guilty to sexually touching a woman without her consent. The 66-year-old hairdresser, who became the first Australian man to be nicknamed the nation’s “first bloke” when Ms Gillard ousted Kevin Rudd as Labor leader in 2010, is expected to admit to sucking a woman’s nipple without her consent in an incident that took place in Brunswick on March 13 last year.

>>19250396 Controversial blockbuster Sound of Freedom heads to Australian cinemas - "The controversial American hit film Sound of Freedom, about a Homeland Security agent who quits his job to take on child traffickers, is headed for Australian cinemas. The unheralded thriller has stormed to stunning box office success in the US - taking more than $US130 million ($191 million) in three weeks - after being released by self-described faith-based distributor Angel Studios. While it tells a non-partisan story, the film has been championed by both mainstream conservatives and far-right figures including Steve Bannon and My Pillow proprietor Mike Lindell as well as followers of the QAnon movement." - Garry Maddox - smh.com.au

>>19256981 ‘Hugely significant’: Australia to manufacture and export missiles to US - Australia is set to begin manufacturing its own missiles within two years under an ambitious plan that will allow the country to supply guided weapons to the United States and possibly export them to other nations. The push to accelerate the creation of a local missile manufacturing industry in co-operation with the US will be one of the centrepiece announcements at the Australia-United States Ministerial (AUSMIN) consultations.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487483

#31 - Part 4

Australian Politics and Society - Part 4

>>19257385 Video: QAnon-link film gets local release - "Sound of Freedom, a micro-budget independent film with links to QAnon that became an unlikely box office hit in America, will be released in Australia in August. The film, made on a budget of $US14.5 million ($21.6 million), has taken in an astonishing $US130 million ($191 million) at the box office since its opening on July 4th. Sound of Freedom stars Jim Caviezel as Tim Ballard, a former federal agent who founded the anti-trafficking organisation Operation Underground Railroad. It follows his mission through Colombia to save a girl from child traffickers. During the Trump presidency, Ballard co-chaired a council established to guide federal anti-trafficking policymaking." - Geordie Gray - theaustralian.com.au

>>19257385 Q Post #3635 - Sometimes a good 'movie' can provide a lot of truth and/or background. 'Official Secrets.' Relevant today? Enjoy the show! - Q - https://qanon.pub/#3635

>>19262419 Secret space deal agreed to in AUSMIN talks as US green lights missile production in Australia - The US and Australia will embark on a secret new space partnership amid Chinese technological leaps that threaten US supremacy in the key military domain. The initiative, which is likely to include the development of offensive space-based capabilities, was agreed at AUSMIN talks in Brisbane, where the US also vowed to help Australia to produce advanced new missile systems within three years. US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin, Secretary of State Antony Blinken met with their Australian counterparts Richard Marles and Penny Wong on Saturday, declaring “enhanced space cooperation” a new priority for the nations’ “unbreakable alliance”.

>>19267311 Anti-fascist protesters rally outside neo-Nazi weightlifting event - Police stopped anti-fascism protesters from clashing with a group of neo-Nazis holding a “white powerlifting competition” at a boxing gym in Melbourne’s west on Saturday. Dozens of anti-fascism protesters marched to the Legacy Boxing Gym in Sunshine West, walking down Industrial Drive just before 3pm chanting “unite, unite, unite to fight the right”, before calling on the white supremacists to face them in the street. The neo-Nazi group waved at the protesters and performed Sieg Heil salutes from behind a fence, but did not leave the gym - previously linked to far-right groups – while demonstrators were outside.

>>19272527 US military analysts to embed in Australia's defence department to monitor regional threats in wake of AUSMIN talks - American military analysts will soon be sent to work at the Defence Intelligence Organisation (DIO) in Canberra as both allies intensify joint efforts to scrutinise the moves of states like China, Russia and North Korea in the region. The US and Australia announced that they would establish a "Combined Intelligence Centre --- Australia" within the DIO by next year, saying the new entity would "enhance long-standing intelligence cooperation".

>>19272789 New dates revealed for Donald Trump Jr’s Australian tour after visa fracas - Donald Trump Jnr will hit Australian shores in September, with the political firebrand to touch down following a visa fracas which led to his string of shows being postponed. New dates for the son of former US President Donald Trump have been released including shows in Brisbane (September 25), Melbourne (September 26) and Sydney (September 27). Guests are set to include former British politician Nigel Farage and conservative South Australian Liberal Senator Alex Antic. It comes after a visa stoush delayed Trump Jnr’s initial Australian tour dates set down for July.

>>19290208 Joe Hockey’s ‘Trump whisperer’ predicts the Don’s likely return - The former deputy chief of staff to Donald Trump says “there’s a very big chance” he will be re-elected US president next year, but that Australia and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese have nothing to fear. Emma Doyle, who worked for Mr Trump between 2018 and 2020, now works for Australia’s former ambassador to the US Joe Hockey and his advisory Bondi Partners, where she is privately dubbed “the Trump whisperer”. Ms Doyle said the key to surviving under the former president was “not going to work every day afraid of being fired. If you get fired, you get fired.” “I was always very direct, never threw people under the bus and would say: ‘we’ve looked at this six different ways and here are two options’.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487485

#31 - Part 5

Australian Politics and Society - Part 5

>>19297988 United States Air Force 'mission planning' and operations centre to be built in Darwin - A new US Air Force "mission planning" and operations centre will be built in Darwin, as part of $630 million in American spending across the top end over the next two to three years. The "Squadron Operations Facility" in Darwin will add to its growing array of military assets in the north, raising fears Australia may be locked into any future military conflict between China and the US.

>>19303272 Alexander Downer Tweet: Had a drink with friends yesterday where I met Papadopoulos in 2016. They’ve put up this plaque!! - https://twitter.com/AlexanderDowner/status/1687518177016631298

>>19314910 Don’t ban paying cyber ransoms, ex-US spy chief warns Australia - A former US National Security Agency director says Australia should not impose a blanket ban on paying cyber ransoms but instead adopt a risk-based approach that considers a set of key criteria. Retired Admiral Michael Rogers, who headed the NSA and led United States Cyber Command from 2014 to 2018 under presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump, also called for a shift in thinking on cyberattacks. “This is what I used to tell the two presidents, ‘Sir, if the metric you’re going to use is anytime we have a significant penetration that is a failure, then you are going to be incredibly frustrated’,” Mr Rogers told The Australian Financial Review.

>>19314910 Q Post #585 - TRUST Adm R. He played the game to remain in control. Q - https://qanon.pub/#585

>>19320818 The US and Sweden have put a bounty on the head of alleged AN0M gangster Maximilian Rivkin - A $7.6m bounty has been placed on the head of a fugitive Swedish gangster who targeted Australia’s drug market and is a key lieutenant of Australia’s most wanted man, Hakan Ayik. News of the reward offered for the arrest of Maximilian Rivkin comes as another of the 17 men indicted over the encrypted app AN0M, Seyyed Hossein Hosseini, is extradited to the US, taking to five the number of international alleged gangsters now facing the US justice system on racketeering charges. The app, which was pushed by the likes of Australian drug kingpin Hakan Ayik, was marketed as a secure way to avoid law enforcement, but was in fact a Trojan horse app being run and monitored by the FBI and Australian Federal Police. While 17 people were indicted over running the criminal enterprise behind the app, more than 1300 people were charged globally with a number of crimes as a result of the sting.

>>19321039 Video: Fireball that lit up Melbourne night sky was most likely debris from Russian rocket - A large flaming object that lit up Melbourne’s sky overnight is thought to be debris from a Russian rocket used to send a satellite into space. Victorians captured videos showing a bright fireball travelling across the night sky late on Monday, close to midnight. Social media posts indicate it was seen from Melbourne’s CBD as well as outer suburbs such as Sunbury and Mornington. Residents in regional Victoria and South Australia also reported seeing the flashes of light. The Australian Space Agency said that the flashes of light were likely the remnants of a Russian Soyuz-2 rocket re-entering Earth’s atmosphere.

>>19326780 Trump’s potential return to White House up to American people, says Kevin Rudd - The Australian ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, says it is up to the American people whether Donald Trump returns to the White House - an outcome he previously said would “fray” support for the US alliance in Australia. The former Australian prime minister said on Wednesday that US politics was “a complex beast” and he was focused on keeping on good terms with both sides of the aisle, including former Trump officials. Prior to his appointment as ambassador, which took effect earlier this year, Rudd called Trump “the most destructive president in history”. Rudd told Guardian Australia before the 2020 election that if Trump were re-elected, “the overall fabric of domestic political support in this country and among other American allies around the world will begin to more fundamentally fray”.

>>19326786 Kevin Rudd Tweet (27 Feb 2022): Donald Trump is a traitor to the West. Murdoch was Trump’s biggest backer. And Murdoch’s Fox Television backs Putin too. What rancid treachery. - https://archive.ph/gbMyl

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487487

#31 - Part 6

Australian Politics and Society - Part 6

>>19333536 Elon Musk lashes the ABC over its decision to abandon his social media platform X - Billionaire businessman Elon Musk has lashed out at the ABC over its decision to abandon his platform and accused the public broadcaster of favouring “censorship-friendly social media”. Musk purchased X (formerly Twitter) in 2022 and has made many changes to the platform, including rebranding it, sacking thousands of staff and introducing charges for verification, but its overhaul has not been welcomed by the public broadcaster. The reasons behind the ABC’s decision to stop using the platform included blaming toxic interactions, costs and lack of trust but it was met with annoyance by Musk who took to social media to scold the taxpayer-funded organisation. Hours after the decision was announced by the ABC, Musk responded on X to a post about the ABC’s move by writing, “Well of course they prefer censorship-friendly social media. The Australian public does not”. Mr Musk did not specifically name any social media platforms in his post.

>>19333564 Kevin Rudd in ‘traitor Donald Trump’ U-turn - Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, says he could work with a re-elected Donald Trump - who he attacked last year as a “traitor” - if the “good burghers” of the United States put the Republican frontrunner back in the White House. Dr Rudd, who is in Canberra for the unveiling of his prime ministerial portrait on Thursday, said he had worked “comfortably and seamlessly” with congressional Republicans and with former members of the Trump administration since his arrival in Washington in March. “Our job as the Australian Embassy in Washington is to work with both sides of the aisle,” Dr Rudd said. “What the good burghers of the United States choose to do in their own electoral process is a matter for them.”

>>19333564 Kevin Rudd Tweet (27 Feb 2022): Donald Trump is a traitor to the West. Murdoch was Trump’s biggest backer. And Murdoch’s Fox Television backs Putin too. What rancid treachery. - https://archive.ph/gbMyl

>>19333643 Former NSA director and commander of US Cyber Command says America can learn ‘a lot’ about cybersecurity from Australia - The former head of America’s National Security Agency has declared there are “a lot of things” the United States can learn about cybersecurity from Australia. Former NSA Director and Commander of the United States Cyber Command, Mike Rogers, said that while there are “significant challenges” with respect to cyber security in Australia, the country also has “a lot of good things going for it.” The former Admiral, who lead the NSA and the US cyber command from 2014 until 2018, cited the fact that Australian governments from both sides of politics had been “very aggressive” and “very focused on cyber security.” The former NSA director also credited Australia with prohibiting Chinese company Huawei from being involved in the country’s 5G network “well in advance” of both the US and the United Kingdom.

>>19340466 ALP conference to be a Paul Keating-free zone - Former prime ministers Paul Keating, Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard will not attend the first in-person ALP national conference since 2018, as senior Labor figures scramble to avoid messy fights over AUKUS, economic and social policy, Palestine, trade and fossil fuels. More than 2,000 party delegates and members, union officials, MPs and observers will meet over three days at the Brisbane Convention Centre next week at the first national conference held in Queensland since the 1970s.

>>19367972 Rudd, Newsom get cosy on climate - Under the five-metre-high ceilings of the Leland Stanford Mansion in Sacramento, Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, showed just what a former prime minister has to do to become mates with the potential next president of the United States. Californian governor Gavin Newsom, who many believe is planning a presidential run soon with a growing fund-raising base and an increasingly vulnerable Joe Biden at the helm, was courted on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST) by Rudd along with, as the ambassador put it, “a bunch of visiting Australian corporate buccaneers”. Newsom, 55, who has been governor since 2019 and a politician for 20 years, is widely regarded as the next best option for the Democrats after Biden. A favourite hate figure of the Republican right for his progressive views, he governs a state that, with GDP of about $US3.6 trillion ($5.5 trillion), is the fifth biggest in the world, behind Germany and ahead of India. He and Rudd met to announce a memorandum of understanding for five years of co-operation on clean energy, transportation and technology, green finance and investment, and research and development.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487490

#31 - Part 7

Australian Politics and Society - Part 7

>>19367975 Kevin Rudd says he will never apologise for his 2007 climate change warning - Kevin Rudd has revived his declaration that climate change is the greatest moral challenge of our time, saying he would never apologise for the warning he issued in 2007 even though it doomed his prime ministership when he abandoned his signature carbon pricing scheme. The US ambassador, who unveiled a climate pact between Australia and California with Governor Gavin Newsom on Wednesday, said he was “ridiculed” for his comments at the time. “I make no apology for saying it then and I make no apology for repeating it now, because it is,” Dr Rudd said.

>>19367987 Kevin Rudd AC Tweet: Proud to join @CAGovernor @GavinNewsom in Sacramento today for the signing of a new landmark climate MoU between Australia and California. This MoU will enhance cooperation in areas including clean transportation, energy, climate-friendly business and R&D.

>>19367987 Q Post #2782 - [Example CA] - https://calmatters.org/articles/commentary/gavin-newsoms-keeping-it-all-in-the-family/amp/? - What ‘family’ runs CA? They are all connected. Wealth-Power-Influence - [RIGGED] - The More You Know.... - Q - https://qanon.pub/#2782 - https://qalerts.pub/?q=newsom - https://qalerts.pub/?q=california

>>19368006 U.S. Embassy Australia Tweet - https://twitter.com/USEmbAustralia/status/1691583564310306947 - (Durham boat - Go Matildas)

>>19368006 Q Post #3800 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durham_boat - Anons found the subtle hint dropped in the beginning. Think Durham start. Think 'Q' start. You have more than you know. Q - https://qanon.pub/#3800

>>19397621 Family Court judge rules father’s gender non-conformity ‘confused’ his children - A Family Court judge has determined that a father’s refusal to conform with traditional gender norms left his three children “confused” and encouraged them to “question their gender identity” after they all began identifying as non-binary, ruling the two youngest children will not be permitted to see their ­father for an extended period. The matter regarded the breakdown of a 20-year relationship between a mother and a ­father, who identifies as male but occasionally wears gender non-conforming clothes, including a dress to his middle child’s first day of school. Justice Kylie Beckhouse earlier this month ruled the two youngest children, known pseudonymously as Riley, 8, and Taylor, 13, will not be allowed to see their father for the next four months, after which period they will spend time with him on Sundays. The eldest child, Jamie, 16, who is taking puberty blockers and wishes to undergo a mastectomy once he completes his HSC, will live with both parents in accordance with his wishes.

>>19404456 AN0M accused Edwin Kumar asks FBI to give him names and messages from encrypted app - An Australian man accused of providing encrypted AN0M devices to people who used them to organise drug trafficking is asking prosecutors to give him details of every message sent on every phone he is accused of providing. The case against Edwin Harmendra Kumar, being heard in the US, has revealed fascinating details of the inner workings of Operation Ironside, the police sting of the century, built around the encrypted app AN0M. Mr Kumar, who was extradited from Sydney to the US earlier this year to face racketeering (RICO) charges, is seeking details of all users and all messages sent via the devices prosecutors say he provided or serviced. He is also seeking any reports of drug transactions allegedly involving him directly, or any end-user who allegedly used a device he had distributed or serviced.

>>19417641 Australia-California: A climate partnership made in la-la land - "Last week, Australian ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd and California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a memorandum of understanding in Sacramento on climate change. It should have been called a memorandum of waffle, as both governments jointly promised to do precisely nothing. After ploughing through 1600 words of waffle, the reader learns the MOU “does not create any legally binding rights or obligations and creates no legally recognisable or enforceable rights or remedies, legal or equitable, in any forum whatsoever”. Whatever agreements California and Australia make won’t make a scrap of difference to the global climate, given the near entirety of additional increases in carbon dioxide emissions now arise in India and China." - Adam Creighton - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487491

#31 - Part 8

Australian Politics and Society - Part 8

>>19427525 ‘I did nothing wrong’: Donald Trump arrested over Georgia 2020 election charges - "Donald Trump has become the first former US president to have his mugshot taken as he turned himself in to face criminal charges at a Georgia jail plagued by violence, squalor and overcrowding. In yet another extraordinary day in US presidential history, the 77-year-old Republican’s private plane touched down in Atlanta shortly after 7pm on Thursday (local time), where Trump surrendered over allegations that he was part of an alleged “criminal enterprise” designed to subvert the 2020 election results in that state. The charges, which Trump denies, represent the fourth criminal case that he has faced in about five months." - Farrah Tomazin - theage.com.au

>>19427567 Video: Donald Trump’s mugshot a big gamble for the Democrats - "Democrats have taken a big gamble in forcing Donald Trump to turn up at Fulton County Jail for finger printing and a mugshot, following the former president’s fourth indictment this year. Never before in US history has a former president been treated like this, let alone one who is in effect the de facto opposition leader, and the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for president for 2024. Whatever the outcome of the four indictments in court rooms across America over the next few years, the Georgia mugshot will become the visual embodiment of Trump’s status as a martyr for Republicans, at the same time as it’s the symbol of his criminality for Democrats." - Adam Creighton - theaustralian.com.au

>>19440283 Three dead in NT US military aircraft crash that involved 23 marines - Military aviation investigators will travel to a remote Northern Territory island after a US military aircraft crashed on Sunday killing three US Marines and seriously injuring at least five. They were among 23 marines on the tilt-rotor MV-22B Osprey when it crashed on Melville Island about 9.30am while participating in a multinational exercise with Australian, Filipino, Indonesian and East Timorese forces. Five of the injured were medically evacuated to Darwin Hospital including one in a critical condition who underwent surgery soon after arriving. The other survivors were triaged at the crash scene and awaiting transport to Darwin late on Sunday by CareFlight helicopter and fixed wing aircraft.

>>19440314 Three US Marines killed in aircraft crash in Australia during training exercise - (CNN) Three US Marines have been killed and several others seriously wounded after an Osprey aircraft crashed during military exercises in Australia. Of the 23 Marines on board the MV-22B Osprey aircraft, three died while five others have been transferred to Royal Darwin Hospital in a serious condition, the Marine Rotational Force - Darwin said in a statement on Sunday. The incident on Melville Island in Australia took place at 9:30 a.m. local time. “The Marines aboard the aircraft were flying in support of Exercise Predators Run. Recovery efforts are ongoing,” the statement read, adding “the cause of the incident is under investigation.”

>>19440325 Video: Three US Marines killed in military aircraft crash near Darwin - Three US Marines are dead after an American military aircraft crashed during an exercise drill in the Tiwi Islands, off the coast of Darwin. - 9 News Australia

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487493

#31 - Part 9

Australian Politics and Society - Part 9

>>19446105 ADF Academy cadets claim they were pressured to remove uniforms for Wear It Purple Day - Defence insists Wear It Purple Day (WIPD) activities are voluntary for personnel after cadets claimed they were warned not to dress in military uniform during the annual LGBTIQ+ event because it would be considered a "protest". Students at the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA) have complained they felt pressured to wear purple clothing on Friday in a move the federal opposition has condemned as "coercive" and "overtly political" for the armed forces. For several years the Defence Department has encouraged members to take part in WIPD, but ADFA recruits said a directive was given last week outlining that regular uniforms would be prohibited this year.

>>19446144 Aussie troops will keep flying on ‘Widowmaker’ after crash - Australian troops will continue to fly on US Osprey aircraft as long as they are certified to operate, despite the weekend crash that killed three Marines on Melville Island near Darwin, Defence Minister Richard Marles said. Rescuers on Monday continued efforts to recover the bodies and investigate the cause of the accident that thrust the safety record of the tilt-rotor aircraft sharply into focus. The V-22 Osprey, a joint design of aviation companies Boeing and Bell, has the unwanted nickname of the “Widowmaker” for the number of fatal accidents the type has been involved in. Since 1991, the aircraft has been involved in 10 fatal crashes, claiming 54 lives. The crashes took place in testing, exercises and during combat operations.

>>19446165 Video: Moments after US Osprey crash that killed three marines heard on air traffic control audio - Air traffic control audio has the moment authorities declared an emergency after the crash of a US military Osprey aircraft that killed three marines. Twenty-three personnel were onboard the Osprey, with 20 of the crew evacuated to Darwin. In the audio, an American voice can be heard making the first mention of a serious incident unfolding on the Tiwi Islands, to Darwin's north. "We are just a declaring an emergency, we have Dumptruck 11 flight single MV-22 in the vicinity of Melville Island." Approximately six minutes later, air traffic control asks for further information: "Contact 33, search and rescue is requesting … if there is fire." "There is a significant fire in the vicinity of the crash site. Looks like it is not spreading, but there is a significant fire," comes a response.

>>19452903 Cardboard drones from Australia used in attack on Russian airfield - Australian-made cardboard drones have been reportedly used to help bomb a Russian airfield as the Ukrainian military steps up its attacks on Russian territory. Ukraine claimed it struck five Russian fighter jets on the weekend in a kamikaze drone attack on the Kursk airfield in Russia, approximately 170 kilometres from the Ukrainian-Russian border. A prominent Telegram channel run by a former Russian fighter pilot, known as Fighterbomber, said that the drones used in the attack included the distinctive lightweight drones made by Australian engineering company SYPAQ in Melbourne.

>>19452993 UPDATE: MARINE ROTATIONAL FORCE - DARWIN MV-22B OSPREY TILTROTOR AIRCRAFT CRASH - Marine Rotational Force - Darwin can confirm the names of those killed in the U.S. Marine Corps MV-22B Osprey crash on Melville Island, north of Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, on 27 August 2023 at approximately 9:30 a.m. The cause of the crash remains under investigation. Deceased are: U.S. Marine Corps Corporal Spencer R. Collart, male, 21, MV-22B Osprey crew chief for VMM-363 (REIN), Marine Rotational Force - Darwin, originally from Arlington, VA. U.S. Marine Corps Captain Eleanor V. LeBeau, female, 29, MV-22B Osprey pilot for VMM-363 (REIN), Marine Rotational Force - Darwin, originally from Belleville, IL. U.S. Marine Corps Major Tobin J. Lewis, male, 37, the executive officer of VMM-363 (REIN), Marine Rotational Force - Darwin, originally from Jefferson, CO.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487496

#31 - Part 10

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 - Part 1

>>19204909 Video: Talisman Sabre Facebook Post - 19 July 2023 - 3 days to go! 3 days left until the start of #TalismanSabre2023!

>>19204923 Chinese intelligence expected to monitor Australia’s Talisman Sabre military exercises - The Australian defence force expects that Chinese intelligence will seek to monitor Talisman Sabre, a military training exercise involving 30,000 personnel from 13 countries including the US and Pacific neighbours. The director of the exercise, Brigadier Damian Hill, said he expected Chinese intelligence to seek to monitor the event again this year. “Even though they’re not invited, they still turn up,” he said. “But they haven’t asked to be invited either.”

>>19204951 Japan to fire advanced ship-killing missile on Australia's shores - Japanese forces will fire their most advanced anti-ship missile into Australian waters for the first time, ahead of large-scale multinational military exercises that begin later this week. Japan's Self Defense Force (JSDF) is preparing to conduct a live fire demonstration of its Type 12 Surface-to-Ship missile (SSM) at a weapons range in Jervis Bay, south of Sydney.

>>19204962 American tank on way to Talisman Sabre in big central Queensland car crash - A US military tank, believed to be on the way to the Talisman Sabre military training exercise, has been caught in a fiery multi-vehicle crash on the Bruce Highway in central Queensland. Six people were taken to the Rockhampton and Gladstone hospitals, three with suspected spinal injuries. Queensland Police confirmed the forensic crash unit was investigating after the accident at Bajool, south of Rockhampton, involving seven vehicles.

>>19205012 Video: Multiple people injured in Bruce Highway crash involving US military tank - A United States military tank, multiple caravans and a B-double truck have been involved in a seven-vehicle crash on the Bruce Highway south of Rockhampton, injuring several people. Police said vehicles in the crash included a semi-trailer carrying a US military tank, a flat bed truck carrying two caravans, a B-double truck, three cars and a four-wheel drive towing a caravan.

>>19211171 Alice Springs alcohol restrictions to continue for at least two years after drops in NT crime rates - The Northern Territory will extend alcohol restrictions in Alice Springs for at least two years after incidents of domestic violence and assault plummeted by more than a third. The move follows an outcry from locals who had demanded for months that grog bans be implemented.

>>19211252 Bruce Highway reopens after multi-vehicle crash involving US tank - Both lanes of the Bruce Highway are now open, as investigators piece together the chain of events that led to a fiery multi-vehicle crash involving a US military tank in central Queensland. The seven-vehicle crash happened near Bajool, south of Rockhampton. It involved multiple caravans, a B-double truck and a semi-trailer carrying a US army tank en route to a military exercise. Capricornia District Police Inspector Ben Carroll said police were still piecing together the cause of the crash, but initial investigations suggest a passenger vehicle failed to stop for an escort vehicle accompanying the semi-trailer carrying the tank, causing a domino effect.

>>19211276 Video: Talisman Sabre military exercise brings foreign troops to Australia for war games - Thousands of troops from 13 countries have descended on Queensland for the Talisman Sabre war games, the largest to date. The biennial military exercise involving Australia and the United States has expanded over the past decade to include military partners and observers from many more countries in the Indo-Pacific region. Tent cities have been set up to accommodate an influx of 30,000 troops across the state's north, which has become a hive of activity with armoured vehicles, warships and aircraft.

>>19211280 Boxers and boots on the ground: tightening military ties with Germany - Visiting Australia to mark the inaugural involvement of German troops in Australia’s premier war games, Lieutenant-General Alfons Mais indicated his country’s armed forces, known as the Bundeswehr, planned to deepen ties with Indo-Pacific militaries as democracies unite to stand up for the international rules-based order. “We are here to strengthen relationships with partners. Not only the Australian Defence Force, but the US and France are participating, so partners we know already. It’s a signal to show the relevance of the region and where we can contribute.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487498

#31 - Part 11

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 - Part 2

>>19221161 Japan's top general inspects anti-ship missile ahead of historic Australian launch - Japan's top military officer is in Australia inspecting his country's most advanced anti-ship weapon as part of his country's largest ever participation in joint military exercises. Japan's Self Defence Force (JSDF) was scheduled to carry out a live test of its Type 12 Surface-to-Ship missile (SSM) for just the second time outside of Japan at the Beecroft Weapons Range on the New South Wales south coast. But the Australian Defence Force has delayed the exercise due to unfavourable sea conditions, and plans to resume the launch over the next few days.

>>19221167 Video: Chinese 'spy ships' expected to sit off Darwin and Central Queensland during Talisman Sabre military exercises - Officials are preparing for two Chinese "spy ships" to arrive off Australia's coast next week to monitor the multinational Talisman Sabre military exercises opening in Sydney this morning. Since 2017, China's Navy has deployed at least one Auxiliary General Intelligence (AGI) vessel to snoop on each of the biennial training drills involving the United States, as well as other partner nations. Defence and security sources told the ABC they were expecting a pair of People's Liberation Army-Navy (PLAN) vessels to head towards Australia over the next few days.

>>19226439 Talisman Sabre 2023: Firepower demonstrations 1,000 miles apart signal start of massive exercise in Australia - Dozens of mortar shells and rockets screamed across the Australian bush into a mountainside over the weekend, one of two live-fire demonstrations that kicked off the largest-ever Talisman Sabre exercise. Now in its 10th year, the biennial Talisman Sabre is expected bring more than 30,000 personnel, nearly double the number of troops deployed in 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic, with additional participants from the United Kingdom, Canada, Indonesia, Fiji, Tonga and Papua New Guinea. The exercise provides an opportunity for the individual nations to practice teamwork and communication in the event of “whatever crisis may exist in our region in the future,” Lt. Gen. Greg Bilton, the Australian Defence Force chief of joint operations, said Friday during the exercise’s opening ceremony in Garden Island, Australia.

>>19226439 Talisman Sabre - MAGIC SWORD - https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

>>19226465 Talisman Sabre: Chinese spy ships moving into position to monitor war game exercise - Live demonstrations of the latest military firepower are on display as part of the largest ever US and Australia-led war gaming exercise, Talisman Sabre. Chinese spy ships are moving into position to monitor the exercise for the next fortnight. - Sky News Australia

>>19231969 First image emerges of RAAF's encounter with Chinese spy ship during Talisman Sabre - An aerial photograph showing an RAAF P-8 Poseidon plane flying over a Chinese surveillance ship as it headed towards Australia last week has been obtained by the ABC. The image of the Dongdiao Class Auxiliary General Intelligence (AGI) vessel was taken from on board another Australian military aircraft over international waters in the Coral Sea.

>>19237744 ‘Olympics of war games’: This year’s Talisman Sabre is most ambitious ever, official says - This year’s Talisman Sabre is the “biggest and most ambitious” version of the multinational exercise ever and Australia’s largest military undertaking in more than a century, according to U.S. and Australian military officials. The exercise, with 30,000 troops from 13 countries, kicked off with a ceremony Friday but swung into gear with two live-fire drills the following day at sites 1,000 miles apart. Talisman Sabre, led by the U.S. and hosted by Australia along its eastern coast, is scheduled to conclude Aug. 4.

>>19243607 Video: Submarine spotted off Queensland coast one of several navy vessels headed to massive war games - A submarine has been spotted cruising off the coast of Queensland, much to the surprise and delight of locals. Doug Bazley, 63, of Caloundra on the Sunshine Coast, said he had been on Golden Beach for about two hours Friday afternoon when he noticed some unusual “spray and mist” in front of a container ship heading through the spitfire channel about 3.45pm. The keen photographer said he grabbed his binoculars and soon spied the surfaced Royal Australian Navy Collins Class submarine about 5km off coast, complete with a person standing on top and at the front of the sub.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487499

#31 - Part 12

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 - Part 3

>>19243643 Midge Point community marvels as Operation Talisman Sabre unfolds in their backyard - The shores of a secluded beach in the Whitsundays set the scene for a large scale military attack between American, Japanese and German forces. Three impressive landing craft air cushioned boats were deployed to Midge Point beach, where marine troops then worked to secure the area. The Midge Point community were able to watch the mock operation, carried out on July 26 as part of a three-day rehearsal under Talisman Sabre 23. Resident Robyn Crawford said “awesome” was the only word to describe what she had just seen.

>>19243661 Talisman Sabre 2023 a risky geopolitical game - "While "Exercise Talisman Sabre" may appear as an impressive military practice, its unintended consequences must not be understated. The aggressive posturing and heightened military readiness exhibited during drills can inadvertently increase uncertainty and anxiety among regional actors, leading to misconceptions, miscalculations, and misunderstandings. Besides, this hostile drill risks perpetuating a cycle of strategic mistrust, insecurity and confrontation in the region. Also, this US-backed drill provokes other regional powers especially China for countermeasures as Beijing may perceive it as a threat to its national interests and security." - Emilia Fernandez, security and political analyst with a focus on South Asian geopolitics, and PhD researcher at the University of Lucerne, Switzerland - chinadaily.com.cn

>>19250260 Talisman Sabre 23 Field Exercise Sets Benchmark for Combined Military Training in Indo-Pacific - "You're currently standing in what we call the Field of Dreams," said Australian Army Col. Ben McLennan, commander of the Australian Defense Force's Combat Training Centre, as he welcomed reporters to the Townsville Field Training Area. The training area is the epicenter of the 10-day field training exercise taking place during Talisman Sabre 23. "This activity that's occurring here is just the richest, most immersive and most realistic, no-consequence training environment that we can possibly create," he said. "We're calling it the Olympics of war games because it's the biggest, most ambitious Talisman Sabre ever."

>>19250270 Video: NZ soldiers perform Haka Tu in warning to mock enemy in Australian war games - A contingent of New Zealand soldiers have declared their readiness to head into battle on Australian soil by performing a traditional war challenge to intimidate their enemy. In a video released Wednesday, the soldiers performed the Haka Tu in front of counterparts from Australia, the US, Fiji and France in the Queensland bush to mark the start Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023.

>>19257074 United States, German and Japanese Military Forces Conduct Joint Amphibious Assault during Talisman Sabre 23 - Sailors from USS New Orleans transported the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, German Army, and Japanese Self-Defense Forces service members ashore via a landing craft, air cushion operation as part of Talisman Sabre 23 at Midge Point, Australia on July 25, 2023. Amphibious operations provide a combined-joint force commander the capability to rapidly project power ashore in support of crisis response at the desired time and location. “The exercise here is important because of all the joint forces - we integrate and we do all our training together,” said Sgt. Jorge Bravo, a U.S. Marine with the 31st MEU. “They have their own way of doing things, we have our own way of doing things, and we find the common ground in the middle - and we were better because of it.”

>>19262114 Video: Four feared dead after military chopper crashes near Hamilton Island - Four Australian Defence Force members are missing, feared dead, after a helicopter crash during the Talisman Sabre military exercise in Queensland. A search and rescue mission involving Australian and US Defence Force personnel is underway off Hamilton Island for the crew of the MRH-90 helicopter, which went down about 10.30pm on Friday. Emerging from Australia-United States Ministerial Consultation (AUSMIN) talks in Brisbane on Saturday, Defence Minister Richard Marles said the meeting was conducted with “heavy hearts”.

“The families of the four aircrew have been notified of this incident and our hopes and our thoughts are very much with the aircrew and their families,” he said. “Our hopes are very much with the efforts of the search and rescue crews as they go about their work right now.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487502

#31 - Part 13

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 - Part 4

>>19262158 Video: Crashed military helicopter has history of safety issues - The military helicopter involved in a horror crash off the coast of Queensland, leaving four feared dead, has a problematic history with nearly a dozen recorded safety incidents linked to MRH-90 Taipan helicopters. The helicopter ditched into the water about 10.30pm on Friday off the coast of Hamilton Island while on a two-helicopter mission as part of the Talisman Sabre joint exercise with America. It is the second incident this year, following a crash in Jervis Bay in March during a counterterrorism military training exercise.

>>19262255 Video: Talisman Sabre helicopter crash: Hopes fade for missing air crew - Four Australian Army aviators are feared dead after a horror chopper crash over the Whitsundays in what looms as the nation’s worst peacetime military disaster since 2005. Wreckage was recovered from the waters off Hamilton Island on Saturday, more than 12 hours after the chopper went down in the middle of major international war game exercises. In what Australia’s Defence chief described as “a terrible moment”, the MRH-90 Taipan ditched into the sea just before 11pm on Friday during Exercise Talisman Sabre. It is feared the incident could become one of Australia’s worst peacetime military disasters since two Black Hawk helicopters collided near Townsville in 1996, killing 18 personnel, and the 2005 Nias Island Sea King crash which killed nine personnel.

>>19262307 US pledge to stand by Aussies after Talisman Sabre crash tragedy - Top military officials from Australia and the United States have declared their unwavering commitment to Exercise Talisman Sabre as they expressed sorrow for four personnel still missing after a catastrophic crash during war-games in north Queensland. The disastrous ditching of an MRH90 Taipan during night-time exercise off Lindeman Island loomed large over high-level talks between Australian and American defence and foreign affairs officials in Brisbane. The annual AUSMIN talks delivered significant progress in deepening Australian and US military ties and cementing itself in an increasingly contested Pacific, but the timing was inextricably linked to what is set to be the nation’s worst peacetime disaster in at least two decades.

>>19262368 Talisman Sabre Facebook Post: 28 July 2023 - Statement issued by Defence - Defence can confirm an Australian Army MRH-90 Taipan helicopter has impacted waters near Lindeman Island, off the Queensland coast. The aircraft was participating in a night-time training activity as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 when it was reported missing late Friday night, 28 July 2023. Four crew were on board the aircraft at the time of the incident and are currently missing. Military and civilian search and rescue aircraft and watercraft are currently conducting search and rescue operations at the incident site. At this time Defence’s priority is supporting our ADF members and their families. Families of affected personnel have been notified. Families seeking information and support can call the Defence Member and Family Helpline at 1800 624 608.

>>19267202 Investigation launched into military helicopter crash, four feared dead - The federal government has launched an investigation into the cause of a helicopter crash that authorities fear has led to the death of four missing Defence Force personnel, making it Australia’s worst peacetime military accident in almost 20 years. Australia and the United States’ most senior defence and foreign policy officials expressed their dismay over the horror accident, which has revived longstanding concerns about the technical problems that have plagued the MRH-90 Taipan, the aircraft involved in the crash.

>>19267242 Police officer’s son among four feared dead in crash near Hamilton Island - The four men feared dead after a Defence helicopter went down in waters off the Whitsunday Islands have been identified. Captain Daniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class Two Joseph Laycock, and Corporal Alexander Naggs were named by the Chief of Army, Lieutenant General Simon Stuart, as the four involved in the crash. The crew were members of the Australian Army Aviation’s 6th Aviation Regiment based at the Holsworthy Army barracks in Sydney. Lieutenant General Stuart said the men’s names had been released with permission from their families.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487503

#31 - Part 14

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 - Part 5

>>19267266 Four missing defence aviators identified, search-and-rescue mission continues near Hamilton Island after Taipan helicopter crash - Four Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel who were on board a Taipan helicopter that crashed into waters near Hamilton Island have been identified. Captain Danniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class Two Joseph Laycock and Corporal Alexander Naggs were on board the MRH90 helicopter that ditched into the ocean during a training exercise as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre on Friday night. All were members of the 6th Aviation Regiment. Lieutenant General Simon Stuart, the Chief of the Australian Army, said the families of the men were being supported by the ADF and had consented to the names of the missing men being released.

>>19272518 Video: ‘No hope’ of finding ADF servicemen alive: Richard Marles - There is no longer any hope of finding alive the four men aboard the MRH-90 Taipan helicopter when it crashed into the ocean off Queensland’s Whitsunday Islands on Friday night, with the government shifting the search and rescue mission to a recovery operation. Defence Minister Richard Marles said “the loss of these four men is as significant and meaningful as the loss of anyone who has worn our nation’s uniform. If it is as we imagine it to be, they died on Friday night making a difference.”

>>19290021 Human remains found after army helicopter crash - Human remains and parts of a cockpit have been found in the area where four army aircrew members died when their helicopter crashed last week off the Queensland coast. Lieutenant-General Greg Bilton told reporters the search-and-recovery mission had identified a “further debris field” in the sea near Hamilton Island that was consistent with a catastrophic, high-impact crash. “Sadly, I can confirm human remains have also been observed in this location by [a] remote underwater vehicle,” he said. “Due to the nature of the debris field, positive identification of the remains is unlikely to occur until we recover more of the wreckage.”

>>19297773 Defence Australia Tweet: Video: #TalismanSabre2023 is now officially closed. - #TS23 is the largest Australia-US bilaterally planned, multilaterally conducted exercise. This year is the largest iteration of the exercise, with 13 nations and more than 30,000 personnel participating. #YourADF

>>19297823 Talisman Sabre Tweet: Thank you to all of the personnel who have participated in the exercise, and to the local communities for their support. #TalismanSabre2023 has officially come to a close.

>>19297823 Talisman Sabre - MAGIC SWORD - https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487505

#31 - Part 15

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 1

>>19250326 Anthony Fauci on Australia’s COVID response, AI and the next pandemic - The man who became the face of the coronavirus response in the United States says Australia’s willingness to accept science and resist conspiracy theories will help the country stave off future pandemics, but is concerned growing animosity and threats towards scientists will stifle the next generation of experts inspired by the events of the past three years. In an interview with the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, Dr Anthony Fauci also said the responsible use of artificial intelligence would help scientists anticipate future variants of COVID-19 and predict other problem diseases before they reach pandemic level.

>>19252375 New Zealand government funds project to discredit anyone who questions safety of vaccines - It’s not only the UK government that’s refusing to acknowledge excess deaths since the mass covid injection campaign began, the New Zealand government is doing the same. Is it because they are afraid to admit that those who are raising awareness about the unsafety of the vaccines might be right?

>>19257187 Anthony Fauci has hailed Australia’s success in virtually eradicating HIV in inner Sydney - Top US medical advisor Anthony Fauci says Australia has demonstrated “proof of concept” that HIV can be eradicated, with the pockets of inner Sydney with large gay populations that have effectively stamped out the virus providing a powerful incentive to the world. “It shows it can be done,” Dr Fauci told The Australian. “I think Australia as a nation and Sydney as a city should be congratulated on doing that, because once you prove a concept, it becomes an incentive.”

>>19262682 Covid cover-up: how the science was silenced - America’s top infectious diseases adviser, Anthony Fauci, delib­erately decided to downplay ­suspicions from scientists that Covid-19 came from a laboratory to protect his reputation and deflect from the risky coronavirus research his agency had funded, according to his boss, one of the most senior US health officials during the pandemic. In an exclusive interview, Robert Kadlec - former assistant secretary for preparedness and response at the US Department of Health – told The Weekend Australian that he, Dr Fauci and National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins privately discussed how to “turn down the temperature” on accusations against China in the early days of the pandemic while they were trying to encourage Beijing to co-operate and share a sample of the virus. - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19262728 Who made Covid? US spy agencies have a name - US intelligence agencies are understood to be examining the possibility that Chinese military scientist Zhou Yusen’s research to develop a coronavirus vaccine led to the creation of Covid-19, and the first cluster of the pandemic. The decorated Chinese scientist died about May 2020 in circumstances that Five Eyes intelligence agencies have long suspected was at the hands of the People’s Liberation Army. The Weekend Australian can reveal that the FBI has, on at least two occasions since mid-last year, spoken with a close relative of Zhou who is now residing in the US. The individual is understood to be a crucial new witness. - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19262914 ‘Turn the temperature down’: how the Covid cover-up began - A ‘nightmare’ of circumstantial evidence showed the virus could have been genetically engineered. But instead of disclosing their lab-leak suspicions Anthony Fauci and his peers pivoted to distract attention from contentious research funded by the US. There are several indicators that senior Chinese Communist Party officials know precisely how Covid-19 arose to ­become the most infectious virus in a century, shutting down major world economies and killing millions of people. Now, as the misinformation perpetuated by scientists is ­exposed and intelligence efforts persist, the rest of the world inches closer to the truth, too. - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19272598 Australian professor Eddie Holmes privately discussed signs Covid-19 could have been engineered - A leading Australian virologist privately discussed signs Covid-19 may have been genetically engineered, writing “the furin cleavage site is an issue” and “it’s the epidemiology that I find most worrying” before publicly insisting a laboratory leak was a conspiracy theory. Evolutionary biologist Eddie Holmes has come under international scrutiny for his role in co-authoring a journal paper that claimed scientific analysis showed the virus was natural.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487507

#31 - Part 16

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 2

>>19278192 Edward Holmes claims ‘bad memory’ for not declaring writing a paper with a Wuhan scientist - Leading Australian virologist Edward Holmes said a “bad memory” was behind the reason he didn’t disclose he was listed on a paper submitted to medical journals alongside a Wuhan Institute of Virology scientist. Professor Holmes was co-author of a paper titled the Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2 that claimed Covid-19 was a natural virus and “improbable” it was a laboratory construct. But when authorising that paper, he did not disclose his work on a previous paper with a Wuhan scientist. He said he forgot his name was listed on a January 2018 paper about bat coronaviruses with a Wuhan Institute of Virology researcher, Jie Cui, a former postdoctoral student of his.

>>19278196 US academics ‘may be prosecuted’ over Covid-19 lab leak: top scientist - A leading US scientist expects academics who played down the idea Covid-19 leaked from a Chinese laboratory, despite their private doubts, will face criminal prosecution for fraud and has praised journalist Sharri Markson for her dogged investigation of the so-called “lab leak theory”. Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and professor at Rutgers University, told The Australian the “preponderance of evidence” available supported the notion the new virus emerged from research-related activities at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, before rapidly spreading throughout the world in early 2020.

>>19280809 FOI Response Proves Australian Government Is Actively Censoring Citizens Posts About Covid Vaccine Injuries On Social Media - Yesterday, a response was received to a Freedom of Information Act (“FOI”) request which includes evidence that the Australian Department of Health and Aged Care (“DHAC”) were colluding with Facebook to censor posts about covid vaccine injuries. The FOI response is heavily redacted but the evidence is clear. - https://www.truth11.com/untitled-1190/

>>19434487 Biden’s probe censored Covid ‘smoking gun’ - "US President Joe Biden’s 90-day probe into the origins of Covid-19 censored the input of intelligence agency scientists who concluded the virus was most likely genetically engineered. Mr Biden ordered the Intelligence Community in May 2021 to give him an assessment into how the pandemic began after revelations, first published by The Australian, that researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology had been hospitalised with Covid-like symptoms in November 2019 in the suspected first cluster of the pandemic. When the report was published it concluded that most intelligence agencies assessed the virus, even if it had leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was natural rather than manipulated in a laboratory The Australian can reveal that this was not the assessments made by the four groups within the intelligence agencies that actually engaged in scientific analysis, who concurred that there was either a highly likely or reasonable chance the virus was genetically engineered." - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19434533 Decade-old Wuhan clue that proved Covid’s origin - "Buried away inside one of the US intelligence agencies’ secret laboratories, a group of eminent scientists examined the structure of Covid-19 in order to determine its origin. At the same time, another group of scientists, these ones happy to shape public opinion via social media, were fashioning a very different narrative, determined to turn the world’s gaze from the experimental lab in the middle of the ground-zero city -- Wuhan. While Anthony Fauci and his like-minded scientific foot-soldiers were quickly latching on to and publicly endorsing a theory that the virus had a natural origin, keenly dismissing any talk of a lab leak as a conspiracy, these other, far less conspicuous scientists were quietly reaching a conclusion that was poles apart. The scientists who wrote what is regarded as the seminal research on the natural origin theory - the Proximal Origins paper - have ­received global recognition, some amassing hundreds of thousands of social media followers. But the scientists at the ­Defence ­Intelligence Agency’s National Centre for Medical Intelligence (NCMI) remain unknown and their endeavours to uncover the origins of Covid-19 have gone publicly unrecognised. Worse, there have even been attempts, at the highest levels of the US government to censor them and keep their discoveries secret. Stripped of scientific complexity, these highly experienced ­researchers conclude that Covid-19 was almost certainly the result of experiments in a lab, and was not of natural origin as the world has been led to believe. They made a discovery that was ­described internally as a smoking gun." - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487508

#31 - Part 17

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 1

>>19243381 Key Assange supporter says Wikileaks founder could cut deal to secure freedom - One of federal parliament’s leading supporters of Julian Assange says the WikiLeaks founder could cut a deal with prosecutors and plead guilty to “whatever nonsense” necessary to secure his release from prison. Labor MP Julian Hill, the member for Bruce, tried unsuccessfully to visit Assange in Belmarsh prison, where he has been held since 2019, during a private trip to Europe recently. “The reality is that Australia cannot force the United States to [release Assange], and if they refuse, then no Australian should judge Mr Assange if he chooses to just cut a deal and end this matter,” said Hill.

>>19243388 OPINION: If Albanese’s such a buddy of Biden’s, why is Assange still in jail? - "Julian Assange is in his fourth year in Britain’s Belmarsh prison. If the current appeal fails, he will be shackled and driven off in a prison van and flown across the Atlantic on a CIA aircraft for a long trial. He faces likely life imprisonment in a federal jail, perhaps in Oklahoma. I don’t believe the president can shake his head and say, “nope”, given all we have gifted - the potent symbolism of B52s, nuclear subs and bases on the east and west coast. It would look like we have sunk into the role of US territory, as much a dependency as Guam or Puerto Rico. If Assange walks out the gates of Belmarsh into the arms of his wife and children it will show we are worth a crumb or two off the table of the imperium. If it’s a van to the airport, then making ourselves a more likely target has conferred no standing at all. We are a client state, almost officially." - Bob Carr, former foreign affairs minister of Australia and longest-serving premier of NSW - theage.com.au

>>19257022 Assange supporters call for release ahead of US talks - Julian Assange supporters are urging Australia's senior ministers to push for the WikiLeaks founder's release from prison when they meet officials from the United States. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese joined his defence and foreign affairs ministers at meetings with the US secretary of state and defence secretary in Brisbane on Friday. Further meetings will take place over the weekend. The brother for Mr Assange, Gabriel Shipton, said the talks were one of the last face-to-face meetings between the ministers before the 51-year-old faced extradition from England to the US. "Julian is inches away from extradition to the USA," Mr Shipton said in a statement. "The meeting between the secretary of state and the prime minister could be the last chance to put a stop to Julian's nightmare."

>>19262537 Julian Assange case has 'dragged on for too long', Australia's Wong says - Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong said on Saturday the long-running case of imprisoned Wikileaks founder Julian Assange had gone on too long and needs to be completed. Speaking alongside Defence Minister Richard Marles, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Wong said representations had been made on behalf of Assange in public and private but there were limits on what could be done until his legal proceedings concluded.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487509

#31 - Part 18

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 2

>>19262570 Assange ‘endangered lives’: Top official urges Australia to understand US concerns - The United States’ top foreign policy official has urged Australians to understand American concerns about Julian Assange’s publishing of leaked classified information, saying the WikiLeaks founder is alleged to have endangered lives and put US national security at risk. In the sharpest and most detailed remarks from a Biden administration official about the matter, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Assange had been involved in one of the largest breaches of classified information in American history and had been charged with serious criminal conduct in the US.

>>19278210 Julian Assange supporters in Australian parliament urge US to get him out of maximum security prison - Julian Assange’s supporters in the Australian parliament have implored the US government to “get him the hell out of a maximum security prison” regardless of diplomatic friction over the WikiLeaks founder’s eventual fate. The US secretary of state, Antony Blinken, has pushed back at the Australian government’s complaints that the pursuit of Assange had dragged on too long, with the top diplomat declaring that the WikiLeaks founder is alleged to have “risked very serious harm to our national security”.

>>19326761 Assange pursuit 'gone on for too long', Kevin Rudd says - Kevin Rudd says the United States' pursuit of Julian Assange has "gone on for too long" and he will continue to express Australia's concerns. During a visit to Australia as part of high level talks, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Mr Assange was accused of "very serious criminal conduct" . Asked how he was continuing to press Australia's position to the US as ambassador, Mr Rudd said his responsibility to engage on behalf of all Australians included Mr Assange. "As for Secretary Blinken's statements recently, that's to be anticipated from the administration, reflecting their concerns about the history of the case," he told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday. "We in Australia have our own concerns that we continue to reflect and my job as Australia's leading diplomat in the US is to engage effectively, which usually means silently with the US administration, in order to maximise our prospects.

>>19355431 ‘There’s a way to resolve it’: United States ambassador Caroline Kennedy flags Assange plea deal - United States ambassador Caroline Kennedy has flagged a potential plea deal between Julian Assange and US authorities that could end America’s pursuit of the WikiLeaks founder and allow him to return to Australia. As hopes fade among Assange’s supporters that the Biden administration will abandon its extradition request, a David Hicks-style plea bargain has emerged as the most likely way for Assange to avoid a drawn-out criminal trial on espionage charges and a possible lengthy jail term in a maximum security US prison.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487510

#31 - Part 19

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 1

>>19194509 Brittany Higgins, Bruce Lehrmann parliament CCTV footage handed to court - Critical CCTV footage of Bruce Lehrmann and Brittany Higgins in parliament house on the night of her alleged rape has been handed over to court after Sue Chrysanthou SC, acting for Lisa Wilkinson in the defamation proceedings, demanded to know why it wasn’t produced earlier.

>>19204809 ‘Recklessly indifferent to truth’: Linda Reynolds blasts DPP Shane Drumgold over Brittany Higgins case - Former Defence Minister Linda Reynolds has launched a blistering attack on ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold, accusing him of making “baseless and unsubstantiated allegations” that she was motivated by political forces to suppress Brittany Higgins’ rape complaint.

>>19211199 ‘Prefer to silence victims’: Brittany Higgins blasts Linda Reynolds - Brittany Higgins has blasted former defence minister Linda Reynolds for suggesting it should be illegal for anyone who believes a crime has been committed to fail to report it to police, saying “instead of solving the problem, there are people who would prefer to just silence victims”.

>>19257140 Who will take the fall for the Lehrmann controversy? - "There is really only one issue to look for next week when Walter Sofronoff gives the government of the ACT the report of his inquiry into the disastrous Brittany Higgins rape trial. Will anyone take the fall for the now abandoned rape prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann? Will blame be divided among the individuals who were targeted by the ACT government in the terms of reference it drew up for Sofronoff’s inquiry? Or will Sofronoff take a broader approach, one that would enable him to consider the impact of legal structures that have been put in place by the government itself?" - Chris Merritt vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>19262626 Sofronoff findings on DPP Shane Drumgold to be kept secret for weeks - In a shock move, the ACT government will keep secret the findings of the Sofronoff inquiry into the prosecution for rape of Bruce Lehrmann for at least a month as it ponders how to deal with what are expected to be serious adverse findings against chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold. It had been anticipated that when inquiry head Walter Sof­ronoff KC delivered his much-anticipated report on Monday, it would be released immediately but the government will now consider the report “through a proper cabinet” process that ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr said would take three to four weeks, with the Legislative Assembly “updated” at the end of August.

>>19278214 ’No excuse’ for report on Lehrmann rape case to be secret - "The ACT government has decreed that the findings of inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff KC will be kept secret for at least another month. There is no excuse for such a delay; not that Chief Minister Andrew Barr has bothered to offer one. Barr says he “currently intends” to table some or all of the report at the end of August, at which time he “may” provide an interim response, pending a final response that “may take several months”." - Stephen Rice - theaustralian.com.au

>>19278237 Revenge of Bruce Lehrmann: ACT DPP on trial - Bruce Lehrmann will lodge a multimillion-dollar claim for compensation against the ACT Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions as the territory government examines what are expected to be serious adverse findings against chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold. Mr Lehrmann’s explosive claim of malfeasance by the ODPP emerged on the same day the ACT government received the Sofronoff report into misconduct in the prosecution case against the former Liberal staffer.

>>19284047 ACT DPP Shane Drumgold ‘at risk of charges’ if he misled court - If ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold is found to have knowingly made false statements to the Supreme Court to prevent defence lawyers obtaining police documents, he may face an investi­gation for attempting to pervert the course of justice. A number of senior lawyers have told The Australian that if Mr Drumgold is found by the Sofronoff inquiry to have deliberately misled ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum during the course of Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial last year, it could lead to criminal ­charges against him.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487512

#31 - Part 20

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 2

>>19284078 Former judge Walter Sofronoff KC finds police were right to charge Bruce Lehrmann but lashed DPP’s conduct - A landmark inquiry into the trial of Bruce Lehrmann has found the prosecution was properly brought but made damning findings about the conduct of the Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold. Sources who have been briefed on the contents of the report have told news.com.au that Walter Sofronoff KC, a former Supreme Court judge in Queensland, finds that police acted lawfully when they charged Mr Lehrmann. It also finds that the decision of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to prosecute based on the evidence available was correct. - Samantha Maiden - news.com.au

>>19289705 Video: Sofronoff report reveals Shane Drumgold lied during Bruce Lehrmann rape case - ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold knowingly lied to the Supreme Court, engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct, “preyed on a junior lawyer’s inexperience”, ­betrayed that junior lawyer who trusted him, and treated criminal litigation as “a poker game in which a prosecutor can hide the cards,” the Sofronoff Inquiry has found. In findings that are certain to end Mr Drumgold’s career as ACT Director of Public Prosecutions and may lead to criminal prosecution against him for perverting the course of justice, inquiry head Walter Sofronoff KC ruled that every one of the allegations made by Mr Drumgold that sparked the inquiry was baseless. - Janet Albrechtsen and Stephen Rice - theaustralian.com.au

>>19289796 Sofronoff inquiry: ACT DPP Shane Drumgold ‘threw his newest junior under the bus’ - Spare a thought for Shane Drumgold’s hidden victims - the trusting junior staff who unwittingly did the chief prosecutor’s dirty work only to be thrown under the bus as his web of lies unravelled. Drumgold’s betrayal of his loyal team ranged from directing an inexperienced young lawyer to swear a false affidavit to blaming an office administrator for wrongly releasing a document under Freedom of Information laws when he ordered her to do it. Inquiry chief Walter Sofronoff KC was clearly infuriated by Drumgold’s willingness to abuse the trust of innocent members of his team, labelling it “shameful” and an abuse of his authority. - Janet Albrechtsen and Stephen Rice - theaustralian.com.au

>>19289813 Lisa Wilkinson, Shane Drumgold and the Logies speech lie - TV host Lisa Wilkinson’s now-infamous Logies speech has come back to bite ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold, after he was caught lying about it to a Supreme Court judge. Mr Drumgold said he warned the star - who first aired Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations on Ten’s The Project in 2021 - about the danger of prejudicing Bruce Lehrmann’s upcoming rape trial before she gave the speech accepting a Logie award for her reporting. Wilkinson rejected that, saying Mr Drumgold “did not at any time” give her the warning he claimed. Mr Drumgold presented a note of the conference to Chief Justice McCallum as if it had been written contemporaneously by a junior lawyer present at the meeting. It hadn’t. That part of the note that was critical to the Chief Justice was effectively written by Mr Drumgold days later after Wilkinson gave her speech - and after it became clear the upcoming trial was in jeopardy because of it. Mr Sofronoff found that Mr Drumgold “knowingly lied to the Chief Justice”. - Janet Albrechtsen and Stephen Rice - theaustralian.com.au

>>19289859 Shane Drumgold’s time as DPP is surely at an end - Shane Drumgold is without a doubt the biggest loser in Walter Sofronoff’s report on what went wrong during the Brittany Higgins rape trial. But he might not be alone. The next biggest loser might turn out to be the ACT government - which was already on notice that the contents of this report would determine whether it would be hit with a damages bill worth millions of dollars.

>>19289887 Linda Reynolds sues Brittany Higgins for defamation over Instagram post - Liberal senator Linda Reynolds has made good on her threat to sue Brittany Higgins for defamation for a social media post accusing her of harassment, issuing a writ against her former staffer in the West Australian Supreme Court. According to the writ, Reynolds is suing Higgins for aggravated damages over an Instagram story on July 4 and a Twitter post on July 20, both of which she claimed were defamatory of her. The former defence minister is also claiming the posts constituted a breach of a deed of settlement and release the pair signed back in March 2021, which contained a non-disparagement clause.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487514

#31 - Part 21

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 3

>>19308125 DPP Shane Drumgold resigns in wake of misconduct findings - ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold has resigned in the wake of the damning findings of the Sofronoff Inquiry and is expected to retire. On Sunday ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury confirmed that he had spoken to Mr Drumgold last Thursday and “in light of the commentary in the report” the pair had “agreed that his position as Director of Public Prosecutions was no longer tenable”.

>>19314741 ACT top prosecutor Shane Drumgold hits back against inquiry after resignation - ACT top prosecutor Shane Drumgold has accused the head of the inquiry into the Bruce Lehrmann rape case of denying him procedural fairness, and has disputed many of the probe’s findings after resigning from his high-profile role last week. In a written statement on Sunday, Drumgold denied acting dishonestly or underhandedly after inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff, KC, found he had lied to the Supreme Court in the lead-up to the trial, and said the inquiry had missed the opportunity to focus on systemic issues in the justice system instead of focusing largely on him. “Although I accept my conduct was less than perfect, my decisions were all made in good faith, under intense and sometimes crippling pressure, conducted within increasingly unmanageable workloads,” Drumgold said.

>>19314830 Drumgold and Sofronoff face investigation in Lehrmann inquiry fallout - ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold, SC, and Walter Sofronoff, KC, the former judge who led the high-profile inquiry into authorities’ handling of the Lehrmann trial, face investigations that could lead to them both having charges brought against them. In their interim response to the inquiry’s 839-page report on the “case like no other”, ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr and Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury foreshadowed further investigations into Drumgold, who was heavily criticised in the findings, and Sofronoff, who leaked them to select journalists.

>>19320737 ‘Fair go for Shane Drumgold’ case springs a giant leak - "Shane Drumgold has claimed that the leak of the Sofronoff Report denied him procedural fairness. The same notion has been echoed by other people who appear more concerned about a leak to a newspaper than the substance of a report that found that the chief prosecutor was guilty of serious misconduct in office. Drumgold, along with sections of the media, and the ACT Labor government, can excite themselves all they wish about leaks to a newspaper. The Australian did not breach an embargo and will not reveal the source of the leak. It’s curious that those who have spent years defending Julian Assange for leaking stories that may have undermined national security are now hot and bothered about a leaked report that found a DPP who wields enormous state power against citizens behaved improperly. A case of politics or sore losers? Maybe both." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19326680 Police careers destroyed by ACT DPP Shane Drumgold’s false claims - Many senior and junior police involved in the investigation of Brittany Higgins’s rape claims have lost their jobs or gone on long-term sick leave and will never return to policing in the wake of baseless accusations against them by ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold. Thirteen Australian Federal Police officers involved in the investigation of the claims, including Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, have told The Australian of catastrophic damage to their lives and careers from the inquiry he demanded.

>>19326705 'Absolutely awful to me': Brittany Higgins hits out at police in response to damning Sofronoff Inquiry findings - Brittany Higgins has blasted investigators in the Bruce Lehrmann rape case in a statement published on her boyfriend’s social media after she deleted her own Twitter account. While inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff KC was scathing of the conduct of former ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold which was described as “grossly unethical” – he praised police for performing their duties in “absolute good faith”. However, Ms Higgins slammed investigating officers and accused them of being “absolutely awful to me”. In reference to a police executive summary outlining discrepancies in her story - which was found to have been withheld from Mr Lehrmann’s defence team by Mr Drumgold - Ms Higgins said officers tried to “discredit” her. “They wrongly handed over my most private thoughts taken over years in counselling sessions at the Rape Crisis Centre to defence,” Ms Higgins said via her boyfriend David Sharaz’s Twitter account.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487515

#31 - Part 22

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 4

>>19326721 Linda Reynolds blasts ‘social crusader’ ACT DPP Shane Drumgold - Former defence minister Linda Reynolds has criticised outgoing ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold for his treatment of her in the witness box during the rape trial of Bruce Lehrmann, and for comments he made as he resigned from the position, saying when she first read them, she “thought it was a joke”. “If there was ever any doubt of the need for the Sofronoff inquiry, the DPP’s own statement justified it,” Senator Reynolds told The Australian. “It was clearly the voice of a social crusader, not a DPP, and it was clear to me that it was in his mind, the ends justified the means.”

>>19326748 ACT government weighs charges against Shane Drumgold after Sofronoff report - The ACT government has endorsed findings that its chief prosecutor, Shane ­Drumgold, acted grossly unethically, but the capital’s Labor-Greens administration will not investigate other cases he led and has not decided whether to charge him. On Monday afternoon, the Barr government released the full ­report of the Sofronoff inquiry, announcing it supported its 10 recommendations but saying it did not consider it necessary to look at any of the 18 cases Mr Drumgold conducted or participated in since his appointment as Director of Public Prosecutions in 2019.

>>19333459 Linda Reynolds’ defamation case against David Sharaz gets trial date - Brittany Higgins’ partner David Sharaz will front court in a defamation case levelled against him by West Australian Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds in a three-week trial provisionally set for May 2024. Reynolds is demanding the former press gallery journalist pay damages, as well as aggravated damages, over five social media posts, and has requested an injunction preventing the material from surfacing in future. The case has already been beset by delays, with the court having to issue special orders in July just to serve Sharaz with defamation papers, after Reynolds’ lawyers spent six months trying to track him down.

>>19417664 Senator Linda Reynolds’ defamation case against Brittany Higgins’ fiance to ‘end in tears financially’, court told - The lawyer for the fiance of former political staffer Brittany Higgins has told the WA Supreme Court a defamation case against his client will “end in tears financially,” with legal costs potentially reaching millions of dollars. In a hearing lasting nearly three hours, Mr Sharaz’s lawyer Jason MacLaurin argued the matter would “end in tears financially” for both parties, no matter the outcome, with legal bills amassing to “hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars,” which would leave the parties “financially uncomfortable.” Senator Reynolds’ lawyer Martin Bennett retorted such matters usually end in tears one way or the other. The matter is set to go to trial in May, with lawyers for both Senator Reynolds and Mr Sharaz meeting before Supreme Court Justice Marcus Solomon to discuss a security for costs application.

>>19446083 Brittany Higgins, Bruce Lehrmann to take stand in defamation trial - A Federal Court judge has revealed both Brittany Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann will take the stand during the defamation matters between Mr Lehrmann and two media organisations, as the court debates the admissibility of expert evidence stating false sexual assault complaints as “rare”. Both former Liberal staffers at the centre of an alleged rape in Parliament House will give verbal evidence during the defamation cases of Mr Lehrmann and Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson, and a separate matter between Mr Lehrmann and the ABC. The matters are expected to be heard together across four weeks in November.

>>19446088 Ten wants to use expert evidence on Brittany Higgins’ level of intoxication - Network Ten is seeking to rely on expert evidence in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case about sexual assault victims’ typical behaviour and Brittany Higgins’ level of intoxication on the night she alleges she was raped by Lehrmann in Parliament House. The Federal Court trial against the broadcaster is slated to start in Sydney on November 22. Barrister Tim Senior, acting for Ten, told the court at a preliminary hearing on Monday that the network would call 28 witnesses, including Higgins and journalist Lisa Wilkinson. Senior said Ten also wanted to tender two expert reports, on “the reactions and responses of victims of sexual assault … and how things like memory may be affected”, and a toxicology expert’s opinion about Higgins’ level of intoxication on the night in question.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487516

#31 - Part 23

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 5

>>19452895 Shane Drumgold takes legal action against Sofronoff Inquiry - Former ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold is taking legal action against the Sofronoff Inquiry, following its finding that he engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct in the rape trial of Bruce Lehrmann. Mr Drumgold, who resigned from his position as ACT Director of Public Prosecutions following the damning report, has listed a case in the ACT Supreme Court for 14 September. The nature of the legal action is not yet known but Mr Drumgold is likely to be seeking to challenge the board of inquiry findings. Mr Drumgold conceded he made mistakes in his prosecution of Mr Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins but rejected the key findings of the inquiry that he had lied to the Supreme Court and engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct.

>>19452897 Lehrmann prosecutor seeks to quash damning findings from Sofronoff inquiry - Former ACT top prosecutor Shane Drumgold has launched legal action to overturn damning findings about his conduct made by the board of inquiry into the high-profile Bruce Lehrmann trial, and to stop the territory government from taking any action against him based on the report. In judicial review proceedings filed in the ACT Supreme Court on Friday last week, Drumgold is seeking to quash the report by former judge Walter Sofronoff, KC, who controversially leaked it to select media outlets before its official release. Drumgold argues the leak failed to comply with section 17 of the Inquiries Act, denied him natural justice and gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of Sofronoff.

>>19464960 Sofronoff demands ACT Chief Minister retract “unethical” claims - Inquiry head Walter Sofronoff KC has demanded ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr retract suggestions he had breached his duties and acted unethically in releasing his report into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann. Lawyers acting for Sofronoff Inquiry chairman have written to Mr Barr rejecting criticism made by the chief minister at a press conference earlier this month, following publication of Mr Sofronoff’s damning findings against ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold. In a veiled threat to take legal action, Mr Sofronoff’s lawyers say they are writing to give Mr Barr “an opportunity to correct the harm he has caused to Mr Sofronoff’s professional reputation.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487517

#31 - Part 24

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 1

>>19188991 Powerful Senate committee signs off on transfer of nuclear submarines to Australia - The AUKUS security pact has passed a critical hurdle after a powerful Senate committee signed off on the transfer of nuclear-powered submarines to the navy and granted Australia a rare 20-year exemption from tough US defence technology export controls.

>>19204894 Blinken, Austin to visit Brisbane for AUSMIN talks - United States Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin and Secretary of State Antony Blinken will visit Brisbane next week for the annual dialogue with their Australian counterparts Richard Marles and Penny Wong, at the same time the ALP membership continues to agitate against AUKUS.

>>19211235 Australia to gain priority access to US military equipment under Washington proposal - Australian requests for US military equipment would be handled faster than almost all applications “other than from Taiwan and Ukraine” under a proposal before the US Senate. The Australian government has long viewed the complex web of US export controls as a potential barrier to the AUKUS security partnership. But US senators are pushing to ease export control bottlenecks, as well as demanding regular reports on how measures under the AUKUS deal are “strengthening the United States strategic position in Asia”.

>>19220996 US Republicans hold subs plan to ransom in bid to boost domestic submarine production - US Senate Republicans are threatening to block the transfer of Virginia-class submarines to Australia under the AUKUS pact unless Joe Biden boosts funding for domestic submarine production. The move is being led by the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Roger Wicker, who ruled out language this week to authorise the nuclear submarine transfer in the latest version of the nation’s annual defence policy bill. Senator Wicker told Politico that the Biden administration needed to “be sure we have enough submarines for our own security needs before we endorse that pillar of the (AUKUS) agreement”.

>>19231877 AUKUS: Republican Senator John Wicker expects congressional approval by end of year - Republican senator John Wicker, who last week held up critical US legislation that would enable the transfer of nuclear powered submarines to Australia, said he expected the impasse to be resolved by the end of the year, enough time to facilitate the landmark AUKUS security pact.

>>19231918 Doug Cameron warns Anthony Albanese of contest over nuke subs, Palestine at conference - Left-wing former senator Doug Cameron has warned Anthony Albanese he faces a contest at the ALP national conference over nuclear submarines and Palestine. Federal Labor MPs are working to head off disunity on AUKUS and Left-wing demands for a timeline on recognising Palestine, in line with the Prime Minister’s directions this month to Labor’s national policymaking committee.

>>19250231 United States says 'door is open' for New Zealand to join AUKUS as Blinken, Macron continue Pacific tour - The United States says "the door is open" for New Zealand to join AUKUS, as geopolitical competition reaches fever pitch in the Pacific, with three of the world's most influential leaders continuing lightning tours of the region. "As we further develop AUKUS, the door is open to engagement," Mr Blinken said. "As we continue to work on the second pillar, the door is very much open for NZ and other partners to engage as they see appropriate going forward. NZ is a deeply trusted partner, a Five Eyes member, we've long worked together on the most important national security issues."

>>19256860 AUKUS: Republicans demand doubling of submarine production before backing pact - A group of Republican congressmen including Senate leader Mitch McConnell have demanded a more than 100 per cent increase in US submarine production as a condition for supporting the transfer of nuclear-powered submarines to Australia as part of the AUKUS security pact. As annual AUSMIN discussions kick off in Brisbane between the foreign and defence ministers of Australia and the US, 23 Republicans in congress have asked the White House to “immediately” provide a plan, including a request for extra money, to lift production of Virginia class submarines from 1.2 to “a minimum of 2.5” per year.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487519

#31 - Part 25

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 2

>>19256893 ‘A risk we should not take’: Republican resistance mounts to nuclear submarine plan - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared he remains confident Australia will secure Virginia-class submarines from the United States, even as almost half of all Republican senators came out against the current plan on the grounds it would dangerously weaken the US Navy as it competes with China. Twenty-three Republican senators, including Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell, wrote to President Joe Biden on Thursday (Australian time) saying they did not support the proposal to provide nuclear-powered submarines to Australia unless the US doubled its own domestic production capacity.

>>19256945 NZ Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta slams door shut on AUKUS - A split has appeared in New Zealand’s leadership over AUKUS, as the country’s Foreign Minister ruled out joining the pact, only a day after Prime Minister Chris Hipkinsheld the door open to negotiations. Hours after fronting the media with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who said the door was “very much open” for NZ to engage with AUKUS “as a trusted partner,” Nanaia Mahuta appeared to slam that door shut. “I’ll be really clear, we’re not contemplating joining AUKUS,” Ms Mahuta told reporters.

>>19297296 Indigenous voice to parliament: Claims of ‘no say’ on AUKUS nuclear subs torpedoed by referendum adviser - A member of Anthony Albanese’s referendum advisory group says the AUKUS nuclear submarine project has the potential to impact Indigenous communities, signalling she backs the voice to parliament advising government on the key pillar of Australia’s defence policy. Artist Sally Scales said Aboriginal communities should be consulted on aspects of the nuclear subs deal, including where they will be docked. “I don’t care about the nuts and the bolts of the submarines. But what do I care about? Where’s that nuclear waste going to go for (those) submarines?” Ms Scales told an event at the Australian National University on Wednesday night. “If we’re going to build new ports for these submarines, where are those ports going to be? How (are) those Aboriginal communities going to be consulted and worked with?”

>>19297859 Video: US nuclear submarine visits Western Australia as allies increase defence preparedness - A U.S. Navy nuclear submarine arrived in Western Australia on Friday as allies Canberra and Washington deepen defence ties and prepare to transfer nuclear submarine capability to Australia. The U.S. Navy Virginia-class submarine arrived at HMAS Stirling for a scheduled port visit as part of a patrol of the Indo-Pacific, officials said.

>>19297936 Video: US military shows off nuclear capable submarine in Western Australia - The United States military is flexing its nuclear fleet of submarines in Western Australia. The arrival of the USS North Carolina is the first visit since a landmark defence deal was signed earlier this year. Australia is buying eight of the nuclear-powered Virginia class submarines in a deal costing $368 billion. Australia's Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd was on Garden Island touring the 110-metre vessel which can go three months underwater. WA will permanently house nuclear subs from next decade.

>>19308139 Labor faces growing grassroots party revolt over AUKUS pact - The Albanese government is facing a rank-and-file party revolt over the AUKUS defence pact, with about 40 local branches opposing it outright or calling for a review, and activists determined to have it debated at the party’s national conference despite attempts to dampen dissent. Federal electorate councils covering the Labor seats of Sydney, held by Tanya Plibersek, Parramatta and Boothby, plus the seat of Mayo held by independent MP Rebekha Sharkie, have also passed resolutions opposing the trilateral AUKUS defence pact to acquire nuclear-powered submarines.

>>19333477 Australia, US urged to ramp up AUKUS as PM invited to White House - Australia and the United States are being urged to turbocharge the AUKUS pact by jointly producing long-range missiles and using Australia as a testing ground for hypersonic weapons as Anthony Albanese prepares to make his first prime ministerial visit to the US capital. Albanese will be feted at a rare state dinner in Washington, DC, in late October at the invitation of US President Joe Biden, just days before he has been tipped to make an as-yet-unconfirmed visit to Beijing. Republican congressman Mike Gallagher, considered a rising star of American politics, used a speech in Canberra on Thursday night to say the AUKUS pact had the potential to “bring this region from the brink of war” if the three member nations expanded their ambitions and put their nations on a preventative “war footing”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487521

#31 - Part 26

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 3

>>19340296 AUKUS alarm after nuclear dump in South Australia is axed - The government has abandoned a decade-long process to establish a low-level radioactive waste dump near Kimba in South Australia, declaring it will not challenge a court ruling in favour of Indigenous people who argued that their voice was ignored in the site’s selection. The Coalition suggested Australians should prepare for a surge of such outcomes under the proposed voice to parliament, and of ramifications for the AUKUS ­nuclear-powered submarine deal that requires Australia to establish a high-level nuclear waste dump.

>>19340337 AUKUS partnership the 'beating heart of free world' - A leading United States congressman has described the AUKUS security pact as the "beating heart of the free world". Chair of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, Republican Mike Gallagher, called for greater cooperation under the AUKUS agreement as a deterrent. "My view is that the US-Australia alliance, and perhaps AUKUS more broadly, is the beating heart of the free world," he told ABC Radio. >"We have to make AUKUS a success, this is a no-fail endeavour. It will have a dramatic impact on our ability to deter a future war."

>>19346018 Caroline Kennedy says alliance won’t sink if Trump elected - US ambassador Caroline Kennedy says Australia will be able to count on America as a reliable ally in a crisis even if Donald Trump returns to the White House, adding she is hopeful Congress will this year pass laws to allow the transfer of America’s most sensitive military technology to Australia. Congress is currently debating legislation to allow the sale of up to three nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, as proposed by the AUKUS agreement, and to grant its ally a broad exemption to tough defence export controls.

>>19355518 Labor members eager for showdown on AUKUS at the party’s national conference - Richard Marles will attempt to allay simmering concerns over AUKUS among Labor Party members and trade unions with a special briefing, as a showdown over the nuclear defence pact at national conference is certain. The briefing by the Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister is open to all party members and affiliated trade unions to be conducted via Zoom as local Labor branches and federal electorate councils continue to express opposition to the trilateral nuclear submarine pact.

>>19355541 Two Americans Australia can count on - "The single purpose of the nuclear submarine AUKUS agreement between the US, UK and Australia, and its military technology sharing, is, by building deterrence, to prevent war with China. As with the Second World War, our security rests on US leadership. Through the Australian American Leadership Dialogue just held in Canberra, I’ve just interviewed two of the most important Americans in Asian security. Kurt Campbell, Indo-Pacific Coordinator in Joe Biden’s National Security Council, is Biden’s Asia tsar, having been assistant secretary for East Asia in Barack Obama’s first administration. Australia’s best friend in Washington, he’s a big personality, creative, sober, effective at the heart of power now for decades. Hawaii-based Marine Lieutenant General Stephen Sklenka, an intellectual and a soldier, is the deputy commander of US forces in the Indo-Pacific. So, given the threat environment, do the US and its allies have effective deterrence today?" - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19361940 Albanese doubles down on AUKUS as union boss criticises ‘silence’ on internal debate - Anthony Albanese will crash through internal Labor opposition to the AUKUS agreement and declare the nuclear pact a central part of his government’s agenda, as an influential union chief criticised the party’s reluctance to debate the submarine deal. United Firefighters Union boss Peter Marshall, who is running for a spot on Labor’s powerful national executive, said the party’s factional system had stifled debate on totemic issues, arguing a political culture that discouraged debate was counterproductive. “Whether you are for or against [AUKUS], previously there would have been significant debate about the rights and wrongs, whereas there has been complete silence,” he said. “People are frightened… Debate makes good policy.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487523

#31 - Part 27

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 4

>>19374503 Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility Welcomes First Contingent of AUKUS Personnel - Personnel from participating nations reported to Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PHNSY&IMF) in support of the Australia, United Kingdom, and United States (AUKUS) security partnership’s Pillar One initiative Aug. 14, 2023. The Pillar One initiative is delivering a conventionally armed nuclear powered attack submarine (SSN) capability to Australia. The uniformed and civilian submarine maintenance subject matter experts from Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States comprise the Advance Verification Team (AVT) that, over the coming weeks, will work directly with shipyard personnel to gain a full understanding of the maintenance and industrial skills required to establish Submarine Rotational Force-West (SRF-W) in Australia as early as 2027.

>>19382314 Labor conference: ALP armed for keeping China at arm’s length - Senior Labor ministers have warned that China will have 21 nuclear submarines and 200 major warships in the water by 2030, sparking an urgent need to deliver AUKUS submarines and defence technologies to ­prevent war in the Indo-Pacific. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy on Friday urged union and party delegates to back the “progressive” AUKUS defence pact, to help “prevent war” and protect Australians amid Beijing’s aggressive military build-up and rising US-China tensions. “Strength deters war,” Mr Conroy said. In an extraordinary slap down of anti-AUKUS elements inside the Australian Labor Party, the Left-faction powerbroker delivered a scathing attack on those who supported a “Robert Menzies ­appeasement” strategy. Mr Conroy’s claim that anti-AUKUS delegates were appeasers sparked an angry backlash from Left-faction union leaders and colleagues, including federal Labor MP Josh Wilson who ­labelled the minister’s claim as “absurd”.

>>19382343 Chinese aggression has driven the ALP towards a nuclear compulsion on AUKUS - "The Labor Party has turned on the hinge of history. In an identity renovation, Labor has become the party of nuclear propulsion - with China the key to this dramatic transformation. China is remaking the Labor Party today via its strategic assertion, just as Japan’s war re-made Labor in the 1940s. Nuclear propulsion has been sold to the party as a new Labor value, as the path to peace through deterrence, the vital contributor to self-reliance, industrial revitalisation and regional stability. Sections of the rank-and-file who cannot stomach these messages have succumbed before Albanese government dictum." - Paul Kelly - theaustralian.com.au

>>19392379 China’s warning on AUKUS - China has warned against being made the target of the AUKUS agreement as union leaders vow to apply heavy scrutiny over the government’s jobs pledge for the construction of nuclear submarines. After senior ministers warned at Labor’s national conference the AUKUS deal was needed to prevent war with China and limit its regional influence, a Chinese embassy spokesman said bilateral or multilateral defence agreements should be “conducive to world peace and stability and not target any third party or harm others’ interests”. With Labor’s support for AUKUS cemented in its policy platform last week, Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Sunday said a nuclear submarine fleet would act as a balance to China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region.

>>19452872 Teachers in boycott of nuclear submarine project - Pacifist teachers are boycotting a Defence Department “brainwashing’’ program that asks children to design nuclear-powered submarines. The Australian Education Union federal executive will meet this week to consider a national boycott of the science project, which requires high school students to design a nuclear-powered propulsion system for a submarine. The union is furious that the Albanese government is spending $368bn on AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines at a time when most public schools are receiving less money than they were supposed to under the Gonski needs-based funding deal.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487524

#31 - Part 28

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial - Part 1

>>19220746 Why Ben Roberts-Smith defamation ruling has a long way to play out - "In order to make sense of the Ben Roberts-Smith case, one important point needs to be kept in mind: this was not a war crimes trial or a murder trial - at least not officially. Allegations of murder and war crimes were at the heart of the argument. But the reality is that this was merely an expensive, complex private dispute. It is important to be clear about the difference between civil and criminal justice. Even if the different standards of proof are put to one side, the judge’s finding that the murders took place was made on the available evidence - which falls short of the evidence that would have been available to a criminal court. It must therefore be less reliable than a finding by a criminal court." - Chris Merritt, vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>19231979 War Memorial installs plaques noting ‘gravity’ of Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case - The Australian War Memorial has installed plaques next to displays honouring disgraced former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith that say the museum is considering what further content should be added to the exhibits after a landmark defamation case found he was a murderer and war criminal. The plaques read: “The memorial assists in remembering, interpreting and understanding Australia’s experience of war and its enduring impact. This includes the causes, conduct and consequences of war. The memorial acknowledges the gravity of the decision in the Ben Roberts-Smith VC MG defamation case and its broader impact on all involved in the Australian community. This is the outcome of a civil legal case, and one step in a longer process. Collection items relating to Ben Roberts-Smith VC MG, including his uniform, equipment, medals and associated artworks, are on display in the memorial’s galleries. We are considering carefully the additional content and context to be included in these displays. The memorial acknowledges Afghanistan veterans and their families, who may be affected at this time.”

>>19231995 War Memorial ‘acknowledges gravity’ of Ben Robert-Smith murder finding - The Australian War Memorial has quietly added a notice to its displays honouring Ben ­Roberts-Smith “acknowledging the gravity” of the finding in his failed defamation case that he murdered unarmed detainees in Afghanistan. The AWM has previously stated it would leave displays featuring Mr Roberts-Smith in place, despite calls for the collections to be removed from display or contextualised with information about defamation court findings. Greens senator David Shoebridge has called for these items to be removed from display immediately, while former principal AWM historian Peter Stanley has suggested “we might pause before effacing him from our national war museum”. “Removing his portrait and uniform might satisfy a modish desire to obliterate the memory of his actions but by “cancelling” him, we would lose the chance to tell the truth; to explain how the trial’s evidence contradicts the heroic story that the memorial, among others, cultivated,” Professor Stanley said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487526

#31 - Part 29

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial - Part 2

>>19297998 Defence blocks FOI on war crimes letters between the US and Australia - Defence has refused to release documents setting out US warnings that alleged war crimes by Australian troops in Afghanistan threatened to derail special forces co-operation between the allies. The department rejected a Freedom of Information request on the matter by Greens senator David Shoebridge, who blasted the “wall of silence” over the fallout from the Brereton war crimes report on Australia-US military ties. Defence said there were six separate items of correspondence on the matter but refused to release them on the grounds they could undermine Australia’s relations with the US.

>>19417651 Ben Roberts-Smith will fight his defamation loss at a ten-day hearing - War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith says a judge was mistaken in finding that he was involved in four murders of unarmed prisoners following a landmark defamation loss to three newspapers. In the notice of appeal, Mr Roberts-Smith’s lawyers said he “appeals from the whole of the judgment”. His representatives argue that Justice Besanko “erred in his findings” Mr Roberts-Smith was involved in the four murders of unarmed prisoners. Mr Roberts-Smith’s lawyers claim the judge “erred by impermissibly construing the evidence” of Person 41, who witnessed the execution of Ali Jan and should not have been regarded as a reliable witness. “The primary judge added to and cherry picked the evidence of a witness whose evidence he otherwise found to be reliable without adequately explaining the basis for doing so,” the appeal states. They also claim the judge denied procedural fairness, as he did not ask for the “rookie soldier”, known as Person 4, to give evidence about what happened at the compound and placed too great a weight on the evidence of Afghan villagers.

>>19427909 Police, war crimes investigators seek access to documents in Roberts-Smith case - The Australian Federal Police and war crimes investigators are seeking access to restricted documents from Ben Roberts-Smith’s failed defamation case amid dozens of active investigations into allegations that Australian soldiers broke the rules of engagement in Afghanistan. Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko revealed in a judgment on Friday that the Commonwealth had applied for changes to national security orders to allow the AFP and the Office of the Special Investigator to seek access to sensitive court documents. This would include transcripts of parts of the trial heard behind closed doors and documents tendered during those hearings. The OSI is the agency investigating war crimes allegations against Australian soldiers in Afghanistan.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487527

#31 - Part 30

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 1

>>19194398 Women, regional voters lead rebellion on Indigenous voice to parliament: Newspoll - The referendum for an Indigenous voice to parliament has suffered a collapse in support among women voters and in the regions as the referendum heads toward defeat, with just 41 per cent of voters now saying they will vote yes.

>>19194411 Thomas Mayo and Kate Chaney get plaudits in Perth, but WA regions rail against the voice - Out in the WA farming and mining electorate of O’Connor, Liberal MP Rick Wilson sees baked-in opposition. In the last week of June, Wilson ran a survey of his own email database. Though it lacked any of the rigour of a poll, Wilson’s survey concluded 80.1 per cent of the 1487 respondents intended to vote No at the voice referendum later this year.

>>19194426 Thomas Mayo says Indigenous voice to parliament will be ‘difficult to ignore’ - Prominent Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo says an Indigenous voice to parliament will be “difficult to ignore” as he hits out at “disappointing” personal attacks that he says have been hurtful. He would keep talking to Australians telling them the voice would be modest, meaningful, uniting and something that would be celebrated forever.

>>19194442 Thomas Mayo - Voice to Parliament will close gaps and address glaring issue at nation's heart - "How can we say we are the greatest country of all when we are the only like nation with no constitutional recognition of our original habitants. Far from great - Indigenous Australians are proportionately the most incarcerated people on the planet. We are the worst in the world in terms of Indigenous health, education and employment outcomes. At the referendum, we are responding to a simple and modest proposition: should our constitution include recognition of the First Peoples of Australia by granting them the fairness of a say." - Thomas Mayo - canberratimes.com.au

>>19194448 Anthony Albanese confident ‘focus’ will lead to Yes vote for Indigenous voice to parliament referendum - Anthony Albanese has declared the referendum for the Indigenous voice to parliament will be supported by a majority of the people and a majority of the states on the back of a short, five or six week campaign which will be the chance to turn around the negative polling.

>>19194465 Details aside, the vibe won’t win voice referendum - Yes case advocates may have misunderstood the lessons of the 2017 same-sex marriage plebiscite and last year’s federal election that brought a Labor left faction prime minister to power. Voice advocates see both as signs Australia has moved left.

>>19194492 Tony Abbott accuses companies supporting The Voice of ‘shareholder abuse’ - Former prime minister Tony Abbott has accused “woke companies” of “shareholder abuse” by publicly supporting the referendum. The former politician added there was “absolutely no doubt that the new left establishment is massively behind this Voice for all sorts of reasons.”

>>19194500 Indigenous group demands $2.5m for WA tree planting events - More tree planting events in WA were cancelled due to claims by peak environmental body, the South East Regional Centre for Urban Landcare, that Perth-based Whadjuk Aboriginal Corporation is withholding approvals until $2.5m in compensation is received.

>>19199716 Speaking out: opposing camps state their reasons for and against an Indigenous voice to parliament - Australians will be told the ­Indigenous voice to parliament is a “leap into the unknown” when they receive the official No pamphlet in the mail, while the Yes ­brochure promises constitutional recognition with concrete results, as Anthony Albanese concedes the Yes case needs to be made stronger.

>>19199725 Greg Craven ‘beside myself with rage’ after Indigenous voice to parliament No pamphlet quotes him - Conservative constitutional lawyer and prominent Yes campaigner Greg Craven says he’s “beside myself with rage” after one of his quotes criticising the government’s preferred model for an Indigenous voice to parliament was used in the official No pamphlet.

>>19199734 Indigenous people thriving without voice: Mundine - No campaign leader Warren Mundine says the world "wouldn't give a bugger" if the Indigenous voice was shot down at the referendum, arguing Australia is already taking great steps to improve the lives of Aboriginal people.

>>19199738 No campaign 'outdated, missed opportunity': Leeser - Liberal backbencher Julian Leeser has criticised Peter Dutton's arguments against the voice, claiming the No campaign is outdated and could lead to a "missed opportunity" for Australians.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487528

#31 - Part 31

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 2

>>19199762 National Australia Bank in firing line for hosting videos with Yes backer Thomas Mayo - The Coalition has hit out at NAB for hosting pro-voice videos with Thomas Mayo on its website, in which the prominent Yes campaigner declares the advisory body “must be respected and its advice acted upon”.

>>19204775 Anthony Albanese: government will reject Indigenous voice advice if it disagrees - Anthony Albanese has declared an Indigenous voice to parliament is not about treaty or compensating Aboriginal people and says his government will absolutely reject its advice -- including if it suggests changing Australia Day – if Labor disagrees.

>>19204786 Video: Anthony Albanese reveals deepening Indigenous voice to parliament frustration during clash with 2GB Radio host Ben Fordham - Anthony Albanese has publicly revealed what is clearly a deepening personal frustration over where the voice referendum is heading. In an interview with 2GB radio host Ben Fordham Wednesday morning the Prime Minister allowed himself to become audibly vexed and abrasive by the questioning.

>>19211137 Indigenous voice to parliament: Anthony Albanese undermined on treaty claim - Supporters of an Indigenous voice have said the body must be established so it can negotiate treaty, undermining Anthony Albanese’s declaration that the referendum is “not about a treaty”. UNSW Law School professor Gabrielle Appleby and senior Uluru Dialogue member Eddie Synot wrote in March: “Voice precedes treaty because fair, modern treaty negotiations require first the establishment of a representative Indigenous body to negotiate the rules of the game with the state. It can’t be left to the state alone, and the state must have a group of people with whom to negotiate.”

>>19211159 ‘Failure is not an option’: Dreyfus optimistic Voice referendum will overcome opposition - Federal Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus says he is confident most Australians will support the Indigenous Voice to parliament once they are engaged with the issue, declaring change is long overdue and “failure is not an option”. When asked who would be to blame if the referendum failed, Dreyfus replied: “It’s not going to fail. Failure is not an option for me.”

>>19211168 ‘I’m living on optimism’: Pearson finds hope for Voice in a Sydney Westfield - For Noel Pearson, a visit to the Liberal heartland of Hornsby on Thursday to campaign for the Indigenous Voice to parliament became a whistlestop foodie tour as friendly shopkeepers pushed samples of olives, seafood, doughnuts and coffee on the First Nations leader. Pearson said the opposition to the Voice came from the far right and the far left, and that should comfort mainstream Australians. “The Voice is right down the middle, it’s a sensible balance,” Pearson said.

>>19217202 Big W pulls Indigenous voice to parliament plugs from in-store messages - Big W has pulled public address announcements about the Uluru Statement from the Heart and the Indigenous voice to parliament from all its stores, citing feedback from customers and staff. The retail chain, owned by Woolworths Group, had been broadcasting an acknowledgment of country in Big W stores for more than a year and will revert to those, The Australian has confirmed.

>>19217224 Yes supporters of the Indigenous voice to parliament have raised some of the best reasons to vote No - "If the Yes pamphlet was being sincere it would tell people the truth: neither symbolic recognition nor a great big new bureaucracy, as outlined in the Calma/Langton report, are capable of solving the problems facing many Aboriginal people. Only economic participation can do this: kids in school, adults in jobs, people able to create businesses and own their own homes. That isn’t achieved with a magic wand. It’s achievable only through hard graft and political courage." - Nyunggai Warren Mundine, Indigenous Forum director at the Centre for Independent Studies - theaustralian.com.au

>>19217244 Australian Jewish Association says Indigenous voice to parliament advocacy goes against values - A conservative pro-Israel community organisation that opposes an Indigenous voice to parliament has hit out at representative bodies for actively campaigning on the referendum, saying the ­Albanese government’s proposal was “contrary to Jewish values and community interests”. Many major Jewish organisations have backed the voice, ­saying it resonates with them ­because they understand what it’s like to be voiceless.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487530

#31 - Part 32

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 3

>>19220640 Pro-voice Liberal Andrew Bragg calls for referendum delay to 2024 to ‘save the concept’ - One of the few Liberal MPs who support the Indigenous voice to parliament has appealed to the government to delay the referendum to next year. Andrew Bragg, who is campaigning for a yes vote, said not enough “middle ground” had been established and he feared that lack of consensus had doomed the referendum to failure. It was time to recalibrate to “save the concept”, he said, before running a referendum in mid-2024.

>>19222693 Indigenous voice to parliament’s No pamphlet casts light where Yes prefers shadows - "As we count down towards the most significant referendum since Federation, the picture that has emerged in the Yes and No pamphlets is both telling and saddening. As we enter the home straight, the decision taken by the Yes camp in the pamphlet to describe a proposed new institution of state as a committee suggests a new desperation. It is obfuscation at best and outright deception at worst. The No side has avoided overreach and calmly stated what is by now self-evident: the voice is risky, unknown, divisive and permanent." - Louise Clegg, barrister - theaustralian.com.au

>>19222723 Making the case for No to Indigenous voice to parliament, straight from horse’s mouth - "The only thing Yes activists hate more than No campaigners misquoting them is No campaigners quoting them accurately. Nobody makes mincemeat of the Yes case arguments anywhere near as effectively as the Yes advocates. The Yes case is most powerfully condemned out of the mouths of its own supporters." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19222755 NSW slip into No camp puts Voice on track for defeat - The Indigenous Voice to parliament is headed towards a referendum defeat, with most NSW voters supporting the No campaign for the first time and just 31 per cent of Australians expecting the Yes vote to succeed. The Resolve Political Monitor survey shows support for the Voice in NSW slipped to 49 per cent over June and July, from 53 per cent in May-June, while it softened from 56 per cent to 52 per cent in Victoria.

>>19222789 OPINION: Faltering Yes campaign like watching a slow-motion car crash - "Time is running out for the Yes group to turn around its faltering campaign to enshrine a Voice to parliament in the Constitution. If the government is not yet asking itself hard questions about an exit plan, it needs to start planning an escape route now. From a high of 64 per cent public support in September last year, the trend has been all one way, sinking to 48 per cent support in this latest survey. For the first time, this survey shows more people expect the referendum will be defeated than think it will succeed. For the first time, four states would vote No if the national vote were held tomorrow." - James Massola, National Affairs Editor - theage.com.au

>>19222811 Video: PM issues plea to Labor to support Voice to Parliament - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has issued an urgent plea to the Labor faithful to get behind the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, as the latest opinion poll indicates it's heading towards defeat. - 9 News Australia

>>19231753 Video: Tony Abbott blasts PM’s voice ‘not about a treaty’ line - Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott has slammed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for claiming the voice was “not about a treaty” with Indigenous Australians, as a video resurfaced of the Prime Minister wearing a “Voice, Treaty, Truth” T-shirt at at a Midnight Oil concert. “Quite apart from anything the Prime Minister chose to wear at a concert, I go back to that initial statement he made as Prime Minister. The new government is committed to the Uluru statement from the Heart in full - in other words, voice, treaty, truth in full,” Mr Abbott said.

>>19231792 Tony Abbott unleashes on the Voice, Anthony Albanese - Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott has unleashed on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, describing it as a “power grab by activists”. In a scathing critique of the Yes campaign, Mr Abbott told 2GB’s Ben Fordham this morning that he did not want to see Australia “divided by ancestry or race”. “I don’t want to see Indigenous separatism reinforced in our constitution.” He claimed if the Voice passed it would lead to “massive demands for compensation or reparations and even more restrictions on what people can do with their land”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487531

#31 - Part 33

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 4

>>19231811 Indigenous voice to parliament supporters say Anthony Albanese shouldn’t delay referendum - Voice co-architect and senior Australian of the Year Tom Calma says the referendum must be held this year and a delay will not change the will of the people, as Anthony Albanese is told to “go the course” by Yes advocates. Liberal for Yes co-convener Sean Gordon also rejected the suggestion the referendum be pulled because of a fear of failure or that the country may look bad in the eyes of the rest of the world, warning Australia shouldn’t shy away from a proposal put forward by Indigenous people.

>>19231841 Indigenous voice to parliament late-year poll ‘to harmonise voice’ - Conservative Yes campaigner Greg Craven says it would be sensible for Anthony Albanese to push the referendum as far as he can to mid-November or early December in the hope voice ­advocates can claw back support and the millions of dollars in ­donations can have the greatest impact.

>>19231869 Jacinta Price pans Indigenous ‘experts’ in Melbourne - Northern Territory senator and prominent No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has taken aim at Victoria and sporting codes over their support for the Voice to parliament. “You only have to look at who’s running the show here in Victoria and the level of activism that takes place,” she said. “Victoria is one of those places where everything is about ideology and not common sense.” Ms Price also took aim at the major sporting codes and clubs. “I’m really disappointed there are clubs who have come out and said they support it,” she said. “They can’t describe to an Indigenous person in a remote community how it’s going to improve their lives. Why should they be telling Australians how to suck eggs?”

>>19237663 ‘Who knew’: Anthony Albanese responds to furore over picture of him in Midnight Oil T-shirt - Anthony Albanese has laughed off claims he misled Australians when he said the Voice to parliament was not about a treaty after a picture of him wearing a “Voice, Treaty, Truth” T-shirt resurfaced. “Who knew someone would wear a Midnight Oil T-shirt at a Midnight Oil concert? I did see that and have a laugh. Frankly, it shows the desperation of people,” the Labor leader chuckled.

>>19237674 Video: No campaign stands by Gary Johns amid controversy - The No campaign against an Indigenous voice to parliament is standing by Gary Johns, former Labor minister in the Keating government, despite growing calls for him to resign or be sacked over a series of comments and proposals that include blood tests for Aboriginal welfare recipients and a public holiday celebrating intermarriage between black and white Australians.

>>19243329 Indigenous voice to parliament ‘will let us make real deals’, says Noel Pearson - Indigenous leader Noel Pearson says the voice will conduct negotiations with the government of the day and make “real deals” to improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, raising fresh questions from the No campaign.

>>19250147 Chris Hipkins signals support for Indigenous voice to parliament through NZ example - New Zealand Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has held up his country as one that has successfully embraced reconciliation with its Indigenous people, in a strong signal of trans-Tasman support for the voice referendum.

>>19256826 Farmers’ revolt threatens to stifle the Indigenous voice to parliament - The nation’s peak agricultural lobby says West Australian farmers are “paralysed with fear” and uncertain “what they can do on their own land” because of new Aboriginal cultural heritage laws that loom as a key threat to the voice referendum and Labor’s political dominance in the state. The National Farmers Federation has sounded an alarm over Anthony Albanese’s plan to legislate a stand-alone national framework for Indigenous cultural heritage protections, saying the rollout of separate federal rules could “intensify the confusion in WA with overlapping federal laws”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487532

#31 - Part 34

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 5

>>19262483 Reject race-based ‘poison’, privilege the Indigenous voice to parliament will deliver - "The voice referendum deserves to be defeated on the ethics of conviction and consequences. I write as a proud Australian of Indian heritage. I pay my respects to the Aboriginal communities that have lived here since Dreamtime; but also to the pioneers who established modern Australia as a stable and prosperous democracy, and to the visionary leaders who strove tirelessly to create a society that grants equal citizenship to everyone in a vibrant multicultural country. The voice speaks not to all Australians’ better angels but to some white Australians’ guilt complex. Permanently codifying racial grievance into the Constitution will guarantee it is weaponised and monetised sometime in the future by activists making increasingly radical demands and stoking resentment and backlash. If approved, the voice will not mark the end of a successful process of reconciliation but the beginning of fresh claims for co-sovereignty, treaty and reparations, using the Constitution’s authority as the enabling mechanism." - Ramesh Thakur, emeritus professor at ANU’s Crawford School of Public Policy and former UN assistant secretary-general - theaustralian.com.au

>>19267275 Key voice architect Megan Davis criticises media for coverage of the voice referendum - Key voice to parliament architects have accused the media of “driving sentiment” towards a no vote while conceding their own messaging needs to be positive. Numerous polls in recent months have shown declining support for a yes vote at the upcoming referendum and advocates Megan Davis and Noel Pearson are among those to criticise the mainstream media’s coverage of the debate. Professor Davis, the Balnaves chair in constitutional law at the University of NSW, lambasted the media last week and said she had seen significant support for a yes vote while visiting communities across the country, which was at odds to negative media coverage showing falling support. “We are having deep conversations with Aussies and we are not picking up, nor is Yes23, the kind of sentiment that we are seeing in the media, where they are driving the sentiment … downwards, to no,” she told ABC presenter Phillip Adams on his Late Night Live program last week.

>>19267283 Without the Indigenous voice to parliament, a treaty is vulnerable - "The calls for reform over the past century reveal advocacy for a voice within the democratic framework of the state as a pragmatic way of First Nations adapting to the legal and political environment imposed on them. There is also advocacy for a framework for a treaty that would enable communities to practise self-determination. This two-tier approach is common in countries with significant Indigenous populations to ensure every possible mechanism can be adopted to influence the state and to leverage public power to drive change in communities." - Megan Davis, co-author of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, and George Williams, constitutional expert - theaustralian.com.au

>>19267290 One third of voters undecided or open to change: Voice poll - A nationwide polling exercise of more than 14,000 people undertaken by federal Labor shows almost a third of voters are either undecided or can be swayed towards voting Yes for the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, leading the government to conclude the referendum is not lost yet. The Australian Financial Review has learned that earlier this month, over a period of two weeks, Labor surveyed 14,300 voters in what was the most comprehensive polling exercise the party has undertaken outside last year’s federal election campaign. The polling, which drilled down into voter intention and attitudes across all demographics, found on a superficial basis there was 48 per cent support for the Yes vote, 47 per cent for the No vote, and 5 per cent were undecided.

>>19272561 ‘Furphy’: Noel Pearson dismisses calls to delay voice poll - Prominent Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has dismissed calls to delay the date of the constitutional referendum on the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament as he urged voters to rise above allegiances to the major political parties when they cast their vote in the looming poll. Liberal MP Andrew Bragg, who backs the voice, has called for the vote to be delayed to allow the Yes side to recalibrate and build bipartisan support for the referendum after polling revealed ­declining support amid voter confusion.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487533

#31 - Part 35

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 6

>>19283925 Labor’s national platform reveals treaty to be pursued this term of government - Labor has vowed to take steps towards a treaty with Indigenous Australians in this term of parliament in the latest draft of its national platform, as Anthony Albanese refuses to link a Makarrata commission and agreement-making with the referendum. The Prime Minister and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney are facing increased pressure from the Coalition to explain if they still support a treaty and the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full - after Mr Albanese declared on 2GB last month the voice was not about treaty – with senior Liberals questioning Ms Burney’s ability to remain minister.

>>19283990 Indigenous voice to parliament: Why Anthony Albanese can no longer say he supports a treaty - "Why can’t Anthony Albanese provide a simple answer to the question - “do you support a treaty?” The reason is the politics of the voice referendum have forced the Prime Minister into concealing the extent of Labor’s agenda on treaty and truth-telling. This is not a tenable long-term position. With support for the voice trending down, Albanese does not want his constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament to become entwined in the public mind with a complex process of agreement making between governments and Indigenous Australians over the legacy of European settlement." - Joe Kelly - theaustralian.com.au

>>19284007 Inflexible Linda Burney doing more harm than good to Indigenous voice to parliament - "Anthony Albanese and the Labor government are trying desperately to separate the troubled proposal for an Indigenous voice to parliament from the even more controversial and politically damaging ideas of a treaty and truth-telling to rescue the referendum. It is a dismal failure because, as Indigenous Australians Minister and the government face of the campaign, Linda Burney is incapable of the task. Her parliamentary responses to perfectly reasonable requests for information about either the voice or, more recently, Labor’s own $5.8m Makarrata commission - which she announced - to oversee treaty and truth-telling, is embarrassing." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19289915 Indigenous voice to parliament Yes side insists treaties decades away - The Yes campaign has insisted treaties take decades to finalise as it seeks to distance the process from the voice referendum and Anthony Albanese rules out the commonwealth pursuing agreements with Indigenous Australians in this term of parliament. The Prime Minister said states were leading treaty negotiations but left open the possibility of the federal government playing a role, while refusing to say if he personally supported a treaty.

>>19297168 Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton trade barbs over an Indigenous voice to parliament - Peter Dutton has broadened the No campaign’s attack against ­Anthony Albanese and the Indigenous voice to parliament, attempting to link the Prime Minister’s competency and management of the referendum to ­delivering government services and cost-of-living relief. After a week in which the ­Coalition continued to pressure the government over voice and treaty, Mr Albanese accused opponents of the advisory body of “confected outrage” and undermining Indigenous Australians to gain political advantage.

>>19297215 Albanese is now presiding over repeated tactical failures on the voice - "Labor has a well-publicised commitment to delivering the Uluru statement in full. This involves treaty and truth telling, with the voice being the first priority. There is nothing new in this. But the government’s apparent lack of a strategy to deal with inevitable attempts to link the voice to treaty is bewildering. As one senior Labor source said Thursday, as the Coalition continued to entrap the government into talking about the voice: “If the voice isn’t close to dead after this week, it’s got to be on life support.”" - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19297296 Indigenous voice to parliament: Claims of ‘no say’ on AUKUS nuclear subs torpedoed by referendum adviser - A member of Anthony Albanese’s referendum advisory group says the AUKUS nuclear submarine project has the potential to impact Indigenous communities, signalling she backs the voice to parliament advising government on the key pillar of Australia’s defence policy. Artist Sally Scales said Aboriginal communities should be consulted on aspects of the nuclear subs deal, including where they will be docked. “I don’t care about the nuts and the bolts of the submarines. But what do I care about? Where’s that nuclear waste going to go for (those) submarines?” Ms Scales told an event at the Australian National University on Wednesday night.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487535

#31 - Part 36

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 7

>>19297392 Anthony Albanese at top voice: no retreat on Indigenous referendum - Anthony Albanese has promised there will be no retreat on the referendum, declaring a constitutionally enshrined voice would bring a “new day” of unity to the nation and act as a “vehicle for progress” in tackling Indigenous advantage. In his strongest and most ­impassioned defence of the voice, to be delivered at the Garma festival in northeast Arnhem Land on Saturday, the Prime Minister will invoke the spirit and vision of the late Yolngu elder Yunupingu to promote the “coming-together of two worlds”. In a draft of his speech obtained by The Weekend Australian, Mr Albanese says voting Yes is a “once-in-a-generation opportunity for real, overdue and much-needed change” and promises there would be “no delaying or ­deferring this referendum”.

>>19297569 An Indigenous voice to parliament - like Garma - is two cultures embracing for the betterment of both - "Friends, more than 17 million of our fellow Australians are enrolled to vote in this referendum. The highest number of voters in our nation’s history, including a record number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voters. In this decisive moment, each of us holds an equal responsibility. And each of us has an equal opportunity. Yes, we can make history together. More importantly, we can shape the future together. We can vote Yes, in a spirit of unity. We can vote Yes, with optimism and hope - not just for success at this referendum but for our greater success as a nation. We can bring our country together. We can bring our two worlds together. With our hearts and with our heads. This year, on referendum day, the power to reach for a better Australia is in our hands. Let’s seize it together. Let’s vote Yes for recognition, let’s vote Yes for a voice and let’s vote yes for the better future that both will deliver, for all of us." - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese - theaustralian.com.au

>>19302884 Voice campaign stepping up a gear, Noel Pearson signals at Garma Festival - Cape York leader Noel Pearson has signalled the voice campaign is moving into another gear, saying: “We’re going to love them on the beaches in this campaign.” Mr Pearson was speaking at the Garma festival in northeast Arnhem Land when he told the non-Indigenous people in the audience they were crucial to the result of the voice referendum to be held later this year. He described it as the most important vote in the nation’s history and our “last best chance” to complete the constitution.

>>19302959 Indigenous voice to parliament our chance to lift Indigenous lives above lies and insults - "When Anthony Albanese announced his commitment to the Uluru Statement from the Heart and outlined a draft question at the Garma Festival in July last year, we could not have predicted the viciousness of the opposition to what had been refined into a just, practical and constitutionally sound proposition. It is alarming yet unsurprising that politicians and some aspirants have been prepared to set up Indigenous people and their advocates for abuse and vilification for nothing more than transactional electoral motivations. Millions of Indigenous and non-Indigenous people are hoping we are all better than that; so many lives and our future rely on it. If the Opposition Leader were at the Garma Festival this weekend, listening, he would grasp why First Peoples respectfully ask him and all Australians to recognise us in the Constitution through a practical advisory body." - Marcia Langton, Redmond Barry Distinguished Professor at the University of Melbourne - theaustralian.com.au

>>19303021 Cook government to scrap Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act after months of controversy - The West Australian government will scrap its controversial Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Laws within days, the ABC understands. Premier Roger Cook and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Tony Buti will make an announcement early next week. It follows months of harsh criticism of the laws and the government in the lead up to their implementation on July 1 and in the weeks following. The criticism has been led by WA's opposition parties - the Nationals and Liberals - along with farmers groups including WAFarmers and the Pastoralists and Graziers Association. The new legislation came into force to 'modernise' the existing process, which saw major problems exposed in the wake of the destruction of Juukan Gorge. The laws require some WA landowners to check for the presence of cultural heritage before conducting any activities that may compromise such sites.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487536

#31 - Part 37

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 8

>>19303148 Video: Yes campaign relieved as WA set to scrap controversial heritage laws - An obstacle appears to have been cleared from the path of the Yes campaign with the Western Australian government expected to scrap controversial Aboriginal heritage laws that had become a flashpoint in the Voice referendum. Reports of the move to ditch the laws were welcomed by the Yes campaign and Voice advocates at the Garma Festival in north-east Arnhem Land yesterday, after the federal Coalition sought to link the two issues and suggested the WA measures were a precursor to broader national changes that could infringe on property owners’ rights.

>>19308103 'Not focused on hypotheticals': PM not considering other forms of Indigenous recognition if Voice fails - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has warned no other forms of Indigenous recognition will be on the table if the Voice referendum fails. He told ABC's Insiders program, filmed at Garma Festival in north-east Arnhem Land, he will not back down from constitutional recognition in the form of a Voice to Parliament because that was the specific request First Nations people made in the Uluru Statement. "This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity," he said.

>>19308109 Labor in no-man’s land, not wanting to promote a treaty while also unable to say it won’t happen - "Anthony Albanese has launched a media blitz to reboot the failing campaign for a voice to parliament, warning there will be no second chance for constitutional recognition of indigenous Australians if the referendum fails. Amid the glow of an uplifting Garma festival of indigenous Australians, and against the idyllic backdrop of Arnhem Land, the Prime Minister is using his “spear of strength” to simultaneously promote the indigenous voice to parliament, warn there will be no watered-down versions of recognition, and to distance himself and the commonwealth from the Uluru Statement commitment to a treaty." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19308112 Video: ‘Complete lie’: Jacinta Price rejects claims No campaign using fake images of Indigenous people - No campaigner Warren Mundine and Country-Liberal senator Jacinta Price have knocked back “racist” allegations they have used AI-generated images of Aboriginal people to encourage people to oppose the Indigenous voice. Former NAIDOC co-chair and journalist John Paul Janke on Sunday told ABC Insiders that voice opposers had created the AI-generated images “to try to look like it is an Indigenous person supporting the No campaign”. “Online, the No campaign have multiple social media pages. Some of them are now using AI with a Blak Indigenous character to try to look like it is an Indigenous person supporting the No campaign,” he said, speaking from the Garma festival.

>>19314716 ’Nothing to fear from Makaratta’, Anthony Albanese says after Garma boost for voice referendum - Anthony Albanese says there is nothing to fear from the second stage of the Uluru Statement from the Heart - a proposed Makarrata commission often referred to as treaty for short - because any agreement making would be mutual, not imposed. After weeks of trying to separate the voice referendum from a Makaratta Commission, the Prime Minister said no Australian could deny the “struggle” of Indigenous Australians and that the commission would bring people together.

>>19320661 Video: WA Premier Roger Cook announces repeal of Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Laws - WA Premier Roger Cook has confirmed his government will scrap its controversial Aboriginal cultural heritage legislation. The laws have been in effect for only five weeks, and had been designed to avoid a repeat of Rio Tinto's destruction of 46,000-year-old culturally significant caves at Juukan Gorge in 2020. But Mr Cook now says those laws went too far, were too complicated and placed unnecessary burdens on property owners. "I understand that the legislation has unintentionally caused stress, confusion and division in the community and for that I am sorry," he told a press conference this morning.

>>19320682 WA backtrack on heritage laws is a reminder the Indigenous voice to parliament can’t be scrapped - "The “forever” nature of Anthony Albanese’s constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament has been put up in lights by the West Australian retreat over introduction of Indigenous cultural heritage laws. This is the obvious point: there can be no backdown over a voice to parliament that has been cemented into the Constitution. If the voice proves unpopular, something goes wrong with the advisory body or there are unintended consequences, the entity cannot be scrapped. While bad governments can be voted out and bad laws can be repealed, the voice is permanent." - Joe Kelly - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487538

#31 - Part 38

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 9

>>19320706 Indigenous voice to parliament No camp fears rush of the late engagers - Senior No campaigners have warned of complacency, fears that 20 to 30 per cent of voters will remain undecided on the voice until polls open and a “cooling” in fundraising and volunteer support, according to a leaked memo sent to Australians for Unity board members. The No campaign, which leads Yes23 in internal and public polling, holds serious concerns it will be outspent and outnumbered in the weeks leading up to the expected October 14 referendum asking Australians to enshrine a voice advisory body in the Constitution.

>>19326823 Indigenous voice to parliament: AI No group denies relationship with Warren Mundine and Jacinta Price - The man behind a No campaign group that has drawn criticism for using AI generated videos has denied having a formal or informal relationship with Warren Mundine or Country-Liberal senator Jacinta Price. The ABC was forced to issue a statement of clarification after former NAIDOC co-chair and journalist John Paul Janke said voice opponents were using AI to make it appear “like it is an ­Indigenous person supporting the No campaign”. Phillip Mobbs, who is running Constitutional Equality, said AI was a cost-effective way to create campaign videos that reflected multicultural Australia. “What you’ll observe is the avatar is clearly not Indigenous but (it) does reflect the multicultural society we live in,” he said. Mr Mobbs, whose background is in education, said he had no relationship with Senator Price, Mr Mundine or No campaign group Advance Australia.

>>19326866 Video: Indigenous voice to parliament referendum ‘the best chance to shape treaty’, says Thomas Mayo - Prominent Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo says Indigenous Australians who signed the Uluru Statement from the Heart ­wanted to pursue a voice first “so that we could have the best possible say on the Makarrata commission” to oversee agreement-making and truth-telling. Mr Mayo made the direct link between the voice and treaty as fellow leading Yes supporters - including Megan Davis and Tom Calma - backed Anthony Albanese in warning this referendum would be Australians’ only chance to pass constitutional recognition in a generation.

>>19327086 Video: Senator says Uluru Statement ‘confirmed’ as 26 pages by NIAA, after Albo blasts claim as ‘QAnon’ conspiracy - Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says the Uluru Statement from the Heart has been “confirmed” as being 26 pages long by the agency that produced the documents under freedom of information, as she called on Anthony Albanese to “come clean” after the Prime Minister derided the claim as a “QAnon” style conspiracy theory on Tuesday. Mr Albanese used Question Time on Tuesday to blast the claims as a “QAnon” style conspiracy theory. “That is a conspiracy in search of a theory, Mr Speaker,” the PM said. “It is something that has been out there, like a whole lot of the QAnon theories, we have all sorts of conspiracy stuff out there, but this is a ripper. That is the Uluru Statement from the Heart on an A4 bit of paper. That is it. But what we have here is the conspiracy theories colliding with each other. They’re struggling to get their scares straight. I mean, what role did Marcia Langton play in the faking of the moon landing, Mr Speaker? What was the role of the Uluru Statement from the Heart in that?” He stressed it was “absolutely nonsense”.

>>19333302 Indigenous voice to parliament: Anthony Albanese strikes back on length of Uluru Statement - Anthony Albanese has attempted to slap down Coalition accusations the Uluru Statement from the Heart is more than one page as “absolute conspiracy and nonsense”, amid claims the Indigenous Australians agency has faced political pressure to fall into line with the government. The No campaign is intensifying debate over whether the Uluru statement is one or more pages as the Coalition points to previous comments from Megan Davis - an architect of the statement - that it was actually about 18 to 20 pages. The Coalition is claiming the government is wrong to say the Uluru Statement is one page, arguing the document is 26 pages and includes statements about invasion, treaty and genocide.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487539

#31 - Part 39

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 10

>>19333412 Uluru smear job reeks of desperation from No camp - "The Uluru Statement from the Heart is one page. It’s very simple. The unceasing attempts from the No campaign to take draft documents from conference rooms seven years ago and transcriptions of butchers paper seven years ago to manufacture a controversy over the Uluru Statement is farcical. It reeks of desperation. Who would knowingly and willingly mislead the Australian people? Not us. The Referendum Council report and website contains the official documents and they’ve been live online since 2017. It shows the one-page Uluru Statement from the Heart." - Megan Davis - theaustralian.com.au

>>19333451 First Peoples’ Assembly members issue warning on ‘No’ vote push - A rift in the Victorian First Peoples’ Assembly over its support for a national Indigenous Voice to parliament has sparked warnings that looming treaty negotiations with the state government will suffer from any disunity. The push from a minority faction to reverse the assembly’s formal endorsement of the Voice will be discussed at a meeting of the board on Thursday, but nine members of the representative body say the attempt is doomed to fail.

>>19333508 Anthony Albanese’s trip to the US firms up October 14 as Indigenous voice to parliament referendum date - Anthony Albanese’s late October visit to the United States has left little doubt October 14 is the preferred date for the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum, according to constitutional law expert George Williams. The Prime Minister now has three likely overseas trips in late October and early to mid-November, making that period too crowded for a referendum. He is expected to be in Australia between September 11 (after the G20 on September 9-10) and his visit to the White House on October 23, which would allow a short four to five-week campaign. During that time there is just one parliamentary sitting week from September 11-14 and then four weeks of a break, which would give the Yes campaign clear air to prosecute its case.

>>19340214 Video: Noel Pearson warns of high cost if No vote on Indigenous voice to parliament succeeds - Cape York leader Noel Pearson has issued a subtle message for the “progressive No” campaign against the Indigenous voice to parliament, hinting that a failed referendum would be a big loss for them too. Mr Pearson was speaking at a voice forum in the Torres Strait this week when he indirectly addressed any voter who believes Australia should hold out for something more substantial than an advisory body with no power of veto. A video and audio recording of the forum shows Mr Pearson using hand gestures to indicate the voice was at head height while other, more ambitious proposals were high up in the air. If the voice failed at head height, he indicated, a sky-high proposal would not succeed. Still gesturing with his hands, Mr Pearson argued that a failed referendum would leave Indigenous Australians asking for less not more. “And if they say no to that (the voice), you think they’re going to say yes to that (more ambitious proposal)?’” he said. Mr Pearson lowered his hand to waist height as he told the forum: “If they say no (to the voice), next time you will be talking about whether they will say yes to this (less ambitious proposal)”.

>>19340240 Tony Abbott loud in rejection of Indigenous voice to parliament - Former prime minister Tony Abbott has invoked the spirit of US civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr and late Labor legend Bob Hawke in an attack on an Indigenous voice to parliament. Speaking at an Institute of Public Affairs event in Perth on Wednesday night, Mr Abbott said a successful referendum on the voice would “entrench victimhood in our constitution forever”. “Citing … the wonderful words of Bob Hawke back on Australia Day in 1988, ‘we are a country with no hierarchy of descent. We are a country with no privilege of origin’. “Citing the immortal words of Martin Luther King from an earlier generation, ‘I want to live in a country where my four children are judged not by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character’. “My absolute desire is that we can go forward as one equal people and that’s why I’ll be voting no. Because I absolutely reject any suggestion that there is something fundamentally wrong with this great country, Australia.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487541

#31 - Part 40

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 11

>>19340258 Peter Dutton says his government would ‘fight’ for constitutional recognition - Peter Dutton has committed the Coalition to “fighting for” constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians, as he dismissed Anthony Albanese’s threat of Australia losing a once-in-a-generation chance for recognition as “arrogant and dismissive”. In response to the Prime Minister’s warning that a No vote in the voice referendum would mean constitutional recognition would not come around again, the Opposition Leader committed a Dutton-led government to constitutional recognition.

>>19340296 AUKUS alarm after nuclear dump in South Australia is axed - The government has abandoned a decade-long process to establish a low-level radioactive waste dump near Kimba in South Australia, declaring it will not challenge a court ruling in favour of Indigenous people who argued that their voice was ignored in the site’s selection. The Coalition suggested Australians should prepare for a surge of such outcomes under the proposed voice to parliament, and of ramifications for the AUKUS ­nuclear-powered submarine deal that requires Australia to establish a high-level nuclear waste dump.

>>19349726 Jacinta Price says ‘Australians don’t need to be welcomed to their own country’ - Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman, Jacinta Price, has called for an end to welcome to country acknowledgments before every sporting event and public gathering because the practice is “wrong” and dividing the nation. The attack comes after former prime minister Tony Abbott last week conceded he was “getting a little bit sick” of welcome to country, arguing the nation “belongs to all of us, not just to some of us.” Senator Price, a Warlpiri-Celtic woman who grew up in Alice Springs and the leading campaign spokeswoman against Anthony Albanese’s constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament, said “Australians don’t need to be welcomed to their own country”. “There is no problem with acknowledging our history, but rolling out these performances before every sporting event or public gathering is definitely divisive,” Senator Price told The Australian.

>>19349755 The heart of the matter: All Australians are created equal, and they should be treated in the same manner - "Cancel culture’s war on free thinking and free speech must be brought to an end. In order for future generations to benefit from common sense we must arm ourselves with the weapon of truth and stand unified with pride in our shared Australian values and national identity. I can understand the widespread willingness to recognise Australia’s Indigenous heritage. But most of that “recognition” is virtue-signalling. I believe one of our great strengths as a country is that, as Australians, we all play by the same rules and every Australian is entitled to equal dignity and respect, regardless of our background and upbringing, and regardless of how many generations our forebears have been here. Australia is a great country and our way of life is the envy of the world. I am proud to be Australian." - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Country Liberal Party senator for the NT - theaustralian.com.au

>>19349772 ‘Real concern’: David Littleproud at odds with Peter Dutton over alternative to Voice referendum - The Coalition is split on what they would take to the next election should the Voice to parliament referendum fail. While neither the Liberals or the Nationals support a Voice to parliament, both support constitutionally enshrined recognition of Indigenous Australians. While Mr Dutton has pledged to legislate local and regional voices, a fracture has emerged over what the Coalition would take to voters at the next election should the referendum fail. Speaking on ABC’s Insiders on Sunday, Nationals leader David Littleproud said he had concerns over “regional models”. Mr Littleproud said regional bodies would struggle to property represent massive land masses that were made up of “hundreds of diverse communities”. He instead signalled his support for local Indigenous bodies, saying empowering local elders would deliver better outcomes for First Nations people.

>>19355508 Qantas takes support for the voice to parliament to the skies with ‘yes23’ livery - Qantas will not rule out further measures to drum up support for the voice to parliament after painting three of its aircraft with the “Yes23” campaign logo. The Qantas Boeing 737, Jetstar A320 and QantasLink Dash 8 were unveiled at a major event in Sydney on Monday attended by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, the voice architect Noel Pearson, former AFL star Adam Goodes and Qantas’ entire senior leadership team. Outgoing chief executive Alan Joyce said they were backing the campaign because they believed “a formal voice to government would help close the gap for First Nations people in important areas like health, education and employment”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487542

#31 - Part 41

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 12

>>19361889 Prime Minister accuses No campaign of spreading AI misinformation - Anthony Albanese has accused the No campaign of spreading AI-generated misinformation ahead of the voice referendum, escalating his attack on media commentators opposed to his proposed constitutional change, including Peta Credlin and ­Andrew Bolt. On WSFM radio with Amanda Keller and Brendan Jones, the Prime Minister said it was ­“pretty scary frankly, some of the No campaign and stuff that’s going into people’s Facebook posts which is designed to spread misinformation”. “Some of it is AI-generated, some of it generated, of course, by people like the commentators that you have said.”

>>19361898 No campaigner’s comments on Stan Grant, Lidia Thorpe labelled ‘disgusting’, ‘grotesque’ - Remarks from a key figure in the Voice No campaign about Indigenous journalist Stan Grant and independent senator Lidia Thorpe have been condemned and labelled disgusting and grotesque. Australian Jewish Association head David Adler, who sits on the advisory board of top No outfit Advance with former prime minister Tony Abbott, insists he was not trying to insult the prominent Indigenous pair when he questioned Thorpe’s Aboriginal heritage and repeatedly suggested Grant had artificially darkened his skin.

>>19361927 No campaign dumps campaigners over racist remarks, distances itself from Adler - No campaign leader Nyunggai Warren Mundine has revealed he pushed two people out of his referendum campaign over allegedly racist comments, as he distanced himself from under-fire No figure David Adler. Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said on Tuesday that Opposition Leader Peter Dutton should disassociate himself from Adler after this masthead reported he repeatedly questioned senator Lidia Thorpe’s Aboriginal heritage and suggested Indigenous journalist Stan Grant artificially darkened his skin. Mundine said Adler’s comments were “bizarre” and, without referring directly to Adler, said questioning an Indigenous person’s cultural heritage constituted a “disgusting … racist attack”.

>>19367921 Video: ‘Why would I?’: Anthony Albanese ‘hasn’t read’ additional 25 pages of Uluru Statement material - Anthony Albanese says he hasn’t read the additional 25 pages attached to the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which talk of “reparations” to Indigenous Australians under a future treaty, despite the “divisive” material being seized upon by opponents of the Voice referendum in recent weeks. Speaking to 3AW host Neil Mitchell in an hour-long interview on Monday, the Prime Minister accused the No campaign and Opposition leader Peter Dutton of playing dirty and “saying things that they know are not true”. “Peter Dutton knows full well that a Voice will not have a say in where the submarines from AUKUS will go, they know the Uluru Statement from the Heart is one page, not hundreds of pages,” Mr Albanese said. “But what are the other 25 pages? I’ve read them, what are they?” Mitchell said. “What they are is a record of meetings … they’re records of the big lead-up that happened, in the lead-up to, ironically … the Uluru Statement from the Heart,” the PM said. “Do you agree with most of what is said in those 25 pages?” Mitchell said. “I haven’t read it,” Mr Albanese said. “You haven’t read it?” Mitchell said. “There’s 120 pages - why would I?” the PM said.

>>19367937 Albanese rules out legislating the voice if No campaign prevails - Anthony Albanese has ruled out legislating a voice to parliament if the referendum is defeated this year, pledging that he will honour a No vote and the decision of the Australian people. In his most definitive comments to date on the issue, the Prime Minister said that simply legislating a voice, rather than enshrining the advisory body in the Constitution, also was not the outcome Indigenous leaders had asked of the Australian people. “The Australian people - we are giving them a say,” he told an extended podcast with 3AW’s Neil Mitchell. “The idea that the Australian people vote ‘no’ and I say, ‘well, that’s OK, thanks very much for participating in the referendum, we are going to do it anyway’. No. I won’t do that.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487543

#31 - Part 42

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 13

>>19367951 Lidia Thorpe addresses ‘hard truths’ about rights and sovereignty of Indigenous people - An upcoming referendum on the Voice to parliament is “window dressing” and should be called off, senator Lidia Thorpe says. The independent senator and face of the Blak Sovereign Movement outlined her criticism of the proposal in her first address to the National Press Club. Senator Thorpe slammed the Uluru Statement from the Heart for promoting the Voice, which she called a “romanticised spiritual notion” of Indigenous sovereignty. “When we talk about sovereignty, we are talking about much more than just the romanticised spiritual notion talked about in the Uluru Statement. We are talking about real political sovereign power,” she said. “I know that might make people feel uncomfortable. But, too bad. That's why the government is scared to acknowledge it. “We are talking about sovereign rights. Rights to our home lands. Our rights to nurture our lands, water, sea, country, and sky, as we have for millennia.”

>>19382262 Anthony Albanese presses go to super-charge Indigenous voice to parliament campaign - Anthony Albanese, senior cabinet ministers and state premiers are preparing a nationwide blitz of battleground states and electorates, as the ALP and union campaign machines swing behind the Yes23 grassroots movement ahead of the voice referendum. The Prime Minister and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney on Saturday will use speeches on the final day of the ALP national conference in Brisbane to springboard Labor’s Yes campaign ahead of an expected October 14 referendum.

>>19382273 Warren Mundine to launch ‘vision’ at Conservative Political Action Conference - Indigenous entrepreneur Warren Mundine says it is time for Australian conservatives to rejoin discussions they once led on equality and rights. He flagged the Conservative Political Action Conference in Sydney as the forum to set out the movement’s commitments to Closing the Gap and economic prosperity for Indigenous Australians. Mr Mundine and Northern Territory senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, the Coalition’s spokeswoman on Indigenous affairs, will speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Sydney on Saturday. They are expected to reiterate their arguments against the Indigenous voice to parliament, as fellow speakers, including Tony Abbott and Pauline Hanson, are predicted to do.

>>19387384 Albanese declares Voice an opportunity to make Australia greater - The prime minister has rallied Labor members to campaign “like you’ve never campaigned before” for the Voice, to flip opinion polls showing the referendum in peril, at the party’s national conference in Brisbane. Anthony Albanese said the Voice to parliament referendum was a tough undertaking for his first-term government, but Labor was committed to taking on issues “not because they’re convenient, but out of conviction”. A Yes vote, Albanese argued, would “resound across our continent” and make “Australia, the greatest country on earth, just that little bit greater”.

>>19387439 Inside the conservative forum rallying troops against the Voice - Coalition firebrand senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price was treated to a rock star’s welcome as she strode onto the stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Sydney and rallied the crowd to do everything they could to oppose the Voice to parliament referendum. The Voice was a central theme of this year’s CPAC Australia event on Saturday, as the who’s who of the No campaign rubbed shoulders with hundreds of conservative voters who paid up to $600 to attend the two-day conference. For those chasing the VIP experience and access to the after party, it was $7000. Wearing a “Vote No” T-shirt, Price told attendees that while the polling was trending in the direction of a referendum defeat, they should not get complacent.

>>19387527 Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price lashes the prime minister over the Voice - Indigenous Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has lashed the prime minister, telling a conservative conference Anthony Albanese is “so concerned with his own popularity he’s willing to tear apart the country”. The prominent No Campaigner has been vocal about how she doesn’t believe the Constitution should be amended to recognise Indigenous Australians as the nation’s First Peoples and enshrine a permanent, independent Aboriginal and Torres Strait advisory body, or “Voice”, to parliament and the executive government. Senator Price walked onto the stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Saturday at The Star Convention Centre in Sydney to a roaring applause and standing ovation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487544

#31 - Part 43

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 14

>>19397646 Penny Wong and Noel Pearson hit the churches and the temples to preach for the voice - After a weekend of preaching to the converted at Labor’s national conference, the ALP and the Yes campaign are hitting the temples and the churches to convert undecided voters to the voice. Foreign Minister Penny Wong and voice co-architect Noel Pearson were invited to a Sikh temple in Adelaide’s Allenby Gardens on Sunday to speak to worshippers about constitutional change that would guarantee an Indigenous advisory body and, proponents argue, close the gap where previous attempts have failed. At the revered langar - the community kitchen of the temple - they served food to the worshippers, following the ancient Sikh tradition of feeding anyone who is hungry and in need.

>>19404413 Anthony Albanese could announce the Indigenous voice to parliament poll date next week - Anthony Albanese is preparing to announce the date for the voice referendum as early as next week, with the Prime Minister saying parliament “will still be in total control of its destiny” if the advisory body is enshrined in the Constitution. Mr Albanese will head to Perth on Monday for a meeting of his cabinet ministers, who he wants to consult before kick starting the ­official campaign, and will attend a breakfast event on Tuesday. Government sources confirmed the date won’t be revealed while he’s in Perth but said it was possible Australians could learn when they’ll head to the polls once Mr Albanese returned from Western Australia, with October 14 the most likely date. September 11 is the last possible day an October 14 poll can be ­announced. Mr Albanese will travel to Indonesia, The Philippines and India between September 6-10.

>>19417286 Voice referendum date to be announced in South Australia next Wednesday - The date for the Voice to Parliament referendum will be announced at an event in Adelaide on Wednesday next week, the Prime Minister's Office has confirmed, as the battle to win voters in key states ramps up. Anthony Albanese has previously said the vote will happen in October or November, with some speculation it will be held on October 14 due to travel commitments Mr Albanese has made in the coming months.

>>19417576 Video: ‘Tick will be accepted, cross will not’: AEC boss slammed for confusing Voice referendum rule - The head of the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) has sparked confusion after suggesting that ticks will be counted as Yes votes but crosses will not be counted as Nos in the Voice referendum. Opposition leader Peter Dutton now says he will write to the AEC over what he called the “completely outrageous” situation. On referendum day, widely expected to be October 14, Australians will be asked to write either “yes” or “no” in English on the ballot paper to the question, “A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?” But appearing on Sky News on Wednesday, Australian Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers was asked by host Tom Connell whether vote counters would accept other types of marks inside the box. Mr Rogers said it was a “great question” and again urged people to “make sure you write on that box ‘yes’ or ‘no’ in English”. “Now there are some savings provisions, but I need to be very clear with people -- when we look at that, it is likely that a tick will be accepted as a formal vote for yes, but a cross will not be accepted as a formal vote,” he said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487545

#31 - Part 44

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 15

>>19417591 Dutton cross about AEC tick ruling on Voice referendum - Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has called for a re-think by the Australian Electoral Commission after it said a tick could be counted as a Yes vote in the Voice to parliament referendum, but a cross would not count as a No vote. In an interview on Sky News on Wednesday, Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers stressed that Australians should write either Yes or No on the referendum ballot paper in English. However, he then added: “There are some ‘savings provisions’, but I need to be very clear with people: when we look at that, it is likely that a tick will be accepted as a formal vote of ‘Yes’, but a cross will not be accepted as a formal vote.” A spokesman for the AEC said the rules for referendums had been the same for a long time and the “savings provisions” - that is, the ability to count a vote where the instructions have not been followed but the voter’s intention is clear – had been in place for 30 years. Dutton seized on Rogers’ “outrageous” comments in an interview with radio station 2GB, claiming the ruling would give the Yes campaign a clear advantage. “If a tick counts for Yes, then a cross should count for No - it’s as clear as that … I just think Australians want a fair vote, they want to be informed, they want to have the detail before them,” Dutton said.

>>19417606 An Indigenous voice will help fight against endemic disease - "Later this year Australians will get the chance to vote to change our Constitution to recognise the place of First Nations Australians. It’s a chance to unify the country. As Health Minister, I can’t think of an area of policy where that voice will be more important and more valuable than in health. With the best of intentions and substantial investment from both sides of the parliament, the current approach simply isn’t working. Listening to an Indigenous voice to parliament will give us a better insight into how better to spend the hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money that goes into First Nations health -- getting better outcomes and better value for money. Politicians don’t know best – we need to listen to communities to hear their solutions and ensure funding is getting to where it needs to go, ultimately to ensure better outcomes and longer lives." - Mark Butler, federal Health and Aged Care Minister - theaustralian.com.au

>>19417616 The No campaign against an Indigenous voice to parliament concedes a six-week campaign will be challenging - The No campaign has hit out at Anthony Albanese for overseeing a six-week referendum campaign on an Indigenous voice to parliament, labelling it “an absolute slap in the face” to Australians struggling with cost-of-living pressures. A No campaign spokesman told The Australian their strategy would not change once the referendum campaign officially began, which was to communicate to battleground state voters it was a “terrible idea to divide the country with this proposal”. Opponents to the voice are targeting South Australia, Tasmania, Western Australia and Queensland as the No camp only needs a majority in three states to defeat the referendum. “The campaign is a challenge and six weeks is a long time,” the No campaign spokesman said. “It’s obvious to us that the PM has chosen a six-week campaign as it suits both the Yes campaign and the government to spend the $100m we think they have set aside for advertising during the referendum. It is an absolute slap in the face to every Australian that while they are worried about rent and the cost of petrol, the PM will be using their money on this campaign.”

>>19427643 AEC ticks off Peter Dutton over ‘factually incorrect’ complaint - The Australian Electoral Commission has rebuked Peter Dutton for making a “factually incorrect” complaint after the federal opposition leader complained that a tick on a Voice referendum ballot paper counting as a vote but a cross not counting would advantage the Yes camp. On Thursday, Dutton called on the AEC to rethink counting ticks as a Yes vote but not counting crosses as a No vote on a referendum ballot paper - even though doing this has been standard practice for the commission in referendums for 30 years under so-called ‘savings provisions’.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487546

#31 - Part 45

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 16

>>19427688 ABC management and Leigh Sales intervene in debate on Uluru Statement and argue it's a ‘one-page document’ - ABC management and top journalist Leigh Sales have instructed staff at the public broadcaster that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is a “one-page document” and given them tactics to quash any arguments contrary to this. The intervention from Sales and ABC management comes days after the broadcaster’s Media Watch program criticised attempts to label an editorial from Sky News host Peta Credlin arguing that the Uluru Statement was 26 pages long as “false information” on Facebook.

>>19427747 Edict over Uluru statement a step too far, says ABC host Tom Switzer - ABC Radio National presenter Tom Switzer says it’s “highly ­inappropriate” that the public broadcaster issued an edict to staff on what to say in a debate disputing that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is longer than a one-page document. On Friday, The Australian ­revealed that ABC management and top journalist Leigh Sales told staff that the Uluru statement was a single-page document. Sales ­offered numerous tactics on ­addressing any arguments in ­opposition to this. Switzer, who hosts the ­Between the Lines program on Radio ­National, said the ABC and individual staff members should not be arbiters on what is right and wrong in debate. “Why should the ABC or any media outlet issue edicts to staff on highly contentious issues where opinion among even ABC staffers varies?” he said.

>>19434584 WA Nationals backflip on voice, join federal party’s No push - The West Australian Nationals have fallen in line with the federal party on the Indigenous voice to parliament, backflipping on earlier support for the proposal. WA Nationals leader Shane Love, who is also the WA opposition leader, had confirmed his support as recently as April for the proposal to amend the constitution with words guaranteeing the existence of an advisory body with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members. However, the WA Nationals have come under pressure to revise their position on the voice after a campaign by the state Pastoral and Graziers Association to frame unpopular state Aboriginal cultural heritage laws as a sign of things to come if the voice referendum succeeded. New WA premier Roger Cook dumped the laws this month, describing them as too onerous for landowners.

>>19446073 Indigenous voice to parliament: Yes23 campaign must target 1.7m ‘soft’ voters - Yes23 must win over at least 38 per cent of the nation’s 4.6 million undecided voters to claim victory in the October referendum, according to confidential research targeting young people, women, multicultural communities and soft voters in four battleground states. The 31-page Yes23 Persuasive Conversations document, obtained by The Australian, includes new strategies designed to reverse polling trends indicating the pro-voice campaign is on track to lose the referendum, which is expected to be called for October 14. Campaign volunteers have been told to name a “villain” when convincing at least 1.7 million undecided voters to join the Yes cause, including invoking mining billionaires who “care more about profit than protecting our country”.

>>19446079 Voice No vote will damage Australia’s standing: Bishop - Former foreign minister Julie Bishop says Australia’s international reputation will be damaged if the country votes No in the looming Voice to parliament referendum. Ms Bishop joined Foreign Minister Penny Wong in Perth on Monday for a street walk organised to build support for the Yes campaign in Western Australia, considered safe territory for the No side. Ms Bishop, who served as foreign minister under Liberal leaders Tony Abbott and Malcolm Turnbull, echoed comments from Labor figures including Anthony Albanese that if voters rejected the Voice it risked sending a negative message about Australia’s “openness and empathy”.

>>19452806 Anthony Albanese won’t be campaigning for an Indigenous voice to parliament each day - Anthony Albanese won’t campaign daily for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, but instead appear at major referendum events in between running the country, declaring the proposal was “about just giving a bit of respect” to Indigenous people. The Prime Minister attempted to play down the reach of the Voice by comparing it to business groups and stakeholders that provide advice to government.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487548

#31 - Part 46

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 17

>>19452823 Linda Burney is sincere, but not suitable to be face of the Yes campaign for the Indigenous voice to parliament - "Linda Burney is a suitable, sincere and genuine face for the Indigenous voice to parliament but she is not up to being the voice for the Yes campaign for the constitutional referendum. Whether this failure is through inability to perform publicly in parliament, press conferences and public meetings is a result of a “mini stroke”, a heart operation or medication is immaterial. It has been clear for months Burney has been unable to answer simple questions about the voice to parliament, even in sympathetic interviews, that she has Ministerial colleagues on hand at public meetings to help her sell the voice and in parliament her inability to handle basic requests for information is embarrassing to all." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19452845 Video: Meta ends partnership with RMIT FactLab amid voice referendum bias claims - Tech giant Meta has suspended its partnership with RMIT’s fact checking program “effective immediately” after receiving complaints about bias and unfairness relating to the upcoming voice to parliament referendum. Meta executives have distanced themselves from RMIT’s FactLab after it recently came under fire for slapping a “false information” label on Sky News Australia host Peta Credlin’s reports posted on Facebook that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is not a single-page document but is 26 pages long. The FactLab’s failure to have a current certification by the International Fact-Checking Network was also blamed for Meta’s decision to cut ties with FactLab.

>>19458899 Video: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament referendum set for October 14 - Australians will decide the fate of a constitutionally enshrined Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament on October 14. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese officially set the date during a visit to Adelaide, sending the nation to the polls for the first referendum in more than two decades. "For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, this has been a marathon," he said. "For all of us, it is now a sprint and across the finish line is a more unified, more reconciled Australia, with greater opportunities for all." The proposed Voice would have the power to advise the parliament and federal government on matters that affect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. It will need both a majority of the national vote and a majority the states - a so-called double majority - supporting the referendum for the Voice to be enshrined in the constitution.

>>19458930 Anthony Albanese’s Indigenous voice to parliament referendum announcement in full - "My fellow Australians, For many years, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have advocated for Constitutional Recognition through a voice. Our Government - along with every single State and Territory Government - has committed to it. Legal experts have endorsed it. People on all sides of the parliament have backed it. Faith groups and sporting codes and local councils and businesses and unions have embraced it. An army of volunteers from every part of this great nation are throwing all their energy behind it. Now, my fellow Australians, you can vote for it."' - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese - theaustralian.com.au

>>19458950 Yes23 targets Liberal seats, backed by unions - The Yes23 campaign will direct its army of volunteers into 18 Liberal-held marginal seats and traditionally conservative electorates, under a national strategy to win support from millions of soft voters ahead of the October 14 referendum. The Australian can reveal prominent moderate Liberal MPs and party luminaries will lead the push for undecided conservative voters in Western Australia, Tasmania, South Australia, NSW and Victoria to vote Yes for a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice advisory body. Malcolm Turnbull and former federal Liberal Party deputy leader Julie Bishop this week joined the Yes23 campaign in Perth and Sydney, and will continue supporting the push into Liberal Party heartland.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487549

#31 - Part 47

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 18

>>19458972 OPINION: Why my government didn’t back the Voice, but I’m now voting yes - "I will be voting Yes in the referendum on the Voice. Constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians is long overdue and has been a bipartisan policy objective for many years. It’s time to get this done. Six years ago, after long consultations, Indigenous Australians resolved that they wanted constitutional recognition to take the form of an entrenched Indigenous advisory council to be called the Voice. Since then, this particular amendment has been the singular focus of the constitutional recognition movement. If this is the form of recognition most Indigenous Australians want, the rest of us need a good reason to say No. Back in 2017, when this idea was new and lacked detail, my government did not support it. We had two major concerns. First, we believed it had no chance of success in a referendum. The history of constitutional reform in Australia is a dismal one, and to date any proposal faced with concerted opposition has failed. Our other major concern was that the Voice would create an institution in the Constitution, the qualification for which was something other than Australian citizenship. For me, as a republican prime minister, this was particularly important. I believe our head of state should be one of us: an Australian citizen, not whichever English aristocrat happens to be the king or queen of the United Kingdom. I have wrestled long and hard with this issue of constitutional principle, and I have concluded that while the Voice amendment is not entirely consistent with my egalitarian, republican values, nonetheless we are better off supporting it." - Malcolm Turnbull, prime minister of Australia from 2015-2018 - theage.com.au

>>19458993 OPINION: Let’s make a difference, and make history too - "I hope October 14, 2023, is a day my grandchildren will learn about at school. The day that Australia said Yes to constitutional recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and Yes to a voice. The day that Australians from all walks of life and all backgrounds and faiths and traditions came together and voted to celebrate our 65,000 years of history. More importantly, I hope all Australians can look back on ­October 14 and say this was the day the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians started to close. I hope we can look back and say that on that Saturday in spring when Australians voted for a voice to parliament, our country found a way forward on issues where for too long we’ve been going backwards. That’s the beauty of this idea, a proposal Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have been working on for more than a decade. It’s not just about celebrating our history - it’s about getting better results in the future." - Senator Malarndirri McCarthy, Assistant Minister for Indigenous Australians - theaustralian.com.au

>>19459026 OPINION: The Constitution is too important to change because of the vibe - "Especially on something as sensitive as the recognition of Indigenous people in the Constitution, it’s a big mistake to sponsor a referendum proposal that might fail. Had the prime minister confined his proposed change, formally announced on Wednesday, to an overdue recognition of Australia’s Indigenous heritage, it would almost certainly have been carried by acclamation, as the 1967 referendum was. Sadly for the people who could be shattered by the result, what the PM is actually proposing is the biggest change to our Constitution we’ve ever been asked to make. The failure of the current referendum shouldn’t be the disaster for reconciliation that many people understandably fear. It could actually be a golden opportunity to end the separatism that’s at the heart of Aboriginal disadvantage and allow Australians to go forward together as one equal people with an Indigenous heritage, a British foundation and an immigrant character. Indeed, acknowledging that in the Constitution, in preference to this divisive Voice, would be something in which we could all take pride." - Tony Abbott, former Liberal prime minister of Australia - theage.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487550

#31 - Part 48

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 19

>>19459035 OPINION: This isn’t a unifying Voice for Australia, it’s the prime minister’s Voice for division - "I was asked recently what question I think Australians should have front of mind when they head to the ballot box on October 14. My answer is a simple one: do you want Australians to be divided in our Constitution? The prime minister is about to fire the starter’s gun on the most divisive referendum in our nation’s history. And make no mistake, it is divisive through and through. It’s dividing experts, it’s dividing politicians, it’s dividing Australians. It rests on the premise that the Voice could effectively represent Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, but it’s even dividing our communities. I am fighting for a No vote because I already asked myself that simple question, do I want Australians to be divided in our Constitution? No. I want to be one together, not two divided." - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Country Liberal Party senator for the Northern Territory and former deputy mayor of Alice Springs - theage.com.au

>>19464934 OPINION: Your Constitution was designed to erase us. Your token Voice does not empower us - "The referendum date has been announced, and official campaigning has begun. This will be a difficult time for my people. Many of our activists, elders and allies have been yelled at and called racist for not accepting Yes campaign propaganda. The weeks ahead will cause more pain for the many First Peoples and allies who don’t want this referendum. As sovereign people, we do not want to be in your Constitution. Your Constitution was designed to erase our existence and for us to be recognised in it with a token Voice does not empower us, it is another step in the process of assimilation. If the Yes vote wins, we are guaranteed more of the same: First Nations voices calling for control over our lives and Country, and governments twisting, bullying and ignoring them as they continue to kill us and benefit from our land. If the No vote wins, we will start afresh: a clean slate to work together to explore and own the Truth of this country. Those fighting for real change will be emboldened."

>>19464924 PM asks Australians to vote Yes for a simple ’idea’ - Anthony Albanese has asked ­Australians to vote Yes for a ­simple and straightforward “idea” ­enshrining an Indigenous voice advisory body in the Constitution, firing the starting gun on a six-week election-style campaign and a multimillion-dollar advertising blitz. The Prime Minister declared that “when Yes wins, all Australians will win” after announcing an October 14 referendum date at the Yes23 campaign launch in Adelaide. In his pitch for support among faith-based, multicultural, suburban and regional communities, Mr Albanese said the government’s constitutional amendment was “simple, clear, straightforward … unambiguous”. Under pressure from the No campaign over the lack of detail around the voice advisory body’s function and design, Mr Albanese did not repeat his argument that the constitutional change was modest.

>>19471483 Kim Beazley wants Australians to vote Yes for an Indigenous voice to parliament to show respect - Kim Beazley remembers Indigenous boys and girls forcibly separated from their parents coming to the family home in Perth for a meal in 1950s and 60s, and shaping his belief in the ­dignity, opportunities and rights that should be afforded to the First Australians. His father, Kim Beazley Sr, had been an early advocate for land rights, for removing racially discriminatory provisions in the Constitution, and as education minister in the Whitlam government allowed for Indigenous children to be taught in their own language at school. “We always had kids coming out to spend a bit of time with us,” Mr Beazley told The Weekend Australian. “What those kids were actually experiencing, who had been through our house, it shocked me absolutely, and did very much affect my response to the Stolen Generation.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487551

#31 - Part 49

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 20

>>19474105 One side of Indigenous voice to parliament debate is being given extra privileges: this is not democracy - "Section 128 of our Constitution sets out a unique and innovative process for amending a Westminster-style constitution in part because it is the only instance in our nation’s founding document where direct democracy is employed. It puts a question to amend our highest law above the parliament and entirely in the hands of the people. Yet as we hurtle towards a referendum that would entrench a new advisory arm of government for Indigenous people in our Constitution, our founders may well be rolling in their graves about the ways in which the parliament and the government are undermining the process, and in doing so undermining the primacy of people. In short, we have powerful corporations that do not have a vote under section 128 being given carte blanche to influence the result, a misleading question on the ballot paper and the government working to suppress political speech about the nature of the proposal. For the maintenance of social harmony our founders would have assumed parliament would ensure a fair process, but we the people are being treated to anything but." - Louise Clegg, Sydney barrister - theaustralian.com.au

>>19481563 Dutton promises another vote if Indigenous Voice fails - Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has promised to hold a referendum on constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians if the Voice is defeated at the ballot box next month, and he wins power at the next election. Setting out some of his alternatives to a Voice that is written into the Constitution, the opposition leader said he supported “regional voices” and the recognition of First Australians. Asked what he would do if the October referendum was defeated and the Coalition won the next election, Dutton said he was willing to negotiate the creation of local and regional consultation groups in response to a report to the government by Indigenous leaders Tom Calma and Marcia Langton last year. Dutton said the Coalition would go to the next election with a policy to hold a referendum to recognise Indigenous people in the Constitution, but without a Voice specified in the Constitution.

>>19481586 Video: John Farnham backs Voice, permits his anthem to front Yes campaign ad - Australian music legend John Farnham has thrown his support behind the Yes campaign, and permitted his iconic anthem You’re the Voice to be used in a television ad that will encourage voters to see the Voice referendum as a profound moment in the nation’s history. It is one of the few occasions Farnham has allowed his 1986 hit to be used in a commercial, having agreed to license it for an undisclosed sum to Yes campaign outfit Uluru Dialogue. He hoped allowing the song to support a Yes vote would help make the case for the constitutional change. “This song changed my life. I can only hope that now it might help, in some small way, to change the lives of our First Nations peoples for the better,” Farnham said in a statement.

>>19481597 Peter Dutton’s sassy dig after John Farnham lends his voice in new campaign ad for Yes vote - Peter Dutton has taken a sassy dig at the Yes campaign after Aussie music legend John Farnham gave permission for his iconic anthem to be used in support of the Voice referendum. Farnham's hit, You’re the Voice, will be featured in the History is Calling campaign that will air on TV and the internet across the country in the lead up to the October 14 referendum. It marks the first time the former Australian of the Year and ARIA Hall of Famer has given permission for the classic song to be used in a commercial. But Mr Dutton dryly noted the song’s lyric could backfire on the Yes camp. “In a sense, it’s the appropriate theme song for the Yes campaign, because remember that the key line in the lyrics there is, you know, ‘you’re the voice, try to understand it’,” he told Sky News on Sunday. “I honestly don’t think most Australians understand it. And they want to be informed.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487552

#31 - Part 50

Australia / China Tensions- Part 1

>>19194520 Solomon Islands PM accuses Australia of pulling budget support, foreign interference - The prime minister of Solomon Islands, Manasseh Sogavare says China has agreed to provide funding to prop up the country's troubled budget, and also accused Australia and development partners of suddenly withdrawing financial support worth millions of dollars.

>>19199781 Democracy activists welcome here say Aussie MPs, as new figures show few Hongkongers seek visas - People fleeing Chinese oppression in Hong Kong should consider Australia as a destination, the leaders of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China say, as new figures show barely a handful of protection visas are granted to Hongkongers by Australia each year.

>>19204881 ‘My son is innocent’: mother of imprisoned Australian businessman denies he’s a Chinese spy - Australian businessman Alexander Csergo brought home a “shopping list” given to him by two Chinese intelligence officials as evidence of China’s overt and ultimately unsuccessful efforts to cultivate him as a source, his lawyers say. Csergo’s elderly mother, Cathy Csergo said public allegations that her son was involved in espionage were devastating to her family and that his isolation was cruel and unjustified.

>>19210696 Video: How China's foreign minister going MIA could affect diplomacy with Australia - China's Foreign Minister Qin Gang has disappeared from public view after his last public appearance about three weeks ago. Experts say it is the first time a senior minister in the Chinese government has been out of the public eye for more than 20 days without explanation. His disappearance has led to much speculation in China and in the Chinese diaspora around the world about possible changes in the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

>>19220783 China’s spy threat to our solar energy grid - Australia’s fast-growing solar energy grid is being dominated by Chinese firms with links to the Chinese Communist Party, raising fears of the potential for Beijing to sabotage, surveil or disrupt solar energy supplies. New research shows Chinese companies dominate 58 per cent of the Australian inverter market, making the devices, which are internet-connected and can be remotely controlled, potentially vulnerable to any Chinese attempt to target the solar electricity grid.

>>19226522 Battle to save Aussie dad from ‘justice’ in America - Lawyers for an Australian father locked up in prison for nine months over claims he trained Chinese military pilots will front a Sydney Court this week to apply for a temporary stay of proceedings. Dan Duggan has been in solitary confinement awaiting extradition to the US based on 11-year-old allegations he trained Chinese military pilots in South Africa from 2010 to 2012. The allegations, which Mr Duggan strenuously denies, are detailed in a US indictment filed in 2017, at the same time that US foreign policy towards China took a dramatic turn.

>>19226545 Australian ‘Top Gun’ accused of training Chinese is backed by US marine - A former high-ranking member of the United States military has thrown his support behind Daniel Duggan, an Australian citizen and former marine who is being held in maximum security over accusations he trained Chinese military pilots more than a decade ago. Duggan, 54, who lives near Orange in regional NSW with his wife and six children, has been in custody since October last year after the US indicated it would request his extradition. He denies any wrongdoing. In a letter written last week, retired marine colonel Ben Hancock said he had known Duggan for 25 years, including serving in the same squadron for two years, working closely on a six-month ship deployment, and being deployed in Kuwait. He described Duggan as a “loyal patriot” and team player who served the US honourably and could be counted on in difficult circumstances.

>>19237694 ‘I think he is gone’: The strange disappearance of China’s foreign minister Qin Gang - Beijing’s official line had been that Qin Gang has been unwell. The explanation held for a couple of weeks, but few experts now believe that one of China’s top foreign affairs officials has been bedridden for a month without an update on his condition. Illness has also been used previously as an excuse by the Chinese government for officials who have fallen suddenly out of favour and disappeared.

>>19237763 Former top gun pilot Daniel Duggan fights ‘political extradition’ to United States - Former top gun pilot Daniel Duggan’s lawyers say there is a political character to the charges against their client and will present expert evidence on deteriorating relations between the United States and China. Lawyers for the 54-year-old Australian citizen are fighting his extradition to the United States to face charges over the alleged training of Chinese fighter pilots.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487553

#31 - Part 51

Australia / China Tensions- Part 2

>>19237802 Ex-US Marine accused of training Chinese military pilots fights extradition to the US - Former Marine Daniel Duggan once flew Harrier jets for the United States, taking off and landing on Navy carriers during international missions as part of Marine Attack Squadron 214, based in Yuma, Arizona. That was over 20 years ago, but his activity since leaving the service is now the subject of a US indictment that alleges he used his specialist skills to teach Chinese pilots how to land planes on aircraft carriers, claims he denies.

>>19237815 Jailed pilot will rely on novel defence never used in Australia - One of Australia’s top barristers will seek to expand the legal definition of a political offence during a challenge to the extradition of Daniel Duggan, an Australian man accused of training Chinese military pilots overseas. Barrister Bret Walker SC said a political offence does not have a precise definition, with the Extradition Act defining it as an offence of a political character because of the circumstances in which it is committed, “or otherwise”. He said no case law exists setting out the interpretation of those two words, “or otherwise”. “This will be it,” Walker said. “There’s been no case of this kind argued or decided before.”

>>19237833 Daniel Duggan: flight school where former US marine taught says syllabus ‘totally unclassified’ - The flight school where former marine Daniel Duggan allegedly helped train Chinese fighter pilots insists all of his teaching was legal, in line with international standards and “totally unclassified”. The Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA) says it has strict protocols and a code of conduct to ensure no information is shared that might be legally or operationally sensitive – or security classified.

>>19237861 Wife of ex-Top Gun pilot slams ‘terrible injustice’ in extradition fight - A former US marine pilot will remain in limbo for at least another four months as he fights against an extradition order which has been called a “terrible injustice”. Daniel Edmund Duggan has been in custody since October last year after the US indicated it would seek his extradition for charges of conspiracy, arms trafficking and money laundering. On Tuesday, his wife Saffrine Duggan stood outside Sydney Downing Centre Court with the couple’s six children amid a crowd of protesters holding signs demanding Mr Duggan’s release.

>>19237876 Court date set for jailed ex-pilot Daniel Duggan to fight US extradition over claims he trained Chinese pilots - The wife of former US marine pilot Daniel Duggan says the impact of his ongoing incarceration on their family is "horrendous". The 54-year-old denies allegations he helped train Chinese military pilots more than a decade ago, which relate to his work at the Test Flying Academy of South Africa. An extradition hearing was set for November 24, however Mr Duggan's legal team says the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) is investigating the role ASIO played in the lead-up to his arrest, which could impact the case.

>>19237884 Video: Pilot Daniel Duggan in Australia, accused of training Chinese military pilots - The wife of a former U.S top gun has choked back tears as her husband fights extradition from Australia to America, accused of training Chinese military pilots. Daniel Duggan has been locked up since late last year. His family and supporters today demanded his immediate release. - 7NEWS Australia

>>19237894 Video: Family of former US pilot protests outside Sydney court - Family and friends of detained former American marine Daniel Duggan have held a peaceful protest outside a Sydney court, as the father fights extradition to the United States. - 9 News Australia

>>19237929 'Top Gun' pilot speaks from his Australian prison cell as he fights extradition to the US for allegedly training Chinese pilots - Daniel Duggan, 54, says "Hello". The Australian citizen and former US Marine pilot is calling from his maximum-security cell in New South Wales. It's the first time he's spoken publicly. Talking to 7.30 comes with risk. His words could be used as evidence against him. He's been in isolation for nine months. "It's not that I want to speak out or decided to speak out, but I feel that I've had a very unfair ability to defend myself," he told 7.30.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487554

#31 - Part 52

Australia / China Tensions- Part 3

>>19237940 Video: Former US Marine pilot proclaims innocence from Australian prison cell | 7.30 - For nine months, Australian citizen Daniel Duggan has been locked up in a maximum security prison while he fights extradition to the United States. The US Department of Justice wants to prosecute the former marine Major, for allegedly training Chinese fighter pilots more than a decade ago. Tonight, Duggan speaks publicly for the first time. Angelique Donnellan has this exclusive report. - ABC News In-depth

>>19243436 Video: Chinese foreign minister Qin Gang removed from office - Chinese leader Xi Jinping removed his handpicked foreign minister after less than seven months on the job, a surprise move that leaves more questions than answers around China’s black-box political system. Qin Gang’s removal comes after his mysterious absence from the public stage over the past month, a disappearance that has sparked speculation about his fate and cast a global spotlight on the Communist Party’s opaque governance of the world’s second-largest economy.

>>19243465 Video: Chinese minister replaced amid claim of affair with TV host - China’s foreign minister has been abruptly replaced following weeks of speculation about his disappearance from public view and speculation that he has been sacked for an affair with a newsreader. A hastily summoned gathering of the National People’s Congress standing committee announced on Tuesday that Qin Gang had been removed from his post. He has been replaced by his predecessor, Wang Yi, after a month in which he made no public appearances.

>>19243492 Chinese Foreign Ministry scrubs missing minister from its records - China’s Foreign Ministry has removed all mention of Qin Gang from its online records, purging the former foreign minister’s name and his meetings with world leaders. It follows President Xi Jinping’s decision to sack Qin from his role on Tuesday night after rumours ranging from illness to an extramarital affair with a high-profile TV presenter, to a power struggle at the top of the Chinese Communist Party, dogged the rising former ambassador to the United States.

>>19243524 Top legislature appoints officials, reviews law - China's top legislature voted to appoint Wang Yi as foreign minister and Pan Gongsheng as central bank governor, as it convened a session on Tuesday. Qin Gang was removed from the post of foreign minister he concurrently held; Yi Gang was removed from the post of governor of the People's Bank of China, according to a decision adopted at the fourth session of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People's Congress (NPC). - GT staff reporters - globaltimes.cn

>>19243535 China's top legislature adopts a decision of removing Qin Gang as foreign minister, appoints Wang Yi as foreign minister - China's top legislature convened a session on Tuesday to review a draft criminal law amendment and a decision on official appointment and removal. Qin Gang has been removed of his position as Foreign Minister. Wang Yi was appointed as the Chinese Foreign Minister. Tuesday's decision has not touched on Qin's title of State Councilor. - Chen Qingqing - globaltimes.cn

>>19250156 ‘Don’t wait’ to go to Beijing, Julie Bishop tells Anthony Albanese - Julie Bishop says China’s ­reappointment of Wang Yi as Foreign Minister ­“augurs well” for Australia’s relationship with Beijing, and has urged Anthony Albanese to travel to Beijing as soon as possible to accelerate the thaw in bilateral ties.

>>19250241 US coercion will ultimately lead to strong opposition from people of Australia, Pacific Island Countries - "The US and its allies have long been engaged in political manipulation in the region, with the purported aim to impose its own political and economic will on the PICs. More often than not, US aid programs are camouflaged instruments of political influence to shape and reshape the local political landscape. In contrast, China's relationship with countries in the South Pacific region has always been based on the principle of mutual respect, mutual trust and mutual benefit. China's assistance to the countries has significantly improved the local infrastructure, speeded up the economic development and elevated the people's livelihood with tangible fruitful outcomes and enduring benefits." - Chen Hong - globaltimes.cn

>>19257040 Darwin port review ‘holds back’ China ties - Uncertainty over the future of the Chinese-owned Port of Darwin has emerged as a barrier to the restoration of relations with Beijing, which says tensions over the “blue bridge” between the countries could slow the relaxation of trade sanctions on Australian exports. As Anthony Albanese weighs an invitation to visit Beijing before the end of the year, a senior Chinese government official urged the “quick conclusion” of a review of the port’s Chinese ownership, saying the issue was undermining the stabilisation of bilateral ties.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487555

#31 - Part 53

Australia / China Tensions- Part 4

>>19267329 Adelaide top gun Keith Hartley provided training for Chinese airmen, search warrant claims - An Adelaide-based former jet fighter pilot is accused of conducting training for military exercises that were “directed, funded or supervised’’ by China’s People’s Liberation Army. Former RAF top gun Keith Andrew Hartley, 74, is suspected of providing “training involving the use of arms or practising military exercises” to PLA pilots between June 2018 and January 2022. The allegations emerged after Mr Hartley lost a Federal Court bid to have the Australian Federal Police search warrant used to search his home in November voided. He has not been charged with any offence. The raid related to his role as chief operating officer of controversial South African company Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA). He is the second Australian-based former military fighter pilot being investigated for his involvement in the alleged training of Chinese fighter pilots, with former US Marine pilot Dan Duggan incarcerated while he fights an extradition request by the US government.

>>19272537 US to further military footprint in Australia to suppress China; Washington 'source of tension' in Asia-Pacific - Chinese analysts on Sunday warned of a more volatile and unstable Asia-Pacific region where the US would provoke a regional arms race with more large-scale military drills and more strategic weapons deployments, after the latest move between the US and Australia that reached an agreement to expand the US military footprint on the southern continent to contain China's development. - GT staff reporters - globaltimes.cn

>>19272546 Being an offensive bridgehead not in Australia's national interests: Global Times editorial - By serving as the frontline base for Washington's aggression toward China, Australia is essentially tying itself with explosives and placing the lit fuse in the hands of Washington politicians known for their adventurous and provocative thinking toward China. If Australia provides a stronghold or arms for deterring or attacking China, it will undoubtedly face resolute retaliation from China. This is not alarmist talk but military common sense; Australia must not harbor any illusions. - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>19272640 Australian businessman ‘in survival mode’ when he placated Chinese intelligence with open-source information, documents claim - Alexander Csergo, a Sydney businessman, has been charged with one count of reckless foreign interference, with police alleging he provided reports to his handlers whom he knew were part of China’s vast state intelligence apparatus. But, as Csergo told police in an interview detailed in the police statement of facts tendered to a New South Wales court, he says he felt essentially trapped in China - most acutely during the height of Shanghai’s highly restrictive Covid lockdowns – and that he needed to placate his handlers or risk being detained in the country.

>>19272701 Spies may have known for a decade that top gun Daniel Duggan was training China pilots - Australia’s intelligence watchdog is investigating whether Western spy agencies knew for more than a decade that former top gun Daniel ­Edmund Duggan was training ­Chinese pilots through a controversial South African flying academy. The Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security is examining what interactions Australia’s intelligence services had with Mr Duggan, following a complaint from his defence team that the domestic spy agency ASIO may have been involved in “luring’’ him back to Australia in order to enable his arrest.

>>19278203 China lodges complaint over foreign interference inquiry, WeChat criticism - Liberal senator James Paterson has accused the Chinese embassy of complaining to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade about a Senate inquiry into foreign interference on social media probing the influence of WeChat. The Australian can reveal an official from DFAT’s China external and co-ordination branch emailed Senator Paterson’s committee secretariat seeking clarification about the parliament’s powers to compel foreign actors to front public hearings. The official questioned if it was accurate to say Chinese social media giant WeChat’s refusal to appear at the senate hearing “demonstrated contempt”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487556

#31 - Part 54

Australia / China Tensions- Part 5

>>19298066 China's overseas police 'contact point' joins the cloud and remains operational in Australia - China has been using cloud-based technology to implement a police service in Australia, the ABC can reveal. China has set up dozens of police outreach centres in various cities across the world - which Beijing calls "contact points" - linked to the security departments of Chinese cities. Beijing has maintained these are staffed by volunteers and are designed to help Chinese citizens abroad with administrative tasks such as renewing national identification cards, passports and drivers licences, but human rights experts are concerned the contact points could be used to intimidate Chinese dissidents living overseas.

>>19340415 Video: Exercise Malabar joint naval drills begin off Sydney coast - Warships from India, Japan and the United States have met in Sydney Harbour as Australia hosts the annual "Exercise Malabar" military drills for the first time. The quad security partners deny their high-end warfare training is solely directed at China, but insist the activity is about promoting security in the region. Defence correspondent Andrew Greene was onboard HMAS Brisbane as she made her way into Sydney. - ABC News (Australia)

>>19340656 From dining with top officials to a Chinese-born Labor poster child: How Beijing is slowly changing the face of Western Australian politics - "The question of just how close the Chinese state is to the WA Labor government, and in particular to former premier Mark McGowan, has arisen repeatedly in recent years. His government’s appointment of Dr Edward Zhang to a 15-member multicultural council in February 2021 raised eyebrows, given Zhang - while not personally linked to the Chinese Communist Party - is a founding member and honorary chairman of the WA branch of the Australian Council for the Promotion of Peaceful Reunification of China (ACPPRC). This group is tied to Beijing’s United Front Work Department, an integral part of the state apparatus tasked with recruiting people at home and abroad to push the interests of the Communist Party. Then there’s WA Labor backbencher Pierre Yang, who founded the Australian Chinese Labor Association (ACLA) in 2015. Yang's preselection for the 2017 election has raised questions too since he had practically no experience in union activism, which is considered essential to get ahead in the ALP. Just how much is Beijing shaping politics in the WA ALP, and, by extension, in the rest of the state?" - Dr Rocco Loiacono - legal academic, writer and translator - skynews.com.au

>>19340781 Australian Cheng Lei's first message from Chinese prison describes harsh conditions - Australian journalist Cheng Lei, who was arrested and jailed in China three years ago, has released her first public statement describing the harsh conditions of her imprisonment and how much she misses Australia. "I miss the sun. In my cell, the sunlight shines through the window, but I can stand in it for only 10 hours a year," she writes from an undisclosed facility in Beijing. "This is a love letter to 25 million people and 7 million square kilometres of land, land abundant in nature, beauty and space. It is not the same in here, I haven't seen a tree in three years."

>>19340831 China visit not conditional on Cheng Lei’s release, says Albanese - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says his planned visit to China this year is not conditional on the release of detained Australian journalist Cheng Lei, who has written an emotional letter on her three years in jail. Mr Albanese called for the mother of two, detained in China on national security charges, to be released. However, the prime minister would not call off his visit if this did not happen and said dialogue should not be transactional but was instead constructive to sort out disagreements with other countries.

>>19349795 China won’t take the US military’s calls. A top general claims that makes war more likely - China’s military is becoming dangerously arrogant and is fuelling the risk of war with the United States by refusing offers to communicate with commanders in the Indo-Pacific, one of America’s most senior military officials has warned. Lieutenant General Stephen Sklenka, deputy commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said he feared that China would seek to establish a military base in Solomon Islands or another Pacific nation as it sought to dominate the region. Sklenka added that he saw value in Republican congressman Mike Gallagher’s idea of positioning US hypersonic missiles in Australia and other key locations across the Pacific as a way to deter China from launching an invasion of the self-governing island of Taiwan.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487557

#31 - Part 55

Australia / China Tensions- Part 6

>>19361989 Defence calls for Australian drone program to replace risky Chinese-made technology - The Defence Department is looking to turbocharge an Australia-made drone program as it turns its back permanently on high-risk Chinese-made DJI drones. Defence has put out a request for information and responses from Australian industry and research institutes “in relation to development of sovereign uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) and trusted autonomy capabilities.’’ The request relates to small, unarmed drones to be used for training, photography and survey work. The call comes three months after Defence decided to get rid of the more than 800 drones - known as UAS in Defence jargon - and other pieces of tech it owned that had been manufactured by DJI, the world’s largest drone company. The grounding of the drones came after the company was black-listed by the Pentagon amid concerns over its links to the Chinese military, and further concerns that its internet-connected drones posed an un­acceptable security risk. The company, formally known as Da Jiang Innovations, is headquartered in Shenzen, China, meaning its data must be provided to Chinese intelligence agencies upon request. Its technology has also been used to surveil the oppressed Uighur population in Xinjiang.

>>19362026 US sailors ‘sold secrets to China’ - Two US navy sailors have been charged with selling military secrets to China, with one accused of capturing photographs of military hardware during an international warfare exercise involving Australia. Wei Jinchao 22, also known as Patrick Wei, is alleged to have captured and sent details of the world’s biggest international maritime wargames exercise - the Rim of the Pacific Exercise - involving Australia, the US, France, Canada and 22 other countries. Mr Wei and another sailor, Zhao Wenheng, are China-born US citizens accused of sending sensitive military information to Chinese intelligence officers for cash, according to grand jury indictments from June 2022 and 2023 unsealed this month in the Southern and Central District of California district courts. Both have pleaded not guilty.

>>19382314 Labor conference: ALP armed for keeping China at arm’s length - Senior Labor ministers have warned that China will have 21 nuclear submarines and 200 major warships in the water by 2030, sparking an urgent need to deliver AUKUS submarines and defence technologies to ­prevent war in the Indo-Pacific. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy on Friday urged union and party delegates to back the “progressive” AUKUS defence pact, to help “prevent war” and protect Australians amid Beijing’s aggressive military build-up and rising US-China tensions. “Strength deters war,” Mr Conroy said. In an extraordinary slap down of anti-AUKUS elements inside the Australian Labor Party, the Left-faction powerbroker delivered a scathing attack on those who supported a “Robert Menzies ­appeasement” strategy. Mr Conroy’s claim that anti-AUKUS delegates were appeasers sparked an angry backlash from Left-faction union leaders and colleagues, including federal Labor MP Josh Wilson who ­labelled the minister’s claim as “absurd”.

>>19382343 Chinese aggression has driven the ALP towards a nuclear compulsion on AUKUS - "The Labor Party has turned on the hinge of history. In an identity renovation, Labor has become the party of nuclear propulsion - with China the key to this dramatic transformation. China is remaking the Labor Party today via its strategic assertion, just as Japan’s war re-made Labor in the 1940s. Nuclear propulsion has been sold to the party as a new Labor value, as the path to peace through deterrence, the vital contributor to self-reliance, industrial revitalisation and regional stability. Sections of the rank-and-file who cannot stomach these messages have succumbed before Albanese government dictum." - Paul Kelly - theaustralian.com.au

>>19392379 China’s warning on AUKUS - China has warned against being made the target of the AUKUS agreement as union leaders vow to apply heavy scrutiny over the government’s jobs pledge for the construction of nuclear submarines. After senior ministers warned at Labor’s national conference the AUKUS deal was needed to prevent war with China and limit its regional influence, a Chinese embassy spokesman said bilateral or multilateral defence agreements should be “conducive to world peace and stability and not target any third party or harm others’ interests”. With Labor’s support for AUKUS cemented in its policy platform last week, Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Sunday said a nuclear submarine fleet would act as a balance to China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487559

#31 - Part 56

Australia / China Tensions - Part 7

>>19397639 Australia to spend $1.3bn on high-tech missiles - The former deputy prime minister has warned of China’s ability to target Australia from the mainland after the government announced it will spend $1.7bn on long-range strike missiles. Barnaby Joyce flagged concerns after the defence minister finalised a major weapons deal with the US on Monday. “China has certainly got missiles that can hit Australia, make no mistake,” Mr Joyce told Sunrise. Under the new deal, Australia will acquire more than 200 Tomahawk cruise missiles from the US, making it only one of three nations to own the high-tech weaponry. “As we enter what many are calling the missile age, these will be vital tools for the Australian Defence Force to do its job of defending Australians,” Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said. “We are buying these weapons now to deliver capability quickly -- but we are also considering options to manufacture missiles domestically because of the importance of building sovereign Australian defence manufacturing capabilities.” Tomahawk missiles have a strike range of 1500km, and a ship-launched version will be deployed on the Royal Australian Navy’s Hobart-class destroyers.

>>19417267 Video: Plea for Australian help to quell brutal PNG fighting as Canberra and China struggle for influence - The governor of a remote Papua New Guinea province racked by tribal fighting has appealed for Australian help as the nation struggles to contain surging violence that has seen dead people dragged by four wheel-drives and a flood of automatic weapons into the country’s Highlands. The Australian can reveal that multiple tribal conflicts have claimed the lives of an estimated 150 people this year, including two dozen lives in the past fortnight alone, and left thousands homeless.

>>19417281 Anthony Albanese restricted but ready to help troubled PNG and pro-Australia ally James Marape - Escalating tribal fighting in Papua New Guinea’s Highlands is a rolling human rights tragedy that the country’s government has been unable to contain. It is also a difficult issue for federal Labor, which has remained ­silent on the fighting, despite an estimated 150 deaths this year. Anthony Albanese has forged a strong personal relationship with PNG counterpart James Marape, who is standing firmly with Australia on the need to keep China at arm’s length. Marape is happy for his country to reap the economic benefits from China, but - unlike Manasseh Sogavare in Solomon Islands - has rebuffed Chinese efforts to forge closer security ties.

>>19417627 James Marape mobilises elite squad to deal with PNG violence - Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape has vowed to mobilise a new joint force of heavily armed police and soldiers to stamp out tribal warfare in the country’s remote Enga Province, condemning the surging violence as “domestic terrorism”. The pledge came as Australia’s Minister for the Pacific Pat Conroy vowed Australian support for PNG’s response, saying the Albanese government was “deeply committed” to the nations’ policing and security partnership. Mr Marape declared on Wednesday he would not seek outside police support to deal with Enga’s ongoing tribal wars, despite calls by the province’s governor for Australian boots on the ground.

>>19446096 Australian fears he’ll die in Chinese prison after doctors find huge kidney cyst - Detained Australian Yang Hengjun says he is increasingly fearful he will be denied medical treatment and die in a Chinese prison after medical authorities told him they had discovered a huge, 10-centimetre cyst on his kidney. Ahead of a planned trip to Beijing by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese later this year, Yang’s supporters are urging the federal government to demand the academic be given medical parole or access to Australian-supervised medical care outside his Beijing detention centre. “If something happens with my health and I die in here, people outside won’t know the truth,” Yang said in a message conveyed through his supporters. “That is frustrating. If something happens to me, who can speak for me?”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487562

#31 - Part 57

Australia / China Tensions - Part 8

>>19459049 Foreign Minister Penny Wong has appeared on TV wearing a microphone from high-risk Chinese tech company DJI - Foreign Minister Penny Wong used a microphone manufactured by controversial Chinese tech company DJI for a TV interview broadcast from inside Australia’s Embassy in Vietnam. Senator Wong used an audio microphone which clearly displayed the DJI logo despite DFAT several months ago publicly stating it was getting rid of its DJI-manufactured equipment. The company is facing a shadow-ban by the Australian Government after it was formally black-listed by the Pentagon and faced other restrictions slapped on it by the US Government late last year as a result of its close links to the Chinese state. There are also concerns that any data obtained by its internet-enabled devices would be handed over to the Chinese Communist Party’s intelligence agencies upon request, as required of Chinese-headquartered companies under the 2017 national security laws.

>>19464974 Opposition, human rights groups slam Penny Wong over China inaction - The Coalition has accused Labor of inaction over China’s human rights abuses, questioning why the government has failed to introduce the sanctions and travel bans adopted by other jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, United States and European Union. The criticisms were echoed by Human Rights Watch, which queried what message Australia was sending by not joining other comparable countries in taking action. The opposition’s foreign affairs spokesman, Simon Birmingham, launched the attack on the anniversary of the finding made by the UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights, who said China’s forced detention and treatment of Uyghurs “may constitute international crimes, in particular crimes against humanity”.

>>19464986 Xi Jinping set to skip G20 summit, dashing Albanese’s meeting hopes - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s hopes of meeting Xi Jinping on the sidelines of next week’s G20 summit appear to have been dashed, with the Chinese President expected to deliver host India a diplomatic snub by skipping the high-powered event. Albanese had hoped to use what would be his second meeting with Xi to further thaw relations with China and lay the groundwork for a visit to Beijing by the end of the year. The revelation that Xi is expected to skip the G20 in New Delhi came as former foreign affairs minister Julie Bishop prepares to travel to China next week on a sensitive back-channel diplomatic mission.

>>19476767 Video: Sydney councillors filmed with escorts ‘for blackmail’, says corruption watchdog - The NSW anti-corruption watchdog has found a Sydney property developer secretly filmed two councillors with sex workers on a “boys’ weekend” trip to China so he could blackmail them into voting for his projects. The Independent Commission Against Corruption found that the two men who were filmed, Vince Bada­lati and Philip Sansom, and councillor Constantine Hindi accepted perks from developers in exchange for favourable treatment on property developments. ICAC found Mr Badalati and Mr Hindi accepted $170,000 each from developer Ching Wah (Philip) Uy as a reward for having used their positions to help him and the proponents of two proposed developments in Hurstville. The commission found Mr Bada­lati and Mr Hindi engaged in serious corrupt conduct by travelling to China in April 2016 when they knew their positions with the then Hurstville City Council (later Georges River Council) would be misused to endorse and promote the property developments.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487564

#31 - Part 58

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 1

>>19194528 Gymnastics Australia backs away from pledge to assist survivors of childhood sexual abuse - Three years after publicly pledging its commitment to the National Redress Scheme that could offer apologies and compensation to gymnasts who suffered childhood sexual abuse, Gymnastics Australia has declared itself financially incapable of assisting abuse survivors.

>>19199855 Pedophile priest David Edwin Rapson sentenced for further child abuse - A former Catholic priest serving jail time for sexually abusing students in Victoria has been given a "minimum" additional prison sentence for historical crimes against schoolboys at Hobart's Dominic College in the 1980s.

>>19237725 Accountant defends paedophile asset shed ‘plan of action’, tells court unaware of victim compensation claim - An accountant has confirmed he enacted a plan to divest a paedophile’s multimillion-dollar asset portfolio to family and friends ahead of his sentencing, but denied orchestrating the scheme. The Federal Court on Tuesday heard Launceston accountant Ken Davey developed “a plan of action” by which assets of child abuser John Wayne Millwood were sold to family and friends and the proceeds then gifted to them. Millwood later declared bankruptcy and has far avoiding paying a cent of $5.3m in civil compensation awarded to his victim, whom he repeatedly abused over five years in the 1980s. Mr Davey, a partner with Findex Group, told the court it was “pretty obvious” Millwood wanted to urgently dispose of assets before December 7, 2016, when he was due to be sentenced and when solicitors foreshadowed a compensation application.

>>19237732 Disgraced businessman and child abuser John Wayne Millwood to give evidence in bankruptcy case - Disgraced Launceston arts patron and child sexual abuser John Wayne Millwood will finally be grilled on the witness stand after divesting his multimillion-dollar portfolio and declaring himself bankrupt. Millwood, 77, was convicted of child sexual abuse crimes in 2016 and jailed after he pleaded guilty to sexually abusing a boy in the 1980s. In December 2021, he was ordered to pay what was believed to be an Australian record-breaking amount of $5.3 million to his victim, following a civil trial in which Millwood did not appear once. But the victim, known only by a court pseudonym of ZAB, still hasn’t received a cent.

>>19243408 ‘I was expecting to die’: Convicted paedophile John Millwood defends multimillion-dollar asset shed - Convicted paedophile John Wayne Millwood has vehemently denied under oath that he shed millions of dollars in assets to block a pending damages claim from his victim - claiming instead he believed he would die behind bars. The disgraced former Launceston arts patron and businessman, and former manager of Launceston Pathology, gave evidence about his bankrupt estate in the Federal Court of Australia

>>19243709 TikTok tells senate inquiry how it’s tackling online child exploitation material - TikTok kicks 190,000 users off its platform a day for lying about being older than 13 years old, a senate inquiry has been told. The inquiry is examining how Australia’s law enforcement agencies tackle child exploitation, including online trends for explicit material and access to child abuse material. It’s also considering the role technology providers have in assisting law enforcement agencies to combat child exploitation. TikTok director of public policy Ella Woods-Joyce confirmed the online platform closed 17 million accounts in the last financial quarter of 2022. It’s the equivalent of 190,000 users per day being banned. Those cancelled accounts were determined by TikTok’s 40,000 trust and safety professionals who found they were being operated by a person under the age of 13, which is against TikTok’s eligibility policy to use the platform. With more than 8.5 million Australian users coming to the online video platform per month, Ms Woods-Joyce said online child safety was TikTok’s “top priority”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487566

#31 - Part 59

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 2

>>19250288 Jury acquits Kevin Spacey of all nine sexual offence charges in London trial - A London jury acquitted Kevin Spacey on sexual assault charges on Wednesday after a four-week trial in which the actor said he was a “big flirt” who had consensual flings with men and whose only misstep was touching a man’s groin while making a “clumsy pass.” Three men accused the Oscar winner of aggressively grabbing their crotches. A fourth, an aspiring actor seeking mentorship, said he awoke to the actor performing oral sex on him after going to Spacey’s London apartment for a beer and either falling asleep or passing out. All the men said the contact was unwanted but Spacey testified that the young actor and another man had willingly participated in consensual acts. He said a third man’s allegation that he grabbed his privates like a striking “cobra” backstage at a theatre was “pure fantasy.” Defence lawyer Patrick Gibbs said three of the men were liars and incidents had been “reimagined with a sinister spin.” He accused most of them of hopping on a “bandwagon” of complaints in the hope of striking it rich.

>>19250288 Q Post #4590 - https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/kevin-spacey-accuser-dies-by-suicide-day-after-actor-posts-kill-them-with-kindness-video - "This marks the third Spacey accuser to die in 2019." At what point does it become painfully obvious? - Q - https://qanon.pub/#4590

>>19250307 Julia Gillard’s ex Tim Mathieson to plead guilty to sexual assault - Julia Gillard’s former partner, Tim Mathieson, will plead guilty to sexually touching a woman without her consent. The 66-year-old hairdresser, who became the first Australian man to be nicknamed the nation’s “first bloke” when Ms Gillard ousted Kevin Rudd as Labor leader in 2010, is expected to admit to sucking a woman’s nipple without her consent in an incident that took place in Brunswick on March 13 last year.

>>19267294 Nations unite against Facebook over encryption plans ‘that endanger children’ - Britain’s home secretary has been building an international alliance to take on Facebook over its plans to introduce default end-to-end encryption for its messaging apps. Suella Braverman has warned Mark Zuckerberg, the boss of Meta, Facebook’s parent company, that “there will be no let-up” amid fears about the technology’s use by pedophiles and other criminals. End-to-end encryption stops anyone but the sender and recipient of a message seeing it, meaning the companies cannot police the content, making it an ideal tool for criminals. Meta will introduce it on Facebook Messenger and Instagram Direct chats this year.

>>19278301 Video: Breakthrough that led police to alleged abuser of 91 girls at daycare centres - A trusted childcare worker was secretly able to prey on 91 young girls across 15 years, and was only exposed as one of the nation’s most heinous paedophiles when investigators traced bed sheets seen in a horrific video back to one of his centres, police allege. In a case some of Australia’s most senior officers have described as “unfathomable” and “beyond the realm of anyone’s imagination”, the 45-year-old Gold Coast man allegedly targeted vulnerable pre-pubescent girls in 10 childcare centres in Brisbane, one in Sydney and another overseas before his arrest in August last year.

>>19284103 Man charged with child sex offences known to be involved with photography at a childcare centre, ABC confirms - A former childcare worker charged with 1,623 child abuse offences worked at a centre associated with a tertiary education facility and was known to be involved in photography, the ABC has confirmed. The Gold Coast man, 45, has been charged with 136 counts of rape and 110 counts of sexual intercourse with a child under 10. An investigation involving the Australian Federal Police (AFP) as well as Queensland and New South Wales police led to the arrest of the man, with offences allegedly committed in Brisbane, Sydney and overseas between 2007 and 2022. He has been in custody in Queensland since August 2022 when the AFP arrested and charged him with two counts of making child exploitation material and one count of using a carriage service for child abuse material.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487568

#31 - Part 60

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 3

>>19284162 Video: Calls for Australia to introduce the death penalty for paedophiles after a Gold Coast childcare worker is accused of sexually abusing 91 children - There are growing calls for the death penalty to be discussed as a punishment for paedophiles after a childcare worker was charged with a litany of horrific child sex offences this week. The former Gold Coast childcare centre worker, 45, was charged with 1,623 offences against 91 young girls this week. Liberal National Party Senator Matt Canavan said it was time for discussion about punishments more serious than life imprisonment in such cases. 'Life imprisonment seems too soft a penalty for a crime this heinous,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'Maybe we do need a debate about should there be a death penalty for these types of offences,' he added. 2GB host Ben Fordham also argued for capital punishment. 'We don't have the death penalty in Australia, but would anyone seriously argue against it in the case of this paedophile pig?' he said.

>>19289945 Australia’s alleged worst pedophile ‘first detected in police sting’ - One of the nation’s worst alleged pedophiles went deeper underground after a dark web child-sex ring was busted by Australian authorities almost a decade ago. The childcare worker, now charged with the rape and sexual abuse of 91 young girls in 10 centres in Queensland, one in NSW and one overseas, allegedly shared images and videos on the dark web with members of a site called The Love Zone in 2013 and 2014. The Queensland Police Service’s internationally renowned Task Force Argos investigators infiltrated and then secretly took over the global network of child-sex offenders in 2014 after the head administrator had been identified as South Australian public servant Shannon Grant McCoole, who sexually abused at least seven children in his care. Among images and videos of abuse scooped up in the operation were those shared by the 45-year-old Gold Coast-based childcare worker, who the Australian Federal Police this week announced had been charged with 1623 child abuse offences over the 15 years leading up to his arrest last August.

>>19289982 Sex offenders must be identified to protect children, Peter Dutton demands - A national register of child sex ­offenders will be considered by state and territory governments after police charged a childcare worker over the alleged serial rape of dozens of young girls. Federal Education Minister Jason Clare has ordered a review of “working with children’’ checks to close a loophole that may let paedophiles move interstate to work with children undetected. And Peter Dutton is pushing for a national register of pedophiles to help schools and childcare centres identify predators.

>>19298140 Australia’s alleged worst pedophile reported to Queensland Police almost a year before arrest - One of the nation’s worst alleged pedophiles was reported to police almost a year before he was arrested for the alleged abuse of 91 girls after a colleague saw him kissing a girl at a daycare centre in Queensland. Yolanda Borucki, who managed a chain of daycare centres, says she alerted Queensland Police to the alleged kissing in October 2021 and said the alleged offender would take children outside with a mattress and blankets to play in a fort. Ms Borucki said another childcare worker saw the alleged offender, who cannot be identified, kissing a girl inside the fort and a complaint was sent to Queensland Police who cleared the man but did not check his home or devices.

>>19303385 'Hell on earth': State and church enabled child sex abuse, damning report finds - Hell on earth: a place where vulnerable children were subjected to depravity, sexual, physical and spiritual violence while the state looked away. That’s the description in a damning new report of the Marylands School and the associated Hebron Trust run in Otautahi Christchurch from the 1950s to the 1980s by the Brothers of St John of God. The report, titled Stolen Lives, Marked Souls, is part of the Abuse in Care Royal Commission of Inquiry and was tabled in Parliament on Wednesday. It details the horrors of the abuse suffered by many of the young boys in the care of the brothers, their desperation to be believed and helped, and the “shameful” failure of the state and the Catholic Church to act. The victims were as young as 5. “We are aware of no other circumstances or institution where the sexual abuse has been so extreme or has involved such a high proportion of perpetrators over the same extended period of time as that at Marylands School,” inquiry chairperson Coral Shaw said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487569

#31 - Part 61

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 4

>>19314867 The letter that helped seal the fate of dozens of children - In 1977, the then Sydney-based provincial of the Catholic brotherhood St John of God, Brother Brian O’Donnell, received an anonymous letter bearing disturbing news. The prior and one of the brothers at Marylands, the order’s school for students with intellectual disabilities in New Zealand, were sexually abusing a boy, the letter alleged. Pausing at that moment now, as O’Donnell’s eyes flicker across the words on the page, there is an opportunity for dozens of children to avoid their fate, for boys who will later die by suicide to become grandfathers, and countless unhappy lives to take a different trajectory. The junior brother mentioned in the letter was Bernard McGrath, who went on to become the most notorious perpetrator of child sexual abuse among religious orders in Australia and New Zealand and possibly the most prolific. When the letter arrived he had just been promoted by the prior, Rodger Moloney, whose role only emerged in detail in a report into abuse in care by a New Zealand royal commission last week. He was McGrath’s mentor. But O’Donnell was disinclined to believe the allegations. “I thought it was a trouble-causing letter,” he would tell Catholic Church Insurance Limited years later.

>>19320920 Video: AFP announced 19 men arrested, 13 children removed from harm in major online child abuse investigation - Police have removed 13 Australian children from harm and arrested 19 men during an investigation into a "technologically sophisticated" online child abuse network sparked by the murder of two FBI agents in the US. FBI Special Agents Daniel Alfin and Laura Schwartzenberger were shot dead by suspect David Lee Huber as they executed a search warrant on a related case in Florida in 2021. The Australian Federal Police-led Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation began its investigation in 2022 after the FBI shared intelligence about Australian members of a peer-to-peer network allegedly sharing child abuse material on the dark web. Two Australian offenders have been sentenced, with other men who were arrested remaining before the courts.

>>19320928 Catholic church seeks to stop family’s lawsuit over George Pell child abuse allegations - The Catholic church is seeking to challenge a legal ruling in Victoria that would allow the father of a choirboy to sue for damages over allegations of child sexual abuse by Cardinal George Pell. The father, who cannot be named for legal reasons, filed a claim against the Catholic archdiocese of Melbourne and Pell. He claims to have suffered nervous shock after learning of allegations that Pell sexually abused his now deceased son in the mid-1990s.

>>19341000 'After School Satan Club' meeting canceled by City of Chesapeake - "We're seeing new developments between the city of Chesapeake and a controversial after-school club. The Satanic Temple shared on social media that Thursday's meeting of the 'After School Satan Club' at Indian River Library had been canceled by the city. Club leaders believe this is unconstitutional. The city says their policies require groups to assure that events don't pose a threat to public health, safety or welfare. City leaders wouldn't say how this meeting violated those policies. They say they sent specific details to the Satan Club, but would not share those elsewhere. We've reached out to the Satan Club for comment and have not heard back." - Julia Varnier - wtkr.com

>>19341000 Q Post #4545 - Humanity is good, but, when we let our guard down we allow darkness to infiltrate and destroy. Like past battles fought, we now face our greatest battle at present, a battle to save our Republic, our way of life, and what we decide (each of us) now will decide our future. Will we be a free nation under God? Or will we cede our freedom, rights and liberty to the enemy? If America falls so does the world. If America falls darkness will soon follow. Only when we stand together, only when we are united, can we defeat this highly entrenched dark enemy. This is not about politics. This is about preserving our way of life and protecting the generations that follow. We are living in Biblical times. Children of light vs children of darkness. United against the Invisible Enemy of all humanity. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4545

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487571

#31 - Part 62

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 5

>>19362008 Gerald Ridsdale jailed for another year for abusing 13-year-old boy as paedophile priest is told he will likely die in jail - A paedophile priest will 'probably die' behind bars after his prison sentence was extended for abusing another teenage boy. Gerald Ridsdale, 89, earlier this year admitted abusing his 72nd victim and another year was added to his 39-year jail sentence at Ballarat Magistrates Court in Victoria on Tuesday. Ridsdale, who has been in prison since 1994, abused children between 1961 and 1988 while he worked as a Roman Catholic priest in churches and schools across the state. He admitted indecently assaulting his latest victim, a 13-year-old boy, at a Catholic school in Horsham in 1987.

>>19362015 Jailed pedophile ex-priest Peter Andrew Hansen stripped of law credentials - A pedophile ex-priest and former Labor party official who preyed on young boys in Asian countries has been barred from practising law in Australia. Peter Andrew Hansen was jailed in June 2021 for at least 14 years on 31 charges of producing child pornography in Vietnam and the Philippines, distributing child exploitation material and engaging in sexual activity with nine boys. The chief clerk of the NSW Supreme Court applied in April to have Hansen struck off the law register and barred from practising due to his crimes. In a joint judgment handed down on Tuesday, Justices Fabian Gleeson, Jeremy Kirk and John Basten declared Hansen was not a fit and proper person to remain on the roll of Australian lawyers and ordered his name be removed.

>>19374396 Brian Houston not guilty of covering up pedo father’s abuse - Hillsong founder Brian Houston has called his late father a “serial pedophile” after being found not guilty of covering up the church leader’s abuse of a young boy in Sydney in the 1970s. Mr Houston, 69, stood trial in Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court having pleaded not guilty to one count of concealing the serious indictable offence of another person and denied allegations that he failed to pass onto police details of his father’s Frank Houston’s crimes. Following a long-running hearing, Magistrate Gareth Christofi on Thursday found Mr Houston not guilty. Outside of court, Mr Houston said he wanted to “impress his sadness” to his father’s victim, Brett Sengstock, and all the victims of the late New Zealand and Australian church leader.

>>19374447 Video: Hillsong founder Brian Houston found not guilty of concealing his father's sexual abuse of a child - Hillsong founder Brian Houston has been found not guilty of concealing his father's sexual abuse of a child. The 69-year-old has previously told a Sydney court he was left "speechless" in 1999 when he first learned of Frank Houston's abuse of a seven-year-old boy decades earlier. But Brian Houston insisted he did not go to the police because he was respecting the wishes of the victim, Brett Sengstock, who by that time was aged in his 30s. He pleaded not guilty to concealing a serious indictable offence. Magistrate Gareth Christofi on Thursday found Brian Houston not guilty, after concluding he had a "reasonable excuse" for not reporting the matter. In his judgement, Magistrate Christofi found Mr Houston knew or reasonably believed that Mr Sengstock did not want the matter reported to police.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487572

#31 - Part 63

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 6

>>19374474 Catholic church uses death of paedophile priest in bid to stop survivor suing NSW diocese, court hears - The Catholic church is seeking to use using the death of a “prolific paedophile” priest to permanently prevent a dying Indigenous man from seeking justice for alleged abuse suffered on camping trips in rural New South Wales. Two survivors are suing the church’s Armidale diocese for the alleged abuse by notorious priest David Joseph Perrett during camping trips from an Aboriginal mission in the mid-1970s. Perrett died in 2020 while awaiting criminal trial for more than 100 offences relating to the abuse of almost 40 young children - including the two plaintiffs now suing the church - in areas spanning Armidale, Walcha, Guyra and the broader New England region from the 1960s to the mid-1990s. The church is now using Perrett’s death in a bid to shut down civil cases brought by the same survivors against the Armidale diocese. The church argues it cannot get a fair trial against the two survivors’ civil claims because Perrett and other deceased church officials cannot give evidence about whether the abuse occurred, whether there was negligence by the church or whether the camping trips were conducted as part of Perrett’s role with the church, potentially making it vicariously liable for his actions. The church is making the argument despite allegations it did nothing to investigate Perrett’s actions for decades after it learned he had been convicted and sentenced in 1996 for abusing children in north-west NSW.

>>19392401 Melbourne Buddhist monk Naotunne Vijitha Nayaka Thero faces court on child sex abuse charges - A senior Buddhist monk has faced a Melbourne court, charged with child sex offences dating back to the 1990s and early 2000s. The Venerable Naotunne Vijitha Nayaka Thero, who is the abbot of the Dhamma Sarana temple in Melbourne's south-east, is facing 13 charges including sexual penetration of a child under 16 and indecent act with a child under 16. Police charged Mr Vijitha earlier this week, saying three complainants had come forward. The incidents allegedly took place between 1996 and 2004, and police allege Mr Vijitha came into contact with the complainants through his role at the Keysborough temple.

>>19392419 AFP arrest man for allegedly creating child exploitation game in Victoria - A 31-year-old man has been charged over allegedly creating and operating an online child exploitation game used by Australian and international paid subscribers. The Geelong man was arrested after his home was raided by police on August 2. Police will allege the 31-year-old man was the creator and operator of the game, which was allegedly accessed by a number of people across Australia and internationally. Police allege those users had paid subscriptions to the game and their identities are currently being investigated. The joint investigation was launched in May after information about an online child exploitation game was uncovered by the Australian Border Force and provided to police. The platform is allegedly entirely comprised of animated child exploitation images, which is an offence in Australia.

>>19404497 How Taskforce Argos and the AFP tracked down the Gold Coast man accused of 1,623 child abuse offences - Earlier this month, the AFP, Queensland police and New South Wales police revealed they had charged a 45-year-old Gold Coast man with 1,623 child abuse offences. After the accused man's arrest in 2022, the AFP launched Operation Tenterfield, and reviewed almost 4,000 images and videos of abuse material allegedly found in his home under a search warrant. The operation is linked back to the work of Queensland Police Services's specialist child sexual abuse team, Taskforce Argos, which rescued children and brought down a dark web forum called The Love Zone. The anonymous TOR network first came to the attention of Taskforce Argos about a decade ago, after the arrest of a Queensland man who had VIP status on the dark web forum - as they followed leads from a Canadian operation called Project Spade. The abuse material was shared with the International Child Sexual Exploitation database, a global database where specialist victim identification teams work to identify and rescue children. The Argos team would eventually identify the forum's administrator as Families South Australia paedophile Shannon McCoole and after his arrest in 2014, Argos assumed his role in the forum. The former childcare worker currently facing 1,600 charges allegedly shared abuse material on the dark web. Agencies examined the images, but they contained few distinguishable clues for investigators to follow, the AFP said. But in August 2022 the AFP traced bedsheets in the abuse material back to a Brisbane childcare centre, leading to the accused man's arrest.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487574

#31 - Part 64

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 7

>>19417287 NSW court rules Catholic church can’t get a fair trial in civil case over paedophile priest - The Catholic church has successfully used the death of a known paedophile priest to permanently halt a civil claim by two Indigenous survivors, one of whom is dying of cancer. The New South Wales supreme court ruled on Wednesday that the church could no longer receive a fair trial due to the death of assistant priest David Joseph Perrett, which, along with the deaths of other key witnesses, caused the church serious prejudice in attempting to mount a defence. The church won the case despite allegations it had more than three decades to investigate Perrett’s past, but did nothing. The church had been aware since 1995 Perrett abused children, after he pleaded guilty to offences against three boys in north-west NSW. Perrett later confessed to a senior church official that he was a paedophile; by the time of his death in 2020, Perrett was awaiting criminal trial on more than 100 charges relating to almost 40 young children in areas spanning Armidale, Walcha, Guyra and the broader New England region from the 1960s to the mid-1990s.

>>19417697 Malka Leifer jailed for 15 years over sexual abuse of students at ultra-Orthodox Jewish school - Former school principal Malka Leifer has been jailed for 15 years over the sexual abuse of two former students. The 56-year-old must serve at least 11-and-a-half years before she is eligible for parole. The court will consider her already having served 2069 days of that sentence, due to pre-sentence detention in Australia and Israel. Leifer was convicted in April of 18 offences against sisters Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich between 2003 and 2007. The abuse occurred when the pair were pupils of Adass Israel School in Elsternwick, part of a small enclave of ultra-conservative Jewish families in Melbourne’s inner south-east. Outside court, Ms Sapper said the sentence was a “momentous day”. “We feel overwhelmed and grateful that the legal system has recognised and validated the extreme impact of abuse by female perpetrators. Malka Leifer has finally been held accountable. “Today’s ruling of 15 years recognises the harm and pain that Malka Leifer caused each one of us to suffer over so many years. Trauma from sexual abuse is a lifelong sentence. “While no amount of years will ever be sufficient, we are so relieved that Malka Leifer is now in prison … and cannot prey on anyone else.”

>>19417751 Video: A tear stains Leifer’s cheek as she is sentenced to 15 years for child sex abuse - A decades-long fight to bring justice to the victims of Malka Leifer has ended with the former principal of an ultra-Orthodox Jewish school in Melbourne sentenced to 15 years in prison for sexually abusing and raping two former students in her care. Leifer, 56, will be eligible for parole in June 2029 after County Court Judge Mark Gamble imposed a non-parole period of 11½ years. Leifer has already served more than 2000 days in pre-sentence detention in Australia and Israel. Gamble said on Thursday that Leifer was a predator who should feel guilty for sexually abusing the innocent sisters and that she used her position of influence over them to pursue her own sexual gratification. Leifer watched the sentencing via video link from Dame Phyllis Frost Centre. A tear stained Leifer’s right cheek as Gamble reached the end of his sentencing remarks. It was the first time she showed any strong emotion throughout the trial. Outside court sisters Elly Sapper, Dassi Erlich and Nicole Meyer spoke about the “momentous day”, elated that the legal system had finally recognised the abuse Sapper and Erlich had suffered. “This fight was never just for us,” Erlich said. “Today really marks the end of this chapter of our lives and opens the chapter to us healing to any other survivors in this nightmare. You are never alone. We are all behind you.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487575

#31 - Part 65

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 8

>>19427786 Malka Leifer sentencing: No remorse as law catches up with a callous predator - As it dawned on Malka Leifer that she would spend another six years in an Australian jail, her head began to rock from side to side and a tear glistened on her cheek. But it looked more like hollow self-pity from the convicted sex ­offender than remorse for the repeated rape and abuse of two ­former students of the ultra-orthodox Jewish school where she was once the principal. As Judge Mark Gamble said on handing Leifer a 15-year sentence, the 56-year-old has never shown any regret for her abuse and still insists she is innocent of all 18 sexual assault charges against her. “I am not convinced Ms Leifer has in any way reformed,” he told Melbourne’s County Court. He said Leifer’s repeated assaults on the students between 2004 and 2008 while she was principal of Melbourne’s Adass Israel school was a case of “callous” and deliberate grooming of highly vulnerable young women who were “completely ignorant about sexual matters”. “This case is striking for just how vulnerable these victims were, and for the calculating way in which the offender, Ms Leifer, took callous advantage of those vulnerabilities in order to sexually abuse them for her own sexual gratification,” Judge Gamble said.

>>19427870 Elly Sapper, Dassi Erlich and Nicole Meyer speak after Malka Leifer's sentencing - Sequestered in a hotel room together on Thursday afternoon, Elly Sapper, Nicole Meyer and Dassi Erlich finally allowed the emotions of the day to sink in. Earlier, the three sisters had walked through the doors of the County Court in Melbourne's CBD, the eye of a media storm made up of dozens of camera people and reporters from every major news organisation in the country. Malka Leifer, their former school principal at Adass Israel School, had just been sentenced to 15 years in jail over 18 sexual offences against Ms Sapper and Ms Erlich. Leifer was cleared by jurors of charges relating to Ms Meyer in April. Hours after sentencing and media frenzy, Ms Sapper told ABC Melbourne radio that she was simply lying on the bed in her hotel room, "allowing the magnitude of the emotions" to come over her for the first time that day. "Hearing those words, 15 years, I breathed a huge sigh of relief," she said. Next to Ms Sapper was her sister Dassi, who experienced a sense of validation alongside relief. "While no sentence really can validate what we've been through, we do feel grateful for the sentence that Malka Leifer received today, we feel that it does in some part validate the abuse that we've been through," Ms Erlich said. It's a wait for validation that has lasted nearly two decades.

>>19427933 'You ruined me': Milton Orkopoulos victims reveal abuse trauma - A pedophile former NSW politician who destroyed the lives of the young boys he abused has been confronted with the torment his victims face daily as a result of his actions. In April, Milton Orkopoulos was found guilty on 26 charges of sexual offending against four underage boys and supplying them with drugs between 1993 and 2003. Some of the offences were committed during his stint as a state MP. "The life I wanted and deserved is so different to the life I got dealt because of what you did and the drugs you gave me," one survivor said in his victim impact statement.

>>19427976 Catholic Church loses bid to restrict family’s lawsuit against Pell and church - The Catholic Church has lost a bid to restrict the family members of victims of child abuse by clergy from bringing civil cases against the institution. The Court of Appeal on Friday rejected the church’s attempt to overturn a decision made by the Supreme Court in August last year that the father of a former choirboy who prosecutors had alleged was sexually abused by George Pell is entitled to sue the church. The decision paves the way for affected family members of other victims to sue the church over the impact of their abuse. The father alleged he had endured harm and suffering as a result of his son’s death, which he attributes to the actions of Pell.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487576

#31 - Part 66

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 9

>>19434646 Video: How private investigators exposed Malka Leifer, infiltrating a small Israeli community to seal her extradition - Malka Leifer is smiling. Malka Leifer is buying a loaf of bread. Malka Leifer is waiting for the bus. Malka Leifer's charade is about to be exposed. Two hundred hours of undercover footage of the mother-of-eight going about her daily chores was the pivotal piece of evidence that led to her downfall. When the vision was captured in 2017, Leifer was facing child sex abuse charges dating back to her time as principal of the Adass Israel School in Melbourne. However, the Israeli courts had determined Leifer was so mentally incapacitated that she was unfit to be extradited to Australia. The pictures told a different story. The undercover sting was orchestrated by Israeli private investigator Tsafrir Tsahi and sex abuse victims advocate Shana Aaronson.

>>19452901 Former WA Nationals MP James Hayward guilty of child sex abuse - A West Australian MP has been found guilty of sexually abusing a young girl and has automatically been disqualified from ­parliament. A jury of six women and six men found James Hayward, 53, guilty of two counts of indecent dealing charges. He was acquitted of two other charges including the allegation he showed the child how to search for pornography online. Hayward did not apply for bail and was remanded in custody until his sentencing hearing in October. Hayward was an independent member of WA’s upper house after he was suspended from and then quit the Nationals WA in the wake of charges relating to indecently assaulting the girl between 2019 and 2021, when she was aged between six and eight. He had pleaded not guilty. After more than four hours of deliberations the jury handed down their verdicts as Hayward stood silently and members of his family, including his wife, sobbed.

>>19452902 Video: Jailed paedophile teacher given end-of-life permit with 17 years left on sentence in Adelaide - An Adelaide paedophile has been given permission to end his life after being jailed for sexually abusing his students while working as a music teacher, 9News can exclusively reveal. Malcolm Day, 81, is thought to be the first prisoner in the nation to be granted a voluntary assisted dying permit after having been diagnosed with a terminal illness, believed to be cancer. Day was sentenced to 20 years in prison last June and has 17 years left on his sentence. There is an 11-step process to access voluntary assisted dying in the state and 9News understands Day is towards the end of that process, meaning it could be finalised within the next few days. The director of pro-euthanasia group Exit International Philip Nitschke said use of the scheme by a prisoner was going to happen sooner or later. "By the sound of it, he satisfies all the conditions of the South Australian assisted dying legislation," Nitschke said.

>>19459101 Tasmania's child sex abuse commission of inquiry wraps up with final hearing in Hobart - The Tasmanian child sexual abuse commission of inquiry has referred more than 100 people to Tasmania Police and child protection since it began. The commission's president revealed the numbers at the final hearing in Hobart of the Commission of Inquiry into the Tasmanian Government's Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in Institutional Settings. The commission focused on the Launceston General Hospital, Ashley Youth Detention Centre, out of home care and public schools. "Although we believe that children are now safer in Tasmanian institutions than was the case in the past, more work needs to be done," commission president Marcia Neave said. Ms Neave said the commission had referred more than 100 people to police and child protection during the 29 months of the inquiry. She said it was also the commission's view that the Ashley Youth Detention Centre should be closed as a "matter of urgency", and improving the safety of children in youth detention and out of home care should be a priority. Ms Neave said the Tasmanian government's response to allegations and incidents of child sexual abuse since 2000 had too often been inadequate.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487578

#31 - Part 67

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 10

>>19464965 Tim Mathieson: Julia Gillard’s former partner will plead guilty to sexual assault - Australia’s former ‘First Bloke’ will admit he sexually assaulted a woman in Melbourne last year, a court has been told. Raymond Timothy Mathieson, also known as Tim Mathieson, appeared before the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Thursday, August 31. The 66-year-old was dressed in a dark suit as he appeared via video link from his home. At a previous court hearing last month, his barrister Brad Penno said negotiations with police had resolved the case as two unnamed charges were withdrawn against his client. Mr Penno previously said his client had agreed to admit to intentional sexual touching without consent and requested the matter be adjourned to find out if prosecutors would accept diversion. Diversion allows low-level and first time offenders to avoid a criminal conviction by undertaking conditions that benefit the victim, the community and themselves. But in court, Mr Penno said diversion had been taken “off the table”, and requested the matter be adjourned until October for a one hour hearing. He confirmed Mr Mathieson would still plead guilty.

>>19474215 Malka Leifer conviction: ‘Good - but not good enough’ - “How do I move on in life without Malka Leifer being such a central role in it - especially after getting ‘not guilty’?” It’s the question Nicole Meyer continues to wrestle with, while she spoke candidly with The AJN from a Melbourne hotel room, four days after the sentencing of disgraced former Adass Israel School principal, Malka Leifer. Over the past 22 years - more than half of Meyer’s life - Leifer had been a constant; “as my teacher or principal, then, as my boss and colleague”. “And throughout it all, she was my abuser, attempting to escape justice.” County Court Judge Mark Gamble sentenced Leifer to 15 years imprisonment for 18 sexual offences - including six counts of rape - with a non-parole period of 11.5 years. The sentence takes into account time already spent in custody, meaning she could be released in 2029. But the indictments related only to acts committed against Meyer’s sisters, Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper; when the jury handed down their verdict in April, they found Leifer not guilty of a further five charges of rape and sexual abuse relating to Meyer. It was a crushing blow for three sisters who have stood united through a protracted 12-year battle for justice, encompassing an international campaign to #BringLeiferBack, lengthy court delays, extradition orders, political corruption and terse diplomatic relations between Australia and Israel.

>>19474326 How AUSTRAC is saving kids from sexual abuse - In 2020, a trickle that became a stream of tiny financial transactions to fund child sexual abuse, eventually became a flood that destroyed some of Australia’s biggest business reputations. And it had the unintended, but enduringly good, impact of adding a valuable weapon to the armoury for the fight against child exploitation. At the heart of the flood was the detective work of the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC), the federal government agency charged with monitoring the legality of money flowing in and out of the country. Its main target was Westpac. AUSTRAC swamped Westpac’s reputation with a civil court action, alleging negligence in discerning and reporting large-scale money laundering between 2012 and 2019. It accused the bank of breaching anti-money laundering and counterterrorism financing laws on more than 23 million occasions, involving $11 billion in transactions. Westpac was duly ordered by the court to pay the highest civil penalty in Australian history: $1.3 billion. Some of Westpac’s failings involved suspicious transactions related to child exploitation in the Philippines, including two associated with child sex offenders.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487579

#31 - Part 68

Qanon / Conspiracy Theory Hit Pieces, Australia and Worldwide - Part 1

>>19211499 The QAnon-adjacent film that’s become a massive box office hit - "It’s the surprise hit in American cinemas, a thriller about rescuing sex-trafficked children, that has sparked debate about its links to QAnon conspiracies. On the way to breaking $US100 million any day now, Sound of Freedom has been championed by such far-right figures as Steve Bannon and My Pillow proprietor Mike Lindell. And now Donald Trump is hosting a screening at one of his golf clubs. The film has Jim Caviezel playing a real-life Homeland Security agent, Tim Ballard, who quits his government job for a mission to rescue children from sex traffickers in Colombia. So far, there are no signs of an Australian cinema release." - Garry Maddox - smh.com.au

>>19211499 Q Post #3635: Sometimes a good 'movie' can provide a lot of truth and/or background. 'Official Secrets.' Relevant today? Enjoy the show! Q - https://qanon.pub/#3635

>>19250396 Controversial blockbuster Sound of Freedom heads to Australian cinemas - "The controversial American hit film Sound of Freedom, about a Homeland Security agent who quits his job to take on child traffickers, is headed for Australian cinemas. The unheralded thriller has stormed to stunning box office success in the US - taking more than $US130 million ($191 million) in three weeks - after being released by self-described faith-based distributor Angel Studios. While it tells a non-partisan story, the film has been championed by both mainstream conservatives and far-right figures including Steve Bannon and My Pillow proprietor Mike Lindell as well as followers of the QAnon movement." - Garry Maddox - smh.com.au

>>19257272 US conservative hit Sound of Freedom to be shown in Australian cinemas - "The “QAnon adjacent” film Sound of Freedom will be shown in several Australian cinemas in August, with the Mel Gibson co-owned chain Dendy among those saying it would screen the movie, citing “overwhelming demand”. Sound of Freedom is based on the true story of Tim Ballard, a former homeland security department agent who tried to rescue children from sex traffickers in Colombia. Ballard is played by Jim Caviezel, who played Jesus Christ in Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ. The film does not directly reference QAnon, a baseless conspiracy theory that asserts Democrats are a cabal of Satan worshippers who traffic children for sex. However, Caviezel has pushed claims of the conspiracy theory in the past, and when promoting the film on Steve Bannon’s podcast, dropped the QAnon line “there is a big storm coming”." - Josh Taylor - theguardian.com

>>19257385 Video: QAnon-link film gets local release - "Sound of Freedom, a micro-budget independent film with links to QAnon that became an unlikely box office hit in America, will be released in Australia in August. The film, made on a budget of $US14.5 million ($21.6 million), has taken in an astonishing $US130 million ($191 million) at the box office since its opening on July 4th. Sound of Freedom stars Jim Caviezel as Tim Ballard, a former federal agent who founded the anti-trafficking organisation Operation Underground Railroad. It follows his mission through Colombia to save a girl from child traffickers. During the Trump presidency, Ballard co-chaired a council established to guide federal anti-trafficking policymaking." - Geordie Gray - theaustralian.com.au

>>19257385 Q Post #3635 - Sometimes a good 'movie' can provide a lot of truth and/or background. 'Official Secrets.' Relevant today? Enjoy the show! - Q - https://qanon.pub/#3635

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487583

#31 - Part 69

Qanon / Conspiracy Theory Hit Pieces, Australia and Worldwide - Part 2

>>19321154 Donald Trump remains an existential threat to the survival of US democracy - "Donald Trump’s orchestrated efforts to subvert the will of the voters and attempt to overturn the result of the 2020 US presidential election, to effectively instigate a coup d’état, is the most serious and egregious charge that can be made against anyone who believes in democracy, freedom and the rule of law. The prospect, though, of Trump being re-elected as president challenges the survival of this system. Trump has also shattered the norms and conventions of US politics; namely, the principle of the peaceful transfer of power embodied by George Washington, who retired after two terms. No previous US president, however upset at their defeat, sowed disinformation and discord like Trump. Trump remains a disgusting, disgraceful, dangerous individual. He is the first US president to be charged with a criminal offence. Trump’s indictment for attempting to overturn the presidential election of 2020 will be one of the great trials of our time. It is imperative, for the survival of US democracy, that he is found guilty of these crimes and does not return to power." - Troy Bramston - theaustralian.com.au

>>19327086 Video: Senator says Uluru Statement ‘confirmed’ as 26 pages by NIAA, after Albo blasts claim as ‘QAnon’ conspiracy - Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says the Uluru Statement from the Heart has been “confirmed” as being 26 pages long by the agency that produced the documents under freedom of information, as she called on Anthony Albanese to “come clean” after the Prime Minister derided the claim as a “QAnon” style conspiracy theory on Tuesday. Mr Albanese used Question Time on Tuesday to blast the claims as a “QAnon” style conspiracy theory. “That is a conspiracy in search of a theory, Mr Speaker,” the PM said. “It is something that has been out there, like a whole lot of the QAnon theories, we have all sorts of conspiracy stuff out there, but this is a ripper. That is the Uluru Statement from the Heart on an A4 bit of paper. That is it. But what we have here is the conspiracy theories colliding with each other. They’re struggling to get their scares straight. I mean, what role did Marcia Langton play in the faking of the moon landing, Mr Speaker? What was the role of the Uluru Statement from the Heart in that?” He stressed it was “absolutely nonsense”.

>>19333351 Why PM’s backtrack on the Uluru Statement from the Heart won’t wash - "This week in parliament, Anthony Albanese doubled down on his claim that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is just a simple one-page statement -- almost an Australian version, he’s said, of the Gettysburg Address. He’s doing this because he needs the Uluru Statement to be a benign, uplifting document in order to get his voice referendum passed by voters, and because he needs to deny that the voice is just the first step in “Voice, Treaty, Truth” - a lengthy and complex process that will lead to multi-­billion dollar reparations payments (on top of the near $40bn a year that’s currently spent on Indigenous Australians) and the rewriting of our history as a story of shame. He’s so keen to bluff people out of referencing the full statement that he denounced the claim that it’s actually a 26-page document as a “conspiracy” worthy of QAnon." - Peta Credlin - theaustralian.com.au

>>19387408 A tale of two conferences: a choice between hope and despair - "CPAC chairman Matt Schlapp, a wealthy political adviser and lobbyist, will appear at the Australian conference this weekend alongside Matthew Whitaker, who served briefly as acting attorney-general to Trump, despite nine legal challenges to his appointment. Australians love to think of themselves as larrikins who thumb their noses at suits and sophisticates. But not the CPAC Australia mob. Among the current and former Coalition MPs scrambling to share a stage with the grizzled men of the Grand Old Party are Tony Abbott, Barnaby Joyce, Bridget McKenzie, Keith Pitt, Alex Antic, Ted O’Brien and Bronwyn Bishop. And, of course, Mundine and Price. This pair love to present themselves as champions of “average” Australians, squaring off against the “elites” of Canberra. But it’s hard to imagine a more elite look in politics than sharing a stage in a ballroom at The Star with two Trump loyalists. That’s the No campaign. Full of doublespeak and hyperbole, happy to trade in misinformation and outright lies, and to demonise their opponents when called out. Just like Donald Trump." Marcus Stewart, Nira illim bulluk man of the Taungurung Nation and a member of the Uluru Dialogue - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487586

#31 - Part 70

Qanon / Conspiracy Theory Hit Pieces, Australia and Worldwide - Part 3

>>19417293 Liberal Party branch to host QAnon believers’ favourite movie - "The NSW Liberals continue to behave like an outfit with their fingers squarely on the pulse. Next week, the party’s Willoughby state electorate conference will hatch a bold new plan to win back teal voters by holding a movie night at the Hayden Orpheum in Cremorne. Forget Barbie, Oppenheimer or any such woke nonsense. The branch members will be watching Sound of Freedom, a brawny Christian action thriller about child sex trafficking, which nudges and winks at unhinged QAnon conspiracy theories just enough to become a sleeper box office hit among the American right. Former president Donald Trump even hosted a screening at his private club in New Jersey." - Kishor Napier-Raman and Liam Mannix - smh.com.au

>>19417298 Former agent who inspired QAnon-linked thriller says critics have agendas - "Tim Ballard has had it with being linked to QAnon conspiracies. The former US Department of Homeland Security agent, who estimates he has gone on “several dozen” missions to rescue sex-trafficked children since founding Operation Underground Railroad a decade ago, has become the public face of the surprise American box office hit Sound of Freedom. Ballard is played by Jim Caviezel from The Passion of the Christ in a dark low-budget thriller that has taken a stunning $US178 million - more than the latest Indiana Jones and Mission: Impossible movies – since faith-based distributor Angel Studios released it on Independence Day. While it dramatises a mission to rescue sex-trafficked children in Colombia without taking sides politically, the movie has been championed by the far right in America’s fractious culture wars. Its supporters have included Steve Bannon, MyPillow proprietor Mike Lindell, QAnon followers online, Mel Gibson, who is one of the executive producers, and former president Donald Trump, who held a private screening at his Bedminster golf club a month ago. That leaves Ballard facing awkward questions, ahead of the movie’s opening in Australian cinemas this week, like whether he believes in the QAnon conspiracy that liberal elites run paedophilia rings. “That gets into some conspiracy theories that I’m not a part of, even though I’ve been accused of being a part of this QAnon movement,” Ballard says on a patchy Zoom call after a premiere in Buenos Aires. “I’ve disavowed it so many times. But I will say that the sex addiction that brings the demand for child sex is everywhere. “It’s on every level of every economic order, every type of person. Professionals, educators, law enforcement and politicians. Jeffrey Epstein is an example. So I don’t think it’s more prominent in elite circles. I think it’s really just everywhere.”" - Garry Maddox - theage.com.au

>>19452924 US, world should fear new Donald Trump presidency - "The mugshot of the disgraced Donald Trump after being arrested at Georgia’s Fulton County jail for attempting to overturn the 2020 presidential election is one of the most iconic photos of our time. Not surprisingly, Trump has already monetised it, offering it for sale on shirts, cups and stickers, and earning $US7.1m ($11m) in 24 hours. A concerted and co-ordinated effort to undermine and sabotage an election is one of the gravest crimes anybody can commit in a democracy. If Trump had succeeded, the US would have slid towards an autocracy. There can be no gainsaying this. It is absurd to blame Democrats for Trump’s indictments given that those most damning of Trump are his former Republican staff and officials. The 2024 election will be about the survival of US democracy. Trump is likely to win the Republican nomination for president but he is not certain to defeat Joe Biden. If Trump loses again, he will incite further unrest and violence. But if Trump wins, he will, as flagged, move to terminate democracy. The US, and the world, will pay a heavy price if Trump regains the presidency." - Troy Bramston - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487591

File: be56f4ab657c907⋯.jpg (70.28 KB,400x400,1:1,OZ_Pepe.jpg)

File: 49c9e47c7fb3569⋯.jpg (232.75 KB,841x514,841:514,Q_479.jpg)

File: ccb3ea3d2932b3c⋯.jpg (300.17 KB,842x828,421:414,Q_908.jpg)

File: a6f1a731b3eccc9⋯.jpg (136.57 KB,842x302,421:151,Q_910.jpg)

PREVIOUSLY COLLECTED NOTABLES

Q Research AUSTRALIA #31 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/5007322d

Q Research AUSTRALIA #30 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d4ab48e9

Q Research AUSTRALIA #29 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/7345bbf2

Q Research AUSTRALIA #28 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/f55ec192

Q Research AUSTRALIA #27 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/0b34604e

Q Research AUSTRALIA #26 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/9061e982

Q Research AUSTRALIA #25 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/767a7ba2

Q Research AUSTRALIA #24 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/8aa647c3

Q Research AUSTRALIA #23 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d8746531

Q Research AUSTRALIA #22 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/0c91380d

Q Research AUSTRALIA #21 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d1699b6f

Q Research AUSTRALIA #20 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/dd402760

Q Research AUSTRALIA #19 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/c2a98b43

Q Research AUSTRALIA #18 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/2ea866f7

Q Research AUSTRALIA #17 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/1df91700

Q Research AUSTRALIA #16 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/805b4829

Q Research AUSTRALIA #15 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/f975dc35

Q Research AUSTRALIA #14 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/62cdd4fd

Q Research AUSTRALIA #13 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d2399cda

Q Research AUSTRALIA #12 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/558b72b8

Q Research AUSTRALIA #11 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/c17ab97f

Q Research AUSTRALIA #10 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/bb780c9d

Q Research AUSTRALIA #9 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/6a61bec5

Q Research AUSTRALIA #8 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/7ee89fce

Q Research AUSTRALIA #7 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/239e467c

Q Research AUSTRALIA #6 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/c4932ea1

Q Research AUSTRALIA #5 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/5941506b

Q Research AUSTRALIA #4 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/acf74c16

Q Research AUSTRALIA #3 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/2021ac89

Q Research AUSTRALIA #2 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/b8855384

Q Research AUSTRALIA #1 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/1e0dcd6e

THREAD ARCHIVES

Q Research AUSTRALIA #31 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/HRkP9

Q Research AUSTRALIA #30 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/qhbEg

Q Research AUSTRALIA #29 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/d8OqC

Q Research AUSTRALIA #28 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/cXDww

Q Research AUSTRALIA #27 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/KZ6Y0

Q Research AUSTRALIA #26 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/dJnda

Q Research AUSTRALIA #25 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/mWRzL

Q Research AUSTRALIA #24 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/uytYA

Q Research AUSTRALIA #23 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/R5AIe

Q Research AUSTRALIA #22 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/vwtO9

Q Research AUSTRALIA #21 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/Si585

Q Research AUSTRALIA #20 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/Q7NNa

Q Research AUSTRALIA #19 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/elcTK

Q Research AUSTRALIA #18 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/oV4MT

Q Research AUSTRALIA #17 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/NtfuF

Q Research AUSTRALIA #16 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/PFwgE

Q Research AUSTRALIA #15 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/5hP7I

Q Research AUSTRALIA #14 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/A85E8

Q Research AUSTRALIA #13 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/rdbq6

Q Research AUSTRALIA #12 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/PahoV

Q Research AUSTRALIA #11 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/VoY1C

Q Research AUSTRALIA #10 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/lmbJh

Q Research AUSTRALIA #9 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/gOsSc

Q Research AUSTRALIA #8 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/xYtqT

Q Research AUSTRALIA #7 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/YT76p

Q Research AUSTRALIA #6 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/DGknZ

Q Research AUSTRALIA #5 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/vlHWs

Q Research AUSTRALIA #4 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/B0Z4l

Q Research AUSTRALIA #3 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/xznbY

Q Research AUSTRALIA #2 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/hlJ0W

Q Research AUSTRALIA #1 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/vJ8oH

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487594

File: fc03f2897a3cf42⋯.jpg (3.11 MB,2800x2000,7:5,Chairman_of_the_Joint_Chie….jpg)

CURRENT DOUGH

https://controlc.com/242495d9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487613

File: 6bfa6463f126668⋯.mp4 (10.11 MB,640x360,16:9,Coalition_leapfrogs_Labor_….mp4)

No vote for Voice tips over 50 per cent as Coalition leads Labor on Newspoll primary vote

SIMON BENSON - SEPTEMBER 4, 2023

1/2

The Coalition has leapt ahead of Labor on primary votes for the first time since last year’s election and ­Anthony Albanese has dipped into negative territory, as support for the voice dropped further following the ­referendum date announcement and the official launch of a six-week ­campaign.

An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian shows ­support for an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government falling to 38 per cent and those intending to vote No rising to 53 per cent.

This marks the first time that ­opposition to a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice to parliament and executive ­government has achieved an outright majority.

It comes as support for the ­Coalition lifts to its highest level since the May 2022 election, with the opposition now leading Labor 37 per cent to 35 per cent on primary votes.

While Labor still leads comfortably on a two-party preferred lead of 53-47 per cent, the Prime Minister’s personal approval ratings have also fallen into negative territory for the first time in his premiership.

Mr Albanese now faces a divisive six-week campaign ahead of the October 14 referendum with electoral support for the government in a weakened position as cost-of-living issues continue to bite with households.

The results reflect shifting sentiments in the six-week gap since the previous Newspoll on July 15. This survey was conducted between last Monday and Friday and polled 1200 voters throughout Australia. The further decline in support for the voice follows the Prime Minister’s announcement last week that the referendum would be held on October 14.

The fall in favour for the voice – on the back of a five-point rise in the No vote and a three point ­decline in the Yes vote since July – was consistent almost across the board with the most notable ­declines among men and the ­important demographic of 35 to 49-year-olds.

The only age group with a ­majority in favour of the voice now is the 18 to 34-year-old group. But among these younger voters there was a four-point decline in support to 55 per cent.

There was now a majority against the referendum question across all other age groups, with 66 per cent of over 65s, 61 per cent of 50 to 64-year-olds and 51 per cent of 35 to 49-year-olds saying they intended to vote No.

Support among men fell 12 points to 33 per cent, with the No vote rising to 59 per cent. The gap between regional and metropolitan voters also narrowed, with a decline in the city based vote, which had previously favoured a Yes vote but had now switched with 48 per cent saying they would now vote No compared with 42 per cent in support.

Those claiming not to have ­decided how they would vote narrowed to 9 per cent from 11 per cent in the previous survey.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19487616

File: d038bf09ae3b10a⋯.jpg (347.97 KB,815x720,163:144,Voice_to_parliament_Septem….jpg)

>>19487613

2/2

The latest Newspoll figures came as Peter Dutton pledged to hold his own referendum on ­Indigenous constitutional recognition if he were to win the next election, which is due in 2025. “I think it’s right and respectful to recognise Indigenous Australians in the Constitution – we will work with the Labor Party to find a common ground,” the Opposition Leader told Sky News on Sunday.

“Yes, I believe very strongly that (constitutional recognition) is the right thing to do. But enshrining a voice in the Constitution is divisive.

“It will divide the country down the middle; it will not provide practical outcomes.”

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney and voice co-­architect Megan Davis blasted Mr Dutton’s proposal for a second vote on constitutional recognition, and said only a voice would change Indigenous lives.

“Peter Dutton and the ­Coalition spent nine years in ­government and failed to progress constitutional recognition,” Ms Burney said. “October 14 is the one shot Australians will get at ­recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander people in our ­Constitution.”

Professor Davis said there was “zero evidence anywhere in the world that a statement of recognition changes anything, so that’s my response”.

In troubling signs for the government, the continuing decline in support for the voice coincides with primary support for Labor falling to its lowest level since last year’s election, slipping a point to 35 per cent.

While this remains 2.4 points above its election result, the poll shows the Coalition for the first time securing stronger underlying voter support.

Mr Albanese has also suffered a significant fall in his personal ­approval ratings, with satisfaction in his performance falling from 52 per cent in July to 46 per cent in the latest Newspoll.

Those dissatisfied with the Prime Minister rose six points to 47 per cent.

The Greens, which remain locked in battle with Labor over the government’s affordable ­housing bill and resources tax, have also lifted a point to 13 per cent, while support for other minor parties and independents – including the teal independents fell three points to 8 per cent.

Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party remained stable at 7 per cent of the total vote.

The Coalition’s primary vote has lifted three points since the previous Newspoll in July to 37 per cent, representing a high-water mark for the Liberal-Nationals in this term of parliament and the first time it has lifted above its election result of 35.7 per cent. The ­Coalition had fallen to as low as 31 per cent almost a year ago.

The two-party preferred vote lead of 55-45 per cent enjoyed by Labor in the previous poll has been cut to 53-47 per cent.

The poll period also covers the current controversy over airfares and the government’s decision to block Qatar Airways from providing more flights into Australia in competition with Qantas, as well as the ALP national conference where Mr Albanese went into ­battle with the unions and left-wing factions over the AUKUS ­security pact and submarine deal with the UK and the US.

This has produced the first net negative result – minus one – for Mr Albanese’s approval rating since the election.

While he still holds a strong lead over Mr Dutton on that measure, Mr Albanese has also suffered a four-point fall to 50 per cent in the preferred prime minister stakes, with Mr Dutton lifting two points to 31 per cent.

This is the narrowest margin between the two leaders.

However, Mr Dutton’s low ­approval ratings remain largely unchanged. Those satisfied with him rose two points to 38 per cent while those with a negative view stayed at 49 per cent, leaving the Opposition Leader with a net negative approval rating of minus 11.

Support among Labor voters for the voice remained stable at 61 per cent, while Labor No voters rose three points to 31 per cent.

There was also an increase in the No vote among Greens voters from 15 per cent in July to 26 per cent in the latest poll, and a clear fall in the Yes vote among supporters of the minor party from 76 per cent to 64 per cent.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/no-vote-for-voice-tips-over-50-per-cent-as-coalition-leaps-ahead-of-labor-on-primary-vote/news-story/47923e5faa868024fea3b9f05d6cd1ff

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19493285

File: 50da2fe83ccb24c⋯.jpg (178.74 KB,1280x720,16:9,Illustration_Johannes_Leak.jpg)

>>19487613

Anthony Albanese is burning through his political capital as the voice falters

SIMON BENSON - SEPTEMBER 3, 2023

The political damage has begun.

Anthony Albanese can no longer take comfort in the Yes campaign’s ability to win over ­undecided voters. Even if it did, it appears this won’t be enough. It now also has to convince a significant number of voters to change their minds.

There are only six weeks to make up significant ground as support for the voice referendum ­continues to retreat. Something remarkable is going to have to happen, if it’s not already too late.

Broader political consequences are also becoming apparent. Labor for the first time has begun to show signs of electoral harm. As has the Prime Minister personally. This is playing out in the ­primary-vote contest. The Coalition now leads Labor by two points. It is the first time it has been ahead since the election. Only four months ago, Labor enjoyed a six-point lead.

This is significant, considering the broader state of the Liberal Party’s low support until now and Peter Dutton’s ­unpopularity. The Prime Minister’s approval ratings have also dipped into negative territory, just, in another post-election first, after a drift downwards since the start of the year.

While Labor is still polling ahead of its election result – and ­despite the latest numbers, Labor still enjoys a strong two-party-­preferred lead – the reversal of the primary-vote dynamic will send a dose of reality through the Labor caucus. It has lost ground to the left and is facing the potential for a backlash from the middle.

Whether it is the voice, or the perception that the government is distracted from bread-and-butter economic issues, Albanese’s and the Labor government’s political dominance is being challenged.

The Coalition and the Greens are the major beneficiaries. The latest Newspoll will re-enforce the Liberal leader’s approach and offer the Greens no reason to change their strategy of playing hardball with Labor over key legislation on housing and resources tax.

The Liberal-Nationals vote at 37 per cent, its highest since the election, is still a long way from what the Coalition needs to be back in the game and Dutton’s numbers are still low. But considering the opposition was at 31 per cent this time last year the movement is in the wrong direction for the government.

What will trouble Labor strategists is the change over the past six weeks among 35 to 49-year-olds and their disposition toward the voice. With the Yes vote winning out marginally over the No until now, sentiment has shifted strongly the other way. This is a demographic focused on cost-of-living issues. And nothing gets up politically if you can’t convince them.

They won Scott Morrison the 2019 election, lost him the next.

While the No vote remains strongest in the regions, metropolitan voters are now also for the first time more inclined to vote No.

A deep partisan divide now exists, set against a renewed disconnection between the progressive movement and middle Australia.

Support for the voice is down across the board. In February, 56 per cent were in favour, 37 per cent against. These numbers have in the space of six months virtually reversed. Even those most strongly in favour, 18 to 34-year-olds, have drifted.

The only shift in favour of the voice has been among female voters and those aged over 65 – but the older demographic was ­already a lost cause. The No vote leads among all age groups now other than the young.

There is evidence also of a cooling off in the electoral honeymoon Albanese has enjoyed during the first half of his first term in office.

The challenge for the government over the next six weeks is to convince middle Australia that it is focused on its concerns.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/honeymoon-is-over-as-coalition-leaps-ahead-of-labor-on-primary-vote-for-first-time-newspoll/news-story/3fa674c21c79319e88664db74493af60

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19493287

File: ffd740b9400ec4d⋯.jpg (242.73 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Victorian_Opposition_Leade….jpg)

>>19487613

Victorian Liberal leader John Pesutto confirms he’ll say No on Indigenous voice to parliament

HARRY BRILL - SEPTEMBER 4, 2023

John Pesutto has declared he will vote No in next month’s referendum, arguing that the objectives of the voice can be achieved without changing the Constitution.

The Victorian Opposition Leader, in announcing his position, said he wanted a positive outcome for First Nations people and said this sentiment was shared between Yes and No voters alike.

“Putting aside whether one supports or opposes the voice, I ­believe the objectives of the voice can be achieved without constitutional change,” Mr Pesutto said.

“Governments at all levels should continue to improve their frameworks to engage Indigenous voices and meaningfully enhance the life opportunities of First ­Nations people. I greatly respect many Yes ­advocates who are urging constitutional change and I embrace the same exalted aims for our country that would see all First Nations people share in Australia’s limitless promise.

“Reasonable differences of opinion over our path need not foreclose common bonds over our destination: to eliminate disadvantage suffered by First Nations people and honour the sacred traditions of culture bequeathed by their ancestors down the ages.”

The decision not to support a voice to parliament comes after what the Opposition Leader described as “careful consideration”.

“I have decided to vote no in the upcoming referendum on the voice,” he said in a statement released on Monday, which went on to say that he strongly supported “recognition of First Nations people in our foundation document, the Constitution”.

Victorian MPs will be free to cast conscience votes next month after the Liberal Party had voted in favour of a non-binding position ahead of the referendum.

Most notably, Liberal MP Jess Wilson has indicated she will support the voice next month.

Should the referendum succeed, Mr Pesutto confirmed he would “commit to working positively to make the voice a success”.

“If the referendum is not successful, we must all rally to advance the wider cause of reconciliation and unite to close those gaps in life outcomes which, to this day, deny so many First Nations people the dignity and equality of opportunity they deserve,” Mr Pesutto said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/victorian-liberal-leader-john-pesutto-confirms-hell-say-no-on-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/60ba7f11830bd1857f4d73bec5cd5c8e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19493306

File: 33b540fe206a961⋯.jpg (400.37 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Circular_Head_Aboriginal_C….jpg)

File: 29de37227d514a1⋯.jpg (338.24 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Voice_referendum_No_voter_….jpg)

>>19487613

Warring Indigenous groups unite against voice

The Yes campaign in Tasmania is being cruelled by power struggles between warring Indigenous groups whose opposition to the voice is driven by fear their rivals will control it.

MATTHEW DENHOLM - September 3, 2023

1/2

The Yes campaign in Tasmania is being cruelled by power struggles between warring Indigenous groups whose opposition to the voice is driven by fear their rivals will control it.

Yes campaigners are most ­confident in the left-leaning south, but No sentiment is fuelled by bitter conflict between Indigenous groups, particularly in the more conservative north and northwest.

The longstanding peak Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre, ­associated with prominent family groups, is battling what it claims are attempts by “tick-a-box” Indigenous people to gain influence and control over land and ­organisations.

Hostility between the TAC and newer, regional-based Aboriginal corporations is most acute in the northwest, where the Circular Head Aboriginal Corporation has growing influence. The two groups are often at loggerheads – over Aboriginal identity, voting rights and land access – but are in furious agreement on one issue: the voice is no good.

Each has a range of reasons but a common theme is concern the other mob will gain control of the voice and disenfranchise them. Both would rather government consult with them and their elders directly than via a voice from which they felt excluded.

It is a divide that threatens to fell the voice campaign, as Yes insiders increasingly see Tasmania and South Australia as key to getting the majority of states ­required to pass a referendum.

In the west of the state in Smithton, CHAC chairwoman Selina Maguire-Colgrave said the Tom Calma-Marcia Langton model of just two voice representatives per state did not sit well with the divisions in Tasmanian Aboriginal politics. “In Tassie, we are still fighting for recognition as Aboriginal people – the TAC and the land council don’t recognise many of CHAC’s members,” Mrs Maguire-Colgrave said.

She said TAC figures had abused and boycotted CHAC members on state committees, providing a glimpse of what the voice would be like.

“We see Marcia Langton’s map and the plan for two people from Tasmania – it would be the complete downfall of CHAC should that happen,” she said.

“It (only two Tasmanian voice representatives) would cut our voice off. That’s why we’re voting No. It’s divisive.”

Mrs Maguire-Colgrave is ­calling for detail about how many voice members will be elected and how. She believed it was culturally inappropriate to expect Tasmania – a land of disparate Indigenous nations and groups – to have as few as two voice members. “Each community in Australia has its own issues – what’s happening here in Circular Head is different to the needs in outback WA,” she said.

“So how are either of our voices heard by just two people sitting in an office in the capital city? You’ve got to talk to each community.”

She said TAC assertions that CHAC members were not Aboriginal were wrong and motivated by that organisation’s attempts to retain control.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19493309

File: 72ddcb2a09ebeb2⋯.jpg (250.3 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Sammy_Howard_a_member_of_t….jpg)

>>19493306

2/2

Krystelle Jordan, a TAC member and its treaty negotiation group, said: “I wonder, ­especially here on the northwest coast, how many of these (voice) seats will include Aboriginal people – and not just people who tick a box and claim to be Aboriginal.”

Devonport-based Ms Jordan said there were “too many unknowns” about the voting system, the number of voice seats and eligibility. “If these people do manage to sit on these advisory committees, it then becomes another white advisory committee,” she said. “So that advice will not come from our elders, who it should come from. It’s going to come from people who quite literally only have to tick a box.”

She conceded some TAC members may vote Yes, despite the strong No stance of elders such as Michael Mansell, but believed most would vote No.

“We have been advising the government for 250 years and we’re sick of it,” she said. “My elders have stood staunch in the struggle to get our land back through sit-ins and marches through the streets of lutruwita (Tasmania),” Ms Jordan said.

“It’s my elders whose voice matters and my elders have never marched the streets for an advisory committee. The voice is more of a step back in our view. It’s a waste of a referendum. Treaty should come first and foremost.”

The situation is disappointing for Indigenous Tasmanians backing the Yes case, who include members of groups from Bruny Island in the south to Six Rivers Aboriginal Corporation in the north.

Albert “Sammy” Howard, a Devonport-based Six Rivers member, said he jumped ship from the No to the Yes camp, believing the voice would deliver constitutional recognition and an advisory body that could be ironed out by parliament.

“I realised it’s just two simple questions,” Mr Howard said. “If you believe Aboriginal people were here before colonisation, vote Yes. If you also believe that Aboriginal people deserve to have a voice in things that concern them, vote Yes. That’s it. The rest of it is to be decided by the Australian parliament of the day. Also, if the Yes vote doesn’t get up, it will put treaty negotiations back 20 years.”

Rodney Dillon, of Bruny’s Weetapoona Aboriginal Corporation and the First Nations Referendum Working Group, backs a Yes vote, believing the voice “can make significant change” and that a No vote would set back Aboriginal rights.

He said increasing the number of voice representatives would be up for discussion. “But two (voice) members is two more than we have now,” Mr Dillon said. “Let’s have the vote, get this thing through – and then there’s a few things like (number of positions) that we could talk about.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous-power-struggles-endanger-yes-vote-in-key-referendum-state-of-tasmania/news-story/38011ae1f30a5d1caa5bd71ccc65215b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19493339

File: b8bc41d6848fdb5⋯.jpg (479.01 KB,3000x1856,375:232,Julian_Assange_has_been_de….jpg)

File: 5548845f2d317c3⋯.jpg (2 MB,4969x3313,4969:3313,The_delegation_includes_fo….jpg)

Parliamentary delegation will visit Washington to urge US to ditch extradition of Julian Assange

Patrick Bell - 5 September 2023

A multi-party delegation of federal MPs and senators will travel to Washington DC this month as part of the campaign to release WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

The United States is seeking to extradite Mr Assange from the United Kingdom on 18 charges related to the publication of thousands of military and diplomatic documents.

He has been detained in the Belmarsh Prison in London for more than four years, and is currently appealing the UK's decision to agree to his extradition.

The parliamentary delegation will include former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce, Labor MP Tony Zappia, Liberal senator Alex Antic, independent MP Monique Ryan, and Greens senators David Shoebridge and Peter Whish-Wilson.

The group will urge US politicians and officials to abandon their extradition efforts, when it travels to Washington on September 20.

"What we will be asking the US to do is to demonstrate their commitment to the First Amendment," Dr Ryan said.

Mr Joyce said the prosecution sets a dangerous precedent that a citizen can be sent to a third country for an offence they did not commit in that country.

"We hope that we are given a fair hearing, because we believe it is something that we need to park and move on from," he said.

Senator Shoebridge said Mr Assange was the subject of a "political prosecution" for "telling the truth" and it was incumbent on the delegation to advocate for his release.

In a statement, Mr Assange's brother Gabriel Shipton said Australians had "had a gut full" of his brother being left in detention, and wanted to see him returned to his family.

"The vast majority of Australians can't understand why the US continues to act in a way that keeps Julian locked up in one of the worst prisons in the UK," he said.

"Even Australians who didn't support Julian's actions believe he has suffered enough and should be set free immediately."

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has previously expressed frustration that a diplomatic solution to the case has not been reached.

"This needs to be brought to a conclusion," Mr Albanese told the ABC earlier this year.

He is set to travel to Washington himself next month.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-05/federal-politicians-visit-washington-urge-release-julian-assange/102814298

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19493562

File: c1dd1c12a7cfe1a⋯.jpg (282.99 KB,2048x1152,16:9,AFP_Southern_Command_Assis….jpg)

Let police use artificial intelligence amid ‘tsunami’ of online child sex abuse

ANGELICA SNOWDEN - SEPTEMBER 5, 2023

Authorities will continue fighting a “tsunami” of online child abuse with their hands tied behind their backs if they can’t use tools such as artificial intelligence, warning the voices of privacy advocates are ­stifling those of victims and ­survivors.

Jon Rouse, a former Queensland detective inspector who worked in child protection for nearly 30 years and spearheaded Australia’s first operation targeting internet child sex offenders, said AI technologies such as Clearview AI - a platform banned in Australia - should be used. “If we are going to do the worst job, we need access to the best tools, simple as that,” he said.

“We need access to the best tools because we are fighting with our hands behind our back. ­(Offenders) have end-to-end ­encryption, they have anonymised platforms, they have obfuscation. We are fighting with a very small force for the rights of children globally.”

Professor Rouse said that ­before he retired, he worked to get victim-identification professionals from around the world to the US - where Clearview can be used - to identify cold-case victims of abuse. Dubbed Operation Renewed Hope, the mission successfully identified 311 probable victims of child sex abuse this year.

The operation “worked ethically. It worked appropriately with oversight. Right now the privacy we’re protecting is the child sex ­offender,” he said.

AFP Assistant Commissioner Hilda Sirec said the use of AI would fast-track the work of law enforcement officers and minimise their exposure to child abuse images. “One hundred per cent law enforcement has to adopt technologies to help identify victims (and) search for offenders to make sure they stop victimising (children),” she said.

“There’s a lot of things that the technology out there can do. (It can do) the same amount of identification and analytics that thousands of humans would take thousands of lifetimes to achieve.

“We’ve just got to get the processes done in the right way and adopt these technologies.”

Both said the top priority was the protection of children.

AFP Deputy Commissioner Lesa Gale added: “Given that the volume of child exploitation ­material coming into our country is exploding - I would almost go so far as to say it is like a tsunami - anything we can do to identify those victims and to reduce ­exposure for our officers is important,” she said.

It comes as police, officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs and the Attorney-General's Department, and survivors including Grace Tame gathered for the launch of the AiLECS Lab, a partnership between the AFP and Monash University.

AiLECS aims to advance ethical and transparent datasets for law enforcement agencies. The lab has so far collected about 800 images with consent to build the world’s first ethical image bank to combat child exploitation.

By comparison, Clearview AI has scraped 30 billion facial images from public websites including social media.

The Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation ­received more than 36,000 ­reports of abuse in 2021-22. In the same period, the AFP charged 221 people with 1746 related offences.

In 2021, Australia’s privacy watchdog effectively made the use of Clearview illegal. An investigation found it collected facial images without consent for a trial conducted by some Australian police forces between October 2019 and March 2020.

If you need help, visit the Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation website:

https://www.accce.gov.au/

https://www.accce.gov.au/help-and-support/who-can-help

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/let-police-use-artificial-intelligence-amid-tsunami-of-online-child-sex-abuse/news-story/98cce7b5ee1041bce3d23f884fd20043

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19493577

File: cd6f0ae4f99b4b9⋯.mp4 (14.08 MB,960x540,16:9,Six_men_have_been_charged_….mp4)

File: 8779d961e17e910⋯.jpg (696.68 KB,2768x1848,346:231,Detective_Inspector_Glen_D….jpg)

File: 14d357848427034⋯.jpg (287.25 KB,2048x1369,2048:1369,Minister_for_Child_Safety_….jpg)

File: 5cf32293938abaf⋯.jpg (324.1 KB,844x513,844:513,Q_1735.jpg)

>>19493562

More than 100 child sex charges laid against six Queensland men, 15,000 cases referred to child safety since July 2022

Sarah Richards - 5 September 2023

Six Queensland men have been charged with more than 100 child sex offences following extensive investigations by taskforce Argos detectives.

Detective Acting Superintendent Glen Donaldson said the alleged offences committed by the men were "extremely serious, and in some cases truly shocking".

As part of the investigation, a 46-year-old Fortitude Valley man was charged with more than 20 child sex offences and is accused of photographing children in public toilets as well as running a hidden network inside a child exploitation website.

A 44-year-old Beerwah man was taken into custody accused of 62 offences, including making child exploitation material.

An Upper Kedron man, 42, and a Cairns man, 39, were charged with using a carriage service to access child exploitation material.

A 22-year-old Albion man was charged with grooming a child and making exploitation material and police allege a 26-year-old man from Carina, used social media to attempt to meet a child.

All of the men charged are due to face court in the coming weeks.

Detective Acting Superintendent Donaldson said the offences involved children as young as infants, toddlers, and up to 17 years old.

"The maximum penalty for some of these offences is 20 years imprisonment," he said.

"This is probably every parent's worst nightmare."

Detective Acting Superintendent Donaldson said the 22-year-old Albion man charged with grooming a child and making exploitation material had written down his "fantasies".

"This offender discussed the rape of children online and has written down child sex fantasies, which are truly shocking," he said.

Detective Acting Superintendent Donaldson said the men involved were in well known groups.

"They all know each other so the less information that gets out, the more assistance Argos has in continuing to penetrate these networks," he said.

"This is still an active investigation.

"Obviously, these offenders love watching the news to see what Argos is doing so I have to be very careful in what I can say," he said.

He could not provide information on the men's occupations but said none of them had blue cards.

Minister for Child Safety Craig Crawford said the number of alleged offenders arrested was concerning, but he was more worried about those who hadn't yet been caught.

"It's a reminder to parents to always be consciously aware of where your child is, and who they're interacting with at all times," he said.

He described the alleged offending by one of the men as "disgusting" and a "shocking act".

"If you have any concerns at all about the welfare of a young person, you can report it," Mr Crawford said.

Detective Acting Superintendent Donaldson echoed the importance of the role caregivers played in children's lives.

"These arrests are a reminder to parents and caregivers of the dangers of online predators and how crucial trusted loved ones are in teaching children about privacy, personal safety and that nothing is so awful they can't speak to them about it," he said.

Between 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023, the Queensland Police Service charged 1,587 people with 8,005 child sex offences.

Queensland police have also submitted 15,699 reports to the Department of Child Safety, Seniors and Disability Services regarding children identified as being at risk of significant harm.

Authorities referred a further 2,329 matters to Family and Child Connect where serious concerns were held by first response police regarding the wellbeing of a child, and police believed support to the child and family would prevent a report to the Department of Child Safety.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-05/qld-six-men-charged-with-child-exploitation-abuse-offences-argos/102814566

https://qanon.pub/#1735

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19493588

File: 1338235d9e9f1f2⋯.mp4 (15.45 MB,640x360,16:9,The_AFP_has_released_censo….mp4)

File: d767ae3d2ad0978⋯.jpg (159.75 KB,956x1457,956:1457,2301001.jpg)

File: 99d516639568908⋯.jpg (70.73 KB,1280x960,4:3,2301002.jpg)

File: 88184ec4e01d607⋯.jpg (150.92 KB,2112x1164,176:97,2301003.jpg)

File: 41e9f65e3195ce8⋯.jpg (154.76 KB,1046x332,523:166,2301004.jpg)

>>19493562

Australian Federal Police release images in search for cold case victims of child sexual abuse

Maryanne Taouk and Courtney Barrett Peters - 4 September 2023

The Australian Federal Police (AFP) has released new images giving the public a glimpse into the rooms where child sex abuse is perpetrated, in the hope it will lead to identification of the abused children.

In four images, the AFP's victim identification specialists have released photos of two rooms, with distinctive curtains, wall paint, a bed frame, and a fireplace.

Acting Assistant Commissioner for the AFP-led Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation (ACCCE), Helen Schneider said finding the children abused in the rooms had proven to be like finding a "needle in a haystack".

"These images are from older matters," she said.

"We believe the child victims in these matters are now adults but we accept that the trauma of this kind of offending does not fade away."

"Victim identification specialists have the painstaking task of going through images and videos frame-by-frame to identify anything that helps with the origin, location or the identity of a victim.”

The screenshots are from videos found on the dark web that the AFP has confirmed took place in Australia.

Acting Assistant Commissioner Schneider said the images contain clues that will help find victims and offenders.

"We want any information," she said.

"We want to hear it because every one of those images involves a real child who is being abused somewhere."

The blitz to identify the rooms comes at the start of National Child Protection Week, which asks the public to stop abuse by tracing the origin of objects on the ACCCE website.

The department's site, launched in March 2021, has since had 186,000 visits and generated 908 tip-offs.

"We're looking for people who might work in fields that might have greater exposure to housing locations," Acting Assistant Commissioner Schneider said.

The homes may have been visited by tradespeople, real estate agents or builders over the years.

Authorities say while no information is too small, the current owners may not be associated with any crimes committed but could form clues that could crack the case.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-04/afp-release-images-inside-child-abuse-rooms-to-crack-cold-cases/102810212

https://www.accce.gov.au/what-we-do/trace-an-object

Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation

Stop Child Abuse - Trace an Object

We need your help in the fight against online child sexual exploitation.

The smallest clue can often help solve a case.

Can you help us recognise these objects?

The below objects have been taken from the background of sexual abuse material involving children. Sometimes it is necessary to edit the imagery to focus on a specific area or object. If you recognise any of these objects, click on the item and provide the ACCCE with the information you have. We specifically want to trace their origin (location/country). Reports can be made anonymously.

We are convinced that more eyes will provide more leads and ultimately help to remove children from harm.

Find out more about how your reports help us free a child from exploitation.

https://www.accce.gov.au/what-we-do/stop-child-abuse-trace-object/about-trace-object

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Am2kNMcf7M

If you believe a child is in immediate danger, call Triple Zero (000) or Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 to report anonymously.

TRIGGER WARNING: The following content may be distressing to some people. Out of respect for the victims, we urge you not to share any personal information (recognisable pictures, names, etc.) on social media or anywhere online. Your useful tips can be shared with us in a secure way by clicking the 'Make a report' link underneath an image. Thank you for your support.

https://www.accce.gov.au/what-we-do/trace-an-object

https://qanon.pub/#1735

>You are not alone in this fight.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19499246

File: 22a63453f2a9a72⋯.jpg (491.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Leading_No_campaigner_Warr….jpg)

>>19487613

Opponents to an Indigenous voice to parliament concede their campaign is ‘low-key’

ROSIE LEWIS - SEPTEMBER 6, 2023

Opponents of an Indigenous voice to parliament are running a “low-key” ground campaign that’s “not as flash” as the Yes side, according to leading No spokesman Warren Mundine, with the focus on reaching voters through social media platforms such as TikTok rather than door-knocking and holding daily public events.

As the official campaign enters its second week, Mr Mundine declared the No camp’s greatest campaigning technique was to let supporters knock on doors and talk with Australians because “they can’t answer the questions”.

The claim was made as Anthony Albanese ratcheted up his parliamentary attack against Peter Dutton on the referendum, saying the Opposition Leader wanted to defeat it for political reasons and then have a second poll so he could “talk about this for year after year after year after year”.

“We want outcomes,” the Prime Minister said. “No one is asking for a second referendum, which is his position. He wants to see Indigenous people, he just doesn’t want them to be heard.”

Mr Dutton questioned how Mr Albanese could go ahead with the October 14 referendum “knowing that he’s going to divide our country clean down the middle”.

Four prominent Yes campaigners – Dean Parkin, Thomas Mayo, Noel Pearson and Rachel Perkins – have been out-campaigning the No camp, traversing the country and holding daily events while 30,000 volunteers knock on doors.

Amid warnings from Nationals leader David Littleproud that the No campaign couldn’t afford to be complacent, Mr Mundine acknowledged there were some days he wasn’t able to appear publicly on the campaign trail because he still had businesses to run.

“We’re just ordinary Australians who still have to work. We’re not as flash as the Yes campaign,” he said. “It’s working in our favour all this stuff. Every time they pull out a celebrity, people go ‘eh eh’. It’s not about the vibe, it’s not about feeling good or feeling guilty, this is about the governance of this country and practical events. It (the No campaign) is just low key, talking to groups of people and asking them to talk to their families and ‘here’s what it’s all about’.”

Asked what the No camp’s most effective campaigning technique was, he said: “Them (Yes23) knocking on doors and talking face-to-face with the public.”

The Australian understands the No campaign has relied on detailed modelling to produce a road map revealing exactly which voters – including who they are, what they do and where they live – would be most receptive to their messaging.

That information is then used to inform where to target all voter contact tactics including digital advertising, phone calls, text messages and unaddressed mail.

The No campaign body, Fair Australia, is prioritising cheaper social media ads rather than mainstream media and engaging with voters on platforms like TikTok – where it has 33.6k followers compared to Yes23’s 3.1k. followers.

Former Western Australia treasurer and voice supporter Ben Wyatt said the status quo was no longer acceptable and told undecided voters who weren’t sure if the Constitution needed amending: “Sometimes when you have had such strong evidence of policy failure, you need to shake the system up – a Yes vote shakes the system up in Aboriginal policy and ensures that we get a much better outcome in the implementation and development of policy.”

Aboriginal activist Megan Krakouer, campaigning alongside Mr Wyatt and Mr Parkin in Perth, said she didn’t believe the voice was enough or that “it’ll make the great change we need it to” but people in her community were suffering from suicidality and mental health and she wouldn’t “stand in the way of some kind of progress”.

“I’m not sure it’ll work but I do know we have to give it a try because there is just so much despair in our community,” she said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/opponents-to-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-concede-their-campaign-is-low-key/news-story/472199474b5ca36a36922166e69a2dd2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19499267

File: 03833448029fa8b⋯.jpg (347.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>19487613

Indigenous voice to parliament: Say Yes to embrace future of hope for our First Nations

LINDA BURNEY - SEPTEMBER 6, 2023

With the date of the referendum set, many Australians are now turning their attention to the choice they will make in just six weeks. On October 14, Australians will be asked a simple question: Do you support a change to the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice?

Yes or no.

The choice is simple: we can take the next step forward as a nation by embracing practical reconciliation or we can choose to close the door on recognition for Indigenous Australians.

Embracing this moment, and choosing yes for constitutional recognition through a voice is our best chance of addressing the injustices of the past, and create structural change that will ensure Indigenous communities are listened to, so we can get better results.

Saying no means accepting an unsatisfactory status quo. It means accepting that things can’t get better. It means accepting an eight-year gap in life expectancy. It means accepting poorer health and educational outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

The harsh reality is that only four out of 19 Closing the Gap targets are “on track”; doing more of the same is a path to nowhere.

Contrary to claims by the No campaign, members of the voice will not be appointed by government, nor will it comprise of so called “elites”.

The voice would be a committee of Indigenous Australians, selected by Indigenous Australians to give advice to government. It will include Indigenous Australians from every state and territory, the Torres Strait Islands and representatives from the regions and remote communities.

The No campaign has tried to mount a scare campaign about what representations the voice may make to parliament and the government. But Australians are commonsense people with a strong BS detector. So when the No campaign tries to claim the voice will have a say on everything from AUKUS submarines to parking tickets, Australians’ BS detector starts blaring.

As the Minister for Indigenous Australians, I will ask the voice to consider four main priority areas: health, education, jobs and housing. These are key areas I believe require urgent advice and input from the voice, in order to inform policymaking in Indigenous communities.

The voice will be tasked with taking the long view; it won’t be subject to short-term political thinking from Canberra.

Recently, a Productivity Commission report showed how the current top-down, business-as-usual approach isn’t working. The PC concluded we need to consult, involve and empower First Nations communities to deliver solutions that work in their communities. The voice will help shift the approach from top-down to bottom-up solutions.

It is often said we live in cynical times. That a steady stream of outrage and a seemingly never-ending tide of bad news has meant people are less open to the possibility of change. But I have never believed that. I have always believed Australians look to the future with hope.

The idea of the voice comes from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people themselves, through the years of consultation that culminated with the Uluru Statement from the Heart in 2017. At its core the Uluru Statement from the Heart is a statement of hope – a gracious request for all Australians to walk together to a better future.

In the words of Noel Pearson:

“The Uluru Statement from the Heart is about faith in the possibilities, faith in the Australian people, faith against so much history undeserving of faith. How can a people against whom so many faithless acts were performed over two centuries revive a faith in their own country?

“From the bowels of despair about our place in this country, we have an expression of hope for the future. And love.

“This is about bringing the country together. It is about a love for our own country, notwithstanding the lack of love that our people have experienced for too long in this, our own home.”

On October 14, let’s choose hope for a better future. Let’s choose to close the gap, and not close the door on recognition for Indigenous Australians.

Let’s vote yes for a voice.

Linda Burney is Indigenous Australians Minister.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-say-yes-to-embrace-future-of-hope-for-our-first-nations/news-story/3a0327eb63bad34c8a3ee0a4a5851397

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19499282

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Fearless Aussies put lives on Ukraine frontline

LIAM MENDES - SEPTEMBER 6, 2023

1/2

Josh Norman* is in daily pain from a shoulder injury he sustained during his time in the Australian Army.

Fellow former soldier Damien Solomon* was medically discharged after losing much of the hearing in his right ear.

Yet both men are on their way to the frontline in Ukraine, determined to help in the fight against Russia, despite the fear they could be punished by Australian authorities for choosing to make what they believe is the only ethical decision.

“I’d like to think that if Australia were invaded we’d have a lot of foreigners come over and help us, guys just like us just like us from a different country,” Mr Norman told The Australian, before travelling to serve in a Ukrainian unit with other foreigners.

Mr Solomon said Australians had a vested interest in discouraging regional superpowers, such as China, from territorial ambitions.

“If Russia were to be allowed to get away with (the invasion), it would signal to other players more relevant to Australia that that kind of behaviour is okay. And that could lead to more problems for us domestically.”

The medically-discharged veterans are fearful of speaking publicly – not because of potential repercussions from Russia – but for fear of being government repercussion upon their return.

About an hour from the Russian border, sitting in what used to be a primary school classroom in Ukraine’s east after being the target of a missile, the duo explained how they believe in the country’s cause and that Ukrainians should “be able to live their lives”.

Seeing the classroom full of pink school desks and chairs, and young children still living among destroyed dwellings across the country, reminds Mr Norman of his young nephew safely back in Australia.

“Seeing those kids around makes me want to fight,” the east coast resident said. “If Australia was invaded, other people would be trying to help my nephew out, which I truly believe. I really believe in the cause.”

After spending many months in Ukraine, the pair have been struck by the war’s impact on the most vulnerable in Ukrainian society. Every day there are rocket attacks, aerial bombings, explosions. Air raid sirens ring out across the country.

“I think people aren’t really that aware of what’s actually happening and how wrong it is … but the people that are really suffering, a lot of women, a lot of children, a lot of the vulnerable people, the elderly,” Mr Norman said. “They should be able to just get on with their life, they shouldn’t have to be fighting against an invading army to try and protect their families and get their land back, it’s just the right thing to do.”

The shoulder injury has left Mr Norman with debilitating daily pain despite having a ketamine infusion, multiple surgeries, ongoing physiotherapy and stretching, and a cocktail of pain medication – which he will be on for the rest of his life.

Even with the medication, he is often in serious pain. And that’s when he’s not wearing his body armour. “I stocked up on enough medication to last me until next year,” he said. “If I was to run out of that, or if I was to lose that medication, it would be very much a mental game, I would be in a lot of pain. But it’s a decision I’m happy with that I made. I know the risks, I know how it is, and I’m still happy to be here.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19499289

File: 7e76700e6f65efc⋯.jpg (552.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Two_ex_Australian_Army_mat….jpg)

>>19499282

2/2

Mr Solomon, whose grandfather was a Yugoslav Partisan in WWII fighting Nazis and whose great grandfather was a soldier in the Austro-Hungarian Army, lost a “high degree” of hearing in his right ear during his five years in the army.

“I really look up to my grandfather, one of the most important people in my life, so I always wanted to be in the army,” he said.

The pair both say they didn’t get the experience they were hoping for in the Australian Army, but firmly believe the skills they learnt can be utilised on the frontline to help bring an end to the invasion.

In the past few months, the two mates have been training hundreds of Ukrainians from all walks of life – accountants, teachers, retail workers – in infantry tactics at a top-secret training facility, run by a former British army soldier, called Trident Defence Initiative.

Mr Norman says he doesn’t believe Australians realise just how much Ukraine is relying on the West, but he concedes the West is suffering “war fatigue”.

“If you lose Western support, the war is pretty much done,” he said. “I’m here for the cause … I believe innocent people should be free; the problem here is that the women, the children, the vulnerable, can’t really do anything for themselves.

“There’s certainly war fatigue, all over social media I see people talking about that we shouldn’t be in Ukraine, who don’t know anything about anything.

“Most people on social media that make these comments are just peanuts who’ve got no idea what they’re talking about.”

As they prepare to head to the frontline, they manifest youthful enthusiasm. It’s clear they’re looking for adventure.

They’re joking, they’re humorous, they’re excited. It’s endless banter. They’re not scared of death. At least, not at the moment.

Every day thousands of foreigners are fighting the brutal war on the frontline. Among them are around 100 Australians fighting.

Last week, a 22-year-old British fighter, Sam Newey, died in combat. “We hear about people dying,” Mr Norman said. “It’s very real but it’s not something that we really dwell on or think about too much. I don’t think I’d get anything done if I was really worried about dying.”

The pair say they’re expecting “a lot of artillery”.

“Pretty much every day – there’s nothing that you can really do about that,” Mr Norman said.

“I’ve heard other dudes who have just been getting shelled the entire time that they’ve been around, so it really does just depend where they are and what’s happening,” Mr Solomon said.

At the moment, their families know they’re in country training soldiers. As for telling their loved ones they’re heading to the frontline? “I’ll let them know – possibly,” Mr Norman said. “The big thing about not telling them isn’t to keep it hush for the sake of it, but I think it would be detrimental, them knowing that I’m fighting, because then they would be waiting every day for a message.”

Mr Solomon said: “I’m in the same boat, I think I’m maybe blissfully unaware, but I sort of think more about the good that I’m going to do than the chance that I’m going to … die,” he said.

“It’s definitely a real possibility, but I don’t think I’d get anything done if that’s all I thought about.

“Whatever happens, happens.”

(* Names are pseudonyms)

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/fearless-aussies-put-lives-on-ukraine-frontline/news-story/6f3d2712b7ecd96cc47d72682f774c9d

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsDokn8ala8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19505142

File: 9e4db63d9d4a39f⋯.jpg (337.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Yes_campaigner_and_key_arc….jpg)

>>19487613

Marcia Langton says the government must explain what happens if the Indigenous voice to parliament vote fails

ROSIE LEWIS - SEPTEMBER 7, 2023

Indigenous leader Marcia Langton has urged the Albanese government to lay out what the future holds for Aboriginal Australians in the event of a No vote for the voice referendum on October 14, fearing it could give governments a mandate to “do nothing and to make our lives worse”.

Declaring this was Australia’s “one chance” to achieve constitutional recognition, leading Yes campaigners joined with Professor Langton on Wednesday in warning they would not work with Peter Dutton on a second “voiceless” referendum if the poll next month failed because it was not what they wanted.

In a major address to the National Press Club 5½ weeks out from the referendum, Professor Langton said the Albanese government should set out an agenda for Indigenous Australians if the poll failed as soon as possible and “before the rabble take over and turn a No vote into a mandate to cause us even further harm”.

“If the government is not inclined to set out the agenda before the vote, then they should do so immediately afterwards and that means they should be prepared now to tell us what the future holds for us,” Professor Langton said.

“Many Indigenous Australians on the front lines of dealing with these problems in towns and cities and communities and outstations and homelands are very worried about the prospect of losing the voice because they already have little to say. And a loss will mean they will have even less.”

Anthony Albanese has said his focus is on winning the referendum and his “plan B” for closing the gap if the referendum fails is to “continue to always do what we can” to reduce the disparity between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.

Professor Langton said she would not be willing to work with the Opposition Leader on another referendum “should he ever be elected”, saying it would serve no purpose because Indigenous Australians had asked for recognition through a voice to combine symbolic and practical change.

Prominent Liberal Yes campaigner Sean Gordon said the main reason he wouldn’t work with Mr Dutton on symbolic constitutional recognition was because making taxpayers pay twice for two referendums went against Liberal values.

Mr Dutton earlier this week said that, if elected, he would hold a second referendum on constitutional recognition if the Australian people reject next month’s poll, after telling The Australian he would pursue constitutional recognition while legislating local and regional voices.

“Where he (Mr Dutton) falls over – this is his lack of understanding on the issue – is the guarantee. The guarantee is simply, from Indigenous people’s perspective, to ensure there will be a structure set up to give voice to Indigenous people to ensure that when policies and programs are made about us, they seek advice from us … regardless of which party is elected,” Mr Gordon said.

Thomas Mayo, one of Yes23’s chief campaigners, also indicated he wouldn’t work with Mr Dutton by saying recognition had to be practical, not just symbolic: “The urgency (Professor Langton) expresses is shared by all in the Yes campaign. We cannot accept the status quo, which is basically what the No campaign is defending.”

Professor Langton said the Yes camp’s path to success would be through truth-telling, after Indigenous leader Noel Pearson reframed the campaign’s strategy on Tuesday, declaring “a secret weapon” that could yet win the vote would be engaging the soft Nos.

Professor Langton said Australians should understand the lack of progress in closing the gap and it was these facts – such as a 10-year difference in life expectancy between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians – that she would talk about with undecided voters.

Former prime minister Tony Abbott has called Mr Pearson’s pitch to The Australian’s subscribers at the first Great Voice Debate a “sharp change of tactics” for the Yes camp.

“Noel Pearson now says that it’s important to answer people’s questions about the voice,” Mr Abbott writes in The Australian on Thursday.

“If only he could. No one can say how the voice will be chosen, what powers it will have, and exactly who can stand for it, because all this would have to be decided after the referendum by the parliament; and then, most likely, further adjudicated by the High Court when a future government’s decision-making displeases some or all of the voice’s members and arguably contravenes an expansively worded whole new chapter in our Constitution.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/marcia-langton-says-the-government-must-explain-what-happens-if-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-vote-fails/news-story/c1a5b3a7bc07bce8c6b7dbb872aaf029

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19505149

File: 33a8ce19eff08a9⋯.jpg (6.39 MB,5555x3703,5555:3703,Professor_Marcia_Langton_a….jpg)

>>19487613

>>19505142

Langton makes emotional plea to voters as Yes campaigners face threats

David Crowe - September 6, 2023

1/2

Indigenous leader Marcia Langton has claimed death threats and abuse are being aimed at the key advocates for a Yes vote at the October 14 referendum, in an emotional call on voters to save lives by voting for change.

Langton said there was “nothing to fear” from the Indigenous Voice and warned voters against the “deceit” of No campaigners who had claimed the outcome would divide the country on race.

But she called on the government to prepare for the aftermath of the national ballot by setting out how it would ensure consultation with First Nations people, saying a No vote would be falsely seen as a “mandate to do nothing” that would entrench disadvantage and cost lives.

While she did not name individuals who had been subject to death threats, Langton expressed concern at the tone of the debate and warned of more damage if the Voice was rejected on October 14.

At one point in her address, with tears in her eyes, Langton named footballer Adam Goodes and broadcaster Stan Grant as examples of Indigenous people who had been targeted by parts of the media.

“I think the debate will change so radically if the No vote succeeds, that our advocacy will be seen as ineffectual, and so, therefore, how we participate in the public square will be very, very different,” she said.

“Because the levels of abuse against the Yes campaign, including death threats, and daily published insults and abuse, takes a toll.

“And I think our generation of leaders will hand over to younger leaders. And they, too, then, will become targets like Adam Goodes, like Stan Grant, and the cycle will continue.

“And in this regard, I think the media has a responsibility to lift their game in reporting on these issues, and not participate in pile-ons on persons who are good and decent people.

“I fear that a No vote will be interpreted, and falsely I should say, as a mandate for governments to do nothing and make our lives worse. I think that’s the greatest danger,” Langton told the National Press Club on Wednesday.

“I also fear that a No vote will be perceived, and again I say falsely, as a mandate for not establishing consultative bodies. Again, I say, that’s false – that would be a false interpretation of a No vote.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19505150

File: 805643e27b21760⋯.jpg (203.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_leader_Marcia_L….jpg)

>>19505149

2/2

Langton is a professor at the University of Melbourne and was appointed by the Morrison government in 2019 to lead the design process for the Voice, co-chaired by fellow professor Tom Calma, and resulting in recommendations that cleared the way for this year’s vote.

“I do hope that the government sets out an agenda for reform that’s based on common sense, on the recommendations of many inquiries and royal commissions and on expert advice, before the rabble take over and turn a No vote into a mandate to cause us even further harm,” she said.

Asked if the government should do this before or after the October 14 vote, she said: “It must be as soon as possible. If the government is not inclined to set out the agenda before the vote, then they should do so immediately afterwards. And that means they should be prepared now to tell us what the future holds for us.”

Langton’s comments come after the latest Resolve Political Monitor showed 54 per cent support for No and 46 per cent for Yes, highlighting the prospect of defeat for Voice advocates.

Asked for her message to those who were leaning towards a No vote, Langton said the current approach often led to “tick a box” consultations that had delivered failure on closing the gap in Indigenous disadvantage.

“What Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people really want rarely makes its way through the bureaucratic haze,” she said.

“Often we find that what was said is not reflected in the outcome.”

Langton countered concerns over the Voice being made permanent in the Constitution by saying it would be needed for the long term and predicting, for example, that it would take at least 50 years, on current trends, for First Australians to reach parity with the population on life expectancy.

“There’s nothing to fear,” she said of the suggestion that parliament would be obliged to listen to the Voice.

“Would there be an obligation? I don’t know. That’s up to the parliament.”

Langton joined other Indigenous leaders in dismissing the proposal from Opposition Leader Peter Dutton for a second referendum on constitutional recognition of Indigenous people if this referendum failed, saying she was “not in the least” interested in this idea.

“There’s no point in a second referendum because it’s not what we want,” she said.

Langton described the Voice proposal at this referendum as the “one chance” to improve outcomes for Indigenous people because it would build trust and confidence in better policy at a time when Indigenous disadvantage had become worse on some measures.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/langton-makes-emotional-plea-to-voters-as-yes-campaigners-face-threats-20230906-p5e2bn.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19505156

File: 34ead6ff9464962⋯.jpg (251.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 2163befbf3e56f8⋯.jpg (216.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Chinese_Premier_Li_Qiang_a….jpg)

Anthony Albanese agrees to visit China this year after seven-year freeze-out

BEN PACKHAM - SEPTEMBER 7, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese has formally accepted an invitation to visit to Beijing this year - the first by an Australian Prime Minister since 2016 - during bilateral talks with Chinese Premier Li Qiang on the sidelines of the East Asia Summit in Jakarta.

The Prime Minister raised with Mr Li the plight of Australians detained in China, including Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun, and called for the resumption of “unimpeded trade” between the countries.

He said he also expressed Australia’s concerns over China’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong during the “frank and constructive” talks, and its disputed territorial claims in the South China Sea and over Taiwan.

“Australia seeks to work towards productive and stable relations with China based on mutual benefit and respect,” Mr Albanese said after the meeting, which lasted about 50 minutes.

He said he confirmed “I would accept an invitation and will visit China later this year at a mutually agreeable time”.

The trip will be the first by an Australian Prime Minister to China since Malcolm Turnbull visited Hangzhou in 2016 for that year’s G20 Summit.

Premier Li said relations between China and Australia had showed “positive momentum”, and the progress in restoring bilateral ties had been welcomed by both countries and the international community.

“I welcome you, Mr Prime Minister, to visit China within the year, and hope to work with you to further improve and grow bilateral relations and bring greater benefits to (our) two peoples,” Premier Li said.

Mr Albanese said he raised the plight of Ms Cheng, Dr Yang, and three other Australians facing the deaths penalty in the country for criminal offences.

He said Australians were particularly conscious of Ms Cheng’s case. “They want to see Cheng Lei reunited with her children,” he said.

He said the plea was “heard respectfully” by Premier Li.

Mr Albanese said Mr Li raised Chinese concerns about its trade and economic relationship with Australia, which were likely to have included Australia’s bans on Chinese telcos participating in the nation’s 5G network, and the treatment of Chinese investors by Australia’s Foreign Investment Review Board.

The meeting continues the thaw in bilateral relations that began with Mr Albanese’s meeting with Xi Jinping at last year’s G20 summit in Bali.

China’s trade bans punched a $20bn hole in Australia’s annual exports to the country since relations collapsed in 2019, but key sanctions have been eased in recent times including a massive tariff on Australian barley.

Just $2.5bn worth of blockages remain, with wine, lobster, and some red meats the main exports still subject to bans.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19505158

File: 628ec80c68e7e18⋯.jpg (287.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19505156

2/2

The meeting came amid heightened tensions over China’s new “standard map” released just over a week ago that reasserts Beijing’s disputed claims in the South China Sea, and declares parts of India as its own territory.

The map has been vehemently rejected by India, Malaysia, The Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam and Taiwan.

Mr Albanese said his talks with Premier Li were heavily focused on de-escalating such tensions.

“We took the whole context of the discussion was about how we all have an interest in a peaceful, secure and prosperous region. That’s something that is our starting point,” he said.

The meeting was Mr Albanese’s first with Premier Li, and restored what had been an established routine of Australian prime ministers meeting Chinese premiers at ASEAN summits.

It came as former Labor trade minister Craig Emerson led a delegation to Beijing with former foreign minister Julie Bishop and Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade secretary Jan Adams, for the first high-level Australia-China Dialogue since bilateral relations faltered.

The Global Times said in an editorial that the dialogue was “a momentous event between China and Australia”, and “a reflection of the East-West relationship as a whole”.

It attributed the thaw to a “pragmatic adjustment” by Labor since it returned to power in May last year.

“After the (Albanese) government came to power and began adjusting its policy toward China, China-Australia relations rebounded,” the paper said.

“The restart of this high-level dialogue is seen as a sign of further warming of China-Australia relations.”

It said if Australia and China could manage their differences, then China could do the same with other Western countries.

“From this vantage point, China-Australia ties have far-reaching ramifications beyond bilateral relations,” the state-run paper said.

The Prime Minister had hoped to meet Xi Jinping at the G20 summit in India later this week but the Chinese president skipped that conference in a snub to host Narendra Modi.

Chinese presidents have not traditionally attended ASEAN but Mr Xi’s decision to skip the G20 Leaders’ Summit is unusual. Analysts said the move was aimed at undermining strategic rival India.

The meeting came amid heightened tensions in the region over China’s renewed territorial claims in its new “standard map” released just over a week ago.

The map reasserts Beijing’s disputed claims in the South China Sea, and declares parts of India as its own territory.

The map has been vehemently rejected by India, Malaysia, The Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam and Taiwan.

Mr Albanese will also have a bilateral meeting with Indonesian President Joko Widodo on Thursday and participate in the East Asia Summit and the ASEAN-Australia summit, before flying out for Manila for a bilateral meeting with Philippines’ President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos.

The Filipino leader has taken an increasingly strident stance against Chinese claims to disputed South China Sea features which the Philippines consider to be its own territory.

The leaders are likely to discuss joint naval patrols in the heavily contested waterway, as well as bilateral trade issues.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-to-have-talks-with-chinese-premier-li-qiang-on-sidelines-of-asean-summit/news-story/da96b58f3b59ed2986c758dc15bfd14b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19505163

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

AUKUS deal not moving through US Congress as smoothly as hoped, senator warns

Brad Ryan and Jade Macmillan - 7 September 2023

Congress is at risk of "doing Beijing's work" if it fails to pass legislation necessary to the AUKUS deal, the US Senate's foreign relations chairman has warned.

Two years since the deal to supply Australia with American submarines was announced, senior members of congress are urging their colleagues not to hold up laws to authorise their delivery.

Bob Menendez, the chairman of the US Senate's Foreign Relations Committee, told a hearing in Washington that congress's implementation of the deal had "not gone as smoothly as some of us would have hoped".

But he said China's recent behaviour towards Australia meant "time is of the essence" in the trilateral agreement between Australia, the US and the UK.

"They [China] are aggressively trying to influence Australian politics and civil society, buying critical infrastructure like port facilities in Darwin, making political donations, even hacking Australian parliament and major political parties," Senator Menendez said.

"This is a critical moment."

But some Republicans have been raising concerns about elements of the deal, arguing Canberra's $3 billion investment is not enough to ensure the US can supply Australia with submarines while also meeting its own military needs.

Republican Senator Roger Wicker, who blocked a plan to fast-track congressional approval for part of the deal in July, told Politico at the time: "It makes sense to be sure we have enough submarines for our own security needs before we endorse that pillar of the [AUKUS] agreement."

Senator Menendez, a Democrat, today said congress "needs to play its part if the agreement is going to work".

"If we fail to move forward with full congressional support of AUKUS, including the nuclear-powered submarines, we are doing Beijing's job for them," he said.

Bipartisan support despite Republicans' reservations

Under the deal, Australia will buy at least three Virginia class nuclear-powered submarines from the US before eventually producing its own.

But congress needs to pass legislation to authorise the deal.

A group of 25 Republicans wrote to President Joe Biden in July, warning the plan to supply Australia with submarines would "unacceptably weaken" the American fleet unless funding for US production was increased.

Senator Bill Hagerty, one of the letter's signatories, told today's hearing AUKUS had strong bipartisan support despite those reservations.

"I can't think of a single member of congress, whether they'd be Republican or Democrat, that doesn't support AUKUS and, at least, the objectives of AUKUS," he said.

"I think the question before the president and congress right now is how to implement AUKUS quickly."

Sub supply shortage

A sticking point for the group of Republicans is a current shortage of attack submarines in the US fleet.

Military leaders say the Navy requires 66 attack subs, but currently only has 49, with about a third of those out of action due to maintenance.

Senator Hagerty and others have been pushing for a plan for the US to build 2.5 Virginia-class submarines a year – about double the current rate of production.

"The [Biden] administration still hasn't put forward a credible long-term plan to ensure that our navy meet its requirements to have 66 attack subs in a reasonable timeframe," he said.

"Ladies and gentlemen, that's a problem."

Assistant Secretary of Defense Mara Karlin conceded the US's defence industrial base was "not as strong as anyone would like it to be".

"With congress's leadership and support, the administration has been able to put in billions of dollars – indeed, approximately $4 billion in the latest president's budget – for both production and maintenance of submarines," she said.

"And so there's a lot of really hard work to help increase those numbers."

Greg Brown, a senior analyst at the Washington office of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), said he believed there was broad backing for AUKUS, despite differing views over how it should be implemented.

"I think there's still lots of room for optimism, and nobody should get too concerned yet," he said.

"But just realise that the process in the United States is very complex and very murky."

The first Virginia-class submarines are due to be delivered to Australia sometime in the 2030s.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-07/aukus-senate-commitee-hearing-washington-submarines/102824604

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6hGaIrAzoQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19505187

File: 15c32f7a1fdeb96⋯.jpg (254.14 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Convicted_paedophile_Gary_….jpg)

File: 6d38f8c7241028a⋯.jpg (2.23 MB,5000x3753,5000:3753,Kathleen_Foley_is_the_chai….jpg)

File: ac64de81b8ffe40⋯.jpg (751.23 KB,2043x1533,681:511,The_inquiry_is_examining_h….jpg)

File: dbd5e28068fb2e1⋯.jpg (257.72 KB,1000x787,1000:787,If_you_or_anyone_you_know_….jpg)

Child sexual abuse inquiry to investigate three teachers and 18 schools over historical offences

abc.net.au - 7 September 2023

An inquiry into historical child sexual abuse at Beaumaris Primary School will investigate whether abuse was also committed at 18 government schools in Victoria.

The Board of Inquiry was set up to investigate abuse committed by a cluster of Beaumaris Primary offenders including former teacher and principal Gary Arthur Mitchell.

Mitchell is a convicted paedophile who taught at numerous Victorian primary schools from the 1960s through to the 1990s.

The investigation will also look into alleged abuse committed by two other teaching staff who are yet to be named by the Board of Inquiry.

Legal proceedings are currently underway against one of the persons yet to be named.

In all, the allegations relate to 18 schools across Victoria, including:

• Beaumaris Primary School

• Moorabbin (Tucker Road) Primary School, now Tucker Road Bentleigh Primary School

• Mount View Primary School

• Warragul Technical School, now Warragul Regional College

• Dandenong North Primary School

• Dandenong West Primary School

• Beaconsfield Upper Primary School

• Mirboo Primary School, now Mirboo North Primary School

• Emerald Primary School

• Cranbourne Primary School

• Bunyip Primary School

• Tarwin Lower Primary School

• Hampton Primary School

• Aspendale Primary School

• Belvedere Park Primary School

• Ormond East Primary School, now McKinnon Primary School

• Tarraville Primary School (now closed)

• Moorabbin West Primary School (now closed)

The chair of the inquiry, Kathleen Foley, said the allegations related only to historical abuse.

"I want to reiterate that the scope of this inquiry is to inquire into, report on and make recommendations regarding historical child sexual abuse from the 1960s until the end of the 1990s," she said.

The inquiry is now open to submissions from people who want to talk about their own experiences of abuse at the schools in question.

There will be private hearings from September until November, and public hearings will be held from the end of October until December.

The Board of Inquiry will deliver its report to government by February 28, 2024.

"I recognise how difficult it can be for victim survivors of child sexual abuse to come forward and the time that this can take. I also understand the courage and resilience that this requires," Ms Foley said.

"I also hope that in listening we all begin to better understand the impact this type of abuse has on victim survivors, their families and friends, our community and society."

Ms Foley said the inquiry would "closely review" the response from the Department of Education at the time of the alleged offences.

A website has been set up where people can make submissions to the Board of Inquiry.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-07/inquiry-to-investigate-abuse-allegations-at-victorian-schools/102825382

Board of Inquiry into historical child sexual abuse at Beaumaris Primary School and certain other government schools

https://www.beaumarisinquiry.vic.gov.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19505211

File: b18e4cac7733557⋯.jpg (151.61 KB,599x792,599:792,Philippines_rescue_2.JPG)

File: f9370e7225df617⋯.jpg (283.57 KB,576x1024,9:16,A_rescued_victim_2_.jpg)

File: ef1a04c82ff5f4f⋯.jpg (244.12 KB,576x1024,9:16,A_rescued_victim_3_.jpg)

One in 100 Filipino kids are victims of online sexual abuse. Australians are driving the demand

Chris Barrett - September 7, 2023

Singapore: Technology companies and financial institutions are being urged to take a tougher stand against child exploitation after an alarming new report found 500,000 children in the Philippines were trafficked in a single year to produce livestreams and other sexually abusive content, with Australian offenders a key driver of demand.

A landmark two-year study by the International Justice Mission and the University of Nottingham Rights Lab lays bare the magnitude of online child abuse for profit in the South-East Asian archipelago.

It estimates that one in 100 children in the Philippines were victims in 2022 alone, while almost 250,000 adults in the country trafficked children to record new material.

Australia has been identified as the third-highest contributor to payments for such content behind the United States and the United Kingdom, according to the Philippine Anti-Money Laundering Council, a government agency in Manila.

“It’s just dreadful. It’s such an underreported crime that it was really difficult to know just how prevalent it is,” said International Justice Mission Australia chief executive Steve Baird.

“So this bit of research is the first time, I think, anywhere globally that we’ve really had a pulse on the size of this and it’s shocking.”

The Scale of Harm report was developed with survivor consultants and a research team that included experts from the Australian Institute of Criminology as well as Lynne Walker, the former intelligence director of financial crimes watchdog AUSTRAC.

The abuse usually takes place in real time on livestreams and offenders, mostly watching from abroad, typically pay between $30 and $70 via an international money transfer for the commissioning of a video. Previous research by the International Justice Mission in 2020 showed the average age of children trafficked in the Philippines to be 11.

Intelligence obtained from the Australian Federal Police led to the biggest rescue of victims at once in the Philippines in June. Sixteen children, one as young as 10, were freed in an operation in the north of the country.

The operation was instigated after a January search of a 56-year-old Queensland man’s baggage at Sydney Airport by Australian Border Force officers uncovered child abuse material and incriminating messages.

Baird said agencies such as the AFP and the Brisbane-based, AFP-led Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation were doing “excellent” work trying to combat child exploitation in connection with overseas authorities such as the Philippine National Police.

But with $1.3 million having flowed from Australia in more than 9000 suspicious transactions between 2020 and 2022, he believes the scourge of online sexual abuse needs to be tackled by technology giants and banks with more urgency.

“The single biggest thing that can be done is [for] the tech companies to use technology that’s designed to prevent or disrupt livestreamed child sexual abuse, including the manufacturers of camera-enabled devices as well because the technology does exist,” Baird said.

“You saw with the terrible massacre in Christchurch [in 2019] when terrorism was livestreamed, that was a moment in time when Facebook said ‘you can’t have that’ and actually took some proactive steps.

“One of the things that disturbs me is a lot of it is just happening on the normal web through these regular social media channels. The size and the scale of it tells us that in a way.”

The report, released on Thursday, also recommends the reporting and blocking of suspicious transactions by financial institutions to be expedited.

Samson Inocencio, a Philippines lawyer, said he hoped the findings would encourage the government in Manila to intensify the fight against trafficking of children for abuse, and convince communities to report the crime.

Traffickers’ use of pre-paid SIM cards makes them difficult to track.

“Obviously, this is a global issue fuelled by demand [internationally] but we would love for greater community reporting especially because a lot of these incidents are happening in local communities across the Philippines,” he said. “We would love for local people to be aware of what they can do.”

Philippine authorities have removed 1181 victims of child abuse from harm and caught 359 perpetrators, according to the International Justice Mission.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/one-in-100-filipino-kids-are-victims-of-online-abuse-australians-are-driving-the-demand-from-home-20230906-p5e2j4.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19511644

File: d4816ed1d1f3e2d⋯.jpg (249.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_in_Brisbane.jpg)

>>19487613

Indigenous voice to parliament: Noel Pearson’s caution over welcome to country

PAUL GARVEY - SEPTEMBER 8, 2023

Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has called for Australia to scale back use of welcome to country in the wake of the upcoming referendum, noting that the practice can often be overdone.

The prominent Yes campaigner on Friday said Australia was still learning about when the ceremony should and should not be used, saying there was a need to develop a consensus on the most appropriate practices.

“People often don’t know what to do. We’ve got to adopt a sensible approach to these things,” he said. “When someone opens a meeting, that’s fine. But … every speaker then subsequently does the welcome and it cuts into the meeting, I can tell you.”

Mr Pearson’s comments came amid a concerted effort from the Yes campaign to sway so-called “soft nos”. While he been an at-times aggressive advocate for an Indigenous voice to parliament, he struck a more moderate and conciliatory tone on Friday on Sydney talkback radio 2GB.

The Cape York leader apologised for some of his attacks on No campaign opponents, pitched the voice as a means to tackle spending waste on Indigenous programs, and argued that those intending to vote against the constitutional amendment were ­“absolutely not” racists.

“This is our most sacred document as Australians, the Constitution, which is why we’re so conservative about changing it,” he said.

“And that is how it should be. We should be very careful in the decisions we make about changing any word in the Constitution.”

Mr Pearson estimated that less than a quarter of the tens of billions of dollars directed towards Indigenous affairs in Australia was being used productively. He noted that some small communities had three programs all addressing the same single issue.

“In a community in Cape York Peninsula of 1300 people, 400 people come from the outside every day delivering programs and I can’t see what return we’re getting,” he said. “That’s why we’re doing the voice. We want to stop the waste. We want to have more productive outcomes.”

The practices of welcome to country and acknowledgment of country have become part of the voice debate, with Coalition Indigenous affairs spokeswoman ­Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, a prominent No campaigner, describing it as “wrong and divisive”.

Former prime minister Tony Abbott, also advocating against the referendum, has also said he was “getting a little bit sick” of the practice.

Indigenous academic Marcia Langton, a Yes campaigner and one of the key architects of the voice, has previously said it may be difficult to sustain the welcome to country in the event the No case succeeds.

Last month, WAFarmers president John Hassell vowed to ditch the acknowledgment of country from future events. He said it “reeks of virtue-signalling and, worse, it is demeaning, divisive and a recent phenomenon, which is not steeped in tradition at all”.

“You can’t get on a plane or go to any event without hearing of the local elders past, present or ­future,” he said. “If you go to a conference, it seems every speaker feels the need to mindlessly repeat the last speaker’s acknowledgments as if we have not already got the message. It is getting tiresome, and I’m calling time on it.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-noel-pearsons-caution-over-welcome-to-country/news-story/0a6037b826d87786943af1efe043d969

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19511677

File: dc4cfc55b34f261⋯.jpg (348.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Murray_Watt_speaks….jpg)

>>19487613

Even the left now calling out ‘elite’ grip on voice to parliament

CLAIRE LEHMANN - SEPTEMBER 8, 2023

1/2

Much like other social media platforms, Reddit forums in Australia skew to the young and to the left.

With the average age of a Reddit user estimated at 23, it’s no surprise that political discussions often lean towards green-left perspectives. Nevertheless, recent discussions about the upcoming voice referendum have revealed a surprising mix of viewpoints within this demographic.

And what is intriguing is the number of individuals expressing a No stance for reasons that do not neatly align with traditional or conservative ideals.

“What a waste of time and money. Voting NO on this nonsense. Imagine if they put $364m into social services in Alice Springs,” wrote one commenter in r/AusFinance, a subreddit of nearly half a million members engaged in discussions about financial issues in Australia.

“Weird how every corporation is pushing yes. Drove past a rich area with no Aboriginal people and every second house has a yes sign nailed to their gate,” wrote another.

Although the left-wing No voter is a real phenomenon, their perspective has largely been missing from our media, with prominent No voices associated with the right side of politics. But not everyone who opposes the voice identifies as right-wing.

“I’m a leftist Aboriginal, and I have a lot of issues with this,” wrote one commenter in r/Australia, a forum of 1.4 million members, “Stop dividing us. We are one country.”

Much of the conversation in these popular online forums has focused on the perceived disjuncture of hosting a referendum during a cost-of-living crisis. “This won’t get over the line,” wrote a user. “The timing of it is so shockingly bad. People can’t afford to buy groceries or find suitable places to live, but this is top of mind for the government?”

Left-leaning No voters do not appear to oppose the voice because they are diehard constitutional conservatives, or because they lack compassion. It’s not about being racist either. Their frustration stems from the perception that the Labor government is not adequately addressing the issues that matter to them most, and is instead focusing on the higher-order matter of constitutional change.

And if there is one overarching theme that emerges from these discussions, it is that there is a divide in Australia, but it is defined by class and asset ownership – not race.

When figures such as Malcolm and Lucy Turnbull take selfies with Allegra Spender and Tanya Plibersek in support of the Yes campaign, it sends a message to ordinary Australians that, regardless of party lines, they belong to the same economic club.

That club is the urban, professional, asset-owning club that is very comfortable and cosy on the inside but, for those standing on the outside looking in, appears smug, self-congratulatory and exclusive.

This week, for example, a three-bedroom house situated on less than a quarter-acre of land within Spender’s (formerly Turnbull’s) electorate sold for $7.8m. To put that in perspective, the average pre-tax salary in Australia stands at $90,800. That means a modest dwelling on a small plot of land just sold for 85 times the national average wage.

In the context of promoting “social justice”, it is fair to ask what these politicians have done to address land availability and housing supply.

If such elected officials are unable to alleviate the challenges faced by regular Australian families today, how will they help Indigenous Australians tomorrow? And what material difference will a voice make? Those who are struggling are entitled to know.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19511686

File: 4e1cdc6ef449aaa⋯.jpg (1.75 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Malcolm_Turnbull_takes_a_s….jpg)

>>19511677

2/2

The fact that corporate Australia is overwhelmingly in support of the voice simply furthers the perception that it is primarily a concern of elites.

“I won’t be swayed either by bullshit corporate activism endorsing a Yes vote by Qantas, Coles, the AFL, or any number of billion-dollar companies that couldn’t give a rat’s arse about everyday Aussies, Indigenous Aussies included,” wrote one commenter in r/Australia.

“More than 1600 people are becoming homeless each month in Australia,” wrote another. “Imagine being one of those people … And then remember you voted for (Prime Minister Anthony Albanese) based on his campaigning around the little guy and him being in social housing … And all he has done is harp on about the voice.”

The fissures within the left over the referendum today reflect broader fissures that are affecting left-of-centre parties around the world. Described by Thomas Piketty as the “Brahmin Left”, the highly educated, urban-professional classes who now dominate left-wing parties – including the ALP – have interests that are at times in conflict with their traditional blue-collar base.

Yet although Labor’s shift towards representing the Brahmin Left is largely irreversible, many of the old emotional associations with the underdog and the working classes remain. Therefore Labor must take extra care in order to avoid alienating those who are struggling, particularly during times of economic hardship. For this reason, the voice referendum should have been postponed.

Ultimately, left-wing No voters may end up deciding the voice’s fate. But more than that, they may also come to determine the length of the current government’s tenure.

“The number one issue in our country at the moment is housing and the cost of living,” as one commenter put it. “The government is out of touch.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/even-the-left-now-calling-out-elite-grip-on-voice-to-parliament/news-story/b9b1ca9b282dee14b9533285e8012d95

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19511755

File: fda2beb61a03cab⋯.jpg (133.1 KB,1920x1079,1920:1079,Former_Australian_deputy_p….jpg)

File: ed810486a7b7396⋯.jpg (227.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Alan_Joyce_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

>>19355508 (pb)

>>19487613

Qantas flights for Indigenous voice to parliament opponents urged in ‘spirit’ of fair go

JOE KELLY - SEPTEMBER 8, 2023

Incoming Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson is being urged to restore the airline’s damaged reputation by ensuring the national carrier matches its “offer to the Yes camp with free flights for No supporters”.

Former deputy prime minister John Anderson – a long-serving transport minister in the Howard government and leading critic of the voice to parliament – warned that Qantas had played a key role in dividing the nation by straying into the realm of social and political activism.

Mr Anderson called on Ms Hudson to go back to the drawing board and extend the same hospitality for Yes campaigners – who are receiving free flights that Qantas expects to cost up to $500,000 – to supporters of the No campaign.

“As a long-serving Australian aviation minister who is still ­frequently asked for his views on Qantas, I am concerned to see the deep reputational damage this well-known Australian company is suffering,” Mr Anderson said.

“For some years now Qantas has been seen as deeply enmeshed in social and political issues, which are often divisive.

“I believe that there has been serious overreach and that this is a significant contributor to the current plight of the airline.

“I believe that the board and the new CEO should give very serious consideration to an initial down payment on repairing that reputational damage by matching its offer to the Yes camp with free flights for No supporters in the interests of a truly informed ­debate.”

Appearing alongside then Qantas boss Alan Joyce at Sydney Airport on August 14 to celebrate the airline’s decision to display special Yes23 livery on three of its aircraft, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese praised the company.

“Qantas has a long history of doing its bit to carry the nation, to lift all of us a little bit higher, both literally and figuratively,” Mr Albanese said. “There is no company in Australia that immediately says Australia, like this brand of Qantas.

“And it is in the spirit of Australia, that statement about Qantas, which defines the way that we are being uplifted.”

Mr Joyce said Qantas had taken the decision on the Yes campaign “because we believe a formal voice to government will help close the gap for First Nations people in important areas like health, education and employment”.

“These aircraft will send a message of support for a Yes vote as they travel the country.”

But Mr Anderson questioned whether the Qantas motto, “Spirit of Australia”, remained an accurate reflection of the airline.

“Surely the true ‘spirit of Australia’ would recognise that Australians really do value a fair and balanced debate,” he said.

“Extraordinarily, the Yes team acknowledged some time ago that support from elites was not playing well and indicated that they would change tack.

“Somehow much of the ­corporate sector seems to have missed this memo as evidenced by 14 out of the 20 biggest ASX companies contributing support and money.

“I believe this is contributing to the serious divisions we are now seeing in Australia ­generally, and the deep divide over the referendum in ­particular.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/qantas-flights-for-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-opponents-urged-in-spirit-of-fair-go/news-story/71547523b6bbbe46e99631b034efeb89

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19511829

File: 7b14c525ac96a00⋯.jpg (185.71 KB,2016x1134,16:9,Chinese_President_Xi_Jinpi….jpg)

File: a4e17968c69dd45⋯.jpg (282.22 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Let_s_shake_on_it_Anthony_….jpg)

File: bfe6ea72012f143⋯.jpg (239.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_jokes_wit….jpg)

>>19505156

China moves to repair damage it caused to relations with Canberra

CAMERON STEWART - SEPTEMBER 8, 2023

Anthony Albanese’s meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang on the sidelines of the East Asia Summit is another breakthrough moment in the slow restoration of the China-Australia relationship.

Beijing is now primarily driving this rebalance through conciliatory words and actions that stand in stark contrast to its wolf warrior, wrecking ball behaviour of recent years, which led the relationship to crumble.

Mr Li, in his meeting with the Prime Minister, spoke of a renewed relationship that “has continued to show a positive momentum of movement” and of his hopes “to work with you to further improve and grow the bilateral relationship”.

He reiterated the invitation for Mr Albanese to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing later this year, an invitation that the Prime Minister has accepted.

An editorial this week in the state-run Global Times offered a further insight into China’s new tone in its dealings with Australia. It described the visit of a large Australian delegation to China, including former Labor minister Craig Emerson and former Liberal foreign minister Julie Bishop, as “a momentous event between China and Australia”, and “a reflection of the East-West relationship as a whole”.

The Global Times went on: “After the (Albanese) government came to power and began adjusting its policy towards China, China-Australia relations rebounded.”

This last statement is a complete distortion of the truth but a necessary falsehood that China must state publicly to allow it to repair its relationship with Australia without losing face.

The truth is it is China, rather than Australia, which has adjusted its policy to help repair the relationship. It did so after realising its “wolf warrior” behaviour when Beijing sought to punish Australia over its foreign interference laws, the banning of Chinese telco Huawei from the 5G rollout and Canberra’s call for an inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus, were ultimately futile.

Beijing saw that slapping trade sanctions on Australia, worth $20bn, and the trumped-up arrests of Australian citizens in China were ineffectual in changing Australian policy, under either the Coalition or Labor governments.

The Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Penny Wong have deftly handled this slow reparation by avoiding some of the more hostile rhetoric directed towards China by the former Coalition government while not taking a backward step on actual policy.

Restoration of the relationship is a work in progress and will continue to be a slow-burn on both sides. The process began with the meeting between Mr Albanese and Mr Xi on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Bali last November and has progressed with bilateral meetings of senior ministers this year.

Although China has repealed some of its trade bans, including recently the massive tariff on Australian barley, there are still bans worth at least $2.5bn including on wine, lobster and some red meats. Diplomatically, the relationship continues to be undermined by China’s ongoing and unjustified detention of Australians Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun.

The government has been wise not to make removal of the remaining trade bans or release of the two Australians a firm condition of Mr Albanese’s upcoming visit to Beijing but China knows these two actions are ultimately necessary if it wants to restore the relationship to something approaching normality.

However, the change in China’s mood is palpable. The Global Times this week stated that “the restart of this high-level dialogue is seen as a sign of further warming of China-Australia relations”.

This was the same newspaper that declared in early 2020: “Australia is always there, making trouble. It is a bit like chewing gum stuck on the sole of China’s shoes. Sometimes you have to find a stone to rub it off.”

It seems Australia is no longer chewing gum.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/china-takes-lead-in-repairing-damage-it-caused-to-relations-with-canberra/news-story/55cf252dd88569ace9a9bbfd1fa5ccea

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19511867

File: 27bd64b028c2d2c⋯.jpg (1.24 MB,3696x2456,462:307,The_Ben_Roberts_Smith_disp….jpg)

File: df35de86ef41322⋯.jpg (1.8 MB,3024x4032,3:4,A_new_panel_alongside_the_….jpg)

File: 87318cf51ca217f⋯.jpg (1.34 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Greens_senator_David_Shoeb….jpg)

>>19231979 (pb)

>>19231995 (pb)

Australian War Memorial adds panel with context of Ben Roberts-Smith's defamation case to uniform display

Elizabeth Byrne and Charlotte Gore - 8 September 2023

The Australian War Memorial (AWM) has added information to a plaque commemorating Corporal Ben Roberts-Smith's Victoria Cross medal, to reflect recent court rulings over his alleged conduct in Afghanistan.

The AWM has added details about a Federal Court ruling in a defamation case brought by Mr Roberts-Smith against media groups, which found there was substantial truth to allegations he had been involved and complicit in unlawful killings in Afghanistan.

Mr Roberts-Smith is currently challenging the ruling with an appeal, and has not been charged with any criminal offence.

In a statement this morning, an AWM spokesperson said the memorial had added further context to displays that included Mr Roberts-Smith.

"A revised text panel acknowledging the status of the defamation case is now on display," they said.

The revised text panel reads in part:

Accounts of alleged misconduct by a small number of Australian Special Forces soldiers in Afghanistan began appearing in the media from late 2016.

Claims were later heard in a civil defamation case brought by Roberts-Smith against media outlets and journalists.

In June 2023 a Federal Court Judge determined that there was "substantial truth" to the allegations that Roberts-Smith had been involved and complicit in unlawful killings in Afghanistan.

Roberts-Smith has appealed this decision.

Roberts-Smith has not been charged with any offence under criminal law.

Following the outcome of the defamation case in June this year, Greens senator David Shoebridge called on the War Memorial to remove the former special forces commander's display — something the AWM said at the time it would not do, but would consider adding the context of his defamation case somewhere in the exhibit.

The War Memorial said the purpose of the memorial was to assist in remembering, interpreting and understanding the national experience of war and its enduring impact, and that included "the causes, conduct and consequences of war".

Today, Senator Shoebridge said adding extra information to the display was "a very modest step forward".

"But it hardly balances the rest of the exhibition, which glorifies Ben Roberts-Smith," he said.

"What needs to be told here is the whole truth of Australia's 20-year-long conflict in Afghanistan.

"That includes the voices of Afghan civilians who lost their families and loved ones to brutal acts of war ... and it should not contain a shrine to Ben Roberts-Smith."

Senator Shoebridge said the display still placed Mr Roberts-Smith "at the heart of Australia's involvement in Afghanistan and in the role of a hero".

University of Sydney Challis chair of international law Ben Saul agreed with Senator Shoebridge that the plaque did not resolve the issue.

"It minimises what happened in Afghanistan because it makes no reference to the broader context of up to 39 unlawful killings identified in the Brereton Report," he said.

"The impression visitors to the memorial would come away with is still that Ben Roberts-Smith is mainly a war hero."

The AWM has also taken two portraits of Mr Roberts-Smith off display, but a memorial spokesperson said that was part of the $500 million redevelopment currently underway at the site.

"The removal of more than 300 collection items relating to Peacekeeping and more recent Middle East operations took place in August 2023," they said.

"This gallery change has been planned since 2021 to support the development project and exhibition displays within the new galleries in the new Anzac Hall.

"Two Ben Roberts-Smith portraits have been decanted as part of these planned gallery works.

"The memorial will display 1,000s of new objects in an expanded Peacekeeping and Middle East galleries in the new Anzac Hall."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-08/act-australian-war-memorial-ben-roberts-smith-display-plaque/102832720

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19511910

File: e8b00578b695f44⋯.jpg (2.35 MB,5417x3392,5417:3392,Google_and_other_tech_firm….jpg)

Australia to require Google, Bing to clamp down on AI-created child porn

Online safety code requires search engines to take ‘appropriate steps’ to prevent spread of child abuse material.

aljazeera.com - 8 Sep 2023

Australia has unveiled regulations requiring internet search engines to crack down on child sexual abuse material created by artificial intelligence.

The online safety code announced on Friday will require services such as Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and Yahoo to take “appropriate steps” to prevent the spread of child exploitation material, including “synthetic” images created by AI.

The announcement comes after the eSafety commissioner delayed the implementation of an earlier version of the code in June after Microsoft and Google introduced AI functionality for their internet search engine services.

“The use of generative AI has grown so quickly that I think it’s caught the whole world off guard to a certain degree,” eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said in a statement.

Grant said the code was a “great example” of how regulators and tech firms could work together to make the internet more safe.

“When the biggest players in the industry announced they would integrate generative AI into their search functions we had a draft code that was clearly no longer fit for purpose and could not deliver the community protections we required and expected,” she said.

“We asked the industry to have another go at drafting the code to meet those expectations and I want to commend them for delivering a code that will protect the safety of all Australians who use their products.”

Earlier this year, the BBC reported that paedophiles have been using the AI software Stable Diffusion to create and sell life-like child sexual abuse material on content-sharing sites such as Patreon.

Australia’s eSafety commissioner is currently working on drafting two new codes to regulate online storage services such as iCloud and OneDrive, and private messaging services, respectively.

Efforts by governments to increase oversight of cloud and messaging services to combat child exploitation have prompted pushback from the tech industry and privacy advocates.

WhatsApp and Signal have threatened to pull out of the United Kingdom if it passes the Online Safety Bill, which would require platforms to scan for child sexual abuse material.

Tech firms and civil libertarians say the law would compel platforms to scrap end-to-end encryption, putting the privacy of all users at risk.

In June, Australia’s eSafety commissioner announced codes to regulate social media, internet carriage services, app distribution services, hosting services and equipment providers.

Breaches of the codes are subject to civil penalties.

https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2023/9/8/australia-to-require-google-bing-to-clamp-down-on-ai-created-child-porn

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19511987

File: 54a8dcc47fccdf1⋯.jpg (531.99 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Ralph_Babet_said_h….jpg)

File: 2a9d79cbbb4a735⋯.jpg (285.23 KB,814x1407,814:1407,POTUS_32.jpg)

File: 41260b597b961a4⋯.jpg (126.46 KB,823x1248,823:1248,1fa754e91a479aa5.jpg)

File: a655a15a73b71ae⋯.jpg (330.17 KB,750x1439,750:1439,SB_1.jpg)

>>19427525 (pb)

>>19427567 (pb)

'Great admirer': Victorian Senator Ralph Babet's letter declaring support to former US president Donald Trump revealed

Victorian Senator Ralph Babet has penned a letter to Donald Trump to assure the former United States president he has "friends in the Australian Parliament".

Yashee Sharma - September 8, 2023

Ralph Babet has declared his support to the legally-embattled Donald Trump.

The former United States president posted a letter penned by the Victorian Senator to his social media Truth Social on Friday.

Mr Babet, a Senator for Clive Palmer’s United Australia Party, wrote how “pleased” he was to see Trump running for re-election in 2024 and wished him “every success”.

“I have always been a great admirer of the United States. But to see the deterioration in American over the past four years has been truly heart breaking,” he wrote.

“Watching the way the Biden Administration has brought the US into disrepute around the world through weak leadership, both at home and abroad, has been devastating for lovers of freedom everywhere.

“America is meant to be a beacon of freedom and, I have no doubt, will be again under your leadership.”

Trump is currently embroiled in four criminal indictments and a number of civil lawsuits.

He is accused of allegedly attempting to overturn the 2020 election result, when he was voted out of office. He is the first president to be criminally indicted and have his mugshot taken.

Most recently, an American federal judge found Trump was liable for defaming E. Jean Carroll, who alleged he raped her in the 1990s.

Mr Babet said he could not “begin to image the forces aligned against” Trump.

“But I am confident that the American people will see through all of that to elect you once again as their President,” he wrote.

The Victorian Senator then assured the controversial billionaire he had “many friends in the Australian Parliament”.

“Australia may be a long way from the United States geographically, but we are not that far removed in terms of the issues we face,” he wrote.

“I believe it is not only in the US interest for you to be in the White House, but it is in the interest of freedom loving people everywhere.

“So please be encouraged that you have many friends in the Australian Parliament, not least of all me, who will be cheering you on in the Presidential campaign.”

Mr Babet was elected in 2020 and is a self-described “conservative and staunch patriot”. As a Senator, he receives a taxpayer-funded salary of at least $198,839 per annum.

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/great-admirer-victorian-senator-ralph-babets-letter-declaring-support-to-former-us-president-donald-trump-revealed/news-story/6031c61395651bd54b068da8bfb1b70b

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111025171296398109

https://twitter.com/senatorbabet/status/1699934857798049920

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19518014

File: bdcbe61e79c559b⋯.jpg (2.38 MB,4786x3191,4786:3191,Mining_magnate_Clive_Palme….jpg)

>>19417576 (pb)

>>19487613

Palmer launches court bid to force AEC to count ‘X’ as ‘No’ in Voice vote

Michaela Whitbourn - September 9, 2023

Mining magnate Clive Palmer and United Australia Party Senator Ralph Babet have launched a Federal Court bid to force the Australian Electoral Commission to count crosses on Voice referendum ballot papers as a vote against the proposal.

The urgent court challenge comes just five weeks before the historic Voice to parliament referendum on October 14.

The Electoral Commission has made clear that a tick will be counted as a Yes vote but a cross, which may be ambiguous, will not be counted as a No vote on Voice referendum ballot papers, consistent with legal advice that has been provided for decades.

Opposition leader Peter Dutton has previously claimed this would give the Yes campaign an advantage.

Babet and Palmer – the founder of the United Australia Party – are seeking a Federal Court declaration that “effect shall be given to any ballot papers containing a cross (“X”) written alone in the space provided, by treating such ballot papers as clearly demonstrating the voter’s intention that he or she does not approve the proposed law”.

They are also seeking an order restraining the AEC from “instructing scrutineers or any other officer” to count ballots “other than in accordance with” that declaration.

Alternatively, the men seek a declaration that any ballot papers containing a tick alone “do not clearly demonstrate the voter’s intention” to be counted as a Yes vote, and are to be treated as informal votes. They also seek a related order restraining the AEC from instructing scrutineers or other officers to count those votes other than in accordance with that declaration.

Federal Court Justice Steven Rares made orders on Friday listing the challenge for a hearing on Wednesday, September 20.

The AEC has previously made clear that “the formal voting instructions for the referendum are to clearly write either ‘yes’ or ‘no’, in full, in English”.

“It is that easy: given the simplicity, the AEC expects the vast, vast majority of Australian voters to follow those instructions and cast a formal vote,” the commission said.

It took aim at misinformation surrounding the vote count and noted that “more than 99 per cent of votes cast at the 1999 federal referendum [on an Australian republic] were formal”.

“Even of the 0.86 per cent of informal votes, many would have had no relevance to the use of ticks or crosses.”

Australians will cast their vote on October 14 on whether to enshrine recognition of the nation’s First Peoples in the Constitution by creating a body that would advise the parliament and executive government on matters relating to Indigenous Australians.

Under so-called “savings provisions”, a vote may be counted where a voter’s intention is clear, even when they have not followed the instructions to write either “Yes” or “No” on the ballot paper.

“The longstanding legal advice provides that a cross can be open to interpretation as to whether it denotes approval or disapproval: many people use it daily to indicate approval in checkboxes on forms,” the AEC said in a statement last month.

“The legal advice provides that for a single referendum question, a clear ‘tick’ should be counted as formal and a ‘cross’ should not.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/palmer-launches-court-bid-to-force-aec-to-count-x-as-no-in-voice-vote-20230909-p5e3ek.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19518077

File: 20950ffd773da62⋯.jpg (1.52 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Support_for_a_Yes_vote_is_….jpg)

File: 868108b2310962c⋯.jpg (184.08 KB,916x686,458:343,In_all_polls_No_has_firmly….jpg)

>>19487613

The latest poll for the Voice to Parliament shows Yes trailing No by greatest margin yet

Casey Briggs - 9 September 2023

1/2

With 34 days until polling day, advocates for a Voice to Parliament would almost certainly be wishing they were in a stronger position right now.

From extremely high levels of support a year ago, when the referendum question hadn't been finalised and the Voice was a vague concept in people's minds, support has fallen a long way.

The latest poll from RedBridge, published on Saturday, estimates 61 per cent of Australians are opposed to the Voice, while 39 per cent are in favour.

It’s the single lowest poll result we've seen for Yes (worse than the 38 per cent in Newspoll this week because that poll included 9 per cent undecided), albeit from a pollster which has tended to produce poorer numbers for Yes than other polls.

With this new data point, along with Newspoll and Essential polls published this week, Yes is sitting at an average of 43.7 per cent across the polls.

No is sitting more than 12 percentage points ahead on 56.3 per cent.

The RedBridge poll was conducted over a period both before and after the Uluru Dialogue launched its ad for the Yes campaign featuring John Farnham's You're the Voice.

"Support for Yes is rapidly declining across all demographic cohorts now," says Kos Samaras, a director at RedBridge and former Labor strategist.

"For some time, what was still holding up for them was university-educated voters and younger voters, and even that's dropping," he says

"It looks like the more [voters] are exposed to this campaign, the less likely they are to be voting yes."

The poll results also suggest naming the date for the referendum vote, and a general intensifying of campaign activity, have had little immediate impact on public opinion.

Can Yes turn things around?

This polling average, calculated using a model developed by Professor Simon Jackman at the University of Sydney, is not a prediction of the outcome of the vote, but an effort at interpreting all the published polls to date.

For Yes to win from here, it needs to turn things around dramatically, and fast, or hope that we're about to see perhaps the worst polling fail in Australian history.

"Their only hope now is that polling is methodologically challenged when surveying for referendums, although history tells us otherwise," Samaras says.

The No campaign, on the other hand, would be feeling increasingly hopeful of not just defeating the referendum, but defeating it comprehensively with five or six states voting against it.

Support for the Voice in the polls has been falling by about 0.7 percentage points a week, and there are still five weeks to go before the vote.

Two of the three national polls published this week were conducted after the Prime Minister announced the October 14 referendum date, while Newspoll was in the field on either side of the announcement.

Newspoll suggests No is leading in all states and regions, and Samaras says Liberal, National and One Nation voters appear to be more solid in their vote right now than voters on the left.

"If Yes wants to economise its time, it really needs to be going really hard after soft voters on the Labor, Green piles," he says.

"They could pull it off, but everything has to align. It is difficult because there isn't enough of those soft voters."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19518078

File: db39578dca1a336⋯.jpg (173.81 KB,917x788,917:788,There_s_a_stark_generation….jpg)

File: fe6577bc19c90b4⋯.jpg (90.37 KB,917x330,917:330,The_persuadable_middle_mak….jpg)

>>19518077

2/2

Generational differences are stark

Another common pattern across the polls is that the generations are not on the same page.

"You can see the massive generational difference in this," says Peter Lewis, who runs Essential Research, a Yes23 campaign partner.

"If this referendum was being run by under 35's, it's a slam dunk, and it's dead on arrival if you're over 55."

Who is shifting, and who is undecided?

Various polls have put the number of persuadable voters — those who are undecided or softly leaning one way or the other — at between 20 and 30 per cent.

They will be the focus of both campaigns until October 14.

Polls from both RedBridge and Essential this week have suggested that the No vote is slowly firming, while Yes is struggling to consolidate its locked-in support.

In the Essential poll — which has generally shown better figures for Yes than RedBridge — the "hard" No vote has grown from 38 to 41 per cent.

"29 per cent are yet to commit hard either way, of which 10 per cent can't even pick a side they're leaning towards," Lewis says.

"There is a large number of people that are yet to engage or make up their mind, and the last six weeks are going to be really important.

"Those that are locked in are more likely to be locked in No than locked in Yes, which speaks to the challenges the Yes campaign faces."

Many voters are uninformed and apathetic

By most accounts, the Yes campaign has more money to spend than No, and many more volunteers on the ground.

On paper that might give them a campaign advantage, and enable hundreds of thousands of one-on-one conversations to occur as polling day approaches.

Yes advocates, like Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, maintain those conversations — and a direct engagement with the issue — will make all the difference.

"When [it is] put to them what the question actually is, they respond very positively," he said a fortnight ago.

On the general principle, he may well be right. Peter Lewis points to his polling, which suggests nearly two thirds of people agree with the statement that "when we listen to people, and make decisions based on their local knowledge, we get better outcomes".

But that has not always been the ground this debate has been fought on, and voters don't seem to be paying all that much attention.

Essential's polling suggests that only about half of people say they feel well informed about the referendum, and that most people haven't read either the Uluru Statement from the Heart itself nor the referendum pamphlet that has been sent to all households.

"People are saying 'oh I just need someone to explain what it's all about', [but] everything's there in front of them," Lewis says.

"There is still a pathway," he believes. "The path to victory is that as [the vote] draws closer people actually take the time to read the statement, read the pamphlet.

"It just seems to me that with the ecosystems of information that are both pervasive and not trusted, the clarity around the proposition has been undermined."

What information do people trust?

He says the source people are most likely to trust for information about the referendum is their friends and family.

Combine that with a general apathy about the referendum, which Kos Samaras says is coming through strong in focus groups conducted by RedBridge.

"People don't really care about this, it's not at the top of their mind," he says. "It's not at the centre of their daily lives, they're not really concerned about it."

Many people have heard about the referendum on the news, "but they're a bit bored about it".

"Polling is difficult when it comes to this because you can't measure apathy."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-09/voice-to-parliament-uluru-statement-yes-vote-fallen-no-ahead/102832938

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19518144

File: 408aec5f00d70e0⋯.jpg (146.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,PM_Anthony_Albanese_is_fac….jpg)

File: 332c95fd1a28e65⋯.jpg (334.41 KB,1858x1045,1858:1045,The_support_of_Australia_s….jpg)

File: 15f28a7b50db0ca⋯.jpg (262.02 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0001.jpg)

File: da4e4b52c6616c8⋯.jpg (231.71 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0002.jpg)

>>19487613

>>19518077

Labor voters abandon Albanese’s bid to establish a Voice to Parliament

New polling reveals Labor is losing its heartland as support for the Voice to Parliament drops to a dismal new low.

Michelle Bowes - September 9, 2023

Aussies are abandoning the Prime Minister on the Voice to Parliament, with new polling revealing just 39 per cent of the nation plans to vote Yes in the upcoming referendum.

The latest poll from RedBridge, released today, marks the lowest poll result for the Yes campaign so far - with an overwhelming 61 per cent planning to vote No.

The poll was conducted in the first week of September, following Anthony Albanese’s announcement the referendum would be held on October 14.

Unlike some other polls, RedBridge requires voters to make a choice between Yes and No, rather than allowing them to reply that they are undecided.

The poll also found that Labor voters are deserting the party line, with 57 per cent of its supporter base planning to vote Yes and 43 per cent No.

By contrast, the RedBridge poll found that 87 per cent of Coalition supporters were planning to vote in line with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s No camp.

In line with the national findings, support for the Voice in NSW now sits at just 39 per cent, while support in Queensland is at 35 per cent.

Victorian are the strongest supporters of the Voice, but even there, only 45 per cent of voters plan to vote Yes.

RedBridge director of corporate affairs and communications, Tony Barry described support for the Yes vote as in “freefall”, having dropped five per cent in a month.

“The Yes23 campaign keep briefing the media that they are taking their campaign to the suburbs and regions, but then they pivot back to media stunts with corporates, celebrities or former senior politicians who previously opposed it,” Mr Barry told The Daily Telegraph.

“Attaching your campaign to a toxic brand like Qantas and one of the most disliked CEOs in the country might work if you are pitching your message to the members of the Chairman’s Lounge, but in suburban and regional Australia it goes down like a cup of sick,” he said.

“The No campaign is showing greater message discipline by repeatedly referring to the proposal as the ‘Canberra Voice’ because their research is presumably showing it is a persuasive message that moves soft voters into their column.”

The latest polling has also revealed other divides, with metropolitan voters showing more support for a Yes vote than those in rural and regional Australia.

Women are also more likely to vote Yes than men, while younger voters are also more in favour of the Voice than their older counterparts.

Voters who left school without completing year 12 or those that have a TAFE, trade or vocational qualification are also more likely to vote No, underlining the lack of support for the Voice among traditional Labor voters.

Another poll supported the fall away among Labor voters, with polling from Freshwater, conducted at a similar time, revealing the news for Labor could be even worse.

That poll found that just 53 per cent of Labor supported a Voice, with 32 per cent against and 15 per cent undecided.

Greens voters are the strongest supporters of a Yes vote, at 77 per cent.

The Freshwater poll found that 15 per cent of voters were still undecided, a figure that could still tip the Yes vote over the edge if the vast majority voted for the Voice.

But the chances of success for the PM’s referendum are looking increasingly unlikely, due to the requirement for a vote to achieve a double majority to change the Constitution.

This means that not only do the majority of voters nationwide need to vote in favour of the change, but so must a majority of voters in at least four of the six Australian states.

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/labor-voters-abandon-albaneses-bid-to-establish-a-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c6375d3ac10955310f3e6c1ab774e97e

https://redbridgegroup.com.au/voice-referendum-poll-september-2023-week-one/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19518173

File: 369edbf0471629e⋯.jpg (75.13 KB,1110x693,370:231,Australia_has_been_supplyi….jpg)

File: 79963f14eef1892⋯.jpg (101.68 KB,940x788,235:197,The_cardboard_drones_can_c….jpg)

>>19452903 (pb)

>>19499282

How Australian cardboard drones became a critical innovation in the Ukraine war

Paul Cureton - 3 Sep 2023

Innovative design choices can have a massive impact in the theatre of war, so it is important to understand the principles behind their development. Recent use of low-cost cardboard drones by Ukraine, supplied by Australia, to attack targets in Russia is a good example of how this can work.

Australia has been supplying Ukraine with 100 of the drones per month from March this year as part of an aid package deal worth an estimated $30 million, following an agreement struck in July 2021, according to the Australian Army Defence Innovation Hub.

Emerging technologies tend to override current technologies, and in turn, this generates competitive counter-technologies. This circular relationship driven by innovation is often critical in warfare as it can provide key technological advances.

Drone technology was originally developed for military use. It was then seen to offer opportunities in the civilian sphere for logistics, delivery and disaster relief. This then in turn has offered new innovations that can translate to military applications.

Conflicts in the future will be particularly shaped by drones, which will have implications for international relations, security and defence.

The Australian firm Sypaq, an engineering and solutions company founded in 1992, created the Corvo Precision Payload Delivery System (PPDS) for use in military, law enforcement, border security and emergency services, as well as food security, asset inspection and search and rescue.

Ukrainian forces reportedly used the PDDS cardboard drones in an attack on an airfield in Kursk Oblast in western Russia on August 27. The attack damaged a Mig-29 and four Su-30 fighter jets, two Pantsir anti-aircraft missile launchers, gun systems, and an S-300 air surface-to-air missile defence system.

Design principles

The design principles behind the success of the drones revolve around several factors including the production cost, airframe material, weight, payload, range, deployment and ease of use. Other considerations include the reliability of the operating software and the ability to fly the drone in various weather conditions.

Generally, small drones offer high-resolution imagery for reconnaissance in a rapidly changing theatre of war. The Corvo drone has a high-resolution camera that provides images covering a large area, transmitting footage back to its user in real time.

The importance of real-time mapping is critical in modern agile armed forces’ command and control as this can direct ground forces, heavy weapons and artillery.

In some cases, the design of small drones is concentrated on adapting the payloads to carry different types of munitions, as seen in the attack in Kursk.

The cardboard drones can carry 5kg of weight, have a wingspan of two metres and a range of 120km at a reported cost of US$3,500 ($5,300). Waxed cardboard is an ideal material as it offers weather resistance, flat-pack transportation (measuring 510mm by 760mm) and, importantly, a lightweight airframe, which enables a longer flight range and a high cruise speed of 60km/h.

Fixed-wing drones also offer longer ranges than rotor-based drones as the wings generate the lift and the airframe has less drag, so they are more energy efficient. They can also fly at higher altitudes. The drones can be launched from a simple catapult or by hand and so can be rapidly deployed.

Low-tech material, hi-tech thinking

Radar involves the transmission of electromagnetic waves, and these are reflected off any object back to a receiving antenna. Cardboard is generally harder to detect by radar — but its components, such as the battery, can be detected.

But the Corvo drone is likely to have a small signature. Radar-absorbing materials are needed to have full stealth properties. These polymers have various absorbing qualities to avoid radar detection.

Another design principle is the swarming capability of the drone. Swarms of drones can overpower air defence systems through sheer volume or can be used as decoys in counterintelligence operations.

Swarms are highly reliant on the development of artificial intelligence, which is still an embryonic research area. But a recent drone race at ETH University in Zurich, in which AI-piloted drone beat drones controlled by world-champion drone racers, highlighted this potential.

All of these design principles and innovations have and are continuing to transform warfare and theatre operations. It is likely that small drones at low cost are likely to have further mission success in the future.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-03/ukraine-war-australian-made-cardboard-drones-russia-warfare/102804120

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19518233

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19499282

>>19499282

Zelensky’s frontline Aussie raining hell on Russia

Ethan McNamara, the first Australian frontline warrior to speak openly of his fight for Ukraine, is part of a wave of defence personnel using their training in what they see as a just war.

LIAM MENDES - September 8, 2023

1/3

Just over a week ago, Ethan McNamara was running through a field in a desperate attempt to avoid Russian artillery fire.

It’s become a common occurrence for the 24-year-old from Brisbane, who in late September last year travelled to Ukraine to join the fight on the frontline.

Now he is a member of the Ukrainian military; second-in-command of a drone reconnaissance and attack unit, part of GUR – a secretive Ukrainian military intelligence service combat unit.

Before this, McNamara had never worked with drones, which he says have completely changed the structure of modern warfare.

The former Australian Army soldier is the first Australian to speak in-depth without the cloak of anonymity about his experience on the frontline in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

He’s one of about 100 Australians and other foreigners – often former military personnel, some with zero prior combat experience – moved by Ukraine’s plight to go there to help.

He met The Weekend Australian on the outskirts of Slovyansk, about 50km from the frontline, candidly discussing being on the receiving end of artillery rounds, as well as talking about people he has killed.

The city is on edge after 16 civilians, including a child, were killed by a Russian air strike in the town of Kostyantynivka, less than 50km away, on Thursday.

“From being able to … see men that you’ve killed, and then being on the other end of that and hearing those rounds coming to you, is, you know, it’s all fun and games until it’s reversed, and you know someone is actively trying to kill you,” McNamara said. “It’s fun until it’s not.”

He recalls close calls he’s had.

“There’s been times where we’ve been running through tree lines and open fields, and you hear (artillery) coming in, you got a few seconds of that last whistle before the explosion, and all you think is ‘I need to get down’,” he said.

“You drop on to your face and then you’re like, ‘I need to get up’ and this stuff’s heavy on my back right now, and you just keep ­pushing forward, up down, up down.

“A lot of people say, ‘I think of my family, I think of my loved ones, I think I’m going to die’,” he said.

“No, for me it was just, I hate getting up and down from the ground because this is heavy.

“Everyone takes it differently, I suppose. Some I know won’t even flinch, they’ll just laugh at the sound.

“Insane dudes, insane dudes.”

McNamara’s role can range from conducting reconnaissance, to “dropping bombs on people” and calling in mortar strikes from his comrades.

He is often based in trenches or homes previously occupied by families, launching either a small consumer drone, modified to carry explosive, or a larger drone, which is sent 500m into the air and with its attached camera can see up to 20km away.

“Our job allows us to cause a much bigger casualty rate on the Russian side. Instead of getting to shoot at one or two people in a trench, we’ll take out groups of five to eight, we’ll take out vehicles, we’ll take out their mortars.

“The strategic level of our team is a lot bigger than just the day-to-day trench life, which is the reason why I came here and the whole reason I’ve stayed with this team, because I’m able to come here and have a much bigger effect than just picking up a gun and running across the field.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19518243

File: 1094ad483963731⋯.jpg (529.61 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Former_Australian_Army_sol….jpg)

File: 86fd22d2c1be8d2⋯.jpg (260.61 KB,1599x899,1599:899,Ethan_McNamara_conducting_….jpg)

File: 06d6eed7ee446a0⋯.jpg (195.72 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ethan_McNamara_with_a_dron….jpg)

>>19518233

2/3

This has led McNamara to not just flying off-the-shelf drones, but also kamikaze drones and “deep reconnaissance” bombers.

“Helicopters and jets and these big UAVs are very expensive, ­especially if you’re NATO military,” he said.

“To take an off-the-shelf commercial drone and be able to have eyes in the sky nearly 24/7, see infiltration routes, see ammo caches, see positions without having to send over a big asset is unreal. You can almost not give them a break by day and by night.”

The off-the-shelf drones, while costing upwards of $20,000, have heat-seeking capabilities.

“You can find their locations, you can find anything that moves or anything that’s noticed,” the Aussie fighter said. “And you can just rain hell on it.”

He says during operations he can be right on the frontline, or several kilometres away.

“At the end of the day here, it’s just like at some point, you step out. You might not ever shoot at someone, but you’ll get shot at, you will get shot at. Without a doubt. Yeah, we’ve been shot at a couple of times.”

What he can’t get used to however, is the feeling of heading into a front. Or what comes with that task.

“There’s certain sounds and smells out here that will get you shivering almost, it’s something that I personally haven’t gotten used to yet,” he said. “It’s just something that will, I suppose, never leave your brain, going into a front, you’re watching the frontline blow up and you’re like, ‘I’ll be there in 15 minutes’,” he said.

“It’s something that I’ve never trained for, it’s something I always expected to do, but never understood how unready I was for actually what a frontline’s like.”

On Wednesday last week, McNamara’s close friend, Sam Newey, a 22-year-old British civilian, was killed in action. Newey’s mother told British journalists her son wanted to join the British Army but was ineligible because he had faced charges – which were dropped – for supporting his brother, Daniel, who went to fight with Kurdish forces in Syria in 2020.

When McNamara and his friend weren’t on the frontline, or just behind it, they shared an apartment in Kharkiv.

“(He was) one of the best blokes I’ve ever known, to be honest with you,” McNamara told The Weekend Australian.

“(He) went from being a civilian, felt like you need to come out here and help take out some bullies, and that’s exactly what he’d done until sadly his time’s up, taken too soon.”

Newey’s death made ­McNamara contemplate whether he should leave Ukraine and return home to see his family, who now live in the NSW Hunter Valley. “I’ve come to the conclusion that I will stay and keep fighting … I’ll stay as long as I need to,” he said.

But his decision to stay, in the end, wasn’t because of what happened to Newey but because of the people he’s grown close to in the almost 11 months he’s been on the ground.

“I’ve seen the effect that it had on his family and loved ones, so that was the decision I had to make, whether or not I can do that to my family. And sadly, as it stands, the bond and relationship I have out here is over the family at the moment.

“As much as it’d hurt them, they know I’m doing what I love, and hopefully they can understand that.

“That’s why I’m staying.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19518248

File: 37678a697d39975⋯.jpg (270.5 KB,1600x2132,400:533,Ethan_McNamara_with_slain_….jpg)

File: d75539043341ae7⋯.jpg (219.35 KB,1200x1600,3:4,Sam_Newey.jpg)

>>19518243

3/3

McNamara was first motivated to go to Ukraine when he was in the barracks in Brisbane and overheard some fellow soldiers saying they wanted to go and help – but “always came up with excuses”.

“So I booked a flight, got out here, giving it a crack, and I’ve loved it ever since,” he said.

“Ukraine’s such a different place. But it’s something that I’ve grown to love.

“When the first few days of the war happened, everyone’s saying they’d go and do something, all these brave heroes that have, trained for the majority of their life, to always come up with excuses, and to never do it, something I said I’d never do, and one day I just said: ‘You know what, I’d go to Ukraine’.”

On returning home for a short Christmas break, he was detained and taken to an interview room, where he was interrogated for more than six hours.

His mobile, laptop, storage devices and even his shoes were scrutinised.

“They went through f.cking everything, there was not a single thing that was on my person or in my bags that didn’t get scanned and physically searched by them,” he said.

While the process for him was “frustrating”, and he understands why authorities were questioning him, McNamara believes there should be more support directed to those who have been doing the work he has.

“I definitely think there should be more support but I also understand the fact of being careful who gets sent here, who learns what skills and what sort of mindset that person is … should be looked at,” he said.

McNamara says one of his greatest feelings is seeing Australian Bushmaster armoured personnel vehicles – of which Australia has donated 120 to Ukraine – heading towards the frontline.

“Seeing them going in makes you happy to see a bit of home out here, but there’s so much more I do think they (the government) could do.

“The Ukrainian government, I believe, could use a lot more fire support.

“There’s a lot of equipment that we do lack at a strategic level, that could definitely help this war effort.

“There’s just so much that I’ve seen in armouries in military bases that could be used out here that sit there and do (the joint Australia-US military exercise) Talisman Sabre in Australia, and it’s like, ‘why don’t we help?’ ”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/australian-soldier-ethan-mcnamara-is-raining-hell-on-russia-from-ukraines-frontline/news-story/e7a50c2ce1c5b4f55679d4c162306bf5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-svm3Xaiiw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19518366

File: c26020417d27e08⋯.jpg (291.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Detective_Leading_Senior_C….jpg)

File: f0808ed39557aa3⋯.jpg (343.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Detectives_Carla_Corbitt_S….jpg)

File: 91bd2f548d376ee⋯.jpg (218.57 KB,1842x1036,921:518,A_small_segment_of_the_wal….jpg)

>>19493562

Inside JACET: The SA police officers who rescue children from depraved sex predators

Inside the office of SA’s elite team of police officers who rescue children from pedophiles around the world is a board of simple kids’ images. Each one has a special meaning.

Sean Fewster - September 8, 2023

1/3

For once, it wasn’t the perverse images of child exploitation or deceptive messages of grooming that most disturbed Detective Leading Senior Constable Steve Hegarty.

A veteran member of SA’s elite child-rescuing police team, such appalling material never ceased to horrify him, but he’d learned to steel himself against it.

Instead, as he plumbed the torrid depths of a pedophile’s child abuse chat logs, Hegarty was more concerned by the long silences between the victims’ replies.

As he scrolled thousands of pages of data, he worried the vulnerable children targeted by the predator had harmed themselves, or worse, due to their psychological torment.

“That was a traumatic day at work … I said to someone ‘it’s like reading a real-life horror story, but it’s back in time and there’s nothing you can to do change the outcome’,” he said.

“You’re halfway through it, you don’t know how it’s going to end, so you’re flicking quicker and quicker to get to the point of ‘how quickly can I find this child?’.”

Fortunately, the work of Hegarty, his dedicated teammates and their law enforcement allies around the world saved the children and secured the pedophile’s guilty pleas.

It was another win for SA’s Joint Anti Child Exploitation Team, a combined SA Police/AFP group that is changing the face of child protection both here and around the world.

It also epitomised the core ethos that bind the tight-knit, elite team as they investigate some of the worst criminal acts that go before the state’s courts.

“If this job was just about child exploitation, then I couldn’t do it,” Hegarty said.

“I know we can’t save every child, but I don’t think I could mentally put myself through this job unless I thought there was a chance we could.

“When we do remove a child from harm, and we know we’ve stopped evil and given that child freedom from the situation they’re in, that’s the best sensation you can get.

“It’s phenomenal how it can make you feel, and it makes the darkness go away.”

‘OUR FOCUS IS VICTIMS’

To mark National Child Protection Week 2023, The Advertiser is stepping inside JACET to see how victims are saved and pedophiles are busted.

Every Australian capital city has a JACET of their own – SA’s boasts more than a dozen officers, detectives, specialists and investigators.

In the past six years alone, the SA team has brought down an internet sex ring, unmasked the man who started the online abuse trade and caught a predator who marked each day of his life by violating an innocent child.

Most recently, former RAAF spy Jacob Donald Walsh pleaded guilty to a national-record 230 abuse crimes following an SA JACET investigation.

He is officially Australia’s worst-ever convicted child sex offender, serving a 22-year prison term – which a judge said would have been 457 years if not for a ban on “crushing” penalties.

Each of those cases set legal precedents that can now be used by police across the country to pursue offenders, and by courts to impose robust sentences.

Dozens of other alleged offenders are currently before the state’s courts and, at times, it seems the team is making arrests on a weekly basis.

And while JACET’s numbers are impressive, Detective Senior Constable Jordan Dowling said it is not the group’s concern.

“The media, even police officers, can get into the habit of being offender-focused or focused on the number of offences,” he said.

“We have a focus on the victim and on protecting children.

“You can apprehend offenders every single day for the rest of your life, and that’s always going to be there, but if you can rescue a victim that’s the ultimate.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19518374

File: 03a7bd86893acab⋯.jpg (834.44 KB,2000x2667,2000:2667,JACET_combines_the_experti….jpg)

File: 2a03ed109c9168a⋯.jpg (614.51 KB,2000x2667,2000:2667,JACET_s_symbol.jpg)

>>19518366

2/3

THE RESCUE WALL

That sentiment is displayed on the wall of their CBD offices, where a child-shaped paper cut-out is posted for every victim rescued from abusive criminals.

Hegarty said the wall was not an official monument, but something that arose from the team’s shared motivation.

“I had a very blunt conversation with an interstate peer that I do not want offender’s faces looking at me while I’m working,” he said.

“We were discussing that in the office and the idea came up, about our focus on removing children from harm, and how that’s what motivates us.

“One of the team said ‘let’s do that, let’s put something up’ … all we would do is a country, a case reference and the age of the child, just to symbolise what we’d done.”

Dowling said he considers himself “lucky” to have the desk directly beneath the wall.

“It’s a good reminder – every single day, when you’re under the pump or stressed and things aren’t that great – of why we do this,” he said.

“It’s also an important way to recognise each of those images of a kid represents a real person, a real child that was really harmed.”

Hegarty agreed.

“The job can be challenging, and it can be difficult, and you can have those dark times,” he said.

“The public asks ‘how can offenders commit these crimes?’, and we have those exact same thoughts too.

“Sometimes you just need to have a moment of clarity, take a deep breath and say that’s why we do this, and that’s what the Wall symbolises

“That’s at the heart and soul of what we do – it’s not about the offenders we arrest, it’s about how many children we can remove from harm.”

‘THINGS I WILL NEVER UN-SEE’

JACET’s dedication to its purpose is tested constantly by dangers both physical and psychological.

Even the simplest investigation spans months and require officers to view hundreds of thousands of abhorrent images, multiple times, to find clues and evidence.

“There are certain things I will never un-see and certain things I will never forget and there are things, plenty of things, I wish I had never seen,” Hegarty said.

“There’s also the language used to discuss abuse, and that’s another difficult thing to deal with … I’ve walked away from my screen plenty of times just from reading it.

“It can be quite confronting, even though they are not exchanging materials, the words they are saying, the content of their conversations, is just as horrific.

“It’s horrifying what you see people write … there are times where I have been really dark, and there are cases that have affected me more than others.”

Some threats are more than mental – in September 2021, a man who had persistently abused his own son violently attacked a JACET detective inside a moving vehicle.

The man, who cannot be named, used his feet and legs to kick and crush the detective’s head into the car’s door as it made its way through heavy Kensington Rd traffic.

Though back-up quickly arrived and the pedophile was subdued, the detective’s injuries have left him with permanent disabilities – but he has returned, undeterred, to duty in JACET.

The offender, meanwhile, began his 17-year prison term with a judge’s praise for the officer and all of JACET ringing in his ears.

In recent years, courts have taken the experiences of JACET and other police into account during sentencing, commending their work while offering condolences for their exposure.

“It’s great that (people) acknowledge investigators and their exposure, and being indirect victims of it,” Dowling said.

“But it really does pale in comparison to the actual victims involved.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19518386

File: bacc71b758144dd⋯.jpg (139.39 KB,1280x720,16:9,Ruecha_Tokputza.jpg)

File: 249e22ad192eff5⋯.jpg (76.77 KB,1280x720,16:9,Jadd_William_Brooker.jpg)

File: c77feb0cee6fbf4⋯.jpg (94.67 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Geoffrey_William_Moyle.jpg)

File: f6ec30838820f2c⋯.jpg (140.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,RAAF_Sergeant_Jacob_Donald….jpg)

>>19518374

3/3

He said that, in addition to supporting one another, JACET members have access to outreach services, psychological counselling and routine check-ups.

Investigators have the freedom to step away from their confronting case loads as needed, or to share the work with peers, until they are ready to take it up once more.

The unit also follows best practice guidelines as to what times of day, and for how long, evidence is analysed in order to reduce vicarious trauma.

“It’s being able to be aware of the potential impact and, if you need help, talking to people,” Hegarty said.

“Our team is an extremely close dysfunctional family, we have a bond because of how we work together and what we see together.

“We reach out to one another, we look after each other.”

And it is through that camaraderie and care that the unit continues to succeed – and weather the next court date.

“My least favourite line is when defence lawyers say ‘there was only this number of offences’,” Hegarty said.

“As soon as they say ‘only’, if I’m in the court, I can tell you right now, my blood pressure goes up.

“Don’t ever use the word ‘only’ when you’re talking about a child victim of abuse.”

JACET’S BIGGEST BUSTS … SO FAR

Ruecha Tokputza, aka “The Child Collector”

Tokputza, of Mile End, generated more than 900,000 images and videos of child exploitation material during his abuse of 13 children in Australia and Thailand.

He was caught by JACET after it and its international partners sought to crack a server in Bulgaria that housed illicit, illegal material.

JACET thought busting Tokputza would give them a password to the server – instead it revealed his litany of abuse and provided evidence to arrest other men overseas.

Tokputza was jailed for a record 40 years, with an SA judge saying his crimes were “without comparison” in legal history.

Jadd William Brooker, aka “The Centre of the Web”

Checking the chat logs of a newly-arrested barista, JACET found a chilling message from another man saying he wanted to infect children with HIV.

They followed the disgusting message’s IP trail to Jadd William Brooker of Glenelg – and by finding him, they exposed an extensive online pedophile network.

Brooker, who has victims around SA, across Australia and overseas, eventually pleaded guilty to a then-record 182 child abuse crimes.

He will next face the Supreme Court in October, where prosecutors will seek to have him jailed indefinitely as an uncontrollable sexual predator.

Geoffrey William Moyle, aka “The Author of Misery”

For decades, the most infamous pedophile in the world was the mysterious “Waka” who deviants praised for having “written the Bible on child abuse”.

Waka had all but invented the global online child abuse industry, making him the number one target of the US Department of Homeland Security.

A 20-year manhunt ended when information shared with JACET led to the SA detectives unmasking Waka as Westbourne Park-based foreign aid worker Geoffrey William Moyle.

Details in Moyle’s personal photos matched shoes, watches and items in Waka’s perverse videos, leaving no doubt as to his identity.

Moyle is now serving a 12-year sentence and is $80,000 poorer, having agreed to compensate one of the child sex slaves he routinely abused.

Jacob Donald Walsh, aka “The Lying Spy”

Brooker’s status as the pervert record-holder lasted barely months before another JACET arrest overtook him – in spectacular, disquieting fashion.

As in that case, one arrest – that of online impersonator Cameron Robert Bowen – led detectives to the bigger criminal, RAAF intelligence officer Sergeant Jacob Donald Walsh.

He had stolen the identity of his stepdaughter’s boyfriend to pursue girls as young as 10 for sex, preying upon their insecurities and mental health issues in order to satisfy his urges.

Faced with the enormity of JACET’s dossier on his crimes, Walsh capitulated almost instantly pleaded guilty to a record 230 offences and is serving a 22-year sentence.

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-sa/inside-jacet-the-sa-police-officers-who-rescue-children-from-depraved-sex-predators/news-story/9caec981bd4bd9c89edbc2c04a019a58

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c116fc No.19521787

File: 290d34e5700862a⋯.png (5.38 MB,2048x1534,1024:767,2023_09_09T122927Z_7156111….png)

Chevron Pulls Contract Crew From Australia LNG Project As Strikes Begin

Reporting by Jyoti Narayan in Bengaluru Reuters September 9, 2023

Sept 9 (Reuters) – Chevron Corp CVX.N started withdrawing contractor workers from its Gorgon liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility on Saturday, shortly after staff went on strike at two major projects in Australia, a union coalition said.

“Chevron chartered a special flight this morning to Barrow Island to evacuate 50 blue and white collar contract crew off the Gorgon Project,” Offshore Alliance said in a Facebook post.

The two sides are at odds over issues including pay, job security, rosters and rules around overtime and transfers between Chevron facilities.

“We will continue to take steps to maintain safe and reliable operations in the event of disruption at our facilities,” a spokesperson for Chevron told Reuters.

Workers at Chevron’s LNG projects in Australia started strike action on Friday after talks broke down, potentially disrupting output from facilities that account for over 5% of global supply.

No further talks were scheduled between the unions and the U.S. energy major, according to the website of the Fair Work Commission, Australia’s industrial umpire, which had mediated five days of negotiations.

Australia is the world’s biggest LNG exporter and its main buyers are in Asia.

The dispute over wages and conditions at Chevron’s Gorgon and Wheatstone operations has supported British and European gas prices, as traders anticipate lower Australian supplies would intensify competition from other sources.

https://gcaptain.com/chevron-pulls-contract-crew-from-australia-lng-project-as-strikes-begin/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19523025

File: 60983fe6f1009cc⋯.jpg (189.41 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Kirsty_Clark_at_the_Austra….jpg)

File: 3d8d1684e909d5c⋯.jpg (476.95 KB,955x1000,191:200,Do_you_recognise_this_wall.jpg)

File: fe16134e38b433e⋯.jpg (350.49 KB,955x836,955:836,Do_you_recognise_this_room.jpg)

>>19493562

>>19493588

In a perfect world, Kirsty Clarke’s job wouldn’t exist

She knows she works in one of “the worst areas that you can work in”, but mum of two Kirsty Clark says the “satisfaction” she gets from doing this job well is like nothing else.

Thomas Chamberlin - September 9, 2023

1/2

Kirsty Clarke views some of the most vile images and videos of sexually abused children every day.

In the perfect world, her job wouldn’t exist.

But so bad is the horrific child abuse in Australia and across the globe, she and a team of victim identification specialists in the Australian Federal Police spend hours every day combing images for clues. Frame by frame.

Anything that could help save an abused child or catch a child sex offender.

It could be the accent of a person or an item in the room such as clothing or an accessory that helps the team solve a case.

“We had a particular case where we found one video and 50 images on the Darknet of a pre-pubescent boy being sexually assaulted,” Ms Clarke told The Courier-Mail.

“So in this particular case, we worked collaboratively with international partners using the Interpol database.

“The items in the room indicated a country of production, so we were looking at things like we could see a game in the room, a particular type of cup, and a water bottle, a piece of candy sitting on the bench. And the team rallied around and found where those particular items were sold in the country.”

The team identified the boy as likely living in the United States so referred it to American victim ID teams in April 2022, with the Federal Bureau of Investigation taking over the task of locating the child.

“And after a month of their investigation, a five-year-old boy was rescued,” Ms Clarke said.

“The abuse occurred about four years prior and the child had never disclosed and when the uncle was arrested the parents had no clue that he had been abused.”

The AFP and Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation identified 141 child exploitation victims in 2022-23 and reports of online child exploitation have more than doubled since 2018

Working as a victim identification specialist, seeing horrific images, takes a toll as the abuse material can’t be unseen, but Ms Clarke said the job which was like “finding a needle in a haystack” was worth it if children were saved.

“And that’s what makes us stay in the job,” she said.

“This is probably one of the worst areas that you can work in, but it’s also one of the best areas that you can work in because the level of satisfaction knowing that that child is no longer subjected to that type of behaviour and that child is removed from harm.

“And a child can be a child again and be happy in their environment and not be subjected to that type of horrific behaviour – there’s nothing more satisfying.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19523031

File: 5fbfb40392356d4⋯.jpg (139.76 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Kirsty_Clark_says_her_work….jpg)

File: 4463f28f8e188a1⋯.jpg (526.11 KB,945x1655,189:331,Do_you_recognise_this_room….jpg)

File: dd3f95df3e72bdd⋯.jpg (224.58 KB,955x624,955:624,This_bed_frame_includes_a_….jpg)

>>19523025

2/2

The team analyses darknet images as well as those on offender’s computers after police raids to see if the person has produced material or has other videos or images that can be analysed.

It’s this same team that is understood to have linked bedsheets in an image to a childcare centre that led one of Australia’s worst alleged sex offenders being charged with raping 91 girls at childcare centres in Queensland, one centre in New South Wales and another overseas.

When Ms Clarke joined the unit she didn’t have children but is now a mother of two.

Being a mother herself has its advantages and disadvantages and has affected her parenting.

“I bring more experience to the role by being a mum, because I can recognise current products or brands of nappies. I bring a level of experience through being a parent to the role. But then the roles also affected my parenting in some bad, some good ways.

“For example, I really have good communication with my children about being very clear about body parts. And I’m not afraid to have uncomfortable conversations with them because I know how quickly a child can be taken advantage of.”

Ms Clarke said the team also have cold cases they haven’t been able to solve that are regularly reviewed.

As part of trying to solve the cases the AFP has released images with non-confrontational pictures of rooms or objects which investigators are asking for the public’s help to recognise an object or room that could help save a child.

Ms Clarke said child abuse wasn’t a small problem and there were hundreds of children the team were looking for.

“I don’t have any words to try and describe the gravity of the problem and that’s why we just need to try and find as many victims as possible because there’s certainly plenty of children out there that are currently being abused or have previously been abused and they’ve never come forward.

“And that’s something that I really value in the role is that we might be the only opportunity for that child to speak out or for that child to get help.

“We might be the only victim ID team around the world that lays eyes on that video or those sets of images.

“So we’ve got to put our best foot forward to try and find every single clue for that child to be rescued, to have a voice, to get the support that they need and that they deserve really, and they deserve their childhood back and not be in an awful situation.”

https://www.couriermail.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-qld/in-a-perfect-world-kirsty-clarkes-job-wouldnt-exist/news-story/4078697bedbe448753486081fb7d92b3

https://www.accce.gov.au/what-we-do/trace-an-object

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19523059

File: b15c6b5643d5638⋯.mp4 (15.58 MB,640x360,16:9,Families_protest_Satan_Clu….mp4)

File: 9dd026944e19ffe⋯.jpg (92.39 KB,932x524,233:131,After_school_Satan_Club_ev….jpg)

File: dd0482e636f9b7e⋯.jpg (78.82 KB,932x524,233:131,After_school_Satan_Club_ev….jpg)

File: 61499dd26a9e710⋯.jpg (67.78 KB,932x524,233:131,After_school_Satan_Club_ev….jpg)

>>19341000 (pb)

After school 'Satan Club' event at Southern California library draws protests

Mario Ramirez and Kelli Johnson - September 7, 2023

LANCASTER, Calif. - Dozens of protesters made their religious beliefs known outside a back-to-school night event hosted by the Satanic Temple at the Lancaster Library.

The group said the goal was not to introduce any type of religion or belief system but rather, to promote free rational thinking.

"I just want people to know that the Satanic Temple, we are about personal liberty and free rational inquiry. We’re not worshiping the devil or anything like that. We’re just trying to have fun and help the children have a good time," said Satanic Temple spokesperson René Grigori.

The event was described as a "family-friendly" with arts and crafts, science experiences and live demos.

Meanwhile, dozens of protesters gathered outside the library holding signs and participating in prayer groups.

"We’re representing Jesus Christ. The Lord and Savior. We’re not trying to have the enemy destroy this town. We got enough issues here, in Jesus Name!" a protester told a news photographer at the scene.

The protesters argue the group is trying to entice children with gifts and games to turn away from their beliefs. However, the Satanic Temple’s after-school club says it only plans events where other religious groups are operating to provide a safe alternative to students.

A spokesperson for the Lancaster Unified District said the district does not support the event or the group, but they were obligated to share information about the event to district families.

https://www.foxla.com/news/after-school-satan-club-lancaster-library-protests

https://www.instagram.com/thesatanictemple/

>Humanity is good, but, when we let our guard down we allow darkness to infiltrate and destroy.

>Like past battles fought, we now face our greatest battle at present, a battle to save our Republic, our way of life, and what we decide (each of us) now will decide our future.

>Will we be a free nation under God?

>Or will we cede our freedom, rights and liberty to the enemy?

>If America falls so does the world.

>If America falls darkness will soon follow.

>Only when we stand together, only when we are united, can we defeat this highly entrenched dark enemy.

>This is not about politics.

>This is about preserving our way of life and protecting the generations that follow.

>We are living in Biblical times.

>Children of light vs children of darkness.

>United against the Invisible Enemy of all humanity.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19523142

File: 2aea89c98983a8a⋯.jpg (231.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_greets_Fr….jpg)

>>19487613

>>19518077

Anthony Albanese ‘not sorry’ after parking voice campaign for world stage

BEN PACKHAM - SEPTEMBER 10, 2023

Anthony Albanese has defended his decision to be out of the country for an entire week of the voice referendum campaign, which he has described as “a once-in-a-generation chance to bring our country together”.

The Prime Minister, who attended the ASEAN, East Asia and G20 summits and squeezed in a side trip to the Philippines, refused to take questions during the trip on the foreign affairs implications of an Indigenous voice to parliament.

Mr Albanese, who was due to arrive back in Canberra on Monday morning, said it was vital that Australia was represented at such international forums.

“The G20 is such an important body. It represents 85 per cent of global GDP. And that‘s why what happened here matters,” he said at the summit in New Delhi.

“One in four Australian jobs is dependent on trade. I make no apologies for being engaged because it‘s important that Australia has a seat at the table; because it impacts on the living standards of Australians.”

Mr Albanese will fly in from India for what is likely to be another horror week of parliament for the government over its failure to fully explain its decision to reject more Qatar Airways flights to Australia in a boon for Qantas.

He has previously declared the result of the Voice referendum would “affect international perceptions of Australia”.

“It’s … about how Australians see ourselves, but also how the world sees Australia,” Mr Albanese said in April.

But striding the world stage at the ASEAN summit in Indonesia last week, he refused to say whether a Yes vote would strengthen Australia’s relationship with the region or whether a No vote would undermine it.

The trip’s clash with last week’s parliamentary sitting in which the government was trounced by the opposition could have been avoided as the summit dates were known when the sitting calendar was decided.

With support for the voice in free fall according to the latest polling, Mr Albanese is facing grumbling from the “Yes” camp over his referendum sales pitch which is falling flat with voters.

A RedBridge poll, taken in the first week of September after Anthony Albanese announced October 14 as the referendum date, found only 39 per cent of people said they planned to vote Yes for the constitutional amendment, while 61 per cent planned to vote No.

A September 3 Newspoll conducted for The Australian, which did not force undecided voters to choose like the RedBridge poll, showed ­support for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament and executive government falling to 38 per cent, with 53 per cent intending to vote No.

Mr Albanese did not mention the Voice referendum once during his trip to Jakarta, Manila and New Delhi, despite arguing at the campaign’s August 30 launch that there would be no second chance to have a say on the constitutional reform for many Australians.

“Referendums come around much less often than elections – this will be the first one this century – and they are very different,” he said at the time.

Labor has vowed to deliver a First Nations foreign policy “that weaves the voices and practices of the world’s oldest continuing culture into the way we talk to the world”.

Former foreign minister Julie Bishop has said a “no” vote would send a negative message to the rest of the word about Australia.

But, amid Labor fears of alienating “soft” yes or no voters, Foreign Minister Penny Wong recently refused to endorse her predecessor’s comments.

“I think the more important thing for us to do is to speak with Australians about why this is a change that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders have sought and asked us to support,” she told ABC radio.

“And ultimately, it‘s about recognition, it’s about listening and it’s about getting better results.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-not-sorry-after-parking-voice-campaign-for-world-stage/news-story/c01450ad03b3593427ba6e673d8589c7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19523154

File: 5e8eb80c8282f82⋯.jpg (3.84 MB,5402x3535,5402:3535,Noel_Pearson_and_Anthony_A….jpg)

File: bd22dccb9a4a625⋯.jpg (2.34 MB,4048x2699,4048:2699,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: 8d9981b87d3e490⋯.jpg (2.58 MB,5625x3750,3:2,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_h….jpg)

>>19487613

>>19518077

Pearson says Dutton’s second referendum is a ‘mirage’ - and hopes the Voice isn’t ‘unrequited’

Paul Sakkal - September 10, 2023

Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has attacked Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s proposed second referendum and expressed optimism that the public will accept Indigenous Australians’ outstretched hand of friendship by backing the Voice.

Dutton said last Sunday that if the Voice referendum failed, and he won the next election, he would call another referendum to recognise Indigenous Australians but exclude a constitutional Voice.

The Coalition’s Indigenous affairs spokeswoman and leading No campaigner, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, days later failed to declare support for the idea, which Pearson claimed had eviscerated the Coalition’s reconciliation plans and proved it was not Dutton who set party policy.

Pearson said Dutton was “absolutely not” serious about the second referendum plan, labelling it a “mirage”.

“The leader of the opposition is trying to have his cake and eat it too. But, you know, it’s like chuck the cake overboard and then somehow we’re going to get a chance to eat it later.”

“It pushes this debate for another five years. We’re already 15 years into it: John Howard promised this thing … on the election eve 2007.”

“The fact is, we will never get a referendum for constitutional recognition out of these people. They are here for constant debate, constant argument, interminable conflict and debate. They want this issue to go on for another five years. They want this issue to never end. They love conflict, and disputation, whereas the Yes campaign is saying: do this on October the 14th.”

Opinion polling has shown a steady decline in support for the referendum, but Pearson and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles both said on Sunday they had confidence it could still succeed.

“At this stage, I believe we still have the capacity to do the right thing,” Pearson said on ABC’s Insiders program.

“I just don’t believe when the hand of friendship and reconciliation is extended from Indigenous people that at the end of the day, their love will be unrequited. I just can’t believe that.

“I cannot believe we still live in Australia where that hand would be just swept aside. This unrequited love is my worst nightmare. I just don’t believe Australians are capable of that at this time in our history.”

Pearson rejected concerns the proposed Voice model was too wide in scope and had made it impossible for more Liberal MPs and conservatives to back the referendum.

He emphasised it was only advisory and could not control the government of the day, and suggested “fearmongering” over the Voice’s potential advocacy on issues such as nuclear submarines was disingenuous.

The Cape York Institute leader, who was integral in the creation of the Voice concept, said both major parties had goodwill towards the proposal until December when the National Party revealed it would campaign against it.

“Politics has entered the fray,” Pearson argued, and “made it into something that questions have been raised about and unreasonable misinterpretations have been made about.”

“[Bipartisanship] broke when [Nationals leader David Littleproud], forced by [Price], decided suddenly late last year they would be opposing the Voice whereas previously they had supported it.”

“She’s obviously been a very compelling arguer in favour of the No case, in fact I think she set the policy for the National Party and the Liberals followed later.”

Marles, speaking on Sky News, said he was still positive about the referendum, saying the idea of creating a body to help consult with Indigenous people was something people supported when it was explained to them.

“I do feel optimistic about being able to see this referendum pass,” he said.

“There is an enormous amount of support.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/they-love-conflict-dutton-s-proposed-second-referendum-a-mirage-pearson-says-20230910-p5e3h0.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19523172

File: 8599c96f33df729⋯.jpg (347.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Far_right_wing_group_does_….jpg)

File: d127b5e3f6297cc⋯.jpg (531.12 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_far_right_nationalism_pr….jpg)

File: 9acd16f679488c5⋯.jpg (418.44 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_heavily_armed_young_man_….jpg)

File: 2149c06f5e9e3de⋯.jpg (79.89 KB,768x1024,3:4,Mugshot_of_serving_member_….jpg)

Extremists, Neo Nazi plot to infiltrate ADF, ASIO and Defence revealed

ASIO and the Australian Defence Force have detected an extremist plot to infiltrate military ranks and find more recruits. This is what we know about these extremists and their mission.

Charles Miranda - September 10, 2023

Extremists including neo-Nazis are attempting to join the military and or recruit some already within Australian Defence Force ranks in an alarming plot to push their destabilising agenda.

ASIO in concert with Defence has identified a rising number of individuals with “ideologically motivated extremism” either actively being groomed in their ranks or trying to join.

According to Defence sources, the move is to attain military training to boost their skill set “capabilities” although for what is not clear.

The revelation comes as in the UK a former soldier who escaped from prison had been facing charges of eliciting personal information from the Ministry of Defence Joint Personnel Administration System, breaching the Secrets Act and “likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism”.

In that case, the ex-soldier Daniel Abed Khalife, 21, was due to face trial in November before his dramatic escape from a south London jail by strapping himself to the underside of a delivery van. He was arrested Saturday near Chiswick in west London, and is in police custody.

The extremism rise in Australia has been linked to conspiracies borne from the Covid-19 pandemic and the emergence of anti-authority sovereign citizens, ultra right-wing nationalists and supremacists and their inciting anti-lockdown violence.

Defence has confirmed it was working closely with national security agencies.

“There is no place for unlawful or inappropriate association with groups or organisations that engage in advocacy for extremist ideology, extremist views, or criminal activity within the Australian Defence Force,” a spokeswoman said.

“Defence works closely with law enforcement and intelligence agencies to identify and counter threats to Defence and Defence personnel involving ideologically motivated extremism. All personnel have an obligation to report contact with these groups.”

The ADF has significantly bolstered recruitment vetting processes including intelligence sharing with ASIO to ensure they meet fit and proper standard tests.

Defence declined to say how many people had been identified either trying to join or within their ranks as no longer fit for service under extremist ideology parameters.

“Defence investigates and takes action when personnel are identified as being potentially involved in unlawful or inappropriate activities. This may include referring investigations to law enforcement and national security agencies,” the spokeswoman said.

ASIO did not respond to questions but it is known through parliamentary hearings that at least half the domestic security agency’s priority onshore caseload is related to the extreme right wing nationalist threat with the other half being religious-motivated extremism and terrorism.

On social media there are currently numerous former ADF members pushing extreme conspiracies encouraging Australians to take action against perceived State-sanctioned public injustices.

In one video posted online, a former Army officer claims State abuse of biometrics designed to expose truth telling “patriots” and enslave the public. On the same platform another former infantry soldier claims there is an Australian government and Defence plot around mRNA vaccines for May 2024, a civil war likelihood in the US and a real-life secret program of genetic manipulation being done to create an AI-controlled Army of “super soldiers” that he likens to the Hollywood military sci-fi action film franchise Universal Soldier starring Jean Claude van Damme.

Canberra University law school senior lecturer Carli Kulmar said the broad issue was significant, as it was in other Western countries.

“ASIO does a good job at vetting extremists trying to join the military but it doesn’t mean some don’t fall through the cracks or they can’t be radicalised while they are a (ADF) member and it is worrying when the call comes from inside the house, inside the military,” the right wing radicalism expert said.

“They are strategically targeted by extremist groups for their skills, their knowledge, their experience, their leadership and training so even if they are not going to play a specific part in something they can train people for it.”

Ms Kulmar said veterans were particularly vulnerable to coercion by extremists looking to add legitimacy to their cause, with former military standing at their shoulder, and offering the appeal of a new camaraderie.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/extremists-neo-nazi-plot-to-infiltrate-adf-asio-and-defence-revealed/news-story/fc9e9c52c82e8df5689261b945511999

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5645ac No.19523250

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e84c8b No.19524789

Twitter embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19518233

>Before this, McNamara had never worked with drones, which he says have completely changed the structure of modern warfare.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

fdb55c No.19525140

File: 51d2226bc9bb8f4⋯.png (403.99 KB,720x424,90:53,Screenshot_20230910_153211.png)

What is a legend?

Our map is wrong?!

South America is 9x larger than Greenland but yet Greenland is larger on the map than S.A.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19529127

File: 781076bc7c4e6cf⋯.jpg (287.2 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Resolve_polling_shows_the_….jpg)

File: 0e3ab1356407258⋯.jpg (302.38 KB,845x1097,845:1097,Yes_vote_support_by_state_….jpg)

File: b0c81b829184bc4⋯.jpg (253.36 KB,845x789,845:789,Voice_referendum_Yes_or_No….jpg)

>>19487613

>>19518077

Voters continue to turn against the Voice - and Albanese along with it

David Crowe - September 11, 2023

1/2

Support for the Indigenous Voice has slumped to 43 per cent after the opening week of the formal campaign for the referendum, with NSW and Victorian voters shifting against the proposal and putting it on track for defeat on October 14.

Voters have swung against the Voice for the fifth month in a row and are backing the No case in every state except Tasmania, despite a forceful campaign by Yes supporters to assure sceptical voters they had nothing to fear from the change.

An exclusive survey also shows that Labor has lost core support and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has suffered a fall in his net performance rating to minus 7 per cent, driving this measure into negative territory for the first time since the election.

Albanese retains a clear advantage over Opposition Leader Peter Dutton as preferred prime minister, ahead by 43 to 28 per cent, but this has narrowed from 46 to 25 per cent one month ago.

The survey, conducted for this masthead by Resolve Strategic, shows that 35 per cent of voters support the Voice and 49 per cent oppose it when asked about the government proposal for change, with another 16 per cent undecided.

The number of voters who say they would “definitely” vote No has increased from 33 to 37 per cent over the past month, while those who say they would “probably” vote No is steady at 12 per cent.

When asked a second question that only allows a Yes or No answer akin to the referendum, and using the exact wording put forward by the government, 43 per cent support the change and 57 per cent are opposed.

Voters have steadily hardened their objections to the Voice throughout the year, with the No vote swelling from 42 per cent in January to 47 per cent in May and 54 per cent in August before strengthening again this month on the “yes or no” question.

Resolve director Jim Reed said there were no signs that campaigning, including adopting You’re the Voice sung by John Farnham as the cause’s anthem, had boosted voter support for the change to the Constitution.

“If anything, the campaign is having the opposite effect because the No vote is still growing,” he said.

“The more people engage in the debate, and the more they consider the proposal, the more they are put off.

“The comments we collect from respondents are becoming more exasperated and frustrated in their tone as the campaign wears on. Many people seem impatient for this to be over, especially those who see it as a diversion or divisive.”

The Resolve Political Monitor surveyed 1604 eligible voters about the wording proposed by the government in the referendum bill passed by parliament to change the Constitution to recognise First Australians by establishing the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. The questions were asked from Wednesday to Saturday, days after the launch of the Yes advertising campaign using Farnham’s song, and the results have a margin of error of 2.4 percentage points.

While the national figures are based on the September survey, the state-by-state results combine the August and September surveys to build a bigger base of 3207 respondents and produce more reliable results for smaller states.

The No vote has gained ground in each state and is strongest in Queensland and Western Australia, with 61 per cent against the change, followed by South Australia (59 per cent against), NSW (56 per cent against) and Victoria (51 per cent against).

While the survey suggests Tasmania supports the change, with 56 per cent in favour and 44 per cent against, this is based on a small sample size to reflect the state’s relatively small population, leading to a bigger margin of error.

“Every poll has a margin of error, but we are sure of the national result being No and of the same result in four of the six states because they are outside that margin,” Reed said.

“The Yes campaign need four states to win, but we only have them ahead in one, [Tasmania] and it’s a result that we’re not certain about either.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19529129

File: a47414bab4c1e66⋯.jpg (204.13 KB,832x693,832:693,Federal_primary_vote_Septe….jpg)

File: 3fb8dbce08fef0f⋯.jpg (134.24 KB,845x770,169:154,Preferred_Prime_Minister_S….jpg)

>>19529127

2/2

Albanese, who returns to federal parliament on Monday after a week overseas at the G20 and other leadership summits, has assured Australians he is acting on domestic priorities such as the cost of living.

Voters cut their support for Labor from 37 to 36 per cent over the past month, while they increased the Coalition’s primary vote from 33 to 34 per cent.

The Greens increased their primary vote from 11 to 12 per cent, while support for independents slipped from 10 to 9 per cent.

While the changes in core support were all within the margin of error for the September survey, the Labor primary vote has fallen from 42 per cent since the May budget, while the Coalition primary vote has increased from 30 per cent over the same period.

When voters were asked about the prime minister’s performance, 40 per cent said he was doing a good job and 47 per cent said he was doing a poor job, with the remainder undecided. This resulted in a net performance rating of minus 7 per cent, down from a positive rating of 2 per cent one month ago. His net rating was 35 percentage points in January.

The trend has improved Dutton’s standing on this personal measure, with 35 per cent saying he was doing a good job and 43 per cent saying he was doing a poor job. This resulted in a net performance rating of minus eight per cent, compared to minus 17 percentage points in January.

Support for the Voice among Labor voters has fallen from 75 per cent in April to 69 per cent in May and 64 per cent in August, before slipping to 60 per cent in September.

Support has fallen slightly among Greens voters, with 81 per cent in favour in June but 78 per cent in favour in September, and it has fallen among Coalition voters from 26 per cent in June to 16 per cent in September. This means 84 per cent of Coalition voters are now on the No side.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/voters-continue-to-turn-against-the-voice-and-albanese-along-with-it-20230910-p5e3fy.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19529135

File: fa2d1a12b0dcacc⋯.jpg (141.95 KB,1150x805,10:7,Yes_advocate_Rodney_Dillon….jpg)

File: b1505399eaaa68f⋯.jpg (67.35 KB,1294x1073,1294:1073,Published_on_Monday_Resolv….jpg)

>>19529127

Tasmania the lone state in support of Voice - poll

Callan Morse - September 11, 2023

Tasmania is currently the only state with a majority in support of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament proposal, according to the Resolve Political Monitor survey, published in Nine newspapers on Monday.

With just under five weeks until polling day, 56 per cent of poll respondents in the island state said they were in support of the Voice, with 43 per cent against the proposal.

Speaking at a Yes23 event in southern Tasmania on Sunday, Tasmanian Elder and Yes campaigner Rodney Dillon said an unsuccessful referendum would equate to Australia accepting permanent disadvantage of Indigenous peoples.

"By having a 'No' vote I think that we're saying that it's OK for people to live 10 years less. It's OK for kids to stay in that prison system and become career criminals. It's OK for the housing standards of Aboriginals right around the country to stay like it is," he said.

The Aboriginal Heritage Council chair and Tasmanian Regional Aboriginal Communities Alliance (TRACA) co-founder said the Voice would be the "greatest step this country will make in my lifetime", saying he was not prepared to "keep accepting what happened in the past".

"This is a step towards us holding our hands and I've never always felt that," Mr Dillon said.

"That hand's not always been out, but at the moment that hand is out by all levels of government."

Tasmania is currently the only state in the country where the Liberal Party, Labor and the Greens are united in supporting the Voice.

Speaking at the same event, Tasmanian Greens senator Nick McKim said the referendum could be won or lost in Tasmania.

"This is a moment in history for our country where we can accept the generous offer made to us by Aboriginal Australians and recognise them in the constitution and take a significant, meaningful step forward along the pathway to bringing our country together," Senator McKim said.

Tasmanian senator and Palawa woman Jacqui Lambie said the government had "failed miserably" to provide detail and share positives of the Voice.

"Labor's done a really lousy job at selling this, to be brutally honest," Ms Lambie told Sky News.

In the same interview, Ms Lambie rejected the Opposition's pledge to hold a second referendum on constitutional recognition, labelling it a "brain fart".

Elsewhere in the country, support for the Voice as dipped with a shift against the Voice evident in Victoria and South Australia.

According to the Resolve poll, 49 per cent of Victorian respondents were in favour of the Voice, with 51 per cent against.

The No case was even stronger in South Australian, with 59 per cent against the Voice and 41 per cent in favour.

Whilst denying a failed referendum would sent a negative message to First Nations Australians, Nationals leader David Littleproud said the prime minister should split the referendum question to avoid dividing the nation.

"The message is that Australian people have come and they've decided that the proposition the prime minister has put forward to us isn't the proper way to unite our country or to actually close the gap," Mr Littleproud told reporters in Canberra.

Mr Littleproud said most people supported constitutional recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

"Many Indigenous Australians feel that view now and that's why I think it's wrong for Indigenous leaders who support 'yes' to … make generalised statements about how Indigenous Australians will feel," he said.

Queensland and Western Australia recorded their lowest state-based Yes poll result to date, with 39 per cent of respondents in favour and 61 per cent against in each jurisdiction.

New South Wales' No vote support also grew, with 56 per cent of respondents indicating a No preference with 44 per cent for the proposal.

Nationally, 57 per cent of the poll's 3207 respondents indicated a No stance on the Voice with 43 per cent in favour of the proposal.

There are 33 days remaining until referendum day.

https://nit.com.au/11-09-2023/7624/tasmania-the-sole-state-in-support-of-voice-poll

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19529150

File: a6bbde3274ee46e⋯.jpg (175.66 KB,1580x888,395:222,NSW_MP_Jason_Yat_sen_Li_le….jpg)

File: 9231e617a655d48⋯.jpg (1.09 MB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Karen_Mundine.jpg)

File: eadf882f7b28a1e⋯.jpg (395.72 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Yes23_spokeswoman_Karen_Mu….jpg)

>>19529127

Army of under-18 Yes campaigners hoping to turn referendum tide

ALEXI DEMETRIADI - SEPTEMBER 10, 2023

The Yes campaign is hoping an army of under-18 volunteers can help convince the adults in their lives to back the Indigenous voice, as support for No strengthens in the polls.

In Sydney’s inner city, mirrored across the country, students have learned the tricks of the trade in leafleting, door knocking and campaigning to try and convince swing voters to put a Yes on the ballot.

A vote, to their chagrin, they cannot cast themselves.

“We still have the power to talk to people around us about why they should vote Yes,” said 17-year-old Rosanna Cartwright, who is juggling her International Baccalaureate with door knocks and leafleting.

The youth drive – U18 For Yes23 – drew on Yes23’s materials, tweaking them for under-18 campaigners, and has since created a national platform for ­students across Australia to download the body of leaflets or register to volunteer.

Its Sydney-based group, however, is the first during the referendum to organise itself into a fully fledged youth-focussed Yes campaign arm, and launched on Sunday with the help of Yes23 spokeswoman Karen Mundine.

The cohort of under-18s hit the heavy-footfall spots across Sydney’s inner west, with specifically designed Yes materials for young campaigners.

The area has a high proportion of Asian migrants and Asian-Australians, and previous coverage highlighted referendum misinformation on popular community groups, such as WeChat.

“There’s a lot of misinformation out there, so we thought we could be a friendly face, talking to people about the importance of voting Yes,” Ms Cartwright said.

School captain Venkat Mallemala said he wanted to change people’s minds, and votes.

“We’ve still got an ability to use our own voice to support the voice, so I’ve talked with my friends, family, and even our teachers,” the 17-year-old said.

The initiative came after discussions within the local NSW MP’s youth advisory board, run by Jason Yat-sen Li.

“This shouldn’t be a ‘politicians campaign’, it should be authentic and community-driven,” the Strathfield Labor MP said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/army-of-under18-yes-campaigners-hoping-to-turn-referendum-tide/news-story/fe0f145154bb5ca7bdfffb480e98110d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19529155

File: 749d7de23538cad⋯.jpg (125 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_Fair_Australia_spokesman….jpg)

>>19529127

No campaign against an Indigenous voice to parliament stronger on TikTok while Yes23 targets Facebook, Instagram and Twitter

ROSIE LEWIS - SEPTEMBER 11, 2023

Opponents of an Indigenous voice to parliament say social media has been crucial in “levelling the playing field” at next month’s referendum, as new data shows the No campaign’s TikTok videos are most likely to reach young women in Australia’s biggest cities.

But the Yes campaign’s following on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are much larger than Fair Australia’s, with Yes23 insiders saying engagement on their posts was double that of the No camp’s.

“On social media platforms, we are reaching millions of Australians each week,” a Yes23 campaign spokeswoman said.

“On the ground, our 35,000 volunteers are out in force every day, at train stations, shopping centres, knocking on doors and holding community forums.”

Declaring Fair Australia’s TikTok videos were “no doubt putting pressure on the Yes campaign”, the No Camp clocked up nine million video views on the platform between August 24 and last Thursday and has been averaging one million views a day since the ­referendum date was announced by Anthony Albanese on ­August 30.

Analysis of Fair Australia’s TikTok engagement, obtained by The Australian, shows the biggest reach was to 18 to 24-year-olds (36.3 per cent) and 25 to 34-year-olds (27.5 per cent) and the videos were most likely being watched by voters in Sydney (26 per cent), Brisbane (20.2 per cent) and Melbourne (15.1 per cent).

More than half of the views (57.9 per cent) came from women and 42.1 per cent from men.

A Fair Australia spokesman said the voice referendum marked the first national campaign where the impact of online and social media had superseded traditional advertising channels.

“This includes TikTok, and there is no doubt that it has played a crucial role in levelling the playing field against the $100m advertising machine that is the Yes campaign,” he said.

“The vast majority of content is being viewed in Sydney and Brisbane. The audience is younger and more likely female. There is no doubt that this content is putting pressure on the Yes campaign. Their popular vote strategy relies on younger voters in big metro capitals – and this is exactly who is engaging with our content.”

The Yes camp strongly disputes its war chest will amount to anything near $100m.

While Fair Australia has 37,000 followers on TikTok compared to Yes23’s 3500, on Facebook Yes23 has 61,000 followers versus 34,000 for Fair Australia.

There are 41,000 Instagram ­accounts following Yes23 and 3900 following Fair Australia, while Yes23 has 15,500 Twitter followers and Fair Australia has 5800 followers.

A Fair Australia spokesman said TikTok was an “incredibly powerful” tool and tens of thousands of Australians were using the group’s content on their own channels and platforms.

“Organic content from our campaign is actually out performing paid content from the Yes campaign. This is allowing our paid advertising content to concentrate on the (No) battleground states (of Tasmania, South Australia, Queensland and Western Australia),” he said.

The No camp’s confidence in its digital campaign came as prominent Yes campaigner Noel Pearson said he wouldn’t believe a hand of friendship and reconciliation from Indigenous people “would be just slapped aside” by Australians.

“At this stage, I believe we still have the capacity to do the right thing. I tell you one thing though, I just don’t believe when the hand of friendship and reconciliation is ­extended from Indigenous people that at the end of the day, their love will be unrequited. I can’t believe that,” he told the ABC’s Insiders program, adding the Yes camp could “absolutely” still win.

“This unrequited love is my worst nightmare … We’re 3 per cent of the population. We are the most powerless people in the country, with the weakest political constituency in the country, but through persuasion and through argument and through constant campaigning, we’ve managed to make gains. We’re the underdog in this referendum but I still believe we can achieve victory.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/no-campaign-against-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-stronger-on-tiktok-while-yes23-targets-facebook-instagram-and-twitter/news-story/1b36011120c4818c90d07479c5aa7759

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19529197

File: 7dd33a26d51e39a⋯.jpg (189.05 KB,862x485,862:485,For_decades_the_Victorian_….jpg)

File: 6d38f8c7241028a⋯.jpg (2.23 MB,5000x3753,5000:3753,Kathleen_Foley_is_the_chai….jpg)

File: ac64de81b8ffe40⋯.jpg (751.23 KB,2043x1533,681:511,The_inquiry_is_examining_h….jpg)

File: 77f546cf6d54d91⋯.jpg (1.04 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,_We_ve_given_Foley_the_pow….jpg)

>>19505187

The case of paedophile William Landman shows why Daniel Andrews's inquiry won't 'go where it needs to go'

Russell Jackson - 11 September 2023

1/3

"The person who's running the inquiry … we've given to her the power to go where the evidence takes her."

So said Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews last Thursday, explaining the role Kathleen Foley SC will play in leading the government's recently-launched Board of Inquiry "into historical child sexual abuse in Beaumaris Primary School and certain other government schools".

Warning: This story contains details of child sexual abuse

In the case of Beaumaris Primary, where a cluster of paedophile teachers abused alarming numbers of children in the 1960s and 70s, the evidence is likely to take Foley and her inquiry on hellish journeys that sometimes end in cemeteries.

And to be clear, those who survived, the loved ones of those who didn't, and the brave few who ensured this inquiry is even taking place, certainly deserve its fullest attention and respect.

But on launch day, even the inquiry's title, trailing off into vagueness, already begged uncomfortable questions. "Certain other government schools"? Which ones? Any and all to which, using the premier's description of Foley's role, "the evidence takes her"?

To be blunt, probably not.

Even a cursory glance at the terms of reference, which Premier Andrews misidentified as "very broad", spelled out Foley's limited remit with crystal clarity. Presently, her inquiry is solely an examination of abuse perpetrated by the Beaumaris Primary offenders — at that school and 17 other government schools they were shuffled through — and the contemporaneous institutional responses to that particular abuse.

Never mind the painful, often traumatising legal ordeals such survivors have faced in recent years when they've sued the Victorian Education Department. The inquiry won't tackle those present-day indignities.

And never mind that the Beaumaris abuse represents a small fraction of the degradations inflicted on blameless children by the incalculable number of paedophile teachers who infiltrated Victoria's state school system in the 20th century. As it stands, those will go unexamined too.

On Thursday, Premier Andrews was asked about that bigger picture.

"They [the inquiry] can go where the evidence takes them," he repeated. "That's the way it was structured. But again, I just want to make this point, it was not for us to be naming a whole bunch of other schools. There needs to be evidence led, there needs to be a process."

Unfortunately for the premier and his education department, a mountain of evidence has already shown that child sexual abuse was rife in that "whole bunch of other schools". One law firm alone, Arnold Thomas Becker, says it is currently pursuing claims related to 70 Victorian government schools.

'It will go where it needs to go'

Two weeks ago, ABC Investigations revealed that the Victorian Education Department not only knew about the widespread sexual abuse of children in its schools in the 1960s, 70s and 80s, it spent at least three decades covering it up and enabling abusers.

It was a system personal injury lawyers have likened to the worst excesses of the Catholic Church.

The ABC's investigation revealed that recidivist child abusers often enjoyed 30-year teaching careers, being shuffled from school to school by the Victorian Education Department's district inspectors — even when whistleblowers begged for the horror to end. Instead, the so-called "boundary riders" of the system knowingly exposed generation after generation of children to life-changing abuse.

Even when paedophiles were removed from classrooms, we found, their employment terminations were often not accounted for in official statistics reported to the Victorian parliament. This means it is almost impossible to know how many sexually abusive teachers were sacked for their crimes. Hundreds of civil law suits suggest the true figure would be alarmingly high.

Since these details were revealed in their full depravity two weeks ago, ABC Investigations has been flooded with disclosures from survivors of government school abuse dating back to the early 1950s.

One was dismayed to learn that her abuser had enjoyed a 50-year teaching career. Many more wrote of emotional breakdowns, incurable addictions and lifelong traumas that have accompanied the loss of siblings and friends.

Others — the sort of people who never command media headlines — have simply soldiered on in silence. They are our parents, grandparents, siblings, neighbours, and friends.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19529203

File: 5f2b1c356dc63d6⋯.jpg (2.93 MB,3024x4032,3:4,Allegations_against_Willia….jpg)

File: eeff9a4b25ecb0d⋯.jpg (524.71 KB,1920x1440,4:3,Serial_paedophile_William_….jpg)

File: aa18c70c54241cc⋯.jpg (341.58 KB,1920x1440,4:3,Sources_familiar_with_Land….jpg)

>>19529197

2/3

We also heard from former teachers and Victorian Education Department staff who, when the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse was announced in 2012, had been prepared to lift the lid on what they'd witnessed. Only, they couldn't. To their dismay, the royal commission didn't examine a single case specifically related to abuse in the Victorian Education Department system.

These could-be whistleblowers outlined a system in which district inspectors and the department's regional managers protected their own, routinely dumping paedophile teachers into other regional districts where country children were treated as expendable.

Naturally, they now ask: 'what do I do with these stories if nobody wants to hear them?'

You wonder what such credible and well-meaning individuals would make of Premier Andrews's conclusion on Thursday that an inquiry into a mere handful of offenders will "go where it needs to go" and "look at the schools it needs to look at".

Such comments sit at odds with Premier Andrews's strong track record for confronting the problems that afflict survivors of institutional childhood sexual abuse. Even personal injury lawyers have commended his removal of longstanding time restrictions on abuse claims. Survivors whose advocacy campaigns have landed in his office testify to his personal decency.

But even as the state's debts mount, and Andrews's thoughts perhaps turn to leadership succession planning, he will continue to face calls for a dedicated, root and branch investigation of this avoidable travesty.

Because the simple fact is that even those who've spent years understanding the trail of devastation caused by child sexual abuse in the Victorian school system are constantly surprised by the shameful stories that keep emerging from the past.

Right now, Victoria has a $4.5 million inquiry whose small staff will be asked to untangle a web of horrors related to a single cluster of offenders. It would be ludicrous to expect it, in its current form, to examine possibly hundreds more and provide adequate support to survivors.

'The community will naturally feel outraged'

Among the more extraordinary stories brought to the attention of ABC Investigations in the past fortnight, but by no means exceptional, was that of a former Victorian Education Department teacher and headmaster named William Stuart Landman (sometimes spelled Landmann).

Landman's story receded from public view 45 years ago, but there was a brief period in which it must have shocked Melbourne. In October 1977, a particularly lurid front-page headline in local tabloid newspaper The Truth screamed: "Headmaster charged over girl pupils — 43 counts".

It detailed charges of wilful and obscene exposure, indecent assault, gross indecency and unlawful assaults. They were committed by Landman against more than a dozen girls aged eight to 11 years old in the course of just four months at Chelsea Primary, a Victorian government school in Melbourne's bayside south-east.

The Truth's reporter did not have much information to work with — the department's assistant director general A.T. Hird was quoted saying "it's a long-standing policy with the Education Department not to divulge any information about any of its teachers" — but he gathered some telling details: "Mr Landman is a relieving headmaster who works at various schools in Victoria" and "is on indefinite sick leave".

To say William Landman worked at "various schools" is a great understatement. Sources familiar with his case this week told ABC Investigations he was a sexual predator and incurable child abuser for most of his 34-year teaching career, but was shuffled all over the state regardless. Somehow, they say, Landman even assaulted children in a period when the Victorian Education Department assigned him correspondence teaching jobs to keep him away from classrooms.

One source said Landman's offending was common knowledge at the Victorian Education Department by 1960, when during a posting in the department's recruitment office, he was caught exposing himself to teenagers being interviewed for trainee teacher positions. For four years, Landman was given a position at the Turana youth justice centre, teaching Melbourne's most vulnerable.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19529217

File: 8cdd96d4e1c3f51⋯.jpg (444.79 KB,1998x1499,1998:1499,The_Victorian_Department_o….jpg)

File: 2be559955d9aece⋯.jpg (3.17 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Ribbons_tied_to_the_fence_….jpg)

File: 32937f9ad1ce899⋯.jpg (344.06 KB,1505x635,301:127,Counselling_and_support_se….jpg)

>>19529203

3/3

Public records indicate that between 1944 and 1959, Landman taught at the primary schools in Auburn, Auburn South, Deepdene, Malvern, South Melbourne, Mt Evelyn, Clarinda and Preston East.

After his time in the Department's recruitment division, Landman moved into the visual education branch in 1962, worked as a correspondence teacher between 1963 and 1971, at Turana from 1971 to 1974, and from 1974 at Moe Special School (now Baringa Special School). It was as a relieving headmaster that he landed at Chelsea Primary in 1977.

By the time of his conviction on 22 counts of child abuse in August 1978, William Landman's sentence of three and a half years with a minimum of 12 months was a landmark case in Victoria. In those days of discredited child witnesses and good behaviour bonds, jail time was considered severe punishment.

So too was the dressing down from Judge Ogden of Melbourne's County Court, who suggested the establishment of a specialised centre for treating "sexual deviants" like Landman.

According to one report, the court heard that Landman had "masturbated to the point of ejaculation in his headmaster's office in front of students who were either in the room or looking through the window" and indecently assaulted girls in the same room — assaults that a police source familiar with the case told ABC Investigations had been endured by the girls both alone and in pairs when they were regularly called into Landman's office.

Least surprising of all to those who knew of Landman's offending, Judge Ogden was "told by psychiatrists that Landmann had a 30-year history of disturbed and erotic behaviour and suffered from a complexity of sexual problems".

Judge Ogden concluded: "The community will naturally feel outraged at your behaviour."

Outraged, yes, but probably not aware of the most galling aspect of Landman's teaching career, which was that he never should have been let in a classroom at all.

This week, an ABC Investigations search of public records found that in 1944, when Landman was an 18-year-old trainee teacher bound by the supposedly strict regulations of the Victorian Education Department's 12-month probation system, he pleaded guilty to a charge of burglary.

Under the Registration of Teachers and Schools Act of the time, this surely would have qualified Landman for removal under a provision for those "guilty of conduct unbefitting a teacher". Two years later, the Teaching Service Act of 1946 was equally clear: the education minister should "dispense with the services of any student teacher for misconduct".

Yet, the Victorian Education Department simply waved Landman through, promoting him and shuffling him around the state for four decades until he became, for a time, the state's most infamous headmaster.

You might ask: "why does a story like this still matter?"

The simple answer is that the knock-on effects of such crimes are still being felt now; the youngest of Landman's government school victims are women in their mid-50s now, and their suffering should matter to all of us.

We should be asking another question: how many other children were abused by William Landman across his inexplicable career in Victorian government schools?

Sadly, without a dedicated inquiry that accounts for him and all the other William Landmans of the Victorian Education Department, we may never know.

Do you have more information about this story? Contact Russell Jackson at jackson.russell@abc.net.au

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-11/william-landman-reveals-narrow-scope-of-sex-abuse-inquiry/102834468

https://www.gazette.vic.gov.au/gazette/Gazettes2023/GG2023S339.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19529255

File: f18adb986ec696b⋯.jpg (347.29 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Catholic_Archbishop_of_Per….jpg)

File: 4d93969151efec1⋯.jpg (222.42 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Archbishop_Timothy_Costell….jpg)

File: 567b37b30f48c80⋯.jpg (1.86 MB,3923x2616,3923:2616,Archbishop_Timothy_Costell….jpg)

File: 4765b4f5b8a81a0⋯.jpg (342.71 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Barbara_Blayney_says_the_c….jpg)

Roman Catholic Archbishop Tim Costelloe fronts WA parliamentary inquiry into institutional child sexual abuse

Briana Shepherd and Keane Bourke - 11 September 2023

1/2

The difficulties survivors of child sexual abuse face when attempting to pursue justice is a reality of complexities of the church, the Catholic Archbishop of Perth says.

Timothy Costelloe made the statements while testifying before the Community Development and Justice Standing Committee's inquiry into the options available to survivors of institutional child sexual abuse in Western Australia who are seeking justice.

He also rejected claims that he was trying to evade responsibility of being "dishonest" in his communication on the issue.

Described variously as a "war of attrition" and an "attempt to break you down", survivors have spoken of unnecessarily long delays in legal proceedings and unreasonable demands for information.

Archbishop Costelloe, who has been the Catholic Archbishop of Perth since 2012 and gave evidence at the 2017 Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, began with an apology and a pledge.

"I wanted to take this opportunity to repeat again, on behalf of the church I lead in the Archdiocese of Perth, my sincere apology to those who have been so badly wronged by members of the Catholic Church," he said.

"I continue to be horrified by the extent of this abuse in Catholic institutions and am personally shamed by the failure of so many of our leaders to respond with compassion and integrity.

"The safety and wellbeing of children and young people in Catholic settings is now a fundamental priority for us all."

After his opening statement, the archbishop was questioned at length over reports from survivors as to the difficulty they have faced when attempting to deal with the Catholic Church, be it finding information or attempting to begin legal action.

Archbishop Costelloe responded to the many questions of this nature by firstly highlighting that the Catholic Church was a complex organisation, and by pointing out that his jurisdiction did not extend across the whole state.

"[I want to] just reiterate if I may that each diocese — and there are four in Western Australia, about 30 around the country — is headed up by a bishop," he said.

"Every bishop is directly responsible to the Holy See, so we don't have a structure of a national church or a national leader of the church in Australia.

"The reality of the church is much more complex than people appreciate and that's not to make any excuse for it, it is the reality."

When asked his thoughts on how a survivor may feel re-traumatised when seeking justice only to be told they had not come to the right place, or to have someone tell the survivor it was someone else's responsibility, Archbishop Costelloe responded in a similar vein.

"I'm not trying to hide anything, or evade responsibility, I'm trying to explain how I operate within the reality of where I find myself," he said.

"I reject the suggestion that I am being dishonest or insincere in anything I've said about my commitment to this issue.

"I belong to the church and must operate within the reality of the church, we may or may not like the reality of the way the church is structured, I can't change it, I have to operate within it.

"I'm doing that to best of my ability and really want to say strongly I do not accept I'm being dishonest, insensitive or in any way unresponsive."

Archbishop Costelloe said the WA Professional Standards Office was the appropriate body for first contact for survivors, but conceded it might not be well enough known, and highlighted the church's improved accountability.

"Through our safeguarding program here in the Archdiocese of Perth, and through the establishment of Australian Catholic Safeguarding Limited at the national level, stringent protocols have been adopted and embedded in the way in which the Catholic Archdiocese of Perth operates," he said.

"Our compliance with these protocols will be regularly audited and the results made public.

"As a result, church authorities will now operate with full accountability to the Catholic community and the community at large."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19529263

File: 6fbc34b699d6306⋯.jpg (1.37 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Dave_Kelly_says_he_never_g….jpg)

File: 68db50ca1b3f3fd⋯.jpg (382.36 KB,1859x1239,1859:1239,Jarrod_Luscombe_wants_to_s….jpg)

File: dbd5e28068fb2e1⋯.jpg (257.72 KB,1000x787,1000:787,If_you_or_anyone_you_know_….jpg)

>>19529255

2/2

A 'person-centred' approach

Barbara Blayney is the head of the Archdiocese of Perth's safeguarding office and told the inquiry her office implements a national trauma-informed strategy to dealing with survivors and victims.

When asked if they sought feedback from survivors who took part in developing the protocol, Ms Blayney said there was a feedback mechanism within the website, but said they had not reached out to individual survivors to ask that particular question.

Labor's member for Bassendean and former government minister, Dave Kelly, then posed a question to the archbishop based on a personal experience.

"I became aware [in a 2013 newspaper article] of a paedophile at my school, which was Christian Brothers College Fremantle … a brother called Father Danny McMahon," Mr Kelly told the inquiry.

"The article had talked about abuse at Aquinas and Trinity and knowing, from my experience that he'd taught when I was at CBC Fremantle, I wrote to the school saying 'this guy taught at our school, what are you going to do about potential victims there?'

"A couple of months later he [the principal] said my complaint had been referred to the professional standards office, that was in July of 2013.

"I've never received any correspondence from the professional standards office with my inquiry about Brother Danny McMahon.

"So, from talking to victims, they're not particularly impressed by the service they get from the professional standards office and from my own experience … I've never received a response, is there any reason for that?"

Archbishop Costelloe said he was not aware of that issue so could not respond directly but said he would think the church's processes had been improving over time.

"Remembering of course … that CBC Fremantle is not under the authority of the archdiocese, it's under the authority of the Christian Brothers," he said.

"I'm not trying to avoid responsibility, but I feel obliged, also for the sake of those who have suffered at the hands of the church, to be clear about who must accept responsibility for these things."

Survivors struggling to navigate system

Jarrod Luscombe is engaged in civil proceedings over his abuse by McMahon, who is now deceased, when he was a schoolboy and sat through the archbishop's testimony.

He helped members of the Perth-based group Survivors of Child Abuse prepare their submissions for the inquiry.

"Working with the survivors, a lot of them are struggling through these core processes," he told media outside of the inquiry.

"So how do we try and advocate on behalf [of them] when there are hundreds of different Catholic entities that we need to contact to ensure that they actually abide by their own guidelines, which they're not doing."

He said there were several initiatives he and other survivors wanted to see implemented.

"I think initially would be to ensure that the Catholic Church actually abide by the model litigant guidelines," he said.

"We would definitely like to see the district court be able to fast track and expedite some of these cases.

"There are a number of support services as well that survivors desperately need, so one of the submissions with the Catholic Church was a co-funded victim support scheme.

"We also need to fully understand the complex nature of complex PTSD."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-11/catholic-archbishop-perth-timothy-costelloe-inquiry-sexual-abuse/102839592

An inquiry into the options available to survivors of institutional child sexual abuse in Western Australia who are seeking justice

https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Parliament/commit.nsf/(InqByName)/C759C87000EEB37E482589D600029F5A

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19534922

File: 451a92e3bd2fd56⋯.jpg (250.95 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_Tasmanian_Liberal_P….jpg)

>>19493306

>>19529127

Voice ‘can be refined’, Noel Pearson tells Indigenous No groups

MATTHEW DENHOLM and PAIGE TAYLOR - SEPTEMBER 11, 2023

Local Aboriginal groups should not assume their state will have only two representatives on the voice to parliament, with “ample opportunity” to “refine” its design, says Indigenous leader Noel Pearson.

The prominent Yes campaigner on Monday urged Indigenous groups not to oppose the voice out of concern its size or voting system would disenfranchise them, as its final form was yet to be decided.

“I would just urge our people to not put the cart in front of the horse – there will be ample opportunity to get the design right after the referendum,” the Cape York leader said, as he rallied the Yes campaign in Tasmania.

“There’s concern all over the country that the process of generating the legalisation (to create the voice) gives people the opportunity to build an optimal design for the voice.

“I believe there’ll be great opportunity to do that. We’ll be able to refine the design of the voice following the referendum. Ultimately, it’s parliament that settles the design of the voice.”

Several Indigenous groups in Tasmania – which Mr Pearson said was “absolutely key” to a national Yes vote - oppose the voice largely out of fear they will be outvoted by others and lose the ear of governments.

The Tom Calma-Marcia Langton national voice model has as few as two voice representatives per state.

As well as stressing the chance to “refine” this model, Mr Pearson urged local Indigenous groups to consider the opportunity for a series of local voices at the state or regional level.

“I’m concerned about Cape York and that our communities in Cape York are properly represented at the community level to get their issues addressed,” he said.

“Some of the issues need to be taken to Brisbane and some of the issues need to be taken to Canberra. Same here (in Tasmania).

“Footprints of local voices are crucial to get people to understand ‘oh, that is how I fit into this opportunity’. It’s not just the two people who go to the national voice in Canberra.”

Uluru Dialogue campaigner Geoff Scott, a Wiradjuri man from Narromine, said he could see a scenario in which hundreds of Indigenous people were part of the voice or consulted about its work at regular forums.

“We had 1300 people contribute to the Uluru Statement from the Heart and I don‘t think we should be afraid of that number,” Mr Scott said. ”It’s about ensuring local voices get heard in the corridors of power.”

Mr Scott also backed local and regional voices, as well as a national voice, similar to the Calma-Langton proposal, presented to the Morrison government in 2021.

“In some respects the hard work starts after the people give us the mandate,” he said. ”We all have to come up with something that suits the needs of communities.”

Constitutional lawyer Gabrielle Appleby acknowledged concerns among Indigenous Australians about how the voice would represent them.

Professor Appleby, whose work on the voice has included presenting to Anthony Albanese‘s expert constitutional panel, described the lack of detail about the voice as a “very deliberate constitutional choice“.

“There are many sound reasons for constitutional brevity,” she said. These included decreasing the likelihood of judicial reviews, as well as” preserving flexibility for changing circumstances”.

“For First Nations people for example, this issue is raised acutely with respect to the determination of membership of those who serve on the voice, and the genuine concerns that some hold that the membership must be selected by and represent local communities,” she said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/voice-can-be-refined-noel-pearson-tells-indigenous-no-groups/news-story/6abbc2b8a8e0394bfb6d1f9883f65de6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19534951

File: c545022532f54f9⋯.jpg (245.38 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Fair_Australia_No_campaign….jpg)

>>19446073 (pb)

>>19529127

No campaign’s ‘fear, doubt’ strategy revealed

"Paul Sakkal - September 12, 2023''

1/2

The campaign to sink the Voice has instructed volunteers to use fear and doubt rather than facts to trump arguments used by the Yes camp.

In an online training session, the national campaigning chief for leading No activist group Advance, Chris Inglis, detailed the anti-Voice movement’s core strategy of playing on voters’ emotions.

Inglis instructed volunteers not to identify themselves upfront as No campaigners as they make hundreds of thousands of calls to persuadable voters, but instead to raise reports of financial compensation to Indigenous Australians if the Voice referendum were to succeed.

“When reason and emotion collide, emotion always wins. Always wins,” he said as he displayed the same quote from US psychology professor Drew Westen, author of The Political Brain.

The No case is now leading in several national polls ahead of the October 14 referendum. The latest RPM poll, published on Monday, shows support for the Indigenous Voice slumping to 43 per cent, with voter sentiment swinging against the constitutional amendment in every state except Tasmania.

Inglis explained at the meeting on Monday, August 28, that the No camp’s job was to make people suspicious of the Voice and its backers, while the Yes campaign continued to cite academic arguments and documents such as the Uluru Statement.

“This is the difference between facts and figures or the ‘divisive Voice’,” the long-time Liberal Party staffer said. “That feeling of uncertainty, of fear or doubt, that stays. That lasts for a very, very long time.

“I’m going to hammer in a lot of this emotive language.

“If you took everything that I had just said and turned it into one little thing, this is what you should write down and remember forever so you can tell your kids, tell your grandkids, tell your nephews and nieces: that people vote based on how they feel.”

Advance runs the leading No campaign Fair Australia, which is aligned with the Coalition’s Indigenous Australians spokeswoman, Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price.

Advance was started in 2018 as a conservative counterweight to GetUp and counts former prime minister Tony Abbott on its advisory board. It claims it has a 250,000-strong supporter base fighting “woke politicians and elitist activist groups … taking Aussies for a ride with their radical agenda”.

It is not suggested that either Price or Abbott endorses the coaching methods outlined in the training session run by Inglis.

Scripts used by Advance’s 10,000-strong network of phone campaigners show how they are taught not to introduce themselves as calling from “the No campaign”.

Instead, they are asked to sound as if they were concerned citizens associated with Fair Australia who “heard” the Voice would push for financial compensation for Aboriginal people.

“It’s been designed purely for soft voters. If we had put [No] in the opening line … that in itself will scare people, right?” Inglis told volunteers.

“It’s not from the ‘No campaign’ … Fair Australia’s soft, it’s calming.”

The script states: “I’ve also heard that some of the people who helped design the Voice proposal are campaigning to abolish Australia Day and want to use the Voice to push for compensation and reparations through a treaty. All of these things raised a few questions in my mind and made me wonder if there was more to it all than meets the eye”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19534954

File: 0c37ad1d886710b⋯.jpg (205.93 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Jacinta_Price_and_husband_….jpg)

>>19534951

2/2

Inglis told supporters that phone canvassing – using a tool called CallHub employed by successful campaigns in Europe and the United States – was integral to Advance’s efforts.

If 250 people attend a phone calling session, Inglis said, they could reach 15,000 so-called “soft” voters yet to make a firm decision.

Inglis, a former ACT Liberal staffer, said in the briefing that he had worked on state and federal election campaigns for about 12 years.

His briefing outlined Advance’s “three-wave plan” through Fair Australia to defeat the Voice.

The strategy was first deployed in autumn, when No campaigners started raising awareness of the Voice as an issue of concern.

In winter, the conservative activists began talking about the “Voice of division”.

As referendum day nears, the Fair Australia campaign has begun discussing the consequences of voting Yes and asking Australians to act by rejecting the proposal.

A Fair Australia spokesman said the volunteer briefing was standard practice across all sides of politics and the campaign’s messaging reflected the actual concerns of voters.

“We make no apologies for our volunteers being as persuasive as they possibly can be,” he said.

“Every single volunteer is asked to identify themselves as calling from Fair Australia, and any suggestion to the contrary is a flat-out lie.

“Yes campaign supporters have nothing better to do but deceptively infiltrate our campaign and provide potentially illegal recordings to left-leaning news outlets. We will be referring the matter to the federal police and taking further advice.”

Price’s office was contacted to comment on Advance’s strategies.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s office declined to comment.

This masthead previously reported that senior members of the Liberal Party are wary of Advance’s ability to radicalise the party’s membership base. The Liberals have made sure the party’s databases and resources are not shared with Advance during the Voice campaign.

Last month, The Australian detailed a cheat sheet for Yes volunteers seeking to shift sentiment through phone calls, instructing them to “name the villain, or unfair barrier, including who or what is harming us and why – pick a villain that most people dislike or distrust”.

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney said in June that she feared the No campaign had imported “American-style Trump politics to Australia”.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/no-campaign-s-fear-doubt-strategy-revealed-20230910-p5e3fu.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19534980

File: 1a8b11436519e93⋯.mp4 (3.93 MB,960x540,16:9,Marcia_Langton_accuses_No_….mp4)

File: 0790eb34749cdd2⋯.jpg (239.12 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prominent_voice_campaigner….jpg)

File: ef842e7319f11f3⋯.jpg (306.35 KB,1170x1648,585:824,The_front_page_of_the_Bunb….jpg)

>>19529127

Claims made by No voice case based on racism, stupidity: Marcia Langton

JOE KELLY and ROSIE LEWIS - SEPTEMBER 12, 2023

Indigenous leader Marcia Langton says No campaigners in the voice referendum are using racist tactics but she doesn’t believe the majority of Australians are racist, after comments she made at the weekend sparked outrage.

The Bunbury Herald reported on Tuesday that Professor Langton told a forum on Sunday: “Every time the No cases raise their arguments, if you start pulling it apart you get down to base racism – I’m sorry to say that’s where it lands – or sheer stupidity.”

Deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley demanded Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney condemn the comments, which she said “accused No voters of opposing the referendum because of ‘base racism … or sheer stupidity’, but Professor Langton told Nine newspapers she was not calling No voters racist and stupid.

“I’m saying the claims being made by the No case are based in racism and stupidity – and appeal to racism and stupidity,” Professor Langton told Nine.

“And they are appealing to Australians to frighten them into adopting highly racist and stupid beliefs.

“I am not a racist, and I don’t believe that the majority of Australians are racist. I do believe that the no campaigners are using racist tactics.”

The Australian has obtained a recording of the forum, in which Professor Langton says: “Every time the No case raises one of their arguments, if you start pulling it apart you get down to base racism – I’m sorry to say that’s where it lands – or sheer just stupidity.”

The Bunbury Herald reported that the forum was attended by a crowd of about 100 people at the ECU South West campus and that Professor Langton was joined by Labor state MP, Don Punch.

ECU has informed The Australian that the voice referendum open forum held at the university’s South West campus on Sunday was not an ECU event.

The Australian has been told it was instead co-ordinated by Mr Punch’s office.

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Price – a leading campaigner for the No case – said the comments provided an “insight into the mindset and agenda of the Aboriginal activists pushing the divisive voice.”

She warned the remarks from Professor Langton would be highly offensive to about half the nation.

“Whichever way the referendum goes, the result looks like it will be extremely close and any suggestion no voters who are unpersuaded by their proposed voice are siding with racism or stupidity is highly offensive to at least half the country.”

The comments from Professor Langton clashed with Noel Pearson who told ABC radio in Hobart on Tuesday that it was imperative to answer questions from opponents of the voice with “respect” in a bid to win over undecided and soft No voters.

“There’s a great swag of Australians who still are undecided or soft in their No or soft in their Yes,” Mr Pearson said. “I’m finding that as long as we treat their questions and concerns with respect and we attend the outstanding questions they have in their minds I find that people are willing to listen to the answers and people are willing to contemplate changing their position once they have a greater understanding, a clear understanding of what we’re doing with this referendum. So, it’s ours to win.”

But Mr Pearson also said the referendum would be “a test of our democracy, because the real question, I think the big question is, can hope and belief and optimism triumph over fear and anger?”

“You know, that’s a real question for us in this social media age, in the modern democratic age, can a campaign of positivity for the future prevail against a headwind, an absolute raging storm of fear and anger.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/no-voters-branded-racist-stupid-by-prominent-voice-campaigner-marcia-langton/news-story/62a442a2903abb9a5b7e2ee377f1d4e7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19534996

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19529127

>>19534980

WATCH: Marcia Langton labels No voters ‘racist, stupid’ in exclusive footage

Sky News Australia

Sep 12, 2023

Sky News host Sharri Markson has obtained exclusive footage of prominent Voice campaigner Marcia Langton accusing Australians voting No in the referendum of “base racism” or “sheer stupidity”.

The professor’s controversial comments were made during a forum hosted by Edith Cowan University after being asked why so many Australians were undecided on the referendum.

“Every time the No cases raise their arguments, if you start pulling it apart you get down to base racism - I’m sorry to say that’s where it lands - or sheer stupidity,” Professor Langton said.

“If you look at any reputable fact-checker, every one of them says the No case is substantially false. They are lying to you.”

Ms Markson obtained the footage after the professor’s comments were splashed on the front page of the Bunbury Herald on Tuesday.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmi2wiib-uE

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19535062

File: cc89d83d0e19011⋯.jpg (154.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Opposition_Indigenous_Aust….jpg)

File: 63d8c5efd8872b0⋯.jpg (167.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Psychiatrist_Jillian_Spenc….jpg)

>>19199832 (pb)

Opposition Indigenous Affairs spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says ‘women are under attack’

SARAH ISON - SEPTEMBER 11, 2023

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says pushing back against the transgender movement and its impact on children will be among her next priorities after the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum.

Speaking at an event hosted by Liberal senator Alex Antic that featured speakers including Katherine Deves and Moira Deeming, Senator Price said the parliamentary inquiry into gender-affirming care – which refers to medical treatments used to transition people to the gender of their choosing – proposed by One Nation Leader ?Pauline Hanson should not have been left to “a conscience vote”.

“In the Senate, we had an opportunity to vote for an inquiry into gender-affirming treatments for children. It should never have been a conscience vote because this issue speaks to the human rights of our most vulnerable, and that is our children,” Senator Price told the small group gathered in Parliament House.

“This debate, this argument, the way it’s being played out, the way in which women are now under attack for standing up for the vulnerable, for standing up for children, is so many steps backward to where we’ve come to fight for our rights as women.”

The topic of transgender rights has become a political flashpoint over the past two years, with Ms Deeming suspended from the Victorian Liberal party room following her appearance at a Let Women Speak rally in March.

At the 2022 federal election, Scott Morrison sought to bring the transgender issue into focus by selecting Ms Deves as the Liberal candidate for Warringah.

Senator Price said women such as Ms Deves and Ms Deeming were “brave” and had been “thrown under the bus” in expressing concerns for women’s rights being impinged upon by transgender women.

“That sends a message to our vulnerable women, women who don't come from Western cultures, that they aren’t important, that their voices don’t matter,” she said.

“If you can have a movement that has seen to provide equal rights and opportunity and respect for women in Western culture … suddenly be overturned and go backward, well, that leaves our most vulnerable in a more marginalised position.

“That puts us further behind the eight-ball.”

Asked if she would take up the issue following her campaign against the voice to parliament, Senator Price said it went “hand in hand” with her portfolio, particularly regarding issues facing marginalised Indigenous women.

“It’s definitely up there in the list of priorities,” she said.

Senator Antic’s event was heavily policed, and organisers claimed they had received credible death threats.

Disallowed entry, the National Union of Students, LGBTQI+ advocates and Greens MPs protested outside Parliament House.

Greens LGBTQI+ spokesman Stephen Bates said the speakers were “fearmongers” and peddled transphobia.

“There is no line these people won’t cross,” he said. “They’re hellbent on taking us back decades on LGBTIQA+ and women’s rights.”

Ms Deves told the event on Tuesday morning the resolve of women who were critical of transgender rights had been “strengthened” and “galvanised” by the backlash they had faced from some sections of society.

“The apparatuses of the state, the courts, disciplinary processes, and quasi-judicial bodies may be weaponised against those of us who refuse to acquiesce to a movement that is determined to erase us as a legal sex class,” she said.

Psychiatrist Jillian Spencer, who has launched a complaint with the Queensland Human Rights Commission over her inability to object on medical grounds to gender-affirming treatments, said there needed to be a federal independent body set up to determine “what interventions are safe to be delivered to children, at what age and under what circumstances”. She said children who were “vulnerable and confused” were presenting at gender clinics and being pushed into gender transitioning as a “way forward to happiness”.

Dr Spencer, who appeared on Seven’s controversial Spotlight episode, said public health services were “still requiring all their staff to affirm children and to recommend these risky interventions”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/opposition-indigenous-affairs-spokeswoman-jacinta-nampijinpa-price-says-women-are-under-attack/news-story/32b7ec599e714c6d8b88abbc2f685d33

The Gender Agenda: De-Transitioning Full Episode | 7NEWS Spotlight

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgW_xtIcpew

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19535089

File: 9310dbfcf447040⋯.jpg (247.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_top_gun_pilot_Danie….jpg)

File: aec91ee94356d2f⋯.jpg (372.01 KB,1080x1441,1080:1441,Former_US_fighter_pilot_Da….jpg)

>>19226522 (pb)

>>19237940 (pb)

Top gun Daniel Duggan, seeks documents showing why he was deemed a high-risk inmate

ELLEN WHINNETT and LIAM MENDES - SEPTEMBER 11, 2023

The former US top gun accused of training Chinese military pilots has gone to court seeking to find out why he was initially deemed an “extreme high-risk restricted’’ prisoner, a designation usually­ ­reserved for terrorists.

Daniel Edmund Duggan has two appeals lodged with the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal seeking documents from NSW prison authorities.

The Australian citizen is trying to ascertain why he received such a high-level designation when he was first detained after being ­apprehended on a provisional ­arrest warrant last October.

He does not face any charges in Australia but the US is seeking to extradite him to face charges ­alleging he helped train Chinese fighter pilots, and for money-laundering.

The indictment relates mainly to his activities training Chinese pilots through a South African flying academy during a short-term contract more than 10 years ago.

The US alleges the academy was a front group for China, training People’s Liberation Army ­pilots, and that Mr Duggan’s training breached US laws related to the exporting of defence services.

Mr Duggan denies any wrongdoing, and his supporters say the pilots he trained were civilians.

Mr Duggan, a father of six, was arrested by the Australian Federal Police at the request of the US in his NSW hometown of Orange last year and initially detained at the Bathurst Correctional Centre in maximum security.

According to a timeline prepared by the International Commission of Jurists, headed in Australia by former NSW director of public prosecutions Nicholas Cowdery, the NSW Commissioner of Corrective Services ­approved Mr Duggan’s designation of “extreme high-risk ­restricted’’ inmate a week after he was taken into custody. He was later transferred to the Metropolitan Remand and ­Reception Centre at Silverwater, Sydney, on December 1.

On December 16, his interim extreme high-risk designation was revoked, although he was not advised until he received a letter on January 17. In March he was moved to the Lithgow Correctional Centre.

Mr Duggan is strongly resisting being extradited to the US and his legal team continues to seek documents relating to his security designation. His appeals’ next hearing is listed for September 25.

“The proceedings listed before the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal are a current matter between Mr Duggan and the ­Department of Communities and Justice, a department spokeswoman said. “It would be inappropriate to provide comment about ongoing legal matters.’’

The federal Attorney-General’s office, which is involved in the extradition request, said section 53 of the Extradition Act 1988 stipulated that persons held in extradition custody are subject to the prison conditions and treatment of the relevant state or territory.

“Accordingly, decisions about Mr Duggan’s classification and prison conditions are made by, and are a matter for, Corrective Services NSW,’’ a spokeswoman said. “Decisions regarding classification and prison conditions are separate from the extradition request for Mr Duggan, which is a matter for the Attorney-General’s Department.’’

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/top-gun-daniel-duggan-seeks-documents-showing-why-he-was-deemed-a-highrisk-inmate/news-story/41b59c4533993e9234282fb0b2ffa0b0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19541754

File: a5640976eb5d2d6⋯.jpg (309.98 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Marcia_Langton_addresses_t….jpg)

File: 6327526060ea14b⋯.jpg (131.28 KB,1280x720,16:9,Clinton_Apologizes_for_Cal….jpg)

>>19529127

>>19534980

>>19534996

Does Marcia Langton’s dismissal of No case signal the death knell of the Indigenous voice?

DENNIS SHANAHAN - SEPTEMBER 13, 2023

Will Marcia Langton’s dismissal of the referendum No case as either “base racism or sheer stupidity” be the Indigenous voice’s campaign death knell as was Hillary Clinton’s dismissal of Donald Trump’s supporters as a “basket of deplorables” in her US Presidential election campaign?

Will it be seen as Mark Latham’s aggressive handshake of a much older John Howard during the dying days of the 2004 election campaign?

It is too early judge, just as the full extent of Clinton’s gaffe was not recognised until later, but, as the Yes campaign for the Indigenous Voice to Parliament flounders, loses momentum and is given up for being lost there cannot have been a worse intervention.

If the referendum fails there will be fingers pointed to the statements of the Yes supporter and architect of indigenous voice proposals on Sunday as an emotional turning point just as was Clinton’s dismissal of at least half of Trump’s supporters.

This will be especially the case if Yes campaigners are looking for someone to blame for the failure.

In all campaigns there can be a “turning point” or an emotional moment when a large body of voters is insulted and repelled and either changing the course of the campaign or confirming a trend.

There is no doubt the trend has been away from the Yes campaign and toward the No campaign as the months of preparations and process have progressed for the referendum model for an indigenous voice to Parliament and executive government.

Even Langton herself, while arguing there can still be victory because of the number of undecided voters, last week was talking about the need for a clear agenda from the government “as soon as possible”.

In the absence of substantive debate and detail the entire referendum debate sparked and spiralled from trivialities, gaffes, invective and insults from both sides for the months leading to the start of the formal campaign on Monday.

Bitterness has grown as the campaign has progressed with indigenous leaders trading barbs, politicisation of arguments, ubiquitous claims of misinformation, disinformation and lies, and enthusiastic “gotchas” from both sides for moments of lowering of the tone of the debate.

But, base racism is about as low as the tone can go.

What’s more, it’s not just the insult that damages the Yes campaign but also alienates potential “soft No” voters – the very target of last resort for the Yes campaign – and with only entrench opposition and hard decisions to vote no.

There are plenty of problems for the Yes campaign, but the direct accusation of base racism and its immediate impact on the political debate in parliament has to rate as one of the biggest and could well be seen as Clinton’s “deplorables” moment or that handshake.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/does-marcia-langtons-dismissal-of-no-case-signal-the-death-knell-of-the-indigenous-voice/news-story/bca069443342fef37b6416ebac4d1678

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19541800

File: 9303ac2b6c4f93c⋯.mp4 (3.4 MB,960x540,16:9,Professor_Marcia_Langton_c….mp4)

File: 0ce9bc1b8b8ca33⋯.jpg (228.93 KB,Prominent_Yes_campaigner_M….jpg)

>>19529127

>>19534980

>>19534996

Indigenous voice to parliament: Marcia Langton has no one to blame but herself

DENNIS SHANAHAN - SEPTEMBER 13, 2023

It is easy to understand why Marcia Langton is seeking to play down and clarify her comments about the No campaign against the referendum for an Indigenous voice to parliament being built on “base racism” or “sheer stupidity” – she has created a furore which is damaging the Yes campaign and for which she will be blamed.

And, she has no one to blame but herself.

Langton’s comment at a Yes campaign event on Sunday: “Every time the No case raises one of their arguments, if you start pulling it apart you get down to base racism – I’m sorry to say it but that’s where it lands – or just sheer stupidity” is now central to the tone, substance and success of the referendum campaign.

Langton has sought to explain away the commentary, put a sympathetic spin on her words, gone on the attack and distract from the core argument that she has used her leading position as a Yes campaigner to label the No campaign as racist and stupid and infer those who want to vote No are accepting racist and stupid arguments.

“I certainly was not calling No voters racist but I was explaining very carefully to the woman who asked me the question how their fear tactics worked,” she told ABC on Wednesday.

Labor ministers were scrambling in media interviews to back Langton’s explanation and adopt the traditional political tactic of attacking the media, the opposing side and accusing the No campaign or its supporters of racism.

The problem for Langton is that she has dropped an incendiary claim into a febrile political atmosphere which is directly working against the latter-day Yes campaign tactics of treating No voters with respect and seeking to claw back failing support from so-called “soft No voters”.

Langton is a respected campaigner for Indigenous rights, a forceful academic and lawyer who is true to herself and has never taken prisoners.

But, she is not a politician used to campaigning and has unleashed a furore which will only serve to strengthen opposition to the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government and has provided political ammunition to Peter Dutton and the Coalition.

At the very beginning of the formal five-week referendum campaign Langton has brought the spotlight on herself and created collateral damage for Anthony Albanese and his ministers who are being called upon to “condemn” the “base racism” epithet.

Outside an election campaign a leading advocate may be able to downplay the significance of politically dangerous remarks, even if they can’t deny them as Langton can’t in this instance. But within the intensity of what is an increasingly bitter and personal campaign for want of real argument, there is no escape.

In 2019 the then NSW Labor opposition leader Michael Daley was caught on video and audio – as was Langton until it was taken down from a Labor MP’s website – at the beginning of the election campaign declaring that Sydney people were being forced out of the city and foreigner – “mainly Asian” – were taking their jobs.

Labor’s campaign never recovered and Daley’s remark was blamed for the loss.

This is how tough and unforgiving an election campaign can be and Langton’s hard, even harsh approach, has already taken its toll on the Yes campaign.

No matter how sympathetically her explanations are treated, no matter how careful Labor’s support is and no matter what more is to come, real damage has been done because of the words from her mouth.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-marcia-langton-has-no-one-to-blame-but-herself/news-story/8ddd78a7c321b9da2eb9151b7b3996d5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19541817

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19529127

>>19534980

>>19534996

Video emerges of Marcia Langton saying ‘hard No voters’ are ‘spewing racism’

Sky News Australia

Sep 13, 2023

Professor Marcia Langton has been filmed saying "hard No voters" of the Voice to Parliament are "spewing racism", after earlier defending her remarks at a forum.

Sky News Australia Political Editor Andrew Clennell revealed on Wednesday another video has surfaced of the professor labelling those against the Voice "racist".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfTWxvIioKk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19541925

File: 6fb2e5da4856afb⋯.jpg (279.83 KB,2041x1148,2041:1148,The_deadly_tactical_fire_s….jpg)

File: 7457e98df237019⋯.jpg (298.29 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Michael_Creagh_of_Brisbane….jpg)

File: 604ff82ccc76baa⋯.jpg (284.9 KB,1253x1671,1253:1671,Travis_Reddy_of_DefendTex.jpg)

File: 38c22d363dc01a5⋯.jpg (352.75 KB,1523x2031,1523:2031,Some_of_DefendTex_s_grenad….jpg)

File: c3aaa46d79e01a7⋯.jpg (317.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Red_McClintock_of_DroneShi….jpg)

>>19518173

Mind-boggling lethal Aussie weapons to be deployed by Ukraine, UK and possibly AUKUS

Danielle Gusmaroli - September 13, 2023

An Australian company’s “spy in the sky” drone that can wipe out entire military squads with its electronically fired bullets, tear gas and rubber baton rounds is to be deployed in Ukraine.

The new silent but deadly tactical fire support Cerberus GHL drone will be deployed to shore up munitions stockpiles in Ukraine’s fight with Russia.

“It’s spy in the sky technology that infantry under fire on the front line can use to hit back – it can wipe out entire squads,” Michael Creagh, chief executive of the Brisbane-based aerospace company behind the drone, Skybourne Technologies, said.

“It is under development for the UK, US and Australian armies, and potentially for AUKUS pillar 2’s autonomous weapons and artificial intelligence trial.

“There’s nothing like this out there, and at 150 metres from the target it is silent and deadly, and a new version with infra-red light to spot the enemy in the dark is about to be released.

“It can be carried in a soldier’s backpack and will give Ukraine more power in its fight against Russia.”

The pioneering drone, that can fire five 40mm grenade rounds to take out military squads within an 8km casualty radius, costs between $US50,000 ($A77,000) and $150,000 ($A233,000).

It is on show alongside other Australian-sponsored weapons for top military brass this week at the largest arms fair on the planet, the Defence and Security Equipment International (DSEI) weapons conference, at London’s ExCeL centre.

About 106 Australian defence suppliers are taking part in the week-long exhibition.

Among the state-of-the-art vehicles, firearms, protective equipment and communications technology is the mine-protected Bushmaster, manufactured by Thales Group from its plant in Bendigo, Victoria.

Another Aussie creation, the Drone40 autonomous loitering munition, that weighs less than a 200 gram phone, can pursue its target at a 15km distance.

The grenade, in its 11th configuration, was deployed by Ukraine military forces last year and was updated to overcome electronic warfare capabilities including tracking radar systems.

“It follows you, it sees you from over the hill, and has a flight time of 24 minutes,” CEO of Melbourne defence technology company DefendTex, Travis Reddy, said.

“We design these because Australia has a small but capable defence force of 25,000 soldiers and in potential conflicts we are outnumbered by one hundred to one,” he said.

“The only way to make it a credible deterrence to a threat is to over match the enemy we have to be as effective as 10 or 100 people, and we have to do that through technology.

“Australia, being an island, has always been about using that air-sea gap, but on land, it‘s the same if I can hit the enemy before they can hit me. I can keep pulling back and pulling back and pulling back and inflicting losses as they advance. That’s how I get that 101 advantage.”

A drone jamming gun made by Sydney firm DroneShield doesn’t have any projectiles but interferes with communications between the pilot and a drone, bringing down the drone. It is available to government agencies and the military around the world.

“Like a regular gun, you point at the drone to increase radio noise around,” director Red McClintock said.

“If you‘re at an airport in Australia, and there is a drone flying across the runway, that will completely shut down the airport, you’re not able to land planes if, say, a drone is sucked into the main engine of a jet.

“The results will be catastrophic. You will probably have the entire aircraft lost and everyone on board killed.”

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/national/mindboggling-lethal-aussie-weapons-to-be-deployed-by-ukraine-uk-and-possibly-aukus/news-story/8b42726c749bfa9cc0063e5ec9554af4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19541984

File: d4091d526c06f9b⋯.jpg (918.13 KB,3000x2054,1500:1027,In_May_a_number_of_drag_qu….jpg)

File: b6c05068fa456b6⋯.jpg (8.05 MB,8256x5504,3:2,State_Library_Victoria_chi….jpg)

Librarians to be trained in dealing with abuse after extremist threats

Melissa Cunningham - September 13, 2023

1/2

Librarians are dealing with death threats, trolling and intimidation at increasing levels, as protesters try to block drag-themed story time events and ban certain books on shelves.

This escalation in abuse – which has sparked a string of drag-themed children’s events being cancelled across Victoria – has prompted a new wave of training for librarians, aimed at teaching them how to protect themselves and the public and defuse potentially dangerous situations.

The endgame, says State Library Victoria chief executive Paul Duldig, is never having to cancel a rainbow story time at the library again.

“There’s been a lot of anger directed towards librarians, who by their nature are absolutely there for the public good,” Duldig said.

“The principles that librarians are trained and live by means they’re very brave. In some ways, this is the awful flip side of libraries being so important to culture. Culture is contested.”

State Library Victoria has decided to take a stand, hosting a symposium on Wednesday for library staff from across the state led by police, LGBTIQ+ commissioner Todd Fernando, academics and legal experts, examining the growing challenges faced by libraries.

There have been rising numbers of protests at Victoria’s public libraries over the last nine months. Demonstrators have also stormed council meetings over plans to hold drag themed story times or events around gender and sexuality.

Drag story time events involve drag performers reading books to children, often in libraries, and are aimed at presenting diverse role models.

“One of the reasons it’s so popular is that the performances are incredibly engaging [and] that’s what we need for engaging young people with literacy,” Duldig said.

“Rainbow families find it so affirming to be in that story time. They can see their community.”

Duldig said each time a rainbow story time event is cancelled, or a book is stolen from a library shelf by a protester, it had a “chilling effect” on democracy and intellectual freedom.

He has been closely watching the situation unfolding in libraries in the US and the UK, where there had been a deluge of harassment and violence aimed at librarians. Some tactics, including protesters calling government bodies and demanding audits of libraries, were now being used in Australia.

Duldig said he knew of cases where WorkSafe had been called in at the eleventh hour and led to events being cancelled.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19541992

File: ae986ba12734876⋯.mp4 (14.68 MB,640x360,16:9,A_Melbourne_council_has_ca….mp4)

>>19541984

2/2

As part of the push to keep Victorian libraries safe, Duldig said librarians from across the state would soon be trained on how to safely respond to abuse and intimidation. This included training from experts, such as police, on the words and body language to use.

“It sounds common sense, but it’s essentially training on how to not inflame a situation, and also not to accept anything that’s abusive or violent,” he said.

He said the purpose of symposium was to help draft a statewide program of protocols to protect those at risk, including librarians and drag performers.

“There’s no one magic thing that is going to solve it,” he said. “But what we need to make sure is where we’re aligned, we’re trained, we’ve got the right policies. We’ve done the scenario planning, and we’ve got backup plans.”

Duldig said there had been a concerning rise in incidents, including threats made by extremist groups.

“We are facing a situation that has never happened before in living memory,” he said.

In May, a drag story time event to raise awareness for LGBTIQ rights was cancelled at Oakleigh Library in the city’s south-east after repeated threats were aimed at harming the drag performer, families intending to attend the event and Monash City Council staff.

A drag queen story-time event scheduled to be held at Eltham Library was also moved online following serious concerns of threats of violence by protesters on May 15. It came after a Monash Council meeting was temporarily suspended after 100 protesters showed up to express their anger at the scheduled drag event.

A 23-year-old Melbourne drag queen, who goes by the stage name Millie-Anne Problems, was also targeted by activists prompting the cancellation of the event in Chelsea in April, promoting calls for a greater response from authorities.

A drag show was also cancelled by Casey council, and last year, neo-Nazis crashed a drag event in Moonee Valley in the city’s north-west.

“We need to make sure we are building the institutional resilience so that can continue to do the work that needs to be done,” Duldig said.

“Everyone’s got a story about someone who the library was the only place they could actually be themselves while they were growing up or find themselves reflected in some way that really gave them hope.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/librarians-to-be-trained-in-dealing-with-abuse-after-extremist-threats-20230912-p5e405.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548454

File: bb8c8dc3f582413⋯.jpg (63.38 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Trades_hall_secretary_Luke….jpg)

File: 23b5eedecfa2703⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,1240x1755,248:351,0001.jpg)

File: 09f8707302b7b1f⋯.jpg (460.95 KB,1240x1755,248:351,0002.jpg)

>>19529127

>>19534980

>>19534996

>>19541817

Yes campaigners told to accuse No camp of vilifying Aboriginal people

'Paul Sakkal - September 13, 2023

Trade union campaigners are being instructed to tell Australians the No side is vilifying Aboriginal people in the Voice to parliament referendum campaign, which has sparked another intense political feud over racism allegations.

The opposition has seized on newly unearthed comments from top Voice proponent Marcia Langton – referring to social workers as “by and large … racist” – a day after she rejected the Coalition and media misleadingly construing her criticisms of the No campaign as an attack on individual voters.

Langton said the views of No leaders Gary Johns, who has said Indigenous people should take blood tests for welfare payments, and David Adler, who accused journalist Stan Grant of artificially darkening his skin, were proof of racism within No’s ranks.

A key strategy of the No campaign – according to Matthew Sheahan, leader of major No outfit Advance – is to portray the Voice as divisive and has used Langton’s comments to further this charge.

Yes campaigners accuse their opponents of sparking the viciousness of the Voice debate. A Victorian Trades Hall Council “key messages” document shows its thousands of volunteers are being told to convince voters that the anti-Voice movement punches down on Indigenous Australians.

“Call out the tactic and who’s behind it: Point to their motivation Creating division (eg by vilifying Aboriginal people); Distracting (eg by insisting on ludicrous detail),” the document states.

The union training sheet tells campaigners to claim the No campaign is driven by a desire to “divide the working class”, “safeguard mining interests” and “sell newspapers with shock”, before recommending a comparison with the same-sex marriage plebiscite.

The union document can be found on the council’s website and was discovered in the same week this masthead reported on No’s instruction of volunteers to instil fear in voters’ minds and not to identify themselves upfront as No campaigners.

Trades hall secretary Luke Hilakari said many Yes volunteers had encountered offensive content and that calling out misinformation and division was important.

“It’s not a mistake from the No campaign, it’s a tactic. Former government ministers have imported these Trumpish tactics that should never have been part of our political discourse,” he said.

Brawling over the referendum reached intense and personal highs during the second last parliamentary question time before referendum day. Treasurer Jim Chalmers accused Opposition Leader Peter Dutton of being the “chief propagandist” in a campaign of lies, as the Coalition backbench hurled interjections at Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney.

Nationals leader David Littleproud was ejected from the house in a question time dominated by questions to Burney on Langton’s statements and others made by Voice campaigner Megan Davis about the prospect of treaty and reparations.

Dutton repeatedly demanded Burney stop reading information from a script and said if she was truthful in response to an answer about the Voice’s scope she would admit the advisory body could touch “every area of public policy”.

Chalmers claimed Dutton’s Voice campaigning was adding “more poison into the well”, an accusation Dutton’s deputy Sussan Ley labelled a “disgusting slur”.

Langton said on ABC’s Radio National on Wednesday morning that there were “of course” people advocating for the No campaign who were not racist, a day after it emerged she had labelled the No case’s arguments racist and stupid.

Responding to the furore over her quotes, she said the No side was trying to “frighten Australians into believing the referendum will result in damage to the Australian social and democratic fabric”.

Media outlets reported on Tuesday a statement made by Langton in July in which she referred to some voters as racist.

“The surge of racist nonsense is confined to a minority of Australians,” she said at a University of Queensland event.

“Ordinary Australians are thinking ‘Yes, of course I am voting for the Voice’, and that would be 48-49 per cent.

“Then there is hard No voters and I am hoping they are about 20 per cent and they are the ones spewing racism.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/yes-campaigners-told-to-accuse-no-camp-of-vilifying-aboriginal-people-20230913-p5e4ch.html

https://www.weareunion.org.au/voice_resources

https://assets.nationbuilder.com/victorianunions/pages/16627/attachments/original/1681272398/A4_voice_messaging_handout.pdf?1681272398

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548476

File: 2c66fbe7fd5f284⋯.jpg (103.43 KB,1280x720,16:9,Marcia_Langton.jpg)

>>19529127

>>19534980

>>19534996

Indigenous voice to parliament: Marcia Langton has form in ‘racism’ attacks

JOE KELLY - SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

Prominent Indigenous campaigner for the voice to parliament, Marcia Langton, has previously described Jacinta Price and her mother Bess as the “coloured help” for conservative think tanks and accused one in every five voters at the upcoming referendum of “spewing racism”.

In an article published in the Saturday Paper on August 25, 2018, Professor Langton said Senator Price and her mother – a former member of the NT parliament – had appeared to be “sincere in their comments about the impact of violence on their own lives”. But she said their “failure to extend sympathy to other Aboriginal victims raises questions about their motives”.

“Leaving aside appearances on mainstream television, many of Bess Price’s speaking engagements have been at the invitation of the rightwing think tanks,” Professor Langton wrote.

“It is important to communicate with all Australians on this issue, as I have a number of times myself, but speaking at the Bennelong Society or the Centre for Independent Studies to the exclusion of other organisations raises the suspicion that Bess and Jacinta have become the useful coloured help in rescuing the racist image of these conservative outfits.”

In her 2018 piece, Professor Langton said Senator Price “legitimises racist views by speaking them against her own people”.

Senator Price told The Australian Professor Langton “can’t understand that some people, ­especially other Aboriginal people, might have a different view to her”. “She and too many other voice advocates resort to emotional blackmail and attacks because they are unable to argue the merits of their own divisive voice proposal,” she said.

Professor Langton was contacted by The Australian about her 2018 article, asking whether she stood by the piece, but did not respond by deadline.

On Wednesday, she also doubled down on her claim made on Sunday at a public forum in Bunbury, Western Australia, that the No campaign could be reduced to “base racism” or “sheer stupidity”, in an extensive interview on ABC radio. “What I was saying was that the claims made by the No campaign are based in racism and stupidity,” she said.

At the event on Sunday, Professor Langton declared: “Every time the No case raises one of their arguments, if you start pulling it apart you get down to base racism – I’m sorry to say it but that’s where it lands – or just sheer stupidity.”

Pressed on whether she was branding no voters racist and stupid, Professor Langton told the ABC: “I deny it absolutely.”

However, footage of Professor Langton speaking at the University of Queensland on July 7 this year was broadcast a short time later on Sky News in which she suggested a large number of No voters and 20 per cent of the population were “spewing ­racism”.

“The only poll that matters is the poll on voting day,” she said.

“Yes. We have a lot of work to do. And I am hoping – and I hope I am right – that the surge of racist nonsense is confined to a minority of Australians. I do hope I am right about that.

“And that ordinary Australians are thinking, yes, of course I am voting for the voice and that would be say 48-49 per cent; about 20 per cent of people saying, ‘I’m not sure how I vote. I’m a bit confused. I need more information.’ And then there’s the hard No voters. And I am hoping that they are about 20 per cent and they are the ones who are spewing the racism.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-marcia-langton-has-form-in-racism-attacks/news-story/400b7e5acdb895a9f524aa5526c5e725

The folly of Jacinta Price

Marcia Langton - August 25, 2018

https://web.archive.org/web/20190921071949/https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/opinion/topic/2018/08/25/the-folly-jacinta-price/15351192006752

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548487

File: 918cabce9726289⋯.jpg (261.98 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Northern_Territory_senator….jpg)

>>19529127

No alternative: Jacinta Price’s Indigenous voice to parliament pitch

JOE KELLY and ROSIE LEWIS - SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

1/2

Jacinta Price hopes a No vote at the referendum will mean governments take greater accountability for improving the lives of First ­Nations people, warning a voice will only become “yet another ­battle ground for many Aboriginal voices to disagree, fall out and ­create division”.

In a draft version of her speech to the National Press Club in Canberra obtained by The Australian, the opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman will on Thursday say a voice to parliament will “undermine the importance of the Aboriginal members of parliament” who are “fighting to affect real change via the democratic structures by which they were elected”.

The No campaign’s leading spokeswoman laid out her vision of what a referendum defeat should mean for Australia, after a two-day political storm over claims from Marcia Langton ­opponents of the voice were being fed arguments steeped in “base ­racism … or just sheer stupidity”.

Using Professor Langton’s own words to attack her, Senator Price declared that “what would be ­racist, is segmenting our nation into ‘us’ and ‘them’.”

“You have to say it would also be stupidity to divide a nation when it has been growing ever more cohesive. To split it along fractures of race rather than try to bring it closer together,” she said. “My hope is that, after October 14, after defeating this voice of division, we can bring accountability to existing structures, and we can get away from assuming inner-city activists speak for all Aboriginals, and back to focusing on the real ­issues: education, employment, economic participation and safety from violence and sexual assault.”

Pointing to the Victorian ­experience with the Yoorrook Justice Commission, Senator Price also argued that Indigenous “truth-telling commissions” had “no desire to tell history in the round”. “They desire to misrepresent Aboriginal life prior to the arrival of the British as some form of Pasconian paradise,” she said. “And they want to demonise colonial settlement in its entirety and nurture a national self-loathing about the foundations of the modern Australian achievement.”

The address from Senator Price on Thursday comes after footage emerged of Professor Langton speaking at the University of Queensland on July 7 this year in which she suggested that 20 per cent of the population voting at the referendum were “spewing ­racism”. Professor Langton also doubled down on her assertion No campaign arguments in the voice referendum were “frankly stupid and racist” and confusing voters, ramping up her attack by hitting out at tactics she said were ­imported from overseas and damaging democracy.

“The No case has caused severe damage to our social fabric and to our democracy by importing overseas tactics using a call bank that automatically generates numbers and sending these messages out to millions of Australians. This is deeply damaging to our democracy,” Professor Langton told ABC radio on Wednesday.

“There’s a lot of work to do both with people who have legitimate concerns that need to be ­addressed and clarified and also those people who are simply confused by the very base and frankly stupid and racist claims being made by the No campaign to frighten Australians into believing that the referendum will result in damage to the Australian social and democratic fabric.”

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney refused to condemn Professor Langton’s comments in parliament after being asked by deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley if the remarks were in accord with her request for people involved in the referendum to act respectfully and with care.

“There is no room for racism in Australia. The pain of racism is real for those people who have experienced it. It is something that should not be used for political purposes,” Ms Burney said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548489

File: 435f15484379dd5⋯.jpg (135.32 KB,1280x720,16:9,No_alternative_Jacinta_Pri….jpg)

>>19548487

2/2

Campaigner for the No case, Warren Mundine, rejected Professor Langton’s suggestion 20 per cent of Australians were racist as “pure nonsense”. “Many Aboriginals enjoy a good life in Australia and we’ve got migrants who have come overseas living here and millions more want to come here. So this idea that 20 per cent of Australians are spewing racism is a bizarre comment,” he said.

SA Liberal senator Kerrynne Liddle, who is also Indigenous, said Professor Langton’s views of the No campaign were “pretty ordinary”. “I’m not going to be moved by commentary that suggests my position is ill-informed, stupid or racist,” she said. “But I’m really troubled for those people who hold a No position who aren’t as comfortable as I am with taking this position.”

Yes23 co-chair Rachel Perkins said there was “only a very small margin” of Australians with racist views, as she defended Professor Langton’s attack.

Campaigning in Perth for a Yes vote, Ms Perkins said Professor Langton’s comments from Sunday had been taken out of context.

“That was unfortunate. She’s now had the opportunity to respond and you can see that she’s talking about some of the No case’s material,” Ms Perkins told 6PR radio. “We have seen ads from the No case … that do have those racist undertones and we have seen some commentary from some people associated with the No case that is very upsetting.”

“The thing we’ve got to keep in mind is Australia is fundamentally not a racist country. People are having their views not necessarily based on racism at all. People are having their views because they might have concerns but we have to be understanding that people are still making their minds up.”

Uluru Dialogue Strategic ­Adviser and former journalist Kirstie Parker said the Yes campaign was appealing to Australians not to be frightened into voting no based upon mischief-making and subterfuge by outfits like Fair Australia who she said had abandoned honesty, decency, fairness – all long-held Australian values. “Such ‘no campers’ are trolling Aussies, and I hope Aussies will understand that come referendum day, and vote accordingly,” she said.

The Coalition peppered Ms Burney with questions in parliament over several controversial remarks Professor Langton had made – including that families had been broken apart by social workers who were, by and large, white and racist – while demanding detail over how the voice would work. The government also sought to escalate its attack against Peter Dutton, labelling him the “chief propagandist” of misinformation and mistruths in the referendum campaign.

“The Leader of the Opposition has taken the weirdest whispers from the furthest fringes of social media and legitimised them and amplified them here in the people’s house of parliament,” Jim Chalmers said. “He has seen this (the referendum) from the very beginning, not as a chance for unity, but as an excuse to practise the usual nasty and negative and angry and dishonest and divisive politics.” In her National Press Club address to be delivered on Thursday, Senator Price said that, to argue the voice was a request of First Nations people, was to play into “backwards, neo-colonial racial stereotyping, suggesting that all Aboriginal people think the same, feel the same and want for the same things”.

“Despite racial stereotyping that suggests Aboriginal Australians are one homogenous group, we are not,” she said. “I am one of 11 Indigenous voices in parliament, and I will not accept … our democratically elected voices are redundant because we belong to political parties.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/no-alternative-jacinta-prices-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-pitch/news-story/9a2af3896976d5eeb393eb4c819ab176

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548513

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19529127

>>19548487

Indigenous Australians benefit from colonisation, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price tells press club

GEOFF CHAMBERS - SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

1/2

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says colonial settlement has delivered a “positive impact” for First Nations people and has backed the abolition of stand-alone Indigenous Australians ministers.

In a National Press Club speech that lacked substantive detail on how the Coalition would Close the Gap if the October 14 referendum goes down, Senator Price said she remained cautious of Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s plan to legislate regional and local voices.

The prominent No campaigner said she was open to a second referendum focused on constitutional recognition if processes – including a Constitutional Convention – were put in place and Australians support another vote.

On the impact of colonial settlement on Indigenous Australians, Senator Price said colonisation has had a positive effect providing Aboriginal people with “running water and readily available food”.

“Everything that my grandfather had when he was growing up because he first saw white fellas in his early adolescence we now have. Otherwise he would have had to live off the land, provide for his family,” Senator Price said.

“Aboriginal Australians … have the same opportunities as all other Australians in this country. We certainly have one of the greatest systems around the world in terms of the democratic structure in comparison to other countries.

“It is why migrants flock to Australia to call Australia home because the opportunity that exists for all Australians. But if we keep telling Aboriginal people that they are victims, we are effectively removing their agency and giving them the expectation that someone else is responsible for their lives.”

Senator Price also claimed that descendants of convicts brought to Australia in chains could argue they “suffer from intergenerational trauma”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548515

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19548513

2/2

The Northern Territory Country Liberal Party senator, who wants a royal commission into the sexual abuse of Aboriginal children, said a key priority must be addressing cultural practices in remote communities that drive the highest rates of family and interpersonal violence in Australia.

“The experience that, not because of the effects of colonisation, but because it is expected that young girls are married off to older husbands in arranged marriages. We haven’t had a feminist movement for Aboriginal women because we have been expected to toe the line … for the rights of our race but the rights as women has been second place,” she said.

Asked whether a stand-alone Indigenous Australians minister should exist, Senator Price said “I would hope to see that one day in our country, we wouldn’t require such a portfolio”.

Senator Price said a constitutionally enshrined Voice to Parliament body suggests that the “gap will exist in perpetuity and that is not what we want”.

“If we don’t have that (Indigenous Australians) portfolio it means that everybody is taking advantage of the same opportunities that our country has to offer.”

For now, Senator Price said she would use the “position of power to hold to account those that we are responsible for within this portfolio”.

“There are over 3,000 Aboriginal organisations and many of whom the responsibility of this portfolio go under.”

“If you’re responsible for such a portfolio you should be holding to account those under you that are supposed to be delivering the outcomes because government might hold the purse strings but it is everybody’s responsibility going forward and that is the accountability that I don’t believe has been applied effectively enough previously.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-australians-benefit-from-colonisation/news-story/590af2bd863be395ff9022e4d91a6e4d

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeTNSIdSNXE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryDTG-V8Dok

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548520

File: d9c0243b1332a4f⋯.jpg (2.1 MB,4664x3109,4664:3109,Coalition_spokeswoman_for_….jpg)

>>19529127

>>19548487

Price says colonialism has been good for Indigenous Australians

Paul Sakkal - September 14, 2023

1/2

The Opposition’s Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says colonisation has been good for Indigenous Australians, as she failed to support the Coalition policy of local and regional Voices in a fierce, provocative speech met with cheers by her frontbench colleagues.

In a National Press Club address that challenged widely held views of Indigenous and intergenerational disadvantage, Price claimed political leaders had been unwilling to apply common-sense approaches to Indigenous policy issues for fear of being branded racists.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has repeatedly stated his support for local and regional voice bodies instead of a national model supported by Labor.

But Price, who has also failed to back Dutton’s proposal for a second referendum on symbolic recognition, said the Coalition did not have a settled policy on other voices.

“At this stage there are certainly conversations taking place and need to be had,” she said, adding that she would be part of shadow cabinet deliberations.

The 42-year-old has become one of the most important figures in the Voice debate since Dutton gave her the Indigenous affairs portfolio in April.

Yes campaigners believe she has been key in convincing Australians the Indigenous community is split on the Voice, and the National Party leader David Littleproud described her speech as one of the most powerful he had ever heard.

When asked whether Indigenous people suffered the consequences of British settlement, Price said: “I’ll be honest: no.”

“A positive impact? Absolutely. I mean, now we’ve got running water, we’ve got readily available food. I mean everything my grandfather had when he was growing up, because he first saw whitefellas in his early adolescence, we now have.

“Many of us have the same opportunities as all other Australians in this country.

“We certainly have probably one of the greatest systems around the world in terms of the democratic structure in comparison to other countries – that is why migrants flock to Australia.

“If we keep telling Aboriginal people that they are victims, well, we are effectively removing their agency… That is the worst possible thing you can do to any human being – to tell them they are a victim without agency and that’s what I refuse to do.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548522

File: 230de341f9036de⋯.jpg (3.82 MB,5249x3499,5249:3499,Nationals_leader_David_Lit….jpg)

>>19548520

2/2

Price refused to condemn the views of No leaders Gary Johns, who has said Indigenous people should take blood tests for welfare payments, and David Adler, who accused journalist Stan Grant of artificially darkening his skin, but instead said she and fellow No campaigner Warren Mundine had been subjected to “horrible racial vilification”, and that she did not support blood tests.

Many leaders, Price argued, had been scared to apply accountability to Indigenous communities because they were fearful of being marked as prejudiced.

“We are treating Aboriginal people differently. And we treat no other group of Australians in this manner. If I’ve got anything to do with it, we’ll actually start treating Aboriginal people like Australian citizens.”

Price received a standing ovation from a crowd that included No leader Mundine, Coalition MPs David Littleproud, Michaelia Cash, Bridget McKenzie, Kerrynne Liddle and Barnaby Joyce, and conservative commentators Tom Switzer and John Roskam.

She said, to the laughter and applause of her colleagues: “That would mean that those of us whose ancestors were possessed in their own country and brought here in chains as convicts are also suffering from intergenerational trauma, so I should be doubly suffering.”

Price’s comments were later condemned by Linda Burney, the Minister for Indigenous Australians, as “offensive”.

“It denies the experience of so many First Nations families. We only have to look at the Stolen Generations and the impacts that has had, in terms of ongoing trauma and pain. Her comments are a betrayal of so many people’s stories.”

Roskam, an Institute of Public Affairs senior fellow, said Price’s referendum campaigning was having a profound effect on centre-right politics in Australia.

He argued Price was proving the Coalition could win the culture wars and take on big business, which largely supports the Voice.

“This is a potentially transformational moment in Australian politics,” he said.

After the speech, Central Land Council chief Les Turner said grassroots NT leaders had consistently said Price did not speak for them, according to Guardian Australia.

Liberal MP Keith Wolahan on Thursday pleaded for civility on both sides of the Voice debate, after a week of heated exchanges.

He urged Voice backers to avoid invalidating the outcome of the referendum by claiming the No campaign was based on “misinformation”, a term he said was overused.

“When we stoke the fires on either side of this debate, there’s consequences for that,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/price-says-colonialism-has-been-good-for-indigenous-australians-20230914-p5e4lz.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548542

File: 6f8f1c35840ed19⋯.jpg (445.25 KB,2400x1440,5:3,WikiLeaks_founder_Julian_A….jpg)

File: d4800bfdcedee49⋯.jpg (694.65 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0001.jpg)

File: 0fe49e41a52ba70⋯.jpg (347.22 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0002.jpg)

File: c450469a680d599⋯.jpg (361.7 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0003.jpg)

File: 59e03287a9e80f3⋯.jpg (362.89 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0004.jpg)

>>19493339

Julian Assange: more than 60 Australian MPs urge US to let WikiLeaks founder walk free

Exclusive: MPs from major parties say continued extradition and prosecution would be ‘unjust’ and lead to an ‘outcry’ in Australia

Daniel Hurst - 14 Sep 2023

1/2

More than 60 Australian federal politicians have explicitly called on the US to drop the prosecution of Julian Assange, warning of “a sharp and sustained outcry in Australia” if the WikiLeaks founder is extradited.

With a small cross-party delegation due to fly to Washington next week, the Guardian can reveal the lobbying trip has won the open support of 63 members of Australia’s House of Representatives and Senate.

In a letter, the 63 MPs and senators said they stood in support of the trip to the US and were “resolutely of the view that the prosecution and incarceration of the Australian citizen Julian Assange must end”.

They said the matter had “dragged on for over a decade” and it was “wrong for Mr Assange to be further persecuted and denied his liberty when one considers the duration and circumstances of the detention he has already suffered.

“It serves no purpose, it is unjust, and we say clearly – as friends should always be honest with friends – that the prolonged pursuit of Mr Assange wears away at the substantial foundation of regard and respect that Australians have for the justice system of the United States of America,” the letter said.

Assange remains in Belmarsh prison in London as he fights a US attempt to extradite him to face charges – including under the Espionage Act. The charges are in connection with the publication of hundreds of thousands of leaked documents about the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, as well as diplomatic cables, in 2010 and 2011.

Assange sought refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London in 2012 and remained there until 2019. The Australian citizen was arrested when Ecuador revoked his diplomatic status and has been in jail since then, amid a series of legal challenges against the US extradition bid.

The Australian MPs and senators said they agreed with comments by the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, that “enough is enough … and that nothing is served from the ongoing incarceration of Julian Assange”.

They also welcomed the recent backing of the opposition leader, Peter Dutton, saying this bipartisan position was “matched by the wide cross-party and independent support within the Australian parliament itself, which in turn reflects the strongly held views of the Australian community”.

“Let there be no doubt that if Julian Assange is removed from the United Kingdom to the United States there will a sharp and sustained outcry in Australia.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548552

File: ff62bc6afd5ab9b⋯.jpg (617.15 KB,2400x1440,5:3,A_giant_billboard_in_Melbo….jpg)

>>19548542

2/2

The letter was organised by the co-conveners of the Bring Julian Assange Home Parliamentary Group: the independent MP Andrew Wilkie, the Labor MP Josh Wilson, the Liberal MP Bridget Archer and the Greens senator David Shoebridge.

The total number of signatories – 63 Australian federal politicians – reflects an increasing cross-party consensus on the issue. It compares with 48 who signed a letter to the US attorney general, Merrick Garland, in April.

New backers of the cause include Shayne Neumann and Louise Pratt of the governing Labor party, and Melissa Price of the opposition Coalition.

The Australian politicians noted “with gratitude the considerable support in the United States for an end to the legal pursuit of Mr Assange from members of Congress, human rights advocates, academics, and civil society, and from within the US media in defence of free speech and independent journalism”.

“On that basis we ask Congresspeople, members of the press, and other relevant civil society stakeholders in the United States to speak up now in supporting an end to the prosecution and detention of Julian Assange,” they wrote.

The Australian politicians said they believed the “right and best course of action” would be for the US Department of Justice to cease the prosecution.

Alternatively, they said, “a decision to simply abandon the extradition proceedings would have the sensible, just, and compassionate effect of allowing Mr Assange to go free from a prolonged and harsh period of high-security detention”.

The US secretary of state, Antony Blinken, has previously pushed back at the Australian government’s complaints that the pursuit of Assange had dragged on too long.

During a visit to Australia in July, Blinken said he understood “the concerns and views of Australians”.

But he added that it was “very important that our friends here” in Australia understood the US concerns about Assange’s “alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of our country”.

Blinken said Assange was alleged to have “risked very serious harm to our national security”.

The White House has previously said Joe Biden is committed to an independent Department of Justice. Albanese is due to meet the president during an official visit to the US, including a state dinner, on 25 October.

Assange’s brother, Gabriel Shipton, said: “Australians are told that we are great mates with our American friends, but Julian’s treatment says otherwise. It’s up to the prime minister to take this message and use the support from within the electorate to free Julian.”

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/sep/14/julian-assange-more-than-60-australian-mps-urge-us-to-let-wikileaks-founder-walk-free

https://andrewwilkie.org/2023/09/julian-assange-campaign-goes-to-washington/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548568

File: 3404be86fe86055⋯.jpg (239.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

Peter Dutton seeks to overturn ACT legislation decriminalising hard drugs

SARAH ISON - SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

Canberra is set to become a “boom market” for drug dealers and crime gangs, according to Peter Dutton, as the federal ­Coalition proposes using commonwealth powers to override the ACT government’s decision to decriminalise the possession of ice, heroin, cocaine and other illicit substances.

The ACT government’s drug reforms, due to come into effect on October 28, would make Canberra the first city in Australia to decriminalise the possession of small quantities of illicit substances in a bid to divert people away from the justice system and towards treatment services.

But the Coalition announced it would move a private member’s Bill in the upper house on Thursday to use commonwealth powers to reverse the laws.

The Opposition Leader said the Coalition would take a stand against the “crazy government legislation” that would result in the Labor-Greens government “rolling out the red carpet for drug use and more crime”.

“These ACT drug laws beggar belief,” he said. “I am totally shocked and dismayed at what the ACT government is doing.

“The ACT government is rolling out the red carpet for drug use and more crime. It is effectively welcoming more ice, heroin, cocaine, MDMA, and speed, on our streets.”

As revealed by The Australian last month, ACT Health Minister Rachel Stephen-Smith admitted her government took the idea of decriminalising hard drugs to the election “quietly” and used a private member’s Bill to “quickly” pass the laws.

This was despite warnings by ACT Police in 2021 that any step towards decriminalising drugs should be made in a slow, “staged” manner, rather than relaxing the rules for several illicit substances at the same time.

The ACT Liberals sought to stall the changes this week, moving a motion for them to be delayed until after the 2024 election, but were ultimately voted down by the Labor-Greens coalition.

Mr Dutton – a former Queensland police officer – said the legislation would give a “green light” to drug use and importation to Canberra.

“The Australian Federal Police has warned that the laws would lure recreational drug users into Canberra and spark an increase in drug-related deaths,” he said.

“Police resources are already scarce. This will be a disaster as drug dealers see Canberra as a new boom market for organised crime. The proposed territory drug laws are a disgrace and the federal Coalition will be taking a stand.”

The decriminalising of drugs in the ACT – which will officially take place from October 28 – has heaped pressure on other jurisdictions to consider such a policy.

NSW Premier Chris Minns has said his government had no mandate to decriminalise drugs in this term.

Opposition legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash will in the Senate table the legislation to reverse the ACT laws, with the issue expected to be debated in the next sitting fortnight.

“Our nation’s capital should not be the drug capital,” she said.

“But the Prime Minister is doing nothing while the ACT Labor-Greens government has opened the door to dangerous drugs in Canberra.

“Where is the PM and where is Senator Katy Gallagher on this issue? Do they agree with this proposed drug law, or are they going to back our law enforcement agencies who are deeply opposed to it?”

When asked about the ACT’s policy by The Australian last week, a spokesman for Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil said “State and territory laws are a matter for those states and territories”.

ACT independent senator David Pocock slammed the federal Coalition for attacking Territory rights.

“It is hugely disappointing to see interstate senators continuing to try to interfere with the ACT’s democratically elected government,” he said.

“If they would like to see changes in the ACT’s laws, I would encourage them to run for the Legislative Assembly at next year’s election.”

The issue of Territory rights was brought into focus last year when the Commonwealth passed legislation allowing Canberra to make its own laws in regards to voluntary assisted dying, overturning rules put in place under the Howard government preventing such a move.

The ACT government is now considering implementing the most liberal euthanasia laws in Australia that could be accessed by children as young as 14.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/peter-dutton-seeks-to-overturn-act-legislation-decriminalising-hard-drugs/news-story/b2ce169ea7b6afdda1f728b01be255aa

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548631

File: f2d8301983d71c6⋯.jpg (1.57 MB,3400x2269,3400:2269,Australian_Defence_Ministe….jpg)

>>19267329 (pb)

>>19535089

Australia toughens ban on training 'certain foreign militaries' after pilot case

Kirsty Needham - September 14, 2023

SYDNEY, Sept 14 (Reuters) - Australia will toughen laws stopping former defence staff from training "certain foreign militaries", introducing a penalty of 20 years prison and widening the ban to stop any Australians offering military training to countries seen as a national security risk.

A series of cases where former military pilots living in Australia had worked for a South African flight school training Chinese pilots, which the United States alleges are Chinese military pilots, has prompted the crackdown.

Australia's "Five Eyes" intelligence partners of Britain, United States, New Zealand and Canada will be exempt from the new law, officials said.

Exemptions will also be provided if the defence minister authorises the training, or it relates to humanitarian relief or United Nations duties.

Penalties of up to 20 years prison will apply for providing military training or tactics to a foreign military or government body, including hybrid civilian and military organisations, or state-owned companies, without authorisation from the defence minister.

Defence Minister Richard Marles introduced the amendment to Australia's parliament on Thursday, saying the bill was partly modelled on U.S. laws, and will strengthen criminal laws in Australia that already ban the provision of military training to a foreign government by former Australian defence staff.

The new law goes further, stopping any Australian citizen or permanent resident from providing such training without the minister's authorisation.

The intention was to "prevent individuals with knowledge of sensitive defence information from training or working for certain foreign militaries or governments where that activity would put Australia's national security at risk", he said.

A former U.S. Marines Corp pilot who had recently returned from working in China was arrested in Australia last year and faces extradition to the United States on charges of training Chinese military pilots at a South African flying school. The pilot, Daniel Duggan, an Australian citizen, remains in custody and denies any wrongdoing.

The Test Flying Academy of South Africa was placed on a U.S. trade blacklist on national security grounds in June for "providing training to Chinese military pilots using Western and NATO sources".

The flight training division of AVIC, a Chinese state-owned aviation and defence company that was in partnership with TFASA, is also on the blacklist.

The Australian home of TFASA chief operating officer Keith Hartley was raided by Australian Federal Police in November. A court was told Hartley, a former British military pilot, was suspected of organising the training of Chinese military pilots delivered by the flight school. Hartley has not been charged, and denies any wrongdoing.

Under the new law, working for companies where a foreign government holds 50% of shares or the directors are expected to act in accordance with the wishes of the foreign government is also banned.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australia-toughens-ban-training-certain-foreign-militaries-after-pilot-case-2023-09-14/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19548649

File: 200c0960ed65de8⋯.jpg (141.71 KB,2048x1152,16:9,US_biotech_giant_Moderna_i….jpg)

File: 902428496d6b25e⋯.jpg (79.7 KB,768x1024,3:4,Moderna_president_Stephen_….jpg)

Moderna set for Covid and flu ‘superjab’ in early 2026

JARED LYNCH - SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

Australians will be able to roll up their sleeves for a “superjab” to protect them from both Covid and the flu by early 2026 if Moderna has its way.

The US biotech company has slated its anticipated launch date for the product, which will combine vaccines for the flu and Covid-19 into a single shot for the first time.

The northern hemisphere will be able to access the jab from late 2025 for its flu season, subject to regulatory approval, with a launch Down Under to follow in 2026.

It will come six years after the pandemic began and is expected to be followed by another superjab, which will include a vaccine for RSV – or respiratory syncytial virus. This will offer people protection against the three main respiratory viruses that cause the most hospital admissions.

Australia will also play a key role in manufacturing the superjab. Moderna – which is listed on the Nasdaq with a market value of $US40bn ($62.5bn) – is halfway building a new factory in Melbourne, which is expected to begin operation by 2025.

The facility is part of a 10-year partnership with the Australian government to produce mRNA vaccines locally to prepare for the next pandemic (whatever its pathogen may be).

The Melbourne site will produce Moderna’s respiratory vaccines, including the superjab – possibly manufacturing the first vials for the 2025 northern hemisphere launch if all regulatory approvals are completed by then.

But the number of people getting Covid-19 booster shots has dived, despite official health advice in Australia and the US recommending people get a dose six months after their last shot or Covid infection.

For Moderna, this has sparked falling sales, with the company flagging in a trading update on Wednesday that it expects Covid-19 vaccination sales of $US6bn to $US8bn this year, compared with $US18.4bn in 2022.

This has raised questions about the relevance of a superjab. But for Moderna president Stephen Hoge it’s a no-brainer.

“It’s really a bifurcated situation. Covid still causes more hospitalisation in every age group than flu,” he said. “There’s a large number of people who follow those sorts of public health recommendations and then there’s a large number that exercise their right not to.

“Only about 60 million people got the fall booster (last year) which compares with 150 million people who get the flu (vaccine in the US). The public health officials say everybody who gets a flu vaccine should get a Covid vaccine – we still need to probably double the number of people who choose to do that.”

As the pandemic recedes further into the past, Dr Hoge believes rather than thinking of individual virus names for vaccines people should be focused on broader respiratory protection.

“You know it’s sort of ironic. The flu jab, which is almost universally used, has four different flu strains in it. So maybe we just kind of stop calling Covid, Covid and call it ‘flu five’. I joke. But I genuinely think a combination respiratory vaccine that covers against the big three threats and public health really will make a big difference and that’s what we are working towards.”

CSL, Australia’s biggest health company with a market value of $130bn, is also eyeing a superjab, with its vice-president overseeing clinical development of vaccines, Jon Edelman, last year saying such a move made sense.

CSL has secured a licensing deal with Arcturus Therapeutics to access its late-stage amplifying mRNA vaccine platform technology, which includes a Covid-19 vaccine candidate. But Moderna is so far the only company to name a potential launch date.

The mRNA technology instructs the body’s cells to produce a protein to create an immune response, appearing like a miracle technology that can be adjusted to fight any disease, even cancer.

Dr Hoge said Moderna’s mRNA flu vaccine was “at least as good” as conventional shots.

“There’s always a chance of being better. It’s obviously not the bar we needed to clear but it’s nice to clear the bar with a wide margin,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/moderna-set-for-covid-and-flu-superjab-in-early-2026/news-story/26e269c193781ab1aa3304f94db7cfa6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19555745

File: 544674d02ddc883⋯.jpg (200.23 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Price_with_Claire_….jpg)

>>19529127

>>19548487

‘Treaty not needed, we were never at war’, says Indigenous voice to parliament No campaigner Jacinta Price

GEOFF CHAMBERS and RHIANNON DOWN - SEPTEMBER 15, 2023

1/2

No campaigner and opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has rejected a treaty with First ­Nations people because they were never at war with British colonists and declared as “fantasy” the idea of a utopian society before colonisation.

Speaking at The Great Voice Debate hosted by The Australian in Canberra on Thursday, Senator Price warned Australians to not accept a “romanticism” of Aboriginal culture and traditions as pushed by elite Indigenous activists. She said there was too much violence and sexual misconduct in remote communities, with women at risk because the issue was being downplayed.

“For those on the ground, many of who are my family, they are suffering because of elements of traditional culture,” she told ­debate, attended by Peter Dutton and South Australian senator Kerrynne Liddle.

“We have to acknowledge what is encouraging the levels of violence in our communities. We have to start telling the truth, and not in an ideological way to try to rewrite history in our country to fit a particular narrative.”

After the Coalition and No side this week seized on “racism” comments made by Indigenous academic and activist Marcia Langton, Senator Price said using race as a weapon was a distraction from frontline issues.

“There’ll be people who believe that … this country is racist. We need to get away from the issue of race. If you can’t even see yourself as an Australian, at least see yourself as a human being,” she said.

After earlier telling the Nat­ional Press Club that colonisation had delivered “positive” impacts for Aboriginal people, Senator Price said she feared the first priority for a constitutionally ­enshrined voice to parliament and executive government was treaty and reparations.

“There’s no shying away from it. If proponents want to suggest otherwise then that is just the exercise … of gaslighting Australians. We need honesty in this debate. We know that that is the agenda of many who support the voice and we’re not going to take any other suggestion otherwise. There are treaties in negotiation around the country right now.

“It’s one law for all as far as I’m concerned. And this is the problem that treaty poses for the Australian people. And again, you can’t have treaty with your own citizens. There was, as far as I know not a declaration of war for there to be a treaty.”

The Northern Territory Senator – who accused Anthony Albanese of being “scared of upsetting” referendum working group members – said Indigenous Australians must move away from the belief they are “victims of our nation’s history”.

“Effectively, when you believe you are a victim, your agency has been removed, and you believe that somebody else is responsible for your life. If you’re a human, you’re capable of anything. It doesn’t matter what your racial heritage is.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19555751

File: 738f9410bc20797⋯.jpg (282.24 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

>>19555745

2/2

Ahead of the October 14 referendum, Senator Price warned voters that future governments would be powerless to dismantle a voice advisory panel, similar to the axing of ATSIC. “I think that’s the danger actually. If there are allegations of fraud and corruption or sexual misconduct … then those structures do not deserve to be in place.”

The 42-year-old said Aboriginal politics had been traditionally dominated by “aggressive individuals” who control power and influence in Indigenous communities. “I do not want to see a repeat of that. And a change in our constitution that would enshrine that in perpetuity.”

The Country Liberal Party senator hit back at Indigenous leader and Yes23 campaigner Noel Pearson – who appeared at The Great Voice Debate in Sydney last week – for attacking for her. “He has a seat at the table. He’s had the ear of that many prime ministers in the past.” Senator Price said her family should have done more to support her nephew Kumanjayi Walker, who was killed during an arrest in Yuendumu.

Backing The Australian’s reporting on the death, which provoked claims of racism, she said “the fact that one of my nieces … was sexually abused in the same household as him by her own ­father, this is a reality”.

“You only reported on the tip of the iceberg, as to what goes on in places like Yuendumu and those who don’t like to hear it are part of the problem.

“In terms of my nephew’s case, more should have been done prior to him ending up in the circumstances that he ended up in our family. My family should have been far more responsible in his life when he was alive, as well as his cousin who was a victim of rape in the same household that he lived in.

“These are the issues that we need to confront if we’re going to fix the problems on the ground. And that’s just the reality of it.”

Reflecting on her upbringing on the “tough streets of Alice Springs”, Senator Price said the reason she was in her position had nothing to do with her being Indigenous. “To become what you want to become in the face of adversity. And that’s what needs to be believed going forward.”

When asked why she had thrived in the world of politics while many in her family and community had their lives mired by violence, Senator Price said education had played a key role.

“Maybe it’s the Irish in me, but I grew up pretty tough on the streets of Alice Springs. You know, for the fact that my extended family experienced violence and there were those that were victims of abuse and sexual abuse and alcoholism and all those sorts of things.”

“In my immediate family, I grew up with an Aboriginal mother and a white Australian father, who loved one another and you know, my mother, she was born out bush … English was a third language to her.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-australians-benefit-from-colonisation/news-story/590af2bd863be395ff9022e4d91a6e4d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19555788

File: b939aaf961b2ea9⋯.jpg (279.52 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Pat_Dodson.jpg)

File: 576f2d8ad2714a9⋯.jpg (266.33 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Dodson_the_Special….jpg)

>>19529127

Ailing Dodson puts faith in ‘goodness of Australians’

The ‘father of reconciliation’ went for a Covid jab and discovered he had cancer, a diagnosis that has sidelined him from the voice debate — until now.

PAIGE TAYLOR - 16 September 2023

1/2

Senator Pat Dodson was not going to see a doctor on March 31. He was due at the Winnunga Aboriginal medical service in Canberra for a Covid jab. To describe the timing of that appointment as fortuitous is a massive understatement. Once there, Dodson told doctor Eric Sambaiew he had been feeling sick. That was an understatement too. The father of reconciliation was staring at death. Sambaiew sent Dodson straight to the emergency department at Canberra hospital, where he was found to have a life-threatening infection on his oesophagus and Hodgkin’s lymphoma, a cancer of the lymphatic system. He has been absent from parliament and public life since, though on Thursday Dodson told The Australian he hopes he will soon be well enough to join the campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament.

“The chemo does what it does, it knocks you about it, makes your hair fall out. You have good days and your bad days … hopefully, that’s all behind me,” Dodson said from his home in Broome.

“There’s no cure for the Hodgkin’s lymphoma as far as I know, but it can be put into remission. And hopefully, you know, you can get back to doing pretty much what you were doing prior.”

After almost six months on the sidelines of the voice debate, Dodson says he is convinced of the goodness of Australians.

“I keep hearing ‘You have lost this, you may as well lay down and die’, you know, crawl into a hollow log and lick your wounds,” he said.

“I don’t believe that. I believe Australians are better than this. I believe Australians will look at this on the day and say ‘well this is a decent, honourable, good thing for us to do’.”

Dodson thinks of the Gartlans, the white farming family who treated him like a son in 1960s rural Victoria and demonstrated to him what reconciliation can look like. Marion Gartlan, a nurse and mother of five, looms large in Dodson’s memory because of the way she advocated for him during his school years. On one memorable day at Monivae College, Gartlan drove in from the family farm to confront a male welfare officer carrying out what had become regular visits to the school to question Dodson. Gartlan spoke to the welfare officer, then told Dodson: “Everything’s okay. You won’t be seeing him again.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19555795

File: 0f257a94e910745⋯.jpg (197.19 KB,1381x1842,1381:1842,Dodson_in_the_priesthood_w….jpg)

File: 3500852ccfca119⋯.jpg (60.07 KB,719x958,719:958,On_the_Gartlan_family_farm….jpg)

File: f1f9df14517335e⋯.jpg (118.19 KB,1389x781,1389:781,Dodson_at_a_Gartlan_family….jpg)

>>19555788

2/2

Long after the deaths of the Gartlans, Dodson remains friends with their two surviving children, Bud and Christine.

“I grew up in the little town of Katherine, I witnessed the Rights For Whites meeting and the Gurindji (people) walked off Wave Hill (station), it was the most terrible experience I’ve ever had in my life. So I’ve seen the worst side of what we’re capable of as Australians when it comes to Aboriginal relationships,” he said. “But I’ve also seen the better side – the ’67 referendum, the positive nature of our response to so many things, the goodwill on a day-to-day basis. I mean, I deal with tradies in my life or just local business people or just people I meet at the shops. Australians, people travelling through as tourists. There’s a decency in Australians that I’m hoping and confident … will come through.

“Now that to me is what I’ve always hoped in and placed my trust in. And it began with the strength of Mrs Gartlan.

“The grace and goodness that I saw in a person who knew very little about Aboriginal people … she stood up to the welfare and got rid of them out of my life.”

Dodson said he grew up in an era when government dominated the lives of Indigenous people. This was a time when “learned white folks believed they knew best what Aboriginal people needed”.

There had been periods when governments did take advice from Indigenous representative bodies, but those bodies were inevitably abolished. It was not a role Dodson nor any other Indigenous politician could possibly fulfil because of their obligations to their party and the electorate they represent including farmers, miners, Aboriginal people, small-business operators and local government.

“We face more of the same,” he said.

“The referendum would provide an axiological shift for us if it was successful.

“It would create a shift in the axis of our relationship and that would be a good thing for all of us. For all Australians.”

After six rounds of chemotherapy, Dodson is full of gratitude for the care and kindness of Australians who learned he was ill and sent him good wishes. This includes political opponents.

“And it’s helped me immensely in my recovery process,” he said.

“I’m still recovering but I am a long way from where I was, so I’m hopeful that in the next couple of weeks I’d be a lot fitter than I am and hopefully be able to become involved in the process prior to the 14th of October.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/pat-dodson-puts-faith-in-goodness-of-australians-ahead-of-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum/news-story/89d97d09688be4c43fbd9f1789f45640

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19555843

File: 1e016b083f046cc⋯.jpg (190.82 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_leader_and_the_….jpg)

File: ad1e8552dffd031⋯.jpg (174.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Yes_campaign_director_Dean….jpg)

>>19529127

>>19555788

Pat Dodson: Indigenous voice to parliament a battle of principles

PAIGE TAYLOR and GEOFF CHAMBERS - SEPTEMBER 15, 2023

1/2

Pat Dodson, the father of reconciliation, has conceded the No case in the referendum debate has been “effective” and that a lack of detail has made promoting the voice more difficult, as Yes23 prepares to launch a more aggressive campaign to claim victory.

The Western Australia Labor senator, who is seriously ill and has so far been unable to campaign for Yes23, said the October 14 referendum to constitutionally enshrine a voice to parliament and executive government was “a contest of Australia’s integrity and honesty, and its future”.

In an interview with The Australian, the Broome-based senator said the voice’s relevance is “what will determine its effectiveness”, and rejected claims that Indigenous Australians were already over-represented in federal parliament.

“I think there is a fairly effective No campaign being run. I don’t believe that’s necessarily a campaign that’s … in our best interest but it’s their campaign,” Senator Dodson said.

“I think that it’s difficult, as everyone knows, to promote the Yes campaign in terms of the detail, what the proposition is, what the provision is, why this is important, how it’s going to benefit us.

“There are some questions that are about detail, which are really not the substance of what we’re talking about. The referendum is about a principle. We put principles in our Constitution, and then we leave it to the legislators to use those principles when they come to make laws.”

Following a bruising fortnight of parliamentary sittings in Canberra, Senator Dodson’s intervention just over four weeks out from the referendum comes on the eve of a major pivot in Yes23’s messaging and strategy.

Speaking in question time on Thursday amid Coalition and No campaign outrage over “racism” comments made by Indigenous academic Marcia Langton, Anthony Albanese called for a respectful debate.

“I want the Yes campaign to be positive. The Yes campaign is about embracing a message of reconciliation and unity and, yes, love. Fear is a powerful emotion. But it’s not one that advances a country. What advances a country is bringing people together and a positive message,” said the Prime Minister, who had earlier joined Michael Long at the completion of the former AFL star’s walk from Melbourne to Canberra in support of the Yes campaign.

Ahead of the launch of Yes23 television ads on Saturday, campaign director Dean Parkin acknowledged speed-bumps in the conversation “have not been helpful” and that winning the referendum vote will be a “difficult task”.

As tens of thousands of pro-voice supporters attend mass walks in more than 40 capital cities and regional towns over the weekend, Yes23 is preparing to amplify warnings about the consequences of a No vote.

Amid No campaign warnings that the voice body will intervene across every facet of government, Senator Dodson said “if it wants to deal with an irrelevancy, then it will be dealt with as irrelevant”.

The 75-year-old, appointed by Mr Albanese as Special Envoy for Reconciliation and Implementation of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, said the voice would be elected by Indigenous Australians “for the purpose of Aboriginal representation to the parliament and the executive”.

“(It) exclusively concentrates on the matters that affect Aboriginal people.

“And that will go from health, housing, education, employment … to legacy issues that we know we still have to deal with and the perennial issues that we haven’t got on top of like deaths in custody, incarceration rates, kids being taken away and domestic violence,” he said.

“We’re going to have to deal with some of those broader legacy issues that are going to the question of disadvantage and dispossession, and displacement of Aboriginal people, as well as the contemporary issues now, they’re matters for the future.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19555852

File: 976f0dab0c28237⋯.jpg (94.46 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Long_Walk_founder_and_….jpg)

File: 360f918b9f5ef8a⋯.jpg (136.52 KB,1280x720,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19555843

2/2

Senator Dodson said future Indigenous leaders elected to a national voice should not be prejudged as “being inept and unastute as to the nature of the responsibilities and the obligations … they’re going to have to carry in their advocacy to the parliament on matters that affect them”.

“There’s a maturity within the Aboriginal leadership that I think people underestimate and condemn and foreclose upon without really understanding that there’s been huge changes, understandings and development.

“So it won’t be the same ol’, same ol’ experience that people thought they had with ATSIC or something like that. I think there’s a quality of leaders (who have a) sense of their accountability and responsibility.”

Senator Dodson, a former Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation chair and Aboriginal Deaths in Custody commissioner, said Australia’s future identity would be measured in terms of whether the nation votes yes or no.

Born as a “non-citizen” before the 1967 referendum, Senator Dodson said he grew up in an era dominated by governments and “learned white folks who believed that they knew best”.

Ahead of opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Price telling the National Press Club on Thursday that Indigenous MPs and senators were “over-represented” in the parliament, Senator Dodson said he was elected to represent an entire state.

“You’re trying to represent the interests of the state and that encompasses everyone in the state, the farmers, the miners, the Aboriginal people, the small-business operator. As an Aboriginal person, member of the Labor Party and a senator, I’m a politician that is a member of the Labor Party.

“I’m not there exclusively for Aboriginal people. In fact, there are many things internally, when the topic of Aboriginal people or issues that affect Aboriginal people arise, I don’t necessarily see that as me having to be the definitive answer on those matters. I might join the debate, I may not join the debate, depending on which portfolio it is.”

Writing in The Australian, Mr Parkin said Yes23 would ramp up efforts to win over soft voters by countering “misunderstanding and misinformation”.

Mr Parkin – who rejects claims that the voice is a “project of the elites” – said while “some Indigenous people disagree” with the proposal, he believed a majority would vote yes.

“I have no doubt politicians and bureaucrats want to find solutions, regardless of their position on the referendum. But I am similarly of the resolute conviction that without a Yes vote, there will be no successful means to finding those solutions without ongoing advice from the real experts – the people in communities,” Mr Parkin wrote.

“That conviction stems from the decades of failed policy underpinned by stop-start policymaking, not so much characterised by course adjustments as it is by ripping up the map every few years.

“Our campaign has just over four weeks left to run. This is the period when we believe Australians will really focus on both the provision and the choice.”

Pointing to repeated failures in Closing the Gap – illustrated in a recent Productivity Commission update – Mr Parkin said “we have to ask what a No vote will mean for the nation”.

With Yes23 signing up almost 40,000 volunteers to doorknock, hit the phones and attend booths on referendum day, Mr Parkin said Yes23 had “never been under any illusions that winning this referendum would be anything other than a difficult task”.

“Australians are justifiably hesitant about changing the foundation document that has been the platform for such a successful nation.

“The debate has rightly been robust. The conversation more broadly has occasionally taken detours, which evidently have not been helpful to a Yes campaign that is working to explain a constitutional change to 18 million Australians,” he wrote.

“In talking to people about this, it’s very common to meet voters who currently plan to write no on their ballot paper. Exploring their reasons, it has been my consistent experience that more often than not, their view is based on a misunderstanding, or sometimes simple misinformation.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/pat-dodson-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-a-battle-of-principles/news-story/869ed562d9a364dc6f65d78070a0dc98

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19555945

File: 41288b7b9e75184⋯.jpg (339.54 KB,2048x1152,16:9,SA_Premier_Peter_Malinausk….jpg)

>>19529127

South Australia’s Indigenous voice to parliament Yes numbers ‘not adding up’

DAVID PENBERTHY - SEPTEMBER 15, 2023

1/2

The No campaign is increasingly convinced that South Australians will reject the voice to parliament despite Yes campaigners hailing the state as a must-win at the ­October 14 referendum.

With the national Yes campaign officially launched by ­Anthony Albanese in Adelaide’s northern suburbs on August 30 framed around an appeal to the state’s progressive political traditions, there has been little sign since of the public groundswell needed to deliver a Yes win in SA.

Opposition Leader David Speirs told The Weekend Australian that he believed the state’s Yes vote was “in freefall” and that he would almost bet his house on a No victory.

The Yes camp disagrees and believes SA is still there to be won and that its trailblazing history backing land rights legislation, decriminalising homosexuality and giving women the right to vote makes the Voice a natural progression for the state.

Polls by Newspoll and the Australia Institute had the Yes vote marginally ahead in SA last month at 52-48, but a Guardian poll this week had the No vote in front, reflecting the views of No vote campaign tacticians that ­opposition to the referendum is hardening and that undecided voters are switching to No.

No campaigners believe the Yes camp has misread SA and placed far too much store on its inner-city, arts-loving, left-wing voters, ignoring the fact that the state has a large blue-collar and welfare-reliant population, and a higher-than-national-average share of older and Anglo-Saxon residents who are more hostile to the Voice.

In a tactical sense, most of the public activities aimed at bolstering the Yes vote so far have involved unions and church groups already in support anyway.

Conversely, attempts to popularise the Voice through a citywide campaign of Yes posters appear to be rubbing some voters up the wrong way.

The football-mad state’s two biggest community organisations, the Port Adelaide and ­Adelaide footy clubs, have both formally ­advocated a Yes vote. But they did so mutedly via brief social media statements several months ago and have done no campaigning on the issue since, despite some individual players such as Port legend Gavin Wanganeen playing an influential Yes role.

The two most prominent political advocates of the Yes vote are the popular and conservative Labor Premier Peter Malinauskas and Attorney-General Kyam Maher who successfully steered Australia’s first legally-enshrined voice through parliament earlier this year.

While Mr Malinauskas is missing a full week of campaign opportunities as he leads a trade delegation to China to restore SA’s wine, grain and education sectors, Mr Maher said he ­remained “cautiously optimistic” of victory, saying the Yes campaign had not yet hit full speed.

“A lot of voters aren’t engaged with the question yet and I ­remain hopeful that they will see the arguments for change and that they have nothing to fear,” he said.

In a party-political sense, SA has been notable in that the Liberal side of politics is providing zero support for the Yes vote, unlike in Western Australia where former foreign minister Julie Bishop has campaigned for Yes and in NSW where former premier Barry O’Farrell and former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull are doing the same.

SA is the only state where the parliamentary Liberal Party is campaigning in its entirety against the Voice, despite having long been a stronghold for the moderate faction of the party.

Notable senior moderates – most tellingly former trade minister senator Simon Birmingham – have effectively sat out the Voice debate by refusing to say how they are going to vote.

This has spared the federal ­opposition the awkwardness of another frontbench departure, seen with the resignation as shadow attorney-general of Yes backer Julian Leeser in April after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton formally embraced the No vote.

Mr Speirs, who assumed the Opposition Leader’s role last year when Steven Marshall resigned upon the defeat of his one-term government, said he believed the Yes camp had misread the South Australian electorate.

Mr Speirs is one of the few ­remaining suburban Liberals after last year’s election whitewash and his southern seat of Bright is home to a large number of young mortgagees, tradies and pensioners, all of whom are being crunched by the cost-of-living crisis.

“I would almost bet my house on it losing in SA,” Mr Speirs said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19555948

File: af35990071fc20c⋯.jpg (357.76 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Attorney_General_Kyam_Mahe….jpg)

>>19555945

2/2

“I am loathe to say that I can’t find anyone in my electorate who is backing it, because one person will ring and say that they are backing it, but it almost feels like it is one of them to the other 99 voting No. I wouldn’t be surprised if the result ends up being 70 No and 30 Yes in mortgage belt seats like mine, which are no different from mortgage-belt seats in the rest of Australia.

“It feels like it is in freefall, for a couple of reasons. The first is the tendency for the Yes camp to run over the top of anyone who has raised any concerns about the process. It’s their way or the highway. People feel patronised and lectured.

“The second is that we are in the middle of the most significant cost-of-living squeeze since the 1980s. There are a lot of younger blokes in white vans in my electorate who think all this time and attention is a distraction from other issues that matter more.”

Mr Speirs wrote a Facebook post earlier this week attacking the Yes camp for using suburban Stobie poles (telegraph poles) along major roads to erect Yes posters, reiterating his party’s promise to abolish all forms of corflute advertising at any election.

“That Facebook post about them plastering Yes corflutes over Stobie poles was the most liked and commented post I have had in months,” he said.

“As a tactic for the Yes camp it’s gone down like a lead balloon, especially as a referendum is not an election anyway.”

Mr Maher disagreed with Mr Speirs’ analysis and said he was disappointed that so many Liberals who had privately and even publicly supported the Voice had “gone missing”, predicting there would be a middle-class backlash against their negativity.

“It was only a couple of years ago that the Marshall government was looking at introducing its own version of the Voice. It seems extraordinary that in the space of two years they can go from looking at creating an Aboriginal advisory body to taking the position they are now,” he said.

“In some Liberal electorates in the Adelaide Hills and the eastern suburbs I am not sure if they are misreading their own voters.”

Mr Maher was more upbeat about the Yes campaign’s success so far and said many multicultural groups had been swinging behind the cause, believing the Yes vote should prevail on fairness grounds.

He said he believed the messaging around the launch with voice co-architect Noel Pearson and the Prime Minister last month had successfully resonated with SA’s liberal traditions.

“There is a huge part of our psyche in SA where we take pride in these policy achievements,” Mr Maher said.

He said that whatever happened on October 14, SA’s legislated version of the Voice would still be up and running next year, despite having chosen to delay the elections of delegates this year for fear of creating confusion amid the referendum.

He said it was a pity that SA’s election timetable had not given the Malinauskas government the time to get the state Voice operational ahead of the referendum.

“We will have a Voice here in SA regardless, the laws are passed, it’s on the statutes, and it will be up and running some time around next March,” he said.

“People will see that there is nothing that is going to be taken away from them and that all it is aimed at doing is delivering better policy outcomes.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/yes-numbers-not-adding-up-in-crunch-state-of-sa/news-story/d49244f2c1408b9360b810a026b12afa

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19555995

File: 6c06b45fba7c2c3⋯.mp4 (13.4 MB,960x540,16:9,Yes_campaign_launches_new_….mp4)

>>19481586 (pb)

>>19529127

Indigenous voice to parliament: Libs and Nats bolster No campaign, as Yes23 launches new ad

GEOFF CHAMBERS and PAIGE TAYLOR - SEPTEMBER 15, 2023

1/2

Liberal and Nationals divisions across the country have agreed to co-ordinate resources with the No campaign and boost volunteer stocks, as Yes23 launches a nationwide advertising blitz to claw back voters ahead of the ­October 14 voice referendum.

In a major boost for the No campaign, The Weekend Australian can reveal that all Liberal Party state divisions and the Nationals have pledged to actively support members who volunteer and hand out on referendum day and at pre-poll booths.

With Yes23 boasting around 40,000 volunteers – bolstered by union and ALP members – the number of No volunteers is now expected to be significantly higher than the 15,000 anti-voice supporters who have already pledged to hand out and actively campaign at polling booths.

Amid rising pressure on Anthony Albanese to provide more detail about how a constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament and executive government would close the gap for Indigenous Australians, Yes23 will blanket airwaves from Saturday with a new campaign ad push.

The ad, running across TV, print, radio and digital platforms, features a young Indigenous child asking simple questions about whether a voice would mean better opportunities for him in areas including health, education and employment.

Yes23 will stage mass walks in more than 40 capital cities and regional towns on the weekend, marking the campaign’s biggest show of force. Paul Kelly, Midnight Oil frontman Peter Garrett, Bernard Fanning, Missy Higgins, Spiderbait and Dan Sultan will perform at the Yes23 events, which are expected to attract tens of thousands of supporters.

As Yes23 ramps-up its promotions, confirmation that Liberal and Nationals organisations are shifting resources closer to the No campaign will heap more pressure on Yes strategists seeking to reverse negative opinion polls.

There had been initial reluctance from senior Liberal figures to align the party too closely with the Fair Australia No campaign, run by right-wing activist group Advance.

Following last year’s bruising federal election defeat and the Aston by-election loss, senior Liberal Party sources said the voice debate had “galvanised the membership and galvanised the broader base, who may or may not be formal party members”.

With most state Liberal leaders already opposing the voice referendum, the decision to actively support the No campaign allows members and supporters to participate in campaigning without having to provide their details to external organisations.

While the federal Liberal Party and Fair Australia are separate entities, they are “working constructively with the shared goal of defeating Labor’s Voice proposal”.

In NSW, the Liberal Party will separately facilitate Liberal volunteers who want to get involved with either the No or Yes campaigns. Senior party sources said it was expected a large majority would campaign No.

In the battleground state of Tasmania, where Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff and federal MP Bridget Archer support the voice, the state division will help co-ordinate grassroots members in support of the No campaign.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19556014

File: f4de65ee44a3e5d⋯.jpg (507.39 KB,1688x2965,1688:2965,The_new_ad_campaign_launch….jpg)

File: 06d1945d07e0d4f⋯.jpg (192.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Opposition_Indigenous_Aust….jpg)

File: 233663c1383c72e⋯.jpg (185.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_with_AFL_….jpg)

>>19555995

2/2

A No campaign spokesman said having Liberal and National volunteers supporting their ground campaign was a “huge shot in the arm”.

“The No campaign has more than 15,000 volunteers signed up for pre-poll and election day but it’s a big country and we need to cover a lot ground. While we all remain separate entities, the support from extra volunteers will be incredibly valuable,” they said.

A senior Nationals source said the party would have “members campaigning for a No vote in NSW, Victoria and Queensland”.

“Our members are very motivated to defeat this divisive voice,” he said.

Yes23, which in recent months focused on digital channels while holding back a large portion of its ad-spend war chest, will unleash a final four-week advertising blitz targeting millions of soft and undecided voters. The new ad will run alongside the John Farnham-endorsed You’re the Voice advertisement.

Yes23 director Dean Parkin said the ad tells a “powerful story of the once-in-a-generation opportunity Australians have on 14 October to improve the lives of Indigenous people”.

“This ad explains to Australians why a successful Yes vote is the best shot we have at tackling the entrenched disadvantage Indigenous people live with,” Mr Parkin said. “As more and more Australians start to tune in, we are explaining to the community that this referendum is simply about recognising the first peoples of this nation and listening to them so we can better address longstanding problems.”

At a Yes23 event in Sydney on Friday, Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney was recorded telling NSW Premier Chris Minns: “We’ve just finished two weeks of gruelling parliament. To me it’s just unbelievably racist and bullying. The way they have treated me is appalling.”

Ms Burney later told The Weekend Australian: “In recent months, my office, social media and email accounts have been ­inundated with racist abuse … ­racism takes its toll”.

“But I will never allow racism to weaken or diminish my resolve to see Australia embrace constitutional recognition through a voice. My message to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who are experiencing racism is this: hold your head high, be proud of your identity and who you are.”

After WA Labor senator Pat Dodson told The Australian that a lack of detail had made promoting the voice more difficult, priest and human rights lawyer Frank Brennan said “to vote Yes you don’t have to be convinced it’s all perfect, you don’t have to be convinced the process was perfect”.

“If it is No, it will be the hubris of a new government that said ‘let’s go for broke we don’t need to do the legislative design first, we don’t need to get the opposition parties at the same time’,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-libs-and-nats-bolster-no-campaign-as-yes23-launches-new-ad/news-story/a7f886e0cc7607c16d1860a7d82afd60

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19556052

File: e899cb4d1340397⋯.jpg (214.34 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Yes23_campaign_director_De….jpg)

>>19529127

Referendum offers us the chance to choose hope over spread of fear and confusion

DEAN PARKIN - SEPTEMBER 15, 2023

1/2

Tens of thousands of Australians will gather in every major Australian city this weekend to walk in visible support of a Yes vote in the October 14 referendum. Thousands more will be wearing T-shirts and badges as they knock on doors to talk to their fellow citizens in suburbs across the country to explain what is being asked in the referendum, and encouraging them to vote yes.

Yes23 has never been under any illusions that winning this referendum would be anything other than a difficult task. Australians are justifiably hesitant about changing the foundation document that has been the platform for such a successful nation.

The debate has rightly been robust, and no better evidenced anywhere than in the contributions from advocates in these very pages throughout the year.

The conversation more broadly has occasionally taken detours that evidently have not been helpful to a Yes campaign that is working to explain a constitutional change to 18 million Australians.

In talking to people about this, it’s very common to meet voters who currently plan to write “no” on their ballot paper. Exploring their reasons, it has been my consistent experience that more often than not, their view is based on a misunderstanding, or sometimes simple misinformation. Discussion of the proposal, the rationale, and the opportunities in voting yes very often will lead people to change their minds.

This is what the campaign team and the now almost 40,000-strong army of Yes23 volunteers are working to roll out at scale between now and October 14.

For the vast majority of our volunteers, this is the first time they have been politically active on any issue. They come from all walks of life, all faiths, all backgrounds, and all political allegiances. It is a true, broad cross-section of the Australian community.

On the days we are out knocking on doors and handing out flyers in the suburbs and at train stations, the trope that supporting recognition through a voice is somehow a project of the “elites” rings especially hollow.

While we are out in Yes T-shirts and carrying placards, the No campaign, in contrast, is telling its supporters to hide the fact that they are advocates for No when they call people’s homes or mobiles, working off a script deliberately designed to sow fear and confusion in voters’ minds. The contrast is stark.

Just as we have always known this would not be an easy campaign, we have planned for the final weeks of the campaign as a time when voters really start to focus on the decision before them. It means the campaign will move into a new phase.

Because Australia has a choice to make. As the referendum nears, it is important for voters to understand clearly the options they are choosing between.

The case for Yes is to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the Constitution by creating an advisory committee that will advise the parliament and the government on issues that matter to Indigenous people.

This is what Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have asked for as a means of recognition after more than a decade of consultations, because it is a means to be recognised with a desperately needed practical benefit, one that addresses the entrenched failures of policymaking.

It is overwhelmingly supported among Indigenous people. Of course there are some who disagree. But to borrow from former chief justice Robert French, not instituting a governance body on the grounds that some people might dissent is an argument for getting rid of parliaments.

So a Yes vote will mean delivering the recognition that Australians overwhelmingly support, in a means that Indigenous people overwhelmingly support. And it will allow us to move on from the broken approach to policymaking that has left Indigenous Australians to suffer in vast disproportion to their numbers on an array of basic measures of living standards, in one of the wealthiest countries in the world.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19556055

File: 22f19621ae81fab⋯.jpg (430.71 KB,1999x1125,1999:1125,The_May_2000_Walk_for_Reco….jpg)

>>19556052

2/2

At the same time, we have to ask what a No vote will mean for the nation. A No vote will mean ignoring what Indigenous Australians have proposed as a way to fix their many problems. Again, that proposal is to establish a standing advisory committee called a voice.

A No vote will mean more of the same old policy failures. Continuing disappointment in the data. An ongoing gap between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and their fellow Australians.

And a No vote will mean shutting the door on a practical means to address disadvantage and continuing absences of opportunity for Indigenous kids in health, education, and their employment prospects.

One of the most profound data points in the Productivity Commission’s Closing the Gap dashboard is under Target 4, about Indigenous children thriving in their early years.

Nationally, almost two out of three Indigenous children are not developmentally on track in areas such as social competence, language and cognitive skills, and emotional maturity.

And this number has gone backwards in recent years. For comparison, more than 55 per cent of non-Indigenous kids are on track on all five measurement areas.

The future trajectory of that gap for Indigenous kids – and other gaps that should be closing – is directly at stake on October 14. This is but one data point on the gap, and I raise it not to darken the mood but to shine a light on the opportunity.

We know Australians will come to terms with the stakes. And perhaps this is what gives me most confidence about the outcome. We are an optimistic people whose default position is to help out our fellow Australians.

I have no doubt politicians and bureaucrats want to find solutions, regardless of their position on the referendum.

But I am similarly of the resolute conviction that without a Yes vote, there will be no successful means to finding those solutions without ongoing advice from the real experts – the people in communities.

That conviction stems from the decades of failed policy underpinned by stop-start policymaking, not so much characterised by course adjustments as it is by ripping up the map every few years.

Our campaign has just over four weeks left to run. This is the period when we believe Australians will really focus on both the provision, and the choice.

There is so much positivity in the conversations on the ground – you’ll see it again in the walks this weekend – that we are optimistic Australians will choose Yes.

Dean Parkin is campaign director of Yes23.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/referendum-offers-us-the-chance-to-choose-hope-over-spread-of-fear-and-confusion/news-story/63a9b0f38136c473ec17e11dd747b3d9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19556112

File: 1dfffa05cb992e2⋯.jpg (399.71 KB,1800x1350,4:3,Tribal_fighters_in_Papua_N….jpg)

File: 2348dc2325ac823⋯.jpg (260.44 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tribal_fighters_in_Papua_N….jpg)

>>19417267 (pb)

>>19417281 (pb)

>>19417627 (pb)

AFP denies our guns fuel PNG tribal wars

BEN PACKHAM - September 14, 2023

The Australian Federal Police says there is “no credible evidence” that large numbers of smuggled guns from Australia are being used to wage tribal wars in Papua New Guinea, after the country’s police commissioner said Australia-sourced weapons were fuelling the deadly conflicts.

PNG Police Commissioner David Manning this week said illegal guns were flowing in from Australia for use in tribal wars that have killed more than 150 people this year alone.

“Some of these firearms are brought in from Australia, eventually finding (their) way into the tribal fight areas,” he told the Post Courier newspaper.

He said drones from Australia were being used by tribes to spot enemies from above.

An AFP spokeswoman said Australia, which has some of the world’s strongest gun laws, was not a significant source of illegal weapons.

“There is no credible intelligence to suggest large-scale importation of illicit firearms to PNG from Australia, as reported in recent media,” she said.

However, she was unable to rule out a possibility that criminal syndicates may have trafficked small numbers of guns to Australia’s northern neighbour.

Analysts have long warned of contraband flowing into PNG across its land border with Indonesia’s West Papua province, with some claiming guns are traded for women and drugs.

However, the PNG Defence Force’s acting commander, Commodore Philip Polewara, said the country’s porous maritime border with Australia also posed a serious risk. “I can admit that, especially in the southern border, there are holes where … these things do come through,” he said.

Tribal fighting in PNG’s Enga Province has claimed dozens of lives in recent months, as automatic weapons transform the scale and bloodiness of traditional tribal battles.

The fighting comes as PNG faces a financial crisis and surging population growth that has strained the government’s ability to provide basic services.

Enga’s Governor, Peter Ipatas, appealed for Australian help to contain the violence that has been marked by an influx of automatic weapons and hired gunmen.

PNG is yet to make a formal request for Australian support, and any AFP contingent would be unable to carry weapons due to constitutional restrictions.

Videos available online show piled-up naked bodies from recent fighting, and three dead men being dragged behind a four-wheel drive.

PNG Prime Minister James Marape has sent in a new squad of police and soldiers to try to wrest control of the province from the warring tribes.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/afp-denies-australian-guns-fuelling-papua-new-guinea-tribal-wars/news-story/25f6bea85c30276ecde69dd4315a90a6

https://www.postcourier.com.pg/police-defence-raise-concerns-on-illegal-guns/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19556208

File: 058fe282e4422a8⋯.jpg (259.36 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Warrant_Officer_Darrel_Row….jpg)

File: 911021ac6f458d4⋯.jpg (383.32 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Army_personnel_help_clean_….jpg)

File: a0df918f53ea892⋯.jpg (306.45 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Australian_army_personnel_….jpg)

Military ‘not a disaster relief force’, committee warns

BEN PACKHAM - SEPTEMBER 15, 2023

A Labor-led committee says states and territories can no longer treat the Australian Defence Force as “some sort of shadow workforce” to respond to domestic crises, warning that the practice is “unsustainable” and risks degrading ADF warfighting capabilities.

In its latest examination of Defence’s annual report, the joint standing committee on foreign affairs, defence and trade expressed alarm that more than half of all ADF members had been assigned to domestic disaster relief tasks in recent years.

It said diversion of ADF personnel to such tasks carried “genuine and profound” risks that would grow as the climate warmed.

“The near-persistent requirement for Defence to respond to domestic crises is unsustainable and creates unacceptable concurrency pressures that will soon degrade the ADF’s warfighting capability,” the committee said in a unanimous report tabled in parliament on Thursday.

Defence subcommittee chair and Labor MP Julian Hill said the states and territories needed to “lift their collective game” to build community resilience and properly resource their own disaster responders.

“The ADF cannot continue to be seen as some sort of ‘shadow workforce’, especially in circumstances where certain states or territories have not adequately resourced and increased their own capabilities, and community resilience and responses,” he said.

ADF personnel have for years been used to respond to fires and floods, and were even called in to support nursing home operators during the Covid crisis, sacrificing valuable training time in the absence of a viable civilian alternative.

At the same time, Defence has struggled to meet its recruitment targets, prompting the committee to speculate that disaster relief ­activities “may be a contributing factor towards job dissatisfaction” within the ADF.

Labor said before the election that it would consider creating a civilian disaster response force, but the idea has not been revisited since it won government.

The committee, in its examination of Defence’s 2021-22 annual report, said the ADF was facing “serious issues” in meeting its recruitment and retention targets, with the strong labour market making the task more difficult.

It highlighted the contraction of the force’s personnel that year by about 900 personnel, despite its annual net growth target of 1000.

The committee expressed concern at the state of some of the ­nation’s defence infrastructure, saying critical upgrades at remote air bases had been neglected.

The committee’s members were also “seriously disturbed” at the state of disrepair of a pier the Harold E. Holt Naval Communications Station, seeking an explanation from Defence on how it had been allowed to deteriorate.

“The adage ‘prevention is better than cure’ seems to have been ignored, and urgent action is required within the next few months as this is a critical capability for Australia and the US,” the report said.

Meanwhile, one of the ADF’s most senior commanders told a conference in Canberra on Thursday that he was racing to get new unmanned and autonomous capabilities into the service.

The ADF has no armed drones or loitering munitions, and is only belatedly investing in unmanned underwater vehicles.

Lieutenant General Greg Bilton told the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s Disruption and Deterrence conference that there was now “a sense of urgency” ­driven by the strategic environment.

“I want that technology as soon as (industry) can give it to me,” General Bilton said.

“It doesn’t need to be perfect … I just want to be using it and learning and adapting.”

General Bilton also said that the ADF had not yet “cracked the nut” on the use of data to make the best possible decisions.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/military-not-a-disaster-relief-force-committee-warns/news-story/77a5bede9670baf948fe33a7007d7b70

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19556229

File: 46f542bb402f4ff⋯.jpg (1.26 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Wickr_users_are_sent_out_a….jpg)

File: 1d5136a6c0afd8b⋯.jpg (3.56 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Drug_dealers_have_informed….jpg)

The polite message from Melbourne’s drug dealers to keep customers

Alex Crowe - September 15, 2023

A sophisticated drug dealing network operating in Melbourne has encouraged its customers to migrate away from using the soon-to-be defunct encrypted messaging app Wickr to rival platform Signal.

Melbourne residents signed up to a Wickr-based drug delivery service have been instructed to stop using the Amazon-owned app before its shutdown on December 31. The app has been widely used by drug dealers, hackers and paedophiles in Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom.

A Melbourne group – advertising more than 15 types of drugs including cocaine, ketamine and MDMA – has instructed Wickr users to maintain the same alias when switching apps to enable them to keep the business running efficiently.

“We are starting to place orders through Signal as well, following the same order form as our original format,” they wrote in a message to users seen by The Age.

“We appreciate our loyal customer base and would love to keep this running smoothly and provide you with the best privacy and make it easier for us to create orders.”

Wickr users are sent out a menu of what drugs are available and told to text through their pseudonym, phone number, address and preferred delivery time with their order. The Melbourne dealers then send a message back with the total cost of the order and delivery time.

Fees are calculated based on substances and distance required to travel to make the delivery. City drops attract an additional $30 fee due to the added risk of making a drug delivery in the city.

Dealers on Wickr offered most of the class A drugs commonly used in Australia, alongside a range of prescription medication, including anti-psychotic and anti-depressant medications, in a message to their network that went out this month.

“Upon delivery, be waiting outside, ready to accept orders or designate a spot for your order to be left so our drivers can stick to schedule. It is always best to order as early as possible, as we have a backlog of orders and can take a few hours to get to you,” administrators wrote.

“We start the day with a backlog of messages we work hard to get through, along with constant messages coming in through the day. If you haven’t heard back from us in an hour or so, most of the time it is because we are working through that backlog.”

Victoria Police said they were aware of illicit activity occurring across online platforms, including the acquisition and sale of illegal drugs.

“The supply of illicit drugs online and via social media is an evolving part of modern policing,” a spokesperson said. “We will continue to investigate, and charge people engaged in unlawful online activity, including the supply of illicit drugs.”

Victoria Police continues to target the drugs that do the most harm, working at the local level with crime investigation units and with the Australian Federal Police and Australian Border Force, the spokesperson said.

“Police work tirelessly to reduce the supply of drugs in Victoria. However, drug use is a whole of community issue which requires a collaborative approach to address,” the spokesperson said.

Amazon stopped accepting new users for Wickr in January ahead of its shutdown, which the company said was to allow it to focus on its business and public sector customer base.

Amazon and Signal Foundation did not respond requests for comment.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/the-polite-message-from-melbourne-s-drug-dealers-to-keep-customers-20230908-p5e328.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561548

File: 0336a69813c7dfb⋯.jpg (728.2 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Opposition_Indigenous_Aust….jpg)

>>19529127

>>19548487

A surprise voice seeks end to separatism

Australian democracy is about to be shaken up. Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s alternative vision issues a challenge for the elites.

PAUL KELLY - September 16, 2023

1/4

Australian democracy is about to be shaken up. It has been a nasty week on the campaign trail and in parliament, where the voice is in trouble.

But something else is emerging – an assertion that rejecting the voice is the gateway to a better destiny for Indigenous peoples. If the voice is rejected on October 14 much can be attributed to indigenous senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, who is turning into a new and powerful figure on our landscape – among both Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples – and whose vision is a systemic rejection of the orthodoxy surrounding the voice and Indigenous political power.

Price is not just saying No to the voice. She is saying yes to a different vision – that Indigenous peoples must be joined together in the wider nation, that they not be seen as separate, that the long-run goal must be the phasing out of separate Indigenous institutions and special policies. For Price, these are the problems. Price opposes the voice because she sees it as the latest step in a tragic, mistaken direction for Australia that must be reversed.

Price says the essence of her campaign is “a fight against those who want to divide our nation”. But her targets are both establishments, the non-Indigenous and the Indigenous power structures. This is a unique position; we haven’t seen it before. This is what makes the referendum so potentially significant in its consequences.

Her immediate goal is to defeat the referendum. But behind any such defeat Price has a vision for Indigenous peoples and the nation utterly anathema to conventional progressive wisdom. A referendum defeat will guarantee a new cycle of dispute about our future direction.

No treaty

Price says “it is only an elite few” who want the voice. She says its Aboriginal proponents “have had years at the table”. She thinks the voice seeks to perpetuate an unrepresentative Indigenous industry. Price wants no treaty, and an end to the constant debate about racism, rejecting the remarks this week from high-profile Indigenous academic and leader Marcia Langton that the No campaign is based in racism or stupidity.

Price dismissed as a lie that Aboriginal people did not have a voice, saying they had 11 voices in parliament.

She branded as another lie the insistence by Anthony Albanese that the voice was an act of courtesy by Indigenous Australia. “The claim that this is an invitation from Indigenous people to the rest of Australia is the second lie that the voice is built upon,” Price told the National Press Club.

“To say this has come from ‘First Nations people’ plays into backwards, neo-colonial racial stereotyping, suggesting that all Aboriginal people think the same, feel the same and want for the same things.”

She radiates a different view from Aboriginal Australia. Coming from the Northern Territory with a grassroots family experience of violence against women and children, and a critic of the existing Indigenous institutions, Price fights the Indigenous status quo. She says Indigenous peoples will be better off without an Indigenous constitutional institution. She demands accountability for existing Aboriginal structures and a rejection of the claims of inner-city activists to speak for all Aboriginal peoples.

Bending the minds of the establishment

Price is a revisionist, a radical and a conservative, a mix that bends the minds of the political and media establishment. This was apparent in her NPC performance. She repudiates the entire narrative of invasion trauma and the claims that Indigenous peoples today still suffer from colonisation. Indeed, she said colonial settlement had a “positive impact” – nominating running water and readily available food.

These remarks will infuriate the power structure, Indigenous and non-Indigenous. They demand modification since they deny too much of the historical record. Peter Dutton cannot afford to repeat them.

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney repudiated Price, saying her remarks betrayed the experience of many First Nations peoples. But this inevitable debate risks being a distraction for the Yes camp.

While Price’s blanket rejection of any downside of colonisation doesn’t work, what does work is the point she’s trying to get across: the historical narrative of Aboriginal people as victims since 1788 is counter-productive, constitutes a misleading “romanticism” of Aboriginal culture and works against Indigenous agency.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561555

File: dedae15e83ba541⋯.jpg (730.76 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Price_repudiates_the_entir….jpg)

>>19561548

2/4

The media will focus on the colonisation hook to discredit Price, but this misses the greater significance of her position: Price’s alternative vision for Indigenous Australians will have wide appeal and if the referendum is defeated it will trigger a new, different and divisive debate about how Australians relate to one another.

“If we keep telling Aboriginal people that they are victims, we are effectively removing their agency,” Price said. She denounced separatism and attributing the causes of Aboriginal disadvantage to “racism and colonisation”, saying that putting “grievance before fact” ruined commonsense policies. Asked about more people nominating themselves as Indigenous, Price knew why: that happened when you prioritised race, not need. This was Australia’s national blunder, putting race before need.

Speaking from the heart

Her performance at the NPC was astonishing for a politician elected only last year. Price cuts through. Her content is forthright, strident, yet compelling. Price is persuasive. She says things other politicians can’t say or would never dream of saying. She is going to become popular because she deals in common sense. She wants a united country, Aboriginal people in a broad Australia, not endless demands for separate rules, norms and institutions.

She speaks from the ground up, but she’s smart. Australians look at her face and know who this woman is. Price arrives culturally free. She speaks from the heart. She doesn’t speak the reconciliation vernacular or the culture of Aboriginal dispossession. Other politicians seem reluctant to challenge her. But that will change. The progressive elites will try to destroy her. She’s dangerous. Does she realise how dangerous her message is? She will unleash forces that will reverberate through the left and right of politics for years.

Price said the long-run goal should be the eventual phasing out of the separate Indigenous Australians ministers because they wouldn’t be required. A constitutionally enshrined voice implied “the gap will exist in perpetuity and that is not what we want”.

In short, she rejects the moral foundations on which much Indigenous policy in this country has been based for the past two generations. She rejects the narrative now dominant in our schools, universities, progressive media and corporations. Price, unsurprisingly, will interpret any defeat of the voice as having far wider implications for Australia.

This is not what the Prime Minister envisaged when he launched this referendum, backed by an alliance of elite, corporate, celebrity, institutional, professional and sporting bodies on a scale unprecedented since World War II. Australia’s elites are in the process of being administered a huge shock.

The referendum contest remains open. The Yes case is redoubling its efforts. Its determination and capacity remain strong. It has an army of volunteers and is well financed. But the startling feature of the contest, so far, is the quality and credibility of the Indigenous leadership of the No camp headed by Price and Warren Mundine and supported by indigenous Liberal senator Kerrynne Liddle.

For Price, there’s a danger: beware the mad populist right claiming any referendum win and claiming Price. She will need astute political advice. Her worst mistake would be to allow herself to be manipulated and exploited by the extreme right and inept conservatives in this country. They are political poison. These people will be a menace after any referendum loss and would represent the sure path to diminishing her remarkable brand.

Australia’s mainstream and corporate elites have been taken by surprise in this campaign. They never saw this coming; they never did proper due diligence on the referendum. How serious are these people? Many felt changing our Constitution was a calculated deal to appeal to their Indigenous staff. A referendum defeat will repudiate their judgment and their conception of their own country. It will show they misread Australian values, knew nothing of Indigenous politics, ventured into territory they didn’t understand and demonstrated that they cannot be trusted on the strategic decisions about the nation’s future identity.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561560

File: b179b7df0c1a776⋯.jpg (187.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19561555

3/4

Price tied together the nexus of elites. She attacked Canberra politicians who were Yes supporters but who “listened to the Qantas-sponsored leaders of the activist industry”, not to ordinary Aboriginal women who had come to the national capital seeking help.

“The voice will become yet another battleground for many Aboriginal voices to disagree,” Price said. “This division must be rejected and certainly must not be enshrined within our Constitution.”

It is doubtful if there has ever been an insiders-outsiders contest on this scale in our history. The strategy of the Yes camp was to build an alliance of institutional and community support. Albanese still invokes this alliance.

While the full scale of respective financial support will not be known until after the referendum the Yes camp was backed by an April announcement of $17m from a range of rich philanthropists and family foundations. The Ramsay Foundation has provided $5m, Qantas is flying the Yes campaigners around the country, BHP, Rio Tinto and Wesfarmers donated $2m each.

This week Albanese told the parliament: “Every major business in Australia is supporting the Yes campaign. Woolworths, Coles, Telstra, BHP, Rio Tinto, the Business Council of Australia, the Catholic Church, the Imams Council, the Australian Football League, the National Rugby League, Rugby Australia and Netball Australia are all supporting the Yes campaign.”

The actual list, of course, is far longer, running into hundreds of community and professional organisations. The weight of institutional middle-class Australia has aligned with the Yes case. The No side has support including financial supporters but nothing on this scale.

Yet the week revealed, again, the central problem of the Yes campaign – public concern that the voice will divide the nation. From the start the obstacle for the Yes camp was the model of the voice, a point repeatedly made by many authorities who were treated with contempt by the Albanese government. The voice, by definition, is a group rights political body based on ancestry and granted unique advisory access to parliament and government – a model that is contentious and raises a series of doubts that have not been answered.

Yes advocates saw their efforts sabotaged this week by Langton – who has a long record of courageous achievement for her people – but who told a Bunbury forum last Sunday that the No case was anchored in “base racism” or “just sheer stupidity”.

This followed Noel Pearson the previous week seeking to win over the soft Noes, talking compassion, saying the voice was about love and attempting to put a positive frame around the proposal. Langton retaliated saying she had been misrepresented but doubled down on her original claims referring to “the very base and frankly stupid and racist claims being made by the No campaign”.

This only provoked the release of several further clips, one quoting her from July this year saying that 20 per cent of voters – the hard Noes – “are the ones who are spewing the racism”. In 2020 she said Aboriginal families had been broken apart by social workers “who are, by and large, white and racist”. A further clip from several years ago had Langton saying Australia was a “horrible racist country”.

As Dennis Shanahan said in this paper Langton, a distinguished academic and force for Aboriginal advancement, is not a politician accustomed to campaigns. Her message conflicted with the Yes strategy and real damage had been done.

Struck senseless

With much of the media struck senseless, The Australian Financial Review’s political editor, Phillip Coorey, made the pertinent point: what made Langton’s comments “so reckless” was that this was the precise evidence about racism the No camp wanted to be able to exploit.

Moreover, in August 2018, in The Saturday Paper, Langton had patronised Price and her mother, Bess Price, in an offensive manner, branding them the “useful coloured help” for right-wing think tanks, the Bennelong Society or the Centre for Independent Studies, thereby raising suspicions “about their motives” when speaking about violence in Aboriginal communities.

Langton has made mistakes. But the No campaign is just as guilty, if not more guilty, of racist and offensive comments and misinformation. This week, therefore, should serve as a break point: the country cannot spend the next month sinking into accusations and counter-accusations about racism.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561568

File: 7fd64b7ce4ca389⋯.jpg (229.09 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Distinguished_Professor_Ma….jpg)

>>19561560

4/4

In a depressing and complex week, an example of our better selves suddenly sprang from multicultural Australia. Independent MP Dai Le, who arrived in this country as a Vietnamese refugee, interviewed on Sky News by Laura Jayes and talking with emotion, described Australia as a country “growing and maturing”, pointing out “there are flaws in any society”, conceding there were some racist people but asserting that “Australia is not a racist country”. This was the generosity and balance the week badly needed. At the same time Warren Mundine branded talk of racism as “madness” and said “whatever the result we have to come together”. He said he had just met and “cuddled” football legend Michael Long, who had walked from Melbourne to Canberra for the Yes cause.

The week in parliament was ugly and emotional, dominated by a slanging match of accusation between Albanese and Dutton. It was conspicuous for post-referendum blame-game positioning. Indeed, the blame game is a potent force hurting the referendum.

Feeling the momentum behind the No cause Dutton attacked Albanese: “He doubles down and he stands before the Australian people as the first Prime Minister in our country’s history who will seek to divide our country right down the middle.” And Albanese said of Dutton: “When it comes to dishonesty and division, when it comes to fear and campaigns and falsehoods, this bloke wrote the book.”

The problem is that attacking Dutton won’t win the referendum. This is not an election campaign. Treating it as an election campaign is folly. The people are not being asked to choose between Albanese and Dutton; they are being asked to vote in a referendum, and the only way Albanese can win is to build a broad based voting alliance. He needs to persuade.

At week’s end this is where the Prime Minister finished. Welcoming Long’s arrival in Canberra, Albanese was positive and eloquent. “Changing a constitution is tough,” Albanese said. “It’s hard. We knew that at the beginning of this journey. It didn’t stop us from stepping out. And not for a day, not for a day have I regretted that decision. And not a single Indigenous leader who I’ve met has asked for anything other than to keep stepping forward. Michael Long has made a lot of steps all the way the way from Melbourne. He’s a great Australian who cares for his people.”

The Yes camp says it still has a narrow path to victory. All his life Albanese has been a political warrior. His path to victory lies in promoting the notion of twin ideas of reconciliation and Aboriginal responsibility. A month is still a long time.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/jacinta-prices-alternative-to-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-is-a-vision-for-the-future/news-story/4c36bbc221c22433a93aaf21b6e39974

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561603

File: 4ae025f6765a614⋯.jpg (3.55 MB,4032x3024,4:3,The_Yes_campaign_has_descr….jpg)

File: 4fa27bfc8841d61⋯.jpg (3.41 MB,4032x3024,4:3,The_Walk_for_Yes_campaign_….jpg)

File: 19028076562cbc2⋯.jpg (595.23 KB,2016x1512,4:3,The_Walk_for_Yes_event_is_….jpg)

>>19529127

Thousands rally in Adelaide in Yes campaign event ahead of Voice to Parliament referendum

abc.net.au - 17 December 2023

Thousands of Voice to Parliament supporters have gathered in Adelaide in one of the Yes campaign's biggest South Australian events ahead of the referendum.

The Yes campaign said the turnout demonstrated there was "overwhelming" backing for the Voice in South Australia, a state supporters have described as pivotal to its hopes of referendum success.

Supporters gathered in Victoria Square before marching through central Adelaide, with musician Paul Kelly also performing for the crowd.

Similar rallies are being held across the country this weekend, with most taking place on Sunday.

The Adelaide "Walk for Yes" rally follows a series of opinion polls indicating a sharp dive in support for the Voice in South Australia, a similar trend to that reported in other states.

Several recent polls in the state have indicated that a majority of South Australians now oppose the Voice.

But Albanese government minister Amanda Rishworth said the large crowd at the Adelaide rally was a positive sign for the Yes campaign.

"This is to demonstrate the overwhelming community support here in South Australia for a 'Yes' vote," Ms Rishworth said.

"We will see South Australia playing such a critical role in this referendum coming up."

Voice supporter and Bunganditj woman Lilly Lesslie, who attended the rally, said she was pleasantly surprised by the number of attendees.

"It is shocking because from what I had seen online it wasn't looking so good," Ms Lesslie said.

"It is a relief to see a lot of people out here today for the Yes vote."

No campaign says SA Voice support dropping dramatically

Yes campaign director Dean Parkin expressed confidence that South Australia would vote in support of the Voice.

"We are very encouraged by what we are seeing here in South Australia," Mr Parkin said.

"We reckon South Australia is going to be absolutely there with us."

But South Australian Liberal leader David Speirs, who opposes the Voice, said he would "almost bet his house" on the referendum being rejected by voters in his home state.

"The writing is on the wall," Mr Speirs said.

"Public sentiment towards the Voice shows it will likely be defeated.

"People are sick of inner city elites intent on dividing our nation based on labels."

The No campaign said it would be in South Australia on Tuesday to "prosecute the reasons why the Voice to Parliament … is built on a falsehood".

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-16/sa-yes-campaign-referendum-march/102864664

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561661

File: 320a8de16a3a15f⋯.jpg (246.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_gave_a_rousin….jpg)

File: d57080b0d0f58c4⋯.jpg (376.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_community_gathering_co….jpg)

File: 3f6615ab9a71652⋯.jpg (244.48 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_AFL_player_Michael_….jpg)

>>19529127

Indigenous leader Noel Pearson slams divisive politics in Voice

ADELAIDE LANG - SEPTEMBER 16, 2023

Indigenous leader and lawyer Noel Pearson has welcomed a substantial change for the Yes campaign as he says it moves out of the realm of politics and into the hands of the people.

Speaking at a community gathering in Redfern, in Sydney, on Saturday morning, he said the Yes campaign would focus on a message of unity in the lead up to the Voice to Parliament referendum.

“We’re so very pleased that the politics of division and anger and suspicion and fear generated by politicians is now behind us,” he told the crowd in Sydney’s inner west.

“We’ve got the next four weeks to have conversations with our fellow Australians about the power of listening.”

Australians will head to the polls on October 14 to vote on whether to amend the constitution.

The majority of Australians and the majority of the six states must vote yes in order for the referendum to succeed.

“This is about recognising the Aboriginal And Torres Strait Island people as the first peoples of Australia,” Mr Pearson said.

“That is a principle that no one should really have any objection to. It is simply the truth. It’s history. It’s a fact.”

Despite recent polls showing an alarming drop in support for the Yes campaign, the Indigenous leader said he believed Australians would choose to acknowledge the nation’s first people in the constitution.

“Australia is going to be a better country on October 15,” he said fervently.

“It’s a great country now, but on October 15, we will move to a new future.”

Yes23 spokesman Rachel Perkins said the Yes campaign aimed to “bring the country together” and “make it whole” to the packed community gathering on Saturday.

“This is a message of friendship that Aboriginal and Torres Strait people are extending to the nation and we are confident that our fellow Australians are going to accept that hand of friendship,” she told the cheering crowd.

“It’s time … to draw a line in the sand and give us the right to have a voice to change our lives.”

Ms Perkins explained the Voice to Parliament was simply “a modest proposal” which would change Indigenous lives for the better.

“No is about the status quo,” she said of the opposing Voice campaign.

“Yes is for hope, Yes is for unity and Yes is a change for people whose lives are at the bottom rung of the ladder in this country.”

For Indigenous leader Aunty Norma Ingram, the Voice is the opportunity to resolve a lifelong battle for recognition of the nation’s first people.

She said it was encouraging to see awareness of Indigenous issues and stories had increased ahead of the upcoming referendum.

“My parents were fighting for Aboriginal citizens’ rights in 1938, and we are still here fighting because we (don’t) have a voice,” she said.

“Get out there, people, and vote yes because it’s not only good for Aboriginal people, it’s good for all Australians.”

Former AFL star Michael O’Loughlin agreed that a successful referendum would be the first step in unifying Australia.

“Together we can do a lot of incredible things for this great country,” the former Sydney Swans player said.

“It is a great country but we’ve got a lot of work to do.”

Reconciliation Australia CEO Karen Mundine said a Yes vote would bring the country together and provide solutions to longstanding problems.

“This is a moment in our time when we get to do something positive to move us forward,” she said.

“This is how we make Australia better.”

Indigenous actor Luke Carroll, Tribal Warrior CEO Shane Philips and musician Tim Freedman also gave stirring endorsements for the Yes vote.

All of the Indigenous leaders and activists encouraged attendees to join the 50,000 people who had signed up to the Yes campaign walks in the major cities this weekend.

Ms Perkins said the walks would be an opportunity to demonstrate unity and a desire for change as the Yes campaign enters the crucial final month.

“We’ve got a month to go and we’re going to give every day our best shot,” she said.

Despite the overwhelming positivity of the Yes campaign, recent polling has revealed the No campaign is leading in every state.

A recent poll shows national support for the Voice plummeted 21 per cent over the past year, with similar declines in every state.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/indigenous-leader-noel-pearson-slams-divisive-politics-in-voice/news-story/b722353e3c5de4c94548504776cd46c4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561705

File: 9bf3ecfb5d38ce0⋯.jpg (966.1 KB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Leading_Voice_architect_No….jpg)

File: 9612f9a8a9f68fb⋯.jpg (3.84 MB,5555x3703,5555:3703,Minister_for_Indigenous_Au….jpg)

>>19529127

>>19561661

Don’t be distracted by ‘controversy bombs’, Pearson urges Yes campaign

Lisa Visentin and Michael Koziol - September 16, 2023

1/2

The Yes camp will use rallies for 50,000 people and concerts in capital cities on Sunday to try and draw a line under a messy opening fortnight, after the Voice referendum campaign became mired in a verbal crossfire about racism and the impact of colonisation.

Voice co-architect Noel Pearson said at a Yes23 rally in Sydney’s Redfern that the campaign would need to avoid “controversy bombs” over the remaining four weeks to referendum day on October 14, as he dismissed comments by Coalition frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price that British colonisation had no lasting negative impacts on Indigenous Australians.

“What I believe, is the only path forward for the Yes campaign over the next four weeks is to keep pushing a positive message,” Pearson said. “Don’t be distracted by these attempts to chuck controversy bombs into the water to blow up an argument over here that’s got nothing to do with the referendum.”

He said Price’s comments, made in response to a question about colonisation at the National Press Club on Thursday, were “just provocative words”.

“They ought to be taken as, alright, she’s woken up or her advisors have woken up and thought, what is the most annoying thing I could say today to cause a controversy?”

Also during the week, the Coalition seized on comments by top Voice proponent Marcia Langton saying the No case’s arguments were “based in racism and stupidity”.

In a separate interview marking the one-month deadline until referendum day, Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney maintained she was not contemplating defeat on October 14, and expressed her desire to stay on in the role when asked about her post-referendum plans in the context of the toll of the campaign and her recently disclosed medical issues.

“I am resilient,” she said. “I think that in many ways just like Cathy Freeman didn’t give up and Vincent Lingiari didn’t give up, I’m here for the right reasons. I’m here to make this country a better place and I will continue to do that.”

After a week in which Burney came under intense Coalition pressure in question time over the Voice, and was accused by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton of responding with irrelevant scripted answers, Burney verged on tears as she spoke of the challenge facing Yes campaigners and Indigenous Australians over the next four weeks and beyond.

“I’m not contemplating defeat, so I’m not going to talk about if there is a No vote. But the most important thing is the message of love overcoming fear,” Burney said, as she went on to draw an analogy to her experience caring for her disabled husband Rick Farley before his death in 2006.

“I don’t want to get upset, but in my own life I have seen and been in a situation where I saw my husband become very sick and extremely disabled. For six months he was like that before he actually died. And I know that no matter what happened in that situation it was our love for each other that was the important thing.

“And that’s what will happen because we as a people, and the Yes campaign, we are not going to give up. The Aboriginal affairs agenda is huge … a whole range of issues to do with the issues facing First Nations people, that will not stop. But in terms of this referendum, it is our one chance as a nation to recognise and do better.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561714

File: f235befdcb140a3⋯.jpg (3.03 MB,5362x3575,5362:3575,Warren_Mundine_at_the_pres….jpg)

>>19561705

2/2

Her comments came before she was caught on a live microphone on Friday while campaigning alongside NSW Premier Chris Minns, where she appeared to suggest she had been treated “appallingly” by the federal opposition during the parliamentary fortnight.

“We’ve just finished two weeks of gruelling parliament. To me, it’s just unbelievably racist and bullying. The way they have treated me is appalling,” Burney said to Minns.

She later issued a clarifying statement saying her office, social accounts and email had been inundated with racist abuse.

About 50,000 people had signed up to take part in the Walk for Yes events around the country, Pearson said while addressing the Redfern rally alongside Yes23 campaigner Rachel Perkins and Indigenous former AFL player Michael O’Loughlin.

The largest walks are expected in Sydney and Melbourne in what Yes23 campaigners hope will help arrest sliding momentum. A Resolve poll this week showed support for the Voice had slumped to 43 per cent after the first week of the campaign and the No case was leading in every state except Tasmania.

Prominent No campaigner Warren Mundine said his side was not worried about the Yes camp having a larger ground campaign, claiming that “people are rejecting the message that it is based on – that Aboriginal people don’t have a voice, which is utter nonsense”.

Asked about the Yes campaign’s struggles on Saturday, Minns said he believed the campaign still had time to make the arguments and assure people the Voice would be a positive change and would not replace representative democracy.

“Nothing will take precedence over the House of Representatives and the Senate. Nothing. That’s our system, our system works,” Minns said.

“Some people are saying that it’s already over before it’s begun. It’s not. Most people I speak to either aren’t engaged on the issue yet or haven’t thought deeply about it.“

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/don-t-be-distracted-by-controversy-bombs-pearson-urges-yes-campaign-20230915-p5e4wo.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561768

File: 1143b1e53e8919d⋯.jpg (377.95 KB,2048x1152,16:9,This_is_a_moment_of_empath….jpg)

>>19529127

Why the Indigenous voice to parliament is a Thatcher-esque project

JULIAN LEESER - SEPTEMBER 16, 2023

1/2

Earlier this week I received an email from a constituent named Les. Les is a retiree and shared with me how he is being squeezed with rising medicine, food and power costs. He didn’t hold back in asking me why I was advocating for the voice when so many Australians were hurting financially.

It was a legitimate question to ask. I think many Australians are asking: why should we vote Yes in this referendum when the economy is so tight? Surely there are better priorities.

My answer to Les, and the many who share his view, is that the voice gives us the means to tackle the economic challenges facing so many Indigenous communities. By tackling these challenges we also can make our economy and the budget stronger.

We have to change what we are doing because what we are doing isn’t working.

Despite enormous goodwill, bipartisan support and untold billions in taxpayer funds, we are not making a substantive difference to closing the economic and social gaps that Indigenous Australians face.

The terrible truth is that in Australia today, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people face:

• Chronic ill-health – with Aboriginal people, on average, living eight years less than other Australians.

• Widespread unemployment – with the Indigenous unemployment rate being nine times higher than what other Australians face.

• Poverty – with one in two Indigenous Australians living below the poverty line.

• Homelessness – with one in five Indigenous households living in accommodation not meeting an acceptable standard.

• A lack of safety for women and children. In NSW, an Indigenous woman is 30 times more likely to present at a hospital with injuries from violence than other Australian women.

• Lack of opportunity – with Indigenous boys in this country more likely to go to jail than university.

The risk in this referendum is not change, it’s a continuation of the same old, same old.

As a conservative, I’ve wondered for a long time why we consistently are failing to make any real progress on Indigenous health, education, housing, safety and economic advancement.

I believe the answer is cultural and is found in the words of poet Oodgeroo Noonuccal: Indigenous Australians want “freedom, not frustration; self-respect, not resignation”.

All too often, Canberra and decision-makers in state capitals make decisions for and not with Indigenous communities, and in so doing we rob them of the agency that can help their communities grow. It was a point made by the Productivity Commission in its recent Closing the Gap report.

The commission said: “There appears to be an assumption that ‘governments know best’ … Too many government agencies are implementing versions of shared decision-making that involve consulting with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people on a predetermined solution, rather than collaborating on the problem and co-designing a solution.”

The voice is about changing this mindset. It’s about giving voice and respect to local and regional communities. It’s about forsaking a belief that we know best. Only then can we make a meaningful difference and deal with what songwriter Paul Kelly calls “the stone in our shoe”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561773

File: f170aa23fdcf0e5⋯.jpg (2.28 MB,5409x3606,3:2,Liberal_MP_and_Yes23_Campa….jpg)

>>19561768

2/2

I believe the disconnect between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australia is the root cause of the economic disconnection in Indigenous communities and lives.

The practical work of the voice is about closing the gap and creating economic opportunity. It’s about shifting our focus from looking down to looking up and out, from welfare to jobs, and from prisons to universities.

You can achieve this through empowerment, respect and the strengthening of Indigenous civic infrastructure, all within our democratic system.

Frankly, the idea of giving Indigenous communities a voice, shifting decision-making closer to communities and giving people greater responsibility to shape the politics that affect them is almost Thatcher-esque.

These are all deeply liberal and conservative ideas.

I do recognise that the voice challenges an aspect of our modern political culture, and that is our increasing inability as a country to walk in each other’s shoes.

It’s a topic that has been on my mind for some time. It wasn’t an accident that I started the year with a speech to the Young Liberal Convention about the voice and about empathy.

We often think empathy is about identifying with people “just like us”. However, that is not an understanding and a reckoning with difference; it’s not true empathy. Empathy is bigger.

Empathy is not about accepting and embracing people because we can see ourselves in them. It is about standing with people and their right to dignity, freedom and self-expression when we can’t see the similarities.

In a time when so many of us are under pressure and face our own challenges, we are being asked to lift up our eyes and to change the way we do things so that we can close the gap

Yes, my correspondent Les is right to say Australians in our suburbs are feeling great pressure and we must do more to alleviate them.

I don’t believe the voice cuts across this work. I think it’s an integral part of our work to make our country and economy stronger.

We do this by trying to get Indigenous Australians to the same starting line that other Australians are at. That is what this referendum is about.

The voice is not about special treatment or privileges. It’s about Indigenous children, their lives and their future, and trying to create the conditions so Indigenous children can walk confidently in two worlds.

This is a moment of empathy, a moment of shared understanding, and a moment of consequence.

I hope we seize it.

Julian Leeser is the Liberal member for Berowra in Sydney.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/why-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-is-a-thatcheresque-project/news-story/2512c7049034c773b6c47dbeb94f2a75

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561865

File: d6673082646d483⋯.jpg (181.23 KB,1827x1218,3:2,The_report_revealed_it_was….jpg)

File: 63d513415a52803⋯.jpg (234.34 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0001.jpg)

File: 2002c5aac3b0bf0⋯.jpg (843.21 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0002.jpg)

File: 3e25258bc584e6b⋯.jpg (716.64 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0003.jpg)

File: b645254fe61ac3d⋯.jpg (899.31 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0004.jpg)

Report finds decades of violence and sexual abuse allowed to go unchecked in Victoria's racing industries

AAP / ABC - 13 Sep 2023

1/2

Harassment and abuse have gone unchecked in Victoria's racing industry, with victims subjected to ritualised violence and physical and sexual assaults, the racing watchdog has found.

The Racing Integrity Commissioner, Sean Carroll, has issued a long-awaited report into victim support and complaint processes in the industry, saying it has fostered a community filled with people who have lived and breathed racing for generations.

However, the sense of community has led to an "environment where harassment, abuse and assault have taken place unchecked", the report said.

"The dark flip side of loyalty has been a culture of silence across the industry that is underpinned by an historical and widespread, tacit discouragement of reporting," the commissioner's report said.

"At times, those who have raised complaints have been the subject of overt retaliation.

"A number hold the perception that perpetrators of abuse have been protected."

'Their voices have been heard'

Integrity commissioner Sean Carroll, in his review of the industry, heard devastating accounts of physical and sexual abuse including rape, sexual and physical assault, humiliating initiation practices, ritualised violence, grooming and harassment.

Children as young as 12 and young recruits were among the victims, and some of the abuse took place in recent years, the review found.

Racing Minister Anthony Carbines said the allegations from victims were unacceptable and deeply distressing.

"Their voices have been heard and will drive meaningful and enduring change," he said in a statement.

Greyhound Racing Victoria chief executive Stuart Laing apologised to survivors for the harm caused by past failures.

"GRV commits to learning from the report, so we can play our part in driving a better future for the Victorian racing industry," he said.

Harness Racing Victoria also offered an apology on behalf of the industry while vowing change.

"We are committed to setting higher standards to promote a safer and more inclusive industry," chief executive Matt Isaacs said.

Racing Victoria chief executive Andrew Jones said the final report was confronting, featuring accounts of experiences over the past 50 years that no one should be subjected to.

He praised the courage of those who spoke to the review panel and also apologised.

"One victim is one victim too many and it's clear from the report that we still have more work to do," he said.

"Child abuse in any form, in any workplace, in any situation is unacceptable and nobody in Victorian racing obviously is anything other than appalled by it."

Matt Hyland from the Victorian Jockeys Association urged anyone who had been abused or was struggling to reach out for support.

"We just have to say to those people we are listening and we hear you," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561875

File: 539dc5250b15c93⋯.jpg (635.44 KB,1482x962,57:37,The_head_of_the_Greyhound_….jpg)

File: bde7e97163b3ebb⋯.jpg (858.51 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0005.jpg)

File: dcd9204b8ef90bb⋯.jpg (846.57 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0006.jpg)

File: 4606c80889441d7⋯.jpg (838.21 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0007.jpg)

File: 36a26dc555c3f74⋯.jpg (744.03 KB,1241x1754,1241:1754,0008.jpg)

>>19561865

2/2

Decades of abuse and silence

The report revealed 71 per cent of complaints it investigated came from the thoroughbred industry, 19 per cent related to the greyhounds sector, 9 per cent from the harness racing industry and a small number were cross-code.

More than half of the victims were male and almost all were harmed when they were under the age of 25.

While more than a third of the abuse happened over the past few years, the rest of the incidents date back to the 1970s.

From the 1970s to 1990s, it was common practice for child apprentice jockeys to be indentured to stables, with trainers becoming their legal guardians.

Many lived in dormitories where children as young as 12 lived largely unsupervised.

"In some cases, the dormitories became the hunting ground for sexual predators," the report said.

The report detailed how sexual and physical violence "became the norm in this era", with no avenue for complaint.

Some said said they also feared speaking up in case they lost "the chance of becoming a star" or "their only source of income".

Many reported to the review that the abuse they suffered led to drug and alcohol addiction, depression, self-harm, suicide attempts and periods of incarceration.

The abuse was not always physical.

The report told of one victim-survivor in the 1980s who was not paid for 12 months and did not have a single day off over a year.

There were also accounts of constant pressure to remain at a minimum weight, leading to the use of pills, excessive smoking and methamphetamines.

"I remain personally devastated to hear participant experiences of continuing tolerance of harassment, abuse and assault within each of the codes," the commissioner wrote.

"A number describe feeling invisible and invalidated because they consider that people in positions of authority have historically turned their backs on the problem, and colleagues and bystanders continue to walk past and turn a blind eye when they witness specific incidents."

"This is unacceptable."

Calls for restoration and repair

The commissioner made nine recommendations to make the industries safer, including better reporting and response processes.

They include a one-year deadline for developing a comprehensive plan for the prevention of physical and sexual abuse, assault and harassment, and establishing an independent restoration scheme for current and former workers who have experienced abuse.

The commissioner recommended the scheme be based on the restorative and redress approaches of other sporting codes, including direct access to support services and counselling.

"The absence of targeted wellbeing programs for stable and kennel staff, including track riders, strappers, greyhound catchers and attendants — who collectively form the vast majority of the [Victorian racing industry] workforce — is an industry shortcoming," the Commissioner said.

The review also said the industries' controlling bodies must refer reports of alleged criminal conduct to the police.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-13/victorian-racing-industries-report-abuse-violence-sexual-assault/102851616

https://racingintegrity.vic.gov.au/review

https://racingintegrity.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0026/201869/Independent-Review.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561988

File: 4a5238b3817acdd⋯.jpg (351.6 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Meet_the_Australian_cybers….jpg)

Meet the gurus hanging out on the dark web

Murky to most, the dark web is the epicentre of cyber attacks, identity fraud and drug crime, but it’s also not a bad business opportunity for those who know where to look.

JOSEPH LAM - September 14, 2023

1/2

The dark web is often characterised as a mythical place, an out of reach portion of the internet where only the most elite criminals frequent to trade stolen credentials, sell illegal weapons and share fraud tactics. But the reality is far more unremarkable than that.

Some would even describe the dark web as having a better resemblance to the early days of the internet rather than any kind of high-tech experience.

That’s according to Brenton Cooper, an Adelaide man who has for the past six years made a business out of selling access to its content. “It’s like the really early days of the internet when the internet was sort of like a directory,” Cooper says. “It’s basically folders that you can explore by clicking and that’s how people access the dark web today.

“There’s a whole range of forums that you can go in, as well as message boards. The marketplaces are relatively straightforward and like the experience you would have in eBay.”

Cooper is the founder and chief executive of Fivecast, the marketplace for dark web marketplaces, which provides a window into the world of criminal activity. The company is one of several in Australia that operates in a portion of the internet inaccessible to most.

While the average Australian won’t ever access the dark web, nor will most leaders at major companies, many are desperate to know if their data and their customers are being bought, sold and traded in illegal forums.

A former engineer, Cooper saw the opportunity to set up his platform in 2017, which could provide access to dark web files through a standard internet browser with no special software or hardware required. That’s quite the contrast to the dark web that sees many use former US military anonymity software TOR for access – originally developed to protect the identities of US Navy intelligence agents.

Fivecast’s marketplace looks a bit like that of eBay or Facebook, where companies can, for a buck, gain access to data that has been downloaded and vetted in a secure environment.

The idea has quickly caught on, with the company having now raised $34m across multiple capital rounds to fund its global expansion and to extend its product offering.

Today the company operates out of four major offices in the US, the UK and Cooper’s hometown of Adelaide, with a staff headcount of 120.

Fivecast is now used by almost all Australian law enforcement agencies or services in one capacity or another, says Cooper. “We’re helping them really collect that information index and make it searchable so that they can look for particular identifiers, whether it’s your own crypto wallet, premium signatures and things like that,” he says.

“Today we’re looking at about 750 different dark web forums and over 25 separate marketplaces. So it’s quite an active ecosystem.”

It’s a service that is well compensated, costing customers anywhere between $50,000 to several million per year, Cooper adds.

To understand how the business operates, one must first understand how the dark web works. The internet, Cooper says, can be broken up into the three parts: the surface, deep and dark web.

“The surface web is what you find with a Google search and makes up about four per cent of total data on the internet,” he explains. “The deep web makes up the most of the internet and that is information that sits behind logins or paywalls, such as social media and other sorts of paid platforms including news.

“The remainder is the dark web; and the dark web is really sort of an overlay on top of the traditional internet where you’re using encryption and relays to sort of provide secure browsing.”

In the wake of mass cyber attacks Australia has seen over the past two years, Fivecast has taken on a number of new customers. Many companies that have been breached use the platform to find out just how much data has been stolen.

“That’s one of the benefits of being able to dip your toe into the dark web without having to worry about any infrastructure and concerns,” Cooper says. “That is one of the corporate use cases we have. On the law enforcement side, it’s much more about those illicit markets, whether it’s looking for drugs or human trafficking.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19561998

File: be1f7f5b0182fce⋯.jpg (861.24 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Fivecast_CEO_Founder_Brent….jpg)

File: 468cdbe5e208cea⋯.jpg (94.86 KB,800x1067,800:1067,Jamieson_O_Reilly_the_foun….jpg)

File: 1bc0138fca1a088⋯.jpg (103.66 KB,1280x1707,1280:1707,Telegram_has_become_a_popu….jpg)

>>19561988

2/2

The business today exists as a software-as-a-service (SaaS) product that is hosted in the cloud. Customers sign up to access the platform.

Given the nature of access to the dark web, “it draws in particular threat actors, as we like to call them, who can sort of roam freely and do what they want to do, whether that’s co-ordinate cyber attacks or exchange details,” Cooper says.

As vendors are increasingly moving into the dark web space, some criminals are choosing to conduct activity on other platforms. Some areas include invite-only hacker threads and messenger chats on platforms including Signal and Telegram.

Jamieson O’Reilly is the founder and chief executive of Dvuln, a cybersecurity firm that provides intel to companies including OCR Labs. Of late, O’Reilly has assigned four staff a new task: to infiltrate the chatrooms of hackers and criminals on secure messaging platforms.

Telegram, which has long been popular among right wing conspiracy theorists and was used widely to organise anti-lockdown protests across Sydney and Melbourne in 2021, is one of those platforms.

While in operation, staff pose as hackers and use local jargon to gain the trust of those running the platforms to obtain access. Once inside, they observe and report their findings back to their headquarters, which in turn delivers those reports to customers.

“It’s not like there are thousands of websites that our staff have to traverse across. It’s really just a handful of key players in that world that we need to keep tracking and keep on top of what they’re doing and what they’re planning,” O’Reilly says.

He adds that Dvuln is aware of a handful of notorious figures in the space but, rather than try to pin down who they are, it looks for traces of them across multiple threads and forums.

“The trouble is it’s too easy for these people to use multiple identities so we don’t put too much value on attribution,” he says. “Some companies in this space chase attribution very hard but we’ve always had this mantra that it takes someone 10 minutes to create a new profile.”

Dvuln has four main services, but two of its most popular include penetration testing, when the company is hired to test new systems or applications, and red teaming, which is an extension of penetration testing that doesn’t test a single application or program but rather the entire system.

These services typically cost between $2000 to $3000 per day, with pen testing lasting a couple of weeks and red teaming running up to several months.

With the threat of cyber attacks on corporate Australia causing increasing alarm and the rising sophistication of criminal online activity, it’s appears to be a timely (and lucrative) sector to be at the forefront of.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/technology/the-aussies-dipping-their-toes-and-businesses-into-the-dark-web/news-story/2c67a99eefdd2d92ee1c14536a2a7746

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19562030

File: 63c14a40308eb0e⋯.jpg (411.64 KB,2048x1365,2048:1365,Anthony_Albanese_and_Joe_B….jpg)

File: eeb320b40716692⋯.jpg (1.03 MB,5000x3335,1000:667,Roger_Wicker_says_US_subma….jpg)

>>19505163

Two years after AUKUS announcement, American politicians are divided on delivery of subs to Australia

Jade Macmillan - 16 September 2023

1/2

A Republican senator has renewed calls for the US to step up its production of nuclear-powered submarines before selling them as part of AUKUS, arguing America is as "unprepared" as it was ahead of the Pearl Harbor attack.

The US is set to transfer at least three Virginia-class submarines to Australia from the early 2030s under the AUKUS agreement.

However, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services committee, Roger Wicker, told a hearing in Washington this week that the US was failing to meet its own shipbuilding targets.

"We should be producing somewhere between 2.3 and 2.5 attack submarines a year to fulfil our own requirements as we implement AUKUS," he said.

"Instead, we're down to building 1.2 attack submarines per year… and the path back toward two per year is based on hopes and wishes.

"We are as unprepared as our fleet was for the Japanese attack on the eve of Pearl Harbor in 1941. We need to act."

Senator Wicker insists he supports the AUKUS agreement but has refused to back legislation in congress authorising the transfer of the submarines, arguing substantial new investments are needed in America's shipbuilding capacity first.

In a letter to the president last month, he and 24 other Republicans argued selling submarines to Australia without a clear plan to replace them would "unacceptably weaken" the US fleet at the same time that China expands its military power.

"AUKUS presents a generational opportunity to strengthen deterrence in the Indo-Pacific, and there is strong bipartisan support for the agreement," Senator Wicker said in emailed comments to the ABC.

"But the Biden administration must complete significant work before I can be convinced that it has a comprehensive vision for how AUKUS can be implemented fully in the near term.

"That work includes immediately delivering to congress a major submarine industrial base study and working with congress to build a plan to fix our submarine production and maintenance problems."

Push for speed amid prospect of another Trump term

The AUKUS agreement will see Australia obtain up to five Virginia-class submarines from the US before eventually building its own nuclear-powered boats.

But two years after the deal was first announced, the US Congress still needs to sign off on several legislative proposals to progress it.

They include legislation to approve the sale of the subs, to allow Australia to make a promised $3 billion contribution to US shipyards, and to facilitate the sharing of sensitive technology.

One of AUKUS's most public backers in congress, Democrat Joe Courtney, argued the US legislative body was "not built for speed" but he remained optimistic of overcoming the issues raised by Republicans.

"It's a valid concern, you know the US Navy has its own needs in terms of its submarine fleet," he told the ABC.

"But I think with the investment that we're seeing in the lead time, in terms of the demand signal, we can get that cadence production above two Virginias a year and really satisfy both nations' navies, in terms of what they need."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19562041

File: a22a57056528370⋯.jpg (1.22 MB,4006x2671,4006:2671,Democrat_congressman_Joe_C….jpg)

>>19562030

2/2

Senators on both sides of US politics last week urged their colleagues to move quickly on the legislation, with one warning congress risked "doing Beijing's job for them".

Mr Courtney said the potential for Donald Trump to win the Republican presidential nomination next year, and then a second term in the White House, was also cause for speed.

"He's such an unpredictable, erratic person in terms of just, you know, what strikes his fancy," he said.

"Honestly, that's another reason why I think we should really move this year in congress to really sort of lay a strong foundation so that it's going to be able to go on regardless of changing government."

Leaders reaffirm AUKUS commitment despite lingering concerns

The political debate in the United States comes amid ongoing questions in Australia about the merits and the cost of AUKUS, which could have a price tag of up to $386 billion.

Tensions within the Labor Party were exposed at its recent national conference, while former prime minister Paul Keating has described the agreement as the "worst deal in all history".

In a joint statement to mark two years since the initial announcement of AUKUS, the leaders of the US, the UK and Australia reaffirmed their commitment to the plan and to working with legislators in each country to make it a reality.

"As democracies, our legislatures have an important role to play to oversee and enable our progress," the statement said.

"We are committed to working with them, and look forward to historic action that will empower AUKUS's success."

Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles also previously expressed confidence in the level of bipartisan support for the agreement in the US.

"We very much understand the heat and light that comes with the passage of legislation through parliaments," he told a press conference last month.

"And we are completely sanguine about what we are seeing in America and understand that is just part of the process."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-16/aukus-submarine-deal-two-years-on-republicans-warning/102860868

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19562094

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19499282

Ukraine’s soldiers plead for Anthony Albanese to give them Hawkei vehicles despite faults

LIAM MENDES - SEPTEMBER 16, 2023

1/2

Ukrainian soldiers fighting on the frontline have pleaded for Aus­tralia to supply them with faulty Hawkei light armoured patrol ­vehicles after repeated requests have been stonewalled by the ­Albanese government.

At a secret training base in the Donetsk Oblast region in Ukraine’s east, near the site of some of the fiercest fighting of the war, The Weekend Australian shared the back of an Australian-made Bushmaster with soldiers keen to see more help in the “fight for democracy”.

While the Bushmasters have been warmly welcomed, Anthony Albanese has rejected desperate calls from Kyiv to supply Ukraine with Australian-built Hawkei vehicles, citing “a range of reasons”.

In April, The Australian ­revealed faults with the anti-lock braking system were behind a reluctance to supply Ukraine with the four-wheel drives. They can travel much faster and are far more mobile than the Bushmasters, of which Australia has already donated 120.

From near the frontline against Russia’s ­invasion, Ukrainian soldiers said they would gladly take the vehicles to protect them, despite the braking issues.

“I think it’s not really a problem at all … some problems, troubles with ABS system, is not a problem because you still have brakes,” said Matviy of the 80th Air Assault Brigade.

“Sometimes on the frontline, you don’t have even the ability to brake, so it’s not the big problem.”

He said the Ukrainian army would be able to work with the ­vehicles if provided with them, citing other Western equipment such as tanks and aircraft they had been able to operate.

Anti-lock braking systems help prevent skidding and loss of steering on slippery surfaces, but are typically turned off on loose or uneven terrain.

“The main question is in the desire and enthusiasm,” Matviy said. “If you want, you can fly in space, so if you want, you can adapt.”

He said the Ukrainian priority was the protection of soldiers.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19562110

File: 365fff80f87689a⋯.jpg (459.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ukrainian_soldiers_demonst….jpg)

File: e47f2e100745dd1⋯.jpg (177.6 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_Ukrainian_soldier_atop_a….jpg)

File: 8de7e4a5c89846a⋯.jpg (347.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ukrainian_soldiers_demonst….jpg)

File: 2e85220f2b363c6⋯.jpg (145.8 KB,1600x900,16:9,An_Australian_Bushmaster_d….jpg)

>>19562094

2/2

At a secret training base in the Donetsk Oblast region, military units train in between combat missions to try to liberate nearby towns, including Bakhmut, which Russia has held since May.

Having returned that morning from a 24-hour-long mission, the soldiers demonstrated how they would storm enemy positions – just as they’d done in the hours prior.

With the sound of artillery in the background – some training, some from the frontline – the Bushmaster carrying the soldiers charged down the mountainous terrain, and began firing the 50 calibre machine gun attached to the turret. After it came to a halt, out came the soldiers, taking positions and firing towards the (makeshift) enemy.

An Australian-supplied Bushmaster assigned to a different unit was destroyed last week by ­artillery in Bakhmut, but it saved the eight Ukrainian ­soldiers on-board. Had they been in a different ­vehicle, there’s a good chance they might not be alive.

“We had the situation when we were in Bakhmut, and we was shelled under artillery fire and the shell come close to us and the Bushmaster was turned upside down, and everyone was alive and unharmed,” Matviy said.

Another Bushmaster was hit by an anti-tank rocket system.

“The rocket hit directly the Bushmaster, and (if) you were in another armoured vehicle, the chance of survival is very low … they have some injuries, but they were alive and the level of injuries was not so severe,” he said.

Some Bushmasters have been left inoperable because of a shortage of spare parts – especially tyres, which are “constantly being damaged” by shrapnel. “If an artillery shell or mine has dropped nearby, after the explosion, the wheels are sometimes damaged and we cannot use it so wheels are a big problem,” Matviy said.

His message to the Prime Minister? “Fight for democracy,” he said. “I ask you to continue to support us comprehensively, until the complete victory against the Russian expansion.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/ukraines-soldiers-plead-for-anthony-albanese-to-give-them-hawkei-vehicles-despite-faults/news-story/3ed03b7e704ac8faa806e06e61d3a8e4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IY14xbHJgMY

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19566036

File: fced7700edfa0fc⋯.jpg (355.79 KB,About_60_000_more_First_Na….jpg)

File: 85e535ae0cf7583⋯.jpg (466.3 KB,Melbourne_crows_stretched_….jpg)

File: e01290813e326c4⋯.jpg (170.08 KB,Australians_will_vote_in_f….jpg)

File: e9c484219c1c990⋯.jpg (191 KB,Mass_rallies_follow_polls_….jpg)

>>19529127

‘History is calling us’: Yes campaign ramps up as thousands join in rallies across Australia

ELEANOR CAMPBELL - SEPTEMBER 17, 2023

Thousands of supporters of the Voice to Parliament have taken to the streets across the country, with a crucial message for Aussies that “history is calling us” ahead of the October referendum.

Supporters of the Yes campaign turned out in record numbers on Sunday afternoon across major cities including Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Canberra.

It marks one of the biggest campaign pushes for the Yes vote since the referendum date was announced.

Minister for Indigenous Australians told a roaring crowd in Melbourne’s CBD that “history is calling us” and that “each and every one of you can help answer the call from generations of Indigenous people.”

“For 65,000 years, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have been speaking 363 languages, but no voice,” Ms Burney said to raucous applause.

“In 27 days, you have the power to do something about it. You have the power to use your voice to allow Indigenous Australians to have a bigger say in the future.”

Ms Burney said she was “speechless” and “almost crying” to witness the number of people in attendance.

“To look out over this crowd and see you. To know where your hearts are, to know where your spirit lives. And that you, like us, want to embrace this opportunity to move this country forward together,” the minister said.

Campaigner and co-author of the Uluru Statement from the Heart Megan Davis said the number of people who turned out in support of the Voice “just blows our minds”.

“It wasn‘t just one city, it was many, many cities, including towns,” she told NCA Newswire.

“It’s really overwhelming and I think it’s a really historic moment.”

Ms Davis said that the show of support could be a sign that there is “probably a silent majority of people who support it.

“Rallies are just an extraordinary demonstration of the support that‘s out there, they are big numbers,” she said.

“I was in Melbourne and even though I was at the back of the crowd, it was just an extraordinary, huge number [of people].”

Australia’s Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus, who joined the mass rally in Melbourne, took aim at No campaigners while speaking to reporters.

Mr Dreyfus said anti-Voice advocates like Warren Mundine had “no solutions” for addressing Indigenous disadvantage.

“The no campaign talks about wanting to get practical improvement, the no campaign should be voting yes if they want practical improvement in the lives of Aboriginal people because that’s what this referendum is about,” he said.

Thousands of people descended into Redfern Park in Sydney to march as temperatures climbed above thirty-degrees, with organisers urging rally goers to stay in the shade and remain hydrated.

An estimated 5,000 people turned out to rally in Canberra with crowds parked outside the front lawn of Parliament House carrying large ‘Vote Yes’ signs.

Brisbane’s pro-Voice rally saw a about 20,000 people chanting ‘Yes’ holding signs which read ‘Stop the Trumps, Vote Yes’ and ‘Maintain the love.”

In response, a large Aboriginal flag was pictured draped across Victoria Bridge which read ‘Vote No.’

Sunday’s mass rallies come after polls this week indicated a downfall for the October 14 referendum, with the national average support for Yes reportedly falling below 45 per cent.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese spoke out this week about questions over the Yes campaigns success and said while referendums were “hard to win” said he had confidence that voters would turn out in favour.

“I’m confident that every Australian will take up the opportunity to vote Yes,” the PM said on Thursday.

Since 1901, only eight of 44 proposals for constitutional change have been approved.

The Australian Electoral Commission reported that a record number of Australians are enrolled to vote ahead of the date, with enrolments for First Nations people above 90 per cent for the first time in history.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/history-is-calling-us-yes-campaign-ramps-up-as-thousands-join-in-rallies-across-australia/news-story/4f91b9d62493cb89a57fce85e0063025

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19566045

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19529127

Leading No campaigner Warren Mundine claims a treaty process will be more successful if No vote wins

abc.net.au - 17 September 2023

Leading No campaigner Warren Mundine has backed a treaty process, claiming it's more likely to succeed if the No vote is successful.

Mr Mundine, a Bundjalung man, also called for the date of Australia Day to be changed.

Speaking on the ABC's Insiders program, Mr Mundine said there should be multiple, individual treaties, recognising Aboriginal nations.

"We've got to recognise Aboriginal culture, Aboriginal culture is our First Nations and the first thing we learn about life is one nation cannot talk about another nation's country," he said.

"Only those traditional owners can talk about those countries so therefore when you talk about a state treaty or a national type treaty it doesn't make sense in our culture."

Mr Mundine said achieving that would be more likely without the Voice.

"We don't need another body of bureaucracy we need to recognise those traditional owners."

Mr Mundine's position puts him at odds with much of the conservative No campaign, which has warned against the Voice, saying it would open the door to establishing a treaty.

There are already processes underway across Australia which could lead to state-based and clan-based treaties, notably in Victoria where Aboriginal leaders want treaty negotiations underway by 2024.

Mr Mundine said treaties are needed to resolve issues around sovereignty and give protections to Aboriginal culture and heritage.

"We're moving very strongly in that position with the land rights acts and the native title acts where Aboriginal people have a major say in what happens on their lands," he said.

"Through that process, 55 per cent of Australia now is in Aboriginal ownership. We'll probably get up to 70 or 80 per cent I predict in the next 10 to 20 years."

Aboriginal people's land rights are "recognised" over 50 per cent of Australians land mass — not ownership.

A No vote will take us further away from justice for First Nations: Bandt

Greens Leader Adam Bandt said the referendum isn't about treaty, and is rather about constitutional recognition for First Nations people.

But he said without it, establishing a treaty becomes less likely.

"An unsuccessful outcome in the referendum will more likely take us further away from justice for First Nations people in this country," Mr Bandt said.

"If we successfully change the constitution we are a step closer for justice for First Nations People in this country."

"Some people aren't talking anymore": Mundine confirms Gary Johns no longer campaigning

Following a week of debate about the level of racism unleashed during the referendum debate, Mr Mundine said he was surprised by the intensity of the attacks.

"In the last 12 months, I've never seen so much racism and comments and attacks than I have seen since I was a kid," Mr Mundine said.

He was asked if he'd taken action about racism in the No camp, including whether fellow campaigner, former Labor minister Gary Johns, had been sacked.

Mr Johns has been criticised over comments he made about the need for Aboriginal people to undergo blood tests before getting welfare payments.

"I've been very strong about these issues, people know that and you notice that some people aren't talking any more," Mr Mundine said.

He said Mr John's removal from the campaign had been a team decision.

"We had a cup of tea and we talked about it," he said.

"My thing is that I talk to everyone, racists, non-racists — and everyone — because if you're going to eliminate racism, or try to eliminate racism, you've got to talk to racists."

No discussion with Dutton about Senate position

Mr Mundine also responded to suggestions he was set to enter parliament, replacing retiring Liberal senator Marise Payne.

He said he hadn't discussed the Senate position with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton.

"I haven't had a chat with anyone about this because I want to focus on things that are relevant," Mr Mundine said.

"To me that's irrelevant, to me the Senate campaign, who's going to replace Marise Payne, my thing is about we need to focus on defeating the Voice."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-17/warren-mundine-backs-treaty-process/102866444

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tptfEBk7FNI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19566056

File: 88c4b0566397d2f⋯.jpg (626.29 KB,2400x1600,3:2,Stephen_Maxwell_Johnson_s_….jpg)

>>19529127

OPINION: The movie that erased my doubts about the Voice

Bob Carr, Former NSW premier and former Australian foreign affairs minister - September 17, 2023

1/2

I had reservations about the Voice until seeing a movie. I’ve long opposed a charter of rights because it might steer policymaking away from parliament and into courts. If there was someone on the Labor side who might have needed assurance the Voice would not do this, it might have been me. But not after the opening scene of High Ground.

This 2020 movie, directed by Stephen Johnson, is set in Arnhem Land in the early 1920s. It is about race relations on the Australian frontier.

It opens with Aboriginal people at a waterhole, an oasis of palms and running water. This peace is shattered by fire from repeater rifles. When it stops, the only sound is the flight of waterfowl and the buzzing of flies around black corpses. Blood runs in the sand.

That scene – inspired by the Gan Gan police massacre of 1911 – confirms the power of visual media in dramatising what the law calls mass-atrocity crimes. Think of Steven Spielberg’s 1993 Schindler’s List. Or Ken Burns’ documentaries, The West, The Vietnam War and The US and the Holocaust. There is Rachel Perkins’ documentary The Australian Wars, broadcast on SBS in 2022 and backed by the work of two dozen historians. It detailed the forcible displacement of Aboriginal people to make way for expansion of grazing – a violent displacement.

My response to the terrifying scene that opened High Ground went like this: “The survivors of this are saying that all they want is a pipeline to parliament called the Voice. That’s all? Only access? Just give it to them. No argument. No delay.”

I have no romantic view of pre-1788 Australia. The story of colonisation is no single narrative. It’s jostling counter-narratives. Some are happy, such as the triumph of our British-derived civic culture or our success at merinos and mines. A lot of good things arrived with the First Fleet. I support January 26 as Australia Day, believing it can be re-imagined by First Nations as a triumph of Indigenous resilience; they can rebaptise it Survival Day.

Yet since historian Henry Reynolds first pointed to the massacres, the evidence has slowly, steadily mounted. Professor Lyndall Ryan at Newcastle University, after 10 years of research, estimates 400 massacres of Indigenous people, 12 of whites. Dr Pam Smith, an archaeologist at one site in the Kimberley, has interred bones that had been burnt for six days to disguise the crime.

If there were no other reason to vote Yes on October 14, the cruelty of the Indigenous displacement – like nothing else in our history – would give us one.

Paul Keating’s words from his 1992 Redfern speech say it all: “… it was we who did the dispossessing. We took the traditional lands and smashed the traditional way of life. We brought the diseases. The alcohol. We committed the murders. We took the children from their mothers. We practised discrimination and exclusion.”

John Howard and Tony Abbott, the best debaters in the Liberal camp, argue that the Voice will divide us by race, entrenching race in the Constitution. To this there is a simple reply. The racial divide was decreed by official, uniformed Australia with the vote of our colonial and, later, state legislatures. It was Australian state authority that resolved there were two categories of Australians.

One racial category was to have its land removed without treaty or bargain. One category, defined by race, could be marched in neck braces to jail or massacre sites. Only Indigenous people were classed by museums, as late as 1938, as Australian fauna.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19566065

File: b6dc792bef49fd4⋯.jpg (2.58 MB,High_Ground_cast_members_J….jpg)

>>19566056

2/2

As a former Australian foreign affairs minister, I was honoured to meet 14 Caribbean nations in New York and ask them to vote for us in the 2012 ballot for the United Nations Security Council. They approved what I said about the marine environment, climate, banning small arms. But their spokesperson added, unprompted, that they liked Australia because of “the Apology”. The 14 Caribbean states voted for us. Kevin Rudd’s apology had added lustre to our international reputation.

How is our international reputation going to look if the Australian people are seen to vote down the mildest of constitutional tweaks on behalf of our First Nations?

As premier of NSW, I had the support of all parties when in June 1997 I presented the first apology to the stolen generations delivered by an Australian parliament. When, last year, we celebrated the 25th anniversary, I again met people who had been torn from their mothers and stuck in institutions. One talked of his attempt at escape, walking a stretch of railway line to return to his mother. There is only one racial category of Australians who systematically received that treatment.

If you heard someone on radio talking about being wrested from his mum and stuck in a boys’ home, then escaping and following a railway line in the hope of finding his way home, you would know that it was an Indigenous Australian.

Now, all these peoples request is a guaranteed Voice to the parliament, with their ideas able to be endorsed or rejected.

Think of the seizing of their land and the savagery that went with it. It’s a triumph of the spirit of reconciliation that a Voice is all they seek.

Metaphorically, the gunshots still echo. Only one group suffered massacres and now it’s time to make amends. High Ground’s footage is dramatised, but it’s not fake. Doubters might stream it on SBS On Demand, where they can also find Rachel Perkins’ The Australian Wars.

It’s time to let kindness have its day in public policy.

Bob Carr is a former foreign affairs minister and was NSW’s longest serving premier.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/the-movie-that-erased-my-doubts-about-the-voice-20230912-p5e439.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19566073

File: b179b7df0c1a776⋯.jpg (187.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_defeat_for_the_referendu….jpg)

File: bb6045ce8133526⋯.jpg (248.67 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Marcia_Langton.jpg)

File: 5697bd521d3be0c⋯.jpg (306.8 KB,1270x1693,1270:1693,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price.jpg)

File: af6bd62e4521163⋯.jpg (617.94 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Linda_Burney.jpg)

>>19529127

Anthony Albanese has miscalculated and the Indigenous voice to parliament could be doomed

DENNIS SHANAHAN - SEPTEMBER 16, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese is letting down Indigenous Australians because of a lack of real leadership and a failure in his duty, not only to Indigenous people but also to the nation.

The Prime Minister has miscalculated on the political strategy for the October 14 referendum for an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government, having already lost enormous public goodwill and designing a debate without substance.

As a result, public support for the Yes campaign has slumped and the referendum already could be doomed to failure. There has been an inability to explain how the voice would work and, in the absence of substance, the vacuum has filled with trivia and invective.

Indigenous Australians have been given what looks like a false hope and the nation has been delivered division.

Even if the referendum passes on the strength of a $100m advertising campaign in the next four weeks and a desperate turn to negativity, damage to Indigenous reconciliation has already been done through the bitter vitriol, fearmongering, moral bullying and racial sledging of some on the warring sides.

The explosion of racist language this week and the diversion of the debate into name-calling after voice architect and Yes campaigner Marcia Langton said the No campaign was based on “base racism and sheer stupidity” demonstrated how febrile and divisive the referendum campaign has become.

Both sides trotted out examples of racist language and sought apologies or condemnation as Peter Dutton sought to entwine Albanese in all the worst aspects of the debate and detract from the government’s political success in getting its $10bn housing fund through the Senate.

“They’re just providing a look through the window of what the voice might be as a body if it’s successful on October 14. It will be divisive, it will divide Australians, and you hear it in the language of Marcia Langton,” the Opposition Leader said on Thursday.

Albanese was warned of all of this, including by voice supporters, but was dismissive and remained convinced of the inevitability of success based on public goodwill without detailed arguments.

Indeed, the only major factor the Yes campaign was not warned about was the emergence of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price as a powerful new force in politics as the face of the No campaign who has completely overshadowed Labor’s hapless Indigenous Australians Minister, Linda Burney.

With public polling showing the Yes vote is below 50 per cent even in the ACT – the only jurisdiction to vote in favour of a republic in 1999 – there is growing pessimism and embittered frustration within Labor and the Yes campaign but no retreat or change from Albanese.

In the closing hours of the final parliamentary sitting before the voice referendum, Albanese remained committed to his original strategy: appealing to the emotion of love to reject the “powerful emotion of fear”, deriding appeals for details of the scope of the voice and doggedly determined to continue. Although, as support for the referendum has fallen, there is now a concession about how hard it will be to succeed.

“Changing a constitution is tough. It’s hard. We knew that at the beginning of this journey. It didn’t stop us from stepping out. And not for a day, not for a day have I regretted that decision,” Albanese said.

“I want the Yes campaign to be positive. The Yes campaign is about embracing a message of reconciliation and unity and, yes, love. Fear is a powerful emotion. Fear is a powerful emotion, but it’s not one that advances a country. What advances a country is bringing people together and a positive message.”

Albanese called on MPs to carry a “message of love and hope and reconciliation. Away from the parliament and back to the people in our electorates.”

“In the next four weeks Australians can take the next step to a better future. By writing Yes. That is all we are being asked to do. To write Yes. Walk those few steps is what we are being asked to do,” he said.

But moments later he attacked the character of the Coalition, describing it as: “Negative. It’s angry. It’s hostile and seeks to divide. Never seeks to bring people together.”

Yet much of this criticism could be directed towards the results of Albanese’s own miscalculation.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19566075

File: b7234ec8d86c946⋯.jpg (382.16 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Anthony_Albanese_has_confl….jpg)

>>19566073

2/2

Albanese’s failure of leadership for all Australians rests on two of his basic decisions at the start of the referendum process on election night in May last year.

First, as Prime Minister, he did not seek any compromise from the Indigenous leaders and architects of the voice to parliament to give the referendum the best chance of being passed. Second, having committed to a difficult model, he did not do everything he could to ensure success.

When he enthusiastically committed to a referendum this term to enshrine a voice to parliament, Albanese was operating on the basis that there was goodwill towards Indigenous Australians and his Labor government could win by appealing to that emotional goodwill without relying on a constitutional convention or providing details of how a voice to parliament would work.

Public polling clearly showed there was goodwill towards Indigenous people, even towards constitutional recognition, and Albanese believed an emotional campaign that did not get into detail would easily succeed and politically marginalise and damage Dutton.

Albanese’s mantra on the timing and style of the voice referendum was always that when Indigenous leaders asked him to hold a referendum he couldn’t “say nup” and argued “if not now, when?”. He did not use the authority of his office and the strength of his offer to argue for a less radical, less difficult model to sell, nor did he consider the haste of the venture could be its undoing.

With no discussion or mandate from a constitutional convention, emotional support drained, the demand for detail grew and the No campaign delivered a devastating slogan: “If you don’t know, vote no.”

Albanese’s lack of regret this week for embarking on his campaign and his continued expression of confidence in the referendum being passed by a majority of Australians and states is a clear indication of his faith in the emotional campaign and refusal to offer any detail or legislative outline. Yet even Labor senator Pat Dodson – the father of reconciliation – conceded the effectiveness of the No campaign was boosted by the lack of detail about the voice advisory body, which made the Yes campaign more difficult.

“I think that it’s difficult, as everyone knows, to promote the Yes campaign in terms of the detail, what the proposition is, what the provision is, why this is important, how it’s going to benefit us?” he told The Australian.

On the No campaign side, opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Price has effectively countered Labor’s emotional strategy with deeply personal stories of domestic violence, sexual assault of children and murders, demonstrating the reality of life for the most marginalised and arguing the voice will not address their practical problems.

Price’s effectiveness as a campaigner, given she has been in the Senate for only just more than a year, has altered the trajectory of the voice debate and turned her into a new force within the Coalition. Just as Kevin Rudd was able to use the Iraqi wheat scandal as the issue to lift his profile to the point of being a Labor leadership contender and Peter Reith used referendum opposition to be seen as a possible Liberal leadership candidate, Price will emerge from this referendum campaign with an authority and political credibility that will have to be recognised and rewarded within the Coalition.

This is especially so given the inversion of Albanese’s strategy to use the referendum to terminally damage the Opposition Leader and the Coalition for opposing the voice to parliament.

A defeat for the referendum is now unequivocally a defeat for Albanese, who acted in haste and with hubris.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/anthony-albanese-has-miscalculated-and-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-could-be-doomed/news-story/bbaf3029d213d01168482226ce99a364

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19570657

File: 99ac77162673a14⋯.jpg (214.58 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Peter_Dutton_has_sided_wit….jpg)

File: fc98a596075872e⋯.jpg (198.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Leading_No_campaigner_Warr….jpg)

File: 47e98834dac770b⋯.jpg (195.74 KB,1684x2244,421:561,Warren_Mundine_said_he_sup….jpg)

File: c67c979b9ba9535⋯.jpg (673.19 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_d….jpg)

>>19529127

>>19566045

No campaigner Warren Mundine walks back support for treaties should Voice referendum fail

COURTNEY GOULD and JACK QUAIL - SEPTEMBER 18, 2023

Leading No campaigner Warren Mundine has walked back his previous support for treaty processes should the Voice referendum fail, while also hurling accusations that the Yes campaign are launching “racial attacks and abuse”.

While Mundine previously claimed treaties were more likely to be progressed if a No vote was successful, when asked to clarify his position, the No advocate instead referred to “Native Title and land rights”.

“These things have huge commercial outcomes for Aboriginal people in regard to jobs, in regards to training, and in regard to running their own business, and it's done a tremendous job for Aboriginal communities,” Mr Mundine told Sky News on Monday.

“That’s what I’m talking about.”

But when asked on ABC’s Insiders’ program whether treaties were more likely if the referendum failed, Mr Mundine responded: “Yeah because then, on 15 October, if it is a no vote, that’s when the real work starts.

Asked on Sky News about Marcia Langton’s comments that the No campaign was racist, Mundine accused Langton of being “out of touch with the Australian community.”

Mundine refused to be drawn on whether he would support a second referendum to recognise Indigenous Australians in the Constitution should the Voice referendum fail, as has been proposed by Opposition leader Peter Dutton.

“My focus, because it is such an important thing, is to defeat this lie of a referendum and crush it,” he said.

It comes after Peter Dutton sided with Country Liberal Party senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, who is also a leader in the No campaign, as a split emerges in the opposition camp over treaties with First Nations people.

The Opposition Leader emphatically ruled out entering into treaty negotiations should the Voice be defeated and he win power at the next election.

“I want to see money spent on practical outcomes for Indigenous kids in remote and regional areas,” he told reporters in Melbourne.

“I don’t want to see billions of dollars spent on treaties, where lawyers will line their pockets (through) treaties that are negotiated for 20 or 30 years. It’s completely unacceptable.”

Just three days earlier Senator Nampijinpa Price rejected a treaty with First Nations people at an event hosted by The Australian.

Senator Nampijinpa Price said she opposed treaties because “you can’t have a treaty with your own citizens”.

A major part of the No campaign has been to link the treaty-making process to the Voice referendum.

Mr Dutton on Monday again sought to link Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s support for the referendum to the treaty’s process.

But Mr Albanese encouraged voters to “look at the words that are proposed” and not what he says is a “fear campaign”.

“Like when marriage equality happened, there was a fear campaign about that too and no one’s existing marriage was affected. It just gave a group of people the same rights and it was a good thing to do,” Mr Albanese said on Coffs Coast radio.

“It was a fair thing to do and so is a vote for Yes on October 14.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/peter-dutton-picks-a-side-in-no-campaign-fight-over-treaty/news-story/2e1f8d0fff4fd4d2e06f13f7dbaeec42

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19570662

File: 1c821d57d1b9479⋯.jpg (851.67 KB,2276x1280,569:320,Clockwise_from_top_left_Th….jpg)

File: 15b96e4fd78d3ec⋯.jpg (3.38 MB,5395x3597,5395:3597,Melbourne_Magistrates_Cour….jpg)

>>19320818 (pb)

>>19404456 (pb)

‘Threat-to-life messages’: 39 men charged as part of global police sting appear in court

Erin Pearson - September 18, 2023

Almost 40 Victorian men charged as part of a global police sting that cracked open an encrypted app have faced court as fresh details of Operation Ironside were aired in a courtroom for the first time.

Accused men and their lawyers filled six rows on Monday in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court, where the police case against the men was tested for the first time.

Australian Federal Police digital forensic examiner Keith Fell said he was tasked with examining phones that had the encrypted AN0M application installed. Officers had infiltrated the app over about three years.

Fell said while the devices looked like mobile phones, the AN0M part of the device could only be accessed through a password-controlled calculator app.

Two codes could be used, he said, one that would allow a user to access the encrypted service and another that would wipe the phone.

He said one setting also allowed the user to set a time when messages were automatically deleted.

“It’s unique; it’s nothing I’ve come across before,” Fell said.

Those charged as part of the sting include senior Comancheros figure Mark Buddle, who is accused of being involved in a transnational criminal syndicate that operated out of Hong Kong and Turkey and who allegedly imported $40 million of cocaine into Melbourne in May 2021.

Buddle returned to Victoria in August 2022 after six years abroad and remains in custody at Barwon Prison.

Thirty-eight others are facing charges including trafficking drugs, dealing in the proceeds of crime and possessing firearms and other weapons.

Of those charged, eight remain in custody and appeared in court remotely on Monday from places including Barwon and Port Phillip prisons.

Eight witnesses are expected to give evidence over the coming month, including a person who acted as the conduit between the AFP and their “human source”.

Acting AFP Superintendent Robert Dzaja was involved in Operation Ironside for 18 months from January 2020, when the operation was classified and not widely known. He told the court that while the general intent was to run an encrypted communication platform that allowed investigators to capture and gain evidence, the intention was for the platform to largely remain a secret.

By March 2021, though, it became a priority for the entire operation, he said. The operation had allowed officers to read intercepted messages from AN0M devices in real time.

This, he said, included “threat-to-life messages”.

Dzaja said that when Australian authorities learnt of potential hits overseas, though, they were not permitted to hand over “protected information” to other countries.

He agreed there ended up being so many devices internationally that the AFP found it hard to keep up with monitoring them all. As the operation grew, he said, translators had to be called in to help with data collection.

In June 2021, the AFP said it had stopped 21 planned underworld killings in Melbourne and infiltrated drug networks across the country as part of an international investigation using encrypted message technology.

At the time, it was revealed Australian police had partnered with the FBI for a three-year operation, dubbed the “sting of the century”.

It followed the take-down in 2018 of encryption service Phantom Secure, which had 14,000 users in Australia. Authorities, police said, then moved to infiltrate AN0M just before the product was due to be released to the criminal market.

As the operation concluded, in Victoria alone police raided 37 properties and arrested 32 people while also seizing more than a tonne of illicit drugs, luxury cars, cash, guns and gold bullion at places including Sydenham, Footscray, Glenroy, Elwood and Port Melbourne.

Australia-wide, more than 220 people were arrested. About 3.7 tonnes of drugs, $45 million in cash and 104 weapons were also seized in the operation, which involved more than 4000 police.

The committal hearing before magistrate Simon Zebrowski continues.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/threat-to-life-messages-39-men-charged-as-part-of-global-police-sting-appear-in-court-20230918-p5e5lm.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19575597

File: a28570b7f7f7135⋯.jpg (367.92 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_o….jpg)

File: 78e87553f403a25⋯.jpg (418.29 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Protestors_assemble_outsid….jpg)

File: f7f35771c914845⋯.jpg (342.99 KB,825x872,825:872,SAA_1.jpg)

File: 26efbe0d40a8d6f⋯.mp4 (7.88 MB,960x540,16:9,FqzfOaZRRo8eN9iw.mp4)

>>19529127

>>19570657

Anthony Albanese says ‘racist pigs’ abuse hurled at Indigenous voice to parliament opponents was ‘nasty’

ROSIE LEWIS - SEPTEMBER 19, 2023

Anthony Albanese has condemned “nasty behaviour wherever it occurs” after No campaigners were labelled “racist pigs” and “racist dogs”, conceding some of the tone of the voice referendum debate has been unfortunate.

As leading No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price declared the Prime Minister had to take responsibility for the racism and division in Australia, Mr Albanese urged voters to be respectful and debate the referendum question before them.

Peter Dutton also urged Australians to participate in the voice debate respectfully, lashing the “deeply disturbing” protest.

Video taken by South Australian Liberal senator Alex Antic walking into Fair Australia’s No campaign launch in Adelaide on Monday evening shows protesters yelling “racist dog”, “racist pig” and “crazy wankers”.

Senator Price and Indigenous leader Warren Mundine were the headline speakers of the event.

“I condemn nasty behaviour wherever it occurs,” Mr Albanese said.

“Of course some of the tone of the debate has been unfortunate. That’s the truth. What I would say to people is be respectful. I respect every Australian regardless of whether they’re going to vote Yes or whether they’re going to No.”

The Opposition Leader said people who had decided to vote No had “done so for good reason”.

“They have listened to the debates. Many of them are frustrated with the fact that the Prime Minister is deliberately withholding information,” Mr Dutton said.

“People don’t understand the model and the scenes that we’ve seen are disturbing because people are entitled to their views. I have a great deal of respect for people who are voting either Yes or No.”

Senator Price said there had been bullying, gas lighting and manipulative behaviour during the referendum campaign.

“This is the level of racism and division that the Prime Minister has to take responsibility for in this country right now. Where people like myself, people like my incredible colleagues here, are singled out because apparently as Indigenous people we’re supposed to agree with a proposal that is empty,” she said in Adelaide on Monday.

“We’re supposed to agree with leftist ideology as opposed to thinking for ourselves and certainly to inform the Australian people as to the danger to voting yes. We must vote no for unifying this nation, for maintaining equality in our country. We’re having conversations with Aboriginal people from grassroots communities who are dead set against this, they see the dangers in this, and we’re here to represent those voices.”

Mr Albanese seized on divisions within the No camp, after Mr Mundine split from Senator Price to declare his support for treaties and changing Australia Day four weeks out from the October 14 referendum.

Senator Price has also been cautious in backing a second referendum solely on constitutional recognition - which Mr Dutton has committed to pursuing if he wins the next election - saying any future process must involve all Australians.

“There has been a significant fear campaign going on raising a whole lot of issues that won’t be impacted by October 14, including issues in which people in the No camp Warren Mundine has a very different view from Jacinta Price who has a different view from Peter Dutton,” Mr Albanese said.

“Peter Dutton appears to want for this referendum to be defeated, for him to win the next election and then have another referendum. That to me makes no sense to reject what Indigenous people are asking for, which is a very modest and simple request.”

Asked on Monday if he was worried his support for treaties would cost him any tilt at replacing Marise Payne as a NSW senator, Mr Mundine responded: “I’m worried about this lie that the Albanese government is running about a referendum that is costing hundreds of millions of dollars that could be better spent in those communities, getting kids to school, getting people into businesses, getting jobs. That’s what I’m worried about and that’s my total focus, is to make sure this referendum doesn’t get up.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-says-racist-pigs-abuse-hurled-at-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-opponents-was-nasty/news-story/7114fbd68e8651fec91b9b55a09b0ce5

https://twitter.com/SenatorAntic/status/1703709559171547484

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19575624

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19529127

>>19575597

Jacinta Price breaks down in tears at packed out No rally as she describes the Voice as the 'biggest gaslighting event' in Australia's history

DUNCAN EVANS - 19 September 2023

1/2

Wild scenes of jubilation erupted during a raucous No campaign rally in the must-win state of South Australia on Tuesday night.

More than 1,000 people, many wearing 'No' supporter T-shirts, packed into the Adelaide Convention Centre to hear leading campaigners including Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Nyunggai Warren Mundine AO.

South Australian Senator Kerrynne Liddle was also in attendance to rail against the Voice to Parliament, which would enshrine a Indigenous-led advisory body into the Constitution.

In an emotional speech, Senator Price broke down in tears when she spoke of her role as a 'vessel' for Indigenous people who she said had been ignored by mainstream politics and media.

'I was a vessel for the women sitting in that room, the cousin of a young girl murdered, hanging from a tree,' she said, referencing her address at the National Press Club last week.

'They are the voices the media ignores, they are the voices Labor ignore, they are the voices the Greens ignore, they are the voters the Teals ignore.

'And they are the voices this bloody Voice to Parliament will ignore.'

As her voice rose in anger, the crowd rose to its feet and clapped and cheered furiously.

The outspoken shadow Indigenous Affairs minister called the Voice referendum the 'biggest gaslighting event our nation has ever experienced.'

'We are sick to death being told how racist we are, how horrible we are. Our own children are being taught not to be proud to call themselves Australians in this country,' she said.

Senator Price argued a Voice would 'constitutionally enshrine' a victimhood mentality in the country and degrade the future of Indigenous Australians.

Senator Price also said racial politics from the United States such as the Black Lives Matter movement had begun to filter into Australia.

'It doesn't belong here,' she said.

Speaking before Senator Price, Mr Mundine praised conservative ideals as the best way to help Indigenous Australians advance.

'Australia is not a racist country and our people are not racist,' he said.

'We wouldn't be spending billions of dollars to help people if we were a bunch of racists.'

Mr Mundine said successive governments had spent hundreds of billions of dollars helping Indigenous Australians in the past 50 years and he said there needed to be better accountability for how money leads to 'practical outcomes'.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19575629

File: fa27f7c426e576f⋯.mp4 (2.12 MB,304x540,76:135,Protesters_chant_at_a_No_c….mp4)

File: 5925c1362013ff4⋯.jpg (292.41 KB,1997x1123,1997:1123,Senator_Jacinta_Price_is_p….jpg)

File: 8bcdbd1f5d7fec9⋯.jpg (379.79 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Nyunggai_Warren_Mundine_AO….jpg)

File: 07339969291da43⋯.jpg (464.14 KB,2048x1152,16:9,More_than_1000_packed_into….jpg)

File: 9937c08a05f7d12⋯.jpg (591.95 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_crowd_at_the_No_campai….jpg)

>>19575624

2/2

Earlier, loud protesters gathered outside the packed out event, chanting with a megaphone: 'Always was, always will be Aboriginal land.'

Appearing at a press conference before her speech, Senator Price criticised the protesters, saying there had been a growing ugliness in the campaign.

'This is the level of racism and division the prime minister has to take responsibility for,' she said.

She said Indigenous Australians such as herself and Mr Mundine had been subjected to 'bullying, gaslighting and manipulation'.

South Australia is considered a key battleground in the referendum campaign, with thousands of Yes and No volunteers expected to fan out across the state to persuade voters to back the change.

Backers of the Voice want to embed a permanent advisory body for Indigenous Australians in the Constitution.

Mr Mundine said the referendum was 'dividing the nation' and the central argument for a Voice was a 'lie' because Indigenous Australians already had voices in the government.

He also said Indigenous Australians had progressed in society since he was a boy, highlighting the growing number of Indigenous doctors, lawyers and other university graduates and the growing economic contribution of Indigenous businesses.

When pressed whether a No vote would mean a change to Australia Day, Mr Mundine said: 'We want Australia Day to remain'.

Senator Price said South Australia was a crucial state for the campaign and she criticised Premier Peter Malinauskas' state-based Voice model.

She said it had gone 'silent' and had not improved the lives of South Australia's most marginalised people.

South Australia became the first Australian state to legislate a First Nations Voice to Parliament, but elections for the advisory board were put back to March 2024, as the state-based model was being 'overshadowed' by the referendum and causing confusion among voters.

In her own speech, Senator Liddle also criticised South Australia's Voice, arguing it had been 'parked' and the public had not been allowed to see how it would function.

South Australian Opposition Leader David Speirs was also seen at the packed-out event.

Senator Price said Australians must vote No to 'unify the nation'.

When pressed on her earlier controversial remark that British colonisation had not delivered a lasting negative impact on Indigenous Australians, Senator Price said Indigenous Australians would 'probably not' want to return to life as it was in pre-colonial Australia.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12533067/Jacinta-Price-breaks-tears-packed-No-rally-describes-Voice-biggest-gaslighting-event-Australias-history.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC76X9ym02o

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19575654

File: abf632137490f61⋯.mp4 (9.19 MB,960x540,16:9,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….mp4)

File: 715683a83b42a1d⋯.jpg (214.74 KB,1159x775,1159:775,Nyunggai_Warren_Mundine_Co….jpg)

File: 4ae025f6765a614⋯.jpg (3.55 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Supporters_gathered_at_Vic….jpg)

>>19529127

>>19575597

>>19575624

Voice opponent Jacinta Nampijinpa Price breaks down at Adelaide No campaign event

abc.net.au - 19 September 2023

A leading opponent of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament has broken down in tears while delivering an address at a No campaign event in Adelaide, also accusing supporters of the Yes campaign of "bullying" and "gaslighting".

Coalition Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price told about 1,000 attendees of the event that she and her fellow Indigenous politicians already provide a voice for their people in federal parliament.

Senator Price became emotional as she recalled speaking on behalf of them, including at a National Press Club speech last week.

"I was a vessel for the women sitting in that room, the cousin of a young girl murdered hanging from a tree, the old woman in the middle of chemo who came to my office seeking to be heard because native title have written her and her family out of the history books," she said.

"Her days are coming to an end and she just wanted her voice to be heard."

Ahead of the event in Adelaide, Senator Price said Indigenous supporters of the No campaign were being singled out for their stance against the Voice.

The Shadow Minister for Indigenous Australians said there were "individuals as part of [Yes] rallies, progressive white Australians" that were suggesting she was "simply a voice" for "mainly white" Country Liberal Party members.

She did not cite specific examples or clarify who she was referring to with her comments.

"People like myself … are singled out because apparently as Indigenous people, we're supposed to agree with a proposal that is empty," Senator Nampijinpa Price said.

A group of protesters gathered outside the Adelaide Convention Centre holding signs reading "fight racism" and "no pride in genocide", and banners against the AUKUS deal, while chanting "always was, always will be, Aboriginal land".

"You wouldn't see a group of No people show up to a Yes event and protest and jump up and down and try to stop them from having their say," Senator Nampijinpa Price said.

"This is what we've come to see in our country — bullying, gaslighting, manipulative kind of behaviour."

Senator not drawn on treaty comments

Senator Nampijinpa Price and leading campaigner Nyunggai Warren Mundine were both key speakers at Fair Australia's Vote No event at the Adelaide Convention Centre, and were joined by South Australian Liberal senator Kerrynne Liddle.

Senator Nampijinpa Price would not be drawn on Mr Mundine's comments backing a treaty process — remarks that fellow No campaigners, including Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, have distanced themselves from.

Mr Mundine brushed off questions about whether he was worried his stance on a treaty would cost him in any future political moves.

"We're here to stand up to this referendum which is dividing this nation," he said.

"[It's] costing hundreds of millions of dollars, which could be better spent in those communities getting kids to school."

Senator Liddle also said division was a major problem — because of the Voice proposition itself and because of the campaign.

"Whether you came here 70,000 years ago, like I can trace my ancestry on both sides, or whether you came here last year or 10 years ago, our foundation document applies to everyone equally," she said.

Yes campaigners hopeful weekend turnout defies polling

The No campaign's event in Adelaide followed a weekend of rallies organised by Voice supporters across the country, with tens of thousands of people attending in both Sydney and Melbourne on Sunday.

In South Australia — a state the Yes campaign has described as critical to its hopes of success in the referendum — thousands marched through the centre of Adelaide.

Voice backers there expressed confidence that South Australian voters would back the referendum, despite polling showing a sharp dive in support for the Voice in that state.

"This is to demonstrate the overwhelming community support here in South Australia for a 'Yes' vote," federal government minister Amanda Rishworth said of Saturday's rally in Adelaide.

"We'll see South Australia playing such a critical role in this referendum coming up."

Yes campaign director Dean Parkin said he was encouraged by what he was seeing in the state.

"We reckon South Australia is going to be absolutely there with us," he said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-18/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-no-campaign-in-adelaide/102869746

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19575725

File: 13a0f9e3fb89a27⋯.jpg (335.42 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Brisbane_fans_welcome_Dako….jpg)

File: 242543e6fc9a0c3⋯.jpg (361.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Crowds_march_during_a_Walk….jpg)

File: e8ba9a6e0c64b49⋯.jpg (670.38 KB,825x1353,25:41,M_1.jpg)

>>19529127

AFLW 2023: Gillon McLachlan apologises to Brisbane Lions fan forced to remove a T-shirt showing support for the Yes movement

LAUREN WOOD - SEPTEMBER 18, 2023

AFL chief executive Gillon McLachlan has apologised to an AFL Women’s fan who was forced to remove a T-shirt showing support for the Yes movement at a game at Springfield on Sunday.

The Brisbane Lions fan, named Michelle, has detailed her account of attempting to enter the ground while wearing the shirt and said security at the ground made her take it off, claiming it was making a “political statement”.

The AFL conditions of entry contained in the terms and conditions of tickets includes policies relating to political statements.

“That was a mistake by the security guard — that should not have happened,” McLachlan said.

“I apologise to the AFLW supporter who was there. It should not have happened.”

The Brisbane Lions – which has apologised to the member involved – were contacted for comment on Monday morning and confirmed that the security on the day were “overzealous”.

“We’re aware of the incident and have contacted the patron to apologise,” the Lions said.

The woman had detailed her account on social media.

“I just got refused entry by security from (the Brisbane Lions AFLW) game because I was wearing a YES T-shirt,” Michelle wrote.

“(They said) ‘no political statements’.

“I’ve worn this shirt to the Gabba (with) no probs. “Security wouldn’t let me wear my hoodie over the top. They also said I couldn’t turn the shirt inside out to wear.”

The woman said she was “in tears” at the time over the incident.

“Thankfully a lovely woman in line came over and offered me a spare shirt,” Michelle wrote.

“Her and her partner even walked back to the train station with me so I could change in the toilets there.

“I’m so confused as I thought Brisbane Lions had come out in support of the Voice.”

She also said that another woman at the same game had been forced to remove “Yes” earrings.

Michelle later said that she had been contacted by the club and been informed that it had been a case of “third party security being overzealous with generic guidelines” and assured that it would not happen in the future.

Conditions of entry to AFL and AFLW games state that patrons agree “not to … wear or display commercial, political, religious or offensive signage or logos of any kind”.

The league and its clubs have been open in their support of the indigenous Voice to Parliament campaign with the referendum vote to be held on October 14.

“People who are expressing their own views coming to games in a T-shirt — it’s absolutely their right to do that,” McLachlan said on Monday.

The league has ruled out promoting the Voice on grand final day or at any other final.

“What we’ve said, though, is that the games themselves will not be available for either side,” he said.

“We’ve made our position clear and now we want the finals football to speak for itself like it’s doing. The football’s been amazing and the crowds have been incredible.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/afl/aflw-2023-brisbane-lions-fan-forced-to-remove-a-tshirt-showing-support-for-the-yes-movement/news-story/52b2b12b7daebc9abf7643c52e17a77b

https://www.lions.com.au/news/1338943/a-statement-from-the-brisbane-lions-board-first-peoples-voice-to-parliament

https://twitter.com/xcx_survivor/status/1703378923206344811

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19575743

File: 271597401c61818⋯.jpg (293.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,On_Thursday_the_state_gove….jpg)

File: 44123ea1ca640c6⋯.jpg (58.49 KB,1280x720,16:9,Equality_Australia_legal_d….jpg)

File: 47fdaaaa5ced7d6⋯.jpg (150.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,NSW_MP_Alex_Greenwich.jpg)

File: 39a2c68e9ba08c5⋯.jpg (313.71 KB,1461x1948,3:4,Minister_Penny_Sharpe.jpg)

File: d186669bc8a0cd7⋯.jpg (567.15 KB,1698x2264,3:4,Minister_Steve_Kamper.jpg)

>>19529127

LGBT groups call for advisory board amid NSW government faith council establishment

ALEXI DEMETRIADI - SEPTEMBER 18, 2023

Sydney’s LGBT community is ­demanding Premier Chris Minns keeps his promise to set up a voice-like advisory council for gay and trans people, after he set up a similar body for religious leaders who have promised to use it to push Labor on policy priorities.

The state government last week announced the establishment of a “milestone” NSW Faith Affairs Council to advise ministers on policy that could affect ­religious communities, such as – one faith leader suggested – changes to voluntarily-assisted dying or conversion practices.

LGBT groups, although welcoming the move to give ­religious figures a forum, want the government to ensure a similar olive branch will be extended to them.

“Everyone deserves to be treated with dignity and respect, including LGBT people, people of faith, and those of us who belong to both groups,” Equality Australia legal director Ghassan Kassi­sieh said.

The council, in the process of being filled with 16 religious leaders from across the state’s ­denomin­ations, would provide counsel only to policy that could affect it, and government is not obliged to consult it on every matter.

Mr Kassisieh also called for the government to go a step further and honour an election commitment to establish an LGBT advisory council, and a whole-of-government LGBT inclusion strategy.

Government leader in the Legislative Council Penny Sharpe said Labor was committed to a similar board, but it was too early to confirm its details.

“The government remains committed to establishing an LGBT advisory council and we will be working closely with community advocates from across our state as we work to deliver it,” she said.

State MP for Sydney Alex Greenwich, who is gay, also applauded the initiative, as he said he did for the government’s engagement with LGBT organisations.

“I really welcome the establishment of the faith council, just as I welcome the direct engagement the government is doing with LGBT organisations,” he said.

Mr Greenwich supported the passing of the Religious Vilification Bill, which made it unlawful to “incite hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of, a person because of their religious belief, affiliation or activity”.

“Working together we are able to tackle the discrimination we all face, and work towards sustainable policy outcomes,” he said.

The MP introduced a bill in August to reform conversion practices in the state. It will return to parliament later this year.

It is that type of policy Catholic Archdiocese of Sydney engagement director Monica Doumit previously said she suspected the council would be keen to be heard on, or provide feedback to.

Multiculturalism Minister Steve Kamper, to whom the council would report, said it was one ­example – of many – in which the government was listening.

“The council is about listening to our multi-faith community, understanding their point of view and ensuring they are considered when decisions are made,” he said.

“Our responsibility is to the people of NSW, and the majority of people in NSW practise a faith – so it is important we work to understand the challenges multi-faith communities face.”

However, the move wasn’t without criticism.

NSW Liberal Democrat MP John Ruddick described it as a ­“religious voice to parliament”.

“We established the separation of church and state centuries ago; the government should be indifferent to religion and let citizens express their faith as they see fit,” he said.

Former multiculturalism minister Mark Coure said it was nothing more than a rebrand of the Coalition’s previous similar council.

“Aside from a rebranded name, the state government have not been able to provide any other differences about its council (compared with ours) or how much this name change will cost taxpayers,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/this-may-hold-lgbt-groups-call-for-advisory-board-amid-nsw-government-faith-council-establishment/news-story/cd6cc5782a031d7d15cf0cddc2360922

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19575766

File: 57e0d0082d6843a⋯.jpg (320.22 KB,1867x1098,1867:1098,Australia_will_buy_another….jpg)

File: 7fce133bc058f97⋯.jpg (2.02 MB,4800x3200,3:2,The_Air_Force_s_P_8_Poseid….jpg)

File: 584252e1a1be217⋯.jpg (814.43 KB,3600x2438,1800:1219,Former_prime_minister_Tony….jpg)

Potent $1.5 billion upgrade to Australia's maritime surveillance with manned and unmanned aircraft

Andrew Greene - 18 September 2023

Australia will purchase a fourth long-range Triton drone for maritime surveillance, despite the US Navy recently halting production of the expensive unmanned platform which critics warn is vulnerable to enemy attack.

The contentious American acquisition is part of a $1.5 billion boost to the RAAF being unveiled on Tuesday that includes upgrades to the existing P-8A Poseidon fleet, allowing the patrol aircraft to eventually fire anti-ship missiles up to 1,000km.

Under the Poseidon upgrade program, the Department of Defence expects the first of its 14 Boeing-made aircraft to receive enhancements to anti-submarine warfare, maritime strike and intelligence collection capabilities from 2026.

The entire fleet is expected to be completed by 2030.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy says the P-8A upgrades and purchase of an additional MQ-4C Triton Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) will be "critical to our defence and particularly surveilling the northern approaches to Australia".

"The purchase of an additional Triton will enhance operations from Australia's northern bases, a priority under the Defence Strategic Review," Mr Conroy said.

"The upgrades to the fleet of Poseidon aircraft strengthens our ability to secure and protect Australia's maritime interests."

Originating from the Global Hawk program, the MQ-4C Triton is manufactured by Northrop Grumman, boasting the ability to fly surveillance missions for more than 24 hours at altitudes exceeding 50,000 feet.

Under the previous Coalition government, an initial order was made for three of the high altitude long endurance (HALE) aircraft with plans to eventually buy up to seven, but none have yet been delivered to Australia.

According to the Biden administration's latest Department of Defense budget, the Triton program will be terminated with production ceasing in 2024.

The halted production will leave the US Navy with a total of 22 aircraft, well short of its earlier target of 70.

Decision to persevere with Triton drone 'strange'

Former Australian defence official Marcus Hellyer has described Labor's decision to persevere with the Triton as "strange".

He predicts the program will undoubtedly cost more in both acquisition and sustainment than originally forecast.

"Rather than getting in deeper and throwing good money after bad do we actually reconsider the whole thing and get out while we still can?" says Dr Hellyer, now with Strategic Analysis Australia.

"We've been pursing this capability for well over 20 years, we've been involved with the US on this program in various ways and we've been contributing financially to this program for a very long time.

"The question was always would we continue and get the full six or seven or would we get a smaller number but if we got a smaller number would it actually be a viable capability?"

However, the Triton acquisition is the right decision for Australia when combined with other steps being taken by the government, says Mr Conroy.

"I think this is good technology that gives us that persistent longer-range presence, that complements the best maritime surveillance aircraft in the world in the P-8 Poseidon and investments we're making in space awareness," he said.

When Australia's Triton aircraft eventually arrive, they are expected to be housed at RAAF Base Tindal in the Northern Territory but operated remotely from RAAF Base Edinburgh in South Australia.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-18/1-5-billion-maritime-posiedon-triton-long-range-missiles/102870116

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19575834

File: 4c347c0736a50c0⋯.jpg (233.52 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Defence_Minister_Richard_M….jpg)

File: a0ca30f664ed999⋯.jpg (306.76 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_Chief….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19575766

Are AUKUS and Marles killing our defence force?

GREG SHERIDAN - SEPTEMBER 19, 2023

1/2

There’s every chance AUKUS could turn out to be the enemy of Australian defence self-reliance, or of any defence capability at all. Worse, it could ultimately go the way of the French submarines. People will lose faith in it because it’s not remotely on track to deliver anything at all in a meaningful timeframe.

Nothing much is happening about AUKUS in the physical universe. We haven’t even seriously begun upgrading the Stirling submarine base in Western Australia that is meant to host nuclear-powered subs by 2027.

Similarly, not a sod of earth has been turned to build the missile factory that has been announced a thousand times. Even when it’s built, it’s only going to manufacture the shortest-range artillery rockets that the modern HIMARS launcher uses.

This is apparently so we can prove our manufacturing credibility and in time make longer-range artillery rockets. Consider this astounding contradiction. We need to take baby steps building artillery rockets but magically, from a standing start, we’ll soon be building one type of nuclear-powered sub, operating another nuclear-powered sub, and still operating the poor old Collins-class as well.

Richard Marles must already be judged a failure as Defence Minister. He tried to get more money for Defence and failed. As a result, the whole show is in shocking disarray.

The Albanese government’s political calculation seems to be that the symbolism of the AUKUS subs means the public thinks the government is big on defence, therefore it doesn’t need to actually do anything else.

AUKUS is nonetheless important because it has become a central part of the symbolism of our alliance with the US. But that’s the only reason it’s important. For neither AUKUS nor anything else is actually delivering defence capability.

The whole defence project is in disarray. The next example will be the government’s response to the review of the surface fleet being headed by retired US vice-admiral William Hilarides. The very existence of this review is itself quite grotesque.

When the Albanese government took office, it established the Defence Strategic Review. The government didn’t publish the original DSR report but a highly doctored and diminished version of the report. It then said the DSR didn’t make recommendations about the navy’s surface fleet so this would be the subject of yet another review, due to report by September.

Now it seems the government may not even publish the report and its response until the new year. The Albanese government will be approaching its second birthday before any decisions at all are taken concerning our surface fleet. This is its response to the most dangerous strategic circumstances in 80 years.

In fact, the government has effectively done less than nothing because the DSR and all the other reviews have produced paralysis across defence decision-making.

Well-informed sources tell me that because of this paralysis Defence is on track for a significant underspend in this year’s budget.

If Defence underspends its budget it has to give the money back. When a department is in disarray, as Defence is now, the only way it can get out of an underspend is to make one-off opportunist purchases of off-the-shelf foreign capabilities. Thus we are to buy our fourth Triton surveillance drone.

Tritons are incredibly expensive and they are pretty much yesterday’s technology. The US has decided to cancel the program at a very small number of such aircraft. The Triton is a useful surveillance capability. Of course it’s unarmed. We still don’t have a single armed drone.

The government’s astonishing lack of urgency on defence generally, and the surface fleet in particular, reflects two realities. It has decided to spend no extra money. And it has also decided to make no effort to increase military capability over the next 10 years.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19575840

File: 28e3220a6c503a8⋯.jpg (76.96 KB,1279x719,1279:719,The_MQ_4C_Triton.jpg)

File: 869b2b9a246a9b4⋯.jpg (163.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Sailors_of_the_forecastle_….jpg)

>>19575834

2/2

Retired admiral Rowan Moffitt, over the weekend, judged: “Our navy remains unfit to deliver the maritime defence strategy the government proposes. It is older, has less firepower, is less reliable and has fewer ships than a generation ago.”

So far the centrepiece of the planned acquisitions for the surface fleet are the troubled nine Hunter-class frigates we’re notionally building and are supposed to start getting in the early 2030s. Moffitt calls the Hunter frigate “probably the most under-armed warship of its size in the world”.

Marles can’t bring himself to say a word against the Hunter frigates. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy has been savagely critical, saying the Australian people were conned when the previous government told them the Hunters were a mature program. Instead he described them as a developmental program.

Are the two ministers at loggerheads on the Hunters? Everyone has known the Hunter’s problems for years.

Similarly we’re spending enormous money building huge offshore patrol vessels, which are vastly bigger than is required for their police role. Everyone thought: why not stop the OPVs at vessel No. 6 out of a scheduled 12, and substitute similarly sized corvettes, which are smaller than mainline frigates but which you can pack with weapons? These and other basic questions have been with us for years. All the government does is continue not to answer them at all.

In parliament last week, Marles thundered that Peter Dutton had claimed the government was cutting defence expenditure. This was untrue, he said, and referenced an ABC fact check.

The ABC fact check in question does indeed say that because defence spending is rising incrementally each year you cannot describe it as a “cut”.

However, this same ABC fact check concludes: “Labor plans to spend $1,463.7 million less on the Department of Defence than what the former Coalition government planned to spend over the same three-year period.”

Here’s the state of our defence. The air force is modern, has hitting power, but is way too small. The army is tiny, has almost no hitting power and no concept of operations. The navy is a colossal mess with no hitting power at all beyond the Collins subs, nothing planned for 10 years and no way forward. Meanwhile the Chief of the Defence Force gives speeches about “truth-decay” and climate change.

Any nation that acquires nuclear-powered subs needs to spend a lot more money. If it doesn’t radically increase its defence budget it can spend that money only by eating up other defence capabilities. We already spend defence dollars staggeringly inefficiently.

We’re getting nuclear subs, but we’re not increasing defence spending within these forward estimates, and promises after that are just science fiction.

So far, the government is overseeing the decline of Australian defence capability. It really is a national tragedy.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/is-aukus-and-marles-killing-our-defence-force/news-story/f3228cd47685774704af71fb87f5e7f8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19575912

File: 6c72fdad25e20a8⋯.jpg (271.61 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_Bishop_of_Broome_Ch….jpg)

Broome bishop preyed on young Aboriginal males: Vatican investigators

PAUL GARVEY - SEPTEMBER 18, 2023

A longstanding Catholic bishop of Broome was a “predator” who sexually assaulted four Aboriginal men and boys and groomed dozens more, the Vatican’s own investigation has found.

Christopher Saunders, who spent decades serving the church in Broome before resigning in the wake of alleged sexual misconduct and bullying, hosted multiple “bunga bunga” parties for him and young Aboriginal men and boys at various church properties, according to Vatican investigators.

The investigation under the Vatican’s Vos Estis Lux Mundi papal inquiry powers also found Bishop Saunders spent thousands of dollars of church money each month on cash payments, mobile phones, alcohol and cigarettes for “vulnerable” Aboriginal men and boys.

The bishop strongly denied the allegations when the Vos Estis Lux Mundi investigation – the first of its kind in Australia – was first announced and police have not charged him in relation to any of the allegations.

Extracts from the 200-page ­report prepared by the Vatican’s investigators and obtained by The Australian detail how they identified 67 Aboriginal boys and men who they said may have been subjected to delictual acts or grooming behaviours by the bishop. “It has been established through the interview of witnesses and examination of documentary and other evidence that Bishop Christopher Saunders has developed a modus operandi of grooming young Aboriginal men for sex during his time within the Kimberley Region, both as a Priest and as Bishop,” the report says.

The investigation was based on dozens of interviews with witnesses, including previous secretaries of the bishop, alleged victims and past and present members of the clergy.

“The Bishop has been variously described by witnesses as having two personalities, one of a wonderful orator and strong leader yet the other of a sexual predator that seeks to prey upon vulnerable ­Aboriginal men and boys and ­attack any person that challenges his behaviour or attempts to jeopardise the flow of church funds required to facilitate it,” the report said.

“Many of the church community that have stood up, over the years, against the Bishop and his behaviours have either lost their jobs, lost their faith, or suffered both psychological and reputational damage and some continue to live in fear of the Bishop and his followers while he remains in the Broome Diocese.”

The Vatican’s report was also critical of the West Australian police investigation into Bishop Saunders’ alleged offending. The first complaint about the bishop was made in 2018 when a 27-year-old man told a Catholic priest at Halls Creek that he had been sexually abused by Bishop Saunders from the age of 16. Police began investigating, and by March 2020 Bishop Saunders had stood aside from the ­administration of the diocese. By May 2021, however, police had decided not to press criminal charges as the ages of the victims at the time of the alleged acts were unable to be substantiated through evidence at that time.

The allegations first came to light in a Channel 7 news report in 2020. Channel 7 ­reported that Bishop Saunders ordered his staff to collect and burn hundreds of office documents, files and photographs after the network first aired the abuse allegations. The Vatican’s investigators said police had “mishandled” the inquiry for various reasons, “including limited resourcing and competing priorities, a lack of will by senior management to tackle the systemic issues, a strained ­relationship between police and the Kimberley Aboriginal Legal Service and evidence gaps relating to establishing the ages of the victims at the time of the alleged offences”.

Bishop Saunders started working in Broome as a deacon in 1975. He was named Bishop of Broome in 1995, taking on responsibility for what is one of the church’s biggest dioceses in the world by land mass.

The Australian Catholic Bishops Conference late on Monday released a statement describing the allegations as “very serious and deeply distressing, especially for those making the allegations”.

It said the independent report had been provided to the Holy See, with the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith continuing the investigation.

“We will respect the enduring confidential nature of this process by not commenting on specific allegations that have been raised,” it said.

“Bishop Saunders, who has maintained his innocence, is able to respond to the report by communicating directly with the Holy See. In due time, the Holy See will make its determinations. It is hoped that this will not be unduly delayed.”

The bishop declined to be ­interviewed by the investigators.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/broome-bishop-preyed-on-young-aboriginal-males-vatican-investigators/news-story/6bb8195cc3a7313d6965294ff0ef75e7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19575967

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19575912

Broome Bishop Christopher Saunders: Pope-ordered investigation alleges as many as 71 victims

Chris Reason - September 18, 2023

1/2

A top-secret investigation ordered by the Pope into an Western Australian Bishop – the first of its kind in Australian history – has found he is likely to have sexually assaulted four youths while potentially grooming another 67.

The bombshell 200-page report also found that 73-year-old Bishop Christopher Saunders spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in church and charity funds to groom the young men.

A 7NEWS investigation exclusively obtained a copy of the final report that has been handed to the Vatican for action by Pope Francis.

The report was completed six months ago in April and sent to Rome – but no decision has yet been made on the future of the former Bishop of Broome.

Only a Pope can appoint a Bishop – and only a Pope can de-frock one.

Since the acquittal of Cardinal George Pell in the High Court in 2020, Saunders has become the highest-ranked Catholic in the country to face a sex crimes investigation.

It’s believed Bishop Saunders may be the highest-ranked official of any religion in Australia to face such serious accusations.

The report makes an astonishing number of findings against Bishop Saunders, who had been working in the Broome diocese for almost 50 years.

“The Bishop has been variously described by witnesses as … a sexual predator that seeks to prey upon vulnerable Aboriginal men and boys,” the report states.

“During the investigation, four victims of sexual acts were identified.

“67 additional Aboriginal boys and men were also identified as persons that may have been subjected to delictual acts or grooming behaviours by Bishop Saunders.”

It claims the alleged offences date back 50 years — to the time when the clergyman was newly-ordained and first working as a priest in Sydney.

“One additional man was identified through the Church’s National Redress Scheme as being an alleged victim of Bishop Saunders while (he) was a parish priest at Clovelly in 1976.”

Saunders was ordained as a priest in 1976 and moved full-time to the Kimberley region. He became a Bishop in 1996.

The report claims he had developed a “modus operandi” of grooming vulnerable young Aboriginal males by plying them with alcohol, cash, phones, phone credit, hotels, air and bus travel.

It found he was spending between $3000 and $4000 per month on alcohol for the youths.

It also alleges he had five bank accounts — which at one time held a total of $3 million. The safe in the Chancery was found to have $80,000 in cash.

He also collected multiple guns, bought a $70,000 boat and several cars.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19575976

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19575967

2/2

The investigation was led by two former WA Police detectives with 60 years of service between them.

They identified a total of 102 witnesses, and formally interviewed 30 of them.

One former Church worker revealed Bishop Saunders funded his lifestyle using money that had been donated from around Australia, Broome’s local opshops and even from the Sunday service collection plates. The money was meant to go to indigenous charitable causes.

One staffer called it “immoral and improper”.

The report also reveals Bishop Saunders would use the church airplane to transport alcohol to dry Aboriginal communities around the vast 770,000 square kilometre diocese.

Witnesses said slabs of Jim Bean and Coke would be hidden in hessian bags “at the Bishop’s instructions to disguise the contents”.

In 2020, Bishop Saunders voluntarily stood down after 7NEWS broadcast a special report revealing he had been at the centre of an 18-month investigation by WA Police codenamed “Operation White Plane”.

In May 2021, police and prosecutors announced they would not lay charges claiming “insufficient evidence”.

Bishop Saunders resigned from his position in Broome just months later, in August, but still holds his title as Bishop and his entitlements.

The Vos Estis inquiry was launched by Pope Francis on September 27 last year.

The report also found that many members of the Church community that stood up to Bishop Saunders over the years, “have either lost their jobs, lost their faith, or suffered both psychological and reputational damage.”

The Papal inquiry is officially known as a Vos Estis Lux Mundi — Latin for “You Are the Light of the World”. It’s a policy championed by Pope Francis in 2019 to shine light into the darkest corners of the Catholic world.

It’s believed there have been at least seven Vox Estis inquiries worldwide — six in the US — and now this, the first of its kind in Australia.

The Catholic Church in Australia would not comment on the report — except to confirm that the results of their investigation had been sent to the Vatican.

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/wa/broome-bishop-christopher-saunders-pope-ordered-investigation-alleges-as-many-as-71-victims-c-11940349

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbbI0-_ksBk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKHkyg34GMA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

96acd5 No.19580374

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581483

File: 76857412081b158⋯.jpg (191.14 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 83f3938591e4ad7⋯.jpg (240.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: 68225088da0caec⋯.jpg (166.27 KB,893x776,893:776,Support_for_the_Voice_Sept….jpg)

>>19529127

Anthony Albanese has no regrets sending Australians to polls for referendum

ELLEN RANSLEY and COURTNEY GOULD - SEPTEMBER 20, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese says if he had his time over, he would still be holding the Voice to Parliament referendum despite the debate turning “nasty and divisive” at times.

When Mr Albanese claimed victory in May last year, the first thing he committed the Labor government to was implementing the Uluru Statement from the Heart “in full”, with a referendum on enshrining an Indigenous Voice to Parliament the first step.

But, with just more than three weeks until Australians vote in the first referendum since 1999, debate has at-times taken an ugly turn.

After a difficult parliamentary sitting fortnight, both sides of parliament have condemned a group of pro-Voice activists who shouted profanities at No campaigners as they walked into a rally event in Adelaide earlier this week and called for respectful debate ahead of October 14.

When asked whether he would still make the same commitment to hold the referendum if he had his time again – knowing now how “nasty and divisive” the debate would become – Mr Albanese was emphatic.

“Yes because when are we going to get this done (otherwise)? It’s been 122 years,” he told 2SM radio on Wednesday morning.

“There’s provisions in the Constitution to allow New Zealand to be the seventh state of Australia, but there’s no acknowledgment of the first peoples of Australia.

“This should not be controversial.”

Mr Albanese said he was not the only political leader to commit to a referendum, saying it was also the “Coalition’s position before the last election … before 2016”.

“Go back all the way to 2007, John Howard committed to it, within 18 months of his election that there was going to be a referendum for constitutional recognition … I’ve been determined to restore faith in politics by doing what we said we would do and this is an opportunity to move the country forward. And there’s nothing to fear from this proposal,” he said.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has pleaded for a delay to the “divisive” referendum or a new question instead asking Australians to vote on Indigenous recognition without a constitutionally enshrined Voice amid declining support for the Yes vote.

Mr Albanese has remained steadfast in his commitment.

Speaking in Sydney on Wednesday, Mr Dutton said everyday Australians were “angry” with Mr Albanese for being asked to head to the polls without the details of the Voice model and condemned the protesters who gathered outside a No campaign event earlier this week.

“We live in a free country. We treasure our democracy. It’s absolutely sacrosanct to our way of life. And I don’t tolerate for one minute Australians being abused by other Australians in those sorts of rallies,” he said.

“If you have anything to say in our country, in any debate, in any political forum, you say it in a peaceful way.”

The Liberal leader sought to link Mr Albanese to the protesters, claiming the Prime Minister had “set our country up to be divided”.

“He’s been warned for months and months and months that he was embarking on a path right up to October 14 and likely beyond which is splitting our country in two,” Mr Dutton said.

“We said to the Prime Minister that he should not proceed with this referendum because Australians haven't got the detail that they require to make an informed judgment.

“And I think that’s why Australians are angry at the Prime Minister at the moment because they’re being asked to vote on something that won’t be designed until after the election takes place.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5c970e No.19581488

File: 8de5cd015892792⋯.png (407.63 KB,1040x578,520:289,ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581489

File: 92094aa047f99e2⋯.jpg (356.08 KB,825x1062,275:354,Y23_1.jpg)

File: ec7c4af8d96b5ba⋯.mp4 (6.57 MB,640x640,1:1,h01fkBfQGNqlVf5e_1.mp4)

>>19581483

2/2

It comes as Cathy Freeman – arguably one of Australia’s greatest sporting icons and a proud Aboriginal woman – has thrown her support behind the Yes case.

In a video for Yes23, the gold medallist encouraged Australians to vote Yes, saying “I can’t remember a time when change has felt so urgent, where momentum has been so strong”.

“We have the chance to be part of a moment that brings people together, to work hard for something that we can all believe in,” she said.

In a press conference on Wednesday, Mr Albanese thanked the “great Australian” for using her voice, saying it was “not surprising” she was a strong supporter of a Yes vote.

“I hope that people to listen to Cathy Freeman’s very clear and unequivocal plead for people to vote yes,” he said.

Deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley said while she didn’t agree with Freeman’s position, she had “articulated her views very strongly” and suggested she should consider a tilt for parliament.

“I don’t agree with her. I don’t agree with the argument for Yes, but as I’ve said many times, it’s okay to vote Yes, and it’s okay to vote No,” she told Sky News.

“What’s not okay is the type of disrespect and abuse that people experienced only a day or so ago in Adelaide … The type of abuse we’ve been seeing is just not okay.

“You can have that contest of ideas around the kitchen table, but you absolutely need to respect everyone’s views in this.”

In a bid to encourage undecided voters to support the Voice, the Uluru Dialogue is rolling out a new social media campaign, asking young people to “ring your rello” and discuss the impeding referendum with them.

Uluru Youth Dialogue co-convener Bridget Cama said young people would play a “really important role” in the upcoming referendum.

“We’re asking young Australians right across the country to get on the phone and call their relative, and just talk to them about the Voice – why it’s important to them as young people and then asking them whether they would support the Voice and vote yes,” she said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/anthony-albanese-has-no-regrets-sending-australians-to-polls-for-referendum/news-story/47229e84e888061499d8ec382b83e363

https://twitter.com/yes23au/status/1704065500244742525

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581498

File: b21b2b0a0dd1de7⋯.jpg (223.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_and_former_Li….jpg)

>>19529127

Indigenous voice to parliament’s Yes campaign ‘not about separatism’, says Noel Pearson

PAIGE TAYLOR and ROSIE LEWIS - SEPTEMBER 19, 2023

1/2

Noel Pearson has declared Indigenous Australia will not return to “assimilation” as the co-architect of the Indigenous voice moved to counter No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s calls for an end to separatism.

The Cape York leader expressed concerns the debate over the Indigenous voice to parliament was sending the country backward into old territory where assimilationist ideas were accepted.

He argues for an alternative concept of unity in which Indigenous people have a special but not separate place in the nation’s story, a reference to John Howard’s landmark speech on constitutional recognition in 2007.

“It’s too late for us now to be talking about assimilation. We’re not gonna turn into whitefellas tomorrow,” Mr Pearson said.

“Our children are gonna remain Aboriginal. And I think we can accept that I think Australians accept that. You can’t turn the clock back. It’s gonna be an enriching thing for the country when we do this.”

The Cape York leader was in Perth on Tuesday when he categorically rejected that the campaign for the Indigenous voice to parliament was about separatism, as Senator Nampijinpa Price has repeatedly argued.

One of the No campaign’s key slogans is “One Together, Not Two Divided”.

“The Yes campaign is not a campaign for separatism, it is not a campaign for assimilation,” Mr Pearson said at Edith Cowan University in the northern Perth suburb of Joondalup, where students can take a unit studying his reforming work and philosophy in Indigenous economic participation and welfare reciprocity.

“It (the voice) is a third way, which is that we be recognised as having our own identity, culture, languages, heritage within a united Australia.”

Senator Nampijinpa Price’s blanket rejection that there has been any downside of colonisation caused deep upset last week, and historians and researchers rushed to offer evidence of the ongoing harm of colonial policies.

However, when an audience member at Edith Cowan University asked Mr Pearson if Senator Nampijinpa Price was wrong or being mean-spirited, he replied that it was “a tactic”.

“It is like (saying) ‘all Mexicans are rapists’. Just say an outrageous thing. It’s the way democratic discourse seems to have taken a turn,” he said.

“People can say outrageous things – even things they don’t believe – in order to capture attention, galvanise constituencies. They’re as delighted at our distress as much as anything so I just think we must not be distracted by that. I don’t think it’s a serious argument … we have to continue with the progress we have made.

“On this issue it’s either assimilation or it’s separatism or it’s a united society where we get to keep our culture, we get to self-determine our lives … these are (John) Howard’s words, a special but not separate place in Australia.”

Mr Pearson lamented that the referendum had become about power for some politicians.

“In the minds of too many people, particularly the politicians, this is about the next federal election rather than the long-term future of the Australian people,” he said. “Referendums are about a long vision for the country.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581499

File: ca6961f88102c90⋯.jpg (94.08 KB,1280x720,16:9,Yes23_campaigner_Noel_Pear….jpg)

>>19581498

2/2

Earlier on Perth radio, Mr Pearson made a pitch to West Australian voters when he said: “The No campaign, it’s in their interest to hearken back to controversial policies of the past. The fact is … we’re at a point in Australia where Australians largely accept that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have their own identities. They have their own cultures. They have their own languages. And that this is a good thing for the country. We don’t want to lose those things.

“We are no longer demanding that Aboriginal people abandon those things. They’re not ugly things. They’re not bad things. They are, in fact, rich things and we have got something to contribute to the culture. The situation has changed from 30, 50, 80 years ago. We now accept Aboriginal identity and culture and languages, and recognition of that. The recognition that that is part of Australia is something we now want to agree with in the Constitution and recognise it in the vote that we take on October 14.

“When Aboriginal kids go astray and they see no place in the society, you know really it’s not about so-called assimilation, we’re not going to turn into whitefellas. That’s never going to happen. We’re not going to leave our culture and identity and languages. But at the same time, it’s not about separatism. The Yes campaign is about integration. It’s about unity. It’s about bringing the country together so that people can have their cultures but be very naturally Australian.”

Senator Nampijinpa Price said: “This is a disgraceful and divisive attempt by Noel Pearson to verbal Australians voting no.

“Nobody except him is talking about assimilation or turning Aboriginal children into ‘whitefellas’.

“Of course Australians are proud of their Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander brothers and sisters. Of course we are proud of our Indigenous heritage.

“And this is exactly why we don’t want to be divided by race in our Constitution.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/indigenous-voice-to-parliaments-yes-campaign-not-about-separatism-says-noel-pearson/news-story/f048c88639fd97f56800ad027b11943e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581536

File: fa7133faef45311⋯.jpg (370.21 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,NSW_Liberal_Democrat_MP_Jo….jpg)

>>19529127

Anti-Voice rallies organised by pro-Putin conspiracy theorist

Matthew Knott, Sherryn Groch and Paul Sakkal - September 19, 2023

1/2

Rallies opposing the Indigenous Voice to parliament planned around Australia this weekend are being organised by a pro-Kremlin activist and anti-vaccination campaigner living in the Russian consulate in Sydney.

The official No campaign has distanced itself from the latest iteration of the “world freedom rallies”, which have long been organised by Simeon Boikov, who is also known online as “the Aussie Cossack”.

While posters for the rallies were originally framed around opposing Australian aid to Ukraine and an array of conspiracy theories, they have now been rebranded as anti-Voice events and are expected to draw crowds in the thousands.

A spokesman for the major No outfit, Fair Australia, said the events scheduled for Saturday were “not supported, endorsed or funded by us in any way”.

“We expect there will be many grassroots events and organisations springing up in communities across the country in opposition to the divisive Voice and that is understandable,” the spokesman said in a written statement.

The rallies – scheduled in Sydney, Melbourne, Perth, Adelaide and Canberra as well as regional centres such as Casino in NSW and Yeppoon in Queensland – could further escalate tensions over the referendum after footage emerged on Tuesday of protesters calling Liberal senator Alex Antic a “racist dog” as he entered a No event in Adelaide.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called for civility while Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said the vision was disturbing.

“Of course some of the tone of the debate has been unfortunate, that’s the truth,” Albanese said. “What I would say to people is: be respectful. I respect every Australian regardless of whether they’re going to vote Yes or whether they’re going to No.”

NSW Liberal Democrat MP John Ruddick, who will speak at the Sydney No rally, said Boikov had played an important role in organising logistics for the event.

“We’re very lucky to have him,” Ruddick said.

But Ruddick said he was “horrified” that he had initially been promoted as speaking at a rally listing the Voice as just one of 16 issues of concern including the “indoctrination of children”, AUKUS, abortion, and the extradition of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Other topics listed allude to popular conspiracy theories over 5G technology and the World Economic Forum.

Ruddick said it was “absolutely muddying the waters” on the referendum.

“This is a single issue referendum; we don’t want it merging with all the other stuff,” he said.

“We will not be discussing the Ukraine war, COVID, digital currency – none of that will be on the agenda, none of that will be spoken about from the platform.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581538

File: 5cb324f94fe30f0⋯.jpg (93.57 KB,671x680,671:680,The_original_poster_for_Sa….jpg)

File: 19c38ff4cd89fc7⋯.jpg (272.78 KB,1080x1080,1:1,The_updated_poster_for_Sat….jpg)

>>19581536

2/2

But Boikov, an outspoken advocate of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, said he expected the event to highlight topics other than the referendum.

“We don’t want people to forget about all the other issues,” he said. “We’re saying no to the Voice, but the Voice isn’t something that cancels out all the other grievances that we have with the government.”

During the pandemic, Boikov expanded his following through the sovereign citizen and anti-vax movements. He now regularly invites Indigenous sovereign groups to perform Welcome to Country ceremonies at his pro-Russia rallies, claiming that all Indigenous Australians support the invasion of Ukraine.

Indigenous groups have held recent events at the Sydney Russian consulate, where Boikov has been holed up since December to avoid jail time for assaulting a 76-year-old man at a rally in support of Ukraine at Sydney Town Hall.

Last month, Boikov took a poll on his Telegram channel inviting followers to vote on which issue the freedom rallies should focus on next, suggesting everything from “NO to the Voice” to “NO to NATO”.

The Svoboda Alliance – Russians in Australia who oppose Putin’s invasion of Ukraine – said pro-Kremlin influencers were “using First Nations people to promote their messages”.

“Looks like the Kremlin believes that voting No will undermine the Labor Party and the prime minister,” Alliance spokesman Ilya Fomin said.

Eddie Synot, a Wemba Wemba lawyer and researcher, said No campaigners’ use of conspiracy theories was causing damage to First Nations people. “Once again, our communities, the most disadvantaged in this country, are ignored and used by others for their own purposes,” he said.

A recent analysis of the debate on X (formerly Twitter) by Queensland University of Technology researcher Timothy Graham suggests conspiracy theorists are increasingly infiltrating the No campaign online.

While neither side appeared to be deploying armies of bots, Graham said the No camp had many more “suspicious accounts” and was dominated by misinformation and conspiracy theories.

The Voice debate ticks all the boxes for a foreign adversary looking to sow division in Australia, he said. “It’s about race; it’s polarised. They look for any fissure, any crack, to make it worse.”

When the Black Lives Matter movement took off in the US, researchers discovered Russia had waged a covert and sophisticated campaign to inflame division.

Isabella Currie, an expert in Russian information warfare, said she hadn’t found conclusive evidence Russia was running a formal campaign in the Voice debate.

But she said Russia had previously tried to “exploit genuine anti-imperialist and anti-Western sentiments”, including in the 2016 US presidential election.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/anti-voice-rallies-organised-by-pro-putin-conspiracy-theorist-20230919-p5e5zc.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581567

File: a0d2c06cd5aa0cc⋯.jpg (142.26 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Qin_Gang_holds_up_China_s_….jpg)

File: d5b54e6e4a8c679⋯.jpg (387.07 KB,825x822,275:274,FX_1.jpg)

File: 0c8e3071681d7c4⋯.jpg (106.09 KB,1064x2048,133:256,FtYuJXAWIAE432l.jpg)

File: 135df6ea2be696f⋯.jpg (60.38 KB,538x1024,269:512,FtYuJXCWcAAjqCQ.jpg)

File: e6093bf259996d5⋯.jpg (112.3 KB,1024x772,256:193,FtYuJXEWcAACd5w.jpg)

>>19210696 (pb)

>>19237694 (pb)

>>19243436 (pb)

Xi Jinping’s pick for foreign minister, Qin Gang, dismissed over love child

WILL GLASGOW - SEPTEMBER 20, 2023

Xi Jinping’s pick for foreign minister, Qin Gang, was dismissed after only seven months because Beijing worried a love child with a Chinese television journalist made him vulnerable to American intelligence agencies.

Senior Chinese officials have been told Mr Qin, 57, was abruptly removed from his job as China’s top diplomat because of “lifestyle issues”, a party euphemism for his widely discussed affair with Phoenix television host Fu Xiaotian.

“The probe found that Qin had engaged in an extramarital affair that led to the birth of a child in the US,” the Wall Street Journal reported, citing sources familiar with the internal communist party investigation.

“The investigation is continuing with Qin’s co-operation … and it is now focusing on whether the affair or other conduct by Qin might have compromised China’s national security.”

The salacious dismissal is hugely embarrassing for Xi, who had overseen Qin’s unusually fast promotion. It has exposed huge gaps in Beijing’s vetting process, a problem underlined by the additional recent removal of China’s Defence Minister Li Shangfu.

The twin disappearances of two of Beijing’s public faces to the world have given rare insight into the fractious state of elite Chinese politics.

Before being promoted to be the Chinese Foreign Minister last December, Qin served as China’s ambassador in Washington, Beijing’s most important posting and an indication of Xi’s trust in him. Gossip about a love-child born in America being Qin’s undoing has swirled for months.

While Beijing did not comment on the Wall Street Journal report, Chinese propaganda corroborated them while suggesting Washington may have played a role in the affair.

“The reason why Qin Gang was dismissed is because he had a lover and a child born in the United States … Moreover, the lover may be a spy for the CIA,” wrote one Chinese propaganda account.

Qin has not been seen in public since June. Two months before that, the Chinese television journalist believed to be his mistress posted a cryptic message on social media saying she was flying from Los Angeles to an unspecified location on what appeared to be an otherwise empty private jet.

Her post included a photo of her interviewing Qin a year earlier in China’s Washington embassy. It also included a photo of her “precious baby son Er-Kin”, a name which in Chinese sounds like “Son of Qin”, as noted by Philip Cunningham, who tracks Chinese propaganda.

Both her American or Chinese social media accounts have been silent since that post in late April, when the party’s investigation into Qin’s “lifestyle issues” began. She is believed to now be Beijing.

Earlier posts indicate she was raising her child in a mansion on the southern Californian coast, reportedly a rental costing $US50,000 a month. There are unconfirmed reports that she also had an apartment near China’s ambassadorial residence in Washington.

The scandal comes as Xi’s worries about the loyalty of his officials who deal with foreigners and during a period of intense geopolitical competition with America.

Some Biden officials have gloated about the rare insight into China’s baroque elite politics, which in all but the most extraordinary cases are kept secret from those outside the senior ranks of the party.

“President Xi‘s cabinet line-up is now resembling Agatha Christie’s novel And Then There Were None,” America’s Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel recently wrote on social media.

Beijing has not commented on the disappearance of General Li, 65, but analysts believe it is related to an ongoing investigation into failures in China’s rocket development program.

Before being appointed defence minister, Li served as the head of the PLA’s main department for procuring and developing weapons, a position with a long history of having the “worst corruption” inside the Chinese military, according to former US officials.

Two senior officials overseeing the People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force, which controls the country’s strategic missiles, were both dismissed in July.

Beijing has not given a reason for their dismissal, but analysts suspect they were also subject to a corruption investigation.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/xis-pick-for-foreign-minister-qin-gang-dismissed-over-love-child/news-story/ac6a04b2269b61b7cf14999cf074720c

https://twitter.com/xiaotianphoenix/status/1645553461428101124

https://jinpeili.substack.com/p/the-phoenix-follies-romancing-politics

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581594

File: 5bd8e632ad2fb47⋯.jpg (224.88 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Pacific_climate_activists_….jpg)

File: 81d19ea3fcd0a49⋯.jpg (221.75 KB,675x900,3:4,The_open_letter_advertised….jpg)

File: ca845823decd38f⋯.jpg (2.51 MB,1733x3150,1733:3150,NYT_open_letter_Australia_….jpg)

Climate scientists and Pacific activists call on Australia to ramp up ambitions ahead of UN summit

Hugo Hodge - 20 September 2023

1/2

Movers and shakers in the fight against climate change are gathering for the United Nation's Climate Ambition Summit in New York on Wednesday, while climate scientists and Pacific activists call on Australia to ramp up its own ambitions.

The summit comes as the Australia Institute has published a full-page ad in the New York Times calling on the Australian government to halt "over 100 new coal and gas projects" in the pipeline.

The open letter, signed by over 200 scientists and experts, called on Australia to accelerate climate action, "not climate annihilation".

The institute's director, Dr Richard Denniss, is attending the UN climate summit and said Australia "wants to have it both ways" when it came to climate leadership and fossil fuels.

"On the one hand, we want the world to support our bid to host a COP," he said, referring to the UN Climate Change Conference.

"But at the same time, we're ignoring the UN and indeed, our Pacific neighbours' calls on us to stop expanding fossil fuels."

Australia has bid to co-host COP in 2026 with Pacific nations but the proposal has been met with criticism.

'You need to listen', Pacific activists say

Usaia Moli, a Fijian climate activist and subsistence farmer, said that while the Pacific region viewed Australia as an older sibling, it was time the bigger country came to the table as "equal partners" in the fight against climate change.

"We feel and we know Australia needs to do a lot more than what is happening right now. They've made a lot of commitment in the past, but it's about time they put resources into it," he said.

Mr Moli, whose village was relocated due to rising sea levels, said Australia would have the Pacific's support in hosting COP but it needs to "step up your work in the Pacific".

"You need to come down and listen. You need to take a walk in our shores and our villages and our seas and our forests to know exactly what we are up against," he said.

"People need to hear us because we are the experts when it comes to our issue. So, if you're going to plan for us, make sure that you're planning together with the first nations people of all Pacific."

Another Fijian climate activist, Lavenia Yasikula Naivalu, called on the United Nations to give greater recognition to the importance of community-based solutions.

She leads grassroots climate action in her remote island community, including relocating buildings affected by rising sea levels, coral reef restoration and fisheries preservation.

"If I was going to be invited, I want to plead to world leaders, if we could have forums where we are included in the process, and that is climate justice," she said.

"Include us grassroots people in decision making processes, because that is fair — we are the ones who are the victims."

The pair were part of a Pacific delegation who were in Australia earlier this month meeting with parliamentarians and business leaders to call for greater climate financing in their region.

"It's very important for us to come and tell the truth, so that whenever they [Australian leaders] represent the Pacific, they can represent us well, because we don't have that opportunity. But Australia does have that opportunity," Mr Moli said.

Meanwhile, US President Joe Biden will host a second summit with leaders of the Pacific Islands Forum at the White House on Monday next week to discuss climate, economic growth, sustainable development.

It is widely being seen as part of the country's efforts to step up engagement with a region where the US is in a battle for influence with China.

'Renewable energy superpower'

A spokesperson for Minister for Climate Change and Energy Chris Bowen said Australia was investing $40 billion to become a "renewable energy superpower".

The money would also "support the transformation to renewable energy for Australia and key trading partners".

"This investment is focused on building new industries, like green hydrogen and critical minerals, while ensuring energy security as these new energy sources are developed," they said.

"Emissions from large gas and coal production facilities in Australia are subject to strict limits under the reformed Safeguard Mechanism, with the legislation capping overall emissions from the covered sectors to contribute to our international commitments."

They said these reforms would deliver more than 200 million tonnes of emissions reduction by 2030.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581598

File: 5e406eb60778d7c⋯.jpg (239.72 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Usaia_Moli_says_Australia_….jpg)

File: b7e4642acba526b⋯.jpg (172.73 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Lavenia_Yasikula_Naivalu_s….jpg)

File: 2bb0f64669fde19⋯.jpg (1.42 MB,5000x3453,5000:3453,Foreign_Minister_Penny_Won….jpg)

File: d3f85c2daa3447b⋯.jpg (47.48 KB,908x540,227:135,Dr_Wesley_Morgan_says_Paci….jpg)

>>19581594

2/2

Australia 'behind the eight ball'

The climate summit has been convened by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to showcase leaders from across government, business, finance, and society who are making concrete actions to keep alive the Paris Agreement goal of curbing global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius.

In July, Mr Guterres said the Earth had transitioned from global warming to "the era of global boiling".

It is expected that some countries will use the summit to call on other nations to sign onto a first-of-its-kind fossil fuels non-proliferation treaty — a push from Pacific countries Vanuatu, Tuvalu, Tonga, Fiji, Niue and the Solomon Islands asking global leaders to phase out coal, gas and oil production.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Assistant Minister for Climate Change and Energy, Jenny McAllister, are in New York to attend the UN General Assembly and the climate summit. It is not clear whether they have been invited to address the summit.

Senator Wong, questioned by a reporter outside the summit, said Australia was trying to undertake "a big transition in a short space of time".

"We will be, by 2030, in excess of 80 per cent renewable energy – when we came to government, we were just over 30 per cent," Senator Wong said.

"We recognise our history and the nature of our economy … we are genuinely motivated to change that."

In a statement, Ms McAllister said Australia was part of the international fight against climate change.

"I look forward to promoting Australia's constructive role on climate change at home, in the Pacific and beyond as we build momentum towards this year's Conference of the Parties [COP] in Dubai," she said.

Dr Wesley Morgan, senior researcher at the Climate Council, is an expert in multilateral cooperation on climate change and said although Australia likes to think of itself as a leader on climate change, Pacific nations have been the real leaders for decades.

"Australia likes to claim it is a leader, but in contrast to the Pacific global climate leadership, Australia is a global climate laggard and unfortunately, is still behind the eight ball," he said.

"The Pacific Island countries are the reason why we have the Paris Agreement and [it] is the only means we have to cooperate globally to cut emissions."

Dr Morgan said that although the New York climate summit is a long way from the lived realities of Pacific communities, "the link is direct and it is crucial".

"It is global summits like these that are crucially important for setting an agenda for moving away from coal, oil and gas and shifting to a global clean energy economy and that will mean survival for Pacific Island communities," he said.

Dr Denniss said that Australia had the resources to be a Pacific leader on climate change, but it was yet to prove itself.

"Australia still spends around $11 billion a year on fossil fuel subsidies, yet when it comes to supporting Pacific nations with climate finance, and indeed disaster recovery, we spend a tiny percentage of that on our Pacific neighbours," he said.

"I don't blame them for wishing Australia would show leadership in this front, but to be clear, after decades, there's no sign that that's what Australia wants to become."

Dr Denniss said the United Nations climate summits could achieve better outcomes if grassroots organisations were better platformed.

"I think that they do a better job these days of including diverse opinions, particularly from grassroots organisations in smaller countries. But I don't think for a minute that those groups have anything like the access that the fossil fuel industry has, that big business has," he said.

"If leaders spent more time talking to community organisations that represent people that really are in the frontline of the climate catastrophe … and less time listening to fossil fuel executives explaining the role that gas has to play in tackling climate change … I think we'd get much better outcomes if we had much broader consultations."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-20/australia-called-to-ramp-up-climate-ambitions-nyt-ad/102876940

https://nb.australiainstitute.org.au/nyt_open_letter

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581607

File: 61c3c2342230276⋯.jpg (479.59 KB,1980x1320,3:2,Australia_will_deliver_an_….jpg)

>>19499282

Australia to support Ukraine at UN's highest court

Kat Wong and Dominic Giannini - September 20 2023

Australian officials will take a stand in support of Ukraine at the United Nations' highest court as the Balkan country challenges Russia's claims its invasion was carried out to prevent genocide.

Days after Russian forces invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Kyiv filed a case to the International Court of Justice alleging Russian leaders were abusing international law by using false claims of genocide in eastern Ukraine to justify its invasion.

Russian representatives have continued to accuse Ukraine of committing genocide.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong says Russia is in breach of the UN charter, which protects the sovereignty and territorial integrity of every nation.

"Nothing Russia says or does can distract from that fact," she told reporters on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York on Wednesday (AEST).

"Russia has been active in its disinformation and misinformation about this war … and … what we have seen is countries including Ukraine pushing back on that."

She added the fact Russian President Vladimir Putin had engaged with North Korean dictator and global pariah Kim Jong-un "says something about how desperate he is".

Officials from 32 countries are expected to deliver interventions in support of Ukraine at The Hague's Peace Palace.

Solicitor-General Stephen Donaghue will deliver Australia's intervention on Wednesday night (AEST) where he will argue the court has jurisdiction to hear the case.

Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus says false allegations of genocide undermine the rules-based international order and Mr Donaghue's intervention "demonstrates Australia's unwavering commitment to upholding fundamental rules of international law and the integrity of the Genocide Convention".

Australian officials have continued to call on Russia to immediately withdraw its military forces from Ukraine, in compliance with the International Court of Justice's March 2022 order.

Since the invasion, Australia has given Ukraine more than $790 million in aid, including $610 million in military equipment.

Senator Wong is expected to deliver a national statement on climate, development and the country's commitment to UN reform and preventing conflict.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8356386/australia-to-support-ukraine-at-uns-highest-court/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581618

File: 8089f04ff707a69⋯.jpg (77.98 KB,720x405,16:9,Brazilian_President_Luiz_I….jpg)

File: f9dbeb36b209a2e⋯.jpg (58.44 KB,720x405,16:9,Julian_Assange_is_facing_1….jpg)

File: c812037cd89fd6c⋯.jpg (1003.1 KB,825x1832,825:1832,GS_1.jpg)

File: 106744e7e94a0cf⋯.jpg (478.74 KB,1152x2048,9:16,F6YjVMMbIAAoZln.jpg)

>>19493339

Brazil's president says Julian Assange can't be punished for 'informing society' in a 'transparent' way

Lula had previously denounced the lack of concerted efforts to free Julian Assange

Landon Mion - September 20, 2023

Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said at the United Nations in New York City on Tuesday that it is "essential" to preserve the freedom of the press and that Wikileaks founder Julian Assange should not be prosecuted for informing the public.

"It is essential to preserve the freedom of the press. A journalist like Julian Assange cannot be punished for informing society in a transparent and legitimate way," Lula said.

The president's comments come a day before a cross-party delegation of Australian politicians meet in Washington, D.C., with U.S. officials, members of Congress and civil rights groups. The group is bringing a letter signed by more than 60 members of parliament calling on the U.S. to drop the prosecution against Assange, who is fighting against extradition to the U.S., where could be sentenced to as many as 175 years in an American maximum security prison.

U.S. President Joe Biden will host Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in late October. Albanese has repeatedly called on the U.S. in recent months to end the prosecution of the Australian journalist.

Assange is facing 17 charges for receiving, possessing and communicating classified information to the public under the espionage act and one charge alleging a conspiracy to commit computer intrusion. The charges stem from the 2010 publication of cables U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning leaked to Wikileaks that detailed war crimes committed by the U.S. government in the Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, detention camp, Iraq and Afghanistan. The materials also expose instances of the CIA engaging in torture and rendition.

Wikileaks' "Collateral Murder" video showing the U.S. military gunning down civilians in Iraq, including two Reuters journalists, was also published 13 years ago.

"Our fight is against disinformation and cybercrime," Lula said on Tuesday. "Acts and platforms should not abolish the labor laws we fight so hard for."

Assange has been held at London’s high-security Belmarsh Prison since he was removed from the Ecuadorian Embassy on April 11, 2019, for breaching bail conditions. He had sought asylum at the embassy in London to avoid being sent to Sweden over allegations he raped two women because Sweden would not provide assurances it would protect him from extradition to the U.S. The investigations into the sexual assault allegations were eventually dropped.

In May, Lula denounced the lack of concerted efforts to free Assange, calling it an "embarrassment" that a journalist who "denounced trickery by one state against another is arrested, condemned to die in jail, and we do nothing to free him."

"It's a crazy thing," Lula told reporters at the time. "We talk about freedom of expression; the guy is in prison because he denounced wrongdoing. And the press doesn’t do anything in defense of this journalist. I can’t understand it."

The Obama administration decided not to indict Assange after Wikileaks published the cables in 2010 because it would have had to also indict journalists from major news outlets who published the materials. Former President Obama also commuted Manning’s 35-year sentence, for violations of the Espionage Act and other offenses, to seven years.

However, former President Trump's Justice Department later moved to indict Assange under the Espionage Act, and the Biden administration has continued to pursue his prosecution.

"I think there must be a movement of world press in his defense. Not in regard to his person, but to defend the right to denounce," Lula told reporters in May. "The guy didn't denounce anything vulgar. He denounced that a state was spying on others, and that became a crime against the journalist. The press, which defends freedom of the press, does nothing to free this citizen. It's sad, but it’s true."

Last year, the editors and publishers of U.S. and European news outlets that worked with Assange on the publication of excerpts from more than 250,000 documents he obtained in the Cablegate leak — The Guardian, The New York Times, Le Monde, Der Spiegel and El País — wrote an open letter calling for the U.S. to drop the charges against Assange.

And in April, Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., led a letter to the Justice Department signed by some of her congressional colleagues demanding Assange's freedom.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/brazils-president-says-julian-assange-punished-informing-society-transparent-way

https://twitter.com/GabrielShipton/status/1704088375949664311

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581632

File: 1b5016d3751e101⋯.jpg (305.92 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Albanese_s_long_promised_i….jpg)

Albanese to announce 12-month COVID inquiry

James Massola and Natassia Chrysanthos - September 20, 2023

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will finally announce the long-awaited inquiry into Australia’s response to COVID-19 pandemic on Thursday.

The 12-month inquiry will not be a royal commission but is expected to have wide-ranging powers to call witnesses and it will examine the response of federal and state governments to the pandemic since it began in January 2020.

Albanese and Health Minister Mark Butler will on Thursday release the terms of reference for the inquiry, which will be led by a panel of medical and economic experts.

Albanese discussed the inquiry with State and Territory leaders at the most recent national cabinet meeting in Brisbane in August and those governments have been notified that the announcement of the inquiry is imminent.

Just three state premiers and chief ministers - Victoria’s Daniel Andrews, Queensland’s Annastacia Palaszczuk and the ACT’s Andrew Barr - have led their governments since the start of the pandemic.

Albanese has never promised a royal commission into the country’s response to COVID-19 and instead has said, repeatedly, that he supported holding a “royal commission or some form of inquiry” into the country’s handling of COVID-19.

The federal government has argued that the pandemic is still ongoing when explaining the delay in announcing the inquiry.

While Australia kept infections in low numbers from the first wave in 2020 by shutting down international borders and enforcing quarantine for everyone who arrived, the first years of the pandemic were marked by interstate border closures, the shuttering of businesses, school closures across the nation and repeated lockdowns, most notably in Melbourne, which endured six lockdowns totalling 262 days from March 2020 to October 2021.

Federal health data, which is also reported to the World Health Organisation, shows Australia has reported more than 11.5 million confirmed cases of COVID and almost 23,000 deaths between January 2020 and mid-September this year.

About 11.3 million of those cases were contracted during the Omicron wave, which began in December 2021 and remains the dominant strain of the virus circulating Australia.

Data from the Actuaries Institute, published earlier this year, found there were 10,300 extra deaths in Australia last year directly due to COVID while another 6600 deaths, including from heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and diabetes, could also be linked to the effects of the pandemic on both people’s health and the health system.

In May, the World Health Organisation declared COVID-19 was no longer a global emergency.

Butler was asked earlier this month about whether the inquiry was imminent and said “the prime minister and I and other ministers have made very clear that we intend to hold a deep inquiry into the management of COVID over the last few years”.

“It would be extraordinary for government to take any other position and we’ll announce the terms of that inquiry in due course.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581637

File: e4cf6872245947b⋯.jpg (2.84 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Cleaners_disinfecting_a_ho….jpg)

>>19581632

2/2

Former prime minister Scott Morrison, who led Australia through the first two years of the pandemic, told the Australian Financial Review earlier this week that he would co-operate with an inquiry into COVID-19 but only if it looked at the role of and actions taken by the states as well as the federal government.

He also argued the inquiry should have the power to ensure state and territory officials appeared before it.

While no nationwide inquiry into COVID in Australia has been conducted, there have been numerous independent and academic examinations carried out.

The most wide-ranging report was funded by the Paul Ramsay Foundation and headed by former Prime Minister and Cabinet Department secretary Peter Shergold. It made a series of recommendations to boost preparedness for future pandemics and increased use of experts.

Other investigations have looked at particular policies. A report headed by economists Steven Hamilton, Tristram Sainsbury and Geoffrey Liu which examined the early withdrawal of superannuation stimulus policy found up to a quarter of people drained their retirement savings within days of it starting.

In June, federal Treasury revealed it would start its own independent investigation into the $90 billion JobKeeper program that supported the economy through the pandemic amid long-standing complaints it had enabled profit-making businesses to swell their bottom lines.

Former deputy chief medical officer Nick Coatsworth said the primary outcome of the inquiry should be to define proportionality in Australia’s disease control response.

“The inquiry will only succeed if we take a forward-looking posture about how we best make public policy during future pandemics,” he said.

“We should at all costs avoid a blame game, however there does need to be significant scrutiny on the states and territories because ultimately their polices were the ones that were most restrictive.“

Before news of the inquiry emerged on Wednesday afternoon, Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie accused the Albanese government of choosing to pursue an inquiry, rather than a royal commission, to protect Labor premiers.

Policy experts and the Australian Medical Association have been urging the prime minister to launch the sweeping investigation before the end of this year to avoid turning the probe into a political blame game in the run-up to the next federal election.

AMA President Steve Robson said its terms of reference should be focused on the future while its timing needed to ensure it was free from politics and could remain objective.

He said the health future of Australia was only going to get more complicated, particularly as the population aged and climate change increased risks from issues including vector-borne diseases and supply chain disruption.

The conservative Institute of Public Affairs backs an inquiry into the country’s handling of the pandemic – and has proposed its own terms of reference for a royal commission – saying it should probe how the virus entered the country, the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on those who did not contract the virus, the operation of national cabinet, and the design of policies such as JobKeeper.

The left-leaning Australia Institute also believes an inquiry should look at the lines of responsibility between state and federal governments.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-announces-12-month-covid-inquiry-20230920-p5e6cd.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19581648

File: e6faa92d3b77e7e⋯.jpg (1.39 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Former_teacher_Gary_Bloom_….jpg)

File: 81e26471e1cb642⋯.jpg (179.57 KB,1174x783,1174:783,Bloom_now_lives_in_Scotlan….jpg)

File: 819d477e75fc205⋯.jpg (166.02 KB,1092x565,1092:565,Gary_Bloom_during_his_time….jpg)

‘You stole my voice’: Former primary school teacher guilty of historical child sex abuse

Erin Pearson - September 20, 2023

Almost every day, Ben* passes the mobile phone towers on a hill by the Western Ring Road that serve as a reminder of the place where he was abused.

It’s hard to miss, he says. The tip and horse paddocks may be long gone, and the landscape changed, but when he drives by, he is immediately taken back to a small clearing, just out of sight beyond the tree line, where the tip once stood.

Ben says it recalls the day when as a 10-year-old boy, he believed he was going to be killed to keep his abuser’s secret.

“This is my experience. Today, I have a voice,” he told the County Court of Victoria on Wednesday.

While reading his victim impact statement, Ben faced his attacker, former Melbourne primary school teacher and swim coach Gary Bloom, for the first time in almost four decades, after the 58-year-old pleaded guilty to historical child sex abuse offences.

The court heard that in 1985, Bloom was working as a teacher at Sacred Heart Primary School in Diamond Creek, in Melbourne’s north-east, and as a swimming coach when he began visiting a paddock not far from the present-day Western Ring Road that children were known to frequent.

Prosecutor Emma Fargher said Bloom visited the area almost every second day, and he regularly approached children and spoke to them, showing interest in what they were doing.

One day in 1985, he told Ben to follow him to an area on the other side of some thick trees, where Ben was abused.

Fargher said Bloom later followed the victim in the street and told him not to tell anyone what had happened. “Mr Bloom told the victim that he would find out if he told anyone and that he would get angry,” the prosecutor said.

The court heard Ben reported the abuse to police in 2019. Bloom – by then living overseas – was charged and released on bail during a trip back to Australia in December 2021.

The case was due to head to trial, but Bloom later pleaded guilty to three charges of indecent assault, which carries a maximum penalty of five years in jail.

The County Court heard Bloom relocated to Scotland from Melbourne in the 1990s. He now lives in Aberdeen, in Scotland, where he runs a bed and breakfast with his wife. He also works as a geologist with Shell on drilling expeditions.

Turning to face his abuser as he read out his victim impact statement, Ben said Bloom’s actions had affected his life and hurt him in ways that were more complex, more destructive and enduring than words could adequately explain.

“For years, I was deliberate to present a veneer of normalcy. I kept your secret hidden from almost everyone. I didn’t know how to reclaim my voice … so I stayed quiet. In those moments, you stole my voice, my sound, the air, my sense of self,” Ben said.

“In the weeks after you abused me, I attempted to suicide in the backyard of my dad’s house. It was a Saturday, my dad had gone to the shops, long enough, I thought. I felt sad, I felt shame. I thought that I was to blame. I was 10, I was a little boy, innocent.”

Bloom was ordered to return to court in October for sentencing. He remains on bail.

*Not his real name. Changed to protect the identity of a victim of child sexual abuse.

If you or anyone you know needs support call the National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), Lifeline (13 11 14), the Suicide Call Back Service (1300 659 467), Beyond Blue (1300 22 4636) and Kids Helpline (1800 55 1800).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.kidshelpline.com.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/you-stole-my-voice-former-primary-school-teacher-guilty-of-historical-child-sex-abuse-20230920-p5e63s.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19587705

File: 9156c69343a72b5⋯.jpg (5.7 MB,5555x3704,5555:3704,Clive_Palmer_s_Federal_Cou….jpg)

File: 5c5007da3f88a08⋯.jpg (187.46 KB,960x640,3:2,Sample_ballot_papers_for_Y….jpg)

>>19518014

>>19529127

Clive Palmer loses bid to force AEC to count ‘X’ as ‘No’ in Voice vote

Michaela Whitbourn - September 20, 2023

Mining magnate Clive Palmer and United Australia Party senator Ralph Babet have lost a Federal Court bid to force the Australian Electoral Commission to count crosses on Voice referendum ballot papers as a vote against the proposal.

In a judgment delivered late on Wednesday night after an urgent court hearing, Federal Court Justice Steven Rares said an “X” was “inherently ambiguous” and could not be counted as a No vote in the historic referendum on October 14.

Voters will be instructed to write “Yes” or “No” on the Voice referendum ballot paper. However, under so-called “savings provisions”, a referendum vote may be counted where a voter’s intention is clear, even when they have not followed the formal instructions.

“The longstanding legal advice provides that a cross can be open to interpretation as to whether it denotes approval or disapproval: many people use it daily to indicate approval in checkboxes on forms,” the AEC said in a statement last month.

“The legal advice provides that for a single referendum question, a clear ‘tick’ should be counted as formal and a ‘cross’ should not.”

Babet and Palmer – the founder of the United Australia Party – sought a Federal Court declaration that “effect shall be given to any ballot papers containing a cross (“X”) written alone in the space provided, by treating such ballot papers as clearly demonstrating the voter’s intention that he or she does not approve the proposed law”.

Alternatively, the men sought a declaration that any ballot papers containing a tick alone “do not clearly demonstrate the voter’s intention” to be counted as a Yes vote.

Rares said that “a cross is used in daily life both as a means of selecting one of two or more choices and as indicating a negative choice”.

“Often one is asked to select a choice with a cross and … this was an early form of voting after Federation,” he said.

“The use of a cross placed in the answer to the single question on the ballot paper for the referendum (namely, ‘Do you approve this proposed alteration?’) is inherently ambiguous as to the intention that the voter is intending to convey as to the proposal”.

Rares said a tick was unambiguous.

“Unlike a cross, which has more than one signification as either a disapproval or a selection of an answer, being approval, the tick both approves or selects the affirmative as the voter’s answer,” he said.

“A tick signifies assent or approval. It is not a symbol that conveys a negative response.”

Palmer and Babet were ordered to pay the Electoral Commission’s costs.

Rares shortened the timeframe for filing any notice of appeal from 28 days to a week.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/clive-palmer-loses-bid-to-force-aec-to-count-x-as-no-in-voice-vote-20230920-p5e6dc.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19587714

File: 75b117a0760b130⋯.jpg (187.95 KB,2048x1152,16:9,AEC_Commissioner_Tom_Roger….jpg)

File: 814afd8ae2bce4d⋯.jpg (516.47 KB,891x1876,891:1876,The_Voice_referendum_Six_t….jpg)

>>19529127

1.2 million postal votes could delay voice count

GEOFF CHAMBERS - SEPTEMBER 21, 2023

A record 1.2 million Australians have applied for postal votes and millions more are expected to vote at prepoll booths in the two-weeks ahead of Anthony Albanese’s voice referendum, potentially delaying a final result in the event of a tight count.

The Australian Electoral Commission has also put a call out for workers to staff booths across the country, particularly in rural and remote areas, with 63,000 out of a required 100,000 confirmed.

After rolls were closed on Monday night, AEC Commissioner Tom Rogers on Thursday said more than 17.6 million Australians were eligible to cast their vote on October 14.

Mr Rogers said the surge in postal applications could impact the count if the result is close.

“Currently we’re sitting at close to 1.2 million applications for postal votes for this event. If we looked at the election in 2022 as a comparison, it’s probably 200,000 more applications for this event. (The 2022 election) was a high watermark for postal votes because of the pandemic,” Mr Rogers said.

“People have asked me, will we get a result on the night and the answer is I don’t no. It depends on how close the result is.

“But already at this stage with weeks to run, if we’re at 1.2 million postal votes it could well be that we have to wait for the postal votes to be returned before the result becomes clear. And we have to wait for a full 13 day period under law just to deal with that.”

Mr Rogers said “we can only count the votes that we have, so on the evening we may have to wait for those votes to come in”.

Similar to postal vote trends at general elections where the Coalition outperforms Labor, the No campaign is confident they will beat Yes23 on postals.

Mr Rogers said they were continuing their recruitment drive, with the AEC needing 100,000 temporary workers to run more than 500 early voting centres and over 7,000 polling places on October 14.

“We’re advertising for staff. We’ve indicated previously we need around about 100,000 people. I urge individuals in remote and rural areas who feel that they can work with us to do that,” he said.

“We’ve sent around 95,000 offers out already, we’ve had about 63,000 confirmed and we’re satisfied with the way that it’s going. We’re really pushing for people, particularly in remote areas, who can work with us, please do.”

The AEC Commissioner said 97.7 voters had enrolled – the highest number since federation – including 91.4 per cent and 94.1 per cent young and Indigenous Australians. Australians living abroad will also vote in record numbers at 105 missions around the globe.

Referendum booklets have now been published in 34 foreign languages and 12 Indigenous languages, with an additional First Nations language to be released in coming days.

Mr Rogers, who recently met with AFP commissioner Reece Kershaw about security arrangements, said levels of misinformation and abuse levelled at AEC staff were at record highs and the AEC has been rebuffed by unnamed social media companies following requests to remove content.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/12-million-postal-votes-could-delay-voice-count/news-story/db2038b6c35acd7fbe1440200342257a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19587731

File: 530233d82a12e55⋯.jpg (441.07 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Simone_Young_conducts_the_….jpg)

File: 44fe691942e57a3⋯.jpg (388.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,People_hold_signs_as_they_….jpg)

File: 8f709f2a15a42a6⋯.jpg (300.78 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Dmitri_Shostakovich.jpg)

File: e224bd8d019c2d5⋯.jpg (226.8 KB,1296x1728,3:4,Noel_Pearson.jpg)

>>19529127

Voice politics don’t belong in our concert halls

RACHAEL KOHN - SEPTEMBER 21, 2023

Across the country, concertgoers have been hijacked by orchestras that have used the opportunity of a captive audience to campaign openly for the Yes vote in the upcoming referendum.

When my husband and I recently attended one of the dozen or so Sydney Symphony Orchestra concerts we enjoy each year, we were shocked that the usual acknowledgment of country was followed by a statement read out by an orchestra musician that the SSO supported the Uluru Statement from the Heart and the Yes vote, and by implication exhorted us to do the same.

To put it mildly, we were displeased by this blatant politicking in a most inappropriate place.

At the very least, it was a breach of contract. Subscribers who pay hefty sums and travel to the concert hall to hear the classical music repertoire, and patrons who have generously supported the orchestras, funding chairs, international guest conductors and education programs, are being lectured to by orchestra spokespeople as if it is their prerogative to determine our political views.

It is not only an insult to the intelligence of the audience, many of whom would be well read on the issues surrounding the referendum, but it is also an invasion of privacy to which the orchestral musicians should be particularly sensitive.

It was not so long ago that some of our most celebrated composers were under the severe pressures of the dictatorial Soviet regime that used the arts as a vehicle of propaganda.

Many artists come to mind: Dmitri Shostakovich and Sergei Rachmaninoff struggled to maintain their freedom of conscience as expressed in their music, with Rachmaninoff finally escaping to the West.

Musicians such as Vladimir Ashkenazy also fled, carving out a brilliant career as both pianist and conductor, and in 2018 with the financial support of the SSO Maestro’s Circle, of which my husband and I are members, accepted the role as conductor laureate of the SSO.

The heavy hand of politics within classical music has been a scourge, not a benefit.

Indeed, the acknowledgment of country that precedes every concert and presumably every event at the Sydney Opera House also has marred the concert experience with an unnecessary and tiresome political ritual that has had the opposite effect of its intended purpose.

Even Noel Pearson, campaigner for the Yes vote, acknowledged its overuse in other settings. Rather than inclusion, it has become an expression of exclusion. It not only is intended to make all non-Indigenous people feel as if they are invaders and here on sufferance, it also negates most of the population – diverse migrants who made Australia home, developed its institutions, including its conservatoriums and orchestras, and now contribute to our musical enjoyment as denizens of the state orchestras and as world-renowned guest musicians.

More recently, the apex of musical virtuosity is found among the many Asian Australians, such as Emily Sun and Ray Chen, who enthusiastically have taken up the classical music repertoire. It is to them and their elders we owe a debt of thanks for enabling their musical genius.

Whatever the SSO and other orchestras and arts companies around the country decide in respect to exploiting captive audi­ences to campaign for the Yes vote, there is a deeper issue at stake, which is the nature of our democratic freedoms and obligations.

Australia is one of the most successful and rare Western democracies because, unlike most others, voting is compulsory. In other words, it is a personal responsibility to be knowledgeable about political issues, facts and processes, and to keep oneself informed by reading reliable sources. The referendum asks just that of all of us and respects our ability to make informed choices.

As there are significantly different views on the subject, at the very least we are required to avail ourselves of as much knowledge as possible and, above all, freely exercise our personal and private conscience on this important constitutional matter.

Conscience is becoming more and more difficult to hold on to as concert halls and even pulpits are becoming vehicles of political campaigning.

When we enter the concert hall and take our seats, most of us are keenly aware that it offers us one of the last refuges where we as individuals of all backgrounds, faiths and political persuasions can come together and experience a human connection that transcends politics and borders on the sublime.

Let us fight to preserve that sacred quality. We need it now more than ever.

Dr Rachael Kohn AO is an award-winning producer and broadcaster. She was presenter of The Spirit of Things and The Ark on ABC Radio National and is the author of four books.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/voice-politics-dont-belong-in-our-concert-halls/news-story/c73888663dbbab596c8ab6f70345f84a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19587750

File: d04070428cc7236⋯.jpg (226.78 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Anthony_Albanese_Julian_As….jpg)

File: 917d0e9b79731c7⋯.jpg (885.51 KB,3500x2334,1750:1167,WikiLeaks_founder_Julian_A….jpg)

File: b07983980c96555⋯.jpg (3.08 MB,4272x2849,4272:2849,US_Secretary_of_State_Anto….jpg)

>>19493339

Unlikely alliance pleads for Julian Assange’s release in US

Farrah Tomazin - September 21, 2023

New York: The US-Australia alliance faces a fresh test after Canberra politicians descended on Washington to demand the immediate release of Julian Assange and warned that his extradition would spark a backlash from America’s key AUKUS partner.

With the Wikileaks founder running out of options, Australian politicians from across the aisle have met with members of US Congress and officials from the State and Justice departments to call for the Australian citizen, who’s being held in London’s Belmarsh prison, to be sent home by Christmas.

“We’ve made it very clear that the continued prosecution of Julian Assange is not the action of a friend of Australia,” said Greens Senator David Shoebridge, who added that extradition would be “a blow to the relationship between Australia and the United States”.

“When you look at the charges that he faces, he’s effectively been charged with being a journalist.

“He has shared information which was gathered by a third party.

“Bradley Chelsea Manning has already been prosecuted for that and is already free. Yet, the journalist who shared the information has been hounded across the earth by the US administration.”

Shoebridge was joined in Washington by Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce, Liberal senator Alex Antic, Labor MP Tony Zappia, independent MP Monique Ryan and fellow Greens senator Peter Whish-Wilson.

The trip was intended to raise the profile of Assange’s plight in the weeks leading up to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s first prime ministerial trip to Washington next month, where he will be granted a state dinner by US President Joe Biden.

“This side of the AUKUS partnership feels really strongly about this and so what we expect the prime minister to do is that he will carry the same message to President Biden when he comes in October,” said Ryan.

“It’s a question of justice. These are political charges that are being pursued in a political way by the US government.”

Assange is facing a maximum jail sentence of 175 years after being charged with 17 counts of breaching the US Espionage Act plus a separate hacking-related charge.

The charges relate to WikiLeaks’ 2010 publication of cables detailing war crimes committed by the US government in the detention camp at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Albanese and Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong have previously said the case against Assange had gone on too long and needed to come to a conclusion, and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton recently backed this position.

Although most Australians agree, the issue is likely to be politically sensitive for Biden as he heads towards an election next year, given many Democrats and Republicans believe Assange’s actions had placed lives at risk and that he ought to be punished.

“I understand the concerns and views of Australians,” US Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently told reporters. “I think it’s very important that our friends here understand our concerns about this matter.”

Members of Congress who are meeting with the delegation include Republican congressman Thomas Massie, Republican senator Rand Paul and Democratic congresswoman Ilhan Omar.

Asked if the Albanese would raise the issue with Biden in October, Wong, who is in New York for the United Nations General Assembly, replied: “We have raised this many times … Secretary Blinken and I both spoke about the fact that we had a discussion about the views that the United States has and the views that Australia has.

“We are consistent in our view that we think this has gone on too long, and the breadth of political representation on this delegation, I think, demonstrates there are a great many people in Australia who would like to see this matter resolved,” Wong said.

However, the minister rejected the notion that the alliance would be tested if Assange was not released.

“I think the alliance has survived and continued to be strong through many decades and it will continue so to be.”

The Wikileaks founder also has an ally in Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who told the UN General Assembly that Assange should not be prosecuted for informing the public.

“It is essential to preserve the freedom of the press,” Lula said. “A journalist like Julian Assange cannot be punished for informing society in a transparent and legitimate way.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/unlikely-alliance-pleads-for-julian-assange-s-release-in-us-20230921-p5e6ej.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19587772

File: 13166600658cc55⋯.jpg (138.07 KB,2031x1142,2031:1142,Scott_Morrison_with_Chines….jpg)

File: b570c61809d52cc⋯.jpg (316.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Taiwanese_President_Tsai_I….jpg)

Scott Morrison to visit Taiwan, warns against ‘appeasing’ Beijing

BEN PACKHAM - SEPTEMBER 20, 2023

Scott Morrison will travel to Taiwan in early October to show his support for the self-governed ­island, just weeks before Anthony Albanese visits China to patch up relations with Beijing.

The former prime minister will visit Taipei for the October 11-12 Yushan Forum, where Tony Abbott branded China a “bully” and urged “solidarity with Taiwan” in a speech two years ago.

Declaring that the region’s security would not be achieved through “appeasement”, Mr Morrison said his trip would present an “interesting contrast” to the Prime Minister’s upcoming visit to ­Beijing.

He said Mr Albanese’s scheduled trip to China before the end of the year carried significant risks, and Beijing could use it to create the impression of “a backdown by Australia”.

“I certainly don't think that’s what the intention is. But once you get on that plane and go there, well, they are controlling how that is represented, and their microphone is very big,” he said.

“They will describe it how they will describe it, internally and more broadly. And that's not something one would ever have control over.”

His visit to Taipei should garner significant attention given his status as a former prime minister whose government was at the forefront of the West’s push back against Beijing.

Mr Morrison, who is still a sitting MP, said he was pleased to address the forum, which gives Taiwan an opportunity for global engagement in the absence of ­official diplomatic links with most of the world.

He said the future of Taiwan was “totemic in the whole Indo-Pacific peace and security agenda … I think it’s really important that I go there and express support, but do so in a practical way.

“Because (Taiwan) is the one issue that if not handled well, poses significant threats to the region. But that has to be secured through strength, not appeasement.”

Mr Morrison’s comments to The Australian came as dozens of Chinese warplanes crossed the median line of the Taiwan Strait that separates the island from China, prompting protests by ­Taipei.

Mr Albanese has confirmed he will visit Beijing before the end of the year, but his travel dates have not yet been disclosed.

Both China and Australia have said the visit will mark the 50th anniversary of Gough Whitlam’s historic trip, from October 31 to November 4, 1973.

Mr Morrison told partyroom colleagues before Mr Albanese formally accepted the invitation that his successor should not be “too keen” to visit China.

He cautioned at the time against “the government‘s acquiescent and concessional approach” towards restoring ties with Australia’s largest trading partner.

Mr Albanese’s China trip will be a delicate balancing act, with Beijing likely to try to cast it as a ­triumph of Chinese diplomacy and as an example for other countries on how to get along with them.

Relations between Canberra and Beijing cooled markedly under Malcolm Turnbull, who banned “high risk” Chinese telcos Huawei and ZTE from Australia’s 5G network.

But it was the Morrison government’s call for a UN investi­gation into the origins of Covid-19 that really infuriated Beijing, which then responded with co­ercive trade sanctions against Australia that are yet to be fully wound back.

Mr Abbott delivered a scathing rebuke to China at the Yushan Forum in 2021, declaring there was nowhere in the world where “the struggle between liberty and ­tyranny (is) more stark than across the Taiwan Strait”.

“Nothing is more pressing right now, than solidarity with Taiwan if we want a better world,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/scott-morrison-to-visit-taiwan-warns-against-appeasing-beijing/news-story/bf605b3cd2873a6e823ed4bcb5e75c03

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19587792

File: b5b9e0f9826788b⋯.jpg (170.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_ACT_chief_prosecuto….jpg)

File: a3f9bf88f806e63⋯.jpg (239.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_was_found_t….jpg)

>>19289705 (pb)

>>19452895 (pb)

Shane Drumgold’s case against Sofronoff inquiry to be heard by Victorian judge

ELLIE DUDLEY - SEPTEMBER 21, 2023

Former ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold’s case against the inquiry that ended his career will be heard by a Victorian Supreme Court judge, due to a potential conflict of interest preventing it from being heard by a judge in his own jurisdiction.

Mr Drumgold last month launched extraordinary legal action challenging both his “termination” by the ACT government and the findings of the inquiry that he engaged in serious malpractice and grossly ­unethical conduct in Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial.

The ACT Supreme Court on Thursday heard Chief Justice Lucy McCallum had decided it “would not be appropriate for any resident judge of this court to hear these proceedings.”

ACT Registrar Jayne Reece wrote to parties last week saying there was a potential “conflict of interest” due to Mr Drumgold’s standing in the ACT Supreme Court, which was further “complicated” by the fact Chief Justice McCallum presided over Mr Lehrmann’s trial.

As such, the court heard Chief Justice McCallum had written to Victorian Supreme Court Chief Justice Anne Ferguson requesting she allow one of her justices to become an acting member of the ACT Supreme Court.

Chief Justice Ferguson obliged, and Justice Stephen Kaye is in the process of becoming appointed to oversee proceedings.

“That is the mechanism around in which we will avoid any conflict of interest of our resident judges,” Ms Reece said.

Mr Drumgold is suing the inquiry - chaired by Walter Sofronoff - and the ACT government, after Mr Sofronoff ruled that every one of the allegations made by Mr Drumgold that sparked the inquiry was baseless and the chief prosecutor “did not act with fairness and detachment as was ­required by his role”.

Mr Drumgold conceded he made mistakes in the case but ­rejected the key findings of the inquiry that he had lied to the ­Supreme Court and engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct.

After the report was leaked to the media, including to The Australian, Mr Drumgold said he had been denied procedural fairness.

“It has deprived the ACT government of the opportunity of considering my conduct ­objectively,” he said.

Mr Drumgold is now seeking a declaration that the report and decisions are invalid.

Mr Drumgold says Mr ­Sofronoff failed to comply with s.17 of the ACT Inquiries Act, which provides that board members must not provide inquiry documents to others or communicate inquiry information ­except under provisions provided by the act.

Mr Drumgold challenges a number of Mr Sofronoff’s findings on the grounds of “legal ­unreasonableness”.

These include the findings that he had breached his duty by reading Brittany Higgins’ counselling notes; that he had been wrong not to disclose police ­documents; that he had betrayed the trust of junior staff members; and that he falsely claimed legal professional privilege over documents.

Mr Drumgold also disputes Mr Sofronoff’s finding that he had knowingly lied to Chief Justice Lucy McCallum over a note of a meeting he had with Lisa Wilkinson prior to her Logies speech and that he failed in his duty to warn the TV presenter of the dangers of making the speech.

He further objects to the findings that his treatment of senator Linda Reynolds in the witness box was grossly unethical and that his comments lauding Ms Higgins after the discontinuance of the Lehrmann case were ­improper.

The court on Thursday heard Mr Drumgold had dropped his claim against ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury.

The parties on Thursday debated the timetabling of the matter, with Mr Sofronoff’s solicitor Glen Cranney arguing he did not have appropriate time to comply with Mr Drumgold’s proposed schedule, which would require him to file particulars “within days”.

“It is unfair on Mr Sofronoff, to force him into that position (when) he doesn’t yet have counsel or clarity around his position,” Mr Cranney said.

Mr Drumgold’s lawyer Terry O’Gorman disagreed, saying Mr Sofronoff had been made aware of the orders last week, and stressing there was “no common sense reason that all orders we request be made today not be made.”

Ms Reece ordered Mr Drumgold file an originating application by tomorrow, and the matter be listed for another directions hearing next week to determine further timetabling.

The matter will likely be heard across two days next year, depending on whether there are large disputes over facts.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/shane-drumgolds-case-against-sofronoff-inquiry-to-be-heard-by-victorian-judge/news-story/57d3ca3eaff2320cae19596e6e299c31

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19587828

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19581632

State and territory decisions will be excluded from inquiry into COVID pandemic responses

Natassia Chrysanthos - September 21, 2023

1/2

Decisions made by state and territory governments – such as state-based lockdowns and border closures – will be outside the scope of the COVID inquiry announced by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Thursday.

A three-person panel led by a public service expert, epidemiologist and health economist will be given 12 months to probe the Commonwealth’s response to the COVID pandemic and make recommendations for how Australia can better prepare for similar events.

The inquiry will review the provision of vaccinations, treatments and key medical supplies to Australians, mental health support for those impacted by COVID-19 and lockdowns, financial support for individuals and business, and assistance for Australians abroad.

It will also investigate the role of the different governments in responding to the pandemic, and the coordination of national cabinet. But major decisions made unilaterally by premiers and chief ministers – which also include school closures and vaccine mandates – will fall outside the review’s scope.

Former senior public servant Robyn Kruk, epidemiologist Professor Catherine Bennett and health economist Dr Angela Jackson will lead the inquiry, which will invite submissions from members of the public and be supported by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.

“I’m very pleased, and I want to thank the three individuals who’ve agreed to be part of this inquiry. They have vast experience in public health in government and economic expertise,” Albanese said.

He insisted the inquiry would be a “constructive, rather than destructive” process.

“We need to examine what went right, what could be done better with a focus on the future. Because the health experts and the science tells us that this … is not likely to be the last one that occurs. So that’s why better preparedness is very important.”

Albanese defended his government’s decision to hold an inquiry instead of a royal commission into the COVID pandemic, as had been called for by some health and policy experts.

“No one promised a royal commission,” he said.

“What do you think a royal commission could do that this couldn’t do? Nothing… This will be an inquiry that we’ll hear from stakeholders that will get input that will report within a year because a lot of the work has already been done. There have been 20 different inquiries.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19587833

File: 6785d3f30ec2e83⋯.jpg (2.11 MB,5920x3947,5920:3947,A_federal_inquiry_will_be_….jpg)

>>19587828

2/2

Coalition health spokeswoman Anne Ruston said it was essential that an inquiry probed state and territory responses as well as the Commonwealth’s. She called for leaders to be compelled to give evidence so that the investigation was not politicised against the former Coalition federal government.

Ruston told ABC News Breakfast earlier on Thursday morning that unless the inquiry had the power to compel states and territories to participate, it would be a “protection racket for the states and territories and potentially a witch hunt on the previous Coalition government”.

“Because so many of the decisions that impacted Australians so significantly during the pandemic were decisions of the states and territories,” she said.

“This was a once-in-a-hundred-year incidence in this country and it deserves to be absolutely and properly prosecuted if we are going to have an inquiry.”

Albanese batted away questions about whether state and territory leaders would be compelled to appear before the inquiry, saying there had been several changes of government across the country since the pandemic began.

“I should imagine that everyone will want to participate in this,” Albanese said, without giving a direct answer as to whether current or former premiers and chief ministers would be forced to partake.

Instead, he pointed to the fact that many state and territory leaders now in power had not been in charge of the pandemic response.

Albanese said the inquiry should not be “subjected to political bickering”.

Pandemic decisions

Federal

• International borders including restrictions on travel in and out of Australia, travel advice

• JobKeeper and other support payments

• Vaccine procurement and communications

• National medical stockpile management

• Managing aged care homes

• Financial assistance to states and territories for the extra costs incurred by their health services in responding to COVID-19

• Non-financial assistance such as from Australian Defence Force

State

• Managing hospitals

• State border closures

• School closures

• Closures of non-essential businesses

• Density limits

• Exercise limits

• Reasons for leaving the house

• Numbers of people with whom you could have contact

• COVID testing facilities

• Contact tracing

• Mask mandates

• Police ensuring compliance with lockdown laws and public health regulations

Overlapping

• Hotel quarantine

• Mandatory isolation periods, testing requirements

• Vaccine rollout (co-ordinated by Commonwealth, with some centres run by states)

• Cruise ships (Commonwealth responsibility for border control and quarantine; state responsibility for public health)

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/state-and-territory-decisions-will-be-excluded-from-inquiry-into-covid-pandemic-responses-20230921-p5e6ee.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnJ-LrWAa5I

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19587850

File: a62063fc6c2ffcc⋯.jpg (187.8 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Covid_pandemic_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 6468f86824564fb⋯.jpg (135.67 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Health_Minister_Mark_Butle….jpg)

>>19581632

Covid pandemic royal commission refusal ‘a protection racket’, says Coalition

GREG BROWN, SARAH ISON and TRICIA RIVERA - SEPTEMBER 20, 2023

The Coalition has accused Anthony Albanese of running a ­“protection racket” for Labor premiers after refusing to hold a royal commission into the Covid-19 pandemic.

The Prime Minister and Health Minister Mark Butler are on Thursday expected to announce an inquiry into the handling the pandemic, but it will not have the investigative powers of a royal commission.

The inquiry will reportedly last for 12 months and be led by a panel of experts including an epidemiologist and an economist.

Before the election, Mr Albanese said there needed to be a royal commission or “some form of inquiry” into the handling of the pandemic. “It is beyond doubt that you will need an assessment. Whether that be a royal commission or some form of inquiry, that will need to happen,” he said ahead of the 2022 poll.

A month before the May 2022 election, a Labor-dominated parliamentary committee recommended “a royal commission be established to examine Australia’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic to inform preparedness for future Covid-19 waves and future pandemics”.

Opposition Health spokeswoman Anne Ruston accused Mr Albanese of walking back on an “initial commitment” to hold a royal commission.

“In the absence of the states and territories being compelled to participate it looks like nothing more than a protection racket for the state premiers,” Senator Ruston said.

She said Australia was one of the best performing countries in the world throughout the Covid-19 pandemic.

“However, with the power of hindsight, we have the opportunity to explore how we could do things better if faced with similar challenges again and we should all be open to learning from the experience,” she said.

Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie said there was “no doubt in my mind” Mr Albanese fell short of announcing a royal commission into the management of the pandemic to protect Labor premiers, particularly Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews.

“They’re not delivering a royal commission and there’s only one reason why … and that’s because a royal commission into Covid would have to look at national cabinet, would have to look at that function to keep us all safe through a global pandemic,” she told Sky News on Wednesday night.

“But then look at the different jurisdictions’ reactions and that means seriously examining the ­actions of Premier Daniel Andrews.”.

Infectious disease expert Robert Booy said the inquiry was needed to investigate what the country could have done better.

“One might argue that some of our social-distancing approaches effectively locking people up in tower blocks was excessive and locking whole states down without compassion for people needing medical attention didn’t make sense either,” he told The Australian.

“An inquiry is a useful thing to do,” he said.

Professor Booy, a consultant to vaccine manufacturers and an honorary professor at the University of Sydney, said he didn’t believe a royal commission was necessary.

“It’s not as if there are any huge blunders that need to be unearthed or addressed,” Professor Booy said.

“For the first time in history we’ve had a preventive specific vaccine available for a new pandemic and in the main that probably prevented millions of deaths around the world and certainly thousands of deaths in Australia.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/covid-pandemic-royal-commission-refusal-a-protection-racket-says-coalition/news-story/a26855d0fd0c7d33e8acee01e4b5473b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19587888

File: ac417309880e27f⋯.jpg (575.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Victorian_Premier_Daniel_A….jpg)

File: 6b0a0e5cf99e2f1⋯.jpg (123.23 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Lead_Economist_for_Impact_….jpg)

>>19581632

PM’s panel members backed hard lockdowns

SARAH ISON and GEOFF CHAMBERS - SEPTEMBER 21, 2023

1/2

Two-of-the-three experts hand-picked to lead the government’s Covid-19 inquiry publicly supported Victoria’s hard lockdowns, fuelling Peter Dutton’s concerns that Anthony Albanese has been “rolled” by Labor premiers in excluding state and territory pandemic decisions.

Independent inquiry panel member Angela Jackson, an economist and former deputy chief-of-staff former Labor finance minister Lindsay Tanner, in July 2021 said that Victoria needed “a hard lockdown and a dose of luck to get through this”.

In another June 2021 tweet, Dr Jackson declared that “Melbourne has suffered its share of lockdowns helping to keep the rest of Australia Covid free”.

“Time to bloody step up Sydney because personally could do without lockdown 5.0. And yes would prefer that we had hit vaccination targets and this option was redundant,” she said.

In another tweet, Dr Jackson slammed a “group of six adults (that) my husband asked to either mask up or leave the middle of the playground yesterday”.

“Thanks for being irresponsible adults and making our kids lives that little bit harder,” she tweeted.

After the Victorian Department of Health reported 450 new local cases in September 2021, Dr Jackson posted: “Really think they need to be thinking about some restrictions to slow this thing down – closing construction for two weeks for example?”

“A third of cases linked to it – it’s not essential and I’m not arguing for Covid zero just that we don’t overwhelm hospitals and delay the general reopening … which would have a bigger economic cost than closing construction for a two week circuit breaker.”

Ahead of flying to Sydney in May 2021, Dr Jackson asked followers if she was “stark raving mad to still be planning on jumping on a plane from Melbourne to Sydney? Note: I will be fully vaccinated”.

“Now thinking those Covid-19 passports are a great idea – however this has zero basis in any policy analysis, and 100 per cent basis in naked self interest.”

When asked by The Australian if she was personally supportive of Premier Dan Andrews’ decision to lockdown the state, Dr Jackson pointed out “the panel won’t be looking at this issue”.

“(It) would be fair to say that in my view the economic and health system impacts of letting Covid-19 run were such that lockdowns were a necessary tool,” Dr Jackson told The Australian.

Across 2020 and 2021, fellow panel member and epidemiologist Catherine Bennett was also publicly supportive of Melbourne’s lockdowns to allow contact tracers time to contain outbreaks.

However, Professor Bennett backed the softening of lockdowns in late 2021 and through 2022, warning that lockdowns and other restrictions would become less effective in combating Covid-19.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19587889

File: 048ad91d4e1b5d7⋯.jpg (166.38 KB,825x466,825:466,AJ_1.jpg)

>>19587888

2/2

The third panel member is NSW Department of Health director-general Robyn Kruk, who conducted the inquiry into the NSW health system’s response to Covid-19 that reported back earlier this year.

The Covid inquiry’s terms of reference released on Thursday confirmed the panel’s scope would include the vaccination program, broader health supports for people affected by Covid-19, international policies to support Australians at home and abroad and financial supports provided to individuals.

While the role of the Commonwealth, national cabinet and responsibilities of state and territory governments were within the scope of the inquiry, decisions made by states during the pandemic were not.

“The following areas are not in scope for the Inquiry: Actions taken unilaterally by state and territory governments (and) international programs and activities assisting foreign countries,” the terms of reference read.

Mr Dutton said the exclusion of state decisions “didn’t make any sense”.

“It’s clear here that the prime minister is putting the interests of Daniel Andrews and Annastacia Palaszczuk ahead of the interests of the Australian people. And that is a very dangerous act for a prime minister to undertake,” the Opposition Leader said.

“If there’s nothing to hide here, then why not let the sun shine in? I think the prime minister has made a deliberate decision to put the interests of Labor premiers ahead of our national interest.”

Opposition health spokeswoman Anne Ruston said the move to protect the states from scrutiny was “a damning indictment” on the government.

Mr Albanese defended the scope of the inquiry, which he said should be about “coming together in a constructive way to learn the lessons which have been”.

“The idea that it should be subjected to political bickering is not what the objective is here,” he said.

“This isn’t aimed at conflict. This is aimed at people being able to participate.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/pms-panel-members-backed-hard-lockdowns/news-story/e5c2ada048942352ba641b8b136b8f1a

https://twitter.com/EconomistAnge/status/1427090542274375680

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19587905

File: 146872f99151102⋯.jpg (491.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anti_lockdown_protesters_a….jpg)

File: 81ca7ed03f085d6⋯.jpg (183.61 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 1e42be362b8b61d⋯.jpg (638.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Francis_Park_in_the_Blackt….jpg)

>>19581632

Half-baked Covid-19 inquiry will only deliver half-baked answers

CAMERON STEWART - SEPTEMBER 21, 2023

How do you learn the lessons of Australia’s response to the coronavirus pandemic without examining its most glaring mistakes?

That is exactly what the government is trying to do in announcing a national inquiry into the government’s response to the pandemic while excluding the decisions by the states including lockdowns and border closures.

So for example, there will be no questions asked about the pros and cons of why Victorian Premier Dan Andrews locked Melbourne down for 262 days, a record which made headlines around the world?

There will be no questions about whether any lessons can be learned from harsh policies like closing children’s playgrounds or imposing street curfews or sudden and inflexible border closures?

The exclusion of states in the inquiry seems to be an attempt to ensure Anthony Albanese’s aim of making the inquiry a “positive” experience so “the process of learning from the pandemic is constructive, rather than destructive”.

“We need to make sure that this is forward focused and [we] consider all of the Commonwealth responses to the pandemic.”

While a bitter witch hunt about the worst excesses of the pandemic are in no-one’s interest, at the same time the pandemics and the associated lockdowns were a brutal experience for many imposing tolls on jobs, mental health and children’s education. These are not issues that should be swept under the carpet in this review.

Even Victoria’s former chief health officer professor Brett Sutton, who was the architect of Victoria’s record lockdowns, says it would be “totally appropriate” for the inquiry to prove if lockdowns were worthwhile

“I would be disappointed if we didn’t go to those really important issues … there shouldn’t be shyness about asking the tough questions for those things that were most disruptive,” Sutton says.

In the case of Victoria, it certainly seems that federal Labor has handed Labor premier Dan Andrews a get-out-of-jail free card for excluding the states from scrutiny.

The Victorian Labor leader has, by some distance, the worst record of any state premier in handling Covid. Under his watch Victoria had not only the longest lockdowns but also the harshest. Andrews also presided over the 2020 hotel quarantine bungle that killed 768 mostly elderly people with no clear resolution as to who was responsible. Yet all of this pain delivered no advantage. More people died from Covid in Victoria than anywhere else in the country, including its larger neighbour NSW.

The extent of the pandemic overreach in Victoria is still seen in distressing statistics about the lockdowns on children’s education and mental health and on small businesses.

An independent review of Australia’s response to the pandemic led by top public servant Peter Shergold criticised the overuse of “brutal” lockdowns, the unjustified closure of schools and inadequate protection of aged care residents.

That isn’t to say there wasn’t a place for lockdowns, particularly early in the pandemic. But their ongoing use in 2021, raises serious questions of state government overreach. How can we learn these lessons from these issues if we don’t look.

By excluding the states, the government has given us a half-baked inquiry which can only give half-baked answers.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/halfbaked-covid19-inquiry-will-only-deliver-halfbaked-answers/news-story/40c813375281593d0ba3cf09344266f5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19595044

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Testing…..

Q Post 4827

Oct 7 2020 20:14:06 (EST)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP1QHVNHMAE

Can music be healing?

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4827

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19597168

File: 6cf37fc1ea96833⋯.jpg (500.77 KB,825x892,825:892,MCH_1.jpg)

File: fd03d48e0f98590⋯.jpg (238.37 KB,900x675,4:3,The_American_rapper_said_h….jpg)

File: f5f9b8f36496306⋯.jpg (990.85 KB,4855x3380,971:676,Mc_Hammer_famed_for_his_90….jpg)

File: c272880afe50d02⋯.jpg (398.32 KB,825x1020,55:68,PH_2.jpg)

File: f850b868b8ffbb4⋯.mp4 (10.31 MB,640x352,20:11,qStCW9hpguZkiWZA.mp4)

>>19529127

'I'm with you': US rapper MC Hammer throws support behind Voice to Parliament sparking fiery debate on Twitter

US rapper MC Hammer has weighed in on the Voice to Parliament debate on social media and urged Australians to "repair the breach", but the gesture garnered mixed feedback.

Miriah Davis - September 22, 2023

MC Hammer, famed for his 90s smash hit U Can't Touch This, has thrown his support behind the Yes vote ahead of the Voice referendum - but the move has sparked fiery debate on social media.

The American rapper said he had spent time reading articles and "getting up to speed" on the Voice to Parliament referendum, which is just three weeks away.

Australians will head to the polls for the Voice to Parliament referendum on October 14 to vote on whether to enshrine an Indigenous advisory body in the Constitution.

Hammer took to X overnight to back the proposal, telling his 3.1 million followers: "I'm with you. Australia it's time. Repair the breach. #Yes2023."

He pointed out Australia "has no treaty with its Indigenous people and has done little in comparison to other British dominions like Canada, New Zealand and the United States to include and uplift its First Nations people".

Hammer also referred to prominent Yes campaigner Professor Megan Davis and credited her efforts in educating people on the importance of Indigenous constitutional recognition.

Quoting Ms Davis, Hammer said: "A successful referendum will set a precedent that will be 'really useful for other indigenous populations around the world in relation to recognition'."

While others hailed Hammer's endorsement of the Voice, the post has also attracted a flurry of criticism, including from No advocate and One Nation Leader Pauline Hanson.

"Here is some more useful information for anyone interested in this referendum," Ms Hanson commented.

In her response she included a video of Indigenous activist Thomas Mayo titled: "Exposed - the not so secret true agenda."

"Fix your own country first please. The USA is intrinsically divided," another chimed in.

"All due respect, you have no idea what you're talking about," one person said.

Hammer doubled down on his support for the Voice, arguing there is only "one Earth".

"Politics are no longer domestic. The World is inextricably linked… I cannot avoid your politics… We have a responsibility one towards another," he wrote.

In a follow up post on X on Friday morning, Hammer shared video in which Ms Davis presents a spoken-word version of the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

"Sometimes in life you don't choose the fight. The fight chooses you," he captioned the post.

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/im-with-you-us-rapper-mc-hammer-throws-support-behind-voice-to-parliament-sparking-fiery-debate-on-twitter/news-story/77f44897d27a2b92ae89a72c2c2e01e4

https://twitter.com/MCHammer/status/1704835837983379774

https://twitter.com/PaulineHansonOz/status/1704997648737128455

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601872

File: 884f312e1566a08⋯.jpg (1.47 MB,3000x2000,3:2,No_campaigners_walk_to_the….jpg)

File: 05895bf7458c86f⋯.jpg (1.39 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Neo_Nazis_led_by_Thomas_Se….jpg)

File: 56c00577b6f2210⋯.jpg (1.98 MB,3000x2000,3:2,The_No_rally_on_the_steps_….jpg)

>>19529127

>>19581536

Hundreds of anti-Voice protesters rally in Sydney, Melbourne

Lisa Visentin, Tom Cowie, Andrew Taylor and Rachel Eddie - September 23, 2023

1/2

Anti-Voice rallies in Sydney and Melbourne today were much smaller in scale than the official Yes campaign marches last weekend.

Several hundred people gathered in Sydney’s Hyde Park on Saturday for the rally, with some carrying “Vote No” signs associated with the formal No campaign, despite attempts by the campaign to disassociate themselves from the rally.

In Melbourne, neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell gatecrashed the end of the No rally with a group of people wearing black masks, unfurling a banner on the steps of Victoria’s state parliament that read “Voice = anti-white”.

The group performed a Nazi salute and were heckled by other protesters, who were largely drawn from the anti-lockdown rallies that filled the city’s streets during the pandemic but have since dwindled in numbers to about 500 on Saturday.

The rallies, which were held in cities around the country, were organised by pro-Kremlin activist and anti-vaccination campaigner Simeon Boikov, who is known online as “the Aussie Cossack”.

They were promoted under the banner of Boikov’s previous anti-vax “world freedom rallies”, but this time emphasised an anti-Voice position.

Protesters held up signs falsely claiming the Voice referendum was part of a “hidden agenda” by the United Nations to steal land.

However, many appeared motivated by conspiracy and anti-government causes like QAnon, with signs and t-shirts protesting paedophile ring conspiracies, vaccination, as well as 5G and other technologies.

The atmosphere of the Melbourne rally had an air of a movement reuniting, with many attendees still agitated by vaccine mandates and other historical health measures enacted to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

The group marched from parliament to Flinders Street Station, where protesters took turns to speak to the crowd and sing songs, including a lyrically reworked version of John Farnham’s You’re The Voice – which has been used by their opponents in the Yes campaign.

“It’s all just like COVID. That’s why we’re here because we smell the same rat,” said Mark Mack, who altered the first verse of Farnham’s lyrics to: “They’re trying to take the country over.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601876

File: a24fdccf709c190⋯.jpg (1.86 MB,4480x2987,4480:2987,Attendees_at_the_Sydney_ra….jpg)

File: 14f751ef6008591⋯.jpg (915.8 KB,3157x2105,3157:2105,Attendees_at_a_No_rally_in….jpg)

>>19601872

2/2

The Sydney event, which was hosted ex-Howard government MP turned Liberal Democrat, Ross Cameron, began with a Welcome to Country by Aboriginal activist Bruce Shillingsworth, who has been linked to the fringe Indigenous “Original Sovereigns”.

He urged the crowd to vote No to Voice, and praised them for standing up to the “evil regime here and around the world” and opposing a “dictatorship” which he did not identify.

NSW upper house MP John Ruddick, a member of the Liberal Democrats who worked with Boikov to organise the Sydney protest, told the crowd that the Voice would set up a “two class structure” in Australia. Ruddick took aim at federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton for proposing a second referendum on constitutional recognition.

“He wants to have another referendum. He’s not getting the message and he wants to set up regional voices,” said Ruddick, who is a former member of the Liberal Party.

The numbers were significantly lower than the tens of thousands of people who attended Yes rallies in Melbourne and Sydney last weekend.

Earlier in the week, major No outfit Fair Australia said the anti-Voice rallies were “not supported, endorsed or funded by us in any way”. Federal Liberal frontbencher James Paterson urged No voters not to attend the events, condemning them as a “shameless” attempt to push “wacky and extreme causes”.

Speaking before the rallies started on Saturday, Communications Minister Michelle Rowland urged people to draw a contrast between No protests and the Yes marches last weekend.

“Australians should be aware that these No rallies are actually being organised by a bloke hiding in the Russian consulate in Sydney … they should question the motivations in this regard and they should be invited to contrast this weekend’s activities with the positive message displayed last weekend,” Rowland said.

Campaigning in Ryde in northwest Sydney, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese drew on veteran singer Kamahl’s Voice U-turn as he spoke with shoppers at a shopping centre on Saturday morning.

“He’s someone who came out and said No and went away, spoke to people, read what it was about, read the question and decided that he would come out and declare his support for Yes,” Albanese said. “And to say why would anyone oppose this?”

“We have now a new term we’ve coined today: Kamahl-mentum.”

Meanwhile, Dutton addressed the Liberal Party’s Victorian state conference on Saturday, arguing that Albanese still had not answered simple questions about the Voice.

“I believe Australians on the 14th of October are going to stand up for what they believe in,” Dutton told Liberal Party members in Melbourne. “They’re going to support the position of the Liberal Party because they know that we’ve thought about it.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/anti-voice-crowds-dominated-by-conspiracy-theories-as-neo-nazis-gatecrash-rally-20230921-p5e6hw.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601885

File: 4ab6f5fe37e0b5d⋯.jpg (103.17 KB,1671x940,1671:940,Anthony_Albanese_announces….jpg)

File: f0f32c114d881b2⋯.jpg (354.37 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Victorian_Premier_Daniel_A….jpg)

>>19581632

Experts reject narrow Covid inquiry terms

NATASHA ROBINSON and ANGELICA SNOWDEN - SEPTEMBER 22, 2023

1/2

The nation’s peak doctors’ group has rejected the narrow terms of Anthony Albanese’s Covid-19 inquiry, saying that carving out the unilateral actions of the states will mean the probe will be operating with “one hand tied behind its back”.

Australian Medical Association president Steve Robson is urging the government to expand the scope of the inquiry, saying the key issues that affected the health workforce and that continue to cripple public health systems in the wake of the pandemic relate largely to management and decisions of state governments.

“I am scratching my head as to how you can run an inquiry and come out with recommendations for next time that don’t include a lot of the state and territory stuff,” Professor Robson said.

“We really are concerned that while the intentions are good, if you’re running the inquiry with one hand tied behind your back … we’re not really sure it’s going to be achieving its stated aims. We’ll be bringing up all of the issues, whether they like it or not.”

The Andrews government quarantine hotel bungles that sparked a 112-day lockdown and killed some 800 people, curfews, travel limits and playground closures are key matters not likely to be adequately scrutinised in a federal Covid-19 inquiry in a move that has been strongly criticised.

Victorians endured a total of 262 days in lockdown between 2020 and 2021, believed to be the longest in the world, and some of the harshest restrictions compared with other states, along with standard Covid rules like school shutdowns and work-from-home instructions.

They included locking down hundreds of public housing residents in a snap decision – not based on health advice – that was found to have breached human rights, limiting people to spend two hours outside their home for exercise, shutting down playgrounds and banning alcohol consumption outdoors.

As well, 50 residents died in the country’s deadliest Covid outbreak at St Basil’s Home for the Aged in 2020, and in 2021 the city was overcome for nearly a week with violent protesters who clashed with police over a range of pandemic-related grievances.

Victoria’s former chief health officer Brett Sutton, who was at the helm of the state’s pandemic response, told the ABC on Thursday morning he would be “dis­appointed” if the inquiry did not examine the value of lockdowns and he expected to be called to give evidence.

“I would be disappointed if we didn’t go to those really important issues,” he said. “There shouldn’t be shyness about asking the tough questions for those things that were most disruptive.

“As they should about quarantine, as they should about international travel and the closing of the country, as they should about the right communications and the right policy settings to maximise vaccine coverage, how you deal with misinformation and disinformation and all the rest.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601886

File: cd7490a93320c34⋯.jpg (320.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Queensland_Premier_Annasta….jpg)

>>19601885

2/2

ANU infectious diseases professor Peter Collignon said the main impact of a lot of the restrictions was on lower socio-­economic groups, and he believed the benefit of stopping people from going outside was not commensurate with the social and mental fallout.

“Victoria was the first to adopt an elimination strategy in Australia. That hasn’t given a better ­medium to long-term result than just suppression,” he said.

The concerns were echoed by the nation’s leading public health social sciences professor Julie Leask, who described the carve-out of the states actions as “a major weakness” of the inquiry, given that the states were largely responsible for public health orders, lockdowns, enforcement, hospitals and school closures, which all had the biggest impact on people’s daily lives.

“People want a chance to be heard, they want to vent and that’s crucial for moving on and regaining some of the lost trust,” said Professor Leask from the University of Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute. “I don’t think this inquiry will enable that.

“We do Australians a disservice if we don’t properly account for how the pandemic was managed at all levels and learn from that.”

The GP lead on the Southwest Sydney Public Health Network Covid Working Group, Campbelltown doctor Ken McCroary, said the effects of harsh lockdowns that targeted the most disadvantaged areas were still being felt today.

“The lockdowns were unfair and they were unequal,” Dr McCroary said. “Our reality was a dystopia. If we don’t look at these issues, we’re not going to be prepared next time.”

Royal Australian College of General Practitioners president Nicole Higgins said it was dis­appointing that state governments would not be held specifically accountable by the Covid-19 inquiry, but the focus on the role of a ­national, independent Centre for Disease Control to advise the states was key.

“What the announcement does is it shows that we do need to have a nationally consistent response and the terms of reference address that,” Dr Higgins said.

“What it hasn’t addressed is how we’re going to have a locally delivered response.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/experts-reject-narrow-covid-inquiry-terms/news-story/32a69674bedb9d7678202c28333a1976

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601905

File: b828c07828a2e31⋯.jpg (137.25 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Victorian_Premier_Daniel_A….jpg)

>>19581632

Covid inquiry: Why light must be shone on state leaders’ responses

DAMON JOHNSTON, VICTORIA EDITOR - SEPTEMBER 22, 2023

The most significant unforeseen consequence of the Australian response to the global Covid-19 pandemic was the sudden promotion of the nation’s premiers.

During those dark lockdown years of 2020 and 2021, as the nation confronted its greatest threat since World War II, we needed unifying national leadership.

Instead, we woke up one morning and found it wasn’t the prime minister or federal government that would run much of this show.

We would be under the control of parochial premiers and their ­previously faceless state public ­servants who were armed, and willing, to use crushing health laws in pursuit of a “Covid zero” political fantasy.

“To hell with more than a century of federation, I’m in charge” was the mantra, as our mostly Labor premiers who sell themselves as progressives transformed into progressive dictators and slammed their borders shut, and kept them shut for too long.

To understand just how outrageous Anthony Albanese’s decision to shield the premiers from his Covid inquiry is, you need to remember the above.

The terms of reference stating that “actions taken unilaterally by state and territory governments” would be excluded from what looms as a soft ball inquiry is the final pandemic insult.

Everything Victorians endured after the first national lockdown – lasting 43 days – lifted was the result of decisions made by Daniel Andrews and a small number of ministers and bureaucrats.

The hiring of private hotel quarantine security guards responsible for the virus leak that sparked a 112-day lockdown and 800 deaths was an Andrews government decision (although during his own pretend inquiry, the Premier and others couldn’t recall specifically who made the ­decision. Funny about that).

The curfew, the 5km limit, closing playgrounds, restrictions on leaving your home, banning visitors, building a “ring of steel” to catch city fugitives sneaking into the country were all decisions made by the Andrews government as it locked Melbourne down for a world record 260-plus days.

Forcing hundreds of thousands of children into home schooling for month after month – now increasingly linked to long-term mental health and learning problems among kids – was another Andrews government decision.

And what about Andrews’s ­secret Covid political and social polling conducting by QDOS?

Victorians deserve to know everything about every decision that Andrews made.

Premiers are quick to make the point that these were unprecedented times.

They are right.

They had to act, and mistakes were inevitable.

This is the reason to shine a light on them, not shield them.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/covid-inquiry-why-light-must-be-shone-on-state-leaders-responses/news-story/e4d01dc22c4529c4307374fdafd96deb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601919

File: 784c9b699ccac76⋯.jpg (140.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Rupert_Murdoch_executive_c….jpg)

File: 9aae6622b8bd12f⋯.jpg (412.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Rupert_and_Lachlan_Murdoch….jpg)

File: 9426cdcb2c3dcd1⋯.jpg (282.01 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Rupert_Murdoch_with_his_so….jpg)

Rupert Murdoch to step down as executive chair of News Corp, co-chair of Fox

CAMERON STEWART - SEPTEMBER 22, 2023

1/2

Rupert Murdoch, the Australian-born businessman who went from running a small Adelaide newspaper to creating a multi-billion-dollar global media empire spanning news, entertainment and cinema, has announced he is stepping down as chairman of his companies at the age of 92.

Mr Murdoch’s eldest son Lachlan, 52, will take over as the sole chair of News Corp and continue as executive chair and chief executive officer of Fox Corporation.

“On behalf of the Fox and News Corp boards of directors, leadership teams, and all the shareholders who have benefited from his hard work, I congratulate my father on his remarkable 70-year career,” said Lachlan Murdoch. “We thank him for his vision, his pioneering spirit, his steadfast determination, and the enduring legacy he leaves to the companies he founded and countless people he has impacted.”

In a statement the company said that Mr Murdoch, currently chairman of Fox Corporation and executive chairman of News Corp, would step down from all his roles as of November when the companies hold their annual meetings. Mr Murdoch will be appointed Chairman Emeritus of each company.

Mr Murdoch said: “For my entire professional life, I have been engaged daily with news and ideas, and that will not change. But the time is right for me to take on different roles, knowing that we have truly talented teams and a passionate, principled leader in Lachlan who will become sole chairman of both companies.

“Neither excessive pride nor false humility are admirable qualities. But I am truly proud of what we have achieved collectively through the decades, and I owe much to my colleagues, whose contributions to our success have sometimes been unseen outside the company but are deeply appreciated by me.”

Mr Murdoch’s career spanned an era which saw the transformation of the global media landscape with traditional mainstream media challenged by the rise of 24/7 cable news, the internet and social media. Throughout his career, Mr Murdoch sought to invest early in these new frontiers when opportunities presented.

Mr Murdoch said his companies were in “robust health’’ and he had every reason to be optimistic about the coming years.

“The battle for the freedom of speech and, ultimately, the freedom of thought, has never been more intense,” he said.

“My father firmly believed in freedom, and Lachlan is absolutely committed to the cause. Self-serving bureaucracies are seeking to silence those who would question their provenance and purpose. Elites have open contempt for those who are not members of their rarefied class. Most of the media is in cahoots with those elites, peddling political narratives rather than pursuing the truth.”

Mr Murdoch, the second of four children of Sir Keith Murdoch and Dame Elisabeth Murdoch, was just 21 when he took over the running of the Adelaide news upon the death in 1952 of Sir Keith, a media proprietor and war correspondent.

He founded Australia’s only national broadsheet The Australian in July 1964, and then greatly expanded his Australian media presence with the 1986 takeover of the Herald and Weekly Times.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601923

File: 94f887f5aee9cff⋯.jpg (290.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Rupert_Murdoch_holds_up_ed….jpg)

File: abc1620e74afb65⋯.jpg (106.24 KB,1280x720,16:9,Sir_Keith_Murdoch_left_and….jpg)

File: fbc23ed7df1a354⋯.jpg (1.44 MB,835x3695,167:739,Rupert_Murdoch_s_unrivalle….jpg)

>>19601919

2/2

News Corp’s Australian media assets now include Melbourne’s Herald Sun, Sydney’s Daily Telegraph, Brisbane’s Courier Mail, Adelaide’s The Advertiser, the Hobart Mercury and Sky News Australia amongst others. But Mr Murdoch was not content with confining himself to Australia and from the late 1960s he sought to expand his business interests into both the United Kingdom and the United States.

In Britain he bought the tabloid mastheads News of the World and The Sun before acquiring the then broadsheets The Times and The Sunday Times. He shook up the British media landscape in the 1980s when he took on and defeated the print unions in Wapping which had opposed job losses flowing from the increasing automation of papers.

Mr Murdoch also expanded into the US market in the 1970s most notably with the tabloid, the New York Post, and in 2007 he acquired Dow Jones & Company which gave him control of the prized masthead, the Wall Street Journal. In 1974 he moved to New York and in 1985 he gave up his Australian citizenship to become a US citizen to allow him to expand his US business interests.

In the 1980s he moved into the movie and publishing world, buying Twentieth Century Fox and publisher HarperCollins.

But Mr Murdoch’s biggest move in the US was the 1996 creation of Fox News 24-hour cable channel to meet what he believed was a strong market for a conservative news. That hunch proved to be correct with Fox News now the dominant cable news channel in the US.

There were also controversies in his long career, including in 2011 over News of the World reporters hacking phones to get stories.

Mr Murdoch’s critics also claimed he had undue political influence and that he used his publications to influence election outcomes and shape public opinion.

His supporters backed him as a bold business titan and someone who challenged political elites.

Under his ownership, News Corp’s Australian newspapers have had a centre-right political leaning but have editorialised in favour of both major parties over the years, including initially for Labor prime ministers Gough Whitlam, Bob Hawke and Kevin Rudd.

Mr Murdoch has six children Lachlan, James, Elisabeth, Prudence, Grace and Chloe.

He said he would still be actively involved in the “contest of ideas’’.

“In my new role, I can guarantee you that I will be involved every day in the contest of ideas. Our companies are communities, and I will be an active member of our community. I will be watching our broadcasts with a critical eye, reading our newspapers and websites and books with much interest, and reaching out to you with thoughts, ideas, and advice. When I visit your countries and companies, you can expect to see me in the office late on a Friday afternoon,” Mr Murdoch said in a note to staff.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/rupert-murdoch-executive-chair-of-news-corp-to-step-down/news-story/4b259b41eeaf65a28383658443a1d562

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601944

File: 79d388561ec5c13⋯.mp4 (15.07 MB,640x360,16:9,Sen_Bob_Menendez_and_Wife_….mp4)

File: 286b6960e65c561⋯.jpg (239.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Bob_Menendez_has_b….jpg)

>>19505163

Senior US Democrats senator Bob Menendez charged with corruption

ADAM CREIGHTON - SEPTEMBER 23, 2023

One of the most senior Democrats in Washington, Senator Bob Menendez, has been charged with corruption after the FBI found hundreds of thousands of dollars, gold bars, and a Mercedes-Benz at his private home, allegedly provided by three Egyptian-American businessmen for favours.

The explosive allegations against the senator for New Jersey, who is also chairman of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee, emerged on Friday (Saturday AEST) and come amid tense negotiations over funding the government in a senate where Democrats hold a slim 51 to 49 margin.

Damian Williams, US attorney for the Southern District of New York, which has brought the charges, alleged the senator had between 2018 and 2022, along with his wife, accepted bribes from three businessmen with links to Egypt, including $US480,000 ($745,000) in hidden cash and three gold bars worth around $US150,000 found at the chairman’s home.

“Bribes included cash, gold, payments toward a home mortgage, compensation for a low-or-no-show job, a luxury vehicle, and other things of value,” the 39-page indictment read, noting the senator had searched the web for “how much is a kilo of gold worth” during the period of alleged corruption.

Mr Williams said in a press conference that the 69-year-old senator “used his power to benefit Egyptian businesses in various ways, provided sensitive non-public US government information to Egyptian officials and secretly aided the government of Egypt”.

“On his senate website, it says he cannot compel agencies to act in someone’s favour, that he cannot influence matters involving private businesses, and he cannot get involved in criminal matters, yet behind the scenes he was doing those things for certain people,” Mr Williams added.

The indictment included extensive evidence including text messages, emails and web searches by the senator and his wife, Nadine, that lay out their relationship with and payments from three New Jersey businessmen – Wael Hana, Jose Uribe, and real estate developer Fred Daibes – each of whom were also indicted.

“Menendez also improperly advised and pressured an official at the United States Department of Agriculture for the purpose of protecting a business monopoly granted to Hana by Egypt and used in part to fund the bribes being paid to Menendez,” the indictment said.

The corruption charges against the senator came around six years after a separate set of corruption allegations against him were dropped because they met with a hung jury.

Senator Menendez, a supporter of the AUKUS agreement, introduced legislation into the senate in July to enable the transfer of nuclear submarines to Australia as part of the three way security pact.

After Mr Williams’s press conference Senator Menendez released a statement blaming the charges on “forces behind the scenes” that had “repeatedly attempted to silence my voice and dig my political grave”.

He said he was confident the matter would be “successfully resolved once all of the facts are presented and my fellow New Jerseyans will see this for what it is”.

Unless he resigns, the allegations will complicate Senator Menendez’s bid for re-election for another six-year term in 2024. He was elected to the senate in 2006, winning a third term in 2018 with 54 per cent of the statewide vote.

The indictment will cause political damage to the Democrat Party at a time when some Republicans have speculated the Biden family has engaged in corruption, based on the behaviour of President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, allegedly selling influence and who was last week charged with federal firearm offences.

“My office remains firmly committed to rooting out corruption without regard to partisan politics,” Mr William said at his press conference, adding that the investigation was “very much ongoing”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/senior-us-democrats-senator-bob-menendez-charged-with-corruption/news-story/364efbff8ad3de02ba9d8c1daf4ca76a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601950

File: 9dfec2b0b0ff841⋯.jpg (2.93 MB,6000x4000,3:2,US_Senator_Robert_Menendez….jpg)

File: 339ce8b386d5a3d⋯.jpg (1.15 MB,3493x2329,3493:2329,Two_of_the_gold_bars_found….jpg)

File: 8bcd3c073a32689⋯.jpg (913.96 KB,3954x2636,3:2,A_jacket_bearing_Menendez_….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19601944

Gold bars, cash-stuffed envelopes: Indictment of Democratic senator alleges vast corruption

John Harney and Steven T. Dennis - September 23, 2023

Washington: US Democratic Senator Bob Menendez has been called on to resign hours after he was indicted on bribery charges that involved alleged gifts of gold bars and cash from foreign governments.

New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy called on his state’s senior senator to step down after the charges were announced.

Menendez, as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, defended the AUKUS agreement from Republican resistance.

Murphy, a fellow Democrat, could appoint a successor should Menendez agree to step down.

In a statement released late Friday afternoon, Murphy said the allegations were “deeply disturbing.”

“These are serious charges that implicate national security and the integrity of our criminal justice system,” he added.

He said that while Menendez and his co-defendants – his wife, Nadine Menendez, and three businessmen – were entitled to defend themselves, “the alleged facts are so serious that they compromise the ability of Senator Menendez to effectively represent the people of our state. Therefore, I am calling for his immediate resignation”.

The sweeping federal charges accuse the Menendezes of doing favours for the businessmen who showered them with gifts of gold bars, hundreds of thousands in cash, mortgage payments and a Mercedes convertible.

The indictment in New York federal court said that Menendez abused his power to secretly benefit Egypt as well the businessmen, including one seeking help with his own federal indictment. Another businessman sought the senator’s help to protect his company, the only authorised importer of halal meat to Egypt, according to court papers.

The senator, who is up for re-election next year, has denied the allegations and pledged to fight them.

Representative Andy Kim of New Jersey also released a statement urging Menendez to resign. Another House Democrat, Dean Phillips of Minnesota, earlier told CNN he should step down.

Earlier Friday, Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement that Menendez “had rightly decided” to give up his chairmanship of the Foreign Relations panel “until the matter has been resolved”.

Schumer also praised Menendez, saying he “has been a dedicated public servant”.

When he faced charges in an earlier unrelated corruption case, Menendez gave up his post as the top Democrat on the committee. His 2017 trial ended in a hung jury and prosecutors later dropped the case.

Under the US Constitution, he cannot be removed from office unless two-thirds of his fellow senators vote to expel him. According to the Senate’s website, 15 members have been expelled since 1789. All but one were removed because they supported the Confederacy during the Civil War.

Several other senators, however, resigned after charges were brought against them. That includes Senator Harrison Williams, a New Jersey Democrat who had been indicted in the Abscam bribery scandal. He resigned in 1982.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/gold-bars-cash-stuffed-envelopes-indictment-of-democratic-senator-alleges-vast-corruption-20230923-p5e70c.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601957

File: f4d7141caff225a⋯.jpg (426.91 KB,2252x1502,1126:751,Foreign_Minister_Penny_Won….jpg)

Penny Wong to remind UN that Australia wants a Security Council seat by 2029

Farrah Tomazin - September 22, 2023

New York: Australia will ramp up its push for a seat on the UN Security Council while calling for Russia’s veto powers on the global body to be constrained as a consequence of Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

In a major speech to the United Nations General Assembly in New York, Foreign Minister Penny Wong was also set to highlight the existential threat of climate change and the need to ensure the world remains free from nuclear weapons.

She will warn that tensions over the South China Sea and military build-up in the Indo-Pacific had given rise to “the most confronting circumstances in decades” and would require a greater collective effort to prevent an unwanted war.

“Military power is expanding, but measures to constrain military conflict are not – and there are few concrete mechanisms for averting it,” she was due to tell global leaders on Friday evening (US time), according to an early copy of her speech.

“So it is up to all of us to act to deploy our collective statecraft, our influence, our networks, our capabilities, to minimise the risk of misunderstanding and miscalculation to prevent catastrophic conflict. Peace-building today must rise to this challenge.”

The minister’s speech is her second address at UN High-level Week: an annual talkfest where political leaders, diplomats and captains of industry gather along New York’s East River in a bid to solve the problems of the world.

US President Joe Biden was the only leader out of the five veto-wielding, permanent members of the UN Security Council who attended the event this year, prompting renewed questions about the body’s overall influence.

Russian President Vladimir Putin – who has a warrant out for his arrest by the International Criminal Court – and Chinese President Xi Jinping both declined to attend for the second year in a row.

French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi – whose country is engulfed in a scandal over the alleged murder of a Sikh separatist leader – were also absent.

Almost 20 months since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the push to reform the UN took centre stage this week, with Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky giving an impassioned address calling for Russia to be stripped of its authority on the Security Council.

Wong will use her speech to back the push for a UN shake-up, suggesting that nations from Africa, Latin America and Asia should have greater representation on the committee – including permanent seats for India and Japan, two of Australia’s Quad partners.

She will also remind the UN that Australia wants a spot on the council by 2029.

And relating to Russia, “we must demand more of the permanent members, including constraints on the use of the veto,” Wong said.

“With its special responsibility as a permanent member of the Security Council, Russia mocks the UN every day it continues its illegal and immoral invasion of Ukraine.

“The rest of the permanent members and all member states must be unyielding in our response to Russia’s grave violation of Article II of our shared UN Charter. If we waver in our response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, we would be validating the most fundamental of breaches of international law.

“Who might be the next victim of state-based aggression?”

Wong’s address to the UN General Assembly takes place a month before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese heads to Washington for a highly anticipated state visit with Biden.

It also caps off a busy week in New York, in which the Foreign Minister took part in bilateral meetings with counterparts from Israel, Germany, Barbados and Canada, among others.

She also co-hosted a high-level event with Japan on a fissile material cut-off treaty, which aims to prevent the continued production of the material that creates nuclear weapons.

The UN first flagged the need for such a treaty 30 years ago, but decades later no such treaty exists.

“Australia wants a world where no country dominates, and no country is dominated,” she said.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/penny-wong-to-remind-un-that-australia-wants-a-security-council-seat-by-2029-20230922-p5e6wa.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601965

File: adbb217363e7ea1⋯.jpg (43.27 KB,860x496,215:124,In_his_address_to_the_UN_G….jpg)

File: 5b2f5b65fc2abea⋯.jpg (1.91 MB,4728x3152,3:2,Manasseh_Sogavare_second_f….jpg)

File: fa2647f64d31947⋯.jpg (1.14 MB,3150x2100,3:2,Manasseh_Sogavare_met_with….jpg)

Solomon Islands PM snubs meeting with US president, praises China's 'global security initiative' in UN speech

Nick Sas and Chrisnrita Aumanu-Leong - 23 September 2023

Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare has declined a White House invitation to meet with US President Joe Biden at next week's Pacific leaders' summit.

In a move that will further stoke Australian and US concerns over Mr Sogavare's perceived lean towards China, Mr Sogavare will return to Solomon Islands capital Honiara next week after delivering his speech to the United Nations General Assembly Friday night.

United States authorities are reportedly disappointed by Mr Sogavare's decision to decline the invitation.

He is the only Pacific leader to decline, apart from Vanuatu's new Prime Minster Sato Kilman, who has remained in Port Vila to navigate a brewing political crisis after taking power two weeks ago.

A Solomon Islands government official told the ABC Mr Sogavare would not attend because of "domestic issues", saying Mr Sogavare needs to be back in the Honiara parliament for a raft of bills, and the invitation from the White House came after parliament business had been set.

Solomon Islands Foreign Minister Jeremiah Manele will attend in Mr Sogavare's place.

The White House summit, in its second year, was initiated by the Biden administration to reboot relations in the Pacific region as China continues its own aggressive push.

Pacific leaders will meet with Mr Biden and attend a range of events across a three-day period in Washington starting on Monday.

The White House said the summit was designed to "reaffirm the US commitment to our shared regional priorities and deepening our cooperation around them".

The US - by its own admission - has been largely absent in the Pacific region over the past three decades, but has been loudly proclaiming it is "back" to help with development issues and the lingering threat of climate change.

It reopened its embassy in Solomon Islands last year, and US ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy told the ABC that Washington had "hundreds of millions" ready to spend in the country but was "waiting for permission" from the Solomon Islands government.

Sogavare praises Belt and Road initiative

Western powers have been increasingly concerned over Solomon Islands' moves towards China since it signed a secretive security pact last year.

China has been pouring money into the country and has funded a new national stadium and infrastructure developments for the upcoming Pacific Games, which will be held in November.

Mr Sogavare has defended his country's position, saying it is "friends to all, enemies to none", and has rejected claims the security pact will lead to China building a military base in the country.

In his speech at the United Nations overnight, Mr Sogavare called for global peace and spoke about the "toxic mix of geopolitical power posturing" in the region.

The speech called for greater action on climate change, but it focused on more equity in trade and fairer partnerships for developing nations.

And in comments that will no doubt raise anxieties in Canberra, Mr Sogavare singled out China in his speech, praising the country for its work as a development partner and highlighting the "comprehensive strategic framework" he developed with China's President Xi Jinping during his visit in July.

"We applaud the People's Republic of China for the initiative in accelerating the implementation of the 2030 agenda through their Belt and Road initiative, global development initiative [sic], global security initiative and global civilisation initiative," he said.

Australia is by far Solomon Islands' biggest aid donor and has been leading development projects in the country for decades, but China is the country's largest trade partner.

In his strongest condemnation yet, Mr Sogavare also denounced Japan's release of wastewater from Fukushima's crippled nuclear plant.

In comments echoing China's concerns — and going against the views of leaders from Fiji and Papua New Guinea — he said he was "appalled" by the move and warned of effects on the South Pacific's waters.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-23/solomon-islands-sogavare-snubs-biden-invitation-china/102893366

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601978

File: b5c12c5c0ea22f3⋯.jpg (3.04 MB,4200x2910,140:97,Prime_Minister_of_Solomon_….jpg)

File: e3907cc1501d0ef⋯.jpg (248.36 KB,1802x1438,901:719,China_s_President_Xi_Jinpi….jpg)

>>19601965

Solomon Islands PM shuns Joe Biden as Timor-Leste signs deal with China

Reuters / theage.com.au - September 24, 2023

Sydney/Washington: The Unites States is disappointed Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare will not attend a Pacific Islands summit with US President Joe Biden next week, the White House said.

Biden will host a second summit with leaders of the Pacific Islands Forum at the White House on Monday as part of his efforts to step up engagement with a region where the US is in a battle for influence with China.

Sogavare’s withdrawal came after China and Timor-Leste announced on Saturday they had upgraded bilateral ties to a comprehensive strategic partnership, potentially giving Beijing more influence in the region while satisfying the young half-island nation’s desire for stronger ties with major economies.

The agreement to enhance relations came after China’s President Xi Jinping met with Timor-Leste’s Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou ahead of the opening ceremony of the Asian Games, the Chinese foreign ministry said in a statement on Saturday.

“Both sides will increase mutual support and strengthen international co-operation,” said Xi.

Last year, when Jose Ramos-Horta was inaugurated as Timor-Leste’s fifth president since the country’s independence in 2002, the Nobel laureate pledged to forge closer relations with China, especially in energy, agriculture and infrastructure.

He said he would continue to foster a relationship with the United States, but added that Timor-Leste would not be implicated in any rivalry between Beijing and Washington.

Timor-Leste welcomes strong ties with all countries, including its southern neighbour Australia, Ramos-Horta said last year.

Upgrading their ties, China and Timor-Leste agreed to co-operation under the Belt and Road Initiative championed by Xi, that could open the way for investment in infrastructure.

Looking beyond South-East Asia, China has built ties with small nations in the Pacific during recent years, worrying the US and allies Australia and New Zealand, who have long seen the region as their sphere of influence.

China sent its military-run hospital ship to the Pacific in July to visit countries including Timor-Leste and Solomon Islands.

In a joint declaration, released on state-run China Central Television (CCTV), China said it would provide help for Timor-Leste’s economic and societal development.

Biden’s summit with the 18-member forum will take place on Monday and Tuesday (US time) in Washington.

“We are disappointed that PM Sogavare of the Solomons does not plan to attend,” a Biden administration official said.

Solomon Islands Foreign Minister Jeremiah Manele will reportedly attend the summit instead.

The Solomon Islands Prime Minister’s Office did not respond to a request for comment.

Sogavare spoke at the United Nations General Assembly on Friday in New York, where he praised China’s development co-operation as “less restrictive, more responsive and aligned to our national needs”, and said Beijing was its lead infrastructure partner.

Sogavare said he reached an understanding with President Xi Jinping during a July visit to China for Solomon Islands to achieve development through China’s policies, including the Belt and Road Initiative and Global Security Initiative.

Vanuatu’s Prime Minister Sato Kilman also will not attend the meeting, an official from his office said, because all Vanuatu government lawmakers need to be in parliament on Monday for a no-confidence vote.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/oceania/solomon-islands-pm-shuns-joe-biden-as-timor-leste-signs-deal-with-china-20230924-p5e75u.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19601994

File: 9f5da4ada4c8b02⋯.jpg (98.89 KB,634x462,317:231,A_20_year_old_US_Marine_is….jpg)

File: 67a96d0d9510897⋯.jpg (56.31 KB,634x453,634:453,Robertson_Barracks_where_1….jpg)

File: 8c067252c7bc788⋯.jpg (52.94 KB,586x320,293:160,Last_year_s_Marine_Rotatio….jpg)

US marine stationed in Australia is charged with rape as base is ordered into lockdown

DAVID SOUTHWELL - 21 September 2023

A US marine stationed in Australia has been charged with aggravated assault and sexual intercourse without consent.

The 20-year-old marine was arrested in Palmerston, south of Darwin, on Monday in relation to the incident that allegedly occurred there earlier that day.

The American has been been granted bail to appear in Darwin Local Court at a later date.

Since 2012, The Marine Rotational Force has stationed personnel in the Top End of Australia at several military bases.

Starting with just 250 marines in the first year, there is now an air-ground task force of 2,500 personnel.

A US Defence spokesperson said the marines were assisting NT Police with the investigation.

The spokesperson said the US Defence Force 'does not tolerate this kind of behavior and is committed to enforcing high standards of good order and discipline, and upholding justice and the rule of law,' he said.

The marines' base at Robertson Barracks is understood to have been locked down.

None of the 150 US military personnel are able leave the base of receive visitors, under what the spokesman called a 'restricted liberty status' at the base.

The Americans were due to leave Darwin in October following the joint Predators Run Exercise.

Predators Run was the NT's largest Australian-led military exercise but it came to a tragic conclusion when three marines were killed in a crash.

US Marine Corps crew chief Corporal Spencer Collart, 21, pilot Captain Eleanor LeBeau, 29, and Major Tobin Lewis, 37, died when their Boeing MV-22B Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft plunged to the ground and burst into flames on remote Melville Island, 80km north of Darwin near the end of August.

No Australian members were involved.

Along with Australian and US troops Indonesia, East Timor and the Philippines also took part in the training.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12544913/US-marine-rape-Darwin.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19602020

File: 7efe4472bee2918⋯.jpg (983 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Stephen_Asher_64_was_jaile….jpg)

File: ea17068c45c0e40⋯.jpg (376.34 KB,1754x1241,1754:1241,Operation_Bakis.jpg)

File: b9027f313c708fa⋯.jpg (145.8 KB,1920x1280,3:2,FBI_agents_Daniel_Alfin_an….jpg)

File: 2cc799c90dfffc0⋯.jpg (467.31 KB,3135x2097,1045:699,A_screen_shot_from_local_n….jpg)

File: 0802a7a4c954504⋯.jpg (60.7 KB,800x800,1:1,Florida_paedophile_David_L….jpg)

>>19320920 (pb)

Two FBI agents uncovered a paedophile ring, leading to their murders - then a Perth arrest

Rebecca Peppiatt - September 23, 2023

1/2

Perth man Stephen Paul Asher, a self-confessed paedophile, was jailed this week after an investigation that had its origins in the murders of two FBI agents.

The 64-year-old father is also a tech genius and cyber-security expert who formerly worked for Goldman Sachs before co-launching a cyber software company now worth $20 million.

Asher had the technical ability to fly under the radar as he scanned the dark web for images of naked pubescent and prepubescent girls, some under 13 years old.

But after automatic gunfire killed FBI special agents Daniel Alfin and Laura Schwartzenberger as they stood on the doorstep of a Florida apartment in February 2021, further investigations revealed their killer was part of a child abuse network that stretched as far as Australia.

They knocked on the door of reclusive IT worker, 55-year-old David Lee Huber, to execute a search warrant for child abuse material.

It’s believed Huber saw the agents through his doorbell camera and fired his assault rifle through the door.

Alfin and Schwartzenberger died and three more agents were wounded. Huber then turned the gun on himself.

But the officers’ work continued after their deaths, and a year later the FBI discovered Huber was part of a child abuse network that stretched as far as Australia.

After the tip-off, a joint police investigation was launched by the AFP and state police, leading to the arrest of 19 men and the removal of 13 children from harm.

Police said those involved developed a “sophisticated online child abuse network” and that some of the offenders produced their own material to share with other members.

They added that they were all likely employed in occupations that required a high degree of tech knowledge.

Asher was one of those men, the only one from WA, and when police raided his Perth home last year they found three laptops and another device containing hundreds of photos and videos of girls.

They were in states of undress, Perth District Court heard on Thursday, and the images were focused on genitals and breasts.

The court heard Asher confessed to searching for and downloading the images. He also told police he was a paedophile and gave them passwords to the laptops.

“He told police he had a sexual attraction to teenagers,” federal prosecutor Isobel Saville told the court.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19602027

File: 47925acc9efb667⋯.mp4 (15.54 MB,640x360,16:9,AFP_announces_19_men_arres….mp4)

>>19602020

2/2

While being sentenced for three counts of having child abuse material he had accessed using a carriage system and one count of using a carriage service to access child pornography material, the court heard Asher was “a gifted child” who excelled in English and maths at school before going on to university.

His career as an IT whiz soared but after losing both of his adopted parents as a child, his mental health declined and he was prone to bouts of depression. It was in those times that he sought solace in child pornography, the court heard.

“You told police that you identified as a paedophile,” judge Belinda Lonsdale said.

“You told police you had been accessing child exploitation material for some time.”

The court heard Asher had few friends, struggled with impulsiveness due to ADHD and displayed symptoms of autism spectrum disorder.

Since he had been arrested and charged, the court heard Asher had been forced to walk away from the 30 per cent share he had in his successful cyber-security company because he would have breached its ability to continue its national security work.

He’d also been evicted from his rental home and abandoned by his 31-year-old son.

But the judge said with a maximum penalty of 15 years for each of the charges he was facing, she needed to deter others from engaging in similar activities.

“The children are real children, they are not electronic depictions or avatars,” she said.

“The making of child exploitation material is so widespread, the courts must do their part in this.”

Asher was given a total sentence of 18 months after the judge reasoned his offending could have involved younger children in far more compromising images. She added that Asher was a first-time offender who had no prior criminal history. He could be released after nine months spent in jail on a conditions-based reconnaissance order.

AFP commander Helen Schneider said no matter how sophisticated the setup, police would track down child exploitation offenders.

“Viewing, distributing or producing child abuse material is a horrific crime and the lengths that these alleged offenders went to in order to avoid detection makes them especially dangerous – the longer they avoid detection, the longer they can perpetuate the cycle of abuse,” she said.

“The success of Operation Bakis demonstrates the importance of partnerships for law enforcement at a national level here in Australia, but also at an international level.”

Support is available from the National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/national/western-australia/two-fbi-agents-uncovered-a-paedophile-ring-leading-to-their-murders-then-a-perth-arrest-20230921-p5e6l3.html

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/murder-of-fbi-agents-leads-to-alleged-australian-paedophile-ring-bust-20230807-p5dui7.html

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/australian-children-removed-harm-and-19-men-charged-child-abuse-offences

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19606802

File: dd3125da4ef4f6f⋯.jpg (211.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Peter_Dutton_and_Anthony_A….jpg)

File: dac27e556dbfd5d⋯.jpg (339.43 KB,815x699,815:699,Voice_to_parliament_Septem….jpg)

>>19529127

No vote gains more ground amid a loss of support for Peter Dutton

SIMON BENSON - SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

1/2

National support for the Indigenous voice to parliament has failed to gain the expected campaign momentum heading into the final weeks before the October 14 referendum, with only slightly more than a third of surveyed voters now saying they will vote yes.

But the further decline in support has also coincided with a sharp fall in Liberal leader Peter Dutton’s approval ratings following a heated political debate over race, with satisfaction in the ­Opposition Leader’s performance now at a record low.

According to an exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian, 36 per cent of surveyed voters say they intend to vote yes. This reflects a two-point fall in the past three weeks and a continuation of the erosion in support since the beginning of the year.

It also marks the lowest level of support so far for the federal government’s constitutional model to enshrine Indigenous recognition and a voice to parliament and executive government.

Despite Anthony Albanese’s campaign drive to win undecided voters, opposition to the referendum question has risen a further three points to 56 per cent, with less than three weeks to go before voters will cast their ballot.

The swing to the No vote has occurred across almost all age groups and other demographic indicators but is most pronounced among women and younger voters who have been the strongest supporters of the voice to date.

Support among women has fallen from 41 per cent to 36 per cent but the proportion of those saying they would vote no has risen nine points to 57 per cent.

There is now almost no difference between male and female voters in their current voting ­intention with support for the voice among men ticking up three points to 36 per cent.

The decline in support among younger voters, however, signals a concerning trend for the Yes ­campaign.

The 18-to-34-year-old demographic is the strongest support base for the voice. However, even among this group, support has ­fallen five points to 50 per cent with a four-point rise to 41 per cent for the No vote.

At the beginning of the year, support for the voice among this group was close to 70 per cent.

Support also fell further away in the critical 35-to-49-year-old age group with a three-point fall to 36 per cent in favour and five-point swing to 56 per cent toward those opposed.

The only demographic other than the male voting category to experience a lift in support was among university-educated voters, which rose five points to 54 per cent.

There has also been a fall in support among Labor voters, with those approving of the constitutional alteration falling from 61 per cent in the previous Newspoll to 56 per cent in the latest survey. Labor voters opposed to the voice rose five points to 36 per cent.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19606805

File: dd3125da4ef4f6f⋯.jpg (211.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Peter_Dutton_and_Anthony_A….jpg)

File: dac27e556dbfd5d⋯.jpg (339.43 KB,815x699,815:699,Voice_to_parliament_Septem….jpg)

>>19529127

No vote gains more ground amid a loss of support for Peter Dutton

SIMON BENSON - SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

1/2

National support for the Indigenous voice to parliament has failed to gain the expected campaign momentum heading into the final weeks before the October 14 referendum, with only slightly more than a third of surveyed voters now saying they will vote yes.

But the further decline in support has also coincided with a sharp fall in Liberal leader Peter Dutton’s approval ratings following a heated political debate over race, with satisfaction in the ­Opposition Leader’s performance now at a record low.

According to an exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian, 36 per cent of surveyed voters say they intend to vote yes. This reflects a two-point fall in the past three weeks and a continuation of the erosion in support since the beginning of the year.

It also marks the lowest level of support so far for the federal government’s constitutional model to enshrine Indigenous recognition and a voice to parliament and executive government.

Despite Anthony Albanese’s campaign drive to win undecided voters, opposition to the referendum question has risen a further three points to 56 per cent, with less than three weeks to go before voters will cast their ballot.

The swing to the No vote has occurred across almost all age groups and other demographic indicators but is most pronounced among women and younger voters who have been the strongest supporters of the voice to date.

Support among women has fallen from 41 per cent to 36 per cent but the proportion of those saying they would vote no has risen nine points to 57 per cent.

There is now almost no difference between male and female voters in their current voting ­intention with support for the voice among men ticking up three points to 36 per cent.

The decline in support among younger voters, however, signals a concerning trend for the Yes ­campaign.

The 18-to-34-year-old demographic is the strongest support base for the voice. However, even among this group, support has ­fallen five points to 50 per cent with a four-point rise to 41 per cent for the No vote.

At the beginning of the year, support for the voice among this group was close to 70 per cent.

Support also fell further away in the critical 35-to-49-year-old age group with a three-point fall to 36 per cent in favour and five-point swing to 56 per cent toward those opposed.

The only demographic other than the male voting category to experience a lift in support was among university-educated voters, which rose five points to 54 per cent.

There has also been a fall in support among Labor voters, with those approving of the constitutional alteration falling from 61 per cent in the previous Newspoll to 56 per cent in the latest survey. Labor voters opposed to the voice rose five points to 36 per cent.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19606808

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19606805

2/2

The latest Newspoll, which showed a further contraction in the number of voters who don’t know which way they will vote – down one point to 8 per cent – also tested the suggestion that Yes ­voters were more likely to turn out to vote, giving the Yes camp an ­advantage.

However, the poll found that No voters were just as likely to vote as Yes voters. The total of those definitely or very likely to vote was 91 per cent among Yes voters and 90 per cent among No voters.

However, the least likely to turn out were also those most ­likely to vote yes. Among 18-to-34-year-old voters, those with the strongest support for the voice, only 77 per cent said they would definitely or very likely to vote.

This compared to 97 per cent among those aged over 65, where the No vote was strongest.

The latest Newspoll also ­recorded a six-point fall in Mr ­Dutton’s satisfaction ratings to 32 per cent, with the Opposition Leader now at his lowest level of approval since taking the job. His net approval rating is now at minus 20.

Anthony Albanese’s approval ratings improved slightly to 47 per cent but also remain at historically low levels for the Prime Minister with a net approval rating of plus three.

The head-to-head contest over who voters regard as the better prime minister remains relatively unchanged with Mr Albanese on 50 per cent and Mr Dutton falling a point to 30 per cent.

The Coalition and Labor are now level pegged on primary vote support at 36 per cent each – with a one-point gain for Labor and a one-point fall for the Liberal/­Nationals parties since the last Newspoll at the beginning of ­September.

The Greens suffered a two-point fall to 11 per cent, during a period in which the minor party dropped its opposition to the ­government’s housing bill.

Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party fell a point to 6 per cent while support for other minor parties and independents rose three points to 11 per cent.

The two-party-preferred vote has lifted for Labor which leads the Coalition 54-46 per cent – a two-point increase in the margin.

Mr Albanese has summoned his cabinet to meet in ­Adelaide today, with South ­Australia regarded as a critical state for both sides of the voice campaign.

At the weekend Mr Albanese urged voters to consider what was at stake.

“I would just encourage people to not be focused on what this isn’t about, but be focused on what it is about,” the Prime Minister said.

“It is about just recognition, and is about giving people a voice, over, a say, over their affairs, because then you’ll get better outcomes. And with that comes responsibility as well.”

The latest Newspoll surveyed 1239 voters throughout Australia via online interviews between September 18 and September 22.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/no-vote-gains-more-ground-amid-a-loss-of-support-for-peter-dutton/news-story/e2e7eebb8ab6c36a45490e558174e727

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOMxH7i8-j4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19606828

File: 3ac1d4c55076b90⋯.jpg (185.9 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Latest_poll_results_show_v….jpg)

File: 038211cfa18b1a1⋯.jpg (319.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Cartoonist_Warren_Brown_s_….jpg)

File: c2c8bd587e0c073⋯.jpg (461.53 KB,825x1184,825:1184,KS_1.jpg)

File: 0caf5b5b5a19bd5⋯.jpg (166.8 KB,2048x1162,1024:581,F6vctdMaoAA8WQ_.jpg)

File: 4c6548c7b17f02a⋯.jpg (66.1 KB,2048x914,1024:457,F6vctdLbUAAn6X4.jpg)

>>19606805

RedBridge poll finds voters don’t think Voice to Parliament is a top-5 priority

An exclusive new poll has found that few Australians rank the Voice as one of the top five priorities for the federal government, nominating cost of living and housing affordability as top issues.

James Campbell - September 24, 2023

Hardly any Australians rank the Voice as the top priority issue for the federal government, according to a new poll that has also found support for the referendum has fallen to 38 per cent.

The latest RedBridge poll, taken last week, found that despite Yes23 and the Uluru Dialogue stepping up their advertising spend, support for the Voice is still falling.

The poll found that nationally the percentage of people planning to vote for the Voice has dropped by another percentage point since the start of the month.

The last RedBridge poll, taken at the start of September, found support had fallen 5 per cent to 39 per cent in the month since its previous survey.

The only state to buck the trend in the latest poll was NSW, where support for the Voice has increased from 39 per cent to 42 per cent.

But this was offset by a decline in support for the Voice in Victoria, where it dropped from 45 per cent to 41 per cent, and in Queensland, where it dropped three points to 32 per cent.

The Voice has been behind in every state and territory, as well as nationally, in RedBridge’s past two polls.

The latest RedBridge research also tested how importantly voters rate the Voice as an issue for the Albanese government.

On that metric it is performing abysmally, a distant last in the issues voters were asked to rank as priorities.

According to RedBridge only 2 per cent of voters rate the Voice as their top or second or third priorities for government (6 per cent in total), while 4 per cent put it down as their fourth and another 4 per cent as their fifth most important issue.

Cost-of-living was easily the most important issue for voters, with 92 per cent of them ranking it in the top five.

This was followed by housing affordability, which was ranked by 73 per cent of people as a priority for government, and the economy and jobs, which was rated by 69 per cent.

The next most important issues for voters were health funding, wages, climate change, the economy transitioning to renewable and national security.

With only roughly 15 per cent of voters putting the Voice as a top-five priority, it was rated as being less than half as important as road and infrastructure funding, which was chosen by 31 per cent of voters.

RedBridge director Tony Barry said “To paraphrase (American political strategist) James Carville: ‘It’s the economy, Albo’.”

He said the poll’s personal issues profile numbers showed that in a cost of living and housing crisis, the government was not aligned on personally relevant issues which is why its messages were failing to land.

“There’s a real risk for Albanese and Labor that the referendum cements the idea that the government has the wrong priorities and that it will then be punished,” Mr Barry said.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/redbridge-poll-finds-voters-dont-think-voice-to-parliament-is-a-top5-priority/news-story/48af8dc8fc67285fa92a2074a82e2e92

https://twitter.com/KosSamaras/status/1705701963952967796

https://redbridgegroup.com.au/voice-referendum-poll-13-21-september-2023/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19606852

File: 50879b8d1cebd11⋯.jpg (365.45 KB,3000x1999,3000:1999,Home_Affairs_secretary_Mik….jpg)

Home Affairs secretary Mike Pezzullo stood aside as alleged texts to Liberal powerbroker investigated

Tom Lowrey - 25 September 2023

The secretary of the Home Affairs Department, Mike Pezzullo, has been asked to step aside as an investigation is conducted into text messages he is alleged to have sent to a Liberal Party powerbroker.

The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age have published the texts said to have been sent over a number of years between Mr Pezzullo and Scott Briggs, an influential figure within the Liberal Party.

Home Affairs Minister Clare O'Neil on Monday morning asked Mr Pezzullo to stand aside while the messages are investigated by the Australian public service commissioner.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Mr Pezzullo has agreed to do so, and described Mr Pezzullo's decision as "appropriate".

Mr Albanese said the government would expedite the findings of the investigation, and expected more information later today.

"Cabinet is meeting this afternoon where no doubt I'll be able to get further reports about that," the prime minister said.

Many of the published messages refer to ministerial appointments under former Coalition governments, including appointments for those with responsibility for Mr Pezzullo's Home Affairs Department.

Mr Briggs has held a number of roles within the party, including deputy director of the New South Wales branch and president of the federal electoral conference in former prime minister Scott Morrison's seat of Cook.

In a message allegedly sent to Mr Briggs during the Liberal Party's 2018 leadership contest, Mr Pezzullo advocated for the appointment of a prominent conservative as home affairs minister.

"You need a right winger in there – people smugglers will be watching … Please feed that in [to Morrison and Turnbull]," the newspapers claim Mr Pezzullo said in one of the published messages.

Other messages regard appointments like attorney-general and defence minister.

Some of the conversations also appear to show disdain for parliamentary processes like Senate estimates, where senators are given the opportunity to grill departmental officials about policy.

Mr Pezzullo was the first person appointed to lead the newly created Home Affairs Department in 2017, and has held the role under both Coalition and Labor governments.

'Thoroughly professional': Dutton on Pezzullo

Ms O'Neil refused to comment on the nature of the messages, however, she said she is often in communication with Mr Pezzullo in his role as her department head.

"Well, the secretary of my department and I communicate frequently, as you can imagine," she said.

"When I spoke to the secretary this morning, I asked him to stand aside. That's the appropriate course of action and I'm not going to make further comment on this until the inquiry is concluded."

The Greens' home affairs spokesperson, senator Nick McKim, said Mr Pezzullo's position as secretary was untenable.

He said Mr Pezzullo should offer his resignation, and if he does not, the prime minister should sack him.

"There is no doubt now that his position is untenable, and if he's not prepared to step up and do the right thing, then Mr Albanese should step up and act," he said.

Former Home Affairs minister now Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said Mr Pezzullo "conducted himself in a thoroughly professional way in my dealings with him".

"He had a passion for Home Affairs because he believes very strongly in national security and border protection," he said.

Mr Dutton said the "matter should be referred to the Australian Federal Police if there has been a leak of sensitive information".

The prime minister said former Australian public service commissioner Lynelle Briggs would conduct the inquiry.

The Department of Home Affairs has declined to comment.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-25/mike-pezzullo-home-affairs-secretary-scott-briggs-text-messages/102896034

https://www.smh.com.au/national/five-years-a-thousand-messages-how-a-top-public-servant-tried-to-influence-governments-20230919-p5e5ss.html

https://archive.vn/02N3Q

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19606854

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19606852

An unprecedented glimpse into politics and power

60 Minutes Australia

Sep 24, 2023

Running Australia is a big job.

But if you think it’s the government of the day in Canberra that’s calling all the shots, after seeing this story you might think again.

Tonight, in a joint investigation with the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, we expose the highly inappropriate actions of one of our most senior public servants. Michael Pezzullo is the boss of Home Affairs, the department responsible for Australia’s national security. He’s supposed to be independent and apolitical but as you’ll see, that’s not the way he operates.

Pezzullo has been wielding extraordinary power from the shadows, interfering in government and doing all he can to build an impenetrable empire.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnzmvJRN_nM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19606877

File: 3d5b9c775707047⋯.jpg (348.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Penny_Wong_delivering_Aust….jpg)

>>19581632

Pandemic inquiry useless without admitting to failures

ADAM CREIGHTON - SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

1/2

Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s remarks at the United Nations last week, in a session related to “pandemic prevention, preparedness and response”, were a stark reminder of why it’s too early to institute any inquiry into Australia’s Covid-19.

Senator Wong blamed the pandemic for “hardship and suffering” and for “exacerbating inequities of our global system”, pointing out that 124 million people fell back into poverty.

To be sure, SARS-Cov2, the coronavirus that emerged in early 2020, contributed to the deaths of millions of people around the globe, as any new, highly contagious virus would in a world of eight billion people. But much of the suffering over the past few years was caused by governments, not “the pandemic”.

Covid-19 didn’t print trillions of dollars, euros and pounds, which have prompted rampant inflation, years of declining living standards, higher interest rates and a massive surge in inequality.

The virus didn’t close schools and universities, ruin small businesses, delay medical treatments, sow intergenerational discord and isolate people from their loved ones. It didn’t force millions of people to take a rushed vaccine against their will, or censor doctors and medical professionals who turned out to be right. These were all political decisions. Until our political leaders are able to speak honestly about the role of government in the hardship and suffering of the past few years, any sort of inquiry will be a waste of time, whatever the terms of reference happen to be.

The risk of having an inquiry too soon is that the conclusions will endorse the government response because the vast bulk of society – including those who would oversee and staff such an inquiry – supported it, either publicly or privately. Only a fresh set of eyes, perhaps at least 10 years into the future, could do an adequate job.

Indeed, we are still living through the costs of the government’s response to Covid-19. While the pandemic has abated – declared over by the WHO earlier this year – excess deaths in Australia are still at record highs.

“Self-evidently, the early international response was not well co-ordinated,” Senator Wong also said in her remarks. And thank god it wasn’t! Imagine the disastrous position we would be in if we had no counterfactual scenarios to measure the benefits and costs of what our governments did.

If jurisdictions such as Sweden, Japan and various states of the US, had enacted the same destructive policies all at the same time, contrary to earlier pandemic planning, we would never know what a disaster they have turned out to be. Thankfully, we do know. Very few of us would’ve imagined in the middle of 2020 that Australia’s excess deaths would end up about the same as Sweden’s; that outcomes in Florida and California would be more or less the same, despite vast differences in the level and costs of restrictions.

“Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted,” distinguished epidemiologist Donald Henderson wrote of the 20th century in 2006. That principle, which underpinned pre-2020 pandemic planning, was hurled out the window. But it’s a principle we desperately need to get back.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19606880

File: de7fc1c75360c44⋯.jpg (427.98 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Police_patrol_the_streets_….jpg)

>>19606877

2/2

David Bell, an Australian doctor who worked at the World Health Organisation for eight years, expressed his profound concerns about the direction of global health policy in a July article in the American Journal of Economics and Sociology.

There are three principles of public health, he argues, that were lost during Covid-19, and which must be revived. First, public health should be based on a weighting of costs and benefits. The near maniacal obsession with stopping Covid-19 came at immense costs, social and economic, that very likely outweighed the benefits.

“Reducing death from a single respiratory virus became the primary function of public health,” Bell writes.

Second, public health used to be about maximising quality-adjusted years of life remaining, rather than minimising deaths regardless of age. “Though the average age of death from Covid-19 was similar to the age of all-cause death in most countries, and life-years lost is so fundamental to understanding disease burden, age was seldom mentioned in media reports,” he points out.

“Nearly everyone on Earth would agree that the impact of the death of a five-year-old will be greater than that of an 85 year old.” Yet by pushing hundreds of millions of people globally into poverty, by shutting down global trade, governments in rich countries contributed to the deaths of many young people.

Third, public health once defined individual health in terms of physical, mental and social wellbeing, as opposed to simply not dying from a respiratory virus.

“This is why the WHO, in its 2019 recommendations on pandemic influenza management, strongly advised against measures such as border closures, or quarantine or restriction of healthy people,” he adds.

To my mind, there is no question the world would be far healthier, happier and prosperous today if governments had done nothing in 2020 except provide the public with the best information they had about SARS-Cov2, compared to the socio-economic bonfire that we all witnessed beginning in early 2020.

While delaying a review into our response is advisable, it won’t make much of a difference anyway. We all learned a lot during the Covid-19 pandemic, about ourselves, our friends and family, government and human nature.

And one of those main lessons must be that in a time of panic, well-considered and sensible plans and viewpoints will be dumped. We should remember that rational behaviour is the exception not the norm.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/pandemic-inquiry-useless-without-admitting-to-failures/news-story/811905d6006348b96658619ef947a05a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19606895

File: 61a973d9bfe3a4d⋯.jpg (203.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19505163

AUKUS consensus is collapsing under weight of Labor blunders

BOB CARR - SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

1/2

When Anthony Albanese addressed his federal electoral council on July 6 he rebutted criticism of AUKUS by saying Labor governments always have to prove themselves on national security.

This was an explanation for Labor acquiescing in the Scott Morrison plan in 2021. It was the justification for not reopening the issue eight months later when Labor won government.

This instinct that Labor must always underline its national security credentials was on display in parody version at Labor’s national conference in Brisbane. Pat Conroy, Minister for Defence Industry, branded AUKUS doubters “appeasers”.It was language that might have been lifted from Bob Santamaria’s TV broadcasts during the Vietnam War. But it’s not working.

The right in Australia has withdrawn its goodwill towards the Albanese government on national security. Linking Labor and AUKUS won’t cut it. In any case, the bicephalous US political system makes it unwise to talk up the three-nation deal. It is now risky to boast about it.

Three days after the conference there were reports of a congressional research paper that concluded AUKUS could worsen the US Navy’s shortfall of nuclear-powered subs. This report decisively strengthened the hand of the US Republicans who commissioned it and who are threatening to block the sale of subs to Australia. This will feed into local scepticism eroding the Canberra consensus about AUKUS and its grandiose reach.

That scepticism was captured last week in a seminal article by foreign editor Greg Sheridan in which he effectively withdrew support for Defence Minister Richard Marles – unfairly, because all his defence imbroglios have been inherited. But it reframed the AUKUS debate: “There’s every chance AUKUS could turn out to be the enemy of Australian defence self-reliance, or of any defence capability at all. Worse, it could ultimately go the way of the French submarines. People will lose faith in it because it’s not remotely on track to deliver anything at all in a meaningful time frame.”

Over 40 years Sheridan has been the vanguard of US-aligned commentary in Australia. But he is now saying the symbolism of AUKUS subs won’t buy the government dominance in the national security space. His argument that we are the only country to adopt nuclear subs without increasing defence spending is difficult to answer.

An article appearing the same day in the Australian Financial Review, by former ASPI director Michael Shoebridge, confirms this withdrawal of support for Labor from supporters of US-Australia strategic integration. Shoebridge confirmed the US congressional resistance now has to be taken seriously. He writes: “US congress continues to debate Pentagon plans to transfer US Virginia-class submarines to Australia in the early 2030s, as America’s own domestic debate about its military capabilities and its submarine industrial base challenges gathers momentum.”

It probably won’t be Joe Biden but his successor who will make the decision whether to sell us Virginia-class subs or preserve them for American’s own order of battle. He or she will take office, Shoebridge says, “…with fresh eyes about America’s own defence and what value AUKUS brings to the US, at what costs and pains.”

The US Navy will then have its lowest number of attack submarines, 46 instead of 66. That’s when the AUKUS deal has the US handing over at least two to Australia.

It might not even be a decision for the next president but the president inaugurated on January 20, 2029. Donald Trump junior? Vivek Ramaswamy? Gretchen Whitmer? Gavin Newsom? Each capable of being persuaded old Joe got it wrong when he promised US assets to a far-off ally.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19606897

File: dfd7924fc65575a⋯.jpg (396.64 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Joe_Biden_participates_in_….jpg)

>>19606895

2/2

Shoebridge frets about what Americans could think of us when they realise we’ve put little towards the package. This anxiety is an Australian pathology. But the US embassy must be aware federal Labor has told Labor figures in the Illawarra that any decision about an east coast submarine base at Port Kembla won’t be started till the 2030s and take 10 years anyway. Selecting a site for the storage of highly enriched uranium could take more than a decade. A nuclear-waste repository in South Australia was as emphatically rejected by Liberals as Labor.

There was another signal that the right of Australian politics is now dissenting from the AUKUS consensus. It came from Sharri Markson on Sky, who may have collected insights from senior figures in the Coalition and right-wing US circles. On September 19 she said there are politicians in Washington “jeopardising the AUKUS deal”.

That “jeopardising” is as far as anyone has gone in assessing congressional grumpiness over the prospect of selling precious subs to Australia. Yet when Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s caucus is rebellious on other fronts, it might be a correct reading. Pat Conroy’s “appeasers” have bobbed up behind the lines.

Markson said this was one reason the US ambassador Caroline Kennedy was in the US so often. When Biden, Rishi Sunak and Albanese solemnised AUKUS in San Diego with hands on hearts, there had been no hint of wobbles in Washington.

Committing to Morrison’s AUKUS is the most consequential decision of the Albanese government. The Parliamentary Budget Office estimates it will cost $50bn between 2027 and 2033 alone. Our navy, already under-resourced, will have to make painful savings. Other defence platforms will be “cannibalised”. The verb is Sheridan’s.

Splintering a bottle of champagne over the snout of an Attack-class French sub in the early 2030s would plainly have been a simpler option with less stress for other defence assets. The whole fleet would have been a bargain at a trifling $90bn compared with the half-trillion-dollar price tag for the Loch Ness monster alternative arriving in the 2050s.

And waving off HMAS Attack from the Adelaide dock to plough its deterrent firepower in our northern reaches would have been a lethal statement about our regional strength, and easily enough to have baptised Labor with the national security good housekeeping seal of approval.

Bob Carr was the longest-serving premier of NSW and Australian foreign minister.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/aukus-consensus-is-collapsing-under-weight-of-labor-blunders/news-story/30b88fb3daa62779c3a98c42582832d5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19606948

File: 7a1e72cbf8d3ef8⋯.jpg (241.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,His_tour_was_first_delayed….jpg)

File: b9c2213e62d0354⋯.jpg (96.53 KB,1280x720,16:9,Deleted_posts_from_Mr_Trum….jpg)

File: 24018e2e82955ad⋯.jpg (113.98 KB,825x380,165:76,AS_1.jpg)

>>19272789 (pb)

‘Scheduling conflicts’: Donald Trump Jr’s Aussie tour pushed back to December

The son of twice-impeached ex-US president Donald Trump was due to speak in Australia today, but organisers have again pushed the tour back.

Blake Antrobus - September 25, 2023

1/2

A controversial speaking tour hosted by the son of twice-impeached ex-US president Donald Trump has been delayed for the second time, with organisers saying “scheduling conflicts” are to blame this time.

Donald Trump Jr was due to host talks in Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney this month as part of his contentious live tour, organised by the Australian arm of conservative not-for-profit organisation Turning Point.

It had already been delayed from its initial date in July following a visa stoush.

In an email seen by NCA NewsWire, the tour’s organisers Turning Point Australia said Mr Trump Jr had been forced to postpone the week’s events due to “last-minute scheduling conflicts”.

“We sincerely apologise for any inconvenience this may cause,” the email states.

New tour dates in Sydney (December 10), the Gold Coast (December 11) and Melbourne (December 13) have since been organised.

“Your existing tickets will be automatically valid for the rescheduled event, so there’s no need to do anything if you wish to attend on the new date,” the email states.

A spokesperson from Turning Point Australia said Mr Trump Jr had “a number of commitments” which had impacted his schedule for the next couple of weeks.

The spokesperson did not elaborate further on what the specific scheduling conflicts were.

Mr Trump Jr had also pulled out of a similar event in the United States being hosted by political commentator and podcaster Tim Pool.

Venues for the new dates are yet to be confirmed.

“Venues are often harassed by protesters and groups such as Antifa in the lead up to an event like this so we announce the location 24 hours before to spare the venue the headaches and the abuse,” the spokesperson told NCA NewsWire.

The postponement comes a week after Mr Trump Jr’s X (formerly Twitter) account was hacked – posting a series of vulgar messages.

One post stated: “I’m sad to announce, my father Donald Trump has passed away. I will be running for president in 2024”.

Others slurred current US president Joe Biden, bragged of “interesting messages” with deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and claimed North Korea was “about to get smoked.”

All posts have since been deleted.

Andrew Surabian, a spokesman for Mr Trump Jr, confirmed the hack in a post on his own X account.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19606963

File: 9a083d130c3a25d⋯.jpg (327.98 KB,1138x969,1138:969,Donald_Trump_Jr_LIVE_.jpg)

File: 3f65ebcee22d136⋯.jpg (154.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Donald_Trump_Jr_was_initia….jpg)

File: fac5dbe982cd8e2⋯.jpg (359.36 KB,825x1176,275:392,SM_1.jpg)

File: aac020013902847⋯.jpg (378 KB,825x1537,825:1537,JP_3.jpg)

File: bf7ed88114c6550⋯.jpg (349.7 KB,481x970,481:970,Donald_Trump_Jr_slaps_down….jpg)

>>19606948

2/2

Billed as a “landmark” Australian tour for the son of the twice-impeached 45th US president, Mr Trump Jr is lauded as “fearlessly outspoken” who has “captured the imagination of conservatives from around the world.”

Former Ukip leader Nigel Farage and Liberal senator Alex Antic are listed as special guests on the speaking tour.

General tickets to the event – which had been the subject of public outcry and a petition to stop Mr Trump Jr from getting a visa – are priced from $59 for students or concession holders to $89 for general admission.

A private dinner event – with a whopping $2500 price tag – includes a pre-show dinner with Mr Trump Jr, champagne reception and front-row seating.

“The Private Dinner, Backstage Pass and VIP Tickets are mostly sold out across the 3 events,” the Turning Point Australia spokesperson told NCA NewsWire.

“Additional tickets have been released for some of these in order to accommodate demand.

“Over 8000 tickets have been sold for the 3 events.”

In their email, Turning Point Australia also apologised for the delay in processing requested refunds.

“Refunds are being manually processed by the promoter alone, which has proven to be a time-consuming task,” their email states.

“Rest assured that we are working to expedite this process. We understand the frustration this may cause.”

They conclude with: “We want to assure you that this event will be well worth the wait. Don Jr is excited to come to Australia, and Turning Point is committed to delivering an unforgettable experience when the event takes place in December.”

Mr Trump Jr claimed a visa delay from the federal government was the reason for July’s planned tour being cancelled.

But Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil refuted this, stating Mr Trump Jr was given a visa “like everyone else” and had tried to blame the government for his “poor ticket sales”.

In a series of now-deleted tweets she called Mr Trump Jr a “sore loser” and a “big baby who isn’t very popular”.

He returned fire by calling the minister a “coward”.

“The tyrannical Left doesn’t believe people have the right to freedom of expression and will do anything to shut down conservative voices, but we will not bow down to them,” Mr Trump Jr said.

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/donald-trump-jrs-australia-tour-delayed-again-over-scheduling-conflicts-organisers-announce/news-story/9b0a30d73cad7583b1d2e818a71767ff

https://twitter.com/Surabees/status/1704472921287090654

https://twitter.com/sharrimarkson/status/1676794861578776577

https://twitter.com/SenPaterson/status/1676792534671163392

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12273465/Donald-Trump-Jr-slams-cowardly-Australian-MP-Claire-ONeil-called-big-baby-amid-visa-row.html

https://www.trumplive.com.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611559

File: 0a6441608400e2f⋯.mp4 (12.35 MB,640x360,16:9,Daniel_Andrews_resigns_as_….mp4)

File: f2d59517ec7f9e3⋯.jpg (564.56 KB,825x1387,825:1387,DA_1.jpg)

File: 486624c726a52b5⋯.jpg (3.01 MB,2388x3184,3:4,F67Pv4bbsAAo08N.jpg)

Daniel Andrews resigns as premier of Victoria after three elections, nine years

abc.net.au - 26 September 2023

1/2

Daniel Andrews has resigned as the premier of Victoria after nine years in the role.

Mr Andrews announced today that he would formally step down at 5pm tomorrow.

He said leading the state had been "the honour and privilege" of his life.

"It's not an easy job being the premier of our state — that's not a complaint, that's just a fact," he said.

"It requires 100 per cent from you and your family. That is, of course, time limited and now is the time to step away."

The MP for Mulgrave, who has led Labor to three consecutive election victories since first forming government at the 2014 election, is among the state's longest-serving premiers.

Mr Andrews paid tribute to his family at an afternoon press conference.

"To Cath, she is my best friend and none of this was remotely possible without her support, her guidance and her love.

"To Noah, Grace and Joseph, they know only politics. Dad has always done this.

"For all that this has meant, thank you, you are everything to me."

A successor is due to be chosen by his party at midday tomorrow, with Deputy Premier Jacinta Allan and Public Transport Minister Ben Carroll likely contenders.

Ms Allan has already announced on social media that she will put herself forward as the party's next leader.

After winning last year's election, Mr Andrews declared multiple times he would see out a third term as premier, and contest an election in 2026.

"It was true then and I've changed my mind," he said.

"And having explained to you in my statement … I hope that you have a sense that when it's time, it's time."

Mr Andrews said the role of premier had consumed him and over time that "takes a toll".

"To have been premier for nine years and the leader of my party for 13 years is a greater set of opportunities than I ever thought would be afforded to me, a kid from the country with only really an aspiration to do good, to work hard, to work with teams of people to perhaps make things better," he said.

PM praises Andrews's role during COVID pandemic

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described Mr Andrews as a "man of great conviction, enormous compassion and a fierce determination to make a difference".

"And he has made such a positive difference to the lives of Victorians," Mr Albanese said.

"You can measure his contribution through nine years, three election victories — the last one with an increased majority.

"But what you can measure it on is the fact that he is a builder. He has built enormous infrastructure benefits for Victoria. He's rebuilt a health system — a passion of his from his time as health minister, and indeed, during the pandemic as well.

"He's rebuilt schools. And in the announcement that he's made, as well, last week, he's determined to deal with the challenges of housing."

Mr Albanese said Mr Andrews had never "shirked his responsibilities" and made reference to his role during the state's COVID experience.

"He stood up each and every day during the pandemic. He stood up for doing what he believed was absolutely right to keep Victorians safe – not making easy decisions, making difficult decisions," he said.

"And Daniel Andrews will be remembered for his contribution to Victoria."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611563

File: 998f3eebd0b50f4⋯.mp4 (14.24 MB,640x360,16:9,_A_man_of_great_conviction….mp4)

File: 21a381eefae38ca⋯.jpg (1.66 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,John_Pesutto_says_Daniel_A….jpg)

>>19611559

2/2

Former Labor premier Steve Bracks, who served as a political mentor to Mr Andrews, said the premier had picked "the right time" to depart.

"I wasn't surprised. I thought into the third term Daniel would probably take the next step and move on," Mr Bracks told ABC News.

"He has served the state extremely well, and after a while this job gets to you.

"He's right when he says once you start thinking about life after politics, that's the time you've got to go. And that's what he's done."

Another former Labor premier, John Brumby, said Mr Andrews was "very good at building consensus and support in the community".

"He won three elections convincingly and he increased his majority at each election so there must have been many things he was doing right," he said.

Opposition says Andrews leaves a 'broken' state

Victorian Opposition Leader John Pesutto acknowledged "the long period of service that Daniel Andrews has given to the Victorian Parliament and the Victorian people".

However, he said the premier's legacy would be defined by growing levels of state debt and multiple anti-corruption investigations.

"I do take this opportunity to wish Mr Andrews well with his family in all that he does in the future," he said.

"But at a time like this it's also important to face the facts.

"The facts are that Premier Daniel Andrews is standing down today because things have fallen apart.

"We've seen it day after day, one crisis after another.

"The legacy that Daniel Andrews leaves is a state that is broken. Victorian is broken — we know it, we see the evidence of it every day."

Former Liberal Premier Jeff Kennett said Mr Andrews's legacy would be determined by the state in which he left the community.

"He was so much in control, he didn't use the traditional media, he used social media, he controlled his party very strongly," he said.

"But the real test is not where you start, but where you finish and the state in which you leave the community.

"So Daniel's legacy won't be determined today or tomorrow it'll be determined over the next three or four years, or it might even be determined over the next 20 years."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-26/daniel-andrews-resigns-as-victorian-premier/102902584

https://twitter.com/DanielAndrewsMP/status/1706529765166076169

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611567

File: d91227d8ef2d98c⋯.jpg (310.68 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Premier_Daniel_Andrews_ann….jpg)

File: c092c3a2ad6945c⋯.jpg (118.25 KB,1280x720,16:9,_Historic_day_as_Daniel_An….jpg)

>>19611559

Dan Andrews was reviled by the right but enough voters kept backing him

JOHN FERGUSON - SEPTEMBER 26, 2023

1/2

Dan Andrews’ ruthless divisiveness was unmatched.

He leaves a legacy as contested as the political battlefield that he ruled over, a strategy that was built on winning and holding office at any cost.

Andrews was fuelled by a precocious, instinctive talent that, in the end, could not mask the deep flaws that delivered an imperfect pandemic response and a smashed budget.

Victoria’s finances are in terrible shape, but don’t expect Andrews to be apologetic.

“I am not a regretful person, I don’t look back,’’ he said at Melbourne’s Parliament House.

Andrews was Australia’s first truly modern political leader, marketing himself shamelessly at younger, digital era voters while wedging the Greens in the inner city.

He wedged everyone, sometimes - in the case of the pandemic - he wedged himself.

Andrews was a creature of party headquarters who saw life principally through the prism of numbers - 50 per cent plus one.

Reviled by the right but loved by the left, Andrews delivered Labor three election wins and skewered four Liberal leaders. He was an election-winning machine.

Andrews was, in many senses, popular in raw numerical terms but he profited by a roll call of catastrophic Liberal failures.

Andrews led the national debate on social issues for years and supercharged the state’s economy by pouring concrete like it was Carlton Draught after a grand final win.

At no point after the 2020 pandemic broke out did he look like demanding serious budget repair.

Despite all this, Andrews, just 38 when elected leader in 2010, goes down as the most influential premier in Victoria behind Liberal Henry Bolte, who ruled for 17 years until 1972.

When considering who is the most significant Victorian leader since World War II, think about the enormity of the challenges facing Andrews in the midst of the pandemic, even if some of those challenges were own goals.

Anyone wanting evidence of the bitter Victorian divide should have been in Crown casino at 1.20pm for the Carbine Club grand final week function on Tuesday.

Eddie McGuire broke the news to 900 or so mainly old blokes who roared with approval. No doubt there were many who kept their Labor allegiances to themselves.

This is the thing about Andrews, the people who voted for him often kept their counsel, making it even harder for the Liberal Party to know where to look.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611571

File: 474cf45f3994a4c⋯.jpg (139.42 KB,1280x720,16:9,Daniel_Andrews_says_the_on….jpg)

File: 6dc6a7b1611a5b5⋯.jpg (217.9 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Deputy_Premier_Jacinta_All….jpg)

>>19611567

2/2

He was an all-or-nothing leader.

The history books will rightly question the absurdity of some of the pandemic restrictions but in many ways they define his premiership style.

Andrews was always excessive.

In some ways like former Liberal leader Jeff Kennett, but on money, the pair were polar opposites.

Kennett valued every cent, but Andrews believed that taxpayers’ money was there to be spent on assets, wages and, frankly, for base political purposes

To those in the know, it was a matter of when he went rather than if but the Dan Andrews departure still ends in an earthquake.

It will change the course of Victorian affairs in the short, medium and long term and gives the state Coalition an enormous opportunity to rebuild its stocks.

The assumed replacement, deputy premier Jacinta Allan, will have a terrible task trying to manage the fiscal fallout if she is handed the chalice.

After bungling the Commonwealth Games bid, Victorians were given rare insight into how not to run efficient government, an issue that raised its head during the pandemic response.

From start to finish, the bid was catastrophic.

It also showed in sharp relief, the role of his anticipated replacement.

Allan was charged with delivering the games and did a terrible job. Not even the Victorian Liberal Party could miss this political opportunity.

Allan was also at the heart of virtually every facet of the so-called big build, which is a series of major projects across Victoria that have suffered enormous blowouts.

Allan must decide what sort of government she wants to run and whether she wants to keep roaring down the debt road. Assuming she gets the big job.

More broadly, it will take months to unpack the impact that Andrews had on the national debate, for better and for worse.

He poured a lot of concrete and the zeal with which he pursued some policies was copied around the country, just as the campaigning techniques will be during the next decade.

Euthanasia, which started in Victoria under Andrews, spread like a fire around the country. It is arguably the most significant social reform for generations.

He favoured unions that could help him and oversaw an administration that was relentlessly accused of lacking integrity. For all the mud thrown at him, nothing terminal landed in Andrews’ lap.

Perhaps his luckiest turn of fate was the political incompetence of the Liberal Party; he leaves with the Victorian Liberal Party on its knees.

It will be hard for the right to rebuild but, ironically, Andrews’ passing will provide opposition leader John Pesutto with the clearest run possible.

A new, compromised Labor leader with a whole lot of Andrews baggage.

It can’t be that hard.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/dan-andrews-was-reviled-by-the-right-but-voters-kept-backing-him/news-story/94e896768b966ff0175d5013349d1136

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611589

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19606805

Uluru statement a ‘symbolic declaration of war’, says Warren Mundine

James Massola and Paul Sakkal - September 26, 2023

1/2

The Uluru Statement from the Heart, which first proposed a Voice to parliament, is a symbolic declaration of war against modern Australia, according to leading No campaigner Nyunggai Warren Mundine.

In a firebrand speech to the National Press Club on Tuesday, less than three weeks before Australians will vote in a historic referendum, Mundine claimed the Yes campaign is built on a “litany of lies”, as he disputed the claim that 80 per cent of Australia’s first people back the Voice proposal and that Indigenous Australians aren’t listened to by policymakers.

Uluru Dialogue co-chair Megan Davis hit back at Mundine’s characterisation of the document, released in 2017.

“The Uluru Statement from the Heart was an expression of peace and love to the Australian people, it is about belonging and unifying the nation and I find it really repugnant the notion it could be associated at all with the language of the declaration of war,” she told the ABC.

In his speech, Mundine described the Voice as “a political ploy to grab power, not just from the Australian nation but also from traditional owners themselves,” and argued it is “another lie” that “Indigenous representative body would give good advice and would change Indigenous lives for the better”.

“If this was true, the gap would already be closed because Indigenous voices have been giving advice to governments for decades. The fact is that Indigenous bodies can give bad advice, like the Coalition of the Peaks who advocated against cashless welfare cards. They don’t have all the answers and they haven’t been able to solve all the problems,” he said.

Head of the Recognise a Better Way campaign and president of the Voice No committee, Mundine is one of the most prominent members of the No campaign but, in a recent interview on the ABC’s Insiders program, surprised many when he backed treaties with Indigenous Australians and a change to the date of Australia Day.

Though he was originally the warm favourite, Mundine subsequently dropped out of the race to fill a casual vacancy for the Liberal Party in the Senate.

Taking a swipe at the Yes campaign, he said the Voice “is not about whether Indigenous Australians are recognised, respected or listened to. And it’s certainly not about how to improve the lives of those Indigenous people who continue to live in poverty, disadvantage and sometimes outright despair”.

Mundine argued that “as Aboriginal people, we have a choice: to continue to feel angry and aggrieved — to be trapped in the past — or to draw a line in history and move on from a clean slate”.

“The Uluru Statement comes from this place of continuing anger. It couldn’t be further from the idea of reconciliation … it sees Indigenous Australians as trapped in victimhood and oppression, not free or able to make their own decisions. It depicts self-determination as an aspiration, not something within reach today. This is a lie.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611594

File: ccb12aa2c44af5b⋯.jpg (3.07 MB,5700x3800,3:2,Nyunggai_Warren_Mundine_du….jpg)

>>19611589

2/2

Despite the fact Australia is on track to meet just four of the 19 closing the gap targets, and Indigenous Australians die eight years younger, on average, than other Australians, Mundine argued that “most Indigenous Australians are doing fine. They go to school, go to work, run businesses, take care of their families and they are not in prison. They don’t need a special Indigenous Voice”.

He said the biggest lie of all from the Yes campaign is that he and colleagues in the No camp including Coalition senators Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Kerrynne Liddle don’t want things to improve for Indigenous people and have no ideas of how to help Indigenous people.

He argued there are four critical areas that need to be addressed: accountability for the billions already spent on Indigenous communities; ensuring Indigenous kids go to school; increasing economic participation and social change to end violence and abuse in communities.

Mundine denied Australia’s international standing would be harmed by a No result, saying he sat on the board of international mining companies and Americans and Europeans “couldn’t give a crap” about the referendum outcome.

“They don’t really care about Australia,” he said. “Look at some of the countries we do business with and how they treat their own citizens. We’re still doing business with them.”

He also declined to condemn a comedian at a conservative conference hosted by Mundine who joked about “violent black men”, and refused to censure Kerry White, a committee member of Recognise a Better Way, who recently said the Stolen Generations was a myth.

Mundine’s speech comes less than two weeks since Price told the National Press Club that colonisation has been good for Indigenous Australians, a claim refuted by Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney, the Central Land Council and most published research, including a 2022 report by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, which found “colonisation has had a devastating impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and culture”.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/uluru-statement-a-symbolic-declaration-of-war-says-warren-mundine-20230926-p5e7na.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOHxIf2TY6o

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611675

File: 192bc10581c1d80⋯.jpg (249.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Chinese_President_Xi_Jinpi….jpg)

>>19601965

>>19601978

Beijing-Timor ties signal critical moment in our region’s security

PETER JENNINGS - SEPTEMBER 26, 2023

1/2

There was a touch of Fidel Castro in Manasseh Sogavare’s speech at the UN last week.

In a collarless Mao suit the Solomon Islands Prime Minister Sogavare delivered an ardent tirade against the “toxic mix of geopolitical power politics” afflicting the Pacific.

Barring one mention with a half-dozen other countries supporting the forthcoming Pacific Games, Australia (the Solomons’ largest aid donor and ultimate security guarantor) was ignored.

China was lavishly praised for delivering a model of “South-South co-operation” that was “less restrictive, more responsive and aligned to our national needs”.

Japan was hammered for plans to release water from the Fukushima reactor into the Pacific.

Cuba was thanked for providing medical training and the US urged to end the “unjust embargo” on Havana. Bizarrely, the US was condemned for fighting the Battle of Guadalcanal, “a war not of our making” – that’s the fight along with the Battle of the Coral Sea that saved Australia and the Solomons in World War II. Sogavare then refused to attend a Pacific summit with US President Joe Biden. That takes some chutzpah. The US reopened its embassy in the Solomons only last February and is lining up to be a donor.

The most worrying Sogavare line was a veiled reference to AUKUS.

“We remain concerned on the development of military nuclear investment in the Pacific region and its potential to trigger a nuclear arms race and its implications for our nuclear-free status,” he said.

That is, of course, breathtaking nonsense. Compare the Australian plan for eight nuclear-powered submarines arriving some time in the 2040s with China’s massive expansion of nuclear weapons to more than 1000 warheads, the Pentagon estimates, by the end of the 2020s.

Note also that China’s interest in the Solomons has become more intense since AUKUS was announced. A People’s Republic of China military presence in the Solomons would horribly complicate Australia’s defence planning and threaten the activities of a new east coast submarine base location.

From Beijing’s perspective Sogavare’s speech and snubbing of Biden was pitch perfect. He’s their man in Honiara. If anything, “Soga” is becoming more emboldened. This makes the outcome of the Solomon Islands election – delayed by Sogavare to April next year – of critical interest. Solomons politics is volatile and a change of government is always possible. Few in the Pacific region would be sad to see the firebrand leave office.

While Sogavare was in New York, East Timor Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao was in the Chinese city of Hangzhou meeting President Xi Jinping. A “comprehensive strategic partnership” was signed to “increase mutual support and strengthen international co-operation”.

The Chinese Communist Party’s English-language newspaper, Global Times, wrote on Sunday that the Timor agreement and Solomon Islands co-operation reflect “a clear choice by regional countries to engage in mutually beneficial co-operation with China and is a model of South-South co-operation”.

East Timor’s engagement is not driven by Sogavare’s ideological zeal. Dili is focused on spreading its geopolitical bets and knows Indonesia – which dominates Timor’s economy – will be wary of moves to get closer to China.

That’s cold comfort. The reality is that East Timor forms part of the northern archipelagic arc through which any military threat to Australia will come. We have a profound interest in ensuring that our near neighbours, such as the Solomons and East Timor, do not fall into China’s strategic orbit.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611680

File: 3497c4ac59211b7⋯.jpg (149.55 KB,1200x800,3:2,Manasseh_Sogavare.jpg)

>>19611675

2/2

The Albanese government’s Defence Strategic Review calls for more diplomatic effort, more “statecraft”, more defence engagement with Pacific and Southeast Asian partners, more military effort in northern Australia and “making it harder for countries to be coerced against their interests”.

These are laudable aims, but on the face of it nothing has changed since the arrival of a more regionally focused Albanese government. The key policy question to ask is: how do you stop neighbours that actively want closer engagement with China? Sogavare is not being coerced by Beijing. He is doing precisely what he wants to do.

There are no easy solutions, but here I suggest four steps the Albanese government should take. Be warned: they are expensive and will not be welcomed in Beijing.

First, the government should stop being coy with the Australian people about the nature of the threat. The DSR talks about a “lack of transparency or reassurance” in China’s military build-up. In fact, China’s strategic actions couldn’t be clearer or more obvious.

We should stop pretending to be uncertain about the source of strategic risk. The answer is China. The government shirks from saying so because of its desire to put bilateral trade back on track.

Second, we should copy the NATO approach of using intelligence to expose bad behaviour. This did a lot to expose Russian malfeasance in the lead-up to the 2021 invasion of Ukraine and to strengthen European unity to help Kyiv.

We should not hesitate to publicly identify behaviours of the Sogavare government that run contrary to the interests of the Solomons’ people. More hard-nosed expressions of the national interest and fewer mawkish references to the “Pacific family” might help our neighbours to realise that Australia is serious about security.

Third, Anthony Albanese should inject some strategic substance into his planned visit to Beijing by making it clear to Xi that we will expose and vigorously resist China’s attempts to weaken Australia’s position with our neighbours If Canada’s Justin Trudeau can shirt-front Xi on China’s electoral interference in Canada, Albanese should do the same on China’s actions in the Pacific. That will make for a tough conversation, but that’s far better than just repeating empty slogans about how we will “co-operate where we can, disagree where we must and always act in the national interest”.

The Solomons is surely a case where Albanese in Beijing should “disagree where we must”. If not now, Prime Minister, when?

The toughest call for Australia is to realise that leading on security in our near region cannot be delivered with defence spending at 2 per cent of gross domestic product. Our spending on diplomacy is a fraction of that. Australia chronically underspends on national security because of decades of free riding on the US. To build our own military presence in the region and to give our neighbours confidence that we are a dependable and strong partner we need to lift defence spending to at least 3 per cent of GDP.

The dirty secret of Australia’s political bipartisanship on defence is that its just a political axis of cheapness, big talk and free riding. Beijing knows that, so does Sogavare, and so do we.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/beijingtimor-ties-signal-critical-moment-in-our-regions-security/news-story/ccb0c7866266b59ace2ed686a8479e56

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611687

File: 85817a456d9bc6f⋯.jpg (755.37 KB,2405x1603,2405:1603,Taiwan_s_President_Tsai_In….jpg)

Taiwan lobbies Australian lawmakers on supporting its bid for Pacific trade pact

Ben Blanchard - September 26, 2023

TAIPEI, Sept 26 (Reuters) - Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen on Tuesday called on Australia to support its bid to join a pan-Pacific free trade pact during a meeting with a group of visiting Australian lawmakers.

Taiwan and China both applied in 2021 to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), but China says it opposes adding Taiwan, which it claims as its own territory.

The CPTPP is a landmark trade pact agreed upon in 2018 by 11 countries including Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam. Britain was accepted as a member this year.

Tsai, meeting a cross-party delegation at the presidential office in Taipei, noted that Australia was Taiwan's largest energy supplier and a major source of agricultural goods.

"We look forward to the continued strengthening of economic and trade cooperation between Taiwan and Australia," Tsai said in comments released by her office. "We also hope that the Australian government and parliament will support Taiwan's accession to the CPTPP to jointly promote economic growth and sustainable development of the Indo-Pacific region."

Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell has said "every country has to agree to the accession of a new country" and CPTPP members were discussing how to consider new applications.

Australia, like most countries, has no formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan.

Tsai said Australia has continued to play an important role in maintaining peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region, and has emphasised the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.

"In this regard, I would like to express my sincere gratitude," she added. "Protecting the free and open Indo-Pacific region is the common goal of Taiwan and Australia."

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/taiwan-lobbies-australian-lawmakers-supporting-its-bid-pacific-trade-pact-2023-09-26/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611699

File: 099b17f1221b8d1⋯.jpg (331.2 KB,1440x960,3:2,In_this_photo_released_by_….jpg)

File: 98fe30259c94e75⋯.jpg (331.93 KB,1440x960,3:2,In_this_photo_released_by_….jpg)

>>19611687

On a visit to Taiwan, Australian lawmakers call for warmer relations with self-ruled island

apnews.com - September 26, 2023

TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — On a visit to Taiwan, a delegation of six Australian lawmakers called Tuesday for warmer relations with the self-ruled island increasingly threatened by Beijing.

The visit comes as Australia has been working at recalibrating its relationship with China, which had been tense in the past few years over disputes on the origin of COVID-19. China in response had imposed tariff barriers on several Australian exports, such as barley.

Paul Fletcher, a lawmaker with Australia’s Liberal Party, lauded the fact that the lawmaker delegation crossed party lines.

“The two major parties in Australia are both represented and we are here to further the warm relationship between Australia and Taiwan,” Fletcher said.

They also discussed strengthening economic cooperation with Taiwan, particularly in clean energy, and expressed an interest in Taiwan’s semi-conductor industry.

China claims Taiwan as part of its territory.

Taiwan, with a population of 23 million compared to China’s 1.4 billion, has never been part of the People’s Republic of China and while increasingly isolated diplomatically and threatened militarily by Beijing, has maintained an international presence separate from the mainland.

At the same time, Australia has been working to expand its security partnerships in the region with an eye on China’s presence, which has grown in the past few decades.

Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen said she was grateful for Australia’s role in regional security, citing its new partnership with the United States and the United Kingdom called AUKUS and the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue.

“In recent years, Australia has continued to play an important role in upholding peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific,” she said. “It has also used major international gatherings to emphasize the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and support Taiwan’s international participation. For this, I want to express sincere gratitude.”

https://apnews.com/article/australia-taiwan-visit-lawmakers-2a9b7a4430c49ec091986abb0cb2f83b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611723

File: 5480f0f4ad1d857⋯.jpg (250.14 KB,1767x994,1767:994,Northern_Territory_crocodi….jpg)

File: bce385d8e0ab650⋯.jpg (137.05 KB,768x768,1:1,Britton_pleaded_guilty_the….jpg)

File: e685a27c76bbd18⋯.jpg (339.92 KB,1360x2092,340:523,Britton_will_be_sentenced_….jpg)

Prominent Zoologist guilty of 60 bestiality, animal abuse and possessing child exploitation material charges

A judge was forced to excuse essential workers from a courtroom as it heard details of the sadistic torture, sexual exploitation and killing of at least 39 dogs.

news.com.au - September 26, 2023

Warning: Graphic content

A renowned zoologist has pleaded guilty to dozens of sickening charges including animal cruelty, bestiality and possession of child exploitation material.

Darwin crocodile expert Adam Robert Corden Britton, 52, was unmasked as the serial animal abuser in the Northern Territory Supreme Court on Monday.

His name had previously been suppressed from the public due to the depravity of his crimes, which threatened his right to a fair trial, the NT News reported.

Britton pleaded guilty to 60 charges, including the torture, rape, and killing of at least 39 dogs.

The court heard he referred to the animals as “f*ck toys”, raped puppies and operated a nightmarish “torture room” on his property in McMinns Lagoon, half an hour outside Darwin.

Chief Justice Michael Grant excused Sheriff’s officers and permitted security guards to wait outside the courtroom, sparing them from hearing the full details of the heinous crimes.

“The facts contain material describing acts that can only be described as grotesque perversity and cruelty, which are both confronting and distressing and which, in my assessment, have the potential to cause nervous shock,” Justice Grant said.

Britton held a PhD in zoology and held the position of Senior Research Associate at Charles Darwin University.

He was also co-chief of a successful crocodilian research and consulting business, Big Gecko, where he kept saltwater crocodiles as pets on his property.

The NT News reported Crown prosecutor Marty Aust revealed in court that Britton had a sadistic sexual interest in animals, particularly dogs, dating back to at least 2014 when he began engaging in sexual activities with his Swiss-Sheppard dogs, Ursa and Bolt.

Between November 17, 2020, and April 22, 2022, Britton obtained 42 dogs of various breeds and ages, most of which he tortured and sexually exploited for his sadistic pleasure, ultimately killing them.

Mr Aust told the court Britton scoured Gumtree for dogs and puppies listed for sale in the Darwin area, building rapport with unsuspecting owners, many of whom had to give up their pets due to travel or work commitments.

In one chilling instance, Britton met with the owners of a large brown dog named “Wolfe” to ensure the dog would be well cared for, the court heard.

Prosecutors told the court he even sent them a picture of Wolfe appearing relaxed and happy in his new home, all while concealing that the dog had already suffered unspeakable cruelty at his hands.

Additionally, the court heard that Britton used Telegram’s encrypted messaging service to share videos of his despicable acts through accounts named “Monster” and “Cerberus.”

He engaged in discussions with other users about bestiality, animal abuse, the acquisition of dogs, and methods for disposing of their bodies.

A search of Britton’s laptop uncovered 15 files of child abuse material he had sourced online, including content involving toddlers being subjected to horrifying acts.

Britton pleaded guilty to 37 counts of animal cruelty causing serious harm or death, 10 counts of raping or attempting to rape dogs, four counts of possessing or transmitting child abuse material, animal cruelty, breaching duty of care to his own dogs Bolt and Ursa, and using a carriage service in an offensive manner, the NT News reports.

He has been remanded in custody and will return to court for sentencing later.

https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/animals/prominent-zoologist-guilty-of-60-bestiality-animal-abuse-and-possessing-child-exploitation-material-charges/news-story/bde8efd81c5263ac84707844bd51beec

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611731

File: a8f8822b3aa86b4⋯.jpg (247.54 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Adam_Britton_pleaded_guilt….jpg)

File: aa40f5964c45282⋯.jpg (88.93 KB,1024x768,4:3,Adam_Robert_Corden_Britton….jpg)

>>19611723

Zoologist Adam Britton guilty of 60 bestiality, animal abuse and possessing child exploitation material

WARNING: DISTRESSING CONTENT. A Darwin zoologist preyed on the trust of pet owners before sadistically torturing, sexually exploiting and killing at least 39 dogs.

Fia Walsh - September 25, 2023

A well-known zoologist who sadistically tortured, sexually exploited and killed pet dogs before telling their former owners they were “settling in well” has pleaded guilty to 60 beastiality, animal cruelty, and possessing child exploitation material charges.

Adam Robert Corden Britton’s name had previously been suppressed from the public due to the details of his crimes being so depraved they threatened his right to a fair trial.

At the Supreme Court on Monday the 52-year-old admitted to killing at least 39 dogs which he called “f-ck toys”, raping puppies, running a “torture room” on his McMinns Lagoon property, and advising others in “zoo-sadism”.

In a rare move, Chief Justice Michael Grant excused the Sheriff’s officers and told security guards they could wait outside the courtroom rather than having to listen to details of the crimes – most of which are too horrific to be published.

“The facts contain material describing acts that can only be described as grotesque perversity and cruelty which are both confronting and distressing and which in my assessment have the potential to cause nervous shock,” Justice Grant said.

Britton holds a PhD in zoology and worked as a Senior Research Associate at Charles Darwin University.

The former Brit was also co-chief of a successful Top End crocodilian research and consulting business Big Gecko, keeping saltwater crocodiles as pets on his property half an hour from Darwin.

Crown prosecutor Marty Aust told the court Britton had a sadistic sexual interest in animals – in particular dogs – dating back to at least 2014 when he began engaging in sexual activities with his two Swiss-Sheppard’s Ursa and Bolt.

Between November 17, 2020, and April 22, 2022, he sourced 42 dogs of varying breeds and ages which he later tortured and sexually exploited for sadistic sexual pleasure, killing most of them, the court heard.

Mr Aust said Britton set up alerts on Gumtree for when a new dog or puppy was listed for sale in the Darwin area, building rapport with owners, “many of whom had to reluctantly give their pets away due to travel or work commitments”.

In one case, the owners of a large brown dog “Wolfe” met with Britton twice to “ensure he would be a suitable person who would properly care for Wolfe”.

Britton sent the owners a picture he had previously taken of the dog, with a message saying “Wolfe was relaxed and eating well and enjoying her new home”.

“Unbeknownst to the previous owners the dogs had already been sexually exploited, tortured and killed,” Mr Aust said.

The court heard Britton used the encrypted messaging service Telegram to share videos of his offending through two accounts titled Monster and Cerberus.

He also chatted with other users about bestiality, animal abuse, how to source dogs, and how to dispose of their bodies.

“Owner is looking for a good ‘forever home’ for their beloved pooch, make sure you offer them one … telling them you want a new family member after your old dog died from cancer last year hardly ever fails,” Britton posted in the Monster account.

A search of Britton’s laptop also found 15 child abuse material files he had sourced online, including toddlers being forced to engage depraved acts.

Britton pleaded guilty to 37 counts of animal cruelty causing serious harm or death, 10 counts of raping or attempting to rape a dog, four counts of possessing or transmitting child abuse material, animal cruelty, breaching duty of care to Bolt and Ursa, and using a carriage service in an offensive way.

He was remanded in custody and will return to court for sentencing at a later date.

https://www.ntnews.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-nt/zoologist-adam-britton-guilty-of-60-bestiality-animal-abuse-and-possessing-child-exploitation-material/news-story/25c6abfda25edae7700059c0a61520b0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611751

File: fe8d166e8f666fa⋯.jpg (313.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Bestiality_allegations_to_….jpg)

>>19611723

Bestiality allegations so ‘abhorrent’ as to prejudice right to fair trial, judge rules

Territory judge refuses request to release details of more than 200 charges police have described as ‘the depravity is deeply disturbing’.

Jason Walls - August 13, 2022

THE details of allegations against a man facing more than 200 charges, including bestiality and animal cruelty, are so “abhorrent” they could prejudice his right to a fair trial if publicised, a judge has ruled.

The 51-year-old Rural Area man has been on remand in Holtze Prison since he was arrested and charged over “a significant number of videos depicting animal cruelty and bestiality” in April.

At the time, detective acting Senior Sergeant Jon Beer said if members of the public had come across the videos, “they would be revolted”.

“It is incomprehensible that an individual could imagine such acts let alone carry them out,” he said.

“The depravity is deeply disturbing.”

The man’s identity is suppressed from publication under NT law and his lawyers subsequently applied for an order also banning the media from publishing any further details of the allegations, on the basis that it would “offend against public decency”.

On Thursday, Chief Judge Elizabeth Morris rejected an application by the NT News to have that order lifted, saying her ruling was less about “protecting the public” than “protecting the rights of the defendant, because the allegations are abhorrent”.

“It’s a little difficult to accept from the defendant an argument about public decency given the allegations contained in the matter,” she said.

“(But) if public decency is offended there could be a consequence in relation to a fair trial because the community at large has a body of information about which they are so horrified that anybody who might come before them as a jury charged with those offences, they’re going to be falling over themselves to find him or her guilty.”

The man’s barrister, Mary Chalmers SC, had argued that allowing the allegations to be aired in public would “turn this thing into an absolute circus, impacting upon things as basic as (trial) preparation”.

“This matter has already been reported internationally, I believe, and that’s without any details, really, at all,” she said.

“What we’re dealing with here is a question of the administration of justice, not whether the defendant is being a bit rich by asking for this compared to what he’s alleged to have done — noting of course that these are all only allegations at this stage.”

Prosecutor Marty Aust said while the Crown took no position on the application, “it might well be that your honour errs on the side of caution” until the matter was resolved.

Mr Aust said much of the case against the man was “almost overwhelming” and there would likely be “some form of negotiated resolution”.

“Until that happens, there’s a risk that the administration of justice may fail if material becomes known such as to take away any right of this man to get a fair trial,” he said.

“We want to prosecute (him), we want to successfully prosecute him and at an appropriate time, all of the material should be made available with respect to, if it gets to that point, what pleas were entered, what the evidence was in support of those, and why the sentence was what it was.”

The man returns to court on October 12.

https://www.ntnews.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-nt/bestiality-allegations-so-abhorrent-as-to-prejudice-right-to-fair-trial-judge-rules/news-story/f4ecbf811811ee25effa7e974516574d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611774

File: 5401d2a528b0724⋯.jpg (237.58 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Animal_welfare_inspectors_….jpg)

>>19611723

Alleged bestiality details so depraved as to ‘offend public decency’, court rules

The details of a Darwin man’s alleged bestiality and animal cruelty are so depraved they would ‘offend against public decency’ if published, a court has ruled.

Jason Walls - April 27, 2022

UPDATE 4.30PM: THE details of a Darwin man’s alleged bestiality and animal cruelty are so depraved they would “offend against public decency” if published, a court has ruled.

The 51-year-old faced the Darwin Local Court on Tuesday where his barrister, Mary Chalmers SC, applied for any details of the alleged offending to be suppressed from publication.

Ms Chalmers said statements made by police and already reported in the media supported the contention that the details would “offend against public decency” if released.

“I don’t think it’s controversial that we tick that box on the application,” she said.

“The first and principle rule is that judicial hearings should take place in open court, publicly and in open view, with no restrictions on reporting, which is a fundamental precept of our criminal justice system,” she said.

“However, there are occasions where that principle must yield to the paramount duty of the court to (ensure) that justice is done.

“Your honour, this appears to be one of those cases.”

Ms Chalmers said the “main details” of the alleged offending were already public so she was not seeking “a complete stifling of any reporting of the matter”.

“Also, the opinion of a long serving NT Police officer about perhaps the level, and what he’s said, your honour may assess as having been accurate,” she said.

“It doesn’t appear to be an exaggeration, for example.”

Prosecutor Caitlin Searle said while “of their very nature, cruelty to animal charges are often confronting”, the prosecution did not oppose the order for the time being.

In adjourning the case until June 22, judge Alan Woodcock said he was satisfied that the publication of the evidence was likely to offend against public decency and it was in the interest of the administration of justice to grant the order.

EARLIER: A RURAL area man charged with bestiality and aggravated animal cruelty will face court for the first time on Tuesday afternoon, following a raid on a property last week.

The man, aged in his 50s, who cannot be named under NT law due to the nature of the charges, was due to appear in the Darwin Local Court on Tuesday morning where his lawyer, Julie Franz, successfully applied for an adjournment.

In a statement released on Saturday, a spokesman for the NT Joint Anti-Child Exploitation Team said officers had been tipped off to the man’s alleged activities after a video depicting animal cruelty “surfaced on the internet”.

During the raid, further material, including “a significant number of videos depicting animal cruelty and bestiality” were also allegedly recovered on computers, mobile phones, hard drives and digital cameras.

At the time, detective acting Senior Sergeant Jon Beer said the contents of the videos was allegedly “abhorrent”.

“If members of the public came across this material they would be revolted,” he said.

“It is incomprehensible that an individual could imagine such acts let alone carry them out. The depravity is deeply disturbing.”

Under the bestiality provision of the Criminal Code, any person found guilty of engaging in vaginal or anal intercourse with an animal is liable to imprisonment for up to three years.

The NT Sexual Offences Act prohibits the publication of the identity of alleged sex offenders “before the defendant is committed for trial or sentence”.

The case returns to court at 2pm.

https://www.ntnews.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-nt/top-end-bestiality-case-lands-in-court-for-the-first-time/news-story/6ddc7956d8e6bc123304c4de7ca2039b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611836

File: 574410edee1bb1a⋯.mp4 (4.92 MB,640x360,16:9,Home_video_of_man_who_plea….mp4)

File: 95cb46bb008c56b⋯.jpg (183.76 KB,634x845,634:845,Britton_an_academic_at_Cha….jpg)

File: 1c87e5c1699d5be⋯.jpg (75.21 KB,634x515,634:515,In_2016_Britton_uploaded_a….jpg)

File: ea4991dab9f34b9⋯.jpg (88.44 KB,634x360,317:180,The_court_heard_Britton_st….jpg)

File: ae5afee9c7f931d⋯.jpg (113.18 KB,634x425,634:425,Adam_Britton_centre_with_h….jpg)

>>19611723

Married British zoologist - who worked for BBC alongside his wife and David Attenborough - admits raping and torturing dozens of dogs at his animal shelter in case that has shocked Australia

RACHAEL BUNYAN - 26 September 2023

1/2

A British crocodile expert has pleaded guilty to raping puppies and torturing more than 40 dogs - including his own pets Ursa and Bolt - at his Australian animal shelter after luring pet owners to give him custody of their beloved canines.

Adam Britton, 51, who grew up in West Yorkshire before moving to Australia, began his offending in 2014 and tortured and sexually exploited more than 42 dogs he had called 'f*ck toys' until his arrest in April 2022.

Britton, an academic at Charles Darwin University in northern Australia who once hosted legendary broadcaster David Attenborough at his home, tortured 39 of those dogs to death in a horrific case of animal cruelty that has shocked the nation.

The married zoologist had sexually abused his own Swiss Shepherd pets, Ursa and Bolt, for almost a decade before he eventually expanded to Gumtree Australia to source more dogs to torture and kill at his sprawling rural estate at McMinns Lagoon on the northern tip of Australia.

Britton would even film himself torturing the defenceless animals in what he called his 'torture room' - a shipping container fitted with recording equipment - until most of them died before posting the sick material online, the court heard.

Britton, a leading zoologist who has worked with the BBC and National Geographic on productions, stood calmly as he pleaded guilty to 56 counts of animal cruelty at the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory yesterday.

He also pleaded guilty to four counts of accessing and transmitting child abuse material. Britton will be sentenced at a later date.

The details of Britton's crimes are so horrific and 'grotesque' that Chief Justice Michael Grant urged the public and security staff to leave the courtroom before the prosecutors outlined the facts of the case in a rare move.

'These facts contain material that can only be described as grotesque and perverse acts of cruelty which is confronting and distressing and which in my assessment have the potential to cause nervous shock,' he said. Much of the details surrounding Britton's offending are also too gruesome to be published.

Prosecutors told the court how Britton, who hosted Attenborough while the broadcaster filmed part of the BBC's Life in Cold Blood docuseries at his property, has a 'sadistic sexual interest' in animals and in particular dogs since at least 2014.

Britton's wife Erin, a wildlife ranger who met Prince Harry and helped him catch a saltwater crocodile, was unaware of her husband's disturbing fantasies and has since reportedly changed her surname.

Britton not only tortured and sexually abused his own pets Ursa and Bolt, who he created an Instagram page for, but also dogs from pet owners he had lured into his trap through the online marketplace platform Gumtree Australia.

Britton would use Gumtree Australia to target pet owners across the Darwin region who were often reluctantly giving their pets away due to work or travel commitments, the court heard.

Britton, who set up alerts on the site for when a new dog or puppy was listed for sale in the area, would build a 'rapport' with the unsuspecting dog owners in order to negotiate taking custody of their dogs, prosecutor Marty Aust said.

If the pet owners reached out and asked Britton for updates on their old pets, he would spin a 'false narrative' to say they were healthy and send them old photos.

In one scenario, Britton sent a message to the owners of a large brown dog to reassure them the animal was 'settling in well'.

'Wolfe was relaxed and eating well and enjoying her new home,' the message wrote.

But unbeknownst to the previous owners the dog had already been 'sexually exploited, tortured and killed,' Mr Aust said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19611840

File: 59679f1151c7b04⋯.jpg (114.3 KB,634x634,1:1,The_married_zoologist_had_….jpg)

File: 1d2ea1296ed3dbc⋯.jpg (120.79 KB,634x404,317:202,Britton_not_only_tortured_….jpg)

File: af5b124839d32b4⋯.jpg (86.58 KB,634x460,317:230,Britton_s_wife_Erin_left_a….jpg)

File: 6821246280f8b99⋯.jpg (125 KB,634x1054,317:527,Britton_a_leading_zoologis….jpg)

File: 8baab495c5a13d3⋯.jpg (143.59 KB,634x951,2:3,Britton_who_grew_up_in_Wes….jpg)

>>19611836

2/2

Britton, who grew up in West Yorkshire in the UK before moving to Australia 20 years ago, would share videos and images of himself sexually exploiting the dogs on Telegram under accounts titled 'Monster' and 'Cerberus' - named after Dante's three-headed dog in Greek mythology who guarded the gates to hell.

Prosecutors told the court on Monday he used one Telegram account to engage with 'like-minded people', and another which was used to disseminate images and recordings of the abuse.

'Using these applications, the offender discussed his 'kill count',' prosecutor Marty Aust said.

In a message read to the court, Britton spoke about his urges to a stranger on Telegram: 'I had repressed it. In the last few years I let it out again, and now I can't stop. I don't want to.'

His account had 114 threads where he described how he acquired the pets, how he abused them and how he disposed of their bodies.

Britton boasted that he would tell pet owners on Gumtree Australia that his old dog had died of cancer and he wanted a 'new family member' - and that the tactic hardly ever failed.

'Owner is looking for a good 'forever home' for their beloved pooch, make sure you offer them one … telling them you want a new family member after your old dog died from cancer last year hardly ever fails,' Britton posted in the Monster Telegram account.

A video was eventually sent to the Northern Territory Animal Welfare Branch and passed on to police who arrested Britton in April 2022. At the time, police seized 44 items including computers, mobile telephones, cameras, external hard drives, tools, weapons, sex toys and dog paraphernalia.

Britton was charged last year, but his name was suppressed by the courts to ensure media attention would not bias a jury against him.

The order was lifted after his pleaded guilty on Monday. He has been remanded in custody since then.

Britton was a prominent crocodile expert in northern Australia and a senior researcher at Charles Darwin University. None of his offending is alleged to have been against the reptiles.

He is set to return to court on December 13 for sentencing submissions.

It was only two years ago that he was an esteemed researcher at Charles Darwin University who attracted international recognition for his work as a crocodile conservationist with his wife and business partner, Erin.

There is no suggestion whatsoever that Erin, a biologist and wildlife ranger who has assisted in a range of projects on sea turtles and counting crocodiles, knew anything about her husband's crimes or obsessions, and she appears to have dropped his surname.

The National Geographic website suggests she will be on international wildlife expeditions for the next six months, and there is no mention in her bio of her husband and former business partner.

Britton grew up in England and received his Ph.D. in Zoology at the University of Bristol before moving to Australia after 1996 to pursue his fascination with crocodiles.

He met his future wife and they set up a consultancy company, Big Gecko, which sold footage of crocodiles to television and film directors. They worked with natural history shows with the BBC and National Geographic.

Their saltwater crocodile, Smaug, became something of a celebrity in his field and appeared in two horror films.

Britton was a shameless self-promoter and would often update his social media profiles with photos of his crocodiles, property, and media clippings.

While he managed to hide his sick fantasies, one of the more disturbing posts on his public Facebook page was a post celebrating his Swiss Shepherd Bolt's first birthday in 2016.

The post included a photo of Bolt as a puppy in 2015. According to the court on Monday, Britton started sexually abusing his own dogs in 2014.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12560879/British-crocodile-expert-Adam-Britton-51-pleads-guilty-raping-puppies-torturing-dogs-Australian-animal-shelter-luring-pet-owners-Gumtree.html

>EVIL KNOWS NO BOUNDS.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19617030

File: 017adf1d8890d57⋯.jpg (994.3 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Noel_Pearson_addresses_the….jpg)

File: 4216b11f459b7b7⋯.jpg (1.54 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Mr_Pearson_says_the_refere….jpg)

>>19606805

Leading Yes campaigner for Voice to Parliament Noel Pearson makes impassioned Press Club plea

Georgia Roberts - 27 September 2023

1/2

Leading Yes campaigner and Indigenous academic Noel Pearson has made an impassioned speech to the National Press Club, pleading for Australians to support the Voice to Parliament in a show of "unity".

On October 14 the country will head to the polls to vote on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament — a referendum Mr Pearson described as "the largest mirror we will ever look into as a nation".

"[Twenty-four million] people will look into the mirror on October 14 and see ourselves like we never have before," he told the Press Club.

Mr Pearson said the love of country should be why Australians vote Yes to the constitutional amendment.

"I say today — it is the love of country that is our driving motivation for the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Australian constitution," Mr Pearson said.

"I've come to see — it is the love of our country that joins us all as Australians.

"I said it's not the same as patriotism, because there's nothing political about this love of country."

Mr Pearson looked to the future in his speech, hoping First Nations Australians and the rest of the population would get to know one another better than they do now.

"Our children and great-grandchildren will be more likely to share affection between them than us because too many of us have grown up strangers."

Mr Pearson took the time to reassure Australians that he believed the referendum would be legally sound.

"Law can assure us… This referendum will uphold the constitution and recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders as the first peoples of Australia," he told the Press Club.

Mr Pearson called for voters to rely on empathy, highlighting the disproportionately low population of First Nations people in Australia and the likelihood of some not knowing anyone who is Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander.

"Friendship can increase empathy… we are 3 per cent. And you, 97 per cent," he said.

"It's understandable we mostly don't know each other as friends — if we shared meals, we could rely on the empathy of friendship.

"It's just — we are so few, and you so many. Australians mostly do not know our cultures, our languages, the things that make us the same as you.

"Empathy is so important but only love can move us now."

Heart disease kills in Pearson's hometown

Mr Pearson raised that rheumatic heart disease kills two Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people a week.

"Rheumatic heart disease is a scourge. A disease largely eradicated in the rest of the world, but allowed to fester in the paradisal of Cape York and the remote communities of Australia.

"Young children, teenagers, and young adults in their 20s and 30s. They drop dead down the creek, on the football field, sleeping in their beds at night."

Mr Pearson also referred to the cultural differences between Australia and New Zealand and how both countries had treated their First Nations people.

"We are not yet like our New Zealand friends who have brought the cultures of the Maori and the pakeha together."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19617031

File: 9e6a67eca188736⋯.jpg (1.34 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Mr_Pearson_says_a_love_of_….jpg)

>>19617030

2/2

'They're going to set off bombs': Pearson on No campaign

On Tuesday, leading No campaigner Nyunggai Warren Mundine labelled the Uluru Statement from the Heart "a symbolic declaration of war" in his Press Club address.

Mr Mundine also took aim at Australia's largest airline Qantas along with other private entities that had thrown their support behind the Voice.

On Wednesday when asked about the messaging being spread by the No campaign, he said it was "creating controversies beyond the actual thing we're dealing with".

"They're going to set off bombs over here. They're going to set off another bomb over here," he said of the No camp.

"They're going to talk about war over here, anything to distract from the simple words of the alteration that we're voting on.

"That's tactical. That is what they've chosen to do and they want to take our mind off the truth of the words that we're voting on."

Mr Pearson was asked about the misinformation that had been generated during the Voice debate, he described it as "nonsense", referring to instances of High Court decisions reached in the mutual interest of Australians.

"I would say to the undecided voters who are hearing the nonsense… referred to — not one square inch of land was lost because of Mabo," he said.

"Not one square inch of land was lost because of Wik.

"All of these scare campaigns that have looped around and revisited this referendum campaign are just saying the things that never happened. Nobody lost any land."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-27/noel-pearson-addresses-national-press-club/102905566

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19617036

File: 9e78c4f7b4f1095⋯.jpg (140.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_founder_of_th….jpg)

File: a7397c9e9337b9e⋯.jpg (270.68 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_delegation_of_community_….jpg)

>>19606805

>>19617030

Noel Pearson says Indigenous voice to parliament referendum is test of Australia’s democracy

ROSIE LEWIS - SEPTEMBER 27, 2023

Prominent Yes campaigner Noel Pearson has declared the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum will be a test of Australia’s democracy and a No vote will ensure cultural wars – including a debate on whether Aboriginal people are worthwhile – will continue indefinitely.

In a speech to the National Press Club titled “for the love of country”, the Cape York leader conceded supporters of a voice were filled with hope and terror about the outcome on October 14 but said “out of naivety or faith” Indigenous people wanted to ask Australians if they “supported a better future”.

“This really is a test of whether our democracy can sustain a discourse for good,” Mr Pearson said in a sometimes emotional appeal to voters.

“Can we do good things in our democracy by talking to one another in a situation with bots, robo calls and the sheer filth on the sewers of the internet come into play? Can we still do good things in the democracy through putting our case to other citizens in our country and appealing to their intelligence and their hearts?”

Mr Pearson, who in early 2021 called for draft legislation to be released before the referendum to show what the voice entailed, lashed what he described as a “false debate about details” that had conflated the detail of the constitutional amendment and the detail of subsequent legislation.

He said politicians demanding detail should “go to the bathroom and look themselves in the mirror and find out who’s responsible” for developing the voice, a day after Peter Dutton warned the country would end up with an advisory body “skewed toward a Labor-Greens view”.

In comments rejected by the Coalition, Mr Pearson said he could not see a scenario where the question of constitutional recognition would arise again, claiming a second referendum had been killed off by opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and the Nationals.

Nationals leader David Littleproud said the Coalition’s commitment to constitutional recognition through a “proper process” was clear and had been reaffirmed by Senator Price this week.

Senator Price said Mr Pearson’s speech was “all hat and no cattle like the entire Yes campaign”, and when the rhetoric was stripped away it was about division.

“He talks about a nation that is ‘us’ and ‘them’, but that’s not the country most Australians live in. A nation that would be forever ‘us’ and ‘them’ in its Constitution cannot be unified, no matter what Noel Pearson says,” she said.

“The idea that a constitutionally enshrined voice would ‘complete Australia’ is rhetorical nonsense and incomprehensible to the vast majority of Australians who want practical solutions to addressing Indigenous disadvantage.”

Hoping Australians’ “humble temperament and quiet capacity for greatness” would result in a Yes vote, Mr Pearson said the No campaign wanted the status quo to remain and not to move the country forward.

“The status quo is really one of cultural war,” he said.

“They want us to fight about these things forever. About history, about colonisation, about whether Aboriginal people are worthwhile, or whether they should abandon everything about themselves and become white. All of these are distractions.

“But they’re kind of fodder for a cultural war. And it serves their political interests to engage in cultural war. We don’t want that. We want to put cultural war behind us.”

Mr Pearson was joined in Canberra by community leaders from Cape York, the Kimberley and northeast Arnhem Land who said being able to talk directly to parliament and executive government through a voice would mean their problems were heard.

“In the Kimberleys, in our remote communities we’re still living in the dark ages,” Kimberley Land Council cultural adviser Jane Bieundurry said.

“I come from a community, I still drink dirty water. But we need a voice so that our voice from down there can go straight to parliament. I’m a mother who had a suicide victim. I never have no help. I need a voice from there to help me.”

Mr Pearson said Australians’ love of country was the largest motive for voting Yes and a successful referendum would “orientate the relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians down a safe and responsible middle path”.

“Voting Yes is a rejection of confected war. Voting Yes crosses the bridge on the pathway to peace,” he said.

“Voting No leaves us suspended in the neverland that exists when two peoples love the same homeland, but have not yet learned to love each other.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/noel-pearson-says-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum-is-test-of-australias-democracy/news-story/5b095e0961f775908437bf58838c8cbd

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19617051

File: b55872e0dbe3cf3⋯.jpg (411.54 KB,1948x1096,487:274,The_Claremont_showgrounds_….jpg)

>>19606805

Stand delivers as Liberals’ opposition to Indigenous voice to parliament pays off

PAUL GARVEY - SEPTEMBER 27, 2023

There has been no sadder place in the world these past few years than the Liberal Party stand at the Perth Royal Show.

Perched opposite the Police Pavilion and just a few metres down from the Agriculture Hall of Fame, the pop-up tent has long been a forlorn sight at the annual show as the party suffered through humiliating state and federal election defeats.

This year, however, the MPs, staffers and volunteers manning the stand have noticed a distinct change in mood. More and more people have approached the stand this week – grabbing the Liberal-branded show bags stuffed with notebooks, fridge magnets and a mini Australian flag – than have done so for years.

Amid petting the farm animals, watching the woodchopping competitions and perusing overpriced show bags, punters from across the Perth metropolitan area have taken time to stop in and engage with the party.

“It’s fair to say that the level of engagement and the number of people voluntarily coming up and wanting to talk with us is vastly different to 12 months ago,” says one Liberal staffer who has been manning the stand.

The key difference, they say, is the voice.

This year, in addition to the Liberal Party bunting, the stand features corflutes and posters urging punters to vote No “to the voice of division”.

The Liberal Party experience in WA in recent years has been far scarier than any Ghost Train or rollercoaster over at the show’s Sideshow Alley. The humiliation of being reduced to just two lower house seats in the historic 2021 state election rout was followed last year by a wipeout of its federal seats, with the party retaining only one of its seats in the Perth metropolitan area.

But numerous polls have consistently shown support for the voice in WA is among the lowest anywhere in the country, pointing towards a rare and much-needed political win for the Liberals in the west.

Liberal senator Michaelia Cash has been one of the opposition’s loudest voices on the referendum. She told The Australian the “overwhelming feedback” from the Royal Show tent was praise for the party’s stance on the referendum.

“I’ve spent a lot of time talking directly with Western Australians about the referendum and it is clear to me that they want the best for Indigenous Australians, but many have failed to be convinced the voice is the best way to go about it,” she said.

“They don’t trust the Prime Minister because of the lack of detail about the voice. They tell me they don’t want to put something permanently in our Constitution when they are not being told the details of how it will operate.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19617053

File: 8b17c17c16f6987⋯.jpg (499.33 KB,1536x2048,3:4,Liberal_MP_Ian_Goodenough_….jpg)

>>19617051

2/2

The Claremont showgrounds, where the Royal Show is held every September school holidays, sits smack bang in the middle of the blue-chip western suburbs electorate of Curtin.

The seat recorded the highest yes vote of any WA electorate during the gay marriage plebiscite and elected teal candidate Kate Chaney at last year’s federal election, but according to recent polling from the No campaign is on track to reject the voice by ­almost two to one.

There is also hope among the Liberals that their opposition to the voice can help open the door to voters in mortgage-belt seats such as Burt and Brand.

Not all in the party are so encouraged by the inroads made on the voice. Moderates who believe the party erred both morally and politically in choosing to oppose the referendum believe the anecdotal increase in support on the ground in the west is a false dawn.

They say the party has simply attracted the fringe types who have previously been drawn to One Nation or Clive Palmer’s United Australia Party – voters who can make a lot of noise but who typically don’t stick – while further alienating the moderate middle who have gravitated to Labor in recent elections.

They say it is telling that, even as support for the voice has fallen, Mr Dutton’s popularity hasn’t improved and only a little bit of skin has been taken off Albanese’s polling figures.

While the referendum’s defeat would be most meaningful for the party’s federal MPs, it could also have implications at a state level.

The looming failure of the referendum in WA has the fingerprints of Premier Roger Cook all over it, due to the short-lived Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act that was introduced and then swiftly repealed amid a widespread public backlash.

Mr Cook has been actively campaigning for the voice in the lead-up to October 14. He has done so without any support from his predecessor Mark McGowan, who has studiously avoided lending any of his still-considerable clout in WA to the Yes campaign.

But one source close to WA Labor says the damage to Mr Cook from a failed referendum will be minimal.

“When you see it fail in every other state in the country, you can’t blame Roger for that,” he said. “And the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act wasn’t Roger’s fault either, he inherited both the legislation and the regulation – he was just the guy left holding the turd at the end of it.”

While the pain felt by the Liberals in WA in recent years could encourage a tendency to grasp at anything resembling a victory, many in the party are mindful not to read too much into a successful No vote.

The referendum result won’t be fatal to the party, and nor will it be a panacea. Instead, those running the WA Liberals believe it could be a helpful marker on the party’s long journey back.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/stand-delivers-as-liberals-opposition-to-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-pays-off/news-story/116f8caf544b9c78b30de4be3e0068d7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19617085

File: 0710a567f522c19⋯.mp4 (15.03 MB,640x360,16:9,Jacinta_Allan_to_replace_D….mp4)

>>19611567

‘Honour and privilege’: Jacinta Allan will become Victoria’s next premier

Kieran Rooney - September 27, 2023

Jacinta Allan is set to become Victoria’s next premier after a messy morning of party-room negotiations finally resulted in a deal that will install Public Transport Minister Ben Carroll as deputy.

After a bruising 24 hours, a deal was struck between Labor caucus members on Wednesday afternoon that will ensure no other candidate challenges Allan for the leadership.

In return, Labor’s Right faction secured Carroll as its candidate for deputy premier despite a push from Allan’s Socialist Left faction to control both roles.

The move has prevented an all-out war within Victorian Labor that would have resulted in party members being asked to vote on who should be the next leader.

“As a much younger woman from regional Victoria I never expected to have this length of service,” Allan, who was first elected to parliament in 1999, said after the caucus meeting.

“I’ve had the honour and privilege of serving the Victorian community in various ministerial roles under premiers. Strong, decisive premiers [like] Steve Bracks, John Brumby and, more recently, Daniel Andrews.

“And then, in turn, to have the support – unanimous support – today from my parliamentary colleagues, is indeed also a deep privilege, and one that I pledge to continue to work incredibly hard as I have done each and every day.”

Allan got emotional as she talked about becoming just the second woman to lead the state, after former premier Joan Kirner.

“I also hope it says to young women, older women, women from across different backgrounds … that leadership takes on different shapes and sizes,” she said.

“Women have a role, have a place [as] leaders in our community. Whether it’s in politics, running local community groups, being a small business person, running big corporations, running a farm, women have a place to be recognised as leaders in all of these roles across our community.”

Carroll nominated as leader earlier on Wednesday after the Left tried to push its candidates and leave the Right without the senior role. The deal was struck after nearly three hours of negotiations.

“Jacinta has always lived and breathed regional Victoria and has done so much for the level-crossing removal program right across our state and rebuilding the transport infrastructure,” Carroll said.

“I can’t wait to roll up the sleeves and get on and support this new leadership team.”

Allan promised to announce a new-look cabinet within coming days, but she said wanted Treasurer Tim Pallas to stay on in his role. The long-serving treasurer had nominated to be her deputy before the peace deal was reached with the factions.

Opposition Leader John Pesutto said the new premier had avoided talking about the big issue facing her government and Victorians.

“The new premier and her new deputy studiously avoided the biggest issue facing our state: debt, which is an enormous burden,” he said.

“Not one word about how our new premier will address mounting debt, taxes that are making Victoria the least attractive place to invest, rising interest costs on our debt. If the premier wants to be really different in terms of the budget, she could open up the books so we can see the true state of our finances.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/jacinta-allan-will-become-victoria-s-next-premier-20230927-p5e7wl.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19617086

File: 975cef01fb24de4⋯.jpg (400.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Taiwan_President_Tsai_Ing_….jpg)

>>19611687

Beijing warns Albanese over ‘provocative behaviour’ of Australian MPs in Taiwan

WILL GLASGOW - SEPTEMBER 27, 2023

1/2

Beijing has warned Anthony Albanese that the “provocative behaviour” of a bipartisan delegation of Australian politicians visiting Taiwan could stall negotiations over China’s crippling tariff on wine from Australia.

Communist Party mouthpiece the Global Times said the Australian delegation – which is being jointly led by Labor MP Josh Wilson and Liberal MP Paul Fletcher – risked upsetting a “critical juncture” in Australia-China relations ahead of Prime Minister Albanese’s planned trip to Beijing.

“The provocative behaviour of [the] Australian lawmakers is a test for Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese,” the party-state masthead editorialised.

“By playing the Taiwan card, these MPs aim to create troubles in bilateral relations, seek international attention and gain political capital.”

The warning was issued hours after the group of eight Australian politicians met with Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen late on Tuesday, part of a series of meetings with senior economic, foreign ministry and security officials in Taipei during the four-day trip.

Canberra continues to be extremely cautious about its relations with Taiwan, which have been unofficial ever since Australia switched diplomatic recognition to Beijing in 1972.

However, there have been modest changes during the Albanese government. Canberra recently posted a “director of strategic affairs” to its unofficial embassy in Taipei to increase engagement with Taiwan’s defence ministry and other Taiwanese security agencies.

And, in a change from previous delegations of federal politicians, the present Australian delegation allowed Taiwanese officials to release photos of their meeting with President Tsai.

The new approach, which is standard among other similar countries with “One China” policies, was a departure from previous “invisible” Australian delegations and was welcomed by Taiwanese officials.

“Australia values its deep and productive unofficial relationship with Taiwan, focused on trade and investment, cultural and people to people ties,” said a spokeswoman for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

“There has been no change to Australia’s longstanding bipartisan one-China policy position.”

Taiwan is Australia’s fifth-largest trading partner and fourth-largest export market, following booming trade in LNG, coal and iron ore.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19617089

File: 87ebea5bb790bfe⋯.jpg (468.34 KB,825x818,825:818,TIW_1.jpg)

File: 2cc4cf07657dc61⋯.jpg (518.48 KB,825x1142,825:1142,PF_1.jpg)

>>19617086

2/2

Mr Wilson, the senior Labor representative on the trip, told President Tsai the trade relationship could grow further “in areas like the global clean energy transition, critical minerals, education, and tourism.”

The West Australian Labor MP, a member of the parliamentary joint committee on intelligence and security, acknowledged the worsening strategic environment.

“Madame President, there is no doubt that the people of Australia and Taiwan have a shared interest in a region that is peaceful, stable, environmentally sustainable, and prosperous – and together we support an open and inclusive Indo-Pacific based on respectful and collaborative participation in the rules-based order,” he said.

“Australia is committed to working with all our Indo-Pacific partners on that basis, because in our judgement it is both sensible and the right thing to do, and because it’s the only approach that will succeed in addressing challenges that must be shared, like climate change.”

President Tsai’s second term ends in 2024, ending an eight-year period in office that has overlapped with increasingly assertive behaviour by China’s People’s Liberation Army under Xi Jinping’s leadership.

She thanked Australia for repeatedly underlining the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and supporting Taiwan’s international participation.

She also asked for Canberra’s support for Taipei’s bid to join the CPTPP trade agreement, saying it would contribute to “economic growth and sustainable development throughout the Indo-Pacific region.”

Beijing is also pressing Canberra to support its own bid to join the CPTPP trade pact, even as it haggles over its ongoing black-listing of Australian wine and live lobster.

Qin Sheng, executive research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said the Australian delegation could stall progress over the wine dispute.

“China is unlikely to discuss this issue with Australia against the backdrop of [the] Australian MPs’ Taiwan visit,“ Qin told the Global Times.

Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Centre of East China Normal University, said the Australian Prime Minister should discipline the visiting delegation, which includes five Labor members.

“If Albanese truly wants to mend ties with China, he should oppose, condemn and then rein in the rogue behavior of MPs visiting Taiwan,” Chen said.

Mr Albanese led an Australian parliamentary delegation to Taiwan in 2018.

The current delegation includes Labor MPs Graham Perrett, David Smith and Daniel Mulino, Labor senator Catryna Bilyk, along with Liberal senator Matt O’Sullivan and Liberal MP Claire Chandler, the Opposition’s assistant foreign affairs spokeswoman.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/beijing-warns-albanese-over-provocative-behaviour-of-australian-mps-in-taiwan/news-story/3e4899b87b2009623088b250815b0988

https://twitter.com/iingwen/status/1706561739104583819

https://twitter.com/PaulFletcherMP/status/1706890667585307033

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19617095

File: e27585e0619b3d7⋯.jpg (70.99 KB,800x480,5:3,The_Sydney_Opera_House_in_….jpg)

>>19611687

>>19617086

MPs’ Taiwan visit brings embarrassment, test to Australian government

Global Times - Sep 26, 2023

A cross-party delegation of six Australian lawmakers started their four-day visit to the island of Taiwan on Monday. At this critical juncture when China and Australia are endeavoring to improve their strained ties, the provocative behavior of Australian lawmakers is a test for Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

Looking back over the past three years, China-Australia relations have transitioned from a frozen winter to a warm spring, although each step has come with its ups and downs. China and Australia held a high-level dialogue earlier this month. The Australian government has recommenced the visa process for Chinese group travelers. China has dropped anti-dumping tariffs on Australian barley imports. Albanese will also reportedly pay a visit to China later this year. These series of positive signals are a result of the bottoming out of bilateral relations after being damaged by the previous Morrison government.

Currently, the mutual trust between the two countries is still somewhat fragile, and the thawing of relations without trust can hardly be sustained. If China and Australia join hands, the improvement of ties is foreseeable, but if one side intentionally obstructs the process, it may add hurdles to this process.

By playing the Taiwan card, these MPs aim to create troubles in bilateral relations, seek international attention and gain political capital.

Qin Sheng, executive research fellow at the Center for Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times that Taiwan could only get a rubber cheque from these MPs. Although Taiwan said that the visit demonstrates Australia's support for the island as well as its contribution to peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region, this rhetoric does not change anything.

"The Taiwan visit will only bring embarrassment to the Albanese government, because it could disrupt its configuration of China policy. Since Albanese took office, his China policy has been somewhat consistent without many twists and turns. But there are still unresolved issues between China and Australia, such as the wine dispute. China is unlikely to discuss this issue with Australia against the backdrop of Australian MPs' Taiwan visit," said Qin.

Qin added that this shows that Albanese's China policy could be jeopardized by party politics to some extent. This makes it hard for Albanese to make a stance toward this matter - he does not want to displease these politicians in his country, but he does not want their behavior to impede the positive trend of China-Australia relations either said Qin.

Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Centre of East China Normal University, believes that the visit to Taiwan by these MPs can easily be considered the official behavior of the Australian government by the outside world, which deserves vigilance of the Albanese government.

"If Albanese truly wants to mend ties with China, he should oppose, condemn and then rein in the rogue behavior of MPs visiting Taiwan," Chen told the Global Times.

Any country that engages with China knows that the Taiwan question is about China's sovereignty and territorial integrity and the first red line that must not be crossed. On the Taiwan question, Australia once followed the US closely to provoke China. In 2021, then Australian defense minister said it would be "inconceivable" for Australia not to join the US should Washington take action to defend Taiwan, and Home Affairs Department Secretary Mike Pezzullo warned drums of war are beating. Australia had stepped into the strategic pathology of "sacrificing its own interests in exchange for the interests of the US." With Washington's playbook in hand, Canberra often thought of its China policy on behalf of Washington, but it turned out that Australia's national interests do not equal those of the US. The more dedicated and loyal Canberra is, the more it will be placed at the position of a stepping stone. In matters that concern China's core interests and Australia's future, the Australian government has no room for mistakes.

"Australia must firmly reject being instrumentalized or even weaponized by the US," said Chen, adding that Albanese and his team should continue with their rational China policy.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202309/1298969.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19617118

File: 8f43fc73f516c99⋯.jpg (83.57 KB,1222x687,1222:687,Peter_Renshaw_did_not_demo….jpg)

File: b7ddb4d968989b5⋯.jpg (1.75 MB,5000x3541,5000:3541,The_commission_found_Dr_Re….jpg)

File: 07fde30272d7514⋯.jpg (1.35 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,A_photo_of_Zoe_Duncan_is_h….jpg)

File: cf612e5f2b96da2⋯.jpg (277.32 KB,836x879,836:879,Sexual_assault_help_and_su….jpg)

>>19459101 (pb)

Child abuse inquiry scathing of Peter Renshaw over mishandling of allegations at Launceston General Hospital

Jano Gibson - 26 September 2023

1/2

Tasmania's child abuse inquiry has delivered scathing findings against the former head of medical services at the Launceston General Hospital over his handling of allegations against a notorious paedophile nurse and other medical personnel.

The commission of inquiry's final report into the Tasmanian government's responses to child sexual abuse was tabled in parliament on Tuesday.

The commission has made 75 findings and 191 recommendations designed to protect young people from abuse.

While most of the findings relate to institutions, it made five specific findings against Peter Renshaw, including misconduct.

"Dr Renshaw's omissions and fabrications amount to misleading our Commission of Inquiry," it stated.

"We do not make this finding lightly.

"Misleading a Commission of Inquiry undermines public trust and confidence in the process. Such an act by a senior state servant is unethical and unprofessional and brings the State Service into disrepute."

The commission described Dr Renshaw as an "unhelpful witness" who was "defensive and pedantic" during his appearance before the commission.

"Each of the concessions he made, once confronted by the evidence, had to be extracted from him during hearings," it stated.

"We consider that Dr Renshaw failed to accept responsibility for his failures.

"He did not demonstrate even a modicum of self-reflection during our hearings."

The commission said this "frustrated" victim-survivors and their families, who were seeking acknowledgement, reflection and apologies.

Failure to comply with mandatory reporting obligations, inquiry finds

One of the findings against Dr Renshaw related to a failure to comply with the hospital's protocol for the reporting and management of suspected child abuse.

This related to allegations made by 11-year-old Zoe Duncan in 2001 in relation to a doctor, who the commission has referred to by the pseudonym "Dr Tim".

The initial allegations were that Dr Tim had given Zoe a hug, kissed her hand, and said that she was a pretty girl and that if she was older he would marry her.

But despite being informed of the allegations, the commission said Dr Renshaw did not follow the protocols in place at the time.

"We consider that Dr Renshaw's failure to comply with the protocol — by failing to immediately alert the paediatric registrar of Zoe's allegations, his failure to discuss reporting to Child Safety Services with a senior colleague, and his subsequent interview of Zoe — may have contributed to delaying Zoe's disclosure of more serious allegations against Dr Tim, including that he had raped her."

The commission found Dr Renshaw's failure to comply with mandatory reporting obligations in a timely manner also "had an adverse impact on later investigations".

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19617121

File: 37ea4dd958b880a⋯.mp4 (12.41 MB,640x360,16:9,Abuse_survivors_react_to_t….mp4)

>>19617118

2/2

Renshaw 'misled' superiors, inquiry finds

It also found Dr Renshaw misled the hospital's CEO and Health Department secretary about information he had received from police relating to allegations against former nurse James Geoffrey Griffin.

Griffin, who committed suicide in 2019, had worked on the hospital's children's ward for 18 years before he was charged with child sexual abuse offences.

"We find that Dr Renshaw misled [the chief executive and secretary] by failing to convey information fully and accurately to them about the police briefing on 31 July 2019," the commission stated.

"Dr Renshaw's initial briefing, which position Mr Griffin's offending as occurring entirely outside the hospital setting, set the tone for subsequent briefings to the secretary."

The commission said Dr Renshaw also should have "escalated and acted" on separate allegations against Griffin when he was advised on them later that year.

"Dr Renshaw had a responsibility to tell the department and the hospital executive … that there had been a significant failure of systems and processes at the hospital resulting in a paedophile continuing to work in a paediatric ward for several more years," it said.

It also found he misled the department's secretary about Griffin, including in a minute sent in November 2019 that failed to note the nurse's long employment record at the hospital as well as an "extensive complaints history".

"We consider the wording of what was included, combined with what was excluded, to have been calculated to give the impression to the secretary that the hospital was not implicated in Mr Griffin's conduct," the commission stated.

The ABC has approached Dr Renshaw for a response.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-26/tas-commission-of-inquiry-peter-renshaw-lgh-abuse-allegations/102899264

https://www.commissionofinquiry.tas.gov.au/home

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19623862

File: c0c46d5e50e8e24⋯.jpg (375.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Julia_Gillard_at_the_Yes_c….jpg)

File: d9166fdd3c33eb0⋯.jpg (250.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_drag_queen_performs_the_….jpg)

File: b7b45ad74650957⋯.mp4 (9.43 MB,404x720,101:180,Julia_Gillard_launches_UK_….mp4)

>>19606805

‘Vote for best voice’: Julia Gillard launches UK Yes campaign

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - SEPTEMBER 28, 2023

Former Australian prime minister Julia Gillard has told a London audience of how the family stories of indigenous people are imbued with “trauma and exclusion,” and accused the country of failing to listen to the voice of “those who can make the biggest difference.”

Launching the Yes campaign for the indigenous voice to parliament referendum in Britain’s capital early this morning (AEST), Ms Gillard urged a yes vote because: “What the voice will ensure is that we always hear, that we always have, the best, best voice telling us what needs to be done by our nation next.”

Ms Gillard who celebrates her 62nd birthday later this week said a female indigenous counterpart born in the same year would have been at real risk of being part of the Stolen Generation, taken from her family for no reason with documents showing it was for no reason other than “being aboriginal”.

She said if the woman wasn’t taken from her family, then she would know of people who were.

“Intergenerational trauma is a real thing, families learn, families grow generation by generation”, she said.

She pointed out that when the woman was born 62 years ago, it would be another six years before the referendum was passed allowing her to be counted in the census and more than 30 years before the landmark Native Title.

Ms Gillard said: “She would have had to lived all the way to 2007 to hear the word “apology” from Prime Minister Kevin Rudd,’’ noting that “all of these things impacted upon her life in a major way, and we know that just living her everyday life she would face racism and exclusion”.

Ms Gillard added that these individual instances of racism and exclusion added up over time to cause ongoing psychological distress.

Ms Gillard said that there had been some progress with more children accessing early education and less First Nations young people in detention and more Australian land subject to Native Title.

But she warned: “Progress is slower than we aimed for and in some the gap is getting bigger” in relation to the rates of incarceration and the care of children.

She said: “Why do we fail to meet the targets that we collectively as a nation have set ourselves to change? I think that there is one explanation and that is because we haven’t heard the voice of those who can truly make the biggest difference’’.

She said a voice to parliament would mean “together we can sail on a journey that leads to a far more inclusive and reconciled future’’.

Australia House in the Strand is the largest overseas polling booth, with as many as 160,000 eligible voters, mostly expats living in the United Kingdom able to cast their ballot here. The campaign launch, included the appearance of a drag queen singing a rousing rendition of John Farnham’s anthem song “The Voice”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/vote-for-best-voice-julia-gillard-launches-uk-yes-campaign/news-story/e0d05be1d7240b0d5aae79ee07eaa6b6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19623889

File: feacd775f722124⋯.jpg (2.33 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Former_prime_minister_Juli….jpg)

File: 44fca07fef31846⋯.jpg (307.21 KB,825x1189,825:1189,LMB_1.jpg)

File: 1501c7c4b321ceb⋯.mp4 (10.18 MB,480x848,30:53,PlJzsAEh7k8Va1JW.mp4)

>>19606805

>>19623862

Australian expats at world’s largest AEC voting booth urged to vote Yes

Rob Harris - September 28, 2023

London: Former prime minister Julia Gillard has urged a large contingent of expat Australians to make their vote count at next month’s referendum, saying an Indigenous Voice to Parliament enshrined in the constitution would ensure future generations listen to those who have suffered from a century of policies imposed on them.

Gillard, who made a point of mentioning her 62nd birthday this week, told a crowd of around 150 Australians gathered for the Yes23 campaign launch in London, that an Aboriginal woman born in 1961 had been largely failed by governments of all stripes and had likely suffered “generational trauma”.

The UK-based Gillard joined youth advocate Yasmin Poole, Irish social rights campaigner Tiernan Brady and a drag queen called Karla Bear, who sang John Farnham’s anthemic hit You’re The Voice in Camden ahead of early voting in the UK capital beginning next week.

More than 15,000 people – both Australian citizens living in the UK and holidaymakers – are expected to vote at the High Commission in London, making the booth the largest run by the Australian Electoral Commission anywhere in the world.

Gillard, the chair of mental health advocacy group Beyond Blue since 2017, said an Indigenous woman born in the same year as her would have been at risk of being part of the Stolen Generations.

“Taken away from her family for no reason,” she said. “And if later in life she even managed to dig up the documents about why she was taken away from her family, what she was quite likely to have found is the words ‘for being Aboriginal’.”

“And even if she hadn’t been removed from her family, it’s quite likely that across her extended family, there were people who had that experience and intergenerational trauma.”

She said that woman would not have been counted in the census until she was six and would have waited more than 30 years before the landmark Native Title.

“She would have had to live all the way to 2007 to hear the word “apology” from then-prime minister Kevin Rudd,” noting that “all of these things impacted upon her life in a major way, and we know that just living her everyday life she would face racism and exclusion”.

Gillard said institutionalised racism and exclusion had compounded for many over time to cause ongoing psychological distress. But she said positive progress had been made with more children accessing early education and fewer Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in detention.

Voters in the referendum will be asked a question about recognising Indigenous people in the country’s constitution, in what Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called a “once in a generation chance” to improve the lives of the country’s Aboriginal population. It requires the majority of Australians and the majority of states to vote in favour of the change, which includes the establishment of a Voice to parliament, an advisory body on Indigenous affairs.

Gillard said if Australians truly wanted to solve the problems faced by First Nations communities, then the people who lived those problems daily must be able to tell policymakers what should be done, away from election cycles or at only politically convenient times.

"What the Voice will ensure is that we always hear that we all used to have the best experts telling us what needs to be done by our nation next," she said.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/julia-gillard-makes-voice-plea-to-australians-in-the-uk-20230928-p5e87r.html

https://twitter.com/latikambourke/status/1707130802448806137

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19623899

File: 91f0d69cdf69953⋯.jpg (136.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Nyunggai_Warren_Mundine_AO….jpg)

File: 08c50d5f73d94cc⋯.jpg (393.64 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_crowd_at_Come_Together….jpg)

>>19606805

>>19611589

The Voice changes Australian law and risks reparations

ROBERT GOTTLIEBSEN - SEPTEMBER 28, 2023

1/2

Former ALP president later turned Liberal, Nyunggai Warren Mundine, has declared the Uluru Statement from the Heart a declaration of war against modern Australia.

Immediately other Indigenous Australians disagreed. But this week I was privileged to receive a detailed legal opinion on the implications of the Uluru statement for modern Australia from Terence Cole, KC, one of Australia’s best known jurists having been a judge on the NSW Supreme Court and presiding over a number of royal commissions.

Many KCs in Australia are reluctant to comment publicly on the Voice referendum because they fear they would lose their government jobs. Cole is now retired so can speak frankly. Cole does not endorse Mundine’s war prediction but warns Australians about the future reparations they may face and the fundamental changes that implementation of the Uluru statement would bring to the Australia’s legal system.

He concludes: “The potential for great and irremediable harm to Australian society means that The Voice should never be incorporated in the constitution.”

Cole points out that some Indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders want much more than recognition. They want the constitution changed to incorporate their Uluru claimed rights so that in the future, those Uluru rights cannot be abolished.

And already three demands of the Uluru statement have accepted entirely by our Prime Minister – the Voice body, a Makarrata commission and “truth telling about our history”.

But Cole says Uluru also claims Aboriginal “ownership of the soil … of sovereignty based on prior occupation”, and asserts that such sovereignty has never been ceded or extinguished and co-exists with the sovereignty of the crown.

Cole concludes that when asked to vote to amend the constitution to incorporate the Voice, Australians need to understand that some will use it to support the demands for recognition of coexisting sovereignty, a Makarrata commission designed to produce a treaty, monetary compensation for past events, and a rewriting of Australian history.

Cole might not attach Mundine’s description of Uluru as a “declaration of war” but he shows how the proposed changes to property rights will create deep divisions among the population.

Cole explains that the Uluru statement appears to be a claim that there presently exists an unextinguished and unlimited claim of ownership of the soil concurrently with the well recognised sovereignty of the Commonwealth Australia over Australian territory.

Under existing Australian law, ownership of soil and land and water is determined not by Indigenous spiritual notions but by the statutes of the Commonwealth states and territories.

It seems the Voice will seek to change this basic structure of our governance and society.

The Uluru statement claims for reconciliation, a Makarrata commission and a treaty are based solely on race differential. They split Australians into two racial groups on a permanent basis. The first race comprises those identifying as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders and the second the remaining 97 per cent of Australians.

Makarrata is an Indigenous concept of coming together after conflict and to date it has played no part in modern Australian law, politics, life or security. The Voice seeks to change that.

Cole points out that the 97 per cent of Australian non-Indigenous citizens, all born here since federation or arriving here as migrants and acquiring citizenship, are not in conflict with Aborigines or Torres Strait Islanders.

However, it is assumed by some Indigenous and Torres Strait Islander interests that because of their disposition, the injury or harm done to them and the destruction of their then primitive way of life by the infusion of different cultures, there needs to be a reconciliation between Australia and its present citizens and Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders.

The Makarrata commission is to work on a final settlement and reconciliation between indigenous and other Australians by addressing history, culture, empowering Indigenous people to take responsibility for their communities, creating commercial opportunities for Indigenous peoples and concluding agreements between government and indigenous peoples.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19623902

File: 86e8ebd82393b55⋯.jpg (304.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Elders_from_Central_Austra….jpg)

>>19623899

2/2

Coles points out that many people believe these objectives are desirable but it is not clear what any of them have to do with some supposed dispute between Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders and the remaining 97 per cent of Australians.

Then he concludes with these chilling words: “Perhaps the answer is found in the 5th objective of concluding agreements with governments no doubt with significant monetary consequence.”

I add that if those “monetary consequences” are significant it may indeed be a “war declaration”.

Cole says in the process involved a Makarrata inquiry looks backwards and trawls over events, legislation, policies and administrative actions of the last 225 years, seeking to discover areas of discontent in the minds of presently living Aborigines about events, many in the distant past, and no doubt judging situations of the past by the attitudes of the day.

To achieve this and more, Aboriginal interests want a Voice enshrined in the constitution. It is the tool which will enable achievement of the Aborigines’ objectives. but it is difficult to contemplate a “process more designed to cause descent and disunity within the Australian community”.

Finally in considering the Voice proposal the central question is whether we wish to consider Australia in the future as one people with each having the same rights, obligations and privileges, or do we wish to consider Australia as a number of siloed groups with one or more groups having a different status with different rights and privileges.

If it be the latter, then future unity within our society is improbable.

Whatever may have occurred in the past, in 2023 all Australians live in a democracy. Central to that concept is that each person has one vote. Each person is free to join such association as he or she wishes and each person is free either individually or through some association to make representations or advocate for such policies as they regarded desirable. All Australians, including Aborigines and Torres Strait Islander at present have this right.

Cole concludes that it is not clear why either race or length of forebears occupation should constitute grounds for confirming an additional right to have a further Voice to the parliament or government.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/the-voice-changes-australian-law-and-risks-reparations/news-story/c149a678c926393fd9a5a82286bd2812

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19623907

File: e7d8433ad130863⋯.jpg (531.89 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Dusty_Bogan_and_Gerry_Smit….jpg)

>>19606805

Albanese government says far-right influencers are infiltrating the campaign against an Indigenous voice to parliament

ROSIE LEWIS - SEPTEMBER 28, 2023

Senior government minister Murray Watt has accused far-right influencers of “appearing to hijack the No campaign”, as Fair Australia dismisses Yes camp warnings Warren Mundine was “encouraging violence” through a controversial tweet.

Both sides of the voice referendum debate have accused each other of violence and abuse, with a clash between Yes and No supporters outside a No campaign event in Brisbane on Wednesday night the latest confrontation on the campaign trail.

A member of the local chapter of the Proud Boys Ben Shand, known as the Dusty Bogan, was at the event headlined by Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Mr Mundine.

Government sources said this appeared to be part of a larger pattern of infiltration of the Proud Boys in the official No campaign, with Mr Shand asking his followers to “jump on the bandwagon boys” and volunteer for Fair Australia.

A government source said polling booths staffed by members of a right-wing group known for political violence could pose a security risk at polling places.

Former Gold Coast Young LNP chair Barclay McGain, who was suspended from the party and then resigned after video emerged of him laughing at a school leaver’s suggestion Australia should stop celebrating Indigenous culture because it “couldn’t even invent the bloody wheel”, was also at Wednesday’s No campaign event, which was attended by an estimated 950 people.

Tom Sewell, a neo-Nazi and self-proclaimed leader of the National Socialist Network, and self-described “white advocate” Joel Davis were at anti-voice rallies on the weekend, which were not organised by the No campaign.

Mr Sewell has been recruiting volunteers while quoting Senator Price warning against dividing the country along the lines of race.

Senator Watt said “some nasty elements” had joined No rallies.

“Now we’re seeing them appearing to hijack the No campaign,” he told The Australian.

“This is really concerning. Peter Dutton has demanded a high standard from yes campaigners in this debate - I expect he holds those same standards for the No campaign. He needs to explain what he’s doing to make sure Liberal and other referendum volunteers aren’t being exposed to these kind of nasty characters. We all have a responsibility to have a positive, respectful debate.”

The Opposition Leader’s spokeswoman noted he’d been on the record numerous times calling for the debate to be civil and respectful and he didn’t control who was invited to events or what people said.

Fair Australia lashed Senator Watt’s attack as “just desperate and divisive nonsense”.

“They (the Yes campaign) should explain why Uluru Dialogue chairman Megan Davis marched beneath a Communist Party of Australia flag at the recent Yes rallies. Or why Yes23 board member Thomas Mayo gave regular briefings to the Search Foundation, which markets itself as a ‘successor organisation of the Communist Party of Australia’,” Fair Australia’s spokesman said.

“Or why Yes23 volunteers are spitting on people and racially abusing Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Nyunggai Warren Mundine?”

Yes23 and the Uluru Dialogue, of which Professor Davis is co-chair, were approached for comment. There was a Communist Party flag behind Professor Davis at a Yes rally but she was not holding it - she was holding a “You’re the voice: vote Yes” poster - or directly beneath it.

The No campaign was accused of “encouraging violence” on Thursday after Mr Mundine said he’d like to see a boxing fight between voice opponent and professional boxer Anthony Mundine and prominent voice supporter Thomas Mayo.

“I want to see that!!!” Mr Mundine tweeted on Wednesday alongside an emoji of a boxing glove and a Daily Mail story with the headline “No supporter Anthony Mundine says he wants to fight Voice architect Thomas Mayo”.

The Uluru Dialogue, which helped create the Uluru Statement, responded: “After encouraging its volunteers to stoke confusion and fear among Australians, the No campaign has now made the abhorrent leap to encouraging violence.

“While Yes leader Noel Pearson spoke yesterday in the National Press Club of uniting Australians in love of country for a more positive future, No leader Warren Mundine publicly endorsed threats of violence against other Yes spokespeople. Could there be a clearer illustration of the choice for Australian people on 14 October?”

A Fair Australia spokesman said it was the Yes campaign “trying to divide Australians with the voice of division”, defending Mr Mundine’s tweet as “lighthearted”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/albanese-government-says-farright-influencers-are-infiltrating-the-campaign-against-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/7a6623f5d1dfb4e35261aecaa0a21a12

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19623918

File: 86c2aa738334b0c⋯.jpg (3.88 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Bob_Menendez_has_pleaded_n….jpg)

File: 06cda2a2b5f9633⋯.jpg (299.47 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Anthony_Albanese_Joe_Biden….jpg)

File: 749240dee0f6498⋯.jpg (1.33 MB,2819x1879,2819:1879,Damian_Williams_a_US_attor….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19601944

Luxury car, gold bars: Australian ally in US Senate won’t step down over bribery charges

Farrah Tomazin - September 28, 2023

Washington: One of the most high-profile AUKUS allies in the US Congress is facing a growing stampede of Democrat colleagues urging him to resign after he pleaded not guilty over an alleged scheme that involved taking bribes in exchange for helping the Egyptian government with military aid.

Days after federal prosecutors revealed the explosive allegations against Senator Bob Menendez, more than half of the Senate’s Democrats are now demanding he step down amid fears the case could undercut their attack against Donald Trump’s criminal charges ahead of next year’s election.

The most damning shift came from party whip Dick Durban, the second-highest ranking Democrat in the chamber, who had initially declined to say Menendez should leave office but changed course on Wednesday (Thursday AEST) saying it was clear his colleague “could no longer serve”.

But despite facing calls from at least 30 of the 51 Democrats in the Senate, Menendez remained defiant as he and his wife, Nadine, pleaded not guilty to a bribery scheme that allegedly involved receiving gold bars, a luxury car and cash.

In return for the gifts, it’s alleged Menendez used his position as chair of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee to help the Egyptian government with weapons and aid. Three businessmen from his home state of New Jersey have also been charged.

Menendez, 69, is a China hawk and one of Congress’ most senior proponents of AUKUS, the military pact in which the United States and Britain will help Australia acquire nuclear-powered submarines.

In a committee hearing in Congress earlier this month, he described the trilateral agreement as “a generational opportunity that will enhance US national security interests by transforming our alliances, deterring aggression from the People’s Republic of China, and fostering a more peaceful and stable Indo-Pacific”.

He also called out Beijing for “aggressively trying to influence Australian politics and civil society, buying critical infrastructure, like port facilities in Darwin, making political donations, even hacking Australian parliament and major political parties”.

“This is a critical moment in which the United States needs to show we are serious about our commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific,” he said.

Menendez and his wife were arraigned in the same US district court in Manhattan where Trump was found liable earlier this year of sexually abusing and defaming New York writer E. Jean Carroll.

According to the indictment, Menendez shared sensitive secret information from the US government with Egypt, including about military aid. He also allegedly pressured a high-ranking US agriculture official to help a halal meat company owned by one of his co-defendants.

Federal agents searched his New Jersey home in June last year and found more than $US480,000 ($752,000) in cash, some stuffed in envelopes and hidden in clothing, gold bars worth more than $US100,000 and other items allegedly paid for by the three businessmen.

However, he has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and said on Monday the cash found by agents was withdrawn from his personal savings account and kept for “emergencies”, as has been his practice for decades.

This is not the first time the senator has faced court: in 2017 he faced trial in a separate federal corruption case connected to claims he accepted private flights, campaign contributions and other bribes from a wealthy patron in exchange for official favours. That jury ended in deadlock and he was ultimately acquitted.

Fellow New Jersey senator Cory Booker was a character witness for him in the previous case, but has since joined the chorus of Democrats urging him to stand down.

Others include former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, senior Democrat Amy Klobuchar, and Philadelphia freshman John Fetterman, who was the first senator to call for Menendez’s resignation.

However, the top Democrat in the Senate, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, has stopped short of doing so – at least for now.

Speaking to reporters at Capitol Hill, Schumer said he had known Menendez for a long time and was “disturbed when I read the indictment” but added: “Tomorrow he will address our caucus and we’ll see what’ll happen after that.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/one-of-australia-s-key-allies-in-us-senate-pleads-faces-calls-to-resign-20230928-p5e861.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19623930

File: 8bdc61b6235ac73⋯.jpg (49.68 KB,768x432,16:9,_Aussie_Cossack_gets_Russi….jpg)

>>19581536

‘Aussie Cossack’ gets Russian citizenship

Activist Simeon Boikov is a wanted man in his home country

rt.com - 27 Sep, 2023

Simeon Boikov, a Sydney-born activist and videoblogger dubbed the ‘Aussie Cossack’ in his country for his unabashedly pro-Moscow stance, has been granted Russian citizenship.

His name was listed in a decree signed by Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, which granted Russian nationality to 41 foreign-born applicants.

Boikov has been drawing the ire of Australian media for years, with critics blasting him as a “propagandist” who is abusing the country’s supposedly relaxed free speech.

In January, Ukrainian ambassador to Canberra Vasily Miroshnichenko accused Boikov of exposing him to “a major telephone harassment campaign” by sharing his private phone number in a YouTube video. The diplomat filed a complaint with the Australian federal police over the incident.

Miroshnichenko was campaigning to ban Russian athletes from the Australian Open tennis championship at the time, and Boikov invited his followers to share their opinions on that to the diplomat.

Later in the same month, the New South Wales Police reported that an arrest warrant had been issued in Boikov’s name, after he failed to show up for a court appointment. The case involved a scuffle between him and a elderly man during a pro-Ukrainian rally at Sydney’s Town Hall in December last year.

He was charged with assault occasioning bodily harm after the incident, with his passport revoked on the eve of a planned flight to Moscow. Boikov took shelter at the Russian consulate in Sydney, claiming to be a victim of persecution and petitioning for Russian citizenship. An Australian magistrate convicted Boikov in absentia in February.

https://www.rt.com/russia/583650-aussie-cossack-russian-citizenship/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19623941

File: 964cba9fcd9a03a⋯.jpg (135.8 KB,1280x720,16:9,Simeon_Boikov.jpg)

File: 27a27260274febf⋯.jpg (382.29 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0001.jpg)

File: 00b386b6ff264ce⋯.jpg (530.08 KB,1244x1757,1244:1757,0002.jpg)

File: 58d075a89d93dc6⋯.jpg (586.42 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0003.jpg)

File: 0e32fc0295f3eb7⋯.jpg (341.9 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0004.jpg)

>>19581536

>>19623930

Aussie Cossack Simeon Boikov ‘honoured by Putin citizenship gift’

BEN PACKHAM - SEPTEMBER 28, 2023

Self-styled “Aussie Cossack” Simeon Boikov says he is “honoured” to have been granted Russian citizenship by Vladimir Putin, and declared his commitment to serving “the motherland”.

Speaking from the Russian consulate in Sydney where he is seeking refuge from NSW police warrants, the pro-Kremlin, anti-voice activist said he did not intend to renounce his Australian citizenship.

Russian law prevents its nationals holding dual citizenship with any country except Turkmenistan and Tajikistan but Mr Boikov said an exception had been made in his case because of his “special services to the Russian Federation”.

He said he was “extremely thankful” to Mr Putin, and renewed his call to be allowed to leave Australia for Moscow in prisoner swap for a Western hostage. “I’m happy to be swapped for anyone. (Journalist Evan) Gershkovich from the Wall Street Journal, for example,” Boikov said.

His name was listed among 41 foreign-born applicants granted Russian citizenship on Wednesday in recognition of their “service to the motherland”.

The Australian-born Mr Boikov, whose father is a Russian orthodox priest, has been holed up in the Russian consulate for 10 months, refusing to hand himself over to police for an alleged assault on a pro-Ukraine protester.

He has been spending his time there organising anti-voice protests, or “world freedom rallies”.

The official No campaign has distanced itself from the pro-Putin activist.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/aussie-cossack-simeon-boikov-honoured-by-putin-citizenship-gift/news-story/efbd65fb84017032f401872d8d0d4c1e

http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202309270007

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19631056

File: 5974c0704e20011⋯.jpg (171.15 KB,1736x977,1736:977,Clive_Palmer_says_said_his….jpg)

>>19606805

Indigenous voice to parliament: Clive Palmer pays out $2m to say No

GEOFF CHAMBERS - SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

1/2

Clive Palmer will spend $2m promoting the No vote, including a final-week advertising blitz in South Australia and Tasmania, amid rising concerns that Yes23’s $50m war chest could fall short in swinging enough votes for a come-from-behind victory in the voice referendum.

Yes23, No and third-party organisations are on track to spend more than $30m on advertising ahead of the October 14 referendum, with the bulk of funding quarantined for a final two-week push to win over soft and undecided voters.

South Australia and Tasmania, where the fate of the referendum to constitutionally en­shrine an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government is expected to be decided, will become ground zero for Yes and No campaigners as early voting begins next week. Ahead of Anthony Albanese taking his cabinet to Tasmania early next week, Mr Palmer told The Australian he would concentrate advertising in the “final week” of the referendum campaign and focus on the two southern battleground states.

The billionaire mining magnate, who secured one seat in parliament after spending $117m at the 2022 federal election, said his company Mineralogy and not the United Australia Party “would be directly spending a couple of million on the (voice) campaign”.

“We’re spending the money to put our point of view forward. We’re targeting Tasmania and South Australia. We’ll be advertising in all the states but will be ­focusing on them. It’s cheaper to spend advertising in Tassie and South Australia,” Mr Palmer said.

“I think the No case will win. My prediction is 30 per cent Yes when we get to the polling date. If you look at it in the proper context, the most important thing in Australia is not Yes or No at the moment, it’s the cost-of-living and how the average Australian is going to make his way.”

The UAP founder, who confirmed he had not consulted with Indigenous leaders, said his campaign reflected a “personal view” and was not associated with the official No campaign.

Sources close to the Yes campaign told The Australian they were “coming from a long way back” and conceded it would be difficult to shift ground in the final fortnight. No campaigners remain anxious that soft voters could peel off as Australians finalise their ­positions.

As the Australian Electoral Commission prepares to open early voting centres across the country on Monday and Tuesday, new donations figures reveal the big-spending, high-stakes battle being waged between the Yes23 and No campaigns, who are receiving direct and indirect support from third-party political organisations, unions and activist groups.

The Australian can reveal the No campaign has amassed more than $13m from almost 40,500 donations since November last year. From July 1, the No campaign’s Australians for Unity funding vehicle collected $7.6m from 21,033 donations with an average gift size of $361.

Yes23, which rejects being ­labelled a corporate-funded movement, has this month received $1.6m in grassroots donations with average gifts of around $187.

Yes campaign sources said grassroots donations trends were consistent over recent months.

The Yes campaign expects to raise at least $50m through its Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition funding vehicle, which is half the $100m figure used by No campaigners to encourage donations.

While the overall size of the Yes23 war chest is unknown, companies, individuals and groups including BHP, Rio Tinto, Anthony Pratt, Wesfarmers, the Paul Ramsay Foundation, NAB Foundation, ANZ and Qantas have publicly disclosed more than $26.7m in donations, including subsidised travel costs and office space.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19631062

File: cb1f4a0b75bb61f⋯.jpg (171.49 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese.jpg)

>>19631056

2/2

As the Liberal Party and Labor Party conduct their own fundraising drives, the Yes and No campaigns are ramping-up last-ditch efforts to raise money for advertising blitzes blanketing airwaves, digital and print platforms in key states. Yes23 has allocated up to $20m for its final five-week referendum push.

A Yes23 spokesman said “we are a people-powered and grassroots campaign”.

“Our 40,000 volunteers are from all walks of life and we have the backing of hundreds of community organisations.

“The No campaign is also being backed by the likes of Clive Palmer who spent over $120m during the 2022 federal election, and is running advertising supporting a No vote,” the Yes23 spokesman said.

“Whilst over 200,000 everyday Australians walked in support of a Yes vote two weeks ago, neo-Nazis, pro-Russian activists and sovereign citizen conspiracy theorists supported No campaign rallies last weekend.”

A No campaign spokesman said “the lies won’t stop from the Yes campaign … their claims of big money propping up the No campaign has been shown up as an ­absolute lie”.

“Their claim of being a grassroots-powered movement is another lie. The reality that they cannot avoid is that the Yes campaign is a corporate-sponsored behemoth set on dividing our country,” the spokesman said.

If the Yes23 campaign raises $50m, the No spokesman said the “only question left is the total value of in-kind support they’ve been given and how far over their $100m budget this would take them”.

The ALP, which is not directly running advertising, has informed donors that money raised will be put towards specific causes. Donations raised by the ALP for Yes advertising are being distributed to the Yes23 and Uluru Dialogue campaigns.

Similar to the ALP and unions, the Liberals and Nationals are organising supporters to hand out forms at prepoll booths and election centres on referendum day. The Liberals have also co-ordinated a postal vote drive, which has contributed to a record 1.2 million applications for postal votes.

Yes and No campaigners have exchanged barbs over the opaque involvement of political parties, unions and activist groups and whether funding could be redirected through third-parties.

Mr Palmer said the “big thing will be whether Australians get out and vote”.

“It’s a shocking proposition. All over the world, people like Nelson Mandela, Gandhi and others have fought to keep race out of the law and constitutions. If you’re an Aboriginal person, you should have the same rights as all Australians to go to your member of parliament or start a legal action,” he said.

“But once they bring in the voice, they say you’re Aboriginal, you go over and see the voice people and they’ll decide for you whether you’ve got a say or not. Aboriginal people have been run by committees since the First Fleet, they’ve never had a say.”

The referendum expenditure period, requiring disclosure of campaigning expenses and donations exceeding $15,200, is between March 11 and October 14. The AEC has reached out to around 350 entities that will likely have funding disclosure obligations under the Referendum Act.

There will be a three-day advertising blackout from October 12 until polls close on October 14.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-clive-palmer-pays-out-2m-to-say-no/news-story/6b28f7970feb0fa6b1fabfb0514907e2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19637799

File: 2e24a96463c280d⋯.jpg (851.79 KB,4388x2925,4388:2925,Lidia_Thorpe_said_the_Blak….jpg)

File: 9b656d590d7c0ef⋯.jpg (722.75 KB,3000x2074,1500:1037,Tarneen_Onus_Browne_was_a_….jpg)

>>19606805

‘Blak sovereignty’ leaders switch to Yes, isolating Lidia Thorpe

David Crowe and James Massola - September 29, 2023

1/2

Key opponents of the Indigenous Voice have switched sides in the final weeks of the referendum to back the Yes case after rising fears that a No victory would align them with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton or One Nation leader Pauline Hanson.

The moves reveal the concerns among “progressive No” activists who initially rejected the Voice in favour of stronger action – such as a treaty first – but have moved away from the hardline stance taken by Indigenous senator Lidia Thorpe.

But Thorpe said the Blak Sovereignty movement, which she leads, was “growing exponentially” and would continue to oppose the Voice, saying she would not switch sides despite calls from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for her support.

With early voting opening on Monday, the Yes campaign is trying to win back voters who have been swayed by conservative critics who say the Voice goes too far and “progressive No” leaders such as Thorpe who see the Voice as a retreat on sovereignty and treaty.

Thorpe’s case has lost ground, however, among some Indigenous people who have shifted to the Yes side as polling day draws closer.

Melbourne activist Tarneen Onus Browne said they were a “hard No” and actively campaigned against the Voice until changing their mind when they saw the risk of a No victory.

“It is dangerous to those of us in Indigenous communities because of the racism and discrimination it amps up, and I hope to never see another community group be put in danger of right-wing conservatives in a national vote,” they said.

“The racist No campaign is dangerous in so many ways and it has made it OK for neo-Nazis to go out onto the streets of Melbourne – and it’s important for this country to send a message to them by writing Yes in the upcoming referendum.”

Onus Browne is a community organiser for Warriors of the Aboriginal Resistance and made headlines five years ago for telling an Invasion Day rally they hoped Australia would “burn to the ground” – a remark they said was about the need for total change to the political system.

“I agree with much of what the progressive No represents, not the racist No – they are two very different campaigns,” they said.

Anti-Voice campaigners such as Nyunggai Warren Mundine have rejected claims their campaign appeals to racism in the community after Yes leader Marcia Langton said earlier this month the No case used racist tactics.

Meriki Onus, a Gunnai-Gunditjmara woman and an organiser for the Warriors of the Aboriginal Resistance, said a key factor for her was the way the First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria showed how a federal body could work.

“I agree with much of what the No position is, however, I’m leaning towards voting Yes,” she said.

“We’ve seen an example in Australia where a body similar to the Voice to parliament already functions, and I think that they do really good work and there’s amazing opportunity there. So I would be leaning towards a Yes.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19637802

File: 6804e55e0dd1a55⋯.jpg (2.39 MB,5171x3422,5171:3422,Meriki_Onus_from_the_Warri….jpg)

File: a087b9bb10b8fd6⋯.jpg (2.8 MB,5788x3859,5788:3859,Co_founders_of_UP_Uprising….jpg)

>>19637799

2/2

The Victorian assembly has 32 members who are elected by Indigenous people to represent their communities, with voters choosing representatives from five regions across the state. Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney joined the assembly members in Melbourne on Thursday morning to back the Voice.

Onus, who is Thorpe’s younger sister, said she agreed with many of the Victorian senator’s views but had her own personal views about the “yes or no” choice at the referendum.

She said she was not concerned at the claim that setting up the Voice would mean ceding sovereignty and her view was not based on any concerns about Dutton or Hanson.

“I don’t think I’ll ever be put in the same camp as those two – my politics are very different,” she said.

Yes campaigners saw Victoria as a stronghold for their cause until a slide in the opinion polls showed the state was slipping toward the No side, making every vote count and increasing the importance of voters once swayed by Thorpe’s arguments against the change.

In Darwin, chief executive of Uprising of the People, Mililma May said she changed her mind to become an “active educator” on the Yes side of the Voice debate because she was concerned about the way a No victory would be seen in the community.

“The idea of a No vote in the Northern Territory scared me in that it could mean a majority of Australians do not care about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voices. And that fundamentally felt wrong to me,” she said.

May, whose Darwin-based group acts for Indigenous young people in detention, said she had taken a No position at first.

“I was scared that my sovereignty would be impacted. And I was wary of trusting the government after Australia’s history,” she said.

“Moving beyond those fears, I realised that sovereignty can’t be impacted by voting Yes. And I think it’s healthy to have a level of mistrust of the government, but in a way that can make the government accountable.”

While the comments are at odds with Thorpe’s call to Indigenous Australians to reject the Voice, May made no criticism of the Victorian senator.

“I think that Lidia and I have different understandings of what is going to work for our people, and I think that’s valid,” she said.

Thorpe said the Blak Sovereignty movement had grown on social media and she was not changing her position on the Voice. “I’m not going Yes, I’m not betraying the movement,” she said.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/blak-sovereignty-leaders-switch-to-yes-isolating-lidia-thorpe-20230926-p5e7tk.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19637818

File: f5aa48819211169⋯.jpg (131.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,There_is_a_contingent_of_I….jpg)

File: 52a4ef48b44eec9⋯.jpg (373.9 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,The_Black_Peoples_Union_he….jpg)

File: 958f695f5291b17⋯.jpg (208.95 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,BPU_national_president_Kei….jpg)

File: 76772d91aca341d⋯.jpg (283.69 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,People_at_the_BPU_event_li….jpg)

>>19606805

Black Peoples Union rallies to say No to the Voice

DUNCAN EVANS - SEPTEMBER 30, 2023

The radical No vote to an Indigenous Voice to Parliament found its own voice in Canberra on Saturday, with the revolutionary Black Peoples Union holding a meeting to reject moderation and reconciliation in favour of a “reckoning” with Australia’s past and political foundation.

Keiran Stewart-Assheton, a Wani-Wandi man of the Yuin Nation and national president of the BPU, wants voters to reject the Voice, which would embed an Indigenous-led advisory body into the Constitution, in favour of a revolution to overthrow the liberal foundations of modern Australia.

Speaking before the meeting, Mr Stewart-Assheton said he wanted to replace the current political structure with the governance models that existed in First Nations communities before European settlement, what he terms a “proto-communist” model.

“Our systems governments are very different, the closest I suppose in similarity would be some form of communism or socialism, but ultimately it’s not those either,” he said.

“It’s very much its own thing that hasn’t been properly documented and labelled in English.”

The BPU rejects Australia’s Constitutional order but Mr Stewart-Assheton said the group did not want to return to pre-colonial life.

“We want to retain the structures of our First Nations governance models but apply them to our modern era,” he said.

“So we are not talking about going back to living in the bush and no electricity and no running water, we’re just talking about instead replacing the government model and the economic model that we have for one that’s more community-driven and one that actually caters to the working class as opposed to an elite minority of capitalists.”

His vision includes the appropriation of land and bringing mining companies under state control.

BPU activists will vote No alongside Indigenous campaigners such as Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Nyunggai Warren Mundine AO, but the link to Conservative No sentiment is tactical and ephemeral, with the BPU rejecting any kind of settlement or conformity with mainstream Australian life.

Ngambri woman and BPU vice-president Leah House said the Voice would create an “illusion of progress” while allowing the Australian government to continue its “theft and exploitation” of Indigenous land and resources.

“We already have a voice, you’re just not listening,” she said.

“We hope people will come and hear what we have to say. The Black Peoples Union is firmly opposed to the proposal for a Voice to Parliament.”

Mr Stewart-Assheton said the BPU’s philosophy of a “progressive No” was gaining ground before the October 14 referendum day.

“Our campaign has definitely grown and picked up,” he said.

“When we started only a few months ago we were just this radical little fringe minority group that nobody was really paying much attention to, but we’ve been putting out consistent analysis on the Voice which is something that both the conservative No and the Yes campaigns aren’t doing.

“We’re one of the only people out here actually putting out the facts about what this whole proposition is and its history as opposed to all the other camps that are just relying on people’s hope, faith and fear.”

BPU ideology has a line into parliament through Senator Lydia Thorpe, who also rejects the Voice as a smokescreen for what she sees as the continued repression of Indigenous Australians.

“The Voice is the easy way to fake progress, without actually having to change a thing,” she said in her speech to the National Press Club in August.

“It is a destructive distraction, absolving the government of its continued crimes.”

It is understood a staff member of Senator Thorpe attended the BPU meeting.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/black-peoples-union-rallies-to-say-no-to-the-voice/news-story/00132127ca7ef73283b2705fd1baaca2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19637828

File: cbc75335b1e70dd⋯.jpg (173.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_stakes_are_high_for_An….jpg)

File: 37af55186c455ea⋯.jpg (161.88 KB,1280x720,16:9,Illustration_Johannes_Leak.jpg)

File: 7e04c8e64e6f608⋯.jpg (194.76 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Clive_Palmer_is_throwing_2….jpg)

>>19606805

Indigenous voice to parliament referendum fatigue is kicking in on the final run home

GEOFF CHAMBERS - SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

As Australians fire up barbecues and stock eskies for the footy finals long weekend, Yes and No campaigners will have a brief reprieve from the gruelling slog of the voice referendum campaign trail.

Ahead of the Australian Electoral Commission opening early voting centres next week, voice campaigners are finalising preparations for the final two-weeks.

The road to October 14 has been a marathon for veteran Yes23 and Uluru Dialogue campaigners who have endured years of frustration, broken promises and internal disputes over what constitutional recognition should look like. On the other side, and from a standing start, the No campaign has pulled together an alliance of conservative forces.

While Anthony Albanese announced the October 14 referendum date on August 30, the starter’s gun was fired when he took to the Canterbury-Hurlstone Park RSL Club stage on election night and declared: “I commit to the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full.”

The 16-month trek towards constitutionally enshrining a voice to parliament and executive government has worked against the Yes campaign. For many Yes campaigners, who reflect on polls last year showing emphatic support for an Indigenous voice, time has become the enemy.

ALP and Yes23 campaigners are not giving up. Backed by more than 40,000 volunteers, a $20m advertising blitz and a ground game assisted by unions and activist groups, the Yes side is working to pull off a come-from-behind win.

A senior Labor operative said the No campaign line – “If you don’t know, vote no” – had started to lose impact as more Australians understood the voice concept. A No campaigner said many voters, particularly older and conservative Australians, were sceptical about a major change to the Constitution. The lack of detail on the voice has also helped.

Yes23 will likely shift the narrative to what defeat means for Indigenous Australians and the country. The tone of the debate, which turned uglier in recent weeks, is expected to become more negative as both sides seek to lock in soft and undecided voters.

Yes supporters will associate Clive Palmer’s $2m ad blitz with the No campaign, despite no official links between the groups. Yes campaigners have sought to paint the No side as being funded by mining billionaire “villains”.

With at least $26.7m out of an expected $50m Yes23 warchest underwritten by big companies and philanthropic groups, the No campaign will attack their opponents for being a vehicle for elites.

Both sides have sought to claim “underdog” status.

Just over two weeks out from referendum day, the Yes campaign can rightfully claim the tag.

The stakes for Albanese and Peter Dutton are high. Whoever lands on the losing side will carry residual damage all the way to the 2025 election.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum-fatigue-is-kicking-in-on-the-final-run-home/news-story/a779da7b85e4f5c458fc796ebb570832

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19637842

File: f010af461661a1b⋯.jpg (357.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Chinese_ambassador_Xiao_Qi….jpg)

>>19611687

>>19617086

Scott Morrison hits back at China envoy over Taiwan comments

BEN PACKHAM and WILL GLASGOW - SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

Scott Morrison has lashed China’s top diplomat in Australia, declaring the envoy has no right to tell Australian MPs they cannot travel to Taiwan or decide how Australia applies its One China policy.

China’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, warned Australian politicians on Thursday – including the former prime minister – that MPs’ visits to Taipei undermined progress in stabilising ties between the countries.

His comments, at a function in Sydney to mark 74 years of Communist Party rule over China, came just days after an Australian parliamentary delegation met with Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen in Taipei.

“Their words, their actions on Taiwan will absolutely bring about a negative effect on the ongoing improvement of our relationship between China and Australia,” Mr Xiao said.

The ambassador expressed concern over Mr Morrison’s scheduled Taiwan trip in early October, declaring even former prime ministers wear “political hats”.

But Mr Morrison – whose government pushed back against surging Chinese coercion – said Australian MPs were free to travel where they chose.

“The Chinese government in Beijing does not get to decide whether Australian members of parliament can visit Taiwan or not, nor do they get to tell Australians or the world what Australia’s One China policy means,” he told The Australian.

“I’m very much looking forward to visiting Taiwan and ­celebrating their many achievements as a successful representative democracy that has built a highly sophisticated and remarkable market-based economy, which plays such an important role, both in our region and globally.”

Mr Xiao said Anthony Albanese’s upcoming visit to China would lay the foundations for the next 50 years of relations between the countries.

But he warned Australian politicians must “respect that there is a commitment by the Australian government to (the) One China policy, and they need to respect the sentiments and the feelings of 1.4 billion Chinese people”.

Beijing claims Australia’s One China policy means Canberra accepts Taiwan is part of the People’s Republic of China.

But Australia’s deliberately ambiguous One China policy only “acknowledges” the PRC claim to Taiwan, and calls for the two sides to resolve their dispute peacefully.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19637846

File: 10aed2c7e5dbd25⋯.jpg (406.3 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Taiwan_President_Tsai_Ing_….jpg)

>>19637842

2/2

While Australian wine exports are still banned by China, Mr Xiao was upbeat over the warming trade ties between the countries, with Australian coal, cotton, barley and timber now flowing into the Chinese market.

But he warned of the need for “flexibility”, saying China remained concerned over its market access into Australia for wind turbines, railway wheels and stainless steel sheets.

“We need to respect each other, and we need to show flexibility, and show that we have the spirit. I think there will be a way to find a solution to these remaining issues,” he said.

In Taiwan on Thursday, government officials revealed the delegation of eight Australian MPs led by Labor’s Josh Wilson and Liberal Paul Fletcher had allowed Taipei to publicise the trip.

Previously, Australia had been an outlier among wealthy liberal democracies, insisting Taipei not disclose details of visits by sitting Australian politicians and prevent the release of photos of federal MPs meeting with Taiwan’s leaders.

Taiwan’s Foreign Minister Joseph Wu on Thursday welcomed what he said was a positive development in Australian policy.

“I think this is a natural ­evolution of Australian policy or parliamentary policy for their interactions with Taiwan,” Mr Wu told The Australian in Taipei.

“This kind of more openness in their interaction with Taiwan is highly welcome. We are natural partners even though Australia is very far away, but the two countries share the basic values of freedom, democracy and protection of human rights.

“And the two countries are also major trading partners to each other. Australia is also a major investor here in Taiwan … It is necessary for the two sides to work closer with each other across all spectrums of relations. And we will continue to do that. Australia is a very important friend of Taiwan.”

Liberal senator Claire Chandler, part of the delegation, said she hoped the more open approach was maintained on subsequent trips.

“It’s only appropriate that these parliamentary delegations are conducted openly and transparently, and I welcome Foreign Minister Wu’s warm reception of our delegation in Taipei,” Senator Chandler said.

In his prepared address in Sydney, Mr Xiao sought to allay fears of a slowing Chinese economy, saying despite “very challenging” times, Beijing remained confident in the country’s economic trajectory.

Invoking Gough Whitlam’s historic visit to Beijing in 1973, Mr Xiao said Mr Albanese’s visit to Beijing later this year would be “another historically significant visit”.

“We’re working very closely through diplomatic channels to discuss … the details of the visit,” he said. “(It) will lay down a solid foundation for the next 50 years of a friendly and good relationship with China and ­Australia.”

He also called for “more independent Australian foreign policy”, in a swipe at the Australia-US alliance.

“I hope that the Australian side will be more independent in making their decisions, because the relationship between China and Australia is in the interest of Australia (and) in the interest of Australian people.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/scott-morrison-hits-back-at-china-envoy-over-taiwan-comments/news-story/c4389e6d8f232e5fb5f857f4e39cf406

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19643619

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Rock band Kiss stuns MCG crowd ahead of AFL grand final between Lions and Magpies

Ashleigh Barraclough - 30 September 2023

Kiss has stunned crowds at the MCG with a massive performance, shaking off criticisms the rock band is too old to perform at an AFL grand final in 2023.

Performing in front of a full house at the MCG ahead of the grand final between Collingwood and Brisbane, the American rockers took to the stage clad in their signature heavy make-up and glam-rock outfits.

The band opened with I Was Made for Lovin' You, as columns of flame burst from the ground around the stage.

After that came Shout It Out Loud, before the band wowed the crowd with a lively performance of Rock and Roll All Nite, featuring hundreds of dancers forming the word "Kiss" on the MCG turf.

Young kids dressed as mini-Kiss band members were the highlight of the show, vigorously strumming imaginary guitars and drums and rocking to a song that came out in 1975.

At the end of the performance, lead singer Paul Stanley swung his guitar around several times as if to throw it, before the camera panned away and missed the climax.

The AFL said it took 300 people to set up the stage, and 700 wheels to not damage the grass.

At an AFL press conference on Thursday, guitarist Tommy Thayer said: "This is one of the biggest events we've ever played." While Stanley said: "We plan on blowing things up."

The grand final performance came ahead of what the band says will be its last-ever Australian show, scheduled for October 7 in Sydney.

It has been reported that Kylie Minogue and Crowded House declined invitations to perform at the final.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19643630

File: 92b1c48762dc935⋯.jpg (1.07 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Kiss_was_the_main_act_for_….jpg)

File: 12fa363285bdbfc⋯.jpg (2.35 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_young_performers_did_n….jpg)

File: f9aaaee9e41f080⋯.jpg (327.35 KB,825x783,275:261,AFL_1.jpg)

>>19643619

2/2

Tribute to Barassi during Up There Cazaly

Before the Kiss performance, Indigenous musicians William Barton and Jess Hitchcock kicked off the pre-game entertainment with a rendition of Waltzing Matilda.

Then, after the retiring players circled the G, Mike Brady performed his classic footy final anthem Up There Cazaly.

Brady adapted a line in honour of AFL legend Ron Barassi, who died earlier this month, singing: "Up there Cazaly, and Barassi too / we love you number 31, we'll never forget you."

Singer-songwriter Kate Miller-Heidke, who represented Australia in the Eurovision Song Contest in 2019, performed a classical rendition of the national anthem.

With Collingwood up by six points at half-time and the sun shining on the MCG, Mark Seymour and the Undertow took to the stage.

They first performed When the River Runs Dry, originally released by Seymour's band Hunters & Collectors.

The chilled-out set continued with Throw Your Arms Around Me, featuring Kate Miller-Heidke, before Seymour and the band finished with Holy Grail.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-30/grand-final-pre-game-entertainment-kiss-mcg-lions-collingwood/102920574

https://twitter.com/AFL/status/1707971185663705173

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ksZ2j8NSqI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19644829

File: 9eaacf36032527e⋯.jpg (3.84 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Tourists_can_get_dressed_i….jpg)

File: 868970c5a1d9149⋯.jpg (2.06 MB,4032x3024,4:3,In_Xinjiang_tourists_can_e….jpg)

File: 91137d317bcfbb5⋯.jpg (2.33 MB,4032x3024,4:3,The_Uyghur_people_are_a_pr….jpg)

After years of brutal repression, China's Communist Party tries to turn Xinjiang into a tourism hotspot

David Lipson - 1 October 2023

1/3

On the streets of historic Kashgar, a desert oasis in Western China known as the cradle of Uyghur culture, a brand new "Ancient City" is in the midst of a tourist boom.

In recent years, most of the old town's distinctive mudbrick dwellings, which survived 2,000 years of shifting empires, have been demolished, with the government citing concerns over earthquakes and sanitation.

Uyghur activist groups say the destruction of the old town amounts to "cultural genocide".

Now, souvenir stalls selling fridge magnets, cheap jewellery and traditional instruments line the streets, where visitors can take a ride in an electric buggy through the crowds or get dressed in a traditional Uyghur costume for a photo shoot on the steps of a mosque.

China says more than 180 million tourists have flowed into the Xinjiang province so far this year, enticed by government-funded coupons for discounted travel.

The police checkpoints have been rolled back, replaced by a vast network of sophisticated facial-recognition security cameras.

They are one of the few visible signs of the decade long, intense crackdown that may constitute "crimes against humanity", according to a United Nations report released last year.

Xinjiang's 'great rebranding'

For several years, the region of Xinjiang has been shut off from most of the world's media, amid a highly secretive government campaign to stamp out extremism amongst the Uyghur population and other Muslim minorities.

The crackdown came after decades of unrest, including riots in the capital Urumqi where hundreds were killed in 2009 and a car attack on pedestrians in Beijing's Tiananmen Square in 2013, that killed five.

When a knife and explosive attack on Urumqi train station overshadowed President Xi Jinping's trip to the province in 2014, he ordered officials to "strike hard" against terrorism.

Since then, a chorus of academics, researchers, journalists and legal scholars have meticulously documented widespread abuses at the hands of the government, including mass internment camps, forced labour and birth prevention policies.

The United States has labelled the crackdown "genocide", but Australia hasn't used that word.

For its part, China first denied the existence of the camps, before later insisting all of its "vocational centres" were closed in 2019.

Now the province is moving to a state of "normalisation". The great rebranding of Xinjiang is in full swing.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19644832

File: 1814f9acf9493e8⋯.jpg (2.22 MB,4032x3024,4:3,The_Chinese_Government_too….jpg)

File: 2a0ed0fcc7729df⋯.jpg (2.06 MB,3666x2750,1833:1375,The_highly_orchestrated_to….jpg)

File: cecfaad5f1b6603⋯.jpg (2.05 MB,4032x3024,4:3,The_600_year_old_Id_Kah_Mo….jpg)

>>19644829

2/3

A carefully orchestrated tour of Xinjiang

The ABC was invited on a media tour of the region, organised and carefully curated by the Chinese government to show off the best the province has to offer.

But none of the officials wanted to go on the record.

We were shown a Uyghur kindergarten, where students recite verses in Mandarin in the classroom, then dance happily in the playground to traditional music.

A thriving factory belonging to a local business, where one in five workers are said to be from a Muslim minority background.

A milk packaging facility where we can film workers through a glass wall as they monitor production.

And rural towns with painted-on fishponds and colourful murals depicting harmonious scenes of village life, but very few actual villagers.

"The changes in Xinjiang are great," Nie Zhaoyu, a village cadre from Ximen told the ABC.

"Traffic, roads, life, employment and improvement of people's welfare … We can see the happy smiles on people's faces."

The tour, which lasted a week and included about 20 journalists from around the world, was tightly controlled and left little time in the busy program for us to speak to locals ourselves.

In Urumqi, a flashpoint of unrest in the past, we were allowed to walk around and film unrestricted, past midnight and without a minder.

Uyghur families appeared relaxed as they enjoyed kebabs and sheep brains at the bustling night markets.

Those we spoke to said the city was safe and their lives were good.

But our requests to see one of the former internment camps where more than 1 million people are believed to have been locked up for months or years, were denied by our Chinese hosts.

The man and the camera

During the tour, the ABC and a US outlet approached a souvenir vendor who claimed to have spent time in such a facility.

He wasn't provided by the tour guides.

When we started interviewing him, another man we'd never met, appeared with a camera, stood next to us and filmed his every answer.

Imamu Maimaiti Sidike, a father of three, showed no outward sign of intimidation as he impassively described the "extremely radical religious ideologies" that saw him locked up for seven months.

"I didn't allow my wife to work," he said.

"I believed that if we spent her income, we would go to hell and forced her to stay home. I also promoted these values to the people around me."

He denied any mistreatment at the facility, claiming he ate well, played chess and read books and was even allowed to go home on weekends.

"Through my studies, I realised that radical religious views harm people. I no longer have this mindset. I can get along with people of any ethnicity and faith."

Those comments fit the government's prescribed narrative, according to Peter Irwin, Associate Director for research and advocacy at the Uyghur Human Rights Project (UHRP).

"They follow this narrative because of this fear and this ever-present threat of punishment for stepping out of line… People are deathly afraid of saying the wrong thing, meeting the wrong person, or communicating abroad," said Mr Irwin.

"They've detained people for the most basic expressions of religious expression … Having a Koran at home can get you detained for 10 years. Is that a normal society?"

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19644837

File: 17ce30b7ae0da33⋯.jpg (1.64 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Abdureqip_Tumulniyaz_is_th….jpg)

File: b3c6368694f7de0⋯.jpg (2.3 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Yusuf_Hussein_who_now_live….jpg)

File: d9d6ed80c6f448a⋯.jpg (1.98 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Weapons_are_on_display_at_….jpg)

>>19644832

3/3

Religious freedom 'doesn't exist at all'

In Kashgar today, the Chinese flag flaps in the breeze over the top of crumbling mosque domes.

The call to prayer has fallen silent.

Long beards and veils are hard to spot.

We couldn't find anyone who knew where to buy a Koran.

The 600-year-old Id Kah Mosque, which has capacity for 5,000 Muslim worshippers, is now primarily a tourist attraction.

Our guides initially didn't want us to go inside during prayers, but they eventually allowed it.

On the day we visit, a few dozen people show up to pray. Most are elderly and none of them are under the age of 50.

The mosque's Imam, Maimaiti Jumai told us he was "very satisfied" with the government's work to stamp out extremism.

"The efforts our country made on cracking down on extremism, I think set an example for the world," he said.

A similar line was offered at Xinjiang's Islamic institute in Urumqi, where the next generation of Imams are given Chinese language lessons, under the tutelage of director Abdureqip Tumulniyaz.

"Our China, our Xinjiang will not allow [extremism] to take root," he told ABC.

When asked why there was little sign of a living form of Islam in Xinjiang, he suggested religious devotion had gone too far before the government stepped in.

"People were praying in the street, blocking cars; praying in hospitals, so doctors couldn't help their patients; on planes, so the planes couldn't take off."

Describing such claims as "absurd", Peter Irwin said the UHRP has documented the destruction of thousands of mosques and upwards of 1,500 cases of Uyghur Imams and other religious figures who have been detained or disappeared.

"The Imams have been either removed or detained or imprisoned and the Imams that remain are only allowed to have a sermon that's directly in line with what the Chinese government is saying," he said.

"So religious freedom doesn't exist at all and it's been very much replaced by this tourist consumption attitude."

Uyghur exiles cut off from their families

The Chinese Communist Party's big tourism push for Xinjiang is another blow to members of the Uyghur community around the world who have been unable to speak to their families back home, let alone visit them.

Yusuf Hussein left Xinjiang in 1999 and now lives in Adelaide.

He maintained regular contact with his family in Xinjiang, phoning to chat almost every week.

But in 2017, the year the internment camps started operating, he was cut off.

"After that, I didn't get any response. They just didn't pick up," he said.

Last year, some devastating news reached him: His father had died three months earlier.

"That was the only message. And [the messenger] didn't give any details whether [my father] was sick or in concentration camp or anywhere," he said.

The grisly museum in Xinjiang

Like the ravages of the Cultural Revolution in the 1960s and the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989, China now appears to be embarking on a campaign of coerced, collective amnesia about the crackdown in Xinjiang.

A museum in the capital Urumqi, dedicated to "The Fight Against Terrorism and Extremism in Xinjiang", outlines in glossy, gory detail the period of bloody unrest in the province.

It even features grisly, slow-motion videos of hostages being killed by Islamic State terrorists in Syria, as a demonstration of the "foreign influences" infecting Xinjiang.

There are dozens of guns, knives and bombs on display behind glass.

Then, a jarring shift in tone, with panel after panel depicting the harmony and prosperity of current day Xinjiang, under the stewardship of President Xi Jinping.

The decade-long crackdown on the Uyghur population, which activists claim is really an attempt to wipe out an entire culture, receives just a passing mention about "powerful legal instruments".

"Worthwhile results have been achieved," it reads.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-01/ccp-invites-journalists-to-tour-xinjiang/102916238

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19644845

File: 96d201528afc92c⋯.jpg (266.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Angelo_Becciu_is_a_former_….jpg)

Prosecutors seek stretch in jail for cardinal Angelo Becciu

PAOLA TOTARO - OCTOBER 1, 2023

Prosecutors in Rome have asked that the disgraced Cardinal, Angelo Becciu, be sentenced to seven years and three months in prison and forced to pay more than €14m ($23m) in fines for embezzlement as the so-called Vatican “trial of the century” enters its final chapter.

Two and a half years after the chief prosecutor, Alessandro Diddi, opened proceedings in the Holy See, judges have recommended that the 10 defendants accused of an array of financial crimes serve sentences totalling more than 73 years.

If found guilty, Angelo Becciu, a former papal chief of staff and arch nemesis of a raft of financial reforms led by the late Australian cardinal George Pell, will be the first cardinal to be convicted in a criminal trial within the Vatican.

Pell and Libero Milone, the first independent auditor general appointed to the Holy See, had accused the “old guard” within the curia of undermining Pope Francis’s attempts to root out financial corruption in the Vatican. At the time, sources suggested the same “old guard” had exploited Pell’s absence while he fought historic sex charges in Australia to jettison the reform program.

“These were not reforms for the Pope: they were wanted by the Pope for the 1.4 billion Catholics around the world who donate money to their church or leave their property and who deserve to know what the church was doing with their gifts” a source told The Australian.

At the heart of the megatrial is evidence that millions in Vatican funds were funnelled into speculative commercial investments, including acquisition of a €350m property, 60 Sloane Square, in London’s fashionable Chelsea. A former Harrod’s showroom, it was to be converted into luxury apartments until the deal turned sour, forcing the Vatican to pay out millions to extricate itself and which has since been sold at an estimated €140m loss.

As the Vatican tribunal heard closing arguments this week, lawyer Roberto Lipari, representing the Vatican Bank also demanded that the defendants be compelled to repay more than €690mn, originally earmarked for Church needs by the Pope, and ultimately misspent in further reckless speculative investments. A further payment for “moral and reputational damage” to the Holy See of nearly €1m was also requested.

Lipari told the court that the trial had revealed a murky financial world in which the Secretariat of State, operated without any control or oversight and became a vehicle for fraud and personal wealth building.

He said business was conducted in a way designed solely to benefit a monsignor who was himself an expert in canon law but who worked with an accountant who had no experience in investment.

Lipari accused Becciu and fellow defendants – who all insist they are innocent – of embarking on a campaign for personal enrichment, even considering investing in oil extraction in Angola, a country blighted by accusations of human rights abuses. They used Holy See funds, he said, as if it were a “cash machine” which had to say yes to all requests.

“We’ve seen the use of money without due diligence, extortion and blackmail, insiders who sympathised with the blackmailers, (and) huge economic resources managed without taking into account the constraints imposed by the donors.”

“The very notion that (Angola) was even contemplated highlights the lack of (moral and ethical) oversight along with damage to the environment in a country accused of not respecting human rights and with ties of French arms dealers.”

In addition to the Secretariat of State, Lipari was also critical of the Vatican’s so-called financial watchdog body which had originally been set up under Pope Benedict XVI and which originally have the green light to the London deal. The former president of this body, a Swiss lawyer Rene Bruhlart, and his number two, an Italian lawyer, Tommaso Di Ruzza, are among the 10 defendants in the trial.

Judges now have until the end of the year to reach their verdict and rule on guilt or innocence. Italian newspapers reported that the Vatican City State has a small prison, consisting of just three cells and that it is unclear whether the sentences would be carried out in Italy if the judges rule in favour of the prosecution.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/prosecutors-seek-stretch-in-jail-for-cardinal-angelo-becciu/news-story/5aa69ca51ef982694a4efa91b596be77

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19650010

File: ce02bcd3a5e8937⋯.jpg (188.39 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Anthony_Albanese_speaks_to….jpg)

>>19606805

Anthony Albanese says one-on-one conversations will be key to a Yes victory for an Indigenous voice to parliament

ROSIE LEWIS - OCTOBER 2, 2023

Anthony Albanese insists undecided Australians will arrive at a Yes vote “pretty comfortably” during one-on-one conversations about the Indigenous voice to parliament, saying this will be the key to a referendum win on October 14.

With no signs of a turnaround in the polls less than two weeks before polling day, the Prime Minister said the voice “isn‘t a radical proposal, nor is it a conservative proposal, it’s a mainstream proposal” while attempting to contrast a “negative” No campaign with a “positive” Yes campaign.

Mr Albanese hit out at disinformation as he declared the voice won’t advise the Reserve Bank of Australia or where Australia’s nuclear-powered submarines are located, despite Indigenous leaders and Yes campaigners previously saying it could.

Both sides of the referendum said they were confident they’d be able to effectively man booths to engage voters for the final sprint, with prepoll open in all states and territories from Tuesday.

“I know a lot of people have not made up their mind, and what I know is that the feedback, when people talk through these issues, they arrive at a Yes vote pretty comfortably,” Mr Albanese said before hitting the hustings in Hobart.

“I sincerely think the key to the next fortnight is those one-on-one conversations with people to accept this request of the overwhelming majority of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

“No one in the opposition actually believes that a non-binding advisory committee of Aboriginal Torres Strait Islander people is going to sit around and say, where do you think our nuclear powered subs should go? What do you think the Reserve Bank should do about interest rates? They know that‘s a nonsense. And yet they’ve raised these scare campaigns obsessively and have ignored cost-of-living.”

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price was approached for comment.

Uluru Statement of the Heart co-architect Megan Davis has said the voice will be able to speak to all parts of government, including agencies such as the RBA, but will have to decide when and how it will have the most impact.

Indigenous artist Sally Scales has also said Aboriginal communities should be consulted on aspects of the AUKUS nuclear-submarine deal, including where they’re docked.

A No campaign spokesman said Fair Australia had managed to sign up nearly 10,000 volunteers for pre-poll shifts, including members of the Labor Party, Liberal Party and One Nation, and would go close to covering 55,000 hours of pre-poll.

While opponents of the voice conceded they don’t have the resources that Yes23 does – particularly the union movement and GetUp – they were hoping to lock in Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania in the remaining days of the campaign.

“There will be a lot of excuses if they (the Yes campaign) go down. I’m not saying they’re going to,” the No spokesman said.

“If they’re unsuccessful it needs to be called out – they chose to divide the country, they communicated it really clearly then they complained about the fact the process isn’t fair. These are all things you have control over. That’s not a reasonable position.”

Launching a new ad on Monday to run across television for the final two weeks of the campaign, the Yes campaign is pivoting its messaging towards consequences of a No vote.

A mother stands in an empty room and viewers are shown an empty cot and nursery with no baby, with a voiceover saying: “What if I told you that our infant mortality rate is twice as high as non-Indigenous babies? That they’ll grow up half as likely to find employment and will face a life expectancy that’s eight years less than the rest of the country? A No vote means no progress.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-says-oneonone-conversations-will-be-key-to-a-yes-victory-for-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/2fbefb20baa71b5f5083a9797baf2814

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19650029

File: a236de49b43d986⋯.jpg (188.81 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Special_Minister_of_State_….jpg)

File: 16803fb0133ef14⋯.jpg (291.24 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Yes23_campaign_director_De….jpg)

>>19606805

Voice campaign gets ugly as early voting begins

GREG BROWN and JOE KELLY - OCTOBER 1, 2023

Special Minister of State Don Farrell has urged anyone who feels threatened during the voice referendum to contact police, as Yes and No campaigners trade barbs over which side has more extremists.

Ahead of pre-polling commencing on Monday, No campaigners have written to the Australian Electoral Commission complaining their volunteers were worried about their safety standing at booths.

But a Labor spokeswoman described the Advance Australia letter as a “cynical attempt by the No campaign to distract from the extreme and dangerous far-right influencers they’ve attracted”.

“If Advance Australia are aware of threatening or criminal behaviour they should report it to the police,” the spokeswoman said. “The No campaign only focus on creating fear, they offer no solutions and no progress.”

The Albanese government last week accused far-right influencers of hijacking the No campaign after a member of the Proud Boys and neo-Nazi Tom Sewell attended their rallies.

Senator Farrell said no one should feel unsafe on a polling booth. “Threats or intimidation towards anyone engaging in their democratic rights is completely unacceptable,” he said.

“Australia has a strong democracy and conducts elections and referenda in safety and security.

“If people that are engaging in democratic activity feel threatened they should contact the police.”

In the letter to the AEC, obtained by The Australian, Advance Australia executive director Matthew Sheahan raised concerns about No events being “marred by aggressive and, in some cases, violent protesters”.

Mr Sheahan asked the AEC to detail measures it was taking to protect volunteers on booths.

“The vitriol and hostility directed at our volunteers has been deeply unsettling,” he wrote.

“Many of our volunteers have conveyed … apprehensions about participating in the democratic process of pre-poll and election day campaigning, fearing potential confrontations with hostile individuals or groups of individuals.

“Such fears are antithetical to the democratic ethos of our country and our collective belief in the right to participate in the democratic process without fear or hindrance.”

A spokesman for the AEC said it had “engaged with law enforcement agencies regarding upcoming polling activities”.

With 1.5 million people so far applying to vote via post, pre-polling will begin on Monday in Victoria, Tasmania, Western Australia and the Northern Territory. Early voting will commence on Tuesday in NSW, Queensland, South Australia and the ACT.

The Australian understands the Yes campaign expects to “significantly outnumber” the No side with pre-poll volunteers, able to tap into the 50,000 people who signed up to support a constitutional voice.

Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin said the voice would act as an “independent advisory committee that will give advice on matters affecting Indigenous Australians in areas such as education, health, housing and jobs”.

“I encourage Australians to look closely at the question they are being asked,” he said. “As early voting opens, Australians should be aware of the choice. A Yes vote is our best shot at better outcomes for Indigenous Australians … a No vote will mean more of the same.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/voice-campaign-gets-ugly-as-early-voting-begins/news-story/6c887bb3afdee3354e60d79cfebd9935

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19650055

File: 1c76d4e872de20d⋯.jpg (148.25 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 35c2a616a5ea47e⋯.jpg (198.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>19606805

Albanese looking to blame Dutton for his voice misjudgment

DENNIS SHANAHAN - OCTOBER 2, 2023

In the final two weeks of the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum campaign, Anthony Albanese is refining a new political narrative aimed at minimising culpability for his misjudgment and maximising blame for Peter Dutton.

The Prime Minister’s apparent intent, in prudent political expectation or perhaps even anticipation of a defeat for the referendum, is to argue he was misled on the vital issue of bipartisanship by the Coalition and betrayed by the craven political opportunism of the Opposition Leader.

A deflection, in case of defeat, away from his own miscalculation that bipartisanship on a referendum no longer counted because things had changed and the Australian public was more inclined to listen to the elites of business, sport and religion than to leaders of political parties.

Albanese was convinced politics was different now and, like his own rise to Prime Minister against expectations or the acceptance of the Apology to the Stolen Generations and the successful same-sex marriage plebiscite, there was no longer a need for bipartisanship for a successful referendum.

Although such a victory on the basis of elite endorsement and massive advertising is still possible, polling showing a clear majority of people intending to vote “no” means a prudent politician would prepare for a defeat given it is a simple “yes” or “no” result devoid of nuance.

At the weekend, Albanese built on a nascent narrative he started a few weeks ago – apart from blaming “elements of the media” – which is built on a premise he expected Coalition bipartisan support and was misled and betrayed for base political reasons.

Several times, Albanese has advanced the former argument based on an expectation that Dutton’s appointment of Julian Leeser as spokesman on legal affairs and Indigenous Australians was a “positive sign”.

Albanese has suggested publicly for some time that the appointment of Leeser, who had worked for years on parliamentary committees in favour of Indigenous recognition and a voice to parliament, he took as an indication of potential Coalition bipartisanship on the voice referendum.

Albanese’s problem is that Dutton appointed Leeser – as expected – to the shadow portfolio long before the model for a voice was announced and, even when it was, Leeser said he didn’t support the model but as a matter of conscience would resign his role and still campaign and vote “yes”.

Jacinta Price Nampijinpa’s appointment and emergence as a powerful Indigenous voice for the No campaign was not possible for Dutton after the election – Price is a CLP senator from the Northern Territory who sits in the Nationals partyroom in Canberra and is under the purview of Nationals’ leader David Littleproud.

This has not deterred Albanese from running the argument that he took Leeser’s appointment as a positive sign and he repeated it at the weekend in an interview with The Guardian.

Albanese has taken the argument to a new level beyond simply saying he was entitled to expect bipartisan support to declaring Dutton’s opposition to the voice was a direct result of a humiliating defeat in the Aston by-election.

He is now saying that despite Dutton’s previous bad behaviour in relation to the apology, etc, it was this “political opportunism” that prompted the Liberal leader’s decision to oppose the referendum. “We know that we had the Aston by-election. And the week afterwards, Peter Dutton returned to what he’d been urged to do by some of his party, into the wrecker, into the negative, just opposing things, seeing this through a political prism of opportunism rather than an opportunity to actually do something positive.”

If there is a yes vote, it will not matter what is being said now about Dutton and the lack of bipartisanship… but if there is a no vote, Albanese will be the one under pressure for a failed political campaign that has caused potential damage to Australian society and the Labor government.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/albanese-looking-to-blame-dutton-for-his-voice-misjudgment/news-story/4dca4c669673a8c5f09ee13d969668d3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19650060

File: 0f32b53e9cf3af8⋯.jpg (357.57 KB,2048x1152,16:9,US_Navy_Virginia_Class_sub….jpg)

>>19505163

Congressional ‘poison pill’ could scuttle AUKUS nuclear subs deal

ADAM CREIGHTON - OCTOBER 2, 2023

A senior defence policy adviser to the Clinton administration has warned AUKUS was “doomed to failure” without a significant revamp of US defence technology export regulations, amid growing concern that congress might ultimately baulk at the sale of nuclear powered submarines to Australia.

Jeffrey Bialos, partner at law firm Eversheds-Sutherland and former deputy undersecretary of defence during the Clinton ­administration, told The Australian that the three-way defence alliance would be “dead on ­arrival” based on the as-yet legislated proposals to operationalise the landmark deal.

“None of these measures do more than put Band-Aids on longstanding issues. The idea of an exemption for Australia and the UK isn’t new, we tried it in the late ’90s and it failed,” he said.

Mr Bialos, who was also one of the architects of an effort to ­reform of US defence technology export regulations in the Clinton administration, said the regulatory standards that would be ­required of Australia and Britain were so stringent that the countries wouldn’t agree to them and in practice co-operation couldn’t occur, even if the White House was under the impression it could.

“Everybody knows they’re never going to get to yes on that with Australians and the UK, ­because these countries have their own laws, their own traditions and their own approach to export controls,” he said.

Defence Minister Richard Marles and ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd in July hailed a proposed amendment to US law to facilitate the transfer of submarines to Australia, which was later held up by Senate Republicans who insisted the administration boost spending on submarine production capacity first.

Provisions to approve the transfer of Virginia-class submarines to Australia, which is expected to buy between three and five from the US in the early 2030s, remain bogged down in debate in congress as Republicans and Democrats thrash out an ­annual defence spending bill.

“It’s not so much the sale [of the subs] that’s going to be the problem, it’s the essential technology co-operation related to it and Pillar II activities; the rules effectively kill it,” Mr Bialos said.

“What I don’t understand is how a State Department that strongly supports AUKUS at the top level and supports the technology co-operation to enable it has put forward an ITAR exemption proposal with a poison pill,” he said, referring to the dormant congressional proposals to make pillars I and II of the AUKUS deal legally operational.

The State Department told The Australian it did “not comment on pending legislation”, pointing to recent public statements by senior officials that ­expressed support for AUKUS.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19650062

File: edce197a8360de4⋯.jpg (244.29 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_Joe_B….jpg)

>>19650060

2/2

Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former adviser to the head of US naval operations, said he expected “a lot of controversy” when push came to shove and congress needed to approve the sales.

“When people start actually doing the math, it’s going to be very problematic, there’s already pushback on the Hill,” he said.

“We’ll get to 2030 and the question will be: is the US willing to sell to Australia up to about 10 per cent of its submarines,” he explained, suggesting the answer might be no.

Mr Clark said about 18 of the 50-strong attack submarine fleet of the US was in for servicing or major overhaul, implying about 10 per cent had been promised to Australia earlier this year as part of the pathway agreement announced by President Joe Biden, and Anthony Albanese in San Diego.

As part of AUKUS, Australia has promised to make a $US3bn contribution to the US government to help expand US domestic submarine production, but ­Republicans doubt that will be enough additional funding to significantly boost production.

“Putting more money into the submarine industrial base is not going to build submarines any faster, as it’s constrained by workforce and space considerations,” Mr Clark said.

The cost of the submarine component of AUKUS, estimated $368bn through to the 2040s, has attracted criticism from elements in the Labor Party, including over concerns that the US might ultimately fail to provide the Virginia-class submarines ­because of supply ­bottlenecks that have dragged US domestic submarine production rate down to 1.2 a year rather than the two congress had planned.

Mr Bialos said in the late 1990s that president Bill Clinton, who had wanted greater technology sharing with allies such as Britain and Australia, overruled his State Department, which wanted to keep tighter control over transfer of defence assets and technology.

“But they in effect got their ­bureaucratic revenge because they work with allies on the Hill and put this poison pill into the law,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/congressional-poison-pill-could-scuttle-aukus-nuclear-subs-deal/news-story/679b74cd2617c2204e41d7409479d7c5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19650066

File: beda7e5c1315ad0⋯.jpg (660.71 KB,1920x1080,16:9,An_illustration_of_a_SSN_A….jpg)

>>19505163

Aukus: UK defence giant BAE Systems wins £3.95bn submarine contract

Peter Hoskins - 2 October 2023

Britain's biggest defence firm, BAE Systems, has won a £3.95bn ($4.82bn) contract to build a new generation of submarines as the security pact between the US, UK and Australia moves ahead.

In March, the three countries announced details of the so-called Aukus pact to provide Australia with nuclear-powered attack submarines by the late 2030s.

The pact aims to counter China's ambitions in the Indo-Pacific region.

Beijing has strongly criticised the three countries over the deal.

"We're incredibly proud of our role in the delivery of this vitally important, tri-nation submarine programme," BAE Systems Chief Executive Charles Woodburn said.

BAE said the funding will pay for development work to 2028, with manufacturing of the vessels expected to start towards the end of this decade.

The first SSN-Aukus submarine is scheduled to be delivered in the late 2030s.

Both the UK and Australia will use the SSN-Aukus submarines, which will be based on a British design.

"This multi-billion-pound investment in the Aukus submarine programme will help deliver the long term hunter-killer submarine capabilities the UK needs to maintain our strategic advantage and secure our leading place in a contested global order," UK defence minister Grant Shapps said as the Conservative party conference got underway in Manchester.

BAE said the SSN-Aukus will be the biggest, most powerful and advanced attack submarine ever operated by the Royal Navy and will eventually replace the Astute class, which it builds at its site in Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria.

The agreement will provide decades of work at the Barrow-in-Furness shipyard, where it employs more than 10,000 people.

The company said the deal will also fund significant investment at the site, investment in its supply chain and recruitment of more than 5,000 workers.

BAE employs 39,600 people in the UK and has a global workforce totalling more than 93,000, according to the company's website.

Other major UK defence contractors are also getting a boost from the Aukus deal.

In March, it was confirmed that Rolls-Royce Submarines would provide all the nuclear reactor plants that will power the SSN-Aukus vessels.

In June, Rolls-Royce said it would almost double the size of its Raynesway facility in Derby as a result of the deal. On Sunday, Babcock International, which maintains and supports the UK's submarines, said it had signed a five-year deal with the Ministry of Defence to work on the SSN-Aukus design.

The Aukus security alliance - which was first announced in September 2021 - has repeatedly drawn criticism from China.

However, the three Western countries say the deal is aimed at shoring up stability in the Indo-Pacific.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-66979798

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19650072

File: 95c095632836ea8⋯.jpg (1.57 MB,4233x2822,3:2,Cuban_Quba_Isaiah_and_Elia….jpg)

File: f128664a4a36efe⋯.jpg (1.61 MB,3220x4025,4:5,Cuban_performing_air_guita….jpg)

File: f189ecbea491334⋯.jpg (1.27 MB,3000x1831,3000:1831,Elias_7_Quba_6_Cuban_7_and….jpg)

File: 4a6573f604f8bb6⋯.jpg (862.89 KB,2964x1976,3:2,Elias_Manalo_pictured_with….jpg)

File: 2c35a19b739ed3b⋯.jpg (89.22 KB,526x789,2:3,Molly_Dunn_9_preparing_to_….jpg)

>>19643619

Shout it out loud: Proud parents watch kids rock with Kiss at the MCG

Carolyn Webb - October 1, 2023

It’s not every day that your seven-year-old son dances on stage with rock band Kiss in front of 100,000 people at the Melbourne Cricket Ground.

Cuban Casem, 7, wearing the make-up and costume of the band’s Spaceman character, was cool about it and had a ball, rocking out to Rock and Roll All Nite at the MCG before the AFL grand final on Saturday.

Cuban’s mum, Carla Casem, said she was the emotional one, looking on from the sidelines.

“It was overwhelming. I was in tears most of the time,” she said.

Cuban, of Fraser Rise in Melbourne’s west, was one of four kids chosen to dance on stage with the famous American band as the crowd roared during the pre-game entertainment.

He said the best part was doing an air-guitar solo while standing “back-to-back” with lead guitarist Tommy Thayer.

Three of Cuban’s classmates from hip-hop dance school Kstar Studios in Ravenhall danced next to singer and bass player Gene Simmons, singer and guitarist Paul Stanley, and drummer Eric Singer.

Meanwhile, below them, 500 other children performed choreographed dance moves to the song.

The dancers, who were recruited from five Melbourne dance schools, rehearsed for weeks but were sworn to secrecy ahead of the game between Collingwood and the Brisbane Lions.

Carla said her son was nervous before the concert, but once he was out there, he was fine.

Mum wasn’t so fine.

“I couldn’t stop crying, to tell you the truth,” she said. “I was just a mess … but it was a really proud moment.”

Joan Manalo watched at home with about 12 relatives while her son Elias, 7, imitated drummer Eric Singer on stage at the MCG, as dozens of other relatives texted and called.

She said Elias said he’d had “so much fun” and hadn’t wanted to leave the stage.

“He woke up this morning going, ‘Can I do it all over again’?”

Molly Dunn, 9, who dressed as Paul Stanley’s Starchild character, performed in the 500-strong dance ensemble along with fellow students from the Melbourne Academy of Performing Arts in Spotswood.

Her proud mother, Amanda Dunn, said she was nervous at first when watching from home.

“I didn’t think she’d have any trouble with the routine, but it’s such an overwhelming thing to walk out in front of 100,000 people with a hugely famous rock band playing and to perform when you’re only nine,” Amanda said.

“But they all seemed to take it in their stride.”

“I was thrilled, to be honest. I just think it’s such an incredible experience for them. They’ll never forget this, I reckon.

“It’s the sort of thing that, when you’re an old lady you go, ‘I once danced at the pre-match show at the grand final’.”

“Molly was absolutely over the moon when she got home. She’d had such a great time.”

Tom Macdonald, chief creative officer at MushroomGroup, which produced the pre-game entertainment – including Kiss’ performance of three of their hits – said the four mini-Kiss members became a major feature of the show.

They were interviewed by a range of media outlets on Sunday at the Collingwood Football Club’s family day at AIA Vitality Centre near Olympic Park.

“They’ve been so popular; they’ve been doing more press today than anyone else,” Macdonald said.

He said that engaging the audience was important in a pre-game show, and the children had helped achieved this. “These 500 kids were rocking their hearts out. And they absolutely loved it, and it was beautiful to see,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/shout-it-out-loud-proud-parents-watch-kids-rock-with-kiss-at-the-mcg-20231001-p5e8uw.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b77b66 No.19656186

Email addresses of Aus Senators in case you want to express your displeasure

'senator.allman-payne@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.antic@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.askew@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.ayres@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.babet@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.bilyk@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.birmingham@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.bragg@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.brockman@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.carol.brown@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.cadell@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.canavan@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.michaeliacash@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.chandler@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.chisholm@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.ciccone@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.colbeck@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.colbeck@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.davey@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.dodson@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.duniam@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.farrell@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.faruqi@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.fawcett@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.katy.gallagher@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.green@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.grogan@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.hanson@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.hanson-young@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.henderson@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.hughes@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.hume@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.kovacic@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.lambie@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.liddle@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.lines@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.mcallister@aph.gov.au'; 'Senator.McCarthy@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.mcdonald@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.mcgrath@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.mckenzie@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.mckim@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.mclachlan@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.nampijinpaprice@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.oneill@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.matt.o'sullivan@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.paterson@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.payman@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.payne@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.barbara.pocock@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.polley@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.pratt@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.rennick@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.reynolds@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.rice@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.roberts@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.ruston@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.scarr@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.sheldon@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.shoebridge@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.smith@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.marielle.smith@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.steele-john@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.sterle@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.stewart@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.thorpe@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.tyrrell@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.urquhart@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.van@aph.gov.au'; 'senator.walsh@aph.gov.au'

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19656285

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19606805

No campaigners warn against complacency at Perth event as Voice referendum draws closer

James Carmody - 3 October 2023

1/2

More than 1,000 people have gathered at an event in Perth to hear leaders of the No campaign warn against complacency ahead of the referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

With the polls already open for early voting and less than a fortnight until referendum day, Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Nyunggai Warren Mundine were greeted like rock stars at the event on Monday night.

Speaking to the crowd at the Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre, Mr Mundine warned volunteers and campaigners for the No camp not to get complacent.

"The battle is not over yet, we've still got to get out there and fight every day," he said.

The room was a sea of orange "No" posters, hats, and T-shirts, which featured the slogan "Vote no to a Voice of division".

Senator Nampijinpa Price was greeted with a standing ovation when she addressed the audience.

"It's such a pleasure being back here in Western Australia in Perth, you guys are absolutely bringing it," the Northern Territory senator for the Country Liberal Party said.

"I am filled with so much hope, my heart is filled with so much love for this country, love for the Australian people, love for the fact that we are reigniting our Australian spirit.

"This vote is 'no' to division but 'yes' to bringing back our beautiful Australian values."

The pair appeared alongside master of ceremonies for the evening Matthew Sheahan, from conservative lobby group Advance Australia.

"Make no mistake, this is going to be close," Mr Sheahan told the crowd.

"If we get complacent, if we don't volunteer, if we don't continue to talk to family and friends about the dangers of the Voice, they can still steal it from us.

"And we can't allow that to happen."

Outside the venue a small group of protesters gathered, mostly students from the Socialist Alternative.

Noongar Minang man and Aboriginal activist Mervyn Eades spoke at the protest and declared Senator Nampijinpa Price was not welcome on Noongar land, before going on to condemn comments she made at the National Press Club last month.

In her Press Club address, Senator Nampijinpa Price denied First Nations Australians were currently being negatively impacted by colonisation.

First Nations health professionals and those living with chronic health issues said they were "disappointed" and "deeply saddened" by the comments.

Other protesters also took aim at Senator Nampijinpa Price in chants outside the venue.

The protesters were met by counter-protesters who were attending the event in Perth.

A number of police officers kept the two groups apart as they traded chants and insults.

One man was escorted away by police after he tried to enter the venue.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19656290

File: 927a381a0532f2a⋯.jpg (1.2 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Nyunggai_Warren_Mundine_de….jpg)

File: 67ba551efa7b8dc⋯.jpg (2.19 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,More_than_1_000_people_mad….jpg)

File: 3ec3db822606503⋯.jpg (1.19 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_w….jpg)

File: 22e042c068bde0f⋯.jpg (891.75 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Protestor_Mervyn_Eades_mad….jpg)

File: 0260beb534e652b⋯.jpg (323.86 KB,2061x1374,3:2,Peter_Dutton_pictured_in_P….jpg)

>>19656285

2/2

'Concentrate on the vote', says Dutton

Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has refused to outline any detail of Senator Price's proposal for an audit of spending on Indigenous organisations.

Senator Price said in August she wanted the audit carried out if the Voice to Parliament fails and the Liberals win the next election.

Mr Dutton is in WA along with Senator Price urging people to vote No.

Mr Dutton said while he "absolutely, strongly" supports Senator Price's proposal, he would not be drawn on what it might look like or how it would differ from previous audits.

He said if the Liberals were elected and Senator Price was the Minister for Indigenous affairs, there would be improvements for Indigenous Australians.

He also refused to be drawn on whether a royal commission would be the appropriate mechanism.

"We'll make announcements in relation to our policy at the appropriate time," Mr Dutton said.

"The effort now is to concentrate on the vote, which is only a couple of weeks away."

Mr Dutton said both sides of parliament had done all they could to improve the lives of Indigenous Australians.

"To be fair, there are a number of indicators where things have improved but there is a long way to go, and other areas where things have gone backwards despite the fact that record amounts of money have been budgeted," he said.

"The huge amount of money that goes into the funnel out of Canberra, it becomes a trickle of regional and remote areas, and that's why we don't see the housing, we don't see the jobs, we don't see the educational outcomes, we don't see life expectancy we expect to see in capital cities."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-03/voice-referendum-no-campaigners-issue-warning-at-perth-event/102924758

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz5QPM8GQ3M

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19656295

File: 828059df20c9477⋯.jpg (169.41 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Yes23_campaign_signs_along….jpg)

>>19606805

Yes23 warned by AEC on ‘potentially misleading’ purple signs

Paul Sakkal - October 3, 2023

The Australian Electoral Commission has warned the Yes23 Voice campaign that some of its signs could be potentially misleading and demanded it move them away from polling stations.

Some Yes23 signs – which say “Vote YES” – use the same purple colour as the commission’s signs, which have the words “voting centre” on them and are used to inform voters about polling booth locations for the Voice referendum.

The commission said in a statement late on Monday, the first day of early voting, that it had become aware of signs that could “potentially mislead voters”, who might see the official purple colours and become confused about whether a Yes vote was perhaps mandatory, or encouraged, by authorities.

“To be absolutely clear – the signs were erected by the Yes23 campaign, not the AEC,” the statement said.

“When we were alerted to this signage, the AEC requested the Yes23 campaign to rectify the situation by ensuring their signs are not placed in the proximity of AEC voting centre signs.

“The Yes23 campaign has agreed to comply with this request.”

The AEC noted Yes23’s sign had been authorised appropriately – as it was marked as a Yes23 sign in the bottom corner – and was therefore not illegal.

In a statement, a spokesperson for the Yes campaign said: “Yes23 was made aware of this by the AEC and will rectify the situation.”

A shade of purple similar to the AEC’s trademark colour has featured prominently in Yes23 material for months, including on its website and in other places at which it would be of no benefit for Yes23 to replicate AEC colours.

Yes23 headquarters has told its volunteers not to place the signs near the commission’s, after a photo of the signs in the regional Victorian town of Mildura on Monday drew scrutiny and spurred right-wing figures to accuse Yes of deceptive tactics.

A spokesman for Fair Australia, the leading No campaign outfit, claimed the Yes campaign had rolled the signs out across NSW.

“We have gone to great lengths to comply with the election umpire’s often unreasonable requests, which have been consistently ignored by Yes23. For example, Yes23 is still running unauthorised digital ads,” the spokesman said.

“Australians will not be tricked into voting for the divisive Voice.”

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said on Tuesday that the signs were clearly in breach of the rules, while Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he was sure the Yes campaign would comply with any directions from the electoral commission.

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson posted on social media: “The Yes campaign has been caught red-handed using signs the exact same colour as the AEC, trying to mislead Aussie voters. [Albanese] talks a lot about ‘misinformation’. Will he demand the Yes campaign stop using these confusing and deceptive signs?”

Anti-lockdown activist and right-wing citizen journalist Rukshan Fernando gained hundreds of thousands of views for posts on X, formerly Twitter, claiming the electoral commission “didn’t appear particularly interested” in the Yes signs, despite it having asked for them to be removed.

In 2019, the Victorian Liberal Party faced scrutiny for signs containing Liberal messaging in Chinese language using colours similar to the commission’s.

The boss of the Victorian Liberal division at the time was Simon Frost, who is now Yes23’s campaign operations director.

Labor campaigner turned pollster Kos Samaras referred to Frost on Tuesday, posting a picture of the Liberal with the caption: “Look. It was done before.”

This masthead is not suggesting Frost played any role in choosing Yes23’s colour schemes, which were picked before he joined the referendum campaign in May.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/yes23-warned-by-aec-on-potentially-misleading-purple-signs-20231003-p5e99p.html?btis=

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19656309

File: 19014c350252364⋯.jpg (187.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_says_ther….jpg)

File: 18f9f92a02a167d⋯.jpg (193.89 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Voice_to_Parliament_vo….jpg)

>>19606805

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s Voice plea as he urges voters to drown out misinformation

ELEANOR CAMPBELL - OCTOBER 3, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese has pleaded with the thousands of undecided voters to drown out the “absurd” conspiracy theories and vote Yes, as Australians begin to vote in the Voice to parliament referendum.

The Prime Minister, insistent that a Yes vote will prevail on October 14 despite polls pointing towards a defeat, says he is confident Australians will look at the question before them and accept the “very modest request”.

It comes as early voting centres open across the country, with the Australian Electoral Commission confirming 124,000 people in Victoria, Tasmania, WA and the NT voted on the first day of operations.

Early voting commenced in every other state and the ACT on Tuesday.

With less than two weeks until polling day, the Prime Minister has kicked off a nationwide media blitz with a hopeful plea to Australians to accept the request put forward by First Australians and supported by 80 per cent of Indigenous people to enshrine an advisory body into the Constitution.

Mr Albanese said he was hopeful that undecided and “soft no” voters could tune out the “full sweep of misinformation”, citing examples of claims made regarding the Reserve Bank, private land ownership, and the United Nations.

“The idea that the Voice will have a say on the Reserve Bank determination of interest rates is quite frankly absurd, just absurd,” he said on the hustings in Tasmania.

“But to me, I think that is being countered by the goodwill that is overwhelmingly coming from the Yes campaign. The patient, extraordinary leadership from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people themselves who … have spent a lifetime just asking for a crack.

“If Australia votes yes, it will show respect for the First Australians, but it will do something else as well. We’ll feel better about ourselves as a nation.”

A record 17.5 million people set to cast their ballots over the next two weeks in the first referendum since 1999.

The majority of polls have pointed towards a No vote, although the most recent Guardian Essentials poll showed a slight uptick in support for the constitutional alteration up to 43 per cent, although 49 per cent still plan to vote the Voice down, and eight per cent still undecided.

Mr Albanese pressed there was enough time for one-on-one conversations with undecided voters.

“In voting yes, we’ll give three per cent of the population the opportunity to be heard, on matters that directly affect them, and they’ll be able to have a voice and be listened to and we’ll get better outcomes,” he said.

“You’ll get better results, you’ll actually save money – not spend money.

“My plea to voters … is to look at what the question is before the Australian people. It says very clearly, in recognition of Aboriginal and Torrest Strait Islander people as the first peoples of Australia – that’s the recognition bit – and it just says ‘there shall be a body, called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. It may make representations … on matters affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders’.

“There is nothing to fear here, everything to gain.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19656314

File: 28e9baf1669ba13⋯.jpg (231.07 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Both_Yes_and_No_campaigner….jpg)

>>19656309

2/2

Mr Albanese had earlier said the consequences of a No vote would be “more of the same” and Australia “can do better”.

“What I get, including from the volunteers who I met with in Hobart yesterday afternoon, is that when people have those one-on-one conversations with people about what the question is, when I myself have pointed out to people, sat down with people and asked them to read the question – people who are either undecided or soft no voters declare, yeah, that’s fair enough. This is the right thing to do,” he told ABC Radio on Tuesday morning.

Key figures of the vote No campaign have also bolstered efforts to sway undecided voters ahead of October 14, with Indigenous Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price telling a Perth event on Monday that the country did “not want a future where our children aren’t proud to call themselves Australian”.

“These corporations are being funded to push through reconciliation while the rest of us are just wandering around being reconciled,” Senator Price said.

Mr Albanese criticised Opposition Leader Peter Dutton on Monday on his call to hold a second referendum for constitutional recognition for First Nations people, an idea opposed by Senator Price.

“He talks about the cost of a referendum but he wants to have another one,” Mr Albanese said.

“This has been a process (that) has been around for a long period of time. This is a request from Aboriginal people and what they have said is they want constitutional recognition but they want recognition with some substance to it that makes a difference, which is why they want the opportunity just to be listened to – not to have the right of veto, not to have power over the parliament but just to be listened to.”

Australia’s will vote Yes or No on Saturday October 14 to the following question:

“A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/right-thing-to-do-prime-minister-anthony-albaneses-voice-plea/news-story/9ac81bc72c6b8c801b9fbc5a3b666a77

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19656323

File: 674961e42891007⋯.jpg (408.32 KB,2048x1365,2048:1365,Nick_McKenzie_speaks_to_th….jpg)

File: 5c050dc5dcd632f⋯.jpg (67.54 KB,757x364,757:364,A_screenshot_from_the_Face….jpg)

File: fbada3dd0dac067⋯.jpg (55.06 KB,751x367,751:367,Post_on_the_We_stand_with_….jpg)

File: e5cc20e5ed4df32⋯.jpg (23.69 KB,1024x158,512:79,A_comment_on_Facebook.jpg)

>>19417651 (pb)

Death threats from Ben Roberts-Smith supporters aimed at journalist

Calum Jaspan - October 3, 2023

Supporters of disgraced former SAS soldier Ben Roberts-Smith have directed a number of death threats at investigative reporter for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age Nick McKenzie since May, when a judge ruled in favour of his reporting on alleged war crimes committed by Roberts-Smith.

In June, Justice Anthony Besanko ruled that on the balance of probabilities Roberts-Smith was guilty and complicit in the murder of four unarmed prisoners in Afghanistan.

It was a decision several years in the making, following extensive reporting by McKenzie and Chris Masters, who were both subsequently sued for defamation by the former soldier and former Seven Network executive.

“Good morning Nick. I hope you receive the same punishment that Ali Jan allegedly received... just sleep on it mate,” McKenzie was told in a phone message in July, referencing one of the victims of Roberts-Smith.

Members of a Facebook group “We stand with Ben Roberts-Smith VC MG” lobbied others to attend scheduled dates for McKenzie’s and Masters’ book tours in July and August.

The group, which has more than 3700 members, was made private in July after one of its admins, Western Australian woman Linda Deval, was contacted by this masthead over a post claiming it had the support of Roberts-Smith and his family.

“Will be there in Canberra July 26th to let him know fear,” read one comment under the username Gary Redman, residing in the NSW town of Bermagui, on a post urging members to attend dates on McKenzie’s book tour.

“Do everyone a favour and walk in front of a bus you piece of scum,” read an email sent directly to McKenzie from an account under the name Gary Redman.

Redman purchased a ticket to one of McKenzie’s public tour events at the Australian National University, however according to security advice, was excluded from attending the event.

McKenzie said: “I’ve had many veterans contact me with messages of support, including special forces soldiers, who have read my book and realise it celebrates the brave SAS whistleblowers and witnesses who stood up to Roberts-Smith and who represent the military moral majority.

“I’ve also been issued multiple threats of death and violence from people who haven’t bothered to do any research and who fire themselves up in social media echo chambers. Some of the attacks are aimed at my family, which is revolting.”

A Meta spokesperson said keeping people safe on its apps was critical and that it continued to invest in technology to keep abuse off its platforms. The company said it doesn’t allow death threats, hate speech or calls for violence on Facebook and Instagram.

None of the examples provided to Meta were deemed breaches of its policies against online abuse, this masthead understands. “We have a dedicated safety website to support journalists in having a safe experience on our platform so they continue their important work,” Meta’s spokesperson said.

In August, prominent neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell voiced support for Roberts-Smith at a meeting held at Altona RSL in suburban Melbourne. Sewell and others chanted “Heil Ben Roberts-Smith” and “down with Nick McKenzie”.

An appeal by Roberts-Smith over the decision is set to be heard in the Federal Court in February.

https://www.theage.com.au/business/companies/death-threats-from-ben-roberts-smith-supporters-aimed-at-journalist-20230716-p5doke.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19656358

File: 6d2affdfe18596c⋯.jpg (444.04 KB,1600x2134,800:1067,Ashley_Paul_Griffith.jpg)

File: ab5b9a0c3ec506f⋯.jpg (1.11 MB,852x1551,284:517,THE_CHARGES_Ashley_Paul_Gr….jpg)

>>19278301 (pb)

>>19284162 (pb)

>>19289945 (pb)

Unmasked: the face of Australia’s worst alleged pedophile - Ashley Paul Griffith

MACKENZIE SCOTT, DAVID MURRAY and MICHAEL MCKENNA - OCTOBER 3, 2023

This is the face of the childcare worker alleged to be Australia’s worst pedophile.

Ashley Paul Griffith can be identified for the first time under new Queensland laws that allow alleged sex offenders to be named before they are committed to stand trial.

The 45-year-old former childcare worker stands accused of 1623 charges relating to the abuse of 91 little girls over a 15-year period in a dozen centres spanning states and continents.

The Australian could reveal his identity as of 12.01am on Tuesday when new laws came into effect to “modernise” the reporting of such offences and hold perpetrators to account, with media now able to name those accused in a slew of cases before the courts.

However, other accused serious sex offenders, including a high-profile Australian man and two reality show contestants, can still not be named due to court-issued suppression orders that override the legislative changes.

Griffith has remained anonymous since his arrest by the Australian Federal Police in August 2022. The case was made public by the AFP a year later in August after more than 1000 child exploitation charges were laid against him for offences at 10 centres in Brisbane, one in Sydney’s inner-west and another in Pisa, Italy between 2007 and 2022.

It followed an eight-year-long investigation that had allegedly connected the Gold Coast man to child abuse material posted online in 2014, AFP officers said while announcing his arrest eight weeks ago.

Court documents viewed by The Australian allege he systematically recorded each assault and rape on phones and cameras, keeping meticulous files of each of his victims. The charges revealed a pattern of escalating offending, with two little girls at one centre raped more than two dozen times each over several months.

Prior to his arrest, Griffith worked as a director of a childcare centre on Brisbane’s northside. In a since-deleted staff profile on the childcare centre’s website that has been viewed archived online, Griffith said he was a “firm believer in play-based learning”.

“I love engaging children in meaningful experiences that inspire their play and learning,” he said.

“Young children are natural inquirers, exploring the world through their senses, seeking answers and building theories. As an Early Childhood Teacher I hope to share this journey, learning side-by-side children and inspiring them.”

The first known alleged offences took place at a Brisbane centre in 2007 and continued until Griffith moved to Pisa, Italy in 2013, to work at an international school. He moved back to Australia in 2014, settling in Sydney’s inner-west and working at the same centre until 2017. He returned to Brisbane for family reasons in 2018, according to his staff profile.

It was while working in Europe that police allege he posted abuse material to an online forum, with 27 charges laid for the distribution of child pornography outside of Australia between October 2013 and June 2014.

The AFP said families attending the affected locations had been notified prior to the arrest being made public.

Griffith had previously been investigated by Queensland Police on two occasions in 2021 and again in 2022, but no charges were laid despite a former colleague alleging she had seen him kissing a child.

His blue card which allowed him to work with children was unaffected as a result, with court documents revealing he had allegedly continued to offend up until two months before his arrest.

The changes to Queensland laws to publicly name adults charged with rape and other prescribed sexual offences before they are committed to stand trial were passed in September.

The move was born from the landmark Women’s Safety and Justice Taskforce to bring Queensland more in line with the rest of the country.

Previously, media could not name accused persons until after they were committed to trial, due to concerns over “reputational damage” caused if somebody maliciously made up complaints.

Griffith is due to appear in court again on November 6.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/unmasked-the-face-of-australias-worst-alleged-pedophile/news-story/5701e1a810bab1646a293141392a66e2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664314

File: 88c9fcb50ed5abe⋯.jpg (281.38 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19606805

Indigenous voice to parliament Yes case can’t escape its own fatal contradictions

GREG SHERIDAN - OCTOBER 3, 2023

1/2

Whichever side wins the voice referendum – Yes or No – the tone leaders of both sides take on the night of the vote count and immediately after will be of great consequence for Australia.

We don’t have to come together on policy, for bipartisanism in support of bad policy is disastrous. But we should acknowledge that most people who participated in this debate, on both sides, did so with goodwill towards the nation and goodwill towards Indigenous Australians.

This in fact is why the Yes campaign was so grievously misled by the early polling that showed overwhelming support for the voice. These polls didn’t accurately measure support for changing the Constitution. They measured instead the pure goodwill to Indigenous Australians. It has been a fatal slander by the Yes case to argue goodwill to Indigenous Australians requires everyone to vote Yes, that people voting No can be motivated only by ignorance or malice – a typical identity politics false binary.

Foreign policy expert Owen Harries taught students that to prevail in an intellectual disagreement you must answer your opponent’s arguments at their strongest point.

The Yes case and pro-Yes commentators haven’t done this at any stage. They have ignored or grossly misrepresented the arguments of the No case.

On the ABC’s Insiders program on Sunday, one commentator (for whom in general I have the greatest professional respect) remarked that the No case consisted entirely of non sequiturs that he couldn’t even follow. That’s not only palpably decrepit intellectually, it’s a perfect way to lose the argument.

Misrepresenting or dismissing your opponent’s argument works only if your opponent is not going to get a hearing. Yes activists would have liked that, but Peter Dutton’s decision to oppose the voice and Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s brilliant advocacy for the No case mean that wasn’t so.

The Yes case could still win. It’s spending hundreds of thousands of dollars a day in NSW and Victoria. Big money talks in politics. But enshrining racial distinctions in citizenship into the Constitution is such a bad idea that once it is seriously opposed, support for it declines rapidly.

The Yes case can’t escape the contradictions at the heart of its advocacy. On the one hand, the Prime Minister and other Yes campaigners tell us this is a modest change, nothing more than one more advisory committee, it will have no effect on the vast majority of Australians. Yet on the other hand they tell us that only through this constitutional change can our nation heal, Aboriginal disadvantage be addressed and our country continue to be respected internationally. Those two propositions can’t be true simultaneously.

The Yes case tells us that voting No means there will be no change. It’s a vote for the failures of the status quo. This is surely the most ridiculous non sequitur of all. The precise figures are in dispute but certainly billions of dollars are spent on Indigenous people and programs each year.

I don’t think anyone begrudges this expenditure if it’s effective. It’s not effective. Who is in control of it? The Albanese government, which already has countless Indigenous advisory bodies. Are we really to believe that one more Indigenous advisory body will change all this but will be able to do so only if it’s enshrined in the Constitution, with all the problems that brings, and nothing else is worth trying?

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664316

File: 9d3f75b7b2f9332⋯.jpg (299.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

>>19664314

2/2

Price’s suggestion of an immediate audit of all this expenditure is a good one. Failure to get the voice will be no excuse for the Albanese government not to do whatever is necessary in Indigenous policy.

Similarly, the Yes case simply asserts, without ever demonstrating, that there would be no High Court litigation, no new process delays or unintended constitutional consequences from the voice. This is against all Australian constitutional experience.

In administrative law, activist judges frequently reverse a ministerial decision by finding that the minister failed to give sufficient consideration to the views of some body they are supposed to consult. With the voice having a right to consultation in the Constitution, the potential for delay, cost escalation and utterly unpredictable constitutional fallout is obvious.

The Prime Minister asserts it’s ridiculous to think the voice would want, or have, a say on defence policy. But activists involved in design of the voice explicitly do want joint sovereignty or some such nonsense. Certainly it’s not remotely far-fetched to imagine an activist body arguing that sacred lands would be defiled by the presence of nuclear-powered submarines, or fighter bombers, or the like.

The whole Yes construct that this is a campaign by the marginalised against the powerful is colossally absurd and a complete reversal of the truth. This is a campaign of massive institutional power – the government, the ABC, the richest corporations, trade unions – all attempting to browbeat and morally coerce the Australian people into voting Yes. A No vote will be a magnificent declaration of independence by voters.

The biggest factor convincing people to vote No is the concern that the voice, and the insertion of racial categories into the Constitution, will divide rather than unite Australians. In coming to this conclusion the Australian people are demonstrating the wisdom of crowds. Injecting racial categories into the Constitution guarantees that our politics will revolve around the sterile and deadly culture of identity politics. People are right to reject that.

The second big factor is a perfectly sensible concern that a Yes vote will come with other costs – instability, financial liability, unintended consequences. The third factor is deep respect for the stability of the Constitution. The Yes campaign never dealt meaningfully and respectfully with any of these issues.

The fourth dynamic changing people to No voters has been Price and Nyunggai Warren Mundine demonstrating that not all Indigenous Australians support the voice.

Price’s superb advocacy of a new way of doing Indigenous politics is the single most positive, hopeful development in this field in many years. If the Liberal and National parties don’t develop the Price insights into a general approach they are even dumber than they sometimes look. Price offers the insight that advancement for Indigenous people is neither primarily a constitutional question nor even narrowly a political one. It surely involves good access to services, but it also involves individual agency, economic advancement, productive integration into all the opportunities of a modern society.

Help to overcome disadvantage is one thing. Making disadvantage your raison d’etre, creating a permanent grievance industry, is something altogether different. In the end, Australia is not one nation for two peoples. It’s one nation for many, many people, all of them absolutely equal in civic status.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/yes-case-cant-escape-contrary-arguments/news-story/4700d63db1c807c94502ea361ed2dd56

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664325

File: e7483fc47049321⋯.jpg (407.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_crowd_at_Come_Together….jpg)

File: 763620e3a5493a9⋯.jpg (1.01 MB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Uluru_Statement_from_t….jpg)

>>19664314

Close the Gap? No camp’s lack of vision is staggering

TROY BRAMSTON - OCTOBER 3, 2023

1/2

With voting on the referendum to establish a voice to parliament under way, now is the time for those who are planning to vote No to reconsider and vote Yes, ignoring the shrill calls to war and rage, and embrace this simple, modest, low-risk constitutional change that will enlarge and uplift our nation, and reconcile us with the past.

The voice to parliament and government will be an Indigenous consultative body tasked with providing information, suggestions and feedback to policymakers about matters that affect Indigenous Australians so we can improve the health, employment, education, housing, justice and safety outcomes of Indigenous Australians.

If you are not an Indigenous Australian, then there is much to gain by supporting this straightforward constitutional change. It will mean the sums of money allocated to programs for Indigenous Australians is more effectively targeted, benefiting from ground-up advice about what works and what does not.

It will also mean, as Noel Pearson has long argued, there is a new layer of accountability and responsibility about the allocation of public resources towards initiatives that are meant to close the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians on vital health, social and economic indicators.

The voice, made up of representatives from Indigenous communities around Australia, will be transparent in its advice tendered to government and parliament, and ultimately responsible with policymakers for improving outcomes over time. The annual Closing the Gap reports will become a report card for the work of the voice.

So, if you want public moneys to pay a greater dividend by seeing more Indigenous children educated, less substance abuse and welfare dependency, more women living in safe and secure homes, less unemployment and more Indigenous entrepreneurs, and fewer men and boys in detention, then vote Yes for the voice to parliament. Because here is the thing: if you vote No, you are voting for nothing to change. This proposal for an Indigenous advisory body is all there is on offer. There is no second referendum. There is no alternative proposal to help alleviate systematic entrenched disadvantage. This is it.

The constitutional referendum is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to turn the corner on these terrible statistics, written with human misery and government policy failure year after year and in report after report, and script a new chapter in the Australian story. It should be a moment of pride, of hope and about the past but focused on the future.

This referendum is a chance at symbolic reconciliation and practical reconciliation, joining the false divide that has often characterised debate towards Indigenous Australians. Recognising 60,000 years of continuous culture and tradition in the founding document of Australia is an act of both recognition and reconciliation.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664328

File: 0d6405ff02579ea⋯.jpg (99.58 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_addresses_the….jpg)

File: 683857751493b2c⋯.jpg (637.86 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price.jpg)

>>19664325

2/2

But it is not merely symbolic, it is practical too. By enshrining an Indigenous advisory body in the Constitution, it means the idea cannot be abolished. Future parliaments and governments must have a formalised body made up of Indigenous Australians, chosen by Indigenous Australians, to provide advice on matters that affect them.

It is only advice. Whether or not the advice is followed or rejected will depend on the quality of that advice. The genius of this proposal is that the parliament, the elected representative body of all Australians, remains supreme. It will have the power to decide how the voice is structured and how it works. If it does not operate effectively, parliament can abolish it and form a new advisory body. The referendum only provides the opportunity for First Australians to be heard.

This is the message of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, a short one-page document developed after extensive consultation with Indigenous Australians that extended a hand of friendship and reconciliation to all Australians. It is a document that eloquently made the case for a future with hope and opportunity for all.

The integrity of this proposal and its compatibility with our Constitution and system of government have been endorsed by former High Court judges, our premier law societies and most eminent constitutional scholars. So there is nothing to fear with this change to our Constitution. It is far from radical or revolutionary. The parliament cedes no decision-making power to the voice.

The No camp is led by populist reactionary conservatives, many of whom have been propagating lies and misinformation about the voice, and some have peddled unadulterated racism. It has been sickening to observe organisations such as CPAC Australia provide a platform for bigotry. And dangerous to see them attack the integrity of the Australian Electoral Commission.

There is no agreed alternative pathway for reconciliation and recognition offered by the No camp. Its leading proponents, including Warren Mundine, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Peter Dutton and David Littleproud, disagree on treaties, alternative voice bodies and a future, recognition-only referendum. They cannot explain how defeating this referendum will make Indigenous Australians better off.

As I have noted in previous columns, the referendum does not inject racial division in the Constitution; it is already there in sections 51 (xxvi) and 25. It does not confer a special class of citizenship; we have long recognised the traditions and cultures of First Australians in legal judgments, laws and programs. Nor will the voice lead to endless litigation, with former High Court chief justice Robert French explaining there is “little or no scope” for this.

This referendum is about recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians in the Constitution and establishing an advisory body to improve policy outcomes. It is about listening to and respecting them and their unique place in the story of this continent. It is an act of reconciliation. And it offers a chance for all of us to embrace change for a better future for all Australians.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/close-the-gap-no-camps-lack-of-vision-is-staggering/news-story/85781cc487e83923aaf4a4e196db4e85

https://qresear.ch/?q=Troy+Bramston

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664349

File: 3db4a31f57ebe6c⋯.jpg (241.81 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_leaders_Marcia_….jpg)

File: 0e7500339dced6a⋯.jpg (234.29 KB,1934x1088,967:544,Member_of_the_First_Nation….jpg)

>>19606805

Marcia Langton and Tom Calma say the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum has been shaped by our racist history

ROSIE LEWIS and JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - OCTOBER 4, 2023

1/2

Key voice architects say the ­referendum campaign has tapped into “a deep well of historical ­racism” and warn that Indigenous people will need to work “very closely” with politicians in the event of a Yes vote to ensure voice legislation “realises their ambitions for greater control over their lives”.

In an article for world-leading medical journal The Lancet, Marcia Langton and Tom Calma join fellow Indigenous academics Ian Anderson, Yin Paradies and Ray Lovett in cautioning a No vote will have a “profoundly negative effect” on Indigenous Australians who have worked on reconciliation for nearly two decades.

It comes as leading Yes campaigner Noel Pearson said a failed referendum would be “a disaster for all of us” and there was no plan B to improve the lives of Indigenous Australians, while voice supporter Frank Brennan said the poll had “created a hell of a mess” and sent race relations in Australia backwards.

With less than two weeks until polling day and early voting open across the country, Anthony ­Albanese on Tuesday declared the referendum was “certainly win­nable” and undecided voters he had spoken to thought the question they would be asked on constitutional recognition through a voice was “fair enough”.

Acknowledging that the voice was a compromise position for ­Indigenous leaders after “many conservative politicians would not accept the inclusion of rights in the Australian Constitution”, Professors Anderson, Paradies, Langton, Lovett and Calma say there are early signs the referendum process is causing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people higher levels of racism.

“We posit that this is partly ­because the referendum process taps into a deep well of historical racism that originated on the Australian frontier when Indigenous peoples ‘were violently dispossessed from their lands by the British’,” they say in the September 28 Lancet article, quoting Indigenous activist and human rights lawyer Hannah McGlade.

“This history has shaped the 2023 referendum and an increasingly divisive campaign between those advocating a Yes and a No position. The voice referendum process creates a substantial cultural load for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Indigenous peoples are being asked, and expected, to engage in conversations around this topic and, often, are then challenged to defend their position.”

The academics say that to mitigate risk to mental health and wellbeing, there needs to be respectful discourse that counters misinformation emerging about the voice and Indigenous aspirations, noting the government has allocated $10m to support the mental health of Indigenous people during the campaign.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people will no doubt continue to strive for justice if Australians vote down the referendum, they say, which, regardless of the outcome, “will have a profound effect on the future relationship between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and other Australians”.

“Even if the vote is for Yes, Indigenous peoples will need to work very closely with the Australian parliament to ensure the voice legislation realises their ambitions for greater control over their lives. A voice does not guarantee outcomes,” they write.

“A voice provides a stronger platform through which governments can work more effectively with Indigenous Australians at a regional and national level.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664359

File: cb52268397f0862⋯.jpg (308.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tom_Calma.jpg)

File: dc2ffe86cd8c422⋯.jpg (218.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Co_chair_of_the_panel_desi….jpg)

File: a7917b80e43b87a⋯.jpg (891.35 KB,1241x1666,73:98,0001.jpg)

File: 71a6ab21be839b2⋯.jpg (796.11 KB,1241x1666,73:98,0002.jpg)

File: 40c0282b6febd66⋯.jpg (610.36 KB,1241x1666,73:98,0003.jpg)

>>19664349

2/2

Mr Pearson said it would take a couple of generations for the voice to turn Indigenous Australians’ life expectancy around but there would be heartbreak and absolute despair if the referendum failed.

“I have been at this for 30 years working on these problems from the ground up, and I’m telling you that there is no plan B,” he told 3AW radio.

“No will be a disaster for all of us. We will all lose, including the No campaigners. We will lose. If we vote Yes, we’ll all win, including the No campaigners. This will be good for them and for the ­entire country if we vote Yes.”

The Cape York leader said he would not seek to be elected to the voice but would advise and mentor the next generation of leaders so that they could help implement plans to improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

His message to Australians thinking of voting No was: “Really? That people who lived here for 65,000 years are going to be rejected? Their recognition is not going to be implemented in the Constitution after 15 years?”

Hitting out at three “serious missteps” by the Albanese ­government, Father Brennan said the lack of a bipartisan ­process following last year’s Garma festival, not releasing any draft voice legislation and the Prime Minister hand-picking 21 Indigenous leaders for the government’s referendum working group had harmed constitutional recognition and reconciliation.

He said it was “dreadful” of Mr Albanese to suggest the referendum would have been worthwhile even if it failed because it brought Indigenous disadvantage to the fore of public discussion.

“I don’t know a single Aboriginal person who says they’d want to go through this again and that it was worth doing,” he told 2GB radio. “What we’ve done is we’ve created a hell of a mess and in terms of race relations we’re well behind the eight ball from where we were prior to the Garma announcement.”

Mr Albanese said the voice would give respect to Indigenous Australians and something to non-Indigenous Australians too.

“Because we will feel better about ourselves, like we did when the apology (to the Stolen Generations) happened,” he told Hit100.9 Hobart radio.

“We just felt better. An act of generosity. When you do something for someone else, then you feel better about yourself.”

Leading No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price said Australians couldn’t wait for the referendum to be over so parliament could instead focus on cost-of-living issues, insisting the voice was not the way to achieve great outcomes for marginalised Indigenous people.

“Speaking to people face to face as they go in to cast their vote, they are more determined to vote No to any level of division within our Constitution, but they are saying Yes to maintaining equality in Australia,” she said while campaigning in Perth.

“Those that we’re speaking to on the ground … They’re ready to stand up for the benefit of all Australians, but particularly our most marginalised.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/marcia-langton-and-tom-calma-say-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum-has-been-shaped-by-our-racist-history/news-story/d005631bf248d2e21d000597566ba9e0

https://www.thelancet.com/action/doSearch?type=quicksearch&text1=Marcia+Langton&field1=AllField&journalCode=lancet&SeriesKey=lancet

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)01954-2/fulltext

https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(23)01954-2.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664382

File: e4e14838cfe11a1⋯.jpg (230.18 KB,1280x960,4:3,If_the_voice_fails_the_jud….jpg)

>>19606805

Yes campaign can’t distract from real issue of voice’s power

With the Yes and No campaigns in full throttle, replete with exaggerations, distortions and racist claims, there is almost no focus on the central issue.

PAUL KELLY - October 4, 2023

1/2

With voting now open and the Yes and No campaigns in full throttle, replete with exaggerations, distortions and racist claims, there is almost no focus on the central issue of the referendum – the constitutional power of the voice in representing the Indigenous peoples.

There are many claims for this referendum: that it is about “the spirit of reconciliation”, honouring 60,000 years of Indigenous history, about “closing the gap” or showing respect. In fact, like every referendum it is about a constitutional power being created. This is the issue.

We are told by the Yes campaign the voice is a mere “advisory body”. Anthony Albanese calls it a modest and humble request. Of course, the Yes side wants to assuage the fears aroused by the No side. But its depiction of the voice is inaccurate and misleading. Here is the dilemma that has plagued the Yes camp from the outset – the unprecedented nature of the proposal.

The voice seeks to change the mechanisms of influence, power and governance in this country.

Megan Davis and George Williams describe it in these terms: “The voice to parliament is a structural reform. It is a change to the structure of Australia’s public institutions and would redistribute public power via the Constitution, Australia’s highest law.”

They say Australia’s democracy “plays against” Indigenous people, who constitute only 3 per cent of the population. While the voice will be “an enabling mechanism” in treaty negotiations, treaties are not enough – what matters is the “structural power enabled by constitutional recognition”.

This analysis appreciates what the Yes side denies for electoral purposes – constitutional sanction for the voice vests it with unique authority that empowers its relations with government and parliament and its perception by the High Court. To reinforce this point, the referendum creates a new Chapter IX of the Constitution, a step never contemplated since 1901.

The intent is unmistakeable. The voice will become a fundamental arm of Australian governance sitting next to the other great constitutional institutions: the parliament (Chapter I), the executive government (Chapter II), the judicature (Chapter III). Every aspect of its location and organisation can be expected to reflect this stature.

In its report the referendum working group said the voice “enshrined in the Constitution will be an unflinching source of advice and accountability” to the parliament and government. Using representations astutely, Davis says the voice “will have a lot of power”. Its Indigenous mandate means its ability to pressure government would be immense.

The new section 129 establishes the core features of the voice – it may make representations to parliament and government “on matters relating” to the Indigenous peoples.

These powers cannot be revoked by parliament. As Davis and Williams say, the voice gets permanent protection “against changing political circumstances”. No matter what it says, it cannot be abolished (short of another referendum).

Former High Court chief justice Robert French calls the voice a “significant institution in our representative democracy”.

Claims that parliament can control the scope of the voice are wrong. It cannot. Parliament cannot overrule the constitutional amendment. It can, however, determine the voice’s composition, size and operations. Note the referendum does not specify the voice should be “directly” elected by the people (in this case Indigenous people).

Pivotal to the voice is its wide, almost unlimited scope to make representations. Davis and Williams are explicit – the voice can make representations on “specific issues” concerning Indigenous people but also on “general policy areas” from tax to climate change since community-wide policies also affect Aboriginal people.

The design is extraordinary: the voice, for example, has the constitutional power to advise on welfare, education, culture, resources, Australia Day, law, defence and foreign policy, among other issues.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664385

File: 26530b1c2738039⋯.jpg (158.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_says_the_….jpg)

File: c09b83d423a82de⋯.jpg (178.37 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Megan_Davis.jpg)

>>19664382

2/2

While the Yes camp has tried to downgrade or deny the voice’s representational scope, Indigenous leaders have mostly been frank about this issue. Davis and lawyer Gabrielle Appleby argue “the scope of the voice is its strength”. They say: “The voice will be able to speak to all parts of the government, including the cabinet, ministers, public servants, and independent statutory officers and agencies.”

That’s the power being created. The voice can make representations from the Reserve Bank to Centrelink. There are hundreds of such bodies falling within its scope. Repeated efforts by the Yes campaign to prescribe where the voice will give advice are worthless. The voice will be master of its destiny; it won’t be told what to do.

What matters is the power being created. The voice can make representations forever to all such bodies and bodies yet to be created. Whether it would do so is another matter. It defies prediction. What doesn’t defy prediction is the constitutional power authorising this process.

The voice has both a constitutional and political identity. It is a political institution, a group rights body that represents one section of the nation, defined by ancestry.

It means Indigenous people will not only be recognised in the Constitution but the means of recognition is the creation in perpetuity of an Indigenous representative body vesting them with a unique capacity, denied to any other section of the Australian nation, to exercise a political role and influence across the spectrum of executive and parliament on issues both solely concerning Indigenous people or concerning the wider nation.

This is an astonishing innovation in our system of government. It is not a veto but it is a new constitutional power. Advocates say the voice is the sovereign right of First Nations people. But such a right comes with many consequences that the Australian community must assess at this referendum.

It can be seen as only diminishing the principle of equality of citizenship. It is untenable to promote such a body, no matter how justified, yet pretend it does not disrupt the classical liberal compact of democratic equality, so deeply embedded in Australian culture. The almost desperate insistence by the Yes case that the voice is just an “advisory body” is a claim designed to deceive on any test of the evidence and facts.

The voice is an unprecedented departure for our Constitution. Many people have supported reconciliation, native title, the apology and special rights for Indigenous people but cannot support the voice with this design. The Australian tragedy is that people are being told the voice is the only method of Indigenous recognition on offer.

Voice advocates are anxious to argue the issue is not about race. For the Yes case, that’s an electoral necessity. Advocates say, correctly, the voice is a body that represents First Nations people as the Indigenous people of Australia. But surely there are two truths here – it is about First Nations people and it is about race. Isn’t this how most Australians see the issue?

The reality is laws have been passed by parliament in relation to Indigenous people based on the race power in section 51 (XXVI) of the Constitution.

Human Rights Commissioner Lorraine Finlay asserted the voice proposal “inserts race into the Australian Constitution in a way that undermines the foundation human rights principles of equality and non-discrimination”.

For many people the voice is seen in both First Nations terms and in racial terms. After 30 years of debate in this nation about racial issues this is hardly a surprise.

When leading No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says the voice is dividing the country “along fractures of race”, that resonates with many people who have reservations about the way race is now embraced in our society as a celebratory badge of group identity.

The point for the referendum is that the voice is contentious at multiple levels and around its core principles.

If the voice fails, the judgment will be that such a contentious proposal in its design should never have been advanced short of a convention and bipartisanship support.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/yes-campaign-cant-distract-from-real-issue-of-voices-power/news-story/57ed60fe9623768d8d8cc963d4d7c030

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664399

File: f95e2ca3c5243ba⋯.jpg (527.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Coalition_senator_Jacinta_….jpg)

File: f085a851eb538b1⋯.jpg (659.51 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_a….jpg)

>>19606805

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price embarks on Indigenous voice to parliament referendum unity drive

PAIGE TAYLOR - OCTOBER 4, 2023

A busy cafe run by Vietnamese-Australians was an ideal setting for Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s message about a united yet diverse nation living with the sinister threat of racial divide.

In the office district of West Perth on Tuesday morning, Senator Nampijinpa Price worked the coffee machine with members of the Luong family at Epic Cafe, later saying: “I mean, they are an example of the Australian story, and as I keep saying to Australians around the country, it doesn’t matter whether we were here 60,000 years ago or six months ago: you are Australian, it doesn’t matter your racial heritage.”

Yes advocates thought they would own the concept of bringing Australians closer together in this referendum. But Senator Nampijinpa Price has taken it from them and it appeared to be working on undecided voters and Hard Nos alike.

The first-term politician received a rapturous reception at Perth’s biggest convention centre the previous night as she walked on stage to the sound of husband Colin Lillie singing the opening lines of his country rock song, Renegade: “I’m the bringer of change.”

The audience of more than 1200 – all wearing caps depicting the logo of anti-voice campaign Fair Australia – applauded loudly throughout her 17-minute speech on Monday night.

The most enthusiastic applause came when Senator Nampijinpa Price promised to put a broom through Indigenous spending.

Spending is another policy space she seems to be owning in this campaign – despite the fact the voice proposal was partly conceived as a way to end decades of waste and misdirected funds.

“We’re going to do what we haven’t done yet. We’re gonna find out where the billions of dollars are being spent,” she said.

While the crowd devoured it, Peter Dutton did not seem as enthusiastic next morning about committing to an audit, a royal commission or any details about how a Coalition government would carry out this promise.

“I can tell you this: if the Coalition is successful at the next election and I’m prime minister and Jacinta is our minister for Indigenous affairs or Indigenous Australians, there will be improvements made for people living in Indigenous communities like Alice Springs because Jacinta has a practical knowledge, understanding and the ability to apply that skill and knowledge to the benefit of Indigenous Australians,” he said.

Asked what the Coalition’s approach to commonwealth Indigenous affairs spending would be, and how it would differ from previous audits that have revealed a litany of failings, Mr Dutton said: “Well, we will have a lot more to say in relation to these matters in the run-up to the election.”

Several popular social media posts claim the commonwealth’s state and territory Indigenous affairs budget is around $40bn, which appears to be a figure reached after adding inflation to a 2017 Productivity Commission estimate of $33.4bn.

However, The Australian has reported that the Productivity Commission stresses $6bn of that was for programs and policies specifically for Indigenous Australians. The rest – $27.4bn – was for things all Australians receive such as Medicare.

Indigenous voice supporters, including Rio Tinto board member Ben Wyatt, the former WA treasurer, see the advisory body as the only option on offer to reform ineffective Indigenous policy and save taxpayer dollars. Mr Wyatt says it will do this by giving government clear advice from communities that know what works and what does not work.

“These comments from Senator Price highlight that the No position lacks any intellectual foundation other than they will continue to do the same, but, apparently, with more determination,” Mr Wyatt said.

“Senator Price acknowledges … Aboriginal affairs needs more accountability and transparency – the Yes position agrees and argues that this should be in the form of a voice that has the expertise and distance from government to perform such a role. The No position has some odd faith that the status quo, that puts deep faith in the institutions of government doing exactly the same thing, will somehow deliver a different outcome.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/jacinta-nampijinpa-price-embarks-on-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum-unity-drive/news-story/e76ed601cf41a95ce1c9cc666835dcd4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664413

File: 40f5e25c835474c⋯.jpg (86.87 KB,1280x721,1280:721,A_road_sign_defaced_to_rea….jpg)

File: 40b99d527fa1985⋯.jpg (177.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Leading_No_campaigner_Nyun….jpg)

File: f216155b0d6cc34⋯.jpg (190.57 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Yes23_campaign_director_De….jpg)

>>19606805

Bizarre road sign vandals popping up in one state

DUNCAN EVANS - OCTOBER 4, 2023

Police are hunting for vandals who defaced speed limit road signs to read ‘No’ across regional South Australia in another mark of a growing ugliness in the Voice to parliament referendum campaign.

Motorists across the state reported the altered signs, with the 110 speed limit figure vandalised to read “No” in an apparent reference to the campaign, now in its final two weeks before the October 14 vote.

A Department of Transportation spokesman confirmed on Wednesday at least two speed signs, one on the Barrier Highway at Burra and another on Worlds End Highway at Robertson had been vandalised.

“Road signs and infrastructure are very important for driver safety,” the spokesman said.

“Maintenance crews are currently checking other signage in the area for vandalism.

“Defacing road infrastructure is a criminal offence which carries a maximum penalty of $5000 or one year imprisonment.”

A South Australian Police spokesman said the police were aware of the vandalism and were investigating.

Under Section 17 of the Road Traffic Act 1961, traffic control devices may only be installed, maintained, altered, operated and removed with the minister’s approval.

The vandalism poses a safety threat to motorists because speed limits in the regions oscillate between 100 and 110 limits.

Leaders from both sides of the campaign have called for greater civility in the contentious debate on Constitutional recognition, which has been tinged with unsavoury rhetoric and behaviour.

At a rally in Adelaide to launch the South Australia No campaign in September, No supporters were branded as “racist” and “pigs” by protesters.

Leading No campaigner Nyunggai Warren Mundine AO has been accused of stoking vitriol when he posted to X, formerly Twitter, he would like to see former boxer Anthony Mundine fight Yes advocate Thomas Mayo.

Polls show the No camp ahead with less than two weeks to go and an exit poll conducted by The Adelaide Advertiser suggests a majority of South Australians will likely reject the Voice.

The Advertiser spoke with 291 voters at five different pre-polling booths spread across Greater Adelaide on Tuesday, with 169 saying they voted ‘no’ and 122 saying they voted ‘yes’ for a 58-42 split in favour of No.

But the Yes camp is confident it can still secure victory and Yes23 volunteers plan to make a million phone calls to undecided voters before October 14 to persuade them to vote Yes.

Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin said the Yes camp would focus on “meaningful conversations” with Australians who had not made up their minds.

“We know many Australians are only starting to turn their minds to the referendum now,” he said.

“We’ll be making every effort to engage with these voters and have conversations about the importance of a successful Yes vote.

“We’re turning up the dial when it comes to our engagement with Australians.

“We’ll be having genuine, in-depth conversations with undecided voters about how this is a simple and modest proposal that has come directly from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/bizarre-road-sign-vandals-popping-up-in-one-state/news-story/8e17b4a2b365d7565c9cb3e8000ccd12

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664434

File: 6bc3842cb1d63bc⋯.jpg (3.45 MB,6987x4663,6987:4663,A_Virginia_class_nuclear_s….jpg)

File: a5802b8aac67be0⋯.jpg (212.99 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0001.jpg)

File: 22afa9c027cecf0⋯.jpg (813.26 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0002.jpg)

File: 7ee945354119499⋯.pdf (1.48 MB,RL32418.pdf)

>>19505163

Scathing new report hands AUKUS sceptics firepower

James Curran and Andrew Tillett - Oct 3, 2023

An accident by the Australian navy operating US-made nuclear-powered submarines could result in American warships being banned from foreign ports, a new report warns US legislators, providing fresh ammunition for congressional sceptics to scuttle the AUKUS deal.

The Congressional Research Service report also reaffirms American doubts that Australia might not use nuclear-powered submarines bought from the US in a war over Taiwan. That suggests that at least some of Canberra’s messaging about AUKUS not tying Australia irrevocably into a US-led war with China is being heard in Washington.

“Virginia-class boats are less certain to be used in a US-China conflict over Taiwan, or less certain to be used in such a conflict in the way that the United States might prefer, if they are sold to Australia rather than retained in US Navy service,” the report said.

Conversely, the report said approving the sale would see Australia become a “second allied decision-making centre” for operating nuclear-powered submarines in the Indo-Pacific, “which would enhance deterrence of potential Chinese aggression by complicating Chinese military planning”.

Released late last month, the report follows concerns Republican senators raised in a July letter to President Joe Biden, which requested more money for the US submarine industrial base to boost production to fulfil the AUKUS agreement.

While these reports are presented to Congress to assist in deliberations, they represent the most deeply researched and even-handed analysis of policy options on the public record in the US system. This is the most scathing yet of the likely pitfalls.

Most alarmingly for Canberra, one risk identified in the report is Australia would “unavoidably” become responsible for preventing an accident once it operated US-made submarines.

Such an accident might “call into question for third-party observers the safety of all US Navy nuclear-powered ships”, potentially affecting “US public support for operating US Navy nuclear-powered ships and/or the ability of US Navy nuclear-powered ships to make port calls around the world for purposes of sending deterrent signals of alliance resolve and solidarity to China, Russia or other potential adversaries”.

The report lists a number of other stumbling blocks.

On the proposed sale of the Virginia-class submarines, the report questions whether a decision needs to be made by Congress in 2023, or whether it could be “deferred until 2024 or later”. That kicks the issue into the fractious space of a presidential election year and, potentially, the unpredictability of a second Trump presidency.

The report stresses Congress still lacks basic details: the dates that the sold boats would leave the US navy, how much service life they would have, the sale price per boat, and Australia’s contribution to the US industrial submarine base.

These kinds of complications are well known, but the report could fuel concerns the White House is not giving Congress adequate information to make a considered decision.

The report also reignites debate over Australian sovereignty and the prospect of the submarines being called upon by the US.

Selling Australia submarines would “substantially enhance deterrence of potential Chinese aggression” by sending a strong collective signal from the US, Australia and UK to “counter China’s military modernisation effort”.

But no Australian prime minister or minister has ever talked of AUKUS in this way: either explicitly in terms of it being anti-China or of Australia forming a hub for Indo-Pacific decision-making on submarine operations.

Defence Minister Richard Marles’ office declined to comment on the report, but referred to statements he made at July’s AUSMIN meeting where he expressed confidence congressional wrangling would not cruel the deal.

The US roadblocks to sharing nuclear-propulsion technology are in contrast to Britain, where a £3.95 billion ($7.5 billion) contract was announced on the weekend to begin detailed design work on SSN-AUKUS, the submarine that both the UK and Australian navies will eventually operate. Australia is not contributing money at this point to the design work.

https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/scathing-new-report-hands-aukus-sceptics-firepower-20231003-p5e9fz

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32418

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664451

File: 4b4bcceca6e033e⋯.jpg (589.99 KB,2400x1440,5:3,Daniel_Duggan_a_naturalise….jpg)

>>19535089

Daniel Duggan: US extradition case could be delayed due to fight over AFP and ASIO documents

Fate of ex-US navy pilot remains uncertain as legal team seeks 2,000 documents relating to claim he was ‘lured’ back to Australia

AAP / theguardian.com - Wed 4 Oct

Lawyers for an ex-US navy pilot accused of training Chinese airmen say delays in obtaining crucial material from the government mean an upcoming extradition hearing will have to be delayed.

Daniel Edmund Duggan, 55, was arrested in October last year after the US government accused him of arms trafficking by providing military training to Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010 and 2012.

He is also accused of money laundering while a US citizen. The father of six denies all the charges.

Appearing at Downing Centre local court on Wednesday, Duggan’s lawyer Dennis Miralis said his client would seek to vacate an upcoming hearing on 23 November for the United States’ extradition application.

A magistrate will hear submissions on that postponement at an earlier hearing on 23 October, with Duggan expected to appear via a video link.

Outside court on Wednesday, Miralis said it was regrettable that further delays could occur as Duggan was psychologically affected from being held in custody.

“However at the same time, it’s absolutely essential that Dan’s right to a fair hearing is preserved and nothing is done to prejudice that right,” he told AAP.

“Regrettably it’s very slow. However, it’s absolutely crucial for us to get that material.”

The 55-year-old is trying to get hold of documents from government agencies such as the Australian federal police, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation and the US Department of Justice regarding the allegations against him.

Miralis said the agencies had opposed handing over material to the former navy pilot, citing secrecy and the possibility of interference in international relations.

Duggan’s legal team wants to view about 2,000 documents allegedly relating to prior claims the ex-pilot was “lured” back to Australia to be arrested for the extradition.

Miralis said the AFP could not hand over all material until 17 November, mere days before the scheduled extradition hearing.

Duggan’s wife, Saffrine, said in May the prosecution showed the legal system was being “weaponised against an Australian citizen at the behest of a foreign government”.

The US government has accused the former pilot of conspiring with others to provide military training to China in relation to aircraft-carrier approaches and landings.

It is also alleged he provided military training to Chinese pilots in 2012 and conspired to launder payments for the services.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/oct/04/daniel-duggan-ex-marine-pilot-us-extradition-case-arms-trafficking

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664477

File: e2a80cb30a09a2e⋯.jpg (219.27 KB,2400x1440,5:3,Lawyers_for_Alexander_Cser….jpg)

File: 37065dfc3060061⋯.jpg (570.68 KB,2400x1600,3:2,Bernard_Collaery_the_barri….jpg)

>>19204881 (pb)

>>19272640 (pb)

Bondi businessman accused of selling secrets to China can only be accused of plagiarism, lawyers argue

Lawyers for Alexander Csergo say a search using AI tools used to check plagiarism at universities verified his claim he provided open source material

Catie McLeod - 4 Oct 2023

Lawyers for a Bondi businessman accused of selling Australian secrets to China say simple artificial intelligence tools used to check for plagiarism at universities verified his claim he only provided publicly available information.

Alexander Csergo watched on via video link from Sydney’s Parklea prison on Wednesday as prosecutors told Downing Centre local court they would ask the federal attorney general’s department if it wanted to continue his case.

Csergo has been held in prison on remand after he was arrested in Bondi in April. He was the first person in Australia to be charged with reckless foreign interference, an offence created as part of a suite of national security laws introduced in 2018.

The 55-year-old is alleged to have swapped reports on business and politics with two Chinese handlers, known to him by their anglicised names of Ken and Evelyn, in exchange for envelopes of cash while he was living in Shanghai during the pandemic.

His barrister, Bernard Collaery, told the court on Wednesday it should be obvious to police the 13 reports Csergo gave the Chinese were derived from open source material “with some of his own commentary” added, rather than being classified information.

“Perhaps the only offence this man can be accused of is plagiarism,” Collaery said.

“Because you could now do an AI search of where those 13 documents came from. I’ve had a young intern in our chambers check it as the kids can do at university.”

Collaery told the court his staff had gone through tens of thousands of pages of evidence that police had provided to the courts and had not found anything they could connect to any “sinister wrongdoing” by Csergo.

Csergo has previously told Australian police he believed he was being groomed by intelligence officers from China’s ministry of state security and provided anodyne reports to his handlers in an effort to placate them until he could escape China.

He told police he filled the reports with open source and occasionally fabricated information in the hopes of avoiding detention and being able to return to Sydney to see his elderly mother once the Covid-19 lockdown restrictions were lifted.

Asio raided Csergo’s mother’s Bondi home in February before he was arrested and charged two months later, shortly after he returned to Australia.

On Wednesday, his case was adjourned for a fourth time and pushed back by two weeks, meaning the commonwealth department of public prosecutions is likely to miss its six-month deadline for providing a full brief of evidence to the court.

Under New South Wales law, if that deadline is not met, the defence can apply for the charges to be dropped.

The lawyer for the commonwealth department of public prosecutions, Syed Shah, tried to get the deputy chief magistrate Sharon Freund to agree to a 10-week adjournment.

Shah told the court that prosecutors were waiting for the attorney general’s department to “consent” to continuing the prosecution given Csergo’s case was “very complex” and involved Australia’s first charge of reckless foreign interference.

Shah said the commonwealth department of public prosecutions was yet to submit its request for the attorney general’s department to reconsider the case and that it would require eight weeks to make a decision.

Freund pressed Shah on whether this meant Csergo’s charge could be withdrawn and ultimately agreed to Collaery’s request for an adjournment to 18 October.

Guardian Australia has sought comment from the office of the attorney general, Mark Dreyfus, who made an extraordinary intervention in Collaery’s own long-running criminal case last year to have the charges against the lawyer dropped.

Collaery had been facing jail after being charged with assisting his client, Witness K, to leak classified information about Australia’s alleged spying operation in East Timor in 2004.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/oct/04/bondi-businessman-alexander-csergo-china-secrets-plagiarism-lawyers-accusations

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664500

File: b1d8240b7f11afa⋯.jpg (154.65 KB,1557x1354,1557:1354,Xie_has_been_deported.jpg)

File: 15fc72a037f033a⋯.jpg (277.95 KB,2147x1569,2147:1569,Binjun_Xie_is_escorted_to_….jpg)

Binjun Xie: Alleged sex trafficking boss deported over underground prostitution network

Nick McKenzie and Michael Bachelard - October 4, 2023

1/2

An alleged human trafficking boss who exploited Australia’s migration regime to set up a sprawling underground sex worker racket has been hunted down and deported amid a major shake-up of border security.

Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil and Immigration Minister Andrew Giles will on Wednesday unveil the latest in a series of reforms to the visa system aimed at stopping what an inquiry led by ex-police chief Christine Nixon has described as the grotesque exploitation of foreign workers.

Among the reforms are the establishment of a new immigration compliance division within the Department of Home Affairs. A new multi-agency taskforce investigating suspected sex and drug traffickers, known to specialise in obtaining visas via fraud, will also run for at least two more years.

The reforms have been prompted by the Trafficked series of reports by The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, 60 Minutes and Stan, which also forced the Albanese government to commission the Nixon inquiry.

This masthead has also confirmed that Border Force agents recently swooped on Binjun Xie, the alleged Sydney-based human trafficking kingpin who has been on the run since several serious allegations against him were exposed in the Trafficked investigation in November.

The reforms are aimed at helping the Albanese government wrest back control of a migration and visa system racked with rorting, worker and student exploitation and delays.

The government will also crack down on domestic migration agents, who help tens of thousands of foreign nationals navigate the visa system to study, work or settle in Australia.

Agents will face stricter background checks and vetting, while the regulatory agency that oversees them will be given more powers to investigate and penalise agents. However, the government is yet to commit to regulating overseas based agents or introducing the wider anti-money laundering regime called for by Nixon, a former Victorian police commissioner.

The continuing overhaul of the migration system comes after the Albanese government earlier this week announced related reforms aimed at combatting corruption in the overseas education sector, including a new anti-corruption unit to police the nation’s vocational and training industry and combat dodgy education agents.

Trafficked unveiled allegations of visa rorting, human trafficking and exploitation in Australia, including in a booming underground prostitution industry controlled by organised criminals such as Xie.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19664505

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19664500

2/2

The expulsion of Xie – a Chinese triad snakehead known by UK police as The Hammer due to his ruthless disposition – comes a decade after he illegally entered Australia to allegedly rebuild the sex trafficking empire shut down by British authorities, who jailed Xie in Britain in 2013.

Xie allegedly set up a nationwide sex network that police warned was moving Asian women around Australia like “cattle”.

Xie’s story served as a powerful case study of failings in the migration system, given his ability not only to enter and remain in Australia despite his serious criminal past but the ease with which he worked with corrupt migration and education agents to procure dodgy visas for overseas sex workers who faced extreme risk of exploitation after entering Australia.

Trafficked also revealed how state and federal agencies had spent years issuing confidential warnings about migration rorting involving syndicates gaming the visa system to bring criminals or exploited workers into Australia, a problem confirmed by Nixon in her inquiry.

Trafficked also led to the creation of a new multi-agency taskforce, Inglenook. Official data released by the government this week reveals that in addition to Xie’s arrest and deportation, Inglenook has blocked 45 foreign nationals with Australian visas and who are deemed “known facilitators” of visa fraud from re-entering Australia.

Another 79 facilitators have separately been refused immigration clearance, while more than 165 “persons of interest” have been probed to “determine complicity in exploiting the temporary visa program”.

In July, this masthead and 60 Minutes revealed that violent Albanian mafia figures were similarly exploiting the visa system to move narcotics and people into Australia.

In her inquiry, Nixon concluded that it was clear that “gaps and weaknesses” in Australia’s visa system were enabling criminal organisations to exploit people and make money.

She called on the government to reform the visa and migration system, the overseas education sector, law enforcement responses and sex industry rules to help combat “abhorrent crimes” that Nixon warned had remained partially hidden by “seemingly higher law enforcement priorities such as illicit drugs, tobacco and unauthorised maritime arrivals”.

Notably absent from the Albanese government’s decision to release its reform package over three days this week was the suspended Home Affairs secretary Michael Pezzullo. For a decade, Pezzullo led the department that various inquiries have found was not doing enough to safeguard the visa system from exploitation.

Separately, Pezzullo remains the subject of an investigation by the Australian Public Service Commissioner regarding hundreds of leaked texts which he exchanged with Liberal Party powerbroker Scott Briggs.

While the outcome of the investigation is yet to be reached, it is unlikely he will return to his post, government sources said.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/alleged-sex-trafficking-boss-deported-over-underground-prostitution-network-20231003-p5e9er.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOran43Ju9U

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19672517

File: bc31677a8327915⋯.jpg (1.74 MB,5568x3712,3:2,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>19606805

Dutton, Price want Indigenous spending audited

David Crowe and Paul Sakkal - October 3, 2023

1/2

A row over federal spending is clouding the final phase of the referendum on the Indigenous Voice to parliament, with No campaigners demanding an audit of the money spent on First Australians and a former federal minister backing the call.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton linked the spending to the Voice debate by saying the money should be checked to ensure it was going to the “most deserving” people, hours after leading No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price called for the audit.

But Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney said she had made changes in June to address an audit that highlighted what she called the “clearly deficient” safeguards in place during nine years of Coalition government.

Former Indigenous affairs minister Amanda Vanstone argued for a complete audit to discover where the spending was doing most good and where it was not working, after days of debate over total federal and state outlays worth about $33.4 billion.

“I don’t think anyone could genuinely say that Indigenous people are getting value for money,” said Vanstone, who was responsible for Indigenous affairs during the Howard government.

“It’s apparent that we’re not being effective. It’s not so much where’s the money going – because that carries a sort of pejorative inference that you think it’s being wasted and that Indigenous people are wasteful.

“And that’s not necessarily my view. I want to know what’s being effective and to get rid of the ineffective stuff and put it into more effective stuff. And I don’t think we have that map. I’m pretty sure we don’t.”

The current and previous governments have acknowledged that progress has been too slow on closing the gap in Indigenous disadvantage on health, education, and life expectancy.

While Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has urged Australians to vote Yes because the Voice could offer advice that improves outcomes and reduces waste, Dutton has argued for a No vote on the grounds that the Voice would increase waste when money should be spent in local communities.

The Productivity Commission found six years ago that spending on Indigenous Australians was $33.4 billion in 2016 across all services from federal, state and territory governments. The federal portion was $14.7 billion.

Across all governments, only $6 billion was targeted spending exclusively for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, while the remainder was the estimated Indigenous share of total spending that went to all Australians on services such as health and education.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19672518

File: c4cb6cb239d6767⋯.jpg (3.47 MB,5651x3767,5651:3767,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_s….jpg)

>>19672517

2/2

Price, who is the Coalition spokeswoman on Indigenous Australians as well as a Country Liberal Party senator for the Northern Territory and a leader of the Fair Australia campaign against the Voice, called for the audit while in Perth on Monday night.

Dutton, speaking alongside Price at a press conference on Tuesday, said he would have more to say about the matter before the next election, but confirmed he supported the need to examine how money is spent on remote communities.

“I absolutely strongly support Jacinta’s call to make sure money has been paid in taxes … are being spent appropriately,” he said. Dutton argued the huge amount of money from Canberra “becomes a trickle” when it reached remote communities, leading to worse outcomes for Indigenous people.

“It would be a travesty to see money taken away by those most deserving of it and diverted into the hands [of others].”

The Australian National Audit Office has completed several reviews of Indigenous agencies or policies each year over recent decades, with 22 audits completed while the Coalition held power from 2013 to 2022.

A check on fraud and compliance at the National Indigenous Australians Agency raised questions in May this year about grants worth $1 billion to more than 1000 service providers, finding the system for managing fraud was “not fully fit-for-purpose” and did not fully comply with legislation.

“There are weaknesses in the design and implementation of governance and assurance mechanisms,” the audit said. The agency responded in a statement, saying it had accepted and was implementing all of the audit office’s seven recommendations.

“In addition, we have established an integrity group to strengthen our fraud and compliance activities across the agency’s operations and programs and continue working with our partners to protect the communities we serve from potential risks.”

Burney said she had acted In June to ensure integrity in spending.

“The systems put in place by the previous Coalition government were clearly deficient,” she said.

“Strong governance and accountability are vital to ensuring delivery of high-quality services and better outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.”

Burney said she had instructed the agency to establish an integrity branch to elevate fraud prevention and detection, introduce a program of random compliance checks and ensure staff were taking steps to prevent and detect fraud.

Lowitja Institute chairman Selwyn Button, a Gungarri man who is also partner of both PwC Australia and PwC Indigenous Consulting, said the spending claims had turned into one of the “biggest mistruths” of the campaign about the Indigenous Voice.

“The core of the mistruth is how much control and influence Indigenous people have, and how much money goes directly to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people,” he said. “The analysis shows how much of this money they actually control and influence – and it’s a very small proportion.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/dutton-price-want-indigenous-spending-audited-20231003-p5e9fb.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19672524

File: f4ab694f0fc97a8⋯.jpg (191.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Yes_campaign_director_Dean….jpg)

>>19606805

>>19672517

Indigenous voice to parliament: Yet another audit is not the answer, Yes camp says

PAUL GARVEY - OCTOBER 5, 2023

The Yes campaign has hit back at the latest calls from Peter Dutton and Jacinta Price for an audit of ­Indigenous spending, noting that the Coalition conducted almost two dozen such examinations ­during its time in government.

Speaking to reporters in Perth on Wednesday morning, Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin said Mr Dutton and the Coalition had offered nothing to deliver real change for Indigenous Australians.

“Peter Dutton was a senior cabinet minister in a government over nine years, and they conducted 22 audits into the Indigenous Affairs space … The result was a widening … in many key areas at the Closing the Gap targets for ­Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people,” he said.

“What Peter Dutton is proposing is more of the same. That is what a No vote will give all Australians in this campaign, it’ll get us nowhere with respect to progress in Indigenous Affairs, and more of the failed outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.”

Opposition Indigenous affairs spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price on Monday night promised an audit of spending on Indigenous programs. Speaking at a packed No event, she said the opposition would do “what we haven’t done yet”. “We’re going to find out where the billions of dollars are being spent,” she said.

The exact amount spent by the federal government on Indigenous Australians has emerged as a key area of debate in recent weeks.

There have been widespread claims that $40bn is spent each year on Indigenous Australians, but some researchers have argued that the vast majority of that covers programs and spending that applies to all Australians, such as Medicare. About $6bn is estimated to be for programs and policies specifically for Indigenous Australians.

Mr Parkin said delivering more effective spending on Indigenous Australians was a key rationale behind the Voice. “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, we’re at the front of the queue saying we want greater accountability, we want greater impact for the investment that taxpayers are making in Indigenous Affairs, we want to make sure that the money is getting to where it needs to get to the most. That is why we’re saying we need Indigenous people at the table in the form of a Voice,” he said.

“That is what will actually tell people like Peter Dutton where we can actually get better outcomes, where the money can be better spent so we’re seeing those outcomes change on the ground. Just leaving it to Peter Dutton to have another bureaucratic review, another bureaucratic process, isn’t real action, it isn’t a solution, it’s just more of the same failed policies that he’s been a part of over the last decade or so.”

With Mr Parkin at Wednesday’s Yes event were Morrison government minister for Indigenous Australians Ken Wyatt and former deputy prime minister Kim Beazley.

“You can do as many audits as you like. But the crux of the challenge is that nothing will change on the ground until our people sit at the table and have a say about what it is that they’re receiving, instead of external people flying in and flying out,” Mr Wyatt said.

Mr Beazley said voting down the referendum would be “an act of gross discourtesy”. “This imposes, were it to be carried, no impediment, no ability to amend, block or change laws that are placed before our parliament or things that are going to be considered by the cabinet. This referendum rules all that out,” he said.

“What it does is actually give a chance for folk to be listened to.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-yet-another-audit-is-not-the-answer-yes-camp-says/news-story/340ad5f078c56a2733e5c818b6e3504d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19672552

File: 232b6243f31ed1a⋯.jpg (250.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Blair_Cottrell_addressed_t….jpg)

>>19606805

Marcus Stewart, Blair Cottrell and ECAJ say Indigenous voice to parliament No campaign target of far-right

ROSIE LEWIS and RHIANNON DOWN - OCTOBER 5, 2023

Indigenous leader Marcus Stewart says it is concerning that far-right activist Blair Cottrell was supporting the No campaign, triggering a rebuke from voice to parliament opponents who say the Yes case is “gratefully receiving” support from the Communist Party of Australia.

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry also denounced “the paranoid, demented mind of the antisemite” after footage emerged of a man handing out flyers at an anti-voice event in Brisbane that says “every aspect of the Aboriginal voice to parliament is Jewish”.

A No campaign spokesman completely rejected the suggestion it had been “hijacked” by anyone, including Proud Boy members and neo-Nazis, amid calls from Mr Stewart to ensure voice opponents were protecting volunteers on polling booths “from these nasty characters”.

The Albanese government has homed in on the far-right in the final weeks of the campaign, with Anthony Albanese hitting out at misinformation, disinformation and wacky conspiracy theories about the voice.

Mr Cottrell, a high-profile extremist and former United Patriots Front leader, last week reposted The Australian’s story headlined ‘Far-right ‘hijacking’ Indigenous voice to parliament No campaign, says Labor’ with: “Of course we are.”

“It’s politics. Everybody is trying to infiltrate everything in politics. Actually, the ‘far-right’ (read: white Australian workers with access to the internet) has been significantly less successful at infiltrating Australian politics than international Judaism and its leftist rhetoric, which has penetrated every level of social life and is the only reason we’re having this referendum in the first place.”

Mr Sewell, who attended an anti-voice rally on September 23 that was not organised by the No campaign, posted on encrypted messaging platform Telegram on the same day: “The voice, a treaty or a welcome to country isn’t about respect, it’s about guilt being used as a weapon against whites. It is taking power away from whites while we are psychologically disarmed and giving it to a bunch of Jews, abos and traitors.”

Mr Stewart, a member of the government’s referendum working group, said the extremists’ views were concerning.

“They have clearly infiltrated the No campaign and their views have no place in modern Australia. They are hateful, discriminatory and abhorrent. Their involvement is really worrying - but I know Australians will see their fear and hate campaign for what it is,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19672558

File: f0bb391ed983611⋯.jpg (642.41 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Blair_Cottrell_says_far_ri….jpg)

>>19672552

2/2

A No campaign spokesman said he didn’t know these people, had never met them and didn’t agree with their views.

He said leading No campaigners Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Warren Mundine had been abused by “aggressive” and “violent” Yes supporters.

“There are literally tens of thousands of people involved with the campaign on both sides, and no doubt a wildly divergent number of views,” he said.

“The hypocrisy of the government and the Yes campaign is breathtaking - while simultaneously preaching unity they background media to divide Australians. While launching baseless accusations about people ‘hijacking’ the No campaign, they are openly and gratefully receiving the formal endorsement and support from the Communist Party.”

The Communist Party is set to host an “interactive discussion” with Yes23 campaigner Shireen Morris on Sunday while the Search Foundation, which describes itself as a successor to the CPA, has hosted Indigenous leader and militant unionist Thomas Mayo.

“(Prominent Yes campaigner) Megan Davis marched in front of a Communist flag the other day. I don’t think she’s a Communist. I think when you divide the country what you’re going to have is extremes of both ends come up and support either end,” the No campaign spokesman said.

“I don’t think that’s where campaigns are won and lost. They’re won and lost by the swing voter who comes to the table without a position and says I’ve listened to both campaigns, who will I back?”

The flyer criticised by the ECAJ is emblazoned with pictures of prominent Jewish advocates of the voice including Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus, NSW Liberal MP Julian Leeser and lawyer Mark Liebler, as well as Indigenous leader Thomas Mayo.

The Nationalist Socialist Movement Australia has also been active on Telegram, encouraging members to show up to their local No voice rally, blend in and “drop FACTS on the Jewish involvement in the Yes campaign”.

ECAJ chief executive Alex Ryvchin said the voice was just the latest attempt in recent years by the far-right to latch onto popular debates and reorientate public discussion to focus on Jewish people.

“What is particularly troubling about this incident is that it mirrors the language and tactics of US neo-Nazis,” he said.

“It is absolutely essential that we as a society commit to education about antisemitism and the ruin brought by anti-Jewish conspiracy theories. If we fail, the sort of lethal attacks inspired by this propaganda that are routine in the US will begin to hit our shores.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/marcus-stewart-blair-cottrell-and-ecaj-say-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-no-campaign-target-of-farright/news-story/2da7ef2848da65f9529a94f06204e31d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19672573

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19606805

Senator Lidia Thorpe accuses police of failing to protect her after Neo-Nazi racist abuse

Georgia Roberts - 5 October 2023

Independent senator Lidia Thorpe has said the Australian Federal Police (AFP) have failed to protect her after becoming the target of far-right extremist racist abuse.

A warning that this story contains offensive images that may cause distress to our audience.

The Indigenous senator was tagged in a video of a masked Neo-Nazi burning an Aboriginal flag while performing a Nazi salute this week.

In Melbourne on Thursday, she stood in front of the Royal Exhibition Building and described the upcoming Voice to Parliament referendum as an "act of genocide against my people".

Senator Thorpe made allegations that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the AFP are not doing enough to protect her from the far right.

"His violent force that he has sent to protect me can't even protect me, refuse to protect the Blak sovereign woman because the police are part of the problem in this country," she said.

"You want to paint me as an angry black woman, well you are about to see an angry black woman.

"Four months I wasn't allowed to be in my own home, because people want to kill me out there."

The AFP said it did not provide specific details on protection matters "involving Australian High Office Holders and Parliamentarians" however took their protection very seriously, and "significantly" invested in their safety.

The AFP said it was made aware of a video posted to X, formerly Twitter, referencing Senator Thorpe on October 3 and it immediately engaged with the social media platform to have the video removed.

The post has since been deleted and the account that posted it deactivated.

The video contains extremely offensive material but the ABC has chosen to use still images from it because we have reason to believe that this was not an isolated action by one individual.

The ABC has found that Senator Thorpe has been the target of a sustained harassment campaign by members of an Australian Neo-Nazi network.

Several members of this network, particularly in Melbourne where the senator is based, have bragged on their social media channels about harassing and sending her racist and abusive messages.

It is understood they have encouraged their followers to attend events where she was scheduled to speak.

13YARN, a national crisis support line for First Nations peoples who are feeling overwhelmed or having difficulty coping, reported a 108 per cent increase in callers reporting abuse, racism, and trauma between March and June.

'Man-baby Nazis': Government

When asked about the video, the prime minister said people need to be "respectful" during the Voice to Parliament referendum debate.

"I've seen the video that is referred to, that is threatening towards Senator Thorpe and towards the government — and the sort of Nazi rhetoric in that video has no place in discourse in Australian life," he said.

Mr Albanese declined to respond to Senator Thorpe's comments as he had not yet seen them.

"Senator Thorpe contacted me directly. I responded to her at the first opportunity on the same day, spoke to the AFP," he said.

"I don't talk about what AFP support is being given for obvious reasons. That would be quite counterproductive."

Labor frontbencher Bill Shorten also condemned the video as "cowardly and gutless".

"It's cowardly and disgusting, I don't know what it is with these man-baby Nazis, wearing a hood so no-one can see you. They think they're so tough," he told Channel Nine.

"Sending it and trying to pressure one of our senators and abuse them, I think it's cowardly and gutless and I just wish that bloke would take his hood off so people can see what sort of real joker he is."

The AFP had previously charged a man in a separate incident for making violent threats against Senator Thorpe.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-05/senator-lidia-thorpe-recieves-video-from-neo-nazi/102937870

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAjIQssW48o

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19672594

File: 828a3ea1fac986d⋯.mp4 (8.96 MB,480x852,40:71,Lidia_Thorpe_blames_PM_for….mp4)

File: 29c84fab7fd19b8⋯.jpg (1.2 MB,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe_has_b….jpg)

>>19606805

>>19672573

Lidia Thorpe blames PM for Nazi video

ROSIE LEWIS - OCTOBER 5, 2023

Progressive No campaigner Lidia Thorpe has vowed to speak out in the final nine days of the voice referendum campaign and says she’s not scared, after releasing a video of a masked man threatening her, burning an Aboriginal flag and doing the Nazi salute.

The independent senator’s defiance came as Anthony Albanese, senior ministers and Peter Dutton denounced the “quite horrific” and “unhinged” video, which Senator Thorpe blamed on the Prime Minister.

The Australian Federal Police is investigating the video, which has been taken down from X, and the account that posted it has been deactivated.

“The racist Constitution came out of this building,” Senator Thorpe said outside the Royal Exhibition Building, which was home to Australia’s first parliament.

“It’s caused nothing but pain and misery for my people in this country. The referendum is an act of genocide against my people. And the Prime Minister knows exactly what he’s doing.

“Four months I wasn’t allowed to be in my own home because people want to kill me out there. They don’t want my voice to be heard over the next nine days. They want to feel good about the referendum … I’m not hiding for the next nine days. You’re gonna hear from me and you are gonna see me and I am not scared.”

Mr Albanese, who has watched the video, said there was no place for Nazi rhetoric in Australian politics and he had spoken to Senator Thorpe and the AFP.

“I have unfortunately seen that video and once you see it, you can’t unsee it. It is quite horrific, that someone who is self-declared by his actions and his words a neo-Nazi is out there, showing such disrespect,” he told 10 News.

“I think overwhelmingly Australians are generous people.”

Mr Dutton said the video was completely unhinged, unacceptable and should be condemned in the strongest terms, while accusing Mr Albanese of dividing the country.

“You’re talking about family members against family members, communities against communities, and it gives rise in this sort of environment to radical lunatics to make comments like they’ve made in relation to Senator Thorpe. I condemn it, absolutely,” he said.

The Nazi video emerged as tensions between the Yes and No camps increased, with Indigenous leader Noel Pearson slamming Mr Dutton for “rewriting history” after he claimed Mr Albanese didn’t water down the voice model because “Alan Joyce and others” told him not to.

“The government has taken up what Indigenous people proposed in the Uluru Statement,” Mr Pearson said. “This is entirely our proposal, it is just that the current government, Labor, did what the previous government hesitated about for too long.”

Former prime minister Tony Abbott said on ABC radio on Thursday that Aboriginal people “should be encouraged to integrate into the mainstream” and Australia should “end the separatism which has bedevilled Indigenous policy for many decades now”. He said that could be done by governments upholding the same standards for Indigenous and non-Indigenous people and empowering people to have a real choice.

“Unfortunately too often policy has encouraged Aboriginal people to stay … at arm’s length from the rest of Australia and to operate by somewhat different standards,” Mr Abbott said.

“This is why in remote Australia, where the problems are most acute, you’ve got the kids not going to school, adults not going to work and the ordinary law of the land not always being properly enforced.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/lidia-thorpe-says-she-wont-stay-silent-in-final-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum-sprint-after-nazi-video/news-story/bbe3f02572db7f590e341576f9115aea

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679087

File: 6164101fa4c405a⋯.jpg (405.76 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_i….jpg)

File: ba221f3cbc5cd0e⋯.jpg (438.84 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Peter_Dutton_Senator_Micha….jpg)

>>19606805

Regardless of referendum result, Jacinta Price will be biggest winner

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - OCTOBER 4, 2023

Regardless of whether the October 14 referendum succeeds or fails, the biggest winner will be Jacinta Nampijinpa Price.

The 42-year-old Indigenous woman, a mother of four, has made her mark on the country so quickly and so profoundly it’s hard to imagine national politics without her.

Indeed, if the Liberal parliamentary party is smart, it will move her to the lower house and start testing her for the leadership. The party should be planning for the day when Liberals and the country are led by the first female Indigenous prime minister.

Not because Price is female. Nor because she is Indigenous. But because after a challenging time she is already leading a large part of the country on a new path.

Though it would be foolish to suggest her gender and background don’t add to her political attraction, Price is a liberal in the true sense of the word. Her biggest drawcard is encapsulating and championing a set of values that routinely is derided by progressives and often ignored by Liberals, too.

Price has opened our eyes to a stubborn policy to separatism in Indigenous affairs. It has happened under our noses. More recently, this backward agenda has been embedded so deep it has become beyond challenge in so-called polite society where identity politics thrives: within just about every university, big company, local council and government department.

Price rejects this failed orthodoxy. She offers the country a new and radical way. Using logic, persuasion and evidence of past failures, she demands a new direction, not just for Indigenous advancement but also for large swathes of the country that have grown weary of identity politics, victimhood, separatism and billions of dollars in public money untethered from accountability and outcomes.

Price says the voice won’t change any of this; on the contrary it will further entrench these backward outcomes. Her agenda of empowerment from responsibility and, concomitantly, smaller government will appeal to millions of Australians who have no time for political labels.

It is not Liberal to believe a country that separates people by race is on the wrong path. It is Australian. You don’t need to recite Martin Luther King to know, intuitively, that a person should not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character.

Millions of people who have not read the Uluru Statement from the Heart may yet understand that creating a voice is the first step to a treaty that divides the country into “us” and “them” and reparations that will prolong a mindset of welfare dependency and victimhood.

Australians may ask whether the same people who have dominated failed Indigenous politics for more than 40 years will be doing the same with more power from the pulpit of a body embedded in the Constitution.

Price has allowed Australians, not unreasonably, to raise these questions and to challenge other sacred cows, too, ones that have been on the tip of our tongue. Endless, rote welcome to country ceremonies being one example. The tragedy of modern Indigenous policy is that Price’s commonsense agenda is new and radical.

Many years ago I encouraged my teenage children to listen to a speech by Noel Pearson. Back then, Pearson exposed the poisonous cycle of welfare dependency, victimhood and separatism, and extolled empowerment from education and work. Back then he said: “As long as the allowance of racial discrimination remains in our Constitution, it continues, in both subtle and unsubtle ways, to affect our relationships with each other … racial categorisations dehumanise us all. It dehumanises us because we are each individuals.”

Pearson eschewed the political arena. That, and character flaws obvious to those who have worked with him, hindered Pearson from securing widely accepted change.

Price, a Walpiri-Celtic woman who entered the Senate last year, is the new Noel Pearson, only better positioned to bring about lasting change and, unlike Pearson, firmly against entrenching a race-based body into the Constitution. I tell my kids to listen to her and judge for themselves.

Her ability to challenge the shibboleths of the past with articulate and authentic arguments, speaking from experience as an Indigenous woman who has seen violence, poverty and dysfunction, means millions of Australians will look to her to help recalibrate the direction of Indigenous policies. She argues her case with respect.

If the referendum fails, Price will deserve much of the credit for that result. But her work will not be done.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679096

File: de7bd5ee9ac4e59⋯.jpg (405.5 KB,1524x2032,3:4,Martin_Luther_King_Jr.jpg)

File: 0bc5fa9c5daa8d7⋯.jpg (473.51 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Noel_Pearson.jpg)

>>19679087

2/2

After the referendum, Price’s talents will be needed to bring an end to a long era of separatism, welfarism and victimhood. Price could become the pre-eminent politician of our time if she slays these old agendas that many fear will be embedded for generations to come if the voice is inserted into the Constitution.

The country will need Price if the referendum succeeds. Without overwhelming support for the voice at the ballot box, the idea that a referendum that wins by a whisker will unify the country is delusional. A close result will expose a divided country. The country will need Price to challenge old ideas that may be perpetuated by a new body.

Her belief in individual agency, demolishing the paternalism that assumes all Indigenous people think the same, could be a pivotal shift for the country.

It could and should up-end a collectivist model where a handful of activists have assumed power and, even with the best of intentions, have built careers and made money from continued disadvantage.

What Price has endured during her short time in politics will stand her in good stead for the battles after the referendum. She has shown extraordinary tenacity to fight a powerful monolith of institutions, from corporate Australia to large swathes of the media. Though others have played important roles, it has also been a case of Jacinta and Goliath.

Those determined to throw everything at Price after the referendum should remember, for all her talents, her political and moral ascendancy also has been aided by the many critics who have opposed her, attacked, derided and belittled her.

By resigning as opposition Indigenous Australians spokesman, Julian Leeser – a Yes activist – allowed Price to shine in that role. Her skills have shown up the disingenuous efforts of Labor’s Linda Burney and Anthony Albanese. Price’s profile has been further enhanced by senseless attacks by Pearson and Marcia Langton. She has met them with grace. Price continues to offer to debate her opponents even as they refuse.

Corporate backers of the voice have shown (not as privately as they may have hoped) utter contempt for an Indigenous woman who wants to be part of that democratic process. It seems not all voices matter to them. Regardless of the result, they should be mightily ashamed of their sooky, illiberal behaviour.

The silver lining to this most dismal period in Australian politics is the rise and rise of Price. Her success will cause her critics further fits of political apoplexy. Her success will also force these same miserable nay-sayers who believe the worst about their fellow Australians to concede – through gritted teeth – that this is not a racist country.

It may be that Price does not have soaring ambitions to stay in politics, let alone become leader. Or that she does not stack up to the additional challenges of being a leader. But if she stays and becomes leader, even prime minister one day, it will mark the pinnacle of modern politics where a person reaches high office because of the content of their character.

It has been a while since that last happened.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/yes-camp-take-note-prices-vision-about-unity-not-separatism/news-story/62025aa5f9e89b42c173496a536a4828

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679141

File: 803d30e3f9f4b60⋯.jpg (280.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_tennis_champion_Evo….jpg)

>>19606805

Indigenous voice to parliament: The ball is in your court, Australia

EVONNE GOOLAGONG CAWLEY - OCTOBER 5, 2023

When I was a little girl, I remember hiding under the bed so I wouldn’t be taken from my mum. You wouldn’t know how terrifying that was for a kid, even now.

I grew up in an Australia where being Aboriginal was frankly unfair and cruel. Many of my childhood memories have stayed with me through my life. I remember how lucky I felt to be scouted at a young age.

And I have never forgotten this simple thought: if the 1967 referendum had happened three years later, I wouldn’t have been able to leave Australia without permission; maybe I wouldn’t have won Wimbledon.

But the ’67 referendum did happen. We did it then, let’s do it again. I’ve been on this journey of constitutional recognition for a long time and this is the last chance of my lifetime. I know how far our country has come, together. I know we can take the next step, together.

This referendum is a straightforward request from Aboriginal people: to be recognised and listened to on issues that affect our lives.

That’s what you can say Yes to on October 14. Yes to recognition, Yes to listening and Yes to giving Australia our best chance yet to close the gap. That is why I am committed to running my education program for Indigenous kids, because I want to see the gap close. My program is all about keeping kids in school and helping them to lead healthy lives. I know only too well what it means to be on the wrong side of that gap.

Three members of my own family have passed away prematurely, robbed of years of life by preventable heart conditions. That has been the past, and it is the cruel reality of the present – but on October 14 we have the opportunity to make sure it isn’t the future.

Of course, there are some who want to try to make you think this referendum is about a whole lot of other unrelated stuff. Twisting this request from Aboriginal people into something it isn’t.

All this noise and nonsense is designed to frighten people into saying No. We saw the same thing done in the past with Mabo and with the apology. But history proved them wrong. Every single time they have cast shadows, the bright Australian sunshine has proved stronger.

So I’m asking you to keep your eye on the ball and to focus on what really matters.

Through all my years of competitive tennis, something I carried in my heart every time I stepped out on to the court was the knowledge that my success depended on my willingness to listen to others.

For Aboriginal people, knowledge is traditionally passed down by our elders, so I listened to those who knew better than me and, most important, knew how to make me better. That’s how I was able to get to the absolute top of my game.

And that’s something we can all do together on October 14.

We can commit to listening. We can say Yes to governments finally listening to the people and communities who can make us all better.

That’s how we’ll all get to the top of our game as a nation.

There’s nothing for Australia to fear from recognising and celebrating 65,000 years of shared history and there’s nothing to lose from giving the next generation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children the chance to fulfil their potential.

There is so much to gain.

At the start of my career I had so much support from my home town of Barellan in NSW, and that has given me so much heart along the way. I’ve been greatly inspired by the thousands of people in my community and across the country who are coming together to say Yes.

I believe in the simple goodness of every Australian heart. In particular I say to Australians from my generation, the people who gave me such wonderful and warm support on the biggest stage: stand with me now to help Australia grab this great opportunity.

You’ve cheered for me. Now, please, vote with me: vote Yes.

Evonne Goolagong Cawley is a former tennis world No.1 and a Wiradjuri woman.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-the-ball-is-in-your-court-australia/news-story/21896a060340e3681c2e7858a760f2be

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679310

File: 6e81f8577b4ff08⋯.mp4 (7.1 MB,360x640,9:16,7285257063595396353.mp4)

File: 796926853a05280⋯.jpg (207.12 KB,1200x800,3:2,Mr_Albanese_was_among_thos….jpg)

>>19606805

Voice to Parliament Referendum: TV icon Ray Martin says ‘d**kheads and dinosaurs’ Australians will vote no

Caitlyn Rintoul - 4 October 2023

Veteran TV journalist Ray Martin has labelled Australians who vote no as “d… heads and dinosaurs” in an extraordinary spray at an event in Prime Minister Anthony Albanese‘s Sydney electorate of Grayndler.

The Nine TV presenter, who is of indigenous heritage, took the stage at a Yes rally on September 28 at Marrickville’s Factory Theatre in Sydney’s inner west, where he took aim at the No side’s campaign slogan: “If you don’t know, vote no”.

“What that slogan is saying is if you’re a dinosaur or d… head who can’t be bothered reading, then vote No,” Martin told attendees.

“If you don’t know, find out what you don’t know.”

A video of the speech was uploaded to social media platform TikTok, gaining thousands of views and almost two hundred comments.

Laughter and cheering can be heard from the crowd after the remarks.

Mr Albanese was among those listening at the front of the packed room, which was understood to have hosted about 500 Yes23 supporters.

An on-stage female sign language interpreter appeared to make a hand gesture across her forehead to communicate Martin’s “d…head” comment.

Martin went on to argue that the “details” of what the referendum is about “simply don’t matter”, criticising “No vote organisers” for continuously begging Mr Albanese for them.

A video of the speech was uploaded to social media platform Tik Tok, gaining thousands of views and almost two hundred comments. NO

“The words of the referendum could not be simpler than they are. At this stage of the game, the details simply don’t matter. They never did matter, honestly. They’re irrelevant,” he said.

“Over the next 10, 20 or 30 years, no matter who is in Government, the details will change, as will the members of the Voice delegation according to the needs and priorities and policies that are meant to close that bloody gap.”

The posted video only includes a minute and a half of Martin’s speech, which is understood to have continued for 15 minutes and included a heartfelt plea urging Australians to vote Yes.

Martin’s remarks come after the Bunbury Herald revealed prominent Indigenous campaigner and Yes vote advocate Professor Marcia Langton said the No case boiled down to “racism” or “stupidity”.

“Every time the no cases raise their arguments, if you start pulling it apart you get down to base racism — I’m sorry to say that’s where it lands — or sheer stupidity,” Professor Langton said.

A Fair Australia spokesman called for Martin to issue an apology and demanded that Mr Albanese condemn the remarks.

“Ray Martin should apologise. The Prime Minister, who was in the room, should loudly condemn Mr Martin,” he said.

“Having been told we’re ‘racist’ and ‘stupid’, Australians voting no can now add ‘d… head” and ‘dinosaur’ to the list of insults spat at us by the Yes campaign.

“The sneering elites from the Yes campaign are dead set on dividing Australians.

“These elitists are addicted to insulting us, and just can’t stop sneering down their noses at ordinary Australians.”

Martin is a five-time Gold Logie winner best known for his long on-air career, which has included starring roles on 60 Minutes and A Current Affair.

On Sunday, he is expected to appear on a 7NEWS Spotlight’s live panel discussion dedicated to the Voice to Parliament. The panel, led by 7NEWS’ Michael Usher, Liam Bartlett and Sarah Greenhalgh, is expected to bring together leading campaigners from both side of debate.

Last night, Martin said his remarks weren’t targeted at Australians voting No but rather the No campaign slogan.

“I would never condemn people who vote no,” he said. “That’s their right to do it. But I think if you don’t know because you don’t know well then find out read something.”

https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/voice-to-parliament-referendum-tv-icon-ray-martin-says-dkheads-and-dinosaurs-australians-will-vote-no-c-12104137

https://archive.li/WOLXr

https://www.tiktok.com/@yeahnahyeahthevoice/video/7285257063595396353

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679378

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19606805

>>19679310

Ray Martin stands by ‘dinosaurs and dickheads’ comment that lashed No campaign

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - OCTOBER 6, 2023

Veteran journalist Ray Martin has stood by his scathing comments attacking the No campaign after he accused its key slogan of being “nonsensical” and likened it to being a “dinosaur or a dickhead who can’t be bothered reading” the referendum proposal.

When Martin attended a Yes campaign event alongside Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at Marrickville in his Sydney electorate on September 28 the former journalist took to the stage to give an address that heavily criticised the No campaign.

During Martin’s speech he told the audience, “If you don’t know, vote No. What a stupid nonsensical slogan that is.

“If you don’t know, find out what you don’t know.

“What that asinine slogan is saying is if you’re a dinosaur or a dickhead who can’t be bothered reading, then vote No.”

The five-time gold Logie winner was interviewed on Channel 9’s A Current Affair program by host Ally Langdon on Thursday night and during the interview she asked if he regretted the comments.

“No, I don’t,” Martin said.

“I think this is a really important referendum and I would never call No voters dinosaurs or anything else.”

Langdon refuted these claims and said, “But you did call them dinosaurs and another word.”

Martin repeatedly rejected Langdon’s comments.

“No I didn’t. What I said I found offensive was this slogan, this stupid slogan, if you don’t know, vote No.

“That’s just an endorsement of ignorance, if you don’t know find out what you don’t know.”

Martin, 78, said there is “no hidden message in this referendum” and it was “pretty simple.”

He encouraged Australians to vote Yes on October 14, which he said he would be doing himself.

During the TV interview, Langdon told Martin “language is important” and the words he used during this speech were “inflammatory.”

Martin, who hosted many TV programs during his career including A Current Affair until 2005, rejected these claims and said, “I don’t think it is, I would stick by the language.”

“I would say it again,” he said.

“It’s part of the Aussie vernacular by the way, I hear it all the time on morning radio, it’s not like I suddenly stuck out there and said something.

“I think both sides have made it particularly political, especially the No vote.

“To me it’s like women’s rights, or about gay rights, this is Aboriginal rights, it’s the decent thing to do, it’s not about politics.”

Martin spoke about his career in journalism for almost 60 years and said he was a trusted voice within the Australian public.

“I think people trust me,” he said.

“I have got reason to be trusted, I think this is really important, I don’t think we should be scared by the scare campaign.

“I don’t have a reputation for telling people how to suck eggs at all so in this case I’m simply saying if you going to vote don’t say ‘I don’t know that I’m going to vote’ No, go and find out then you can vote No.”

He also said Australians could not criticise the Chinese if Australians vote No at the referendum.

“We can’t point the finger at the Chinese about the treatment of their minorities if we vote No on the 14th, we have to stand up and be counted,” Martin said.

Ask by Langdon if his comments were similar to Hillary Clinton’s moment when she labelled Trump supporters a ‘basket of deplorables’, Martin said he was unsure.

“It could, but I am not part of the Yes campaign team,” he said.

“I am expressing my opinion. If I’m wrong, I’m wrong.”

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton was among those to criticise Martin’s comments this week.

“People aren’t stupid, they aren’t dinosaurs,” he said during an interview with 2GB host Ray Hadley.

“So, the Prime Minister applauded Ray Martin for that reference to Australians, to millions of Australians.

“Then on ABC Radio the next day, the Prime Minister says Ray Martin gave a great speech last night in my electorate.

“So, the hypocrisy, I don’t think, knows any limits and I think it’s why even a lot of Labor people you speak to now in private are shaking their head at what on earth the Prime Minister’s doing.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/ray-martin-stands-by-dinosaurs-and-dheads-comment-that-lashed-no-campaign/news-story/b63887e4060850aacae9a092146e505c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0GL4C6Z6Dg

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679432

File: e9bed35cb94a0f1⋯.jpg (117.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 8c98673f3797145⋯.jpg (6.66 MB,5555x3703,5555:3703,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 8ec0555a827c47d⋯.jpg (3.1 MB,7125x4750,3:2,Opposition_Indigenous_affa….jpg)

>>19606805

>>19679310

Dutton attacks Ray Martin over Voice as Jacinta Price weighs in against ABC

Paul Sakkal - October 5, 2023

1/2

Coalition leader Peter Dutton has taken aim at prominent broadcaster Ray Martin for suggesting the No side’s Voice slogan is aimed at “dickheads”, as Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price railed against alleged bias at the ABC.

The No side has spent months pitching the Voice as an elite-backed idea and portraying the mainstream media as supporters of a radical Indigenous agenda backed by “woke” corporates.

Dutton has seized on several examples of Yes campaigners making critical reflections about No voters’ motives.

Martin criticised the anti-Voice campaign’s “If you don’t know, vote No” slogan at a Yes event with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in Albanese’s Marrickville electorate on September 28.

“What that excellent slogan is saying is if you’re a dinosaur or a dickhead who can’t be bothered reading, then vote No,” Martin said at the event. Albanese was not alongside the five-time Gold Logie winner when he made the remarks.

Dutton raised Martin’s comments in his first answer during an interview on Sydney radio station 2GB this Thursday and referred to the former presenter on five occasions.

“People aren’t stupid, they aren’t dinosaurs,” the federal opposition leader said. “The prime minister preaches inclusiveness and tolerance and all of the woke agenda that they’re pushing out.

“But the prime minister was actually at the speech that Ray Martin made, right? And he praised it on ABC Radio the next day to say that it was a great speech.”

In an interview on ABC Radio Adelaide on Thursday, Price, the federal opposition’s Indigenous Affairs spokeswoman, claimed the national broadcaster, a common target for conservatives, had treated her as a token conservative.

“If you’re a conservative Aboriginal woman, as far as the ABC is concerned, you are controversial or not part of the status quo,” she said. “You’re generally made to feel it’s unacceptable.”

“My experiences with ABC interviews are often hostile, and I’m treated with contempt on many different platforms. Whether it’s ABC Breakfast, or whether it’s [Radio National], [Patricia] Karvelas and [Hamish] McDonald – they’re particularly hostile towards me.”

Referring to an election-night tweet in which Karvelas referred to Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney as a legend, Price said it was clear Karvelas did not have the same regard for her.

“I think it should just be a level playing field across the board,” Price said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679447

File: e16a7dfbf3c4c9c⋯.jpg (3.92 MB,6208x4139,6208:4139,ABC_journalist_Patricia_Ka….jpg)

File: 0acb4eadda52f98⋯.jpg (3.1 MB,4595x3063,4595:3063,Former_prime_minister_Tony….jpg)

>>19679432

2/2

An ABC spokesperson defended Karvelas, Macdonald, and the ABC’s overall coverage of the referendum, which has also been criticised by Yes leader Megan Davis for giving too much airtime to No figures.

“[Karvelas and Macdonald] can be challenging, rigorous and inquisitorial interviewers – and they should be, especially when they’re interviewing politicians. They are highly professional and they never treat anyone with contempt,” the spokesperson said.

“The ABC’s coverage of the referendum has been comprehensive and informative. It has at times been criticised by both the Yes and the No campaigns for ‘platforming’ the other. In reality we are hearing from, scrutinising and interrogating both.

“Given the Yes campaign is the one proposing to change the Constitution, its proposal and the reasoning behind it would naturally receive a greater amount of scrutiny. That doesn’t equate to positive platforming.”

Former prime minister Tony Abbott accused Karvelas of arguing with him rather than interviewing him on Radio National Breakfast on Thursday.

During the interview, Abbott was making the claim that Yes leaders Noel Pearson, Marcia Langton and Pat Anderson had been influencing policies for decades and were far from “voiceless”.

Karvelas picked him up, saying: “You were the PM that ripped quite a lot of money out of Indigenous affairs; they didn’t do it.”

Abbott then complained about the presenter’s interviewing style: “You didn’t interrupt [Labor minister] Clare O’Neil, you’re arguing over the top of me. This isn’t an interview; this is an argument.”

The dispute comes as former High Court chief justice Robert French is set to tell the National Press Club on Friday that key legal arguments about the Voice’s potential legal risk are misguided, claiming it is “improbable” the constitutional alteration would confer a requirement for government decision-makers to give regard to the Voice’s views.

French, a Voice supporter, rejected the notion the Voice was a race-based body and said the No camp’s “If you don’t know, vote No” slogan was “a poor shadow of the spirit which drew up our Constitution”. He also rejected Dutton’s “Canberra Voice bureaucracy” tag.

“If this is a Canberra bureaucracy, what then is parliament, which unlike the Voice has decision-making powers, but a species of Canberra bureaucracy on steroids?” he will say, according to draft speech notes.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/dutton-price-abbott-launch-attack-on-ray-martin-abc-over-voice-20231005-p5ea1o.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679658

File: 03686c8f6d13f2e⋯.jpg (213.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_board_the….jpg)

File: 83838936a7d4ba9⋯.jpg (350.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_disembark….jpg)

File: 5a7d35e71862d67⋯.jpg (187.23 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_RAAF_KC_30A_used_by_th….jpg)

>>19505156

Anthony Albanese hits security turbulence: VIP plane at risk in Beijing

BEN PACKHAM - OCTOBER 5, 2023

Anthony Albanese’s upcoming trip to Beijing has been thrown off course by security advice that he should avoid travelling in his RAAF jet because its systems could be hacked by Chinese spies.

It’s understood a number of options are being considered, including using one or more of the RAAF’s smaller jets, or flying the Prime Minister’s plane to a nearby country and using a different aircraft for the final leg into Beijing.

Mr Albanese’s primary aircraft for international trips is one of the air force’s seven KC-30A air-to-air refuellers that has been modified with VIP sleeping and working ­facilities, and a mix of business class and economy seats for staff and the media. It has advanced communication and navigation systems, and electronic self-­protection capabilities to shield against surface-to-air missiles.

Multiple high-level sources said the security warnings had been issued. It was not yet clear how Mr Albanese would get to Beijing. The Prime Minister has said he will travel to China by the end of the year to restore bilateral ties at the invitation of Chinese President Xi Jinping.

He is yet to release his travel dates but late October or early November are likely, coinciding with the 50th anniversary of Gough Whitlam’s historic visit to China.

Defence declined to discuss the matter, citing operational security. “The KC-30A government transport and communication aircraft is one of a range of platforms Defence uses to provide a special purpose aircraft capability to government,” a spokeswoman said.

The concerns over the aircraft’s security on the tarmac in Beijing are a stark reminder that, while the government is determined to stabilise relations with China, the country remains a potential future adversary for Australia, and has high-level hacking capabilities.

When Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Trade Minister Don Farrell visited China, they travelled there on smaller RAAF VIP jets that do not double as working military aircraft. Even so, the air force took precautions during those visits. During Senator Wong’s late 2022 trip to Beijing aboard an RAAF 737 Boeing Business Jet, the aircrew stayed on board to ensure it was not interfered with. Similar measures were taken for Senator Farrell’s trip to Beijing in May aboard one of the RAAF’s smaller Dassault Falcons. In both cases, the ministers travelled with a small number of staff and few media representatives.

Mr Albanese will have a much larger travelling party including advisers, bureaucrats, and security personnel and a large media pack.

One way around the problem would be to use the RAAF’s two 737s – one for Mr Albanese and his staff, and another for the media.

The Prime Minister could combine the trip with the November 6-10 Pacific Islands Forum in the Cook Islands, and the November 12 APEC summit in San Francisco.

When New Zealand Prime Minister Chris Hipkins travelled to China in June he flew on a Royal New Zealand Air Force jet. It’s understood that aircraft is not fitted with such sensitive equipment as the RAAF KC-30As.

Australian government staff and media are advised to use “burner” phones and computers in China. Security officials warn all devices are vulnerable to the country’s security services. In 2017, a team of US government and industry personnel showed a commercial aircraft could be hacked remotely without any contact.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-hits-security-turbulence-vip-plane-at-risk-in-beijing/news-story/7adf88faea9ff391a1ef878378534907

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679708

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Trump allegedly discussed US nuclear subs with foreign national: Source

ABC News

Oct 6, 2023

ABC News' Katherine Faulders reports former Pres. Donald Trump allegedly revealed potentially sensitive information about U.S. nuclear submarines to Australian billionaire, Anthony Pratt.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFk51XEZO6I

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679775

File: 11a3dcd44281c0c⋯.mp4 (12.95 MB,640x360,16:9,There_are_reports_Donald_T….mp4)

File: 19412b568ec9a2d⋯.jpg (1.77 MB,5000x3332,1250:833,Mr_Trump_praised_Mr_Pratt_….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19679708

Donald Trump accused of sharing nuclear submarine details with Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt

Jade Macmillan - 6 October 2023

Former US president Donald Trump reportedly discussed "potentially sensitive" details of America's nuclear submarine program with an Australian billionaire.

The American ABC news outlet reported that Mr Trump told Anthony Pratt the supposed number of nuclear warheads on US subs, and how close they could get to a Russian submarine without being detected.

The conversation is said to have taken place at Mr Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Florida, several months after he left office.

ABC — which is not affiliated with ABC in Australia — also reported that Mr Pratt allegedly then shared the information with at least 45 people, including journalists and employees, as well as 10 Australian officials and three former prime ministers.

The alleged conversation with Mr Pratt was not mentioned by federal prosecutors when they charged Mr Trump with mishandling classified documents this year.

However, ABC reported that Mr Pratt had been interviewed on the matter at least twice, and that he told investigators he was not sure if the information was accurate.

The New York Times said the businessman was among dozens of people identified as possible witnesses who could testify against the former president at trial.

A spokesman for Mr Trump criticised what they described as "illegal leaks" that lacked "proper context and relevant information".

"The Department of Justice should investigate the criminal leaking, instead of perpetrating their baseless witch-hunts while knowing that President Trump did nothing wrong, has always insisted on truth and transparency, and acted in a proper manner, according to the law," the spokesman said.

A response has been sought from Mr Pratt, and the ABC is not suggesting he has done anything wrong.

The office of special counsel Jack Smith, who is prosecuting Mr Trump, declined to comment.

AUKUS deal not part of conversation, shadow foreign minister says

Anthony Pratt runs Pratt Industries/Visy, which its website says is the "world's largest privately owned packaging, paper and recycling company".

He was praised by Donald Trump as "the most successful man in Australia" during a visit to a Pratt Industries plant in Ohio in 2019.

"He [Mr Pratt] said I'm going to come here and I'm going to spend $10 billion if you win the election," Mr Trump said at the time.

ABC News reported that Mr Trump's comments in the April 2021 conversation came after Mr Pratt suggested Australia should start buying submarines from the US.

The AUKUS deal, under which Australia will obtain nuclear-powered — but not nuclear-armed — subs was announced by Mr Trump's successor Joe Biden about five months later.

But Shadow Foreign Minister Simon Birmingham said Mr Trump would not have been aware of the discussions taking place behind the scenes.

"It's important we keep a clear distinction between AUKUS and these investigations by US authorities," he said.

"Ultimately AUKUS was an agreement struck with the Biden administration, through discussions between Scott Morrison and Joe Biden, as well as [former UK prime minister] Boris Johnson.

"They were discussions had with the utmost of secrecy applied to them, and those confidences were kept."

He said these were the "most sensitive of US defence technologies and capabilities".

"Therefore it is critically important that the sensitivities and secrecy associated with these capabilities be maintained and respected at all times."

Former Australian ambassador to the US Joe Hockey played down the significance of the alleged conversation.

"Australian submariners have been serving on US submarines for years," he said in a statement.

"Similarly US naval personnel have been on our ships. It's a fully integrated partnership. The combat system on the US subs and Australian subs is a joint program. Similarly we share weapons technology.

"If the conversation between Trump and Pratt is as reported there has been nothing said that we all did not know."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-06/donald-trump-allegedly-discussed-nuclear-subs-with-anthony-pratt/102943844

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679792

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19505163

>>19679708

Donald Trump allegedly discussed US nuclear subs with Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt

BEN PACKHAM and ADAM CREIGHTON - OCTOBER 6, 2023

Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt has been identified as a ­potential witness against Donald Trump in his classified documents trial after he allegedly received ­secret information on US nuclear submarine capabilities from the former president.

America’s ABC News reported that Mr Pratt was interviewed by prosecutors and FBI agents over the alleged 2021 disclosure by Mr Trump at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida.

The Pratt Industries and Visy boss reportedly said in the interviews that Mr Trump disclosed the exact number of nuclear warheads carried by US nuclear subs, and how close they could get to a Russian submarine without being detected.

Mr Pratt, whose office did not return calls on Friday, allegedly ­relayed details of the exchange to at least 45 people, including three former prime ministers, six journalists, 11 of his company's employees, and 10 Australian officials, ABC News reported.

Former prime minister Tony Abbott told The Weekend Australian that he had “no recollection of any such discussion” with Mr Pratt, while his successor, Malcolm Turnbull, said Mr Pratt did not speak to him about the matter.

Scott Morrison, who was close to Mr Pratt and was in office at the time of the alleged Trump disclosure, did not respond to inquiries. Anthony Albanese’s office also ­declined to comment.

The Trump-Pratt conversation allegedly happened soon after Mr Trump’s election defeat and about five months before the AUKUS pact was announced.

Prosecutors interviewed Mr Pratt as part of their classified documents case against the former president, and he is now among more than 80 people identified as possible witnesses who could testify in a trial beginning next May, The New York Times reported.

Mr Pratt reportedly told investigators that Mr Trump did not show him any classified documents. Prosecutors could use the Australian’s evidence to argue the former president was reckless in his handling of classified information.

Mr Trump’s alleged disclosure came after Mr Pratt declared to the former president that Australia should buy US submarines, prompting Mr Trump to “lean in” to share the information, ABC News reported.

The Weekend Australian is not suggesting that Mr Pratt knowingly shared any potentially illegal or sensitive information.

Former Australian ambassador to the US Joe Hockey sought to play down the revelations in a comment to The New York Times. “If that’s all that was discussed, we already know all that,” Mr Hockey said.

“We have had Australians serving with Americans on US submarines for years, and we share the same technology and the same weapons as the US Navy.”

Mr Turnbull told The Guardian: “Trump did ask me in early 2017 why we were buying French rather than US subs.

“I explained it was important that they be a sovereign capability and we did not have the means at that stage to sustain and maintain nuclear-powered submarines ourselves.”

The alleged disclosure was not included in the June indictment of Mr Trump, which charged the former president with 40 counts of unlawful retention of national ­defence information and obstruction-related offences.

The 77-year-old Trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, is ­accused of taking hundreds of classified government documents to his Mar-a-Lago home in Florida.

Under the AUKUS deal reached between the Australian, UK and US governments, Australia will be ­provided with nuclear-powered ­attack submarines in the 2030s. They will not carry any ­nuclear warheads.

ABC News reported a former Mar-a-Lago employee, who was close to the Trump-Pratt conversation, told investigators the businessman had told others “within minutes” what the former president had just said.

The staff member told investigators he was “bothered” and “shocked” to hear that Mr Trump had provided such seemingly sensitive information to a non-US citizen in such a cavalier fashion.

The Biden administration cut Mr Trump out of intelligence briefings that former presidents traditionally receive when they leave office, following his role in the January 6 Capitol Hill riots and concerns over his discretion.

Mr Trump and Mr Pratt developed a close relationship throughout the former’s presidency, especially after Mr Pratt pledged to invest $US2bn in American manufacturing in 2017.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/donald-trump-allegedly-discussed-us-nuclear-subs-with-australian-billionaire-anthony-pratt/news-story/fa20fc237e6ee820955f802a0c81026b

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRVwqcPMjLQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679836

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19505163

>>19679708

‘It’s on Wikipedia’: Debate flares over Trump’s submarine disclosures to Anthony Pratt

Matthew Knott and Chris Zappone - October 6, 2023

1/2

Former prime ministers have distanced themselves from revelations that Donald Trump allegedly disclosed classified information about United States’ submarines to Australian packaging mogul Anthony Pratt as debate flared about the national security implications of the alleged leak.

Pratt, the executive chairman of Visy Industries and Pratt Industries, is among more than 80 people whom prosecutors have identified as possible witnesses who could testify against the president at his classified documents trial.

The revelations about Trump’s alleged indiscretion regarding sensitive national security information have revived fears among officials in Canberra about the volatile scenario they would face if Trump wins next year’s presidential election.

Pratt allegedly spoke to Trump about nuclear-powered submarine technology during an April 2021 meeting, five months before the US, Australia and UK announced the formation of AUKUS, the defence pact under which Australia is set buy up to five Virginia-class submarines from the US.

According to America’s ABC News, which broke the story, Pratt told Trump he believed Australia should start buying its submarines from the US.

Trump then allegedly told Pratt two pieces of information about US submarines: the supposed exact number of nuclear warheads they routinely carry, and exactly how close they supposedly can get to a Russian submarine without being detected.

It is alleged that Pratt relayed the information to “scores of others” including three former prime ministers, more than a dozen foreign officials, several employees, and a handful of journalists.

Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said Pratt did not disclose the conversations to him.

“Trump did ask me in early 2017 why we were buying French rather than US subs,” Turnbull said.

“I explained that it was important that they be a sovereign capability, and that we did not have the means at that stage to sustain and maintain nuclear-powered submarines ourselves.”

Scott Morrison did not respond to request for comment, while Tony Abbott said: “I don’t have any recollection of it.”

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham said that “the suggestion of such matters being aired in ways that breach national security undertakings is one that I’m sure US officials would take very seriously, and I would expect them to similarly in Australia”.

Saying that members of Australia’s national security committee of cabinet were expected to keep operational details secret “for the rest of our lives”, Birmingham said nuclear-powered submarine secrets were among America’s “most treasured” military assets.

“I’m sure many in the United States will take very, very seriously the suggestion that these types of technologies, and the capabilities associated with them, could be subject to discussions outside of those confined spaces,” he told Sky News.

Joe Hockey, who served as Australia’s ambassador to the US while Trump was in office, downplayed the seriousness of the alleged disclosures by saying: “At a national security level, there is nothing there that we haven’t known for years or that you can’t pull up on Wikipedia.”

Hockey said that US and Australian troops already work on each other’s submarines and there was significant sharing of sensitive military technology between the two nations.

The alleged conversation between Trump and Pratt did not carry implications for the security of the AUKUS pact, he said.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said: “I will not comment about US domestic issues.”

Michael Green, the chief executive of the University of Sydney’s United States Studies Centre, said: “There is a clear pattern with former president Trump of treating sensitive information, and the intelligence community with real carelessness.”

Green, a former senior official in George W Bush’s White House, said there were many publicly available reports on the number of warheads stored on US nuclear submarines.

“Former president Trump is not exactly a fact checker,” he said. “I’m not sure how to judge if serious damage was done or not. The most damaging thing is that this is such a pattern.”

Richard Dunley, a naval historian at UNSW, struck a different tone, said: “Navies have always been very sensitive about this sort of thing.”

For example, navies are still wary of disclosing information about submarine technology used during the Cold War.

Dunley said Trump’s alleged indiscretion about sensitive military matters, rather than any specific information the Republican presidential frontrunner may have disclosed to Pratt, was the most troubling issue.

“You wouldn’t necessarily know the line between fact and fiction,” he added of Trump.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19679846

File: f915e28f9091b33⋯.jpg (328.16 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Anthony_Pratt_then_Austral….jpg)

>>19679836

2/2

Trump, who polls show is easily leading the Republican presidential field, responded through a spokesperson by calling for the US Department of Justice to investigate what he called criminal leaks.

These “leaks are coming from sources which totally lack proper context and relevant information,” the spokesperson said.

Prosecutors and FBI agents have reportedly interviewed Pratt, who is a member of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club, at least twice.

The alleged disclosure, if confirmed, sheds new light on the impact of Trump’s decision to remove classified documents from the White House after he left the presidency in 2021.

A Pratt Industries spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.

There is no suggestion Pratt broke any laws.

A spokesperson for the special counsel’s office declined to comment on the report or confirm whether Pratt had been interviewed over the alleged disclosures.

Pratt allegedly insisted to investigators he disclosed his meeting with Trump to demonstrate how he was advocating for Australia with the US, ABC US reported.

Justice Department special prosecutor Jack Smith did not include information about Trump’s alleged conversation with Pratt in his June indictment against Trump.

Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home was raided by the FBI in August 2022, as they searched for classified documents the former president allegedly removed from the White House.

In June, Trump was charged on 37 criminal counts for mishandling classified documents – from secret information relating to nuclear programs to sensitive intelligence.

Trump was later charged with “wilful retention” of national defence information, and two counts of obstruction charges. The case is to be argued in the federal court in Florida in May 2024.

Even as Trump’s 2024 election campaign proceeds, and he continues to raise millions in donations for it, his legal woes have grown.

He has been charged in a federal case over his efforts in trying to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election ahead of the violent riot by his supporters at the US Capitol on January 6.

Smith is leading that case, as well as the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case.

Separately, Trump pleaded not guilty to charges of election interference in the state of Georgia in a case that has involved 17 other co-defendent, including his former chief of staff Mark Meadows.

In March 2024, the criminal case against Trump over paying hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels, is scheduled to go to trial, after a jury voted to indict him.

In total, Trump faces 91 felony counts in two state courts and two federal districts.

He is also being sued for fraud by the state of New York in a civil case that he chose to attend this week. Trump, his sons and their family business have been accused of inflating the value of his properties to get better loan terms and lower insurance premiums. The prosecution claims Trump illegally generated more than $US1 billion of financial benefits.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/trump-allegedly-disclosed-us-submarine-secrets-to-anthony-pratt-us-media-20231006-p5ea8a.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4xSp0J4ZEA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19684137

File: 6e5809b3d32b7f4⋯.jpg (276.36 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Donald_Trump_reportedly_sp….jpg)

File: eb3eda6ae7b1aef⋯.jpg (477.12 KB,814x720,407:360,POTUS_33.jpg)

>>19505163

>>19679708

Trump denies telling Aussie billionaire sub secrets

Duncan Murray - October 7 2023

Donald Trump says reports he disclosed secret information regarding US submarines are false, but he will always encourage countries such as Australia to purchase American weaponry.

A report this week suggested the former president told Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt confidential information about US nuclear submarines during a meeting at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort, of which Mr Pratt is reportedly a member.

US outlet ABC News reported Trump told Mr Pratt sensitive information in April 2021, including how many warheads the subs routinely carry and how close they can get to a Russian submarine without being detected.

Mr Trump is currently being investigated for allegedly hoarding classified documents after leaving office.

In a post on his social media platform Truth Social on Friday local time, Trump labelled ABC's report "false and ridiculous".

"Other than the fact that I will often state that we make the best submarines and military equipment anywhere in the world," Mr Trump said.

"A pretty well known fact!"

Mr Trump suggested "fake" stories were being spread by "corrupt prosecutors" trying to interfere with the 2024 presidential election.

"Based on the polling, where I am 60 points up on republican candidates, and 11 points up on crooked Joe Biden, the people of our country aren't buying it," he said.

ABC News said the alleged disclosure was reported to special counsel Jack Smith who is leading the prosecution team.

Australia, the US and the UK are working on a pathway for Canberra to acquire nuclear-powered submarines under the trilateral AUKUS pact, which was formally announced in September 2021.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham said the conversations happened before the AUKUS agreement was finalised, and would not have spanned Australian measures undertaken to achieve the deal.

"There may have been … hypotheticals about whether Australia should access American technology or submarines," he told Sky News on Friday.

"Of course, these are highly sensitive materials and information and it's why so much care needs to go into how we engage with the United States."

Mr Trump said he will always promote US military equipment and encourage countries such as Australia to purchase it.

"The alternative would be for Allies, and others, to buy from Russia, China, or elsewhere. I like creating jobs in America, which was one of my most successful achievements as President!"

Mr Pratt and Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles have been contacted for comment.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8377675/trump-denies-telling-aussie-billionaire-sub-secrets/

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111189451978671227

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19684154

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19505163

>>19679708

Lawrence: Australian billionaire bought ‘exactly what he wanted’ from Trump

MSNBC

Oct 6, 2023

MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell details the “incriminating” breaking news that Donald Trump reportedly revealed nuclear submarine secrets to an Australian billionaire member of Mar-a-Lago who “purchased his access” to Trump while he was president as Trump moves to dismiss or delay the criminal cases against him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDlVfEjHIvg

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19684171

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19505163

>>19679708

TRUMP SPIES; GAVE NUKE SUB SECRETS TO AUSSIES

Keith Olbermann

Oct 6, 2023

TRUMP IS FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES A FOREIGN SPY, who in April 2021 gave away nuclear submarine secrets to an Australian manufacturer of boxes, 'potentially endanger(ing) the U.S. fleet." The businessman promptly told at least 45 other people, including 11 of his own employees, 10 Australian officials, and THREE FORMER Australian Prime Ministers.

We must do to Trump what we would do to any other trafficker in top secret information: arrest, detention without bail, prosecution for espionage.

We know the name of the man Trump delivered defense information to, we know his nationality, we know when and where Trump delivered it to him, we know what the information delivered WAS, we know that Jack Smith’s investigators know about it and interviewed him at least twice, and we know WHO the man in turned SHARED the top secret information WITH, totaling at LEAST 45 other people including three of his home country’s prime ministers.

TRUMP GAVE AWAY OUR NUCLEAR SUBMARINE SECRETS TO A GUY WHO MAKES CORRUGATED BOXES.

It's ESPIONAGE. Donald Trump committed ESPIONAGE. He is not MERELY trying to burn down representative government in this country AGAIN but in his spare time over the last three years he has been committing ESPIONAGE and he is for all intents and purposes a foreign agent of at LEAST one other country, Australia, and when we FIND agents of other countries who trade in information about how many nuclear warheads can fit in one of our submarines or how close they can get to the Russians without the Russians finding out they are there.

And the government, no matter the fallout, needs to arrest Donald Trump today, for espionage, for spying on behalf of a foreign nation, and keep him detained without bail.

Also: Get your popcorn. The Republicans are Cawthorning Matt Gaetz. And, in memory of Dick Butkus.

GRAB THE FRIDAY COUNTDOWN PODCAST: https://tinyur l.com /7hpr8ntx

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sc6SLkVV8zo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19684200

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19505163

>>19679708

Maggie Haberman: This is the latest example of Trump's 'melding' persona, presidency and business

CNN

Oct 6, 2023

CNN's Anderson Cooper breaks down a new ABC report that former President Donald Trump allegedly discussed sensitive nuclear submarine information with a Mar-a-Lago member, and discusses with a panel of experts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEvyQPBXrj8

https://qalerts.pub/?q=maggie

https://qalerts.pub/?q=haberman

>These people are stupid.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19685020

File: 04484179176106b⋯.jpg (5.73 MB,5960x3973,5960:3973,Christine_Nixon_hands_over….jpg)

File: 71d3d5f6c625dae⋯.jpg (61.67 KB,810x540,3:2,Organised_crime_boss_Alban….jpg)

>>19664500

‘Millions on planes’: Boat focus blinded Home Affairs to real abuses, says Nixon

Nick McKenzie and Michael Bachelard - October 7, 2023

1/2

A focus on stopping migrant boats as millions of people arrived on planes with inadequate scrutiny meant authorities missed widespread exploitation and abuse in Australia’s visa system, according to the former top cop who led the Albanese government’s immigration rorts inquiry.

In her most damning comments to date, former Victoria Police chief commissioner Christine Nixon also warned that seismic and sustained reform was needed to address problems in the multibillion-dollar international education sector and to combat the normalisation of foreign worker exploitation.

Nixon described how the economic benefits of Australia’s demand-driven, user-pays international education market had clouded discussion about the entrenched integrity problems in the sector, including ghost colleges and the use of the student visa system as a means of supplying foreign workers.

“Our economy has become accustomed to having cheap overseas labour, and migration system reform will have to take that into account,” Nixon said. “Why is it OK to bring people into this country to be exploited? It isn’t.”

Nixon also said the Home Affairs department needed to undergo significant change to respond to the problems.

“We were told the department’s energy went into the boats [with asylum seekers] but people were just flying into Australia in their millions,” she said.

Nixon’s interview came after the Albanese government announced sweeping reforms to the visa system aimed at curbing corruption in the overseas education sector, combating human trafficking and worker exploitation and reducing lengthy delays in dealing with fraudulent protection visa applications.

Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil said Labor would beef up the immigration compliance section of her department after cuts under previous governments, spending $50 million. It would also crack down on registered migration agents, with more funding to the regulatory body, and strengthen the fit-and-proper person test for international education providers.

The reforms were prompted by the Trafficked series of reports by The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, 60 Minutes and Stan, which forced the Albanese government to commission the Nixon inquiry.

In her response, O’Neil took aim at Opposition Leader Peter Dutton saying his tough-on-immigration stance as home affairs minister was “one of the great frauds in Australian politics.”

Dutton responded that O’Neil was “a very angry person, always very angry and very aggressive”.

Nixon found there was a system-wide enforcement failure partly due to a severe lack of resources.

“Border force has very limited investigative capacity. The federal police is spread thin enforcing all types of commonwealth crimes and also has limited investigative capacity. It gets even worse when you look at enforcement within the overseas education system,” Nixon said.

“What I discovered is that there was nobody really in firm control of the whole visa system. There are always arguments about the levels of permanent migration but no one seemed to have control of how many temporary visas are being granted each year and how some were being abused.

“Until recently Australia has been running a visa system with multiple owners impacting multiple ministers and portfolios without asking, ‘what are the flaws? How do we stop the exploitation’?”

In her inquiry report, Nixon concluded that it was clear that “gaps and weaknesses” in Australia’s visa system were enabling criminal organisations to exploit people and make money.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19685025

File: 15fc72a037f033a⋯.jpg (277.95 KB,2147x1569,2147:1569,Binjun_Xie_is_escorted_to_….jpg)

File: ff0dc4da85eda28⋯.jpg (196.15 KB,1870x1110,187:111,Inside_a_brothel_linked_to….jpg)

>>19685020

2/2

Nixon’s comments come as O’Neil deported a second organised crime boss, Albanian Diego Biba, who was at the centre of some of The Age’s reporting series.

As in the case of recently deported sex trafficker Binjun Xie, Biba managed to spend years in Australia committing alleged serious criminal offences despite compelling evidence he was rorting the visa system.

In her interview with The Age, Nixon called for ongoing monitoring to ensure the government’s proposed reforms are adequately implemented and effective, while describing how more work needed to be done in understanding exploitation of Australia’s migration system.

“It might be that half the people coming to Australia on temporary visas don’t want to go home. We don’t know. What are the exploitation levels? What are the abuse levels? Finding more data is critical,” she said.

The latest statistics reveal that there are over 2.5 million foreign nationals in Australia on temporary visas, including 650,000 international students, 200,000 graduates and 450,000 people with various working rights, including holidaymakers and skilled workers.

The Albanese government is expected to soon release further reforms aimed at matching genuine skills shortages to visa supply.

Nixon said her investigation began with leads generated by the Trafficked series, a significant data sweep of previous reports and a deep dive into intelligence holdings of state and federal agencies.

“I realised very early on that things were bad,” she said.

The ex-police chief was struck by the frustration of some law enforcement officials who briefed her about the human cost of the failure to stop organised crime groups rorting visa streams.

“One police officer I spoke to couldn’t get over the idea that there was so little they could do to combat sexual servitude,” she said, while describing her own revulsion at discovering case studies that exposed abject human suffering.

She said one case involved a 50-something year-old woman from Northern China who entered Australia on a student visa to study English.

Rather than attend school, the woman was picked up at the airport and entered the underground sex industry where she was “appallingly abused”.

Nixon noted that the Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus was seeking to improve the response to human and sex trafficking and that the federal police and border force employed committed investigators. But she said they have a tough job in front of them.

“There was an incredible lack of investigative capacity to deal with these issues,” said Nixon, explaining that this was why she had recommended a multi-agency taskforce, a reform implemented by Labor.

But in a reform still being considered, Nixon said that, as in Canada and New Zealand, temporary migrants should be barred from working in the sex industry.

If they were found to do so, they and their employer could be deported or otherwise sanctioned.

“I’m not blaming the victims. It is about targeting these people who are exploiting these women. This is organised crime,” Nixon said.

“The same nationalities are exploiting each other. They should have their visas cancelled.”

Nixon also attacked the long-standing failure of successive governments to strengthen Australia’s anti-money laundering regime, given that greed and vast international money trails underpin the visa rorting scandal.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/millions-on-planes-boat-focus-blinded-home-affairs-to-real-abuses-says-nixon-20231006-p5ea8g.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19685030

File: 3cac62cf9c0c3b2⋯.jpg (206.06 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Martina_Navratilova_s_high….jpg)

File: 7067d3a5513cd0f⋯.jpg (458.87 KB,825x1310,165:262,MN_1.jpg)

Martina Navratilova slams Gymnastics Australia for pro trans position

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - OCTOBER 6, 2023

Martina Navratilova has slammed Gymnastics Australia – saying “what is wrong with you guys” for allowing biological males who identify as female, and permitting them access to young girls and women’s changing rooms and competitions.

Navratilova, 66, hit out at the national organisation, which boasts of more than 800,000 participants with one of the highest participation sports for children under 12 – for changing its rules to allow transgender people to self-identify and compete in all community gymnastics events.

The tennis star and commentator’s high-profile criticism has put the spotlight on Gymnastics Australia’s radical position, which is going against the recent trend of international sporting organisations such as track and field, swimming and cycling to reinforce women’s sport on sex, not gender.

She said Gymnastics Australia’s position “just threw females and girls under the bus” and warned “to say this won’t end well is an understatement’’.

On Twitter she posted: ”To say this won’t end well is an understatement. To say Gymnastics Australia just threw females and girls under the bus is an understatement. What is wrong with you guys??? This “inclusion” actually will EXCLUDE biological women and most of all girls. #whataboutthegirls”

Ms Navratilova has been outspoken in her belief that women’s and girls sport should be confined to biological females.

Gymnastics Australia chief executive Alexandra Ash said the sport’s commitment to transgender and gender diverse people “is that gymnastics is and will continue to be a safe and inclusive environment for everyone, regardless of their gender, sexual orientation, ability, cultural background, or ethnicity”.

The policy allowed for competitors to wear whatever uniform they liked, and that in community gymnastics competitions – which is where most schoolchildren compete – individuals would be allowed to participate in the competition they believed best reflected their gender identity.

But Navratilova believes the issue of biological males being able to compete against women and also enter and use female changing rooms heavily discriminates against young girls and women.

In the release announcing the new policy Gymnastics Australia said: “We also want all members to feel celebrated in who they are and see them continue to contribute to the diverse community and legacy of gymnastics as one of Australia’s most popular sports for young people.

“At a community level, engaging more than 800,000 Australians nationwide, gymnastics is one of the highest participation sports for Australians aged under 12 and the sport recognises the need to support and protect young Australians navigating their gender identity in sport.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/martina-navratilova-slams-gymnastics-australia-for-pro-trans-position/news-story/bb8dc473f1872c4e0532448dcda9ea6f

https://twitter.com/Martina/status/1709896227364503805

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19685067

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19606805

Voice polling shows support dwindling

Sky News Australia

Oct 7, 2023

Support for the Voice to Parliament continues to dwindle, just a week out from the referendum.

According to a Roy Morgan poll, 46 per cent of Australians intend to vote No, while 37 per cent of people would vote Yes and 17 per cent of voters remain undecided.

Victoria and Tasmania are the only states where people are inclined to vote Yes in the referendum.

Queensland saw the largest amount of 'no' responses.

The majority of men across the country say they are against the Voice - citing fears of losing land.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BDvyi1zNUc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19685172

File: 0ec1e256892bc7e⋯.jpg (53.93 KB,670x450,67:45,Support_for_No_case_now_at….jpg)

File: 280eb9293aa0758⋯.jpg (657.83 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0001.jpg)

File: 7c7c006ef2de85d⋯.jpg (445.93 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0002.jpg)

File: 87cfd1e03fd8323⋯.jpg (417.72 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0003.jpg)

>>19685067

Support for ‘No’ case now at 46% well ahead of ‘Yes’ case on 37% as early referendum voting starts

roymorgan.com - October 05, 2023

The latest Roy Morgan poll shows 46% of Australians (up 2% in a week) now say they will vote ‘No’ to establish an ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice’ compared to only 37% (down 2%) say they would vote ‘Yes’ and a further 17% (unchanged) are ‘Undecided’ on how they would vote.

Respondents around Australia were asked: “Next month’s (Asked on September 25-30, 2023) / This month’s (Asked on October 1, 2023) referendum proposes a law to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. At the referendum to be held on October 14, will you vote yes, no, or are you undecided?”

If ‘Undecided’ respondents are removed the split in favour of the ‘No’ vote is 56% (up 3% in a week) cf. 44% (down 3%). However, past experience with surveys conducted before previous referenda shows that ‘Undecided’ voters are far more likely to end up as a ‘No’ rather than a ‘Yes’ vote meaning the actual figure is likely to be a larger majority in favour of ‘No’ than indicated here.

This special Roy Morgan online survey was conducted with an Australia-wide cross-section of 909 Australian electors aged 18+ from Monday September 25 - Sunday October 1, 2023. Interviewing for this surveying is continuing through until the end of this week.

Next week Roy Morgan will be releasing the full results of this survey, including detailed State-by-State, Gender, Age and Party support breakdowns.

Victoria and Tasmania are only States in which more respondents say they will vote ‘Yes’ to ‘The Voice’

It's worth noting that the road to a successful referendum demands not only a majority of people nationally but also a majority of people in a majority of states (at least four out of six).

The results of this Roy Morgan online survey on ‘The Voice’ show that more people in Victoria and Tasmania say they will vote ‘Yes’ to ‘The Voice’ – the only two States with more in favour, although the result in Tasmania is based on a small sample.

The strongest opposition to ‘The Voice’ is in Queensland in which a clear majority of respondents say they will vote ‘No’ at the referendum.

In the three other mainland States of New South Wales, Western Australia and South Australia there are pluralities of 43-49% of voters say they will vote ‘No’ to ‘The Voice’.

The ‘gender gap’ continues with a majority of men opposed and women narrowly in favour

There remains a clear gender split when it comes to support of ‘The Voice’. A slim majority of men say they will vote ‘No’ to ‘The Voice’ while in comparison there are slightly more women who say they will vote ‘Yes’ rather than ‘No’.

https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/support-for-no-case-now-at-46-well-ahead-of-yes-case-on-37-as-early-referendum-voting-starts

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19685360

File: cc66c26b2ea1683⋯.jpg (167.68 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tony_Abbott_and_John_Howar….jpg)

>>19685067

Indigenous voice to parliament won’t fix crisis in Northern Territory, say John Howard and Tony Abbott

''DENNIS SHANAHAN - OCTOBER 7, 2023"

1/2

John Howard and Tony Abbott have declared the Northern Territory is a failed state because of its inability to provide basic services to remote communities, including education, and believe a voice to parliament will not improve practical outcomes for Indigenous people in central Australia.

The former Liberal prime ministers, who implemented the Coalition’s 2007 intervention into the Northern Territory, which ­included grog bans and placing military personnel in some ­remote communities, said little had changed for Indigenous Australians in the 15 years since the Coalition government’s action.

Mr Howard said changes to the Constitution to include an ­Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government would be tied up for years would not do anything to address the problems facing Aboriginal children in the Northern Territory.

Mr Abbott said a Yes vote for the voice would only “entrench Indigenous separatism” that had not helped disadvantaged communities.

“I think that it entrenches race in the Constitution in a very damaging and destructive way,” Mr Abbott said in an interview for an Australians for a Constitutional Monarchy conference to be aired on Monday.

“I think it would gum up our system of government even further. I think it would reinforce the separatism that’s at the heart of Indigenous disadvantage. So I really do hope that we say a resounding no to this divisive voice.”

Mr Howard – defending his government’s decision to launch the Northern Territory Response to combat child sex abuse, which was heavily criticised – said it was necessary the Northern Territory government had failed.

“The intervention was a recognition that the Northern Territory government had completely failed in its responsibilities and it doesn’t appear as if a lot has changed over the 15 years that have gone by,” Mr Howard said in a presentation for the Australians for a Constitutional Monarchy conference.

“And, I think what emerged from the events in the Territory was a further indictment of the ­inability, the failure of the Northern Territory government to provide the basic services.

“You can make all sorts of changes to the Constitution but unless you have a police force, you have medical services and you have an education system that is up to the task of helping the disadvantaged, then you’re going to have a failure of government.

“And that’s what’s happened in the Northern Territory.”

Mr Abbott, in response to ­revelations in The Australian about failures within the NT ­education system said central Australia ­resembled a “failed state administratively” and the ­education of Indigenous children in remote communities was a chronic failure.

“Central Australia basically resembles a failed state,” Mr Abbott said in an interview with The Weekend Australian.

“Education delivery is a huge recurring problem because of a chronic failure of administration in central Australia.

“Part of the problem is that there are no people with authority who are on the spot, people who can make decisions and are living in the communities. Too many agencies and departments work in silos separated from each other and are only there in the communities a few times.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19685379

File: cad9cb5323c1621⋯.jpg (620.94 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,A_group_of_children_roams_….jpg)

>>19685360

2/2

The most ­authoritative representative body for Aboriginal people in central Australia has called on the Albanese government to intervene immediately to fix the Territory’s schools funding crisis. The Central Land Council’s 90 elected delegates, who represent 24,000 Indigenous people from dozens of communities, decided on Thursday to ask the commonwealth to force the NT government to deal with its bloated bureaucracy and start funding its schools properly.

The Australian’s NT Schools in Crisis series has revealed a shortfall of $214.8m a year for Territory schools, which disproportionately affects the country’s most disadvantaged students under an attendance-based funding model that does not operate ­anywhere else in the country.

CLC chief executive Les Turner said on Thursday: “It is deeply unfair that our children have to leave home and become boarders if they want to go to high school – a hurdle that is too high for most.

“We need federal action to prevent a total collapse of the NT’s remote government education system, which is starved of funds and unable to support the needs of all children.”

The CLC said an Indigenous voice to parliament and government would help ensure governments were told where money could be spent with the best effect.

In 2007 the Howard government intervened in the Northern Territory, suspending the Racial Discrimination Act, introducing grog bans and sending military personnel to some remote communities. There was a furore last year when the NT Labor government allowed alcohol to return to some camps after the intervention-era bans expired, a move that fuelled violence, crime and alcohol abuse in central Australia.

Under pressure from the federal Labor government the bans were reinstated early this year, although NT Chief Minister Natasha Fyles said the Howard-era intervention had “disempowered Indigenous people” and was a Coalition distraction.

Mr Howard said the intervention was aimed at stopping terrible and appalling child sexual abuse that “should make every Australian feel ashamed”.

“I just think that if the referendum is carried, which I hope it’s not, it will present some real difficulties and real challenges,” he said. “If the voice were to get up in the referendum, the next several years will be all about who’s going to get elected to do it and about all the magnificent procedural issues and innovation that won’t solve any problem for Aboriginal children in the Northern Territory.”

Attendance rates at remote Northern Territory schools are as low as 18.7 per cent and have been falling for a decade.

Mr Abbott said the problem was there were no “adverse consequences” for parents who did not send their children to school.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-wont-fix-crisis-in-northern-territory-say-john-howard-and-tony-abbott/news-story/e0f97c9b9da11c66ed3494634862cad6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19685520

File: d6f2f47323431a5⋯.jpg (371.37 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19685067

Indigenous voice to parliament division was predicted by former High Court chief justice Harry Gibbs

JOE KELLY - OCTOBER 7, 2023

A three-decade old warning sounded by former high court chief justice Harry Gibbs on the dangers of enshrining special rights for ­Aboriginal people in the Constitution has been seized upon by the Coalition as evidence a successful referendum next Saturday would permanently divide the nation.

Gibbs, chief justice from 1981 to 1987, was deeply concerned about the potential for the constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians to split the nation along racial lines.

He predicted in the early 1990s that “the constitutional debate in Australia is only beginning” and warned of the need to protect the nation’s founding document from any future changes based on “self-interest, political expediency, mere fashion or sentimentality”.

As founding president of the Samuel Griffith Society, established in 1992, Gibbs wrote Australia Day messages to members and, in 1993, one year after the Mabo case, he expressed alarm that even a simple statement ­recognising Indigenous Australians in the Constitution could have far-reaching consequences.

“The most dangerous change that could be made would be to ­include in the constitution a provision giving special rights to the Aboriginal people,” he said.

“One proposal seems to be to include in the constitution a provision recognising the Aboriginal people as the indigenous inhabitants of Australia, or providing for a treaty with them; but anyone who has seen how constitutional courts appear to be able to conjure great constitutional principles from thin air will know that even simple and innocuous words, intended to do no more than improve the relations between the Aboriginal people and other Australians, could be held to be the basis of substantial rights and liabilities – as perhaps some of the advocates of a change of this kind are well aware.”

Gibbs warned that “nothing could do more to divide the Australian nation than a constitutional change that gave the Aboriginal people special rights and privileges based solely on race”.

“The Aboriginal people, like all other peoples in Australia, are not a uniform group. Some have successfully integrated into 20th ­century society; others are successfully living a traditional mode of life, albeit a modified one; ­others unfortunately are greatly in need of help, which various governments have tried without much success to give them,” he said. “Those in need should be succoured, but that does not mean that all those who are of Aboriginal race should be given special constitutional rights which would not be enjoyed by other Australians, even by those in equal need.”

Gibbs, who died in 2005, said it was important to “ensure that any change that is made benefits Australia, and that arguments based on self-interest, political expediency, mere fashion or sentimentality are exposed and rejected”.

The comments made when Paul Keating was prime minister have been seized upon by the ­Coalition as a prescient warning of the current polarisation caused by the voice.

Despite the warning from Gibbs about constitutional recognition, the Coalition has pledged to take the nation to a second referendum to recognise Indigenous Australians in the Constitution if the voice fails and Peter Dutton wins the next federal election.

Opposition legal affairs spokeswoman, Michaelia Cash, told The Weekend Australian that Gibbs’ insights were as ­“relevant today as they were 30 years ago”.

“He explicitly warned how granting constitutional rights on the basis of race would permanently divide our country,” she said. “He recognised that we should aid our Indigenous brothers and sisters on the basis of need, but should reject division on the basis of race.

“His comments could not be clearer: there is nothing simple or modest about the proposal for a voice. It is precisely the type of change that is ‘most dangerous’ to our system of government.”

Senator Cash also said it was “sad that Harry Gibbs’ insights have been lost on those advocating for yes. But I have tremendous faith in the Australian people, and hope that they recognise the wisdom of his approach on referendum day.”

The Yes campaign was contacted for comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-division-was-predicted-by-former-high-court-chief-justice-harry-gibbs/news-story/dcea3bde90713ef6cd0669cdf7d4e661

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19685549

File: b6318299df1bf5b⋯.jpg (487.83 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Strathfield_MP_Jason_Yat_s….jpg)

>>19685067

Indigenous voice to parliament: Migrants ‘unaware’ voting is imminent

JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - OCTOBER 5, 2023

A large proportion of the migrant community in a part of Sydney’s inner west doesn’t know the voice referendum is approaching, says Strathfield MP Jason Yat-sen Li, as he makes a final pitch to multicultural Australians on the voice.

Mr Yat-Sen Li, who earlier this year highlighted the extent of voice misinformation circulating in Chinese migrant communities, said he had had to build a compelling narrative for Yes among the large Chinese diaspora and other multicultural groups in his electorate.

The Labor MP says many migrants, including his parents, have not had an opportunity to engage deeply with 65,000 years of Indigenous history, making some people susceptible to misinformation.

When Mr Yat-sen Li knocks on a door, he begins with an ­“elevator pitch” on what the voice is, and then appeals to their sense of “justice” and doing “what’s fair” for Indigenous ­people, as well as a deep understanding of the “visceral pain of losing one’s ancestral homelands”. He says migrants from the Middle East have had a millennia of disruption and dislocation, while those from Southeast Asia and India, for example, know the harrowing effects of colonisation.

“A very large proportion (of doors we knock on) still have no idea that (the referendum) is coming.

“And that is a good opportunity to engage and to explain as simply and practically as possible what a referendum is … and what the voice actually means,” he told The Australian.

“In a vast majority of cases, I’ve found different migrant communities are really open and accepting of that … They empathise with the discrimination aspect.

“They understand what it feels like to lose their ancestral homelands. There’s a visceral understanding of what that means. And how psychologically and spiritually debilitating that is when it happens because I think a lot of migrants have felt that themselves.”

Mr Yat-sen Li said the ­hardest part was explaining the “hidden possibility of the ­referendum” which is “how do you unite a country, bringing ­together the Indigenous past, and the multicultural present and future”.

Desis for Yes, a Sydney-based grassroots collective of South Asian Australians campaigning for the voice, is working around the clock to win support.

Co-founder Nishadh Rego said there has been significantly more interest and curiosity in the referendum and what it means for Australia among the South Asian community over the past few months.

Mr Rego said it was hard to say what proportion of the ­community was disengaged but there was “much more work to do”.

Like Mr Yat-Sen Li, the Desis for Yes co-founder said most people in the South Asian community had some understanding, if not experience, of colonialism.

“What we’re trying to do is find those connection points and create space to reflect on what this means through their own experiences …” Mr Rego said.

“And when we have those conversations and find that space to reflect and ask questions and they begin to understand what it is and isn’t, they tend to lean towards Yes.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-migrants-unaware-voting-is-imminent/news-story/5d7016fecf5a808f19048db0af419576

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19685600

File: 043552b0e87074e⋯.jpg (887.82 KB,2400x1648,150:103,Voice_to_parliament_refere….jpg)

File: bc52416e04d707f⋯.jpg (503.55 KB,2400x1440,5:3,_They_know_what_they_re_go….jpg)

File: 25fe9466f23bb28⋯.jpg (496.27 KB,2400x1440,5:3,_I_just_get_the_nods_and_t….jpg)

File: 33e1362003228d9⋯.jpg (418.69 KB,2400x1440,5:3,_Very_civilised_and_friend….jpg)

>>19685067

Key voice battleground South Australia is ‘leaning to no’, campaign volunteers say

As state and territory leaders descend on Adelaide, polling has dipped below a winnable level and campaigners on the ground believe many people are voting no

Tory Shepherd - 6 Oct 2023

At a South Australian shopping centre, Philip Colebatch is handing out flyers for the Indigenous voice to parliament no campaign.

And as the campaign heads into its final days, he’s getting a “sniff” from voters he’s talking to that “it’s leaning to no”.

“I just get the nods and the winks,” he says.

South Australia has become a key battleground state in the lead up to the voice referendum. On Friday – just over a week from the vote – all state and territory leaders descended on Adelaide, including the sole Liberal, Tasmania’s Jeremy Rockcliff. They all support the federal voice to parliament.

The shadow Indigenous Australians minister and leading no campaigner, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, was also due to arrive in Adelaide on Friday evening.

Anthony Albanese announced the date of the vote in Adelaide due to South Australia’s potential to be the swing state that decides the outcome, and both the yes and no campaign have had disproportionately high ad spends in the state.

That’s because the yes campaign needs to win four states and the national result to carry the required “double majority” for constitutional change, meaning voice supporters will need to claim Tasmania and South Australia.

But polling for South Australia has dipped below a winnable level, and according to people on the ground, many people are voting no.

Another no campaigner, Alistair Crooks, says the shopping centre crowds are fairly polarised – and his years on polling booths have taught him you can’t always take them at their word. He, too, has heard more support for the no campaign, “but that’s skewed,” he says.

“It’s older people who’ve got the time to come down here. The young are still working. I don’t think we can read anything too much into it.”

As she hands out pamphlets for the Yes23 campaign just metres away from Colebatch, Kate Baldock says it’s a “mixed vibe” among the people she has talked to, with about 60% backing the no vote.

With early voting opening earlier this week, any last ditch campaigning may be too late.

Most of the volunteers Guardian Australia spoke to said voters haven’t asked many questions as they head inside – and if they did ask questions, it was often to get directions, to ask about ballot papers, or hint at conspiracy theories.

Baldock said some people stopped to ask questions about how the voice would work, and what difference it would make – particularly for healthcare – but many walked straight in.

“I think people are voting early because they know what they’re going to vote for. That nothing’s going to change their mind,” she says.

The South Australian Liberal leader, David Speirs, whose party also voted against the South Australian state voice to parliament, which was legislated in March, says he’s increasingly hearing from young people and women saying they will vote against the voice.

After a recent visit to regional South Australia’s Port Lincoln, he claims nine in 10 early voters cast their ballot for no.

“People have made up their minds on this,” he says.

But the SA premier, Peter Malinauskas, a prominent and vocal supporter of the yes campaign, still maintains the referendum is “winnable”.

He says the vibe varies at the early voting stations, and he’s met his share of hard nos. But there are also those who are open to changing their minds when the debate is distilled down to a “simple proposition”.

“I’ve been pleasantly surprised about the amount of people whose opinion seems to change when you simply explain to them that it’s a non-binding advisory committee of Aboriginal people advising on matters that affect Aboriginal people,” he says.

And while the debate has veered into racism, polarising rhetoric, misinformation and personal attacks across the country, at a ground level it has been more civil.

Those working on the ground say that while there’s robust debate between the volunteers, it’s mostly calm.

“You’ve got passions on both sides. If you’re passionate enough to hand out how-to-vote cards, sometimes you do get a little bit of a sparky vibe between people, but overall it’s been good,” Baldock says.

The Yes23 campaigner Mary Annesley says conversations with no campaigners have been “very civilised and friendly”.

“But we have argued very strongly for what we believe in,” she says.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/oct/06/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum-south-australia-polling-no-campaign

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19685699

File: 077f984b53d24eb⋯.jpg (83.89 KB,1200x800,3:2,WA_Liberal_senator_Michael….jpg)

>>19685067

Voice to Parliament: Hard No for WA as referendum vote looms

Hannah Cross and Joe Spagnolo - 6 October 2023

Fifty-four per cent of West Australians are now hard No voters and won’t be changing their minds in the final week of polling for the referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

Final polling for WA by Fair Australia shows a total of 59 per cent of people plan to vote No compared with 36 per cent who plan to vote Yes.

Five per cent remain unsure.

But significantly, the proportion of hard No and hard Yes voters stands at 54-31.

Fair Australia, part of the No camp and led by senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, polled 637 people.

WA Liberal senator Michaelia Cash said it was clear West Australians were “hardening” their resolve to vote No.

It comes with Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton today writing in The West Australian that voters with “legitimate concerns about this constitutional change” have been called “Chicken Littles, doomsayers and fearmongers”.

Veteran TV presenter Ray Martin on Thursday labelled No voters “d…heads and dinosaurs” if they were being influenced by the No campaign’s slogan: “If you don’t know, vote no.”

“You don’t insult your way to victory. You don’t rally people to your cause by questioning their morality,” Mr Dutton writes.

“And you don’t win votes by dishonestly claiming that those with whom you disagree are peddling misinformation and disinformation or pushing scare campaigns and conspiracy theories.”

While Mr Dutton said he doesn’t disparage Anthony Albanese’s “passion in wanting to address Indigenous disadvantage”, he said the Prime Minister must “bear responsibility for ingraining the division”.

“We all have a burning desire to see improvements,” he said.

“But Mr Albanese’s conduct in this debate has been more akin to a crusading advocate than a credible leader.”

Another TV identity, former ABC presenter and Wiradjuri man Stan Grant, on Friday night said the sky wouldn’t fall in if Australia votes No on October 14.

“Sometimes we can read too much into moments and say: ‘If this fails the sky will fall in’,” Grant said.

“Aboriginal people will keep on surviving, (we) will look for new ways to bring our voice to the political debate and Australia will have to keep on doing the work of democracy — that won’t change.”

https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/opposition-to-voice-to-parliament-hardening-as-vote-looms–c-12126703

https://archive.vn/VSm9Z

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19685753

File: 3a45984cbddd379⋯.jpg (328.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mr_Albanese_arriving_at_Ma….jpg)

File: ae25928b3f0432f⋯.jpg (258.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mr_Albanese_s_home_elector….jpg)

File: 482723af777297e⋯.jpg (288.6 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Prime_Minister_cast_hi….jpg)

File: f526099548e8357⋯.jpg (216.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Early_voting_stations_open….jpg)

File: 5a27c41b316ce23⋯.jpg (253.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_casts_his….jpg)

>>19685067

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese casts Voice vote in home electorate of Marrickville

ANTHONY ANDERSON - OCTOBER 7, 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has cast his vote early in the historic Voice to Parliament referendum with the company of his son from his home electorate of Marrickville.

Mr Albanese was in the inner-western Sydney suburb on Saturday morning where he emphatically dropped his ballot, presumably with a ‘Yes’ vote, into the ballot box at the Marrickville Town Hall early polling station.

He was met by a small crowd who had turned out to cast their own vote ahead of the official Voice vote day on October 14.

Volunteers, both with the ‘Yes’ campaign and the Electoral Commission, were all smiles as the nation’s leader entered the polling area, accompanied by his son Nathan.

“Yes for recognition, Yes for listening, Yes for better outcomes,” Mr Albanese wrote in a social media post, accompanied by a photo of he and his son voting.

Early polling stations opened in some states on Monday, and were all open across Australia by Tuesday due to some jurisdictions enjoying a public holiday.

This will be the first referendum Australia has had since 1999.

If the Yes vote is successful, the Voice will provide an avenue for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to advise the government on policy and legislation issues that directly impact them.

The most recent Newspoll suggested the Yes vote would fail 36 to 56 per cent.

Meanwhile, Australia’s former chief justice Robert French KC says Australians are “better than” abiding by the No campaigns slogan “if you don’t know, vote no,” in an address to the National Press Club on Friday.

“It invites us to a resentful, uninquiring passivity. Australians – whether they vote Yes or No – are better than that,” he said.

“We look forward. We can also look back to better understand where we have come from and where we are now.”

The overwhelming majority of legal experts in Australia say the proposed amendment Australians are voting on is constitutionally sound and would “enhance” the system of government, Mr French said.

Earlier this week, Lidia Thorpe accused the Prime Minister of not supporting her after a video produced by neo-Nazis aired disturbing threats against the Senator.

Speaking to The Project on Thursday, Senator Thorpe responded to the distressing threats made against her by far-right extremists and flagged a spike in racism ahead of October 14.

“As far as I‘m concerned, the Prime Minister is disingenuous with his gesture of this so-called Voice and referendum bringing us together,” Senator Thorpe said.

“We told the Prime Minister that this would divide this country and we told the Prime Minister that this would embolden the racists, but he went ahead anyway.

“So, it is on his head and he should have cancelled the referendum when he was told.”

On Monday night, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price told a few hundred ‘No’ supporters in Perth she didn’t need a Voice to Parliament to achieve all she has.

“We’ve got to fix the structures that already exist instead of muddying the waters and adding more bureaucracy and shoving it into our constitution,” Senator Price told the crowd in Perth Convention and Entertainment Centre’s Riverside Theatre, to a standing ovation.

Outside the venue, a group of about 40 ‘Yes’ protesters called out the ‘No’ campaign’s alleged “racist” and “bigoted” rhetoric in similar scenes to demonstrations held at ‘No’ rallies in Brisbane and Adelaide in September.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/prime-minister-anthony-albanese-casts-voice-vote-in-home-electorate-of-marrickville/news-story/b58cc229554668204d952d13aca8957b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19686008

File: e0c55b5bc0795cd⋯.jpg (2.05 MB,5438x3625,5438:3625,Gabriel_Shipton_addresses_….jpg)

File: 7beef7e1270cfb7⋯.jpg (5.87 MB,7909x5273,7909:5273,John_Shipton_Julian_Assang….jpg)

>>19493339

United in the States: Assange family pins hopes on Albanese-Biden meeting

Kieran Rooney - October 7, 2023

1/2

Julian Assange’s family is working out of the United States to fight his extradition, beseeching lawmakers there for help ahead of a looming meeting between Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and President Joe Biden.

They live in fear that their phones will light up with news that the WikiLeaks founder is about to be whisked from detention in the United Kingdom to a US prison – where they will lose him forever.

This heightened anxiety is fuelling their efforts to campaign for Assange’s release. They are meeting with key Democrats and Republicans, seeking the support of international leaders and drumming up public support to end the 13-year saga over his fate.

Speaking to The Sunday Age, Assange’s half-brother Gabriel Shipton said there were reasons to believe the long-running battle over his extradition could end without him sitting in a US prison.

Albanese’s US trip this month – during which he will meet with Biden – marks a key moment in their campaign.

Shipton said the ongoing uncertainty of Assange’s fate was taking a toll on everyone involved, recalling what Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges told him about families of prisoners.

“It’s almost like they’re all in prison,” he said.

“They’re all working to support that family member who is in prison and keeping them going.

“Whether it’s advocacy, whether it’s being in touch with him on the telephone or going to visit him. We’re all working to free Julian and to keep him alive, essentially.”

In 2019, United Nations special rapporteur on torture Nils Melzer said Assange had been exposed to prolonged psychological torture while being detained. The UK government disagreed with several of Melzer’s findings and said it did not engage in torture as a practice.

Shipton said the psychological effects on Assange were evident to those who talked to him.

“He knows exactly what’s in store for him and that’s why the doctors say that he’d rather die than face prison in the US,” he said.

“Over the years if you go and visit him, you can see the deterioration in him personally and physically.

“It is his fifth year in prison now … He’s been held there solely at the request of the US regarding this extradition. It’s this sort of endless, endless punishment that’s just wearing him down.”

Shipton said the image of Assange in a US prison with poor conditions also weighed heavily on everyone campaigning for his release, including fears they may never see him again.

“That’s what we’re very fearful of. That he’s taken there, and he’s just lost to us,” he said.

“At the moment, the prison conditions are really bad, but he has a visit every week with his kids and his wife. He has a phone call.

“That’s his lifeline, that’s what’s keeping him going. That’s his connection to the outside world and if he’s extradited and that’s taken away from him, then I don’t know how he will be able to keep fighting and be able to survive.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19686025

File: 761ea93e67befde⋯.jpg (1.66 MB,4392x3130,2196:1565,Julian_Assange_in_2017.jpg)

File: 4052419533410f3⋯.jpg (255.74 KB,1280x628,320:157,US_Republican_congresswoma….jpg)

>>19686008

2/2

John Shipton, father of Assange and Gabriel, has been campaigning across Latin America and North America to encourage Washington’s allies to put pressure on the US government to drop the espionage charges against his son.

Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva called for Assange’s release when speaking to the United Nations in September.

A full-page advertisement, signed by 64 Australian parliamentarians, calling for an end to Assange’s prosecution and incarceration, appeared in the Washington Post on September 19.

Gabriel Shipton said he had been meeting with politicians across the US political divide.

He said he believed that there was an expectation from the Australian public that Albanese would discuss Assange when he is in Washington from October 23.

In August, US ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy flagged a potential plea deal between Assange and US authorities that could end America’s pursuit and allow him to return to Australia.

Shipton said Assange would likely be open to such a deal.

“As principled as you are, at some stage you just want to go home to your family. If somebody’s holding the key to your cell and says you can leave, you can go home to your family, be with your kids, go out and see some sunshine or touch grass again. Would you say no?

“It is hard to understand how long Julian’s actually been detained. One of the changes that we deal with in our day-to-day lives, like self-checkout at the supermarket. Julian’s never seen that.”

Independent Kooyong MP Monique Ryan was one of six federal MPs who visited the US in a delegation last month to discuss Assange’s case with lawmakers.

The bipartisan group also included former deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce, Liberal senator Alex Antic, Labor MP Tony Zappia and Greens senators Peter Whish-Wilson and David Shoebridge.

Ryan said many of the politicians they spoke to didn’t realise Australians felt strongly about Assange’s release.

“They thought that either we didn’t care or some of them thought the issue had been resolved long ago,” she said.

“Pretty much everyone that we spoke with agreed that they thought it was a reasonable thing to take action on, and that they would help us.

“We’re in the process of entering into a hugely significant, long-term relationship with the commitment to AUKUS. This could be a potential irritant, the significance of which could increase over time if the situation doesn’t get resolved.

“We said to them don’t let this one individual issue get in the way of what is has been a very productive long-term relationship.”

When asked if he would discuss Assange’s case with Biden, Albanese’s office referred to the prime minister’s previous statements.

In May, Albanese told the ABC that he would not detail private discussions with leaders but said he had made his views clear to the US administration.

“A solution needs to be found that brings this matter to a conclusion and Mr Assange needs to be a part of that, of course, and so I’m hopeful that that will occur,” he said.

“It has been too long and in my view, as I’ve said before, I see nothing is served from the further incarceration of Mr Assange.”

Lifeline on 13 11 14. Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636.

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/national/united-in-the-states-assange-family-pins-hopes-on-albanese-biden-meeting-20231007-p5eafy.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19686068

File: fd06535570ab5dd⋯.jpg (620.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ashley_Paul_Griffith_was_a….jpg)

File: c9613875c277390⋯.jpg (112.85 KB,768x768,1:1,Ashley_Paul_Griffith_who_i….jpg)

File: b9fa90e0b2c004f⋯.jpg (106.7 KB,1200x900,4:3,Daniel_Morcombe_s_killer_B….jpg)

>>19656358

Alleged childcare pedophile Ashley Paul Griffith attacked by inmate in Wolston jail

Thomas Chamberlin - October 7, 2023

One of Australia’s worst alleged pedophiles was rushed to hospital after an inmate tipped boiling water over him at a Brisbane jail.

The Courier-Mail can reveal Ashley Paul Griffith was assaulted in unit S3 at Wolston on Friday.

Griffith was taken to Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital suffering facial burns after the incident which happened just after midday.

He was taken to the hospital to assess his burns.

The Courier-Mail was told the prisoner who assaulted Griffith may have even added jam to the hot water for the “napalm” attack to make the assault more painful and stick to him.

The inmate allegedly assaulted two prisoners.

Officers have told The Courier-Mail the second prisoner assaulted by the inmate was Brett Peter Cowan, who murdered schoolboy Daniel Morcombe.

It’s understood Cowan was punched.

The assault on Griffith comes just days after the alleged pedophile was named for the first time under changes to Queensland laws which allow alleged sex offenders to be named after they are charged.

Griffith is facing more than 1600 charges relating to 91 young girls from 10 Brisbane childcare centres, a Sydney childcare centre and an international centre between 2007 and 2022.

The Gold Coast man has been charged with 136 counts of rape and 110 counts of sexual intercourse with a child under 10.

He has also been charged with more than 600 counts of indecent treatment of a child and more than 600 counts of making child exploitation material.

He allegedly photographed and filmed the girls.

Griffith was arrested in August last year and was originally charged with two counts of making child exploitation material and one count of using a carriage service for child abuse material.

After investigators examined his devices he was charged with more than 1600 offences.

Before that point Griffith, 45, had spent about a year in the protection unit at Arthur Gorrie jail, which is the state’s remand centre, where he had gained a job in prison industries.

Once the 1600-plus charges were announced he was placed into the detention unit for his own safety after people inside the jail became aware he was the person facing the charges.

He was then transferred to Brisbane Correctional Centre and was placed into the “special management unit”.

At a later point he was transferred to Wolston jail at Wacol.

“Unit s3 is for the most protected prisoners that make the media and the worst sex offenders,” an officer said.

When asked about the Friday incident involving the boiling water a Queensland Corrective Services spokeswoman confirmed a prisoner assaulted two other prisoners at Wolston.

“One prisoner was assessed by medical staff on site with no treatment required and the other has been transported to hospital for further assessment,” she said.

“No officers were injured in the incident.”

The incident has been referred to the Corrective Services Investigation Unit of the Queensland Police Service.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-qld/alleged-childcare-pedophile-ashley-paul-griffith-attacked-by-inmates-in-wolston-jail/news-story/53b4f871365603003af392fb1faa93b4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19691563

File: 8e7e09b65ae8d4d⋯.jpg (94.78 KB,1342x756,671:378,Anthony_Albanese_cast_his_….jpg)

>>19685067

Anthony Albanese confirms his government will walk away from the Indigenous voice to parliament altogether if No vote succeeds

ROSIE LEWIS - OCTOBER 8, 2023

Anthony Albanese says his government will walk away from the Indigenous voice to parliament altogether if the referendum is voted down next weekend, warning that trying to improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people won’t be as effective without a constitutionally enshrined advisory body.

The Prime Minister also questioned why the Coalition had the position of an Indigenous Australians spokesperson, held by Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, if they didn’t want to listen to Aboriginal people.

Mr Albanese hit out at what he said was a deliberate strategy by the No campaign to confuse voters, including “absurd debates” over whether the voice will advise the Reserve Bank of Australia on interest rates or the length of the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

“That is all a conscious decision to wreck and to confuse,” Mr Albanese told ABC’s Insiders program.

With just six days to go until polling day and 2.2 million Australians having already voted, Mr Albanese said it was “correct” to suggest his government would walk away from the voice altogether.

“We will continue to do what we can to listen to Indigenous Australians. We try that now. But Indigenous Australians are saying that they want it to be enshrined (in the Constitution),” he said.

“We‘re already undertaking measures (to tackle Indigenous disadvantage) but, in my view, it won’t be as effective as having a body, a voice to be listened to.

“But we‘ll continue to do things like we’re replacing the remote jobs program with a program for employment that actually creates real jobs with real wages. We’ll continue to invest in justice reinvestment, looking at programs like (in the NSW town of) Bourke, that work effectively. We’ll continue to invest in community health. But what a voice will do is provide for an opportunity for us to replicate the success stories.

“There are success stories out there. Success stories where Indigenous kids are going to school, where health programs are being improved.”

Mr Albanese, who voted Yes on Saturday, said he remained optimistic about the result on October 14 and the government would explain Australia’s position to the international community regardless of the outcome.

Pressed on whether a No vote would damage Australia’s reputation internationally and the country would be diminished, he said: “I‘m hoping we vote Yes because the debate here is whether Australia will enlarge ourselves, whether (we are) a country that looks for hope and optimism and for the future, or whether we’re shrink in on ourselves.

“Quite clearly, Australia is being watched at this time in terms of the referendum for how we‘re perceived. And it will be seen as an uplifting moment, it will be seen that Australia has come to terms of their history, that we’re mature nation … Australia is last in the queue when it comes to acknowledging the fullness and richness of our history.”

Deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley said it was ironic people were asking the Coalition how it would help Indigenous Australians in the event of a No vote because it was Mr Albanese’s voice referendum.

She said the Coalition absolutely remained committed to regional and local voices and a second referendum, without outlining any other measures to improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

“It‘s a lose-lose. Whatever the result is on Saturday, it will be bad, divisive and unhappy for Australians the next day,” Ms Ley told Sky News’s Sunday Agenda program.

“So we do need to bring the country together and, of course, as my colleagues focus on how we look at the events beyond the 15th of October, that’s where we’re all thinking because to see this referendum divide the country the way it has gives me no joy.

“I won’t be happy, by the way, if No wins. I will be voting No with a heavy heart and I explain that in detail to everyone who asks me and I‘m pleased that so many people are engaging with the referendum, even though they don’t have the detail, even though they don’t have the answers that they’re desperately seeking with only one week to go.”

Ms Ley said the voice referendum had not helped close the gap, bring Australians together or improve outcomes for Indigenous people.

“We need to remember that the voice is not going to produce those answers for Indigenous Australians. It simply isn’t,” she said.

“But we do want to see the work that every Australian expects from all sides of politics.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-confirms-his-government-will-walk-away-from-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-altogether-if-no-vote-succeeds/news-story/854d1cc4679b91ffb34e5d0bb976753b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19691573

File: eadee27a3fe98de⋯.jpg (231.68 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19685067

Anthony Albanese says Voice won’t be legislated if referendum fails

ELLEN RANSLEY - OCTOBER 8, 2023

Anthony Albanese has defiantly ruled out legislating a Voice to parliament if the referendum fails next weekend, saying it would be “inappropriate”.

When asked if he would “walk away altogether” from the Voice in the event of a No vote, the Prime Minister responded: “correct”.

“Indigenous Australians have said they want a Voice that’s enshrined (in the constitution),” he told ABC’s Insiders.

“What they don’t want to do is what they’ve done time and time again, which is to part of establishing representative organisations, only to see, for opportunistic reasons, a government to come in and just abolish it.”

On Saturday, Australians will head to the polls to vote in the first referendum since 1999, where they will be asked whether they agree to enshrine an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice in the constitution.

Already, about two million people, including the Prime Minister, have voted in pre-polling.

All published polls have the referendum on track to fail, but Mr Albanese says he remains hopeful that Australians will come together and vote Yes.

He reiterated what the Indigenous leaders who gathered at Uluru, and Yes campaigners throughout the leadup to the referendum have been saying, that enshrining a Voice in the constitution rather than legislating it ensures that it cannot be repealed unless there is another referendum.

The Opposition have been leading the charge in calling for the Prime Minister to legislate a Voice and put recognition only to the Australian people in a referendum.

Deputy Opposition Leader Sussan Ley earlier told Sky News it was a “lose-lose” whatever the result was next Saturday, but the country needed to ensure it “came together” the day after to move forward.

“It will be bad, divisive, and unhappy for Australians the next day. So we do need to bring the country together,” she said.

“I won’t be happy, by the way, if No wins. I will be voting No with a heavy heart.”

She said the Liberal Party was still committed to legislating regional and local voices, and remained determine to recognising Indigenous Australians in the constitution without the “divisive” Voice.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton last month announced his intention to hold a second referendum for First Nations’ recognition if the Coalition were to win the next election, but later watered down his commitment after Senator Price declined to back it.

Ms Ley said a second referendum, coupled with legislating local and regional voices “backs in our determination to recognise Indigenous Australians in our constitution.”

As he pleaded with undecided Australians to vote Yes in the Voice to Parliament referendum, Mr Albanese also doubled down in declaring one of the No campaign’s key arguments “the great lie”.

He said Yes campaigns always had the tougher job in convincing Australians, pointing to the fact that just eight of 44 referendums in Australia’s history have been successful, but said the arguments levelled by the No campaign had been harmful and dishonest.

Mr Albanese said Coalition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman and leading No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s claims that the Voice will divide Australia by race was “the great lie”.

“There is race powers now in our Constitution,” Mr Albanese told ABC Insiders.

“And what this (referendum) is about is Indigenous issues, not race… Every other former colony in the world… has recognised its first peoples in its founding document.

“(Having a Voice) allows (Indigenous peoples) to be listened to. Recognise the special relationship with 65,000 years of connection to land and waters gives to Indigenous Australians.”

Asked whether Senator Price was “lying to Australians”, Mr Albanese said it “was not true to say this is divisive”.

“This is an opportunity to bring the country together,” he said.

He said Australia was “last in the queue” when it came to acknowledging the role of Indigenous Australians in its history.

“A vote for yes is a vote to show respect to Indigenous Australians. It’s an opportunity for non-Indigenous Australians to lift that burden up, but it’s something that will also be seen by much of the world,” he said.

He said the world was watching closely.

“Australia is being watched … for how we’re perceived, and it will be seen as an uplifting moment,” he said.

“It will be seen that Australia has come to terms with their history, that we’re a mature nation, and we’d be diminished if we vote No.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/anthony-albanese-says-race-division-argument-the-great-lie-ahead-of-voice-referendum/news-story/f0b1825371104f396e17acc235cf14ef

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19691621

File: b7d0f121aa6780e⋯.jpg (104.23 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Pedophile_Jadd_William_Bro….jpg)

File: 711dcb06910b14b⋯.jpg (219.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Psychiatrist_Dr_Narain_Nam….jpg)

File: 993d994d07dfc2c⋯.jpg (80.22 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_children_abused_by_Bro….jpg)

>>19518386

SA pedophile mastermind Jadd William Brooker discussed sex trafficking babies and toddlers before arrest, court told

Deceitful, manipulative, without empathy – a court has heard what lurks inside pedophile Jadd William Brooker, and have been warned his crimes could have been even worse.

Sean Fewster - October 8, 2023

The HIV-positive pedophile who led the state’s online child abuse syndicate could have escalated to trafficking babies and toddlers for sex if not apprehended, a court has heard.

This week, the Supreme Court was taken inside the mind of Jadd William Brooker – and told he is a deceitful, manipulative and dishonest pervert with no remorse for his crimes, no empathy for his victims and a grandiose view of himself.

Prosecutors urged the court to declare Brooker an uncontrollable predator and jail him indefinitely, using laws created following a campaign by victim advocates and The Advertiser.

Giving sworn evidence, Dr Narain Nambiar, clinical director of the state’s Forensic Mental Health Service, told the court Brooker posed a high risk of reoffending.

He said Brooker’s conversations with other syndicate members demonstrated the extreme lengths to which he was prepared to go to abuse children.

“Brooker demonstrates a particular attitude that supports sexual exploitation and violence, and encouraging others to engage in that behaviour,” he said.

“In one conversation, he discussed the sexual trafficking and selling of children … while there’s no evidence he did that, whether he engaged in it or not, he encouraged it.

“He possessed images of very young babies and toddlers with violent sex acts being performed against them.

“If we look at the diverse and prolific nature of his offending, there were always lines being crossed … we really don’t know, if he weren’t caught, how far he might have gone.”

Brooker, 41, pleaded guilty to having committed 182 sexual abuse and exploitation offences against children and teenagers in Australia and around the world.

Before he was caught by the elite Joint Anti Child Exploitation Team, Brooker had told his syndicate he wanted to infect children with HIV, and filmed himself doing so.

That child was one of more than 20 he pursued, both in person and online, for sex, amassing 4.5 million images and 50,000 messages of child exploitation.

This week, some of those victims dubbed Brooker “a parasite” who had “left a piece of himself” in every child whose innocence he destroyed.

In his evidence, Dr Nambiar said Brooker had a loving adult partner – who knew nothing of his crimes and was not involved with them – throughout his offending.

He said Brooker also had “numerous other” consenting adult sexual partners over the same period, and his willingness to infect children with HIV extended to those adults as well.

Brooker, he said, did not wear condoms, lied to his partners and even his doctor about his health and was “inconsistent” in taking his medication.

“If he’s deceitful, how can you believe him if he says he’s willing to engage in treatment and willing not to reoffend?” he said.

“All of those things need to be taken with a large grain of salt.”

Brooker, he said, demonstrated a “psychopathic personality” through his “lack of empathy, lack of remorse, dishonestly, manipulation” and “quite grandiose” view “about himself”.

He said the “diversity” of his offending, spanning both online and in-person crimes, suggested he was “more likely” to reoffend despite his apologies and purported rehabilitation.

His apologies, he said, were most likely about Brooker’s frustration with being imprisoned and concerns for his own family, not any insight into his victims’ suffering.

“You need to do the work to demonstrate there has been a change in your mindset – it’s not just hollow words,” he said.

Justice Adam Kimber will sentence Brooker on a date to be set.

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-sa/sa-pedophile-mastermind-jadd-william-brooker-discussed-sex-trafficking-babies-and-toddlers-before-arrest-court-told/news-story/4234bc2cf94595e67b47173b3dcbd91d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19691646

File: 19c1dff567e2f85⋯.jpg (132.04 KB,634x1000,317:500,Neil_Barrowcliff_was_arres….jpg)

File: 785bf1220694036⋯.jpg (30.14 KB,306x404,153:202,The_former_international_p….jpg)

File: dab1c55b828ac78⋯.jpg (41.81 KB,634x303,634:303,In_2004_Sydney_University_….jpg)

File: 8ccb6483e0627b6⋯.jpg (80.19 KB,634x826,317:413,A_Sydney_magistrate_adjour….jpg)

International Australian sports star - turned top school teacher - is sensationally charged with producing child abuse material

PRANAV HARISH and CANDACE SUTTON - 8 October 2023

An Australian baseball hero and former international sports star immortalised with a 'Golden Glove' award in his name has been charged with offences against young girls.

Neil John Barrowcliff - affectionately known as 'Barrows' in baseball circles - has been charged with 29 offences including indecent assault of a girl aged between 14 and 15.

The 69-year-old award-winning player, coach and manager, who has received the country's highest accolades over a five-decade career, is also charged with multiple counts of producing and possessing child abuse material.

The alleged offences were committed between 2011 and 2022 in northwestern and western Sydney and included allegedly recording material on an Apple iPhone 4.

Mr Barrowcliff was arrested and charged with two offences in July last year, and a further 27 in July this year, and is expected to fight the charges.

In Parramatta Local Court on Thursday, Magistrate David Price vacated a hearing listed this month for two original charges to accommodate 27 extra offences laid against Mr Barrowcliff in July.

Neil 'Barrows' Barrowcliff played for Hunter's Hill, then for Sydney University baseball team for five years in the 1960s and 1970s.

The University named him in its 2004 'team of the century' and introduced its Neil Barrowcliff Golden Glove Award in 2009 to commemorate his career.

He represented the NSW Patriots for 12 seasons in the Claxton Shield, then the national competition between the states until the establishment of the Australian Baseball League.

Mr Barrowcliff played for Australia three times, and was School Sport Australia's Baseball NSW manager or coach from 1989 to 1997 and acted as National Secretary from 2003 to 2019.

He was Pennant Hills High School's head teacher for Personal Development, Health and Physical Education between 2003 and 2014.

In 2004, the Australian Baseball Federation appointed him as tournament director for its national competition.

In 2013, the Major League Baseball Australian Academy Program acknowledged him for his 'formidably effective' leadership of its program.

He has worked as a sports teacher for the NSW Department of Education & Training and was Australian Schoolboys Tour manager in 2016 and sat on the School Sport Australia Board of Management baseball committee the following year.

In 2018, Mr Barrowcliff was executive officer of the Baseball Under 18 Oceania Qualifier Squad.

Magistrate Price adjourned Mr Barrowcliff's charges until November to set a hearing date for the charges.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/mlb/article-12600379/neil-barrowcliff-baseball.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699247

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19685067

Labor’s stocks fall, support for the Indigenous voice to parliament hits new low: Newspoll

SIMON BENSON - OCTOBER 9, 2023

1/2

Support for the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government has weakened further heading into the final week of the campaign, with just a third of voters now backing the proposed constitutional change amid a critical loss of support among younger voters.

The Albanese government has also suffered electorally, with Labor’s primary vote slipping to its lowest level since the election and Anthony Albanese’s personal approval rating dipping to a new low as his lead over Liberal leader Peter Dutton narrows to its tightest margin.

An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian shows support for the voice falling a further two points in the past fortnight to 34 per cent as Australians prepare to cast their vote this coming weekend.

Approval for the referendum question is now at the lowest ebb since it was first proposed.

The no vote has risen two points to 58 per cent, with 8 per cent of voters saying they still didn’t know which way they would vote. With the “don’t know” category removed the split becomes 37/63 in favour of a no vote.

The Prime Minister yesterday remained optimistic that a large proportion of Australians may still be undecided and swing in favour of the voice on polling day.

But in a troubling trend for the Yes campaign, support among younger voters has also fallen below 50 per cent with the no vote for the first time now ahead of the yes vote among a key group that the Yes campaign has been heavily relying on to deliver a victory.

The number of 18 to 34 year-olds saying they intended to vote no rose eight percentage points to 49 per cent. The yes vote declined four points to 46 per cent, while the number of those saying they didn’t know almost doubled from 5 per cent to 9 per cent.

This represents a decline of almost 10 points among this critical voting group since the start of the official referendum campaign.

There is now not a single demographic category in which the yes vote outnumbers the no case. Less than a quarter of voters aged over 65 said they would vote yes – 24 per cent – and only slightly over a quarter – 26 per cent – of 50 to 64 year-olds were in favour.

The only demographic which improved for the yes vote was among the 35 to 49 year-olds where support lifted a point to 37 per cent. However, the no vote still remained stronger at 53 per cent.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699252

File: ae5a1c615987620⋯.jpg (342.86 KB,815x702,815:702,Voice_to_parliament_Octobe….jpg)

File: 522d86551ea4357⋯.jpg (2.49 MB,4232x2650,2116:1325,The_Prime_Minister_casts_h….jpg)

>>19699247

2/2

Among the sharpest decline in support was among Labor voters, with those saying they intended to vote yes also falling below 50 per cent for the first time. The no vote rose six points to 42 per cent while the yes vote dropped six points to 48 per cent.

The latest Newspoll survey of 1225 voters nationally, taken between October 3 and October 6 – a two-week gap since the previous poll – shows a concurrent decline in support for the government and Mr Albanese, with cost-of-living pressures also showing no sign of easing.

Labor’s primary vote fell a point to 34 per cent – its lowest level since the election result, which delivered it victory on a primary vote of 32.6 per cent. It is now four points down since mid-June.

Mr Albanese has also suffered a decline in personal support, with his approval rating dipping back into negative territory for the second time. Satisfaction with his performance dropped two points to 45 per cent – the lowest level recorded for Mr Albanese since becoming prime minister.

Those dissatisfied with the job he was doing as leader rose two points to 46 per cent, delivering a net negative satisfaction rating of minus one.

The Coalition’s primary vote was unchanged at 36 per cent which remains consistent with its election result but is five points up on its lowest level recorded in this electoral cycle.

However, the gap has narrowed in the head-to-head contest between the two rivals, with Mr Albanese’s lead reducing to the tightest margin since the election at 17 points.

Mr Dutton approval ratings recovered from a record low in the last survey, rising five points to 37 per cent with a two-point fall in those dissatisfied with him to 50 per cent. He remains firmly in negative territory on minus 13.

The Greens primary vote lifted a point to 12 per cent in line with its election result. Pauline Hanson’s One Nation fell a point to 5 per cent while other minor parties and independents lifted two points to 13 per cent. This was still down, however, on the 14.5 per cent of the vote secured among this group at the last election.

University-educated voters, who had until now been strongly in favour of the voice, were now also for the first time more likely to vote no, with a nine-point decline in support to 45 per cent. The no vote in this demographic lifted from 40 per cent in the last survey to 49 per cent in the latest.

The divide between metropolitan and regional voters also narrowed significantly, with 31 per cent of country voters backing the voice compared to 35 per cent of city voters.

There was no change in support among female voters at 36 per cent, although no voters dropped three points to 54 per cent, with a corresponding rise in those who didn’t know to 10 per cent.

Support among male voters, however, dropped five points to 31 per cent.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/labors-stocks-fall-as-support-for-the-indigenous-voice-hits-new-low/news-story/598ba848d91a9954766affb18fedee2c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uU_UprmNKPg

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699269

File: f526099548e8357⋯.jpg (216.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 4d01836bce0e167⋯.jpg (249.12 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>19699247

Albanese has spent his and Labor’s political capital on a debate which has divided the country

SIMON BENSON - OCTOBER 8, 2023

For Anthony Albanese, the voice referendum can’t be over soon enough.

Not only has the Prime Minister failed to energise the nation into supporting his key election pledge, Labor is suffering pre-fallout damage as a consequence.

Albanese has expended his political capital on a debate that has divided the country and ­assisted in driving down the Labor Party’s electoral stocks.

What occurs on the other side of next weekend is anybody’s guess.

There have been critical shifts over the past few weeks that have obvious implications for the voice but also the broader political landscape.

Once the rock upon which a victory for the voice would be built, support among younger voters has been eroding since the beginning of the voice campaign.

It has now reached a tipping point where, according to the latest Newspoll, more 18-34 year olds for the first time say they ­intend to vote no than those saying yes.

At just 46 per cent, there has been a collapse for the Yes case among those most inclined to support it.

At the beginning of the year, approval of an Indigenous voice to parliament was at 70 per cent.

And if a majority of younger people can’t be convinced to back it, then the referendum has no hope.

There is now not a single demographic represented in Newspoll that shows the Yes vote ahead of the No vote.

This is more than just a failure of the campaign. It points to something far more fundamental.

Voters would appear to be more concerned about the principal argument rather than a debate over the mechanics.

There were early indications that it would head this way. A Newspoll conducted at the start of the year, when the split was the reverse of what it is today – 56 per cent in favour, 37 per cent against – identified two factors that most influenced the No vote.

The strongest reason for opposing it then was a belief that it favoured one group of Australians over another.

The second was doubt that it would help solve the problems facing Indigenous Australians.

Those two factors – division and disbelief – were early and leading indicators. This was before the No campaign had even begun.

These are now the prevailing issues the Yes campaign and the Albanese government face in trying to turn votes in the final week.

While the generational divide has narrowed in recent weeks, it is not in the way the Yes camp was hoping. If anything, there appears to be a generational influence at work, with parents and grandparents now sharing their doubts with their children.

While the public and political debate remains polarised, voter sentiment has become less ­partisan.

Labor voters have begun to turn against the question, with the gap between the Yes and No camps narrowing significantly since the start of the official campaign five weeks ago.

The No vote among those identifying as Labor supporters is now at 42 per cent, and the Yes vote is down to 48 per cent. In February, support for the voice among Labor voters was at 71 per cent.

While things could change within the next six days, there is nothing in the polls that would lend encouragement to a more optimistic outcome.

Albanese is now paying a political price. Labor’s primary vote has dipped to its lowest level since the election at 34 per cent. Albanese’s approval ratings are now also at their weakest point.

While these are early warning signs for the government that its focus must shift, Peter Dutton isn’t reaping electoral rewards as a result.

The Coalition’s primary vote has improved, but only to the point that it has returned to its election-losing level of 36 per cent.

And while the leadership margin has narrowed to its tightest since the election, Albanese still remains comfortably ahead of the Liberal leader as preferred prime minister.

Albanese, however, cannot escape his attachment to the broader rejection of the voice at a time when the primary focus for most Australians is on their household budget.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/albanese-has-spent-his-and-labors-political-capital-on-a-debate-which-has-divided-the-country/news-story/d7e187e7845cc3d91268109012beea2d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699279

File: d8a1cc6ce38393c⋯.jpg (242.78 KB,1740x978,290:163,Paul_Keating_attends_an_In….jpg)

File: bcb4da481ffce70⋯.jpg (465.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Then_prime_minister_Paul_K….jpg)

>>19699247

Paul Keating makes case for voice to improve Indigenous lives

TROY BRAMSTON - OCTOBER 9, 2023

1/2

Paul Keating has given his full support to the referendum to provide constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians through a voice to parliament and government, as the campaign enters its final week.

The former prime minister, who negotiated the Native Title Act in response to the High Court’s Mabo judgement with Indigenous leaders, told The Australian that a constitutionally enshrined advisory body would lead to systematic improvement in policy results across the board.

Mr Keating said his seven-month negotiation with Indigenous leaders on the complex issues of native title through 1993 showed that a standing advisory body could significantly enhance the policymaking process and increase living standards for Indigenous Australians.

“A voice can dramatically improve outcomes,” he said in a statement provided exclusively to The Australian. “The idea of a ‘voice’ has been tried and it worked. For this demonstration and a host of other reasons, I will be voting ‘yes’ on Saturday.”

In his first public statement on the referendum since the enabling legislation passed the parliament and the question to be put to voters was settled, Mr Keating said his Indigenous advisory group on native title informed the government and the parliament in its deliberations.

“We have already had demonstration of a ‘voice’ in respect of deeply complex issues once before and the overall outcome was sharply enhanced,” he said.

“The ‘voice’, on that occasion, was the concentrated consultation employed over a period of seven months between the commonwealth and Aboriginal and Islander people in respect of ­native title.”

Mr Keating said a similar constitutionally enshrined advisory body, responsible for making representations on matters that ­affect Indigenous Australians, and which does not diminish the parliament’s authority, would benefit policymaking across the spectrum.

“Without an Indigenous ‘voice’ to executive government, and with that, to the parliament, this historic opportunity would not have produced an optimum outcome of the kind that the ­Native Title Tribunal, in subject titles, was able to subsequently award,” he explained.

“While the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet at the time possessed a first-rate ­Aboriginal policy unit, its authority and grasp of issues central to Indigenous people would not have comprehended the quality and poignancy of advice and experience that Indigenous people across the country were able to provide.

“The long and tortuous seven months extended consultation through the native title process was the first and, so far, the only example of a ‘voice’ in the full throat of its advisory mandate but as it turned out, a mandate that went a long way to settling perhaps the primary Indigenous grievance; the theft of their ­estate.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699283

File: a4e3060822328ee⋯.jpg (335.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_and_Paul_Keat….jpg)

>>19699279

2/2

The former prime minister delivered the landmark speech on reconciliation at Redfern Park in December 1992, calling for “recognition” of the history and plight of Indigenous Australians, an opening of “hearts” and a commitment to improving living standards as the “practical building blocks of change.”

He initiated the inquiry into the forced separation of Indigenous children from their families – the Stolen Generations – led by former High Court judge Ronald Wilson, which reported in May 1997. His government also established the Indigenous Land Fund with $2bn to buy back pastoral leases to revive native title.

Mr Keating told The Australian that his negotiation of the Native Title Act with Indigenous leaders and also business and farming groups and state governments from April to November 1993 was the hardest thing he did in his time as prime minister.

“The consultation was the very first episode of an Indigenous ‘voice’ speaking directly to the executive government on a matter materially central to Indigenous people; namely, that the High Court had found Indigenous people possessed a private property right to their own soil – but a right immediately threatened with extinguishment by malevolent state governments,” he recalled.

“The urgency of the task, given the complexity, was to be met by comprehensive engagement by the commonwealth – the Keating government – with representatives of the national Aboriginal Land Councils under the chair of the then ATSIC.

“The challenge was to meet and settle two fundamental objectives: justice for Aboriginal people along with the development of a workable, fair system of land management in Australia.

“The High Court decision was silent on the nature of the ancient title it said had survived the act of sovereignty by Britain. It was also silent as to where that title lay, who could enjoy it, as it was silent as to a method Indigenous people could employ to recover it.

“This was left for the executive government to do.

“This necessitated me, as prime minister, attending native title cabinet committee meetings for three days and evenings a week for seven months leading up to the passage of the Native Title Bill through both houses.

“And during those seven months, Indigenous representatives … would intermittently attend cabinet committee dis­cussions.”

The ultimate result, he said, was that after protracted negotiations, the policy outcome was superior to what it otherwise would have been. This process demonstrates the benefit of a voice to parliament and government.

Troy Bramston is the author of Paul Keating: The Big Picture Leader (Scribe)

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/paul-keating-makes-case-for-voice-to-improve-indigenous-lives/news-story/7fa3d0d8b2a77378f881b23ba2c1be37

https://qresear.ch/?q=Troy+Bramston

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699287

File: a8821c550242fad⋯.jpg (290.44 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,A_1993_picture_showing_the….jpg)

File: 5075747cd50970d⋯.jpg (468.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Then_prime_minister_Paul_K….jpg)

File: 020a478124318bc⋯.jpg (337.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_and_Paul_Keat….jpg)

>>19699247

>>19699279

A voice can dramatically improve outcomes for Indigenous Australia, former PM Paul Keating writes

PAUL KEATING - OCTOBER 9, 2023

A voice can dramatically improve outcomes.

How can such a claim be reasonably asserted?

It can be asserted because we have already had demonstration of a “voice” in respect of deeply complex issues once before, and the overall outcome was sharply enhanced.

The voice, on that occasion, was the concentrated consultation employed over a period of seven months between the commonwealth and Aboriginal and ­Islander people in respect of ­Native Title, indeed the only structured consultation by government that Indigenous Australians have been party to since the referendum in 1967.

That consultation began in the cabinet room on 27 April, 1993, and finished on 15 November, 1993, seven months later, on the day before, as prime minister, I introduced the Native Title Bill to the House of Representatives.

The consultation was the very first episode of an Indigenous “voice” speaking directly to the executive government on a matter materially central to Indigenous people; namely, that the High Court had found Indigenous ­people possessed a private property right to their own soil – but a right immediately threatened with extinguishment by malev­olent state governments.

The urgency of the task, given the complexity, was to be met by comprehensive engagement by the commonwealth – the Keating government – with represen­tatives of the national Aboriginal Land Councils under the chair of the then ATSIC.

The challenge was to meet and settle two fundamental objectives: justice for Aboriginal people along with the development of a workable and fair system of land management in Australia.

The High Court decision was silent on the nature of the ancient title it said had survived the act of sovereignty by Britain, but it was also silent as to where that title lay, who could enjoy it, as it was silent as to a method Indigenous people could employ to recover it.

This was left for the executive government to do.

This necessitated me, as prime minister, attending native title cabinet committee meetings for three days and evenings a week for seven months leading up to the passage of the Native Title Bill through both houses. And during those seven months, Indigenous representatives, separately accommodated in Parliament House, would intermittently attend cabinet committee discussions including during and after attendances at the same committee by the mineral and agricultural industries, along with the land management agencies of the states.

Without an Indigenous “voice” to the executive government, and with that, to the parliament, this historic opportunity would not have produced an optimum outcome of the kind that the Native Title Tribunal in subject titles was able to subsequently award.

While the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet at the time possessed a first-rate Aboriginal policy unit, its authority and grasp of issues central to Indigenous people would not have comprehended the quality and poignancy of advice and experience that Indigenous people across the country were able to provide.

The long and tortuous seven months of extended consultation through the native title process was the first and so far only example of a “voice” in the full throat of its advisory mandate but as it turned out, a mandate that went a long way to settling perhaps the primary Indigenous grievance; the theft of their estate.

That “voice” also went ­beyond the matter of land. In the consequence, I set up the inquiry into the Stolen Generations under former High Court judge Ronald Wilson, as my government also did the Indigenous Land Fund with $2bn allocated to buy back pastoral leases, allowing native title to revive.

Thirty years on, Indigenous people now enjoy title to approximately 55 per cent of the Australian continent and when all the cases are heard, more likely two- thirds of the national land mass.

The idea of a “voice” has been tried, and it worked big time. For this and a host of other reasons, I will be voting Yes on Saturday.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/a-voice-can-dramatically-improve-outcomes-for-indigenous-australia-former-pm-paul-keating-writes/news-story/d7aedcab6e485e2aa6af6b09a8f43321

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699303

File: b68bf634d8093d8⋯.jpg (170.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,_Write_one_word_Yes_.jpg)

>>19699247

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese urges Aussies to ‘Vote Yes’ in opinion piece

Anthony Albanese has appealed to all Australians in an article for news.com.au ahead of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese - October 9, 2023

As the time for all Australians to head to the polling booths and vote on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament fast approaches, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has appealed to news.com.au readers in a passionate address.

Urging Aussies to vote Yes at Saturday’s referendum, Mr Albanese says:

THE DECISION IS YOURS, AUSTRALIA

“When governments listen to people, they make better decisions, they save money and they get better results.

That’s why we consult doctors and health care workers about health policy, it’s why we talk to farmers about agriculture policy, it’s why we ask scientists about science policy.

The one area where governments from both sides of politics have consistently failed to listen, sometimes even failed to ask, is when it comes to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

We know the consequences this has had for Indigenous Australians: an 8 year gap in life expectancy, an infant mortality rate twice as high, communities where children are suffering from diseases that have been eliminated nearly everywhere else in the world.

On October 14, you can vote Yes to change this. You can make a powerful statement about Australia’s history and take positive action for Australia’s future – and all you have to do is write one word: Yes.

A referendum isn’t like an election. When you go to vote you’re not being asked to support a party, a politician or a policy.

Instead, you’re being asked to say yes to an idea. To listen to an idea that came directly from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people themselves: constitutional recognition through a Voice.

Over many years this idea has been backed by all sides of politics, by members of every faith and tradition and by Australians from all walks of life.

Now the final decision belongs to you.

Voting Yes means we will finally recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in our Constitution, celebrating the fact that we share our ancient island continent with the oldest continuous culture on earth.

Voting Yes is a symbolic statement of national unity and it’s also a practical act of Australian fairness.

This is where voting Yes will make a difference to the lives of some of the most disadvantaged people in our country. It will mean Indigenous communities thousands of kilometres from Canberra have a say in the decisions and policies that affect their lives.

That’s the point of the Voice. The Voice will be a non-binding advisory committee of Indigenous Australians from every state and territory, chosen by Indigenous Australians.

The Voice won’t have the power to overrule parliament or block laws, it won’t deliver programs or distribute funding. Its only power will be the power of its ideas.

The great opportunity here is the chance for Canberra to learn from communities. To find out what works when it comes to boosting school attendance, creating jobs, improving the rates of healthy childbirth, putting young people on a pathway to training or university.

This is how voting Yes will save Australia money. Because we’ll be investing in things communities actually want and programs that really work. This is good for the people who need the support and it benefits every taxpayer as well.

This is what your Yes vote can achieve: recognition, listening and better results. Greater unity and more opportunities.

We already know what a No vote means, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are living with it now.

Voting No means sticking with the same waste and repeating the same mistakes.

Voting No says this is as good as it gets. Voting Yes is about Australia doing better.

So if you want to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and their culture in our Constitution, vote Yes.

If you want to make a positive change for the Australians who need it most: vote Yes.

If you want to wake up to a stronger, fairer and more reconciled Australia, vote Yes.”

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/prime-minister-anthony-albanese-urges-aussies-to-vote-yes-in-opinion-piece/news-story/875f8bd5ce0888f0c7aa938f3cb80640

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699323

File: 7e43783abdc91c4⋯.jpg (451.62 KB,1920x1440,4:3,Simon_Fenwick_one_of_the_t….jpg)

File: 24f41e591a3b7b5⋯.jpg (141.05 KB,2048x1152,16:9,_Mike_Cannon_Brookes_is_wi….jpg)

>>19699247

Corporate Australia has ‘misread national mood’ on voice

One of the largest donors to the No campaign has warned that conservative viewpoints are being deliberately stamped out of the nation’s boardrooms, as the gulf widens between corporate Australia and the average person.

JOE KELLY - October 9, 2023

1/2

Simon Fenwick – one of the top five donors to the No campaign – has hit out at corporate Australia for misreading the national mood on the Voice to parliament, warning that conservative viewpoints were being deliberately stamped out of the nation’s boardrooms.

The 53-year-old who left Brisbane in the mid-1990s for London and New York where he helped start up the multibillion-dollar fund management firm International Value Advisers has voiced alarm at what he believes is a growing gulf between corporate Australia and the average Australian.

He warned there was a double standard, where wealthy donors to progressive causes did not face the same stigma or backlash as conservative donors and that start-ups he was working with had been targeted because of his stance on the referendum.

“Mike Cannon-Brookes is willing to donate to fashionable causes. He finds little or no backlash in most of the mainstream media. However, if you donate to conservative causes, there is an aggressive backlash and the progressives are very aggressive and cunning at targeting this,” Mr Fenwick said.

“Where it gets more concerning is where small businesses, where I am on the board, are being targeted … The claim being that I’m against the Voice, therefore I am anti-Aboriginal therefore you should cancel working with them,” Mr Fenwick said.

Speaking publicly about his decision to donate $750,000 to the No campaign, Mr Fenwick said he was deeply concerned the Voice to parliament would divide the country, “creating a permanent grievance industry which is something I witnessed in the US”.

Mr Fenwick – who also sits on the board of free-market think-tank the Institute of Public Affairs – told The Australian he had made three separate donations of $250,000 since April towards the Fair Australia campaign and argued it was important to speak out given the lack of support for the No case from big business donors.

“In terms of the CEOs of the publicly listed ASX 200, I don’t believe there’s a single No,” Mr Fenwick said.

“How could so many CEOs read the temperature so badly (on the Voice)? What gives them the right to think they speak for the shareholders, customers and staff? I would say it’s hubristic.

“I hope this is the start of a ­process to get back to focusing on bread-and-butter issues and running their companies.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699326

File: 7f15f91fb1f5943⋯.jpg (378.73 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Leslie_Gillespie_OAM_IPA_b….jpg)

>>19699323

2/2

Mr Fenwick also said there was a distinction between opposing the Voice and supporting efforts to close the gap, saying that a lot of his philanthropic work was aimed at “moving the needle on Aboriginal outcomes”.

Nine years ago, he established a scholarship endowment at Brisbane Grammar School for Aboriginal students and he sits on the board of the University of Queensland endowment fund aimed at providing opportunities to disadvantaged students.

Mr Fenwick said he was a supporter of the Yalari organisation, a not-for-profit organisation offering education scholarships for Indigenous children from regional, rural and remote communities.

“This struck me as an area where Australia was really lagging behind, because in many respects Australia had become a much wealthier country in the two decades I’d been away and yet outcomes for our most disadvantaged people were more or less flat,” he said. “And so in speaking to a few people about it, it seemed the best way to undo this was via education.”

Mr Fenwick, who started donating to Advance Australia (now known as Advance) after it was established in 2018 and sits on its advisory board, also confirmed that he had donated about $500,000 to political candidates backed by Clive Palmer, One Nation, the Nationals, the Liberal Democrats, and the Liberal Party since returning to Australia in 2014.

His approach was to back candidates whose policies he personally agreed with.

He said that he was not aligned with the Liberals on a range of issues from the target of reaching net zero by 2050 or on lockdown and vaccination mandate policies.

Before the referendum campaign, he donated about $1m of his own money to support campaigns run by Advance across “the gamut of issues” from energy to free-speech because he was concerned free market and ­conservative groups were “not only disorganised but missing from the field” and unable to ­compete with Left-wing activist groups such as GetUp.

“It felt that it was an unfair fight and to be frank conservatives were amateurish and not recognising the changing media landscape,” he said.

The Australian has previously revealed that Clive Palmer would spend $2m promoting the No vote, including a final-week advertising blitz in South Australia and Tasmania, but this would not be funnelled through the Fair Australia campaign.

By late September, the No campaign had amassed more than $13m from almost 40,500 donations since November last year. From July 1, the No campaign’s Australians for Unity funding vehicle collected $7.6m from 21,033 donations, with an ­average gift size of $361.

Yes23, which rejects being ­labelled a corporate-funded movement, received $1.6m in grassroots donations in September with average gifts of about $187.

However, the Yes campaign expects to raise at least $50m through its Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition funding vehicle.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/corporate-australia-has-misread-the-national-mood-fenwick/news-story/4a1e96f19681f1219caa1a6b87d3a19f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699336

File: cd2140d3d2c751a⋯.jpg (502.26 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_Yes_campaign_rally_at_Pa….jpg)

>>19699247

>>19699323

ANZ, CBA, Westpac and NAB donate about $7m to Indigenous voice to parliament Yes vote

ROSIE LEWIS - OCTOBER 9, 2023

The big four banks have donated around $7m to the Yes campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament, sparking claims from the Coalition the case for change was “made by our elites, for our elites and funded by our elites”.

The extent of the donations have been revealed to federal parliament for the first time just days out from Saturday’s referendum, with Westpac contributing $1.75m, National Australia Bank donating $1.5m and Commonwealth Bank providing $2m.

The ANZ’s roughly $2m donation was confirmed during a parliamentary committee on bank closures in regional Australia last month. If ANZ’s donation was exactly $2m, the total amount from the major banks would equate to $7.25m.

Westpac also said it had agreed to requests from employees to provide in-kind support for the Yes campaign.

“At present there are 14 employees providing predominantly part-time support (to the Yes campaign),” the bank said in a response to questions from the committee’s chair, Nationals senator Matt Canavan.

“These costs have not yet been calculated as the activity is still underway. These costs are considered ‘in-kind’ referendum expenditure and will be disclosed in full to the Australian Electoral Commission.”

NAB provides Australian-based employees with 16 hours of volunteer leave per calendar year and this may be used to volunteer for the Yes and No campaigns. The specific organisations that employees volunteer for are not tracked.

The Yes campaign has furiously denied claims from the No camp that it’s war chest will reach $100m but has said it expects to reach at least $50m through its Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition funding vehicle.

Senator Canavan, whose party opposes the voice, said of the big four banks’ contributions: “The Yes campaign has been made by our elites, for our elites and funded by our elites. At a time of rising mortgage pressure, why are the banks spending so much money on a political issue supported by only a clear minority of Australians? The banks should focus on their customers, not on politics.”

A Yes23 campaign spokesman said Senator Canavan appeared to have forgotten that billionaire businessman Clive Palmer was “pouring millions into advocating for a No vote”.

Mr Palmer has said he will spend $2m promoting the No vote while Simon Fenwick, one of the top five donors to the No campaign, will donate $750,000.

“Thousands and thousands of everyday Australians, from all walks of life, have made grassroots donations to the Yes campaign,” the Yes23 spokesman said.

NAB noted that of its $1.5m in donations, $1.3m of the money was sent through the NAB Foundation, which “uses philanthropy, social investment and in-kind support to fund social and environmental progress in Australia”.

The Australian revealed last month that companies, individuals and groups including BHP, Rio Tinto, Anthony Pratt, Wesfarmers, the Paul Ramsay Foundation, NAB Foundation, ANZ and Qantas have publicly disclosed more than $26.7m in donations to Yes23, including subsidised travel costs and office space.

Leading Yes campaigner Noel Pearson on Monday said the referendum was a “moral choice” and a No vote would “bring shame to the country” and be a travesty the nation may possibly never live down.

He backed in Anthony Albanese’s decision not to legislate the voice if the referendum failed.

Peter Dutton wouldn’t outline a timetable for a second referendum solely on constitutional recognition, saying it would be worked out in time in the event of a No vote.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anz-cba-westpac-and-nab-donate-about-7m-to-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-yes-vote/news-story/9ba4ec8953c7738fc593263229c04c92

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699349

File: 5597a29307a251f⋯.jpg (182.78 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Queensland_psychiatrist_Dr….jpg)

>>19199832 (pb)

>>19535062

‘Limit kids’ access to risky gender drugs’

Australian psychiatrists call for puberty blockers for adolescents to be restricted, after UK study finds mental health deterioration in one-third of children on the drugs.

ROSEMARY NEILL - October 8, 2023

1/2

Leading Australian psychiatrists say puberty blockers should be restricted to children enrolled in rigorous clinical trials, after a new British analysis found the mental health of one-third of adolescents deteriorated while they were taking the controversial drugs.

The new UK analysis of an earlier, landmark study found 34 per cent of children aged 12 to 15 reported their mental health had deteriorated after taking puberty blockers for one year, while 29 per cent of children saw their psychological health improve. No mental health change was reported by 37 per cent of the children who had been on blockers for 12 months.

Overall, the fresh analysis, published on preprint health sciences website medRXIV, suggests 71 per cent of children taking puberty blockers reported a decline or no change in their mental health after one year of treatment. Yet as the study states: “The main argument for the introduction of puberty blockers in the UK for this age group (under 16) had been their potential to relieve psychological distress’’ while the children explored their gender identity.

Philip Morris, a visiting professor of psychiatry at Bond University, said: “To see a third of people getting worse is very concerning.’’

Given that puberty blockers had other potential side-effects, including infertility and loss of bone density, “we would want to see a result where the majority of people had benefited substantially’’, said Dr Morris, president of the Gold Coast Medical Association.

The British report’s authors, Professor Susan McPherson from the University of Essex and retired social scientist David Freedman, regarded the “comparatively high levels’’ of psychological deterioration among the surveyed children as “concerning’’: “It is important to note that the highest rate of deterioration (34 per cent) is seen in the self-report scale at 12 months (of drug treatment) and only slightly reduces by 24 months to 27 per cent,’’ they wrote.

The reanalysis of the three-year study differs dramatically from the original findings of the Tavistock Gender Identity Development Service and University College London Hospitals, which concluded that puberty blockers caused no changes in the surveyed children’s mental health.

The two analyses reached such different conclusions because the original research reported average group results, while the new study looked at children’s individual mental health trajectories.

The original study led to younger children being prescribed puberty blockers in the UK, according to the BBC. The university and the Tavistock clinic – the latter was criticised by the independent Cass review and will be replaced with UK regional gender clinics from 2024 – have welcomed the new findings.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699354

File: 9c657d465126af0⋯.jpg (266.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,_To_see_a_third_of_people_….jpg)

>>19699349

2/2

Psychiatrist Jillian Spencer, who openly advocates for a cautious rather than an affirmation-only treatment model for children with gender dysphoria, said the latest UK findings “beg the question, ‘Why on Earth are puberty blockers still being prescribed’?”.

Dr Spencer said despite potential side-effects including infertility and impaired sexual function, in Australia, these drugs “are being prescribed off label for children with gender dysphoria, which means that no drug company has ever had to prove to a regulator that puberty blockers are safe and effective”.

“Australia is not taking any steps to regulate or monitor the prescription of puberty blockers to children and adolescents,” she said. “Puberty blockers have been in use for at least 20 years and there still isn’t any reliable evidence that they improve psychosocial outcomes. However, there is growing evidence of their harms.’’

The senior staff psychiatrist lodged a complaint with Queensland’s Human Rights Commission after she was stood down in April from clinical duties at the Queensland Children’s Hospital, reportedly due to a “transphobia” claim.

Dr Spencer alleges she was prevented from adopting a neutral therapeutic approach and forced to comply with gender-affirming polices she believed may have harmed young people during her employment at the hospital.

Australian children’s hospitals follow gender-affirmative guidelines, which gender-affirming doctors regard as world’s best practice.

Peak body the Australian Professional Association for Trans Health strongly supports the gender affirmation model, including the use of puberty blockers, but did not respond to The Australian’s request to comment on the new UK analysis.

AusPATH said on its website in 2022 there was “increasing evidence that access to reversible puberty blockers, and later gender-affirming hormone treatment if wished, is associated with positive mental health and social wellbeing in adolescents with gender incongruence’’. AusPATH added the evidence showed “adolescents are satisfied with these treatments and perceive them as essential and lifesaving’’. It opposed a UK recommendation to restrict the availability of puberty blockers for children with gender incongruence.

Dr Spencer and Dr Morris said Australia should follow the UK’s plan, announced in June, to restrict puberty blockers to children taking part in clinical trials.

Dr Spencer said: “It is urgent that Australia … fall in line with the UK and restrict the prescription of puberty blockers to high-quality clinical research trials. We need to stop exposing Australian children to these risky, experimental treatments without the safeguards of a clinical research trial.’’

The new UK analysis has limitations: the sample size (44 children) is small, it has not been peer-reviewed and there is no control group, meaning researchers can’t definitively conclude the changes in the children’s mental health were caused by puberty blockers.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/life/uk-study-finds-mental-health-of-one-third-of-kids-on-puberty-blockers-deteriorates/news-story/3f0b52034671590e6b8a9ee91882cc0d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19699368

File: b5f19613cc81d94⋯.jpg (239.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Thorpe_has_condemned_the_v….jpg)

File: eb4a1c685c9f956⋯.jpg (387.28 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Israeli_rescue_member_work….jpg)

File: 6934aa7ee6c4eb3⋯.jpg (279.86 KB,825x815,165:163,SLT_1.jpg)

File: 6e0875758e4f28b⋯.jpg (114.28 KB,1170x805,234:161,F75UH_6bkAAqY7W.jpg)

Indigenous Senator Lidia Thorpe says she ‘stands with’ Palestine

The Indigenous Senator has publicly thrown her support behind Palestine in a post on social media, as the Israel-Hamas conflict rages on.

Brielle Burns - October 9, 2023

Indigenous senator and No campaigner Lidia Thorpe has publicly rallied behind Palestine in a “foul” and “appalling” move, as the death toll in the Israel-Hamas conflict continues to climb.

Senator Thorpe made her stance on the conflict clear in a post on the social media platform X on Sunday night, writing “I stand with Palestine!”

The tweet was accompanied with a controversial map of Israel, appearing to show the gradual dispossession of “Palestine land” over several decades.

“Unprovoked They said [sic],” the caption of the map reads.

Many were quick to condemn the senator on social media, pointing to the atrocities unfolding after Hamas, a Palestinian Islamist militant group, attacked Israel on Saturday.

“The most appalling public statement you’ve ever made, and that’s saying something,” wrote Sky News columnist Will Kingston.

Others pointed out that women had been “kidnapped raped and brutalised” in the conflict.

“Stand with Palestine but not for Hamas,” said another.

Contentious map

Others on social media claimed the map shared by Senator Thorpe was false.

An article published by Australia Israel and Jewish Affairs Council notes similar maps such as those shared by Senator Thorpe, were “riddled with misrepresentations and omissions”.

“Their overall narrative is an outright lie,” it reads.

Pointing out the inaccuracies, the article claimed: “While the small patches may correspond reasonably accurately with the land then privately held by Jews, the rest of the map is a lie. “The totality of the remaining area was not in any sense “Palestinian”, whether this refers to ownership, control, or even simply habitation.”

‘Violent occupation of Palestine’

It’s not the first time Senator Thorpe has thrown her support behind Palestine.

Last month she called on Australia to recognise the sovereignty of the Palestinian people in a speech before the Senate.

“I rise to condemn the violent occupation of Palestine, the brutality of the colonial power that is Israel and their state-sanctioned murder of the Palestinian people,” she said.

“In 2022, Israeli forces murdered more than 170 Palestinians, including 53 children. Since the start of 2023, 160 lives have been taken, including 35 children.”

She added the Australian government must call on Israel to “end the illegal occupation”.

“This government must recognise sovereignty abroad and at home, recognise the sovereignty of the Palestinian people over all the land taken since 1967 and call for the Israeli government to end the illegal occupation.”

Israel formally declared war on Hamas Sunday following the surprise attack by Hamas militants.

The death toll from the conflict has surged above 1000, with officials reporting at least 413 deaths in Gaza and thousands more wounded across the war zone. At least 100 have been taken hostage.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the nation was in for a “long and difficult” war.

“Israel was caught flat-footed by the unprecedented attack,” said Jonathan Panikoff, director of the Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative. “I’ve heard multiple comparisons to 9/11, and many Israelis are struggling to understand how this could have happened.”

https://www.news.com.au/world/middle-east/indigenous-senator-lidia-thorpe-says-she-stands-with-palestine/news-story/02d964f89e7894871ae73a3262ccc82a

https://twitter.com/SenatorThorpe/status/1710897419029000198

https://aijac.org.au/fresh-air/disappearing-palestine-the-maps-that-lie/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19706372

File: 95a6cf0377b77f2⋯.jpg (160.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_in_Sydney….jpg)

>>19699247

Liberals hit back at Anthony Albanese’s Indigenous voice to parliament misinformation claims

JESS MALCOLM - and ROSIE LEWIS - OCTOBER 9, 2023

Senior Liberal frontbenchers have hit back at Anthony Albanese’s claim that misinformation was undermining the voice referendum amid dwindling support for the government’s proposal.

Opposition legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said five claims the Prime Minister made during the voice debate were not supported by facts.

Mr Albanese has repeatedly blasted misinformation he said was being peddled by the No campaign to wreck the referendum and confuse voters.

He said misinformation and disinformation were preventing voters from considering the “very simple” referendum question before them. He has pointed to misinformation, disinformation and conspiracy theories when asked why the voice was losing support, including among Labor voters.

Five repeated claims by Mr Albanese include that it is “nonsense” that the voice would advise the RBA or on nuclear submarines, that the length of the Uluru Statement from the Heart was just one page, that the detail on the voice was simple, and that the voice referendum had nothing to do with treaty.

Senator Cash told The Australian there was “little in the PM’s claims which is supported by the facts” and Mr Albanese was unable to rule out issues that the voice would advise on. “If anyone is dealing in misinformation, it is the Prime Minister himself,” she said. “He certainly cannot rule out issues the voice will advise on and it is clear that the Uluru statement contained much more material than the single page he claims.”

Deputy Liberal Leader Sussan Ley said Mr Albanese needed to stop blaming “everyone else for his failure to explain his voice proposal” and he should take responsibility for a referendum failure.

“Anthony Albanese’s deliberate use of ‘misinformation’ as a political attack comes at the same time his government is seeking to make spreading ‘misinformation’ an offence under the law – it is reckless and lazy politics and unacceptable from the nation’s leader,” she said.

The attacks come as constitutional law expert George Williams told The Australian the voice would “absolutely” be able to provide advice on AUKUS if it impacted Aboriginal people, after Mr Albanese declared it a “nonsense” to suggest the advisory body would make recommendations on where nuclear submarines were located.

Professor Williams also suggested an established Indigenous voice to parliament might seek to provide advice to the Reserve Bank but that it would be up to the parliament to decide whether it would speak directly to the independent economic body.

“The voice can make representations on matters affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders and you would think there are defence matters which impact them sometimes, such as Indigenous people in the armed forces.

“If there is a link established with a matter of the AUKUS ­program impacting Indigenous people, then it absolutely could provide advice.”

Centre for Public Integrity chair Anthony Whealy said the voice might seek to make representations to the government on AUKUS in cases where Indigenous people were concerned about nuclear proliferation on their land.

However, he predicted the voice would lose its efficacy if it sought to make broad representations outside issues that directly affected Indigenous people.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/liberals-hit-back-at-anthony-albaneses-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-misinformation-claims/news-story/34c4afc7b48b36de5f92f288405b74a4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19706380

File: 762b4def23cddef⋯.jpg (207.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_Yes23_campaigner_hands_o….jpg)

File: fe335464de0a5c0⋯.jpg (284.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Yes23_spokesperson_Dean_Pa….jpg)

>>19699247

Voice holds promise of hope for our most vulnerable

TROY BRAMSTON - OCTOBER 10, 2023

1/2

Australia faces a moment in history where the decision we make about whether to recognise Indigenous Australians in the Constitution with an advisory body to parliament and government will have profound implications for this generation and the next.

The constitutional referendum proposed is both an act of recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians as the first people of this continent with respect for their 60,000 years of continuing culture and also the establishment of a mechanism to improve policy outcomes.

This is a chance to forge a new partnership between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. It was initiated in 2017 through the Uluru Statement from the Heart by the First Nations people, who seek only to be listened to about policy that holds the chance of higher living standards and equality of opportun­ity.

Nobody can deny that when you look at the life expectancy of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians there is a significant gap. When you measure education, health, housing, employment, incarceration or safety outcomes, the need to alleviate entrenched disadvantage is evident. These statistics are written in human misery.

The failure to close this gap shames us all. It is time for a new way forward.

The genius of the proposed advisory body to policymakers – both the parliament and the executive government – is that it provides for innovation as well as responsibility.

What the advisory body to be called a voice will achieve is agency and accountability. It means we can bring Indigenous Australians, via their chosen representatives, to the table with the decision-makers. They can explain, based on consultation with their communities and their experiences, what works and what does not.

This will ensure that vast sums of money expended to programs for Indigenous communities are better spent. There will be greater transparency about the policymaking process concerning Indigenous Australians.

While policy decisions will rightly remain the duty of governments, they will make more informed decisions.

The voice would be made up of Indigenous Australians, chosen by their communities, with gender balance and across generations. It would be able only to “make representations” to – that is, advise – parliament and government on matters that relate to Indigenous Australians. The parliament and the government also may ask the voice for advice. Whether this advice is followed will depend, as ever, on the quality of it.

The High Court would not be overrun with legal challenges if the advice was not followed. As former chief justice Robert French has said, this risk is very low. The only issue is whether the advice was listened to, not whether it was followed.

French carries significant weight and makes a mockery of those who claim the voice would clog courts in litigation.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19706382

File: e75d3c7d3861b2a⋯.jpg (246.22 KB,1296x1728,3:4,Yes23_campaign_co_chair_Ra….jpg)

>>19706380

2/2

Neither is the voice a threat to the supremacy and sovereignty of parliament. A successful referendum would provide for a new head of power in the Constitution that simply says there must be an Indigenous advisory body. But it is up to the parliament to determine its “composition, functions, powers and procedures”.

The voice would have no veto power over laws or programs. It would not be able to raise or spend money – other than to undertake research, consult and provide advice – nor would it have a service or program delivery role.

If the parliament did not like how the voice was operating, then it could be abolished and a new body set up with different members, operations and processes.

The proposed change does not inject race into the Constitution or divide Australians. This is a message propagated by the No campaign and reactionary conservatives.

The Constitution already has race powers in sections 51 (xxvi) and 25. We have long recognised the special status of First Nations Australians in legal judgments, laws and programs. This is not about race but about indigeneity.

A Yes vote gives hope, opportunity and agency to the pressing need to close the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.

A No vote gets us nowhere. The No camp has not put forward an agreed, coherent or compelling alternative plan to improve policy outcomes for Indigenous Australians that also fosters responsibility and accountability. It is confused and divided on questions of recognition, treaties and advisory bodies.

This is not the first referendum on constitutional recognition. In November 1999, John Howard proposed a preamble to the Constitution that included “honouring Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders, the nation’s first people, for their deep kinship with their lands and for their ancient and continuing cultures which enrich the life of our country”. It overwhelmingly was rejected with 60.66 per cent voting No.

The referendum to be determined on Saturday holds the promise of real change rather than only rhetoric. It is symbolic, providing recognition of the First Australians, but it is also practical in that it establishes a body tasked with providing advice on how to improve policy outcomes.

There is a yearning deep within the Australian soul for reconciliation. There is, as Noel Pearson says, a whispering in our hearts about unfinished business.

We have an opportunity, with the eyes of the world on us and our consciences telling us there is another way. These are the better angels of our nature and it is time we heed their call.

In the final analysis, constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians through a voice to parliament is a sensible, logical and rational step for a mature nation. It is not radical or revolutionary. It is modest, simple and straightforward.

If we vote Yes, it can make a real difference. If we vote No, nothing will change. We have two paths ahead of us. We must take the right one and vote Yes.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/voice-holds-promise-of-hope-for-our-most-vulnerable/news-story/6b838f3836fea4a4c123ce5b4c0fad13

https://qresear.ch/?q=Troy+Bramston

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19706386

File: 8c449715ee161df⋯.jpg (146.15 KB,1280x720,16:9,Sharri_Markson_on_Sky_News.jpg)

File: e3f77172ca0ceb0⋯.jpg (144.65 KB,1280x720,16:9,She_grew_emotional_while_d….jpg)

>>19699368

Sky News host Sharri Markson in tears as she describes Hamas’ atrocities against Israeli civilians

Samantha Maiden - October 10, 2023

Sky News journalist Sharri Markson broke down in tears as she catalogued the “pure savagery” of Hamas terrorist attacks on innocent women and children.

The investigative journalist, who is Jewish, became emotional as she described how Palestinian forces had killed hundreds of Israelis and taken families hostage.

Describing the militants as “barbarians with no limits” she said they had offered the elderly and the vulnerable “no mercy”.

“This is the darkest day for Jewish people in decades. It’s being called Israel’s September 11. It is pure savagery,” she said on her Sky News Australia show, Sharri, on Monday night.

“But it’s the heinous barbarity that makes this attack by Hamas so sickening and so unexpected for the state of Israel, that prides itself on national security and is surrounded by Arab States endlessly calling for its annihilation.

“There was no mercy shown as the elderly, the women, the children – the babies – were kidnapped, seized and carted off by jeering men, away from the safety of their homes, their loved ones and their life as they knew it.”

Markson has previously been subjected to anti-Semitic death threats.

“While much of the focus has been on the geopolitics and the big picture, tonight, I want to talk about the actual people being tortured and brutalised,’’ she said.

“These are real people, not missiles. These are scenes of inhumanity not seen since the rise of ISIS and the brutal terrorist beheadings designed to terrify the civilised world.

“Here, we have a beautiful teenage girl captured and dragged through the streets by thugs. Look at the way they drag her out of the boot.

“Her hands tied, tagging her by her beautiful long hair as they shove her back in their vehicle. You shudder as you imagine what they’ve done to her, how they’re likely abusing and probably debasing (her).”

She said there was “no mercy” shown as the elderly, the women, the children, and the babies were kidnapped.

“Listen to how these animals laugh and cheer. To jump for joy as they spill blood. How can humans be this cruel, to laugh?’’ she said.

“And celebrate as they tortured terrified young souls who had so much ahead of them in life who were so hopeful for the future.

“There are just simply too many faces, too many people to show you tonight. The horror of what we are seeing is overwhelming. I want to show you that each life is equally valuable and important.

“It is beyond despicable. It is sickening.”

Former Australian ambassador to Israel Dave Sharma told Sky News that for Hamas to have seemingly penetrated Israel’s border undetected was a “terrible operational failure”.

“It’s shocked a lot of people in Israel,” Mr Sharma said.

“Hamas seemingly penetrated Israel’s border undetected or largely undetected.

“They overran a military base, one of the bases of the Gaza division which is entrusted with the security of that border. “There are still active Hamas terrorists in about nine locations inside Israel now.

“For this to have been allowed to happen is a terrible operational failure and there will have to be lessons learned from this.”

https://www.news.com.au/world/sky-news-host-sharri-markson-in-tears-as-she-describes-hamas-atrocities-against-israeli-civilians/news-story/9b24f3a34bed808ba214f377c4ac805a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19706391

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19699368

>>19706386

‘Pure savagery’: Hamas attack on Israel the ‘darkest day for Jewish people in decades’

Sky News Australia

Oct 9, 2023

The war on Israel has passed 48 hours and the shock of the Hamas terrorist attacks have shaken lives across the globe and caused the "darkest day for Jewish people in decades", according to Sky News Australia host Sharri Markson.

Ms Markson has condemned the “sickening” acts committed by the “degenerate evil” of Hamas.

“It's being called Israel's September 11 … it is pure savagery,” she said.

“But it's the heinous barbarity that makes this attack by Hamas so sickening and so unexpected for the state of Israel that prides itself on national security.

“There was no mercy shown as the elderly, the women, the children – the babies – were kidnapped, seized and carted off by jeering men - away from the safety of their homes, their loved ones and their life as they knew it.

“How can humans be this cruel? To laugh and celebrate as they torture terrified, young souls who had so much ahead of them in life, who were so hopeful for the future.”

Warning – this video contains distressing content.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-81FeWzutDU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19706419

File: 73dd478ecc5aed9⋯.jpg (269.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Pro_Palestine_supporters_l….jpg)

File: b9b674991391341⋯.jpg (332.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Pro_Palestinian_protesters….jpg)

File: aa2d1b12e897033⋯.jpg (1.17 MB,5500x3667,5500:3667,People_with_Israeli_flags_….jpg)

File: 152e73c0bb34e53⋯.jpg (383.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Pro_Palestine_supporters_a….jpg)

File: 2b7a88388b2e212⋯.jpg (318.98 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Rally_For_A_Free_Palestine….jpg)

>>19699368

NSW Police say ‘no’ to Jewish community: yes to Palestinian rally

ALEXI DEMETRIADI and JAMES DOWLING - OCTOBER 10, 2023

1/2

NSW police warned Sydney’s Jewish community to avoid the Opera House on Monday as its sails were lit with the Israeli flag to commemorate those killed and kidnapped by Hamas, after green-lighting a pro-Palestinian march to the site.

Jewish leaders said it was “sad and disturbing” to be told they were not safe in Sydney, as Greens MPs backed Palestinian marchers who said they supported “resistance” against Israel despite the deaths and disappearances of women and children.

Pro-Palestinian protesters, who had marched from Town Hall, threw flares outside the Sydney Opera House and yelled “f*ck Israel” and “f*ck the Jews” as the sails were lit in blue and white.

A number of police officers guarded the Opera House stairs.

An Israeli flag was burned on the steps of the Opera House in one of the most concerning scenes from Monday night’s pro-Palestine rally.

Video footage depicts protestors using what appears to be flares to light up the flag, in the middle of a congregated group.

Colin Rubenstein, executive director of the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) said the throwing of flares, chanting of abuse and burning of the Israeli flag was “deeply disgusting”. “This is deeply disgusting and offensive behaviour. Morally it’s bankrupt and of course we would expect the authorities to be closely scrutinising this behaviour. One has to understand that inciting violence is an offence in Australia,” he said.

Other monuments internationally have been lit in support of Israel, including the Eiffel Tower in Paris, the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, Ground Zero in New York and Niagara Falls. These were largely met with peaceful observance and support, such as in Germany where crowds carried Israeli flags towards the Brandenburg Gate.

Pro-Palestine protests have been seen in a number of countries, with UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak warning that the conflict was a “fast-moving” situation both abroad and at home.

London’s police presence has risen after celebrations of Hamas’s ambush broke out onto the streets. In Northern Ireland a giant Palestinian Flag was displayed on Black Mountain near Belfast.

At Sydney Town Hall, Mark Spiro was dragged away by police as he held an Israeli flag. He was heard shouting “I did nothing wrong” as he was arrested and removed by officers.

“I was literally at the protest for all of probably three seconds with a rolled up Israeli flag, and next thing I know I’ve got multiple police officers trying to grab the flag off me and then carrying me away from the scene,” Mr Spiro said in an interview with Sky News.

“It was excessive and at the time having both of your arms pinned back for effectively having a rolled up Israeli flag was shocking and confronting.”

NSW police wanted to take Mr Spiro to a police station, but he was allowed to leave after agreeing to leave the city and handing over his flag to police.

“I walked from Town Hall Station across the road with a rolled up flag, next thing I know I have three police officers holding my arms back and trying to confiscate my flag,” Mr Spiro said.

“(The police) should feel ashamed of themselves quite frankly, I was an innocent bystander.”

NSW Police have since released a statement on the event.

“The NSW Police Force will continue to engage with community groups as we monitor the situation both here and abroad,” the statement reads.

“Our priority is to ensure that all members of the community feel safe and supported and are free to go about their daily lives.”

Attendees speaking to The Australian said they didn’t condone the murder of innocent civilians, but were at the rally to support Palestine.

Anthony Albanese on Monday said the pro-Palestinian march should not go ahead and warned protestors they would only inflame the situation.

The NSW Jewish Board of Deputies told members late on Monday that authorities advised them not to go to the Opera House – despite it being lit up in support for Israel – as police allowed Palestinian support marchers to leave the starting point at Town Hall and walk towards the lit-up sails.

“NSW police are urging the community not to attend the Sydney Opera House or Town Hall this evening,” an email from the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies said. “Community members already in the CBD should be vigilant … The events … may pose a risk to the safety of community members and you are strongly urged not to attend.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19706425

File: c4963f563967e5e⋯.jpg (332.73 KB,825x820,165:164,IOP_1.jpg)

File: e7e1854f11e8d97⋯.mp4 (9.81 MB,640x360,16:9,cLezTk4ayVwKWMr6.mp4)

File: ae5d7de7dc8e58a⋯.jpg (422.41 KB,825x1157,825:1157,DP_1.jpg)

File: 2aabb6809ae9386⋯.mp4 (5.38 MB,640x936,80:117,iC3_ZdfaUUrThQRR.mp4)

>>19706419

2/2

NSW Jewish Board of Deputies president David Ossip said it was disturbing and concerning to know the community was not safe in its own city. “It is a very sad state of affairs when security concerns mean the Jewish community is not safe to go to certain parts of the Sydney CBD,” he said.

The board have been in contact with NSW police throughout the day and it is understood the new advice came from Assistant Police Commissioner Tony Cooke.

A NSW police spokeswoman said safety was “the first priority”.

“Police are engaging with community groups as they continue to monitor the situation – the community can be assured an appropriate policing response is in place across the state,” she said.

At 8:30, the bulk of the pro-Palestine march had filtered away, but a rowdy group from the crowd — some decked in face coverings, with megaphones and flags of Iran, Lebanon, Palestine and the Gulf states — could be heard chanting “f*ck the Zionist pigs”.

“Palestine will be free, f*ck the Zionist pigs,” one group chanted.

“Allahu akbar” was also heard under the sails of the Opera House.

Although scenes never escalated into full-on violence — more akin to a rowdy football game — one freelance photographer had a $10,000 camera was ripped from her by pro-Palestine protestors and thrown down the steps of the Opera House.

“The flares were starting and I was just near the edge,” freelance photographer Michelle Haywood said.

“I held it up to get a better shot, and next thing I know a young bloke grabbed it.

“He said: ‘what the f*ck do you think you’re doing’, and threw it about 20 metres.”

Ms Haywood was in tears speaking to The Australian and said it then got kicked around by other rally protestors, explaining the piece of kit was not insured and would now set her back close to $10,000.

Earlier on Monday, the Prime Minister condemned the pro-­Palestine rally in Sydney’s CBD on Monday night as Australia’s Jewish organisations condemned both the Greens for their support and those planning to attend.

“I support people’s right to demonstrate their views, we’re a democratic nation,” Mr Albanese said, “but I would counsel what is to be served apart from creating a climate not conducive to peace and to the objectives of wanting to see Palestinians and Israelis living a peaceful and secure life.”

The Australian Jewish Association and the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies slammed state Greens for supporting the pro-Palestine rally in Sydney’s CBD, with one of the groups saying they were “backing terror”.

The organising group, however, have said it would be a “mass peaceful protest”.

After events in Lakemba in southwest Sydney overnight – where fireworks were fired in celebration of Hamas’s attacks – Jewish figures remained concerned.

“As Israeli women, men, children and the elderly are being hunted down, raped, beheaded and butchered in the streets, the NSW Greens are joining others tonight at a ‘rally for Palestine’ calling for ‘no war’ on terrorist-run Gaza,” AJA chief executive Robert Gregory said, comparing it to a rally during World War II in support of Nazi Germany.

“The NSW Greens and anyone who attends this disgrace are dancing on the blood of the Jewish victims … (the party members) are reprehensible and have disgraced themselves in such a way that they should never play a role in any parliament. We call on all decent people to condemn them. “

The NSW Greens posted on X on Monday afternoon proclaiming their support for the rally.

Also on Monday, Greens MP Jenny Leong, in a response to a post by federal Defence Minister Richard Marles calling the attacks “unprovoked”, criticised him, as well as a decision to light up the Opera House in the Israeli flag.

“Unprovoked?! This is a disgraceful statement from Defence Minister Richard Marles,” Ms Leong said. “It is also appalling that tonight the Opera House will be lit up in support of Israel – what about all of the Palestinian lives lost since occupation?”

Mr Ossip said it “defied credulity” that any person could attend the pro-Palestine rallies that “celebrated the rape of Israeli girls” and “kidnapping … How could any decent human being seek to justify or defend the murder of 260 young people innocently attending a dance party?”

Earlier on Monday, NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman condemned the rally in Lakemba – saying it “celebrated barbarity” – and criticised the Greens’ stance.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/police-to-jews-stay-away-from-sydney-opera-house-protest/news-story/29fd92eed36f6271f7f527645962c793

https://twitter.com/Imamofpeace/status/1711548821417717824

https://twitter.com/DrewPavlou/status/1711294503016100079

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19706443

File: 78ddf98eb7fffac⋯.jpg (414.25 KB,1920x1080,16:9,NSW_Premier_Chris_Minns_wi….jpg)

File: 03625cc99ac2852⋯.jpg (188.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Eiffel_Tower_is_illumi….jpg)

File: 331a12e1e7bcd03⋯.jpg (345.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Palestine_supporters_rally….jpg)

File: 928155d7f325bdd⋯.jpg (335.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Protesters_watched_on_as_f….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

Monday’s pro-Hamas march was a day of shame for Sydney. The premier needs to answer for it

SIMON BENSON - OCTOBER 10, 2023

The NSW government has ensured that October 9, 2023 will be a day that lives in infamy.

A national day of shame for Sydney and a failure of character and leadership on multiple levels, both State and federal.

Two contrasting images now expose what is an international embarrassment for Australia and an unforgivable offence to the Jewish community.

British prime minister Rishi Sunak delivering a speech of solidarity to a Synagogue in London following the demonic horror of the Hamas attack as thousands of Jewish people gathered in solemn embrace underneath the Eiffel Tower.

Yet under the sails of Sydney’s Opera House illuminated with the Israeli flag, chants of “f*ck the Jews” and the burning of the Israeli flag sprang from a pro-Palestinian protest that the NSW government and its police force have effectively admitted it was powerless to stop.

Never before has a community, the Jewish community, been told by an Australian government to stay inside because the streets they call home aren’t safe.

How could this happen?

So far there has been no satisfactory explanation. The NSW police have justified their decision to allow the protest to proceed because of “operational reasons”.

Even if one accepts that allowing the protest at Town Hall to take place was justified, knowing the hatred it might incite, the decision to then provide a police escort for protesters down to the Opera House is inexplicable.

Police Minister Yasmin Catley is now facing widespread condemnation, has been missing in action. Calls for her resignation grow.

The NSW Attorney-General, Michael Daley has as much to answer for. His excuse that he didn’t know about it defies credulity.

And as the highest law officer of the State, his warning to the Jewish community to stay in their homes can only confirm what is now a broader incompetence. Surely it is the government’s primary obligation to ensure the streets are safe.

Premier Chris Minns finds himself as a leader under pressure to act and explain why this was allowed to occur. His suggestion that had he known what was to transpire he might have stepped in don’t pass muster.

He should have known. He is the premier.

The response so far to Monday night’s protest from the federal Labor leadership has been noticeably weak.

Bill Shorten stood alone in calling out the anti-Semitism. Not his Cabinet colleagues.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/mondays-prohamas-march-was-a-day-of-shame-for-sydney-the-premier-needs-to-answer-for-it/news-story/2f809461182bed553559fa3843bd6c8d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19706457

File: b1a74293a02a6bd⋯.jpg (257.57 KB,1906x1072,953:536,Former_foreign_minister_Bo….jpg)

File: e390ebea9f6c4b0⋯.jpg (511.16 KB,825x1123,825:1123,BC_6.jpg)

File: 3ef5e49863f42fc⋯.jpg (242.47 KB,825x517,75:47,ML_1.jpg)

File: 514a9cdf02744a0⋯.jpg (229.58 KB,825x495,5:3,BC_7.jpg)

>>19699368

Bob Carr attacked for Palestine posts

JOE KELLY - OCTOBER 9, 2023

Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council national chair Mark Leibler has condemned former foreign minister Bob Carr for saying Palestinians had a right to resist an illegal occupation and would suffer a “disproportionately huge retaliation” from Israel.

Mr Carr, a key critic of Israel and prominent supporter of Palestinian recognition, responded to the Hamas terrorist attack in which more than 700 Israelis have been killed – including more than 250 people at a music festival in southern Israel – by saying Hamas had won a “tactical ­success”.

“Will be very short-lived. It will draw disproportionately huge retaliation directed at civilians and indifferent to children,” he posted on X. “Between the suicidal instincts of Hamas and the dominance of Israeli air power the losers will be long-suffering Palestinians in what is the world’s largest refugee camp. Palestinians have a right to resist an illegal occupation, the spread of settlements all illegal and apartheid laws – but resist peacefully. Mainstream moderate Palestinians committed to a negotiated solution deserve world attention and support, now more than ever.”

Mr Leibler responded, asking: “Bob – just how far does your hatred for Israel and the Jewish people go? You did not even condemn the sickening attack by Hamas against Israel’s civilian population. Shame on you!”

Anthony Albanese told 2GB radio Hamas’ actions were “unprecedented … completely unacceptable”.

“The idea that you would have people launching essentially indiscriminate shooting at random, just trying to cause as much harm as possible, is just an atrocity that deserves condemnation,” the Prime Minister said.

Mr Albanese also said a pro-Palestine protest march planned for the Opera House on Monday evening should not go ahead, and urged people not to attend “just out of respect for the loss of life”.

He said Israel had a “right to defend itself and in these circumstances it will”.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong also defended her language after she was criticised by the Coalition for saying “Australia urges the exercise of restraint”.

“I think it is always the right thing for Australia to urge restraint and the protection of civilian lives,” Senator Wong said. “Are people suggesting that we ought not be in any conflict calling for the protection of civilian lives? Of course we should.”

Peter Dutton said the Coalition would not ask Israel to show restraint, arguing it was “completely and utterly the wrong time for that sort of language”.

“When the attacks took place in New York and across the US in the 9/11 attacks, John Howard … prime minister at the time, stood shoulder to shoulder with President Bush in the United States. It wasn’t a time for restraint. It was a time to make sure that, firstly, people are secure and further attacks can be prevented.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/bob-carr-attacked-for-palestine-posts/news-story/86520350dfe4282f90b76f7c9671d507

https://twitter.com/bobjcarr/status/1710939485725495470

https://twitter.com/LeiblerMark/status/1710945032843543037

https://twitter.com/bobjcarr/status/1711498445423566890

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19706509

File: 5ad45038f8ee994⋯.jpg (165.58 KB,1280x720,16:9,Israel_has_a_right_to_defe….jpg)

File: 7c6ca2bd13b0b65⋯.jpg (6.47 MB,8640x5760,3:2,Israeli_firefighters_extin….jpg)

File: e231eba752052be⋯.jpg (2.21 MB,5974x3983,5974:3983,Israeli_soldiers_patrol_a_….jpg)

File: b0aa50040598546⋯.jpg (311.37 KB,865x1134,865:1134,Israel_Hamas_conflict.jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

PM calls for calm as concerns grow for safety of Australians in Israel

Matthew Knott - October 10, 2023

1/2

Hamas has warned it is ready to dig in for a long war as Israel prepared to escalate its response to the Palestinian militant group’s shock weekend attacks, mobilising hundreds of thousands of troops and pelting Palestinian targets with aerial bombardments.

As Israel launched what it called a complete blockade of Gaza by sealing off the enclave from food, fuel and other essential supplies, the United States cautioned Iran and Lebanese militant group Hezbollah against turning the dispute into a wider and more devastating regional crisis.

Hamas, which has been condemned by global leaders for killing and kidnapping hundreds of Israeli civilians over the weekend, provoked further global alarm by vowing to publicly broadcast the executions of Israeli hostages if Israel does not provide warning of its attacks on Gaza.

Israel Defence Forces (IDF) spokesman Richard Hecht said the Israeli military was building a base next to the Gaza Strip that could accommodate tens of thousands of soldiers.

“Israel is going to respond very severely and aggressively and there will be more loss of life,” Hecht told reporters on Tuesday.

“We should all change the paradigm here. This is not tit for tat.”

The IDF said it had called up an unprecedented 300,000 reservists and was imposing a total blockade of the Gaza Strip, a sign it could be preparing for a ground assault on the densely populated region of 2 million people.

More than 200 targets were struck in Gaza on Tuesday (Australian time), the IDF said, with dozens of fighter jets attacking high-rise buildings in the Gaza City neighbourhood of Rimal.

The bodies of about 1500 Hamas militants have been found in Israeli territory, the Israeli military said on Tuesday after announcing it had largely gained control in the south and restored full control over the border on the fourth day of fighting.

Spokesperson Richard Hecht said no Hamas fighters have crossed into Israel since Monday night (Tuesday morning AEDT), although infiltrations could still be possible.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he remained concerned about the fate of Australians in Israel because there were so many of them visiting or living in the country, flagging the possible evacuation of Australian citizens in Israel if required.

“We are working on a range of contingency arrangements that I won’t detail publicly for obvious reasons, but we do work on these contingencies,” he told the ABC.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said there were no reports of Australians having been killed or hospitalised as a result of the attacks.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a nationally televised address: “What we will do to our enemies in the coming days will reverberate with them for generations.”

Speaking to local officials near Israel’s border with Gaza, Netanyahu said: “What Hamas will experience will be difficult and terrible; we are already in the campaign and we are just getting started.”

Ali Barakeh, a member of Hamas’ exiled leadership in Beirut, warned that the militants had an arsenal of rockets that would last a long time.

“We have prepared well for this war and to deal with all scenarios, even the scenario of the long war,” Barakeh told Associated Press.

He added that Hamas would use hostages to secure the release of people detained in Israeli jails and even some Palestinians imprisoned in the United States.

Barakeh said that he believed Hamas’ allies, including Iran and Hezbollah, “will join the battle if Gaza is subjected to a war of annihilation”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19706512

File: 36003b27e582caa⋯.mp4 (15.74 MB,640x360,16:9,Police_and_prime_minister_….mp4)

>>19706509

2/2

In his first comments since being appointed to the role of chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Charles Brown issued a warning to Iran by saying his advice was “not to get involved” in the conflict.

“We want to send a pretty strong message,” Brown, the top US military leader, told a small group of reporters travelling with him to Brussels.

“We do not want this to broaden and the idea is for Iran to get that message loud and clear.”

The White House said that while Iran was complicit in Hamas’ attacks, the US does not have intelligence or evidence that points to its direct participation in the shock weekend assaults.

A senior US Defence official said that the US military’s increased presence in the Middle East – including the deployment of the massive Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier with approximately 5000 sailors and a deck of warplanes on board – was intended to serve as a deterrent signal to Iran, Hezbollah and other actors in the region not to join in the hostilities.

The official said the US was making it “very clear to adversaries or those that might be entering this conflict to escalate it that they should think twice and not take advantage of the instability”.

The leaders of the United Kingdom, United States, France, Germany and Italy on Tuesday released a joint statement affirming “steadfast and united support” for the state of Israel and expressing “unequivocal condemnation” of Hamas.

“We make clear that the terrorist actions of Hamas have no justification, no legitimacy, and must be universally condemned,” the leaders said.

“There is never any justification for terrorism.”

Israeli authorities said the death toll in Israel had risen to at least 900 people, mostly civilians, including more than 250 people killed while attending a music festival near the border with Gaza.

At least 687 Palestinians were killed and at least 3726 injured, authorities in Gaza said.

A spokesperson for Hamas’ armed wing said it would begin killing civilian hostages and broadcasting the act if Israel targets people in Gaza without giving notice.

“We declare that we will respond to any targeting of our people who are safe in their homes without warning, with the execution of our civilian hostages, and we will broadcast it with audio and video,” Abu Obaida said in a statement posted on the Al-Qassam Brigades’ Telegram channel.

Graphic videos, reviewed and reported by The Washington Post, showed at least four Israeli hostages being killed soon after being taken captive in a street in Be’eri, a kibbutz in southern Israel.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong backed Israel’s right to defend itself, saying: “The taking of hostages, the attacks on civilians, the sorts of images, awful images that we are seeing, reminds us of the security situation that Israel confronts.

“This is really a dreadful situation, a devastating loss of life.”

Albanese said it was time for all Australians to behave in “a responsible way”.

“We need to lower the temperature,” he told Sky News on Tuesday afternoon.

“I don’t want to see conflict here in Australia and I don’t want to see the sort of scenes that I saw last night.”

As Israel’s ambassador to Australia Amir Maimon flew back to Canberra from Israel, where he was visiting for a holiday, Israel’s deputy ambassador Chris Cantor said he did not believe most Australians understood the enormity of suffering Israel had experienced.

Describing Hamas’s attacks as the equivalent of 10 September 11, 2001-style attacks, Cantor told the ABC the assaults constituted the “worst national tragedy in the history of modern Israel”.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/middle-east/hamas-threatens-to-broadcast-executions-as-australia-defends-israel-20231010-p5eb15.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712663

File: fde853c733de241⋯.jpg (5.29 MB,6912x4610,3456:2305,Journalist_Cheng_Lei_arriv….jpg)

File: 20d3c21a3951a7c⋯.jpg (4.99 MB,6720x4482,1120:747,Foreign_Minister_Penny_Won….jpg)

File: 6fd28bdc62ec90c⋯.jpg (4.54 MB,6611x4409,6611:4409,Cheng_Lei_with_Foreign_Min….jpg)

File: 8413dd734ce82d9⋯.jpg (336.44 KB,1176x1568,3:4,Cheng_Lei_pictured_on_Wedn….jpg)

>>19340781 (pb)

>>19340831 (pb)

Cheng Lei ‘elated’ to return to her family after release from Chinese jail

Eryk Bagshaw and Paul Sakkal - October 11, 2023

Cheng Lei, the Australian journalist detained on national security charges by China, has returned to Australia, bringing to an end a three-year ordeal that saw put her at the centre of a bitter diplomatic dispute between Canberra and Beijing.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Cheng, a Melbourne mother-of-two, was elated to be home after years of negotiations with Chinese officials finally secured the release of the 48-year-old. Albanese confirmed on Wednesday she was met at Melbourne airport by Foreign Minister Penny Wong.

“Her return brings an end to a very difficult few years for her family,” Albanese said. “The government has been seeking this for a long period of time and her return will be warmly welcomed not just by her family and friends but by all Australians.”

Cheng’s release removes a key hurdle from Albanese’s visit to Beijing following years of hostility between Australia and its largest trading partner. “It will be this year,” he said.

Cheng was detained in August 2020 at the height of tensions between Australia and China over human rights, trade disputes and COVID, leading her supporters to claim that she was a victim of arbitrary detention.

The University of Queensland graduate, who moved to Australia from China when she was 10, endured months of solitary isolation designed to extract a confession in the Chinese legal system, before being moved to a prison that only allowed her 10 hours of sunlight a year.

Australian authorities and Cheng’s family remained largely unaware of the specific charges against her throughout her imprisonment. Fellow Australian, writer Yang Hengjun, is still behind bars in Beijing on vague espionage charges.

“Her matter was concluded through the legal processes in China,” Albanese said. “We continue to advocate for Dr Yang’s interests, rights and wellbeing with Chinese authorities at all levels.”

The Prime Minister said he had raised the issue at a formal meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Delhi at the G20 in September.

“We sat next to each other at the G20 at a formal dinner as well. It was an opportunity in a less formal way to be able to have discussions and dialogue,” he said. “Dialogue is always a good idea. Even with people who you have disagreements with.”

Cheng’s sentencing had been delayed at least six times since her one-day closed-door trial last year. Australian officials were barred from attending the hearing.

It remains unclear whether a formal sentence was handed down by the Chinese court, which has a 99 per cent conviction rate, or if she had been released on medical grounds, as has occurred with other cases of foreigners being detained in China.

“Our focus remains on her interests and welfare,” said Albanese. “We are asking for her privacy and that of her family to be respected at this time as she adjusts to what has obviously been a very difficult and traumatic period for her in her life.”

In August, Cheng released a letter from jail revealing her hopes for reuniting with her children in Melbourne and her memories of Australia.

“I haven’t seen a tree in three years,” she said. “This is a love letter to 25 million people and 7 million square kilometres of land, abundant nature, beauty and space.”

Albanese said he had spoken to Cheng about her letter once she had returned to Melbourne.

“I spoke to her about the recent message she made to the Australian people. She is a very strong and resilient person,” he said.

Cheng’s partner Nick Coyle, who has not commented publicly since her release, said in August her family had endured an endless cycle of uncertainty.

“She has missed her daughter going to high school. Her parents aren’t getting any younger and Lei is their only child. So time is getting more and more precious,” he said.

“It’s the big things and all those little things that we take for granted about life in Australia.“

In a joint statement, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and his foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham welcomed the news of Cheng’s safe return.

“Ms Cheng’s release and return home to her children and partner Nick Coyle will be a moment of great relief and joy to them.

“We thank all of those who have worked tirelessly over three years to secure this outcome and acknowledge everyone who has advocated for Ms Cheng’s release. Particular acknowledgement is owed to Australia’s Ambassador to China, Graham Fletcher, along with many DFAT officers and consular officials.”

More to come

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/australian-journalist-cheng-lei-returns-from-detention-in-china-20231011-p5ebjh.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712740

File: f32795de08fe977⋯.jpg (2.97 MB,5616x3744,3:2,East_Timor_President_Jose_….jpg)

File: e3907cc1501d0ef⋯.jpg (248.36 KB,1802x1438,901:719,China_s_President_Xi_Jinpi….jpg)

>>19601978

China worried security support for Timor would bring ‘overreaction’: Ramos-Horta

Chris Barrett - October 9, 2023

Singapore: Timor-Leste President Jose Ramos-Horta says China has stopped short of forging greater links with Dili in supporting its military and police forces out of concern about how it would be received in Australia.

The upgrading of diplomatic relations between South-East Asia’s youngest nation and Beijing last month elicited comparisons with China’s police co-operation deal with Solomon Islands, an agreement that triggered anxiety about China expanding its influence in the Pacific.

Ramos-Horta has insisted that the new comprehensive strategic partnership signed by his Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao and Chinese President Xi Jinping is focused mostly on infrastructure development and on industries such as agriculture, and is no worry for Australia.

“We could have had more Chinese support, for instance, in infrastructure to our defence forces, to our police force. And sometimes when I chat with the Chinese about increasing their support to our police force, like building our whole compound, they’d say they’d be willing to do it, but they would be concerned about the overreaction or potential overreaction in Australia and elsewhere,” he told ABC radio on Monday.

“The Chinese are actually sensitive to the sensitivities of our neighbours. They are more respectful of Australia’s position than Australia is of the Chinese position.”

A statement by China and Timor-Leste announcing the elevation of ties in late September said the two countries had agreed to “enhance high-level military exchanges, strengthen co-operation in areas such as personnel training, equipment technology, the conduct of joint exercises and training”.

Ramos-Horta, who performs a largely ceremonial role under Timor-Leste’s semi-presidential system, has moved to downplay the significance of such engagements, reinforcing Australia’s role as Dili’s security partner of choice.

“A month ago we had an exceptional visit from for Chinese navy hospital [ship], super modern,” he said.

“That’s the kind of operation [we are talking about] … we are not talking about military training because that we do primarily with Australia.”

Among the poorest countries in Asia, Timor-Leste has already leaned on state-owned Chinese companies for a range of major projects including a highway and its national electricity grid. Beijing also built Timor’s Defence and Foreign Ministry headquarters and its presidential palace.

But less than a quarter of a century since breaking free from the oppression of Indonesian occupation, Timor-Leste’s still-prominent resistance-era figures have stressed that they want no part in geopolitical rivalries.

“For us, in our foreign affairs policy, we say ‘no alliance, no enemies, all friend’, ” independence hero Gusmao told this masthead before an election in May that returned him to the prime ministership. “For us, no more wars.”

Parker Novak, a US-based non-resident fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Global China Hub and Indo-Pacific Security Initiative, said the statement outlining Dili and Beijing’s enhancement of ties wasn’t a surprise in general.

“Could it be concerning? Yes. Does it show that Timor-Leste is rhetorically embracing China? Yes. But I don’t have the same alarmist reaction that some others have had,” he said.

“To me, the agreement codifies a lot of things that were already happening between the two countries at the ground level. It’s also a reflection of Timor-Leste’s ‘friends with everybody’ approach to foreign policy. They don’t see any reason why they shouldn’t turn to China for development and economic assistance, just as they see Australia, Japan, Indonesia, the US and others as sources for assistance.”

Facing a fiscal cliff in a decade with revenue from natural resources running out, Gusmao’s government is continuing negotiations over the future of the long-stalled Greater Sunrise gas field in the Timor Sea with joint venture partner Woodside Energy.

It hopes to secure an agreement by next year to pipe gas to Timor-Leste’s south coast for processing rather than to Darwin, which has been Woodside’s preferred option.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/china-worried-security-support-for-timor-would-bring-overreaction-ramos-horta-20231009-p5earl.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712747

File: 005f58aac786a58⋯.jpg (104 KB,1312x738,16:9,An_SAS_badge.jpg)

>>19417651 (pb)

>>19656323

British army ‘was told SAS lied to justify killing of Afghans’

MARIO LEDWITH - OCTOBER 10, 2023

Senior British military officers were warned that SAS units were planting evidence to try to justify the killings of dozens of innocent civilians during raids in Afghanistan, an inquiry has been told.

The deaths allegedly stemmed from an unofficial policy within the British special forces to “execute Afghan males of fighting age” even when they posed no threat. High-level concerns about the alleged killings prompted one senior military officer to say that justifications given were “logic-defying”. Other staff used internal emails to lament a “casual disregard for life”.

Details of the killings emerged on the first day of a public inquiry into the behaviour of elite military units. It will examine claims that more than 80 Afghans were summarily killed between 2010 and 2013.

The Ministry of Defence ordered the inquiry last year after campaigning by victims’ families and claims by the BBC program Panorama that one unit may have unlawfully killed 54 people in one six-month tour.

Opening the inquiry at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, Lord Justice Haddon-Cave, the chairman, said the allegations were “extremely grave”. The inquiry would examine claims that the allegations were “covered up at all levels over the last decade” and that investigations by the Royal Military Police were not fit for purpose.

The inquiry heard evidence from internal emails between officials in which they referred to the official explanation about raids as “bollocks”.

In one raid in Northern Helmand aimed at finding a mid-level Taliban commander in February 2011, nine people were allegedly killed in their beds, probably while asleep. The unit involved said it acted in self-defence.

In an exchange, after eight people were killed in a night raid in 2011, an officer expressed fears about being “dragged down” when the “next WikiLeaks occurs”. The identities of SAS and SBS troops will be anonymised.

The inquiry will focus on raids, known as deliberate detention operations, during which killings were legitimised as acts of self-defence.

Oliver Glasgow KC, counsel to the inquiry, said the central allegation in the inquiry was that raids were “abused by elements within UK special forces” to execute Afghan males.

In April 2011 a commanding officer wrote to the commander of the British special forces, outlining claims that a special forces sub-unit had killed people after they were restrained.

The commanding officer had earlier written a statement in which he laid out claims that British operatives had planted weapons on those they killed.

In October 2012 a night-time raid in central Helmand province seeking a suspected Taliban commander resulted in the deaths of three boys aged 12, 14 and 16 and a man of 18.

The inquiry was told that the chief of staff of the special forces was arrested as part of a subsequent investigation into the incident, for allegedly perverting the course of justice.

RMP officers had travelled to Afghanistan in February 2014 to interview Afghan officers about the deaths. But an interview with one officer was terminated by the chief of staff over what was said to be a breach of “agreed conditions”. Investigators returned to arrest the chief of staff in Afghanistan the following month but they were incorrectly told he was not there.

The chief of staff was arrested later and subsequently referred to the director of service prosecutions alongside two soldiers, who were being directly investigated in connection with the deaths. No charges were brought.

Concerns about the British security activity were previously highlighted in judicial review proceedings brought by the Saifullah and Noorzai families. A member of the Saifullah family said they hoped the truth would finally emerge. “We have lost our normal sleep and are having nightmares and dreams filled with difficulties,” they said.

Mr Glasgow said the inquiry would hear about how information from a security services computer server was “withheld from those tasked with looking into the allegations”.

Leigh Day, the legal firm representing the families of 33 people, including eight children, killed by British special forces, said the inquiry should end a “wall of silence”. An RMP investigation into allegations of wrongdoing in Afghanistan will be scrutinised. It ended with no charges being brought.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/british-army-was-told-sas-lied-to-justify-killing-of-afghans/news-story/b5cd89fa1e9865d4223fbe64b1d27b5f

https://www.iia.independent-inquiry.uk/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712756

File: b32a9d5a69fb7bf⋯.jpg (163.81 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Pro_Palestine_supporters_i….jpg)

File: 838c48a4c907e13⋯.jpg (341.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Pro_Palestine_supporters_c….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706386

>>19706391

At a celebration of slaughter, Labor looks the other way

SHARRI MARKSON - OCTOBER 11, 2023

1/2

More than once since Hamas terrorists invaded Israel last weekend and slaughtered hundreds of innocent men, women and children in their homes, at a music festival and on the streets, I have felt grateful to call Australia home.

It’s deeply distressing for anyone following these events to see vision of mothers and their babies being kidnapped by barbarians and held hostage. But for Jewish Australians this horrifying depravity has felt incredibly personal – even though seemingly a world away from our sparkling way of life here in Australia.

A world away, that is, until Monday evening, when the NSW government allowed the barbarians who had murdered entire families in Israel to be celebrated on the steps of the Sydney Opera House. Absurdly, NSW police urged Jews to stay in their homes, not to come into the CBD, to keep away from the Opera House and the Town Hall, saying it wasn’t safe to walk the city’s streets. That’s the inexplicable path the NSW government took as pro-Palestinian protesters, chanting “Death to Jews” and “Gas the Jews” and burning the Israeli flag, celebrated the slaughter of innocent Israeli civ­ilians.

Fuelled by anti-Semitism, the protest was vile in its hatred and shocking for all Australians – regardless of faith or ethnicity – to watch. It was clearly hate speech: unlawful behaviour that drives a terrifying wedge between Australians when we’re supposedly embracing inclusivity.

For a Jewish Australian walking down the street, there’s now a discernible feeling of fear and worry. Should we take our children to school, having just seen these people – our fellow citizens – chant “Kill the Jews” and “Gas the Jews” on the streets we love? These are the questions I am now seriously asking myself in the city in which I was born and raised, and where I have always felt safe.

In allowing this hateful, divisive, anti-Semitic protest to go ahead, the NSW Labor government, the police and the Greens are fostering an atmosphere of fear and distrust in our beautiful, peaceful country.

The images beamed around the world on Monday evening were supposed to be of a national landmark – the Opera House – lit up in blue and white lights in solidarity with Israelis and those of the Jewish faith across the world. It was a heartwarming gesture. Instead, what we witnessed was a shambles as the Minns government allowed an ugly protest to be conducted on the steps of that landmark.

The NSW government allowed Australians (as many of these protesters were) to use a national symbol to project images of hate, without any action or intervention from police. Make no mistake, those images of Sydney, beamed around the world, will provide a moral ballast to the terrorists who are murdering young families.

Instead of taking action to rein in the protest, the NSW government acted in a cowardly way; it was despicable and corrosive. It essentially surrendered the Opera House to those who openly celebrate terrorism. This is what appeasement looks like. Failing to shut down or curtail a protest that even police felt wasn’t safe for Jews is the sign of a feeble government.

Moreover, the police should’ve moved decisively against those people openly threatening Jews. The Opera House now is tainted by the vilest sentiments imaginable.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712760

File: 92ef97312146c81⋯.jpg (279.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_flare_is_thrown_at_the_S….jpg)

File: 30ad39df20fe921⋯.jpg (594.03 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,NSW_Premier_Chris_Minns.jpg)

File: c8f547c8cc4cac3⋯.jpg (389.98 KB,1600x2133,1600:2133,Foreign_Minister_Penny_Won….jpg)

>>19712756

2/2

The only known arrest on Monday evening was of a Jewish man, waving an Israeli flag, who was handcuffed for his own safety. All the while, safe passage was provided for those chanting murderous slogans and celebrating terror.

Let’s be absolutely clear: Labor allowed hate crimes to be perpetrated without intervention of any kind. It’s only in the aftermath that Assistant Police Commissioner Tony Cooke claims he’s examining CCTV to try to track down the perpetrators. This is all too late. All around the world, Jews are in hiding while pro-Palestinian protesters take to the streets. In New York, Toronto, even outside the White House, chants of “Allahu Akbar” celebrate the deaths of hundreds and the kidnapping of at least 160 innocent Israelis. It seemed unthinkable that such cruelty could be inflicted on women and children; even more unthinkable that our fellow citizens could rejoice in this suffering.

But here’s where it gets even more concerning. The celebration of these terrorist attacks in Sydney’s southwest and in the city this week have shone a spotlight on the voters the Albanese government and the Labor Party have been pandering to and courting in recent years. It has been well-reported that Labor has long been a supporter of Israel – until the demographics in western Sydney changed with increasing migration. To appeal to their voters, Labor MPs walked away from supporting the democracy of Israel and started pushing for boycotts and recognition of a Palestinian state, even wanting to ban sponsored trips to Israel.

Terrorist group Hamas applauded Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s policies in a press release when she hardened Labor’s position against Israel this year. Labor’s national foreign policy has been catering to the minority of Australians who do not share our common values of mateship, tolerance and acceptance. Instead, they wish death to the Jews.

They do not believe the Jewish community should exist. Never has this been more clear than in the wake of the worst atrocities perpetrated against the Jewish people in decades. This should serve as a wake-up call for federal Labor to examine exactly who it is that the party has been bending over backwards to appease.

For me, as a Jewish Australian, the barbaric nature of the Iran-funded terrorists has been deeply upsetting, as it has been for most Australians of different faiths and backgrounds. It’s impossible to watch young girls being paraded and beaten by thugs without being emotionally affected. But what has been upsetting too is the realisation that Labor has been too weak to stand up to anti-Semitic sections of the Australian population who support this barefaced inhumanity.

In not shutting down the protest, in allowing protesters to use the platform of the Opera House, in changing foreign policy to appease this group of people, it’s clear that Labor has lost its moral compass. It has done so not for peace. How can you have peace when Hamas’s reason for existence is to annihilate Jews? But for politics and the promise of a few votes.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/at-a-celebration-of-slaughter-labor-looks-the-other-way/news-story/23e53bf87fff35ea2549e85b6baad263

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712770

File: 2b1e057f8245f53⋯.jpg (234.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_prime_minister_John….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

John Howard demands Anthony Albanese stop Labor’s ‘pussyfooting’ on Hamas terrorists

SIMON BENSON, BEN PACKHAM and JESS MALCOLM - OCTOBER 11, 2023

1/2

John Howard has demanded ­Anthony Albanese display “leadership from the top” to stop Labor’s “pussyfooting” response to the Hamas terror atrocities and ­labelled anti-Israeli protests at the Sydney Opera House a “catastrophic descent from civility”.

As Benjamin Netanyahu threatened Hamas terrorists in Gaza with a military response that would “echo throughout the generations”, federal and NSW Labor faced outrage from the Jewish community over the handling of pro-Palestinian protesters who burned the Israeli flag and chanted anti-Semitic slurs in Sydney on Sunday and Monday nights.

Two of the most senior federal ministers from western Sydney – Tony Burke and Chris Bowen – were under pressure for failing to full-throatedly condemn local anti-­Israel preachers and activists who led the two NSW rallies celebrating Hamas’s attacks. And NSW Police Minister Yasmin Catley refused to apologise for officers telling Sydney’s Jewish community to avoid the Opera House – which was being lit up in the ­colours of the Israeli flag in commemoration of Israel’s war dead and hostages – as they let an unauthorised group of 700 protesters march to the site and throw flares at the steps.

The Prime Minister on Tuesday called for calm in the community, as he said nothing justified the slaughter wrought by Hamas.

“We need to lower the temperature,” Mr Albanese said. “I don’t want to see conflict here in Australia and I don’t want to see the sort of scenes that I saw last night … they certainly don’t have a place.”

Mr Howard on Tuesday called on all sides of politics to condemn Hamas and its sympathisers, as he accused Labor widely of being “hugely conflicted” on the issue. He said Foreign Minister Penny Wong appeared “uncomfortable” in her condemnations, and ­signalled the Prime Minister was not being unequivocal in his support of Israel.

“When 9/11 occurred there was unanimity of response. I was in America, Kim Beazley was leader of the Labor Party and there wasn’t a cigarette paper between us. He completely supported our position,” Mr Howard told The Australian.

“This should be the same … Mr Albanese should make some unequivocal statements, as should the Foreign Minister.

“Instead of that there is pussyfooting and lukewarm condemnation. And then you have the NSW Attorney-General (Michael Daley) saying everyone should remain calm and go home.

“How can you remain calm when demonstrators are invoking the memory of the Holocaust? People remain calm in that?

“I never thought we would crumple to this … We need leadership from the top; we aren’t getting that at the moment.”

Mr Howard praised NSW Premier Chris Minns’ strong condemnation of the protests and said all politicians should show solidarity with Australian Jews.

“You can have strong views, you can argue about the Middle East but for people to invoke the memory of the most appalling crime in humanity, the extermination of six million Jews in gas chambers is terrible,” Mr Howard said. “It’s totally beyond the pale as far as I’m concerned. … To have people chanting those things, it is a catastrophic decent from civility that I never thought I’d see.

“If you’re a law-abiding Jewish person in Sydney who wanted to go along to the Opera House and (were) told you had to stay at home, what is this?

“There is no room here for moral equivalence, when you have people murdering babies.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712774

File: a8b6bee5606c5b3⋯.jpg (128.91 KB,1280x719,1280:719,Sheik_Ibrahim_Dadoun_at_a_….jpg)

>>19712770

2/2

It emerged on Tuesday that Mr Albanese was yet to hold a national security committee meeting on the Israel-Hamas conflict, despite 10,000 Australians being in the war-torn country and the potential hit to the global economy.

The NSC brings together the nation’s most senior ministers, ­intelligence and military chiefs and top diplomats and mandarins.

Sources said no meeting of the NSC had been called, and none yet scheduled, despite Mr Albanese getting daily briefings on the war in Israel. Mr Albanese branded the protests at the Opera House “horrific” and said they should not have taken place.

“They’re horrific, quite clearly slogans which are anti-Semitic and just appalling, with no place. And I did say that that demonstration shouldn’t have gone ahead and I stand by that. We are a tolerant, multicultural nation.

“I understand that people have deep views about issues relating to the Middle East conflict, but here in Australia, we have to deal with political discourse in a ­respectful way.

“And I certainly didn’t see that from the footage that I saw last night, which is one of the reasons why I believe it was just inappropriate for it to go ahead last night.”

But his Leader of the House, Mr Burke, failed to directly condemn a preacher in his electorate who said he was elated at the murder of Israelis. The head of the nation’s peak Jewish body, Alex Ryvchin, called on the Workplace Relations Minister to “repudiate this incitement in the harshest and clearest terms”. The criticism came after a rally took place in Lakemba in Mr Burke’s southwest Sydney electorate, during which speakers described attacks on ­Israel as an act of “courage” and “resistance”.

Mr Ryvchin, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive, said the fact Mr Burke had said “nothing about what took place in his electorate shows a complete lack of leadership when it is needed most”.

“It cannot be that the loudest voices are those calling for Jews to be gassed while the voices of moderation, peace and tolerance are entirely absent,” Mr Ryvchin said. “Burke and his colleagues have much to answer for.”

Mr Burke on Tuesday condemned the actions of Hamas and said it was an “extraordinarily ­difficult time for anyone who is worried about their loved ones”.

“Increasing anger and division in Australia will not help anyone who is at risk and I urge everyone to try to keep the situation here in Australia as calm as possible,” Mr Burke said. “I condemn the actions of Hamas. Attacks on civilians are never justified. I hope and pray for the safety of everyone at risk in ­Israel and in Gaza.”

Mr Bowen, the Energy Minister, also failed to make any direct condemnation of Hamas or its supporters in Australia, saying only that he supported Mr Albanese’s position. “The Prime Minister has made the government’s position on these marches crystal clear. I fully support that position,” Mr Bowen said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/labor-mps-tony-burke-chris-bowen-accused-of-lack-of-leadership/news-story/d810d54c0f61d907581f6492a0e9992e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712785

File: f5f0413ddd2441d⋯.jpg (165 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Protestors_outside_the_Syd….jpg)

File: 82ec22181594df3⋯.jpg (343.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Protesters_burn_the_Israel….jpg)

File: 23d39d3ef5198b0⋯.jpg (166.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,NSW_Premier_Chris_Minns.jpg)

File: 87e5779b99bcc30⋯.jpg (200.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Police_Minister_Yasmin_Cat….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

Sydney Opera House ‘screw up’ lambasted by political, religious leaders amid operational autopsy

ALEXI DEMETRIADI - OCTOBER 11, 2023

1/2

NSW’s defiant Police Minister has declared officers “successfully” managed a widely condemned pro-Hamas march, despite authorities’ only arrest being an innocent man carrying an Israeli flag .

Yasmin Catley was fighting off calls to resign on Tuesday after pictures of police lining the Opera House’s steps amid anti-Semitic chants and burnings of the Israeli flag were broadcast around the globe.

NSW Premier Chris Minns called the protest “abhorrent”.

“At the end of the day, this is the opposite of the dynamic, multi­cultural community that we want in NSW,” Mr Minns said.

“It was a situation where racial epithets were thrown at the Jewish community by the mere fact that they were members of the Jewish community.”

Both the Premier and Ms Catley came under fire for the government’s handling of the rally, which was allowed to march to the Opera House when it was to be lit up in the colours of the Israeli flag. Sydney’s Jewish community was warned by police about attending the CBD given “safety concerns”.

Crowds at the Opera House chanted “f*ck the Jews” and “Zionist pigs” as they lit flares at the steps of the iconic Sydney building.

On Tuesday, Attorney-General Michael Daley admitted he wasn’t across Monday night’s events. He said police and operation decisions do not involve the Attorney-General, and called the protest “shocking and appalling”.

“I was not briefed on last night’s operations in relation to the Opera House protests, nor any discussions the police may have had, nor any advice they may have given,” Mr Daley said.

Mr Minns said police made an “operational decision” in a “short space of time”, and assistant police commissioner Tony Cooke said “risks were avoided”.

“The best option was to control and manage the situation,” Mr Cooke said. “This is not about us condoning, supporting (or) facilitating any protest … this is about us providing for the public safety.”

He confirmed he advised the Jewish community of the “significant risk” of attending.

The protest was also unauthorised, without the requisite paperwork.

“Police did not approve the march … there was no authorisation,” Ms Catley confirmed on Tuesday, saying inquiries would be held into its handling.

““They needed to manage a highly volatile crowd… and determined the best option was to control and manage crowd movements. They did that successfully.”

Former Australian ambassador to Israel and federal MP Dave Sharma said: “This has been a complete screw up by the NSW government – how on earth did they allow this to happen?”

“From the Brandenburg Gate to the Eiffel Tower, thousands gathered peacefully at iconic sights lit in Israeli colours in a show of solidarity,” he said. “In Sydney, we showcased a wild mob, cheering on the most barbaric acts, chanting the most vile slogans.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712787

File: 336e6b7c3198830⋯.jpg (188.73 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Assistant_Commissioner_Ton….jpg)

File: 2ebb157b5b3c8bc⋯.jpg (379.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Pro_Palestine_supporters_a….jpg)

File: a491b7cb985b332⋯.jpg (208.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,_L_R_Allegra_Spender_and_D….jpg)

>>19712785

2/2

Wentworth MP Allegra Spender – whose electorate has a large Jewish community – described the protest as a “national disgrace”.

“Australians enjoy the right to protest, but not the right to spread hate speech and anti-Semitism,” Ms Spender said.

Ms Spender said she had written to the government asking for an explanation and that Jewish community members in her electorate were “anxious”.

“I can’t understand why police would authorise a march if they believe it would be a threat to the safety of other community members,” Ms Spender said.

“I think it was a colossal error of judgment from the minister and I believe she should resign.”

Former prime minister Tony Abbott said he was appalled at the celebration of “gruesome atrocities”. “Australia should be united in condemnation and in solidarity with Israel,” he said.

Mr Abbott said he hoped Mr Minns would have “stern words” with Ms Catley and reprimand NSW Police after the debacle.

“It was a serious error of judgment by the police to allow that march to go anywhere near the Opera House, where there was always going to be trouble,” he said.

The NSW Opposition was unequivocal in its condemnation of both the rally and the state government’s handling of it, with Liberal leader Mark Speakman saying Labor was “missing in action”.

“They have failed in their duty to ensure the protection of Sydney’s Jewish community – instead telling them ‘to stay home’,” Mr Speakman said.

He called on Ms Catley to apologise to Sydney’s Jewish community and said he feared they were “feeling unsafe” in their own city.

A spokeswoman for Ms Catley said the minister had been in contact with police and the Jewish community on Monday, but it is understood she had not reached out on Tuesday to the community to offer an apology or to discuss safety issues.

Former police minister Paul Toole said Monday was a communication breakdown. “What we’re seeing is no communication or lack of action (from the Police Minister) who is not across the ­detail and doesn’t have the right working relationship with the police required,” he said.

Ms Catley’s spokeswoman said that she had “zero role in operational decision making”.

“It would be grossly inappropriate if she did – those decisions are for NSW Police operational commanders,” she said.

Ms Catley said public safety was a priority: “The police’s priority was to control and manage a large and volatile crowd and prevent conflict, violence and ensure public safety.”

Jewish community leaders have slammed Monday’s events and the NSW government’s handling of them .

“To see preachers inciting hatred, glorifying the most despicable violence and atrocities on our streets should never have occurred,” Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sydney-opera-house-screw-up-lambasted-by-political-religious-leaders-amid-operational-autopsy/news-story/cd33a97764158dc616a0f1f502c11219

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712796

File: 564de617bca6b26⋯.jpg (181.07 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Galit_Carbone_66_far_right….jpg)

File: c4d69bd3e787f81⋯.jpg (187.04 KB,1600x900,16:9,Galit_Carbone_left_with_he….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706509

Australian grandmother killed in Israeli kibbutz as Hamas issue ultimatum: we will televise Israeli hostage executions

BEN PACKHAM - OCTOBER 11, 2023

1/2

Sydney-born grandmother Galit Carbone is among those killed in Israel, Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil has confirmed

The 66-year-old Australian-born grandmother’s lifeless body was found just metres from the door of her home in the Be-Eri kibbutz, just 5km from the Gaza border, where she had previously worked as a librarian and raised her three children.

Ms Carbone, born in Sydney is the first known Australian victim of the brutal conflict.

Her cousin Julian Cappe said the family was “numb” after getting confirmation she had been killed. “We’re not sure if she was killed in her home or dragged out and killed, but her body was not found in her house,” Mr Cappe said.

Ms O’Neil said she is “devastated” by the death of Galit who died after militants went door to door forcing residents out of their homes.

“This is heartbreaking news this morning for the family of this particular individual, her community here in Australia … our hearts absolutely go out to her,” Ms O’Neil said.

“I’m devastated for the people who knew her, but also the broader Jewish Australian community.

“We’ve got brothers and sisters of the Jewish religion around our country who are suffering greatly from what is a brutal, violent, abhorrent and completely unjustified act of terrorism against their country and their citizens.”

Ten thousand Australians live in Israel.

The Hamas terrorist group has threatened to record executions of Israeli hostages unless the Jewish state winds back its bombardment of the Gaza Strip, in a brutal ultimatum for the country as it prepares massive retribution against the militant group.

The warning came as Israel ­ordered a “complete siege” of Gaza in preparation for an offensive, halting the flow of food, water, electricity and fuel into the Palestinian enclave as it activated a ­record 300,000 reservists for its “Swords of Iron” campaign.

The Israeli military on Tuesday night (AEDT) said it had found the bodies of more than 1500 Hamas fighters inside Israel, bringing the overall death toll to more than 3100, and claimed to have the Gaza border secured against Hamas.

“We have gained full control over the border fence in the Gaza Strip. In the last day, not a single terrorist entered the fence,” an Israel Defence Forces spokesman said on Tuesday.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed an Israeli response to the terrorist invasion of his country that would “echo down through generations”.

“Hamas terrorists bound, burned and executed children. They are savages. Hamas is ISIS,” Mr Netanyahu said, likening the group to the extremist Islamic State network.

The threat of the war expanding throughout the region also ­increased, after a deputy commander of the Israeli 300th Brigade, Alim Abdallah, was killed in clash with militants who had crossed the Lebanese border.

As Israeli forces mobilised for the coming offensive, sources in Australia’s Jewish community said a number of Australians may be among the more than 900 people killed in the weekend attack on Israel.

Foreign Affairs officials refused to confirm any deaths, but said Australians were still missing in ­Israel following the attack.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said there were about 10,000 Australians in Israel, but declined to comment on individual cases.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712798

File: 3197ac848fe813f⋯.jpg (288.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_soldier_rests_against_an….jpg)

File: 755196e7f0c2c3b⋯.jpg (331.24 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_plume_of_smoke_rises_in_….jpg)

>>19712796

2/2

Hamas fighters dragged off an estimated 150 hostages in the surprise attack on Saturday, including women, children, the elderly and senior army officers.

The terrorist group said it would start executing the prisoners if Israeli jets continued to pound targets in Gaza without warning, as they had done since the invasion. “From this hour, any targeting of our people in the safety of their homes, without warning, will be met with the execution of civilian hostages, which will be broadcast with video and audio,” said Hamas armed wing spokesman Abu Uba­ida.

Israel Defence Forces spokesman Richard Hecht said the threat would not achieve the group’s aims. “If they harm one of these grandmothers or one of these babies or one of these children, it will not make things better, and they know it,” Lieutenant Colonel Hecht said.

“No electricity, no food, no water, no gas – it’s all closed.”

The Israeli military revealed it had secured the Gaza perimeter and planted landmines where the militants toppled the border wall.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he was “deeply distressed” by the announcement. He warned that Gaza’s humanitarian situation would “only deteriorate exponentially”.

Fireballs lit up Gaza City on Monday night as Israeli jets struck hundreds of sites, including mosques and a marketplace.

Hamas said four hostages died in the strikes, along with one of their captors. Gaza residents reported receiving audio messages from Israeli security officers telling them to leave areas in the north and east of the city.

Authorities there said at least 687 Palestinians had been killed in the conflict, and the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine refugees said it was sheltering more than 137,000 displaced people in schools across Gaza.

“The situation is unbearable,” said the UN agency’s spokeswoman Amal al-Sarsawi.

As families began to bury their dead across Israel, the Herald Sun reported Carbone – the first identified Australian victim – might have been “dragged around” by militants before her death.

Carbone was reportedly only a road away from where her children and grandchildren were hiding in a safe house before IDF soldiers rescued them from roaming Hamas militants

Tensions have soared across the Middle East since the weekend attack, amid signs of Iranian involvement that could spark a wider regional conflict.

US deputy national security adviser Jon Finer said there was not yet direct evidence linking the attack to Iran, but the US believed it was “broadly complicit” in the Hamas operation.

As its supporters across the Arab world rejoiced at the violence, Hamas called on “resistance fighters” in the West Bank and in Islamic nations to join its “Operation Al-Aqsa Flood”.

“The military operation is still continuing,” a Hamas official said from Doha, declaring “there is currently no chance for negotiation on the issue of prisoners or anything else”.

In 2011, militants in Gaza ­released Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit after more than five years in captivity. He was freed in a swap for 1027 Palestinians, including a senior Hamas leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar.

Prisoner exchange appears an unlikely option for Israel now, as it would give Hamas a propaganda victory that very few Israelis would accept. Retired Israeli brigadier general Ariel Heimann said: “We care about our hostages, and this time they are citizens – women and children. But now is the time to fight against Hamas, and all Israelis are behind it.

“It’s a lose-lose situation, whatever is decided.”

As Israeli forces prepare to invade Gaza to rescue hostages and wipe out Hamas, the country is on high alert for an attack by Iranian-backed Hezbollah terrorists across its northern border with Lebanon. On Monday, the Israeli army said its soldiers had “killed a number of armed suspects” who had crossed the northern border, and that Israeli helicopters were striking targets in the area.

The Palestinian militant group Islamic Jihad later claimed responsibility for the thwarted infiltration from Lebanon to Israel.

Washington, which moved its biggest aircraft carrier into the eastern Mediterranean to deter attacks by Hezbollah, said it had no plans to put US troops on the ground but would supply its ally with munitions.

Israel has asked the US for more guided missiles for its fighter jets and more missiles for its Iron Dome air defence system.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/hamas-ultimatum-we-will-televise-hostage-executions/news-story/ea6396926d3a1443b2088de1e91b5df9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712817

File: af71697805259aa⋯.jpg (492.87 KB,825x850,33:34,DA_4.jpg)

File: 9e26f2dceb67528⋯.jpg (1.91 MB,4096x2731,4096:2731,F8HsnLbWUAAhihW.jpg)

File: 714f55a3f8298f1⋯.jpg (1.98 MB,4096x2731,4096:2731,F8HsoUAWkAAfowo.jpg)

File: a29bbaf68cc7c41⋯.jpg (2.04 MB,4096x2731,4096:2731,F8HsptpWIAAUPgs.jpg)

>>19440283 (pb)

>>19452993 (pb)

Defence Australia Tweet

Thank you and farewell ❤ Up to 2500 @USMC personnel have begun departing Australia as the 12th rotation of @MRFDarwin wraps up. While stationed in Darwin, the MRF-D conducted various combined training exercises with #YourADF, as well as with regional partner nations.

https://twitter.com/DefenceAust/status/1711909542940885173

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19712836

File: 4fa5c8a5c7a8d61⋯.mp4 (14.81 MB,960x540,16:9,Public_Sector_Women_in_Lea….mp4)

File: b63a679ea56ddab⋯.jpg (446.63 KB,1513x1736,1513:1736,Hillary_Clinton_will_headl….jpg)

File: 80badde48f03b63⋯.jpg (326.97 KB,1019x977,1019:977,Hillary_Clinton_SELLING_FA….jpg)

Hillary Clinton to share leadership tips at Aussie public servant talkfest

Noel Towell and Kishor Napier-Raman - October 11, 2023

It takes a brave soul these days to stand in front of an Australian Public Service audience and start going on about leadership, what with the controversy engulfing some of the federal bureaucracy’s highest climbers – Home Affairs boss Mike Pezzullo and former Human Services secretary Kathryn Campbell – over their conduct while leading mammoth federal departments.

So whichever genius chose out-of-towner Hillary Clinton - yes, that Hillary Clinton - as the headline act at a Public Sector Women in Leadership talkfest early next year, ought to take a bow.

Now, history will remember Clinton as the US presidential candidate who lost to Donald Trump. But remember she also had a decent knock in the demanding role of her nation’s secretary of state during Barack Obama’s administration and would have learnt a thing or two as one half of the famous “Billary” White House, as her husband Bill Clinton’s presidency was often dubbed.

Firing the questions at Clinton, who will be beaming in from the States rather than actually visiting these shores, will be former host of the ABC’s 7.30 Leigh Sales – herself a bit of a public sector high-flyer, when you think about it – who does a lot of these corporate gigs nowadays.

The money is good, and you don’t get abused all over the internet for your troubles.

Also on the bill is federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek, Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody and former Services Australia chief executive Rebecca Skinner, the public servant who had to pick up the pieces of the robo-debt debacle that effectively ended Campbell’s career.

Skinner’s last major act at the helm of the 34,000-strong workforce at the outfit that runs Centrelink, Medicare and the Child Support Agency, was to apologise to the workforce for the unfair toll the robo-debt took among its ranks.

Maybe Skinner should have been considered to top the bill at February’s leadership conference.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/hillary-clinton-to-share-leadership-tips-at-aussie-public-servant-talkfest-20231010-p5eb7h.html

https://the-hatchery.co/event/women-in-leadership-summit-feb-2024/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720209

File: 1b1e7f6107451e1⋯.jpg (1.62 MB,4368x2915,4368:2915,A_depiction_of_the_Austral….jpg)

File: 691877066896aa9⋯.jpg (251.96 KB,1202x711,1202:711,Final_YouGov_Voice_referen….jpg)

>>19699247

Australians to reject Indigenous Voice in referendum - final YouGov poll

Praveen Menon - October 12, 2023

SYDNEY, Oct 12 (Reuters) - Australians are set to overwhelmingly say 'No' to a proposal to constitutionally recognise the country's Indigenous people in a referendum on Saturday, one of the final opinion polls ahead of the vote showed.

Australians have to vote 'Yes' or 'No' to a question asking whether they agree to alter the 122-year-old constitution to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island people, and create a body, called the Voice to Parliament, that can provide advice to the government.

More than 4 million people have already cast their ballot after early voting began on Oct. 2.

With less than two days to go before voting day on Oct. 14, those opposed to the proposal lead the 'Yes' camp by 56% to 38%, according to the final poll by YouGov published on Thursday. Some 6% of those polled were undecided. Yougov polled 1,519 voters for the survey.

"Our final poll indicates a sweeping ‘No’ victory – with nearing six in 10 voters intending to cast a ‘No’ vote," said Amir Daftari, YouGov Director of Polling and Academic research.

"Our detailed analysis indicates that it is very unlikely that 'Yes' will win anywhere apart from a number of inner metropolitan seats.”

'Yes' leads among the young while older voters overwhelmingly favour 'No', the polls found.

Australia's Indigenous citizens, about 3.8% of the country's 26 million population, have inhabited the land for about 60,000 years but are not mentioned in the constitution and track below national averages on most socio-economic measures.

Support for the referendum, the first since voters rejected a 1999 proposal to become a republic, has ebbed over the past few months. Supporters argue the Voice will bring progress for Indigenous Australians, while some opponents say enshrining one group in the constitution would be divisive.

Others against the Voice have described it as tokenism and toothless.

Referendums are difficult to pass in Australia, with only eight referendums being approved since it became a country in 1901.

Constitutional change requires a majority of votes nationwide and in at least four of the six states.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australians-reject-indigenous-voice-referendum-final-yougov-poll-2023-10-12/

https://au.yougov.com/politics/articles/47566-final-yougov-voice-referendum-poll-no-increases-lead-to-18-points

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720215

File: 5e491ea86754aa4⋯.jpg (289.35 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Labor_senator_and_National….jpg)

>>19720209

Voice referendum: Patrick Dodson says nation faces path akin to post-apartheid South Africa if Yes fails

ROSIE LEWIS - OCTOBER 11, 2023

Patrick Dodson says Australia will need to take a path similar to South Africa following the abolishment of apartheid if the voice referendum is voted down and must develop a new way of ascertaining the views of Indigenous people.

The father of reconciliation said he was hopeful an Indigenous voice to parliament would be legislated by the next election, due in 2025, if the Yes vote won while issuing several stark warnings three days out from polling day, including that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people “can’t live in your own country and not be recognised”.

The West Australian senator, who has lost his beard and is still recovering from cancer, gave his only public speech during the voice referendum campaign to the National Press Club on Wednesday.

“If we say No … we’re going to have to look in the mirror and say who the hell are we, what have we done, and now what are we going to do about it?” Senator Dodson said

“The challenge will be for us to try and develop what the South Africans did when they got rid of the apartheid regime. They had to develop these dialogues and scenario planning processes and develop a truth and reconciliation commission in order for that country to try and heal from the woefulness of that apartheid policy and try to go forward.

“We would have to seriously look at getting rid of these notions of consultation and simply bringing some groups together and getting what they want to say. It’s going to be a structured process because the nation is bogged down in division here.”

Senator Dodson acknowledged the Albanese government had committed to implementing the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, which asks for voice, treaty and truth-telling, and would have to consider how to fulfil the second and third requests.

He said it was a challenge for the Australian people as much as the government to determine how the nation heals from any No vote.

“You can’t deny a people whose culture has been here for 60,000 years. If that’s what happens with a No vote, that’s what you’re doing, you’re saying ‘you people have no history here, you have no legitimacy here, you have no right to be here’. That’s an intolerable proposition,” Senator Dodson said.

“We have to change the methodology by how you ascertain the views and interests of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, but also try to decide what scenarios that could be possible for better this service delivery, better participation, better quality of outcomes and greater levels of governance for First Peoples in the way that things get done.”

While polling has consistently shown falling support for the voice during the official campaign, with just a small bounce in some polls, Senator Dodson said he didn’t believe in the polls and was still confident the Yes camp could win over enough voters to succeed.

Peter Dutton cautioned Australians against casting an informal vote “in what is probably the most important ballot that you’ll cast in your lifetime”, urging people intending to vote No to vote early or on Saturday.

“We can’t afford for complacency to allow the Yes vote to get up, because it’s not in our country’s best interests,” he said.

“This is a new chapter being inserted into our Constitution – the first time ever since federation that’s been proposed. There’s been no constitutional convention, the process to design the voice doesn’t start until after the vote has taken place, again, without precedent.”

Yes23 is targeting Tasmania, South Australia and Western Australia in the final three days of the campaign, telling undecided voters about the consequences of a No vote and pushing the still “significant support” among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

Leading No campaigners Warren Mundine and Jacinta Nampijinpa Price will be in Tasmania, Alice Springs and Sydney before finishing the campaign together in Queensland on Friday and Saturday.

They will talk about the “voice of division”, in messaging that hasn’t changed since day one of the campaign.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/voice-referendum-patrick-dodson-says-nation-faces-path-akin-to-postapartheid-south-africa-if-yes-fails/news-story/d94d2bfbdf0ff9a24f59c8e0da375f32

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720229

File: 11cc42c0f2131e2⋯.jpg (1.22 MB,2784x1856,3:2,Noel_Pearson_wants_people_….jpg)

File: f6cfe2ecf27b4e5⋯.jpg (2.66 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,A_group_of_Yes_campaign_le….jpg)

File: 5a5845a65bc78d0⋯.jpg (462.12 KB,1688x1125,1688:1125,Patrick_Dodson_centre_left….jpg)

>>19720209

Noel Pearson urges voters to consider future generations at last-ditch Yes campaign rally for the Voice

Cason Ho - 12 October 2023

Prominent Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has compared the politicisation of the Voice to Parliament referendum to vandalism, in a last-minute pitch to voters.

Speaking at a Yes event in central Perth today, the co-architect of the Uluru Statement From the Heart attempted to appeal to undecided voters.

"My last pitch, on behalf of this referendum campaign, is to say to those Australians who are undecided, who are still thinking about yes or no - don't slam the door on the children," he said.

"This is not about Noel Pearson or Patrick Dodson, or Jacinta Price or Warren Mundine - we are the past, the children are the future, we're doing this for them."

Australians will vote on Saturday on whether an Indigenous Voice to Parliament should be enshrined in the constitution.

The Voice would be an independent body advising parliament and government about matters affecting the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, but would have no legal power to enforce its recommendations.

Lament for bipartisanship

Mr Pearson equated the politicisation of the referendum to vandalism, stating there was bipartisan support for the Voice in the past.

"We had bipartisanship for so long - It's the political parties and the politicians that have vandalised this," he said.

Despite polls signifying falling support for the Voice would likely lead to a victory for the No campaign in the referendum, Mr Pearson said he still held hope.

"It's not in the hands of the politicians, it's in the hands of the Australian people," he said.

Campaign hurt by 'botched' heritage laws

On the other side of the debate, opponents of the Voice were already considering what they'll do if the referendum doesn't pass.

"If, as expected, Western Australia's verdict is a no, then I'll be calling upon the Cook government to make sure it does respect that verdict, and doesn't take any further steps towards legislating a state Voice to Parliament," WA opposition and Nationals leader Shane Love said.

Mr Love said he believed it was "virtually impossible" for the majority of Western Australians to vote Yes, after confusion over the state's Aboriginal cultural heritage laws bled into the Voice debate.

"I think if it had any chance before the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act, and the botched rollout of it, it was certainly sunk come July when that act was implemented."

Dodson 'not guided by polls'

Speaking outside a voting poll in Broome, Indigenous WA senator Patrick Dodson said he was still confident of a Yes vote at the referendum.

"I'm optimistic that the Australian people will support this referendum. I'm not necessarily guided by the polls, I think the Australian public will decide," he said.

That optimism was shared by former federal Liberal Indigenous affairs minister Ken Wyatt, who also cast his vote today.

"Even walking here this morning, I had people say 'I am voting Yes because I believe in giving Aboriginal people a voice'," he said.

"This is about us asking for our chance to co-design, co-plan, and be involved in decisions that are made about us."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-12/noel-pearson-urges-yes-vote-at-voice-campaign-perth-yes-event/102967826

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720267

File: fe335464de0a5c0⋯.jpg (284.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Yes23_spokesperson_Dean_Pa….jpg)

>>19720209

Defeated voice is a victory for the status quo

DEAN PARKIN - OCTOBER 12, 2023

1/2

In two days, after 15 years of work under seven prime ministers, Australians will vote on a proposal that came from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. We are not putting this proposal to politicians but taking it as a request to the Australian people.

We chose the people over the politicians whose solutions have continuously, tragically, failed despite best intentions. We chose the Australian people because we had – and still have – faith in everyday Australians.

Perhaps it was to be expected that many politicians would seek to retain their powers and campaign for No. The trouble is that the decisions made using those powers have been sending the welfare of our people backwards.

Earlier this week I stood with some of the community leaders in Redfern. Aunty Millie Ingram, a local elder who grew up on a mission in central NSW, talked about how a Yes vote is for all Australians.

“You can come along with us, and all of our future generations of young Australians will grow up in a wonderful and happy country,” she said. “That’s what we want for our young children. I’m sure that’s what you want for your young children. So, let’s do this together.”

Shane Phillips, the Tribal Warrior founder, spoke of the practical benefits of saying Yes. “We were a community that was downtrodden and we were actually imploding as a community for a long time from the scars of dispossession,” he said.

“But we empower ourselves. We found the solution. It was within us. We rebuilt ourselves. We went through healing. We made sure that we took the responsibility back and that is all this voice is about for us.” He explained how a youth program in Redfern led to an 82 per cent drop in robberies across a three-month period. “The media accidentally conditions everyone to look through deficit lenses at us,” he said. “We need to show them there is a strength lens that they can look through now, and if they do that our young ones can launch themselves up again.”

Listening to Shane and Aunty Millie, I reflected on the connection between what they had to say and the sentiments of other Indigenous Australians who have spoken up: the Yolngu people, the Central and Kimberley land councils and dozens of other land councils; and people from Cairns to Yuendumu and Tennant Creek who have shown, from the red centre to the sea, Indigenous Australians want this.

They ask Australians to say Yes because they believe it will bring the country together, empower Indigenous Australians and give us the sense of belonging to modern Australia that every citizen deserves.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720271

File: e9cc9a6d8fc1a5f⋯.jpg (126.41 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Yes_voters_gather_at_a_ral….jpg)

>>19720267

2/2

I often talk about the voice being simple yet profound. The profundity stems from the hope it will deliver to communities – the hope you hear in the words of Aunty Millie and Shane Phillips. The simplicity is in the clear, tightly bound words of the proposed amendment to the Constitution. There are 92 words in the proposed amendment, and I encourage everyone to read them.

As has been attested by the overwhelming majority of legal experts, including former High Court chief justice Robert French just last week, this is a constitutionally safe provision where parliament stays in charge.

A Yes vote will create a non-binding advisory committee protected from opportunistic abolition by a future government. History tells us abolition is the fate of any legislated voice. Every single version of an Indigenous body has been deleted in the past.

A Yes vote gives us the simplest imperative that the federal government have an Indigenous advisory committee.

We must also consider what a No vote will do – precisely nothing. A No vote is not a neutral vote. It is a vote in favour of the status quo, with all its concomitant failures. It is a vote to keep decisions in the hands of politicians, leaving them free to continue making the same mistakes that inevitably arise when people aren’t consulted about decisions that affect them.

Although many politicians undoubtedly come with good intentions, as a group there’s no denying they have proven incapable of delivering meaningful change for Indigenous communities on the ground.

Our positive campaign with its message of hope has had its challenges, particularly in a year in which Australians have struggled making ends meet in a once-in-a-generation cost-of-living crisis.

This weekend, your vote counts. Enough people writing three letters on to a ballot paper will propel Australia a step further along the path of reconciliation. To a future where we get more done for Indigenous people, together. We have faith that Australians know Yes is the right response to the invitation of Indigenous Australians on this question, and that is the answer they will give.

Dean Parkin is the director of the Yes23 campaign.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/defeated-voice-is-a-victory-for-the-status-quo/news-story/a62bb32ac2b50b8268c93c73071ac699

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720280

File: be4551f9b7912a9⋯.jpg (268.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_AEC_has_warned_people_….jpg)

File: 639fe4c4a34d1a1⋯.jpg (170.14 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_volunteer_wearing_a_Vote….jpg)

>>19720209

Keep clothing neutral or face vote ban: AEC

JAMES DOWLING - OCTOBER 12, 2023

The Australian Electoral Commission has urged voters not to wear any clothing that could be construed as campaign material as they go to vote in the voice referendum.

“The rules surrounding what people can or cannot wear into a polling place in a referendum are the same as for elections,” a statement from the AEC reads.

“Campaigning is not allowed inside the polling place or within six metres of the entrance.

“Our staff will take a commonsense approach to conversations with voters regarding these matters – to either cover up or to make sure people behave appropriately when inside the polling place.

“We have a temporary workforce of approximately 100,000 people who are everyday members of the community doing their best to facilitate a positive voting experience for Australians. Please be kind.”

Voters can still wear campaign merchandise, but the trouble comes if they can be seen obviously spruiking for a particular vote, or even indicating towards the polling place.

Due to the specificity of policy, the AEC has advised voters avoid the paraphernalia entirely, at least while you’re inside and voting.

“The AEC understands that passions are often high around referendum events, and people want to proudly display their voting intentions – either way – when coming to vote. Please don’t fall foul of the law,” the statement appeals.

“Simply wear or display campaign material outside the polling place instead.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/keep-clothing-neutral-or-face-vote-ban-aec/news-story/57491a961d312e01d6a9f69fa0f7e8ff

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720294

File: e849c30babbc5ba⋯.jpg (412.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_at_Melbou….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

Anthony Albanese reaches out to Jewish community following terror attack

JOE KELLY and BEN PACKHAM - OCTOBER 12, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese has declared that anti-Semitism and hateful prejudice have “no place in ­Australia” and announced plans to evacuate hundreds of Australians from Israel on special government-organised flights from ­Friday after the Jewish homeland was attacked by Hamas terrorists in Gaza.

The Prime Minister met members of the Jewish community on Wednesday evening, addressing the St Kilda Hebrew Congregation in Melbourne following harsh criticism his government’s response was too soft on the pro-Palestine protests at the Sydney Opera House on Monday night where the Israeli flag was burned and anti-Semitic slogans were chanted.

With Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowing a war of ­retaliation on Hamas and amid reports that 40 babies were slaughtered in a massacre at the kibbutz of Kfar Aza, Mr Albanese said his government would begin “the assisted departure of Australians who want to leave Israel” after 66-year-old grandmother, Galit Carbone, was revealed to be the first Australian citizen killed in the attack.

“Many of you will fear a rise in anti-Semitism here at home,” Mr Albanese said. “I want to assure you, that kind of hateful prejudice has no place in Australia. Our country is better than that – and our country is a better place because of you and your community. And my government is committed to keeping the community safe.

“Over thousands of years, Jewish people have summoned tremendous courage and resilience in the face of trauma. It must feel almost unbearable to have to draw on those strengths again. But I want to say very clearly: you are not alone.”

The synagogue visit is believed to be the first significant contact Mr Albanese has had with senior members of the Jewish community since Saturday’s attack on Israel. On Wednesday evening, Mr Albanese was yet to speak to Mr Netanyahu although it’s understood the Prime Minister’s office requested a call on the weekend.

Labor frontbenchers including Tanya Plibersek and Clare O’Neil strongly denounced pro-Palestinian protests in Australia, a day after senior western Sydney Labor MPs came under pressure for failing to full-throatedly condemn local anti-­Israel preachers.

Ms O’Neil, the Home Affairs Minister, revealed she had triggered a national co-ordination mechanism in response to the unfolding conflict between Israel and Palestine, bringing together relevant agencies to co-ordinate the federal government’s response.

She said the national co-­ordination mechanism had “not been triggered to an event like this ­before,” as Israel declared it was ­releasing “all restraints” on its combat troops ahead of a massive ground offensive on the Gaza Strip.

With Joe Biden condemning the “pure, unadulterated evil” unleashed by Hamas terrorists on the Jewish State, Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said the nation would soon extract vengeance on the Hamas terrorist group for its brutal attack that has killed at least 1200 people. “Whoever comes to decapitate, murder women, Holocaust survivors – we will eliminate him at the height of our power and without compromise,” Mr Gallant told soldiers.

Pope Francis on Wednesday night called for the immediate ­release of hostages held by Hamas in Gaza and expressed his concern for the Palestinians in the enclave.

Ms O’Neil will meet Jewish leaders and security experts on Thursday alongside Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus to discuss what further steps the commonwealth could take to provide support to the Jewish community in Australia. She urged people not to attend any further protests that sought to celebrate or justify the attacks on Israel, arguing there were “real concerns that people in the Jewish community hold about the safety of their children and the safety of their homes and the safety of their synagogues”.

Former Labor deputy leader, Ms Plibersek branded the attacks by Hamas as abhorrent and urged Australians to “behave appropriately, de-escalate any violence here, respect the law”. “It is important to say there is no place for hatred or vilification or any sort of threats here in Australia,” she said.

However, Ms Pilbersek’s office also confirmed that part-time electorate staffer Will Simmons had attended the pro-Palestine rally on Monday, despite Mr Albanese urging people not to attend.

It is understood Mr Simmons left before any of the scenes at the Opera House steps and was not part of any of the incidents. There is also no suggestion of wrongdoing on the part of Mr Simmons, with a spokeswoman for Ms Plibersek saying the minister found out after the event and called Mr Simmons as soon as she found out.

“He knows this is absolutely unacceptable – he should never have been there,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720298

File: 612b7c243835be4⋯.jpg (334.09 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_belatedly….jpg)

>>19720294

2/2

Responding to criticism from Peter Dutton that it was “unbelievable” the government had not yet convened a national ­security committee meeting in response to the events in the Middle East, Mr Albanese declared the issue was not a “political game”.

“We don’t foreshadow when NSC meets,” the Prime Minister said. “We don’t produce the minutes of NSC. That’s the way that national security, diplomacy and intelligence should operate. These are serious issues … And quite frankly, I don’t intend to hold press conferences and ­announce intelligence briefings.”

Members of the Jewish ­community told The Australian they were astounded the Prime Minister had not called a ­meeting of cabinet’s national security committee following the attack, amid fears for the safety of the more than 10,000 Australians in Israel.

As the Israeli death toll passed 1200, one senior member of the community said the Prime Minister’s lack of contact was consistent with Labor’s recent hardening of its position on Israel, which declared the West Bank and Gaza as “occupied Palestinian territories” and Israeli settlements as ­“illegal”.

Mr Albanese said Australians who wanted to leave Israel on ­assisted departure flights must register with the government’s 24-hour consular emergency centre.

“There will be two flights to begin with and we are working on additional options,” he said.

The flights will be made available by Qantas from Friday and take passengers from Ben Gurion Airport in Israel to London and will be operated free of charge. As of Wednesday evening, about 800 Australians had registered with the consular emergency centre.

Qantas said it had put in place the arrangements following a request from the Australian government and it was expected that a Boeing 787 Dreamliner would operate from Tel Aviv in the coming days.

Federal Greens leader Adam Bandt condemned anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in a statement, after the NSW Greens opposed a parliamentary motion condemning the attacks by Hamas.

As the ACT Greens endorsed a pro-Palestine rally scheduled for Canberra on Friday, NSW Greens upper house members opposed a motion from Labor’s Bob Nanva to support Israel.

The Greens attempted to amend the motion to express support for “Palestinians bombed by Israel” and denounce the “Palestinian occupation”.

Mr Bandt, when forced to clarify the party’s position, ­declared the conflict had brought “pain and grief to so many, and there is no place to worsen that through hateful and violent racism and bigotry, including anti-Semitism and Islamophobia”.

“For there to be a lasting peace there must be an end to the State of Israel‘s illegal occupation of the Palestinian territories,” Mr Bandt said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-reaches-out-to-jewish-community-following-terror-attack/news-story/0bf294ea180b9de9df31b06fa092f53c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720309

File: 91aaa9599b1593f⋯.jpg (276.27 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Few_images_are_as_powerful….jpg)

File: 70e80f688b94813⋯.jpg (1.05 MB,2496x1662,416:277,Yang_Hengjun_has_spent_fou….jpg)

>>19712663

Cheng Lei’s release is a remarkable feat of diplomacy

Eryk Bagshaw - October 11, 2023

Three years was three years too long for Cheng Lei.

Three years of missed sunshine, three years of missed birthdays, three years without her children, now aged 12 and 14, who moved between primary and high school while she imagined what trees looked like in her three-metre cell.

But it was a remarkable feat of diplomacy from the Department of Foreign Affairs negotiators and two Australian governments to extract the 48-year-old Melbourne mother of two from the world’s greatest exponent of arbitrary detention in that span of time.

Just ask Taiwanese businessman Lee Meng-chu, who spent four years in jail for taking photos of police. Or Hideji Suzuki, the Japanese exchange leader who was bundled into a van and imprisoned for six years.

Or Australia’s Yang Hengjun, a writer and critic of the Chinese government who remains in a Beijing prison four years after he was arrested, unaware of the charges against him.

Delay, delay, delay. Cheng’s sentencing was delayed more than six times after her trial. The Chinese system is built around playing for time to either extract a confession or a concession from a foreign government. In Cheng’s case, neither appears to have come.

By Wednesday morning, China expelled Cheng after handing down a sentence of two years and 11 months for “illegally providing state secrets to a foreign country” and taking into account the time already served.

“The judicial processes were completed,” Albanese said after announcing Cheng had arrived back in Melbourne to hold her family again, while providing little indication of the enormous effort undertaken to secure her freedom.

Cheng’s release followed years of diplomacy in Beijing from Australia’s diplomats, messages from Cheng dictated to officials, a combination of quiet diplomacy from embassy officials and a public campaign by her partner Nick Coyle.

They worked together, keeping public pressure on China through the media while not pushing too far and making her volatile situation worse.

Cheng was released despite two daunting obstacles: she was born in China and the Australian government had limited hard leverage to use in her release.

Australia had no Meng Wenzhou, the Huawei chief financial officer released by Canada to secure the release of Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor after three years in Chinese jails.

That left Australian officials, foreign ministers, trade ministers and prime ministers imploring their Chinese counterparts to do the right thing, while hoping that the time would come when China’s use of Cheng as a diplomatic pawn would no longer be in the nation’s interests.

The inflection point came when the Albanese government was elected last year.

The Coalition government had weathered $20 billion in trade strikes, but with a new government in Canberra and no policy concessions from Australia, the position of rolling hostility became counterproductive for Beijing.

It drove up the cost of coal, limited markets for investors and gave the impression that China was a bully.

Albanese now has a much-needed foreign policy win that he can claim through both persistence and circumstance. Within weeks, he will travel to Beijing. If the Voice to parliament referendum is defeated on Saturday, it will function as a reset.

Albanese will be able to say that two of his major goals have been achieved: China’s trade sanctions have been mostly lifted, and Cheng Lei has been released from jail. He has one more goal: Yang, the Australian writer and father, remains behind bars and his health is deteriorating.

Few images are as powerful as an Australian returning to their children after years stuck in a Chinese jail cell.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/cheng-lei-s-release-is-a-remarkable-feat-of-diplomacy-20231011-p5ebkj.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720316

File: 154dc6cd39429ac⋯.jpg (73.53 KB,1200x720,5:3,Cheng_Lei_an_Australian_na….jpg)

>>19712663

Australian TV anchor Cheng Lei deported by Chinese state security authorities after serving sentence

GT staff reporters - Oct 11, 2023

Cheng Lei, an Australian national, who had worked for a Chinese media outlet, was deported from China, after serving a sentence of two years and 11 months for illegally providing state secrets to a foreign agency, China's Ministry of State Security announced on Wednesday.

Cheng was born in June 1975, and was originally employed at a Chinese media outlet. In May 2020, Cheng was lured by a member from an overseas organization. In violation of the confidentiality agreement signed with her employer, she illegally provided the foreign organization the state secrets that she grasped during her work using her mobile phone, the ministry said.

In August 2020, Beijing State Security Bureau took criminal measures against Cheng after an investigation. Cheng confessed the facts of the crime, and voluntarily pleaded guilty. The No.2 Intermediate People's Court of Beijing, through trial, sentenced Cheng to an imprisonment of two years and 11 months, plus deportation. Cheng did not appeal, according to the authorities.

The Chinese judiciary have made judgments lawfully, and fully guaranteed the rights of the parties concerned in accordance with the law, respecting and implementing the consular rights of the Australian side, including consular visits and notifications, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said on Wednesday.

The No.2 Intermediate People's Court of Beijing sentenced Cheng to two years and eleven months in prison and deportation for illegally providing state secrets overseas. Cheng was deported by the Beijing State Security Bureau after finishing her sentence in accordance with the law, said Wang.

When asked if Cheng's case will help better China-Australia ties, Wang said that China's stance on China-Australia ties has been consistent. Healthy and stable bilateral relations are in accordance with the interests of both countries and both peoples, as well as regional and global stability. China is willing to work with Australia to push for the continuous improvement of bilateral ties, Wang noted.

Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center at East China Normal University told the Global Times on Wednesday that the Chinese judiciary authorities have followed legal procedure in this case, and Western media should not make a fuss over the matter as anyone who violates Chinese laws will be dealt with accordingly, whatever his or her nationality is.

The case should not be directly linked to the improvement of China-Australia relations, Chen said, as the matter is not a "transactional deal" for mending ties, and the improvement of bilateral relations should not be based on individual events, as such a foundation would certainly not be stable. Nevertheless, Cheng's case serves as a "constructive signal" for China-Australia relations.

China and Australia should not only maintain the steady and positive momentum of bilateral relations, but also go beyond stabilization to promote a continuous improvement and development of ties, as relations are at an important moment for a new start, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said at the Asia Briefing LIVE 2023 Organized by the Asia Society Australia in Melbourne on Wednesday.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202310/1299642.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720328

File: 6ad2b67be681c4b⋯.jpg (55.3 KB,586x600,293:300,Foreign_Ministry_Spokesper….jpg)

>>19712663

>>19720316

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference on October 11, 2023

The Wall Street Journal: The Australian Prime Minister announced that Australian journalist Cheng Lei had returned home to Australia after three years in prison in China. Could you clarify whether she was sentenced, why she was released now and any discussions between the Australian government and the Chinese government over this issue?

Wang Wenbin: Relevant Chinese authorities have released the information on this, which you may refer to. After a trial, the Beijing No.2 Intermediate People’s Court sentenced Cheng Lei to two years and 11 months of imprisonment and deportation for illegally providing state secrets to an overseas party. After serving her sentence, Cheng Lei was deported out of the country by the Beijing Municipal State Security Bureau in accordance with the law. 

I would like to stress that China’s judicial authorities tried the case and delivered the sentence in accordance with the law. The rights of the individual concerned under the law were fully protected, and Australia’s consular rights including the right to visit and the right to be notified were respected and implemented.

…..

The Wall Street Journal: From a diplomatic perspective, the Cheng Lei case has been a major source of tension between China and Australia for three years now. Is it China’s hope that with this case now resolved there’s an opportunity for better relations between Australia and China going forward?

Wang Wenbin: China’s position on the growth of China-Australia relations is consistent and clear. A sound and stable China-Australia relationship is in the interest of both countries and peoples. It is also conducive to peace and stability of the region and beyond. China stands ready to work with Australia to continue to improve and grow the bilateral relationship and bring more benefits to the two peoples.

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/202310/t20231011_11159390.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720340

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19712663

>>19720316

Cheng Lei was deported in accordance with the law after completing her sentence.

SpokespersonCHN发言人办公室

'Oct 12, 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnryf-kKaUE

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720351

File: a5459ae179dc30e⋯.jpg (93.12 KB,1009x673,1009:673,Chinese_Ambassador_to_Aust….jpg)

Chinese envoy eyes new start of China-Australia ties

Xinhua - 2023-10-11

MELBOURNE, Australia, Oct. 11 (Xinhua) - China and Australia should not only maintain the steady and positive momentum of bilateral relations, but also go beyond stabilization to promote the continuous improvement and development, as the relations are at an important moment for a new start, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said on Wednesday.

Xiao made the remarks at the Asia Briefing LIVE 2023 Organized by Asia Society Australia in Melbourne.

Xiao said last year was a year of stability for China-Australia relations. This year is a year of exchanges, dialogue and improvement for China and Australia, said the ambassador, noting that the two countries have seen exchanges and visits in various fields and at various levels, and made positive progress in bilateral ties in 2023.

For the future of China-Australia relations, he shared three expectations.

First, mutual understanding. "China regards Australia as a friend. There is no reason for Australia to see China as a threat," the Chinese ambassador told the audience.

Second, expansion of practical cooperation. China is Australia's largest trading partner. The practical cooperation between China and Australia has benefited the two peoples, and the mutually beneficial cooperation also enjoys a promising prospect, Xiao said.

Third, proper handling of differences. The Chinese envoy called on to focus on cooperation, manage differences on the basis of mutual respect, and promote the further improvement and development of bilateral relations, rather than let differences hinder the pace of cooperation.

https://english.news.cn/20231011/ceab0435f0c8482e9892d1446d183103/c.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720377

File: 80f72db6d663be2⋯.jpg (186.34 KB,1450x816,725:408,Scott_Morrison_addresses_t….jpg)

File: fe12affb3292b61⋯.jpg (476.56 KB,825x817,825:817,TIW_2.jpg)

File: 618e1fd6503df72⋯.jpg (119.33 KB,1193x760,1193:760,F8IoZRkbsAAywcF.jpg)

File: fc4ff9e79465fa9⋯.jpg (264.62 KB,1743x1053,581:351,F8IoZRtbQAAzxgb.jpg)

File: afd2aafcfde2484⋯.jpg (319.41 KB,1895x1057,1895:1057,F8IoZRpaAAAdYrZ.jpg)

>>19587772

Quad must engage with Taiwan, says Scott Morrison

WILL GLASGOW - OCTOBER 12, 2023

Scott Morrison has called for Australia to update its “One China” policy to strengthen security ties with Taiwan – including through the Quad – in response to rising aggression from Beijing that threatens to upend the inter­national order.

In an address in Taipei on Wednesday evening, the former prime minister said “no other place on the planet” was more central to “ the cause of liberty and democracy” than Taiwan.

“When my government took the decision for Australia to swiftly provide lethal support to assist Ukraine … this was as much a decision to support Ukraine, as it was to demonstrate our alignment with a global Western resolve to resist the aggression of authoritarianism, especially given the tacit endorsement of the invasion by Beijing. I was as concerned about Beijing as I was about Moscow.”

Mr Morrison said Australian and other liberal democracies needed to push back on Xi Jinping’s claims over Taiwan: “One can reasonably ask, if Taiwan, then what and who is next?”

He said a conflict in Taiwan would cause a “severe global economic depression” and “if the PRC were to forcefully occupy Taiwan, this would enable the PRC to project well beyond the first island chain, radically altering the security environment within the Indo-Pacific.”

Since Gough Whitlam switched diplomatic recognition to Beijing in 1972, Australia has had only unofficial ties with Taiwan. Ahead of the trip, China’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, said Mr Morrison’s trip would have a “negative effect”.

Mr Morrison on Wednesday said Beijing had continually tried to “verbal” Australia’s “One China” policy.

“So let me be clear about what it is, and what it isn’t. In recognising the People’s Republic of China in 1972, Australia’s One China policy acknowledged that the PRC had claims over Taiwan, however it did not recognise the legitimacy of those claims, either way, on behalf of any party.

“Taiwan’s ultimate status was to be resolved peacefully … The status of Taiwan is deliberately ambiguous, and remains so.”

From the West’s perspective, he said, “this status quo is anchored in preventing conflict, ensuring respect for the autonomy of the people of Taiwan and the maintenance of a strategic balance within the Indo-Pacific ­region that favours peace, stability and prosperity.

“Our challenge is how we now protect this balance in a vastly altered geopolitical environment to the one in which our One China policy settings were first established 50 years ago.

“This requires a critical appraisal of diplomatic, economic and security policy settings, within the context of preserving the status quo.”

He said it was crucial Taiwan was allowed to more fully engage with the international community, in ways that did not cross the “threshold of national statehood”, by including it in groups such as the CPTPP trade pact, Interpol, the WHO, the International Civil Aviation Organisation and other UN forums.

He also said the Quad should look to engage with Taiwan. “China’s economic rise has been deliberately used to establish a capability to forcibly bring Taiwan under Beijing’s control … Whether the PRC chooses to exercise this capability is another matter.

“This is the subject of a more extensive calculus, which we must work constantly to ensure can never add up. This is achievable. As Ukraine demonstrates, but also Iraq and Afghanistan, wars can be started but they cannot be easily concluded, nor their purposes durably accomplished.”

In an interview with The Australian in Taipei, Mr Morrison said Taiwan was “not specifically” the impetus for his decision to pursue nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS security group but it was “part of the mix.”

He said engagement with Taiwan through the Quad could cover “security issues”, along with supply chain resilience and dis­aster prevention.

He said his government had already been “setting down this path” of expanding Australia’s co-operation with Taiwan and his speech was “not an attempt to be confrontational but an attempt to evolve a setting to make it ­durable.”

“Of course [Beijing] will resist it. But if you don’t stand on that point of resistance, then it will fall. This is what happened in the South China Sea. They will keep pushing forward and forward and forward until someone says no,” he told The Australian.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/quad-must-engage-with-taiwan-says-scott-morrison/news-story/fe8fd3d094df21cb554f0c52246cd0ba

https://twitter.com/iingwen/status/1711975257555468712

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19720463

File: a94655a8b582414⋯.jpg (1.04 MB,825x2038,825:2038,VRG_114.jpg)

File: 2c803ccba687b91⋯.jpg (279.82 KB,1536x2048,3:4,F8Nffvma4AAEOSs.jpg)

File: ed58d0c0c5a3c90⋯.jpg (173.15 KB,852x376,213:94,Q_4923.jpg)

Virginia Giuffre Tweet

There are so many more people involved in the #EpsteinClientList that haven’t been penalised & most likely never will be. Even though I have named some of the participants publicly to help fill in the gaps for you smart people who can read between the lines & also I have named privately -( for the safety of my family) -to the authorities to be made aware of those who participated in the sex trafficking of minors & women including some of the upmost respected and influential members of society. The current laws prevent me from holding every single MF accountable and when I do speak out I end up in a lawsuit that forces me to face some of the worst memories and having the perpetrators in the same room with me, scowling at me, it still haunts me to this very day. I wish I could do so much more but I got so lost trying so hard to get justice for me and so many other victims that I confused my priorities, which #1 is being a mom & a wife. Now I realise I need to take a step back, take a few breaths and find my inner strength again. Hoping one day I’ll find peace.

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1712317291248169006

Q Post #4923

Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624

Dearest Virginia -

We stand with you.

Now and always.

Find peace through prayer.

Never give up the good fight.

God bless you.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4923

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19728711

File: 672346a1601292d⋯.jpg (180.4 KB,1920x1080,16:9,ABC_s_Middle_East_correspo….jpg)

File: aa36c3a6d616ddb⋯.jpg (105.54 KB,768x1024,3:4,Recreated_WhatsApp_groupch….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

ABC Middle East correspondent Tom Joyner labels stories about babies being beheaded in Israel ‘bullshit’

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - OCTOBER 13, 2023

The ABC’s Middle Eastern correspondent Tom Joyner has labelled reports about babies being beheaded by Hamas terrorists in ­Israel as “bullshit” during a fiery exchange in a WhatsApp group with hundreds of international journalists and broadcasters.

Joyner, who is reporting on the conflict between Israel and Pales­tine, told a WhatsApp chat group on Tuesday – in now-deleted comments – he did not believe stories being reported around the world about babies being beheaded were true.

“The story about the babies is bullshit,” he posted to the large group of media representatives sharing information about the attacks in Israel by Hamas terrorists.

WhatsApp messages posted by Joyner, seen by The Australian, were met with condemnation from many members of the media who are part of the chat group set up shortly after the conflict in Israel began at the weekend.

One group member responded to Joyner’s “bullshit” comment with “Care to retract this now?”

Joyner immediately replied, telling the group he was sorry for his remarks.

“I’m sorry about the wording – I regret that. But we still have not seen clear evidence,” he wrote on WhatsApp.

“Why hasn’t there been anything unequivocal from the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) or from Netanyahu.”

Many reports, including from i24News correspondent Nicole Zedek who is in Tel Aviv, told of first-hand testimony from soldiers about the beheadings.

“Some soldiers say they found babies with their heads cut off, entire families gunned down in their beds,” she said.

“About 40 babies and young children have been taken out on gurneys – so far.”’

Zedek also said in a TV interview that soldiers had told of the atrocities they had witnessed.

“As I was speaking to some of the soldiers, one of the deputy commanders who was first on the scene to arrive to this massacre on Saturday, he said that with his own eyes he witnessed children with their heads cut off by these masked terrorists,” Zedek said.

In the WhatsApp messages shared among international media representatives, Joyner was quickly met with condemnation by journalists reporting on the war in Israel.

“Why are you picking this hill to be humiliated on?”, one person wrote.

Another also replied to Joyner’s comments and said: “The PMO (Prime Minister’s Office) confirmed it, there are numerous eyewitness testimonies from the field and (US President Joe) Biden just confirmed seeing evidence to support it.

“What more would you like?

“Do you need to be taken to a morgue and open body bags yourself? Shame on you.”

Another journalist also replied: “There have been multiple people here, myself included, saying they have spoken to eyewitnesses about decapitations.”

Joyner, who has been posting numerous pictures on his Instagram account from Israel, has produced multiple stories on the events unfolding in Israel.

When he was contacted by The Australian on Thursday, he did not respond.

Mr Biden told Jewish leaders that he had seen “confirmed pictures of terrorists beheading children” in southern Israel, although these remarks were later clarified to say that neither Mr Biden nor US officials had seen actual images.

On Friday, Israel confirmed reports of babies being burnt and decapitated in Hamas’s assault on the Kfar Aza kibbutz and that photos were shown to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken during his visit to Israel on Thursday by the Public Diplomacy Directorate in the Prime Minister’s Office. Tal Heinrich, spokesman for the Israel leader, also confirmed the brutality.

“Toddlers, babies heads were cut off,” he said.

Later in the day, the photographs were published by Benjamin Netanyahu’s office on X. The Israeli leader’s account said he showed Mr Blinken “photos of babies murdered and burned by the Hamas monsters”.

Graphic messages have also been shared about the South First Responders – the first group of responders in Gaza – and this included one image of a young child burned alive in a home.

The ABC was also asked questions about the matter but would not comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/abc-middle-east-correspondent-tom-joyner-labels-stories-about-babies-being-beheaded-in-israel-bullshit/news-story/c0a2473df1ef6054e5b2be2b936867a5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19728751

File: 40b17c76a24c699⋯.jpg (161.53 KB,1280x720,16:9,ABC_Middle_Eastern_corresp….jpg)

File: 740f701591b696e⋯.jpg (176.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Jeremy_Leibler_has_written….jpg)

File: e377213fa0a1425⋯.jpg (133.48 KB,825x328,825:328,TJ_1.jpg)

File: 531f137a8368e9d⋯.jpg (181.99 KB,825x462,25:14,TJ_2.jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

>>19728711

Jewish leaders urge ABC to stand down Tom Joyner over ‘bullshit’ comments about babies being beheaded

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - OCTOBER 13, 2023

The ABC is facing pressure from Jewish leaders to stand down Middle Eastern correspondent Tom Joyner from reporting on the war in Israel after he labelled reports about babies being beheaded by Hamas terrorists as “bullshit” in a WhatsApp group with international media.

The Zionist Federation of Australia’s president Jeremy Leibler has written to the ABC’s director of news Justin Stevens on Friday in a letter outlining that he was left “stunned and appalled” by Joyner’s remarks that “Jewish babies being beheaded and burnt to death in Israel are ‘bullshit’.”

It comes after The Australian revealed Joyner had been met with condemnation over his controversial remarks made to members of the international media.

Late on Friday the ABC said management had spoken to Joyner and in a response to Leiber said he “expressed his remorse”

“Tom recognised the language of his comment was inappropriate and apologised to the group,” the ABC said.

On Friday, Israel confirmed that the reports of babies being burnt and decapitated in Hamas’s assault on the Kfar Aza kibbutz and photographs were also shown to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken during his visit to Israel on Thursday by the Public Diplomacy Directorate in the Prime Minister’s Office.

In Mr Leibler’s letter, seen by The Australian, he described Joyner’s comments in the WhatsApp group with more than 600 journalists who are reporting on the atrocities in Israel were based on “unfounded scepticism and refusal to report on these crimes that forced the public release today of photographic evidence of charred and mutilated children.”

“He was immediately and rightly condemned by the other journalists to whom he made the comment,” Mr Leibler said in the letter.

“He must now promptly be denounced and disciplined by the ABC.”

He has asked that Joyner no longer report on the attacks in Israel by Hamas terrorists.

“I respectfully urge you immediately to stand down Mr Joyner as the ABC’s Middle East Correspondent,” he said.

“His continued position is untenable.”

After Joyner posted his comment in the WhatsApp group on Tuesday – which has now been deleted – he was met with condemnation with other members of the international media.

“Why are you picking this hill to be humiliated on?”, one person wrote.

Another journalist replied and said: “The PMO (Prime Minister’s Office) confirmed it, there are numerous eyewitness testimonies from the field and (US President Joe) Biden just confirmed seeing evidence to support it.

“What more would you like?

“Do you need to be taken to a morgue and open body bags yourself? Shame on you.”

Another journalist also said: “There have been multiple people here, myself included, saying they have spoken to eyewitnesses about decapitations.”

Joyner replied to his initial comments refuting the stories about the babies and wrote, “I’m sorry about the wording – I regret that. But we still have not seen clear evidence.

“Why hasn’t there been anything unequivocal from the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) or from Netanyahu.”

The Australia Israel and Jewish Affairs Council’s executive director Dr Colin Rubenstein said the ABC should investigate Joyner’s conduct.

“We were shocked by Tom Joyner’s insensitivity and unprofessional remarks, and it would be entirely appropriate for the ABC to investigate the matter,” he said.

3AW broadcaster Neil Mitchell said on this program on Friday that Joyner “needs to be taken out of that area (the Middle East) immediately by the ABC … they are dead babies.”

“That sort of language make it into a vile debating point,” Mitchell said.

“Pull him out now for his own sake.”

In 2021, Joyner posted on social media that he had a great time in Gaza that is run by Hamas terrorists.

“It’s been a really life-changing experience over the last few days,” he wrote.

“The people in Gaza are strong and generous … can’t wait to go back.”

He also said in 2021 on X, formerly Twitter, that he would stop using the word “clashes” after a pro-Palestinian group complained.

Joyner was contacted about the matter multiple times but did not respond.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/jewish-leaders-urge-abc-to-stand-down-tom-joyner-over-bullshit-comments-about-babies-being-beheaded/news-story/eca36cd410c5edb5dda1b79ca04a30b7

https://twitter.com/tomrjoyner/status/1389938777834115077

https://twitter.com/tomrjoyner/status/1391857719087411203

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19728776

File: 6f971e0a128af63⋯.jpg (783.32 KB,2560x1440,16:9,Israeli_forces_extract_dea….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

>>19728711

Israeli official says government cannot confirm babies were beheaded in Hamas attack

Matthew Chance, Richard Allen Greene and Joshua Berlinger - October 12, 2023

Jerusalem (CNN) - The Israeli government has not confirmed the specific claim that Hamas attackers cut off the heads of babies during their shock attack on Saturday, an Israeli official told CNN, contradicting a previous public statement by the Prime Minister’s office.

“There have been cases of Hamas militants carrying out beheadings and other ISIS-style atrocities. However, we cannot confirm if the victims were men or women, soldiers or civilians, adults or children,” the official said.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indicated that people had been beheaded by Hamas in an appearance beside Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Thursday, but did not specify if they were children.

His office later released what it described as “horrifying photos of babies murdered and burned by the Hamas monsters.”

The three photos showed two babies whose bodies had been burned beyond recognition and a third infant’s bloodstained body.

The post said that Netanyahu showed Blinken the photos, as well as others.

The explosive allegations that children had been decapitated at the kibbutz of Kfar Aza emerged Tuesday in Israeli media. Israel Defense Forces later described the scene as a “massacre” in a statement to CNN. Women, children toddlers and the elderly were “brutally butchered in an ISIS way of action,” the IDF said.

Tal Heinrich, a spokeswoman for Netanyahu, said on Wednesday that babies and toddlers had been found with their “heads decapitated” in Kfar Aza.

US President Joe Biden appeared to confirm that information. In a roundtable with Jewish community leaders on Wednesday, he said: “I have been doing this a long time, I never really thought that I would see… have confirmed pictures of terrorist beheading children.”

A US administration official later clarified Biden’s remarks, telling CNN that neither Biden nor his aides had seen pictures or had received confirmed reports of children or infants having been beheaded by Hamas. The official clarified that Biden was referring to public comments from media outlets and Israeli officials.

An IDF spokesman, Jonathan Conricus, later in the day said terrorists had likely carried out decapitations of babies in the Be’eri kibbutz.

“We got very very disturbing reports that came from the ground that there were babies that had been beheaded… I think we can now say with relative confidence that unfortunately this is what happened in Be’eri,” he said.

Israeli officials initially avoided discussing the specifics of how its citizens were killed. They instead likened Hamas’ brutality to that of ISIS, the Sunni terror group that beheaded captives and burned prisoners alive.

Hamas on Wednesday denied the allegations. Izzat al-Risheq, a senior official and spokesperson for the Islamist militant group, said that the international media had “spread lies about our Palestinian people and the resistance claiming that members of the Palestinian resistance beheaded children and attacked women with no evidence to support such claims and lies.”

Al-Risheq’s claim that Hamas did not attack women is demonstrably false. Women, children and the elderly at kibbutzim like Kfar Aza and Be’eri and were killed during the surprise attack. Videos posted online verified by CNN show women who were attending the music festival targeted by the group’s gunmen being kidnapped.

CNN has pored through hundreds of hours of media posted online attempting to corroborate accounts of atrocities committed by Hamas. In one video, which CNN determined to be authentic but has not been able to geolocate, an assailant attacks an injured man with a garden tool in an attempt to behead him. But CNN has not seen anything that would appear to confirm the claims of decapitated children.

CNN also visited the ransacked ruins of Kfar Aza on Tuesday and saw no evidence of beheaded youths. Israeli officials have not released any photographs of the incident either.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/12/middleeast/israel-hamas-beheading-claims-intl/index.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19728831

File: 7dbeba90333316a⋯.jpg (345.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Thousands_of_people_across….jpg)

File: b633318aea15007⋯.jpg (280.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_rallies_come_as_Israel….jpg)

File: 2bef6eddb3b84c3⋯.jpg (332.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Dozens_of_Palestinian_flag….jpg)

File: a96d1eac765aefb⋯.jpg (352.8 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Canberran_protesters_have_….jpg)

File: 7151a8bda0afabb⋯.jpg (410.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Protesters_of_all_ages_sho….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

Huge crowds attend pro-Palestinian rallies in Canberra, Brisbane and Perth

Hundreds of Australians have gathered in major cities to show their support for Palestinians caught up in the conflict with Israel.

Eli Green - October 13, 2023

Hundreds of Pro-Palestinian protesters have begun to gather at rallies across the country as Gaza braces for a ground strike from Israeli forces.

Australians in Canberra, Brisbane and Perth have gathered in support of the heavily-bombarded Palestinians as Israel continues to send warplanes into Gaza in retaliation for attacks from Hamas militants.

Attendees in Canberra were seen peacefully waving flags, as a small group of counter-protestors stood nearby holding signs.

Regarded as Israel’s 9/11, Hamas launched its deadliest attack on the country on Saturday, firing 3500 rockets into the contested territory.

Israel has warned 1.1 million civilians in north Gaza that they have 24 hours to relocate to the south, with its military chief declaring “now is the time for war”.

Protesters at the Canberra rally called on the Australian government to do more to support Palestinians under siege.

One leader wanted the government to “call out Israel’s breaches of international laws, including the fourth Geneva convention and UN resolutions”.

The rallies in Canberra and Brisbane come on the same day that NSW Premier Chris Minns has urged residents of his state not to attend protests planned for this weekend in Sydney.

“Obviously, I’m concerned about the assembly on Sunday,” Mr Minns told the media on Friday.

NSW Police revealed they may use extraordinary powers to search those planning to attend the pro-Palestine protests after a previous rally organised by the same group featured anti-Semitic chants.

“Now, I think it is fair to note that whether that protest was hijacked or there was malevolent intent from the very beginning, it doesn’t matter,” he said.

“The organisers of the protest have proven to the NSW police, the government, people of NSW that they can’t manage a peaceful protest.”

Mr Minns had a grim warning for Sydneysiders if the scenes on Monday were repeated on the weekend.

“That would be ruinous for Sydney‘s sense of cohesion, our multicultural, multi-faith community, we couldn’t have those scenes again and police have got every right to protect and ensure that those scenes aren’t repeated over the weekend,” he said.

https://www.news.com.au/world/middle-east/huge-crowds-attend-propalestinian-rallies-in-canberra-brisbane-and-perth/news-story/983094d2bfc9c8445d147c722de43d4b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19728896

File: 2bb760631bb1c59⋯.jpg (197.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mike_Burgess_says_ASIO_is_….jpg)

File: c7666a15f359305⋯.jpg (248.23 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anti_Israel_protesters_thr….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

ASIO war-of-words violence warning over Israel

BEN PACKHAM - OCTOBER 13, 2023

1/2

The nation’s top domestic security agency has warned of the potential for “opportunistic violence” in Australia following Hamas’s terrorist attack on Israel, calling on “all parties” to refrain from stoking division amid fears domestic extremists could take advantage of community unrest.

As pro-Palestinian groups plan further rallies in coming days, ASIO head Mike Burgess said he had not lifted the national terrorism threat level, but the agency was on alert for indications of planned violence.

“I remain concerned about the potential for opportunistic violence with little or no warning,” the ASIO director-general said.

Mr Burgess said the potential for such violence was distinct from planned attacks, declaring ASIO was well placed to detect threats to security from politically motivated and communal violence.

“In this context, it is important that all parties consider the ­implications for social cohesion when making public statements,” he said. “As I have said previously, words matter. ASIO has seen ­direct connections between ­inflamed language and inflamed community tensions.”

Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council executive director Colin Rubenstein said the warning was “unfortunately all too relevant to the current situation in Australia”, with anti-Israel protests ­forcing heightened security at Jewish schools and community ­institutions.

“Australian multiculturalism is successful because it is built on a foundation of mutual respect and tolerance, which must be re­inforced and reasserted, and there should be firm action against those who brazenly violate Australian laws,” Mr Rubenstein said. “There should be nothing but widespread condemnation of the contemptible savagery shown by Hamas, and of anyone who celebrates it.”

As the death toll in Gaza neared 1200 on Thursday – about the same as the number of Israelis killed in Hamas’s brutal attack on Saturday – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu formed a unity government with members of the opposition. Mr Netanyahu said the arrangement cleared the way for the coming offensive on Gaza, declaring “every Hamas member is a dead man”.

As the fallout continued after Monday’s march through Sydney when protesters burnt the Israeli flag and yelled anti-Semitic chants, a broad coalition of ­Muslim groups voiced their anger at what they said was a “one-sided’’ response to the Israel-Hamas conflict from the Australian government. In a joint statement, they condemned the decision to light up the Sydney Opera House with the colours of the Israeli flag by asking their mosques to project the red, black and green of the Palestinian flag, or fly pro-Palestine banners.

“The people of NSW and the world witnessed the double standards in Australia when it saw the colours of the invading, colonising occupying force – Israel – shining on the symbolic public icon we know as the Sydney Opera House,’’ the statement read.

They said incitement to violence and expressions of hatred ­toward any people should be condemned, but the joint statement opens up a serious threat to the relationship between governments and the Muslim community, which numbers nearly one million people.

The peak Islamic body, the Australian National Imams Council, did not caution its members to stay away from public rallies but said there was no place for hateful slurs and disharmony.

It urged any protesters to display “the best Islamic morals and manners’’ while distinguishing ­between political Zionism, and ­Judaism and the Jewish people, “who deserve our kindness and ­respect as brothers and sisters in humanity”.

Pro-Palestinian rallies are ­slated for Brisbane, Perth and Canberra on Friday evening and Sydney, Melbourne and Adelaide on Sunday. NSW Premier Chris Minns urged people planning to attend the Sydney rally to stay home and warned anyone who incited violence or hatred would be dealt with by the law.

Jewish groups will hold a vigil in Melbourne’s Caulfield Park on Friday afternoon for those killed and taken hostage in the weekend terrorist attack, after being warned by police their security could not be guaranteed if they held the event in the city.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19728901

File: f01609e34516853⋯.jpg (206.06 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Pro_Palestinian_protesters….jpg)

>>19728896

2/2

After Mr Burgess’s warning on Thursday, Labor sources accused Peter Dutton of being among those seeking to sow division, after he called for anti-Israeli ­protesters to be deported if they were not Australian citizens. In an incendiary interview, the Opposition Leader also agreed with 2GB host Ray Hadley that some in the Labor Party “hate Israelis”.

“I think there is certainly that element to it,” Mr Dutton said. “There is also a political element to it as well because people like (cabinet ministers) Chris Bowen, Ed Husic and others will be playing to their electorates. And that I think is shameful because they are giving … encouragement to the kind of conduct that we saw at the Sydney Opera House.”

Mr Dutton later told The ­Australian Anthony ­Albanese needed to discourage further ­rallies like those in Sydney where protesters chanted “Gas the Jews”. “This is a time for strong – not weak – leadership from the Prime Minister and he needs to take the heat out of a difficult situation,” he said.

In the wake of the ugly protests, the Prime Minister visited a Melbourne synagogue on Wednesday night, saying anti-­Semitism and “hateful prejudice” had no place in Australia.

As Israeli jets continued to pound Gaza ahead of an expected ground attack on the Palestinian enclave, Foreign Minister Penny Wong called for both sides of the conflict to protect non-­combatants. “Australia’s consistent position in all contexts is to call for the protection of civilian lives and the observation of international humanitarian law,” Senator Wong said. “That law exists to protect all of us.”

Her comments came as Israel’s top diplomat in Australia said the Hamas attackers who butchered his people had committed crimes against humanity. Writing in The Australian, ambassador Amir Maimon suggests the Gazan people are also culpable, saying the killers “did not originate from the void”.

“They were raised, indoctrinated and conditioned in a milieu where a hatred for Israel is the overarching theme of life under Hamas,” Mr Maimon writes.

“When this war is over, the people of Gaza will have to choose. They will have to choose whether they continue to harbour Hamas, and if they will continue to sacrifice their brothers, sons and husbands for Hamas to squander in pursuit of its sickening, unattainable goal.”

The UN said 340,000 people were now displaced in Gaza, amid ­damage to civilian infrastructure, and an Israeli blockade that has cut off supplies of food, water, electricity and fuel for the densely populated enclave.

Mr Albanese attended one of Australia’s largest mosques in Lakemba in Sydney’s southwest last Friday, a visit that coincided with a national initiative for all mosques to dedicate their Friday sermons to support of the voice referendum. Muslim groups who had sought to draw a parallel between the situation in Palestine and Australia’s Indigenous people said they felt betrayed by the ­government.

The Imams Council’s community relations adviser Ramia Abdo Sultan, who has family trapped in Gaza, said the government's silence on the situation facing civilians there was damaging relations with Muslim Australians. “All that work that ANIC (national imams council) has put in over the past few years to build significant community trust … is slowly withering away because of this issue, the unfairness in the ­response,’’ Ms Sultan said.

“Can we not get a public statement of some sort, state or federal, just to acknowledge the losses ­inside Gaza?”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/asio-warns-of-opportunistic-violence-amid-israelhamas-conflict/news-story/c306496de1956fe3d6ef5e2224efa79f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19728938

File: 3f77f5f7f2dc18b⋯.jpg (283.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Liberal_leader_Peter_Dutto….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

>>19728896

ASIO boss’s call for calm risks stirring the political pot

SIMON BENSON - OCTOBER 13, 2023

ASIO has made an extraordinary intervention into what is an extraordinary situation evolving in Australia.

On the surface, it reflects concerns that another tipping point in the nation’s social cohesion may be approaching.

While it is rare for a director-general of security to so overtly step into the political arena, Mike Burgess clearly feels that he has been forced to do so.

Presumably, the intelligence agency is picking up some disturbing chatter.

The risk from the intelligence agency’s point of view is for the raw emotions of the Hamas terrorist attack on Israel now playing out domestically to spark spontaneous acts of violence.

An obvious consequence is the potential beyond a random conflagration for an angrier and more divided community, laying fertile ground for more organised expressions of hatred.

The key concern for the agency is the general security environment becomes more complicated and volatile.

It has happened before – from the Cronulla riots to actual acts of terrorism.

Burgess’s intervention, however, has had immediate repercussions.

While he is concerned about the security environment, he has inadvertently added to a volatile political environment.

Burgess said “all parties” needed to consider the implications for social cohesion when speaking publicly.

“As I have said previously, words matter. ASIO has seen direct connections between inflamed language and inflamed community tensions,” he said.

Some may argue that it is not ASIO’s role to be venturing into this debate publicly. And there are valid reasons why.

The Albanese government has been quick to seize on Burgess’s warning, backgrounding media that the spy boss’s comments directly contradicted Peter Dutton’s calls for non-citizen hate-preachers to be deported.

Burgess has now found himself being verballed by the government when his aim was to point out the escalating implications for the more obvious forms of inflammatory language.

What is patently evident from Burgess’s statement is that he was responding to the anti-Semitic chants at the Sydney Opera House on Monday amid concerns of more protests to come. “As always, ASIO is not interested in those who are engaged in lawful protest, but rather the small subset of protesters who may wish to escalate protest to violence. This includes religiously motivated and ideologically motivated extremists, or anyone who believes that violence is a means to further their own interests.”

Dutton, as all politicians, needs to be careful. But there is nothing the Opposition Leader has said so far that ASIO could consider was socially divisive.

When you have protesters chanting “gas the Jews”, you know you have a serious problem from a security perspective.

It is unsurprising that Labor would seek to politically exploit Burgess’s comments when it has come under criticism for its own response to the tragedy.

The Prime Minister also knows that he will have to deal with inevitable outbreaks over the party’s own internal divisions when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/asio-bosss-call-for-calm-risks-stirring-the-political-pot/news-story/fa4b1c88600c69f569ad11997c8689c5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19728966

File: f4429b2d698bc90⋯.jpg (266.72 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_Socceroos_friendly_match….jpg)

File: f8ec1141197f037⋯.jpg (451.31 KB,2000x1125,16:9,The_Football_Association_h….jpg)

File: ab1ed0217626f11⋯.jpg (266.53 KB,1600x900,16:9,The_Wembley_arch_lit_up_li….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

Football Australia say they ‘align’ with the Football Association and don’t want Wembley arch lit up to support Israel during the friendly with England

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - OCTOBER 13, 2023

A Socceroos friendly match against England early tomorrow morning has been mired in controversy after the Football Association has decided not to light up the Wembley arch in the colours of Israel.

One of the reasons given by the Football Association was that it didn’t want to inflame any tensions ahead of Australia’s world cup qualifier against Palestine on November 21.

Instead players will respect a minute’s silence and wear black armbands.

Football Australia told The Australian it had been consulted by the FA on their proposed plans and public statement and added “which we are aligned on”.

The FA has refused to criticise or condemn the Hamas atrocities, describing mass slaughter of some of the most vulnerable as “ongoing conflict”, riling Jewish communities in the United Kingdom.

The FA’s position not to light up their flagship ground has attracted significant controversy, including bold accusations it is pandering to Middle East financial interests – because the Wembley arch is regularly lit up to respect victims of natural disasters and other terror attacks.

Most recently the arch was lit for those suffering from the Morocco earthquake and the flooding in Libya, and in past years has honoured innocent victims of terror attacks such as the Bataclan disaster in 2015 and victims of the Istanbul bombings as well as supporting Ukraine in 2022. A plan to turn off the lights altogether and leave the arch in darkness for the match was rejected.

This week is a break in the football calendar across the country and the England-Australia clash is the first opportunity to mark Saturday’s heinous atrocities carried out by the Hamas terrorists who slaughtered 260 young festival goers, burned people alive and murdered babies, and claimed the lives of more than 1300 people.

Football Association also rejected a proposal by the Government’s adviser on anti-Semitism to illuminate the arch on Thursday night instead of during the England-Australia match.

Supporters attending the match will be prevented from bringing in any flags of Israel or Palestine.

The FA issued a statement saying: “On Friday evening, we will remember the innocent victims of the devastating events in Israel and Palestine. Our thoughts are with them, and their families and friends in England and Australia and with all the communities who are affected by this ongoing conflict. We stand for humanity and an end to the death, violence, fear and suffering.”

But the failure to condemn Hamas’ brutality on Israelis has been heavily criticised by the Board of Deputies and the Campaign Against Antisemitism and has led accusations from a former chairman of the Football Association, David Triesman that the organisation was pandering to “wealthy Middle East states”.

Lord Triesman told the UK’s Telegraph: “There has been an abject unwillingness to take any action which might upset the wealthy Middle East states which now wield such power in football finances.

“And what might upset them is what is unwelcome to the militias they support. It was the same indulgence of regimes like Vladimir Putin’s. Anything can be tolerated so long as football can still hear the rattle of the cash tills.”

He added: “It’s inexplicable that they don’t see this in the same light that they saw Ukraine. That can only be because they don’t think it’s important or significant. What is there to think about?

A spokesman for the Campaign Against Antisemitism said: “The FA is sitting on the fence. These ‘devastating events’ did not just happen by chance, like some sort of natural disaster. They were brought about by a murderous terrorist organisation that barbarically slaughtered the most Jews in one day since the Holocaust. It is utterly shameful that the football industry will not acknowledge this.

“The incomprehensible decision not to light up Wembley, when the stadium has done so in the past, speaks volumes. The FA, Premier League and other bodies in British football must condemn the terrorist attacks swiftly and without caveat.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/football-australia-say-they-align-with-the-football-association-and-dont-want-wembley-arch-lit-up-to-support-israel-during-the-friendly-with-england/news-story/633b15b2d29fcf43424fe10ccbda4315

https://antisemitism.org/introduction/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19729093

File: bfb9383af9f7872⋯.jpg (433.03 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19720209

The voice referendum is Australia’s chance to get it right

ANTHONY ALBANESE - OCTOBER 13, 2023

Earlier this week, I had the privilege of meeting the Anangu women who painted the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Sitting with them in the red dirt in the centre of our continent, I thought about how remarkable their artwork is.

Not only does it match the power of the words it surrounds, its greatest beauty is that leaves room for all of us to do what Australians have done so many times before: seize the chance for a better future. And we can do that by voting Yes.

Yes means recognising Indigenous Australians as the original inhabitants of this continent.

Yes means listening to them on matters that affect them so we get better outcomes. And as the Solicitor-General put it, Yes will enhance our democracy.

Everything about how the voice will operate will be decided by parliament. Each elected representative – your local federal member, your senators – will help shape it. This is how parliament works. Nothing will change that.

But when it comes to making policies that affect only Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, the voice will give parliament a chance to work better.

It boils down to a simple act: listening. When a government is preparing to make a decision, its members strive to ensure it is an informed decision.

We get advice from experts. We listen to the wisdom of those on the ground.

It’s more effective than guesswork, and a lot cheaper.

Yet, inexplicably, such basic due diligence has not been applied to policies that affect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

Rather than listening to the people who could guide them towards the best results, governments of all persuasions have wasted billions in a muddle of good intentions that haven’t gotten results.

This referendum is our chance to get it right.

It will only be when we at last listen properly to Indigenous voices that we can close the gap that runs like a chasm through the heart of our country.

Diseases eradicated from most of the planet are a bleak reality in many Indigenous communities.

The starkest statistic is the fact that on average, the life of an Indigenous Australian is eight years shorter than a non-Indigenous Australian. Each statistic is a name, a face, a loved one, an ocean of grief.

A No vote means no change, just a broken status quo. No is the situation we are living now.

But as Evonne Goolagong Cawley put it, today is our chance to ensure it isn’t the future.

Yes means rejecting the option of doing nothing. That is no option at all. Yes means recognising this is the best chance of a way forward we’ve ever had.

And because Australians are a fair, compassionate and courageous people, I believe we’re ready to take this step together.

With Yes, all Australians can win.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/the-voice-referendum-is-australias-chance-to-get-it-right/news-story/2767437dcb9a6282d36f22f21291c8e9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19729112

File: 81a55c180175fa8⋯.jpg (450.85 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>19720209

Voice referendum Yes activists driven by revenge and retribution

PETER DUTTON - OCTOBER 13, 2023

Our democratic system has been the source of our stability and progress for 122 years.

A voice would be the most consequential change to our system in history. There is nothing “modest” about it.

Whether you are an Indigenous Australian, were born Australian, or have come from around the world and become Australian, we are all Australians and are treated equally under the law. A voice will change this fundamental democratic principle conferring a privilege on one set of Australians based on ancestry.

We all recognise the disadvantages facing Indigenous Australians, especially in remote communities. But a voice will not deliver improvements we desire. The voice will be more Canberra bureaucracy that hoovers up more taxpayer dollars.

Thomas Mayo said the voice was “a black political force to be reckoned with”. Teela Reid said the voice was “the first step in redistributing power”. The longer version of the Uluru Statement mentions the goals of “self-government”, “self-determination”, “reparations” and “a financial settlement”. Does this sound like a “gracious request”?

Activists want a constitutionally powered voice to pursue an agenda driven by resentment and retribution – not reconciliation and improving Indigenous lives.

In January, I wrote to Mr Albanese respectfully seeking answers to 15 questions about how the voice would function. Australians are none the wiser today. Instead of explaining how the voice will help Indigenous Australians, Mr Albanese wants voters to uncritically accept it as the panacea. Our best legal minds are divided on the voice showing this change is risky. The words that would be included in the Constitution mean that no issue is off limits to the voice and that the High Court – not the parliament – will determine its powers and remit.

The Prime Minister could have made this referendum about recognition only, established the voice through legislation, or put forward separate constitutional questions on recognition and the voice. He rejected these options, chose a controversial question and bet the house because he wants his Redfern moment.

A few home truths may sink in for the Yes campaign leaders if the No vote prevails. You don’t insult your way to victory. You don’t rally people to your cause by questioning their morality. You don’t win votes by dishonestly claiming that those with whom you disagree are peddling misinformation and disinformation or pushing scare campaigns and conspiracy theories.

Saturday’s vote is about whether we believe in Australia. I believe we have the capabilities and commitment as Australians to find solutions to national problems, including Indigenous disadvantage. We don’t need to change our Constitution to do this. We just need to have confidence in ourselves and the courage to speak difficult truths and to take actions which have been avoided.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/voice-referendum-yes-activists-driven-by-revenge-and-retribution/news-story/7c7bc5269031b8a7a10f2b76e011596a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19729130

File: eafc79f3c59d068⋯.jpg (415.54 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Yes23_co_chair_Rachel_Perk….jpg)

>>19720209

On the voice referendum, we’ve nothing to lose, and everything to gain

RACHEL PERKINS - OCTOBER 13, 2023

For the first time in more than half a century, Australians can vote to heal our country. On your ballot paper is a 92-word vision for recognition, a modest request to be heard.

On Saturday, Australians must collectively pause, for a moment, to think about our country, its deep past and its future.

This is a nation-building moment, a chance to make a change of profound symbolism, a change that also delivers a practical benefit. And it can be achieved with just a few words.

With these words we are poised to accept the great richness of our history and the truth of our nation’s foundation from which we’ve been hiding for more than 200 years.

These words are a question to every Australian.

At its heart, you must decide this: do you believe that in being Australian you are part of human history on this continent, a history that traces our combined experience, 2500 generations, 65,000 years.

When you support the Yes vote, you support the majority of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders at the grassroots.

I will not see another opportunity like this in my lifetime. Its significance for the First Peoples is momentous, even if for most Australians it will not make any material difference in their lives.

For them, nothing will change in accepting this hand of friendship offered by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders apart from being a moment of unity, recognition and inclusion.

For our people, it comes with a guarantee of hope, for change in our lives to realise what we call the voice.

Today, Aboriginal children are born into hardship and disadvantage of a kind unknown to any other group of Australians. One in three of my people live at or below the poverty line. In remote communities, we have 20 times the rate of kidney failure of non-Indigenous people.

The purpose of the voice is to find remedies for now, reasons for hope, now.

The best thing we can do as a people, as a nation, is give people opportunity and hope.

And here’s the other reason for the voice – every time we take even the smallest step towards lifting our Indigenous people out of the mire, Australia takes a step forward too.

The voice won’t fix every failure, and none will it fix overnight, but it might move the foundations a little, change the perspective, get us working with new purpose and direction.

Hopelessness is a fair description of life for a great many Indigenous people. Helping us to take responsibility for our communities is precisely what the voice will do. It will speak to parliament, but it will also bring an eye and ear to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.

The voice will face the truth. It can’t succeed without facing it.

We’ve nothing to lose in giving it a chance, and everything to gain.

Rachel Perkins is co-chair of Yes23 and a proud Arrernte and Kalkadoon woman

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/on-the-voice-referendum-weve-nothing-to-lose-and-everything-to-gain/news-story/a1138ac0a929ebc37e771b7b53d6e21c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19729143

File: 8c8b283669d09a8⋯.jpg (414.2 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Senator_Jacinta_Price_make….jpg)

>>19720209

On voice referendum day, don’t let this dangerous proposition tear us apart

JACINTA NAMPIJINPA PRICE - OCTOBER 13, 2023

There are any number of reasons why Australians should vote No to the voice. It is a proposal that lacks any detail or evidence as to how it would work. Legal experts have repeatedly warned about the inherent risks and the unknowns of how it may be interpreted by the High Court.

The government has made empty promises about its form, they have lied about how many Indigenous Australians support the voice, and they have failed to explain that this proposal has come from only a small number of people, not all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders.

For me, the reason to vote No is even more simple: I don’t want to see our country divided along the lines of race. Since the 1967 referendum, this country has grown increasingly more unified. The prominence of race in our social discourse fell rapidly, our multicultural character has shone through, and we have become a beacon around the world as a place accepting of all.

With a Warlpiri mother, a white Australian father, a proudly “Scozzie” husband – a new Australian – and our blended family, I understand the incredible gift that our diverse country offers to all Australians.

Whether you’ve been in this country for 60,000 years or became an Australian 60 seconds ago, you are equal in our Constitution. You have the same rights and opportunities – the same democratic voice – as every other Australian. Proponents of the voice want to change that.

The Uluru Statement, which Prime Minister Albanese committed to in full in 2022, calls for voice, treaty and truth.

The voice is the first step, enshrining division in the Constitution, but it is not the last. For all the emotional blackmail about this being a “modest” request that “Indigenous people have asked for” themselves, the truth is there is nothing modest about the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

This is not an attempt to solve Indigenous disadvantage; this is an attempt to divide us, to tear at the fabric of this nation and remake our country through an enormous change to our founding document. Australians have been lied to and told this is our last hope, but it is not.

If we truly want to solve Indigenous disadvantage in this country, we need to be honest about where the problem is. We must focus on need, not race.

We need to be real about the fact “the gap” is more about place than race, and acknowledge that it is widest in remote and rural Australia, in communities where English is not a first language, where education levels are low, food and clean water are scarcer, unemployment is higher, and medical care flies in once a week.

The voice, and its proponents, ignore that reality.

The voice is a dangerous proposal. It is full of legal risks, unknowns and empty promises. It is the first step in dividing our country, when we should be working towards unity.

By voting No, Australians are saying that we want to remain unified, that we want to solve our problems together, and that we want to be one together, not two divided.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/on-voice-referendum-day-dont-let-this-dangerous-proposition-tear-us-apart/news-story/6707dc9e3eee45886cfee84d7d25107e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19729190

File: 2ee8031286d6cb6⋯.jpg (505.7 KB,1600x2133,1600:2133,Linda_Burney.jpg)

File: 0f0f6f9091809ae⋯.jpg (643.74 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Michael_Long.jpg)

File: 4f40092edc14b7d⋯.jpg (479.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_crowd_at_Come_Together….jpg)

>>19720209

Indigenous voice to parliament: it’s time to embrace this chance for good of the nation

LINDA BURNEY - OCTOBER 13, 2023

Six years ago, 250 Indigenous elders and leaders gathered at Uluru after the most extensive consultations with First Nations people this country has ever seen.

After more than a decade of discussion about constitutional recognition, long supported by both sides of parliament, the First Nations people gathered at Uluru for the National Convention finally had their say. In the Uluru Statement from the Heart they called for constitutional recognition through a voice.

“We seek constitutional reforms to empower our people to take a rightful place in our own country. When we have power over our destiny our children will flourish. They will walk in two worlds and their culture will be a gift to their country.”

Not symbolism. But structural change that will help improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and move our great country forward together. At its core the Uluru Statement from the Heart is a statement of hope – a gracious request for all Australians to walk together to a better future. On Saturday, Australians have the opportunity to accept that generous invitation and give Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people a greater say in their future.

Because what is happening right now is not working. For too long, successive governments have spent billions trying to close the gap with little if any progress.

Australians are now more aware than they’ve ever been about the appalling statistics and the great divide in outcomes for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Life expectancy eight years shorter than non-Indigenous Australians. Children more than 11 times more likely to end up in out-of-home care. Young people more than 24 times more likely to end up in detention or jail. Adults 14 times more likely to be imprisoned.

We must all agree these statistics are unacceptable. We must all agree we need a new approach. And that new approach is the voice.

The voice would be a committee, made up of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians to provide advice about issues directly affecting their communities. This is our best chance to give Indigenous Australians the same chance at life as their fellow Australians. Throughout this campaign the No camp has tried to distract, confuse and scare people.

But the question Australians will answer this weekend is a simple one. Do you support a change to the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice? Yes or no.

Embracing this moment, and choosing yes for constitutional recognition through a voice is our best chance to ensure Indigenous communities are listened to, so we can get better results.

The voice will turbocharge our effort to make progress on closing the gap. We’ve got nothing to fear from listening and a lot to gain: better results and better use of taxpayer money.

The No campaign has no plan to make things better. Voting no means more of the same. It accepts that we can’t do better. Voting yes means listening. Voting yes means fixing the mess and moving our great country forward.

I am so proud of the Yes campaign, for bringing so many Australians together. Australians from all walks of life involved in the campaign share a vision for a better future. A future that recognises 65,000 years of culture and tradition and gives Indigenous people a say over their destiny.

After walking from Melbourne to Canberra in support of the voice, AFL legend Michael Long beautifully said what this referendum is about: “It’s about love. It’s about listening. It’s about giving Indigenous people power over their destiny.” I urge Australians to open their hearts and vote yes for a better future. Because we owe it to the next generation – to do better.

Linda Burney is the federal Minister for Indigenous Australians.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-its-time-to-embrace-this-chance-for-good-of-the-nation/news-story/f299814f9ab4ef6a8423b33ea2186ba8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19729226

File: b08296cea78e2eb⋯.jpg (136.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19720209

Low voter turnout threatens No victory

GEOFF CHAMBERS and ROSIE LEWIS - OCTOBER 13, 2023

No and Yes campaigners have warned of a record low voter turnout between 80 and 85 per cent, which could narrow the final voice referendum result amid an expected final week swing to Yes.

Ahead of Saturday’s referendum, senior No campaign figures have tempered expectations of a landslide result due to rising fears that up to two-in-ten Australians will snub Anthony Albanese’s vote to constitutionally enshrine an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government.

The No campaign, which will have 25,000 volunteers manning booths across the country supported by Liberal and Nationals party members, remains concerned that low voter turnout could deliver a closer than expected final result.

Last year’s 2022 federal election recorded an 89.82 per cent voter turnout, which was the lowest turnout since compulsory voting was introduced ahead of the 1925 federal election.

The 1999 Republic referendum registered a 95.1 per cent turnout, which was three per cent higher than turnouts for the 1988 and 1977 referendums.

With many voters not engaged and focused on cost-of-living pressures, the Yes camp believes voter turnout could fall below 85 per cent. Combined with an expected final week swing, Yes campaigners were hopeful of a closer result but still believed they would ultimately fall short.

No campaigners on Friday were urging supporters to get out and vote to ensure that turnout doesn’t plunge as low as 80 per cent.

While internal and public polling suggests the No campaign will win both a majority of states and the national vote, Fair Australia strategists remain focused on their original aim of claiming victory in three states.

The No campaign is confident of winning Queensland and Western Australia. Tasmania has been difficult for both the Yes23 and No campaigns to gauge who will ultimately win the state. South Australia is expected to edge No despite a last-ditch, multimillion-dollar ad blitz by Yes23.

Entering the final week of campaigning, which has been dominated by the Israel-Hamas war, Yes campaigners believed around 25 per cent of Australians remained uncommitted on how they would vote.

A Yes23 source said if voter turnout was in the low 80s, it could impact the final result but conceded it was hard to know how the no-shows would fall in terms of support. Impacts of voter turnout will become clear on Saturday.

Despite the media blackout that came into effect on Thursday, Yes23 and No campaigns are blanketing digital platforms and print with ads and final messages that are not captured by the election advertising ban.

Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin on Friday said there was absolutely still a pathway to victory, estimating nearly three million of the 11.6 million Australians who have not yet cast their vote remained undecided.

Mr Parkin said the organisation had amassed 60,000 volunteers who would be fighting “every minute between now and when the polls close” at 6pm. Previously Yes23 had predicted it would sign up 50,000 volunteers.

“There is absolutely a pathway to victory. We’re very encouraged by what we’re seeing out on the ground, what we’re hearing from our volunteers that are out there … in those early voter centres,” Mr Parkin said alongside Yes campaigners at Parliament House.

“We reckon there’s about 25 per cent, about a quarter of the … remaining people that are yet to vote are out there to be won. So that’s a big chunk of the Australian population. We believe Australians are very open to this.

“We haven’t been at a referendum for 24 years in this country and there’s been (a) tremendous amount of speculation about what’s going to happen tomorrow. And, of course, the pollsters have had their say. Well, the most important thing tomorrow is that the Australian people get to have their say.”

Mr Parkin accused the No campaign of going “very quiet this week” and taking voters for granted.

“They seem to have put the cue in the rack. They think that they’ve got this won,” he said.

“They are taking Australian voters for granted, the Yes campaign absolutely is not.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/low-voter-turnout-threatens-no-victory/news-story/51f86aa44485f7c19459908b0c71095d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19729249

File: 95893ddff1a52df⋯.jpg (2.56 MB,4911x3274,3:2,Kevin_Rudd_has_strong_word….jpg)

>>19505163

Rudd slams ‘crazy’ US red tape slowing AUKUS

Matthew Cranston - Oct 13, 2023

Washington | Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, has slammed “ridiculous” US bureaucracy holding back faster progress on the AUKUS submarine pact between the two countries.

The former prime minister said tough export controls on sensitive military technology could slow the sharing of nuclear propulsion technology between the allies under AUKUS.

“We’re not a bunch of naive Australians who wander into town and think that everything can be waved away at once,” Mr Rudd told the American Australian Associations’ annual event in Washington on Thursday (Friday AEDT).

“What we cannot afford in the future, is the continuation of the most ridiculous manifestations of the ITAR regime,” he said, referring to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations in the US.

Mr Rudd cited Australia’s orders for missile systems with the US in previous years.

“It takes six years from point of order to the point of delivery, and then for a separate ITAR project to take over as to whether we can then be provided with the instruction manual for the use of said missiles.

“That’s where it gets really crazy.

“The current process, for example of flying US citizens out to Australia, to repair and maintain US technology, or to send it back to the US for repair and maintenance doesn’t work any more,” he said.

Under the AUKUS deal agreed in 2021, the US plans to sell five nuclear powered-submarines to Australia at price tags to be determined by the US State Department.

‘Disrupt we must’

China’s aggression in the Pacific and the AUKUS pact have spurred US politicians on both sides to recognise tough export controls on Australia need to be eased. But there are some concerns that loosening controls could allow “bad actors” to gain access to valuable US military secrets.

Many of the export controls could be overlooked quickly by the Biden administration, without having to pass through Congress, as has been the case with supplying some technology to Ukraine. Other rules, especially around nuclear intelligence, need Congress approval.

Mr Rudd said he has reminded members of Congress of long-standing intelligence sharing arrangements between the two allies.

“Well guys, we’ve been sharing the highest classified intelligence information with each other since 1946. Here we are in 2023 … and we haven’t done that in terms of defence kit. So we should ask the question, why not? There is no good reason. We need to move ahead.”

“I know this will disrupt a number of things that we currently do, but disrupt we must.”

“We don’t have any time to wait. The times are urgent.”

“The crises multiply each day in depth and breadth and complexity. There was a time in our relationship that we could seminar these things to death. The time for seminaring things is over. The time for action is now.”

Mr Rudd also raised the need for Australian superannuation funds to find their place in defence investments.

“Part of our challenge is to introduce the Australian superannuation industry into investible categories. In the defence science and technology space.

“It’s not been an area where Australia’s venture capital, or investment capital has been in the past. It needs to be and it should be. There’s nothing offensive in terms of ESG standards about investing in defence science and technology base, nothing at all.”

https://www.afr.com/world/north-america/rudd-slams-crazy-us-red-tape-slowing-aukus-20231013-p5ebxk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19729271

File: 63b6c3eec232ef5⋯.jpg (293.44 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Kevin_Rudd_Australian_Amba….jpg)

>>19505163

Kevin Rudd delivered a blunt rebuke of congress for slow progress on AUKUS changes

ADAM CREIGHTON - OCTOBER 13, 2023

Kevin Rudd has slammed “really crazy” and “ridiculous” US regulations that could thwart the transfer of US nuclear submarines to Australia as part of the AUKUS security pact, urging senior Biden administration officials to put pressure on a paralysed congress to expedite the necessary changes to facilitate the landmark agreement.

Dr Rudd, ambassador to the US, also said Australia would remain “rock solid” with the US in the face of “challenges which lie ahead [that] are beyond our imagining”, referring to the prospect of war in the Middle East, Ukraine and China’s growing threat in the Indo-Pacific.

In a speech at an American-Australia Leadership Dialogue event in Washington on Thursday (Friday AEST), Mr Rudd sounded the alarm on congress’s slow progress in changing strict US regulations that would hamper the transfer of US military technology to Australia as promised under AUKUS.

“What we cannot afford in the future, is the continuation of the most ridiculous manifestations of the ITAR regime,” he said, referring to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, which in their current state would throttle the creation of a seamless defence industrial base between the two countries.

The Biden administration and US Ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy have repeatedly sought to reassure Australia that the necessary regulatory changes would occur, and the government remains confident they will be made, even if Donald Trump returns to the White House after the 2024 presidential election.

Dr Rudd said amending the rules, which require congressional changes, would be a “monumental step forward in realising this mission of a seamless industry”.

Jeffrey Bialos, a senior defence policy adviser to the Clinton administration, earlier this month told The Australian that AUKUS was “doomed to failure” without further changes, amid additional concerns that congress might ultimately baulk at the sale of nuclear powered submarines to Australia given the US navy’s own requirements.

“We’re not a bunch of naive Australians who wander into town and think that everything can be waved away at once,” Dr Rudd said, speaking to an audience including senior defence experts an Biden administration officials.

Dr Rudd’s warning came weeks before the prime minister was due to arrive in Washington for an official state visit at the White House hosted by US President Biden and First Lady Jill Biden.

The former prime minister, who succeeded Arthur Sinodinos as ambassador earlier this year, also warned US bureaucrats not to engage in “regulatory clawback” if the legislative changes were eventually approved. “Guess what? We’re all alert to that – we don’t intend to allow it to happen”.

“There was a time in our relationships that we could seminar these things to death. The time for ‘seminaring’ is over – the time for action is now.”

Provisions to approve the transfer of Virginia-class submarines to Australia, which is expected to buy between three and five from the US in the early 2030s, remain bogged down in debate in congress as Republicans and Democrats thrash out an annual defence spending bill.

“Waiting for weeks, months or even years for spare parts or stocks to be replenished is no longer viable … One of the many military lessons from Ukraine is that defence materiel depletes quickly in a conflict.”

Wading into the crisis in the Middle East, Dr Rudd also declared Hamas, the Palestinian terrorist organisation responsible for savage attacks on Israel last week, was “the very face of evil”. “A leopard does not change its spots,” he said, reminding the audience of Australia’s decision when he was prime minister to ban the group as an international terrorist organisation.

“The burden of American strategic leadership as the world’s remaining superpower is to deal with all of these challenges simultaneously,” Rudd told the gathering, which included Biden administration officials, members of parliament, diplomats and defence industry heads.

“But the responsibility, in the same breath, for allies of the United States like Australia is to be rock solid with the United States as it confronts each and every one of these challenges … and that is where the government of Australia proudly stands today.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/kevin-rudd-delivered-a-blunt-rebuke-of-congress-for-flow-progress-on-aukus-changes/news-story/d16f7aad8aedb0b500d02b568a7762d1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19733764

File: 1664c10dee6fa0d⋯.jpg (352.29 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_visits_Ba….jpg)

File: ce08bc3799ac034⋯.jpg (377.38 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Anthony_Albanese_visits_Ba….jpg)

File: 77b43a66f9c1ce0⋯.jpg (278.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>19720209

Tears and calls to action as Australians decide the fate of the voice referendum

RHIANNON DOWN - OCTOBER 14, 2023

Anthony Albanese has issued a tearful last pitch to voters to support the voice in one of his final pit stops along the referendum campaign trail in his Sydney electorate of Grayndler.

In a longwinded and emotionally-wrought address that evoked the legacy of civil rights activist Martin Luther King, the Prime Minister called on Australians to “unite” behind the voice and be on the “right side of history”.

Mr Albanese stopped to take selfies with constituents and patted dogs outside voting booths at Balmain Public School before lashing sections of the media for “extraordinary ignorance” and criticised the No campaign for “stoking division”.

Dressed in his signature campaign battle armour of an akubra hat and Yes T-shirt, Mr Albanese fought back tears as he spoke about how some critics had called on Australians to boo the welcome to country at the AFL and NRL grand finals.

“We must do better. We can do better,” he said.

“This is not a radical proposition. This is a hand outstretched of friendship from the First Australians to every Australian, just asking for it to be grasped in that spirit of reconciliation and friendship.”

With a record number of early voters already casting their ballots on Friday, Labor and Coalition MPs converged on polling booths on Saturday morning in an attempt to win over the eight million Australians still due to have their say on referendum day.

Jim Chalmers made a final plea to voters to support the voice outside a Logan polling station in Queensland, declaring that he remained hopeful while holding “no illusion about how hard it is to change our Constitution”. The Treasurer cast his vote for the Yes side before piggy backing his daughter out of the polling station.

“Millions of Australians wouldn‘t have voted yet,” Dr Chalmers told Sky News.

“And they‘ve got a chance here to vote for that better listing and those better outcomes through constitutional recognition.”

Meanwhile, Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney cast her vote in Carlton South Public School in Sydney’s south alongside NSW Premier Chris Minns.

“I have to admit I had some butterflies in my tummy and it made me feel proud, it made me feel hopeful for the future of this country,” she told reporters.

The No side has also been vocal in its opposition to the voice outside polling booths across the country, including Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price who said many Indigenous people did not trust “the government or the proposal”.

“I’m not going to be complacent and I wouldn’t like to call anything until we know definitely what the result is,” she told Sky News in Alice Springs.

Independent Senator and prominent “progressive No” campaigner Lidia Thorpe called out racism in Australia describing it as a “cancer”.

Speaking outside a polling booth in the electorate of Cooper in Melbourne’s north, Senator Thorpe declared that “racism is an illness; it makes people sick”.

“So this referendum has shown where the cancer is in this country and where we need to heal this country, and where we need to put our efforts as a nation to stamp out this ugly thing called racism,” she said.

Nationals Leader David Littleproud has also been on the hustings for the No side this morning in Brisbane where he implored Australians not to “feel guilted to vote either yes or no”.

“There should be no guilt about the result that comes out tonight,” he said.

Liberal MP Julian Leeser who resigned as opposition legal affairs spokesman earlier this year after Opposition Leader Peter Dutton – who has not been conspicuously absent from polling booths today – announced the Liberal Party would oppose the Indigenous voice to parliament.

“I’ve taken the stand that I’ve taken because I wanted to be here on this day; handing out how to vote cards in my electorate for something I believe in,” he told Sky News from outside a Berowra polling station.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/tears-and-calls-to-action-as-australians-decide-the-fate-of-the-voice-referendum/news-story/bbb25ed62004c60ad912dab4a06f8a96

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19733778

File: 7837d077d823e77⋯.jpg (333.68 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Jan_Gorbacz_for_the_No_cam….jpg)

File: 7fc8d806c7f654c⋯.jpg (807.27 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Gold_Coast_MP_Sam_O_Connor….jpg)

>>19720209

>>19733764

Voice referendum: Double trouble for the Yes camp

SARAH ELKS - OCTOBER 13, 2023

Yes campaigners in Queensland and Western Australia are ­bracing for a bruising defeat at Saturday’s referendum, despite a flurry of volunteer-driven last-minute action in the outlying states.

In published polling on support for the voice referendum, the two jurisdictions – which make up about 30 per cent of the national voting population – have consistently remained at the bottom of the national tally.

The Yes campaign has mobilised about 70,000 volunteers ­nationwide – eclipsing the 25,000 estimated by the No side – and Yes23 director and Quandamooka man from Queensland’s Minjerribah Dean Parkin issued a final plea to voters to back the proposal.

“A very simple act by all Queenslanders and West Australians in voting Yes can lead to a practical change for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples across the country,” he said.

A Labor volunteer working on the Yes campaign told The Weekend Australian the result would “go down the gurgler” in those two states, a prediction backed by No campaign insiders.

“If we get 40 per cent in Queensland it would be a good result … and in WA, the cultural heritage laws really stuffed us over there,” the volunteer said.

Another senior campaigner said while “Queensland and WA were always going to be the toughest to get over the line”, WA had the benefit of high-­profile Liberals backing the Yes vote, including former foreign minister Julie Bishop.

In Queensland, all state and federal LNP MPs appear to be publicly backing a No vote, apart from the state LNP MP for Bonney on the Gold Coast, Sam O’Connor.

The Yes campaigner said: “As soon as (Opposition Leader) Peter Dutton came out so negatively against the voice, with such a strong message from Dutton as a Queensland leader, we were in trouble.”

On Friday, Mr Dutton said he supported “the recognition of Indigenous Australians because of their 65,000-year connection to our country” and claimed a referendum on that would have achieved “90 per cent support”.

“Instead, the Prime Minister has gone down the path of the voice,” he said.

Pollster Kos Samaras, director of RedBridge Group Australia and former campaign strategist for Victorian and federal Labor, said the two states would be crucial.

“If the support for the voice in Queensland and WA is in the 30s, support for the voice in the other four states needs to exceed 56 per cent,” he said on Twitter.

“This will meet the first threshold (four states) but it will be just enough to meet the second threshold, the national ­majority.”

Queensland-based demographic pollsters DemosAU’s latest survey of 2251 voters nationwide between October 1 and 9 revealed a Yes vote of 30 per cent in Queensland, 57 per cent for No, and 12 per cent undecided.

In WA, the results were similar: 30 per cent Yes, 57 per cent No, and 13 per cent undecided.

DemosAU director and head of research George Hasanakos said Queensland and WA were traditionally difficult to convince to vote for constitutional reform in referendums.

“They’re a bit more sceptical of initiatives which come out of Canberra,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/voice-referendum-double-trouble-for-the-yes-camp/news-story/17cd73129567b5d7f502792461b9eec8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19733828

File: 3d1cec03ace32fa⋯.jpg (2.63 MB,6141x4094,3:2,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: 2bfd35227c5d607⋯.jpg (2.96 MB,3024x4032,3:4,In_Peter_Dutton_s_electora….jpg)

File: 48e9b6a9eafd72a⋯.jpg (3.07 MB,3024x4032,3:4,Strathpine_locals_Robert_a….jpg)

File: 107cf8f2111f200⋯.jpg (5.04 MB,8256x5504,3:2,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe_said_….jpg)

>>19720209

>>19733764

In Peter Dutton country, No holds its ground as voters question a lack of detail

James Massola, Jocelyn Garcia and Lachlan Abbott - October 14, 2023

The No campaign is confident it will secure victory in the Voice to parliament referendum, with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton suggesting a record number of Australians could oppose the constitutional change.

While Dutton did not invite media to attend a polling place when he voted in his electorate of Dickson on Saturday afternoon, prominent No campaigner Nyunggai Warren Mundine was out on the hustings and the opposition’s Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price was on Saturday afternoon due to fly from Alice Springs to Brisbane, where the official No campaign will gather to watch the vote count.

The federal opposition leader told Channel Seven’s Weekend Sunrise that Anthony Albanese’s decision to hold a referendum had divided the country.

“I wrote to the prime minister in January of this year with 15 reasonable questions, he’s never replied to that letter. He’s never answered the queries that millions of Australians have,” he said.

“He was told all year not to go down this path. If he was going to have a referendum, do it on recognition because 70, 80, 90 per cent of Australians would support recognition being enshrined in the Constitution, but he didn’t do that, and because the Voice is in there, people now it seems, in record numbers are going to vote against it.”

In Dutton’s seat of Dickson, at the Pine Rivers State High School, a steady stream of voters were turning up at the temporary polling place to cast their votes on a hot Saturday afternoon.

People voting No were thick on the ground and both the Yes and No campaigns had several volunteers outside the entrance to the polling centre.

Bryan and Amy, a married couple who are Strathpine locals, were both emphatic No voters.

“There just wasn’t enough clarity from the government to explain what the process was going to be and what the actual outcomes were going to be, it was just massive red flags,” Brian said.

“They had massive corporations all on board, BHP and Qantas. That just feels like more red flags, the only reason they’d be on board is to make a profit. That’s what it’s all about.”

Bryan said the campaign had been unfortunate because “no one wants division between any race in this country, we are all equal” but Yes campaigners had been “arrogant”.

Robert, another Strathpine local, said he had voted No because “I don’t like the idea of dividing our nation. Government should already be taking into account [the needs] of everyone, [regardless of] race, religion or creed”.

His friend Natasha, who usually votes Greens, said she had been completely torn and could have gone either way. The decisive factor for her had been some Indigenous leaders speaking out.

“I was actually Yes in the beginning but then after hearing from more people, especially Aboriginal elders that I have respected a lot, I’ve listened to a lot more of that. And I think that’s kind of swayed me a bit,” she said.

“ I think, also, something my husband said to me, he’s like, ‘so if we do this for Indigenous Australians, then who next?’ What other nationality that’s in Australia? You know, the Chinese, do they then get a Voice?”

But in Brisbane’s suburb of West End, resident Peter Branjerdporn wore an “Always Was and Always Will Be” shirt as he joined a throng of voters at the inner-city West End State School.

“I voted Yes today because I’m a pharmacist and I really think we need to close the gap,” he said. “I do believe the Voice will inform the decisions that are made.”

Branjerdporn said other health professionals he had spoken to helped him decide which way to vote.

In Melbourne’s Reservoir, progressive No campaigner, independent senator Lidia Thorpe, voted at the Northern School for Autism.

Thorpe, a Djabwurrung Gunnai Gunditjmara woman who quit the Greens over the Voice and who has long called for a treaty to be prioritised ahead of the body, said it would not make a difference to Indigenous lives.

“How dare 97 per cent of this country decide our destiny,” she told reporters.

“This referendum has done nothing but hurt people, divide communities, divide families.”

As she cast her ballot, she said it was a “sad day”.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/in-peter-dutton-country-no-holds-its-ground-as-voters-question-a-lack-of-detail-20231010-p5eb5x.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19733848

File: b9383b44c84db78⋯.jpg (4.16 MB,5459x3639,5459:3639,The_prime_minister_is_expe….jpg)

File: 535320e2667ce4e⋯.jpg (1.61 MB,2051x3076,2051:3076,Lingiari_MP_Marion_Scrymgo….jpg)

>>19720209

>>19733764

PM war-games all outcomes ahead of Saturday night Voice speech

James Massola and Paul Sakkal - October 13, 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will address the nation on Saturday night regardless of the outcome of the Voice to parliament referendum in a speech that will seek to knit the country back together after a bitterly fought and divisive referendum campaign.

Albanese is expected to make the address from Canberra on Saturday evening as Yes and No votes are counted rather than attending an event hosted by the Yes campaign.

Prime ministers do not necessarily speak on the night of a referendum.

John Howard held a press conference on the Sunday after the failed referendum for a republic and constitutional preamble in November 1999. More than a decade earlier in 1988, then-attorney-general Lionel Bowen spoke on behalf of the Hawke government after its four referendum questions were overwhelmingly defeated.

Unlike election night in May 2022, campaigners for and against the proposed constitutional amendment are not planning big public gatherings.

Voice supporters will hold a low-key event in Sydney’s inner west while the official No campaign will gather in Brisbane to watch the votes being counted.

The prime minister and his team have war-gamed all possible scenarios including a comprehensive No victory, a Yes victory and a close result in which postal votes play a key part. For example, if four states backed Yes but the national vote was close, or the national vote succeeded but the target of winning four states was still too close to call.

A source in the No campaign who was not authorised to speak publicly said their event would look nothing like the typical election night event that major parties hold. In Melbourne, the No side will not have an event, reflecting the reluctance of the Victorian Liberal division to campaign on the Voice.

“It will be very low-key. I think most MPs will be in their electorates, thanking their volunteers,” the source said.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton will be in Brisbane but his office would not confirm if he would attend the official No campaign event.

The mood in the Yes camp has darkened in recent days and there are growing expectations among government MPs that defeat is the most likely outcome – but they have not yet given up all hope of a Yes victory.

Marion Scrymgour, the Labor MP for the electorate with the highest proportion of Indigenous voters, the Northern Territory seat of Lingiari, urged the political establishment to continue fighting for Indigenous advancement if the referendum failed.

“We can’t just accept the status quo after October 14. We can’t let people down – the very people we asked to vote for this. We’ve got to focus on jobs and education.

“Aboriginal people themselves, they are sick of the status quo but at the same time they’re also sick of people saying ‘vote for change’. They think we’ve been voting for change for a long time and not much has changed.

“We can’t allow our country to look at itself in a negative way – we’ve got to come together.”

Scrymgour said the campaign would have benefited from more easy-to-understand information to voters.

“We could have had more information. I think there was a reliance that others were picking up things like language translation and making sure Aboriginal people whose first language was not English knew what was going on,” she said.

Albanese, asked on Thursday where he would be on referendum day, said he would campaign across South Australia, Tasmania and NSW on Saturday.

The prime minister said he remained hopeful of a Yes result and said Australians would remember the anti-Voice arguments similarly to those made against same-sex marriage or the apology to the stolen generations.

“I hope Australians think with their heart, but also with their head,” Albanese said in Perth. “You only move a country forward with optimism and hope.”

Voice architect Noel Pearson made one of his final pitches of the campaign, saying “don’t slam the door on the children” because “we’re doing this for them”.

Leading No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price cast her vote at an early polling booth in her hometown of Alice Springs on Thursday, saying “there are other ways” of improving the lives of Indigenous Australians.

“Ultimately, if we want equality for Aboriginal people, we want to be self-reliant. We don’t want to rely on governments, or agencies or anybody else to be dependent on.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/pm-war-games-all-outcomes-ahead-of-saturday-night-voice-speech-20231012-p5ebro.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19734009

File: 289f4f8a1e2a7d3⋯.mp4 (10.99 MB,640x360,16:9,I_have_no_regrets_Albanese….mp4)

File: 38f870a566a683a⋯.jpg (262.9 KB,1223x795,1223:795,Voice_to_Parliament_refere….jpg)

File: c91c30ede23c85a⋯.jpg (4.03 MB,6015x4192,6015:4192,About_9_million_votes_woul….jpg)

>>19720209

>>19733764

No campaign confident of victory as Albanese remains hopeful

David Crowe - October 14, 2023 - 6.00pm

The campaign against the Indigenous Voice is confident of victory after voting closed on Saturday in the referendum to decide whether to enshrine the new body in the nation’s Constitution.

The Yes campaign mobilised up to 70,000 volunteers and gained a powerful presence at polling stations around the country but privately conceded the numbers were against them.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese brushed off questions about a defeat for the Voice at a final event in Sydney on Saturday morning to back the change, saying he remained “very hopeful of a Yes vote”.

“What I see is hope and optimism. That’s what this campaign has been about,” he said.

“A Yes campaign that’s been positive. A Yes campaign that has spoken about the future. A Yes campaign that spoke about us embracing each other and enlarging our country.

“And a No campaign that is based upon fear and us shrinking into ourselves.

“I want to lead a country that is outward looking, that is confident. That’s why I said this is about respect for Indigenous Australians.”

Australians cast 8.4 million votes before the final day of the referendum in early and postal voting, according to the Australian Electoral Commission, which meant about 9 million votes would need to have been cast on Saturday to achieve a full turnout.

“Of the 17.6 million people on the electoral roll, around 9.2 million need to visit a polling place today,” the AEC said in a statement early on Saturday.

Insiders in the Yes and No camps have acknowledged the prospect that many Australians would not have bothered to vote, injecting some uncertainty into the results when all public opinion polls showed the No camp had a national majority of voters as well as a majority of states.

One of the leading figures in the Yes camp, Marcia Langton, acknowledged the prospect of defeat for the Voice by writing that “reconciliation is dead” in a commentary in The Saturday Paper.

Langton, a co-author of the report that advised the government on the design of the Voice, said Australians had been given the chance to accept or reject an invitation from First Australians to make a positive change.

“I hope I’m wrong, but everything around me is saying that today Australia will reject that invitation. It will choose to leave our hand outstretched,” she wrote.

“The nation has been poisoned. There is no fix for this terrible outcome.”

Speaking before polls closed, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said Australians would vote against the Voice because the government had never told them the details about how it would operate.

“I can respect the fact that people are voting Yes or No, and I’ve advocated No because I just don’t think we’ve got the detail – and if you don’t understand it, don’t vote for it,” he said on Channel Seven’s Weekend Sunrise program.

“It’s a very significant change that’s proposed to our Constitution, and if I thought it was going to provide the practical outcomes in Indigenous communities, then it would be a different story.”

Nationals leader David Littleproud prepared for a No vote by saying the result of the referendum should lead to a dramatic shift in policy in Canberra to make sure the money being spent on Indigenous Australians was not wasted.

“There should be no guilt about the result that comes out tonight,” he told reporters at a polling station in Brisbane. “This is a democratic process that the Australian people will determine. The Australian people always get it right.”

Littleproud praised Coalition colleagues including Northern Territory senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, South Australian senator Kerrynne Liddle and No campaigner Nyunggai Warren Mundine for opposing the Voice, but he also commended Yes campaign spokesman Dean Parkin.

“Can I also say to Dean Parkin, who has led the Yes case – a great Australian as well, and he’s come with this, with the right intent, as we have, and it’s important,” he said.

Littleproud called for a “2023 intervention” to overhaul policy, using language that echoed the Howard government’s use of federal authorities to intervene in NT communities in 2007.

“That intervention needs to be in Canberra and getting them out of Canberra and getting them around campfires and town halls, listening to local elders,” Littleproud said.

“Because if you empower those local elders in those remote areas, then you change lives. That’s how you close the gap.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/no-campaign-confident-of-victory-as-albanese-remains-hopeful-20231010-p5eb5r.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19734087

File: 568035e22ab3888⋯.mp4 (15.49 MB,640x360,16:9,Australia_votes_No_to_the_….mp4)

File: 2d871300c552065⋯.jpg (360.41 KB,1223x875,1223:875,Voice_to_Parliament_refere….jpg)

>>19734009

PM's voice referendum has been lost

GEOFF CHAMBERS - October 14, 2023 - 7:23pm

Anthony Albanese’s $365m voice referendum has been rejected by Australians, with a majority of voters in all states and nationally on track to inflict a heavy defeat for the Yes campaign.

Millions of Australians delivered an emphatic rejection of the Prime Minister’s referendum to constitutionally enshrine a voice to parliament and executive government following a bruising campaign between Yes23 and No.

Yes campaigners and ALP strategists acknowledged the vote was lost inside an hour of counting, with NSW, Tasmania, Queensland and South Australia voters swinging hard towards No. No was also leading Yes in Victoria and was expected to claim a sizeable victory when counting begins in Western Australia.

Yes campaigners, who needed a double majority including victory in four states and more than 50 per cent of the national vote, have conceded the heavy defeat. They will blame the result on the cost-of-living crisis and difficulties in engaging disconnected Australians on the merits of a constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament and executive government.

With Yes trailing No in all states and the national majority, Mr Albanese will address the nation from parliament house after Yes23 concedes.

Multicultural voters in western Sydney are on track to deliver a massive blow for the Yes side despite the Prime Minister, Yes23 campaigners and Labor ministers pouring resources into the electorates in the final weeks of the campaign.

Yes23 had identified millions of western Sydney voters, who also heavily voted No in the 2017 same sex marriage postal survey, as critical to claim victory in NSW.

On current trends, a majority of voters in the seat of Barton held by Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney rejected the voice. Just after 7.30pm, 54.4 per cent of voters backed No compared with 46.5 per cent for Yes.

Heavy defeats are also projected in the seats of Cabinet ministers across the country.

More to come

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/politics-live-news-australia-andrew-forrest-slams-dogooder-companies-on-aboriginal-issues-as-he-says-he-voted-yes/live-coverage/698933fd5c4d2cb642cdcbff695bb5b2#118376

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2pPTyqaNMQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

33c928 No.19739175

Clean it up, janny

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19739995

File: 102d87ec0abd23e⋯.jpg (2.23 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 3becb4cd9929fb0⋯.jpg (277.83 KB,1223x795,1223:795,Voice_to_Parliament_refere….jpg)

>>19734087

‘We have given our all’: Albanese pledges unity after defeat on Voice

David Crowe - October 14, 2023 - 10.45pm

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called for a “new national purpose” to tackle Indigenous disadvantage after a resounding defeat for the Voice, with 59 per cent of voters rejecting the proposal at Saturday’s referendum.

The campaign for change gained only 41 per cent of the national vote and lost in every state after years of debate over constitutional reform, igniting claims from the Yes camp that its rivals engaged in lies to fool the electorate.

Albanese took responsibility for the result but told voters he was a “conviction politician” who honoured his promise to Indigenous leaders to embrace the Voice and take it to a referendum.

“This moment of disagreement does not define us and it will not divide us,” he said.

“We are not Yes voters or No voters, we are all Australians. And it is as Australians, together, that we must take our country beyond this debate without forgetting why we had it in the first place.”

The prime minister sought to calm advocates for change who accused the No side of “horrible” tactics to destroy the Voice, which was proposed by Indigenous leaders in a statement at Uluru six years ago.

“The Uluru Statement from the Heart was an invitation extended with humility, grace and optimism for the future,” Albanese said.

“Tonight, we must meet this result with the same grace and humility.”

But he defended his carriage of the campaign by saying he and others pledged to give Australians the chance to decide for themselves whether the Voice should be approved.

“We have kept that promise. We have given our all. We argued for this change, not out of convenience but from conviction, because that’s what people deserve from their government.

“And, of course, when you do the hard things, when you aim high, sometimes you fall short.”

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton blamed Albanese for the failure and said voters should be frustrated with the prime minister for asking them to vote for the Voice without giving them details about how it would operate.

Dutton committed to an audit of spending on Indigenous programs and a royal commission into child sexual abuse in First Nations communities.

“Australians were always going to reject a proposition which divided us into different categories,” he said.

“One of the great attributes of the Australian public is that we all see ourselves as equal. It doesn’t matter if you came here six months ago … or 60 years ago, or [have] 65,000 years of ancestry in this country.

“We’re all equal Australians. And I think the Australian public rejected the prime minister’s proposition to divide us on the basis of ancestry or race – and that’s a great thing for our country.”

Coalition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, one of the most visible No advocates, said it was a shame the Yes side wrongly claimed there was misinformation when the case for change was a campaign of “no information”.

Price said voters had said no to “grievance” and the push from activists to suggest Australia was a racist country.

“We are absolutely not a racist country,” she said.

“We are one of the, if not the, greatest nations on the face of the earth. And it’s time for Australians to believe that once again.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19739996

File: 2505170598ca18c⋯.jpg (1.67 MB,5736x3778,2868:1889,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>19739995

2/2

The verdict from voters became clear shortly after 7pm, only one hour after polls closed on the east coast, in a sign of the strong mood against the call to enshrine the Voice in the nation’s founding document.

NSW voters rejected the Voice by 58 per cent in the count at 10pm, while Victorians were 54 per cent against. Queensland led the No vote, with 67 per cent against, followed by South Australia with 64 per cent opposed.

Tasmanian voters rejected the Voice by 59 per cent, and Western Australia was 60 per cent against.

While Albanese called for grace and humility, leading Yes campaigners turned on Dutton and the No camp in a blistering accusation that they had spread lies and misinformation in the campaign, a claim the No side denied.

“There has been some really horrible political campaigning from Peter Dutton and his No campaign. It’s been disgusting to be frank,” said Thomas Mayo, a union official and a key leader of the Yes side, on the ABC.

“I think that the Australian public were ready for this. I disagree when people say that, that they weren’t, I disagree that this was a bad idea.”

Mayo said voters should “look very closely” at those who had lied during this campaign when they next cast their votes, in a clear reference to Dutton and the next federal election.

“I think Albanese was courageous. I think he was empathetic. I think he genuinely wanted this change. And he has done the right thing by putting it to the people. So it’s not his fault,” Mayo said.

“It’s not the Australian people’s fault. It’s the people that have lied to us to the Australian people. They are the ones that we should be blaming.”

Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin told supporters in Sydney on Saturday night that the No side had used misinformation to win.

“We did everything we could to cast the net wide across the political spectrum and the legal spectrum to ensure that what we proposed was strong,” he said.

“But it is clear from the result that we were not able to reach you through that, and we were not able to reach you and cut through what has been the single largest misinformation campaign that this country has ever seen.”

Yes campaigner Marcus Stewart, the co-chair of the First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria, said the message was that political leaders needed to do better.

“Australian people are not racist if they voted No. I want to be absolutely, categorically clear,” he said.

No campaign leaders, including the Fair Australia group that led the case against change, have denied using lies or misinformation in social media campaigns that cited advocates for the Voice who have called over time for compensation for First Australians.

Victorian senator Lidia Thorpe, who opposed the Voice because she wanted sovereignty and treaty instead, said she was not surprised by the result “given the country has not been taken on a journey and the referendum was ultimately a bad idea in the first place”.

“I’m not surprised we’ve got No votes coming out strongly because people either don’t know what it’s about, or, for the blak sovereign movement, we don’t want it going in the Constitution,” she said on the ABC.

Some of the strongest support for the Voice came from city seats held by the “teal” independents who campaigned for the change, with the Melbourne seat of Goldstein (held by Zoe Daniel) voting 61 per cent in favour in the early count and nearby Kooyong (held by Monique Ryan) being 60 per cent in favour.

The same pattern emerged in Sydney seats, with Mackellar (held by Sophie Scamps) in favour by 54 per cent, North Sydney (held by Kylea Tink) in favour by 62 per cent, Warringah (held by Zali Steggall) in favour by 61 per cent and Wentworth (held by Allegra Spender) in favour by 64 per cent.

Support for the Voice was 77 per cent in Albanese’s seat of Grayndler in NSW and the No vote was 60 per cent in Dutton’s seat of Dickson in Queensland.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/no-campaign-confident-of-victory-as-albanese-remains-hopeful-20231010-p5eb5r.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740004

File: 7186098e0bf9327⋯.jpg (308.78 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Anthony_Albanese_and_Linda….jpg)

>>19739995

Voice lost, Albanese vows to focus on closing gap

Anthony Albanese’s $365m referendum has been rejected by a majority of voters in every state.

GEOFF CHAMBERS - October 14, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese’s $365m voice referendum has been rejected by a majority of voters in every state, after millions of Australians backed a No vote and torpedoed a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous advisory body.

In a disastrous result for the Prime Minister that closely reflected The Australian’s Newspoll, the No vote was on track to claim majority support in NSW, Tasmania, South Australia, Queensland, Western Australia, Victoria and the Northern Territory.

Yes23, which was prepared for defeat but not the scale of the loss, required a double majority including victory in four states and more than 50 per cent of the national vote. Late on Saturday night, the national vote showed No leading Yes by almost 60-to-40 per cent.

Speaking at Parliament House after polls closed in WA, Mr Albanese said: “I absolutely respect the decision of the Australian people and the democratic process that has delivered it”.

“Tomorrow, we must seek a new way forward. I never imagined or indeed said that it would be easy. Very few things in public life worth doing are. Nor could I guarantee the referendum would succeed. History told us that only 8 out of 44 had done so,” Mr Albanese said.

“Our nation’s road to reconciliation has often been hard going, a climb steep, the ground uncertain, the headwinds powerful, the way forward difficult to navigate. But through the decades there has been hard-won progress as well.

“The historic fact that Australia’s story is 65,000-years-old remains a source of national pride and remains a fact. From tomorrow, we will continue to write the next chapter in that great Australian story, and we will write it together. And reconciliation must be a part of that chapter.”

Mr Albanese, who following last year’s federal election committed to implementing the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full and holding a referendum to constitutionally enshrine a voice to parliament and executive government, said it was his “duty as a conviction politician” to put the question to voters.

“Tonight is not the end of the road and it is certainly not the end of our efforts to bring people together. The issues we sought to address have not gone away, and neither have the people of goodwill and good heart who want to address them,” he said.

Mr Albanese earlier this month rejected legislating a voice to parliament if the No vote was successful and claimed that Australia’s international reputation would be harmed if the referendum went down.

The 60-year-old invoked a Winston Churchill quote: “success is not final – failure is not fatal – it is the courage to continue that counts”.

“We intend as a government to continue to do what we can to Close the Gap, to do what we can to advance reconciliation, to do what we can to listen to the First Australians,” he said.

A majority of voters in the Sydney seat of Barton held by Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney rejected the voice, with 56 per cent voting No and 44 per cent supporting Yes.

Ms Burney, who flagged that in coming months the government would unveil details of its renewed commitment to Close the Gap, said “for many, today is a day of sadness”.

“This result is not what we hoped for. We, of course, accept the decision of the Australian people. This is not the end of reconciliation. We need to keep listening to Indigenous Australians about what works and what can make practical differences for the next generation,” Ms Burney said.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said this was a “referendum that Australia did not need to have” and acknowledged many Indigenous Australians who supported Yes would be “hurting”.

“We must redouble our efforts to improve outcomes for Indigenous Australians in those disadvantaged communities and to Close the Gap,” Mr Dutton said.

“That includes an urgent need to boost law and order, to increase school attendance and employment at many remote communities. And that means listening less to activists and more to people in those communities and those who championed them.

“The Prime Minister was warned … not to proceed with this divisive referendum. And he owes the Australian public an apology for that. I think the Prime Minister really needs to listen to the Australian public instead of just words of arrogance.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740005

File: 42835e389b56b0c⋯.jpg (309.14 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_leading_Y….jpg)

>>19740004

2/2

The Northern Territory seat of Lingiari, where the Uluru Statement from the Heart was sealed in 2017 and where Mr Albanese campaigned in the final week, was on track for a sizeable No vote.

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price – the face of the No campaign and a former Alice Springs deputy mayor who lives in Lingiari – said Australians had “overwhelmingly” rejected the referendum.

“They have said No to grievance and the push from activists to suggest that we are a racist country when we are absolutely not a racist country. We are one of, if not, the greatest nations on the face of the Earth,” Senator Price said.

“It’s time for Australians to be proud to call ourselves Australian. Because until we can be proud, we can’t form a position where we are strong enough to tackle the big issues in our country.”

A statement released by pro-voice Indigenous leaders on Saturday night effectively declared an end to reconciliation: “We now know where we stand in this, our own country. Talk not of recognition and reconciliation. Only of justice and the rights of our people in our own country,” the statement said.

Greens leader Adam Bandt and the ACTU blamed the referendum result on Mr Dutton and the No side’s “misinformation” campaign.

ACTU president Michele O’Neil said: “I want to warn those looking for complex reasons – this referendum was lost on April 5th – the day Peter Dutton announced that the Liberal Party would campaign against the referendum”.

Millions of voters in regional Australia and western Sydney voted No in key Labor electorates, including seats held by Cabinet ministers Chris Bowen, Tony Burke, Michelle Rowland, Jim Chalmers, Jason Clare, Ed Husic, Amanda Rishworth and Mark Butler.

Only one of 57 Coalition seats – Bradfield in Sydney – was on track to return a Yes vote. Teal seats won from the Liberal Party at recent elections, including Warringah, Wentworth, North Sydney, Mackellar, Kooyong and Goldstein, returned Yes votes.

The Queensland seats of Brisbane and Ryan, which the Liberals lost to the Greens, and Higgins and Chisholm, lost to Labor, also voted Yes.

Mr Dutton, who repeated his push for a Royal Commission into child sexual abuse in Indigenous communities and an audit into spending on Indigenous programs, told Yes voters he respected their decision.

“While I disagree with your position, I respect your decision to have voted Yes. At all times in this debate, I have levelled my criticism at what I consider to have been a bad idea – to divide Australians based on their heritage or the time at which they came to our country,” he said.

“The Coalition, like all Australians, wants to see Indigenous disadvantage addressed. We just disagree on the voice being the solution. And while Yes and No voters may hold differences of opinion, these opinions of difference do not diminish a love for our country or our regard for each other.”

Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin, who will lead the response following a crushing defeat that left senior Indigenous activists devastated, said Australians who voted No are “people of goodwill but who had doubts about what this meant”.

“We did all we could to alleviate those doubts. We cast the net wide across the political spectrum and the legal spectrum to ensure that what we proposed was strong, but it is clear from the result that we were not able to reach you through that,” Mr Parkin said.

“We were not able to reach you and cut through what has been the single largest misinformation campaign that this country has ever seen.”

Ahead of MPs returning to Canberra on Monday, Mr Dutton and the No campaign have pledged to be respectful in the wake of the referendum defeat.

Mr Albanese will come under immediate pressure to re-set Labor’s agenda, ramp up the focus on cost-of-living pressures and reassure his caucus that the government will put the referendum loss behind them.

Labor MPs and Yes campaigners have linked the referendum defeat to cost-of-living pressures facing households and businesses, the No campaign’s “spreading of misinformation”, Mr Dutton’s support for a No vote and failure to effectively explain the voice advisory body model.

The No campaign expects a record 6.13 million Australians who voted early and an additional 2.1 million people who applied for postal votes would break heavily in their favour. Postal votes were likely to break more than 60 per cent in favour of the No side.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/referendum-result-pms-voice-rejected-by-all-states/news-story/5be4d2b466dc0eb2960bd6c26593f7e4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740015

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19739995

Tearful Anthony Albanese admits defeat in the Voice referendum

Samantha Maiden - October 15, 2023

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has delivered an emotional speech declaring he “gave my word” to Indigenous Australians to hold the referendum, win or lose.

Red-eyed and clearly rocked by the result, Mr Albanese said he never imagined it would be easy but conceded he was disappointed by the result.

The No camp had the vote tied up by 7.25pm, with decisive victories being won in all major states.

“My fellow Australians, at the outset, I want to say that while tonight’s result is not one that I had hoped for, I absolutely respect the decision of the Australian people,’’ he said.

“And I say to the millions of Australians, all over our great country that voted yes with hope and goodwill.

Mr Albanese said the result did not define Australia.

“And it will not divide us,’’ he said.

“We are not yes voters or no voters. We are all Australian. We must take our country beyond this debate, without forgetting while we had it in the first place.”

Mr Albanese said he always knew securing victory would “not be easy”.

“Nor could I guarantee the referendum would succeed. History told us that only eight out of 44 had done so,’’ he said.

“What I could promise was that we would go all in and that we would try.

“And we have given Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people the fulfilment of their request.

“We argued that this change, not out of convenience, but from conviction. I believe it was the right thing to do.”

Choking back tears, he also recalled his emotional meeting at Uluru earlier this week, when he was welcomed by the traditional custodians.

Asked why the No vote won, Mr Albanese appeared to lay the blame at the feet of the Liberal Party.

“The analysis will go on for some time. me, no doubt. But the truth is that no referendum has succeeded without bipartisan support in this country,’’ he said.

During the press conference, Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney openly wept as she urged Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people not to be defeated by the result.

“I know the last few months have been rough,’’ she said.

“Be proud of the 65,000 years of history and culture. We will carry on and we’ll move forward. This is not the end of reconciliation.”

Ms Burney said in the months ahead the Albanese Government would have more to say about new commitments.

“Because we all agree we need better outcomes for First Nations people.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740017

File: 45862eb6e0d8ed4⋯.jpg (327.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_visits_Ba….jpg)

File: fb9880e7901ea7a⋯.jpg (199.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_with_Pat_….jpg)

File: 9f9ffbcbe603a22⋯.jpg (179.56 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_in_Uluru_….jpg)

>>19740015

2/2

Mr Albanese’s speech comes after Nationals leader David Littleproud declared the PM would be to blame if the referendum failed.

Accusing the Prime Minister of “hubris” the recriminations started before the polls closed at 6pm AEST.

“He let it get away from him and he didn’t bring the parties with him and he was warned not to divide our country,” he said.

“He is the one who has taken this to the people, he runs the parliament, he runs the country and this sits squarely at his feet.”

Mr Albanese ended the campaign for the Yes vote today insisting he had done “all I can”.

Evoking the legacy of civil rights activist Martin Luther King, the Prime Minister called on Australians to “unite” behind the Voice and be on the “right side of history”.

“We must do better. We can do better,” he said.

“This is not a radical proposition. This is a hand of outstretched friendship from the First Australians to every Australian, just asking for it to be grasped in that spirit of reconciliation and friendship.”

But Mr Albanese turned cranky during a press conference, lashing out at “the media” after being asked a question about the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

“You made a promise to implement the Uluru Statement from the Heart. If this referendum fails will you push ahead with other elements of that?” a reporter asked.

The 2017 Uluru Statement is the document that informed the decision to have a referendum on creating an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

The document also flagged the importance of truth-telling about Australia’s history and a process for a treaty with First Nations Australians following the Voice.

“Can we concentrate between now and 6pm on what people are voting for? Can we just do that?,’’ he said.

“What this is about is constitutional recognition and a non-binding advisory committee that won’t have any power except for the power of its ideas. A capacity to talk to the government. Why? Because when we listen to people directly affected, we get better outcomes.”

In his election victory speech, Mr Albanese committed his government to implementing the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full.

“I begin by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land on which we meet. I pay my respects to their elders past, present and emerging. And on behalf of the Australian Labor Party, I commit to the Uluru Statement from the heart in full,’’ he said.

An emotional Mr Albanese also wept this week at Uluru when he sat with leaders from central Australia.

During the ceremony, Anangu women performed a dance they created using big digging sticks which the prime minister later said symbolised carrying the burden of the referendum.

“The sticks represented the burden of the yes campaign, the burden of feeling the weight of history which is upon us. [We have] the opportunity to lift that burden of history,” he said.

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/anthony-albanese-is-to-blame-if-the-voice-referendum-fails-david-littleproud-has-said/news-story/d4bd5b05c1c09e80f6163e08b6415278

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYkxl931BEg

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740031

File: 6632c160e113025⋯.jpg (194.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: dd11c29622fd3ea⋯.jpg (467.01 KB,1853x2204,1853:2204,The_Voice_Referendum_Elect….jpg)

>>19739995

Voice referendum result reveals Australia’s city-country divide

JOE KELLY - OCTOBER 15, 2023

1/2

The voice referendum has exposed the chasm between the nation’s inner-city electorates and the outer suburbs and regions, with the key metropolitan seats in capital cities defying the national trend by voting to embrace change.

Despite the decisive national defeat of the voice, the proposition has exposed geographic divisions reflecting a major gulf in attitudes between those living in the heart of the nation’s capital cities and those in the rest of the country.

The divide also reflects key differences in opinion between those living in more wealthy areas who were more likely to vote Yes, and opponents of change in the outer suburbs where cost of living pressures were more keenly felt.

The Northern Territory — where Indigenous Australians represent about 30.8 per cent of the population according to the 2021 census — was on Saturday night returning a strong vote against the voice to parliament, with about 65 per cent of people voting No.

In the Labor seat of Lingiari, more than 60 per cent of people were voting No while, in the Labor held seat of Solomon, which is home to Darwin, about 64 per cent of people were voting No.

In Victoria – the state with the highest Yes vote – the Greens-held seat of Melbourne was recording a Yes vote of close to 80 per cent, while the nearby Labor seats of Cooper and Macnamara were recording results of about 70 per cent.

The Labor held seat of Wills was recording a Yes vote of nearly 70 per cent, while the seat of Higgins – which was won from the Liberals at the last election – was also returning a Yes result of more than 60 per cent.

Bill Shorten’s seat of Maribyrnong was returning a Yes vote of nearly 60 per cent, as were the Labor seats of Fraser and Gellibrand.

Similarly, the “teal” seat of Kooyong – held by independent MP Monique Ryan after she defeated Josh Frydenberg at the 2022 election – was returning a yes vote of more than 60 per cent, as was the seat of Goldstein held by teal independent Zoe Daniel.

But the further from the centre of Melbourne, the weaker the results for the Yes case with Richard Marles’ Geelong based-seat of Corio returning a No result of 52 per cent. The neighbouring seat of Corangamite held by Labor MP Libby Coker was also returning a No result of 53 per cent.

To the south-east of Melbourne, the Labor held seat of Bruce held by Julian Hill was returning a No result of about 56 per cent while Holt was returning a No vote of 52 per cent.

But the regional Victorian seats were all comfortable No votes, flipping the result in the inner-city electorates. The Liberal held seat of Wannon was returning a No vote of nearly 65 per cent, while the Nationals held seat of Mallee was returning a No vote of nearly 80 per cent.

In the east of the state, Gippsland was returning a No vote of more than 70 per cent.

The seat of Indi, held by independent MP Helen Haines, was returning a No vote of about 66 per cent.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740033

File: c1143fdd5fea2b6⋯.jpg (507.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Supporters_at_a_Yes23_even….jpg)

>>19740031

2/2

In Sydney, the trend was replicated with inner-city electorates and wealthy northern suburbs seats all returning strong Yes votes – including the seats held by the teal independents with Warringah, Wentworth and North Sydney all returning Yes results of more than 60 per cent. The teal held seat of Mackellar in the northern suburbs was returning a Yes vote of about 52 per cent.

Anthony Albanese’s seat of Grayndler was returning a result of more than 75 per cent while former Labor deputy leader Tanya Plibersek’s seat of Sydney was returning a Yes vote of more than 70 per cent.

The Liberal held seat of Bradfield to the North of Sydney was returning a Yes vote of about 52 per cent, but the contest tightened in the west. The inner-west Labor electorates of Reid and Bennelong were returning close No votes of about 51 per cent on Saturday night.

But the safe Labor seats in Western Sydney with strong multicultural communities voted heavily in favour of No - as they did in the same sex marriage plebiscite.

Chris Bowen’s seat of McMahon was returning a No vote of more than 60 per cent, while Jason Clare’s seat of Blaxland was returning a No vote of about 62 per cent and Tony Burke’s seat of Watson was returning a No vote of nearly 60 per cent.

In the seat of Newcastle, the Yes vote succeeded with the city returning a Yes vote of about 54 per cent. But in the neighbouring seats it was the No vote that was dominating, with the Labor electorates of Hunter and Paterson returning No votes of about 70 per cent. The Labor seat of Shortland was also returning a No vote of about 61 per cent.

The pattern was again replicated in Queensland, although the state delivered a stronger overall result for No than either Victoria and NSW. The Greens held seat of Brisbane was returning a Yes vote of about 60 per cent, while the two other Greens’ seats of Ryan and Griffith returned Yes results of close to 55 per cent.

In the seat of Lilley, held by Labor’s Anika Wells, the Yes vote was in front with a result of about 52 per cent on Saturday night while, in the seat of Moreton held by Labor’s Graham Perrett, the Yes result was close to 54 per cent.

However, Treasurer Jim Chalmers’ seat of Rankin to the south of Brisbane was returning a strong No vote of about 63 per cent while in the seat of Oxley, held by Labor speaker Milton Dick, the No vote was running at about 55 per cent.

However, the Gold Coast seats in Queensland voted heavily for No, with the seat of Moncrieff held by the LNP’s Angie Bell returning a result of about 67 per cent for No, and the seat of Fadden, held by the LNP’s Cameron Caldwell, returning a No result of more than 70 per cent.

Peter Dutton’s seat of Dickson to the north-west was returning a No vote of about 63 per cent.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/voice-referendum-result-reveals-australias-citycountry-divide/news-story/4b8385db68a58278409b4437ed30a992

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740040

File: ffabe3f6b7db7c5⋯.jpg (100.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,Noel_Pearson_campaigning_w….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740031

Voice referendum result in Tasmania delivers Yes camp’s biggest shock

MATTHEW DENHOLM - OCTOBER 14, 2023

Tasmania has voted No in the voice referendum, 60pc to 40pc, shocking the Yes camp, which had seen the island state as a likely stronghold.

The result was described as ‘heartbreaking’ by figures in the Yes campaign, which had the benefit of a pro-voice premier, in Liberal Jeremy Rockliff.

No is leading in the northern electorate of Bass (62pc to 58pc), despite having a pro-voice Liberal federal MP, Bridget Archer, and in northwest Braddon (72pc to 28pc), and in sprawling Lyons (67pc to 32pc).

Only in Hobart-based Clark (60pc to 40pc) and southern Franklin (51pc to 48pc) is the Yes campaign ahead.

The result is devastating for the Yes campaign, which had seen Tasmania, as well as Victoria, as its strongest states and best chance of pulling off a national victory.

Yes campaigners had to battle opposition to the voice by several peak Indigenous groups, including the Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre, Aboriginal Land Council of Tasmania and the Circular Head Aboriginal Corporation.

The scale of the No win in Tasmania has shocked the Yes campaign, which had believed the island state was the most likely to vote Yes.

However, ALCT chair and No advocate Michael Mansell told The Australian the results in Tasmania and nationally were unsurprising, reflecting Indigenous opposition to the voice.

Mr Mansell called on Anthony Albanese to now progress Treaty and designated Indigenous seats in parliament.

“I’m hardly surprised – since July I could sense the public mood had change significantly,” Mr Mansell said.

“The public were aware there was no groundswell of Aboriginal support for the voice and that if they don’t see that groundswell they tend to go away from it.”

He called on the Prime Minister to harness the national support for Indigenous people and the 50,000 Yes volunteers to progress Treaty and designated Senate seats for Aboriginal people.

“The PM and the Yes campaign can’t just let people and those 50,000 volunteers walk away with a hollow, useless feeling,” he said.

The Yes vote is highest, as expected, in the state’s left-leaning southern electorates of Clark and Franklin, but has tanked in Launceston-based Bass, where Ms Archer’s strong voice advocacy has failed to persuade more than 40pc of voters.

Bass and Braddon are generally more conservative, rural and regional electorates but the scale of the No vote is significant and emphatic.

Ms Archer told The Australian she was “heartbroken”. “As a vocal supporter and campaigner in the Yes campaign, I am naturally disappointed but of course, respect the decision of voters in Bass,” Ms Archer said.

“My heartbreak is reserved for the many Indigenous members of our community who had fought for this recognition in the hope of a pathway to a better future.

“The cause of reconciliation has been set back, badly, but it doesn’t end here. I am committed to continuing to walk with our First Nations people and our entire community towards a united country, where the hopes and dreams of all who live here are given the opportunity to flourish.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/tasmania-votes-no-in-voice-referendum/news-story/fe2f7031eb47d342bc4d1d8dea1b2d72

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740043

File: f05ef82937d67fe⋯.jpg (6.73 MB,6354x5235,2118:1745,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe_casts….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740031

Victoria votes against the Voice despite strong support in inner Melbourne

Kieran Rooney and Lachlan Abbott - October 15, 2023

1/2

Victoria has rejected the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, with 55 per cent of the state voting No.

With 74 per cent of the state vote counted on Sunday morning, Victoria returned a clear No vote, albeit by the lowest margin of the six states.

The referendum was defeated nationally after NSW, South Australia, Queensland and Tasmania also rejected the proposal.

Victoria was tipped by commentators to be the state with the highest level of support for the Voice, even as surveys found the Yes campaign consistently losing ground throughout 2023.

Premier Jacinta Allan, in a joint statement with Treaty and First People’s Minister Natalie Hutchins, on Sunday morning said many First Nations people would be hurting after the result.

“We know that for many Australians, the pain they feel will linger – and for others, it may never fade at all,” the statement said.

“To First Nations people, we say this clearly: Victorians respect you and your culture.

“We want a better future for you. We want a better future for your communities. We want a better future for your children. And we want a better future for the generations to come.”

Election analyst Antony Green told the ABC Melbourne had some of the highest Yes votes in the country in inner suburban electorates. But the city’s outer suburbs were favouring No.

“What we’re seeing is the pattern of inner versus outer in both of the major capital cities,” Green said.

With counting continuing, support in the seat of Melbourne, held by Greens leader Adam Bandt, was at 78 per cent on Sunday morning.

In Kooyong, won at the last election by Monique Ryan from former treasurer Josh Frydenberg, the Yes vote was ahead 60-40, while in nearby Goldstein, won by Zoe Daniel, Yes was ahead 57-43. Labor deputy leader Richard Marles holds the seat of Corio which takes in much of Geelong and towards the outer-suburbs of Melbourne. It is 46-54 in favour of No.

Marles told the ABC it was very difficult to win referendums.

“We knew that coming into this, but because something is difficult doesn’t mean we don’t try,” he said.

“We took this to the Australian people and obviously the results we are seeing are not what we hoped. It is disappointing. In the same breath we very much respect this result.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740046

File: 79e9eb139fc5dbf⋯.jpg (1.47 MB,3000x2086,1500:1043,AFL_executive_Tanya_Hosch_….jpg)

>>19740043

2/2

Yes campaigner and AFL executive Tanya Hosch said she was devastated the referendum was defeated.

“I have been working on this for over a decade and so have many other people,” she told the ABC.

“We are going to need to take a moment to absorb that message and what it says.”

Federal senator for Victoria Lidia Thorpe, who did not support the Voice, said it had been a horrible 12 months in the lead-up to the vote.

“We need to rebuild, and rebuild at the grassroots level, and that’s where this whole referendum and even the idea of it coming out the way it did, it left the grassroots behind,” she said.

Thorpe was the Greens Indigenous spokeswoman before quitting the party after disagreeing with their decision to support the Voice. She is seen by many as the most vocal proponent of the “progressive No” vote, and describes herself as the leader of the Blak sovereign movement.

She said she wasn’t surprised to see a strong result for the No campaign, arguing the country had not been taken on a journey and the referendum was a bad idea.

Polling from Resolve Political Monitor had support for the Voice in Victoria at 65 per cent in results collected over December and January. By June, it had fallen to 56 per cent, dropped to 49 per cent in August and September and bottomed out to 46 per cent a week before the referendum.

In that latest poll, voters in Melbourne’s inner suburbs were most supportive of the proposal, with 58 per cent in favour. But voters in the outer suburbs and regions were opposed to the Voice, polling 53 per cent and 52 per cent respectively.

Speaking before casting her ballot on Saturday, Allan said the Victorian government would continue to build on its policies for Aboriginal Victorians, including the Yoorrook Justice Commission and consulting the state’s First Peoples Assembly.

“That’s the work that is happening right now. That’s the work that will continue to happen into the weeks, months and years ahead,” she said.

Victoria is in the early stages of negotiating a statewide treaty with the Assembly. It could include recognition of historic wrongs and commitments from the government to give Aboriginal Victorians greater decision-making powers over issues that affect them.

In one of its first major reports in September, the Yoorrook Justice Commission called for a stand-alone child protection system and a major overhaul giving First Peoples a greater say over how the criminal justice effects them.

Both reforms are expected to feature in treaty discussions.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/victoria-votes-against-the-voice-20231012-p5ebsb.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740055

File: 895cd87d3442f93⋯.jpg (160.6 KB,2048x1152,16:9,South_Australian_Premier_P….jpg)

File: 368fa332a5adb41⋯.jpg (309.67 KB,2048x1152,16:9,South_Australian_Oppositio….jpg)

File: 81b1ec1acf94b0e⋯.jpg (325.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Madellen_Dawson_49_was_one….jpg)

File: 0eeb6605fd6c263⋯.jpg (41.83 KB,768x1024,3:4,Every_electorate_in_South_….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740031

SA voters deliver a massive blow to the Voice to parliament

DUNCAN EVANS - OCTOBER 15, 2023

Every state in Australia rejected the Voice to parliament on Saturday but only one state said No in all of its electorates.

South Australia recorded a whopping 64.4 per cent No vote, the second highest in the country after Queensland.

Even the state’s inner-city seats delivered tight No victories, while inner-city electorates in Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane backed Constitutional change.

Voters in the seat of Adelaide, held by Labor’s Steve Georganas, supported No with 50.4 per cent of the votes, the tightest margin in the state.

The No wave broadened as the electorates moved away from the city’s core.

Hindmarsh, held by Health Minister Mark Butler, takes in working-class Port Adelaide, the Adelaide Airport and the beach suburbs to the north, and voted 61.6 per cent for No.

Regional and outer suburban South Australia delivered crushing blows to the Yes camp, with the seats of Grey, Spence and Barker all producing No percentages above 70 per cent.

For 49-year-old Madellen Dawson, voting at the Plympton-Glenelg RSL in the electorate of Boothby, issues such as cost-of-living pressures were “much more important” than enshrining an Indigenous-led advisory body into the Constitution.

“It (the Voice) will create a division that is unnecessary,” she said.

“More of a rift than unity”.

The South Australian Labor government, led by Premier Peter Malinauskas, has legislated a state-based Voice to Parliament, with elections to the new body set to begin in March 2024.

The state-based Voice cannot veto legislation or stop the parliament from undertaking its duties and functions, but it can engage with the executive, including Cabinet, Cabinet ministers and the chief executives of government departments.

Mr Malinauskas has committed to going ahead with the March elections.

“The Prime Minister honoured his commitment to put a constitutionally enshrined First Nations Voice to a vote in a referendum. Our democracy has now decided against that model,” he told The Adelaide Advertiser on Saturday night.

“But the work at a federal level to close the gap on Indigenous disadvantage must continue.”

South Australian Liberal leader David Speirs, speaking at the Kauri Community and Sports Centre in Adelaide after voting No on Saturday, said South Australians would be “shocked” to discover the state had a Voice.

“I don’t see today’s referendum as a referendum necessarily on the state voice,” he said.

“I believe the vast majority of people, I think 90 per cent plus, don’t know there’s a state Voice and they will get a terrible shock in March, when suddenly the Voice is pitched into the public arena for the elections to the state Voice.

“They will think: ‘didn’t we vote this down on the 14th of October and they will be quite shocked by that process that will unfold here in March.”

Mr Speirs said he reserved his right to judge the Voice as it unfolded, but if he believed it was not working, “my party will certainly look to amend it.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/sa-voters-deliver-a-massive-blow-to-the-voice-to-parliament/news-story/f0eb967e8b20a8d8c7a18e278bc2a144

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740086

File: 02349e24a45a56b⋯.jpg (228.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 9cf665cbd0646a1⋯.jpg (255.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Penny_Wong_consoles_Yes_su….jpg)

File: 6438322f2a6fd83⋯.jpg (362.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740031

>>19740055

How South Australia killed the voice to parliament

DAVID PENBERTHY - OCTOBER 15, 2023

1/2

The failure of the Yes campaign to read the public mood resulted in complete humiliation in South Australia, with the state earmarked as a likely Yes delivering the second-biggest No vote in Australia with all 10 of its federal electorates rejecting the voice.

Anthony Albanese and Yes tacticians placed so much store in the SA result that they started and ended their formal campaign in SA, the Prime Minister officially launching the Yes campaign in the northern suburb of Elizabeth on August 30 and ending with a photo shoot in the seaside beach suburb of Glenelg last Friday.

Their thinking was that an appeal to SA’s progressive traditions as the first state to embrace female suffrage, land rights laws and the decriminalisation of homosexuality would help get the voice over the line.

The complete reverse happened, with Saturday’s resounding result showing that the more South Australians saw and heard about the voice, the less they liked it.

From a crowded field, how’s this for a statistic – in Elizabeth, where the Yes campaign was launched, the home of Jimmy Barnes and the former Holden factory, the No vote stands at 72 per cent, the highest in any Labor seat in Australia.

The result echoes the analysis in The Australian a month ago that Yes tacticians were placing too much store on Adelaide’s inner-city, arts-loving liberal voters, ignoring the fact that SA’s suburban and regional population is much older and much poorer than in the eastern states.

These were the voters the Yes campaign failed to reach, as evidenced by one SA visit by the PM three weeks ago where he campaigned on the elegant cafe strip known as The Parade in the eastern suburb of Norwood, the spiritual home of flamboyant left-wing premier Don Dunstan. In a tactical sense it was the equivalent of walking the length of Darling Street, Balmain, to take the pulse of the people.

As of midday Sunday the statewide result stood at 35.61 per cent Yes and 64.39 No, with only Queensland delivering a bigger No vote, and SA’s Yes vote standing five points behind that of Tasmania and NSW and 10 per cent behind Victoria.

A closer analysis of the results shows devastation for the Yes vote in rural SA, with the No vote topping 80 per cent in much of the Far North and South-East.

While a rural rout was expected – the Liberal member for the northern seat of Grey Rowan Ramsey told The Australian last month he expected an 80-20 No vote – it was suburban Adelaide which delivered the biggest rebuff to the Yes campaign.

For the past two months the Yes campaign focused heavily on the city seats of Boothby and Sturt as pivotal to the result. Boothby was won by Labor last year for the first time since 1949 after former Liberal MP Nicolle Flint quit politics; Sturt is the former stronghold of Liberal moderate powerbroker Christopher Pyne but almost fell to Labor at last year’s poll.

Despite the efforts of Yes campaigners, the No vote prevailed comfortably in both those seats, with even the richest and most left-leaning seat of Adelaide returning a No vote by a slim margin.

The statewide story of the result can be told in the sprawling southern beach suburb of Aldinga. The booth at the southern end of Aldinga known as Aldinga Beach is filled with expensive weekenders owned by well-off city residents and environmentally-friendly, off-grid housing owned by Green-voting residents. Here the Yes vote is well ahead but in central Aldinga, which is home to many aged pensioners, tradies and young first homebuyers, the booth at the local shopping centre is returning a resounding No.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740090

File: 94e18c0429c8689⋯.jpg (160.92 KB,2048x1152,16:9,SA_Premier_Peter_Malinausk….jpg)

File: 072a653ee2859a2⋯.jpg (312.49 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Voting_queues_at_Gawler_Pl….jpg)

>>19740086

2/2

One man who saw the result coming was Opposition Leader David Speirs whose state seat of Black is just up the road from Aldinga and includes a swath of new land-release suburbs accommodating Adelaide’s southern sprawl. Speirs has spent much of the past month on pre-poll booths in the suburb of Hallett Cove. He told The Australian four weeks ago that he believed the SA Yes vote was “in free fall”.

“I would almost bet my house on it losing in SA,” Mr Speirs said last month. I wouldn’t be surprised if the result ends up being 70 No and 30 Yes in mortgage belt seats like mine.”

Speirs' assessment proved completely accurate with all five Hallett Cove booths delivering a No vote, the most comprehensive margin at the Hallett Cove Lutheran Church where so far 4713 No votes have been counted versus 2017 Yes votes.

“Mr Albanese has got a hell of a lot of questions to answer,” Mr Speirs told The Australian on Sunday. “It didn’t need to be this way, we didn’t need to have a referendum like this. He has unsettled a lot of people, Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal.

“The problem with the voice was that it ran contrary to the fabric of Australia, that egalitarian nature that we all love.

“Hallett Cove is basically Australia. It’s a classic hardworking suburban mortgage belt area. You get a clear sense of what is going to happen not just locally but nationally by talking to people here.

“The Yes campaign thought that people would switch on at the end and go yes. What happened was that people had already switched off and gone no. They had had a gutful of hearing about it. It was like, please, can you just move on and reduce my energy bill?”

Mr Speirs also said the Yes campaign on the ground had a “FIFO” quality with figures such as voice co-architect flying in and out of SA whereas the No vote was prosecuted persuasively locally by new SA Liberal Senator Kerryn Liddle who teamed up with Jacinta Price in high-profile attacks on the proposal.

The thumping No win means that SA is now in the unusual position of delivering the second-highest No vote in the land yet being unique in having its own voice to parliament, with the Malinauskas government confirming it will still press ahead with state voice elections in March next year.

Mr Malinauskas told The Australian on the eve of the referendum that the result would not deter the Government from implementing its own voice, which unlike the federal model was legislated with the bill passing SA parliament earlier this year.

“As far as we are concerned it is happening here anyway,” Mr Malinauskas told The Australian. “What we have got in SA is different by the fact that it is legislated.”

But Mr Speirs said the resounding Yes vote on Saturday meant South Australians would be confused when the local voice started next March.

He also revealed that the Liberals would monitor the workings of the voice and were open to campaigning at the 2026 SA election for its abolition if it proves to be a brake on the workings of government.

“We don’t even know how it is going to work yet so we will have to wait and see,” Mr Speirs said.

“But because it has been legislated we are open to amending it if it is not working properly or even to abolishing if it proves to be completely unworkable, but we will wait and see.”

Privately one senior member of the Right Faction-dominated Malinauskas Government told The Australian that they regarded the Yes campaign as “one of the worst election campaigns” they have ever been involved in.

The Labor figure said he believed the Yes vote was “doomed from the moment Albo thought it was a good idea to stand up with Alan Joyce with those painted Yes jets”.

“The idea that that was going to win over a single voter in the outer suburbs struggling to make ends meet was probably the dumbest thing I have ever seen in politics,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/how-south-australia-killed-the-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c2191ec71965095f1e6d4ce9826d88cb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740101

File: 34f25f67a3f294a⋯.jpg (214.71 KB,2048x1152,16:9,WA_Premier_Roger_Cook.jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740031

Heritage laws debacle fuelled voice referendum failure in WA

PAUL GARVEY - OCTOBER 14, 2023

The Western Australian government’s disastrous introduction of its Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act has been blamed for propelling the state to an emphatic rejection of the Indigenous Voice to parliament.

The defeat of the referendum had already been confirmed well over an hour before polling centres in WA closed on Saturday and before an official post-vote after party by the Yes23 campaign in Perth had opened its doors.

As results from WA finally began to filter in, it quickly became clear that WA had joined all other states and the Northern Territory in strongly rejecting the constitutional amendment. Just over 40 per cent of counted votes in WA were for Yes.

WA’s new Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act came into force in July, just as debate about the Voice was heating up, and the new state-based laws immediately attracted a fierce backlash from across the community amid fears that it would significantly inhibit the rights of landowners. After less than a month, Premier Roger Cook announced that the act would be repealed.

Polling since then had consistently shown that support for the Voice was lower in WA than in any other state.

While Labor and the Yes campaign had repeatedly attempted to dismiss any links between the ACHA and the Voice, Teal independent Kate Chaney told The Australian that the controversy around the heritage laws had clearly had an impact on Voice support in the state.

“Just at the last booth I was at, a woman was talking about the Cultural Heritage Act and that being her reason for voting No,” she said.

“It has had an impact, and it‘s very unfortunate timing.”

The most senior Federal Liberal in WA, legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash, on Saturday morning said the controversy over the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act should prompt the state’s Labor government to pause any plan to introduce a state-based Voice.

“The reason the Labor government had to scrap those laws is because the people of Western Australia, in particular our farmers and landowners, stood up and said, ‘my land, hands off Mr Cook’,” she said.

“If a No vote does get up tonight, and it gets up in Western Australia, I would say to the state Labor government here, respect the vote of the Western Australian people.”

WA opposition leader Shane Love said the referendum’s failure was to blame on both the proposed model and issues around the heritage act.

“The Albanese Voice was a proposed solution which failed to address a very real problem,” he said.

“However, these issues have not been helped by the Cook Labor Government’s decisions to reduce regional representation in State Parliament, or the botched implementation of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act and its ongoing fallout.”

WA Liberal leader Libby Mettam originally came out in support of the Voice but reversed her position in the wake of the cultural heritage debacle.

On Saturday night, she said the botched act had clearly impacted on the result.

“There is no doubt that the Cook government’s shambolic Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act has had an impact on the vote or support for the voice in WA,” she said.

“The chaos created by the Cook Labor government’s botched rollout of this act and the lack of details provided created real doubt and mistrust about how their federal Labor colleagues would implement the voice.”

In a statement on Saturday night, Mr Cook said the nation had spoken and it was the job of leaders to listen.

“I know it has been a challenging campaign for many Indigenous Western Australians. But tomorrow, we move forward,” he said.

“The Government I lead will continue our important work towards reconciliation, and closing the gap with our First Nations peoples.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/heritage-laws-debacle-fuelled-voice-referendum-failure-in-wa/news-story/26b8b2e13c15dcd4839e0fd5c796b72e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740165

File: 593ded226c76ac1⋯.jpg (707.25 KB,3000x2000,3:2,David_Littleproud_s_federa….jpg)

File: 6f9ec7ceef4883c⋯.jpg (226.67 KB,950x1157,950:1157,Queenslanders_voted_agains….jpg)

File: 3df8f843d6abeb5⋯.jpg (762.89 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Quilpie_Shire_Mayor_and_sh….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740031

Queenslanders voted against the Voice to Parliament — more than any other state or territory in Australia

Bridget Judd - 15 October 2023

1/2

It only took a little over an hour for polls to close in the Sunshine State before the ABC's election analyst Antony Green came into frame.

"It's absolutely clear that the No vote has won Queensland."

More than 3.6 million Queenslanders were enrolled to vote in the referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament — and with more than 70 per cent of ballots counted, just three of the state's 30 federal electorates supported the proposal.

Nationally, Queensland saw the strongest No vote of any state or territory, while the federal electorate of Maranoa also returned the largest No vote in Australia.

The rural seat, which extends from Warwick, Dalby and Kingaroy to the NT border, saw 84 per cent of voters reject the Voice.

Across most of Queensland, it was a resounding No

All three federal electoral seats held by the Greens — Brisbane, Griffith, and Ryan — were projected to swing in favour of a Voice to Parliament.

Elizabeth Watson-Brown's electorate of Ryan was the first seat to be projected for the Yes campaign, while Lilley — a Labor safe seat held by Anika Wells — delivered a marginal No vote.

Moreton was the most marginal seat on Sunday morning, leaning 50.8 per cent to No with 69.1 per cent of the votes counted.

Across the rest of Queensland, however, the results told a different story.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers's electorate of Rankin — a safe Labor seat — voted No, while other Labor-held federal electorates, including Oxley and Blair, also returned a majority no vote.

The top six electorates nationally with the highest percentage of No vote were all in Queensland: Maranoa, Flynn, Capricornia, Hinkler, Dawson and Kennedy.

The country's strongest vote against the Voice

Nationals leader David Littleproud's electorate of Maranoa was the first to be projected for the No campaign in Queensland, and returned the country’s strongest vote against the Voice.

Mr Littleproud said he was not "taking any glee" from the majority No vote.

"I think now takes a lot of political leadership for all of us to come together and chart the course for our nation," he told ABC Radio.

"And to make sure that we do have those practical measures on the ground, particularly in our parts of the world, to make sure that where there is a gap that we do close it."

Quilpie Shire Mayor and sheep grazier Stuart Mackenzie said the Voice didn't resonate with his conservative electorate in outback Queensland, where a large number of residents worked in agriculture.

"Reconciliation is living as one community and all contributing to that community in relative harmony. We don't really see a divide here," Mr Mackenzie said.

"It was only to create more problems."

Cr Mackenzie said the Yes campaign was driven by inner-city elites, who had little understanding of the issues at hand in the bush.

"They don't understand Australia … it was intellectual arrogance," he said.

"The more you segregate, the worse the problems are."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740173

File: dd4d664f3dbbbda⋯.jpg (1.52 MB,3936x2624,3:2,Traditional_owner_Josh_Gor….jpg)

File: c6f82eac8c48852⋯.jpg (123.98 KB,1323x884,1323:884,Lex_Wotton_followed_the_po….jpg)

File: e1451701a587eea⋯.jpg (1.91 MB,4240x2832,265:177,Pamela_Johnson_Barry_and_J….jpg)

>>19740165

2/2

Mithaka traditional owner Josh Gorringe, a Yes supporter from the Maranoa electorate, said many people weren't sure what they were voting for on Saturday.

"I think the big thing that I got from a lot of people out here was they found that there was a lack of information out there on what they were actually voting for — 99 per cent of them, if the question was, 'Do you want to identify Indigenous people in the constitution?' 99 per cent of them would have said Yes," Mr Gorringe said.

"But they were just worried what the Voice would do for land rights and other things like that.

"And with such a strong no campaign on social media, in all different forms, on TikTok, Snapchat and all that, a lot of people got that kind of news."

Moving forward, Mr Gorringe said: "We'll just keep building our little pocket of Country."

"We're just trying to maintain our relationships with local people, keep our heads down and keep moving on I suppose, keep putting out information that we do with the researchers, and on Country with the rangers.

"It's a hard one, but that's the joy of being in a democratic country I suppose. I don't think anyone should be criticised for voting No or voting Yes."

The rest of the state's electoral seats held by Liberal and National members all rejected changing the Constitution – including Opposition Leader Peter Dutton's seat of Dickson, in outer northern Brisbane.

"This is the referendum that Australia did not need to have. The proposal and the process should have been designed to unite Australians, not to divide us," Mr Dutton said.

"What we've seen tonight is Australians literally in their millions reject the prime minister's defensive referendum."

Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk said she respects the decision of the people.

"This wasn't the right way. I acknowledge the strong feedback," she said in a statement.

"But that won't stop our efforts to bring justice, reconciliation and material improvement to the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples."

'Try to find a way and heal the wounds'

With the referendum defeated, the national discourse now turns to the future.

Prominent Palm Island community member, Lex Wotton, followed the polling and was not surprised by the result.

"As an Aboriginal person, you feel a bit disappointed — disappointed in the sense that it came to this," Mr Wotton said.

"I think we all have to move on from now and try to find a way and heal the wounds."

The remote Indigenous community falls into the north Queensland electorate of Herbert, where more than three-quarters of the population voted No.

"We will just have to go back to the drawing board and start all over again," local resident Pamela Johnson-Barry said.

By contrast, three quarters of people in the Palm Island community voted Yes.

Queensland University of Technology Professor Chelsea Watego, a Munanjahli and South Sea Islander woman, said she felt for those who had "been betrayed by hope through this whole campaign".

Professor Watego said she hoped the referendum would spark "a black political movement" across the country.

“We need to change the battleground,” she said. “We're not fighting to be the problem to be solved. We're arguing for our unique rights as First Nations peoples."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-15/queensland-voice-to-parliament-vote-results/102977008

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740192

File: aff4fd823852f20⋯.jpg (482.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Outside_a_voting_booth_for….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740031

Migrant factor shows little effect on voice results

NOAH YIM - OCTOBER 14, 2023

Seats with a high Indian-ancestry populations appear to have voted against the voice to parliament despite electing Labor candidates in the 2022 federal election while seats with large Chinese-ancestry populations were split on the referendum question.

Generally, seats with high migrant populations did not exhibit a clearly different trend from those without such demographics. The “swing’’ was defined as the difference between that seat’s two-party-preferred Labor vote in the 2022 federal election and its Yes vote in the referendum.

Looking closer at individual ancestries, the 15 seats with a highest proportion of Indian descent appeared to have moved clearly to vote No in the referendum after voting largely for Labor in 2022, although no correlation can be established at this point.

The outer metropolitan seat of Scullin in Victoria – held by Andrew Giles – at the time of writing had counted 37 per cent of votes and No was leading at 57.6 per cent. In the 2022 election, the seat voted heavily in favour of Labor, with a 65.6 per cent two-party-preferred vote share towards the party. In the census, 7.7 per cent of its population reported being of Indian ancestry.

Another example is the NSW outer metropolitan seat of Chifley – held by Industry Minister Ed Husic – where an estimated 11.3 per cent of its population is of Indian ancestry. When it was reporting 72.2 per cent of votes counted so far, No was leading at 58 per cent. This comes after Mr Husic won the seat in 2022 with a healthy 13-point two-party-preferred margin.

At the time of writing, the only seat among these 15 leading Indian-ancestry seats which was seeing an increased Yes vote over Labor’s two-party-preferred margin in 2022 is the NSW outer metropolitan seat Mitchell, held by Liberal Alex Hawke.

Of the 73.2 per cent of all votes counted so far, Yes was trailing at 41.7 per cent compared with Labor’s 39.3 two-party-preferred percentage in 2022. The census showed 9.4 per cent of Mitchell’s residents were of Indian ancestry.

On the other hand, the 15 seats with the highest Chinese-ancestry populations are split on the voice.

Nine of 15 currently have No leading and the other six have Yes leading.

Such seats include eastern Melbourne’s Chisholm, which at the last census had 28.9 per cent of people registered as being of Chinese ancestry. At the time of writing, the seat has returned 71.4 per cent of its votes and it was neck-and-neck, reporting 49.7 per cent Yes and 49.5 per cent No with the rest being invalid. Labor flipped the seat from Liberal control in the 2022 election.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/migrant-factor-shows-little-effect-on-voice-results/news-story/a29842601ab0826172c34673c122a3a5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740235

File: 3f12f9dc9c493fa⋯.jpg (1.05 MB,4368x2912,3:2,Yes23_campaign_director_De….jpg)

File: 502fd9a71c07360⋯.jpg (5.76 MB,7947x5298,3:2,Emotional_Yes_supporters_l….jpg)

>>19739995

Indigenous Yes campaigners fall silent as they grieve referendum result

Lisa Visentin - October 14, 2023

1/2

Indigenous Australian campaigners for the Voice to parliament say they will fall silent for a week as they grieve the outcome of the referendum, and have called for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags to be lowered to half mast to reflect the loss they feel.

A statement by Indigenous Voice supporters, which the Yes23 campaign circulated on their behalf on Saturday night, labelled the referendum defeat a “bitter irony”. Indigenous Voice supporters said they would take a week of silence to “grieve this outcome and reflect on its meaning and significance”.

It was not immediately clear whether the statement represented all Indigenous campaigners who had backed the Voice. Yes23 and the Uluru Dialogue said they endorsed the statement, and it was shared on social media by the NSW Aboriginal Land Council and the Central Land Council.

“That people who have only been on this continent for 235 years would refuse to recognise those whose home this land has been for 60,000 and more years is beyond reason. It was never in the gift of these newcomers to refuse recognition to the true owners of Australia,” the statement said.

“The referendum was a chance for newcomers to show a long-refused grace and gratitude and to acknowledge that the brutal dispossession of our people underwrote their every advantage in this country.”

The statement said Indigenous Yes supporters would not comment during this mourning period and urged all Australians to reflect on “the role of racism and prejudice against Indigenous people in this result”.

“To our people we say: do not shed tears. This rejection was never for others to issue. The truth is that rejection was always ours to determine. The truth is that we offered this recognition and it has been refused. We now know where we stand in this, our own country. Always was. Always will be.”

The Indigenous Voice advocates said they would not rest long but would “pack up the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Fly our flags low. Talk not of recognition and reconciliation.”

They would “re-gather our strength and resolve, and when we determine a new direction for justice and our rights, let us once again unite. Let us convene in due course to carefully consider our path forward.”

Earlier on Saturday evening, Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin delivered an emotional speech to a crowd of several hundred Yes volunteers at Wests Ashfield Leagues Club in Sydney’s inner west. He addressed the Australians who “voted No with hardness in your hearts”.

“Please understand that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have never wanted to take anything from you,” Parkin said. “All we have wanted was to join with you our Indigenous story, our Indigenous culture and not to take away or diminish what it is that you have, but to add to it, to strengthen it, to enrich it.”

“I would ask you in light of this result, if not tonight, if not in the next few days, but at some point, you find some peace in your own hearts towards us.”

Parkin also took aim at what he called “the single largest misinformation campaign that this country has ever seen” and MPs who joined the No camp and “waged a campaign, in my view very incorrectly and dishonestly, that this No vote would result in division in our country.

“It’s not enough to say that you were against division, you now have a solemn responsibility to back up those words in the next few days as we process this result, and in particular, when the parliament sits next week in Canberra, it is time to put the cudgels down,” Parkin said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740245

File: 66e79ef0961097f⋯.jpg (683.6 KB,4006x2671,4006:2671,Prominent_Yes_campaigner_T….jpg)

File: 70abb77ba90d43e⋯.jpg (795.1 KB,3000x2007,1000:669,Nira_illim_bulluk_man_Marc….jpg)

>>19740235

2/2

Before his speech, resignation filled the air as Voice supporters filed into the club’s function room.

On muted TVs playing in the background, the ABC and Sky News beamed the early results they dreaded – a thumping victory for the No campaign – but few were watching, choosing instead to share a drink and swap stories from the hustings.

However, they rose to their feet in a standing ovation as prominent Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo took to the stage and declared the fight for better outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people would continue.

“This has been about justice. And it doesn’t matter what happens tonight, if it is a No answer, then we’re not lying down. We’re not taking no for an answer, and we will continue,” Mayo said. He praised the 70,000 volunteers who had mobilised for the Yes cause on voting day.

“I really hope that everybody will keep walking with us. It’s not just 70,000 people. What we’ll see is millions of people saying Yes. And what we’ve done is we brought Indigenous matters to the forefront of this country.”

He may have been almost 1000 kilometres away in Brisbane, but Opposition Leader Peter Dutton was in the minds of those at the Yes23 event in Ashfield as they sheeted home blame to him and the Coalition before the result was announced.

“Peter Dutton has been dishonest to the Australian people. He has lied to the Australian people. The No campaign, their lies were exhausting themselves in the last few days,” Mayo said.

“I really hope that when the analysis is done, win or lose, that that is exposed for all Australians to see. I hope there are repercussions … That dishonesty should not be forgotten in our democracy by the Australian people.”

Inner West Mayor Darcy Byrne, a long-time friend of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and former staffer in his electorate office, told the crowd that Dutton would be remembered as a wrecker of the referendum, giving an early taste of how the Labor faithful would seek to put their version of history.

“In the wake of his defeat at the Aston byelection, he decided to put his own political survival above the national interest. Division has been his goal and denigration his weapon of choice,” Byrne said, as those gathered responded with chants of “shame”.

“Peter Dutton walked out on the apology to the stolen generations. In 2023, he has sought to slam the door shut on the hopes of reconciliation.”

There were no reflections on where the Yes campaign and government may have erred in their attempts to persuade voters of the merits of their cause. Instead, Byrne sought to place Albanese alongside the Labor giants who secured landmark progress on Indigenous rights.

“[Gough] Whitlam poured the sand into [Vincent] Lingiari’s hands, [Bob] Hawke established ATSIC, [Paul] Keating spoke at Redfern and enacted Mabo, [Kevin] Rudd apologised to the stolen generations.

“And now Anthony Albanese has had the personal and political courage to insist that after 235 years, after everything we’ve seen, that there must finally be a just and respectful settlement between the first inhabitants and our society as a whole,” he said.

Janet Rentz, a volunteer who letterboxed around Sydney’s inner west, said she had come to the event “to be with like-minded people and to grieve”. “I’m ashamed of my fellow Australians who have responded to vilification, misinformation and fear tactics,” she said.

Another volunteer, Anne Ryan, said the referendum result didn’t reflect her experience manning a booth in Sydney’s inner west earlier on Saturday, which had left her hopeful of a victory for the Yes vote.

“It’s upsetting, shocking. If anything, I thought we might have lost by a small amount,” Ryan said.

“It’s devastating to Indigenous people and for our nation.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/yes-campaigners-won-t-take-no-for-an-answer-slam-wrecker-dutton-20231010-p5eb8i.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740312

File: 2fbe682004da3a3⋯.jpg (268.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Thomas_Mayo_hugs_Reverend_….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740235

Voice referendum result sees ‘recognition refused for the true owners of Australia’

JOE KELLY - OCTOBER 15, 2023

1/2

Indigenous leaders across Australia who supported the voice have lamented the defeated referendum as a “bitter irony” in that newcomers who had been on the continent for 235 years would “refuse recognition to the true owners of Australia”.

“The referendum was a chance for newcomers to show a long-refused grace and gratitude and to acknowledge that the brutal dispossession of our people underwrote their every advantage in this country,” the leaders said.

“For more than six years, we have explained to our nation why the voice was our great hope to achieve real change for our families and communities.”

The statement was shared online by the Central Land Council, which represents 24,000 Indigenous people in some of the most remote communities in the Northern Territory, the NSW Aboriginal Land Council and by Yes23 co-chair Rachel Perkins.

However, The Australian has been told that an even broader collective of Indigenous leaders endorse it including all land councils in the northern territory and members of the Uluru Dialogue. One person familiar with the creation of the document said it has “widespread Indigenous endorsement”.

The statement declared that it was now a “time for silence, to mourn and deeply consider the consequence of this outcome’’.

It called for a week of silence from Saturday night to “grieve this outcome and reflect on its meaning and significance”.

“Much will be asked about the role of racism and prejudice against Indigenous people in this result. The only thing we ask is that each and every Australian who voted in this election reflect hard on this question,” the statement said.

“We will not rest long. Pack up the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Fly our flags low. Talk not of recognition and reconciliation.

“Re-gather our strength and resolve, and when we determine a new direction for justice and our rights, let us once again unite. Let us convene in due course to carefully consider our path forward.”

Another source said the names of individuals was not included on the document to give leaders time to regroup and think about the way forward.

“Right now there is a very visceral feeling that millions of Australians hate them,” the source said.

Yes23 campaign chief Dean Parkin earlier in the night declared supporters of an Indigenous voice to parliament weren’t able to cut through to Australians because of the “single largest misinformation campaign this country has ever seen”.

The extraordinary claim came as fellow leading Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo blasted the “disgusting” No campaign following an emphatic defeat of the voice referendum pushed by Anthony Albanese and Indigenous leaders.

Conceding defeat from Yes23’s referendum night function, held in the Prime Minister’s inner-west Sydney electorate of Grayndler, Mr Parkin said he hoped Australians found peace in themselves and towards Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

“To those who voted No, people of goodwill but who had doubts about what this meant, we did all we could,” Mr Parkin said.

“We did all we could to alleviate those doubts. We did all we could to ensure that the proposal was strong. We believe that the proposal remained strong. We believe that the proposal is legally safe.

“We cast the net wide across the political spectrum and the legal spectrum to ensure that what we proposed was strong, but it is clear from the result that we were not able to reach you through that.

“We were not able to reach you and cut through what has been the single largest misinformation campaign that this country has ever seen.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19740319

File: 17c227a9405db63⋯.jpg (492.65 KB,825x1042,825:1042,TM_2.jpg)

File: 36ae547e994a5c0⋯.jpg (206.82 KB,960x960,1:1,F8cNNKsa8AAVH3a.jpg)

File: fa98988dcb219d7⋯.jpg (188.92 KB,960x960,1:1,F8cNNLLbIAAwE9i.jpg)

>>19740312

2/2

A “devastated” Mr Mayo, who labelled Peter Dutton a “wrecker” minutes before the vote was called, attacked the Opposition Leader and also One Nation leader Pauline Hanson for opposing the voice model he helped create.

“We have seen a disgusting No campaign, a campaign that has been dishonest, that has lied to the Australian people and I’m sure that will come out in the analysis,” he told the ABC.

“I’m sure that history will reflect poorly on Peter Dutton, Pauline Hanson, all of those that have opposed this, and so, I don’t know what’s next but it’s just devastating.”

Mr Mayo said he was not angry at Australians but instead blamed those who had “lied” to voters.

“I am not angry at the Australian public. I think that the Australian public were ready for this. I disagree when people say that they weren’t,” he said.

“I disagree that this was a bad idea because I know that we needed that foundational change to be recognised and to have a guaranteed representative body. Not politicians that purport to speak for us.

“I am not blaming the Australian people at all. But who I do blame and who I hope that the Australian people look very closely at the next time they have a say in this democracy about who our leadership is, I hope they look at who lied to the Australian people.”

Mr Mayo labelled Anthony Albanese courageous but said Mr Dutton led a “horrible’’ political campaign against the voice.

“We put our faith in the Australian people. And, as I said, I think they were ready,” he said.

“But there has been some really horrible political campaigning from Peter Dutton and his No campaign. It‘s been disgusting to be frank.

“We‘re gonna take stock now – Indigenous people, Indigenous leaders. One thing we do know is we’re never going to give up fighting for our rights, our rightful place in this country, for recognition and a Voice because, as I said, it was the right thing to do.”

‘There was no information whatsoever’

Leading No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, the Opposition’s Indigenous Australians spokeswoman, said it was a shame opponents of a voice had been accused of misleading the country through disinformation and misinformation.

“It was a campaign of no information whatsoever,” she said.

“We called out where the Australian people were being misled, whether it was the claim that 80 per cent of Indigenous Australians supposedly supported this when we know that they didn’t, when it was the claim that this was just a simple advisory body, when the words ‘advice’ or ‘advisory’ didn’t even appear in the question nor the proposed chapter.

“The Australian people were misled and then the Australian people saw this for themselves. That is why the Australian people decided to vote No to this proposal.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/thomas-mayo-hits-out-at-wrecker-peter-dutton-as-voice-referendum-defeated/news-story/0a553c895c1f377161891971039ca4bd

https://www.facebook.com/CentralLandCouncil/posts/703500908469249

https://twitter.com/thomasmayo23/status/1713352710588878944

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745124

File: 312a64a0c4eec1d⋯.jpg (249.46 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>19739995

Jacinta Price thanks nation for goodwill after voice referendum result

SARAH ELKS - OCTOBER 15, 2023

1/2

Opposition leader Peter Dutton says the defeated referendum is “good for our country” and paid tribute to Warren Mundine and Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price for leading the No campaign and enduring “personal and offensive attacks”.

Mr Dutton said “what matters tomorrow (is) that this result doesn’t divide us”.

He said he respected Yes voters’ decision, even though he thought the voice was divisive, and a bad idea.

“This is the referendum Australia did not need to have,” he said.

Mr Dutton attacked Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as not being across the detail.

“People from all sides of this debate are rightly and understandably disappointed with the Prime Minister,” he said. “He must take responsibility for it.”

Mr Dutton said Mr Albanese’s priority now needed to be on the cost of living, but recommitted the opposition to a royal commission into child sexual abuse.

“For the past year, the Prime Minister and the government have been consumed by this referendum, and they’ve been focused on the wrong priorities,” Mr Dutton said.

Senator Price thanked the Australian people for “believing in our great nation and the goodwill of this country”.

“The vast majority of Australians want what’s best for everyone of us, including the most marginalised Indigenous Australians,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745125

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19745124

2/2

Senator Price said Australians had said No to division, gaslighting, and bullying, and the idea that Australia was a racist country.

“It’s time for Australians to believe that (we’re a great country), to be proud, to call ourselves Australian,” she said.

She said it could not be demonstrated “how this proposal was supposed to support our most marginalised Australians” including her close family members.

The Alice Springs-based senator revealed her family had experienced three funerals yesterday, and said communities had been exploited for “someone else’s agenda”.

“A vast group of Indigenous Australians did not support this proposal and it’s been a shame that throughout this campaign that we have been accused of misleading this country through disinformation and misinformation, when it was a campaign of no information whatsoever,” she said.

“We called out when the Australian people were being misled.”

Senator Price said in the future, Australia needed to focus not on the voices of activists, but on the “most marginalised” Indigenous Australians living in remote communities.

With the referendum defeated, Mr Dutton said the Coalition would “continue a process” for Senator Price and fellow Indigenous Senator Kerrynne Liddle to look into the party’s Indigenous Affairs policies ahead of the next election.

Mr Dutton said the defeated referendum did not mean Australians had “rejected Indigenous Australians”, just that they rejected the voice.

“Australians were always going to reject a proposition that divided us into different categories,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jacinta-price-thanks-nation-for-goodwill-after-voice-referendum-result/news-story/853945aa75d03aad9087b2f2e9f63daa

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxG7zwRXIGA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745129

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19739995

>>19745124

Voice referendum result heralds ‘new era,’ says Jacinta Price

JOE KELLY - OCTOBER 15, 2023

The Coalition and the No campaign, piloted by Jacinta Price, have promised a “new era in Indigenous policy” that rejects the politics of grievance following the comprehensive defeat of the voice to parliament.

Mr Dutton said efforts should be redoubled to support and improve Indigenous Australians “in those disadvantaged communities and to close the gap.”

He recommitted the Opposition to implementing a Royal Commission into child sexual abuse in Indigenous communities and an audit into spending on Indigenous programs “so we can get the money to where it’s needed.”

Speaking after Anthony Albanese acknowledged the defeat of a constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament, Mr Dutton said the result meant listening “less to activists” and more to people living in remote communities.

Mr Dutton also said the referendum result needed to lead to a reorientation of national politics back to bread-and-butter issues such as the cost-of-living, reducing power prices and boosting national security.

Senator Price, the Opposition’s Indigenous Australians spokeswoman, said the result meant that Australians had “said No to grievance and the push from activists to suggest that we are a racist country.”

She argued the defeat of the referendum offered a new opportunity for Australians to show that “we are one of the, if not the, greatest nation on the face of the earth - and it is time for Australians to believe that once again, to be proud to call ourselves Australian.”

“Because until we can be proud, we can’t form a position where we can be strong to tackle our tough issues within our country,” she said.

“For those of you who voted Yes, please know that we as a Coalition have always got the best interests of all Australians at heart. We want to make sure that we are fighting for a better future for all Australians.”

Senator Price said that “much work needs to be done” to reunite the country and that efforts needed to be focused on those who were most marginalised in society.

Mr Dutton said efforts needed to be made to redouble efforts to support and improve Indigenous Australians “in those disadvantaged communities and to close the gap.”

“That includes an urgent need to boost law and order, to increase school attendance and employment in many remote communities. And that means listening less to activists and more to people in those communities and those who champion them.”

Mr Dutton said that, as Opposition Leader, he believed the nation needed to “come together to tackle challenges, to help families struggling with the cost of living.”

“We need to give young Australians hope that they can buy their own home. We need to fix the mess of the energy policy, so that we can deliver electricity that’s affordable and reliable as well as clean,” he said.

“We need to support, not to oppose our small businesses and boosting our national security to prepare Australia for a very uncertain world … For the past year, the Prime Minister and the government has been consumed by this referendum and they’ve focused on the wrong priorities.”

Mr Dutton said there was now a need to “turn the page, to unite and to address the many challenges facing our country.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/voice-referendum-result-heralds-new-era-says-jacinta-price/news-story/30afec1379e3af84fedde70feb82af7b

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnBcUTxXKH0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745137

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19699368

>>19706419

Thousands attend 'largely peaceful' pro-Palestinian rallies across Australia

Allanah Sciberras and Josh Hohne - Oct 15, 2023

Thousands of pro-Palestinian demonstrators gathered for rallies in Australian cities, with the events ending peacefully according to police.

Large crowds took over the streets of Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Adelaide with a heavy police presence.

However, no arrests were made.

NSW Police Assistant Commissioner Tony Cooke said more than 6000 people gathered at the Sydney event.

Police had the option of seeking "extraordinary powers" after a rally outside the Opera House on Monday night.

"I am pleased to say that in the circumstances today people listened to ensure the behaviours that was seen last Monday, were not repeated," Cooke said,

"People listened to their own community."

Victoria Police said 10,000 people marched in Melbourne, with no arrests.

In Adelaide, a pro-Palestinian rally gathered in front of the State Parliament building.

Police escorted the crowd from North Terrace to Victoria square in Adelaide's CBD.

South Australia Police said the crowd behaved in a "safe, orderly and lawful manner."

Another event was held in Brisbane.

Meanwhile, in Perth today, hundreds of Israel supporters filled the city's main shopping mall, standing in solidarity with friends and family trapped in the Middle East conflict.

The faces of hostages were held close as emotions ran high.

One Perth man recounted how his daughters Cathy and Tamara escaped from near the Supernova music festival.

"When they saw the missiles they decided to leave immediately," Avi Cohen said.

"Some of their friends took the wrong turn and they lost their lives."

Earlier today, NSW Premier Chris Minns pleaded for calm at the Sydney rally, warning any kind of vilification or violence would not be tolerated.

NSW Police Acting Commissioner David Hudson had backed police using the powers, which were first used during the 2005 Cronulla riots.

"I can indicate that the powers we are considering authorising will include any person who attends Hyde Park with the intention to assemble, and perhaps protest, will be subject to searching powers where we don't need reasonable cause to search," he said.

"We will also be demanding that they provide us with their identity and if they fail to do so it is an offence.

"These are extraordinary powers."

Originally planned as a march from Town Hall in Sydney, that event was changed to a "static rally" after organisers failed to submit a form for the protest, which needed to be lodged seven days in advance.

The organisers had condemned the anti semitic demonstrations seen earlier this week, saying they were carried out by a tiny minority of marchers.

Palestine Action Group Sydney said anyone planning a similar display would not be welcome at its rally.

Former NSW police officer Peter Moroney told Weekend Today that it would be a "big logistical effort" for police.

"One of the main concerns is public safety. As we know and as we saw this week, these things can go from reasonably peaceful (but) can explode quickly and rapidly," he said.

"The main concern for police today is ensure that whoever attends, attends for the right reasons and sticks within the parameters of what we would expect decent behaviour."

Officers were able to stop and search attendees and take down their names and address under the powers.

In Melbourne's CBD, supporters gathered for a rally outside the Victorian State Library.

Thousands of people were among the crowd waving Palestinian flags and chanting.

The rally then moved towards the Victorian State Parliament.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/israelhamas-update-heavy-police-expected-ahead-of-propalestine-rally-in-sydney/50ecbdc5-e936-40be-8872-2180a60fcee9

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bokKtjiJ2Pk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745141

File: 52d4e6d5a04b6c7⋯.jpg (215.47 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,National_leader_Christophe….jpg)

File: 6c7907329a04cb8⋯.jpg (524.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_New_Zealand_Prime_M….jpg)

File: f8718c769a760d9⋯.jpg (218.08 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,ACT_leader_David_Seymour_i….jpg)

NZ election: Christopher Luxon to boost Australian alliance, defence

MATTHEW HOOTON - OCTOBER 16, 2023

Incoming Kiwi prime minister Christopher Luxon will boost New Zealand’s defence spending and alliance with Australia, accelerate its return to the Five Eyes fold, and prioritise its trade relationship with India to reduce its economic reliance on China.

Not for two weeks will Kiwis know exactly which parties will be part of Luxon’s government.

It will be led by his centre-right National Party, which won 39 per cent of the party vote in Saturday’s preliminary count, giving it 50 seats in a 122-seat House of Representatives.

But, to govern, Luxon is expected to need both David Seymour’s right-wing, free-market, cosmopolitan Act Party, which won 9 per cent of the vote on Saturday, and Winston Peters’ nationalist, mercantilist and mainly provincial NZ First Party, which won 6.6 per cent.

Final results will be announced on November 3, after overseas, out-of-electorate and late-enrolment votes are counted. National usually loses two seats in the final count, although will pick up an extra seat when a by-election is held in one of its safest seats on November 25.

Only then will Luxon, Seymour and Peters know what cards they can play.

All three parties Luxon is expected to need to govern strongly support New Zealand’s traditional defence relationships, even more so than the outgoing Labour government.

If anything, Luxon’s National is the most pro-China of New Zealand’s mainstream parties. Former leader John Key kept in contact with President Xi Jinping after stepping down as PM in 2016 and plays a role similar to former PM Paul Keating in Australia as one of Beijing’s biggest fans. Other senior National figures have extensive business interests in China.

In contrast, the ACT party adamantly opposes China’s ambitions in the Pacific and unequivocally backs the Western defence network. In its alternative budget in July, which promised to slash most areas of government expenditure, ACT budgeted to increase defence spending to 1.5 per cent of GDP over four years and 2 per cent by 2030, belatedly bringing New Zealand into line with Australia’s investment and the NATO benchmark. NZ First is even more suspicious of Beijing, with Peters leading the tilt to the US as Jacinda Ardern’s first foreign minister.

Luxon promises a strong, combat-ready, interoperable military able to defend New Zealand and Australia, and fulfil Wellington’s global security responsibilities.

Labour’s last-minute bone to far-left activists of promising to recognise the Canberra-based “ambassador” of the Palestinian Authority is now unthinkable. New Zealand will more reliably support Israel and it right to self-defence than either Key or the outgoing Labour government.

On India, Luxon’s interest is naive, underlining his being in politics for just three years. He promises to sign a free-trade agreement with New Delhi in his first term, despite milk powder, beef and other meat not being much welcomed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu-nationalist government.

Still, prioritising India should help expand New Zealand’s strategic and economic relationship with China’s South Asian rival, as envisaged by the US’s Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity, putting further distance between Wellington and Beijing.

Like Key, Luxon promised to improve productivity and incomes to reduce Kiwis’ incentive to make use of “free trade in labour” with Australia, although no meaningful policy program was offered about how. Tax cuts will go ahead from July 1, but not those Luxon promised in August, which were slammed by everyone except him as poorly thought through, unaffordable and inflationary.

Labour left New Zealand with massive debt, embedded inflation, high interest rates, falling real incomes and what looks worryingly like a structural fiscal deficit. Combined with responding to the dangerous geopolitical situation, restoring basic macroeconomic discipline will be quite enough for Luxon, Seymour and Peters to get on with.

Matthew Hooton is a New Zealand political commentator who has previously worked for the National and ACT parties, and the Auckland Mayor.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/nz-election-christopher-luxon-to-boost-australian-alliance-defence/news-story/d758043a2f7af145d2d31261f21be3d3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745190

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19739995

>>19745124

Warren Mundine blasts journos at fiery post-Voice press conference in defence of Jacinta Price

Warren Mundine has said journalists needed to “wake up” to themselves after pursuing bizarre line of questioning with Jacinta Price.

James Morrow - October 15, 2023

Warren Mundine has blasted sections of the media for their treatment of fellow No campaigner and shadow Aboriginal Australians minister Jacinta Nampijinpa Price at a press conference Saturday, saying journalists needed to “wake up” to themselves.

“Wake up to yourselves, people are committing suicides in these communities, people are being raped and beaten and this is the questions you come up with?”, Mr Mundine said after a series of questions about voting results in remote Aboriginal communities.

“We’re about getting results – reducing suicides and instead of this nonsense that you people carry on with,” he said.

“It’s about time we had a vote tonight that said Australians want to get things done – well stop talking about all this other nonsense … wake up to yourselves and start asking real questions and making governments accountable.”

“People need to stop turning a blind eye to the violence, abuse, coercive control and destructive behaviour that goes on in some Indigenous communities.”

Mr Mundine continued, launching a broadside at the architecture behind the Voice, and particularly the contents of the longer form of the Uluru Statement from the Heart that became a major point of dispute during the campaign.

“(The Voice) sees Indigenous Australians as trapped in victimhood and oppression. This is a lie. It includes a self-proclaimed history of Indigenous Australia, called Our Story. Written to shame Australians about their non-indigenous ancestors and Australia’s founding,” he said.

“No nation has had a perfect beginning. Most have had bloody and brutal beginnings founded in invasion, conquest, revolution or war. I don’t judge a nation by the worst of its history, but how it seeks to become its better self.”

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/warren-mundine-blasts-journos-at-fiery-postvoice-press-conference-in-defence-of-jacinta-price/news-story/79363ecc5bf1e5c3ab7768837c8e3ac2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lp9iTOsRVxE

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745191

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19739995

>>19745124

>>19745190

‘Wake up to yourselves’: Warren Mundine unleashes on reporters

Sky News Australia

Oct 15, 2023

Prominent No campaigner Warren Mundine lashed out at reporters following the Voice referendum defeat.

About nine million Australians voted at one of the 7,100 polling places around the country on the referendum day.

“Wake up to yourselves, people are committing suicides in these communities, people are being raped and beaten and this is the questions you come up with?” Mr Mundine said at a press conference on Saturday.

“We’re about getting results - reducing suicides and instead of this nonsense that you people carry on with.

“It’s about time we had a vote tonight that said Australians want to get things done - well stop talking about all this other nonsense … wake up to yourselves and tart asking real questions and making governments accountable.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_av7coHxye4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745195

File: ffbc2f032b0ffb6⋯.jpg (285.01 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Sydney_lord_mayor_Clover_M….jpg)

File: 5b481869a94854c⋯.jpg (115.06 KB,650x999,650:999,Sydney_City_Council_and_In….jpg)

File: b41c021063b52be⋯.jpg (130.49 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_long_serving_lord_mayo….jpg)

File: 882207e8197aa35⋯.jpg (304.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Yes_campaign_has_simil….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740235

‘Ugly, Trumpian tactics’: Sydney lord mayor Clover Moore blasts ‘No’ camp

JACK QUAIL - OCTOBER 15, 2023

Sydney lord mayor Clover Moore has blasted the “ugly, Trumpian tactics” and “harmful misinformation” perpetuated by the ‘No’ campaign following the crushing defeat of the proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

“It’s a sad, sad day,” the lord mayor said in a statement released on Sunday following the referendum defeat, adding that the outcome was “devastating and tragic”.

“While I’m grateful that the vast majority of the City of Sydney accepted the generous invitation from First Nations communities, I share your profound disappointment and sadness at the overall result and the rejection of this opportunity to build a brighter future for all.”

Moore confirmed Aboriginal flags would be flown at half mast this week across all council buildings in response to the referendum result.

Flags will also be flown at half mast throughout Sydney’s Inner West Council from Monday.

Mayor Darcy Byrne said the decision was “in recognition of what a sad event this is, and just to show respect.”

“Imagine how a young indigenous person feels, waking up this morning, looking at that result.”

The Voice failed to clear the “double majority” hurdle required to alter the constitution with the proposal falling short of securing majority support in every state, and at a national level.

However, the inner urban areas of Sydney defied the national result to vote in favour of the proposal. The electorates of Grayndler, Sydney and Wentworth – which overlap with the City of Sydney local government area – strongly supported the proposed constitutional alteration.

Amid accusations from Voice proponents that the ‘No’ campaign had been “dishonest” and “lied to the Australian people”, the Sydney lord mayor also expressed her frustration at the tactics used by Voice opponents.

“I’m bitterly disappointed that opportunity was seized upon by a mean, ungenerous and negative political campaign,” she said in a statement.

“It drowned out the simple fact that we need to do more to improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.”

If successful, the proposal would have created a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous advisory body with no power of veto, meaning a future government would not be able to abolish it without holding a second referendum.

Following the overwhelming defeat, Moore called on Voice supporters to harness their advocacy to push for other measures that would address Indigenous disadvantage.

“We must build on that momentum, that energy, and demand change that meets the needs and aspirations Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, and that we have been fighting for long before the Referendum campaign,” she said.

“Let yesterday’s loss be a stepping stone on the path to progress, justice and equality.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/ugly-trumpian-tactics-sydney-lord-mayor-clover-moore-blasts-no-camp/news-story/432a7340e239c343faa59dfb43a1c870

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745203

File: a5cc0941634e416⋯.jpg (232.09 KB,960x640,3:2,How_the_world_reported_on_….jpg)

>>19739995

How the world reacted to the rejection of the Voice

Rob Harris - October 15, 2023

1/2

London: The Australian public’s decision to vote against enshrining an Indigenous voice to parliament in the Constitution has made headlines around the world, with descriptions of a fraught and often “ill-tempered” referendum campaign.

The result of all states rejecting the proposal, and roughly six in 10 voters, has sharpened global attention on the plight of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and their relationship with generations of federal governments.

Human rights experts at the United Nations in Geneva had urged Australians to vote Yes before the poll, saying it would “pave the way to overcome the colonial legacy of systemic discrimination and inequalities” that had undermined the ability of Indigenous peoples to realise their rights to development and self-determination.

In the UK, The Financial Times reported that supporters of the Voice had promised that entrenching the Indigenous peoples into the Constitution would unite Australia and usher in a new era. It said No leaders had described the idea as divisive, as creating special “classes” of citizens where some were more equal than others.

“The failure of the high-profile referendum, which had been supported by some of Australia’s largest companies and institutions, represents a setback in the country’s attempts to deal with its past and present treatment of its native people, who make up 3 per cent of the population,” it said.

The BBC reported Australia had overwhelmingly rejected a plan to give greater rights to Indigenous people in an “often acrid campaign”, which was “based on misinformation about the effects of the plan”.

The Times said it was a “a huge blow” for those who viewed the Voice as a unique opportunity to close the yawning gap that remained between Australia’s Indigenous people and the rest of the population.

“Despite numerous initiatives by successive governments, and many billions of dollars of investment, young Aboriginal men are more likely to go to jail than university, and Indigenous people are expected to die eight to nine years earlier than non-Indigenous people,” it said.

In France, Le Monde said Indigenous Australians had expressed anger and anguish that the white majority had rejected calls for “a reckoning with the country’s bloody colonial past”.

“More than 230 years since the first British penal ships anchored in Sydney, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese proposed the reforms as a step towards racial reconciliation. But instead, it has sparked a deeply rancorous and racially tinged debate that exposed a gulf between First Nations people and the white majority,” it said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745206

File: 5af8d05ba88b402⋯.jpg (191.35 KB,937x880,937:880,Voice_referendum_How_the_w….jpg)

>>19745203

2/2

Deutsche Welle, German’s public, state-owned international broadcaster, described the result as a “major setback to the country’s efforts for reconciliation with its First Peoples”.

In Italy La Repubblica, the left-wing daily paper based in Rome, said the vote which was aimed to give new rights to First Nations peoples had been sunk by a campaign which scared voters with “disgusting lies”.

The Irish Times said the reasons for the decline in support since the initial strong opinion polls were broad.

“Albanese, and his ministers were prominent faces of the Yes movement, and while Labor did not lead the campaign, the government’s focus on the referendum was seen alongside its handling of other national issues,” it reported.

“It weathered accusations that it championed the voice push while failing to deliver tangible improvements for citizens facing cost of living pressures and a housing crisis hurt the yes side.”

Al Jazeera, the Qatari-owned 24-hour English-language news channel, said the result may also have implications for misinformation in Australia, referencing a campaign spread through social media that the Voice would become a third chamber of parliament and bring Aboriginal people more federal funding.

It said Albanese had criticised sections of the media that he said steered the referendum debate away from the core issues.

In the United States, The Wall Street Journal said the rejection of the constitutional amendment, which would have given Indigenous people more say in government, reflected “deep divisions over how best to address the legacy of colonialism and improve the lives of the nation’s first inhabitants”.

It highlighted that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were now “poorer, less educated and less healthy than other groups”.

“The result shows the difficulties in reaching a consensus to address historical wrongs in countries that are grappling with their colonial histories.”

The New York Times, which in the past week has likened the tactics of the No campaign to “Trump-style misinformation”, has warned the reverberations from election conspiracy theories, until recently the domain of political fringes, could be acute.

It said the result had crushed Indigenous hopes of reconciliation, but the campaigns had “raised fears and hopes that were both overblown”.

“Many of them saw it as a sign of Australia taking a step to do right by them after centuries of abuse and neglect,” it said.

“In reality, the proposal, known as the Voice, was much more modest, making some of these expectations rather lofty. At the same time, it had given rise to unrealistic fears – like of homeowners being forced to return their land to Indigenous people – that galvanised opposition to the Voice.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/how-the-world-reacted-to-the-rejection-of-the-voice-20231015-p5ecal.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745215

File: 8759236038adc81⋯.jpg (394.96 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Yes_supporters_react_after….jpg)

File: 9b1aa4bdae5c059⋯.jpg (646.79 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Anthony_Albanese_and_Linda….jpg)

>>19199725 (pb)

>>19739995

Eight reasons why the Yes case failed

GREG CRAVEN - OCTOBER 16, 2023

1/2

This is not an account of why the No case won the referendum. That will be written, triumphantly, by others. This is the story of why the Yes case was lost. It needs to be told now, while the disaster is fresh, if supporters of Indigenous recognition are to profit from our mistakes. Otherwise, excuses and distortions will cover the truth.

It is quite straightforward to trace the causes for the implosion of the Yes case. Tragically, all were or should have been known to its leaders. But they were denied, derided or discounted.

There were eight fundamental reasons for failure.

1.

THE FIRST was endemic overconfidence. The leaders for Yes – including Anthony Albanese – were simply convinced victory was inevitable. They would hear no contradiction. They were told repeatedly that history showed referendums were hard, and those on controversial topics – such as Indigenous recognition – were especially difficult. They reacted with contempt. This referendum was special. It would win at a canter. Indeed, it was said, the answer was so obvious there wouldn’t even be a No case.

2.

THE SECOND problem was an absolute dismissal of bipartisanship, especially by the Prime Minister, but also by other Yes protagonists. At one level, bipartisanship simply was unnecessary when there was only one answer.

But it went further. It was clear that, especially in the case of Albanese, a partisan referendum was the desired scenario. This would give him an unprecedented victory, placing him in the progressive pantheon. His conservative enemies, especially Peter Dutton, would be crushed.

It simply is not true to say Dutton was solely responsible for a partisan referendum.

He was never consulted, as opposed to being told what was happening. The PM’s offers to consider changes to words or content were not real. Dutton was meant to oppose. Eventually, as a matter of politics, he did. But before that, there was an opportunity to at least persuade him towards only modest contradiction, with conscience votes and moderate arguments. This possibility was spurned.

3.

THE THIRD reality was that the advice being received by the PM was appalling. The vast majority of Indigenous leaders around him confirmed his view that this was a cakewalk. He could not lose.

Further, it was made clear to him that unless they got exactly what they wanted in a referendum package, they would walk. He would be left holding the squalling baby of the voice.

The government had structured its process for formulating the voice proposal in a way that reinforced exactly this tendency. By creating an Indigenous Working Group to vet the details of the amendment, a veto was created. As this group was dominated by Indigenous people at the activist end of the spectrum, this veto was enthusiastically applied.

Many of these activists were young, inexperienced, radical and employed in organisations that only reinforced their own views. If current Indigenous leaders do step aside for this doctrinaire younger generation – as suggested by Noel Pearson – both recognition and reconciliation will collapse as popular causes.

The non-Indigenous advisers were just as problematic. They were equally convinced the poll was a foregone conclusion and ridiculed anyone who dared disagree with the process or drafting as troglodyte conservative stooges. Any voice of dissent was constitutionally cancelled.

Both groups were deluded. They said, for example, the No machine was so old and hopeless it simply wouldn’t be able to mount a social media campaign. They dismissed media critics by saying no one read them, listened to or watched them.

There were honourable exceptions to all this self-congratulation. Pearson, Sean Gordon of Uphold and Recognise, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus and Albanese’s chief of staff, Tim Gartrell, were hopeful but always realistic.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745219

File: b9dc074a1636c7f⋯.jpg (1.02 MB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Sean_Gordon_and_Noel_Pears….jpg)

File: b176d4463485c55⋯.jpg (1017.61 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_a….jpg)

>>19745215

2/2

4.

THE FOURTH disaster was the failure to disclose the architecture for the voice. This was a direct result of the campaign’s massive overconfidence. Given the Yes case was so obvious, people would vote for it without detail. Even as it became abundantly clear this was not happening, the mantra droned on.

5.

THE FIFTH failure was the drafting. The amendment was formulated in secret. There was no input from constitutional conservatives, whose support for the draft during the referendum would be crucial. There was an absolute refusal to consider meaningful amendments. The inevitable result was an exhausting debate around drafting.

6.

THE SIXTH disaster was a truly appalling Yes campaign. This was mind-boggling, as the Yes case had at least $20m to spend. They promised a media blitz, a stunning social media campaign and thousands of appealing on-the-ground campaigners.

It was like one of those predicted Russian tank columns that never arrived at Kyiv. The media advertising was more talked about than actually aired. When it was aired, it was calculated to appeal to those already voting yes.

As the campaign wore on, it was obvious the No camp was dominating social media. As for the foot campaign, the polls still steadily worsened, polling booths were well manned by No supporters, and the Yes effort was most obvious in places such as Newtown that were already voting for the voice.

But the entire strategy was flawed. First, it was run like an election campaign, so there would be a Mediscare-type blitz in the last month. But by then, most people had already made up their mind. Bad as it was, the campaign was made even worse by unqualified Yes bosses meddling in the work of campaign professionals. Second, it never recognised the referendum would be won or lost in western Sydney and regional Queensland. The campaign reverberated in Mosman and Camberwell, but in places dominated by “ordinary” Australians with mortgages and without doctorates, it flopped. As predicted by outlawed Yes dissenters, negative voting patterns exactly followed the republic referendum.

7.

THE SEVENTH enemy of Yes was condescension. Whatever the Yes campaign said, it seemed to believe any ordinary Australian who was not convinced was a cretin. The electorate hated it.

The Yes side complained constantly of “misinformation”. There were untruths on each side, but the proponents of the referendum eventually were condemning every argument against the voice not merely as wrong but as deliberate duplicity. This again suggested to the electorate that they were too stupid to sift fact from fiction.

8.

THE EIGHTH and final failure was the ineffectiveness of the political artillery on the Yes side. The Prime Minister was pinned down by his own platitudes, unable to advance beyond a “modest measure” and a “gracious request”. For whatever reason, Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney was never more than a faltering presence. Against the thundering of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, there was no contest.

All of this is a sad retrospective. The real question now for supporters of recognition is where to from here? Any possibility of actual formal constitutional amendment is now in the remotest, unpredictable future. Realistically, there needs to be deep thought as to what real, meaningful recognition would look like in the absence of changing the Constitution. This will require imaginative co-operation between supporters – not mutual heckling.

But the post-mortem needs to begin now. If delayed, reality will be obfuscated by excuses, slick explanations and deflections. This process has already begun. The call by the Yes campaign for a week’s silence is disingenuous. It is an attempt to isolate future discussion from the reality of self-inflicted defeat.

The implausible lines of defence are being drawn. It was all Dutton’s fault. Australians were tricked by misinformation and lies. Anyway, it was an uplifting experience that brought Indigenous Australian to the fore. In reality, we of the Yes lost a referendum that has broken Indigenous hearts. We can at least do them the courtesy of admitting it.

Greg Craven is a constitutional lawyer and former vice-chancellor of the Australian Catholic University.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/eight-reasons-why-the-yes-case-failed/news-story/2f46117e59bdc170a1f242dbc85d9775

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745243

File: 2bfe53f25b39ed3⋯.jpg (189.55 KB,1024x768,4:3,Illustration_Johannes_Leak.jpg)

File: 4d37baf3802f564⋯.jpg (800.85 KB,2001x2668,3:4,A_woman_looks_on_during_a_….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740235

>>19740312

Make no mistake, the No win was an act of insurrection

Australians outside the Tesla zone have told the elite they’ve had enough of the national guilt trip. They’re sick of the self-flagellating speeches, apologies, welcome and all the other performances.

NICK CATER - October 16, 2023

1/2

If there were ever any doubts Australia had made the right decision on Saturday, they were quickly put to rest by a group of Indigenous leaders who released a statement later that evening.

The statement blamed “newcomers” who had refused to acknowledge “that the brutal dispossession of our people underwrote their every advantage in this country”.

“That people who have only been on this continent for 235 years would refuse to recognise those whose home this land has been for 60,000 and more years is beyond reason.”

The oldest person in Australia is Catherina van der Linden, who celebrated her 111th birthday in August. She arrived as a hardworking migrant from The Netherlands in 1958 and has never dispossessed anyone or anything, as far as we know. The prosaic truth that no one currently alive occupied this continent much more than a century ago explains why many Australians regarded the voice as unjust. Saturday’s result was a repudiation of the black-armband approach to history.

Australians outside the Tesla zone have told the elite they’ve had enough of the national guilt trip. They’re sick of the self-flagellating speeches, national apologies, welcome to country and all the other politically correct performances.

It is a call to let bygones be bygones, recognising the pursuit of historical grievances springs from the same unforgiving logic that justifies the Palestinian cause.

Above all, it is a rejection of the insufferable arrogance of the anointed and their presumption of superior wisdom and morality. The No vote amounts to an act of insurrection by outsiders against the progressive establishment.

That much is evident from the wide variation between comfortable inner metropolitan electorates and outer metropolitan and regional seats. As a rule of thumb, the higher the support for the referendum proposal, the harder it is to find a tradie. In the seat of Flynn, which centres on Gladstone in central Queensland, almost one in five people has a trade certificate. In the seat of Melbourne, on the other hand, the tradies make up just 5 per cent of the population. The latest counting shows that 78 per cent of voters in Melbourne voted yes while 84 per cent in Flynn voted no.

The pattern is reversed for university graduates. In the 33 electorates where the vote was running in favour of the voice at the close of Saturday night’s count, one in three residents has a graduate or higher degree. In the No seats, it is one in six.

At its heart, the voice was an intellectual project framed around an abstract concept of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians rather than a practical measure designed to improve everyday lives. People declaring themselves Indigenous account for 1.5 per cent of the population in the Yes seats. In the No seats, it is 4.8 per cent.

The five seats with the largest proportion of Indigenous residents – Lingiari (40.3 per cent), Parkes (16.4 per cent), Leichhardt (16.3 per cent), Durack (15.2 per cent) and Kennedy (14.8 per cent) – voted no by an average of 71 per cent. The results in the five electorates with the smallest Indigenous population – Goldstein (0.2 per cent), Chisholm (0.3 per cent), Bradfield (0.3 per cent), Kooyong (0.3 per cent) and Higgins (0.3 per cent) – averaged 56 per cent in favour.

That doesn’t mean all Aboriginal people were against the voice any more than we can assume every tradie voted no. Indigenous people were split, despite the hubris of the Indigenous elite in their references to “our people”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19745245

File: d50ebad1bfc86b0⋯.jpg (476.44 KB,1202x777,1202:777,SMH_1.jpg)

File: 0d304da93814186⋯.jpg (533.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

>>19745243

2/2

The intelligentsia may find it impossible to concede defeat on anything more than a technical amendment to the Constitution. The Indigenous leaders’ unsigned statement on Saturday hinted darkly at “the role of racism and prejudice against Indigenous people”. They said Australians who voted no should “reflect hard on this question”.

Pointing the finger at the “dinosaurs” and “dickheads” who populate the morally bankrupt land on the other side of the argument offers an easy way out for the voice crusaders. They will not have to dwell on the uncomfortable truth that the result is a rejection of their entire vision of the world, in which Indigenous Australians sit on a higher moral plane, as people who have been wronged by others, who deserve to be redressed.

The Sydney Morning Herald got it badly wrong in a headline on Sunday. “Devastating verdict,” it read. “Australia tells First Nations people ‘you are not special’.” The overwhelming sentiment among No voters was the very opposite.

“They have said no to grievance and the push from activists to suggest that we are a racist country when we are absolutely not a racist country,” Jacinta Nampijinpa Price said on Saturday. “We are all part of the fabric of this nation.”

The founding philosophy of modern Australia, 19th-century liberalism rooted in Christianity, holds that every person is unique, just as all lives matter. No one, however, is more special than anyone else.

On Saturday, Anthony Albanese finally hit the right tone in a speech expressing optimism and a “new national purpose”. The referendum offers a mandate for just that, should the PM have the courage to take it.

Albanese should recognise the result as a call for the end to the policy of separatism that began under Gough Whitlam and has yet to be challenged. The self-determination policy, as it was called, was intended to empower Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people by granting them control of settlements where they might practice their traditional customs.

The descent of these Rousseauean-inspired idylls into welfare sinkholes riddled with social dysfunction was immediate and is now all but irreversible. The most tragic mistake was the assumption that Aboriginal people held abnormally strong communal values that rose above the wishes of any individual. The free market barely operates across much of central and northern Australia.

Adopting capitalism may have brought a couple of billion people out of poverty in the last 30 years, but in large parts of remote Australia, it is effectively banned.

Saturday’s result provides an opportunity to liberate Aboriginal Australians from the debilitating assumption that they are victims from birth. It is a chance to break the tyranny of low expectations. Every Indigenous citizen should be able to exercise their full rights as citizens to alter the course of their lives for good or ill.

Nick Cater is senior fellow at the Menzies Research Centre.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/no-result-was-an-act-of-insurrection-against-the-progressive-establishment/news-story/6d659604f6a17c1b9d2ed70653bd1170

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/how-australia-voted-and-reacted-to-the-voice-20231015-p5ecdu.html

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/devastating-verdict-australia-tells-first-nations-people-you-are-not-special-20231010-p5eb6a.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3cbdc7 No.19748905

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749368

File: 6932dda5c7cd13e⋯.jpg (305.04 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19745124

Price pushes bipartisan action plan

The face of the No campaign will push the government towards policies aimed at ‘bringing Indigenous Australians into the fabric of this nation’.

JOE KELLY - October 15, 2023

1/2

Jacinta Price says there can be no return to the status quo in Indigenous policy following the referendum defeat and will seek to push the Albanese government towards a bipartisan effort aimed at “bringing Indigenous Australians into the fabric of this nation”.

The Opposition Indigenous Affairs spokeswoman and face of the No campaign told The Aus­tralian that “if the government doesn’t want to undertake that responsibility you can expect that this is what I will challenge them on at the next election. I know that, throughout this process, I have had the support of my Coalition colleagues and I have their support going forward to … bring about a much more unified country.”

She said the premise for the ­referendum was “supposedly about doing something different”.

“We should not be doing the same things we have done for ­decades … we can’t accept that.”

Acknowledging that people were suffering from “referendum fatigue”, Senator Price also revealed that her preference was not to take a second referendum for constitutional recognition to the next election as previously committed to by Peter Dutton.

She stressed this would be determined by the Liberal and Nationals through their partyroom processes, but suggested that “what the partyroom will likely want to do is to respect the will of the Australian people”.

“I’ve spoken to Mr Dutton and, I think, given the result of this ­referendum, I think Australians, the preference from Australians would be to just let this be for now.

“I guess that’s something you’d have to test the appetite for later on down the track,” she said.

Reflecting on her priorities following the referendum, Senator Price said she intended to focus on policy development with her ­Coalition colleague Kerrynne ­Liddle and revealed she was “here for the long haul” in politics.

Responding to the defeat of the Yes campaign on Saturday, Senator Price said it meant the dawn of a “new era in Indigenous policy” based on a rejection of the politics of grievance, with the Opposition Leader arguing that efforts needed to be redoubled to close the gap.

Mr Dutton recommitted the Coalition to implementing a royal commission into child sexual abuse in Indigenous communities and an audit into spending on ­Indigenous programs.

Speaking to The Australian on Sunday evening, Senator Price said her message to those deeply disappointed by the referendum result was that “not all is lost”.

She said a greater focus would need to be placed by governments on treating Indigenous Australians “as though they are Australians citizens”.

This meant governments doing a better job in seeking to allow “traditional owners in remote communities to be job creators and not having to rely on the public service to bring about jobs and employment”.

“I’d be seeking this government to initiate this kind of work straight away,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749370

File: cc90458a13f5298⋯.jpg (73.26 KB,1280x720,16:9,Shadow_Minister_for_Indige….jpg)

>>19749368

2/2

Senator Price stressed she had entered politics to fight for “all Australians” – not only Indigenous Australians – and expressed an interest in broadening her portfolio experience in the future.

One area of interest was the economic development of Northern Australia, with Senator Price arguing there were opportunities for it to “contribute to Australia’s economy more richly”.

The referendum result had also revealed the key importance of the regions, with Senator Price arguing they had spoken “loud and clear” and should be “considered a lot more seriously than in the past”.

Responding to the defeat of the Yes campaign on Saturday, Senator Price said it meant the dawn of a “new era in Indigenous policy” based on a rejection of the politics of grievance, with the Opposition Leader arguing that efforts needed to be redoubled to close the gap.

Mr Dutton recommitted the Coalition to implementing a royal commission into child sexual abuse in Indigenous communities and an audit into spending on ­Indigenous programs.

Speaking to The Australian on Sunday evening, Senator Price said her message to those deeply disappointed by the referendum result was that “not all is lost”.

She said a greater focus would need to be placed by governments on treating Indigenous Australians “as though they are Australians citizens”.

This meant governments doing a better job in seeking to allow “traditional owners in remote communities to be job creators and not having to rely on the public service to bring about jobs and employment”.

“I’d be seeking this government to initiate this kind of work straight away,” she said.

Senator Price stressed she had entered politics to fight for “all Australians” – not only Indigenous Australians – and expressed an interest in broadening her portfolio experience in the future.

One area of interest was the economic development of Northern Australia, with Senator Price arguing there were opportunities for it to “contribute to Australia’s economy more richly”.

The referendum result had also revealed the key importance of the regions, with Senator Price arguing they had spoken “loud and clear” and should be “considered a lot more seriously than in the past”.

Key backers of the No campaign told The Australian on Sunday that Senator Price had played a major role in boosting the vote against the voice to parliament.

Former deputy prime minister John Anderson said she “re-cast the national debate around Indigenous affairs by sheer intellectual grunt and personal courage”.

Mr Anderson said the Coalition needed to “think clearly and work effectively with her to maximise the influence her clear thinking and leadership can provide for Australia”.

Former prime minister Tony Abbott said Senator Price was an “extremely effective advocate” who was proud of her Indigenous heritage while being a “very proud Australian”.

But Senator Price has also amassed fierce critics, with Indigenous researcher and intellectual Marcia Langton labelling her the “princess of assimilation” on referendum night.

Hannah McGlade, a Kurin Minang woman who has studied violent and sexual crimes against Indigenous women and children for 30 years, said Senator Price had been “a major force in this campaign and, I believe, in promoting racist discourse to Aboriginal People”.

She said Senator Price would “have the support of many Australians who have not come on the journey of reconciliation”.

“This was a phenomenon seen in the Donald Trump rise, where working class white people were able to be turned against African-American people,” she said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/voice-referendum-jacinta-price-tells-labor-there-can-be-no-return-to-the-status-quo-on-indigenous-policy/news-story/28447815b200202620ddcf704860586b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749373

File: 51544ca21e6c356⋯.jpg (231.59 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Anthony_Albanese_in_Parlia….jpg)

>>19739995

Voice referendum: Anthony Albanese says next steps ‘wont be developed in days’ amid pressure on treaty, truth-telling

ROSIE LEWIS - OCTOBER 17, 2023

Peter Dutton has demanded Anthony Albanese “come clean” on whether the government remains committed to establishing a Makarrata commission to oversee treaty and truth-telling following the voice referendum’s defeat, as the Prime Minister warns next steps towards reconciliation won’t be developed over days.

The political stoush between the major parties over how to tackle disadvantage in Indigenous communities came as Greens First Nations spokeswoman Dorinda Dox cautioned Mr Albanese not to “abandon our people”.

The government is reviewing Labor’s commitment to a Makarrata commission after the resounding No vote at the voice referendum and is facing pressure from Indigenous leaders, the Greens and crossbenchers to prioritise truth-telling.

Mr Albanese said the Uluru Statement from the Heart – which asks for voice, treaty and truth – was developed over decades and a “new path” forward would be devised in a considered, constructive way.

“The expectation that the next step should be developed over days is not respectful. And it’s not one that I will engage in,” Mr Albanese said.

“Our commitment to listening to Indigenous Australians is undiminished. Our commitment to Closing the Gap is undiminished. We accepted the invitation from First Nations people, which was given in the Uluru Statement from the Heart, to invite Australians to walk with them on the path that they had requested. We did that. That was not given the support in the referendum and therefore we have to find a new path.”

In question time, the Opposition Leader referred to a 2021 quote from Mr Albanese in which he said: “There can be no real progress on Closing the Gap and there can be no reconciliation without treaty and truth-telling.”

Mr Dutton asked: “Will the Prime Minister be honest and upfront with Australians and inform the House whether or not he remains committed to a treaty and truth-telling process?”

Rallying Coalition MPs in parliament on Tuesday, Mr Dutton said it was concerning the Prime Minister couldn’t say if his government was committed to treaty or truth-telling despite saying 34 times during the referendum campaign the Uluru Statement should be implemented in full.

“Either you’re committed or you’re not committed, either this is the great moral challenge of our time or it’s not. Just come clean for the Australian people,” Mr Dutton told MPs, according to a Coalition spokeswoman.

Mr Dutton is pushing for a royal commission into child sexual abuse in Indigenous communities and an audit of Indigenous programs as practical steps to help Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

The Greens want a $250m truth and justice commission “to talk honestly about the violence and dispossession of First Nations peoples so we can heal and move forward together”.

The party also wants to work towards treaties.

When asked for her response to the government reviewing its commitment to the Uluru Statement from the Heart, Senator Cox said: “Don’t abandon us, because you set us up and you committed to this in full.

“So don’t abandon the concept that we still need to have a voice so you still need to hear us. But also that the other two elements of these are very, very important. Treaty-making in this country is about making agreements. And so no one loses anything in that but we come to an agreement of how we want to walk forward together. And that is a conversation. That is where we reconcile what’s happened in this nation, but we have to tell the truth first.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/voice-referendum-anthony-albanese-says-next-steps-wont-be-developed-in-days-amid-pressure-on-treaty-truthtelling/news-story/cc903acd3fc5d5b7912916853d9fa553

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749377

File: c0368c1d94b4e26⋯.jpg (171.04 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_arrives_f….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19749373

After Australia said No on voice, Anthony Albanese to review Labor’s treaty pledge on treaty and truth-telling

GEOFF CHAMBERS - and ROSIE LEWIS - OCTOBER 16, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese will review Labor’s commitment to establish a Makarrata commission after the voice referendum failure, as Indigenous leaders, the Greens and crossbenchers increase pressure on the government to back truth-telling and treaty.

In his first parliamentary showdown with Peter Dutton following Saturday’s referendum, the Prime Minister could not confirm whether his government would fully implement the Uluru Statement from the Heart without a constitutional voice.

Ahead of rallying the troops at his first post-referendum Labor caucus meeting on Tuesday, Mr Albanese on Monday accepted personal “responsibility” for the crushing defeat but fell short of strongly endorsing treaty and truth-telling processes.

The Australian understands the government will wait to consult with key Indigenous leaders following their week of silence before reviewing Labor’s pre-election pledge to fund a $27m Makarrata commission super­vising treaty-making and truth-telling.

A senior government source on Monday suggested the resounding defeat of the voice referendum undermined remaining requests from the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which are treaty and truth-telling via a Makarrata commission.

The source said the government wouldn’t be hurried into deciding whether to maintain its commitment to establishing a Makarrata commission, with caucus and Indigenous leaders to be involved in deciding the next steps in achieving reconciliation.

Another source said there would be a period of reflecting, pausing, listening and letting the dust settle before the government outlined how it would tackle disadvantage in Indigenous communities and Closing the Gap.

With spooked Labor MPs urging a major pivot back to core economic and national security issues, Mr Albanese held a nat­ional cabinet meeting on Monday night to rubber-stamp the next phase of the National Skills Agreement with premiers and chief ministers.

Under fire from the Coalition in question time over the cost-of-living crisis, the government spruiked $23bn of measures including energy bill relief, cheaper childcare, increased rent assistance and greater access to Medicare bulk-billing.

Labor MPs on Monday said they would leave it to the Indigenous Australians Minister, Linda Burney, to determine a new way forward after consulting with pro-voice Indigenous leaders following their week of silence.

The review, understood to be sparked by internal concerns about public reaction to treaties after the No campaign weaponised the Makarrata commission during the voice campaign, is expected to examine merits and functions of a national process and crossovers with state governments pursuing truth-telling, voice and treaty bodies.

If the pre-election promise were watered down or significantly altered, Mr Albanese would likely cop fierce opposition from his own Left-faction and Indigenous activists.

A day after Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said the government remained fully committed to implementing the Uluru Statement from the Heart, Mr Albanese told the parliament that Makarrata “is simply a ­Yolngu word for coming together after struggle”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749378

File: 779624210b1c9a4⋯.jpg (130.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,Albanese_to_review_treaty_….jpg)

>>19749377

2/2

Mr Albanese, who will be in Washington next week when leaders regather to prepare their response to the referendum, said “no one is arguing for the status quo, no one can say that just keep on doing the same thing is good enough for Australia”.

“The referendum was about listening to people and about getting better outcomes. And these principles will continue to guide me,” he told parliament. “I will continue to listen to people and communities and consult with Indigenous Australians about a way forward.

“Because the issues we sought to address have not gone away, and nor have the people of goodwill and good heart who want to address them.

“As a government, we have a responsibility to write the next chapter, a chapter that sees the gap closing because we know that only four out of 19 targets are on track.

“Australians know that is not good enough and that is why we must seek to achieve that change.”

The peak body representing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and their families said it wouldn’t be silent after Australians rejected the voice referendum, as it called for truth-telling. “The Uluru statement calls for voice, treaty and truth. It’s now time for some truth-telling,” Secretariat of National Aboriginal and Islander Child Care chief executive Catherine Liddle said.

“This means looking at who we were as a country, the impacts of that on who we are, but most importantly how we go forward to be the country we want to be – a place that values and has pride in being home to the oldest living culture on the planet.

“We also know Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders have the solutions to the issues we face.”

Crossbenchers across the lower and upper houses said truth-telling must be prioritised by governments after Saturday’s result, saying it was imperative federal parliament listened to the voices of Indigenous Australians.

Greens leader Adam Bandt has endorsed a $250m Truth and Justice Commission to work alongside state government truth-telling processes and help progress treaties to recognise First Nations peoples’ sovereignty.

Seeking to deflect pressure back on Mr Dutton, Mr Albanese accused the Opposition Leader of backflipping on his pre-referendum commitment to hold a second vote on constitutional recognition in future years if the Coalition won the 2025 election.

Mr Dutton on Monday backed away from a second referendum, which had been criticised by Nat­ionals MPs, because the “Australian public is probably over the referendum process for some time”.

“The Prime Minister embarked on a divisive path, he spent $400m of taxpayers’ money. He was warned not to go down this path of division and he bears the responsibility for where our country is today,” Mr Dutton said.

“There’s a lot of healing to take place and all of us can be a part of that, but we shouldn’t forget the fact that the Prime Minister deliberately kept the detail from Australians. That is a very significant contributor to the outcome where the Prime Minister dragged the vote down from 65 per cent, down closer to below 40 per cent.

“That is quite a remarkable, almost unprecedented failure in campaigning in an election in our country’s history.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/after-australia-said-no-on-voice-anthony-albanese-to-review-labors-treaty-pledge-on-treaty-and-truthtelling/news-story/0ce2e13376909439b85c7f1af9d61e74

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749397

File: 34ec1f915e9fc8b⋯.jpg (194.95 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: d661ff64916d318⋯.jpg (447.25 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Qantas_has_unveiled_its_ne….jpg)

>>19699323

>>19699336

>>19739995

Failed voice referendum shines light on division

ROBERT GOTTLIEBSEN - OCTOBER 16, 2023

1/2

The societal split that emerged in the referendum duplicates what is happening in the UK, the US and other western democracies.

But in Australia, it took a race-based referendum to understand just how deep the community division has become.

Neither the prime minister nor business leaders understood the depth of the national division.

Business leaders, PMs and/or their older children often live in the pockets of Australia that are totally different to the rest of the nation.

Anthony Albanese represents the Sydney seat of Grayndler, where voters are disproportionately concerned with indigenous affairs, racism and the environment than the rest of Australia, which is far more concerned with economics and practical situations.

There was a 75 per cent Yes vote in Grayndler. Albanese did not understand that his electorate is very different to the rest of the nation, where most ALP voters live.

Many CEOs of large enterprises live in similar communities to Albanese, and their disastrous allocation of shareholder cash to the Yes campaign may have partly reflected the attitudes of people they meet in the supermarket.

CEOs marketing to the nation can therefore push the wrong strategy buttons.

By contrast, Peter Dutton represents the Brisbane seat of Dickson, which is much more like the rest of the nation and recorded a 70 per cent No vote.

Very few CEOs live in Dickson, although non-Brisbane CEOs pass the vicinity as they drive from the Brisbane airport.

I obtained the world comparison and the Albanese/Grayndler insight from a remarkable opinion poll produced three days before the referendum by the UK-based Focaldata group, who correctly forecasted the No vote would reach at least 61 per cent of the electorate and could go higher.

All the Australian-based pollsters predicted a strong No victory, but few predicted the vote would exceed 60 per cent. Accordingly, I want to share with you some of Focaldata’s conclusions, which proved stunningly accurate.

The chief research officer of Focaldata, James Kanagasooriam, concluded that the Yes campaign’s celebrity endorsements and corporate sponsors gave the Yes campaign a “feel” similar to the Hillary Clinton US Presidential campaign in 2016 and the “Remain in the EU” campaign also in 2016. Both also failed.

The Focaldata poll confirmed the structural attitude split in the Labor Party between its older, rural and traditionalist voters and its younger, urban, university-educated base.

Focaldata says this pattern of votes could have been lifted straight from the UK’s EU referendum – with the Yes campaign doing materially worse in the polls.

Australian politics now looks a lot like the US and UK realignment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749403

File: ed810486a7b7396⋯.jpg (227.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Alan_Joyce_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

>>19749397

2/2

While as in the UK, Australia’s Yes supporters have a high number of young people; the 35-44 to age group in Australia remains firmly in the economic and practical issue group voting No.

In the UK, that age group is dominated by Yes voters.

But among most Australians, indigenous affairs rank low in importance, so the Australian realignment may be slower, and the Liberal leader (read Conservative for UK readers) may not be the person to transfer the change into gains for his party.

On the other hand, Focaldata say that almost no ALP style centre-left party in the English-speaking world would hold the Queensland and WA types of rural voters.

The ALP forgot how far apart its rural voters in Queensland and WA were from NSW and Victorian voters.

The Yes side were relying on partisanship kicking in on the Labor side, but that strategy ran up against the global demographic and attitudinal trends now seen in Australia.

Focaldata also concluded that the voice was a hard-to-understand concept and even after months of campaigning, a significant proportion of Australians didn’t really understand it.

And even when they did understand, they were told simultaneously that it was both an important and modest change.

Focaldata concluded the Yes side had only one cogent argument to achieve victory – that it will improve the lives of Indigenous Australians.

The No side deployed three separate arguments that only partially overlapped and therefore offered a much wider electoral coverage: now is not the time for a referendum due to the cost of living crisis; the voice undermines the principle of equality; and more controversially, the concept of ‘First Australians’ is itself flawed.

I would add that the No campaign also focused on the fact that there were no details provided by the Yes campaign.

But if Yes provided the details, they would be forced to reveal that the voice representation on almost any matter to the public service (separate from the parliament) had the power to completely clog government.

That revelation would have caused even more Yes voters to be attracted to No.

In simple terms, Yes was a bad product and no amount of corporate shareholders money could overcome its deficiencies.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/failed-voice-referendum-shines-light-on-division/news-story/e15b9495bcbf421d5b50b720363acf2a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749421

File: 78a22d37e42b736⋯.jpg (227.52 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Yes23_campaign_co_chair_Ra….jpg)

File: 642c216b570382c⋯.jpg (244.51 KB,1620x2162,810:1081,Senator_Andrew_Bragg.jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740235

>>19740312

After No vote, new leaders’ summit to seek new way to constitutional recognition

PAIGE TAYLOR, ROSIE LEWIS and FERGUS ELLIS - OCTOBER 16, 2023

Indigenous leaders who have spent years working towards constitutional recognition are ­expected to regroup next Sunday to begin working on a response to the failed voice referendum.

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles ruled out another ­attempt at constitutional recognition but reaffirmed the government’s commitment to the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full – which asks for voice, treaty and truth. There was no detail on how the government would pursue treaty and truth, with Mr Marles saying the government’s focus was now on reconciliation and closing the gap.

“This (the voice referendum No result) is not a vote against reconciliation, nor is it a vote against closing the gap,” he told the ABC.

“We will work with Indigenous Australia and we’ll definitely listen to them very closely about how we can take steps forward in closing the gap. I really do hope that coming out of this there is, in fact, an increased appetite to put in place programs which can close the gap.”

Voice supporters across the government and opposition said the dust had to settle before the country could consider what to do next on reconciliation. Many Indigenous leaders were participating in a week of silence. The Australian has been told the government will wait to learn the outcome of talks between the Indigenous leaders.

One Labor MP said an ATSIC-style body should be revisited. Health Minister Mark Butler said he would work closely with the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation on how to move forward.

Liberal MP Julian Leeser, who quit the opposition frontbench to campaign for the voice, said the country would need to reflect on what the No vote meant and move slowly towards any second referendum solely on constitutional recognition, as proposed by Peter Dutton.

“We need to commit to the reconciliation process,” Mr Leeser told the ABC. “I think the one thing all sides agreed last night was that Indigenous disadvantage is the top issue. That’s around closing the gap, recommit to the closing the gap process.”

Liberal senator Andrew Bragg said the Albanese government had “squandered a generational opportunity” through its referendum process and model, and there needed to be a recovery “from this shambles” before a conversation on reconciliation.

On Sunday, the First People’s Assembly of Victoria – established in legislation to work towards treaties with the state government – said constitutional recognition was “not the only show in town”.

The treaties being negotiated in Victoria are a series of agreements that defy many people’s understanding of what a treaty is. For example, the agreements may commit government and its ­agencies to work with Indigenous people and give them the authority to make decisions on certain projects.

The Closing the Gap national agreement signed in 2020 by all premiers, chief ministers and then prime minister Scott Morrison is a commitment to work together with Indigenous communities to reduce disparity. However, a Productivity Commission report published in July found this was failing so badly there must be a watchdog with the power to hold bureaucrats to account.

In a statement shared online by Yes23 co-chair Rachel Perkins, the Central Land Council and the NSW Aboriginal Land and Sea Council, Indigenous leaders who supported the voice said: “This is a bitter irony. That people who have only been on this continent for 235 years would refuse to recognise those whose home this land has been for 60,000 and more years is beyond reason.

“Talk not of recognition and reconciliation. Only of justice and the rights of our people in our own country.”

The emphatic rejection of the voice ends 15 years of work that began when John Howard pledged in 2007 to hold a ­referendum on constitutional ­recognition.

In a landmark speech at the Sydney Institute, Mr Howard proposed amending the Constitution to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s “special (though not separate) place within a reconciled, indivisible nation”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indegnous-leaders-summit-to-seek-new-way-to-constitutional-recognition/news-story/3d85ead548dcb1fefef43640ee8553c6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749445

File: 37a875946b81249⋯.mp4 (12.11 MB,540x960,9:16,m6CmO5L94qSOOMh1.mp4)

File: 77c230bc171789c⋯.jpg (291.64 KB,Yes_supporters_react_as_th….jpg)

File: c7666ccc174b137⋯.jpg (506.11 KB,Senator_Lidia_Thorpe.jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740235

>>19740312

ABC reporter says Indigenous communities to rethink whether ‘kindness is the best approach’

An ABC reporter says the Voice result may cause Indigenous communities to rethink how they interact with the rest of Australia.

Frank Chung - October 16, 2023

An ABC journalist says the failure of the Voice referendum may cause Indigenous communities to rethink how they interact with the rest of Australia and whether “kindness is the best approach”.

Indigenous leaders may no longer restrain their “black anger”, according to the ABC’s Indigenous Affairs reporter Isabella Higgins, who predicts a rise in “black sovereignty” and a rejection of the “Australian regime”.

Higgins appeared on the ABC’s Insiders panel on Sunday, the morning after the Voice to Parliament referendum was resoundingly defeated.

Asked about the mood among Indigenous Australians at the Yes event in Sydney’s inner-west on Saturday night following the result, Higgins said the community was “resilient” and had “risen from the ashes many times”.

“They said, our communities won’t stop running if this is a No vote,” she said.

“But I think it’s also been the conventional wisdom in the communities that when we’re talking about reconciliation, we use kind language, we’re generous, we extend the hand of friendship, we invite people in to share our culture, and I think if we look at the campaign messaging around the Voice, it was similar to that.

“So I think this failing, this being rejected, so categorically by all Australians, it will change the way Indigenous Australians want to interact with the rest of the country. It will change whether kindness is the best approach.

“I think often in the community, it is well understood that black anger is not tolerated and so we see leaders pull in their rage, pull in their sadness and constantly use language of generosity, use graciousness to try and appeal to the Australian people. And after, this I think there will be a generation of leaders who have been burnt by this and who won’t be interested in doing that any more.”

Host David Speers asked if the result would “swell the ranks” of the “black sovereign movement” led by independent Senator Lidia Thorpe.

“I would not be surprised if more people pushed towards that message that comes from Lidia Thorpe about not engaging so much with mainstream Australia, not bowing to them, challenging the Australian regime,” she said.

“And of course there will be anger, I think even if you weren’t a card-carrying Yes voter in the Indigenous community, to see the vote, to see Australians reject this so categorically, that’s really hard — to feel, to experience, the whole debate was very uncomfortable. It felt like at times the worth of an Indigenous life was being debated. So I think the message from people like Lidia Thorpe, the message around ‘black sovereignty’, will appeal more after this.”

Asked earlier why she thought Australians voted No, Higgins said she had been surprised by the number of people at the polling booth in final week who still did not understand the proposal.

“We were hearing this from the Yes campaigners, from Anthony Albanese, a week out from this referendum we think 25 per cent of people haven’t decided yet,” she said.

“That’s leaving a lot of truth-telling, a lot of winning over hearts and minds to the final seven days of this campaign. It was a huge job for them and they just couldn’t do it in seven days. It was a difficult proposal, I think, for some people to get their heads around.

“I think for those who perhaps don’t understand the lives of Indigenous Australians, who don’t understand the inequity, the challenges to then try and understand this proposal and how that could that could potentially fix some of these things, it was too much for them to get their head around and in seven days that just wasn’t going to happen.”

Higgins also agreed with Speers that having Indigenous leaders Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Nyunggai Warren Mundine front the No campaign helped “confuse a lot of non-Indigenous Australians”.

“I think she was an incredibly potent campaigner,” she said.

“She was a relatively young Indigenous woman out there saying things that we often hear from a very different demographic, saying that colonisation hasn’t negatively impacted Aboriginal people — I mean, that is patently untrue — but to see someone who looks like that from this community saying that, that absolutely confuses the Australian public. It is not true, but because she is saying it, people question it.”

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/current-affairs/abc-reporter-says-indigenous-communities-to-rethink-whether-kindness-is-the-best-approach/news-story/032eec2a999e487a9f540a2291fa08c5

https://twitter.com/abcnews/status/1713423419084046800

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749474

File: cb41cf281124ad0⋯.jpg (197.79 KB,960x640,3:2,Indigenous_leaders_Noel_Pe….jpg)

File: e105bc9762a4d0c⋯.jpg (713.16 KB,3000x1935,200:129,Nira_illim_bulluk_man_Marc….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740235

>>19740312

Why Indigenous leaders have agreed to a vow of silence after Voice rejection

Paul Sakkal and James Massola - October 16, 2023

1/2

Some of Australia’s top Indigenous Voice campaigners began drafting a statement vowing a week of silence before polls closed on referendum day.

The historic statement, which was not signed by any individuals, was released on Saturday evening after the referendum result became clear and called for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island flags to be lowered to half-mast for the week.

Following the referendum’s rejection by all six states, prominent campaigners maintained their silence as the prime minister and opposition leader led debate in the House of Representatives over the future of reconciliation.

While the statement, which has been widely shared across social media, thanked Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for having the conviction to hold the referendum, it also noted the “bitter irony” that those who had been on the continent for 235 years had denied recognition to people who had lived here for 60,000 years.

“Now is not the time to dissect the reasons for this tragic outcome. This will be done in the weeks, years and decades to come. Now is the time for silence, to mourn and deeply consider the consequence of this outcome,” the statement said.

“The truth is that we offered this recognition and it has been refused. We now know where we stand in this our own country.”

Many on the Yes side, including Indigenous lawyer Noel Pearson and Rachel Perkins, spent referendum night with their families rather than at Yes events to surround themselves with emotional support.

This masthead has confirmed with multiple sources, who spoke anonymously because of the sensitive nature of the matter, that the proposal to have a week of silence in the event of a loss was being discussed days before Saturday.

The document was circulated to Indigenous leaders by Dr Josie Douglas of the Central Land Council throughout Saturday after consultation with key Voice campaigners.

Sources said Douglas pulled together the final wording on a document that compiled contributions from one or more of the senior Indigenous leaders.

Key Yes23 leaders made calls to Indigenous figures across the Voice movement on Saturday afternoon, well before polls closed, informing them about the plan.

This masthead contacted Pearson, Voice co-design authors Marcia Langton and Tom Calma, Uluru Dialogue leaders Pat Anderson and Megan Davis, leading Yes23 campaigners Sean Gordon, Thomas Mayo and Dean Parkin, and Central Land Council leader chief executive Les Turner on Monday to further discuss the reasons for Indigenous leaders’ silence following the referendum result.

All of them declined to comment, with one noting that “it’s not that we are not working, we are talking to each other and taking stock after something that has been pretty bruising”.

The only prominent Voice campaigner who has chosen to speak out is Marcus Stewart, formerly of Victoria’s First People’s Assembly, who said on Sunday: “We asked for this referendum and the government facilitated the process. The loss of this referendum falls fairly and squarely on us as Aboriginal campaigners.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749477

File: 4e288c3653b2782⋯.jpg (192 KB,AD_1.jpg)

File: 7e9fb4871f305c2⋯.jpg (200.42 KB,SS_1.jpg)

>>19749474

2/2

Some of the campaigners were on Monday locked in discussions about their next steps and the manner in which they would address the nation following the defeat that has devastated them.

A number of Voice figures are not fully comfortable with the silence. They believe the voices of the black leadership should be heard in the immediate aftermath of the result, to avoid the narrative about the loss being set only by the prime minister and other politicians.

Sources abiding by the vow of silence said some leaders were frustrated that Albanese and other pro-Voice politicians were, in their view, downplaying the potential role of racism and misinformation in an attempt to minimise political fallout and allow the government to move on from the loss.

These sentiments were expressed by lesser-known Voice activists on Sunday.

Allira Davis, the niece of Uluru Dialogues leader Megan Davis and chair of the Uluru youth dialogue, said on X, formerly Twitter: “The PM is moving on tonight. He just wants to go to Washington and prepare for re-election.”

“And we are just a blip. He’s quoting Churchill FFS. A whole culture of 65,000 years and we are not a part of Australian democracy. And we will not be recognised.”

Uluru Dialogues campaigner Sally Scales posted on X: “This was a devastating result that keeps our people in the status quo. It is bleak. The PM was insulting & pathetic. How dare he. A cop out. Albanese and the ALP will not accept the lies that we put up with. We have been rejected by the Australian people. Reconciliation is dead.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/why-indigenous-leaders-have-agreed-to-a-vow-of-silence-after-voice-rejection-20231016-p5ecpn.html

https://twitter.com/DavisAllira/status/1713139559092154428

https://twitter.com/SallyScales/status/1713137274224017456

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749486

File: fd941907d9fead8⋯.jpg (245.94 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noongar_human_rights_lawye….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740235

>>19740312

Voice referendum: Aboriginal groups speak up amid concerns about week of silence

PAUL GARVEY - OCTOBER 16, 2023

A leading Indigenous human rights lawyer has rejected calls for a week of silence in the wake of the voice referendum, declaring now was the time to discuss a path to improving the lives of some of Australia’s most impoverished communities.

As many Indigenous Australians grappled with the disappointment of Saturday’s result, some called for seven days of silence while others directed their anger towards the campaigning against the voice by independent senator Lidia Thorpe and the so-called “Progressive No” movement.

Noongar human rights lawyer Hannah McGlade, an associate professor and member of the UN Permanent Forum for Indigenous Issues, told The Australian that the call for a week of silence was “ridiculous”.

“They shouldn’t be telling other people how to behave. That’s part of the problem of Aboriginal affairs,” she said. “They can have silence if they want, but this is the time to talk about everything, I would have thought.”

She urged the federal government to redouble its efforts around closing the gap in the wake of the referendum result, particularly on issues around Indigenous incarceration, suicide and child protection. “It can’t end here,” she said.

“The Prime Minister and (Indigenous Australians Minister Linda) Burney should call a roundtable meeting urgently with Indigenous leaders, particularly those who have supported this campaign, to make sure that we don’t slip further behind.”

The National Native Title Council, the peak body representing Native Title groups across Australia, also broke the silence to call for First Nations communities to come together in the wake of the “shameful” result.

“We will have to explain this outcome to our young people, they will then have to go to school knowing the majority of Australians have turned their back on them. For our elders, this rejection is an affront to decades of tireless work to advance our rights,” NNTC chief executive Jamie Lowe said.

“This week, we must hold our young people and elders close, and sit with our families and communities to move through this shameful moment in Australian history together.”

The group’s chairman, Kado Muir, called on Australians to recommit to reconciliation.

“Despite the outcome of the referendum, First Nations peoples, our sovereign nations and rights persist. These rights are determined by our birth, inheritance and belonging to this country,” he said. “These rights are who we are, and they cannot be taken away by a vote.”

SNAICC, an Indigenous group focused on care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, said that while it respected the groups and individuals who had chosen to “go dark” this week, it had decided not to remain silent and instead issued a statement calling for people to be aware of the potential impact of the referendum result on children.

“It’s now time for some truth-telling,” the group said. “This means looking at who we were as a country, the impacts of that on who we are, but most importantly how we go forward to be the country we want to be. A place that values and has pride in being home to the oldest living culture on the planet.”

The referendum result has also refocused attention on the role played by the Progressive No camp, headed by Senator Thorpe, who opposed the voice on the grounds it didn’t go far enough and risked ceding Indigenous sovereignty – with Thorpe eventually quitting the Greens earlier this year after falling out with the party over her opposition to the voice.

Yes23 campaigner James Blackwell, a Wiradyuri man who resigned from the Greens earlier this year in response to what he said was bullying within the party’s First Nations Network, broke his post-referendum silence to take aim at the Progressive No group.

He said those activists should not escape criticism in the wake of the referendum defeat.

Meanwhile, results from polling centres in Indigenous communities have pointed to strong support for the voice from First Nations people.

The polling data has hurt claims from voice opponents that the proposal did not have majority Indigenous support.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/voice-referendum-aboriginal-groups-speak-up-amid-concerns-about-week-of-silence/news-story/3f2638ca5a7c575742ba55366bff0cfb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749502

File: 86d2812ae06c722⋯.jpg (316.71 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Goldstein_MP_Zoe_Daniel_is….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19749377

‘Truth-telling must be priority’, say crossbenchers

ROSIE LEWIS - OCTOBER 16, 2023

Crossbenchers in the lower and upper houses say truth-telling must be prioritised by governments after the voice referendum’s resounding defeat, as Labor weighs up whether to maintain its full commitment to the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

Victorian independent MP Zoe Daniel, whose electorate of Goldstein voted 56-44 for an Indigenous voice to parliament enshrined in the Constitution, said federal parliament should heed Indigenous Australians’ appeal to be listened to on policies to address disadvantage.

The Greens are pushing for a $250m truth and justice commission after the father of reconciliation, Patrick Dodson, last week suggested the country would need to follow a path similar to post-apartheid South Africa if the referendum were rejected, pointing to its truth and reconciliation commission.

“I agree with Senator Pat Dodson that we have reopened the scar around the sore that Indigenous Australia thought we were dealing with through the Apology, Wik and Mabo,” Ms Daniel said.

“We do need truth-telling in some form, whether it be a truth and reconciliation commission as in South Africa. We must ask Indigenous Australia whether that is what they want and in what form.”

Tasmanian Jacqui Lambie Network senator Tammy Tyrrell said a truth-telling process before treaty was a “good place to start”.

“But the federal government shouldn’t interfere with the important work … already happening across many states and territories,” she said. “Some states, like the Tasmanian government, have already started a truth-telling process … The federal government’s role is to help states work with First Nations people to achieve this.”

NSW independent MP Zali Steggall said she would respect the week of silence led by Indigenous leaders of the Yes campaign to reflect on the referendum’s outcome before seeking their views on a way forward.

“At the very least, it is time for practical listening by government to issues First Nations communities are crying out to be heard on, like the water trigger in the EPBC Act to properly assess use of water by gas fracking projects in the Beetaloo Basin,” Ms Steggall said.

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson said the first step towards reconciliation was a “comprehensive audit and examination of the thousands of Indigenous corporations, land councils and charities – and the programs they implement with taxpayer funding – to determine their role in why the gaps are not being closed”.

Tasmanian independent MP Andrew Wilkie did not believe it was appropriate for him to suggest the next steps on reconciliation, saying it was Indigenous Australians who should be consulted.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/truthtelling-must-be-priority-say-crossbenchers/news-story/2326b430b60e06a13d61620b10dd1c6b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749507

File: 0e8cb67c5088d11⋯.jpg (237.07 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_leader_Mick_Goo….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19749377

Voice referendum: ‘We have got to keep going’, says Mick Gooda

LYDIA LYNCH - OCTOBER 16, 2023

Indigenous leader Mick Gooda says there is a way forward for practical change in remote communities, despite the failed voice referendum, with Queensland’s Treaty Institute to begin work early next year.

Mr Gooda, a member of the senior advisory group that designed the voice proposal and who was an architect of Queensland’s treaty laws, said he “felt sick” watching results come in on Saturday night, with 68.9 per cent of his home state voting No in the referendum.

“It was a bit of a reality check, but then I thought, we have the legislation and the resources in place (for treaty and truth-telling). so we have something a bit positive” he told The Australian.

“We’ve got to keep going, this treaty is once in a lifetime and so we are putting our heads down and making sure these things work.”

Queensland parliament passed laws in May – with support from Labor, the Greens and the Liberal National Party – allowing the government to negotiate treaty deals with up to 150 First Nation groups.

Traditional owners will lead negotiations on what they want in treaties, but may seek repatriation, joint management of nat­ional parks, renaming of places, changes to school curriculums and reforms introduced in health, criminal justice and child pro­tection.

A three-year truth-telling inquiry will investigate the “impacts of colonisation” and pave the way for treaties.

The number of state treaties, which could take years to finalise, are unknown but each deal is likely to be worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars apiece.

Mr Gooda said even though the voice referendum had failed, treaties would give opportunities for Indigenous people to have a say on how health, housing and justice services were run in their communities. “That is what I am in there fighting for, exactly that,” he said. “We're just going ahead fullbore. We don’t have an option, we have to keep going.

“We are working on having the Treaty Institute and truth-­telling inquiry stood up early next year, as close to January as possible.”

Mr Gooda said the 10-member treaty institute would be prohibited from negotiating deals with the government, with individual communities required to lead the ­discussions.

“I wouldn’t go as far to say that we will have treaties next year, but there’s certainly some people who will be identifying themselves as treaty parties fairly early,” he said.

“A couple of Native Title mobs, if they were so inclined, I think they would be able to move to a treaty negotiation pretty quick.

“The big thing we’re waiting on now is for the government to start a process of appointing the Treaty Institute Council.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/voice-referendum-we-have-got-to-keep-going-says-mick-gooda/news-story/c189d2122ecf03f6515f2c58adb62701

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749528

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19699368

‘You are not alone’: Albanese condemns Hamas attacks and urges parliament to stand with Israel

Natassia Chrysanthos and Angus Thompson - October 16, 2023

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has condemned Hamas attacks as “calculated, pitiless brutality” as he moved a motion calling for parliament to stand with Israel and denounce antisemitism.

In his most extensive comments on the conflict, which has claimed the lives of more than 1400 Israelis and 2600 Palestinians since Hamas’ October 7 assault, Albanese declared the Islamist militant group an enemy of both Jewish people and Palestinians and urged Australians to resist division at home.

“The evil committed by Hamas in Israel has chilled every Australian heart,” he said. “This was no act of war against the army of an enemy. It was the slaughter of innocent people. It was an act of terror.”

But Albanese’s call was met by division, with the Greens rejecting the motion after a failed bid to amend it to condemn Israeli war crimes, and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton trying to paint the government as weak in its response to pro-Palestine protests.

The prime minister’s motion also recognised that Jewish people had been subject to hateful prejudice, called for the release of all Israeli hostages, acknowledged the “devastating loss of Israeli and Palestinian life” and supported international humanitarian efforts.

“I want to repeat the message I’ve given to all Jewish Australians since the outset: You are not alone. Your fellow Australians stand with you,” he said.

Seeking to draw a distinction between Hamas and civilians, he said: “Let us be clear: Hamas is an enemy – but not just of Israel. Hamas is an enemy of all peace-loving Palestinian people, who are left to pay a devastating price for this terrorism.”

Hamas has been declared a terrorist organisation by Australia, the United States and the European Union for its long-running armed resistance against Israel.

Albanese reiterated Israel’s right to defend itself but joined international calls for the country to abide by the rules of war and protect civilian lives, as its military massed on Gaza’s border readying for a ground assault and Palestinians fled south.

Dutton condemned Hamas’ attack on Israel as “sheer barbarity” and “the embodiment of evil”, but in comments that contrasted with Albanese’s, he said Israel should show no restraint in its retaliation.

“The Coalition proudly supports Israel’s right to do what is necessary and needed in the circumstances, with every asset available to safeguard its sovereignty, to bolster its borders, to protect its people and to thwart threats it now faces,” Dutton said.

He also accused the government of condoning antisemitic slogans used by a small group of pro-Palestine protesters at the Sydney Opera House last week, despite Albanese on Monday repeating his condemnation of the chants, saying they were “a betrayal of our Australian values”.

Dutton said the protesters had shouted words that “we should never hear in our country or anywhere else in the civilised world: ‘Gas the Jews, F the Jews and F Israel’.”

When Labor MP Alicia Payne interjected, telling him to “stop saying it”, Dutton vowed to keep repeating the chants.

“Shame on you for condoning those words or suggesting that those words shouldn’t be condemned in this place,” he said.

Payne later told this masthead she interjected because “I don’t think the Jewish community needs to keep hearing those abhorrent words”.

The claim that protesters yelled “gas the Jews” is unverified.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749532

File: db101a22dc17b03⋯.jpg (590.17 KB,2400x1440,5:3,The_House_of_Representativ….jpg)

>>19749528

2/2

Greens leader Adam Bandt pushed to replace support for Israel’s right to defend itself in Albanese’s motion with a condemnation of the bombing of Palestinian civilians and a warning against the imminent invasion of the Gaza Strip, in an amendment also backed by teal independents Dr Sophie Scamps and Kylea Tink.

But the change was rejected before the Coalition and independents sided with the government in a final vote of support for Israel.

“The Greens voted against the looming invasion of Gaza, but the rest of parliament voted to back it,” Bandt later said. “A humanitarian disaster in Gaza can turn into a humanitarian catastrophe if the invasion proceeds.”

Scamps said she voted to condemn Hamas’ attack on Israel “while I also voted to recognise that the lives of innocent civilians, including women and children, in Gaza are also being lost”.

During the debate, Muslim MP Ed Husic told parliament the attacks by Hamas were “an absolute abomination” and the group must be held to account.

“Hamas must be, and is rightly being, condemned. Innocent Palestinians should be protected. They should be given passage,” he said.

Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-CEO Alex Ryvchin accused the Greens of being the party of “hypocrisy and dishonour”.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said three flights had left Israel on Sunday and another two would leave on Monday.

“The situation is highly challenging and rapidly changing. People should consider these might be our last flights for the foreseeable future,” she said, after earlier saying attempts to evacuate Australians from Gaza had not been successful.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-condemns-hamas-attacks-urges-israel-to-follow-rules-of-war-20231016-p5eck9.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAEbfgGU4kU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749556

File: 778140639d7cbbf⋯.jpg (149.01 KB,1024x768,4:3,Israel_Hamas_conflict_Teal….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19749528

Teal duo in ‘moral fog’ over savage Israel attack, say Jewish leaders

BEN PACKHAM, JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS and JESS MALCOLM - OCTOBER 17, 2023

1/2

Two Sydney teal MPs have joined forces with the Greens to accuse Israel of war crimes just nine days after Hamas terrorists murdered more than 1400 Israelis, in a move condemned as “reprehensible” by prominent Jewish leaders.

Sydney MPs Kylea Tink and Sophie Scamps, and Tasmania’s Andrew Wilkie, backed an ­attempt by Greens leader Adam Bandt to amend the bipartisan motion, seeking to erase a statement declaring Australia “stands with Israel and recognises its inherent right to defend itself”.

In its place, the Greens sought to condemn “war crimes perpetrated by the state of Israel, including the bombing of Palestinian civilians”, and call for an immediate ceasefire.

As Israeli troops prepare for a ground invasion of Gaza, Sydney Rabbi Nochum Schapiro blasted the minor party and its independent backers, saying those who sought to weaken Israel’s response to the massacre of its people were akin to “Nazi enablers”.

The NSW Jewish Board of Deputies condemned the MPs’ position as “completely indefensible and morally reprehensible”, while the Executive Council of Australian Jewry accused them of a “moral fog” that insulted the Jewish people.

Introducing the motion to parliament on the first sitting day since Hamas’s attack on October 7, Anthony Albanese said Australia must consider the attack on the Jewish state with “complete moral clarity”.

“Hamas terrorists committed mass murder on a horrific scale,” the Prime Minister told parliament. “This was no act of war against the army of an enemy. It was the slaughter of innocent people. It was an act of terror. Calculated, pitiless brutality.”

Mr Albanese backed Israel’s right to defend itself against the terrorist organisation, while urging it to protect civilians in the Palestinian enclave. The Australian understands the government’s leadership group pushed back against some Left-faction MPs who wanted to toughen the motion’s rhetoric against Israel on humanitarian grounds.

“Australia cannot stay silent and, indeed, back that invasion,” Mr Bandt said, citing UN condemnation of Israel’s decision to prevent food, water and fuel from reaching the Palestinian territory.

“We join with everyone in this parliament in mourning the 1300 Israelis who have lost their lives, but on today’s count there are also between 2300 and 2600 Palestinians who have lost their lives, many of whom are children,” he said. “And we mourn them as well. This is now moving beyond self-defence into an invasion, and it is up to Australia as a peace-loving country to join the push to stop it.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749560

File: 85955ddb105f461⋯.jpg (402.4 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,The_Greens_opposed_a_motio….jpg)

>>19749556

2/2

Ms Tink, the member for North Sydney, said the Hamas attack on Israel was “unspeakably abhorrent”, but Israel’s decision to turn off water to the enclave was a war crime and must stop. “The answer to the horrific ­terrorism of Hamas against ­innocent Israeli civilians cannot be horrific war crimes against innocent Palestinian civilians,” Ms Tink said.

Dr Scamps, the member for Mackellar on Sydney’s northern beaches, said she condemned Hamas’ attack on Israel, but backed the amendment because innocent lives were being lost in Gaza. “My heart goes out to all the innocent people who are caught up in this horrendous and tragic situation instigated by Hamas,” she said.

Mr Wilkie said the Greens’ amendment was “substantially correct”, and “brought more balance to the Australian parliament’s response to the conflict”.

The Greens’ amendment was voted down 107 to seven. The original motion subsequently passed by an overwhelming 134 votes to four, opposed only by the four Greens MPs: Mr Bandt, Max Chandler-Mather, Stephen Bates and Elizabeth Watson-Brown.

Rabbi Schapiro, whose Chabad North Shore includes members from Ms Tink’s and Ms Scamps’ electorates, said the “moral equivalencies” advocated by the Greens and their supporters were aimed at “weakening Israel’s hand”.

“What happened is similar to Nazism, similar to 9-11. The atrocities committed by Hamas are exactly the same as those committed by the Nazis during World War II,” he said. “For anyone to weaken Israel’s hand when all it’s trying to do is protect its people from barbaric massacres is akin to me as Nazi enablers.”

NSW Jewish Board of Deputies president David Ossip said: “Whilst the Jewish community expects such behaviour from the Greens … Ms Scamps and Ms Tink have turned their back on the Jewish communities in their electorates at their time of need.”

He said by voting with the Greens, they had aligned themselves with the most extreme members of the parliament.

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry’s co-CEO Alex Ryvchin said the Greens were “so hardwired in their loathing of Israel and distrust of the Australian Jewish community that they could not even extend symbolic solidarity with our community”. He said the independents who backed the resolution sought to undermine Israel’s mission to save the 165 hostages taken by Hamas.

Speaking on the motion in parliament, Peter Dutton attacked “apologists” for Hamas who did not condemn anti-Semitic slurs chanted by protesters at pro-Palestinian rallies last week. “Their silence is, frankly, contemptible,” the Opposition Leader said.

He said slurs, including “Gas the Jews, f..k the Jews and f..k Israel”, were “repugnant”, prompting an interjection by Labor backbencher Alicia Payne, who urged him not to repeat the anti-Semitic comments. “I won’t stop saying (it) because it should be condemned,” Mr Dutton said.

He said the Coalition backed Israel’s right “to do what is necessary” to protect its people and thwart its “existential threats”.

Labor frontbencher Tony Burke condemned hate speech by constituents in his western Sydney seat of Watson during last week’s protests. “Statements of hate speech, some of which were given in my part of Sydney, some which were given elsewhere, are all unacceptable and are all to be condemned,” he said.

Independent senator Lidia Thorpe wore a Palestinian keffiyeh scarf in the chamber and accused Israel of oppressing the Palestinian people.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/teal-duo-in-moral-fog-over-savage-israel-attack-say-jewish-leaders/news-story/b43b67fe8b43e14759d94cff1a147046

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19749564

File: 0fc4984ab09a577⋯.jpg (203.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,West_Australian_Senator_Fa….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19749528

Labor Senator attacks ‘killing of innocent civilians in Palestine’

JESS MALCOLM - OCTOBER 17, 2023

A Labor Senator has attacked the “killing of innocent civilians in Palestine” saying Israel’s right to defend itself cannot come at the cost of the “annihilation of Palestinian civilians”.

In the most forceful contribution by Labor thus far, West Australian Senator Fatima Payman called for an “immediate ceasefire” to come into effect amid concern Israeli missiles would strike residential dwellings in Palestine.

The 28-year old Senator described herself as a “Muslim devout to her faith” in her maiden speech to parliament last year.

“Israeli missiles strike residential dwellings, civilians, multistorey apartments, health facilities as well as places of worship indiscriminately killing men, women and children. We must condemn it,” she told the Senate.

“The price tag of Israel’s right to defend itself cannot be the destruction of Palestine.

“Israel’s right to defend its civilians cannot equate to the annihilation of Palestinian civilians.

“I hereby call for an immediate ceasefire to come into effect.”

The Labor Senator condemned the killing of innocent civilians in both Israel and Palestine.

“When talking about the situation in the Middle East, the killing of innocent civilians in Israel should be condemned and we condemn it,” she said.

“The killing of innocent civilians in Palestine should also be condemned and we must condemn it.”

The comments come after Labor introduced a motion backing Israel‘s right to defend itself against Hamas.

The Australian understands the government‘s leadership group pushed back against some Left-faction MPs who wanted to toughen the motion’s rhetoric against Israel on humanitarian grounds

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/labor-senator-attacks-killing-of-innocent-civilians-in-palestine/news-story/766b2e2d632a7eb23450baf55a1d20f3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19755118

File: e5bc05f2c12136a⋯.jpg (204.69 KB,1400x685,280:137,From_left_to_right_Mike_Bu….jpg)

FBI Hosts Five Eyes Summit to Launch Drive to Secure Innovation in Response to Intelligence Threats

FBI National Press Office - October 16, 2023

In their first-ever joint public appearance, leaders of the Five Eyes intelligence partnership—the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand—traveled to the U.S. at the invitation of FBI Director Christopher Wray.

Together they are launching the first Emerging Technology and Securing Innovation Security Summit in Palo Alto, California, the heart of Silicon Valley. In addition to the Five Eyes, the summit is bringing together business leaders and entrepreneurs, government officials, and academics to discuss threats to innovation, coming trends in the use and potential exploitation of emerging tech, and means to work together to advance both economic security and public safety.

The summit kicks off with a fireside chat with all five members hosted by Dr. Condoleezza Rice, former secretary of state. The intelligence leaders will outline current threats and trends to private sector organizations in their respective countries. Following the fireside chat, the intelligence leaders will sit down with private sector leaders for in-depth discussions about expanding and strengthening private-public partnerships to better protect innovation and the collective security of the five nations and their citizens.

Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Director-General Mike Burgess: "The Summit is an unprecedented response to an unprecedented threat. The fact the Five Eyes security services are gathering in Silicon Valley speaks to the nature of the threat and our collective resolve to counter it.

"This summit will raise awareness of the threat, and help the technology sector understand, identify and manage the risks."

Canadian Security Intelligence Service Director David Vigneault: "Innovation drives our collective prosperity and security, yet the threats to innovation are increasing in both scale and complexity. To meet this challenge, CSIS is working proactively with FVEYs partners, private sector leaders, and academia to secure our future and to ensure the safety, security and prosperity of Canada."

"L’innovation est un important moteur de notre prospérité et de notre sécurité collectives, mais les menaces qui pèsent sur elle ne cessent de gagner en ampleur et en complexité. Afin de remédier à cette situation, le SCRS collabore activement avec ses partenaires du Groupe des cinq, des dirigeants du secteur privé et le milieu universitaire pour assurer la sécurité et la prospérité du Canada."

FBI Director Christopher Wray: "Emerging technologies are essential to our economic and national security, and America’s role as a leading economic power, but they also present new and evolving threats. The FBI is committed to working with our Five Eyes and industry partners to continue to protect emerging technologies both from those who would steal them and those who would exploit them for malicious purposes."

MI5 Director General Ken McCallum: "The U.K. is seeing a sharp rise in aggressive attempts by other states to steal competitive advantage. It’s the same across all five of our countries. The stakes are now incredibly high on emerging technologies; states which lead the way in areas like artificial intelligence, quantum computing and synthetic biology will have the power to shape all our futures."

"We all need to be aware, and respond, before it’s too late."

Director-General of Security and Chief Executive, New Zealand Security Intelligence Service Andrew Hampton: "Emerging technologies bring many benefits to New Zealand, not least the potential to drive economic growth. At the same time, these same technologies in the wrong hands can be used in dangerous or illicit ways. The NZSIS is pleased to be working with our Five Eyes intelligence partners along with the private sector on this most critical of challenges.”

The Five Eyes is a coalition of five countries: the U.S., the U.K., Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. It grew from the 1946 BRUSA agreement, shortly after the end of World War II, to share intelligence and coordinate security efforts. The five member countries have a long history of trust and cooperation, and they share a commitment to common values.

The partnership has played a significant role in global security over the past seven decades, strengthening intelligence-sharing and cooperation among its member countries in order to protect their national security and common interests. The security services are focused on countering a range of threats, including terrorism, cybersecurity, weapons proliferation, organized crime, and state-backed espionage and interference.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/fbi-hosts-five-eyes-summit-to-launch-drive-to-secure-innovation-in-response-to-intelligence-threats

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19755135

File: 79132088fd9994e⋯.mp4 (15.78 MB,640x360,16:9,ASIO_boss_Mike_Burgess_say….mp4)

>>19755118

ASIO director tells Five Eyes intelligence summit that alleged Chinese spy was removed from Australia

Jade Macmillan and Andrew Greene - 18 October 2023

1/2

Australia's domestic intelligence chief has revealed a Chinese national was removed from the country after a foiled attempt to infiltrate a prestigious research institution.

ASIO Director General Mike Burgess has revealed details of the alleged espionage last month, while meeting his Five Eyes counterparts in the United States this week.

Mr Burgess says the spying plot against an unnamed Australian organisation was disrupted before any damage was done.

"The plot involved a visiting professor — a genuine academic who had also been recruited by Chinese intelligence," Mr Burgess told reporters.

"Their spymaster gave them money and a shopping list of intelligence requirements and sent them to Australia."

The meeting in Silicon Valley is the first-ever public gathering of the Five Eyes intelligence partners, which includes Australia, the US, the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand.

At the meeting, the domestic intelligence chiefs of Australia and the United States issued a scathing criticism of China, accusing it of intellectual property theft on an unprecedented scale.

Mr Burgess said the decision to step outside their normally secretive meetings reflected the nature of the threat they were facing.

"We recognise nations will spy, we recognise nations will seek strategic advantage," he said ahead of the summit.

"But what we're talking about here, this is behaviour that goes beyond traditional espionage.

"The Chinese government are engaged in the most sustained, sophisticated and scaled theft of intellectual property and expertise in human history.

"And this summit is about how we work with our partners together, and in the tech sector and innovation sector, so they can better be placed to identify and manage those risks effectively."

FBI director Christopher Wray labelled the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) the "number one threat to innovation", arguing it had made economic espionage "a central component of its national strategy".

"The FBI have, over the last several years, had about a 1,300 per cent increase in investigations that are, in one way or another, related to attempts to steal intellectual property or other secrets by some form of the Chinese government, or some arm of the Chinese government," he said.

"It wasn't that long ago, when I checked, we were opening a new investigation, again, specifically focused on China and its efforts to steal intellectual property and other secrets, about every 12 hours."

The UK, Canadian and New Zealand intelligence chiefs expressed similar concerns at the summit, which comes at a time when the Australian government is still trying to stabilise its relationship with Beijing.

The Chinese government has defended its conduct, arguing it has "always attached great importance and been actively committed to intellectual property protection".

A spokesman for the Chinese embassy in Washington, Liu Pengyu, said his country firmly opposed the "groundless accusations and smears" towards China and hoped "the relevant parties can view China's development objectively and fairly".

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19755145

File: 3836c104147cf1e⋯.jpg (1.7 MB,5000x2813,5000:2813,Mike_Burgess_said_China_s_….jpg)

File: 91e0ccda8499929⋯.jpg (2.35 MB,5000x2813,5000:2813,Christopher_Wray_says_some….jpg)

>>19755135

2/2

Duped with a malicious USB

Mr Burgess referenced an unnamed Australian company that found global success making a product "similar to a motion detector" before their sales suddenly dropped.

"A little while later, their product started being returned to the factory because they were broken," he said.

"When they opened their branded products, they discovered they weren't their branded products, because the components were inferior, they were exact knock-offs."

The problem was eventually traced to an international conference, where someone had offered to share information with one of the company's employees by plugging a USB into their laptop.

"That USB downloaded malware onto that laptop, which later on, when they were connected back to their corporate network, was used to steal their intellectual property," he said.

"That intellectual property was passed from the intelligence services to state-owned enterprise that mass-produced the goods and sold them on the market that undercut them."

Mr Wray pointed to a US example, where a wind turbine company entered a form of joint venture with a Chinese state-owned enterprise, which then recruited an insider from the company.

They stole the company's key intellectual property, causing its market cap to plummet and forcing it to slash "hundreds, maybe even thousands" of jobs, Mr Wray said.

"So I think it's important for people to understand that these threats from the Chinese government don't just affect Wall Street," Mr Wray said.

"You know, in US terms, they affect main street, they affect families and jobs and people's livelihoods."

American AI technology was a particular target for Chinese theft, the FBI director told the summit. He warned stolen AI could be used "to take what's already the largest hacking program in the world by a country mile and make it that much more effective".

A diplomatic tightrope

The relationship between Australia and China has begun to thaw after a period of tension in which Beijing imposed a diplomatic freeze and major trade sanctions on Australian exporters.

Anthony Albanese last month revealed that he would accept President Xi Jinping's invitation to travel to China at an undisclosed date, making him the first Australian prime minister to do so since 2016.

Asked whether the summit could affect efforts to improve ties between the two countries, Mr Burgess referred to Mr Albanese's position of "cooperate where we can, disagree where we must".

"I generally don't mention countries, but this is one where China is worthy of mentioning," Mr Burgess said.

"Because it's the Chinese government – Chinese intelligence services are an instrument of the state that have actually sanctioned the wholesale intellectual property theft, over a good number of decades in fact, to our respective national disadvantage.

"And that behaviour must be called out and must be addressed."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-18/five-eyes-spy-summit-asio-cia-fbi-san-francisco/102984976

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19755159

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19755118

>>19755135

ASIO director says alleged Chinese spy was removed from Australia

ABC News (Australia)

Oct 18, 2023

Australia's domestic spy chief Mike Burgess has revealed an academic, recruited by Chinese Intelligence, was removed from the country after a foiled attempt to infiltrate a research institution.

The ASIO boss detailed the case during an historic public meeting of five eyes partners in the US.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfhuN6GKjGs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19755194

File: f4060e115271cae⋯.jpg (819.46 KB,4000x2452,1000:613,Twitter_was_rebranded_to_X….jpg)

File: a08c88c7ea49345⋯.jpg (1.44 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,eSafety_commissioner_Julie….jpg)

File: 32937f9ad1ce899⋯.jpg (344.06 KB,1505x635,301:127,Counselling_and_support_se….jpg)

>>19511910

Australia's eSafety commission fines Elon Musk's X $610,500 for failing to meet anti-child-abuse standards

Georgie Hewson - 16 Oct 2023

The Australian eSafety commission has fined social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, $610,500 for failing to cooperate with a probe into anti-child-abuse practices.

As part of a report by the commission earlier this year featuring X, TikTok, Google, Twitch and Discord, the commission found some of the biggest tech companies were not living up to their responsibilities to tackle the proliferation of child sexual exploitation.

The eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, can now require online service providers to report on how they are meeting any or all of the expectations as part of the eSafety Act.

"This was about the worst kind of harm, child sexual exploitation as well as extortion, and we need to make sure that companies have trust and safety teams, they're using people processes and technologies to tackle this kind of content," she told ABC News Channel.

"Frankly, X did not provide us with the answers to very basic questions we'd ask them like, 'How many trust and safety people do you have left?'"

"Now that's critical to really understanding not only the scope of the problem but also the scale."

Ms Inman Grant said child sexual exploitation was a growing problem in Australia and around the world.

"These companies have a fundamental responsibility to make sure that the platforms that hundreds of millions of people are using around the world are safe," she said.

"We expect car manufacturers to embed seatbelts, we have food standards, so the technology companies should not be any different."

After taking X private, owner Elon Musk said in a post: "Removing child exploitation is priority #1."

But the Australian regulator said when it asked X how it prevented child grooming on the platform, X responded that it was "not a service used by large numbers of young people".

X told the regulator that available anti-grooming technology was "not of sufficient capability or accuracy to be deployed on Twitter".

X now has 28 days to pay the fine.

"If they don't pay the fine within 28 days, then we at eSafety can take them to a civil penalty proceeding, take them to court, and depending on what the court decides, the overall fine could be much higher — up to $780,000 per day from the time that they're found being out of compliance since March," Ms Inman Grant said.

It comes after the commission issued a "please explain" notice to the platform over hate content in June.

"The hate notice against Twitter is an ongoing regulatory investigation," Ms Inman Grant said.

"We're in consistent conversations with Twitter X to try and get the information we need to determine if they're doing enough to tackle online hate."

Though small compared to the $US44 billion ($69 billion) Mr Musk handed over to buy the website in October 2022, the fine is a reputational hit for a company, which has seen a continuous revenue decline as advertisers cut spending on a platform that has stopped most content moderation and reinstated thousands of banned accounts.

Google also on notice

Ms Inman Grant said the commission also issued a warning to Google for noncompliance with its request for information about its handling of child abuse content.

She called the search engine giant's responses to some questions "generic".

Google said it had cooperated with the regulator and was disappointed by the warning.

"We remain committed to these efforts and collaborating constructively and in good faith with the eSafety commissioner, government and industry on the shared goal of keeping Australians safer online," said Google's director of government affairs and public policy for Australia, Lucinda Longcroft.

In response to Google's statement, Ms Inman Grant said Google needed to put its words to into action.

"If you can't answer basic questions about where the technology that you've developed is not being used on major platforms like Gmail and chat and messaging, then you're not eating your own dog food," she said.

"We expect companies like Google that are mature, that have a lot of resources that have developed great technologies that they're licensing to others, to you use them across the suite of the platforms.

"Otherwise they're creating hunting grounds for predators and they're allowing child sexual exploitation and material to be not only hosted but also shared."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-16/social-media-x-fined-over-gaps-in-child-abuse-prevention/102980590

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19755227

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19262114 (pb)

>>19267266 (pb)

‘We will remember them’: PM honours soldiers who died in ADF helicopter crash

Sky News Australia

Oct 16, 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has honoured the four soldiers who lost their lives in a military helicopter crash off the coast of Queensland during a Talisman Sabre exercise.

The MRH-90 Taipan fatally crashed into the waters near the Whitsundays in July.

The crash claimed the lives of Captain Danniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class Two Joseph Laycock and Corporal Alexander Naggs.

“The most difficult thing that I have had to do as the 31st Prime Minister of Australia, is to ring and speak with their families in the days which followed this tragedy,” said Mr Albanese.

“We honour them, we mourn them.

“And with their names held within our hearts, we will remember them – lest we forget.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyY4vvYrALc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19755254

File: 6388fe6ba4b2b5a⋯.jpg (317.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,South_Australian_Liberal_s….jpg)

>>19199832 (pb)

>>19535062

>>19699349

Liberal senator Alex Antic’s bill to ban child gender therapy

DAVID PENBERTHY - OCTOBER 17, 2023

All forms of gender reassignment treatment and surgery would be banned for those aged under 18 – including the controversial and increasing use of puberty blockers – under a bill proposed by conser­vative ­Liberal senator Alex Antic.

The private members bill would allow teenagers to change gender only in the most exceptional circumstances when diagnosed with long-recognised sexual development disorders.

Senator Antic said he had been motivated by growing community disquiet over the explosion in the number of young people “transitioning” and believed that in many cases youths were making the decision not on the basis of genuine medical issues but pressure from peers and health professionals.

He cited the increase in numbers over the past decade in Australia, pointing to a 2023 Freedom of Information request showing the number of under-18s being prescribed puberty suppressing drugs had skyrocketed from just five in 2014 to 624 in 2019.

The same FOI request showed that as of 2021 there were 2067 young people attending public gender clinics, almost 10 times the number in 2014 when there were just 211.

Senator Antic said there was growing evidence from overseas showing many young people who made the decision to change gender came to regret it, and that the state should neither encourage nor enable the young to make such a life-altering decision.

“There is a growing number of young people who, having sought ‘gender-affirming care’, including hormone therapies and surgery, now believe that pursuing this course of action was a mistake and are seeking to undo the damage done to their bodies,” Senator Antic told The Australian.

“Such people have become known as ‘detransitioners’. This suggests that gender-affirming care is not the right course of action for those experiencing gender dysphoria – especially vulnerable young people.

“Why are children as young as three or four years old being diagnosed with gender dysphoria? The notion that some ‘expert’ is qualified to tell a child that they are, in fact, the opposite gender to their biological sex is absurd.”

Senator Antic stressed that his bill was being put forward in a private capacity and was not Liberal Party policy, but he said that he had already spoken to colleagues who were strongly supportive of his proposal.

The conservative senator has become a polarising figure in South Australia and was outspoken against the one-term, moderate-dominated state government of Steven Marshall that was defeated by Labor last year.

Senator Antic has been linked since to a surge in new Liberal Party members, many of them from suburban churches who were angered by senior moderates within the Marshall government over their support for late-term abortion and euthanasia laws.

One SA moderate labelled ­Senator Antic’s transgender bill a “headline-grabber” and warned the Liberal Party both in SA and nationally against “getting tied up and obsessed with fringe culture war crusades”.

“We all saw how that’s played out in Victoria,” the figure said in reference to the split within Victorian Liberals over the expulsion of Upper House MP Moira Deeming for attending an anti-trans rally which was crashed by Nazi sympathisers.

“The last thing we need is another state or even a national brawl along those lines.”

But Senator Antic said the bill was merely a reflection of mainstream concern over the surging number of trans cases and the “flimsy” science behind the decision of young people to change gender. He said his bill was based on the international laws governing the rights of the child, saying the treatment of young people under the current laws was a human rights issue.

“We are seeing an epidemic of detransitioners who have been irreparably harmed by such procedures, meaning legislation is required for Australia to meet its human rights obligations,” Senator Antic said.

“If a person is under 18, they are forbidden from buying alcoholic drinks, buying cigarettes, buying R-rated media, and getting a tattoo. If they are under 16, they are forbidden from driving a car. Yet we are placing children on puberty-suppressing drugs which stunt their physical development.”

If passed, the bill would prohibit health practitioners from providing interventions to a minor that are intended to transition the minor’s biological sex as determined by sex organs, chromosomes and endogenous profiles.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/liberal-senator-alex-antics-bill-to-ban-child-gender-therapy/news-story/c47995465d8d77ce446c210843aa8122

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19755331

File: a84f1b3b711f940⋯.jpg (298.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,Adam_Kneale_was_abused_fro….jpg)

File: a146787bf381f5c⋯.jpg (1.18 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Adam_Kneale_endured_abuse_….jpg)

File: d818795140f3aef⋯.jpg (2.98 MB,3665x2512,3665:2512,The_Western_Times_newspape….jpg)

File: ee24ba58ae3b18c⋯.jpg (1.14 MB,1575x1549,1575:1549,Graeme_Hobbs_now_dead_was_….jpg)

Victim of historical sexual abuse sues Western Bulldogs for damages

Kristian Silva - 18 October 2023

1/2

The Western Bulldogs have been accused of turning a blind eye to a sexual predator, who preyed on young boys at the football club four decades ago.

Adam Kneale, now 51, is suing the club for damages after enduring abuse at the hands of Graeme Hobbs, a former club volunteer who lured young victims with the promise of money, tickets and memorabilia.

Mr Kneale's lawyers said the club, then known as Footscray, acted negligently by failing to take action to stop Hobbs and is liable for the lifelong damage Mr Kneale suffered.

Barrister Tim Hammond said Hobbs, whose nickname was Chops, was a "sick and disturbed sexual predator" who raped Mr Kneale countless times over seven years.

Mr Hammond said the abuse led Mr Kneale to develop substance addictions, and that he continued to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety that had affected his ability to work.

Mr Hammond told the Supreme Court Hobbs was an "integral part" of the footy club, whose volunteering and fundraising work was publicly recognised by club leaders.

"Hobbs was able to take advantage of his special role at the club to take advantage of boys like Adam Kneale and then abuse them," Mr Hammond said.

"Hobbs made money in his role for the Footscray Football Club but it was Adam Kneale who has paid the price for that.

"This was a football club being run by men who should have known."

Mr Hammond said Hobbs first abused Mr Kneale when he was 11-years-old in 1984, and committed further offences at the Whitten Oval club offices, change rooms, toilets, the boardroom and on a trip to Sydney.

"Hobbs was a strange oddball, an older bloke who lived with his dad and hung around with kids on the premises and gravitated to the Under 19's," Mr Hammond said.

"We say people in charge should have asked, ‘What's he doing here and why is he having such an important role at the club?'"

Mr Hammond said, Hobbs also exposed Mr Kneale to other paedophiles, who committed further rapes against him when he was a teenager.

Mr Kneale reported Hobbs to police in 1993.

The case made the front page of the local paper, The Western Times, when the rapist was jailed by the County Court.

Hobbs is now dead.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19755340

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19755331

2/2

Club maintains its conduct was 'proper and appropriate'

Jack Rush KC, acting for the Footscray Football Club, said the club did not deny sexual abuse took place, but denied its former leaders were aware of Hobbs' actions, even after it was reported in the newspaper.

"It's not a straight-forward case," he told the court.

"We are dealing with something that is 40 years old. We are dealing with different times.

"[Hobbs] is responsible for the abuse. He was taken to court and charged by the police, he was sentenced to imprisonment.

"The conduct of the club at all times was proper and appropriate."

Lawyers for Footscray intend to call former Bulldogs president Peter Gordon and ex-CEO Dennis Galimberti to give evidence in the civil jury trial, before Justice Melanie Richards.

Mr Hammond said his client was seeking financial compensation for the pain suffered, lost earnings and aggravated damages to "send a message to the footy club".

Mr Kneale will be the first witness called in the trial.

Other victims of Hobbs, Mr Kneale's family members, medical experts and former journalist Derryn Hinch — who routinely reported on child sex abuse cases at the time — are among those who will give evidence for the plaintiffs.

The trial continues.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-17/western-bulldogs-footscray-sexual-abuse-trial-adam-kneale/102987878

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqnIC5EzzpY

Adam Kneale was like any footy-loving boy of the 80s until a trip to Footscray’s Western Oval turned his innocent life into a nightmare

Russell Jackson - 1 May 2022

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-05-01/adam-kneale-footscray-football-club-story/101007730

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19755365

File: 51544ca21e6c356⋯.jpg (231.59 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Anthony_Albanese_in_Parlia….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19749377

Indigenous voice to parliament: Labor hits pause on treaty and truth telling

ROSIE LEWIS and GEOFF CHAMBERS - OCTOBER 18, 2023

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles has retreated from his post-referendum commitment to the Uluru Statement from the Heart, as Labor refuses to endorse its election pledge on treaty and truth-telling.

Under pressure from the Coalition and Greens, Anthony Albanese and Mr Marles on Tuesday would not re-commit to Labor’s $27m election promise to establish a Makarrata commission overseeing treaty-making and truth-telling processes.

Following the crushing referendum defeat, Mr Marles on the weekend declared the government had “made clear we support the Uluru Statement from the Heart and (truth-telling) is part of it”.

“The principal commitment to everything that’s contained in there we have made and we don’t move away from,” Mr Marles told the ABC on Sunday.

Government sources have since confirmed that treaty and truth-telling commitments were under review pending consultation with Indigenous leaders following their week of silence.

Asked in Question Time on Tuesday whether the government would proceed with implementing the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, Mr Marles watered down his previous ­comments.

“In the light of what has occurred over the course of the weekend, we have made clear that we hear the voice of the Australian people and that the pursuit of reconciliation (and) Closing the Gap is no longer going to be achieved through constitutional reform,” Mr Marles said.

“We are going to take what Indigenous Australians have said in the aftermath of the last weekend and that is allow time for the dust to settle and we will work with them about how we can best, as a nation, achieve the objective of Closing the Gap and pursuing reconciliation.”

Peter Dutton earlier demanded the Prime Minister “come clean” on whether the government remains committed to establishing a Makarrata commission. Warning that next steps on reconciliation won’t be finalised over days, Mr Albanese said the Uluru Statement from the Heart – which asks for voice, treaty and truth – was developed over decades and a “new path” forward would be devised in a considered and constructive way.

“We accepted the invitation from First Nations people, which was given in the Uluru Statement from the Heart, to invite Australians to walk with them on the path that they had requested. We did that. That was not given the support in the referendum and therefore we have to find a new path,” Mr Albanese said.

The government is reviewing Labor’s commitment to a Makarrata commission after the resounding No vote amid pressure from Indigenous leaders, the Greens and crossbenchers to prioritise truth-telling.

Greens First Nations spokeswoman Dorinda Cox, an Indigenous woman whose party wants a $250m truth and justice commission and progress towards treaties, told Mr Albanese: “Don’t abandon us, because you set us up and you committed to this in full.”

In a Coalition partyroom meeting on Tuesday, Mr Dutton told MPs Mr Albanese should declare his position on treaty and truth-telling given he said 34 times during the referendum campaign the Uluru Statement should be implemented in full.

In Question Time, Mr Dutton referred to a 2021 quote from Mr Albanese in which he said: “There can be no real progress on Closing the Gap and there can be no ­reconciliation without treaty and truth-telling.”

Mr Dutton asked: “Will the Prime Minister be honest and upfront with Australians and inform the house whether or not he remains committed to a treaty and truth-telling process?”

Mr Albanese said he would “give respect to Indigenous Australians who have asked for a week to consider their position”.

“I think that is pretty reasonable that we then have a process of consultation,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/voice-referendum-anthony-albanese-says-next-steps-wont-be-developed-in-days-amid-pressure-on-treaty-truthtelling/news-story/cc903acd3fc5d5b7912916853d9fa553

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762073

File: d284686d1a6f052⋯.jpg (439.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Yoorrook_Justice_Commi….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740043

Yoorrook Justice Commission to investigate injustices of Indigenous ‘land, sky and waters’ in Victoria

TRICIA RIVERA - OCTOBER 18, 2023

Victoria’s Aboriginal truth-telling body is preparing a campaign to get Indigenous Victorians “redress” for losing control of “land, sky and waters” in the wake of the voice referendum.

Yoorrook Commission chair Eleanor Bourke, noting the “really challenging” months in the lead-up to the referendum that was defeated on the weekend, said it was time to look ahead.

“Now that the referendum is over, we must find ways to move forward together,” Professor Bourke told The Australian.

“Truth-telling and the work of the Yoorrook Justice Commission is more important than ever. Truth telling can help us come ­together. We can listen to each other with respect and hope and healing. Together we can find common ground and work towards a better shared future for everyone in this place we all call home.

“Yoorrook has commenced its inquiry into land, sky and waters and will soon begin looking into education, health and housing in the next part of the truth-telling process in Victoria.”

After handing down 46 recommendations to reform the criminal justice system and juvenile detention earlier this year, the commission is now investigating “past and ongoing injustices caused by colonisation … in relation to (First Peoples’) land”.

According to the commission’s issue paper, the inquiry will examine the impact colonisation has had on First Nations people and their ability to exercise their relationships and obligations, their right to self-determination and their human and cultural rights in relation to their land.

It will also look at how First Peoples have been able to maintain their connections, knowledge and practices.

“For thousands of generations, sovereign First Peoples governed themselves. They managed traditional lands according to their law and lore, cultural knowledge, practices and customs. These knowledges and practices were passed down through generations and encompassed holistic and interconnected relationships and obligations between each First People and their country,” the paper read.

“Colonisation disrupted these connections through violence and the taking of land and destroyed their systems of governance. The attempted destruction of culture, language, and the deliberate and forced removal of people from their own country followed.”

The paper states the inquiry will focus on “ways to provide redress for past, present and ongoing injustice related to taking First Peoples’ lands” and “the past and present benefits by the colonising state … landholders and settlers through their dispossession of First Peoples of their country”.

Traditional owner groups, organisations and individuals will be invited to roundtable discussions, with evidence-gathering also including visits to sites of significance.

Professor Bourke said the commission’s recommendations could help in the treaty negotiation process.

“Yoorrook’s purpose is to investigate past and ongoing injustices against First Peoples in Victoria. It will recommend changes to the Victorian government and First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria, some of which may be adopted as part of the treaty negotiation process,” she said.

The truth-telling body is expected to deliver its final report in December next year, when the evidence, findings and recommendations from this inquiry will be released.

The move towards treaty comes as Peter Dutton demanded Anthony Albanese “come clean” on whether he is committed to establishing a Makarrata commission.

Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan said on Tuesday her government’s focus was on providing Indigenous Australians with support after Saturday’s result.

“We have been for some time been on a really clear path to how we can better listen … we will continue on that,” she said. “We will continue working with First People’s Assembly … to work through the Yoorrook process.”

A Victorian government spokeswoman also confirmed the recommendations handed down by Yoorrook in July are being considered.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/yoorrook-justice-commission-to-investigate-injustices-of-first-peoples-land-sky-and-waters/news-story/eea09007994d443b0a7fce8862c123c3

https://yoorrookjusticecommission.org.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762095

File: 952907e9a1cdc72⋯.jpg (228.92 KB,1616x1080,202:135,NSW_Premier_Chris_Minns_an….jpg)

File: 16de84dca926867⋯.jpg (119.69 KB,928x642,464:321,Professor_Williams_says_tr….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740033

NSW will push on with First Nations treaty despite Voice referendum's defeat

Sarah Gerathy - 17 Oct 2023

1/2

While the referendum on the Voice to Parliament suffered a resounding defeat on the weekend, states are pushing ahead with their own plans to implement one of the other main pillars of the Uluru Statement from the Heart — treaty.

But while New South Wales has the biggest Indigenous population, it's the only state or territory not to have already started the treaty process.

Treaties have been negotiated with Indigenous people in other former colonies around the world, including Canada, the United States, New Zealand, Norway, Finland, Greenland and Japan.

NSW Premier Chris Minns has said he remained committed to kickstarting treaty discussions with Indigenous people in the state.

So what might a treaty look like in NSW and what happens from here?

What is a treaty?

A treaty is a binding agreement between two or more parties that is used to resolve differences and set out the responsibilities and duties of each party.

In the colonial era, European powers often used treaties to strike agreements with Indigenous people about a wide range of issues, including trade and military alliances and how land would be shared.

But that never happened in Australia because the British never recognised First Nations people as the owners of the land, instead claiming it belonged to no one.

That's the idea of "Terra Nullius", which was overturned by the High Court in 1992 in the landmark Mabo ruling.

As well as historical treaties, countries like Canada also have "modern treaties" with Indigenous people, which aim to address historical injustices as well as set out a way forward in the future.

It's that modern form of treaty that will be discussed in NSW.

University of NSW constitutional law expert George Williams described these sorts of treaties as "more akin to marriages than divorces".

"They are actually about agreeing on mutual co-existence so everyone in the state has a sense of how we can move forward together with our First Peoples in a way that will lead to economic and social prosperity," he said.

So what might be included in a state-based treaty?

After the weekend's result, Mr Minns was keen to emphasise that a treaty in and of itself was a "blank document" — with the content entirely determined by what's negotiated and agreed between the government and First Nations people.

That sentiment is backed up by Professor Williams.

"Treaties are a negotiated outcome, so there is no definite answer to what is in or out, it's a matter of what's agreed between governments and Indigenous peoples," he said.

"What you commonly find in treaties is you do find issues relating to land, waters, you also find cultural heritage protections.

"And sometimes you do find references to reparations, whereby there is compensation for past wrongs. But these are all things that need to be agreed through a treaty process with all parties involved."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762099

File: d1cfc4abb59c18b⋯.jpg (69.17 KB,716x534,358:267,Ghillar_Michael_Anderson_s….jpg)

File: 77b3bd65b9d945d⋯.jpg (2.4 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,People_vote_in_Voice_refer….jpg)

>>19762095

2/2

But Euahlayi elder and Aboriginal tent embassy founder Ghillar Michael Anderson said without a federal treaty there were limitations on what state treaties can achieve.

"New South Wales cannot go beyond and negotiate outside of what's in their (state) constitution," he said.

"So whatever the constitutional powers over the New South Wales, that's all they can talk about."

Mr Anderson helped work on a treaty framework for the National Aboriginal Conference that was set up under the Whitlam government and believes there are key issues that can only be tackled at a federal level.

But he wants to see a state treaty address cultural water access to the Murray Darling Basin and coastal rivers, fishing arrangements, ownership and management of national parks, and access to sacred sites.

"Aboriginal people are saying we're not going to take your land off you, but we want access to sacred sites, we want access and we want to protect them," he said.

And he said mining royalties should also be on the table.

"We want royalties of course, if we agree with any type of mining or gas, there's got to be royalties and they have to go to those nations where they're getting it from, not to every Aboriginal person."

Why is NSW behind other states on the issue of treaty?

In 1988 the then-prime minister Bob Hawke promised to make a treaty with First Nations people within two years, but that pledge was never delivered.

In the absence of federal action, over the past decade, other states forged ahead with beginning the process of reaching state-based treaties.

But in NSW, the Coalition government never proposed putting the issue on the agenda — and it was in power for 12 years.

Before it was elected in March, Labor pledged to spend $5 million on a year-long consultation process on treaty.

The state with the most advanced treaty process is Victoria.

What happens next and how long will the process take?

Mr Minns has so far been unwilling to put a timeline of the treaty process in NSW, warning there are "no easy answers" in the wake of the referendum result.

"It's important to note that in reality in New South Wales will require a treaty with 150 different nations in this state," Mr Minns said.

"So it's not a straightforward process."

He pointed out that some other states had started the treaty process up to nine years earlier and still not reached an agreement.

"Now I'm starting the process in the full knowledge that it's going to be complex and difficult.

"As difficult and long as that discussion will be, it's not tolerable that it's not begun in New South Wales when every other state has started it."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-17/voice-to-parliament-referendum-indigenous-treaty-nsw/102985290

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762116

File: 3c0aaaec091d6c4⋯.jpg (164.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,LNP_leader_David_Crisafull….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740165

LNP’s David Crisafulli pulls support for treaty laws in Queensland after Indigenous voice to parliament vote fails

LYDIA LYNCH and MICHAEL MCKENNA -OCTOBER 19, 2023

Queensland’s Liberal National Party has withdrawn support for state Indigenous treaty laws it helped pass this year that would pave the way for a truth-telling inquiry and hundreds of millions of dollars in reparations.

In a spectacular retreat, Opposition Leader David Crisafulli announced he no longer backs the Palaszczuk government’s legislation that enables separate treaty deals with up to 150 First Nation groups across the state.

Mr Crisafulli, who, polling suggests, is on track to win government at next year’s state election, has faced criticism over his support of the laws, including from the LNP membership and the federal opposition.

His backdown comes days after Queensland delivered the strongest rejection of the voice, with 68.9 per cent voting no in the referendum, some 4 per cent higher than the next state against constitutional change, South Australia.

Only three of 30 federal electorates in Queensland voted in favour of the voice, all Greens-held seats in Brisbane.

In a statement to The Australian, Mr Crisafulli said he feared the treaty process would cause the same division as the voice referendum. “Sadly, over the past six months Australia, and Queensland, has been subject to one of the most divisive debates in my life,” he wrote.

“The Prime Minister was repeatedly warned if he pursued the path he chose for the referendum it would only lead to division, and it did.

“Instead of listening to the people, Labor stubbornly blundered on. I will not make the same mistake the Prime Minister did.”

Branches across the state passed motions earlier this year calling on Mr Crisafulli to rescind support for treaty laws and repeal them if the LNP wins the election.

After The Australian revealed outrage among senior LNP figures, federal politicians and grassroots members in May, Mr Crisafulli insisted he would “absolutely not” reverse laws if he became premier and insisted treaties were “an ­opportunity to outline a better way forward for Indigenous ­communities”.

In his speech to parliament supporting treaty laws, Mr Crisafulli said the path to treaty was something Queensland “should embrace wholeheartedly”.

Now he says he changed his mind in the days after the referendum.

“Reconciliation should be our shared goal and requires a united purpose,” he wrote.

“It’s clear to me that Queenslanders do not want to continue down a path that leads to more division and uncertainty. Considering all these factors, it has now become clear a Path to Treaty is not the right way forward for Queensland.

“The LNP can no longer support a Path to Treaty and will not pursue one if elected to government.”

Under treaty laws, a three-year truth-telling inquiry would travel the state to investigate the “impacts of colonisation”.

The exact number of Queensland treaties, which could take years to finalise, are unknown but the Palaszczuk government has confirmed each one is likely to be worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars apiece.

Traditional owners will lead negotiations on what they want in their treaties, but may ask for repatriations, joint management of national parks, renaming of places, changes to school curriculums and reforms introduced in health, criminal justice and child protection.

Mick Gooda, an architect of the state’s treaty laws, told The Australian on Monday the Treaty Institute and truth-telling inquiry would begin work early next year.

“We’ve got to keep going, this treaty is once in a lifetime and so we are putting our heads down and making sure these things work,” he said.

Mr Gooda said even though the voice referendum had failed, treaties would give opportunities for Indigenous people to have a say on how health, housing and justice services were run in their communities.

“That is what I am in there fighting for, exactly that,” he said. “We’re just going ahead full-bore. We don’t have an option, we have to keep going.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/queensland-lnp-flips-on-support-for-indigenous-treaty/news-story/74219eafa2f25e58befb099516381851

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762128

File: fd32aa35c6e6427⋯.jpg (211.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Warren_Mundine_called_on_t….jpg)

>>19739995

Time to stop the Indigenous voice to parliament vitriol and move on, says Warren Mundine

ALEXI DEMETRIADI - OCTOBER 18, 2023

Leading No advocate Warren Mundine has said the “vitriol” and “hatred of people” in the days after the referendum result are the “worst I’ve seen”.

Speaking to The Australian, Mr Mundine called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to “pour cold water” on the lingering post-vote attacks to “calm the situation down”.

“We can’t go on as a country like this,” Mr Mundine said, referencing the egg attack on CLP senator Jacinta Price’s parents and threats to No voters across the country.

“I know of people that are scared – the threats we’ve seen and things happening are just as bad as what happened during the campaign,” he said.

The No advocate said he understood what the Yes camp – and its voters – were feeling, but that the country needed to “settle down” and “move forward” with closing the gap.

“I’ve been on the wrong end of a vote, it’s shattering when it happens, I understand that,” Mr Mundine said.

“But I didn’t go out and abuse people (for voting a different way).”

He said attacks from Yes supporters pertaining to alleged misinformation and education of No voters showed they were “still attacking the public”.

“I know that both Yes and No voters want to get things working for First Nations people struggling in terrible conditions – let’s put personal things aside, we can’t keep throwing rocks at each other,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/time-to-stop-the-vitriol-and-move-on-says-warren-mundine/news-story/7df0d03453b8c775860d156973a3affc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762161

File: b8fd0ea2a53951c⋯.jpg (353.44 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tim_Mathieson_leaves_Melbo….jpg)

File: 86228496601df4b⋯.jpg (283.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tim_Mathieson_leaves_Melbo….jpg)

File: 26c0f69e6c319e0⋯.jpg (266.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_prime_minister_Juli….jpg)

File: a685c98d7365ddd⋯.jpg (139.09 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_prime_minister_Juli….jpg)

>>19250307 (pb)

>>19464965 (pb)

Julia Gillard’s ex, Tim Mathieson, found guilty of sexual assault

Tim Mathieson, the former long-term partner of Julia Gillard, has been convicted and fined $7000 after admitting to sucking and licking his female friend’s breast while she slept in her own home.

Raymond Timothy Mathieson, once known as Australia’s ‘First Bloke’, appeared in a grey suit before the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Thursday afternoon where he pleaded guilty to sexual assault.

The court was told the complainant invited Mathieson over for an early dinner where the two shared a meal and three bottles of wine, before they both fell asleep at separate ends of a couch while watching a Whitney Houston documentary. However at 8:30pm, the sleeping complainant awoke to the 67-year-old sucking and licking her nipple.

“Don’t do that,” the police prosecutor relayed the words Mathieson’s victim said that night.

The police prosecutor said the former hairdresser still continued to try to get his mouth back on her breast but that he had left after being ordered to leave.

The court was told through the woman’s victim impact statement that she moved interstate to before eventually moving overseas to have “support and safety”.

The pair met while walking their dogs in 2020 and struck up a friendship.

“I was in a state of confusion, anger and feeling completely disrespected,” her statement read.

“I considered the offender to be my friend … It put my reality into question.

“I felt guilt and shame for having a relationship with this person.”

The police prosecutor told the court that the complainant had high levels of anxiety from the assault.

“Because of this I continued to isolate myself or leave situations early,” the statement continued.

“This resulted in me being extremely isolated and enhanced my depression.”

The woman said she felt “stupid and manipulated” and she felt it was difficult to “have a relationship with males”.

Mathieson’s defence lawyer Brad Penno said his client did not have a clear recollection of the incident but that he apologised for the incident the next day.

“It’s isolated conduct and it’s conduct not likely to be repeated,” he said.

Mr Penno described Mathieson as a “talented hairdresser” who made an impression on former prime minister Julia Gillard.

Magistrate Belinda Franjic said Mathieson’s offending was “a really serious example of sexual assault”.

“Firstly, it involves a victim who is vulnerable by virtue of being asleep. Secondly it occurred in the victim’s own home, which makes it particularly egregious,” Ms Franjic said.

“Thirdly it wasn’t fleeting, it wasn’t a protracted duration but it wasn’t fleeting ... he kept trying to get his mouth back on her breast.”

Mathieson received a conviction and was ordered to pay a $7000 fine.

Mathieson was charged on May 23 this year over the sexual assault and had his request for a diversion rejected in August.

The sexual offences and child abuse investigation team (SOCIT) originally charged him with three offences, however charge two and three were withdrawn by the police prosecutor in July.

“The accused at Brunswick East in Victoria on (March 13 last year) intentionally sexually touched (the complainant) by sucking her nipple without consent in circumstances where the accused did not reasonably believe that consented to the touching,” his charge sheet read.

Ms Gillard told the Adelaide Advertiser in March last year that she had split from Mathieson over a year ago.

The former prime minister revealed in her autobiography ‘My Story’ that she met her ex-partner of more than 10 years in 2004 at the Melbourne hair salon he was working at, and that she would go see him “every four to five weeks” on a Sunday morning.

During his time as ‘First Bloke’, Mathieson was involved with organisations like the Indigenous Diabetes Association, Beyond Blue and Australian Men’s Shed Association.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/julia-gillards-ex-tim-mathieson-found-guilty-of-sexual-assault/news-story/304aa487229e4abb419664cf80a2e7a5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762187

File: 81af5ad2d3ab720⋯.jpg (719.64 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Virginia_Giuffre_inset_was….jpg)

File: eabd6177d466cf0⋯.jpg (392.23 KB,825x1028,825:1028,VRG_61.jpg)

File: 0a042aa88f081b6⋯.jpg (446.52 KB,825x1384,825:1384,TLCLLC_1.jpg)

File: 34c4773f336ac6c⋯.jpg (335.17 KB,1700x2200,17:22,F7c0XbaWUAALyp5.jpg)

>>19720463

Prince Andrew's Accuser Scores Major Win

JACK ROYSTON - 10/18/23

1/2

Prince Andrew's accuser has won a two-year lawsuit brought by a fellow survivor of Jeffrey Epstein after an "undoubtedly difficult" legal struggle, her lawyer told Newsweek.

Virginia Giuffre sued Prince Andrew through a New York federal court and settled in February 2022 for an undisclosed sum, though he continued to deny the allegations.

However, Giuffre has spent the intervening year-and-a-half fighting a separate case that appeared to pit survivor against survivor and required her to relive her trauma during deposition, discovery, and gruelling casework.

The litigation, however, ended in a precedent-setting win at the Supreme Court of the State of New York this month.

Giuffre's lawyer, Jill Roth, attorney at Laffey, Bucci & Kent, told Newsweek the legal process had been tough on her client.

"It's been beyond difficult," she said. "No one's harder at work than Virginia, because when you are a party in a lawsuit, you are really being thrust into multiple situations where you have to revisit your trauma and discuss your trauma, discuss the harrowing, brutal experiences that you've had.

"Being a lawyer is a lot of work but being a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and then having to unnecessarily recount all of that as you're continuing to try to move forward in your life is really beyond what's fair and it's really beyond what anybody can be expected to handle and to carry."

Rina Oh, who also describes herself as an Epstein victim, sued Giuffre for libel in 2021 over posts on X, formerly Twitter, describing her as Epstein's girlfriend.

Giuffre wrote: "Rina—if you read this I hope you live in shame for the rest of your life.

"You don't intimidate me any longer & the physical & mental scares you left me with should be enough to put your a** in jail."

At one stage, Prince Andrew looked set to capitalize on the dispute after his lawyer hinted Oh might be dragged into the royal's court battle with Giuffre.

The $10 million Oh case blew up into a bigger lawsuit, however, involving claims and counterclaims in which both women alleged the other had sexually assaulted them and was not a victim but a co-conspirator of Epstein. Both also denied the other's allegations.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762191

File: 4b39361349877a0⋯.jpg (545.27 KB,825x1014,275:338,VRG_62.jpg)

File: 98079fb1b14efc0⋯.jpg (615.84 KB,1275x1656,425:552,0001.jpg)

File: 56e6160e06eb554⋯.jpg (786.4 KB,1273x1655,1273:1655,0002.jpg)

File: f19d5fe7b7cf1de⋯.jpg (729.45 KB,1273x1651,1273:1651,0003.jpg)

File: ee7f5c70b8c85e9⋯.jpg (177.23 KB,1276x1650,58:75,0004.jpg)

>>19762187

2/2

Giuffre's lawyers framed Oh's case as an attempt to stop her speaking out. They countered using what are known as anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) laws.

Ultimately though, Giuffre applied to the New York Supreme Court to have the case thrown out using a new law, passed in 2021, designed to protect sex trafficking victims from being sued for acts they were forced to perform by their abusers.

"It has been undoubtedly difficult for Virginia," Roth said, "who is constantly striving to regain peace and balance and control in her life.

"But she also has to constantly take this decision about, 'do I speak out? When do I speak out?

"'I want to have a voice, I want to fight these people who harmed not only me, but numerous other people, but when I do that I am reopening my wounds and I'm reopening myself to criticism, to attack, to potential lawsuits,' like you see here.

"It's just so hard for her to move on when she has to constantly weigh that and I think that decision is something almost all survivors face from the early times, from the moment they are being assaulted to the moments after it happens.

"'Who do I speak to? Will I be believed? Will I be attacked? Will I be retaliated against? And that's why so many survivors are silent."

For now, though, Giuffre has chalked up a key win which for the first time applied the new laws to protect survivors in a civil case. START had been used before in criminal cases only, Roth said.

Judge Arthur Engoron wrote in his decision on October 3: "[Giuffre] is undisputedly the victim of Epstein's sex trafficking and [Oh's] counterclaims clearly state that Epstein was in the room for the alleged incident.

"As such, under the START Act, plaintiff could not be guilty under the penal law of what defendant alleges. Therefore, the motion to dismiss the counterclaims must be granted.

"For this Court to hold otherwise and to … find that [Giuffre], a victim herself, was capable of being liable for the crimes alleged by defendant, would be contrary not only to the plain language of the statutes, but to the spirit and legislative intent of the START Act."

The ruling added: "Thus the motion of plaintiff Virginia Giuffre is granted and the counterclaims of defendant Rina Oh are hereby dismissed."

Newsweek understands Oh intends to appeal.

https://www.newsweek.com/prince-andrew-virginia-giuffre-major-win-jeffrey-epstein-1835363

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1321588495467491328

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1321593015622758405

https://twitter.com/TLCLawLLC/status/1708894002341462398

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=DkwSNOM6gw_PLUS_aru4dLPf8cQ==

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762208

File: bc26c3884c166ec⋯.jpg (2.65 MB,4094x2729,4094:2729,Early_Childhood_Education_….jpg)

File: 0d27ec5e1606fd0⋯.jpg (642.67 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Labor_senator_Fatima_Payma….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19749528

>>19749564

Nationals whip calls for Gaza ceasefire as Labor ministers accuse Israel of collective punishment

Natassia Chrysanthos and Angus Thompson - October 19, 2023

1/2

Two federal government ministers say civilians in Gaza are being subjected to collective punishment by Israel, exposing tensions within the Albanese government over its position on the war, as a federal Labor senator called for landmarks to be lit in the colours of the Palestinian flag.

Industry Minister Ed Husic and Early Childhood Education Minister Anne Aly, who are the only Muslims in federal cabinet, on Thursday called for Australia to step up support for Palestinians facing a humanitarian crisis. They said Palestinian-Australians felt their lives mattered less in the unfolding political reaction to the Israel-Hamas war.

While the Coalition said the ministers’ comments showed Labor was divided over the conflict, Nationals whip Mark Coulton also departed from the opposition’s stance that Israel should show no restraint in retaliating to Hamas attacks.

“There should be greater focus on the plight of Palestinians who are caught up in this conflict,” he told this masthead. “My greatest concern is for the civilians and children being killed or maimed, and that there are so many people in danger. I am of the belief that there should be a ceasefire until a plan for a humanitarian solution can be worked out.”

In a day of escalating rhetoric over the deadly conflict, in which more than 1400 Israelis and 3000 Palestinians have been killed, Labor senator Fatima Payman said Australia needed to show that it cared for equally for all.

“Given yesterday’s catastrophe, the destruction of Al Ahli Baptist Hospital in Palestine and the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians, it would be empathetic and prudent to light up Australian landmarks with the colours of the Palestinian flag,” said Payman, who is of an Afghan Muslim background.

Husic suggested that the government had only paid lip service to a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians, as both he and Aly called for de-escalation amid a blame-game over an explosion at a Gaza hospital which killed hundreds of civilians and a looming Israeli ground assault.

Husic made a passionate plea for Australia to step up support for Palestinians as they faced what he described as a humanitarian catastrophe.

“I feel very strongly that Palestinians are being collectively punished here for Hamas’ barbarism,” he said in an interview on ABC’s RN Breakfast.

“Israel has described what happened on October 7 [as] Israel’s equivalent of 9/11. The number of Palestinians that have been killed so far equates to the number of people who lost their lives in 9/11. We don’t see any public landmarks in Australia that are being lit up in red, black, white and green.

“Now, there’ll be people that are very uncomfortable with me making that remark. But it goes to the heart of what Palestinians and those who care for them in Australia [think], which is that Palestinian lives are considered lesser than.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762212

File: 11a706d1b36a26c⋯.jpg (243.92 KB,1028x805,1028:805,Israeli_and_Palestinian_co….jpg)

File: 21c0288083d8f13⋯.jpg (2.9 MB,3946x2631,3946:2631,Labor_MP_Maria_Vamvakinou_….jpg)

>>19762208

2/2

Aly, a professor of counter-terrorism and counter-radicalisation who was born in Egypt, backed Husic’s comments. “I feel the pain of Australian Palestinians, Muslim and Christian,” she said.

“I feel the pain of Australian Muslims, and I know that Palestinians have for a long time felt that they have not been seen and have not been heard, that they have been forgotten by the international community, and I want to acknowledge that to them.”

She said it was “hard to argue that this is not a form of collective punishment” and called for a ceasefire. “The idea of war crimes is something that needs to be investigated,” Aly said.

Labor MPs Julian Hill and Maria Vamvakinou agreed that Palestinians were being collectively punished by Israel. Vamvakinou, whose constituents are among the 46 Australians trapped in Gaza, also supported her senior colleagues’ comments about community sentiment among Palestinian-Australians.

“That’s why you see people hitting the streets,” she said. “I’d like to see our government take initiative towards avoiding a military incursion … and I hope we get to a point where everyone in this country, including the political leadership, is emphasising the equal value of innocent lives.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese repeated Israel’s right to defend itself against Hamas but acknowledged the MPs’ contributions in a respectful question time debate on Thursday.

“We mourn every single life that is lost, whether Israeli or Palestinian. The children who have been killed, the families torn apart. There is widespread suffering, no question about that,” he said.

“I recognise the important role that members here are playing in their respective communities.”

Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong also called for parliament to unify in its message about the conflict.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said Albanese should visit Tel Aviv on his way to the United States next week, while deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley said the prime minister should clarify whether he agreed with his cabinet ministers.

”There are obvious, and longstanding, consequences for division – cabinet ministers do not get the luxury of freelancing on foreign policy,” Ley said.

Alex Ryvchin, the co-chief executive of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, said Husic and Aly were rightly concerned about the loss of civilian life, but he defended Israel’s ongoing attacks on Gaza.

“She [Aly] is concerned for human suffering on all sides, and this is perhaps an emotional reaction to that, which I do understand,” he said. “But the way to ensure peace for both peoples is the destruction of Hamas.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/palestinians-in-gaza-are-being-collectively-punished-two-labor-ministers-say-20231019-p5edg7.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762222

File: e2a80cb30a09a2e⋯.jpg (219.27 KB,2400x1440,5:3,Prosecutors_have_secured_m….jpg)

>>19664477

Australian businessman being used as ‘guinea pig’ for reckless foreign interference charge, lawyers say

Attorney general still yet to consent to Alexander Csergo’s prosecution with never-before-proven charge as time in custody exceeds six months

Ben Doherty - 18 Oct 2023

More than six months after Sydney businessman Alexander Csergo was arrested on allegations he was providing sensitive material to Chinese agents, Australia’s attorney general has still not consented to his prosecution.

Lawyers for Csergo say he is being used as a “guinea pig” on a never-before-proven charge, and will seek to have him released on bail after prosecutors secured more time to confirm the charge against him.

Csergo, charged with one count of reckless foreign interference, is alleged to have swapped reports on business and politics with two Chinese handlers, known to him only by the anglicised names “Ken” and “Evelyn”, in exchange for envelopes of cash.

Stuck in Shanghai during the height of Covid lockdowns, Csergo has previously told Australian police he believed he was being groomed by intelligence officers from China’s powerful Ministry of State Security, and filled his reports with anodyne, open-source information. In some cases, he said he included incredible information, such as a purported interview with the Australian prime minister – in order to placate his handlers until he could escape China.

He fled China via Hong Kong in February. He has been in custody since being arrested at his home in Bondi in April.

However, the charge against Csergo was required to have been “certified” within six months of his arrest. That deadline passed on 15 October, but the commonwealth DPP said it would require a further eight weeks to obtain the attorney general’s consent, and to certify the charge against him.

Csergo appeared at Sydney’s Downing Centre local court on Wednesday via video link from custody, while his mother and brother watched on from the courtroom.

Crown prosecutor Talia Epstein told the court Csergo’s was a complex brief, comprising more than 1,200 pages of written statements, 2,000 emails, and 72,000 images.

“This is a novel offence … it has never been proven before.”

She said the attorney general’s department had advised it would take eight weeks to consent to the prosecution.

“Were it not for the attorney general’s consent, the matter would be ready for charge certification,” she told the court.

Csergo’s barrister, the former ACT attorney general Bernard Collaery, told the court: “It’s too late for charge certification, the six-month period has elapsed.

“This man is a guinea pig,” he said, arguing for Csergo to be discharged. “Bail should not be used punitively.”

Magistrate Janet Wahlquist said the delay in the case was unreasonable, telling prosecutors: “He is being kept in custody, and we don’t know how long it will be until you are ready.”

“Bail refusal is not supposed to be a penalty, he has got no record, I can’t imagine why he would not be on bail.”

The magistrate ultimately allowed another six weeks to certify the charge, rather than the eight requested.

She said she had the option of discharging Csergo but said it could present a real disadvantage and an unreasonable further extension if he was then re-charged and the six-month period reset.

“It does seem to me somewhat unreasonable, but I am prepared to extend,” the magistrate said.

“The attorney general should be able to make a decision within six weeks.”

Collaery sought bail for Csergo, but that application was adjourned until Friday to give prosecutors time to prepare their position.

“The crown seeks to put before the court other material that is relevant to an assessment of risk factors including the nature of contact between the defendant and people overseas,” Epstein said.

Csergo’s case will return to court on Friday.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/oct/18/australian-alexander-csergo-being-used-as-guinea-pig-for-reckless-foreign-interference-charge-lawyers-say

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762229

File: f56e07cffa42545⋯.jpg (213.77 KB,1440x960,3:2,Fiji_s_Prime_Minister_Siti….jpg)

File: 14e28d3d886a0bd⋯.jpg (254.15 KB,1440x960,3:2,Fiji_s_Prime_Minister_Siti….jpg)

>>19505163

Fijian prime minister 'more comfortable dealing with traditional friends' like Australia than China

Fiji's prime minister says his government is “more comfortable dealing with traditional friends” such as Australia as China pursues closer security ties in the Asia-Pacific region

apnews.com - October 18, 2023

CANBERRA, Australia (AP) - Fiji’s prime minister said Wednesday on a visit to Australia’s capital that his government was “more comfortable dealing with traditional friends” such as Australia as China pursues closer security ties in the Asia-Pacific region.

Sitiveni Rabuka and Australia’s Anthony Albanese met during the Fijian’s first state visit to Australia since he most recently came to power in December last year. The 75-year-old former army colonel and coup leader had previously been Fiji’s prime minister from 1992 until 1999.

Rabuka sided with Australia in what he described as the “rivalry” and “one-upmanship“ between the United States and China.

“We’re more comfortable dealing with traditional friends, that we have similar systems of government, that our democracies are the same brand of democracy, coming out of the Westminster system,” Rabuka told reporters.

“Our justice system, our policing system - we’re more comfortable with friends that we have had over a longer period,” Rabuka added.

But Rabuka cautioned against countries appearing to be aggressive toward friends and neighbors with whom they had cordial relations.

The two leaders announced several developments in their bilateral relationship including an elevation of the Fiji-Australia Vuvale Partnership, a 2019 agreement on closer cooperation, consultation and friendship.

Australia agreed to sell Fiji 14 Australian-built Bushmaster armored military vehicles and to reach an agreement on cybersecurity cooperation.

Albanese said Australia would provide Fiji with more financial support to help economic recovery after the coronavirus pandemic devastated the country’s tourism industry.

Rabuka said Fiji’s tourist numbers and tourism income had rebounded to pre-COVID levels, with Australia the largest source of visitors.

Australia and the United States have stepped up their engagement with the region since last year when China struck a security pact with the Solomon Islands that raised concerns of a Chinese naval base being established in the South Pacific.

China has also proposed a region-wide security and economic deal with Pacific Island nations but several countries have resisted.

Rabuka said he had been “honored” when Albanese phoned him in March to say that Australia, the United States and Britain would announce in San Diego the following day an agreement on nuclear-powered submarines.

Under the AUKUS agreement, Australia will buy three Virginia-class submarines from the United States and build five new AUKUS-class submarines in cooperation with Britain in response to China’s growing influence.

Rabuka said Albanese had called to alert him of the deal “because we’re family.”

But during a discussion on the AUKUS deal on Tuesday, Rabuka stopped short of endorsing the increased military cooperation.

“I was not part of the planning. I’m in no position to try to stop it. This is a tripartite strategic project,” Rabuka said.

“All I can do is hope that this project will assist the concept of the zone of peace in the Pacific,” he said.

Rabuka plans to ask that the 18-nation Pacific Islands Forum endorse his zone of peace proposal at a meeting in the Cook Islands in November.

The proposal could include nations refraining from actions that jeopardize regional order and stability while respecting neighbors’ sovereignty and territorial integrity, he said.

https://apnews.com/article/australia-fiji-rabuka-albanese-china-098d41e8112205e138555c4efcb5c85d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19762239

File: 0f32b53e9cf3af8⋯.jpg (357.57 KB,2048x1152,16:9,United_States_Navy_Virgini….jpg)

>>19505163

Six US senators have demanded extra information on submarines before backing AUKUS

ADAM CREIGHTON - OCTOBER 18, 2023

A bipartisan group of US senators has demanded the Pentagon release details on how much extra money it will need to provide Australia with nuclear powered submarines in the 2030s at the same time as satisfying the US Navy’s own expanding fleet requirements.

In a further escalation of a months-long standoff between congress and the White House over how to proceed with AUKUS, the three-way security pact among the US, Australia and the UK, three Republican and three Democrat senators have insisted the Pentagon release an already- completed study on the US submarine base by the end of this month.

“Congress must have a comprehensive understanding of the current status of the submarine industrial base as well as the future resource investments necessary to meet our nation’s requirements,” the senators wrote in a letter dated 12th October that was release by Senator John Wicker on Tuesday (Wednesday AEDT).

“The volume of submarine tonnage the industrial base must produce to meet the Navy’s own requirements and fully implement the AUKUS agreement will require historic and sustained investments in the submarine workforce and supplier network,” it added.

As part of the AUKUS agreement, announced in September 2021, the navy is meant to acquire between three and five Virginia-class US submarines by the early 2030s, and the government will chip in US$3 billion to the US Treasury to help expand US submarine base.

Senators have expressed concern this extra funding won’t be enough to boost submarine output to satisfy both promises to Australia and the US navy, which had planned on building at least two new Virginia class submarines a year to boost its own fleet at a time of growing threat from China in the Indo-Pacific.

“It is critical that the administration articulate a detailed plan for instituting necessary enhancements to the submarine industrial base,” the senators wrote, arguing the Pentagon’s plan to release the information early next year wasn’t acceptable.

In July 23 Republicans in congress asked the White House to “immediately” provide a plan to lift production of Virginia class submarines.

“To make up for the sale of at least three attack submarines to Australia, the US would have to produce somewhere between 2.3 to 2.5 submarines per year to avoid further shrinking our fleet’s operational capacity,” the letter to the White House read, noting the current production rate of 1.2 was already below a forecast two per year.

In the same month the senate held up legislative changes that would facilitate the transfer of nuclear-powered submarines and technology to Australia, making its support contingent on a White House request for additional funding of the US submarine base.

Senators’ latest concern about US submarine capacity emerged a week after Australian ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd said congress wasn’t moving fast enough to amend US defence technology export rules that would hobble the AUKUS agreement as they currently stand.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/six-us-senators-have-demanded-extra-information-on-submarines-before-backing-aukus/news-story/b1e57d0b223d4bc8caba615307fbf39a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19769156

File: b95b79edd097b71⋯.jpg (237.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,NT_senator_Jacinta_Nampiji….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19745124

Jacinta Price’s plan for Aboriginal child abuse royal commission savaged by Indigenous leaders

JOE KELLY and PAIGE TAYLOR - OCTOBER 20, 2023

1/2

Nearly 100 of Australia’s leading Indigenous figures and organisations have condemned the ­Coalition’s call for a royal commission into child sex abuse in Aboriginal communities, breaking the “week of silence” and opening a national fracture on Indigenous policy five days after Saturday’s referendum defeat.

A joint statement issued by the alliance – which includes the ­Coalition of Peaks, Reconciliation Australia, the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation and Professor Marcia Langton – warned the Coalition the safety of children “should not be politicised or used as a platform to advance a political position.”

Former prime minister and leading No campaigner Tony Abbott offered his own interpretation of the referendum defeat, arguing the result should be respected by abandoning or scaling back “recent concessions to separatism, such as flying the Aboriginal flag co-equally with the national one as if Australia is a country of two nations”.

Writing in The Australian, Mr Abbott said Australia should abandon or wind back “routine acknowledgement of country by all speakers at official events, as if those whose ancestry here stretches beyond 1788 are more Australian than everyone else.”

Anthony Albanese on Thursday rejected a push by Peter ­Dutton and his Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Price for the government to support a royal commission and an audit into Indigenous spending programs in the parliament, labelling it a “political stunt” designed to “whip up outrage” and saying he would refuse to make child abuse a partisan issue.

The Opposition Leader, attempting to suspend standing orders, argued that Australians had voted on Saturday for a new way forward and the public was “demanding action” but were “not getting it because this Prime Minister is weak (and) indecisive”.

“It is absolutely unbelievable that this government would reject now, yet again – by not even taking this motion to discuss it before the parliament – the prospect of finding a pathway forward to helping young Indigenous kids in communities like in Alice Springs, like in Tennant Creek and elsewhere – these are the most vulnerable of children in the country,” he said.

Mr Dutton said Indigenous children risked a lifetime of mental scarring because of physical abuse and “police need to act on it, and the agencies in the Northern Territory need to act, and the fact is that they are being hamstrung by the authorities in the Northern Territory to the shame of the Chief Minister”.

“And that this Prime Minister would be complicit in that ignorance, and in the inability to act, to save those young children is a damning indictment on this Prime Minister,” he said.

The push for a suspension was defeated by 81 votes to 52, with all four Greens and four teal MPs – Kylea Tink, Zoe Daniel, Kate Chaney and Monique Ryan – voting with the government.

Speaking in question time, Mr Albanese said every member of parliament should find child sexual abuse “abhorrent”, and noted that it did not occur in “just one group” or in one place. “What we won’t be doing is agreeing to stunts which are designed to whip up outrage somehow as if this is a partisan issue,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19769161

File: 1669ab611bfcbc4⋯.jpg (94.4 KB,1280x720,16:9,Jacinta_Price_s_plan_for_A….jpg)

>>19769156

2/2

The referendum result has elevated Indigenous policy and unleashed a national debate on how best to address Indigenous dis­advantage. Aboriginal organisations and health experts – including child health researcher Fiona Stanley, after whom Western Australia’s largest public hospital is named – united on Thursday to reject the push for a royal commission into indigenous child sexual abuse.

Professor Stanley and researcher Sandra Eades, a Noongar professor of child health, said the overwhelming factor predicting child maltreatment was already established: poverty and its associated problems such as poor housing, social unrest, substance abuse and parents’ mental illness.

The alliance of organisations and leaders – including Pat Turner and Tony McAvoy, both members of Anthony Albanese’s referendum working group – said Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people had already developed solutions.

Rather than hold another inquiry – which would be the 34th into child protection since 1997 – the group said the most effective and immediate action government could take to make children safe and protect their human rights would be to appoint a National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children’s Commissioner with the legislated power to investigate and make recommendations.

“This will be more effective and more powerful than any royal commission,” said the group, including Families Australia, Life Without Barriers, the National Coalition for Child Safety and Wellbeing. “The safety of children should not be politicised or used as a platform to advance a political position. It is frustrating and disappointing to hear the Opposition Leader and Senator Price repeating the same claims and calls they made earlier this year, again with no evidence and no credible solutions.”

Indigenous entrepreneur Warren Mundine said the stance of organisations that did not want a royal commission into child sex abuse in Indigenous communities was disgusting.

“What have they got to fear?” Mr Mundine asked. “This is the difference between them and us. We want things fixed.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/silence-breaks-to-savage-jacinta-price-plan-for-aboriginal-child-abuse-royal-commission/news-story/c4aaf2ab952c4df9b597a1a3b193d569

https://www.snaicc.org.au/231019-joint-statement/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19769183

File: e13e4cfb709494e⋯.jpg (245.11 KB,1361x1814,1361:1814,Tony_Abbott.jpg)

File: 00aab0795915cbc⋯.jpg (358.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Shadow_minister_for_Indige….jpg)

>>19739995

Voice defeat delivers opening salvo against identity politics

TONY ABBOTT - OCTOBER 20, 2023

1/2

Probably for the first time anywhere an issue of identity politics has been put to the people and, here in Australia, resoundingly rejected.

Given that the classic notion of the absolute equality of every human being – regardless of race, religion, gender and culture – is now under sustained assault, this should be the vote that rang round the world. Indeed it needs to, given the susceptibility of governments almost everywhere to bad policy based on muddled thinking about group rights and a misguided apology mania in what are the world’s least racist societies.

The constitutional entrenchment of an Indigenous voice to the parliament and to the executive government would have given some Australians a greater say over how all Australians are governed, based on their declared identity as Aboriginal.

To its proponents, it was an atonement for the British settlement of the Australian landmass from 1788, and a way to overcome the intergenerational trauma colonialism had allegedly engendered. It says something about the robust common sense of most Australians that 60 per cent-plus voted no; and something about the dispossession-angst of many that nearly 40 per cent voted yes, including quite a few, such as Father Frank Brennan, who felt obligated that way despite all the flaws in what was proposed.

The remarkable feature of the pre-referendum debate was the deference of normally independent-minded institutions to the pronouncements of the Aboriginal establishment in the Uluru Statement from the Heart, that asserted the persistence of Aboriginal sovereignty, and demanded treaties between the Australian government and so-called First Nations, plus the rewriting of our history as a story of shame, in addition to a constitutionally entrenched voice. Even though there’s already a substantial industry of Aboriginal consultation, including the National Indigenous Advancement Agency administering a budget of nearly $5bn a year; and there’s little evidence that establishing another Canberra-based body would improve the dire living conditions in the remote settlements that are the source of Aboriginal people’s statistical disadvantage.

And the remarkable aspect of the ultimate result was the extent of voter resistance to the moralising and virtue-signalling from big employers, major sporting bodies, law societies and assorted worthies, such that those invested in First World problems largely voted yes while those invested in real-world problems largely voted no.

A watershed moment in the campaign was Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s insistence at the National Press Club that colonisation had actually been good for Aboriginal people because it had brought the rule of law and technological advance. And her further response to an obviously taken-aback, overwhelmingly politically correct audience that her convict ancestors had suffered scarcely less than her Indigenous ones.

What’s clearly happening now, though, is an attempt to de-legitimise the result by claiming that it was due to “misinformation” and what’s clearly evident is the government’s inclination to carry on as if the vote had never happened. The reaction of some businesses to the vote was to offer their staff stress leave and to insist they’d been right actively to support the Yes campaign even though it was way beyond their normal remit and must have been at odds with the position of many of their employees and customers.

This week, Anthony Albanese refused to rule out proceeding with the rest of the Uluru trifecta – treaty and truth – despite the overwhelming rejection of the voice.

There was no indication the Albanese government was seriously rethinking its existing commitments to a Makarrata (or treaty and truth-telling) commission or rescinding its funding. Or that the state Labor governments – with the exception of Queensland – were re-reconsidering their own commitments to treaties and reparations. Even though it was the full Uluru “voice, treaty, truth” separatist agenda voters rejected and even though to any serious democrat No must mean No.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19769188

File: 78dcc4213efccdc⋯.jpg (861.75 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Peter_Dutton.jpg)

File: 44b8f14818945bb⋯.jpg (205.33 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ballot_papers_are_placed_o….jpg)

>>19769183

2/2

As with Brexit, the indications are that the left-establishment will do its best to subvert and sabotage a vote it regards as morally deficient and try to nullify its effect. On a whole range of issues, such as climate, gender and immigration, there’s a disconnect between an empowered minority, with a tendency to regard dissent as not just wrong but immoral, and all those citizens who are much more pragmatic but whose only say is their vote. In an era when Labor and Liberal MPs seem to have more in common with each other than with the people who vote for them, the challenge for democracy is to ensure voting still makes a difference.

Because the voice offended both the liberal principle of constitutional equality and the conservative instinct not to embark on speculative change, the support for the voice of numerous Coalition MPs shows the intellectual diffidence still gripping the centre-right. But Peter Dutton’s brave decision to oppose it, despite the polls at the time, shows courage and conviction can be politically vindicated. His challenge now will be to insist on a full policy reset, when the government next changes.

Meanwhile, if the people’s vote is to be respected, it should mean abandoning, or at least scaling back, recent concessions to separatism: such as flying the Aboriginal flag co-equally with the national one (as if Australia is a country of two nations) and the routine acknowledgement of country by all speakers at official events (as if those whose ancestry here stretches beyond 1788 are more Australian than everyone else).

There’ll be an understandable tendency not to further upset those dismayed by the result; but it’s actually people’s polite acquiescence in what’s known to be wrong and fear of giving offence to previously discriminated-against minorities that’s allowed identity politics to become so entrenched, such that what was self-evident a generation ago now attracts trigger warnings or worse. If the separatist practices that most voters were reacting against persist, regardless of the voice’s thumping rejection, disillusionment with mainstream politics can only deepen.

In the immediate aftermath of the vote, the international reaction was of one pained surprise that Australians had somehow rejected rights for Aboriginal people, rather than just special ones. This simply shows the global pervasiveness of identity thinking – due to the left’s long march through the institutions – and reveals how seismic our vote could be; provided we appreciate the magnitude of what we’ve just done and have the self-confidence to build upon it.

Tony Abbott was the 28th prime minister of Australia, 2013-15.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/voice-defeat-delivers-opening-salvo-against-identity-politics/news-story/e8bbab6b2d88e5bf8745dbf4232c773b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19769209

File: 9cfd8bc7f4f8652⋯.jpg (200.87 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Queensland_Premier_Annasta….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19762116

Annastacia Palaszczuk set to pull the pin on treaty plans

LYDIA LYNCH, ALEXI DEMETRIADI and SARAH ELKS - OCTOBER 19, 2023

1/2

Queensland’s path to treaties with First Nations groups has collapsed, with Labor Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk warning the process cannot go ahead now the Liberal National Party opposition has withdrawn support.

Just days after the state posted the biggest No vote of the voice referendum, Ms Palaszczuk moved to abandon laws – passed this year with the support of the LNP – enabling treaty deals and reparations for up to 150 Indigenous groups.

After the LNP announced on Wednesday night it had backflipped on treaty, Ms Palaszczuk would only commit to going ahead with truth-telling hearings, due to begin early next year.

“For the treaty process, you would need bipartisan support,’’ she said at a press conference. “I can’t predict what is going to happen in the future.”

The surprise comments of Ms Palaszczuk, whose government is facing defeat at next October’s state election, prompted an emergency caucus meeting of Labor MPs, some of whom had publicly condemned the LNP just hours earlier. Labor MPs were told the Premier did not want to put Indigenous people through a “divisive debate” for another year over treaty.

But Lockhart River Mayor Wayne Butcher, who heads a forum of 17 remote Indigenous councils, said he was shocked and saddened by the actions of Ms Palaszczuk and LNP leader David Crisafulli to back away from treaty. “As First Nations peoples of Queensland, right now we are looking to our fellow political leaders to work together with us to unite the state following Saturday’s referendum, not to further divide it by walking away,” he wrote in a letter to Mr Crisafulli on behalf of the mayors of the 17 remote communities.

“This should be a time of healing. Not a time to further kick us when we are down.”

Queensland’s laws had followed Victoria, which has already held truth-telling hearings and is poised to begin treaty negotiations, and South Australia, which legislated a state voice this year.

In NSW, Premier Chris Minns will press ahead with the $5m year-long consultation process with Indigenous leaders about a state treaty, and Tasmanian Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff said a path to a treaty in his state remained. In Labor-held Western Australia a separate treaty is “not currently on our agenda”.

In the biggest state political fallout from the referendum, Ms Palaszczuk on Thursday said even if treaty deals did go ahead, “I doubt there’d be reparations”.

The Premier’s position is a retreat from then-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships minister Craig Crawford’s comments to The Australian in May that treaty deals could be worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars apiece.

Asked repeatedly if her government would progress treaty negotiations without LNP support, which is not required under the legislation, Ms Palaszczuk said: “Effective reconciliation and a path to treaty would require bipartisan support.

“I think you need to ask the questions to the Leader of the Opposition as to why he has done this.”

Mr Crisafulli said the voice referendum was “one of the most divisive and bruising debates” the nation has ever experienced.

“When Queenslanders speak, leaders should listen,” he said.

“It’s the right call and it’s a call that comes from listening.”

Mr Crisafulli said he had not spoken to any First Nations leaders about his decision to withdraw support for truth-telling and treaty, but he had talked about “Indigenous issues” with some mayors this week.

Under Queensland’s treaty model, multiple deals could be negotiated with individual Indigenous groups across Queensland, including the Torres Strait, and prompt changes to school curriculums and involve major health and justice reforms.

The state government set aside $300m to set up the Treaty Institute and facilitate truth-telling hearings and treaty negotiations.

Tasmania and NSW are expected to be the next states to pursue treaties.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19769213

File: 3395f3c41d42733⋯.jpg (145.85 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Queensland_Opposition_Lead….jpg)

>>19769209

2/2

Mr Minns said he “didn’t have the answers” to a treaty after the referendum defeat, promising to consult with “hurting” First Nations leaders before returning to the NSW chamber floor.

“We will be talking with the Indigenous leadership, many of whom poured their heart and soul (into the referendum campaign),” Mr Minns said.

“And we do commit, after we speak to them, to bring that to parliament.”

Mr Rockliff had been the country’s most senior Liberal supporter of the voice and said earlier this week “it was important to continue to move forward”.

Mr Rockliff said a pathway to reconciliation and a state treaty remained in progress, and he noted the Constitution was changed in 2016 to recognise Tasmanian First Nations people.

While it was “very hard” to give an exact estimation of the cost of future treaties, Mr Crawford said about 80 of the treaty settlements that had been finalised in New Zealand “nearly all cost tens or hundreds of millions of dollars” and the cost varied depending on the number of people killed and the amount of land taken by colonial forces in each area.

“So I think that will give us a bit of a guide to get an idea as to what that looks like in a Queensland context,” he told The Australian in May.

“But it depends on things like the level of impact that occurred in that particular part of New Zealand, what the history record shows, the level of massacres, the amount of land that they’ve lost.”

Ms Palaszczuk on Thursday said: “I doubt there‘d be reparations”.

She said Queensland needed “unity” after the Saturday’s referendum.

“I think Australians still do want reconciliation, we heard very loud and clear about the referendum,” she said.

“No ifs and buts. We accept that.

“We need to be talking about the issues that really matter out there amongst Queenslanders – and it is cost of living”.

Ms Palaszczuk and Mr Crisafulli’s comments on treaty come after Queensland delivered the strongest rejection of the voice, with 68.9 per cent voting no in the referendum, some 4 per cent higher than the next state against constitutional change, South Australia.

Mr Crisafulli said he would repeal treaty laws and cancel the three-year truth-telling inquiry if the LNP wins government at next years' state election.

“Reconciliation should be our shared goal and requires a united purpose,” he said.

“It’s clear to me that Queenslanders do not want to continue down a path that leads to more division and uncertainty. Considering all these factors, it has now become clear a Path to Treaty is not the right way forward for Queensland.

After Mr Crisafulli‘s announcement, Queensland Labor Transport Minister Mark Bailey described the decision as “pathetic” and a “naked grab for popularity”.

“It‘s at the expense of our most disadvantaged section of the community,” Mr Bailey told ABC Radio Brisbane.

“I think it‘s one of the most pathetic things I’ve seen in terms of displaying real leadership or lack of, that I can recall.

“The treaty process will continue and if he doesn‘t agree to it, well, he’s just another leader with no courage and I think people can see that when it comes to principles, he’s willing to sell them out.”

Labor backbencher Jonty Bush on Thursday morning said Mr Crisafulli‘s move to “walk away from his commitment to treaty and truth-telling” in Queensland was extremely disappointing but unsurprising.

“Our path to treaty Bill was passed in Queensland at the start of this year. It was passed with the full support of both Labor and the LNP,” Ms Bush said on Facebook.

“To walk away from a commitment already made, with work underway, is cowardice.”

After Ms Palaszczuk’s press conference, Ms Bush told her followers that Labor remained “committed to treaty”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/annastacia-palaszczuk-wont-commit-to-treaties-after-lnp-flips-support/news-story/fcf10d197b7e0a8dc3c55e473424b197

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19769232

File: cc56fd87720216e⋯.jpg (236.06 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19505163

Anthony Albanese and Joe Biden to strike new economic, defence and climate ‘alliance for the future’

GEOFF CHAMBERS - OCTOBER 19, 2023

Anthony Albanese and Joe Biden will announce major economic partnerships next week focused on strengthening ties around clean energy, climate change, defence co-operation and critical minerals amid escalating tensions in the Middle East and surging oil prices.

The US President will host an official state dinner at the White House for the Prime Minister on Wednesday night (US time), bringing together prominent Australian and US business, defence and diplomatic officials to usher in a new Australia-US “alliance for the future”.

Mr Albanese, who will open the new Australian embassy in Washington alongside ambassador Kevin Rudd during the week-long trip, will discuss climate action, clean energy partnerships, AUKUS progress and Indo-­Pacific stability with Mr Biden.

Ahead of the ninth meeting between the pair, Mr Albanese said “our nations are united by our common values, our deep history and our shared vision but this visit … will be focused on building an ­alliance for the future”.

The delegation of industry, banking and mining leaders, which includes Business Council of Australia chief Bran Black, Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Andrew McKellar and Westpac chief risk officer Ryan Zanin, will focus on strengthening investment and innovation relationships.

Mr Albanese, who with US officials flagged a “range of economic announcements” in Washington, said he looked forward to engaging with Mr Biden, Vice-President Kamala Harris, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin.

In parliament on Thursday, Mr Albanese said advancing the AUKUS defence pact was critical in “ensuring Australia plays our part in upholding the stability, ­security and prosperity of our ­region”.

The government, which is devising its own version of the Biden administration’s $US3 trillion Inflation Reduction Act, is keen to expand partnerships and investment with the US.

Amid global competition to access Australia’s critical minerals and rare earths deposits, industry leaders are pushing hard to advance investment and operational support from the US to establish domestic refining, processing and manufacturing operations.

Mr Albanese, who will also travel to Beijing, Cook Islands and San Francisco over the next month, said “we’re a mid-size power, so we do have influence”.

“Whether it’s the economy, climate change, energy, resources or the battle against global inflation, being part of these conversations means Australia gets to shape the solutions,” he said.

“We punch above our weight located where we are in the world, in the fastest-growing region … in human history.”

Mr Albanese said “we need to … know who our friends are and engage with them in our common interests of promoting democratic values, of promoting engagement in our region in a positive way”.

“Our nations are united by our common values, our deep history and our shared vision, but this visit will be focused on building an alliance for the future,” he said.

“At a time of global uncertainty, working with global partners is vital … Whether it’s the economy, climate change, energy, resources or the battle against global inflation, being part of these conversations means Australia gets to shape the solutions.”

Peter Dutton encouraged Mr Albanese to visit Tel Aviv as a “priority” to ensure Australia was part of a global alliance to keep the pressure on “those who want a wider conflict in the region”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-and-joe-biden-to-strike-new-economic-defence-and-climate-alliance-for-the-future/news-story/93b13e951213b42063bfc0d451a98925

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19769266

File: dc1ec03066279cf⋯.jpg (212.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,US_President_Joe_Biden_wil….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19769232

Anthony Albanese’s AUKUS meetings stifled by congress chaos

GEOFF CHAMBERS and ADAM CREIGHTON - OCTOBER 20, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese’s plans to meet with legislators and smooth over concerns about the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal during his four-day visit to Washington have not been locked in amid chaos and delays in appointing a new US Speaker of the House of Representatives.

The Prime Minister, who is expected to strike new deals on critical minerals and clean energy with US President Joe Biden next week, will meet with key congress figures to help expedite legislative changes and make AUKUS fully operational.

The leading candidate for Speaker of the House of Representatives, hardline Republican Jim Jordan, on Thursday (Friday AEDT) said that he still intended to seek the speakership despite failing in two floor votes this week to secure the required number of votes.

The dysfunction in America’s second arm of government makes it unclear who Mr Albanese would meet, at least among Republicans, who have a majority in the House of Representatives but not the Senate.

Mr Albanese’s Washington trip will be headlined by an official state dinner hosted by Mr Biden at the White House South Lawn pavilion, which will be attended by prominent business, defence, diplomatic and political figures.

The full-day program for the White House state visit on Wednesday (Thursday AEDT) includes a formal arrival ceremony and speeches, meetings in the Oval Office and Cabinet room with Mr Biden and secretaries, a joint media conference and state dinner. Donald Trump previously held a state dinner for Scott Morrison in 2019.

Ambassador Kevin Rudd, who will join Mr Albanese in opening the new Australian embassy on Tuesday (Wednesday AEDT), last week spoke publicly about mounting concerns Congress wasn’t moving fast enough to make legislative changes allowing the transfer of advanced defence technology promised under the AUKUS pact.

The Weekend Australian understands that Mr Albanese, who will be accompanied to Washington by partner Jodie Haydon, will meet with the Friends of Australia caucus, a small bipartisan group of congressmen.

Mr Albanese, who ahead of the trip said Australian and US officials were focused on “building an alliance for the future”, is expected to make announcements around critical minerals, climate action, clean energy and Australia’s response to Mr Biden’s $3bn Inflation Reduction Act.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19769271

File: ff6210d2fea5b3d⋯.jpg (191.46 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Joe_Biden_and_Anthony_Alba….jpg)

>>19769266

2/2

The Climate, Critical Minerals and Clean Energy Transformation Compact, announced by Mr Albanese and Mr Biden on the sidelines of the G7 Hiroshima summit in May, will be advanced in relation to business engagement, Australia’s commitment to step-up as a clean energy powerhouse and strengthening innovation links. There will also be announcements around showcasing new Defence Industry commercial activity.

Mr Albanese and Mr Biden, who will meet for the ninth time since last year’s election, are expected to discuss the implementation of AUKUS as well as global developments including the unfolding crisis in the Middle East, China and supporting ongoing stability in the Indo-Pacific region. It is unclear whether Mr Albanese will raise the release of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is in a London prison fighting extradition to the US.

Mr Albanese is expected to visit Arlington National Cemetery, attend a lunch at the US State Department, lead a critical minerals round table with Resources Minister Madeleine King and support an Australian innovation showcase event. Australian business leaders from across banking, resources and tech, some who are travelling as part of a delegation and others based in the US, will take part in select events.

Mr Albanese’s visit comes amid chaos on Capitol Hill, with House Republicans at loggerheads over who should succeed former Speaker Kevin McCarthy, whom a small group of Republicans removed over two-weeks-ago in a historic vote.

A plan to give the temporary Speaker, Republican Patrick McHenry, more powers to enable the passage of legislation and amendments, also appeared to collapse on Thursday.

“I am still running for speaker, and I plan to go to the floor and get the votes and win this race,” a defiant Mr Jordan said after leaving a heated closed-door meeting of House Republicans.

The Ohio congressman, who attracted, successively, 200 and then 199 votes on the House, said the plan to empower the temporary Speaker, which some of his colleagues argued was a better option than the likelihood of further inconclusive – and politically damaging – votes on the House floor, did not have the support of the conference.

Any speaker candidate needs to secure 217 votes on the House floor, implying the Republican candidate can only afford to lose a handful of Republican votes, assuming all Democrats vote for their own nominee, which they have in all ballots so far.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albaneses-aukus-meetings-stifled-by-congress-chaos/news-story/15c8e68aaee26d32575e8b9445ec2109

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19769319

File: 606c54b514f513d⋯.jpg (406.71 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Landbridge_is_reported_to_….jpg)

File: 7baab67337d9353⋯.jpg (844.31 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_announcement_comes_ahe….jpg)

>>19257040 (pb)

Federal government will not cancel Chinese company Landbridge's Port of Darwin lease

Stephen Dziedzic - 20 October 2023

1/2

The federal government has announced that it will not strip a Chinese company of the Darwin port lease, just weeks before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese visits Beijing.

Mr Albanese said last year that the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet would review the 99-year lease held by the Australian subsidiary of Chinese company Landbridge.

Landbridge is reported to have links to the People's Liberation Army of China, and the US Obama administration raised concerns with the Turnbull government after the Northern Territory awarded it to the company in 2015.

In a statement, the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet said that there was "a robust regulatory system in place to manage risks to critical infrastructure" and that it "was not necessary to vary or cancel the lease."

"Monitoring of security arrangements around the Port of Darwin will continue," it said.

"Australians can have confidence that their safety will not be compromised, while ensuring that Australia remains a competitive destination for foreign investment."

The federal government had accepted that advice, the department said.

In a statement, the Chief Minister of the Northern Territory Natasha Fyles said while she "acknowledged" the report's findings, the decision of the former Country Liberal Party administration in 2015 was "one that Territorians did not want and one that would not have been made under a Labor government".

"The CLP sold the Port, sold TIO and spent the lot, leaving Territorians worse off," she said.

"This is now a decision that we have to live with and one our government will continue to manage."

A spokesperson for the Northern Territory's Opposition Leader Lia Finocchiaro said that the review "gives certainty to Territorians" and that the focus should now be on "growing our economy and driving greater investment through our Port".

The decision comes not long after China released imprisoned Australian journalist Cheng Lei and ahead of the prime minister's much-anticipated visit to Beijing.

Benjamin Herscovitch from the Australian National University told the ABC that it "stretched credulity to breaking point to imagine that the timing of this announcement was a coincidence".

"This review of Landbridge Group's Darwin Port lease has taken nearly a year and a half and ministers were talking about its impending release months ago," he said.

"It therefore seems highly likely that this announcement was timed to feed into the positive atmospherics of Albanese's China trip."

In a statement, Landbridge said it was pleased that the review had been completed.

"The outcomes reaffirm our position that there is no basis for security concerns given the port is operated as a commercial enterprise in accordance with Australian Law and the port transaction documents," the statement said.

"Landbridge is hopeful that the outcome of this review, which is consistent with the findings of the reviews conducted in both 2015 and 2021, will now bring this matter to a close.

"Landbridge and Darwin Port look forward to working with the Northern Territory government and Federal government in developing the Port to meet the demands of a growing economy."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19769325

File: 4d295832176a7bc⋯.jpg (3.04 MB,3981x2654,3:2,The_announcement_brings_to….jpg)

>>19769319

2/2

Eight-year saga comes to an end

The federal opposition criticised the government for not explaining its decision not to cancel the lease, calling it "weak leadership by the prime minister".

"An outcome of any major national security review should warrant, at the very least, an announcement by the Prime Minister who, until now, has not shied away from commenting on the Port of Darwin, calling the initial Northern Territory decision to undertake the lease 'a grave error of judgement'," Shadow Minister for Defence Andrew Hastie said in a joint statement.

"Having tried to be a pre-election hero promising a review, he is now sweeping his decision under the rug and hiding behind a departmental media release, sent out on a Friday afternoon," the statement said.

"The opposition is calling on the prime minister to stand up and explain why he is comfortable with his decision given his previous criticism of the lease."

The announcement brings to an end an eight-year saga which has at times preoccupied both Coalition and Labor governments.

In 2015 the then-defence chief Mark Binskin played down the sensitivity of the port, saying "if [monitoring] ship movements are the issue, I can sit at the fish and chip shop on the wharf at the moment in Darwin and watch ships come and go, regardless of who owns it [the port]."

But other Defence officials told the ABC at the time that the deal was "unnecessary and potentially dangerous".

Mr Albanese was also critical of the lease in 2015, saying while an opposition frontbencher that it was a "grave error of judgement" to "give up a strategic asset to a company that has links with the People's Liberation Army in China".

A 2021 review of the lease, conducted under the former Liberal government and handed to then-defence minister Peter Dutton, reportedly found there were no national security grounds to overturn the lease.

But the Coalition also allocated substantial funding to develop new dual-use port infrastructure in Darwin — with speculation that it might make it easier for US and Australian naval vessels to bypass the Landbridge-owned facility.

Mr Herscovitch it was "possible that this latest review determined that there weren't grounds for ending the lease," much like former reports on Darwin Port.

But he said the decision also went against Mr Albanese's former statements on the lease, and seemed deliberately timed.

"It's hard to interpret this decision as anything other than Australian policy compromise to please the Chinese government," he said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-20/port-of-darwin-chinese-company-lease-not-cancelled/103003452

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19769341

File: 02d78cc0495ba07⋯.jpg (683.62 KB,2300x1533,2300:1533,The_Port_of_Darwin_was_lea….jpg)

File: 2ad76876cb776f4⋯.jpg (2.61 MB,6333x3769,6333:3769,A_US_air_force_bomber_land….jpg)

>>19257040 (pb)

>>19769319

Security experts criticise decision to leave Port of Darwin in Chinese hands

James Massola and Rachel Clun - October 20, 2023

Defence experts have criticised a decision to leave a Chinese company’s 99-year lease of the Port of Darwin in place, warning that it leaves investment decisions on critical national infrastructure in the hands of a potential foreign adversary.

The federal government announced on Friday afternoon that a review by key security agencies of the Darwin port lease had found “robust” systems were in place to manage the risks.

The lease was signed by the former Country Liberal Party government in the Northern Territory in 2015 and prompted a Defence Department review by the then Morrison government which found there were insufficient grounds to scrap the lease.

Former US president Barack Obama also expressed displeasure to former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull when the lease was first signed, asking that the US be kept in the loop on such decisions in future. The US has a contingent of up to 2500 Marines that rotate through Darwin each year.

During the 2022 election campaign Prime Minister Anthony Albanese criticised the 2015 decision to lease the port to Landbridge for $506 million, and indicated a willingness to use foreign veto laws to cancel the lease if necessary.

The review has not been publicly released but in a statement released on Friday afternoon, the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet said it had found there was insufficient national security grounds to overturn the lease.

It concluded “there is a robust regulatory system in place to manage risks to critical infrastructure, including the Port of Darwin” and that “existing monitoring mechanisms are sufficient and will be ongoing”.

“As a result, it was not necessary to vary or cancel the lease,” the statement said.

“Monitoring of security arrangements around the Port of Darwin will continue. Australians can have confidence that their safety will not be compromised, while ensuring that Australia remains a competitive destination for foreign investment.”

The review was conducted by spy agency ASIO, the Office of National Intelligence and four government departments.

The decision to allow Landbridge’s lease to remain in place comes just weeks before Albanese travels to China meet President Xi Jinping.

Senator James Paterson, who is the shadow home affairs minister, said that in opposition Albanese had called the lease of the Port of Darwin “a grave mistake”.

“Despite promising to deal with it, now he’s squibbed it, cynically dropped it on a Friday afternoon after parliament has risen and after his media appearance for the day,” Paterson said.

The head of the Northern Australia strategic policy centre at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, John Coyne, and Australian Defence Association director Neil James both criticised the review for failing to examine the broader implications of a Chinese-owned company controlling a critical deep water port.

Coyne said the issue with the Darwin port lease was not that it could open the door to spying but that the Landbridge lease left “future development in the hands of Landbridge and I don’t think their interests will align with ours”.

“Beijing will be happy, it reinforces their capacity to invest in critical infrastructure. Did the government consider the broader impact on development in Darwin harbour and how the lease will affect that? If you keep asking the same agencies the same questions, you will get the same answers,” he said.

“There is no doubt in Washington this won’t be well received either. It hardly shows that we are looking at national security holistically.”

James said the agencies “kept inventing straw men arguments against terminating the lease, but never address the actual problems”.

“The key problem is, no matter how many safeguards you have, to initiate any of them during a time of tensions, you’re doing it at the worst possible time. Anything you do will be escalatory [sic], that’s the fundamental problem and that will never change,” he said.

“This may be influenced by the fact that tensions with China are easing but that won’t last. The Americans have been hoping we would bite the bullet and fix the problem.”

Landbridge is owned by Chinese billionaire Ye Cheng. The port is governed by a range of Commonwealth laws, including the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act, the Defence Act and a deed of licence for access to the port.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/security-experts-criticise-decision-to-leave-port-of-darwin-in-chinese-hands-20231020-p5edve.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c5b8b7 No.19773139

>>19773073

非常にホモな感じ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775463

File: 4e3b1e4d9043703⋯.jpg (147.51 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Victorian_premier_Jacinta_….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740043

>>19762116

Victoria pushes ahead with a treaty despite other states going cold

Kieran Rooney and Chip Le Grand - October 21, 2023

1/2

Victoria will push ahead with a treaty process with the state’s Indigenous people despite Queensland and NSW slowing down plans for their own treaties.

The resounding rejection of the federal Voice to parliament in the two northern states has prompted their leaders to reconsider plans to negotiate an agreement with local First Peoples and had fuelled speculation Victoria could follow suit.

Victoria recorded the best result for the Yes campaign compared to all other states, but the referendum proposal was defeated as 55 per cent of the eligible population voted against it. Regional areas and Melbourne’s outer suburbs were more likely to have No majorities while Yes support was strongest across the inner city.

Although other states are reconsidering their approach, the Allan government has committed to push ahead with the treaty process and early work on negotiations are underway before the formal process in early 2024.

Support for the Voice in Victoria was discussed during Labor’s caucus meeting on Tuesday, including by Indigenous upper-house MP Sheena Watt, according to four MPs who attended.

Despite a swath of state seats voting No, there was not a push from MPs in these areas to rethink ongoing policies for Aboriginal Victorians.

One MP, who asked to speak anonymously to reveal private conversations, said the party did not think the No vote would transform into a movement against Labor. Backtracking on treaty could potentially be more politically damaging than staying on course, they said.

Victoria’s First Peoples’ Assembly co-chair, Ngarra Murray, said the Voice vote had strengthened their resolve to make treaty a reality.

“While we thought a federal Voice would have had its benefits and be complementary to our work, the outcome of the referendum doesn’t really change what we are doing here,” Murray said.

“Things are already in motion in Victoria, and we put in the hard yards making sure everyone in our community knows they are welcome to be part of this journey and that they can help choose the destination.”

The government is also considering its response to recommendations from the Yoorrook Justice Commission’s first truth-telling report, which called for Aboriginal Victorians to be given greater control of how they interacted with the criminal justice and child protection system.

Another MP said these proposals, including major reforms to the court systems, could be contentious if they weren’t handled carefully.

Speaking on Tuesday, Premier Jacinta Allan said she would continue working with the commission and the First People’s Assembly on both processes. She said the legislation to set up a treaty authority had bipartisan support when it was passed.

“We’ve had strong support here in the parliament for the mechanisms we’ve set up here in Victoria to better listen to Indigenous Victorians,” she said.

“That work hasn’t changed.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775468

File: 3d7ab31f1cbb4d2⋯.jpg (6.72 MB,7621x5081,7621:5081,Co_chairs_of_Victoria_s_Fi….jpg)

>>19775463

2/2

Allan met the chairs of the First Peoples’ Assembly during the week and said she had spoken to leaders after the referendum result to offer her support and to assure them Victoria would maintain its current path.

Treaty and First Peoples Minister Natalie Hutchins, responding to questions from The Age about Labor’s plans for a treaty, said: “We know that a lot of First Nations people will be hurting after the referendum – Victorians want a better future for you, your communities and generations to come and that’s what we’ll continue to do through our treaty process.”

Speaking on the ABC on Friday, Opposition Leader John Pesutto said the Victorian Coalition had not changed its view in supporting the treaty authority laws, but would not be drawn on what would happen if further support was sought.

“My position today is that if and when the government wants to put something up, we’ll consider it,” he said.

“We’re not going to state positions at this point when we don’t know what the government is looking to propose.”

Nationals leader and opposition Aboriginal affairs spokesman Peter Walsh said he wanted to discuss traditional landowner agreements in Victoria before the treaty process.

This week, Queensland Opposition Leader David Crisafulli withdrew the Liberal National Party’s support for a treaty in the state, where the No vote polled at 69 per cent. Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk then said treaties would need bipartisan support to go ahead.

NSW Premier Chris Minns promised in January to start a year-long consultation process on a treaty with First Nations people. But after the Voice result, Minns conceded the process would be “complex and tricky”. The NSW government is reviewing its consultation process after the Voice result.

“What I’m saying in the aftermath of the referendum vote and the decision by Australians not to support it means that we have to go back to the First Nations people and talk to them. There’s no easy answers when it comes to next steps. I don’t have easy answers,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/victoria-pushes-ahead-with-a-treaty-despite-other-states-going-cold-20231020-p5edui.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775516

File: 738cf741aefad3c⋯.jpg (2.08 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Yes_supporters_absorb_the_….jpg)

File: 70679a3d197a789⋯.jpg (2.18 MB,5443x3629,5443:3629,Dardi_Munwurro_director_Al….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19775463

After a bruising Voice vote, Aboriginal Victorians turn focus to treaty

Chip Le Grand - OCTOBER 21, 2023

1/3

Alan Thorpe didn’t know quite what to expect. Would his community be angry? Would they be sad? Would they want to gather and talk about it, or did they just want to stay away?

Throughout the Voice campaign, Thorpe had facilitated regular sessions at Dardi Munwurro, an Aboriginal family violence service he helped establish in Melbourne’s northern suburbs, for anyone in the community – black fellas or white – who wanted to yarn about what they were experiencing and feeling about the referendum.

He’d also promised that whatever the result, he’d have another session on the Monday after the vote.

When Monday came, so did the mob. About 50 or 60 people crowded into the Auntie Alma Gathering Place, an outdoor meeting space named after a formidable and widely admired social reformer, to reflect on what, for so many Aboriginal people, had been a bruising ordeal. “That was the biggest group we’d had,” he says. “It was packed.”

As the session began with a smoking ceremony and great cleansing, Thorpe detected a strange energy. “It was a sombre feeling,” he says. “People were just really hurt and angered by the result. I reckon there was a bit of relief as well for some people.”

Once people started sharing their reflections and emotions about the vote, the mood shifted. By the session’s end, a local comedian was on his feet delivering an impromptu stand-up routine which had the mob in stitches. “A bit of black humour,” Thorpe says.

One of the reasons for the mood shift is that, in Victoria, Aboriginal people have a clear sense of where things need to go from here. Since 2016, a year before the Statement from the Heart was issued at Uluru, the Victorian government has been working with the state’s traditional owners towards treaty. At Monday’s session at Dardi Munwurro, First People’s Assembly co-chair Ngarra Murray and fellow members Gary Murray and Alister Thorpe were among the crowd. They spoke about what treaty could deliver.

Ngarra Murray says the referendum result, and the clear sense of rejection carried within, has strengthened the resolve of the assembly to realise treaty, a recognition of Aboriginal sovereignty with the potential to reframe the future relationship between black and white Australia. Fewer than four in 10 Australians supported the Voice but, to enter a treaty, Aboriginal Victorians won’t need popular support or affirmation – only a state government willing to finish what it started.

“We are already on the path to treaty in Victoria and that started long before the referendum became a focus of the national discussion, so while we thought a federal Voice would have had its benefits and be complementary to our work, the outcome of the referendum doesn’t really change what we are doing here,” Murray says.

“Things are already in motion in Victoria, and we put in the hard yards making sure everyone in our community knows they are welcome to be part of this journey and that they can help choose the destination. I will say though that the emotional toll the referendum has had on our communities is very real, I can’t understate the collective exhaustion and hurt our community is experiencing. But as far as Treaty in Victoria goes, the referendum hasn’t changed anything, it’s back to business for us.”

Beyond the headline-grabbing claims and counter-claims of the Voice campaign, Victoria has been quietly progressing its ambition to treaty with its First Peoples. The process is intended to secure a series of treaties, both at statewide level and individually with First Nations groups recognised through their respective clans, language groups and relationship with Country. It will acknowledge the ongoing harms caused by dispossession and create a broad legal framework for greater self-determination.

In August, the newly established Treaty Authority advertised nationally for applicants to serve as its inaugural members – Aboriginal people who will umpire treaty negotiations between the state and Aboriginal groups. The selection panel, which is chaired by Indigenous health advocate Karinda Taylor and includes former state Aboriginal affairs minister Richard Wynne, has completed its initial round of interviews with applicants and developed a long list of candidates.

As early as next week, the managers of the Self Determination Fund, a company wholly owned by the First Peoples Assembly, will issue guidelines about applying for grants to access the $35 million in seed money provided by the Victorian government. Early grants are likely to go towards treaty preparations – lawyers, surveying and other professional services as required. The government has promised to add another $30 million to the fund once treaty negotiations begin next year.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775524

File: 2b614d2d81144ac⋯.jpg (1.54 MB,5025x3350,3:2,Yorta_Yorta_man_Ian_Hamm_f….jpg)

>>19775516

2/3

Murray says the First Peoples Assembly is still developing the log of claims it will take into negotiations but the overarching theme is clear.

“At a big picture level, I guess the key thing we’re looking for is a transfer of decision-making power back into Aboriginal hands. We also want to rejuvenate pride in our cultures and languages and make sure they are recognised and respected. I think part of that is seeing our culture shared and embraced across the state.

“The politicians need to recognise that Aboriginal people are the experts when it comes to Aboriginal people, so if we want to see better outcomes for our communities, we must put Aboriginal people in the driver’s seat.”

The loss of the Voice referendum has, for the foreseeable future, ended any prospect of constitutional recognition of Australia’s Indigenous people. It also reminds Ian Hamm, a Yorta Yorta man who has worked for decades in government and business to advance the interests of Aboriginal people, of a truism in Australian politics.

“A wise head in politics said something to me many years ago,” he recalls. “We were just having a chat and he said ‘Ian, as much as it pains me to say this, there are no votes in black fellas. You won’t win an election on Aboriginal stuff, but you can damn sure lose one.’ That is what played out last weekend.”

Hamm’s greatest concern about the failed referendum is not the result but how the campaign weaponised Aboriginal affairs. Where closing the gap and constitutional recognition were for many years bipartisan goals, Hamm fears that the referendum campaign has turned Aboriginal policy into another roiling cultural war, akin to the climate or gender debates. The impact was seen immediately after Saturday’s results were published.

Within days of the referendum, the Liberal National Party in Queensland withdrew its support for treaty in that state, prompting Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk to warn that no agreement could be reached without bipartisan support. In NSW, Premier Chris Minns equivocated on a treaty process his government has only just started.

“I’m starting our process in the full knowledge that it’s going to be complex and difficult,” he said. “What I’m saying in the aftermath of the referendum vote and the decision by Australians not to support it means that we have to go back to the First Nations people and talk to them. There’s no easy answers when it comes to next steps. I don’t have easy answers.”

In both those states, First Nations treaty aspirations now look like collateral damage from the Voice referendum. In Victoria, the treaty process is far more advanced. So far, Jacinta Allan’s government has given no sign that its commitment is wavering. Across the political aisle, a speech to parliament delivered on Tuesday night by Liberal MP Beverley McArthur foreshadowed a policy headache for John Pesutto’s party room that could see a renewed push by some members to revisit support of the treaty process.

“The fact that only the ACT and wealthy inner-urban electorates voted Yes is telling,” McArthur told parliament. “It is remarkable that the Northern Territory clearly voted no too. It shows that last weekend, electorally the deepest divide was not between Indigenous and non-Indigenous but between the inner-city elites of the eastern states and the rest of the country.

“The Yes campaign took people for granted, relying on optimistic early polling, with nothing to offer but emotional blackmail and personal smears when the sentiment changed. The architects of treaty in Victoria must take note – they cannot blindly progress without properly making the case and taking Victorians with them.”

McArthur tells this masthead the referendum should serve as a timely reminder of what happens when governments try to lead people where they don’t want to go.

“There are a lot of noisy voices and a lot of people have been silent,” she says. “The referendum showed how out of touch politicians can get from their constituencies. Not only politicians; what about the corporate sector, celebrities and sporting codes? I think all political leaders need to take notice of what the people have said. They would be silly not to.”

For now, Pesutto is playing for time. “Our position is, we are going to wait and see what the government proposes,” he said. “Everybody is assessing the implications of what happened on the weekend.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775527

File: a65b3cb4631976c⋯.jpg (5.82 MB,8192x5464,1024:683,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>19775524

3/3

For Ian Hamm, the febrile political climate surrounding Aboriginal affairs suggests treaty in Victoria can still be realised, but the road ahead just got a lot bumpier. He says the referendum has revealed what most Australian people really think about Aboriginal people and their place in this country. The picture is not flattering, although Hamm hastens to add he would rather be in Victoria, where the vote was relatively close, than anywhere else.

“The ’67 referendum wasn’t really about the two constitutional amendments that were put up, it was a question of whether the Aborigines belong in this country and the county said yes,” he explains. “This referendum wasn’t really about the Voice, it was whether Aborigines should be allowed to speak. The answer came back no.

“The referendum redefined what our relationship is between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people. Now we know where we stand. Now we know what the rules of the game are. We live in an age of the triumph of politics over policy, so we have to fight in that realm. In treaty, we need to be more focused and have harder edges. From the Aboriginal perspective it is a lot clearer where we have to take treaty.”

Hamm says that throughout the referendum debate, it was frustrating to see Aboriginal Australia reduced to a cliche; a series of gaps and problems to be solved. The emphasis on remote and regional disadvantage is disconnected from the experience of Aboriginal people living in big cities – “the children of a lesser dreaming” – as Hamm calls them. He says that Saturday’s poll result made Aboriginal people in Victoria more aware of the treaty process. It also “punctured some of the assumptions had about the goodwill in the broader community towards Aboriginal people”.

The depth of that goodwill will be tested further when the Victorian government sits down to treaty with its First Peoples. The No campaign attack lines about the Voice being an elite indulgence will require only a modest tweak to be redeployed against treaty.

Back at Dardi Munworro, Thorpe says the days since the referendum have felt like a time for grieving. “It has created some confusion and trust issues, some people feel betrayed. I am sure it will take a while to repair.” Yet, for all genuine hurt within his community, Thorpe remains optimistic. He says the referendum, although it failed, also showed how deeply committed many Australians are to improving the lot of Aboriginal people.

It has also confirmed to him the way forward. “Treaty for me is the answer,” he says. “It is the thing we have been crying out for, for a long time.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/after-a-bruising-voice-vote-aboriginal-victorians-turn-focus-to-treaty-20231020-p5edqg.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775546

File: 9d16f7a37c0435b⋯.jpg (1.77 MB,4358x2905,4358:2905,Julian_Leeser_quit_the_opp….jpg)

File: ec7eee63b96a081⋯.jpg (2.95 MB,4948x3299,4948:3299,Andrew_Bragg_has_put_his_h….jpg)

File: d56d513a77d8d72⋯.jpg (3.12 MB,5383x3589,5383:3589,Leeser_campaigning_with_No….jpg)

>>19739995

‘Has to serve his time’: Liberals oppose Yes campaigner’s cabinet return

Paul Sakkal and James Massola - October 21, 2023

Liberal MPs are pushing back against the prospect of Julian Leeser returning to the Coalition frontbench, arguing his resignation to campaign for the Voice to parliament should not be rewarded.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has cautiously tested the mood among trusted colleagues in recent weeks to gauge whether Leeser’s return would be accepted, according to two Liberal sources speaking on the condition of anonymity to detail private talks.

Two vacancies exist on the Coalition frontbench: the cabinet secretary post vacated by former senator Marise Payne, and the shadow assistant treasurer’s role formerly held by Stuart Robert, who quit in May. A revamped opposition team could be announced within weeks.

Leeser quit his position as shadow attorney-general and Indigenous Australians spokesman in April after the Liberal Party forced frontbenchers to campaign for No. As someone who was intrinsically involved in the development of the Voice, Leeser moved to the backbench to campaign for Yes.

Several sources said Liberals, particularly those in the party’s right flank who strongly opposed the Voice, had been urging Dutton to keep the Berowra MP on the backbench for the remainder of the parliamentary term.

The delayed shake-up is proving one of the trickiest tests of Dutton’s period as opposition leader, which has to date been marked by a surprising level of internal stability and what MPs describe as Dutton’s astute management of intra-party politics.

He is under pressure to appoint a Queenslander – potentially Bert Van Manen or Garth Hamilton – because the northern state’s MPs are numerically underrepresented in the shadow cabinet.

Dutton will also be conscious of the need to ensure a healthy balance of moderate MPs in a potential future cabinet, after many leading moderates were ousted by teal independents.

Moderate MP and Voice supporter Andrew Bragg has also put his hand up to replace Robert, but that appointment would frustrate some Queenslanders who are, typically, more conservative.

Leeser made a point of never directly criticising Dutton during the referendum campaign and stressed he was quitting on a matter of principle rather than as a protest against Dutton.

Many of the MPs opposing his promotion retain strong respect for the 47-year-old, who is viewed as smart and decent, but may ultimately suffer for his principled stance. But some are questioning his political judgement in fighting for a cause few Liberal voters supported.

One conservative MP predicted Leeser would incur a similar fate to that of Petro Georgiou, a well-known former Victorian Liberal who served 16 years in parliament and was long-touted for promotion but never achieved it, in part because of his outspoken opposition to mandatory detention policies.

“The weight of evidence suggests Leeser would come back. The Left will push for it, he’s a media darling too. But I think Leeser is the new Petro Georgiou”.

“Dutton is a bloke who will give you a chance but if you go against him, he won’t forget it.”

A second MP said Leeser’s resignation had caused damage to the opposition and that while he could return to the frontbench at some point, “he has to serve his time” because “I don’t think you can reward people who go against the leadership”.

A third MP unfavourably compared Leeser’s approach to the Voice to that of Bragg, who consistently attacked Labor for its handling of the referendum, while Leeser largely refrained from criticising the government once it became clear the contentious referendum wording would not be changed to appease conservatives.

In April, Dutton was asked if there was a chance Leeser could return to the frontbench, to which he answered, “I think there will be one day,” and added that “Julian’s a man of immense talent and character”.

Leeser on Sunday said on ABC’s Insiders that his potential promotion was a matter for Dutton and he was fully focused on campaigning to remove the Labor government.

Some MPs said the shadow cabinet could be expanded by an extra member, as Michael Sukkar currently has three shadow cabinet posts and a heavy workload.

Luke Howarth or Angie Bell, who are already frontbenchers, Phillip Thompson, Paul Scarr, or Dean Smith could all be part of a reshuffle of the shadow cabinet and assistant shadow ministry.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/has-to-serve-his-time-liberals-oppose-yes-campaigner-s-cabinet-return-20231020-p5edrb.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775596

File: 55c42dfc9924f7b⋯.jpg (136.08 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_Governor_General_Bi….jpg)

File: 433266ede5b53f9⋯.jpg (335.17 KB,1941x1091,1941:1091,Dallas_and_Bill_Hayden_at_….jpg)

File: a7ea9b14f18ff9e⋯.jpg (182.52 KB,1503x845,1503:845,Then_prime_minister_Paul_K….jpg)

File: d4a5d0075398c65⋯.jpg (217.6 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Gough_Whitlam_and_Hayden.jpg)

File: 08b8aa55661db25⋯.jpg (237.49 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_PM_John_Howard_and_….jpg)

Bill Hayden, former governor-general and Labor leader, dead at 90

TROY BRAMSTON - OCTOBER 21, 2023

Bill Hayden, who served as Australia’s 21st Governor-General, Labor leader and senior minister in the Whitlam and Hawke governments, has died at age 90.

His health had been declining for the past decade and he was in and out of hospital for strokes, pneumonia, heat exhaustion and broken bones. His wife, Dallas, and three children cared for him at home until recently.

Mr Hayden was one of the few surviving members of a generation of leading politicians, his death coming after Gough Whitlam (2014), Malcolm Fraser (2015), Bob Hawke (2019) and Andrew Peacock (2021).

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese praised his lifetime of service to Australia. “In a time of forceful personalities, Bill Hayden was notable for his humility,” he said in a statement. “Yet there was nothing modest about his ambition for Labor or Australia. This was the quiet strength of character he brought to the cause of progress.”

Former Prime Minister Paul Keating, who served in two cabinets with Mr Hayden, said Australia is poorer for his passing. “Bill Hayden was a great servant of Australia,” he said in a statement. “Very few Australians have made such a contribution over such a long period.”

As Labor leader from 1977 to 1983, Mr Hayden almost led Labor to power but reluctantly made way for Hawke who went on to take the party into government when Fraser called a snap election. Mr Hayden said “a drover’s dog” could lead Labor to victory – a final swipe at his nemesis as the axe fell.

Born in depression-era Brisbane to working class parents in 1933, Mr Hayden experienced poverty and a violent father. He was plagued by self-doubt, lacked the killer political instinct and never fully trusted his colleagues. He gave his life to public service and fighting injustices.

Elected to the federal seat of Oxley in Brisbane at the 1961 election, Mr Hayden was the youngest member of Parliament. He had previously worked in the public service as a clerk, finding it boring, and joined the police force. As a young constable, he saw the worst of humanity and the trauma of that experience remained.

He served as Minister for Social Security (1972-75) and Treasurer (1975) in the Whitlam government. In three short years, he was responsible for the introduction of Medibank, new welfare payments and presented the budget which restored a degree of economic credibility but became deadlocked in the Senate and led to the dismissal of the government by Governor-General Sir John Kerr in 1975.

Mr Hayden refused to be drafted into the Labor leadership or serve on the front bench after the electoral drubbing months later but eventually returned to the shadow ministry. He launched an ill-fated challenge against Whitlam in 1977. He became Labor leader later that year.

In his five years as opposition leader, Mr Hayden remade Labor’s front bench, recruited new candidates, overhauled its policies and reformed its structures. He was the vital bridge between the Whitlam and Hawke-Keating governments.

As part of a deal for stepping aside for Hawke to become leader on the eve of the 1983 election, Mr Hayden secured a promise in writing to be made foreign minister in the next Labor government. Hawke kept the promise and Hayden served as Australia’s emissary to the world during the Cold War from 1983 to 1988.

He raised the prospect of becoming Governor-General and Hawke immediately agreed. Then opposition leader, John Howard, refused to support the vice-regal appointment and accused Hawke of trying to assuage his guilt over the Labor leadership contest years earlier. Hayden served in the vice-regal post from 1989 to 1996.

In 2018, Mr Hayden was baptised into the Catholic Church, casting off his atheism. He had an affinity with the church’s social justice teachings, had been a regular churchgoer in his youth, and was schooled in the Catholic system.

Married to Dallas Hayden (nee Broadfoot) for 63 years, Mr Hayden was father to four children: Michaela, Kirk, Georgina and Ingrid. Tragically, the eldest, Michaela, died at age five when struck down by a car outside Sunday School.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/bill-hayden-former-governorgeneral-and-labor-leader-dead-at-90/news-story/b21388bc034c8578970e860afbe2115b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775611

File: 99f90792fc845be⋯.jpg (213.85 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_federal_treasurer_J….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

Anti-Jewish protests ‘an abomination’, says Josh Frydenberg

RACHEL BAXENDALE - OCTOBER 20, 2023

Josh Frydenberg has condemned anti-Semitic protests on the Sydney Opera House steps as an “abomination”, warned of the deep fears of Australia’s Jewish community and praised the “piercing moral clarity” demonstrated by the US, UK and Germany in standing with Israel in its hour of need.

In his first comments since the Hamas terror attack on southern Israel, the former treasurer ­and prominent member of the Jewish community said he never believed he would feel as his grandparents did amid the rising tide of Jewish hatred that heralded the Holocaust, nor as his parents did amid the threat to Israel posed by the Yom Kippur War in 1973. “But now I do. I stand before you anguished and anxious about the future,” Mr Frydenberg said in a speech in support of victims of terrorism, an extract of which is published in The Weekend Australian.

“When fears over safety see Jewish students afraid to attend lectures on campus, Jewish parents feel the need to keep their children home from school, and Jewish schools advise students not to wear their uniforms that makes them identifiable outside school grounds we know we have a problem.

“And when hundreds of demonstrators in Sydney chant ‘f..k the Jews’ and ‘gas the Jews’ we know just how dangerous and ­serious that problem really is. What happened last week outside the Sydney Opera House was nothing short of an abomination. A national disgrace that has become an international embarrassment.”

But Mr Frydenberg also said he believed he could “see the light returning” with the world’s strong response and support following the October 7 attack that left 1400 Israelis dead with US President Joe Biden, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz leading the charge.

“When leaders across the Western world including US President Biden, UK Prime Minister Sunak and German Chancellor Scholz speak with piercing moral clarity in defence of Israel and rush to be by its side in their hour of need it gives me comfort Israel has support where it counts,” he said in Thursday night’s speech.

“We are all here for the same reason – because we support good over evil and because we know (Winston) Churchill was right when in the heat of battle he said ‘if you’re going through hell, keep going’.”

Mr Frydenberg – who last month revealed he had chosen to take up the position of Australian chair of investment bank Goldman Sachs, rather than try for a return to politics – warned that Israel and the Jewish people had survived more than 2000 years of attempts to destroy them.

“The Babylonians, the Assyrians, the Nazis to name just a few (have tried). But history tells us that the enemies of the past are no more,” he said.

“The Jewish people survived and Israel prospered. Now despite the huge challenges ahead I see the light returning.”

But he had faith in the strength of humanity. “These are the darkest of times and every day innocent lives are being lost in both Israel and in Gaza,” he said. “We cannot lose our common humanity as Hamas makes victims of the people of Gaza too. It is my hope that despite all that has happened the light will eventually shine through.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/antijewish-protests-an-abomination-says-josh-frydenberg/news-story/d8fe39247a5e95a994f1067906902fd8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775642

File: cb13aa1bfe40e35⋯.jpg (4.2 MB,7035x4690,3:2,Former_treasurer_Josh_Fryd….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

>>19775611

OPINION: As a Jew, I can despair or look to the lessons of history

Josh Frydenberg - October 20, 2023

1/2

Thirteen days ago, my world changed, our world changed, forever.

The medieval slaughter of innocents representing the single biggest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust punctured the aura of invincibility that surrounded the Israeli Defence Force.

Terror has ushered in widespread trauma leaving a whole nation grieving for the more than 1400 lost and 200 missing. It has left deep psychological scars in the Jewish community in and beyond Israel’s shores that may never heal.

As a person of Jewish faith who has only ever known of a confident and strong Israel, I never thought I would feel, as my parents did in 1973 during the Yom Kippur war, the existential threat facing Israel. But now I do.

As a person of Jewish faith growing up in a tolerant and multicultural Australia, I never thought I would feel, as my grandparents did in 1933, the rising tide of European antisemitism which would consume their families in the flames of the Holocaust. But now I do.

I am anguished and anxious about the future.

When fears over safety see Jewish students afraid to attend lectures on campus, Jewish parents feel the need to keep their children home from school and Jewish schools advise students not to wear their uniforms that make them identifiable outside school grounds, we know we have a problem.

And when demonstrators in Sydney chant “f-ck the Jews” and “gas the Jews”, we know just how dangerous and serious that problem really is.

What happened last week outside the Sydney Opera House was nothing short of an abomination. A national disgrace that has become an international embarrassment.

Just think for a moment what just happened in our own country. Instead of being able to show solidarity with Israel as our national icon was lit up in blue and white, sympathetic Australian Jews and non Jews were told to stay away for their own safety as a rampaging mob was given centre stage.

No such behaviour was tolerated near the Eiffel Tower, the Brandenburg Gate or Number 10 Downing Street when they were lit up in blue and white. To the contrary, thousands rallied outside these landmarks, singing the Israeli national anthem, the Hatikvah, and showing their spontaneous support.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775647

File: d84282a539933aa⋯.jpg (4.96 MB,5626x3751,5626:3751,Josh_Frydenberg_addressing….jpg)

>>19775642

2/2

If that was not bad enough, it’s been reported that it was said to the leadership of the NSW Jewish community that “maybe it’ll just be easier if we don’t light up the Opera House to protect you people”.

“You people”: what a disgraceful term for a community of proud Australians that has never seen a conflict between their faith and their nationality.

A community that has produced our greatest citizen-soldier Sir John Monash, governors’ general, governors, chief Justices, chief scientists, Nobel Prize winners, leading business figures, philanthropists, medical professionals, among so many others …

I can dwell on the death, despair and darkness that is dominating debate, or I can share some of the lessons of history and what they tell us about how the light will shine again.

For more than 2000 years, the enemies of Israel have been seeking its destruction. The Babylonians, the Assyrians, the Nazis, to name just a few. But history tells us that the enemies of the past are no more. The Jewish people survived and Israel prospered.

So now, despite the huge challenges ahead, I see the light returning.

When leaders across the Western world including US President Joe Biden, UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz speak with piercing moral clarity in defence of Israel and rush to be by its side in its hour of need, it gives me comfort Israel has support where it counts.

When thousands of Israelis line the pavements waiting to donate blood, open their homes to fellow citizens who have lost loved ones and volunteer to serve in the army before they’re even asked, it gives me hope that Israel’s debilitating internal divisions can be relegated to a thing of the past.

We are all here for the same reason – because we support good over evil and because we know Winston Churchill was right when, in the heat of battle, he said, “if you’re going through hell, keep going”.

These are indeed the darkest of times. Every day innocent lives are being lost in both Israel and in Gaza. We cannot lose our common humanity as Hamas makes victims of the people of Gaza, too. It is my hope that, despite all that has happened, the light will eventually shine through.

This is an excerpt of a speech given in Melbourne on Thursday night to support victims of terrorism.

Josh Frydenberg is the former treasurer of Australia.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/middle-east/as-a-jew-i-can-despair-or-look-to-the-lessons-of-history-20231020-p5edrw.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775684

File: 9a855c2938b2fdf⋯.mp4 (10.17 MB,960x540,16:9,Thousands_march_in_Sydney_….mp4)

File: ef687f53318d16c⋯.jpg (1.53 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,People_participate_in_a_pr….jpg)

File: 58b8969e943d450⋯.jpg (475.18 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Rally_attendees_walked_fro….jpg)

File: 93be06623ed54a3⋯.jpg (457.59 KB,1670x1114,835:557,The_rally_which_started_at….jpg)

File: 5f076f118d0bd22⋯.jpg (1.23 MB,2420x1816,605:454,Abdullah_Ali_said_he_is_ma….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19706419

Colours of Palestinian flag take over streets in Sydney, Brisbane and Perth as thousands attend rallies

Alexander Lewis - 21 October 2023

1/2

The streets of Sydney, Brisbane and Perth have turned into a sea of green, red, black and white as thousands take part in pro-Palestinian demonstrations.

In Sydney, attendees stretched from the steps of Town Hall along the tram tracks of George Street in the city's centre, chanting "free free Palestine" and "shame shame Albanese".

A number of speakers addressed the crowd including representatives from the Indigenous and Palestinian communities, Jenny Leong from the Greens NSW and Michelle Berkon from Jews Against the Occupation.

The march was given late approval on Friday as NSW Premier Chris Minns promised a "zero tolerance" approach to any violence or hate speech.

Last Sunday, police considered using extraordinary powers to identify and search attendees at a similar, but static, rally that was attended by thousands of people in Hyde Park.

That gathering — which went ahead without police permission — followed a controversial protest in front of the Sydney Opera House on Monday, October 9, where some people were heard yelling anti-Semitic chants.

Protesters were today reminded that racist remarks, flag burning and flares being set off would not be tolerated during the 1.5-kilometre walk.

The marchers for Gaza, which according to NSW Police was up to 15,000-strong, moved from Town Hall to Belmore Park through the CBD.

Abdullah Ali was there carrying his son on his shoulders and said the images coming from Gaza have been difficult to process.

"It's difficult what has been broadcasted in the Western media is definitely not reflecting what is on the ground," Mr Ali said.

"What I see is different … I see parts of children being put in plastic bags, it's extremely hard for anyone to see."

Twin Palestinian-Australian sisters Hannah and Lanni recently returned from visiting family in Nablus in the West Bank. They told the crowd how their time was marred by "fear, worry and sadness".

And soon realised their short experience was what the Palestinian people had to endure for years, likening the situation to a "modern day concentration camp".

"It was hard to believe that a place of hope, opportunity and freedom was now a place of constant oppression," Lanni said.

"The cry for medical aid, the cry for shelter, the cries for water, the cries for food, the cry for help and the silence of the world … I can't understand how nobody does nothing to help them."

The sisters urged people to call for an end to the bombing, saying "the time for change is now".

Ms Berkon, who was representing two Jewish groups, told the crowd she defied Israel's "exploitation of our history", and that the Palestinian people had "a right to sanctuary in their own home".

"We must be clear the root of the violence and misery engulfing everyone between the river and the sea is Israel's sustained and illegal occupation of Palestinian land," she said.

"We know that the fermenter of rage in the West Bank is Israel's military occupation, its settlement, checkpoints, illegal war, detention without trial, torture, imprisonment of children, house demolitions, water apartheid, uprooting of olive trees and everyday harassment."

More than 830 officers were in attendance across the city.

There were no arrests and no one was injured, with police praising the community's "safe and responsible" behaviour.

"We appreciate the co-operation of attendees at today's rally who were generally well behaved," Operation Commander, Assistant Commissioner Scott Whyte said.

"Police will continue to engage with local community groups as they monitor events both here and overseas.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775689

File: b4f34d669b93bb4⋯.jpg (257.36 KB,1920x1080,16:9,The_rally_heard_from_twin_….jpg)

File: 5660fef5bab9a1f⋯.jpg (667.09 KB,2118x1412,3:2,NSW_Police_estimated_that_….jpg)

File: 664148793334869⋯.jpg (303.31 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Mr_Salem_called_what_was_h….jpg)

File: b6cff27e596a515⋯.jpg (1.46 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,More_than_1_500_people_att….jpg)

File: ee53f49b14da05d⋯.jpg (2.35 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_crowd_was_told_the_Pal….jpg)

>>19775684

2/2

'Free Gaza' chants in Brisbane

Brisbane's rally drew more than 500 people draped in Palestinian flags and colours to the city centre this afternoon, chanting 'free Gaza' and 'end the siege'.

Event speakers condemned the Israeli government's killing of thousands of Palestinians and criticised the Australian government's lack of support.

Many called for a ceasefire, including Egyptian woman Soha Mohamed who moved to Australia five years ago.

"It makes me feel angry and outraged that hundreds of children have been killed in the bombing of the hospital in West Bank, there is no Hamas there," she said.

Protester Abdus Salem said he supports the Palestinian people.

"It’s a genocide which is happening. I want to stop the genocide and investigate who is doing the crime,” he said.

"Australia should stop supporting anyone who is doing the genocide."

Fourteen-year-old Ghena Bader was born in Gaza and still has relatives living there who fear for their lives.

"It's sad for them and for us. You're calling them now, but next time you call, they might be dead," Ms Bader told the ABC.

"I've lived through many wars and it's difficult and sad. I feel bad for the children, they don't deserve to live on the streets without food, water or electricity."

Perth protests for Palestinians

More than 1,500 people chanted "Stop the war in Gaza, ceasefire now" at a pro-Palestine rally in Perth.

Palestinian-Australian Ayman Qwaider told the crowd Israel had committed war crimes under international law.

"Israel has bombed homes, whole neighbourhoods," he said.

"Palestinians are not disposable. They are people who deserve life."

People held placards reading "Bombing kids is not self defence. Enough is enough" and "Ceasefire now. Free Palestine".

One protester, Karim Mojaddidi, told the ABC he was against Hamas and was here for the Palestinian people.

"We're just here to protest against the brutal occupation of the Palestinian people," he said.

"This has been ongoing for 75-plus years. It's a brutal occupation so many innocent Palestinians have died over the past five years.

"And what happened last week is just another reminder of the nature of this brutal occupation. And we want that to stop."

More than 4,137 Palestinians and 1,400 Israelis have been killed since a Hamas terrorist attack on October 7, followed by relentless bombardment by Israeli air strikes and a continued siege of Gaza.

Rallies also took place in Wollongong, on the NSW south coast, and Hobart.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-21/thousands-attend-sydney-pro-palestinian-march-october-21/103005592

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775706

File: 9be6ad82eee9016⋯.jpg (94.68 KB,1499x843,1499:843,Ken_McCallum_met_his_count….jpg)

File: fbdb0ea7cb5e63d⋯.jpg (150.16 KB,1280x720,16:9,Australian_PM_Anthony_Alba….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19755118

>>19755135

Chinese spies target nuclear submarine secrets ‘as high priority’

FIONA HAMILTON - OCTOBER 21, 2023

China is attempting to steal nuclear technology secrets from Britain and disrupt AUKUS, one of its most crucial security agreements, the head of MI5 has said.

Ken McCallum, the director-general of the security service, warned about attempts to infiltrate the AUKUS pact, the nuclear submarine agreement with the US and Australia, developed to counter an increasingly provocative China.

The trilateral initiative, which was announced by Boris Johnson in 2021, will equip the Royal Australian Navy with nuclear-powered vessels for the first time. It was seen as an attempt to check China’s growing military assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific region, where its naval force has more than tripled in two decades.

China has accused the three western countries of going down a “dangerous path” over the deal which would “motivate an arms race, damage the international nuclear non-proliferation regime and harm regional stability and peace”.

McCallum said: “If you saw the wider public Chinese reaction when the AUKUS alliance was announced, you can infer from that they were not pleased.

“Given everything else you know about the way in which Chinese espionage and interference is taking place, it would be safe to assume that it would be a high priority for them to understand what’s happening inside AUKUS and seek to disrupt it if they were able to.”

Although Britain has operated nuclear-powered submarines for more than 60 years, Australia has never built its own. It has Collins-class diesel-electric submarines, but the new fleet is untraceable and can stay under water for longer.

The collaboration underlines the importance of the Five Eyes alliance between the intelligence agencies of Australia, the UK, the US, Canada and New Zealand, the latter of which is likely to join AUKUS.

McCallum and his Five Eyes counterparts gathered in public for the first time on Tuesday to sound the alarm about the threat from China – and demonstrate that its hacking and theft of western intellectual property will not be tolerated.

McCallum warned that British businesses were vulnerable to Chinese attempts to steal sensitive information and revealed that 20,000 officials had been targeted on LinkedIn to lure them into passing over military, technology and other secrets.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/chinese-spies-target-nuclear-submarine-secrets-as-high-priority/news-story/e24da263defeb84836445cabd19b490d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775719

File: 0c9f82513d66271⋯.jpg (103.7 KB,1600x900,16:9,Former_US_military_pilot_D….jpg)

File: a2425086cb99ab2⋯.jpg (221.52 KB,1600x900,16:9,Lawyer_Dennis_Miralis_who_….jpg)

>>19535089

Wife of jailed former Top Gun pilot calls on prime minister to intervene on one-year anniversary of arrest

Richard Wood - Oct 21, 2023

The wife of a former US military pilot and Australian citizen arrested one year ago on charges of training Chinese airmen has called for the Albanese government to release him.

Daniel Edmund Duggan, 55, was arrested on October 21, 2022, in regional New South Wales after the US government accused him of arms trafficking by providing military training to Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010 and 2012.

He is also accused of money laundering while a US citizen.

The father of six denies all the charges.

Duggan's wife Saffrine today called on the government to set her husband free ahead of a court hearing on Monday in which his legal team will press for his extradition hearing, set for November 24, be vacated.

She urged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to raise her husband's detention when he meets US President Joe Biden in Washington DC next week for talks.

"We demand they reject the advice of faceless departmental bureaucrats in Canberra," she said.

"We demand they stop them from hiding important information that is vital to Dan's liberty.

"We demand transparency and an end to the secrecy and deception that has marred this case from the beginning.

"And we ask that the prime minister deliver a message on his visit to the US, a message that he will not support the extradition of Dan Duggan.

"A message that Dan is being returned to his family where he belongs as an Australian citizen."

Duggan was provisionally arrested in a supermarket carpark by police in the NSW regional town of Orange and has been held in Lithgow Correctional Centre.

Twelve months on from his arrest, he remains in solitary confinement, with limited time out of his cell and a one-hour visit with family on Sundays.

Duggan's solicitor Dennis Miralis said it was a "long-standing concern" that thousands of documents, requested as necessary to his case, have not been produced by government agencies.

"That material is crucial to Dan's right to defend himself and crucial to the argument set down that seeks to raise his defence in extradition hearing," he said.

"If this material is not going to be produced in the first instance, it's not possible to rely upon this material at a later point in time.

"So, this material is of paramount importance."

https://www.9news.com.au/national/daniel-duggan-family-appeal-for-former-us-pilot-release-on-one-year-anniversary-of-arrest/cecf82b9-adb5-46ef-b8c3-b4e076e6e7be

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775766

File: f184259aff5b354⋯.jpg (900.74 KB,2400x1440,5:3,The_last_photograph_of_Dan….jpg)

>>19535089

>>19775719

Anthony Albanese urged to halt Daniel Duggan’s US extradition during meeting with president

Today marks the one-year anniversary since Duggan’s arrest and being held in maximum-security prison for allegedly breaching US arms trafficking laws

Ben Doherty - 21 Oct 2023

1/2

Showing that their home-baked cake had made it safely to school was important in itself, but the Duggan family had little inkling of the happy snap’s broader significance.

The photograph of Daniel Duggan with his kids outside their country New South Wales school captured one of his last moments of freedom.

“That (cake photo) is the last photo of Dan with us,” his wife, Saffrine, said, ahead of Saturday, the day which marks a year since her husband was arrested.

“Every photo that I take or have since, there is one massive hole in our family – their father and my husband.”

In the year since the naturalised Australian citizen was arrested in a supermarket car park in Orange at the request of US authorities, his family has found themselves battling two governments in court, complex federal law, and arcane secrecy provisions in their bid to bring the father-of-six home.

“People ask me how I’m going and I burst into tears,” Saffrine Duggan said.

“I can’t even put words to my real extent of emotions to how deep the hurt and horror really is.”

Duggan, a former US military pilot who became an Australian citizen in 2012, is accused of breaching US arms trafficking laws by training Chinese military pilots while working at a flight school more than a decade ago.

Duggan has consistently denied the allegation. But if convicted, he faces up to 60 years in prison.

The 55-year-old has been held in maximum-security prisons since his arrest: in March he was moved to Lithgow prison, detained in a two-by-four-metre cell.

He is permitted out into an exercise yard daily but has little-to-no human contact besides phone calls home that drop out every 10 minutes, Saffrine Duggan said.

The family also visits each Sunday for one hour, driving 90 minutes from the family farm.

“We feel that it’s been an act of violence and cruelty on our family to take away a beautiful man, my husband, under allegations that are clearly political, that we flatly deny, are unproven and are 12 years old,” Saffrine Duggan said.

“We can’t believe our government has allowed this to happen.”

She holds hope his case could be raised when the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, meets with US president Joe Biden and other officials during a state visit next week. Any agreement for extradition to the US must be approved by the federal government, specifically the attorney general.

“I ask the prime minister to deliver a message … that he will not support the extradition of my husband,” Saffrine Duggan said.

“He belongs with us, in Australia.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19775768

File: 88eb2e9e88f3248⋯.jpg (248.55 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Daniel_Duggan_when_managin….jpg)

>>19775766

2/2

US-born Duggan served more than a decade flying in the US Marine Corps, rising to the rank of major and working as a military tactical flight instructor.

He left the marines in 2002 and moved to Australia, becoming an Australian citizen in 2012 and renouncing his US citizenship in 2017. He has lived in Australia and China since leaving the marines.

A 2017 US grand jury indictment, unsealed last December, alleges Duggan trained Chinese fighter pilots to land fighter jets on aircraft carriers, in defiance of arms trafficking laws, and engaged in a conspiracy to launder money.

The indictment details payments Duggan allegedly received in 2011 and 2012 for his work training Chinese fighter pilots at a test flight academy “based in South Africa, with a presence in the People’s Republic of China”.

He rejects the charges against him as being politically motivated and says the indictment against him is filled with “half-truths, falsehoods and gross embellishments”.

Duggan’s legal team has maintained the US extradition request is politically motivated, catalysed by the US’s deepening geopolitical contest with China. Australia’s extradition treaty with the US states that extradition requests should be refused if they are for an alleged “political offence”.

They have written to the Australian parliament’s treaties committee arguing Australia’s extradition treaty with the US exposes Australians to being unlawfully lured back to the country so they can be arrested.

They argue he was effectively lured back to Australia from China. Prior to his return, Duggan was granted a security clearance by Asio, a requirement for him to obtain an aviation licence. But a few days after his arrival in Australia the clearance was removed, and he was subsequently arrested. Lures or other subterfuges are legal in the US, but not in Australia.

“Whilst these ‘tactics’ are plainly unlawful under Australia’s domestic legal order, the treaty in its present form self-evidently fails to protect Australian citizens from the US using these techniques against them,” a submission to the treaties committee states.

The extradition battle returns to court Monday morning, when Duggan’s legal team is expected to ask to postpone a full hearing.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/oct/21/anthony-albanese-urged-to-halt-daniel-duggans-us-extradition-during-meeting-with-president

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19780518

File: 1f2b0688b294f9b⋯.jpg (540.09 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_handout_photograph_taken….jpg)

File: 3f14afbb391071e⋯.jpg (422.63 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0001.jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740235

>>19749474

Key land council ends voice silence with blast at No victory

PAIGE TAYLOR - OCTOBER 21, 2023

The Central Land Council, which represents 24,000 remote Indigenous people, says Australia does not know itself.

After a week of silence to grieve last Saturday’s failed referendum, the land council, comprising 90 elected delegates, has spoken about the resounding defeat of the proposal for an Indigenous voice to parliament.

“On 14 October Australia voted NO. But Aboriginal people in all our Central Land Council communities voted YES,” the Central Land Council wrote in a statement issued on Saturday night.

“In fact, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people all over remote Australia voted YES.

“The referendum results tell us an important story: We as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are united.

“We know who we are. We know what we need. And we know things need to change.

“But we live in a country that does not know itself.”

The Central Land Council represents the interests of Indigenous people in roughly the lower half of the Northern Territory. This includes Alice Springs, the home of leading No campaigner and NT Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price.

The council wanted the voice to prioritise advising on three things: overcrowded housing, reform of the failed Commonwealth work for the dole scheme and food security.

In Central Australia, the availability of cheap junk food and the high cost of fresh fruit and vegetables are considered key drivers of the highest rates of diabetes in the world.

“Our people are grieving,” the land council wrote.

“Those of us who have been around for a long time recognise how it feels.

“We have been here before. We are sad, but we know that we must stay strong. Others in our communities, especially young people, are in shock and disbelief.

“We need to work together and support each other.

“CLC leaders and elders created a legacy of fighting to improve the lives of our people. The CLC will never stop advocating for our rights.

“We will keep fighting for equality, fighting for land, fighting for water, fighting for housing, infrastructure, good jobs, education, closing the gap – a future for our children.

“While we are disappointed with the outcome of the referendum, we recognise the courage of the Prime Minister Mr Albanese and thank him for providing Australia with an opportunity to vote for change.

“The CLC members and staff thank all Australians who stood with us.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/key-land-council-ends-voice-silence-with-blast-at-no-victory/news-story/98365df3c0ad97197f0c14209129eb2a

https://www.clc.org.au/media-release-always-was-always-will-be/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19780537

File: 7c97ec81e91c954⋯.jpg (2.33 MB,5232x3488,3:2,The_Voice_had_60_per_cent_….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740235

>>19749474

Indigenous Yes campaigners divided on Voice response, draft reveals

Lisa Visentin - October 22, 2023

1/2

Indigenous leaders are divided over the wording of a joint statement following the Voice referendum defeat, with several objecting to the tone of a draft open letter, which lays blame for the loss on the Coalition and is critical of No voters.

The draft document, intended as the first collective response of Indigenous leaders supporting the Yes campaign after declaring a week of silence following the referendum defeat last Saturday, lays bare the grief and pain among the Yes campaign group and the broader Indigenous community.

It says Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were “hurting and bewildered by what they feel is the viciousness of the repudiation of our peoples and rejection of our efforts to pursue reconciliation in good faith”.

“The truth is that the majority of Australians have committed a shameful act whether knowingly or not, and there is nothing positive to be interpreted from it. Only the shameless could say there is no shame in this outcome,” the statement says.

The document, dated October 20, a leaked copy of which has been obtained by this masthead, is the latest in a series of draft versions circulated among about 50 Indigenous people and organisations, including those associated with the Yes 23 and Uluru Dialogue campaigns.

The document says it is “the collective insights and views of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders, community members and organisations who supported the Yes Campaign”.

The draft statement signalled a pathway forward, saying Indigenous leaders would seek to amend the Uluru Statement from the Heart “to remove the aim of enshrining a First Nations Voice in the Constitution”.

But it says they remained committed to its principles of Voice, Treaty, Truth, and would pursue other options for establishing a representative body for Indigenous Australians.

“We want to talk with our people and our supporters about establishing – independent of the Constitution or legislation – an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to take up the cause of justice for our people,” the draft statement says.

The statement says the referendum was “doomed from the time the National Party and then the Liberal Party said they would oppose it and bipartisanship was lost”.

“Mr [David] Littleproud, Mr [Peter] Dutton and the political parties they lead are responsible for this result.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19780539

File: 783edbdc5f0f62b⋯.jpg (4.99 MB,5472x3648,3:2,Opponents_of_the_Voice_ral….jpg)

>>19780537

2/2

It is unclear who has written the statement or who would endorse it, but multiple sources confirmed to this masthead that, after the draft was circulated on an email chain on Friday, several Indigenous leaders declined to be part of it, saying they disagreed with the tone and some of the points made.

Those who objected included Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner June Oscar, co-chairman of Queensland’s Interim Truth and Treaty Body Mick Gooda, and Coalition of the Peaks lead convener Pat Turner. They were contacted for comment.

The draft document also expressed gratitude for the millions of Australians who voted Yes.

“We have faith that the upswelling of support through this referendum has ignited a fire for many to walk with us on our journey towards healing and justice. Our truths have been silenced for too long,” it said.

But it said rejection by non-Indigenous Australians “who came to our country in only the last 235 years” was “so appalling and mean-spirited as to be utterly unbelievable a week later”.

It praises Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s “gallantry in the campaign” but is critical of his “attempted exculpation of those who voted No”, and takes aim at Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk “and other such cynics who lifted not one finger to support the campaign”.

The document is addressed to the prime minister and “every Member of the House of Representatives and the Senate of the Commonwealth Parliament” and states that it will be circulated to the Australian public and media. Sources close to the Yes campaign were briefing media during the week that the statement was expected to be circulated this weekend, but its status was unclear on Saturday evening.

It accuses leading Indigenous No campaigners Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Warren Nyunggai Mundine, and Liberal senator Kerrynne Liddle of being “front people” for the organisations who led the No Campaign’s success.

It further states that Price’s entry to parliament as senator “was decisive to the abandonment of bipartisanship”.

The language is similar to that used by Cape York leader Noel Pearson when last year he accused Price of being trapped in a “redneck celebrity vortex” and being used by right-wing think tanks to “punch down on other black fellas”. Price rejected the claims at the time as “belittling” and “bullying”. Pearson was contacted for comment.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/indigenous-yes-campaigners-divided-on-voice-response-draft-reveals-20231021-p5edzx.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19780543

File: 0a4020af8ee828b⋯.jpg (2.12 MB,6070x4012,3035:2006,Leading_No_campaigner_Warr….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740235

>>19749474

>>19780537

‘Declaration of war’: Mundine rejects criticism from Yes campaign

Mike Foley - October 22, 2023

Leading No campaigner in the Voice referendum Nyunggai Warren Mundine has dismissed as ridiculous and racist a claim from Indigenous leaders for Yes that he is a puppet of right-wing think tanks, as Anthony Albanese declares the referendum created a new national awareness of the disadvantage confronting First Nations peoples.

A draft document dated October 20 intended to be the first collective response of Indigenous leaders supporting the Yes campaign was to be released after a week of silence marking the referendum defeat.

A leaked copy of the statement was published by this masthead on Sunday and had been circulated among about 50 Indigenous people and organisations, including those associated with the Yes 23 and Uluru Dialogue campaigns.

The draft statement said the 61 per cent national No vote was “so appalling and mean-spirited as to be utterly unbelievable”. It says the “shameful victory” belongs to right-wing think tanks the Institute of Public Affairs and the Centre for Independent Studies, and the media group News Corporation.

The statement, which is unsigned, has caused division among Indigenous leaders in the Yes camp. Some leaders declined to be part of it, saying it struck the wrong tone or that they disagreed with the points it made. Members of the Yes camp who were approached yesterday declined to comment.

The draft letter says Indigenous leaders Price, Senator Kerrynne Liddle, and Mundine who opposed the Voice to parliament “were just front people for three right-wing organisations”.

“It is an old colonial tactic to use black people to fight black people,” the statement says.

Mundine said he opposed the referendum because it was divisive between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. He said the draft letter “was a continuation of that”.

“So much for reconciliation and uniting the country,” he said. “This is a declaration of war, metaphorically.

“This insulting idea that we’re some sort of puppet is just totally ridiculous.

“Saying that the No campaign had a racist base is just ridiculous.”

Mundine said two-thirds of the population, drawing from a cross-section of society, voted No.

“It’s almost Trumpism, quite frankly, that they’re rejecting the vote of the people and it wasn’t white people alone,” Mundine said.

“I’m not going to claim that they were the majority, but there were quite a few indigenous people who voted No.”

The draft letter says the lack of political bipartisan support was the determining factor in the referendum. It praises Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s “gallantry” in defeat. However, it says the prime minister’s failure to blame No voters for their error is wrong.

“Once the Nationals and Liberals joined the No campaign the full arsenal of racism, ignorance and mean-spiritedness was unleashed and an unprecedented campaign of misinformation and disinformation was employed,” the draft letter says.

Nationals leader David Littleproud, who pre-empted his Coalition colleagues in the Liberals by declaring first that his party supported the No case, said the failed Yes campaign was Albanese’s fault.

“While I appreciate the disappointment by some Indigenous leaders for Yes, this was a democratically determined outcome the country made,” Littleproud said.

“The loss of the referendum lays squarely at the feet of the prime minister. He misread the nation in putting forward a proposition that conflated recognition with more bureaucracy.”

Albanese said he accepted the referendum result and said he was optimistic Australians would find a new path to reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people.

“There is a new national awareness of the need to close the gap. We can’t continue to have an eight-year life expectancy gap between Indigenous and non-indigenous Australians,” he said.

“We need to address issues of education, health, housing and other areas of disadvantage. We need to address the justice issues, which are there for all to see.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/declaration-of-war-mundine-rejects-criticism-from-yes-campaign-20231022-p5ee3g.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19780548

File: c64183535116ee5⋯.jpg (209.09 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Opposition_leader_John_Pes….jpg)

File: b3fe874d90ff0f4⋯.jpg (189.76 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Victorian_Nationals_leader….jpg)

File: c2b73b3277c0570⋯.jpg (152.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Chair_of_the_Yoorrook_Just….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740043

>>19762116

>>19775463

Victorian Nationals leader Peter Walsh challenges state truth-telling body

TRICIA RIVERA - OCTOBER 22, 2023

Victorian Nationals leader Peter Walsh has challenged the work of the Yoorrook Justice Commission, as he warned “the time for virtue-signalling is over”.

The state shadow Indigenous Australians minister declined to comment specifically on the Aboriginal truth-telling body’s latest “land, sky and waters” inquiry but said he did not support the work of Yoorrook so far.

The newly launched inquiry into systemic land injustice will look into “past and ongoing injustices caused by colonisation”.

The investigation comes after the commission in July demanded juvenile detention be abolished for criminals under 16 and the creation of a separate child protection system for Indigenous children.

“I have no expectations or predictions of what that (land inquiry) might recommend. I think following their last report no one knows where it will go,” Mr Walsh told The Australian.

“Their last report, on the justice system, one of the recommendations was for a totally stand-alone Indigenous court system. And our view is that we are all Victorians and we’re all equal before the law.

“We supported Indigenous courts for youth, which I think has delivered good outcomes, but as part of the current legal system of Victoria, we do not support a totally separate legal system.”

Yoorrook Justice Commission chair Eleanor Bourke told The Australian that recommendations from the final report may be used as part of the treaty negotiation process.

The Victorian Nationals leader supported the advancement of the state’s treaty process when he helped pass the Treaty Authority and Other Treaty Elements Bill 2022 last year.

Mr Walsh said he has not “agreed or not agreed” to a state-based treaty.

“All we did was agreed to set up a process to talk about treaty and at the time we said we would judge any outcomes of that, any recommendations out of that, on (their) merits,” he said.

“Whatever happens, it has to deliver real outcomes on closing the gap. I think virtue-signalling by the elite organisations in Australia, or the time for virtue-signalling is over and the time for actual action on closing the gap indicators is here.”

The state Nationals leader said he could not take a stance on a potential treaty until he had all the detail.

“It’s a bit like Albanese’s voice. A lot of people voted against it because they didn’t know what it was. And this time we have nothing before us that says anything about treaty.”

Mr Walsh said one of his focuses is to amend the Aboriginal Heritage Act to provide Victorians with certainty on development and to ensure people do not pay “exorbitant” prices or endure long waits for a cultural heritage study.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/victorian-nationals-leader-peter-walsh-challenges-state-truthtelling-body/news-story/fc797a5c3e6ef4ffdc9b5bc66d9f0e0c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19780557

File: e1fc49782af5468⋯.jpg (135.34 KB,1280x720,16:9,ASIO_Director_General_of_S….jpg)

File: b02f6646303ca63⋯.jpg (272.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tesla_and_X_CEO_Elon_Musk.jpg)

File: 0eafe24668289f9⋯.jpg (246.99 KB,2048x1152,16:9,EU_commissioner_for_intern….jpg)

>>19739995

ASIO chief Mike Burgess slaps down claims foreign governments were spreading ‘disinformation’ in Australia

ADAM CREIGHTON - OCTOBER 22, 2023

The head of ASIO Mike Burgess has slapped down speculation the voice referendum was influenced by disinformation spread by foreign governments, adding that his organisation had no interest in policing misinformation or disinformation that is propagated by Australians.

In what could also be seen as a veiled swipe at pending federal legislation to police speech on social media platforms, Mr Burgess said he hadn’t seen evidence China, Russia or any other governments were seeking to influence Australian opinion.

“There‘s lots of people who claim it is there, during elections or referendums, people like to think it’s there, but we haven’t seen that,” he told The Australian at a Five Eyes conference near San Francisco last week.

“We don’t see very much of that at all, but we’re on the look out for it”.

Former Twitter (now X) executive Yoel Roeth told the ABC in September that he expected Russia, China, and Iran might seek to influence the outcome of the Voice referendum, which failed last week in national vote, 61 per cent to 39.

“Elections, and especially elections that touch on divisive social and cultural issues, are prime targets for organised disinformation campaigns and abuse, both foreign and domestic,” Mr Roth told the ABC.

Reports in The Age in September speculated Russia might have been behind certain social media accounts, specifically ‘Aussie Cossack’, on X, which had been advocating a No vote.

“Disinformation, in the form of information put out there deliberately to influence people in a way that‘s not declared; we will only have an interest in that if that is done by a foreign government or intelligence service,” Mr Burgess said.

“If it‘s done by Australians, for their own reasons, as long as there’s no violence or political objective in that… we will have no interest in that”.

Governments in California, UK and Australia have proposed legislation since the Covid19 pandemic to give regulators the power, variously, to police information online or disbar doctors who disagreed with health bureaucracies about Covid19.

The latest draft of the government’s Misinformation and Disinformation Bill before parliament says that it aims to “protect the community and safeguard end-users against harm caused, or contributed to, by misinformation and disinformation on digital platform service”.

European Commissioner Thierry Breton issued public letters to Elon Musk, owner of X, and Mark Zuckerberg, owner of Meta, this month demanding they explain how they were complying with a new European Union law to prevent mis and disinformation online, which he alleged had flared up in the wake of Hamas’s terrorist attacks on Israel.

Mr Burgess, speaking to The Australian on the side-lines of the first ever Five Eyes summit of intelligence chiefs near Stanford University, California, convened to sound the alarm about growing Chinese efforts to steal technology, said misinformation was of no concern to ASIO.

“People are entitled to have the wrong view, that’s no interest to ASIO,” he explained.

Mr Burgess also vowed to stop politicisation of ASIO, in the wake of accusations in the US that the FBI, whose head Christopher Wray also attended the Five Eyes conference, had favoured the Democratic Party in the US, by suppressing the New York Post’s damning story about Hunter Biden’s laptop before the 2020 presidential election, for example.

“I have to make sure that we‘re not politicised, or doing things that lead us to favour to one element, one part of society, one political party … I can assure you, if people were tempted to politicise ASIO, I would prevent it,” Mr Burgess said.

Earlier this year Republicans in congress created a special committee to investigate the alleged ‘weaponisation of the federal government’ by agencies including the FBI and the Department of Justice.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/asio-chief-mike-burgess-slaps-down-claims-foreign-governments-were-spreading-disinformation-in-australia/news-story/7265b07605fc139699b65b2c4a3dc8ca

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19780599

File: ca3cf31738f0641⋯.jpg (411.87 KB,1222x747,1222:747,Earthquakes_GA.jpg)

File: dbd9d9784643a69⋯.jpg (631.17 KB,1078x806,539:403,0001.jpg)

File: b2383552b51aae5⋯.jpg (600.16 KB,1078x806,539:403,0002.jpg)

File: 8ba273c5818e32e⋯.jpg (696.17 KB,825x1123,825:1123,AP_1.jpg)

File: 932e9eca589dd51⋯.jpg (393.78 KB,825x998,825:998,VICSESN_1.jpg)

Thousands left shaken by earthquake in Victorian tourist hotspot

ANGUS MCINTYRE - OCTOBER 22, 2023

A 5.0 Magnitude earthquake has left residents of a Victorian tourist hotspot shaken up - and caused damage close to the centre of Melbourne.

The quake struck near Colac and Apollo Bay on the Great Ocean Road just after 2am on Sunday morning with people as far away as Melbourne feeling the tremors.

Over 5,000 “felt reports” have been submitted to Geoscience Australia by people across Victoria.

Radio host Jacqui Felgate shared photos from Brighton in Melbourne, where a wall appeared to have collapsed as a result of the quake.

The image showed bricks strewn across the footpath and the road.

“Brighton earthquake damage,” she captioned the image.

“Woke up here in Colac wondering what the loud bang was, then thought the shaking floor was that my husband probably fell over,” Hannah, a local resident wrote on Facebook.

“But nope … earthquake. It was intense!”

Other people living near the epicentre reported their houses violently shaking, with one woman saying she was worried her roof was going to cave in.

Siesmologist Adam Pascale said the earthquake was the largest to happen in Victoria since September 2021, when the state was hit by a 5.9 magnitude earthquake.

“We’re expecting aftershocks to continue for some months, so be prepared,” he said,

Geoscience Australia, a government agency carrying out geoscientific research, were urging anyone who felt the effects to submit a report online to assist their team of seismologists analysing the quake.

The initial quake in Colac was followed by a 3.6 magnitude aftershock in Apollo Bay just before 6am.

There have been reports of minor damage but no injuries, according to the Victoria State Emergency Service.

The SES also warned locals to remain alert for aftershocks.

If one occurs, you should drop to the ground and take cover under a sturdy item like a table until the shaking stops, the SES said.

Sunday morning’s tremor is the second in Victoria this month after residents in an area in the state’s east woke to a “loud rumble” on October 7.

A 5.9 magnitude quake, one of the biggest ever recorded in the state, destroyed several buildings in Melbourne in 2021.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/thousands-left-shaken-by-earthquake-in-victorian-tourist-hotspot/news-story/de5d6aef5166f6a2810a88c0e88a0060

https://earthquakes.ga.gov.au/

https://www.instagram.com/p/CyrVU4fBDda/

https://twitter.com/SeisLOLogist/status/1715808512629158366

https://twitter.com/vicsesnews/status/1715841378994028809

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19780602

File: 1ee1d5dbef6dd23⋯.jpg (160.79 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Stephen_Mitchell_entering_….jpg)

Home Affairs let pedophile suspect work in Indonesia embassy for five months

BEN PACKHAM - OCTOBER 22, 2023

Home Affairs allowed a suspected pedophile to keep working in Australia’s Indonesia embassy for at least five months with a security clearance before ordering him home to be arrested.

Public servant Stephen Mitchell was sentenced to 13 years’ jail in May over a string of child sex offences committed against six girls between 1994 and 2008, including charges of persistent abuse of a child and maintaining a sexual relationship with a child.

The Australian Federal Police first contacted Home Affairs about Mitchell on September 15, 2021, seeking help with its inquiries, and formally confirmed in early December 2021 that the former sports coach was under investigation.

Home Affairs let him keep working as a strategic intelligence analyst in the Jakarta embassy until mid-February 2022.

In a tabled answer to a question by Greens senator David Shoebridge, Home Affairs said it allowed Mitchell to remain in his job at the embassy at the request of investigators. “Notwithstanding Home Affairs’ obligations to provide a safe workplace for employees, ACT police requested Home Affairs preserve the integrity of the investigation by not informing Mr Mitchell of the investigation,” it said.

Home Affairs sponsored Mitchell’s checks for a “negative vetting one” level security clearance, which he obtained after commencing work there in February 2018 – more than a decade after multiple sex offence complaints against him.

The department told Senator Shoebridge the government’s security vetting process required a national police check but it did not identify open investigations when charges were not yet laid.

The Senate earlier heard AFP investigators did not inform Indonesian police of the presence of a suspected sex offender in the country before he was returned home, despite being aware of his participation in social clubs there.

Senator Shoebridge told The Australian: “It’s hard to comprehend how for almost half a year a man accused of serious sexual offences against children was working with a high level security clearance in the embassy and no steps were taken to protect children he came in contact with.”

Mitchell’s role at the embassy did not require him to have unsupervised contact with children, and a review found no evidence of such contact.

Senator Shoebridge said this wasn’t an adequate reason to prevent Home Affairs from returning him to Australia earlier, and said Indonesian authorities should have been informed sooner to allow “all reasonable steps to protect the local community”.

“It ignored the nature of his offending, much of which occurred in social and recreational settings,” he said.

Mitchell pleaded guilty to giving false information to obtain security clearances.

The former national rock climbing coach groomed a number of his victims through the sport. He will be eligible for parole in May 2032.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/home-affairs-let-pedophile-suspect-work-in-indonesia-embassy-for-five-months/news-story/dd4172491beec32501385258ad7f9326

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19780612

File: f8979a78daa5b35⋯.jpg (148.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Chinese_Ambassador_Xiao_Qi….jpg)

>>19769319

China agrees to lift ‘coercive’ tariffs on Australian wine

WILL GLASGOW - OCTOBER 22, 2023

Beijing has agreed to review its crippling tariffs on Australian wine, a breakthrough for the Albanese government that leaves only the live lobster trade and a clutch of beef abattoirs on China’s trade blacklist ahead of Anthony Albanese’s trip to meet Xi Jinping.

The Prime Minister unveiled the deal on Sunday as he revealed he would travel to Beijing and Shanghai from November 4 to 7 to meet with President Xi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang.

“I look forward to visiting China, an important step towards ensuring a stable and productive relationship,” Prime Minister Albanese said in a statement.

“I welcome the progress we have made to return Australian products, including Australian wine, to the Chinese market. Strong trade benefits both countries.”

The trade win comes days after the Albanese government announced that it would allow Chinese company Landbridge to continue its controversial lease over the Port of Darwin.

Beijing’s wine tariffs — which Australia challenged in the World Trade Organisation — were a centrepiece of the sweeping trade sanctions China imposed in 2020 after the Morrison government called for an inquiry into the origins of Covid.

Australia has agreed to put its WTO case over the wine tariffs on hold while China undertakes an “expedited review” of its duties, which is expected to take five months. Canberra will resume the dispute in the WTO if the duties are not removed.

China’s backdown had been widely expected in the wine industry after Beijing last month said it had proposed a “package” deal to end them, seen by Canberra as a face-saving exercise.

The WTO had in recent days delivered a draft report on the more than 200 per cent wine tariffs, which sources familiar with the matter said had found in Australia’s favour.

It follows a similar path that Australia convinced China to take in a separate case on an 80 per cent tariff placed on Australian barley. That deal was also agreed to days before an unfavourable WTO report into China’s tariff was to be released.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham - who was Australia’s trade minister in 2020 - said the wine tariffs were “an attempt at economic coercion by China”.

“And it is no doubt, no coincidence that China and Australia received the draft report from the World Trade Organisation into Australia’s appeal against these tariffs only in the last week,” Senator Birmingham said.

“I am confident that draft report would have found that these tariffs were an act against the rules of the WTO. They are clearly in breach of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement and the undertakings that China had given to Australia.

“And so, they should not just be reviewed, but they should be removed and removed forthwith.”

Australia overtook France as the biggest exporter of wine to China in 2019, the year before the tariffs all but eliminated the trade. At their peak Australian wine exports to China were worth almost $1.2 billion.

Treasury Wine Estates, Australia’s most valuable wine exporter, is poised to be the biggest beneficiary of the removal of the tariffs. Treasury’s Penfolds label is the best known in the Chinese market.

“It’s great news to see an agreement for a path forward to allow our Australian brands and wine to be sold in the Chinese market,” said Treasury CEO Tim Ford.

“There are only positives to come out of a favourable tariff review for the Chinese consumer, customers and wine category, for the Australian wine industry and for [Treasury].”

Australian Grape & Wine CEO Lee McLean said it had been a very difficult time for Australia’s grape growers and wine producers, as China’s tariffs compounded a slump from the pandemic and various weather events.

“So this is very welcome news for grape growers and winemakers across the country,” he said.

Li Wei, chairman of Barossa winery Swan Wine Group, said he had “encouraging” feedback in recent surveys of Chinese wine distributors.

“Some dealers who have never sold Australian wine in the past are now considering it,” he told The Australian.

Wine industry experts have forecast that, despite the end of the impost on Australian exports, the trade will not return to its previous levels. Many Australian producers remain wary of the political risk of the Chinese market while wine consumption in China has shrunk over the last four years as its economy has slowed.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/china-agrees-to-lift-coercive-tariffs-on-australian-wine/news-story/cf44d60c2355df19ee958dc37aeeab6d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19780628

File: e413bfeaefb5461⋯.jpg (110.54 KB,1200x800,3:2,Anthony_Albanese_s_US_visi….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19769266

Anthony Albanese to 'urge support' for AUKUS in Washington ahead of meeting with Joe Biden

Natalie Vikhrov - October 22 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will be "urging support" for all legislation needed for the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine deal to go ahead during his four-day visit to Washington next week.

As part of the trilateral agreement, Australia will receive at least three US-built Virginia class submarines and then begin building its own, with a US combat system.

However, the necessary Congress approval has faced challenges.

Ahead of his departure on Sunday, Mr Albanese told reporters in Canberra that foreign politicians should avoid intervening in legislation directly "but this is important".

"Our AUKUS pact is absolutely critical, and I'll be having important meetings with members of Congress and Senate about the legislation that's required to ensure that AUKUS can continue to forge ahead," he said.

"We will be urging support for all of the legislation that is required for AUKUS.

"There is great deal of support across the spectrum for this arrangement. This is in the interests of Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom. And it is one of the reasons why it's very important that I visit the United States to advance Australia's interests."

The upcoming visit will mark the ninth meeting between Mr Albanese and US President Joe Biden since Labor came into power at the last election.

Mr Albanese said it will be an "important visit", where clean energy and critical minerals are also on the agenda.

"As we move to a clean energy global economy, Australia is in a strong position to benefit [from the Inflation Reduction Act] because of the critical minerals that we have and we'll have discussions based upon that, after the signing earlier this year of our Climate Critical Minerals and Clean Energy Transformation Compact," he said.

On Sunday, Mr Albanese also announced Australia and China will be suspending their World Trade Organisation dispute after China agreed to review the tariffs it imposed on Australian wine.

"This is a very significant decision, because unlike some of the other products, the wine industry have indicated they were having difficulty finding other markets to fill the gap that was created by the breakdown in the trade with China. So, this is critical," he said.

Mr Albanese said the deal has "not been transactional" and he was "very confident" in a positive result.

"This is a decision that will be worth more than a billion dollars in Australia's exports," he said.

Mr Albanese will be travelling to China from November 4 to 7, where he will be meeting with President Xi Jinping as well as attending the International Import Expo.

"It is important that we stabilise our relationship with China, that is in the interests of Australia and China, and it is indeed in the interests of the world, that we have stable relations, and that is what this visit will represent," he said.

Mr Albanese said the trip will coincide with the 50th anniversary of Gough Whitlam's visit China, the first visit by an Australian prime minister to China.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8395656/albanese-to-urge-support-for-aukus-in-washington/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

caa198 No.19784085

DON’T FEEL SHEEPISH ABOUT STARING DOWN THE ABSURD

Poignantly accurate by unknown author.

As a child I would sit for hours with my grandmother on the wooden bench seats circling the main arena at the Ekka and watch the sheepdog trials.

Occasionally, an errant sheep would prop and stubbornly refuse to be intimidated by the dog’s constant urging and cajoling but in the end the dog always won and the flock allowed itself to be herded into the pen.



We’ve become like the sheep at the Ekka, constantly herded, urged and cajoled into accepting positions that governments tell us are good for us without bothering to ask us what we think.



The latest victims of herding are Victorians who with Dodgy Dan Andrews snapping at their heels have been told they can’t have gas stoves in their new houses.



Anyone with an IQ exceeding their shoe size knows that this will have zero effect on the world’s environment, but don’t argue. Just do as you are told.


Farmers throughout the eastern states are being herded into submission by power companies threatening to compulsorily acquire sections of their land holdings to allow the construction of giant transmission towers on their properties.



These lines could be run underground but this would be more expensive so, sorry, we’re going to trash the value of your property because it’s cheaper for us that way. Don’t argue. Just get out of the way as we march towards net zero.



Net zero will never happen in the lifetime of anyone reading this but the sheepdogs have worked themselves into an absolute frenzy, racing from one side of the paddock to the other as they herd us into the belief that we can attain the unattainable.



All that is required is a blind ­acceptance of the absurd.



In the cities and suburbs we are being herded into the belief that we need taller and taller apartment buildings, crammed wall to wall in defiance of the planning restrictions imposed by neigbourhood development plans to solve the “housing ­crisis.”



Can you recall a city council election in which the parties campaigned on a platform of promising to ignore planning restrictions, cram as many apartments as possible into any given space and comprehensively ignore any effect on the quality of life of ratepayers so that developers could make lots more money and the council could rake in extra fees and rates?



Neither can I. Don’t argue. Just roll over and cop it with the council safe in the knowledge that any sheep that refuse to budge will be forced into the pen by the massive expense involved in challenging these decisions in the courts.



The sheepdogs had a great time during Covid, police officers and health officials snapping and snarling at our heels as they herded us into our homes, threatening dire consequences for those sheep who refused to go into the pen, in a blatant, ­nationwide abuse of power.


We are now being gradually herded towards an acceptance of converting place names from English to Indigenous dialects.



Why? Is that what the majority of the population wants?



I can’t recall being asked.



The sheepdogs have also barked and wheedled us into enduring and accepting endless welcome-to-country ceremonies.



Why? It’s my country. I don’t need to be welcomed to it. I was born here. My parents were born here. It’s mine and I object to being treated as a stranger in my own home.



The Voice campaign stands out as one of the greatest herding scenarios since the first sheepdog trotted down a gangplank in old Sydney Town and started harassing terrified sheep way back when.



Much to the surprise of the dogs, however, more than one sheep has stood its ground and refused to be herded into the Yes pen.



This was not supposed to happen. When the dogs snapped at their hindquarters the flock was supposed to trot into the pen without question.



For daring to stare down the dogs, holding their ground and refusing to be cajoled and bullied, they have been branded as very bad, un-Australian sheep.



The extension of government power into our lives, the presumption that we will meekly submit to being told what we must accept without question, has been incremental



We are snowed in with faux science, directed to “do the right thing”, toe the line, feel the “vibe” – whatever that might be – and generally cop anything that Big Brother says is good for us.



Quite frankly, I’ve had a gutful of it.


Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785552

File: 7bce41c5ebeb36a⋯.jpg (481.79 KB,2400x1598,1200:799,Donald_Trump_and_Australia….jpg)

File: adccba0d47f7f91⋯.jpg (455.97 KB,814x643,814:643,POTUS_34.jpg)

>>19679708

>>19684137

Donald Trump calls billionaire Anthony Pratt ‘red haired weirdo from Australia’ as he denies discussing submarines

Ex-president lashes out at ‘fake news’ amid reports Pratt used wealth to cultivate close relationship between the pair

Christopher Knaus - 23 Oct 2023

Donald Trump has described Anthony Pratt, one of Australia’s richest men, as a “red haired weirdo” as he lashed out at extraordinary reports about their personal conversations.

Earlier this month, reports suggested Trump had shared top-secret details of US nuclear submarines with Pratt, an Australian billionaire who runs the paper and packaging giant Visy.

New recordings and documents – reported by Australia’s Nine newspapers and 60 Minutes programme as well as the New York Times – have shed extraordinary further light on Pratt’s relationship with Trump and other key global and Australian figures.

The reports suggest Pratt spent hundreds of thousands dollars on memberships at Trump’s private Mar-a-Lago resort, helping him cultivate a close relationship with the president and leading to regular private conversations between the pair.

The covert recordings and documents reportedly show:

Pratt says nothing in the recordings of hearing Trump speak about the US nuclear submarines.

But he says Trump has this “ability to say outrageous things non-stop”.

“He’s outrageous,” Pratt said. “He just says whatever the fuck he wants. And he loves to shock people.”

In response, Trump took to his preferred social media outlet, Truth Social, to describe the New York Times story as false.

He rejected the suggestion the pair had spoken about the US nuclear submarine fleet and its capabilities.

“The Failing New York Times story … about a red haired weirdo from Australia, named Anthony Pratt, is Fake News,” he posted.

“I never spoke to him about Submarines but I did speak to him about creating jobs in Ohio and Pennsylvania, because that’s what I’m all about – JOBS, A GREAT ECONOMY, LOW TAXES, NO INFLATION, ENERGY, DOMINANCE, STRONG BORDERS, NO ENDLESS WARS, LOW INTEREST RATES, and much more!”

In the recordings, Pratt appeared to praise Trump’s willingness to speak his mind, describing him as “shameless and fearless”.

“Can you imagine how yuck it would be to poke someone’s eyes out in a fight? So he does that but in life … He’s shameless and fearless. He’s got incredible balls,” Pratt said in one of the recordings.

Pratt recalled Trump speaking about his phone call to Zelensky, in which he applied pressure for Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden as Joe Biden ran for president.

According to Pratt, Trump said: “‘You know that Ukraine phone call, that was nothing compared to what I usually do.’ He said: ‘That Ukraine phone call, that’s nothing compared to what we usually talk about’.”

Pratt was approached for comment via Visy, his paper and packaging company, but a response was not received by deadline.

Keating and Abbott were also approached for comment. Keating told the Nine newspapers his work for Pratt was well known.

“I do not advise Mr Pratt on commercial matters in Australia or abroad [or] … on government matters in Australia that may be relevant to him or his company. My advice is limited to big picture issues of the international kind.”

There is no suggestion that Pratt has engaged in any wrongdoing or that he is under investigation as part of the probe by special prosecutors in the US of Trump’s handling of confidential information.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/23/donald-trump-truth-social-post-nuclear-submarines-red-haired-weirdo-australian-billionaire-anthony-pratt

Donald J. Trump Truth

The Failing New York Times story, leaked by Deranged Jack Smith and the Biden “Political Opponent Abuser” DOJ, about a red haired weirdo from Australia, named Anthony Pratt, is Fake News. I never spoke to him about Submarines, but I did speak to him about creating jobs in Ohio and Pennsylvania, because that’s what I’m all about - JOBS, A GREAT ECONOMY, LOW TAXES, NO INFLATION, ENERGY DOMINANCE, STRONG BORDERS, NO ENDLESS WARS, LOW INTEREST RATES, and much more! Maggie Hagerman and the Misfits never called me for a comment. Why would they, they just write anything they want. Whether it’s correct or not is of ZERO importance to them. “All the News That’s Unfit To Print.” That’s why we call it the Fake News!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111282033630419995

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785586

File: b6eedf4c170663f⋯.jpg (506.27 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Tapes_reveal_Pratt_s_pursu….jpg)

File: 9b510b744999f9e⋯.mp4 (2.27 MB,1118x590,559:295,What_Trump_told_Pratt_abou….mp4)

File: 73bf90280cf26aa⋯.mp4 (613.88 KB,1118x444,559:222,He_s_outrageous.mp4)

File: d02fe16f0511760⋯.mp4 (1.6 MB,1118x590,559:295,What_Trump_told_Pratt_abou….mp4)

>>19679708

>>19684137

>>19785552

‘Being rich is my superpower’: Tapes reveal Pratt’s pursuit of the powerful

Richard Baker, Nick McKenzie and Hannah Bowers - OCTOBER 22, 2023

1/3

Secret tapes have revealed Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt’s extraordinary private dealings with Donald Trump, a $1 million promised payment to Trump’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and financial dealings with then-Prince Charles in the hope he would become king.

After recent allegations Trump had leaked classified US submarine fleet details to Pratt, the covert recordings reveal the billionaire claimed the former president also disclosed non-public details about US military action in Iraq and a private conversation with Iraq’s leader.

The tapes, along with internal documents from Pratt’s company, Visy, and briefings from over a dozen sources in the United States and Australia, reveal how the packaging titan uses relationships with powerful figures to obtain an advantage in global business and politics.

Pratt gained access to Trump by spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on membership and event fees at the ex-president’s private Florida club, Mar-a-Lago.

Pratt is heard on the tapes simultaneously admiring and besmirching Trump and comparing him to a mafia figure “with balls” who uses henchmen to do his dirty work.

In claiming he had paid a fee of “about a million bucks” to Giuliani in return for the Trump lawyer attending Pratt’s birthday party, the Visy boss explained that “Rudy is someone I hope will be useful one day”. This year, Trump and Giuliani were both charged with criminally subverting the 2020 presidential election.

King Charles is another powerful figure Pratt has cultivated – while he was a prince – with documents listing a “final payment” to “HRH” [His Royal Highness] of $182,000 in 2021.

“My superpower is that I am rich. So I am useful to him [Prince Charles], right?” Pratt said of Charles on the tape.

Leaked documents show how Pratt has also pursued local political influence, revealing consulting payments to two former prime ministers, Tony Abbott and Paul Keating.

Abbott was hired, the files show, weeks after losing his parliamentary seat in 2019, on a retainer of $8000 a month, while Keating’s monthly retainer is $25,000.

In 2022, Pratt budgeted $1.2 million to pay his in-house government affairs and political adviser, Richard Dowdy, who is a former Abbott staffer.

Pratt has also privately claimed on covert recordings that he had donated $1 million to the Voice referendum’s Yes campaign because he had fielded a request to do so from a senior adviser to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

The recordings, which have been obtained by this masthead and 60 Minutes, will reignite the scandal involving allegations Trump had disclosed potentially secret information on the American submarine fleet to Pratt that the Australian businessman later gossiped about.

Pratt did not respond to requests for comment via his media relations manager and hung up when called directly.

Secrets and power

The alleged submarine disclosures by Trump, revealed by a US media outlet, are under investigation and could result in Pratt being called to testify against the former president. They have also made Trump and Pratt’s relationship the focus of intense media scrutiny. Trump is the Republican Party’s frontrunner presidential candidate for 2024.

On the covertly made recordings obtained by 60 Minutes and this masthead of Pratt talking to several people, there is no mention of submarines, but Pratt does claim Trump’s disclosures at Mar-a-Lago were frequently shocking.

“He’s got this ability to say outrageous things non-stop. He’s outrageous,” Pratt said in one recording. “He just says whatever the f— he wants. And he loves to shock people.”

On the same tape, Pratt describes how in 2019, Trump told him he had just ordered the US military to conduct an airstrike on Iranian-linked militants in Iraq. He then disclosed a private phone call he’d had with the leader of Iraq.

“It hadn’t even been on the news yet and he [Trump] said: ‘I just bombed Iraq today and the president of Iraq called me up and said, “You just levelled my city”.’”

Pratt says Trump then boasted about his response: “I [Trump] said to him [Iraq’s leader], ‘OK, what are you going to do about it?’ ”

According to Pratt, Trump then spoke of the infamous conversation he had with President Volodymyr Zelensky in which he pressured the Ukraine leader to investigate then Democrat presidential contender Joe Biden’s son.

A covert recording captures Pratt stating: “Trump said, ‘You know that Ukraine phone call, that was nothing compared to what I usually do.’ He said: ‘That Ukraine phone call, that’s nothing compared to what we usually talk about’.”

Pratt also claimed that Trump described how his phone calls with Russian President Vladimir Putin were tapped by authorities.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785590

File: c8c815cc1c4d182⋯.jpg (88.1 KB,1080x762,180:127,Australia_s_richest_man_An….jpg)

File: a4a42a2541f6f4a⋯.jpg (6.72 MB,6016x4016,376:251,Pratt_at_Mar_a_Lago.jpg)

File: d49773edf9fbf1f⋯.jpg (675.98 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,Rudy_Giuliani_speaks_outsi….jpg)

>>19785586

2/3

Getting close to the president

The tape recordings of Pratt depict a businessman who relishes proximity to power, exposing a hunt for beneficial connections.

Trump and Pratt both praised each other publicly during the Trump presidency. The businessman ran advertisements in the Wall Street Journal backing Trump after Pratt made a $2 billion commitment to create US manufacturing jobs. In 2019, Trump opened a Visy mill in Ohio where he lauded Pratt’s business prowess.

Privately, Pratt savaged Trump’s ethics, claiming he used proxies to push the boundaries of the criminal law, while simultaneously appearing to admire Trump’s ruthless bravado.

“Who would dream of the minute he becomes president, he starts dealing with other countries, sending his kids to do deals, real estate deals with other countries just to see if he can get away with it?” Pratt states on one recording.

“He knows exactly what to say and what not to say so that he avoids jail … but gets so close to it … that it looks like to everyone that he’s breaking the law. He won’t go up to someone and say: ‘I want you to kill someone’. What he’ll say is he’ll send someone to tell someone to kill someone.

“Trump says, ‘Would you go and tell that guy over there to steal for me?’ And so he can say, ‘I never told the guy to steal’. And things like that is how Trump gets away with it. Most people don’t have the legal background and the sneakiness.”

On another recording, Pratt describes the ex-president as a ruthless operator prepared to poke out the eyes of a rival.

“Can you imagine how yuck it would be to poke someone’s eyes out in a fight? So he does that but in life … He’s shameless and fearless. He’s got incredible balls,” he says.

Pratt also recounts how Trump demeaned his own wife at Mar-a-Lago.

“Melania who was sitting next to him at dinner. He said, ‘I asked Melania to walk around the pool in her bikini so all the other guys could get a look at what they were missing’.”

Trump says, on Pratt’s telling, that Melania had replied: “I’ll do that when you walk around with me in your bikini.”

Pratt appears to have worked assiduously to get close to Trump by purchasing a $200,000 membership at his Mar-a-Lago club in spring 2017 and then spending additional amounts to attend special functions there, sources say.

In a draft copy of a speech Pratt delivered to a Jewish group in late 2019, Pratt describes how he “became a member of the Mar-a- Lago resort” as a “strategic” play to secure access to Trump.

“My membership has given me a seat at the table where the president relaxes socially, and mingles with his guests … The key thing being a member at Mar-a-Lago has done has been that I see the president a few times a year.”

A line that appears crossed out in the draft speech states: “It’s definitely turned out to be a strategic decision – and a very good investment.” It is unclear if Pratt authored the speech or approved the redacted lines.

In another crossed-out sentence, the draft Pratt speech states: “President Trump is a very reciprocal man.”

The draft speech also describes how Trump’s business-friendly policies had not only paid huge commercial dividends for Pratt’s company but how Visy’s investment in jobs and manufacturing in “Ohio, a key battleground state in the 2020 election, ticked lots of political boxes” for Trump.

Pratt’s draft speech also states: “I also support Trump because he’s been the most pro-Israel American president in our time.”

Pratt, Giuliani and an expensive party

Other recordings capture Pratt claiming he paid almost $1 million to Giuliani in the lead-up to his 60th birthday in April 2020. The party was cancelled due to Victoria’s COVID-19 lockdowns, but Pratt describes how the payment led to regular contact with the controversial lawyer.

“I paid about a million bucks to [Rudy to] come out as a celebrity guest [but] it didn’t happen so now he calls me once a week,” Pratt says on a recording in which he also marvels at the ruthlessness of the Trump lawyer, the former president and media baron Rupert Murdoch.

“All these guys are like the mafia. Trump, Rupert, Rudy. You want to be a customer, not a competitor. And I am very aware of that.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785595

File: b045ae402eff4eb⋯.jpg (2.17 MB,4514x3009,4514:3009,Anthony_Pratt_and_Prime_Mi….jpg)

File: 2b73dba667a47ba⋯.jpg (214.99 KB,1999x1333,1999:1333,Paul_Keating_and_Anthony_P….jpg)

>>19785590

3/3

Pratt also explains on the tapes why he cultivated connections with influential figures. “What I’m trying to do is network with people who can be useful. Prince Charles said when he introduced me to Camilla, ‘He’s [Pratt] been very useful.’ And I thought, that’s an insult. And then I thought, it is better than being irrelevant.

“Friend is the best. Useful is a silver medal. So I am looking for people like Rudy [Giuliani].”

In the recordings, Pratt says his relationship with Giuliani solidified over lunches and phone calls during the Trump administration, and after he lost power.

“It’s not all just seat-of-the-pants shit, I think that him [Trump] and Rudy are like that, and they are plotting all this out,” Pratt said of the pair’s efforts to stop Biden becoming president in early 2021.

Pratt described how his relationship with King Charles was carefully cultivated before his coronation.

“I see him as an undervalued political stock. It is just that he is a laughing stock now. But when he is king, [they] won’t be laughing.”

The tapes capture a hawkish Pratt claiming to have warned Trump that: “I think China is going to take over Australia.”

In a recent speech praising Foreign Minister Penny Wong, Pratt struck a softer tone on Beijing, stating: “It’s to your great credit that we’ve been able to break the ice between the Australian and Chinese government.”

The tape recordings also provide insights into Pratt’s ability to shift with the political wind as he described more recent efforts to ingratiate himself with the Biden administration.

Australian influence

In Australia, Pratt has cultivated both the Coalition and Labor, making generous donations to both parties.

The leaked documents detail an apparent $1 million donation he made to Labor in January which is yet to be publicly disclosed and which comes after reported donations in the 2021-22 financial year of $1.96 million to the ALP and $1.7 million to the Coalition.

After it was reported earlier this year that Pratt had donated $1 million to the Voice Yes campaign, he was asked by a journalist why he’d done so. Pratt referred the question to an adviser, who said: “It just seemed like the right thing to do at the time.”

But in private, this masthead has confirmed via confidential sources that Pratt claimed he made the donation only after his government relations adviser had held a private meeting with one of Albanese’s senior staffers and had asked if there was anything Pratt could do to help the Labor administration.

Pratt claims that the PM’s staffer responded by asking Pratt to support the Voice, prompting the donation.

The documents list “consultant” payments to Paul Keating of $25,000 a month and to Tony Abbott of $8000 a month after his hiring in June 2019.

Abbott did not respond to questions, while Keating said his decade-long stint as a consultant for Pratt was well-known.

“I do not advise Mr Pratt on commercial matters in Australia or abroad [or]… on government matters in Australia that may be relevant to him or his company. My advice is limited to big picture issues of the international kind,” Keating said.

Pratt’s cultivation of the media is also canvassed in the tape recordings, with the billionaire describing how he had pulled his $730,000 sponsorship package of Sky News programs hosted by Sharri Markson and Alan Jones after Albanese and Biden had been elected.

“I’m a big sponsor of Sky, we are the wallpaper of Canberra,” he states.

“I was Sharri’s big sponsor. I’m not any more because as soon as Biden and Albanese got in, I told Sky I only want to sponsor Sky in the afternoon, none of the talk shows, because it’s too right-wing.”

Pratt has advertised in, or run conferences on superannuation, recycling and his Global Food Forum with The Age, Sydney Morning Herald and Australian Financial Review, which are owned by Nine Entertainment.

He has also run advertisements and events with News Corp publications The Australian and The Wall Street Journal for his Global Food Forum.

https://www. theage. com. au/ world/ north-america/ being-rich-is-my-superpower- tapes-reveal-pratt-s- pursuit-of-the-powerful- 20231017 -p5ecwv. html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785601

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19679708

>>19684137

>>19785552

Revealed: Donald Trump's leaked conversations with Anthony Pratt

The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age

Oct 22, 2023

Nick McKenzie discusses the leaked recordings, during which billionaire Anthony Pratt details the former president’s ‘outrageous’ private conversations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LueFB2CY2GI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785607

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19679708

>>19684137

>>19785552

Donald Trump Spills Secrets

60 Minutes Australia

Oct 22, 2023

60 minutes uncovers tape recordings of Australian Billionaire Anthony Pratt sharing the classified information former president Donald Trump told him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVFT-2k8eWQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785746

File: 45053947d36e139⋯.jpg (632.57 KB,2048x1152,16:9,After_a_week_of_silence_In….jpg)

File: 42ae76e13882341⋯.jpg (443.07 KB,1440x1800,4:5,F9Ey35LagAADpuY.jpg)

File: bf0a47b4a6be828⋯.jpg (462.7 KB,1440x1800,4:5,F9Ey35JbEAAhJ0S.jpg)

File: 8731a69ba180d19⋯.jpg (135.55 KB,1440x1799,1440:1799,F9Ey35NacAAD9hk.jpg)

>>19739995

>>19740235

>>19749474

>>19780537

Indigenous groups vow to be heard after ‘racist’ referendum result

PAUL GARVEY - OCTOBER 23, 2023

1/2

The leaders of the Yes campaign have flagged their intention to establish an Indigenous voice despite the referendum’s defeat, as a week of silence ended with accu­sations of racism, dishonesty and ignorance towards No voters.

In a statement released late on Sunday, a group that described itself as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders, community members and organisations that supported Yes said it was now clear that no constitutional change recognising Indigenous Australians would ever succeed.

In a sign the Indigenous affairs debate will increasingly turn to treaty in the wake of the referendum defeat, the statement addressed the “occupation” of an Australia that belonged to Indigenous people.

“We accept that the majority of non-Indigenous voting Australians have rejected recognition in the Australian Constitution. We do not for one moment accept that this country is not ours,” the statement said. “It is the legitimacy of the non-Indigenous occupation in this country that requires recognition, not the other way around. Our sovereignty has never been ceded.”

The statement said a voice was “sorely needed” in the pursuit of First Nations rights.

“We want to talk with our ­people and our supporters about establishing – independent of the Constitution or legislation – an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice to take up the cause of justice for our people,” the statement said.

“Rejection of constitutional recognition will not deter us from speaking up to governments, parliaments and to the Australian people.”

The referendum’s defeat, the statement said, meant Indigenous people remained excluded from the Constitution as originally intended by the nation’s founding fathers.

“A ‘founding document’ without recognition of First Peoples of this country continues the process of colonisation,” the statement said. “It is clear no reform of the Constitution that includes our peoples will ever succeed. This is the bitter lesson from 14 October.”

The statement was also scathing of the conduct of the Coalition, the No campaign and the media.

The decision by Peter Dutton and Nationals leader David Littleproud to oppose the voice ended more than a decade of bipartisan support for the reform, they said.

“The proposal was tracking 60 per cent support compared to 40 per cent opposition for several years until the National and Liberal parties preferred wanton political damage over support for some of this country’s most dis­advantaged people,” they said.

“There was little the Yes campaign could do to countervail this.”

Mr Littleproud on Sunday night said while he understood the disappointment of some Yes leaders, the referendum result was “a democratically determined outcome the country made”.

“The loss of the referendum lays squarely at the feet of the Prime Minister,” he said. “He misread the nation by putting forward a proposal that conflated recognition with more bureaucracy.”

Lies were a primary feature of the campaign, the statement said, saying that the No campaign was funded and resourced by conservative and international interests with no genuine interest in Australia’s Indigenous people.

“The scale of deliberate disinformation and misinformation was unprecedented, and it proliferated, unchecked, on social media, repeated in mainstream media and unleashed a tsunami of racism against our people,” they said. “We know that the mainstream media failed our people, favouring ‘a false sense of balance’ over facts.”

“Racism against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people had increased during the campaign and was a powerful driver of the No campaign.”

While the authors of the statement were not listed, the document was distributed by the public relations agency that had been working with the Uluru Dialogue throughout the Yes campaign.

It’s understood that while up to 60 Indigenous leaders were involved in the drafting of the document, not all those involved endorsed the final statement.

Sean Gordon, a co-convenor of the Liberals for Yes campaign, said the statement was written by a collective of leaders as a response to all Indigenous people. He said signatures were deliberately not ­attached so as to allow Indigenous people to share and take ownership of the statement.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785750

File: ed13dc007ce5071⋯.jpg (438.61 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Peter_Dutton_left_National….jpg)

File: 2e17b9578cef77a⋯.jpg (357.24 KB,1331x1774,1331:1774,Tiwi_Land_Council_chair_Gi….jpg)

File: 25cca64c75da8c1⋯.jpg (331.31 KB,1408x1878,704:939,Anindilyakwa_Land_Council_….jpg)

>>19785746

2/2

The Australian revealed last week that Indigenous groups in the Kimberley and Pilbara regions of Western Australia had already begun discussions about developing voice-like bodies at a local levels, buoyed by voting results that showed strong support for the referendum in predominantly Indigenous communities.

Those voices would sit outside legislation and would work to deliver outcomes originally envisaged under a constitutionally enshrined voice.

Earlier on Sunday, the Central Land Council, which represents Aboriginal communities in the southern half of the Northern Territory, said the referendum result showed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were united in knowing what they needed and that things needed to change.

“The CLC will never stop advocating for our rights,” the group said. “We will keep fighting for equality, fighting for land, fighting for water, fighting for housing, infrastructure, good jobs, education, closing the gap – a future for our children.”

The organisation said its ­people were “grieving” the referendum result. “Those of us who have been around for a long time recognise how it feels. We have been here before,” it said.

“We are sad, but we know that we must stay strong. Others in our communities, especially young people, are in shock and disbelief. We need to work together and support each other.”

Three more groups – the Northern Land Council, Tiwi Land Council and Anindilyakwa Land Council – issued a joint statement in which they said the result could not be separated from “a deep-seated racism”.

“The vitriol and hatred that were part of the campaign existed prior to it, but were given licence through the process,” the groups said. “The overarching theory we are incapable of managing our own affairs is dehumanising, degrading and … deeply flawed.”

Tiwi Land Council chair Gibson Farmer said the referendum result underscored the need for a way forward that ensured Indigenous voices were not only heard but respected when governments made decisions.

That view was echoed by Tony Wurramarrba, the chair of the Anindilyakwa Land Council. “We ask for and will continue to expect engagement and partnership”, Mr Wurramarrba said.

The Polly Farmer Foundation issued a statement saying the group was saddened by the result.

“Fundamental to improving outcomes for Aboriginal people is that they are recognised and have a voice to determine the best way forward,” foundation chair Mandy Gadsdon and vice-chair Kim Farmer said. “We will stand strong and resilient and will continue to work together on Polly’s vision to support Aboriginal young people ‘to take their rightful place in Australian society’.”

Uluru Dialogue member and Griffith Law School lecturer Eddie Synot – a prominent voice on the referendum in the lead-up to the vote – described the result as “shameful act” that had betrayed Indigenous people again.

“Reconciliation is dead. Any salvo towards remaining goodwill or concern for hardened hearts as a response to yet another betrayal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people by Australians is nothing but the sound of the final, rusted nails being driven into the reconciliation coffin,” he said.

“Our relationship continues, but the era of reconciliation is over. Let there be no mistake about it.”

The result, he said, pointed to a fundamental failure among No voters to understand, accept and recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders as Australia’s First People. “We have been betrayed again by a country that refuses to recognise us, our history and our rights, and refuses justice to our people, who suffer unlike any other,” he said.

“Worse, that refusal comes under the false banner of equality, unity and supposed anti-racism.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/indigenous-groups-vow-to-be-heard-after-racist-referendum-result/news-story/17cc056601796a08bb578ca8116deb83

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785767

File: 40f1cf151ebffd6⋯.jpg (264.25 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 8b4f3d2ba7469ea⋯.jpg (258.2 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Mr_Albanese_will_meet_Mr_X….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19780628

Anthony Albanese to lobby US Congress to back Joe Biden’s bill for AUKUS, Israel and Ukraine

GEOFF CHAMBERS - OCTOBER 23, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese will lobby US congress members to pass Joe Biden’s bill promising billions for the AUKUS submarine program and military aid for Israel and Ukraine, as he launches a four-week international blitz headlined by meetings with the US President in Washington and Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Beijing.

Mr Albanese on Sunday confirmed he would be the first prime minister in seven years to visit China after Beijing agreed to review trade sanctions on Australian wine following the government’s decision allowing Chinese-firm Landbridge to continue operating the Port of Darwin.

Mr Albanese, who will meet Mr Xi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing and attend the Shanghai International Import Expo between November 4 and November 7, flew out to Washington on Sunday for an official state visit and dinner at the White House.

Amid escalating wars in the Middle East and Ukraine and ahead of high-level meetings with Mr Biden and top US officials, Mr Albanese said he would urge the US President at their ninth meeting since the election to “remain focused on the Indo-Pacific ­region” as a counterbalance to Beijing. “We do have strategic competition in this region,” he said.

The AUKUS submarine program is facing resistance from some congressional Republicans and the US House of Represen­tatives is still unable to function because of divisions over the election of a new Speaker.

Despite the chaos in Washington, Mr Albanese said he would lobby for the passage of the $US105bn military aid bill that includes $3.4bn to bolster US submarine production to help promised sales to Australia.

Hours before departing Sydney for the US, Mr Albanese said: “President Biden’s agenda is one that we support and we will be urging support for all of the legislation that is required for AUKUS.”

The Washington trip begins the most significant month of diplomacy since Mr Albanese took office. The meetings with Mr Biden and Mr Xi are immediately followed by the Pacific Islands Forum in the Cook Islands, where Australia is expected to make new climate change pledges in support of its joint-Pacific bid to host a UN Climate Change conference.

Mr Albanese will also attend the APEC leaders meeting in San Francisco later in November and is likely to go to the COP28 Climate Change conference in Dubai in early December.

During his four-day visit to the US, Mr Albanese will announce new agreements on climate change and critical minerals and he is expected to unveil Australia’s first major response to the Biden administration’s $US3 trillion Inflation Reduction Act, which focuses heavily on clean energy investments.

“I’ll be having important meetings with members of congress and Senate about the legislation that’s required to ensure that AUKUS can continue to forge ahead, but also so that Australia can benefit from the Inflation Reduction Act as well,” he said, referring to the Biden administration’s trillion-dollar plus subsidy package for US industry, largely for clean energy projects

Against a backdrop of an imminent Israeli ground invasion of Gaza that will possibly overshadow his visit, Mr Albanese will attend the official White House state dinner on Wednesday (Thursday AEDT) hosted by the President and first lady Jill Biden.

Mr Albanese will also meet Mr Biden’s top-ranking officials in the cabinet room, including Vice-President Kamala Harris, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin and Treasury chief Janet Yellen.

Mr Albanese was expected to fly into Joint Base Andrews in Maryland early on Monday afternoon (AEDT), where he will be greeted by ambassador Kevin Rudd and wife Therese Rein.

The state visit is the first for an Australian prime minister since Donald Trump hosted Scott Morrison in 2019.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785770

File: e1c8dda498c26f4⋯.jpg (281.97 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Joe_Biden_and_Anthony_Alba….jpg)

>>19785767

2/2

Mr Albanese arrives in the US capital with congress in its third week of gridlock from Republican infighting that has left the House of Representatives without a Speaker since October 5.

Democratic congressman Joe Courtney, the co-chair of the Friends of Australia Caucus, said the infighting would likely prevent Mr Albanese from addressing congress.“The majority party’s inability to either settle on a Speaker or reach out to Democrats for a bipartisan path forward will likely prevent the Prime Minister from giving a joint address to the congress, which the Australian people deserve,” he said.

The Australian understands Mr Albanese’s arrival in Washington ahead of his visit to Beijing is not merely symbolic.

With US-China relations still tense, Mr Albanese will discuss his China visit with Mr Biden, US cabinet secretaries and other senior national security advisers to ensure he is fully briefed on Washington’s positions ahead of meetings with Mr Xi and Mr Li in Beijing.

Meanwhile, the Albanese government’s decision on Friday to allow Chinese company Landbridge to continue its lease over the Port of Darwin is understood to have shocked many in the nat­ional security community.

The decision, viewed as a deal with Beijing to win concessions on trade bans and secure a meeting with Mr Xi, was made without a press conference or any minister including Mr Albanese attaching their name to it.

Mr Albanese outsourced the announcement to his department.

The timing of his Beijing visit, which is coinciding with the 50th anniversary of Gough Whitlam’s historic 1973 trip to China, has been viewed by some security ­figures as a concession to the ­Chinese Communist Party’s ­legacy-­building “obsession with anni­versaries”.

Former ambassador to the US Joe Hockey said America could request more help from Australia in relation to both Ukraine and Israel, following Mr Biden’s request to congress last week for extra money for military aid and submarine production.

“There’s always ask and give. Anthony Albanese will be at the coalface of discussions about the future of the Middle East – all the ceremony and warm embrace that everyone sees there obscures the important and many serious discussions,” Mr Hockey told The Australian.

His successor in Washington, Arthur Sinodinos, said the Israel crisis could distract attention from the Australian visit. “The mood in Washington is very much preoccupation, particularly over the next few days, with what Israel will do,” he said.

There were hopes Mr Biden’s request for extra submarine funding would mollify Republican concerns about the capacity of the US industrial base to provide Australia with boats starting in the early 2030s, as agreed under the AUKUS pact.

But on Friday (Saturday AEDT), Republican senator Roger Wicker, who had held up earlier Senate moves to endorse the submarine transfers, said the Biden administration funding proposals were a “welcome start” and a “first step”.

“There is still much work to be done with the administration and Pentagon to expand our industrial base and add the necessary attack submarines to prevent conflict on the seas, but this package signals a positive first step toward that goal,” he added.

Former US ambassador to Australia Arthur Culvahouse told The Australian that legislative changes to support AUKUS were “always going to be difficult”, recalling some of the difficulties he had when Australia purchased US F-35s. “It’s one of the most entrenched bureaucracies in the US government,” Mr Culvahouse said, referring to parts of the State Department that deal with technology transfer.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-to-lobby-us-congress-to-back-joe-bidens-bill-for-aukus-israel-and-ukraine/news-story/6d49b29353dc6c99eb870c41e70dede9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785776

File: 4f7f4afa255ea77⋯.jpg (207.18 KB,1280x960,4:3,Anthony_Albanese_meets_wit….jpg)

File: f9c1fd3408544af⋯.jpg (222.17 KB,2048x1152,16:9,US_President_Joe_Biden_won….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19780628

PM entrapped in crisis of symbolism over outcome

The US will be acutely aware of the fact that several days after standing for photos in the White House Rose garden, Anthony Albanese will be a guest of China’s dictator Xi Jinping.

SIMON BENSON - October 22, 2023

Anthony Albanese is now entrapped in a crisis of symbolism over outcome. It is a political crisis of his own making.

On Monday he will arrive at Andrews Air Force Base outside Washington ahead of a state dinner with US President Joe Biden, before heading to a meeting next week with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing.

Imagery is at the heart of these political expeditions.

Albanese promotes the idea that only Labor can navigate the nexus between the nation’s largest trading partner and Australia’s closest ally – now strategic adversaries – in a world changed fundamentally by the reignition of the enduring ideological dispute.

The meetings occur amid the backdrop of a profoundly changed global dynamic: war in Europe, war in the Middle East and increasing strategic competition closer to home.

There will be clinking of glasses in the Oval Office followed by reflective images of Albanese walking in the footsteps of Whitlam in the Forbidden Palace.

This may be promoted as an assertion of Australian strategic ascendancy but could be equally regarded as a sign of a new Australian faintness following a period of Covid-era assertiveness.

Failure to secure strategically significant benefits in Washington on AUKUS will reflect a weakness of influence. A reluctance to raise the dominant issue of Chinese military aggression – in light of the Pentagon’s recent warning of China’s acceleration of nuclear capability – will be seen as weakness toward Beijing.

There is more at stake here than meets the eye. And the outcome will have significant political ramifications for Albanese with the imagery he is pursuing unlikely to appease a domestic audience that will not avert its gaze from the cost of living pressures it is now enduring.

Albanese, a damaged leader in the wake of the voice referendum, now seeks a narrative that elevates him as a leader that can traverse the chasm: a maintenance of US-Australian cultural and military hegemony against a restoration of Australia-China pragmatic relations.

It’s an almost impossible task without obvious concessions, that goes beyond the fundamentals of its authenticity to the reality of Albanese’s political expectations.

The risk for the Prime Minister is that he will now fail both tests and only add to the political pressures on a Labor government and doubts about his own judgment as the domestic necessity of a response to living standards only increases.

Albanese needs to look beyond imagery and land outcomes that have some meaningful effect at home.

There is every expectation that the Democrats won’t let Albanese walk away without something.

As a fellow centre-left confederate, Biden won’t allow Albanese to walk away empty-handed.

But the bar has been raised over AUKUS and the dysfunction of the US congress limits the promises.

It is now two years since Scott Morrison inked the deal and Albanese signed up to it.

At a minimum, the Prime Minister will want to land something that amounts to progress. At the same time, the CIA will be into Albanese about China. It will be “pegging his ears back” about it, according to one senior intelligence official.

It is also likely that US intelligence officials will raise the issue of the Port of Darwin decision.

The US will be acutely aware of the fact that several days after standing for photos in the Rose Garden, Albanese will be standing in the same spot as Vladimir Putin last week, as a guest of the Chinese dictator.

They will be wondering about Australia’s commitment as it urges the US not to repeat the Obama mistake of taking its eye off the Indo-Pacific.

Meanwhile, average Australian families struggling with their ballooning mortgages will be wondering what it all means for them.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/anthony-albanese-entrapped-in-a-crisis-of-symbolism-over-outcome-as-he-meets-with-biden-and-xi/news-story/0d14cb85377e5df9e4415de40523911f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785789

File: 1f0222fe0976a78⋯.jpg (522.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Darwin_Port_East_Arm_Landb….jpg)

File: 5f36692beda8fcf⋯.jpg (311.5 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,The_Chinese_owned_company_….jpg)

>>19769319

>>19769341

Albanese government has failed strategic test in northern Australia

PETER JENNINGS - OCTOBER 23, 2023

1/2

Yet another review has defended the absurd 2015 Northern Territory decision to lease the Port of Darwin to a Chinese company for 99 years. The lease continues to dog successive federal governments and is undermining defence planning.

Just weeks into replacing Tony Abbott as prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull had to deal with the port lease announcement at precisely the same time defence minister Marise Payne and foreign minister Julie Bishop met their US counterparts in Boston for the 2015 AUSMIN talks. The ministers announced they had “decided to pursue enhanced naval co-operation across all domains”.

With spectacularly bad timing the Darwin port lease was made public just as the US secretaries of state and defence returned to Washington DC.

No one had raised this at AUSMIN. A senior American official told me that news went off around the Pentagon like an atomic bomb.

Barack Obama ticked off Turnbull, saying the US would have liked to have been told. Turnbull said Obama should have been reading the NT News. Imagine the US treating our strategic concerns with such indifference.

In fact, Turnbull and then treasurer Scott Morrison knew they had a problem. A loophole in the foreign investment rules excluded state- and territory-owned assets from federal oversight on national security or any other grounds.

Morrison closed the loophole, but was too late to prevent the Port of Darwin lease. Even before that, Defence had decided nothing needed to be done. A 2015 Defence note, released under Freedom of Information, records an official saying of Chinese company Landbridge: “This is a private company, Australian managed, and operated with a significant degree of autonomy, by Australian-based people.” This was a spectacularly naive misunderstanding about how companies operate under Chinese communism.

Subsequently, Defence, the Prime Minister’s department, ASIO and others have all found ways, over several reviews, to say that leasing Australia’s only significant northern port to a Chinese company for a century presents no strategic concerns.

Defence’s initial “defence” of its non-decision was that the Port of Darwin was separate to the navy’s tiny patrol boat base. The department didn’t make a broader judgment about national security.

The review released by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet last Friday points to a “robust regulatory system in place to manage risks to critical infrastructure”. Such is the alertness of our national security guardians that “Australians can have confidence that their safety will not be compromised”. The statement acknowledges “the importance of the Port of Darwin as a key piece of critical infrastructure” but the focus on risks to the “safety” of Australians moves the attention away from national security.

The bigger picture is clear: China is becoming militarily aggressive in our region. Since the lease of the Port of Darwin, Beijing illegally took over disputed territory in the South China Sea, building new military air bases and sea ports. Chinese military power projects much further south to the Indonesian archipelago. Routine Chinese air and naval patrols and intelligence-gathering ships now operate in Australian waters.

These developments make northern Australia much more strategically important. This is why the US Marine Corps and US Air Force presence in the north is growing, and why they are building up fuel and other stores. It is also why US Virginia -class submarines will operate out of our western navy base from 2027. And it is why Australia is developing plans for nuclear-powered submarines.

The Albanese government should have overturned the lease because we, and our key ally, the US, need that facility to expand and secure a larger military presence in the north. The recently released Defence Strategic Review says “there is a clear need to have the correct infrastructure and logistics support in the right locations to project and sustain power”.

The report’s focus on northern Australia makes it obvious the Port of Darwin issue will have to be addressed soon, even if the government’s immediate priority is to smooth political waters with China before Albanese visits Beijing.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785796

File: 7803a14db5a7ca4⋯.jpg (569.85 KB,1920x1280,3:2,The_federal_government_is_….jpg)

>>19785789

2/2

The Port of Darwin issue has become so toxic that no politician, will defend the lease. That’s why we got a departmental press release issued late on Friday.

Make no mistake: it is the officials who are doing the government’s bidding. We saw in the Robodebt royal commission how officials will always contrive to deliver the results government wants. Inconveniently for Albanese, just two days before the PM&C Port of Darwin statement, the director-general of ASIO, Mike Burgess, joined his Five Eyes intelligence partners in Silicon Valley, California, to warn about Chinese intellectual property theft through spying.

Burgess said: “The Chinese government is engaged in the most sustained, scaled and sophisticated theft of intellectual property and expertise in history. It is unprecedented and it is unacceptable. China has developed a ruthless business model to seize commercial advantage.”

That ruthless business model also applies to China’s desire to control other countries’ critical infrastructure. In China, Landbridge presented the Port of Darwin lease as a triumph for Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road strategy.

The lease has now become a critical block to Australia making urgent changes to strengthen our defence position in the north and to support the expansion of a US military presence. That presence may embarrass some in Labor, but they should thank their lucky stars for its deterrence value because our own defence capabilities are in such a shambolic state.

Albanese is not moving on the urgent work needed to strengthen our security in the north for the sake of promoting a content-free trip to Beijing to mark Gough Whitlam’s 1973 visit.

Labor’s failure to expand the defence budget, its gutting of the army’s vehicle plans, its prevarications over naval shipbuilding and on deciding the location of the east coast submarine base are sacrificing national security, all centred on the dubious claim that relations with China are “stabilised”. China’s strategic game plan hasn’t changed.

China has slowly ended its coercive trade measures, judging that a method of drip-feeding these concessions will make the Albanese government more compliant and less critical. That aim has been achieved. In the first six months of the Albanese government, defence looked as though it was about to get more funding. In the past six months that effort has disappeared. Security has been replaced by statecraft and the fanciful claim that relations with China have stabilised. In Beijing, Albanese will realise there is no truth to the claim. He will privately be told by his hosts that Australian behaviour is the source of all our bilateral problems.

China will not offer any concession on its military growth, threatening Taiwan or bullying neighbours. Publicly, the Chinese will afford Albanese every opportunity to indulge his hero worship of Whitlam’s visit half a century ago. The Chinese know how to gull foreign leaders – recall Emmanuel Macron’s fawning performance of a few months ago.

The risk for Albanese is that the visit will make him look weaker on China in Australia by celebrating small concessions in trade and ignoring the big strategic changes sweeping the world.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/albanese-government-has-failed-strategic-test-in-northern-australia/news-story/a5aa751bf7f9c45674e325bf21e31f83

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785810

File: 6eaf94866762791⋯.jpg (400.82 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Sophie_Vivian_was_sexually….jpg)

File: 27d8eb2614509d7⋯.jpg (132.06 KB,1280x720,16:9,Stephen_Leonard_Mitchell_a….jpg)

File: 1fbce6cba58bd97⋯.jpg (86.01 KB,1280x720,16:9,Sophie_Vivian_as_a_child_S….jpg)

File: 10f53c6b66483fc⋯.jpg (104.59 KB,1280x720,16:9,Stephen_Mitchell_right_ple….jpg)

>>19780602

Why was pedophile suspect Stephen Mitchell allowed to stay in our Indonesia embassy, victims ask

STEPHEN RICE - OCTOBER 23, 2023

Victims of serial pedophile Stephen Mitchell have demanded to know why he was allowed to keep working in Australia’s Indonesia embassy – with potential access to local and embassy staff children – for eight months after they reported his crimes to police.

On Monday, Home ­Affairs chief operating officer Justine Saunders told Senate Estimates her department “wasn’t even aware that there was a formal investigation underway” into Mr Mitchell in September 2021 when Australian Federal Police first contacted the department.

But Sophie Vivian, one of at least six girls groomed and abused by the former national rock climbing coach, had given a detailed statement to the AFP in July 2021 and says police told her in September they would be laying criminal charges against him of trafficking in children for sexual purposes.

The Australian has confirmed that another victim gave police a statement a month earlier, in June, and that a formal investigation began then.

“During those months before Stephen Mitchell’s arrest I was consumed with the most horrific and vivid imagery of what he might be doing to Indonesian children, or to Australian children living at the embassy,” Ms Vivian told The Australian.

“Why didn’t Home Affairs just recall him quietly straight away, as soon as they knew of the multiple accusations against him, stretching back decades?” she asked.

In a tabled answer to a question by Greens senator David Shoebridge, Home Affairs said the AFP made contact in September 2021 “to enquire about Mr Mitchell’s location and role” in the Jakarta embassy and “formally advised” he was under investigation in December 2021.

However, under questioning from Senator Shoebridge on Monday, Ms Saunders acknowledged that in September Home Affairs was aware of “broad allegations of a sexual nature that were historical in their form.”

The former sports coach was allowed to keep working in Indonesia until mid-February 2022 because the AFP had asked “to preserve the integrity of the investigation by not informing Mr Mitchell of the investigation”.

In May this year Mitchell was sentenced to 13 years’ jail, with a non parole period of nine years, over a string of child sex offences committed against six girls between 1994 and 2008.

Ms Vivian, who was 11 when the coach she called “Mitch” began to groom her, says that after reporting Mitchell she kept asking police why his arrest was being delayed but was told that “everything had to be handled delicately”.

“I was told that because they have the death penalty for these kinds of crimes in Indonesia, Stephen Mitchell could end up in front of a firing squad.”

“That’s a hell of a thing to tell a victim of child sexual abuse. There’s enough guilt and shame involved already without having to worry that by dobbing you might bring about someone’s death”

The only thing worse than “ feeling like an executioner”, she said, was spending all those months thinking about what Mitchell was doing in Indonesia.

“It made me sick thinking that he might’ve gone for the job in Home Affairs specifically because the heat was on here, and it was getting harder and harder for him to gain access to Australian children.”

Another child sexual assault victim of Stephen Mitchell, who asked to be known as Claire, said police told her that it was “important they keep him safe in Indonesia and brought him home to charge him”.

“They presented it as if those were the only two options – a potential firing squad in Indonesia or nothing happens.

“But Indonesian children matter too; the families in the (Australian diplomatic) compound matter. He was left there over the Christmas period when there are so many functions involving kids inside and outside the compound.

“And he was on a diplomatic passport, so that’s probably not possible anyway – the Indonesians would have to give him back,” Claire said.

“They could have gotten him back under some excuse to do a project here; they could have said anything. I don’t see why they kept him there.”

Both women are angry that Mitchell was able to obtain a “negative vetting 1” level security clearance more than a decade after multiple sex offence complaints against him.

Several victims had given statements to police between 2003 and 2004 but were told there was not enough evidence to prosecute.

The department told Senator Shoebridge the government’s security vetting process required a national police check but it did not identify open investigations when charges were not yet laid.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/why-was-pedophile-suspect-allowed-to-stay-in-our-indonesia-embassy-victims-ask/news-story/0c4498643e3df86a2a19b5b626d53558

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785838

File: 24a4384b5d1ea55⋯.jpg (186.6 KB,1280x960,4:3,Timothy_Courtney_says_he_w….jpg)

File: 15c32f7a1fdeb96⋯.jpg (254.14 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Gary_Arthur_Mitchell_was_a….jpg)

File: 79c93db4c932b02⋯.jpg (839.35 KB,5000x3332,1250:833,Board_chair_Kathleen_Foley….jpg)

File: ac64de81b8ffe40⋯.jpg (751.23 KB,2043x1533,681:511,The_inquiry_is_examining_h….jpg)

>>19505187

>>19529197

Inquiry into child sex abuse at Victorian state primary schools hears of survivor heartbreak

Kristian Silva - 23 October 2023

1/2

"Why did this happen? And why did it continue for so long?"

They're the questions sexual abuse survivors have been asking for decades.

Today, the same queries were posed by Kathleen Foley SC, on the opening day of an inquiry examining the horrors that took place at Victorian state-run primary schools over four decades.

The $4.5 million inquiry — which will hear evidence from survivors, Department of Education and Training staff and others — will try to piece together some answers.

The inquiry's key focus is on Beaumaris Primary School, and four alleged paedophile teachers who destroyed the lives of numerous children.

Timothy Courtney was the inquiry's first witness.

He said he was preyed upon by Gary Arthur Mitchell and another teacher, Wayne*, who cannot be identified for legal reasons.

"I'm not sure how I managed to get through," Mr Courtney said of the abuse, which started when he was in year 3 in 1972.

"I had my trust in authority absolutely destroyed by what took place at that primary school."

More than 50 years on, Mr Courtney said he hoped sharing his story would help reduce the stigma many others feel when talking about their experiences.

"Silence is the enemy of the survivor," he said.

Four decades and 24 schools examined

Mr Courtney wants the Victorian Government to apologise to those who were let down, and also believes there needs to be wider public recognition for the children who were abused in the state's school system.

Ultimately, he said it was his hope sexual abuse would be eliminated from schools and that and parents would be equipped to spot the warning signs that were missed in his case.

The inquiry has also identified two other alleged perpetrators from Beaumaris Primary School, Grahame (Graham) Harold Steele and David Ernest Keith MacGregor.

The inquiry is examining a period from the 1960s through to 1999, and covers 23 other schools where the men worked.

They range from nearby schools in Melbourne's bayside suburbs, to others in the outer east, Warragul and Phillip Island.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785844

File: e1723677efc48cd⋯.jpg (511.05 KB,2239x1180,2239:1180,Alleged_child_sexual_abuse….jpg)

File: 82b07e436a25536⋯.jpg (202.02 KB,1493x931,1493:931,After_teaching_at_Beaumari….jpg)

File: 0bfde022d21c5c9⋯.jpg (1.72 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Fiona_Ryan_SC_is_the_couns….jpg)

File: dbd5e28068fb2e1⋯.jpg (257.72 KB,1000x787,1000:787,If_you_or_anyone_you_know_….jpg)

>>19785838

2/2

Along with hearing from survivors, the investigation will put the education department's actions at the time under the microscope.

Speaking with reporters after testifying, Mr Courtney wondered whether parallels would emerge with similar cases in the Catholic Church, where abusers were re-located when complaints were made.

"How do you have so many perpetrators at one school? Is it by coincidence or is it by design?" he asked.

Survivor statements tell of heartbreak and struggle following school

Counsel assisting the inquiry, Fiona Ryan SC, said Victoria Police and the education department were among the agencies issued notices to produce information for the hearings.

She said several survivors had come forward to testify behind closed doors in recent months.

"For many, it was a number of years before they were able to process or understand what had happened to them," she said.

Ms Ryan read out a series of comments from those who had come forward, highlighting the heartbreak and struggle they faced in the years after they finished school.

"I've spent over 50 years burying this in my subconscious," one said.

"Don't hide, don't be ashamed of what happened. We were kids," another said.

The inquiry chair, Ms Foley, said the inquiry would examine the support services available to victims and how effective they were.

"We believe we cannot contribute to the process of healing without an open conversation," she said.

The inquiry will continue to receive submissions until the end of October, and is tasked with delivering findings by February 28, 2024.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-23/beaumaris-primary-school-child-sexual-abuse-inquiry/103011292

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785888

File: 10c278d4b5af421⋯.jpg (455.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Daniel_Duggan_s_six_school….jpg)

File: 926d2dff77b3d5d⋯.jpg (120.47 KB,768x1024,3:4,Aussie_man_Daniel_Duggan_w….jpg)

File: 05f3ed284779645⋯.jpg (371.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Saffrine_Duggan_is_seen_ar….jpg)

File: 0afa52e5124cebe⋯.jpg (429.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Daniel_Duggan_s_kids_on_th….jpg)

>>19535089

>>19775719

Former US fighter pilot Daniel Duggan in ‘existential fight’ one year on

JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - OCTOBER 23, 2023

A former top gun fighting an extradition bid by the US will spend at least six more months in possible solitary confinement in a NSW maximum security prison, as his wife urges the Prime Minister to oppose the handover request during his visit t0 Washington.

Downing Centre Local Court heard a date for Daniel Edmund Duggan’s extradition hearing was set for May next year, with his lawyer Dennis Miralis saying that further time in custody was necessary if they were to successfully fight the potential 65-year maximum-security prison term he faced if extradited to the US.

“This is existential,” Mr Miralis told media outside court.

The former US marine has already spent one year in custody after he was issued with the extradition order on charges he illegally trained People’s Liberation Army pilots, conspired with others to enable the training, and money-laundering. He does not face any charges in Australia.

The military training was allegedly provided via a controversial South African flying school, which has links to Chinese state-owned enterprises including aviation giant COMAC, more than ten years ago.

The court heard Mr Duggan would make an application late next month to access a Department of Defence report which deals with Australian Defence Force members allegedly providing military services to China.

Mr Miralis said that material was “critical” to his client’s ability to properly and successfully defend himself, and demonstrated the “political nature” of the US extradition request.

His legal team are also hoping to get their hands on 430 documents from the AFP later this month which include communications between ASIO, the Department of Justice, the AFP and the FBI around their investigation of Mr Duggan.

Outside court, Mr Duggan’s wife Saffrine called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to oppose the extradition of her husband when he meets with President Joe Biden in the US later this week.

“Today we demand our Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese make this right and set Dan free,” Ms Duggan said outside the court on Monday.

Her six school-age children held posters with their father’s face on it, and chanted “Free Dan Duggan”.

“I ask the Prime Minister to deliver a message on his US visit. A message that he will not support the extradition of Dan Duggan. A message that Dan is being returned to his family where he belongs as an Australian citizen,” she said.

She described this day as “the most terrible of anniversaries”.

“Today we mark one year since my husband, a father and best friend, has been locked away in solitary confinement … based on 12 year-old allegations, unproven allegations he flatly denies, allegations which are clearly political and have no place in our legal system.

“And yet another court appearance where we are forced to beg for documents, simple documents, that are vital to Dan’s case, and they should have been provided to us a year ago.”

Ms Duggan called her husband’s imprisonment “an extreme act of violence and cruelty on my family”.

She had duct-taped the measurements for a 2 by 4 metre cell on the ground in front of the court.

“Our government has allowed this to happen. In fact, it enabled it to happen on the orders of a foreign government under an extradition treaty that is unjust and an abomination of our laws.”

She said the extradition treaty “bleeds us dry in an attempt to force submission” through blocking Mr Duggan’s right to bail, and the right of his family of government and legal assistance.

Mr Miralis also said he had “no doubt” the matter would be the subject matter of bilateral discussions.

Diplomacy often occurred behind closed doors, he said, but in relation to extradition cases it was open to the Attorney-General to intervene.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/former-us-top-gun-in-existential-fight-one-year-on/news-story/510b4bc74e668921bcc091aa9aba036d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19785904

File: bf3ca73087a8bd8⋯.jpg (556.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Catholic_Church_s_High….jpg)

File: 38ad53e73356f8a⋯.jpg (103.39 KB,1024x768,4:3,The_father_of_a_dead_forme….jpg)

File: 0983c5a9bea244a⋯.jpg (953.22 KB,2048x1536,4:3,The_choirboy_s_father_is_s….jpg)

File: e0e314e220fdba4⋯.jpg (178.34 KB,1513x1135,1513:1135,The_ruling_opened_the_floo….jpg)

>>19320928 (pb)

>>19427976 (pb)

How legal challenge in Pell case will affect 'secondary' victims

A High Court bid launched by the Catholic Church is set to have far-reaching consequences for personal injury claims in Victoria.

Shannon Deery - October 22, 2023

A legal challenge is seeking to block the parents, siblings, friends and families of abuse victims from suing for damages.

Legal experts say the High Court bid, launched by the Catholic Church, has far-reaching consequences for personal injury claims in Victoria.

If successful it would prohibit “secondary” victims from seeking damages against a range of organisations for psychological injury.

They could include the state government, WorkSafe, the TAC, schools, clubs, kinders, religious organisations and ­social and cultural groups.

The case centres on a claim brought by the father of a dead former choirboy who claims his son was assaulted by Cardinal George Pell.

He is seeking damages for mental harm suffered as a result of being informed of the alleged abuse of his late son and by reason of his son’s death.

In a decision upheld on ­appeal, Victoria’s Supreme Court has ruled the claim can proceed.

In its ruling last year it found that Victoria’s Legal Identity of Defendants (Organisational Child Abuse) Act 2018 – which was introduced by the Andrews government to quash a legal loophole known as the Ellis defence, which prevented child abuse survivors from suing some organisations for their abuse – extended to claims brought against unincorporated organisations by persons who were not themselves victims of alleged child abuse.

Legal experts say the ruling “opened the floodgates” to a range of actions that could now be brought by secondary victims of abuse.

The High Court has been asked to overturn the ruling.

“Whether the Act applies to plaintiffs who are not themselves victims of alleged child sex abuse is a matter of general public importance which will affect the rights and entitlements of those seeking to bring claims against unincorporated NGOs and the liability of such NGOs,” church lawyers said in an application for special leave to appeal.

“Such structures are widely used by sporting clubs, social and cultural groups, and not-for-profits such as kindergartens, all of which may face claims of child abuse.

“In light of the large number of potential defendants to which the Act may apply, there is substantial public interest in clarifying which plaintiffs are within the scope of the Act’s operation.”

The case is being headed by Bret Walker SC, one of Australia’s leading barristers.

He is the same lawyer who successfully prosecuted Pell’s own High Court appeal at which his convictions for child sexual abuse were quashed.

Pell was convicted, then ­acquitted, of abusing the choirboy, who cannot be identified, now at the centre of this landmark case. The former choirboy died of a heroin overdose in 2014 having never disclosed allegations of abuse to his parents or authorities.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-victoria/if-successful-a-legal-challenge-would-prohibit-secondary-victims-from-seeking-damages-against-a-range-of-organisations-for-psychological-injury/news-story/d50985df88c3d38590bb55a080009e35

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792233

File: f2c482571548ac1⋯.jpg (208.33 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Closing_the_Gap_co_convene….jpg)

File: 474fd07deb64155⋯.jpg (380.29 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_woman_reacts_as_the_resu….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19749474

>>19780537

>>19785746

Labor wants more to hear more Indigenous voices before it speaks up

PAIGE TAYLOR - OCTOBER 24, 2023

1/2

Labor is refusing to make any new policy push in Indigenous affairs until it hears from Aboriginal leaders and groups that it believes either abstained from or privately disagree with a strident statement from Yes leaders declaring the reconciliation project all but dead.

The government is now dealing with five responses from Indigenous collectives, land councils and organisations since the resounding defeat of the voice referendum on October 14. Four of the five statements published since referendum night refer to racism as a factor, three refer to misinformation or lies from the No campaign and none advocate for reconciliation.

The Australian understands the government believes there could be more responses coming from leaders and groups that have different or specific points to make. For example, the government wants to hear from Pat Turner, the co-convener of Closing the Gap, about the practical measures built into that national agreement. The deal signed in 2020 by all levels of government is a promise to make decisions in partnership with Indigenous communities for better results. It was hailed as revolutionary at the time but a Productivity Commission report published in July found the states in particular were not holding up their end of the bargain.

Ms Turner told The Australian on Monday that she wished to “let things settle down a bit more” before talking to the media about the future role of the Closing the Gap agreement.

About 60 Indigenous leaders who supported the Yes campaign are believed to have participated in the drafting of Sunday’s statement addressed to the government and every member of parliament on Sunday night.

They said No voters had committed a shameful act – knowingly or not – and flagged their intention to establish an Indigenous voice outside legislation. The statement was unsigned and distributed by the public relations firm that worked with the Uluru Dialogue during the referendum campaign.

The Lowitja Institute, which researches Indigenous-run health projects, was among the organisations that backed Sunday’s joint statement to government and parliament.

The Australian has been told the alliance of 14 Indigenous communities called Empowered Communities was not involved in the drafting of that statement, though individuals who belong to the organisation may have participated. Empowered Communities has worked with government for a decade on ways to give communities a chance to speak directly to decision-makers about what works and what does not. The organisation keenly supports local and regional voices.

The government may also seek out the views of Empowered Communities before announcing next steps in Indigenous affairs.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792236

File: 61d3102b36b5320⋯.jpg (340.8 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_holds_a_p….jpg)

File: b8ddbe3051fe3d1⋯.jpg (276.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Yes_campaign_failed_to….jpg)

>>19792233

2/2

On Monday, the Central Australian Aboriginal Congress, a remote health service for 17,000 Indigenous people in the Northern Territory, explicitly cast doubt on reconciliation as a concept in its response.

“The deliberate strategy of deception and misinformation adopted by prominent ‘No’ campaigners turned many previously good-willed people against us,” the congress said.

“In doing so, they gave permission for racism to run wild.

“Given the result of the referendum and the conduct of the ‘No’ campaign, there are now serious questions about whether reconciliation is still a viable strategy in Australia.”

On Saturday, the Central Land Council, which represents 24,000 Indigenous people in roughly the lower half of the NT, issued its response to the referendum result by saying: “We will keep fighting for equality, fighting for land, fighting for water, fighting for housing, infrastructure, good jobs, education, closing the gap – and a future for our children”.

Separately, the three land councils that represent Indigenous people in the top end of the NT issued a statement saying that not everyone who voted No was racist but the referendum result was tied to deep-seated racism.

“The vitriol and hatred that were part of the campaign existed prior to, but were given licence through, the process. The overarching theory (that) we are incapable of managing our own affairs is dehumanising and degrading and, most of all, deeply flawed,” the three land councils said.

Yes23 leading campaigner Thomas Mayo told The Australian on Monday that varied and separate statements from Indigenous organisations underscored the need for a national voice.

“Moving towards actual solutions and what should be prioritised by the government is so much harder because we do not have a national, authoritative, recognised voice,” Mr Mayo said.

“When there is dissent within an organisation – which happens a lot and it‘s normal – the organisation will come out and say ‘This is our formal position and this is why’ and people expect that.

“We don’t have that so it always ends up a news story that ‘blackfellas cannot agree’.

“The Indigenous leadership really are going to continue to have discussions nationally about ways to achieve the shared goals.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous/labor-wants-more-to-hear-more-indigenous-voices-before-it-speaks-up/news-story/ff9e53141789f707387de7c7732dbf52

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792246

File: 8b92baf628dff41⋯.jpg (299.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Thomas_Mayo_slammed_the_No….jpg)

File: f9bbe6bb5a4afdc⋯.jpg (266.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Thomas_Mayo_said_many_Indi….jpg)

File: f42dad958588801⋯.jpg (276.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,In_an_open_letter_Indigeno….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19749474

>>19780537

>>19785746

Overwhelming No vote for Indigenous Voice called ’embarrassing’

ELEANOR CAMPBELL - OCTOBER 24, 2023

Australia’s failure to enshrine an Indigenous Voice in its founding document is an “embarrassing” moment and should push the country to deal with entrenched disadvantaged facing First Nations people, according to a leading Yes campaigner.

Indigenous advocate Thomas Mayo said the overwhelmingly rejected Voice referendum on October 14 was a painful event for many Indigenous Australians.

“I think it’s embarrassing. It’s hard for Australia to talk about human rights to other countries like China when we still have such a marginalised people,” Mr Mayo said on Tuesday.

“We are one of the only ones who don’t have a treaty with Indigenous people, so it will be very difficult now as far as international relations.”

Mr Mayo’s comments come after Indigenous leaders and organisations broke their week-long silence to grieve the No result on Monday in an open letter that condemned “a shameful act unknowingly committed by the majority of Australians”.

While supporting the general feelings expressed by the letter, Mr Mayo added that he did not sign his name to it.

“It’s a general statement of the feelings of Indigenous people,” he said.

“There’s a lot of pain out there that such a modest proposal was rejected by the Australian people.”

Mr Mayo said it was time to “move forward” and consider an independent advisory body to represent the interests of Indigenous people.

“I think the important thing is what Indigenous people want from the Prime Minister and his government is to now move forward with efforts to close the gap,” he said.

Nationally, only 39.6 per cent of the population voted Yes on the Voice to Parliament referendum, while 60.4 per cent opposed.

Mr Mayo also slammed the No campaign’s “fear mongering” and condemned anti-Voice opponents for “talking about anything other what the actual alternation to the Constitution was”.

He said the media also failed to expose misinformation about the Voice and called for a future analysis into the role social media played in its defeat.

“The Yes campaign could have done some things better, but I think ultimately, you know, when you've got a Leader of the Opposition, when you’ve got politicians and people elected that will lie about something that is not about an election of their party,” he said.

“It was about Indigenous people and it was about the national interest, and to make into a political issue was bad.”

Nationally, only 39.6 per cent of the population voted Yes on the Voice to Parliament referendum, while 60.4 per cent opposed.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/overwhelming-no-vote-for-indigenous-voice-called-embarrassing/news-story/8542801a0acc196083de594ececa84b3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792260

File: 275ce0771b44eb5⋯.jpg (102.28 KB,1803x1015,1803:1015,ABC_managing_director_Davi….jpg)

File: 672346a1601292d⋯.jpg (180.4 KB,1920x1080,16:9,ABC_s_Middle_East_correspo….jpg)

>>19699368

>>19728711

>>19728751

>>19728776

ABC Middle East correspondent Tom Joyner is under investigation over ‘bullshit’ beheaded baby comment

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - OCTOBER 24, 2023

ABC managing director David Anderson has revealed its Middle Eastern correspondent Tom Joyner is under investigation after he labelled reports about babies being beheaded by Hamas terrorists as “bullshit” in a WhatsApp group with international media.

At Senate estimates on Tuesday, Mr Anderson said the public broadcaster is “certainly looking into it, investigating it.”

“I am sorry that happened, and I am sorry that event occurred and that was then distressing to other people as well, it shouldn’t have happened,” he said.

“He was at the time doing what journalists were doing, and that was trying to verify what sources could back up what claims are being made at the time.”

Joyner, who has been reporting on the conflict between Israel and Palestine, told a WhatsApp chat group earlier this month – in comments that have since been deleted – that he disputed reports from around the world about babies being beheaded being true.

Mr Anderson was questioned about the incident by Senator Hollie Hughes who said: “It’s embarrassing, as a country, that our representative at our national broadcaster referred to horrific war crimes as bullshit.”

Mr Joyner posted on the WhatsApp group: “The story about the babies is bullshit.”

The comments were made on the group chat to the more than 600 media representatives sharing information about the attacks in Israel by Hamas terrorists.

Joyner was met with condemnation from many members of the media group, which was set up shortly after the conflict in Israel began.

Mr Anderson acknowledged that Joyner’s comments “distressed” people by the language he used in the messages that were leaked to The Australian.

“We will be investigating as it was on social media, and it was reported,” he said.

“He has a right to procedural fairness, and we’ll go through that.”

After the incident was revealed by The Australian, the ABC said management had spoken to Joyner and he had shown remorse.

“Tom recognised the language of his comment was inappropriate and apologised to the group,” the ABC said at the time.

Israel later confirmed the reports of babies being burnt and decapitated in Hamas’s assault on the Kfar Aza kibbutz and photographs were also shown to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

Mr Anderson also said at Tuesday’s hearing said he doesn’t think the ABC is “anti-Semitic in any way.”

After Joyner’s comments were made public, the Zionist Federation of Australia’s president Jeremy Leibler wrote a letter to the ABC’s director of news Justin Stevens and outlined that he was left “stunned and appalled” by the reporter’s remarks.

“He was immediately and rightly condemned by the other journalists to whom he made the comment,” Mr Leibler said in the letter.

“He must now promptly be denounced and disciplined by the ABC,” Mr Leibler said.

Joyner continues to report on the war in Israel.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/abc-middle-east-correspondent-tom-joyner-is-under-investigation-over-bullsh-beheaded-baby-comment/news-story/513cc5974b26f121d10a4d241c431a63

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792290

File: 3cc662141fe4577⋯.jpg (592.19 KB,1920x1280,3:2,A_state_dinner_will_be_clo….jpg)

File: 1184bced989513c⋯.jpg (4.58 MB,6473x4116,6473:4116,Three_of_the_original_B_52….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19785767

Albanese, Biden to tighten alliance at ‘Love Shack’ dinner

David Crowe - October 24, 2023

United States President Joe Biden has arranged for band The B52s to perform at a state dinner for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, in a sign of the effort being made in Washington DC to welcome the Australian leader on a visit that has been undercut by chaos in Congress.

The new wave band, known for hits such as Love Shack and Rock Lobster, will be the star act at the dinner on the south lawn of the White House when more than 100 guests join the two leaders and their partners on Wednesday night.

Albanese, an avowed fan of 1980s music, has been tight-lipped about the event after arriving in the US capital on Sunday night with a stated mission to use four days of meetings to cement the AUKUS defence pact, act on climate change and deepen cooperation on the supply of critical minerals.

But the state dinner is being watched closely as a guide to the relationship between Biden and Albanese and how their personal ties will influence the next phase of the AUKUS alliance, which assumes the US will sell several nuclear-powered submarines to Australia and transfer technology to help build a new fleet in South Australia.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters the state dinner would go ahead despite the conflict in the Middle East, when asked whether there was any concern that the celebration might seem tone deaf to some because of the suffering in Israel and Gaza.

“We believe that there is no more important time than now to have this state visit with the Australians, and to demonstrate, of course, our strength and partnership and alliances,” she said.

“Having these conversations with one of our allies, like Australia, is incredibly important.

“You’re going to see two leaders come together, continuing to talk about the partnership that they’re hoping to continue to put forward.

“And so, look, it doesn’t stop the work that the president has continued to do, whether it’s these diplomatic conversations, these important bilateral visits, or whether it’s domestic issues here - right here in this country.”

While there has been speculation that prominent Australians ranging from Nicole Kidman to Margot Robbie might attend the dinner, the White House maintains tight control of the guest list and neither the US or Australia has leaked details of those who will attend.

However, this masthead reported that Australian Rugby League Commission chairman Peter V’landys has flown to the United States to attend the state dinner as a guest of the prime minister.

With Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt making headlines after this masthead revealed his remarks about former president Donald Trump, a source familiar with this week’s plans, but not authorised to speak publicly about the event, said Pratt was not expected to attend the Wednesday night dinner.

The last state dinner at the White House for an Australian leader was held four years ago when then prime minister Scott Morrison and his wife, Jenny, joined Trump and his wife, Melania, at a head table that also included Pratt, News Corp executive chairman Lachlan Murdoch and golfer Greg Norman.

Other guests at the September 2019 dinner included Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas, former secretary of state Henry Kissinger and Seven West Media chairman Kerry Stokes.

The White House confirmed to online news service The Deadline that the B52s would perform at the dinner, after the news was first reported by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the major newspaper in the band’s home city in Georgia.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-biden-to-tighten-alliance-at-love-shack-dinner-20231023-p5eeea.html

https://www.ajc.com/life/radiotvtalk-blog/briefs-b-52s-performing-for-joe-biden-millie-bobby-brown-crazy-legs-prince/M7MAU7BUJNDILIQIFEVRTPMMCQ/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792299

File: 5da746921971875⋯.jpg (1.63 MB,4198x2799,4198:2799,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19785767

PM plays down fears submarine pact could be put on back-burner

Farrah Tomazin - October 24, 2023

Washington: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has played down concerns that time is running out to pass a raft of legislation to facilitate the AUKUS submarine pact, as he embarks on a four-day blitz to lobby members of a divided Congress paralysed by Republican infighting.

Hours after landing in Washington for a highly anticipated meeting with US President Joe Biden on Wednesday, Albanese said US politicians from all sides understood the value of AUKUS and wanted “to get it right”.

Diplomats and politicians fear that unless AUKUS progresses over the next few months, the plan could be put on the back-burner once America enters a volatile election year in which Donald Trump is attempting a return to the White House.

Multiple pieces of legislation still need to be passed to make AUKUS a reality, including laws to enable US Virginia-class submarines to be transferred to Australia; a bill that would categorise Australia as a “domestic source” for military production under the US Defence Production Act; and a $3.4 billion White House funding request to strengthen the US Navy’s industrial base amid concerns from some Republicans that AUKUS could stretch it to “breaking point”.

However, Congress – the legislative branch of the US government – has been paralysed and without a Speaker of the House of Representatives for three weeks, after top Republican Kevin McCarthy was ousted by a small group of hardline rebels within his own party.

Despite the challenges, Albanese said he was “very confident” of a positive outcome.

“And that comes from the top in President Biden’s commitment to this, but it also comes from the engagement with Congress and senators,” he said.

In a bid to garner more support for AUKUS, Albanese is expected to meet on Thursday morning with Senate and House leaders who oversee defence policy and funding to talk about the policy.

A reception will also be hosted for him by the bipartisan Friends of Australia Caucus, while the issue will be front and centre at Capitol Hill on Wednesday when Congress’ seapower and projection forces subcommittee, co-led by Democrat Joe Courtney, holds a hearing on America’s submarine industrial base and its ability to support the AUKUS framework.

Appearing at the hearing will be some of the US defence industry’s top officials, including Department of Defence assistant secretary Mara Karlin, under secretary of the navy Erik Raven and Naval Submarine Forces commander Vice Admiral William Houston.

Asked if he would be willing to increase Australia’s $3 billion commitment to boost the US submarine base, Albanese replied: “We think our support is appropriate.”

But signs of the challenge in getting legislation to pass in a dysfunctional Congress were evident on Monday night. As Albanese attended a welcome reception at the north-west Washington residence of Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, Republicans met behind closed doors on Capitol Hill in another frantic search to find a replacement for McCarthy.

Last week, the party nominated two potential candidates – House majority leader Steve Scalise and Trump ally Jim Jordan – but neither was able to get the 217 votes needed from their fiercely divided colleagues.

Eight new candidates are now in the running: Republican whip Tom Emmer, Louisiana congressman Mike Johnson, Republican study committee chairman Kevin Hern, Florida firebrand Byron Donalds, Michigan congressman Jack Bergman, Gary Palmer of Alabama, Austin Scott of Georgia and Pete Sessions of Texas.

Until a new speaker is elected, there is no one third in the line of succession to the president; no ability to pass a funding bill to avoid a government shutdown next month; and no capacity to approve Biden’s new funding request for billions of dollars to support Israel and Ukraine.

The impasse has dashed Albanese’s hopes of delivering a rare address to a joint sitting of Congress, while the Israel-Hamas war has made the state visit a more subdued affair than Scott Morrison’s 2019 visit when Trump was president.

Asked if the White House should have proceeded with the visit, spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre said there was “no more important time than now” for the US to demonstrate the strength of its alliance with Australia.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/pm-plays-down-fears-submarine-pact-could-be-put-on-back-burner-20231024-p5eeix.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792368

File: 9192e341ba9e4e1⋯.jpg (282.52 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Kevin_Rudd_and_Prime_Minis….jpg)

File: 1edf74c8285596a⋯.jpg (2.21 MB,4095x2730,3:2,Anthony_Albanese_at_the_Au….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19785767

PM won’t increase Australia’s $3bn AUKUS pledge to boost US, UK industry

GEOFF CHAMBERS and ADAM CREIGHTON - OCTOBER 24, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese will not increase Australia’s $3bn commitment to boost US and British submarine industrial bases, as he launches a three-day blitz of meetings with US Congress members to lock-in legislative support for the AUKUS nuclear submarine pact.

The Prime Minister, whose hopes of delivering a rare address to a joint session of Congress was blown-up by the ugly Republican fight over the US House of Representatives Speakership, said he believed Australia’s existing funding for AUKUS was “appropriate”.

Amid a messy internal Republican struggle to appoint a new Speaker following the departure of Kevin McCarthy, Mr Albanese is expected to deliver a major speech advocating key AUKUS legislative changes at the US State Department on Friday (AEDT).

Mr Albanese is due to meet key congressmen from the influential Friends of Australia Caucus on Thursday morning local time, including Democrat Joe Courtney and Republican Mike Gallagher, both keen supporters of AUKUS.

On his first full-day in Washington, Mr Albanese was joined by partner Jodie Haydon, Ambassador Kevin Rudd, US Ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy, Rear Admiral Ian Murray and US Army Major-General Trevor Bredenkamp for a wreath-laying ceremony at the tomb of the Unknown Soldier in the Arlington National Cemetery.

Mr Albanese also held at press conference at the new $237m Australian Embassy with Mr Rudd, Ms Kennedy and Microsoft chiefs to launch the tech giant’s $5bn pledge to expand its cloud computing and artificial intelligence operations in Australia. He will officially open the embassy with Mr Rudd on Wednesday (AEDT).

The Prime Minister’s time in Washington has been shrouded by ongoing Republican turmoil on Capitol Hill, which has ruled-out following in the footsteps of John Howard and Julia Gillard who delivered speeches to Congress.

“We are able to talk with legislators. And we’re doing so. And I’ll be meeting some people this afternoon, and then again tomorrow, and then Wednesday and Thursday, while I’m here. And we’re very confident that those discussions have been very productive,” Mr Albanese said.

“When we’re talking about national security and defence, people want to get it right. I’m very confident of a very positive outcome. And that comes from the top in President (Joe) Biden’s commitment to this. But it also comes from the engagement with Congress and Senators”.

Ruling out increasing Australia’s initial $3bn AUKUS boost to expand nuclear submarine industrial bases in the US and Britain, Mr Albanese said Mr Biden’s new bill to increase US funding was about a joint ambition to “increase capacity”.

“The AUKUS arrangements are in the interest of Australia, to play our role. We don’t seek to just be someone who is watching. We seek as well to play a role in security in the Indo-Pacific. And one way we do that is through AUKUS, by lifting up our own capacity. Now, that is very important going forward,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792370

File: f36358d4db2c607⋯.jpg (106.92 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Australian_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

>>19792368

2/2

Republicans, who hold a slim majority in the 435 seat lower house was scheduled to regroup late Monday night local time to determine which of the nine potential candidates for speaker could look to seek a vote on the floor of the House.

Congress has been without a Speaker since 3rd October, an historically unprecedented period that has left the US government unable to pass laws or amendments, including critical legislation to facilitate AUKUS and the president’s request for US$105bn in funding for Ukraine and Israel.

Ahead of his two-day official visit to the White House on Wednesday and Thursday (AEDT), culminating in a state dinner on the South Lawn, Mr Albanese praised Joe Biden’s leadership at a time of extreme global instability. The state dinner is expected to attract an A-list of high-profile business leaders, politicians, diplomats and celebrities.

Asked if he had spoken with Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the unfolding crisis in the Middle East sparked by Hamas’ murder of more than 1,400 mainly Israeli civilians, Mr Albanese confirmed he had not.

He also defended his government’s position on the Israel-Hamas war and declared he was not “picking sides” between Israelis and Palestinians.

“I have spoken to the Israeli Ambassador to Australia on a couple of occasions. And the views that I’ve put are consistent with the resolution that was carried by the parliament. We remain absolutely horrified by the Hamas attacks on Israel. These are abhorrent acts of terror against innocent civilians.”

“We recognised as well, in that resolution, the importance of the protection of civilian lives. The situation is challenging and rapidly changing. And there is a terrible loss of life, including innocent life of both Israelis and Palestinians. And I think that every innocent life matters, whether it is Israeli or Palestinian.

“We pick a side against Hamas. And we did that very clearly and unequivocally. Because the actions of Hamas are against the interests of both the Israeli population, clearly, but also against the interest of Palestinians. We support, as President Biden reaffirmed the United States, a support for a two state solution.”

Mr Albanese, who along with Ms Haydon will take-part in functions and meetings at the White House from tomorrow, said it was “very hard to see how Hamas could negotiate through to what would be a two state solution in the Middle East”.

“I think that President Biden has played a very constructive role. Of course, the United States has a special responsibility as a member of the P5. And I think that, as you look at the emphasis of President Biden has made clearly calling out Hamas, clearly, as well, calling for humanitarian aid to be allowed to Gaza and talking about international humanitarian law and the international law when it comes to war being implemented, they are all appropriate.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/pm-wont-increase-australias-3bn-aukus-pledge-to-boost-us-uk-industry/news-story/3c48706d5826f203b78b2a1c93192f34

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792379

File: c08f7871ffac375⋯.mp4 (15.21 MB,640x360,16:9,The_Microsoft_deal_explain….mp4)

>>19505163

>>19785767

Microsoft to help Australia build 'cyber shield', Anthony Albanese announces in Washington

Brad Ryan - 24 October 2023

Tech giant Microsoft will help Australia build a "cyber shield" to fend off global online threats under a plan to sink billions of dollars into securing and expanding the national digital economy.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Microsoft president Brad Smith unveiled the plan at the Australian embassy in Washington, DC on the first day of the PM's official visit to the US.

Microsoft says the project is part of its biggest investment in Australia in its 40-year history: a $5 billion plan to expand infrastructure and skills, with a focus on cloud technology and artificial intelligence.

The company will work with the Australian Signals Directorate — the national agency responsible for cybersecurity and online warfare — to build the cyber shield, dubbed MACS (Microsoft-Australian Signals Directorate Cyber Shield).

Without naming specific countries, Microsoft said it would have a focus on "defending against sophisticated nation-state cyber threats".

Asked about the plan being aimed at countering the threat of China, Mr Albanese said it was "aimed at strengthening Australia".

He said it was one of the first steps in the Australian Cyber Security Strategy, announced after last year's Optus and Medibank hack scandals and aimed at making Australia "the world’s most cyber-secure nation" by 2030.

"We know, because we've seen through the examples in Australia, the impact that a cyber attack can have," Mr Albanese said.

"This will increase Australia's capacity to resist such attacks, but also to identify potential weaknesses."

Microsoft will also build nine new data centre sites — to add to the existing 20 — in Sydney, Canberra and Melbourne, as it prepares for demand for cloud services to almost double by 2026.

The company has also promised a new "Datacentre Academy" with TAFE NSW to train 200 people in two years, and to support other programs to deliver digital skills training to 300,000 Australians.

Mr Albanese says that "building an innovation alliance" will be a focus of his four-day trip to Washington.

He is also hoping to lock down support for the AUKUS pact, as some Republicans question the deal to supply nuclear-powered submarines to Australia.

However, it is unclear whether he will have an opportunity to speak to a joint session of congress, because the House of Representatives has not appointed a speaker after dumping Kevin McCarthy more than a fortnight ago.

Earlier on Monday, Mr Albanese visited Arlington National Cemetery in nearby Virginia, where he placed a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.

He also visited the graves of two Australians — RAAF Pilot Officer Francis D Milne, who died while serving in Papua New Guinea in 1942, and Yvonne Kennedy, who was on board a flight hijacked by terrorists before it crashed into the Pentagon on September 11.

US President Joe Biden invited Mr Albanese for an official visit after he cancelled a trip to Australia to deal with a debt-ceiling crisis in May.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-24/anthony-albanese-in-washington-dc-microsoft-deal/103012802

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792384

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19755118

>>19755135

“Five Eyes” intelligence leaders warn of China’s global espionage campaign

60 Minutes USA

Oct 24, 2023

War in the Middle East has the FBI tracking more potential threats of terrorism in the United States. Tonight, the bureau's director, Christopher Wray, tells us his main concern is not an organized attack but lone actors inspired by the violence. We met Wray, Wednesday, for an unprecedented interview that included him and the intelligence directors of our english-speaking allies. Together, they know more about the threats in the world than perhaps anyone. They're known as the Five Eyes and they have never appeared in an interview together. They're doing it now because they're alarmed by China which they say is the greatest espionage threat democracy has ever faced.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikh3ncJZPTU

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/china-stealing-technology-secrets-five-eyes-intelligence-leaders-warn-60-minutes-transcript/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792391

File: 8db74870c1b4009⋯.jpg (83.1 KB,1200x720,5:3,Foreign_Ministry_Spokesper….jpg)

File: 155550d5a93bdc6⋯.jpg (46.46 KB,600x392,75:49,Foreign_Ministry_Spokesper….jpg)

>>19755118

>>19755135

>>19792384

Five Eyes accustomed to fabricating, spreading lies about China: Chinese FM

Global Times - Oct 23, 2023

The Chinese Foreign Ministry on Monday refuted the Five Eyes’ remarks hyping the “China espionage threat.” The so-called accusations are groundless, and full of slander and smears against China, said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning at a regular press briefing on Monday.

“China doesn’t accept and firmly opposes it,” Mao said.

China attaches great importance to and is committed to protecting intellectual property rights, and safeguarding international security. The “Five Eyes Alliance” is the world’s biggest intelligence association, which is accustomed to fabricating and spreading false information about China, Mao said. The US, with its technological advantages, unscrupulously conducts eavesdropping and spying on a global scale without distinction, even not sparing their own allies, Mao noted.

The US is escalating its global campaign to hype the “China threat” in intellectual property and artificial intelligence (AI) development in a rare move of collusion with its allies under the Five Eyes to accuse China of intellectual property theft and using AI for hacking and spying against the nations.

It is hoped that the relevant countries will abandon their Cold War mentality and ideological prejudice, viewing China in an objective and fair manner, and stop groundless smears and accusations against China, according to Mao.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202310/1300391.shtml

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning’s Regular Press Conference on October 23, 2023

CNN: I want to follow up on an interview that was conducted by CBS News in the US in which the intelligence chiefs from five nations known as the “Five Eyes” called China “the greatest espionage threat democracy has ever faced”. Two questions. One, is China engaged in a global espionage campaign? And two, what do you say to Fortune 500 companies, people in academia, governments who may be concerned that the Chinese government is a security threat?

Mao Ning: I noted the reports. First of all, I would like to tell you that the “Five Eyes” intelligence chiefs’ accusation against China has no factual ground and is just smears against China. We strongly oppose this.

China remains committed to safeguarding international security. The “Five Eyes” is the world’s biggest intelligence organization and has habitually made up and spread disinformation about China. The US, in particular, has abused its technological prowess to indiscriminately spy on countries globally, not least its allies.

So if anyone is concerned over security threat, it is not China, but the “Five Eyes” countries, that they need to be concerned about. We advise relevant countries to abandon the Cold-War mentality and ideological bias, view China in an objective and just manner, and stop unwarranted smears and blames against China.

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/202310/t20231023_11166320.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792399

File: 3076ac622bf4747⋯.jpg (144.66 KB,1200x720,5:3,China_Australia_ties_warmi….jpg)

File: daff6c94b04c733⋯.jpg (43.95 KB,600x489,200:163,Foreign_Ministry_Spokesper….jpg)

>>19780612

China-Australia ties ‘warming’ ahead of Albanese visit

GT staff reporters - Oct 23, 2023

China welcomes Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to visit China and attend the 6th China International Import Expo (CIIE) at the invitation of Chinese Premier Li Qiang, China's Foreign Ministry said on Monday. A sound and stable bilateral relationship serves fundamental interests of the two countries and their people, and it is conducive to regional and world peace and stability, it noted.

Observers said the visit, adding to a flurry of consensuses and business exchanges between the two sides in recent days, marks another positive step toward repairing China-Australia relations, which have shown signs of thawing and improving since the beginning of this year. It also underscores Australia's desire to expand business ties with the world's second-largest consumer market and boost exports of products such as wine to cope with rising economic uncertainties and global headwinds.

But moves to warm up bilateral economic ties are only the first step, and observers cautioned that Canberra needs to make more concrete efforts and show more sincerity to bring bilateral relations back to the right track. It is also of vital importance for Australia to be diplomatically independent from the US, and not to continue with what some describe as a "semi-decoupling" attempt with China, analysts noted.

Albanese will visit China from November 4 to 7, and the trip will make him the first Australian prime minister to visit China in seven years.

In response to Albanese's upcoming visit, Mao Ning, a spokesperson for the Foreign Ministry, said at a regular press briefing on Monday that China is willing to work with Australia to strengthen high-level exchanges, enhance cooperation in various fields, promote the sustained development and improvement of bilateral relations, and bring more benefits to people in both countries.

The visit comes amid multiple positive signs in the economic sphere. China's Ministry of Commerce said in a statement published on Sunday that China and Australia have conducted friendly consultations under the WTO framework governing disputes such as wine and wind towers that are of mutual concern, and they reached a consensus on properly resolving them.

The progress has been widely welcomed by the Australian business community. Australian premium wine company Treasury Wine Estates said in a statement sent to the Global Times on Monday that it welcomes the announcement and "is well-placed to rebuild its business in China."

"The Albanese government has realized that Australia is highly dependent on the Chinese market. As economies between the two countries are highly complementary, it is likely that bilateral trade will grow in the future," Yu Lei, chief research fellow at the Research Center for Pacific Island Countries of Liaocheng University, told the Global Times on Monday.

Yu described Australia's current strategy toward China as "semi-decoupling," in which Canberra looks to establish closer ties with the Chinese market but at the same time maintains substantial barriers to Chinese investment in Australia.

Therefore, a further "resumption" of bilateral relations depends on the joint efforts of both sides, especially Australia, which should rectify its Chinese strategy from a long-term perspective, observers said.

In the first nine months, China-Australia trade relations saw a continuous positive trend, with 10.2 percent year-on-year growth, customs data showed. While traditional goods like coal and iron ore have been the driving force for such growth, newly resumed trade in products, such as barley, wood and cotton, are injecting new impetus into trade growth.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202310/1300398.shtml

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning’s Regular Press Conference on October 23, 2023

CCTV: It was reported that Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on October 22 that he will visit China and attend the sixth China International Import Expo from November 4 to 7. Can you confirm this?

Mao Ning: China welcomes Prime Minister Albanese to visit China and attend the sixth China International Import Expo at the invitation of Premier Li Qiang. A sound and stable China-Australia relationship is in the fundamental interests of both countries and peoples and conducive to peace and stability in the region and the wider world. China stands ready to work with Australia to step up high-level exchanges, enhance cooperation and exchanges across the fields, promote continued improvement and growth of bilateral relations, and bring more benefits to the peoples of the two countries.

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/202310/t20231023_11166320.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792423

File: d25eb8ab81c58d3⋯.jpg (1.32 MB,5000x3332,1250:833,Reece_Kershaw_says_Austral….jpg)

File: d0b3d42fdbb45db⋯.jpg (253.08 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Kevin_Yam_has_been_targete….jpg)

>>19755118

>>19755135

>>19792379

Police questioned on why they allowed Hong Kong officers to visit cyber centre

Stephen Dziedzic - 24 October 2023

1/2

An Australian lawyer with a police bounty on his head in Hong Kong has questioned why officers from the Chinese territory were allowed into Australia for training, calling it "traumatising" for pro-democracy activists being targeted by Beijing.

The Coalition is also grilling Australian Federal Police's top brass about why the Hong Kong officers were allowed to visit a cyber coordination centre in Australia, given ASIO head Mike Burgess recently accused China of "unprecedented" cyber espionage to obtain intellectual property.

Six members of the Hong Kong Police Force recently completed Australian Institute of Police Management programs and toured AFP sites in Canberra and Perth.

AFP commissioner Reece Kershaw defended the program, telling Senate estimates on Monday night that Australia needed to maintain cooperation with police in both China and Hong Kong to help crackdown on drug smuggling.

"We do actually continually share intelligence with [China] … we are actually a net receiver of intelligence and that intelligence has led to protecting a lot of Australians from harm, particularly from illicit drugs," he said.

"It's a challenging situation that we're faced with, with the complexity of the world we're in at the moment."

But Shadow Home Affairs Minister James Paterson zeroed in on the training program, saying the imposition of China's national security law in Hong Kong and the vast crackdown on civil liberties in the territory raised deep questions about training their police in Australia.

"At this moment they are out there arresting people for lighting candles to commemorate Tiananmen Square, they are locking up media proprietors … they are locking up unionists, they are locking up opposition politicians," he said.

"Do we really think this level of cooperation with the Hong Kong police force is appropriate?"

'Traumatic' to learn Hong Kong police were in Australia, says pro-democracy lawyer

Melbourne-based lawyer Kevin Yam is one of eight overseas-based pro-democracy activists who has been targeted by Hong Kong police, who accused him of "serious" national security offences and offered a reward of $HK1 million ($192,000) for information leading to his arrest.

"While I don't question the AFP's professionalism, to have Hong Kong police in their official capacity being physically in Australia, from a personal perspective, is pretty traumatic," he told the ABC.

"I wasn't born yesterday, I know in this world you sometimes need to deal with unsavoury characters, the Hong Kong police being one of them.

"However, you can imagine that for people like me it's pretty traumatising … when in Australia I have to rely on the Australian police to keep an eye over me."

"I know that they're 800km away in Sydney and Canberra but still, it just doesn't sit right with me to see Hong Kong cops here."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792430

File: def407eba4b2975⋯.jpg (921.19 KB,825x1735,165:347,HKPF_1.jpg)

File: 31f826699bf3a50⋯.jpg (80.45 KB,600x900,2:3,F8o3_ncaMAAUWb2.jpg)

File: b2ccf0456652b27⋯.jpg (85.37 KB,600x900,2:3,F8o3_njbkAAwlQ4.jpg)

>>19792423

2/2

The AFP said it had "longstanding" cooperation programs with the police and the officers involved were comparatively "junior".

Commissioner Kershaw said the training would focus on teaching "executive leadership" rather than "tactical" skills.

"Normally it's rule of law [and] democratic leadership, believe it or not … that's what we teach," he said.

"Our view is that we are trying to influence, and provide that capability, where it's in the interests of our nation."

The commissioner said Australia also maintained links with police in Hong Kong who were still "very good officers" despite the broader erosion of the rule of law in the territory.

"They're doing what they can. That whole system as you know, was [based] on rule of law," he said.

"I don't think it's over yet. Maybe I'm too optimistic. But for policing, certainly for us, certainly we've been providing support to particular leaders in that police force."

The commissioner promised to provide more information on the visit to the cyber security centre, but Senator Paterson said it would be "deeply ironic" if the training program involved cyber security.

"More detail would be appreciated, and it would be deeply ironic if the number one state sponsor of cyber attacks on Australia was coming to talk about cyber security with the AFP," he said.

Mr Yam also said any collaboration with Hong Kong authorities on cyber issues would be alarming.

"One of the things that the Hong Kong police have been proactive on is in the cyber space, prosecuting for sedition just for posting things on Facebook or WhatsApp," he said.

"I'm not sure that … this is a particularly smart move given the tendency they have to use any skills they learn in cyber to enforcing a crackdown."

Coalition to question HKPF relationships with institutions

The Coalition has flagged it will also scrutinise broader links between Hong Kong's police force and Australian institutions.

The current chief executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, John Lee, who previously served as a senior police officer in the territory, obtained a master's degree at Charles Sturt University.

And in 2018 the Hong Kong Police Force signed a new five-year Memorandum of Understanding on "academic cooperation" with Charles Sturt University to provide training to their officers.

The ABC has asked Charles Sturt University if the program has been renewed this year.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-24/afp-allowed-hong-kong-police-tour-cyber-facilities/103014286

https://twitter.com/hkpoliceforce/status/1714244196968853762

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19792436

File: 51ba5e3cd18a27c⋯.jpg (101.18 KB,1415x796,1415:796,Will_Fowles_in_Victorian_P….jpg)

File: 9cb07226aac8ee9⋯.jpg (295.83 KB,1948x1096,487:274,Will_Fowles_and_Daniel_And….jpg)

Victorian Labor MP Will Fowles arrested over sexual assault allegations

RACHEL BAXENDALE - OCTOBER 24, 2023

Disgraced Victorian Labor MP Will Fowles has been arrested and interviewed over allegations he sexually assaulted a state government employee.

Mr Fowles was forced to resign from the parliamentary Labor Party in early August, at the request of then-premier Daniel Andrews’s office, following allegations that he was involved in the “serious” assault. He remains a member of the wider Labor Party.

In September he announced he would not attend parliamentary sittings until the conclusion of a police investigation, which was initiated following a referral from the premier’s office.

On Tuesday, Victoria Police confirmed Mr Fowles had earlier this month been arrested, interviewed and released without charge as part of their ongoing investigation.

“Detectives from the Sexual Crimes Squad executed a warrant at a Ringwood address on 12 October as part of an ongoing investigation into an incident in the Melbourne CBD,” police said in response to questions from The Australian.

“A 45-year-old Ringwood man was arrested at the property and interviewed by police. He was released without charge pending further inquiries.

“As the investigation is ongoing and given the sensitive nature of the matter, we will not be commenting further at this time.”

Mr Fowles, who represents Ringwood in Melbourne’s outer east, has “strenuously” denied the allegation of assault and described his resignation as “a situation I expect will be temporary”.

The allegations against Mr Fowles are believed to relate to an incident alleged to have occurred at a city hotel.

The female alleged victim is understood to have also been interviewed by police.

Mr Fowles had been drinking at the bar in state parliament prior to the alleged assault.

A complaint was first made to the Premier’s office on August 3, prompting an internal investigation which culminated in the referral to police, and the request for Mr Fowles to resign, on August 5.

Mr Fowles has vehemently denied any wrongdoing. His office has been contacted for comment regarding the arrest.

“I was shocked and distressed to learn last night that an allegation of assault has been made against me,” Mr Fowles said the day after resigning.

“The details of the claim have not been put to me. I strenuously deny any allegation of assault. It is not true. There was no assault.

“I was asked to stand aside as a member of the Parliamentary Labor Party, a situation I expect will be temporary.”

In 2019 Mr Fowles took leave from parliament and sought counselling for mental health and addiction issues after kicking in a Canberra hotel room door.

Despite the 2019 incident, the MP was saved from political oblivion last year, when the ALP preselected him to replace resigning Dustin Halse in the seat of Ringwood, after Mr Fowles’s previous seat of Burwood was abolished in a redistribution.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/victorian-labor-mp-will-fowles-arrested-over-sexual-assault-allegations/news-story/e9ccec817e156872e8944c8c34767501

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19798315

File: c84b95586ee714b⋯.jpg (4.65 MB,5268x3512,3:2,Liddle_delivering_a_speech….jpg)

>>19739995

>>19749474

>>19780537

>>19785746

Anonymous letter-writing Indigenous leaders to blame for Voice loss: Liddle

Paul Sakkal - October 25, 2023

The Liberal Party’s sole Indigenous MP has questioned the courage of the authors of an anonymous letter censuring people who voted No in the Voice referendum.

Coalition frontbencher Senator Kerrynne Liddle says she was astonished that key Yes campaigners did not have “the courage to put their names to a statement like this”, and urging the authors of the statement released on Sunday to accept responsibility for the democratic outcome.

In an unpublished draft version of the open letter, revealed in this masthead on Sunday, Liddle was accused of being a “front person” for right-wing think tanks that “used black people to fight black people”.

“I wasn’t a front person for anybody. I’m a proud Indigenous woman. I’m also a member of parliament and a contributing member of my community,” she said, adding that she had seen the draft that named her.

“This wasn’t a political decision for me. I held this position way before I came into politics.”

The former journalist and resources industry executive was involved in various Indigenous organisations before she was elected to the Senate last year and has opposed the Voice for years.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said in April her anti-Voice stance was influential in shaping his own views.

Liddle took aim at an unsigned document that labelled the October 14 outcome “appalling and mean-spirited”, claimed lies were the campaign’s “primary feature”, and argued the truth of the Voice poll was that “the majority of Australians have committed a shameful act whether knowingly or not”.

The document released on Sunday said Australia belonged to Indigenous people and that it was the “legitimacy of the non-Indigenous occupation in this country that requires recognition”.

“For people that claim to have spent a week in mourning, you would have hoped in reflection that they would have not come out with such an aggressive response,” Liddle said in an interview.

“They should be looking at themselves, not pointing the finger at everybody else.”

“They haven’t listened. They say they represent all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. They represent themselves.”

“Imagine if one or more of those individuals who authored this ended up on the unexplained constitutionally enshrined Voice. We’d be hearing this type of toxic talk forever.”

While no names were attached to the letter, several sources who asked not to be named so that they could speak freely previously confirmed Uluru Dialogue leader Megan Davis and Yes23 campaigner Noel Pearson were among many involved in the drafting.

Evidence cited by this masthead shows Pearson and Thomas Mayo had some level of contribution to editing the document, though the extent of any individual’s involvement is unclear.

Some senior Indigenous leaders, including June Oscar, Mick Gooda and Pat Turner, objected to parts of the historic document.

The South Australian senator said the letter misleadingly portrayed the vote as a rebuff of symbolic recognition of First Australians when in fact it was a spurning of what she said was a flawed, unconvincing idea of a new advisory body.

“I think it is outrageous to be suggesting that people rejected Aboriginal people or they rejected closing the gap,” Liddle said.

“What people rejected was the proposition of Voice … The letter ignores the very thing that was problematic for most Australians.”

“Albanese took a proposition straight from the very people that put this letter together in 2017 [the Uluru Statement from the Heart] and he didn’t amend it at all. There was no compromise. And from these people, there’s still no compromise in their position. They’ve learned nothing.”

Liddle said the Yes leadership had failed to accept the loss despite the competitive advantage it had as a result of an “extraordinary amount of money” and the prestige of the leaders involved.

The open letter’s claim that remote Indigenous communities overwhelmingly supported the Voice was disproved by results in Indigenous communities in her home state, she claimed.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/anonymous-letter-writing-indigenous-leaders-to-blame-for-voice-loss-liddle-20231025-p5eeum.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19798327

File: 0842310d477f7ad⋯.jpg (326.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,US_President_Joe_Biden_2nd….jpg)

File: ed78076855088e0⋯.jpg (236.51 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_partn….jpg)

File: a12c3d1231fafa5⋯.jpg (197.46 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Co_ordinator_for_Strategic….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19785767

Biden White House raises concerns about Chinese intimidation ahead of PM visit

GEOFF CHAMBERS and ADAM CREIGHTON - OCTOBER 25, 2023

Senior Biden administration officials have raised concerns about Chinese intimidation, coercion and maritime claims in the South China Sea, and warned that the world faces a “great deal of pain” if Beijing cuts off its dominant critical minerals supply chain.

Joe Biden’s National Security Council strategic communications co-ordinator John Kirby on Wednesday (AEDT) rejected suggestions that conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine had shifted their focus away from the Indo-Pacific region.

Ahead of Anthony Albanese travelling to Beijing on November 4 for meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, Mr Kirby said “President Biden believes it is important that we keep lines of communication open with China”.

“We view China as a strategic competitor. It’s a competition that we need to succeed in. That means being able to co-operate where we can, communicate where we must, and obviously, as appropriate, work to counter some of the (People’s Republic of China) PRC’s intimidation, coercion, excessive maritime claims,” Mr Kirby said.

“We’re taking a holistic view of this relationship. More open lines of communication with China is a good thing. As a matter of fact, later this week Wang Yi (Chinese Foreign Minister) is coming to (Washington) and he will meet with the Secretary of State (Antony Blinken).”

Mr Kirby said the Biden administration’s focus on the Indo-Pacific region remains “right at the top of the list”.

“I’ve heard this speculation that because we’re so fixated on supporting Ukraine. And now of course, we’re deeply involved in supporting Israel that somehow we’re gonna lose sight, or we’re gonna lose focus on the Indo-Pacific. And I just gotta tell you, from my perspective, I just don’t see it. Our Indo-Pacific partners, and that includes Australia, are also invested in some of these same conflicts around the world. We’re all focused on other things. Economically it’s a huge driver of the global economy. And then you have the acute security challenges,” he said.

Ahead of Mr Biden hosting Mr Albanese for an official White House state visit on Thursday (AEDT), Mr Kirby said new deals had been struck during the Prime Minister’s visit including a new space agreement allowing US companies to launch rockets into space from Australia and building closer ties between Australian and US First Nations peoples.

At a critical minerals and industry roundtable in Washington, attended by top Australian and US critical minerals and rare earths company chiefs, US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo warned that China “has a headstart”.

Ms Raimondo said countries like the US and Australia had “allowed … ourselves to become vulnerable by being overly dependent on one or two countries or companies around the world and as a result, extremely vulnerable to the harm that comes from these supply chain disruptions”.

“China has a headstart. And that means we have to work a little harder and a little faster. They have the technology and sustained investment over a long period of time, particularly in midstream processing and refining to dominate the market for critical minerals,” Ms Raimondo said.

“And we all know, if China were to point that new direction unfavourable to us, it can cause a great deal of pain, very quickly. And so, we have a job to make sure that doesn’t happen by drawing closer to one another and becoming less vulnerable.

“I’d say most troublingly, they’ve shown a willingness to employ export restrictions on critical minerals as a retaliatory measure. We’ve seen what’s happening with germanium and gallium and most recently, graphite.”

Ms Raimondo, who made the remarks sitting alongside Mr Albanese and Resources Minister Madeleine King, said “the last few years have really been a massive global wake-up call to all of us around the vulnerabilities of our supply chains”.

“First with COVID, which overnight, massively disrupted our supply chains. Then, of course, the conflict in Ukraine, more disruption. And of course, what we see from non-market actors like China,” she said.

“As we race towards a clean energy future, as we race towards a more stable supply chain, there’s a moment for us, US and Australia, to partner as it relates to critical minerals to our mutual benefit.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/biden-white-house-raises-concerns-about-chinese-intimidation-ahead-of-pm-visit/news-story/5192d90ccfab6b1b09310f001b203b0d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19798334

File: 50459cc81eaf68e⋯.jpg (2.76 MB,5000x2813,5000:2813,Anthony_Albanese_is_in_the….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19785767

Anthony Albanese’s critical minerals funding boost for ‘unbreakable US alliance’

GEOFF CHAMBERS and ADAM CREIGHTON - OCTOBER 25, 2023

1/3

Anthony Albanese will lift support to unlock Australia’s critical minerals deposits to $6bn, amid a high-stakes global contest to dig up, process and manufacture unprecedented volumes of minerals for clean energy, tech and defence products.

The US, EU, China, India, Gulf States and Southeast Asian economic powerhouses are clamouring for access to Australia’s vast critical minerals resources to achieve net zero emissions, diversify away from fossil fuels and drive new artificial intelligence and defence tech advancements.

In a major win for US President Joe Biden ahead of Thursday’s state dinner at the White House, the Prime Minister will on Wednesday (AEDT) announce his government is topping up its critical minerals financing measures by $2bn.

Mr Albanese, who will unveil the funding boost at a roundtable in Washington to be hosted by ­Resources Minister Madeleine King and US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, said “Australia is ­committed to building sustainable and secure critical minerals supply chains with the US”.

Mr Albanese, who is holding rolling meetings with key US congress members over the next three days to lock in legislative support for the AUKUS pact, has also given the green light to Australian legislation to streamline information and technology sharing arrangements with the US.

The new export control reforms will follow earlier legislation to prevent the unwanted transfer of sensitive Defence information to foreign militaries.

Mr Albanese, however, said Australia would not boost its $3bn commitment to support US and British submarine industrial bases.

The Prime Minister, whose hopes of delivering a rare address to a joint session of congress were dashed by the ugly Republican fight over the US House of Representatives speakership, said he believed Australia’s existing funding for AUKUS was “appropriate”.

Expansion of the Australia-US Climate, Critical Minerals and Clean Energy Transformation Compact, announced on the sidelines of the G7 Hiroshima summit in May, will help turbocharge the US clean energy boom fuelled by Mr Biden’s $US3 trillion Inflation Reduction Act.

With Australia boasting some of the world’s biggest deposits of lithium, cobalt, copper and nickel, Mr Albanese said his government was “committed to transforming Australia into a renewable energy superpower, and harnessing the critical minerals we have at home is crucial to achieving this”.

“Australians will benefit through this investment in critical minerals, through technology, skills, jobs and economic gains. Australia is committed to building sustainable and secure critical minerals supply chains with the US,” he said.

“This is central to building a clean energy future and delivering economic growth. The expansion of the Critical Minerals Facility will help to build supply chains with the US and support our shared clean energy, manufac­turing and defence ambitions.

“We’re in strong position, as the world’s largest supplier of lithium, for example, a significant supply of cobalt, vanadium, copper, nickel. The minerals that will power the globe in the 21st century are things Australia has significant amounts of. And we want to work, as well, with US companies.”

Mr Albanese’s visit is being lauded by both countries as evidence of the nations’ “unbreakable alliance”, amid concerns about Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific, the threat of a wider war in the Middle East, Vladimir Putin’s stalemated invasion of Ukraine and deteriorating global economic conditions.

The Prime Minister will be feted by Mr Biden at the White House on Wednesday and Thursday (AEDT), just over a week before he departs for Beijing to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19798336

File: dfb991444920d1e⋯.jpg (308.52 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_at_Arling….jpg)

>>19798334

2/3

Ahead of welcoming Mr Albanese and Ms Haydon to the White House on Wednesday (AEDT) for the official guest book signing and gift exchange with the President and First Lady, Dr Biden and White House social secretary Carlos Elizondo will brief the media on logistics for the state dinner. Guest chef Katie Button, White House executive chef Chris Comerford and White House executive pastry chef Susie Morrison will provide samples of place settings that will be served to guests on Thursday (AEDT).

Mr Biden, who along with his wife, Jill, will host a private dinner for Mr Albanese and partner Jodie Haydon on Wednesday (AEDT), has held only four state dinners. The previous guests – Emmanuel Macron, Narendra Modi and Yoon Suk-yeol – are prominent figures in the Indo-­Pacific region.

While the state dinner invitation list has been held tight, senior US officials are expected to brief out details of the dinner and the guest list, which will include prominent business and community leaders, politicians, defence officials and celebrities.

Australian Rugby League Commission chair and Racing NSW chief executive Peter V’landys, Indigenous leader and voice supporter Tom Calma and CSIRO board member Alex Brown are expected to attend as guests of Mr Albanese.

Australian celebrities Margot Robbie, Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman are also rumoured to be on the list, which was finalised by the White House.

Business, banking and mining bosses have also arrived in Washington, including Macquarie Group chief executive Shemara Wikramanayake, BlueScope chief executive Mark Vassella, Westpac chief risk officer Ryan Zanin, Microsoft Australia-New Zealand managing director Steve Worrall, Business Council of Australia chief executive Bran Black and Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Andrew McKellar.

As industry leaders push for Australia to tap into Mr Biden’s multibillion-dollar clean energy investment, Mr Albanese on Wednesday will boost bilateral co-operation with the US to drive new investment and employment across Australia and US clean energy, manufacturing and defence supply chains. There is also increased focus on providing “responsibly produced and pro­cessed critical minerals” to meet global demand.

Ms King, who recently released a seven-year Critical Minerals Strategy, said the Australia-US taskforce on critical minerals had agreed on “priority areas of work and immediate actions such as joint supply chain mapping and deeper co-operation … on critical minerals”.

“The road to net zero runs through Australia’s resources sector,” she said. “The Australian government is providing significant support to de-risk investment in Australia’s critical minerals sector.”

Australian critical minerals and business executives attending the roundtable on Wednesday (AEDT) include Lynas managing director Amanda Lacaze, Australian Strategic Materials chief executive Rowena Smith, Alpha HPA managing director Rimas Kairaitis, Alliance Nickel chief Paul Kopetjka and Nyrstar boss Dale Webb. On the US side, White House Indo-Pacific coordinator and senior Biden adviser Kurt Campbell will attend alongside Tesla Motors chair Robyn Denholm, Lockheed Martin chief executive James Taiclet and LG Energy’s Heejae Kim.

Mr Albanese will also on Wednesday (AEDT) meet with up to 120 local and travelling business leaders at an Australian Innovation Showcase event.

US-Australian companies including Boeing, Ferra, Energy Impact Partners, Infravision, Australis Scientific, Rohto Pharmaceuticals, Redflow, Faraday Microgrids, Droneshield and Minelab will have chief executives and senior representatives attending.

The event was designed to bring together business leaders across advanced industries with a focus on “net zero transformation, science and technology and defence”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19798337

File: 41916a051b3d1fd⋯.jpg (287.15 KB,2015x1134,2015:1134,Anthony_Albanese_lays_a_wr….jpg)

>>19798336

3/3

Amid a messy internal Republican struggle to appoint a new Speaker following the departure of Kevin McCarthy, Mr Albanese is expected to deliver a major speech advocating key AUKUS legislative changes at the US State Department on Friday (AEDT). He is due to meet key congressmen from the influential Friends of Australia Caucus on Thursday morning local time, including Democrat Joe Courtney and Republican Mike Gallagher, both keen supporters of AUKUS.

He said the AUKUS arrangements were “in the interest of Australia, to play our role”.

“We don’t seek to just be someone who is watching. We seek as well to play a role in security in the Indo-Pacific. And one way we do that is through AUKUS, by lifting up our own ­capacity. Now, that is very important going forward,” he said.

Republicans, who hold a slim majority in the 435-seat lower house, were scheduled to regroup late on Monday night local time to determine which of nine potential candidates as Speaker could look to seek a vote on the floor of the house.

Congress has been without a Speaker since October 3, an unprecedented period that has left the US government unable to pass laws or amendments, including critical legislation to facilitate AUKUS and the President’s request for $US105bn in funding for Ukraine and Israel.

Asked on Tuesday (AEDT) if he had spoken with Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the crisis in the Middle East, Mr Albanese said he had not. The Labor leader, who will open the new $237m Australian embassy in Washington alongside ambassador Kevin Rudd on Wednesday (AEDT), defended his government’s position on the Israel-Hamas war, saying he was not “picking sides” between Israelis and Palestinians.

“I have spoken to the Israeli ambassador to Australia on a couple of occasions. And the views that I’ve put are consistent with the resolution that was carried by the parliament.

“We remain absolutely horrified by the Hamas attacks on Israel. These are abhorrent acts of terror against innocent civilians.

“We recognised as well, in that resolution, the importance of the protection of civilian lives. The situation is challenging and rapidly changing.

“And there is a terrible loss of life, including innocent life of both Israelis and Palestinians. And I think that every innocent life matters, whether it is Israeli or Palestinian.

“We pick a side against Hamas. We did that very clearly and unequivocally. Because the actions of Hamas are against the interests of the Israeli population, clearly, but also (the) Palestinians. We support, as President Biden reaffirmed for the US, a support for a two-state solution.”

Mr Albanese said it was “very hard to see how Hamas could negotiate through to what would be a two-state solution in the Middle East”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albaneses-critical-minerals-funding-boost-for-unbreakable-us-alliance/news-story/a52725e0bf3760dcfac1b927429943d9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19798348

File: d91bc934f798f62⋯.jpg (2.03 MB,4623x3082,3:2,Anthony_Pratt_former_prime….jpg)

File: a79c0c84bf0bbfa⋯.jpg (651.1 KB,2495x1663,2495:1663,Donald_Trump_and_Anthony_P….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19785767

>>19679708

>>19684137

‘Internal politics’: Pratt told me nothing about subs he gleaned from Trump, says Albanese

Farrah Tomazin and David Crowe - October 25, 2023

1/2

Washington: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared he was never told by Australian businessman Anthony Pratt about sensitive nuclear submarine information that former president Donald Trump allegedly shared in an alleged risk to national security.

But Albanese has refused to weigh into the scandal engulfing the billionaire packaging tycoon, telling reporters in Washington ahead of a dinner with President Joe Biden, he wasn’t “going to comment on US internal politics”.

The response comes after a joint investigation by this masthead and 60 Minutes uncovered separate audio recordings of Pratt talking about his relationship with “mafia”-like Donald Trump and his claim of a $US1 million payment to Trump’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.

The covert recordings also reveal that Pratt had claimed Trump disclosed non-public details about US military action in Iraq and a private conversation with Iraq’s leader.

Trump has dismissed those accounts, posting on social media that the stories “about a red haired weirdo from Australia, named Anthony Pratt, is Fake News.”

However, the investigation substantiated previous reporting from America’s ABC News that suggested Trump shared more classified information than was previously known, and that Pratt - who is a member of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort - had divulged that information with scores of people, including former prime ministers and journalists.

Asked if he was ever briefed by Pratt about the discussions he allegedly had with Trump, Albanese replied: “No.”

Pressed on whether he was concerned about the alleged activities involving Pratt, he simply answered: “I’m not going to comment on US internal politics.”

With Trump set to face trial over his handling of classified documents, Pratt is now among more than 80 people that prosecutors have identified as possible witnesses who could testify against the former president.

But as the chief executive of Visy Industries and Pratt Industries, he is also one of Australia’s most prominent business figures, so the headlines surrounding him at a time when Albanese is in the US for a state dinner have proven somewhat delicate.

The last state dinner for an Australian leader at the White House was held four years ago when then prime minister Scott Morrison and his wife, Jenny, joined Trump and his wife, Melania, at a head table that also included Pratt, News Corp executive chairman Lachlan Murdoch and golfer Greg Norman.

This year, however, Pratt is not expected to attend Wednesday’s event, according to a source familiar with this week’s plans, who was not authorised to speak publicly.

The Australian businessman has kept a low profile lately, but in September appeared in Kentucky alongside Ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, and Ambassador to Australia, Caroline Kennedy, where Pratt Industries opened a new a paper recycling plant. In a tweet at the time, Rudd applauded the business for “kicking goals” in the US.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19798352

File: 2ef96bbcd3c89cf⋯.jpg (1.9 MB,5017x3345,5017:3345,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19798348

2/2

The charges Trump faces over classified documents relate to material the former president took after leaving the White House in 2021 and which were stored in boxes all over his Mar-a-Lago resort, including “in a ballroom, a bathroom and shower, an office space, his bedroom, and a storage room”.

They included information relating to nuclear programs and military vulnerabilities, to intelligence that should have only been shared with the intelligence heads of the Five Eyes” countries, including Australia.

But they are not the only charges the former president faces as he seeks the Republican nomination to run for office again next year.

Trump is also facing a trial in Washington for attempting to overthrow the 2020 election results, a trial in Georgia for election subversion in that state, and a trial in New York over hush money payments paid to porn star Stormy Daniels.

For the past few weeks, however, he has been preoccupied with a civil fraud trial in Manhattan, which could ultimately seal the fate of his real estate empire.

In that case, New York Attorney-General Letitia James has accused Trump, his sons and their family business of fraudulently inflating the value of his properties to get better loan terms and lower insurance premiums.

Trump’s former attorney and “fixer” Michael Cohen backed up this allegation on Tuesday (US time) testifying that he and former Trump Organisation chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg would manipulate financial statements based on what Trump wanted his net worth to reflect.

Trump, however, rejected this, saying outside court that Cohen - who went to jail in 2018 for campaign finance charges and lying to Congress, among other things - was a “felon” and “proven liar”.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/internal-politics-pratt-told-me-nothing-about-subs-he-gleaned-from-trump-says-albanese-20231025-p5eerx.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19798362

File: 0a7c5cfd16aaf57⋯.jpg (310.26 KB,825x616,75:56,AA_10.jpg)

File: ea646ff99c010d0⋯.mp4 (15.68 MB,640x360,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_blames_Do….mp4)

>>19798348

Anthony Albanese Tweet

Democracy is precious and cannot be taken for granted - the violent insurrection in Washington is an assault on the rule of law and democracy. Donald Trump has encouraged this response and must now call on his supporters to stand down.

https://twitter.com/AlboMP/status/1346929529198055424

Joe Biden Tweet

Let me be very clear: the scenes of chaos at the Capitol do not represent who we are. What we are seeing is a small number of extremists dedicated to lawlessness. This is not dissent, it's disorder. It borders on sedition, and it must end. Now.

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1346928275470299142

Anthony Albanese blames Donald Trump for US Capitol violence

sbs.com.au - 7 January 2021

https://www.sbs.com.au/programs/video/1841137219993/Anthony-Albanese-blames-Donald-Trump-for-US-Capito

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19798395

File: f895e6ba8083f43⋯.jpg (3.6 MB,5248x3499,5248:3499,Foreign_Minister_Penny_Won….jpg)

File: 8ec5816a1338120⋯.jpg (368.49 KB,825x1251,275:417,SPW_7.jpg)

>>19699368

>>19749528

Wong joins allies asking for ‘humanitarian pause’ to hostilities in Gaza

Natassia Chrysanthos - October 25, 2023

Foreign Minister Penny Wong has joined international allies to call for a humanitarian pause on hostilities in Gaza so that food and water reach civilians and people can move to safety, in the federal government’s strongest statement yet on the Israel-Hamas conflict.

Her intervention comes alongside appeals from the United Nations, United States, Canada and New Zealand for a humanitarian pause to allow safe deliveries of aid in the besieged territory, as Gaza’s health ministry said Israeli air strikes had killed more than 700 Palestinians overnight.

Wong said the way Israel chose to defend itself against the terrorist group’s attack on October 7 mattered and should not lead to the suffering of innocent Palestinian civilians. While she acknowledged some humanitarian aid had been delivered to Gaza in recent days, she said it was “nowhere near enough”.

UN agencies said they were pleading “on our knees” for emergency aid to be let into Gaza unimpeded, and that more than 20 times the current deliveries were needed to support the narrow strip’s 2.3 million people amid widespread devastation.

The federal government has sent two extra aircrafts and support personnel to the Middle East to support Australians in the region given the “volatile situation”, Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Wednesday morning.

There are 79 Australians and their families currently in contact with the government.

Wong said the humanitarian situation in Gaza was dire and humanitarian suffering widespread.

“We have consistently called for safe, unimpeded and sustained humanitarian access, and safe passage for civilians. There has been access in recent days but nowhere near enough,” she wrote in a statement on X on Wednesday morning.

“We call for humanitarian pauses on hostilities, so food, water, medicine and other essential assistance can reach people in desperate need, and so civilians can get to safety.

“The way Israel exercises its right to defend itself matters. It matters to civilians throughout the region, and it matters to Israel’s ongoing security.

“Innocent Palestinian civilians should not suffer because of the outrages perpetrated by Hamas.”

European Union leaders are also expected to endorse a call for a “humanitarian pause” in hostilities later this week, a move that would also give more time for negotiations mediated by Qatar to secure the release of hostages.

A pause is generally considered less formal and shorter than a ceasefire. Russia backed Arab states and called for a humanitarian ceasefire in its contribution to the United Nations on Tuesday.

A senior United States official said it remained opposed to a total ceasefire: “We think humanitarian pauses linked to the delivery of aid that still allow Israel to conduct military operations to defend itself are worth consideration.”

Israel’s Foreign Minister Eli Cohen dismissed calls for “proportionality” in the country’s response to Hamas’ attack at a high-level UN meeting on Tuesday.

“How can you agree to a ceasefire with someone who swore to kill and destroy your own existence?”

“It is not only Israel’s right to destroy Hamas. It’s our duty,” he said, as he urged international support.

Marles said Australia was advocating for a humanitarian corridor so that the 79 Australians, permanent residents and their families could leave Gaza, since they had been unable to exit through Egypt.

Marles did not confirm where the Australian aircraft would be located for operational reasons.

“But we are putting that in place, really, as a contingency to support Australian populations in the Middle East,” he said.

“This is a very volatile situation, and we just don’t absolutely know which way it goes from here, as the world really holds its breath watching it.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/wong-joins-allies-asking-for-humanitarian-pause-to-hostilities-in-gaza-20231025-p5eetz.html

https://twitter.com/SenatorWong/status/1716949619052310775

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19798406

File: df8fa36fe9c580f⋯.jpg (1.34 MB,4580x3054,2290:1527,Melbourne_man_pleads_guilt….jpg)

Melbourne man pleads guilty to sexually abusing Melbourne boy and children overseas

Alex Crowe - October 24, 2023

A man was sentenced to 11 years in prison after pleading guilty to sexually abusing a child in Melbourne, as well as multiple children procured through a paedophile network operating overseas.

Michael Corbett, 61, pleaded guilty to historical offences relating to grooming and abusing a child under 16 in Melton South and recent offences relating to raping three children in the Philippines, during a case heard in the County Court of Victoria on Tuesday.

Police arrested Corbett after investigations into an overseas paedophile network found the Australian citizen had paid a facilitator to procure children who were brought to his house in the Philippines for him to abuse on multiple occasions.

Corbett paid the three boys, who were all aged between 9 and 13, the equivalent of between $7 and $14 after abusing them in his home.

The man responsible for facilitating the abuse in the Philippines was arrested by the country’s national police force in February 2019, which lead to the rescue of six children.

The child victims identified Corbett as one of the perpetrators of sexual abuse during interviews conducted by Australian Federal Police in February 2020.

Police arrested Corbett after he arrived in Sydney from Singapore in November 2021, and he was extradited to Melbourne where he was subsequently charged.

Judge Anne Hassan detailed Corbett’s long history of sexual abuse, which had spanned several decades when sentencing him on Tuesday.

The court heard that Corbett had abused the Melton South boy for three years in the 1980s, including a period of which he was working for the Melton Shire Council.

After meeting the boy when he was nine years old and befriending his mother, Corbett followed the family from Melbourne to Geelong and then to Townsville in Queensland to continue the abuse.

A statement read to the court from the Melbourne victim described the “very profound harm” of the abuse.

The victim said since the abuse began he had lived in deep and resounding fear. He said Corbett turned his childhood into a place of neglect, fear and a constant state of powerlessness.

During the sentencing, Hassan said she was unable to find any evidence of remorse from Corbett or any explanation for his offending.

“Your offending was persistent, predatory and profoundly corrupting,” she said.

“You used the children as objects to be bought and sold and bought and sold for a pittance. This in my view about all other considerations is the most heinous aspect.

“You exploited the vulnerability of children living in poverty in a poor country.”

Corbett has been remanded since November 2021, and was on Tuesday sentenced to 11 years’ imprisonment with a non-parole period of eight years.

A 63-year-old Cabramatta man also connected to the paedophile ring is serving a 19-year prison sentence, following his arrest when returning to Sydney from Vietnam in October 2018. The man was found guilty of multiple child sex offence charges by a NSW court in June 2021, including six counts of rape.

Mark Sharer, AFP leading senior constable, said the federal police was committed to protecting children both abroad and in Australia.

“Our investigators are committed to identifying these offenders wherever they may reside in the world,” he said.

“Trying to hide these abhorrent actions by travelling overseas will not stop us from locating offenders, seizing evidence and putting them before the courts.

“The AFP will continue to work tirelessly to identify and prosecute those preying on children.”

Members of the public who have information about people involved in child abuse are urged to contact the Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation at:

https://www.accce.gov.au/report

If you or someone you know is affected by child sexual abuse and online exploitation, support services are available at:

https://www.accce.gov.au/help-and-support/who-can-help

If you know abuse is happening right now or a child is at risk, call police immediately on 000.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/melbourne-man-pleads-guilty-to-sexually-abusing-melbourne-boy-and-children-overseas-20231024-p5eepx.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19798419

File: 52f16df1bec7926⋯.jpg (153.01 KB,1950x1097,1950:1097,Andrew_Donald_Steele_is_ac….jpg)

File: 67150598d19ea9b⋯.png (1.3 MB,1431x803,1431:803,Screen_Shot_2023_09_02_at_….png)

File: c294433e8adf712⋯.png (941.86 KB,1256x706,628:353,Screen_Shot_2023_09_14_at_….png)

File: 3b1a0818f741f33⋯.jpg (157.64 KB,1282x721,1282:721,Mr_Steele_was_arrested_aft….jpg)

File: f478586fa93b107⋯.jpg (384.07 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Detectives_Carla_Corbitt_S….jpg)

>>19518366

SA JACET says two girls allegedly abused by Andrew Donald Steele rescued from sexual slavery by international investigation

Two girls have been freed from alleged child sexual slavery in the Philippines - and SA’s elite police now allege an Adelaide man paid to participate in their abuse both online and in person.

Sean Fewster - October 25, 2023

Two young girls have been rescued from alleged sexual slavery in the Philippines following investigations into an Adelaide man by SA’s elite child-rescuing police team.

The Advertiser can reveal the children are the alleged victims of Andrew Donald Steele, who faced the Adelaide Magistrates Court on Wednesday charged with exploitation crimes.

Mr Steele, prosecutors have previously alleged, paid international pedophiles almost $50,000 over six years to abuse little girls while he watched and directed their crimes via the internet.

They further alleged the offending was so “intense and severe” that his victims were abused as frequently as 300 times in just 24 days.

On Wednesday, they told the court more charges would soon be laid - alleging Mr Steele had travelled overseas and physically abused his victims in person.

Outside court, the Joint Anti Child Exploitation Team said that, after arresting Mr Steele in May, it consulted with AFP international Liaison Officers in Manila.

The matter was referred to the Philippines Internet Crimes Against Children Center, which identified two of the alleged victims on the island of Bohol.

The girls were removed from harm and placed into the care of child protection services.

AFP Sergeant Joe Barry said this case highlighted the strength of the AFP’s national and international network and the commitment of all agencies to protect children around the world.

“The ability to share intelligence and resources with international partners is vital so that law enforcement can target and arrest those who prey on children,” Sgt Barry said.

“Child sexual abuse is an abhorrent crime and victims are re-victimised every time images or videos of the crimes are accessed and shared.”

AFP Manila Liaison Officer Detective Sergeant Daisie Beckensall said international partnerships are critical in fighting online child exploitation.

“The close partnerships between the AFP Manila office and the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) Anti Human Trafficking Division during this investigation highlights the importance of working together to remove children from harm.”

NBI Attorney Catherine Nolsasco said the arrest of the man in Australia and the removal of the alleged victims in the Philippines is a demonstration of how law enforcement authorities collaborate.

“The NBI, with its strong partnership with the AFP, will continue to be relentless in fighting online sexual exploitation of children.”

ABF Inspector Mel Duncan said officers can examine passenger’s electronic devices at the border as part of their role to detect and disrupt illegal activity, which includes the storage and dissemination of child abuse material.

“While we of course wish our officers never had to come across this type of abhorrent material, it is results like this that underline the critical importance of our role in carefully inspecting digital devices at the border,” Inspector Duncan said.

“Through the use of sharp intelligence, targeting and profiling techniques, ABF officers helped trigger an investigation that has removed two vulnerable children from harm’s way.”

Mr Steele, 65, of Yankalilla, has yet to plead to nine offences that carry a maximum 30-year prison term.

He is charged with one count each of persistently sexually exploiting a child outside of Australia, transmitting and producing exploitation material, and importing prohibited goods.

He is further charged with five counts of possessing or controlling child exploitation material.

It is alleged that, when passing through customs at Adelaide Airport in May 2023, Border Force officers found exploitation material on Mr Steele’s phone.

His arrest triggered further investigation by JACET, which allegedly found six electronic devices containing exploitation material throughout Mr Steele’s home.

On Wednesday, prosecutors asked Mr Steele’s case be postponed for a longer period than normal.

“There has been further disclosure including disclosure of contact offending overseas,” they said.

“That’s going to take some time to assess.”

Magistrate Karim Soetratma remanded Mr Steele in custody to answer the charges in Feburary.

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-sa/sa-jacet-says-two-girls-allegedly-abused-by-andrew-donald-steele-rescued-from-sexual-slavery-by-international-investigation/news-story/6a808bc5282973fcf973029ed4ddcdca

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/children-removed-harm-philippines-following-international-investigation

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c116fc No.19804919

Australian Court Rules Against Carnival in Landmark COVID-19 Case

by Lewis Jackson Reuters October 25, 2023

SYDNEY, Oct 25 (Reuters) – Carnival Corp’s Australian unit has been ordered to pay the medical expenses of a woman who contracted COVID-19, with a judge ruling that the cruise ship operator misled passengers about safety risks in a landmark class action ruling.

The decision from Australia’s Federal Court is the first class action win against a cruise ship operator in the world, according to Shine Lawyers, who represent about 1,000 plaintiffs in the suit.

Justice Angus Stewart found Carnival Australia misled passengers about the measures it had in place to keep passengers from contracting the virus and that it should have cancelled the March 2020 return voyage from Sydney to New Zealand.

Lead plaintiff Susan Karpik was awarded A$4,423.48 ($2,826) for out-of-pocket medical expenses but no damages.

The courts must now decide on the common claims of the remaining parties to the class action, a spokesperson for Shine Lawyers told Reuters.

“It’s of course only a partial win as 28 lives were lost on this cruise,” Karpik said in a statement.

“There are many individuals and families who will never recover from this loss.”

Karpik, who was along with her husband Henry had been a passenger on Ruby Princess, had claimed more than A$360,000, in part due to the psychological distress of her husband’s two-month hospitalisation with the virus.

Carnival Australia said in a statement it was considering the judgment in detail.

The Ruby Princess was for a time Australia’s biggest single source of COVID infection after 2,651 passengers, many feeling unwell, were allowed to leave the ship helping spread the virus across the country and internationally.

Ultimately around 900 cases and 28 deaths would be linked to the outbreak.

A 2020 public inquiry into the outbreak concluded New South Wales state health officials made “inexcusable” mistakes when they allowed passengers to disembark.

https://gcaptain.com/australian-court-rules-against-carnival-landmark-covid-19-case/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805035

File: ab90aa1fdd1f6d8⋯.jpg (1.97 MB,3958x2639,3958:2639,Jodie_Haydon_and_Prime_Min….jpg)

File: b8c56187f3a5726⋯.jpg (1.41 MB,4000x2715,800:543,Caroline_Kennedy_U_S_ambas….jpg)

File: 9f71a6b17250017⋯.jpg (311.19 KB,1200x1635,80:109,Artist_Monica_Coleman_and_….jpg)

File: 93876fa6deb6359⋯.jpg (5.34 MB,5701x3801,5701:3801,Biden_told_guests_that_Aus….jpg)

File: dc126e918b09469⋯.jpg (6.83 MB,5014x3343,5014:3343,Australia_s_ambassador_to_….jpg)

>>19785767

>>19792290

‘All downhill from here, my darling’: PM’s one regret about US state dinner

Farrah Tomazin - October 26, 2023

Washington: The White House was adorned with a large Australian flag. The decor inside was inspired by the shared landscapes of both countries. And guests arrived to a band playing an instrumental version of Crowded House’s hit Don’t Dream It’s Over.

Five months after abruptly cancelling a much-anticipated trip to Australia to deal with a looming debt crisis in Washington, US President Joe Biden gave Prime Minister Anthony Albanese the highest diplomatic honour reserved for an ally: a lavish state dinner.

After a day filled with ceremony and diplomacy - a 21-gun salute on the White House south lawn; a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office - the two world leaders reconvened in the evening for a glitzy black-tie event with more than 300 guests to celebrate their enduring alliance.

Albanese arrived at the north portico of the White House in a chauffeur-driven limousine just before 7pm, where he was greeted by the president, who was wearing a black suit and tie, and first lady Jill Biden, who wore a silver and blush gown embroidered with leaf motifs.

The prime minister’s partner, Jodie Haydon, was equally striking in a draped tulle gown by Australian label Paolo Sebastian, featuring embroidery of native flora and fauna such as kookaburras and wattle.

“We both did very well,” Biden quipped to Albanese before the couples walked inside.

Soon after, the pair entered a temporary outdoor pavilion that had been built on the South Lawn, where a patchwork of guests had been mingling: from politicians and policy wonks, to musicians, actors and captains of industry.

Australia’s ambassador, Kevin Rudd, was spotted near the front of the room having had a lengthy discussion with Republican congressman Michael McCaul, whose party finally appointed a Speaker earlier in the day after weeks of infighting.

Australian musicians The Kid Laroi and Vance Joy worked their respective tables, while the US ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas Greenfield, gave a warm embrace to White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.

And as the leaders prepared to give a toast before dinner was served, Albanese joked that he “only had one regret about tonight, which is I’m not quite sure how I top this for date night with Jodie, at any time, anywhere in the future”.

“It’s all downhill from here, my darling,” he told her.

The state dinner is a tradition that dates back to 1874, when Ulysses Grant hosted the king of Hawaii. Usually, it’s a festive affair filled with celebrities and billionaires, and with music and entertainment well into the night.

This one, however, was set against the backdrop of a war in Ukraine and an escalating conflict in the Middle East - something that resulted in the first lady shelving plans for The B-52s to perform their party hits. Members of the band were instead dinner guests, while a military band played on the stage.

The global challenges were not lost on Biden or Albanese, either.

As Israel prepares for a ground war in the Gaza Strip, closer to home, news that 22 people had been killed during a mass shooting in Maine was delivered to the president during his dinner. Biden stepped out briefly to call the governor and offer his full federal support.

“We live in a world that keeps changing. Yet one thing that keeps the ground firm beneath us is the great constant that is the American spirit,” Albanese said as he toasted Biden.

“It is a spirit Australians identify with. With a small population but big imagination, we punch above our weight - all the while drawing inspiration from our friends across the Pacific. We stand as close as we have ever been.”

Biden was equally laudatory, describing Albanese as a good friend, and Australia as a nation prepared to “face tough challenges and with the courage to fight for a better future”.

But he also turned to the theme the pair had discussed throughout the day: the growing threat of China.

“A great deal of the history of our world will be written in the Indo-Pacific in the coming years. Australia and the United States must - must - write that story together,” Biden said. “To advance freedom, security and prosperity for all.”

As fireworks burst in the night sky outside, Biden raised his glass.

“To our partnership, to our mateship and the future we will create together. Cheers!”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/all-downhill-from-here-my-darling-pm-s-one-regret-about-us-state-dinner-20231026-p5ef7u.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805051

File: b9139102d9d3197⋯.mp4 (15.74 MB,640x360,16:9,PM_and_US_President_hold_k….mp4)

>>19505163

>>19785767

Albanese and Biden stress importance of AUKUS pact amid global tensions

Richard Wood - Oct 26, 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Joe Biden have presented a united front amid current global uncertainty after holding talks in Washington.

Albanese arrived at the White House on Wednesday (Thursday AEDT) as a military band played and 4000 guests watched from the South Lawn.

The pair later held a press conference during which they reiterated the importance of the Australian-United States alliance in what Biden said was a difficult time, with ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

It was part of a state visit intended to bolster American ties in the Pacific against the backdrop of fighting between Israel and Hamas.

Albanese said the relationship between the two nations was one of "trust'.

"I regard the United States as a very reliable partner. I regard the relationship that I have with the President as second to none of the relationships that I have around the world or, indeed, domestically for that matter," he said.

Both leaders also stressed advance the $370 billion AUKUS defence deal between Australia, Britain and the US, under which the Australian navy will acquire nuclear-powered submarines.

Albanese said he was confident the US Congress would pass key legislation, enabling the AUKUS pact to proceed despite concerns by some Republican members.

"I'm very confident in the discussions that I've had with Democrats and Republicans that there is very broad support for the AUKUS arrangements, that there will be support for the legislation going forward and I think that would be a very good thing," he said.

"It is in the interests of Australia, but it's also in the interests of the United States and everyone that I have spoken to similarly in the United Kingdom, across the political spectrum, are all supportive of the AUKUS arrangements."

Biden said he was confident the necessary legislation would be passed by the end of his current term of office.

"It is overwhelmingly in our interests," the president said.

That looks more likely after weeks of US political chaos ended with the election of Republican Mike Johnson as the new House Speaker.

The US President said AUKUS was not a threat to China but about maintaining stability in the Indo Pacific region.

"It is about maintaining stability, stability in the straits, the Indian Ocean, the whole area.

"It is going to increase the prospects for long-term peace rather than anything else."

Biden and Albanese also announced measures to build infrastructure Pacific nations to counter China's growing influence.

They included Australian-US funding to build a new subsea cable to improve internet connectivity in the region.

Albanese acknowledged there was "strategic competition" in the Indo Pacific region.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/anthony-albanese-and-joe-biden-hold-white-house-talks/b2459e94-0d88-4b34-a0a2-9e125f4b7724

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805059

File: 5b8306216c6f477⋯.jpg (684.96 KB,2270x1513,2270:1513,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: f6b82631c4f50fb⋯.jpg (619.92 KB,2163x1635,721:545,Joe_Biden_with_his_son_Bea….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19785767

Albanese quotes Biden’s late son in White House speech

David Crowe and Farrah Tomazin - October 26, 2023

1/2

Washington: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has backed the “moral clarity” of United States President Joe Biden in his response to the conflict in the Middle East, in an address at the White House that amplifies Australian support at a time of American concern about the rise of China.

Albanese cited words spoken by Biden’s late soldier son to highlight the strength of the alliance between the two countries, two weeks before he visits Beijing for talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

With the Biden administration calling China a “strategic competitor” that cannot match the power of American alliances around the world, the prime minister used his ceremonial welcome to the White House to pledge common cause with the US.

The prime minister prepared the remarks to begin a day of formal meetings with Biden and US cabinet secretaries before a state dinner with political and business leaders that could build support for the AUKUS pact on nuclear-powered submarines.

While cheerful 1980s new wave group the B52s will no longer be performing at the state dinner due to concern this could seem tone-deaf when innocent lives were being lost in Israel and Gaza, the function is expected to include celebrity guests to highlight Australian ties with the US.

Referring directly to the war in Ukraine as well as the Hamas terror attack on Israel and Palestinian casualties in Gaza, the prime minister described the alliance as a defence of freedom and peace.

“That is the heart of our alliance. The soul of our partnership,” he told guests at the ceremonial welcome on the south lawn of the White House.

“Not a pact against a common enemy, a pledge to a common cause.

“That is why Ukrainian soldiers are driving Australian-made Bushmasters as they drive back an illegal and immoral invasion.

“And it is why all Australians condemn the atrocities, terror and pitiless brutality of Hamas. And, Mr President, we applaud the personal resolve you have brought to this troubled part of the world. You have spoken with moral clarity and you have stood up for a simple principle. The principle that every innocent life matters, Israeli and Palestinian. And that in any conflict, every effort must be made to protect civilians.”

Quoting an American talking about his time in the Iraq war, Albanese cited a soldier saying: “You know when there’s an Australian with you, they’ll always have your back.” He will then tell the crowd at the White House that the remark came from Major Beau Biden.

The president’s son died of cancer in 2015, at the age of 46. Biden told the story of his son’s remark when he visited Australia as vice-president in 2016.

White House officials emphasised the importance of the personal ties between Biden and Albanese when the US focus on the Indo-Pacific region was “right at the top of the list” of American priorities.

US National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said the Australian visit this week was a sign of the importance of alliances in the Indo-Pacific, adding strategic competitors such as Russia and China could not match the US in building partnerships.

“They’re not even close to the alliances and partnerships that we have,” Kirby said in a briefing with reporters at the Australian embassy in Washington DC.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805063

File: 54865e4925fade4⋯.jpg (1.02 MB,1639x2048,1639:2048,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 52ff71fbe5645c2⋯.jpg (1.47 MB,2699x3598,2699:3598,Australia_s_US_ambassador_….jpg)

>>19805059

2/2

The White House meetings come at a time of tension between the US and China, with US authorities releasing video footage of Chinese fighters “buzzing” US surveillance aircraft in the South China Sea, but also as tensions ease between Australia and China after several years of trade sanctions and diplomatic friction.

Albanese will visit China from November 4 to 7 to meet Xi in Beijing and attend a business expo in Shanghai, as well as marking 50 years since the Australian government under Labor prime minister Gough Whitlam recognised the People’s Republic of China after decades of formal recognition for Taiwan.

In the US, however, the White House describes China as a “strategic competitor” and turns to allies including Australia to help maintain regional security.

“It’s a competition that we mean to succeed in,” said Kirby.

“And that means being able to cooperate where we can, communicate where we must, and obviously, as appropriate, work to counter some of the PRC’s intimidation, coercion, excessive maritime claims.

“I mean, so we’re taking a holistic view of this relationship. We believe that again, more open lines of communication with China is a good thing.”

With chaos in Congress casting a shadow over the Prime Minister’s trip, diplomats and politicians in Washington have spent the past few weeks scrambling to mitigate the impact while the Republicans in the House of Representatives have struggled to choose a new Speaker.

Democrat Congressman Joe Courtney spoke to US Ambassador Kevin Rudd on Saturday, and even then, “everyone was still trying to think if there was a way to rescue the joint address” that Albanese was hoping to give to Congress.

One idea was to see if the Senate could accommodate such a speech, but with only 100 seats in the chamber, compared to 435 in the House of Representatives, it wasn’t possible under parliamentary rules.

Instead, Albanese will meet with members of the Senate and House who oversee defence and intelligence policy in Congress, as well as members of the Friends of Australia caucus, which is co-chaired by Courtney.

Others will then have a chance to meet the prime minister on Capitol Hill, although it is still not clear how many people may be available given the ongoing battle to find a speaker for the House of Representatives.

“The initial plan was to have a joint address, but unfortunately, it’s one of the examples of collateral damage in not having a Speaker - you can’t convene the House,” Courtney said.

“You can’t control what is going on right now with the Republican speaker problem, but it really would have been a great opportunity for the Prime Minister to give his viewpoint from the region at such a critical time.

“But we’ve certainly been getting the word out to as many members as possible that we think people should show respect for a great ally, and we’re hopeful we’re going to have a sizeable turnout.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-quotes-biden-s-dead-son-in-white-house-speech-20231025-p5eexh.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805097

File: 87c8939bf9b85ac⋯.jpg (1.61 MB,4799x3199,4799:3199,Jodie_Haydon_Prime_Ministe….jpg)

File: 60da5b00fb9c32f⋯.jpg (2.07 MB,5286x3524,3:2,US_President_Joe_Biden_has….jpg)

File: a29eb033debb4f6⋯.jpg (748.49 KB,3208x2139,3208:2139,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 321ba0b28ad9617⋯.jpg (654.53 KB,3150x2100,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19505163

>>19785767

‘Trust but verify’: Biden warns Albanese on risks of dealing with China

David Crowe - October 26, 2023

1/2

United States President Joe Biden has warned Australia about the risks of dealing with China and vowed to press ahead with the AUKUS pact on nuclear-powered submarines, in a press conference with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese that emphasised America’s commitment to stability in Asia.

Biden said his administration would take on China and present the US as a more reliable partner in the region, but he made it clear that this “extreme competition” did not mean he wanted conflict.

The president made the remarks while standing with Albanese at a press conference in the rose garden of the White House after a ceremonial welcome and a meeting in the Oval Office to project the strength of the Australian alliance with the US.

With Albanese due to visit Beijing within a fortnight to hold talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the comments in Washington sent the message that Australia could trust the US more than China.

“Trust but verify is the phrase,” Biden said when asked if Australia could trust China.

“China is having their own internal and external difficulties right now.

“China’s economic growth is stagnant compared to what it was. China has engaged in activities, that Russia and many others have engaged in, in terms of intimidation with other countries.”

Biden emphasised US plans to heighten strategic competition with China and take on big Chinese spending plans like the Belt and Road Initiative, which finances major infrastructure projects but has left some countries with big debts to Chinese lenders.

“His Belt and Road Initiative, well, we’re going to compete on that, and we’re doing it a different way,” Biden said.

“The Belt and Road Initiative has been a debt and a noose for most of the people who have signed on. We are working with our G7 partners to provide infrastructure for the nations that he’s trying to deal with.”

Biden also used an earlier meeting to send a public message to Xi that the US is committed to its role in peace and stability in the Pacific as part of its alliance with Australia.

Biden used a meeting with Albanese in the Oval Office to recount a conversation with Xi in which the Chinese leader asked why the US was so engaged with Australia.

Biden’s remark, made in the Oval Office as he sat with Albanese in front of American and Australian media, sent a clear signal about the US commitment to the Indo Pacific.

Biden sat for talks with Albanese in the Oval Office and revealed a question he had been asked by Chinese President Xi Jinping about Australia several years ago.

“I was asked by Xi Jinping a couple of years ago why I was working so hard with your country,” Biden said.

He added that his reply to the Chinese leader was, “We’re a Pacific nation, the United States. We are, and we’re going to stay that way.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805107

File: b5f8ef23b0bed12⋯.jpg (1.56 MB,5137x3425,5137:3425,President_of_the_United_St….jpg)

File: a533d7aa1079a20⋯.jpg (1.46 MB,3842x2561,3842:2561,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 41d392422cf0236⋯.jpg (1.42 MB,4615x3077,4615:3077,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 96c78bc388b3fff⋯.jpg (2.23 MB,3996x2664,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19805097

2/2

On the AUKUS pact, Biden said he believed the Congress would back the agreement on nuclear-powered submarines given Australia was making a significant investment to build the new vessels.

A key barrier to the pact is a delay in Congress to pass changes to defence laws to allow the US to share nuclear propulsion technology with Australia.

Asked if he could give a personal guarantee that AUKUS would be in place by the end of this presidential term, so it could be “future-proofed” from changes in other administrations, Biden responded: “Do you know anyone in elected office who can give a personal guarantee what happens?”

He added: “I’m going to try and I believe it will get done.”

The comments came after Albanese was welcomed to the White House with a 21-gun salute, an honour guard and two marching bands, while guests watched on the south lawn of the presidential residence.

Invited to the White House south lawn to watch the ceremonial welcome for Albanese and his partner, Jodie Haydon, were Australian Industry Group chief Innes Willox, ACTU president Michele O’Neil, NRL boss Peter V’landys, ACCI chief Andrew McKellar, Australian of the Year Taryn Brumfitt, Business Council of Australia chief Bran Black, New York consul-general Heather Ridout and University of Canberra chancellor Tom Calma.

They were joined by Resources Minister Madeleine King, ambassador Kevin Rudd and wife Therese, and members of the Prime Minister’s delegation including chief of staff Tim Gartrell and foreign policy advisor Kathy Klugman.

Biden introduced Albanese to members of the official party including Vice President Kamala Harris, Climate Change Envoy John Kerry and Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

The two leaders inspected the honour guard and then delivered their speeches to the crowd gathered on the south lawn, with the White House estimating the welcome was watched by 3982 guests.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/trust-but-verify-biden-warns-albanese-on-risks-of-dealing-with-china-20231026-p5ef3d.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805135

File: b3afbe96683f018⋯.mp4 (2.03 MB,640x360,16:9,Resurfaced_video_of_Anthon….mp4)

>>19699368

>>19749528

Extraordinary footage resurfaces of Anthony Albanese at a pro-Palestine rally in Sydney

KYLIE STEVENS - 26 October 2023

Extraordinary footage has resurfaced of Anthony Albanese addressing supporters at a free Palestine rally early on in his political career.

The decades-old grainy footage shows the future Prime Minister condemning the actions of the Israeli military at a protest at Martin Place in Sydney's CBD.

The clip obtained by Sky News shows Mr Albanese among a crowd of protesters standing next to a banner that reads, 'Stop the Israeli slaughter, free Palestine now'.

He's seen using a megaphone to condemn Israel's actions.

'The response of Israel has been to meet children throwing rocks with helicopters, with tanks and with missiles,' the future Prime Minister is heard saying.

The footage captions Mr Albanese as a 'federal Labor MP'. He's been the member for Grayndler since 1996.

The clip was aired by Sky News host Sharri Markson on her program on Wednesday night as she slammed the Prime Minister's 'staggering' comments this week on the Hamas-Israel conflict.

'Mr Albanese has over his entire career spoken out against Israel and in support of Palestinians,' she said.

'We're now seeing Albanese show his true colours. He could only stay on message for so long.''

Mr Albanese did slam the pro-Palestine rally held outside the Sydney Opera House on October 9, saying it was 'horrific' and admitting it should not have gone ahead.

Members of the rally were heard chanting 'gas the Jews', others hurled flares at the police while some attempted to set fire to the Israeli flag before stomping on it.

The Prime Minister is currently in the US where he's met US President Joe Biden at the White House and attended a state dinner on Wednesday.

He recently announced that he won't be visiting Israel, unlike President Biden, sparking questions from Australian Jewish leaders.

The prime minister is also yet to speak with Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu since Hamas' attack on Israel on October 7.

It comes as Mr Albanese refused to respond to calls from French president Emmanuel Macron for world leaders to join forces to fight Hamas.

'Our priority has been getting people in Israel but also in Gaza, who want to leave and are Australian citizens, out,' Mr Albanese told reporters in the US this week.

'We've also continued to emphasis the importance of humanitarian support for people in Gaza.'

'I continue to emphasise that Australia's position is for the protection of innocent lives, we mourn as a nation every innocent life which has been lost in the conflict, whether it be Israeli or Palestinian.'

Australian Jewish Association president David Adler criticised Mr Albanese for not making a trip to Israel.

'He's on a trip (to the US) at the moment, we would have liked to see him go via Israel to show solidarity at this time,' Mr Adler said.

'There has yet to be a senior Australian representative to make that gesture. It should be the prime minister as the leader of the country.

'The trip should have been arranged, he is in the northern hemisphere anyway and showing solidarity would have been well-received.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12672897/Extraordinary-footage-resurfaces-Anthony-Albanese-pro-Palestine-rally-Sydney.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805159

File: e73c85b21a62e2d⋯.mp4 (15.9 MB,640x360,16:9,Albanese_s_focus_in_Israel….mp4)

>>19699368

>>19749528

>>19805135

'True colours': Anthony Albanese’s past appearances at pro-Palestine rallies laid bare in resurfaced protest video

Archive footage has resurfaced of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese passionately condemning Israel’s “occupation” of Palestine while attending a protest.

Reilly Sullivan - October 25, 2023

Resurfaced news footage has revealed Anthony Albanese’s past appearances at pro-Palestine rallies earlier in his parliamentary career.

Sky News Australia host Sharri Markson revealed the clip on Wednesday evening while covering the Prime Minister’s state visit to the United States to visit President Joe Biden.

“Albanese has over his entire Parliamentary career spoken out against Israel and in support of Palestinians,” she said before cutting to the resurfaced footage.

In the grainy video, Mr Albanese can be seen protesting against Israel’s “occupation” of Palestine in Sydney’s Martin Place next to a sign reading “Stop the Israeli Slaughter: Free Palestine now”.

Mr Albanese also uses a microphone to condemn the Israeli military.

“The response of Israel has been to meet children throwing rocks with helicopters, with tanks and with missiles,” the future Prime Minister said in the resurfaced clip.

The resurfaced clip comes just one day after French President Emmanuel Macron visited Israel and called for an international coalition of forces to fight Hamas.

Mr Albanese was asked about the French President’s commitment to Israel during a press conference on Wednesday but refused to back France's call for a coalition of forces to fight the terrorist organisation.

“Our priority has been getting people in Israel but also in Gaza - who want to leave and are Australian citizens - out. We’ve also continued to emphasise the importance of humanitarian support for people in Gaza,” he told reporters.

“I continue to emphasise that Australia’s position is for the protection of innocent lives, we mourn as a nation every innocent life which has been lost in the conflict, whether it be Israeli or Palestinian.”

Markson questioned why Mr Albanese would not “join the fight” against Hamas even though Australia "proudly" joined allies against ISIS in Syria and Iraq.

“The only difference as far as I can see it is that the Hamas victims are Israelis,” she said.

“We're now seeing Albanese show his true colours. He could only stay on message for so long.”

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/true-colours-anthony-albaneses-past-appearances-at-propalestine-rallies-laid-bare-in-resurfaced-protest-video/news-story/5e34fccbbd39b8f559bf3e4b036030a4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmA4d1aGjPQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805201

File: 553a824173617c5⋯.mp4 (15.9 MB,640x360,16:9,Chinese_money_laundering_s….mp4)

Chinese gangsters accused of laundering $228m through business spruiked by ex-minister

Nick McKenzie - October 25, 2023

1/2

A transnational crime syndicate is accused of laundering $228 million in dirty funds and tainted cryptocurrency via a money moving business spruiked by a former Howard government minister and allegedly secretly controlled by Chinese gangsters.

On Wednesday morning, Australian Federal Police officers from Operation Avarus-Nightwolf swooped on seven suspected Melbourne members of what agents called the “Long River” – an Australia wide crime syndicate – accusing them of serious financial crime.

Police suspect the syndicate laundered funds via the Changjiang remittance empire, which the crime group allegedly controlled and which was also used by unwitting members of the Chinese-Australian community to send billions of dollars abroad.

Operation Avarus-Nightwolf is significant not only due to the amount of the funds allegedly laundered but the premise that underpins the police case: that a Chinese criminal organisation was brazen enough to set up an Australian government licensed international money moving service, with dozens of shopfronts across Australia, and recruit unwitting former Howard government immigration minister Gary Hardgrave as a spruiker in 2022.

Federal police Eastern Command Assistant Commissioner Stephen Dametto said in a statement that the “alleged syndicate was operating in plain sight with shiny shopfronts across the country”, noting that syndicate members had “purchased false passports for $200,000 each” to allow them to flee Australia if they suspected law enforcement attention.

The 14-month AFP operation involves allegations that the Long River crime syndicate moved $228 million in dirty funds between 2020 and 2023. Police have also moved to restrain more than $50 million in luxury assets purchased by some of the seven suspects arrested on Wednesday, including a $10 million property in Melbourne’s eastern suburbs.

There is no suggestion Hardgrave is involved in any wrongdoing, is a police suspect or ever suspected Changjiang was involved in money laundering.

In a statement provided to the Australian Financial Review on Wednesday, Hardgrave said: “I was engaged to help spruik the business. I’m not involved in the day-to-day operations of the company.”

Police are alleging the Long River syndicate instructed its organised crime customers on how to disguise the movement of suspected dirty funds by using false invoices and other cover stories when sending funds to and from China, Australia and other destinations via Changjiang remitters.

Law enforcement intelligence briefings dated between 2017 and 2021 describe how Changjiang linked remittance businesses gained licences from AUSTRAC – Australia’s anti-money laundering agency – enabling them to move vast sums of money from as early as 2013.

The Avarus-Nightwolf arrests, along with a February AFP operation codenamed Midas and which has so far restrained assets in NSW worth at least $200 million, highlights the scale of Australia’s money laundering problem.

It underscores the challenge facing police as they combat a vast sea of dirty funds smuggled out of China in breach of Beijing’s strict capital flight laws or that have been generated via suspected fraud, corruption or drug trafficking.

The latest arrests also raise a question being increasingly asked by Western officials: what is the role of the Chinese Communist Party in supporting or turning a blind eye to dirty money movement from China to the West?

A senior NSW law enforcement official, who was interviewed by this masthead about Chinese money laundering, said there was a reluctance to openly discuss the true suspected scale of the problem or the Chinese government’s apparent failure to tackle it.

“It is just out of control. It is a huge international issue and there are overseas state actors involved,” the official said a fortnight ago. “People pretend that this doesn’t impact on the cost of living and housing, but it does. We [state and federal agencies] pick off some players but much more resourcing and legislative change is needed.”

This masthead can also reveal that historical federal police and AUSTRAC intelligence describe how a network of Changjiang-linked money remitters were moving hundreds of millions of dollars every year. One briefing document from 2020 states “$1.26 billion [was moved] … between January and September 2020”.

In late 2020, the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission also warned all state and federal police agencies that Changjiang had “become significantly more active in the suspected money laundering activities of the Chen MLO [money laundering organisation].”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805208

File: 579a97513f6f3c7⋯.jpg (1.51 MB,3543x2363,3543:2363,AFP_officers_raid_a_Changj….jpg)

File: c4082b2bbd97173⋯.jpg (5.64 MB,7848x4950,436:275,A_Changjiang_currency_exch….jpg)

File: d5bc2a65bd8fa48⋯.jpg (1.95 MB,2363x3543,2363:3543,AFP_arrest_one_man_in_Melb….jpg)

File: a1e868e7c86aec9⋯.jpg (168.83 KB,1876x1057,268:151,A_screenshot_of_former_imm….jpg)

File: 923884bd4bb139d⋯.jpg (1.31 MB,3543x2362,3:2,Federal_police_seize_a_lux….jpg)

>>19805201

2/2

The Chen MLO has previously been assessed by the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission as posing a grave risk to national security and accused in intelligence briefings of moving funds for fugitive drug boss Hakan Ayik and the notorious Khanani Middle Eastern crime syndicate.

Three years earlier, in 2017, AUSTRAC intelligence warned that suspected crime bosses and Chinese high rollers were cleaning and smuggling dirty money they had gambled at Australian casinos via a Changjiang linked remittance business in Melbourne. The business shares the same Hong Kong address as several Changjiang remittance companies, but carries a different name.

An AUSTRAC report from May 2017 stated that some of the remittance company’s customers included Melbourne businessman Stavro D’Amore, who is facing money laundering charges and is an associate of Mick Gatto, and Ming Chai, the cousin of Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Changjiang marketed itself to Australia’s Chinese community as providing a safe and reliable way to send funds between China and Australia.

In 2022, it recruited Hardgrave, who had been the immigration minister under prime minister John Howard. In one video the company posted on social media, Hardgrave described Changjiang as a firm with “with watertight security processes in place” that had established “multiple layers of due diligence”.

In its media statement, the AFP described how Changjiang’s decision to expand its money moving shopfronts in Sydney during the COVID lockdown was among the factors that prompted federal agents to concentrate their efforts on the business.

“While most of Sydney was a ghost town, alarm bells went off among our money laundering investigators when they noticed Changjiang operating two new shopfronts in the heart of Sydney,” Assistant Commissioner Dametto said.

Police suspect Changjiang was set up by Chinese-Australian money launderers who intermingled the proceeds of crime with legitimate fund transfers totalling at least $10 billion dollars over three years.

“While most of these funds were from customers engaged in lawful actions, the AFP will allege the company facilitated a system for organised criminals to secretly transfer unlawfully-obtained money … including from cyber-enabled scams, the trafficking of illicit goods and violent crimes,” the AFP said in a statement.

Police also allege that some of the money moved by Changjiang was stolen during a $100 million cyber scam that was shut down by the AFP and US Secret Service last year and has led to the arrest of seven people.

In February, the federal police investigators and forensic accountants who led Operation Avarus-Nightwolf separately dismantled an alleged Chinese-Australian money laundering organisation that amassed a blue-chip property portfolio comprised of Sydney mansions, a luxury city building and hundreds of acres of land near Sydney’s second airport.

In the Midas operation, the AFP seized properties and luxury assets worth at least $200 million and arrested and charged nine suspects, including two alleged Chinese-Australian gangsters in Sydney with a combined personal fortune estimated at more than $1 billion.

Money remitters including big names such as Western Union as well as lesser known companies such as Changjiang are commonly used by migrant communities to transfer funds quickly and cheaply to their families and businesses abroad.

In 2005, Australian authorities conducted the first major investigation targeting the remittance sector, with an operation codenamed Gordian arresting multiple Vietnamese remitters.

Since then, the Australian remittance industry has grown exponentially along with the influx of money from China and the sophistication of money launderers who seek to use technology to evade detection and co-mingle dirty money within the vast amounts of legitimate funds passing through the remittance sector.

Two senior law enforcement sources who recently briefed this masthead said anti-money laundering agency AUSTRAC has spent months pushing Treasury to strengthen the vetting and licensing of remittance providers amid fears criminal organisations can too easily register money moving businesses.

“Do we shut down the remittance sector? Or do we require more stringent entry requirements to be a remitter?” one source said.

The arrests on Wednesday will also ramp up pressure on the federal government to introduce long-stalled “Tranche 2” laws. The laws would force accountants, real estate agents and lawyers to face the same obligations as bankers and casinos to report suspected money laundering.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/chinese-gangsters-accused-of-laundering-228m-through-business-spruiked-by-ex-minister-20231025-p5eey8.html

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/seven-syndicate-members-charged-allegedly-laundering-almost-229-million

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805233

File: 2ab4659d1263a2b⋯.jpg (299.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_has_been_ch….jpg)

File: a6054d13b43aa49⋯.jpg (227.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_complainant_told_prose….jpg)

Bruce Lehrmann charged with two counts of rape in Toowoomba

For the first time, it can be revealed that Bruce Lehrmann is the “high-profile man” accused of rape after a night out in Queensland.

Samantha Maiden - October 26, 2023

1/2

Former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann has been charged with two counts of rape in relation to an incident alleged to have occurred after a night out in Queensland in October, 2021.

For the first time, it can be revealed that Mr Lehrmann is the “high-profile man” accused of rape in Toowoomba, west of Brisbane.

The matter was first listed in the Toowoomba Magistrates Court in January, 2023 but Mr Lehrmann has never been named until now.

The two charges pertain to an alleged incident with a woman Mr Lehrmann met in a Toowoomba nightclub weeks after he appeared in an ACT court over unrelated allegations he raped Brittany Higgins. That trial collapsed following an allegation of juror misconduct. Mr Lehrmann was never convicted and strongly denied all allegations.

Queensland Supreme Court judge Peter Applegarth rejected an application by Mr Lehrmann to continue an ongoing suppression order on his name at 5pm on Thursday, October 26.

Earlier, Mr Lehrmann’s legal team had challenged a ruling in the Toowoomba magistrates court that Mr Lehrmann could be named.

Mr Lehrmann’s legal team argued that the original decision should be overturned for reasons that included their client’s mental health, a risk the original magistrate acknowledged but did not find was strong enough for an ongoing suppression order.

“There’s no proper basis to draw the conclusion that a person’s risk is static,’’ Mr Lehrmann’s barrister Andrew Hoare told the Supreme Court. “It must be the risk is something which is fluid.”

However, after hearing the matter Justice Applegarth rejected the application and lifted the non-publication order.

“The applicant is the defendant in criminal proceedings before the magistrate’s court at Toowoomba, he applied to that court for a non publication order,’’ he said.

“Counsel for the applicant submitted on the material before it there was an existing risk of harm, which would be amplified by the publication of the applicants “identifying particulars.”

“In response, counsel for the prosecution and for certain media entities noted the unsatisfactory nature of the applicant’s evidence in support of the submission.

“The applicant gave no evidence but relied on an affidavit from his solicitor and psychologist’s report.

“I’ve concluded that, given the state of the evidence, it was open to a reasonable decision maker to not be satisfied that the non-publication was necessary to protect the safety of the applicant.

“The respondents relied upon what was submitted to the magistrate to be a contrast between the applicant’s public position as he presented in three television interviews between June and August 2023 and Dr. Brown’s description of him after June 2023.”

Mr Lehrmann has not yet been required to enter a plea. He has not yet been committed for trial, a process that will now play out in the magistrates court.

It was the appearance of Mr Lehrmann’s name in a Toowoomba Magistrates Court list in January that first prompted media outlets to report that a high-profile man had been charged with two counts of rape.

At the time, a Queensland Police Service spokesman confirmed a man had been charged and said he was scheduled to appear in court.

“Toowoomba Criminal Investigation Branch detectives have charged a man with the alleged rape of a young woman in October 2021,” police said.

“The man is scheduled to appear in Toowoomba Magistrates Court on January 11, 2023, charged with two counts of rape.”

But when Mr Lehrmann did not front court on that day, the Magistrate questioned his lawyers on why he was not present.

“He has a notice to appear today, why is he not here?” Magistrate Kay Ryan asked.

The accused’s lawyer, Rowan King, explained his client was in Tasmania and could not be present for medical reasons.

Mr Lehrmann has remained on bail since January 11, 2023, with conditions including that he surrender his passport.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805236

File: ee24ea202b486fc⋯.jpg (160.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mr_Lehrmann_has_yet_to_ent….jpg)

>>19805233

2/2

The Toowoomba Magistrates Court has previously heard that the complainant, a Toowoomba woman, had told prosecutors she wanted the man to be identified under new state laws.

The Director of Public Prosecutions Nicole Friedewald told the court that the complainant in the case wanted the man identified.

“She has taken an active position on this matter and instructed my office that she does wish for the applicant to be named. It is not a case that she has taken a neutral position or that she opposes it.

“She is desirous of him being identified and for the non-publication order not to be made,” Ms Friedewald said Magistrate Kelly had found the defendant was not formally linked to a mental health professional and was not prescribed medication.

Lawyers acting for Mr Lehrmann had opposed his identification on mental health grounds citing a letter from a psychologist raising concerns over suicidal ideation.

The decision to allow the media to name Mr Lehrmann follows a long running-legal battle to name him that has played out in the Queensland magistrates court and the Supreme Court.

Until this year, Queensland laws prohibited the identification of the accused prior to committal, a legal process that can take many months.

But those laws were changed, allowing the media to name Mr Lehrmann for the first time from midnight, October 3.

Under the new laws, the defendant, their alleged victim(s) or the prosecution can apply to a Queensland court for a non-publication order.

On September 30, just days before the changes came into force, Mr Lehrmann’s legal team sought a temporary suppression order protecting his identity due to the imminent change to Queensland laws.

Queensland Supreme Court Justice Peter Applegarth AM said the man intended to apply for a suppression order under the new laws “as soon as practicable”.

Justice Applegarth said the committal proceeding had “attracted publicity”, leading to “substantial risk” the high-profile man’s identity would be published before he had an opportunity to obtain a suppression order.

He said it would be “contrary to the interests of justice” if he were to not allow the application.

“The applicant’s right to apply should not be defeated by such publicity,” the judge said.

On the same day the Queensland Supreme Court handed down the interim suppression order, a Toowoomba magistrate complained that Mr Lehrmann’s lawyer “did not have the courtesy” to tell her court last week they had applied for a Supreme Court injunction to suppress the man’s identity.

The hearing was told the defendant had been seeing a psychologist, who had provided a letter mentioning suicidal ideation that formed part of his suppression order application.

Barrister Andrew Hoare, acting for Mr Lehrmann, said there was a “real existing risk of harm” to his client if his identity were to be published.

He said the man suffered from “severe” suicidal ideation that had manifested over years.

But Robert Anderson KC, representing the media outlets, said the high-profile man had not given evidence before the court, instead relying on his solicitors and his psychologist.

He noted Mr Lehrmann was prepared to go public with certain statements but was “unprepared” to face the court and give evidence himself.

On Friday, October 13, Magistrate Kelly, in the Toowoomba Magistrates Court rejected an application for a suppression order sought by the defendant.

“In my view the evidence relied upon doesn’t establish that the order is necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice,” she said.

“Having not been satisfied (that) the order is necessary. I refuse the application for a non-publication order.”

Mr Lehrmann did not attend the hearing and his lawyers submitted his mental health would be impacted if he was named.

But the matter was immediately appealed to the Queensland Supreme Court where Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers argued the judge had made an “error of law” by not finding there was a “risk of substantial harm” to his client if he was named.

That matter was heard on Tuesday, October 17 and Thursday, October, 26 by Justice Applegarth.

https://www.news.com.au/national/queensland/courts-law/bruce-lehrmann-charged-with-two-counts-of-rape-in-toowoomba/news-story/9f4f839cda8d280670cdafa223048a3d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805258

File: 798da6b70a8c6dd⋯.jpg (255.92 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_leaves_the_….jpg)

>>19805233

Bruce Lehrmann in dock on new rape charges

SARAH ELKS and STEPHEN RICE - OCTOBER 26, 2023

1/3

Bruce Lehrmann has been charged with rape after a young woman he met in a Toowoomba strip club Googled the Brittany Higgins rape case and then alleged she recognised him as the man who had unprotected sex with her without consent.

The alleged victim told police she realised it was the same man who introduced himself as “Bryce” when they met at the club in October 2021, only a few weeks after he first appeared in court over allegations he raped Ms Higgins in Parliament House.

Mr Lehrmann allegedly had consensual sex with the woman that night but failed to wear a condom when they had sex twice the next morning. Failing to wear a condom without a partner’s permission is considered sexual ­assault under Queensland law.

The 28-year-old was named on Thursday as the well-known Australian facing rape charges in ­Toowoomba after the Supreme Court of Queensland lifted a suppression order that had protected his identity.

The prosecution and media outlets, including The Australian, had fought in court to remove the non-publication order, arguing that it went against the principles of open justice and that Mr Lehrmann had no automatic protection under the new laws.

The former Liberal staffer was not present in court for the hearing, and remains on bail.

He is expected to plead not guilty to the charges.

Prosecutors in the ACT last year dropped charges against Mr Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Ms Higgins, saying a retrial of the case would pose an unacceptable risk to her health. The trial had earlier been aborted after a juror was found to have brought outside material into the jury room.

Mr Lehrmann was charged in January with two counts of rape by detectives from the Criminal Investigations Branch over the ­alleged offence in Toowoomba but has not yet been committed for trial.

The alleged victim said she met up with friends at the Powerhouse nightclub in Toowoomba’s CBD in October 2021, where she consumed alcohol before moving on to adult entertainment venue The Vault with two friends.

There, according to a police court brief, she “recalls socialising with friends, consuming more alcohol and a quantity of cocaine”.

At some point in the evening, she met Mr Lehrmann in the smokers’ area and talked to him before they left in a taxi to the house where he was staying with a friend.

The pair got into bed clothed. After a brief conversation, she said, she recalled that they kissed and she told him to put a condom on. She then claimed that she woke to find her legs open and Mr Lehrmann’s penis inside her.

The police brief states that she didn’t recall taking off her clothes or underwear.

Mr Lehrmann was holding up a bag of cocaine which he claimed to have found on her breast, she said.

“He emptied the cocaine on to the bedside table and cut it up into two lines with a card.”

She says she had one line and he had the other, according to the police brief.

She said the next thing she remembered was waking up the next morning with Mr Lehrmann having sex with her. She said she told him to stop. The woman claimed she felt groggy when he had sex with her a third time.

After establishing that he had ejaculated inside her, the woman said she told Mr Lehrmann she needed to get the morning-after pill. The pair then drove to a nearby pharmacy to get the morning-after pill, and she asked him to drive her home.

On the way, they stopped to pick up coffee from a McDonald’s drive-thru before Mr Lehrmann dropped her at her own home.

Over the following week, the pair engaged in conversation over social media plat­form SnapChat but soon lost contact.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805262

File: 9866075ecf64b06⋯.jpg (248.82 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_accused_M….jpg)

>>19805258

2/3

The woman says just over six weeks later, in November 2021, she was at home speaking with her flatmate’s mother when the conversation turned to the Higgins case; she decided to search the internet on her phone and realised the man was Mr Lehrmann.

The following day she reported the matter to Toowoomba police and later provided a formal ­witness statement. The Australian understands police will allege they have CCTV footage from the club showing the pair socialising and leaving together, as well as confirmation of the taxi booking in Mr Lehrmann’s name and receipts for the McDonald’s coffee.

Mr Lehrmann was granted bail after being charged, with conditions including that he not contact the complainant and that he surrender his passport, which was not opposed by police.

His lawyers have sought access to thousands of pages of data and messages from the woman’s phone, for up to six months prior to the date of the incident.

On Thursday, judge Peter ­Applegarth lifted an interim suppression order on Mr Lehrmann’s identity.

Earlier this month, Toowoomba magistrate Clare Kelly lifted a suppression order but delayed her decision to allow Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers to apply to the Supreme Court to keep it in place.

The media had been barred from naming Mr Lehrmann in several court appear­ances this year because previous laws protected the identity of people charged with serious sexual offences until they were committed to trial.

At the hearing on Thursday, Mr Lehrmann’s barrister, Andrew Hoare, argued that his client had experienced suicidal ideation during the past two years and was at risk of “catastrophic” self-harm, including suicide, if the non-publication order was lifted.

Mr Hoare said Ms Kelly did not properly consider the risk to the man if he were named.

The court was read an excerpt from a report from a forensic ­psychologist who treated the man, which said: “My concern for the applicant has been alarmed due to the deterioration in his mental state.”

Justice Applegarth said that just because there was a high risk did not mean a non-publication order was necessary. “What can one make of the state of the defendant’s psychology at the moment, and what protective measures are available to him to reduce that identified risk?

“I dare say many people facing the criminal justice system are having suicidal ideations … the existence of suicidal ideations is not necessarily sufficient to establish the level of unacceptable risk (to justify) non-publication.”

Justice Applegarth questioned whether if a non-publication order were granted, other people’s rights – including the media and members of the public – would be affected.

“Absent this order, someone can come into the public gallery of the Toowoomba Magistrates Court and hear what goes on and report it when they go home to someone when they’re having dinner,” Justice Applegarth said.

“(And) a large media entity, small media entity, a reporter from the Toowoomba Chronicle has the right to report matters, including identifying matters (of) the defendant.”

Justice Applegarth said if an order was made, media organisations would lose that right.

“The evidence before the magistrate included evidence that the potential naming of the applicant (Mr Lehrmann) prior to the conclusion of the committal proceeding weighed heavily on him and had affected his mental health,” Justice Applegarth found.

“This unfortunate effect on his mental health permitted, but did not compel a finding that a non-publication order was necessary to protect the applicant’s safety.”

In his detailed reasons, the judge noted that Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers failed to prove that a non-publication order was necessary for his protection.

“The evidence included the presentation of the applicant in media interviews, and the fact that he made no mention in them of being in a poor psychological state for reasons he did not wish to disclose to the public,” he said.

“Instead, he presented to the public, for reasons neither he, his solicitor, nor his psychologist adequately explained to the magistrate, as someone who was keen to litigate pending defamation cases and ‘light some fires’.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805266

File: db8f3b24f80148e⋯.jpg (438.89 KB,1752x2336,3:4,The_media_has_been_barred_….jpg)

>>19805262

3/3

Mr Lehrmann’s submissions had been backed by an expert report from forensic psychologist James Brown, who had treated him several times.

Dr Brown said Mr Lehrmann had reported a “depressed mood and suicidal ideation” in February 2021, when Ms Higgins’s allegations against him were first published in the media.

The “triggering event” for Mr Lehrmann’s “adjustment disorder with depressed mood” was the airing of those allegations, Dr Brown said.

The psychologist saw him frequently during those first six months, and then about monthly from October 2021 until the abandonment of his criminal trial in December 2022.

Mr Lehrmann was charged with the two fresh counts of rape in January 2023, in relation to an alleged attack in Toowoomba in October 2021. “Dr Brown reported that (Mr Lehrmann) had reached out to him in 2023 on a number of occasions for crisis support in times where he was struggling to cope with his ongoing situation,” Justice Applegarth’s judgment said.

He had relocated interstate and was “said to have expressed ‘feelings of hopelessness and helplessness, combined with … insecure housing and financial strain’ that caused Dr Brown to be concerned that the applicant ‘remains a high risk to himself under the pressures he is facing, and to allow him to be identified in the current matter may result in dire consequences’.”

Lawyers for the media organisations argued that Mr Lehrmann had courted media attention in four nationally broadcast television interviews between June and August this year: two on Channel 7’s Spotlight program, one on Sky News with Sharri Markson, and one on Channel 7’s Sunrise.

In the interviews, Mr Lehrmann disclosed that he was suicidal for “a little while there in the start of 2021” and that March 2021 was one of his lowest points, but also a turning point.

“On Channel 7’s Spotlight program on 4 June, 2023, the applicant stated ‘Let’s light some fires’ and later said ‘Everything needs to be out there, in the open, so people can assess this for what it is’,” Justice Applegarth said.

“I hope that Channel 7 paid him or his solicitor a lot of money, for the consequences it has had on this application, if nothing else,” the judge quipped.

It was also revealed that while Dr Brown said Mr Lehrmann was at risk of suicide if he was named, he was not taking any medication for his depression, and Dr Brown was not treating him regularly.

The alleged rape case returns to the Toowoomba Magistrates Court on November 1.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/bruce-lehrmann-named-as-toowoomba-rape-accused/news-story/fb5a049c4a24f607d790ae7b3da11ffd=

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805276

File: 4304bdb3926b854⋯.jpg (61.95 KB,1542x867,514:289,Bruce_Lehrmann_has_been_ch….jpg)

>>19805233

Why we couldn’t tell you Bruce Lehrmann was charged with rape until now

The reason no one could report Bruce Lehrmann as the high-profile man accused of rape in Toowoomba can now be revealed.

Samantha Maiden - October 26, 2023

1/3

The media have not been legally able to report on the identity of Bruce Lehrmann until now under Queensland laws that suppressed the identity of the accused in sexual assault cases until or unless they are committed to stand trial.

Those laws were changed in September, bringing Queensland into line with most other states and territories to allow the naming of accused sex offenders after they are charged.

Despite the change in the law, the legal fight to name him has continued to play out in the Queensland Supreme Court and the Toowoomba Magistrates Court after his legal team sought a suppression order.

The media has instead reported on multiple court hearings in relation to the matter for the past year by simply referring to a “high-profile man” accused of rape in Toowoomba, west of Brisbane. That was until today.

The two charges pertain to an alleged incident with a woman Mr Lehrmann met in a Toowoomba nightclub weeks after he appeared in an ACT court over unrelated allegations he raped Brittany Higgins. That trial collapsed following an allegation of juror misconduct. Mr Lehrmann was never convicted and strongly denied all allegations.

Queensland Supreme Court judge Peter Applegarth rejected an application by Mr Lehrmann to continue an ongoing suppression order on his name at 5pm on Thursday, October 26.

Earlier, Mr Lehrmann’s legal team had challenged a ruling in the Toowoomba magistrates court that Mr Lehrmann could be named.

Mr Lehrmann’s legal team argued that the original decision should be overturned for reasons that included their client’s mental health, a risk the original magistrate acknowledged but did not find was strong enough for an ongoing suppression order.

“There’s no proper basis to draw the conclusion that a person’s risk is static,’’ Mr Lehrmann’s barrister Andrew Hoare told the Supreme Court.

“It must be the risk is something which is fluid.”

However, after hearing the matter Justice Applegarth rejected the application and lifted the non-publication order.

“The applicant is the defendant in criminal proceedings before the magistrate’s court at Toowoomba, he applied to that court for a non publication order,’’ he said.

“Counsel for the applicant submitted on the material before it there was an existing risk of harm, which would be amplified by the publication of the applicants “identifying particulars.”

“In response, counsel for the prosecution and for certain media entities noted the unsatisfactory nature of the applicant’s evidence in support of the submission.

“The applicant gave no evidence but relied on an affidavit from his solicitor and psychologist’s report.

“I’ve concluded that, given the state of the evidence, it was open to a reasonable decision maker to not be satisfied that the non-publication was necessary to protect the safety of the applicant.

“The respondents relied upon what was submitted to the magistrate to be a contrast between the applicant’s public position as he presented in three television interviews between June and August 2023 and Dr. Brown’s description of him after June 2023.”

Mr Lehrmann has not yet been committed for trial or been required to enter a plea. He has not appeared in court for medical reasons.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805282

File: 3d3dfdf9fea8aa6⋯.jpg (85.21 KB,1528x860,382:215,Mr_Lehrmann_was_first_serv….jpg)

>>19805276

2/3

The complainant, a Toowoomba woman, has told prosecutors she wanted Mr Lehrmann to be identified under new state laws.

Mr Lehrmann was first served with a notice to appear in a Queensland court over the Toowoomba rape allegation on December 9, 2022.

The matter was first listed in the magistrates court in January, 2023.

Mr Lehrmann has remained on bail since January 11, 2023, with conditions including that he surrender his passport.

In February 2023, lawyers for media outlets including news.com.au, the Seven and Nine networks, and the ABC, applied to Magistrate Kay Philipson to use her discretionary powers to grant an exemption to Queensland’s Sexual Offences Act that prohibited naming people accused of rape unless and until they are committed to stand trial.

But Ms Philipson rejected that application on the grounds that under the “strict construction” of the law, she could not use those powers unless the matter proceeded to a committal hearing.

As those legal skirmishes played out, Queensland was preparing to legislate longstanding plans to allow the accused in sexual assault matters to be named prior to committal for trial.

Until this year, Queensland laws prohibited the identification of the accused prior to committal, a legal process that can take many months.

But those laws were changed this month, allowing the media to name Mr Lehrmann for the first time from midnight, October 3.

The new laws were a recommendation of the Women’s Safety and Justice Taskforce in July 2022, bringing Queensland into line with most other states and territories to allow the naming of accused sex offenders after they are charged.

Under the new laws, the defendant, their alleged victim(s) or the prosecution can apply to a Queensland court for a non-publication order.

In August, Mr Lehrmann’s lawyer had foreshadowed that he would apply to suppress his client’s identity in the event of the passage of the new laws that would allow media outlets to name him.

“It’s intended that in the next two to three weeks that there will be legislation coming in that will potentially allow the naming of my client and it’s intended that we make an application to maintain the suppression of my client from publication,” Mr King told the court.

On September 30, just days before the changes came into force, Mr Lehrmann’s legal team sought a temporary suppression order protecting his identity despite the imminent change to Queensland laws.

Queensland Supreme Court Justice Peter Applegarth AM said Mr Lehrmann intended to apply for a suppression order under the new laws “as soon as practicable”.

“The applicant seeks a temporary order from this Court to preserve the status quo until his application for an interim order in the Magistrates Court can be heard and determined,” Justice Applegarth said.

Justice Applegarth said the committal proceeding had “attracted publicity”, leading to “substantial risk” the high-profile man’s identity would be published before he had an opportunity to obtain a suppression order.

He said it would be “contrary to the interests of justice” if he were to not allow the application.

“The applicant’s right to apply should not be defeated by such publicity,” the judge said.

“Without such a temporary order his statutory right to apply for an [interim] order would be rendered nugatory and the application would have no utility.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805284

File: 8d3bb07e3a78188⋯.jpg (260.35 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Detectives_commenced_an_in….jpg)

>>19805282

3/3

On the same day the Queensland Supreme Court handed down the interim suppression order, a Toowoomba magistrate complained that Mr Lehrmann’s lawyer “did not have the courtesy” to tell her court they had applied for a Supreme Court injunction to suppress the man’s identity.

The hearing was told the defendant had been seeing a psychologist, who had provided a letter mentioning suicidal ideation that formed part of his suppression order application.

Prosecutor Nicole Friedewald opposed the suppression order and said there was “an absence of evidence supporting the application for an interim order”.

She told the court that the complainant in the case had expressed her view that the man’s identity should be published under the new laws.

Ms Philipson ultimately granted an interim order to keep the man’s identity suppressed until the matter could be heard on October 13.

On that date, Lehrmann’s legal team and lawyers acting for the media outlets faced Toowoomba Magistrates Court, where his legal team argued the order should stay in place.

Barrister Andrew Hoare, acting for him, said there was a “real existing risk of harm” to his client if his identity were to be published.

He said the man suffered from “severe” suicidal ideation that had manifested over years.

But Robert Anderson KC, representing the media outlets, said the high-profile man had not given evidence before the court, instead relying on his solicitors and his psychologist.

He noted the man was prepared to go public with certain statements but was “unprepared” to face the court and give evidence himself.

Mr Anderson said the defendant had “no automatic right to protection” under the recent amendments to the legislation.

On Friday, October 13, Magistrate Clare Kelly, in the Toowoomba Magistrates Court handed down her judgement on the application for a suppression order sought by the defendant.

Magistrate Kelly found the defendant was not formally linked to a mental health professional and was not prescribed medication.

“In my view the evidence relied upon doesn’t establish that the order is necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice,” she said.

Mr Lehrmann did not attend the hearing and his lawyers submitted his mental health would be impacted if he was named.

The Director of Public Prosecutions Nicole Friedewald also revealed at that hearing that the complainant in the case wanted the man identified.

“She has taken an active position on this matter and instructed my office that she does wish for the applicant to be named. It is not a case that she has taken a neutral position or that she opposes it.

“She is desirous of him being identified and for the non-publication order not to be made,” Ms Friedewald said.

After hearing the evidence, Magistrate Kelly refused to grant the suppression order sought.

“Having not been satisfied (that) the order is necessary. I refuse the application for a non-publication order,” Magistrate Kelly said.

However, the accused’s legal team advised they would seek a temporary stay of the order so they could lodge an application for review in the Queensland Supreme Court.

That matter was heard on Tuesday, October 17 and Thursday, October 26.

https://www.news.com.au/national/queensland/courts-law/why-we-couldnt-tell-you-bruce-lehrmann-was-charged-with-rape-until-now/news-story/3d9631e4437efe76301eaa3ec337d9b1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805332

File: 65b0d741b21fe00⋯.jpg (2.16 MB,5000x3335,1000:667,_It_left_me_pretty_bewilde….jpg)

File: ac64de81b8ffe40⋯.jpg (751.23 KB,2043x1533,681:511,Beaumaris_Primary_School_i….jpg)

>>19505187

Grant Holland's story of abuse by paedophile teacher Grahame Steele is being heard after 48 years

Russell Jackson - 25 October 2023

1/5

On Monday morning, in a sleek office building in Melbourne's inner north, public hearings commenced for the Victorian government's board of inquiry into historical child sexual abuse in Beaumaris Primary School and certain other government schools.

The setting was corporate, but, for several survivors and secondary victims who were greeted warmly and submitted their stories in the past month, the validatory impact of the Inquiry's work so far has been nothing short of extraordinary.

WARNING: This story contains references to child abuse and suicide

One of them is a 61-year-old social worker named Grant Holland.

"I felt listened to for the first time in 48 years," Holland tells ABC Investigations.

"I'm happy that I was able to go to a place that wasn't tokenistic. It was genuine. I could tell my story and they were responsive. I couldn't praise them enough."

Until the Inquiry's recent decision to publicise its interest in the offending of former Beaumaris Primary teacher and sports coach Grahame Harold Steele, Holland had long suspected that nobody cared about stories like his.

Dead for a decade, never criminally prosecuted or publicly outed by survivors, Steele had sexually abused boys for decades and simply gotten away with it — although not for lack of trying on Holland's behalf.

In the mid-1970s, Holland was a student at Ormond East Primary, Steele's next Victorian Education department posting after Beaumaris Primary, just 10 kilometres away in Melbourne's bayside south-east.

Three times in the 26 years following his abuse by Steele in 1974, Holland says, he bravely attempted to have Steele prosecuted. Three times, he says, the story he told to police fell on deaf ears.

Only recently, as a result of information provided by the Inquiry, was Holland's worst fear confirmed: Steele remained a primary school principal for almost a decade after Holland's first disclosure, meaning hundreds more Victorian schoolchildren were exposed to a cunning and ruthless sexual predator.

Still, he understands the silence of other survivors of Steele's abuse. Other than police, for almost half a century Holland told no-one of his abuse, refusing to burden loved ones.

"I could never say anything," Holland says.

"My mum lost her own mum when she was little and didn't have such a great childhood, so she was the sort of mum who wanted her kids to have a great childhood. I could never divulge to her because I knew it would break her heart.

"But she passed away this year, so the door is open for me to do it publicly."

'He was a suave-looking and sophisticated bloke'

Holland grimaces to recall it now, but Steele did not conform to the cliche of the lecherous, creepy paedophile. A former star ruckman at Victorian Football Association club Sandringham and an imposing physical presence, Steele was a man's man and boys like Holland were eager to follow his lead.

"I don't like talking like this," Holland says, "but with his brown leather jacket and his brown Valiant Charger, he was a suave-looking and sophisticated bloke. He looked a million dollars.

"Boys were completely obedient to this powerful, strong-looking man with a very authoritarian voice and manner. If there was a truck coming, and he told me I had to stand in the middle of the road, I probably would have stayed there.

"But he was not a good person."

In a police statement 23 years ago, Holland described himself before Steele entered his life: "I was a bright student and was very happy at school."

He also noted the common, innocuous schoolboy interests which quickly put him in harm's way.

"I found I had some natural talent for sport and particularly I enjoyed cricket and football."

At Ormond East Primary, Steele was the sportsmaster, cricket and football coach and, in 1974, Grant Holland's grade 6 teacher. The 11-year-old found himself in a select group of athletically gifted boys who seemed to receive preferential treatment from Steele.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805337

File: e3bbf61c1b325dd⋯.jpg (33.42 KB,391x266,391:266,A_grade_six_school_photo_s….jpg)

File: 29f9405c13c2cc2⋯.jpg (202.83 KB,862x647,862:647,The_1974_Ormond_East_Prima….jpg)

>>19805332

2/5

At Beaumaris Primary, Steele had lured young footballers into a makeshift medical treatment area, sexually abusing them under the guise of sports massage.

At Ormond East, they were pulled from class in groups of four and ferried around town in Steele's Valiant to set up sporting events which often didn't seem to take place.

The destinations included St Kilda Football Club's Moorabbin base — a frequent haunt of other Beaumaris Primary abusers associated with the club's Little League team — where Holland recalls waiting in the grandstand as Steele led other boys into the change rooms, disappearing for hours on end.

Naively, parents at both schools saw nothing untoward in Steele taking four boys at a time on long weekend trips to his holiday home in seaside Inverloch.

It was on just such a trip, alongside three other boys who were part of Steele's "special" group, that the course of 11-year-old Grant Holland's life drastically changed.

'I just knew this stuff was wrong'

Where Steele had previously dangled the carrot of preferential treatment, on the trip to Inverloch, Holland says, the boys saw his darker side even before they'd reached their destination.

"The abuse was horrible and traumatic and has affected my life," says Holland. "But there is also what he did on the first day we went down."

Taken to an abattoir not far from Steele's home, the boys sensed their teacher had connections with the slaughtermen whose bolt guns, knives and trails of blood scared Holland rigid.

"I can still see it now, all this blood," he says.

"They cut the sheep's throats in front of us, slashing them so the blood flowed out right near us. I'd never seen anything like that in my life. It was horrific. I couldn't say it was more horrific than what [subsequently] happened to us, but it's imprinted on my brain as a terrible thing."

To Holland, Steele's message was clear: "Don't say anything."

At length and repeatedly over the days that followed, the boys were sexually abused in the shower at Steele's home.

"I wasn't sexually aware or anything. I just knew this stuff was wrong," Holland says.

"But I was completely obedient. I kept wondering, and talked to the boys, asking why we had to have so many showers during the day — in the morning, the afternoon, at night.

"It left me pretty bewildered, thinking, 'This is wrong but I don't know what to do about it or how I do it. I can't say anything.'"

'I was just off the rails, really'

It is hardly surprising in hindsight that the once happy and bright schoolboy was a different child in the aftermath.

"I was defiant against teachers," Holland says. "I was a pretty good student up until then … I was just off the rails, really."

An "up and down teenagehood" gave way to a restless and transient early adulthood. Career plans were constantly made and dropped.

"I was going to be a PE teacher," says Holland. "I went to uni and quit. Then I was going to be a motor mechanic, but I quit."

"I was going to do all sorts of things, but really just messed around."

The blessing and curse of Holland's work life is that he fell into child welfare and social work, which, along with family therapy and work as a mental health clinician, has occupied his mind with other people's problems — so much easier to process and rationalise than his own.

Marriage and children of his own came later than they might have, in Holland's mid and late 30s, respectively. Inevitably, he's been a paranoid and hypervigilant parent.

For decades, Holland says, he has battled emotional disturbance and suicidal ideation, including an attempt on his own life — moments of quiet desperation he now brushes past quickly, without self-pity.

"I know in my heart of hearts that I'd never do it to my kids," he says. "I don't want them to think, 'Well, if Dad can't handle adversity, how do I handle it?'"

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805344

File: 7793c212bec2a83⋯.jpg (348.01 KB,1186x1539,1186:1539,Grant_Holland_and_a_school….jpg)

File: 5617774e540a18d⋯.jpg (2.05 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Grant_Holland_and_his_cowo….jpg)

>>19805337

3/5

Another grounding force has been his work for The Holland Foundation, a charity providing practical support to children and families coping with complex problems.

In 2015, during the Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Holland also stood up for the children abused at Baltara Reception Centre — a remand home for boys awaiting court appearances and criminal matters.

As one of Baltara's childcare officers for nearly a decade in the 1980s and early '90s, Holland had repeatedly drawn the attention of management to the presence of sexual abusers on staff.

"There was a big cover-up," says Holland.

"I basically lagged on the system. The training was terrible. The background-checking was terrible. When we tried to report things, it got covered up and you got slammed. I had a curtailed career there because I was lagging on the managers."

What was it like giving evidence on behalf of other abuse survivors while harbouring his own painful story?

"I was focusing solely on my role as a youth worker and the experiences in that institution, trying to help uncover what happened," Holland says.

"But underneath that, in my guts, I was bursting to say, 'Hey, I want to tell you something else about myself', but I just couldn't."

A telling line concluded his 12-page statement to the royal commission: "I have decided to speak out because I think it is important that the children who were placed in our care receive justice."

He was already painfully aware how elusive such justice can be.

'Nobody listened and nobody believed me'

Indeed, it was those very experiences at Baltara, where Holland began working in 1982, which prompted his first report of Grahame Steele to police.

He did this, he thinks, either in 1983 or '84 — a fact now difficult to confirm because Victoria Police, Holland says, cannot locate that statement nor another he recalls making in 1989 or 1990.

The second was prompted by press coverage of Operation Paradox, a Victoria Police sexual abuse telethon that drew much publicity and thousands of abuse disclosures between 1989 and 1997.

Hotline calls were anonymous, but Holland says a detailed statement he subsequently gave at Parkdale CIB was not.

"I wanted to do something about the events that had occurred and, most importantly, I wanted to protect other kids," he says.

"I was 100 per cent sure that Steele was a cunning man who was doing it to others."

To Holland's dismay, on both occasions, and after multiple follow-up calls, he says he was told the officers involved had either moved on or their priorities changed.

He is even angrier now that he knows Steele's whereabouts during that time. From 1981 to 1990, Steele was the principal of Belvedere Park Primary in Seaford, following a five-year stint as principal of Aspendale Primary and a one-year return to Beaumaris Primary as deputy principal.

"I said to the cops [in the 1980s] that if he was doing it to us, he's doing it to others because he's so cunning," Holland says.

"I said, 'You've got to stop him'. And I don't think they even looked at that point. Why they didn't proceed further, I have no idea."

Yet his third experience with police, a decade later, was somehow even worse.

'I'm shaking again now just talking about it'

By 2000, historical child sex offending by former Beaumaris Primary teachers was a matter firmly on the agenda of Victoria Police's child sex crimes squad.

One day that year, such a detective called Holland out of the blue and asked what he knew about Steele.

"I nearly fell off my chair," Holland remembers.

"They explained they were investigating previous matters regarding that, so I divulged my story and that I'd tried to report him twice."

ABC Investigations has confirmed that Holland's 2000 statement contained details of his disclosure during Operation Paradox.

For Holland, a third statement was a formality. What followed was far from it.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805347

File: 0e51b2967a15b44⋯.jpg (459.88 KB,1998x1499,1998:1499,The_Victorian_Department_o….jpg)

File: e91870d73d078da⋯.jpg (3.36 MB,4000x3002,2000:1501,The_Board_of_Inquiry_will_….jpg)

>>19805344

4/5

He says he was asked by police to travel to Inverloch, be fitted with a wire and recording device, and not just solicit a confession from Steele, but seek it at the house where Holland had been abused as a boy.

"I look back at that now, given my profession, thinking 'what the heck?'" says Holland.

"I agreed, but I was dumb."

He recalls the lack of a detailed briefing and the unsophisticated equipment. "It was this recorder taped into the back of my pants and a wire with a microphone leading down my trousers to my ankle," Holland says.

"I told them it needed tape because it was falling down my pants. I thought they'd get some medical tape or something, but they just got some sticky tape off the desk and handed it to me.

"It was like a comedy. It was just hopeless. It was ridiculous."

The confrontation with Steele is burnt into Holland's memory — a warm day; Steele's blue Ford Sapphire parked in the garage; the former teacher mowing the front lawn as Holland approached and stammered "Do you remember me?"

"I was shaking like a leaf," Holland says. "I was shaking like an 11-year-old kid again. I was 30-something, but it was like I was back in grade six, just scared and shaking.

"I'm shaking again now just talking about it."

The rest played out like a bad dream, Steele leading Holland inside the house and past a rack of guns — most likely replicas, Holland now concedes, but frightening enough in his traumatised state that he began jabbering away into the microphone with questions about them, hoping detectives would storm in and save him.

"In my stupidity, I thought the police were listening remotely, but they weren't," Holland says. "It was only a recording device and they couldn't hear a thing, which I only found out later when I met them in a nearby park."

In Steele's living room, Holland asked a simple question: "Do you know the effect this has had on me in life?"

Steele walked to a display case which, at Holland's estimation, held 40 photo albums. "He pulls one out, puts it on the table and flips through all these pages, and points to this photo," Holland says.

"It wasn't me. It was another kid who I still remember, who was in the year under me but played in our footy team. Obviously, he had a trophy photo album of everyone he'd had."

He says the sting only deteriorated from there.

"I tried my best to get him to admit it but he was a pretty cunning guy. He was denying stuff. I said, 'I was 12 years old. Why did we have all those showers? Why were you doing this and that? Why were you behind us, doing what you were doing? We were 12."

"In those days I had eczema. He said, 'Oh, you had a skin condition, didn't you? I was just checking that your skin was OK.'"

In the aftermath, Holland says, police interest waned to nothing and the matter was dropped entirely.

"Apart from the abuse, it [the police operation] was just crazy," Holland says. "Just not understanding the trauma. Now I'm older, I know that I should have been prepped for it and properly debriefed."

"I just think they were very naive to the impact of abuse on people. Their handling of me and their record keeping was abysmal. They still can't find the statements I gave earlier. No records. No communication."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19805358

File: 2be559955d9aece⋯.jpg (3.17 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Ribbons_were_tied_to_the_f….jpg)

File: 5d668d72a71b364⋯.jpg (1.51 MB,5000x3334,2500:1667,Holland_is_encouraging_oth….jpg)

File: 32937f9ad1ce899⋯.jpg (344.06 KB,1505x635,301:127,Counselling_and_support_se….jpg)

>>19805347

5/5

'I'll still have those bloody feelings'

Unapologetic and unprosecuted, Grahame Steele died at the age of 80 in 2013.

Like hundreds of other survivors of abuse in Victorian government schools, Grant Holland is in the process of suing the Victorian Education Department for its failure to protect him from Steele and for the damage Steele did.

"I've been suicidal and come better and got worse, but I know my journey to be medically and psychologically better is to forgive," Holland says.

"I know he [Steele] was probably abused as a child, or something bad happened to him. I spent my whole life working in the child protection sector, with youth and disadvantaged people.

"I know that to finally release myself from this, the only way out for me, to be a bit happier with my life, is to forgive.

"But I just can't."

A measure of Holland's resilience can be found in an annual ordeal he endures.

Years ago, family friends started a summer camping trip tradition to a destination in which Holland had no say: Inverloch.

"When we were camping, my kids would always say, 'What's wrong? You've got a short temper,'" Holland says.

"I think I'm a good dad, but my mood and my emotions and my previous depression and internal anger would rise. I'd have to spend two weeks thinking, 'Am I gonna see this guy if I go to the shops? Will I go past him?'

"Now, I know he's dead and buried in the cemetery we drive past to get to Inverloch, but I'll still have those bloody feelings."

In submitting to the Beaumaris Inquiry, Holland says those bloody feelings finally found the right outlet. He hopes other survivors will follow suit before the inquiry's October 31 deadline.

"Apart from the times when it bubbled over and I tried to tell my story [to police] to protect others and failed, I had been resigned to the fact that my story was never going to be heard or told, and I had to just live with it," Holland says.

"Now I've given it a last go, and it was very beneficial and helpful. If someone is sitting on something like what I was sitting on, even if it's a private therapist or counsellor, I'd really encourage them to do it."

The interconnectedness of Holland's story and those of survivors at the 23 other government schools within the Inquiry's scope has also got him thinking of the need for a broader survey of a statewide problem.

"It's not just Beaumaris and Ormond East, and they know that," Holland says.

"There were pockets [of abusers] all over. Things get political. Governments probably say, 'This is a minefield, get it over and done with and say sorry and then move on'. I'm not sure any government would want to open the doors to thousands of others [survivors] around.

"But if there was a vehicle for people to continue to tell their stories, to be heard and validated, that would be very healing for everyone.

"You want someone to believe you and care that it happened."

Do you have more information about this story? Contact Russell Jackson at jackson.russell@abc.net.au

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-25/grant-holland-grahame-steele-beaumaris-abuse/103009032

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19816452

File: 761ea93e67befde⋯.jpg (1.66 MB,4392x3130,2196:1565,Julian_Assange_in_2017.jpg)

File: 12b2d52f8f38bff⋯.jpg (4.39 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Gabriel_Shipton_left_and_s….jpg)

File: 4b84f86bbf3ad35⋯.jpg (558.24 KB,2846x1897,2846:1897,US_President_Joe_Biden_wit….jpg)

>>19493339

‘Enough is enough’: Albanese talks to Biden about Assange

David Crowe - October 27, 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has raised the plight of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in talks this week with United States President Joe Biden, stepping up efforts to find a way to release the Australian from jail.

Albanese discussed Assange in his private talks in Washington DC after making public calls in recent months for a resolution to the US charges against him for releasing state secrets.

The talks came as Assange’s brother, Gabriel Shipton, told this masthead that he feared for his brother’s life because of the impact of the detention on his mental health.

Shipton joined protestors outside the White House this week to raise awareness of the case at the same time Biden hosted Albanese at the residence.

Albanese confirmed to this masthead that he raised his concern about Assange in his discussions with the president during meetings that included an informal dinner, a discussion in the Oval Office at the White House and a formal meeting with Biden and his cabinet secretaries.

While he would not discuss his private talks with Biden or the president’s view of the matter, he made it clear he believed the detention had gone on too long.

“I’ve made it clear that enough is enough — that it’s time it was brought to a conclusion,” he said.

Shipton said Assange should be released because his work at WikiLeaks had been in the public interest.

The Wikileaks disclosures included the “collateral murder” video that showed US forces killing civilians in Iraq and the release of a trove of US diplomatic cables.

“We want the government to do more than just make representations to the Biden administration,” Shipton said.

“Ideally, we would like the government to act as it does for other Australians who are imprisoned overseas.”

Assange, who is currently in London’s Belmarsh prison, is facing a maximum jail sentence of 175 years after being charged with 17 counts of breaching the US Espionage Act plus a separate hacking-related charge.

Shipton, who saw Assange last week, said a visit to his brother was always “full of anxiety” about his brother’s condition.

“He’s still fighting, he’s hanging in there despite what he’s been through and despite the adversary he’s taken on,” he said.

“He’s not the same man he was a year ago or even before that —it’s really taken its toll on him.”

Shipton said it would be unacceptable for Assange to face trial in the US given the case is set down for a Virginia court where the community — and the jury pool — included defence and security workers.

“I don’t believe that Julian would receive a fair trial in the United States,” he said. “It’s a bit of a fairytale, to be honest, this idea that Julian would receive a fair trial or a fair deal that wouldn’t see him suffering more.”

When Australian journalists asked US National Security Council spokesman John Kirby about the case this week, Kirby said it was an extradition matter for the Department of Justice.

Biden faces the risk of a domestic political blowback if he intervenes in the case to drop the extradition request, with conservatives such as former Donald Trump using it against the president at the next presidential election.

Former president Barack Obama commuted the sentence of another person involved in the WikiLeaks disclosures, Chelsea Manning, after she had faced trial and gone to jail.

A cross-party delegation of MPs, including Nationals’ former leader Barnaby Joyce and Kooyong independent Monique Ryan, travelled to Washington in September to plead for Assange’s liberty.

Shipton said people cared about the issue because it was becoming a sign of the “inequality” in the relationship between Australia and the US.

“Julian is an Australian — he’s an Australian father, he’s an Australian son,” he said.

“He’s an Australian citizen who’s been unjustly imprisoned and it’s up to the Australian government to defend their citizens overseas.

“People don’t really understand what he even did wrong. He published truthful material,” Shipton said in Washington.

“So the other aspect to it is our right to know what governments do in our name, and that is important when we are in such a close relationship with the power that is imprisoning Julian for publishing national defence information about what they are doing behind closed doors.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/enough-is-enough-albanese-talks-to-biden-about-assange-20231027-p5efkd.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19821948

Notables

are not endorsements

#32 - Part 1

Australian Politics and Society - Part 1

>>19499282 Video: Fearless Aussies put lives on Ukraine frontline - Josh Norman* is in daily pain from a shoulder injury he sustained during his time in the Australian Army. Fellow former soldier Damien Solomon* was medically discharged after losing much of the hearing in his right ear. Yet both men are on their way to the frontline in Ukraine, determined to help in the fight against Russia, despite the fear they could be punished by Australian authorities for choosing to make what they believe is the only ethical decision. “I’d like to think that if Australia were invaded we’d have a lot of foreigners come over and help us, guys just like us just like us from a different country,” Mr Norman told The Australian, before travelling to serve in a Ukrainian unit with other foreigners. (* Names are pseudonyms)

>>19511987 'Great admirer': Victorian Senator Ralph Babet's letter declaring support to former US president Donald Trump revealed - Ralph Babet has declared his support to the legally-embattled Donald Trump. The former United States president posted a letter penned by the Victorian Senator to his social media Truth Social on Friday. Mr Babet, a Senator for Clive Palmer’s United Australia Party, wrote how “pleased” he was to see Trump running for re-election in 2024 and wished him “every success”. “I have always been a great admirer of the United States. But to see the deterioration in American over the past four years has been truly heart breaking,” he wrote. “Watching the way the Biden Administration has brought the US into disrepute around the world through weak leadership, both at home and abroad, has been devastating for lovers of freedom everywhere. “America is meant to be a beacon of freedom and, I have no doubt, will be again under your leadership.”

>>19511987 Donald J. Trump Truth: Thank you to Senator Ralph Babet of Australia!

>>19518173 How Australian cardboard drones became a critical innovation in the Ukraine war - Innovative design choices can have a massive impact in the theatre of war, so it is important to understand the principles behind their development. Recent use of low-cost cardboard drones by Ukraine, supplied by Australia, to attack targets in Russia is a good example of how this can work. Australia has been supplying Ukraine with 100 of the drones per month from March this year as part of an aid package deal worth an estimated $30 million, following an agreement struck in July 2021, according to the Australian Army Defence Innovation Hub. The Australian firm Sypaq, an engineering and solutions company founded in 1992, created the Corvo Precision Payload Delivery System (PPDS) for use in military, law enforcement, border security and emergency services, as well as food security, asset inspection and search and rescue. Ukrainian forces reportedly used the PDDS cardboard drones in an attack on an airfield in Kursk Oblast in western Russia on August 27. The attack damaged a Mig-29 and four Su-30 fighter jets, two Pantsir anti-aircraft missile launchers, gun systems, and an S-300 air surface-to-air missile defence system.

>>19518233 Video: Zelensky’s frontline Aussie raining hell on Russia - Just over a week ago, Ethan McNamara was running through a field in a desperate attempt to avoid Russian artillery fire. It’s become a common occurrence for the 24-year-old from Brisbane, who in late September last year travelled to Ukraine to join the fight on the frontline. Now he is a member of the Ukrainian military; second-in-command of a drone reconnaissance and attack unit, part of GUR - a secretive Ukrainian military intelligence service combat unit. Before this, McNamara had never worked with drones, which he says have completely changed the structure of modern warfare. The former Australian Army soldier is the first Australian to speak in-depth without the cloak of anonymity about his experience on the frontline in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19821951

#32 - Part 2

Australian Politics and Society - Part 2

>>19521787 Chevron Pulls Contract Crew From Australia LNG Project As Strikes Begin - Chevron Corp started withdrawing contractor workers from its Gorgon liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility on Saturday, shortly after staff went on strike at two major projects in Australia. Workers at Chevron’s LNG projects started strike action on Friday after talks broke down, potentially disrupting output from facilities that account for over 5% of global supply. No further talks were scheduled between the unions and the U.S. energy major, according to the website of the Fair Work Commission, Australia’s industrial umpire, which had mediated five days of negotiations. Australia is the world’s biggest LNG exporter and its main buyers are in Asia. The dispute over wages and conditions at Chevron’s Gorgon and Wheatstone operations has supported British and European gas prices, as traders anticipate lower Australian supplies would intensify competition from other sources.

>>19523172 Extremists, Neo Nazi plot to infiltrate ADF, ASIO and Defence revealed - Extremists including neo-Nazis are attempting to join the military and or recruit some already within Australian Defence Force ranks in an alarming plot to push their destabilising agenda. ASIO in concert with Defence has identified a rising number of individuals with “ideologically motivated extremism” either actively being groomed in their ranks or trying to join. According to Defence sources, the move is to attain military training to boost their skill set “capabilities” although for what is not clear. The extremism rise in Australia has been linked to conspiracies borne from the Covid-19 pandemic and the emergence of anti-authority sovereign citizens, ultra right-wing nationalists and supremacists and their inciting anti-lockdown violence. Defence has confirmed it was working closely with national security agencies.

>>19535062 Opposition Indigenous Affairs spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says ‘women are under attack’ - Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says pushing back against the transgender movement and its impact on children will be among her next priorities after the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum. Speaking at an event hosted by Liberal senator Alex Antic that featured speakers including Katherine Deves and Moira Deeming, Senator Price said the parliamentary inquiry into gender-affirming care - which refers to medical treatments used to transition people to the gender of their choosing - proposed by One Nation Leader Pauline Hanson should not have been left to “a conscience vote”. “In the Senate, we had an opportunity to vote for an inquiry into gender-affirming treatments for children. It should never have been a conscience vote because this issue speaks to the human rights of our most vulnerable, and that is our children,” Senator Price told the small group gathered in Parliament House. “This debate, this argument, the way it’s being played out, the way in which women are now under attack for standing up for the vulnerable, for standing up for children, is so many steps backward to where we’ve come to fight for our rights as women.”

>>19541925 Mind-boggling lethal Aussie weapons to be deployed by Ukraine, UK and possibly AUKUS - An Australian company’s “spy in the sky” drone that can wipe out entire military squads with its electronically fired bullets, tear gas and rubber baton rounds is to be deployed in Ukraine. The new silent but deadly tactical fire support Cerberus GHL drone will be deployed to shore up munitions stockpiles in Ukraine’s fight with Russia. “It’s spy in the sky technology that infantry under fire on the front line can use to hit back - it can wipe out entire squads,” Michael Creagh, chief executive of the Brisbane-based aerospace company behind the drone, Skybourne Technologies, said.

>>19541984 Librarians to be trained in dealing with abuse after extremist threats - Librarians are dealing with death threats, trolling and intimidation at increasing levels, as protesters try to block drag-themed story time events and ban certain books on shelves. This escalation in abuse - which has sparked a string of drag-themed children’s events being cancelled across Victoria – has prompted a new wave of training for librarians, aimed at teaching them how to protect themselves and the public and defuse potentially dangerous situations. The endgame, says State Library Victoria chief executive Paul Duldig, is never having to cancel a rainbow story time at the library again. “There’s been a lot of anger directed towards librarians, who by their nature are absolutely there for the public good,” Duldig said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19821955

#32 - Part 3

Australian Politics and Society - Part 3

>>19548568 Peter Dutton seeks to overturn ACT legislation decriminalising hard drugs - Canberra is set to become a “boom market” for drug dealers and crime gangs, according to Peter Dutton, as the federal ­Coalition proposes using commonwealth powers to override the ACT government’s decision to decriminalise the possession of ice, heroin, cocaine and other illicit substances. The ACT government’s drug reforms, due to come into effect on October 28, would make Canberra the first city in Australia to decriminalise the possession of small quantities of illicit substances in a bid to divert people away from the justice system and towards treatment services. But the Coalition announced it would move a private member’s Bill in the upper house on Thursday to use commonwealth powers to reverse the laws. The Opposition Leader said the Coalition would take a stand against the “crazy government legislation” that would result in the Labor-Greens government “rolling out the red carpet for drug use and more crime”.

>>19556112 AFP denies our guns fuel PNG tribal wars - The Australian Federal Police says there is “no credible evidence” that large numbers of smuggled guns from Australia are being used to wage tribal wars in Papua New Guinea, after the country’s police commissioner said Australia-sourced weapons were fuelling the deadly conflicts. PNG Police Commissioner David Manning this week said illegal guns were flowing in from Australia for use in tribal wars that have killed more than 150 people this year alone. “Some of these firearms are brought in from Australia, eventually finding (their) way into the tribal fight areas,” he told the Post Courier newspaper. An AFP spokeswoman said Australia, which has some of the world’s strongest gun laws, was not a significant source of illegal weapons. “There is no credible intelligence to suggest large-scale importation of illicit firearms to PNG from Australia, as reported in recent media,” she said.

>>19556208 Military ‘not a disaster relief force’, committee warns - A Labor-led committee says states and territories can no longer treat the Australian Defence Force as “some sort of shadow workforce” to respond to domestic crises, warning that the practice is “unsustainable” and risks degrading ADF warfighting capabilities. In its latest examination of Defence’s annual report, the joint standing committee on foreign affairs, defence and trade expressed alarm that more than half of all ADF members had been assigned to domestic disaster relief tasks in recent years. It said diversion of ADF personnel to such tasks carried “genuine and profound” risks that would grow as the climate warmed.

>>19556229 The polite message from Melbourne’s drug dealers to keep customers - A sophisticated drug dealing network operating in Melbourne has encouraged its customers to migrate away from using the soon-to-be defunct encrypted messaging app Wickr to rival platform Signal. Melbourne residents signed up to a Wickr-based drug delivery service have been instructed to stop using the Amazon-owned app before its shutdown on December 31. The app has been widely used by drug dealers, hackers and paedophiles in Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom. A Melbourne group - advertising more than 15 types of drugs including cocaine, ketamine and MDMA - has instructed Wickr users to maintain the same alias when switching apps to enable them to keep the business running efficiently.

>>19561988 Meet the gurus hanging out on the dark web - The dark web is often characterised as a mythical place, an out of reach portion of the internet where only the most elite criminals frequent to trade stolen credentials, sell illegal weapons and share fraud tactics. But the reality is far more unremarkable than that. Some would even describe the dark web as having a better resemblance to the early days of the internet rather than any kind of high-tech experience. That’s according to Brenton Cooper, an Adelaide man who has for the past six years made a business out of selling access to its content. Cooper is the founder and chief executive of Fivecast, the marketplace for dark web marketplaces, which provides a window into the world of criminal activity. The company is one of several in Australia that operates in a portion of the internet inaccessible to most. While the average Australian won’t ever access the dark web, nor will most leaders at major companies, many are desperate to know if their data and their customers are being bought, sold and traded in illegal forums.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19821958

#32 - Part 4

Australian Politics and Society - Part 4

>>19562094 Video: Ukraine’s soldiers plead for Anthony Albanese to give them Hawkei vehicles despite faults - Ukrainian soldiers fighting on the frontline have pleaded for Aus­tralia to supply them with faulty Hawkei light armoured patrol ­vehicles after repeated requests have been stonewalled by the ­Albanese government. At a secret training base in the Donetsk Oblast region in Ukraine’s east, near the site of some of the fiercest fighting of the war, The Weekend Australian shared the back of an Australian-made Bushmaster with soldiers keen to see more help in the “fight for democracy”. While the Bushmasters have been warmly welcomed, Anthony Albanese has rejected desperate calls from Kyiv to supply Ukraine with Australian-built Hawkei vehicles, citing “a range of reasons”.

>>19570662 ‘Threat-to-life messages’: 39 men charged as part of global police sting appear in court - Almost 40 Victorian men charged as part of a global police sting that cracked open an encrypted app have faced court as fresh details of Operation Ironside were aired in a courtroom for the first time. Accused men and their lawyers filled six rows on Monday in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court, where the police case against the men was tested for the first time. Australian Federal Police digital forensic examiner Keith Fell said he was tasked with examining phones that had the encrypted AN0M application installed. Officers had infiltrated the app over about three years. Fell said while the devices looked like mobile phones, the AN0M part of the device could only be accessed through a password-controlled calculator app. Two codes could be used, he said, one that would allow a user to access the encrypted service and another that would wipe the phone. He said one setting also allowed the user to set a time when messages were automatically deleted. “It’s unique; it’s nothing I’ve come across before,” Fell said.

>>19575766 Potent $1.5 billion upgrade to Australia's maritime surveillance with manned and unmanned aircraft - Australia will purchase a fourth long-range Triton drone for maritime surveillance, despite the US Navy recently halting production of the expensive unmanned platform which critics warn is vulnerable to enemy attack. The contentious American acquisition is part of a $1.5 billion boost to the RAAF being unveiled on Tuesday that includes upgrades to the existing P-8A Poseidon fleet, allowing the patrol aircraft to eventually fire anti-ship missiles up to 1,000km. Under the Poseidon upgrade program, the Department of Defence expects the first of its 14 Boeing-made aircraft to receive enhancements to anti-submarine warfare, maritime strike and intelligence collection capabilities from 2026. The entire fleet is expected to be completed by 2030.

>>19581594 Climate scientists and Pacific activists call on Australia to ramp up ambitions ahead of UN summit - Movers and shakers in the fight against climate change are gathering for the United Nation's Climate Ambition Summit in New York, while climate scientists and Pacific activists call on Australia to ramp up its own ambitions. The summit comes as the Australia Institute has published a full-page ad in the New York Times calling on the Australian government to halt "over 100 new coal and gas projects" in the pipeline. The open letter, signed by over 200 scientists and experts, called on Australia to accelerate climate action, "not climate annihilation". The institute's director, Dr Richard Denniss, is attending the UN climate summit and said Australia "wants to have it both ways" when it came to climate leadership and fossil fuels. "On the one hand, we want the world to support our bid to host a COP," he said, referring to the UN Climate Change Conference. "But at the same time, we're ignoring the UN and indeed, our Pacific neighbours' calls on us to stop expanding fossil fuels."

>>19581607 Australia to support Ukraine at UN's highest court - Australian officials will take a stand in support of Ukraine at the United Nations' highest court as the Balkan country challenges Russia's claims its invasion was carried out to prevent genocide. Days after Russian forces invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Kyiv filed a case to the International Court of Justice alleging Russian leaders were abusing international law by using false claims of genocide in eastern Ukraine to justify its invasion. Russian representatives have continued to accuse Ukraine of committing genocide. Foreign Minister Penny Wong says Russia is in breach of the UN charter, which protects the sovereignty and territorial integrity of every nation. Officials from 32 countries are expected to deliver interventions in support of Ukraine at The Hague's Peace Palace. Solicitor-General Stephen Donaghue will deliver Australia's intervention on Wednesday night (AEST) where he will argue the court has jurisdiction to hear the case.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19821960

#32 - Part 5

Australian Politics and Society - Part 5

>>19601919 Rupert Murdoch to step down as executive chair of News Corp, co-chair of Fox - Rupert Murdoch, the Australian-born businessman who went from running a small Adelaide newspaper to creating a multi-billion-dollar global media empire spanning news, entertainment and cinema, has announced he is stepping down as chairman of his companies at the age of 92. Mr Murdoch’s eldest son Lachlan, 52, will take over as the sole chair of News Corp and continue as executive chair and chief executive officer of Fox Corporation. “On behalf of the Fox and News Corp boards of directors, leadership teams, and all the shareholders who have benefited from his hard work, I congratulate my father on his remarkable 70-year career,” said Lachlan Murdoch. “We thank him for his vision, his pioneering spirit, his steadfast determination, and the enduring legacy he leaves to the companies he founded and countless people he has impacted.”

>>19601957 Penny Wong to remind UN that Australia wants a Security Council seat by 2029 - Australia will ramp up its push for a seat on the UN Security Council while calling for Russia’s veto powers on the global body to be constrained as a consequence of Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. In a major speech to the United Nations General Assembly in New York, Foreign Minister Penny Wong was also set to highlight the existential threat of climate change and the need to ensure the world remains free from nuclear weapons. She will warn that tensions over the South China Sea and military build-up in the Indo-Pacific had given rise to “the most confronting circumstances in decades” and would require a greater collective effort to prevent an unwanted war.

>>19601994 US marine stationed in Australia is charged with rape as base is ordered into lockdown - A US marine stationed in Australia has been charged with aggravated assault and sexual intercourse without consent. The 20-year-old marine was arrested in Palmerston, south of Darwin, on Monday in relation to the incident that allegedly occurred there earlier that day. The American has been been granted bail to appear in Darwin Local Court at a later date. Since 2012, The Marine Rotational Force has stationed personnel in the Top End of Australia at several military bases. Starting with just 250 marines in the first year, there is now an air-ground task force of 2,500 personnel. A US Defence spokesperson said the marines were assisting NT Police with the investigation.

>>19606852 Home Affairs secretary Mike Pezzullo stood aside as alleged texts to Liberal powerbroker investigated - The secretary of the Home Affairs Department, Mike Pezzullo, has been asked to step aside as an investigation is conducted into text messages he is alleged to have sent to a Liberal Party powerbroker. The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age have published the texts said to have been sent over a number of years between Mr Pezzullo and Scott Briggs, an influential figure within the Liberal Party. Home Affairs Minister Clare O'Neil on Monday morning asked Mr Pezzullo to stand aside while the messages are investigated by the Australian public service commissioner. Many of the published messages refer to ministerial appointments under former Coalition governments, including appointments for those with responsibility for Mr Pezzullo's Home Affairs Department. Some of the conversations also appear to show disdain for parliamentary processes like Senate estimates, where senators are given the opportunity to grill departmental officials about policy.

>>19606854 Video: An unprecedented glimpse into politics and power - Running Australia is a big job. But if you think it’s the government of the day in Canberra that’s calling all the shots, after seeing this story you might think again. Tonight, in a joint investigation with the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, we expose the highly inappropriate actions of one of our most senior public servants. Michael Pezzullo is the boss of Home Affairs, the department responsible for Australia’s national security. He’s supposed to be independent and apolitical but as you’ll see, that’s not the way he operates. Pezzullo has been wielding extraordinary power from the shadows, interfering in government and doing all he can to build an impenetrable empire. - 60 Minutes Australia

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19821965

#32 - Part 6

Australian Politics and Society - Part 6

>>19606948 ‘Scheduling conflicts’: Donald Trump Jr’s Aussie tour pushed back to December - A controversial speaking tour hosted by the son of twice-impeached ex-US president Donald Trump has been delayed for the second time, with organisers saying “scheduling conflicts” are to blame this time. Donald Trump Jr was due to host talks in Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney this month as part of his contentious live tour, organised by the Australian arm of conservative not-for-profit organisation Turning Point. It had already been delayed from its initial date in July following a visa stoush. In an email seen by NCA NewsWire, the tour’s organisers Turning Point Australia said Mr Trump Jr had been forced to postpone the week’s events due to “last-minute scheduling conflicts”. “We sincerely apologise for any inconvenience this may cause,” the email states. New tour dates in Sydney (December 10), the Gold Coast (December 11) and Melbourne (December 13) have since been organised.

>>19611559 Video: Daniel Andrews resigns as premier of Victoria after three elections, nine years - Daniel Andrews has resigned as the premier of Victoria after nine years in the role. Mr Andrews announced today that he would formally step down at 5pm tomorrow. He said leading the state had been "the honour and privilege" of his life. "It's not an easy job being the premier of our state - that's not a complaint, that's just a fact," he said. "It requires 100 per cent from you and your family. That is, of course, time limited and now is the time to step away." The MP for Mulgrave, who has led Labor to three consecutive election victories since first forming government at the 2014 election, is among the state's longest-serving premiers.

>>19611567 Dan Andrews was reviled by the right but enough voters kept backing him - "Dan Andrews’ ruthless divisiveness was unmatched. He leaves a legacy as contested as the political battlefield that he ruled over, a strategy that was built on winning and holding office at any cost. Andrews was fuelled by a precocious, instinctive talent that, in the end, could not mask the deep flaws that delivered an imperfect pandemic response and a smashed budget. Victoria’s finances are in terrible shape, but don’t expect Andrews to be apologetic. “I am not a regretful person, I don’t look back,’’ he said at Melbourne’s Parliament House. Andrews was Australia’s first truly modern political leader, marketing himself shamelessly at younger, digital era voters while wedging the Greens in the inner city. He wedged everyone, sometimes - in the case of the pandemic - he wedged himself. Andrews was a creature of party headquarters who saw life principally through the prism of numbers - 50 per cent plus one. Reviled by the right but loved by the left, Andrews delivered Labor three election wins and skewered four Liberal leaders. He was an election-winning machine." - John Ferguson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19617085 Video: ‘Honour and privilege’: Jacinta Allan will become Victoria’s next premier - Jacinta Allan is set to become Victoria’s next premier after a messy morning of party-room negotiations finally resulted in a deal that will install Public Transport Minister Ben Carroll as deputy. After a bruising 24 hours, a deal was struck between Labor caucus members on Wednesday afternoon that will ensure no other candidate challenges Allan for the leadership. In return, Labor’s Right faction secured Carroll as its candidate for deputy premier despite a push from Allan’s Socialist Left faction to control both roles. The move has prevented an all-out war within Victorian Labor that would have resulted in party members being asked to vote on who should be the next leader. Allan got emotional as she talked about becoming just the second woman to lead the state, after former premier Joan Kirner. “I also hope it says to young women, older women, women from across different backgrounds … that leadership takes on different shapes and sizes,” she said.

>>19623930 ‘Aussie Cossack’ gets Russian citizenship - Simeon Boikov, a Sydney-born activist and videoblogger dubbed the ‘Aussie Cossack’ in his country for his unabashedly pro-Moscow stance, has been granted Russian citizenship. His name was listed in a decree signed by Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, which granted Russian nationality to 41 foreign-born applicants. Boikov has been drawing the ire of Australian media for years, with critics blasting him as a “propagandist” who is abusing the country’s supposedly relaxed free speech. In January, Ukrainian ambassador to Canberra Vasily Miroshnichenko accused Boikov of exposing him to “a major telephone harassment campaign” by sharing his private phone number in a YouTube video. The diplomat filed a complaint with the Australian federal police over the incident.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19821969

#32 - Part 7

Australian Politics and Society - Part 7

>>19623941 Aussie Cossack Simeon Boikov ‘honoured by Putin citizenship gift’ - Self-styled “Aussie Cossack” Simeon Boikov says he is “honoured” to have been granted Russian citizenship by Vladimir Putin, and declared his commitment to serving “the motherland”. Speaking from the Russian consulate in Sydney where he is seeking refuge from NSW police warrants, the pro-Kremlin, anti-voice activist said he did not intend to renounce his Australian citizenship. Russian law prevents its nationals holding dual citizenship with any country except Turkmenistan and Tajikistan but Mr Boikov said an exception had been made in his case because of his “special services to the Russian Federation”. He said he was “extremely thankful” to Mr Putin, and renewed his call to be allowed to leave Australia for Moscow in prisoner swap for a Western hostage. “I’m happy to be swapped for anyone. (Journalist Evan) Gershkovich from the Wall Street Journal, for example,” Boikov said.

>>19643619 Rock band Kiss stuns MCG crowd ahead of AFL grand final between Lions and Magpies - Kiss has stunned crowds at the MCG with a massive performance, shaking off criticisms the rock band is too old to perform at an AFL grand final in 2023. Performing in front of a full house at the MCG ahead of the grand final between Collingwood and Brisbane, the American rockers took to the stage clad in their signature heavy make-up and glam-rock outfits. The band opened with I Was Made for Lovin' You, as columns of flame burst from the ground around the stage. After that came Shout It Out Loud, before the band wowed the crowd with a lively performance of Rock and Roll All Nite, featuring hundreds of dancers forming the word "Kiss" on the MCG turf. Young kids dressed as mini-Kiss band members were the highlight of the show, vigorously strumming imaginary guitars and drums and rocking to a song that came out in 1975.

>>19650072 Shout it out loud: Proud parents watch kids rock with Kiss at the MCG - It’s not every day that your seven-year-old son dances on stage with rock band Kiss in front of 100,000 people at the Melbourne Cricket Ground. Cuban Casem, 7, wearing the make-up and costume of the band’s Spaceman character, was cool about it and had a ball, rocking out to Rock and Roll All Nite at the MCG before the AFL grand final on Saturday. Cuban’s mum, Carla Casem, said she was the emotional one, looking on from the sidelines. “It was overwhelming. I was in tears most of the time,” she said. Cuban, of Fraser Rise in Melbourne’s west, was one of four kids chosen to dance on stage with the famous American band as the crowd roared during the pre-game entertainment. He said the best part was doing an air-guitar solo while standing “back-to-back” with lead guitarist Tommy Thayer. Three of Cuban’s classmates from hip-hop dance school Kstar Studios in Ravenhall danced next to singer and bass player Gene Simmons, singer and guitarist Paul Stanley, and drummer Eric Singer. Meanwhile, below them, 500 other children performed choreographed dance moves to the song. The dancers, who were recruited from five Melbourne dance schools, rehearsed for weeks but were sworn to secrecy ahead of the game between Collingwood and the Brisbane Lions.

>>19656186 Email addresses of Aus Senators in case you want to express your displeasure

>>19685020 ‘Millions on planes’: Boat focus blinded Home Affairs to real abuses, says Nixon - A focus on stopping migrant boats as millions of people arrived on planes with inadequate scrutiny meant authorities missed widespread exploitation and abuse in Australia’s visa system, according to the former top cop who led the Albanese government’s immigration rorts inquiry. In her most damning comments to date, former Victoria Police chief commissioner Christine Nixon also warned that seismic and sustained reform was needed to address problems in the multibillion-dollar international education sector and to combat the normalisation of foreign worker exploitation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19821973

#32 - Part 8

Australian Politics and Society - Part 8

>>19685030 Martina Navratilova slams Gymnastics Australia for pro trans position - Martina Navratilova has slammed Gymnastics Australia - saying “what is wrong with you guys” for allowing biological males who identify as female, and permitting them access to young girls and women’s changing rooms and competitions. Navratilova, 66, hit out at the national organisation, which boasts of more than 800,000 participants with one of the highest participation sports for children under 12 - for changing its rules to allow transgender people to self-identify and compete in all community gymnastics events. The tennis star and commentator’s high-profile criticism has put the spotlight on Gymnastics Australia’s radical position, which is going against the recent trend of international sporting organisations such as track and field, swimming and cycling to reinforce women’s sport on sex, not gender. On Twitter she posted: ”To say this won’t end well is an understatement. To say Gymnastics Australia just threw females and girls under the bus is an understatement. What is wrong with you guys??? This “inclusion” actually will EXCLUDE biological women and most of all girls. #whataboutthegirls”. Ms Navratilova has been outspoken in her belief that women’s and girls sport should be confined to biological females.

>>19699349 ‘Limit kids’ access to risky gender drugs’ - Leading Australian psychiatrists say puberty blockers should be restricted to children enrolled in rigorous clinical trials, after a new British analysis found the mental health of one-third of adolescents deteriorated while they were taking the controversial drugs. The new UK analysis of an earlier, landmark study found 34 per cent of children aged 12 to 15 reported their mental health had deteriorated after taking puberty blockers for one year, while 29 per cent of children saw their psychological health improve. No mental health change was reported by 37 per cent of the children who had been on blockers for 12 months. Overall, the fresh analysis, published on preprint health sciences website medRXIV, suggests 71 per cent of children taking puberty blockers reported a decline or no change in their mental health after one year of treatment. Yet as the study states: “The main argument for the introduction of puberty blockers in the UK for this age group (under 16) had been their potential to relieve psychological distress’’ while the children explored their gender identity. Philip Morris, a visiting professor of psychiatry at Bond University, said: “To see a third of people getting worse is very concerning.’’

>>19699368 Indigenous Senator Lidia Thorpe says she ‘stands with’ Palestine - Indigenous senator and No campaigner Lidia Thorpe has publicly rallied behind Palestine in a “foul” and “appalling” move, as the death toll in the Israel-Hamas conflict continues to climb. Senator Thorpe made her stance on the conflict clear in a post on the social media platform X on Sunday night, writing “I stand with Palestine!” The tweet was accompanied with a controversial map of Israel, appearing to show the gradual dispossession of “Palestine land” over several decades. “Unprovoked They said [sic],” the caption of the map reads. Many were quick to condemn the senator on social media, pointing to the atrocities unfolding after Hamas, a Palestinian Islamist militant group, attacked Israel on Saturday. “The most appalling public statement you’ve ever made, and that’s saying something,” wrote Sky News columnist Will Kingston.

>>19706386 Video: Sky News host Sharri Markson in tears as she describes Hamas’ atrocities against Israeli civilians - Sky News journalist Sharri Markson broke down in tears as she catalogued the “pure savagery” of Hamas terrorist attacks on innocent women and children. The investigative journalist, who is Jewish, became emotional as she described how Palestinian forces had killed hundreds of Israelis and taken families hostage. Describing the militants as “barbarians with no limits” she said they had offered the elderly and the vulnerable “no mercy”. “This is the darkest day for Jewish people in decades. It’s being called Israel’s September 11. It is pure savagery,” she said on her Sky News Australia show, Sharri, on Monday night. “But it’s the heinous barbarity that makes this attack by Hamas so sickening and so unexpected for the state of Israel, that prides itself on national security and is surrounded by Arab States endlessly calling for its annihilation. “There was no mercy shown as the elderly, the women, the children - the babies - were kidnapped, seized and carted off by jeering men, away from the safety of their homes, their loved ones and their life as they knew it.” Markson has previously been subjected to anti-Semitic death threats.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19821975

#32 - Part 9

Australian Politics and Society - Part 9

>>19706391 Video: ‘Pure savagery’: Hamas attack on Israel the ‘darkest day for Jewish people in decades’ - The war on Israel has passed 48 hours and the shock of the Hamas terrorist attacks have shaken lives across the globe and caused the "darkest day for Jewish people in decades", according to Sky News Australia host Sharri Markson. Ms Markson has condemned the “sickening” acts committed by the “degenerate evil” of Hamas. “It's being called Israel's September 11 … it is pure savagery,” she said. “But it's the heinous barbarity that makes this attack by Hamas so sickening and so unexpected for the state of Israel that prides itself on national security. “There was no mercy shown as the elderly, the women, the children - the babies - were kidnapped, seized and carted off by jeering men - away from the safety of their homes, their loved ones and their life as they knew it. “How can humans be this cruel? To laugh and celebrate as they torture terrified, young souls who had so much ahead of them in life, who were so hopeful for the future.” Warning - this video contains distressing content. - Sky News Australia

>>19706419 Video: NSW Police say ‘no’ to Jewish community: yes to Palestinian rally - NSW police warned Sydney’s Jewish community to avoid the Opera House on Monday as its sails were lit with the Israeli flag to commemorate those killed and kidnapped by Hamas, after green-lighting a pro-Palestinian march to the site. Jewish leaders said it was “sad and disturbing” to be told they were not safe in Sydney, as Greens MPs backed Palestinian marchers who said they supported “resistance” against Israel despite the deaths and disappearances of women and children. Pro-Palestinian protesters, who had marched from Town Hall, threw flares outside the Sydney Opera House and yelled “f*ck Israel” and “f*ck the Jews” as the sails were lit in blue and white. A number of police officers guarded the Opera House stairs. An Israeli flag was burned on the steps of the Opera House in one of the most concerning scenes from Monday night’s pro-Palestine rally.

>>19706443 Monday’s pro-Hamas march was a day of shame for Sydney. The premier needs to answer for it - "The NSW government has ensured that October 9, 2023 will be a day that lives in infamy. A national day of shame for Sydney and a failure of character and leadership on multiple levels, both State and federal. Two contrasting images now expose what is an international embarrassment for Australia and an unforgivable offence to the Jewish community. British prime minister Rishi Sunak delivering a speech of solidarity to a Synagogue in London following the demonic horror of the Hamas attack as thousands of Jewish people gathered in solemn embrace underneath the Eiffel Tower. Yet under the sails of Sydney’s Opera House illuminated with the Israeli flag, chants of “f*ck the Jews” and the burning of the Israeli flag sprang from a pro-Palestinian protest that the NSW government and its police force have effectively admitted it was powerless to stop. Never before has a community, the Jewish community, been told by an Australian government to stay inside because the streets they call home aren’t safe. How could this happen? Police Minister Yasmin Catley is now facing widespread condemnation, has been missing in action. Calls for her resignation grow. The NSW Attorney-General, Michael Daley has as much to answer for. His excuse that he didn’t know about it defies credulity. Premier Chris Minns finds himself as a leader under pressure to act and explain why this was allowed to occur. His suggestion that had he known what was to transpire he might have stepped in don’t pass muster. He should have known. He is the premier." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19821981

#32 - Part 10

Australian Politics and Society - Part 10

>>19706457 Bob Carr attacked for Palestine posts - Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council national chair Mark Leibler has condemned former foreign minister Bob Carr for saying Palestinians had a right to resist an illegal occupation and would suffer a “disproportionately huge retaliation” from Israel. Mr Carr, a key critic of Israel and prominent supporter of Palestinian recognition, responded to the Hamas terrorist attack in which more than 700 Israelis have been killed – including more than 250 people at a music festival in southern Israel – by saying Hamas had won a “tactical ­success”. “Will be very short-lived. It will draw disproportionately huge retaliation directed at civilians and indifferent to children,” he posted on X. “Between the suicidal instincts of Hamas and the dominance of Israeli air power the losers will be long-suffering Palestinians in what is the world’s largest refugee camp. Palestinians have a right to resist an illegal occupation, the spread of settlements all illegal and apartheid laws - but resist peacefully. Mainstream moderate Palestinians committed to a negotiated solution deserve world attention and support, now more than ever.” Mr Leibler responded, asking: “Bob - just how far does your hatred for Israel and the Jewish people go? You did not even condemn the sickening attack by Hamas against Israel’s civilian population. Shame on you!”

>>19706509 Video: PM calls for calm as concerns grow for safety of Australians in Israel - Hamas has warned it is ready to dig in for a long war as Israel prepared to escalate its response to the Palestinian militant group’s shock weekend attacks, mobilising hundreds of thousands of troops and pelting Palestinian targets with aerial bombardments. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he remained concerned about the fate of Australians in Israel because there were so many of them visiting or living in the country, flagging the possible evacuation of Australian citizens in Israel if required. “We are working on a range of contingency arrangements that I won’t detail publicly for obvious reasons, but we do work on these contingencies,” he told the ABC. Defence Minister Richard Marles said there were no reports of Australians having been killed or hospitalised as a result of the attacks. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a nationally televised address: “What we will do to our enemies in the coming days will reverberate with them for generations.” Speaking to local officials near Israel’s border with Gaza, Netanyahu said: “What Hamas will experience will be difficult and terrible; we are already in the campaign and we are just getting started.”

>>19712756 At a celebration of slaughter, Labor looks the other way - "More than once since Hamas terrorists invaded Israel last weekend and slaughtered hundreds of innocent men, women and children in their homes, at a music festival and on the streets, I have felt grateful to call Australia home. It’s deeply distressing for anyone following these events to see vision of mothers and their babies being kidnapped by barbarians and held hostage. But for Jewish Australians this horrifying depravity has felt incredibly personal - even though seemingly a world away from our sparkling way of life here in Australia. A world away, that is, until Monday evening, when the NSW government allowed the barbarians who had murdered entire families in Israel to be celebrated on the steps of the Sydney Opera House. Absurdly, NSW police urged Jews to stay in their homes, not to come into the CBD, to keep away from the Opera House and the Town Hall, saying it wasn’t safe to walk the city’s streets. That’s the inexplicable path the NSW government took as pro-Palestinian protesters, chanting “Death to Jews” and “Gas the Jews” and burning the Israeli flag, celebrated the slaughter of innocent Israeli civ­ilians. It was clearly hate speech: unlawful behaviour that drives a terrifying wedge between Australians when we’re supposedly embracing inclusivity. For a Jewish Australian walking down the street, there’s now a discernible feeling of fear and worry. Should we take our children to school, having just seen these people - our fellow citizens – chant “Kill the Jews” and “Gas the Jews” on the streets we love? These are the questions I am now seriously asking myself in the city in which I was born and raised, and where I have always felt safe. In allowing this hateful, divisive, anti-Semitic protest to go ahead, the NSW Labor government, the police and the Greens are fostering an atmosphere of fear and distrust in our beautiful, peaceful country." - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19821989

#32 - Part 11

Australian Politics and Society - Part 11

>>19712770 John Howard demands Anthony Albanese stop Labor’s ‘pussyfooting’ on Hamas terrorists - John Howard has demanded Anthony Albanese display “leadership from the top” to stop Labor’s “pussyfooting” response to the Hamas terror atrocities and ­labelled anti-Israeli protests at the Sydney Opera House a “catastrophic descent from civility”. Mr Howard on Tuesday called on all sides of politics to condemn Hamas and its sympathisers, as he accused Labor widely of being “hugely conflicted” on the issue. He said Foreign Minister Penny Wong appeared “uncomfortable” in her condemnations, and ­signalled the Prime Minister was not being unequivocal in his support of Israel. “When 9/11 occurred there was unanimity of response. I was in America, Kim Beazley was leader of the Labor Party and there wasn’t a cigarette paper between us. He completely supported our position,” Mr Howard told The Australian. “This should be the same … Mr Albanese should make some unequivocal statements, as should the Foreign Minister. “Instead of that there is pussyfooting and lukewarm condemnation. And then you have the NSW Attorney-General (Michael Daley) saying everyone should remain calm and go home. “How can you remain calm when demonstrators are invoking the memory of the Holocaust? People remain calm in that? “I never thought we would crumple to this … We need leadership from the top; we aren’t getting that at the moment.”

>>19712785 Sydney Opera House ‘screw up’ lambasted by political, religious leaders amid operational autopsy - NSW’s defiant Police Minister has declared officers “successfully” managed a widely condemned pro-Hamas march, despite authorities’ only arrest being an innocent man carrying an Israeli flag . Yasmin Catley was fighting off calls to resign on Tuesday after pictures of police lining the Opera House’s steps amid anti-Semitic chants and burnings of the Israeli flag were broadcast around the globe. Former Australian ambassador to Israel and federal MP Dave Sharma said: “This has been a complete screw up by the NSW government - how on earth did they allow this to happen?” “From the Brandenburg Gate to the Eiffel Tower, thousands gathered peacefully at iconic sights lit in Israeli colours in a show of solidarity,” he said. “In Sydney, we showcased a wild mob, cheering on the most barbaric acts, chanting the most vile slogans.”

>>19712796 Australian grandmother killed in Israeli kibbutz as Hamas issue ultimatum: we will televise Israeli hostage executions - Sydney-born grandmother Galit Carbone is among those killed in Israel, Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil has confirmed The 66-year-old Australian-born grandmother’s lifeless body was found just metres from the door of her home in the Be-Eri kibbutz, just 5km from the Gaza border, where she had previously worked as a librarian and raised her three children. Ms Carbone, born in Sydney is the first known Australian victim of the brutal conflict. Her cousin Julian Cappe said the family was “numb” after getting confirmation she had been killed. “We’re not sure if she was killed in her home or dragged out and killed, but her body was not found in her house,” Mr Cappe said. Ms O’Neil said she is “devastated” by the death of Galit who died after militants went door to door forcing residents out of their homes. “I’m devastated for the people who knew her, but also the broader Jewish Australian community. “We’ve got brothers and sisters of the Jewish religion around our country who are suffering greatly from what is a brutal, violent, abhorrent and completely unjustified act of terrorism against their country and their citizens.” Ten thousand Australians live in Israel.

>>19712817 Defence Australia Tweet: Thank you and farewell ❤ Up to 2500 @USMC personnel have begun departing Australia as the 12th rotation of @MRFDarwin wraps up. While stationed in Darwin, the MRF-D conducted various combined training exercises with #YourADF, as well as with regional partner nations.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19821997

#32 - Part 12

Australian Politics and Society - Part 12

>>19712836 Video: Hillary Clinton to share leadership tips at Aussie public servant talkfest - It takes a brave soul these days to stand in front of an Australian Public Service audience and start going on about leadership, what with the controversy engulfing some of the federal bureaucracy’s highest climbers – Home Affairs boss Mike Pezzullo and former Human Services secretary Kathryn Campbell – over their conduct while leading mammoth federal departments. So whichever genius chose out-of-towner Hillary Clinton - yes, that Hillary Clinton - as the headline act at a Public Sector Women in Leadership talkfest early next year, ought to take a bow. Now, history will remember Clinton as the US presidential candidate who lost to Donald Trump. But remember she also had a decent knock in the demanding role of her nation’s secretary of state during Barack Obama’s administration and would have learnt a thing or two as one half of the famous “Billary” White House, as her husband Bill Clinton’s presidency was often dubbed.

>>19720294 Anthony Albanese reaches out to Jewish community following terror attack - Anthony Albanese has declared that anti-Semitism and hateful prejudice have “no place in ­Australia” and announced plans to evacuate hundreds of Australians from Israel on special government-organised flights from ­Friday after the Jewish homeland was attacked by Hamas terrorists in Gaza. The Prime Minister met members of the Jewish community on Wednesday evening, addressing the St Kilda Hebrew Congregation in Melbourne following harsh criticism his government’s response was too soft on the pro-Palestine protests at the Sydney Opera House on Monday night where the Israeli flag was burned and anti-Semitic slogans were chanted. With Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowing a war of ­retaliation on Hamas and amid reports that 40 babies were slaughtered in a massacre at the kibbutz of Kfar Aza, Mr Albanese said his government would begin “the assisted departure of Australians who want to leave Israel” after 66-year-old grandmother, Galit Carbone, was revealed to be the first Australian citizen killed in the attack. “Many of you will fear a rise in anti-Semitism here at home,” Mr Albanese said. “I want to assure you, that kind of hateful prejudice has no place in Australia. Our country is better than that - and our country is a better place because of you and your community. And my government is committed to keeping the community safe. Over thousands of years, Jewish people have summoned tremendous courage and resilience in the face of trauma. It must feel almost unbearable to have to draw on those strengths again. But I want to say very clearly: you are not alone.”

>>19728711 ABC Middle East correspondent Tom Joyner labels stories about babies being beheaded in Israel ‘bullshit’ - The ABC’s Middle Eastern correspondent Tom Joyner has labelled reports about babies being beheaded by Hamas terrorists in ­Israel as “bullshit” during a fiery exchange in a WhatsApp group with hundreds of international journalists and broadcasters. Joyner, who is reporting on the conflict between Israel and Pales­tine, told a WhatsApp chat group on Tuesday - in now-deleted comments – he did not believe stories being reported around the world about babies being beheaded were true. “The story about the babies is bullshit,” he posted to the large group of media representatives sharing information about the attacks in Israel by Hamas terrorists. WhatsApp messages posted by Joyner, seen by The Australian, were met with condemnation from many members of the media who are part of the chat group set up shortly after the conflict in Israel began at the weekend. One group member responded to Joyner’s “bullshit” comment with “Care to retract this now?” Joyner immediately replied, telling the group he was sorry for his remarks. “I’m sorry about the wording - I regret that. But we still have not seen clear evidence,” he wrote on WhatsApp. “Why hasn’t there been anything unequivocal from the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) or from Netanyahu.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822001

#32 - Part 13

Australian Politics and Society - Part 13

>>19728751 Jewish leaders urge ABC to stand down Tom Joyner over ‘bullshit’ comments about babies being beheaded - The ABC is facing pressure from Jewish leaders to stand down Middle Eastern correspondent Tom Joyner from reporting on the war in Israel after he labelled reports about babies being beheaded by Hamas terrorists as “bullshit” in a WhatsApp group with international media. The Zionist Federation of Australia’s president Jeremy Leibler has written to the ABC’s director of news Justin Stevens on Friday in a letter outlining that he was left “stunned and appalled” by Joyner’s remarks that “Jewish babies being beheaded and burnt to death in Israel are ‘bullshit’.” In Mr Leibler’s letter, seen by The Australian, he described Joyner’s comments in the WhatsApp group with more than 600 journalists who are reporting on the atrocities in Israel were based on “unfounded scepticism and refusal to report on these crimes that forced the public release today of photographic evidence of charred and mutilated children.” “He was immediately and rightly condemned by the other journalists to whom he made the comment,” Mr Leibler said in the letter. “He must now promptly be denounced and disciplined by the ABC.” He has asked that Joyner no longer report on the attacks in Israel by Hamas terrorists. “I respectfully urge you immediately to stand down Mr Joyner as the ABC’s Middle East Correspondent,” he said. “His continued position is untenable.”

>>19728776 Israeli official says government cannot confirm babies were beheaded in Hamas attack - "The Israeli government has not confirmed the specific claim that Hamas attackers cut off the heads of babies during their shock attack on Saturday, an Israeli official told CNN, contradicting a previous public statement by the Prime Minister’s office. “There have been cases of Hamas militants carrying out beheadings and other ISIS-style atrocities. However, we cannot confirm if the victims were men or women, soldiers or civilians, adults or children,” the official said. Hamas on Wednesday denied the allegations. Izzat al-Risheq, a senior official and spokesperson for the Islamist militant group, said that the international media had “spread lies about our Palestinian people and the resistance claiming that members of the Palestinian resistance beheaded children and attacked women with no evidence to support such claims and lies.” CNN has pored through hundreds of hours of media posted online attempting to corroborate accounts of atrocities committed by Hamas. In one video, which CNN determined to be authentic but has not been able to geolocate, an assailant attacks an injured man with a garden tool in an attempt to behead him. But CNN has not seen anything that would appear to confirm the claims of decapitated children. CNN also visited the ransacked ruins of Kfar Aza on Tuesday and saw no evidence of beheaded youths. Israeli officials have not released any photographs of the incident either." - Matthew Chance, Richard Allen Greene and Joshua Berlinger - cnn.com

>>19728831 Huge crowds attend pro-Palestinian rallies in Canberra, Brisbane and Perth - Hundreds of Pro-Palestinian protesters have begun to gather at rallies across the country as Gaza braces for a ground strike from Israeli forces. Australians in Canberra, Brisbane and Perth have gathered in support of the heavily-bombarded Palestinians as Israel continues to send warplanes into Gaza in retaliation for attacks from Hamas militants. Attendees in Canberra were seen peacefully waving flags, as a small group of counter-protestors stood nearby holding signs. Protesters at the Canberra rally called on the Australian government to do more to support Palestinians under siege. One leader wanted the government to “call out Israel’s breaches of international laws, including the fourth Geneva convention and UN resolutions”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822006

#32 - Part 14

Australian Politics and Society - Part 14

>>19728896 ASIO war-of-words violence warning over Israel - The nation’s top domestic security agency has warned of the potential for “opportunistic violence” in Australia following Hamas’s terrorist attack on Israel, calling on “all parties” to refrain from stoking division amid fears domestic extremists could take advantage of community unrest. As pro-Palestinian groups plan further rallies in coming days, ASIO head Mike Burgess said he had not lifted the national terrorism threat level, but the agency was on alert for indications of planned violence. “I remain concerned about the potential for opportunistic violence with little or no warning,” the ASIO director-general said. Mr Burgess said the potential for such violence was distinct from planned attacks, declaring ASIO was well placed to detect threats to security from politically motivated and communal violence. “In this context, it is important that all parties consider the ­implications for social cohesion when making public statements,” he said. “As I have said previously, words matter. ASIO has seen ­direct connections between ­inflamed language and inflamed community tensions.”

>>19728938 ASIO boss’s call for calm risks stirring the political pot - "ASIO has made an extraordinary intervention into what is an extraordinary situation evolving in Australia. On the surface, it reflects concerns that another tipping point in the nation’s social cohesion may be approaching. While it is rare for a director-general of security to so overtly step into the political arena, Mike Burgess clearly feels that he has been forced to do so. Presumably, the intelligence agency is picking up some disturbing chatter. Burgess’s intervention, however, has had immediate repercussions. Burgess said “all parties” needed to consider the implications for social cohesion when speaking publicly. While he is concerned about the security environment, he has inadvertently added to a volatile political environment. Some may argue that it is not ASIO’s role to be venturing into this debate publicly. And there are valid reasons why. The Albanese government has been quick to seize on Burgess’s warning, backgrounding media that the spy boss’s comments directly contradicted Peter Dutton’s calls for non-citizen hate-preachers to be deported. Burgess has now found himself being verballed by the government when his aim was to point out the escalating implications for the more obvious forms of inflammatory language. When you have protesters chanting “gas the Jews”, you know you have a serious problem from a security perspective." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19728966 Football Australia say they ‘align’ with the Football Association and don’t want Wembley arch lit up to support Israel during the friendly with England - A Socceroos friendly match against England early tomorrow morning has been mired in controversy after the Football Association has decided not to light up the Wembley arch in the colours of Israel. One of the reasons given by the Football Association was that it didn’t want to inflame any tensions ahead of Australia’s world cup qualifier against Palestine on November 21. Instead players will respect a minute’s silence and wear black armbands. Football Australia told The Australian it had been consulted by the FA on their proposed plans and public statement and added “which we are aligned on”. The FA has refused to criticise or condemn the Hamas atrocities, describing mass slaughter of some of the most vulnerable as “ongoing conflict”, riling Jewish communities in the United Kingdom.

>>19745137 Video: Thousands attend 'largely peaceful' pro-Palestinian rallies across Australia - Thousands of pro-Palestinian demonstrators gathered for rallies in Australian cities, with the events ending peacefully according to police. Large crowds took over the streets of Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Adelaide with a heavy police presence. However, no arrests were made. NSW Police Assistant Commissioner Tony Cooke said more than 6000 people gathered at the Sydney event. Victoria Police said 10,000 people marched in Melbourne, with no arrests. In Adelaide, a pro-Palestinian rally gathered in front of the State Parliament building. Police escorted the crowd from North Terrace to Victoria square in Adelaide's CBD. South Australia Police said the crowd behaved in a "safe, orderly and lawful manner."

>>19745141 NZ election: Christopher Luxon to boost Australian alliance, defence - Incoming Kiwi prime minister Christopher Luxon will boost New Zealand’s defence spending and alliance with Australia, accelerate its return to the Five Eyes fold, and prioritise its trade relationship with India to reduce its economic reliance on China. Luxon promises a strong, combat-ready, interoperable military able to defend New Zealand and Australia, and fulfil Wellington’s global security responsibilities.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822011

#32 - Part 15

Australian Politics and Society - Part 15

>>19749528 Video: ‘You are not alone’ - Albanese condemns Hamas attacks and urges parliament to stand with Israel - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has condemned Hamas attacks as “calculated, pitiless brutality” as he moved a motion calling for parliament to stand with Israel and denounce antisemitism. In his most extensive comments on the conflict, which has claimed the lives of more than 1400 Israelis and 2600 Palestinians since Hamas’ October 7 assault, Albanese declared the Islamist militant group an enemy of both Jewish people and Palestinians and urged Australians to resist division at home. “The evil committed by Hamas in Israel has chilled every Australian heart,” he said. “This was no act of war against the army of an enemy. It was the slaughter of innocent people. It was an act of terror.” But Albanese’s call was met by division, with the Greens rejecting the motion after a failed bid to amend it to condemn Israeli war crimes, and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton trying to paint the government as weak in its response to pro-Palestine protests. The prime minister’s motion also recognised that Jewish people had been subject to hateful prejudice, called for the release of all Israeli hostages, acknowledged the “devastating loss of Israeli and Palestinian life” and supported international humanitarian efforts. “I want to repeat the message I’ve given to all Jewish Australians since the outset: You are not alone. Your fellow Australians stand with you,” he said.

>>19749556 Teal duo in ‘moral fog’ over savage Israel attack, say Jewish leaders - Two Sydney teal MPs have joined forces with the Greens to accuse Israel of war crimes just nine days after Hamas terrorists murdered more than 1400 Israelis, in a move condemned as “reprehensible” by prominent Jewish leaders. Sydney MPs Kylea Tink and Sophie Scamps, and Tasmania’s Andrew Wilkie, backed an ­attempt by Greens leader Adam Bandt to amend the bipartisan motion, seeking to erase a statement declaring Australia “stands with Israel and recognises its inherent right to defend itself”. In its place, the Greens sought to condemn “war crimes perpetrated by the state of Israel, including the bombing of Palestinian civilians”, and call for an immediate ceasefire. As Israeli troops prepare for a ground invasion of Gaza, Sydney Rabbi Nochum Schapiro blasted the minor party and its independent backers, saying those who sought to weaken Israel’s response to the massacre of its people were akin to “Nazi enablers”. The NSW Jewish Board of Deputies condemned the MPs’ position as “completely indefensible and morally reprehensible”, while the Executive Council of Australian Jewry accused them of a “moral fog” that insulted the Jewish people.

>>19749564 Labor Senator attacks ‘killing of innocent civilians in Palestine’ - A Labor Senator has attacked the “killing of innocent civilians in Palestine” saying Israel’s right to defend itself cannot come at the cost of the “annihilation of Palestinian civilians”. In the most forceful contribution by Labor thus far, West Australian Senator Fatima Payman called for an “immediate ceasefire” to come into effect amid concern Israeli missiles would strike residential dwellings in Palestine. The 28-year old Senator described herself as a “Muslim devout to her faith” in her maiden speech to parliament last year. “Israeli missiles strike residential dwellings, civilians, multistorey apartments, health facilities as well as places of worship indiscriminately killing men, women and children. We must condemn it,” she told the Senate. “The price tag of Israel’s right to defend itself cannot be the destruction of Palestine. Israel’s right to defend its civilians cannot equate to the annihilation of Palestinian civilians. I hereby call for an immediate ceasefire to come into effect.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822014

#32 - Part 16

Australian Politics and Society - Part 16

>>19755118 FBI Hosts Five Eyes Summit to Launch Drive to Secure Innovation in Response to Intelligence Threats - In their first-ever joint public appearance, leaders of the Five Eyes intelligence partnership - the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand - traveled to the U.S. at the invitation of FBI Director Christopher Wray. Together they are launching the first Emerging Technology and Securing Innovation Security Summit in Palo Alto, California, the heart of Silicon Valley. In addition to the Five Eyes, the summit is bringing together business leaders and entrepreneurs, government officials, and academics to discuss threats to innovation, coming trends in the use and potential exploitation of emerging tech, and means to work together to advance both economic security and public safety. The summit kicks off with a fireside chat with all five members hosted by Dr. Condoleezza Rice, former secretary of state. The intelligence leaders will outline current threats and trends to private sector organizations in their respective countries. Following the fireside chat, the intelligence leaders will sit down with private sector leaders for in-depth discussions about expanding and strengthening private-public partnerships to better protect innovation and the collective security of the five nations and their citizens.

>>19755194 Australia's eSafety commission fines Elon Musk's X $610,500 for failing to meet anti-child-abuse standards - The Australian eSafety commission has fined social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, $610,500 for failing to cooperate with a probe into anti-child-abuse practices. As part of a report by the commission earlier this year featuring X, TikTok, Google, Twitch and Discord, the commission found some of the biggest tech companies were not living up to their responsibilities to tackle the proliferation of child sexual exploitation. The eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, can now require online service providers to report on how they are meeting any or all of the expectations as part of the eSafety Act. "This was about the worst kind of harm, child sexual exploitation as well as extortion, and we need to make sure that companies have trust and safety teams, they're using people processes and technologies to tackle this kind of content," she told ABC News Channel.

>>19755227 Video: ‘We will remember them’: PM honours soldiers who died in ADF helicopter crash - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has honoured the four soldiers who lost their lives in a military helicopter crash off the coast of Queensland during a Talisman Sabre exercise. The MRH-90 Taipan fatally crashed into the waters near the Whitsundays in July. The crash claimed the lives of Captain Danniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class Two Joseph Laycock and Corporal Alexander Naggs. “The most difficult thing that I have had to do as the 31st Prime Minister of Australia, is to ring and speak with their families in the days which followed this tragedy,” said Mr Albanese. “We honour them, we mourn them. “And with their names held within our hearts, we will remember them - lest we forget.” - Sky News Australia

>>19755254 Liberal senator Alex Antic’s bill to ban child gender therapy = All forms of gender reassignment treatment and surgery would be banned for those aged under 18 - including the controversial and increasing use of puberty blockers – under a bill proposed by conser­vative ­Liberal senator Alex Antic. The private members bill would allow teenagers to change gender only in the most exceptional circumstances when diagnosed with long-recognised sexual development disorders. Senator Antic said he had been motivated by growing community disquiet over the explosion in the number of young people “transitioning” and believed that in many cases youths were making the decision not on the basis of genuine medical issues but pressure from peers and health professionals.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822022

#32 - Part 17

Australian Politics and Society - Part 17

>>19762208 Nationals whip calls for Gaza ceasefire as Labor ministers accuse Israel of collective punishment - Two federal government ministers say civilians in Gaza are being subjected to collective punishment by Israel, exposing tensions within the Albanese government over its position on the war, as a federal Labor senator called for landmarks to be lit in the colours of the Palestinian flag. Industry Minister Ed Husic and Early Childhood Education Minister Anne Aly, who are the only Muslims in federal cabinet, on Thursday called for Australia to step up support for Palestinians facing a humanitarian crisis. They said Palestinian-Australians felt their lives mattered less in the unfolding political reaction to the Israel-Hamas war. While the Coalition said the ministers’ comments showed Labor was divided over the conflict, Nationals whip Mark Coulton also departed from the opposition’s stance that Israel should show no restraint in retaliating to Hamas attacks. “There should be greater focus on the plight of Palestinians who are caught up in this conflict,” he told this masthead. “My greatest concern is for the civilians and children being killed or maimed, and that there are so many people in danger. I am of the belief that there should be a ceasefire until a plan for a humanitarian solution can be worked out.”

>>19769232 Anthony Albanese and Joe Biden to strike new economic, defence and climate ‘alliance for the future’ - Anthony Albanese and Joe Biden will announce major economic partnerships next week focused on strengthening ties around clean energy, climate change, defence co-operation and critical minerals amid escalating tensions in the Middle East and surging oil prices. The US President will host an official state dinner at the White House for the Prime Minister on Wednesday night (US time), bringing together prominent Australian and US business, defence and diplomatic officials to usher in a new Australia-US “alliance for the future”. Mr Albanese, who will open the new Australian embassy in Washington alongside ambassador Kevin Rudd during the week-long trip, will discuss climate action, clean energy partnerships, AUKUS progress and Indo-­Pacific stability with Mr Biden.

>>19775596 Bill Hayden, former governor-general and Labor leader, dead at 90 - Bill Hayden, who served as Australia’s 21st Governor-General, Labor leader and senior minister in the Whitlam and Hawke governments, has died at age 90. His health had been declining for the past decade and he was in and out of hospital for strokes, pneumonia, heat exhaustion and broken bones. His wife, Dallas, and three children cared for him at home until recently. Mr Hayden was one of the few surviving members of a generation of leading politicians, his death coming after Gough Whitlam (2014), Malcolm Fraser (2015), Bob Hawke (2019) and Andrew Peacock (2021). Prime Minister Anthony Albanese praised his lifetime of service to Australia. “In a time of forceful personalities, Bill Hayden was notable for his humility,” he said in a statement. “Yet there was nothing modest about his ambition for Labor or Australia. This was the quiet strength of character he brought to the cause of progress.”

>>19775611 Anti-Jewish protests ‘an abomination’, says Josh Frydenberg - Josh Frydenberg has condemned anti-Semitic protests on the Sydney Opera House steps as an “abomination”, warned of the deep fears of Australia’s Jewish community and praised the “piercing moral clarity” demonstrated by the US, UK and Germany in standing with Israel in its hour of need. In his first comments since the Hamas terror attack on southern Israel, the former treasurer ­and prominent member of the Jewish community said he never believed he would feel as his grandparents did amid the rising tide of Jewish hatred that heralded the Holocaust, nor as his parents did amid the threat to Israel posed by the Yom Kippur War in 1973. “But now I do. I stand before you anguished and anxious about the future,” Mr Frydenberg said in a speech in support of victims of terrorism, an extract of which is published in The Weekend Australian.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822024

#32 - Part 18

Australian Politics and Society - Part 18

>>19775642 OPINION: As a Jew, I can despair or look to the lessons of history - "Thirteen days ago, my world changed, our world changed, forever. The medieval slaughter of innocents representing the single biggest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust punctured the aura of invincibility that surrounded the Israeli Defence Force. Terror has ushered in widespread trauma leaving a whole nation grieving for the more than 1400 lost and 200 missing. It has left deep psychological scars in the Jewish community in and beyond Israel’s shores that may never heal. As a person of Jewish faith who has only ever known of a confident and strong Israel, I never thought I would feel, as my parents did in 1973 during the Yom Kippur war, the existential threat facing Israel. But now I do. As a person of Jewish faith growing up in a tolerant and multicultural Australia, I never thought I would feel, as my grandparents did in 1933, the rising tide of European antisemitism which would consume their families in the flames of the Holocaust. But now I do. I am anguished and anxious about the future. These are indeed the darkest of times. Every day innocent lives are being lost in both Israel and in Gaza. We cannot lose our common humanity as Hamas makes victims of the people of Gaza, too. It is my hope that, despite all that has happened, the light will eventually shine through." - Josh Frydenberg, former treasurer of Australia - theage.com.au

>>19775684 Colours of Palestinian flag take over streets in Sydney, Brisbane and Perth as thousands attend rallies - The streets of Sydney, Brisbane and Perth have turned into a sea of green, red, black and white as thousands take part in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. In Sydney, attendees stretched from the steps of Town Hall along the tram tracks of George Street in the city's centre, chanting "free free Palestine" and "shame shame Albanese". A number of speakers addressed the crowd including representatives from the Indigenous and Palestinian communities, Jenny Leong from the Greens NSW and Michelle Berkon from Jews Against the Occupation. The march was given late approval on Friday as NSW Premier Chris Minns promised a "zero tolerance" approach to any violence or hate speech.

>>19780599 Thousands left shaken by earthquake in Victorian tourist hotspot - A 5.0 Magnitude earthquake has left residents of a Victorian tourist hotspot shaken up - and caused damage close to the centre of Melbourne. The quake struck near Colac and Apollo Bay on the Great Ocean Road just after 2am on Sunday morning with people as far away as Melbourne feeling the tremors. Over 5,000 “felt reports” have been submitted to Geoscience Australia by people across Victoria. Siesmologist Adam Pascale said the earthquake was the largest to happen in Victoria since September 2021, when the state was hit by a 5.9 magnitude earthquake. The initial quake in Colac was followed by a 3.6 magnitude aftershock in Apollo Bay just before 6am. There have been reports of minor damage but no injuries, according to the Victoria State Emergency Service.

>>19792260 ABC Middle East correspondent Tom Joyner is under investigation over ‘bullshit’ beheaded baby comment - ABC managing director David Anderson has revealed its Middle Eastern correspondent Tom Joyner is under investigation after he labelled reports about babies being beheaded by Hamas terrorists as “bullshit” in a WhatsApp group with international media. At Senate estimates on Tuesday, Mr Anderson said the public broadcaster is “certainly looking into it, investigating it.” “I am sorry that happened, and I am sorry that event occurred and that was then distressing to other people as well, it shouldn’t have happened,” he said. “He was at the time doing what journalists were doing, and that was trying to verify what sources could back up what claims are being made at the time.” Joyner, who has been reporting on the conflict between Israel and Palestine, told a WhatsApp chat group earlier this month - in comments that have since been deleted – that he disputed reports from around the world about babies being beheaded being true.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822027

#32 - Part 19

Australian Politics and Society - Part 19

>>19792436 Victorian Labor MP Will Fowles arrested over sexual assault allegations - Disgraced Victorian Labor MP Will Fowles has been arrested and interviewed over allegations he sexually assaulted a state government employee. Mr Fowles was forced to resign from the parliamentary Labor Party in early August, at the request of then-premier Daniel Andrews’s office, following allegations that he was involved in the “serious” assault. He remains a member of the wider Labor Party. In September he announced he would not attend parliamentary sittings until the conclusion of a police investigation, which was initiated following a referral from the premier’s office. On Tuesday, Victoria Police confirmed Mr Fowles had earlier this month been arrested, interviewed and released without charge as part of their ongoing investigation. “Detectives from the Sexual Crimes Squad executed a warrant at a Ringwood address on 12 October as part of an ongoing investigation into an incident in the Melbourne CBD,” police said in response to questions from The Australian. “A 45-year-old Ringwood man was arrested at the property and interviewed by police. He was released without charge pending further inquiries. “As the investigation is ongoing and given the sensitive nature of the matter, we will not be commenting further at this time.”

>>19798395 Wong joins allies asking for ‘humanitarian pause’ to hostilities in Gaza - Foreign Minister Penny Wong has joined international allies to call for a humanitarian pause on hostilities in Gaza so that food and water reach civilians and people can move to safety, in the federal government’s strongest statement yet on the Israel-Hamas conflict. Her intervention comes alongside appeals from the United Nations, United States, Canada and New Zealand for a humanitarian pause to allow safe deliveries of aid in the besieged territory, as Gaza’s health ministry said Israeli air strikes had killed more than 700 Palestinians overnight. Wong said the way Israel chose to defend itself against the terrorist group’s attack on October 7 mattered and should not lead to the suffering of innocent Palestinian civilians. While she acknowledged some humanitarian aid had been delivered to Gaza in recent days, she said it was “nowhere near enough”.

>>19805135 Video: Extraordinary footage resurfaces of Anthony Albanese at a pro-Palestine rally in Sydney - Extraordinary footage has resurfaced of Anthony Albanese addressing supporters at a free Palestine rally early on in his political career. The decades-old grainy footage shows the future Prime Minister condemning the actions of the Israeli military at a protest at Martin Place in Sydney's CBD. The clip obtained by Sky News shows Mr Albanese among a crowd of protesters standing next to a banner that reads, 'Stop the Israeli slaughter, free Palestine now'. He's seen using a megaphone to condemn Israel's actions. 'The response of Israel has been to meet children throwing rocks with helicopters, with tanks and with missiles,' the future Prime Minister is heard saying. The footage captions Mr Albanese as a 'federal Labor MP'. He's been the member for Grayndler since 1996.

>>19805159 Video:'True colours': Anthony Albanese’s past appearances at pro-Palestine rallies laid bare in resurfaced protest video - Resurfaced news footage has revealed Anthony Albanese’s past appearances at pro-Palestine rallies earlier in his parliamentary career. Sky News Australia host Sharri Markson revealed the clip on Wednesday evening while covering the Prime Minister’s state visit to the United States to visit President Joe Biden. “Albanese has over his entire Parliamentary career spoken out against Israel and in support of Palestinians,” she said before cutting to the resurfaced footage. In the grainy video, Mr Albanese can be seen protesting against Israel’s “occupation” of Palestine in Sydney’s Martin Place next to a sign reading “Stop the Israeli Slaughter: Free Palestine now”. Mr Albanese also uses a microphone to condemn the Israeli military.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822029

#32 - Part 20

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 1

>>19548649 Moderna set for Covid and flu ‘superjab’ in early 2026 - Australians will be able to roll up their sleeves for a “superjab” to protect them from both Covid and the flu by early 2026 if Moderna has its way. The US biotech company has slated its anticipated launch date for the product, which will combine vaccines for the flu and Covid-19 into a single shot for the first time. The northern hemisphere will be able to access the jab from late 2025 for its flu season, subject to regulatory approval, with a launch Down Under to follow in 2026.

>>19581632 Albanese to announce 12-month COVID inquiry - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will finally announce the long-awaited inquiry into Australia’s response to COVID-19 pandemic on Thursday. The 12-month inquiry will not be a royal commission but is expected to have wide-ranging powers to call witnesses and it will examine the response of federal and state governments to the pandemic since it began in January 2020. Albanese and Health Minister Mark Butler will on Thursday release the terms of reference for the inquiry, which will be led by a panel of medical and economic experts. Albanese has never promised a royal commission into the country’s response to COVID-19 and instead has said, repeatedly, that he supported holding a “royal commission or some form of inquiry” into the country’s handling of COVID-19. The federal government has argued that the pandemic is still ongoing when explaining the delay in announcing the inquiry.

>>19587828 State and territory decisions will be excluded from inquiry into COVID pandemic responses - Decisions made by state and territory governments - such as state-based lockdowns and border closures – will be outside the scope of the COVID inquiry announced by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Thursday. A three-person panel led by a public service expert, epidemiologist and health economist will be given 12 months to probe the Commonwealth’s response to the COVID pandemic and make recommendations for how Australia can better prepare for similar events. The inquiry will review the provision of vaccinations, treatments and key medical supplies to Australians, mental health support for those impacted by COVID-19 and lockdowns, financial support for individuals and business, and assistance for Australians abroad. Coalition health spokeswoman Anne Ruston said it was essential that an inquiry probed state and territory responses as well as the Commonwealth’s. She called for leaders to be compelled to give evidence so that the investigation was not politicised against the former Coalition federal government. Coalition health spokeswoman Anne Ruston said it was essential that an inquiry probed state and territory responses as well as the Commonwealth’s. She called for leaders to be compelled to give evidence so that the investigation was not politicised against the former Coalition federal government.

>>19587850 Covid pandemic royal commission refusal ‘a protection racket’, says Coalition - The Coalition has accused Anthony Albanese of running a ­“protection racket” for Labor premiers after refusing to hold a royal commission into the Covid-19 pandemic. The Prime Minister and Health Minister Mark Butler are on Thursday expected to announce an inquiry into the handling the pandemic, but it will not have the investigative powers of a royal commission. The inquiry will reportedly last for 12 months and be led by a panel of experts including an epidemiologist and an economist. Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie said there was “no doubt in my mind” Mr Albanese fell short of announcing a royal commission into the management of the pandemic to protect Labor premiers, particularly Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822031

#32 - Part 21

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 2

>>19587888 PM’s panel members backed hard lockdowns - Two-of-the-three experts hand-picked to lead the government’s Covid-19 inquiry publicly supported Victoria’s hard lockdowns, fuelling Peter Dutton’s concerns that Anthony Albanese has been “rolled” by Labor premiers in excluding state and territory pandemic decisions. Independent inquiry panel member Angela Jackson, an economist and former deputy chief-of-staff former Labor finance minister Lindsay Tanner, in July 2021 said that Victoria needed “a hard lockdown and a dose of luck to get through this”. In another June 2021 tweet, Dr Jackson declared that “Melbourne has suffered its share of lockdowns helping to keep the rest of Australia Covid free”. “Time to bloody step up Sydney because personally could do without lockdown 5.0. And yes would prefer that we had hit vaccination targets and this option was redundant,” she said. In another tweet, Dr Jackson slammed a “group of six adults (that) my husband asked to either mask up or leave the middle of the playground yesterday”. “Thanks for being irresponsible adults and making our kids lives that little bit harder,” she tweeted.

>>19587905 Half-baked Covid-19 inquiry will only deliver half-baked answers - "How do you learn the lessons of Australia’s response to the coronavirus pandemic without examining its most glaring mistakes? That is exactly what the government is trying to do in announcing a national inquiry into the government’s response to the pandemic while excluding the decisions by the states including lockdowns and border closures. So for example, there will be no questions asked about the pros and cons of why Victorian Premier Dan Andrews locked Melbourne down for 262 days, a record which made headlines around the world? There will be no questions about whether any lessons can be learned from harsh policies like closing children’s playgrounds or imposing street curfews or sudden and inflexible border closures? In the case of Victoria, it certainly seems that federal Labor has handed Labor premier Dan Andrews a get-out-of-jail free card for excluding the states from scrutiny." - Cameron Stewart - theaustralian.com.au

>>19601885 Experts reject narrow Covid inquiry terms - The nation’s peak doctors’ group has rejected the narrow terms of Anthony Albanese’s Covid-19 inquiry, saying that carving out the unilateral actions of the states will mean the probe will be operating with “one hand tied behind its back”. Australian Medical Association president Steve Robson is urging the government to expand the scope of the inquiry, saying the key issues that affected the health workforce and that continue to cripple public health systems in the wake of the pandemic relate largely to management and decisions of state governments. “I am scratching my head as to how you can run an inquiry and come out with recommendations for next time that don’t include a lot of the state and territory stuff,” Professor Robson said. “We really are concerned that while the intentions are good, if you’re running the inquiry with one hand tied behind your back … we’re not really sure it’s going to be achieving its stated aims. We’ll be bringing up all of the issues, whether they like it or not.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822032

#32 - Part 22

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 3

>>19601905 Covid inquiry: Why light must be shone on state leaders’ responses - "The most significant unforeseen consequence of the Australian response to the global Covid-19 pandemic was the sudden promotion of the nation’s premiers. During those dark lockdown years of 2020 and 2021, as the nation confronted its greatest threat since World War II, we needed unifying national leadership. Instead, we woke up one morning and found it wasn’t the prime minister or federal government that would run much of this show. We would be under the control of parochial premiers and their ­previously faceless state public ­servants who were armed, and willing, to use crushing health laws in pursuit of a “Covid zero” political fantasy. “To hell with more than a century of federation, I’m in charge” was the mantra, as our mostly Labor premiers who sell themselves as progressives transformed into progressive dictators and slammed their borders shut, and kept them shut for too long. To understand just how outrageous Anthony Albanese’s decision to shield the premiers from his Covid inquiry is, you need to remember the above. Premiers are quick to make the point that these were unprecedented times. They are right. They had to act, and mistakes were inevitable. This is the reason to shine a light on them, not shield them." - Damon Johnson, Victorian Editor - theaustralian.com.au

>>19606877 Pandemic inquiry useless without admitting to failures - "Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s remarks at the United Nations last week, in a session related to “pandemic prevention, preparedness and response”, were a stark reminder of why it’s too early to institute any inquiry into Australia’s Covid-19. Senator Wong blamed the pandemic for “hardship and suffering” and for “exacerbating inequities of our global system”, pointing out that 124 million people fell back into poverty. But much of the suffering over the past few years was caused by governments, not “the pandemic”. Covid-19 didn’t print trillions of dollars, euros and pounds, which have prompted rampant inflation, years of declining living standards, higher interest rates and a massive surge in inequality. The virus didn’t close schools and universities, ruin small businesses, delay medical treatments, sow intergenerational discord and isolate people from their loved ones. It didn’t force millions of people to take a rushed vaccine against their will, or censor doctors and medical professionals who turned out to be right. These were all political decisions. Until our political leaders are able to speak honestly about the role of government in the hardship and suffering of the past few years, any sort of inquiry will be a waste of time, whatever the terms of reference happen to be." - Adam Creighton - theaustralian.com.au

>>19804919 Australian Court Rules Against Carnival in Landmark COVID-19 Case - Carnival Corp’s Australian unit has been ordered to pay the medical expenses of a woman who contracted COVID-19, with a judge ruling that the cruise ship operator misled passengers about safety risks in a landmark class action ruling. The decision from Australia’s Federal Court is the first class action win against a cruise ship operator in the world, according to Shine Lawyers, who represent about 1,000 plaintiffs in the suit. Justice Angus Stewart found Carnival Australia misled passengers about the measures it had in place to keep passengers from contracting the virus and that it should have cancelled the March 2020 return voyage from Sydney to New Zealand. Lead plaintiff Susan Karpik was awarded A$4,423.48 ($2,826) for out-of-pocket medical expenses but no damages. The courts must now decide on the common claims of the remaining parties to the class action, a spokesperson for Shine Lawyers told Reuters.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822039

#32 - Part 23

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 1

>>19493339 Parliamentary delegation will visit Washington to urge US to ditch extradition of Julian Assange - A multi-party delegation of federal MPs and senators will travel to Washington DC this month as part of the campaign to release WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. The United States is seeking to extradite Mr Assange from the United Kingdom on 18 charges related to the publication of thousands of military and diplomatic documents. He has been detained in the Belmarsh Prison in London for more than four years, and is currently appealing the UK's decision to agree to his extradition. The parliamentary delegation will include former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce, Labor MP Tony Zappia, Liberal senator Alex Antic, independent MP Monique Ryan, and Greens senators David Shoebridge and Peter Whish-Wilson. The group will urge US politicians and officials to abandon their extradition efforts, when it travels to Washington on September 20.

>>19548542 Julian Assange: more than 60 Australian MPs urge US to let WikiLeaks founder walk free - More than 60 Australian federal politicians have explicitly called on the US to drop the prosecution of Julian Assange, warning of “a sharp and sustained outcry in Australia” if the WikiLeaks founder is extradited. With a small cross-party delegation due to fly to Washington next week, the Guardian can reveal the lobbying trip has won the open support of 63 members of Australia’s House of Representatives and Senate. In a letter, the 63 MPs and senators said they stood in support of the trip to the US and were “resolutely of the view that the prosecution and incarceration of the Australian citizen Julian Assange must end”. They said the matter had “dragged on for over a decade” and it was “wrong for Mr Assange to be further persecuted and denied his liberty when one considers the duration and circumstances of the detention he has already suffered.

>>19581618 Brazil's president says Julian Assange can't be punished for 'informing society' in a 'transparent' way - Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said at the United Nations in New York City on Tuesday that it is "essential" to preserve the freedom of the press and that Wikileaks founder Julian Assange should not be prosecuted for informing the public. "It is essential to preserve the freedom of the press. A journalist like Julian Assange cannot be punished for informing society in a transparent and legitimate way," Lula said. The president's comments come a day before a cross-party delegation of Australian politicians meet in Washington, D.C., with U.S. officials, members of Congress and civil rights groups. The group is bringing a letter signed by more than 60 members of parliament calling on the U.S. to drop the prosecution against Assange, who is fighting against extradition to the U.S., where could be sentenced to as many as 175 years in an American maximum security prison. U.S. President Joe Biden will host Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in late October. Albanese has repeatedly called on the U.S. in recent months to end the prosecution of the Australian journalist.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822041

#32 - Part 24

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 2

>>19587750 Unlikely alliance pleads for Julian Assange’s release in US - The US-Australia alliance faces a fresh test after Canberra politicians descended on Washington to demand the immediate release of Julian Assange and warned that his extradition would spark a backlash from America’s key AUKUS partner. With the Wikileaks founder running out of options, Australian politicians from across the aisle have met with members of US Congress and officials from the State and Justice departments to call for the Australian citizen, who’s being held in London’s Belmarsh prison, to be sent home by Christmas. “We’ve made it very clear that the continued prosecution of Julian Assange is not the action of a friend of Australia,” said Greens Senator David Shoebridge, who added that extradition would be “a blow to the relationship between Australia and the United States”.

>>19686008 United in the States: Assange family pins hopes on Albanese-Biden meeting - Julian Assange’s family is working out of the United States to fight his extradition, beseeching lawmakers there for help ahead of a looming meeting between Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and President Joe Biden. They live in fear that their phones will light up with news that the WikiLeaks founder is about to be whisked from detention in the United Kingdom to a US prison - where they will lose him forever. This heightened anxiety is fuelling their efforts to campaign for Assange’s release. They are meeting with key Democrats and Republicans, seeking the support of international leaders and drumming up public support to end the 13-year saga over his fate.

>>19816452 ‘Enough is enough’: Albanese talks to Biden about Assange - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has raised the plight of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in talks this week with United States President Joe Biden, stepping up efforts to find a way to release the Australian from jail. Albanese discussed Assange in his private talks in Washington DC after making public calls in recent months for a resolution to the US charges against him for releasing state secrets. The talks came as Assange’s brother, Gabriel Shipton, told this masthead that he feared for his brother’s life because of the impact of the detention on his mental health. Shipton, who saw Assange last week, said a visit to his brother was always “full of anxiety” about his brother’s condition. “He’s still fighting, he’s hanging in there despite what he’s been through and despite the adversary he’s taken on,” he said. “He’s not the same man he was a year ago or even before that - it’s really taken its toll on him.” Shipton said it would be unacceptable for Assange to face trial in the US given the case is set down for a Virginia court where the community - and the jury pool - included defence and security workers. “I don’t believe that Julian would receive a fair trial in the United States,” he said. “It’s a bit of a fairytale, to be honest, this idea that Julian would receive a fair trial or a fair deal that wouldn’t see him suffering more.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822043

#32 - Part 25

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 1

>>19587792 Shane Drumgold’s case against Sofronoff inquiry to be heard by Victorian judge - Former ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold’s case against the inquiry that ended his career will be heard by a Victorian Supreme Court judge, due to a potential conflict of interest preventing it from being heard by a judge in his own jurisdiction. Mr Drumgold last month launched extraordinary legal action challenging both his “termination” by the ACT government and the findings of the inquiry that he engaged in serious malpractice and grossly ­unethical conduct in Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial. The ACT Supreme Court on Thursday heard Chief Justice Lucy McCallum had decided it “would not be appropriate for any resident judge of this court to hear these proceedings.” ACT Registrar Jayne Reece wrote to parties last week saying there was a potential “conflict of interest” due to Mr Drumgold’s standing in the ACT Supreme Court, which was further “complicated” by the fact Chief Justice McCallum presided over Mr Lehrmann’s trial. As such, the court heard Chief Justice McCallum had written to Victorian Supreme Court Chief Justice Anne Ferguson requesting she allow one of her justices to become an acting member of the ACT Supreme Court. Chief Justice Ferguson obliged, and Justice Stephen Kaye is in the process of becoming appointed to oversee proceedings.

>>19805233 Bruce Lehrmann charged with two counts of rape in Toowoomba - Former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann has been charged with two counts of rape in relation to an incident alleged to have occurred after a night out in Queensland in October, 2021. For the first time, it can be revealed that Mr Lehrmann is the “high-profile man” accused of rape in Toowoomba, west of Brisbane. The matter was first listed in the Toowoomba Magistrates Court in January, 2023 but Mr Lehrmann has never been named until now. The two charges pertain to an alleged incident with a woman Mr Lehrmann met in a Toowoomba nightclub weeks after he appeared in an ACT court over unrelated allegations he raped Brittany Higgins. That trial collapsed following an allegation of juror misconduct. Mr Lehrmann was never convicted and strongly denied all allegations. Queensland Supreme Court judge Peter Applegarth rejected an application by Mr Lehrmann to continue an ongoing suppression order on his name at 5pm on Thursday, October 26.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822044

#32 - Part 26

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 2

>>19805258 Bruce Lehrmann in dock on new rape charges - Bruce Lehrmann has been charged with rape after a young woman he met in a Toowoomba strip club Googled the Brittany Higgins rape case and then alleged she recognised him as the man who had unprotected sex with her without consent. The alleged victim told police she realised it was the same man who introduced himself as “Bryce” when they met at the club in October 2021, only a few weeks after he first appeared in court over allegations he raped Ms Higgins in Parliament House. Mr Lehrmann allegedly had consensual sex with the woman that night but failed to wear a condom when they had sex twice the next morning. Failing to wear a condom without a partner’s permission is considered sexual ­assault under Queensland law. The 28-year-old was named on Thursday as the well-known Australian facing rape charges in ­Toowoomba after the Supreme Court of Queensland lifted a suppression order that had protected his identity. The prosecution and media outlets, including The Australian, had fought in court to remove the non-publication order, arguing that it went against the principles of open justice and that Mr Lehrmann had no automatic protection under the new laws. The former Liberal staffer was not present in court for the hearing, and remains on bail. He is expected to plead not guilty to the charges.

>>19805276 Why we couldn’t tell you Bruce Lehrmann was charged with rape until now - The media have not been legally able to report on the identity of Bruce Lehrmann until now under Queensland laws that suppressed the identity of the accused in sexual assault cases until or unless they are committed to stand trial. Those laws were changed in September, bringing Queensland into line with most other states and territories to allow the naming of accused sex offenders after they are charged. Despite the change in the law, the legal fight to name him has continued to play out in the Queensland Supreme Court and the Toowoomba Magistrates Court after his legal team sought a suppression order. The media has instead reported on multiple court hearings in relation to the matter for the past year by simply referring to a “high-profile man” accused of rape in Toowoomba, west of Brisbane. That was until today. The two charges pertain to an alleged incident with a woman Mr Lehrmann met in a Toowoomba nightclub weeks after he appeared in an ACT court over unrelated allegations he raped Brittany Higgins. That trial collapsed following an allegation of juror misconduct. Mr Lehrmann was never convicted and strongly denied all allegations. Queensland Supreme Court judge Peter Applegarth rejected an application by Mr Lehrmann to continue an ongoing suppression order on his name at 5pm on Thursday, October 26.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822048

#32 - Part 27

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial

>>19511867 Australian War Memorial adds panel with context of Ben Roberts-Smith's defamation case to uniform display - The Australian War Memorial (AWM) has added information to a plaque commemorating Corporal Ben Roberts-Smith's Victoria Cross medal, to reflect recent court rulings over his alleged conduct in Afghanistan. The AWM has added details about a Federal Court ruling in a defamation case brought by Mr Roberts-Smith against media groups, which found there was substantial truth to allegations he had been involved and complicit in unlawful killings in Afghanistan. Mr Roberts-Smith is currently challenging the ruling with an appeal, and has not been charged with any criminal offence. The revised text panel reads in part: "Accounts of alleged misconduct by a small number of Australian Special Forces soldiers in Afghanistan began appearing in the media from late 2016. Claims were later heard in a civil defamation case brought by Roberts-Smith against media outlets and journalists. In June 2023 a Federal Court Judge determined that there was "substantial truth" to the allegations that Roberts-Smith had been involved and complicit in unlawful killings in Afghanistan. Roberts-Smith has appealed this decision. Roberts-Smith has not been charged with any offence under criminal law."

>>19656323 Death threats from Ben Roberts-Smith supporters aimed at journalist - Supporters of disgraced former SAS soldier Ben Roberts-Smith have directed a number of death threats at investigative reporter for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age Nick McKenzie since May, when a judge ruled in favour of his reporting on alleged war crimes committed by Roberts-Smith. In June, Justice Anthony Besanko ruled that on the balance of probabilities Roberts-Smith was guilty and complicit in the murder of four unarmed prisoners in Afghanistan. It was a decision several years in the making, following extensive reporting by McKenzie and Chris Masters, who were both subsequently sued for defamation by the former soldier and former Seven Network executive. “Good morning Nick. I hope you receive the same punishment that Ali Jan allegedly received… just sleep on it mate,” McKenzie was told in a phone message in July, referencing one of the victims of Roberts-Smith. Members of a Facebook group “We stand with Ben Roberts-Smith VC MG” lobbied others to attend scheduled dates for McKenzie’s and Masters’ book tours in July and August. The group, which has more than 3700 members, was made private in July after one of its admins, Western Australian woman Linda Deval, was contacted by this masthead over a post claiming it had the support of Roberts-Smith and his family. “Will be there in Canberra July 26th to let him know fear,” read one comment under the username Gary Redman, residing in the NSW town of Bermagui, on a post urging members to attend dates on McKenzie’s book tour.

>>19712747 British army ‘was told SAS lied to justify killing of Afghans’ - Senior British military officers were warned that SAS units were planting evidence to try to justify the killings of dozens of innocent civilians during raids in Afghanistan, an inquiry has been told. The deaths allegedly stemmed from an unofficial policy within the British special forces to “execute Afghan males of fighting age” even when they posed no threat. High-level concerns about the alleged killings prompted one senior military officer to say that justifications given were “logic-defying”. Other staff used internal emails to lament a “casual disregard for life”. Details of the killings emerged on the first day of a public inquiry into the behaviour of elite military units. It will examine claims that more than 80 Afghans were summarily killed between 2010 and 2013. The Ministry of Defence ordered the inquiry last year after campaigning by victims’ families and claims by the BBC program Panorama that one unit may have unlawfully killed 54 people in one six-month tour. Opening the inquiry at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, Lord Justice Haddon-Cave, the chairman, said the allegations were “extremely grave”. The inquiry would examine claims that the allegations were “covered up at all levels over the last decade” and that investigations by the Royal Military Police were not fit for purpose. The inquiry heard evidence from internal emails between officials in which they referred to the official explanation about raids as “bollocks”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822052

#32 - Part 28

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 1

>>19505163 Video: AUKUS deal not moving through US Congress as smoothly as hoped, senator warns - Congress is at risk of "doing Beijing's work" if it fails to pass legislation necessary to the AUKUS deal, the US Senate's foreign relations chairman has warned. Two years since the deal to supply Australia with American submarines was announced, senior members of congress are urging their colleagues not to hold up laws to authorise their delivery. Bob Menendez, the chairman of the US Senate's Foreign Relations Committee, told a hearing in Washington that congress's implementation of the deal had "not gone as smoothly as some of us would have hoped". But he said China's recent behaviour towards Australia meant "time is of the essence" in the trilateral agreement between Australia, the US and the UK. "They [China] are aggressively trying to influence Australian politics and civil society, buying critical infrastructure like port facilities in Darwin, making political donations, even hacking Australian parliament and major political parties," Senator Menendez said.

>>19562030 Two years after AUKUS announcement, American politicians are divided on delivery of subs to Australia - A Republican senator has renewed calls for the US to step up its production of nuclear-powered submarines before selling them as part of AUKUS, arguing America is as "unprepared" as it was ahead of the Pearl Harbor attack. The US is set to transfer at least three Virginia-class submarines to Australia from the early 2030s under the AUKUS agreement. However, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services committee, Roger Wicker, told a hearing in Washington this week that the US was failing to meet its own shipbuilding targets. "We should be producing somewhere between 2.3 and 2.5 attack submarines a year to fulfil our own requirements as we implement AUKUS," he said. "Instead, we're down to building 1.2 attack submarines per year… and the path back toward two per year is based on hopes and wishes. We are as unprepared as our fleet was for the Japanese attack on the eve of Pearl Harbor in 1941. We need to act."

>>19575834 Are AUKUS and Marles killing our defence force? - "There’s every chance AUKUS could turn out to be the enemy of Australian defence self-reliance, or of any defence capability at all. Worse, it could ultimately go the way of the French submarines. People will lose faith in it because it’s not remotely on track to deliver anything at all in a meaningful timeframe. Nothing much is happening about AUKUS in the physical universe. We haven’t even seriously begun upgrading the Stirling submarine base in Western Australia that is meant to host nuclear-powered subs by 2027. Richard Marles must already be judged a failure as Defence Minister. He tried to get more money for Defence and failed. As a result, the whole show is in shocking disarray. Any nation that acquires nuclear-powered subs needs to spend a lot more money. If it doesn’t radically increase its defence budget it can spend that money only by eating up other defence capabilities. We’re getting nuclear subs, but we’re not increasing defence spending within these forward estimates, and promises after that are just science fiction. So far, the government is overseeing the decline of Australian defence capability. It really is a national tragedy." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19601944 Senior US Democrats senator Bob Menendez charged with corruption - One of the most senior Democrats in Washington, Senator Bob Menendez, has been charged with corruption after the FBI found hundreds of thousands of dollars, gold bars, and a Mercedes-Benz at his private home, allegedly provided by three Egyptian-American businessmen for favours. The explosive allegations against the senator for New Jersey, who is also chairman of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee, emerged on Friday (Saturday AEST) and come amid tense negotiations over funding the government in a senate where Democrats hold a slim 51 to 49 margin. Damian Williams, US attorney for the Southern District of New York, which has brought the charges, alleged the senator had between 2018 and 2022, along with his wife, accepted bribes from three businessmen with links to Egypt, including $US480,000 ($745,000) in hidden cash and three gold bars worth around $US150,000 found at the chairman’s home. Senator Menendez, a supporter of the AUKUS agreement, introduced legislation into the senate in July to enable the transfer of nuclear submarines to Australia as part of the three way security pact. After Mr Williams’s press conference Senator Menendez released a statement blaming the charges on “forces behind the scenes” that had “repeatedly attempted to silence my voice and dig my political grave”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822055

#32 - Part 29

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 2

>>19601950 Gold bars, cash-stuffed envelopes: Indictment of Democratic senator alleges vast corruption - US Democratic Senator Bob Menendez has been called on to resign hours after he was indicted on bribery charges that involved alleged gifts of gold bars and cash from foreign governments. New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy called on his state’s senior senator to step down after the charges were announced. Menendez, as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, defended the AUKUS agreement from Republican resistance. Murphy, a fellow Democrat, could appoint a successor should Menendez agree to step down. In a statement released late Friday afternoon, Murphy said the allegations were “deeply disturbing.” “These are serious charges that implicate national security and the integrity of our criminal justice system,” he added. He said that while Menendez and his co-defendants - his wife, Nadine Menendez, and three businessmen - were entitled to defend themselves, “the alleged facts are so serious that they compromise the ability of Senator Menendez to effectively represent the people of our state. Therefore, I am calling for his immediate resignation”.

>>19623918 Luxury car, gold bars: Australian ally in US Senate won’t step down over bribery charges - One of the most high-profile AUKUS allies in the US Congress is facing a growing stampede of Democrat colleagues urging him to resign after he pleaded not guilty over an alleged scheme that involved taking bribes in exchange for helping the Egyptian government with military aid. Days after federal prosecutors revealed the explosive allegations against Senator Bob Menendez, more than half of the Senate’s Democrats are now demanding he step down amid fears the case could undercut their attack against Donald Trump’s criminal charges ahead of next year’s election. The most damning shift came from party whip Dick Durban, the second-highest ranking Democrat in the chamber, who had initially declined to say Menendez should leave office but changed course on Wednesday (Thursday AEST) saying it was clear his colleague “could no longer serve”. But despite facing calls from at least 30 of the 51 Democrats in the Senate, Menendez remained defiant as he and his wife, Nadine, pleaded not guilty to a bribery scheme that allegedly involved receiving gold bars, a luxury car and cash.

>>19650060 Congressional ‘poison pill’ could scuttle AUKUS nuclear subs deal - A senior defence policy adviser to the Clinton administration has warned AUKUS was “doomed to failure” without a significant revamp of US defence technology export regulations, amid growing concern that congress might ultimately baulk at the sale of nuclear powered submarines to Australia. Jeffrey Bialos, partner at law firm Eversheds-Sutherland and former deputy undersecretary of defence during the Clinton ­administration, told The Australian that the three-way defence alliance would be “dead on ­arrival” based on the as-yet legislated proposals to operationalise the landmark deal. “None of these measures do more than put Band-Aids on longstanding issues. The idea of an exemption for Australia and the UK isn’t new, we tried it in the late ’90s and it failed,” he said. Mr Bialos, who was also one of the architects of an effort to ­reform of US defence technology export regulations in the Clinton administration, said the regulatory standards that would be ­required of Australia and Britain were so stringent that the countries wouldn’t agree to them and in practice co-operation couldn’t occur, even if the White House was under the impression it could.

>>19650066 Aukus: UK defence giant BAE Systems wins £3.95bn submarine contract - Britain's biggest defence firm, BAE Systems, has won a £3.95bn ($4.82bn) contract to build a new generation of submarines as the security pact between the US, UK and Australia moves ahead. In March, the three countries announced details of the so-called Aukus pact to provide Australia with nuclear-powered attack submarines by the late 2030s. The pact aims to counter China's ambitions in the Indo-Pacific region. Beijing has strongly criticised the three countries over the deal. "We're incredibly proud of our role in the delivery of this vitally important, tri-nation submarine programme," BAE Systems Chief Executive Charles Woodburn said. BAE said the funding will pay for development work to 2028, with manufacturing of the vessels expected to start towards the end of this decade. The first SSN-Aukus submarine is scheduled to be delivered in the late 2030s. Both the UK and Australia will use the SSN-Aukus submarines, which will be based on a British design.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822057

#32 - Part 30

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 3

>>19664434 Scathing new report hands AUKUS sceptics firepower - An accident by the Australian navy operating US-made nuclear-powered submarines could result in American warships being banned from foreign ports, a new report warns US legislators, providing fresh ammunition for congressional sceptics to scuttle the AUKUS deal. The Congressional Research Service report also reaffirms American doubts that Australia might not use nuclear-powered submarines bought from the US in a war over Taiwan. That suggests that at least some of Canberra’s messaging about AUKUS not tying Australia irrevocably into a US-led war with China is being heard in Washington. “Virginia-class boats are less certain to be used in a US-China conflict over Taiwan, or less certain to be used in such a conflict in the way that the United States might prefer, if they are sold to Australia rather than retained in US Navy service,” the report said. Conversely, the report said approving the sale would see Australia become a “second allied decision-making centre” for operating nuclear-powered submarines in the Indo-Pacific, “which would enhance deterrence of potential Chinese aggression by complicating Chinese military planning”. Released late last month, the report follows concerns Republican senators raised in a July letter to President Joe Biden, which requested more money for the US submarine industrial base to boost production to fulfil the AUKUS agreement.

>>19679708 Video: Trump allegedly discussed US nuclear subs with foreign national: Source - ABC News' Katherine Faulders reports former Pres. Donald Trump allegedly revealed potentially sensitive information about U.S. nuclear submarines to Australian billionaire, Anthony Pratt. - ABC News (USA)

>>19679775 Video: Donald Trump accused of sharing nuclear submarine details with Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt - Former US president Donald Trump reportedly discussed "potentially sensitive" details of America's nuclear submarine program with an Australian billionaire. The American ABC news outlet reported that Mr Trump told Anthony Pratt the supposed number of nuclear warheads on US subs, and how close they could get to a Russian submarine without being detected. The conversation is said to have taken place at Mr Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Florida, several months after he left office. ABC - which is not affiliated with ABC in Australia - also reported that Mr Pratt allegedly then shared the information with at least 45 people, including journalists and employees, as well as 10 Australian officials and three former prime ministers. The alleged conversation with Mr Pratt was not mentioned by federal prosecutors when they charged Mr Trump with mishandling classified documents this year. However, ABC reported that Mr Pratt had been interviewed on the matter at least twice, and that he told investigators he was not sure if the information was accurate. The New York Times said the businessman was among dozens of people identified as possible witnesses who could testify against the former president at trial. A spokesman for Mr Trump criticised what they described as "illegal leaks" that lacked "proper context and relevant information".

>>19679792 Video: Donald Trump allegedly discussed US nuclear subs with Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt - Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt has been identified as a ­potential witness against Donald Trump in his classified documents trial after he allegedly received ­secret information on US nuclear submarine capabilities from the former president. America’s ABC News reported that Mr Pratt was interviewed by prosecutors and FBI agents over the alleged 2021 disclosure by Mr Trump at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida. The Pratt Industries and Visy boss reportedly said in the interviews that Mr Trump disclosed the exact number of nuclear warheads carried by US nuclear subs, and how close they could get to a Russian submarine without being detected. Mr Pratt, whose office did not return calls on Friday, allegedly ­relayed details of the exchange to at least 45 people, including three former prime ministers, six journalists, 11 of his company's employees, and 10 Australian officials, ABC News reported. Former prime minister Tony Abbott told The Weekend Australian that he had “no recollection of any such discussion” with Mr Pratt, while his successor, Malcolm Turnbull, said Mr Pratt did not speak to him about the matter. Scott Morrison, who was close to Mr Pratt and was in office at the time of the alleged Trump disclosure, did not respond to inquiries. Anthony Albanese’s office also ­declined to comment. The Trump-Pratt conversation allegedly happened soon after Mr Trump’s election defeat and about five months before the AUKUS pact was announced.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822061

#32 - Part 31

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 4

>>19679836 ‘It’s on Wikipedia’: Debate flares over Trump’s submarine disclosures to Anthony Pratt - Former prime ministers have distanced themselves from revelations that Donald Trump allegedly disclosed classified information about United States’ submarines to Australian packaging mogul Anthony Pratt as debate flared about the national security implications of the alleged leak. Pratt, the executive chairman of Visy Industries and Pratt Industries, is among more than 80 people whom prosecutors have identified as possible witnesses who could testify against the president at his classified documents trial. The revelations about Trump’s alleged indiscretion regarding sensitive national security information have revived fears among officials in Canberra about the volatile scenario they would face if Trump wins next year’s presidential election. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said Pratt did not disclose the conversations to him. “Trump did ask me in early 2017 why we were buying French rather than US subs,” Turnbull said. “I explained that it was important that they be a sovereign capability, and that we did not have the means at that stage to sustain and maintain nuclear-powered submarines ourselves.” Scott Morrison did not respond to request for comment, while Tony Abbott said: “I don’t have any recollection of it.”

>>19684137 Trump denies telling Aussie billionaire sub secrets - Donald Trump says reports he disclosed secret information regarding US submarines are false, but he will always encourage countries such as Australia to purchase American weaponry. A report this week suggested the former president told Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt confidential information about US nuclear submarines during a meeting at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort, of which Mr Pratt is reportedly a member. US outlet ABC News reported Trump told Mr Pratt sensitive information in April 2021, including how many warheads the subs routinely carry and how close they can get to a Russian submarine without being detected. Mr Trump is currently being investigated for allegedly hoarding classified documents after leaving office. In a post on his social media platform Truth Social on Friday local time, Trump labelled ABC's report "false and ridiculous". "Other than the fact that I will often state that we make the best submarines and military equipment anywhere in the world," Mr Trump said. "A pretty well known fact!"

>>19684154 Video: Lawrence: Australian billionaire bought ‘exactly what he wanted’ from Trump - MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell details the “incriminating” breaking news that Donald Trump reportedly revealed nuclear submarine secrets to an Australian billionaire member of Mar-a-Lago who “purchased his access” to Trump while he was president as Trump moves to dismiss or delay the criminal cases against him. - MSNBC

>>19684171 Video: TRUMP SPIES; GAVE NUKE SUB SECRETS TO AUSSIES - TRUMP IS FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES A FOREIGN SPY, who in April 2021 gave away nuclear submarine secrets to an Australian manufacturer of boxes, 'potentially endanger(ing) the U.S. fleet." The businessman promptly told at least 45 other people, including 11 of his own employees, 10 Australian officials, and THREE FORMER Australian Prime Ministers. We must do to Trump what we would do to any other trafficker in top secret information: arrest, detention without bail, prosecution for espionage. - Keith Olbermann

>>19684200 Video: Maggie Haberman: This is the latest example of Trump's 'melding' persona, presidency and business - CNN's Anderson Cooper breaks down a new ABC report that former President Donald Trump allegedly discussed sensitive nuclear submarine information with a Mar-a-Lago member, and discusses with a panel of experts. - CNN

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822063

#32 - Part 32

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 5

>>19729249 Rudd slams ‘crazy’ US red tape slowing AUKUS - Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, has slammed “ridiculous” US bureaucracy holding back faster progress on the AUKUS submarine pact between the two countries. The former prime minister said tough export controls on sensitive military technology could slow the sharing of nuclear propulsion technology between the allies under AUKUS. China’s aggression in the Pacific and the AUKUS pact have spurred US politicians on both sides to recognise tough export controls on Australia need to be eased. But there are some concerns that loosening controls could allow “bad actors” to gain access to valuable US military secrets. Many of the export controls could be overlooked quickly by the Biden administration, without having to pass through Congress, as has been the case with supplying some technology to Ukraine. Other rules, especially around nuclear intelligence, need Congress approval. Mr Rudd said he has reminded members of Congress of long-standing intelligence sharing arrangements between the two allies. “Well guys, we’ve been sharing the highest classified intelligence information with each other since 1946. Here we are in 2023 … and we haven’t done that in terms of defence kit. So we should ask the question, why not? There is no good reason. We need to move ahead.”

>>19729271 Kevin Rudd delivered a blunt rebuke of congress for slow progress on AUKUS changes - Kevin Rudd has slammed “really crazy” and “ridiculous” US regulations that could thwart the transfer of US nuclear submarines to Australia as part of the AUKUS security pact, urging senior Biden administration officials to put pressure on a paralysed congress to expedite the necessary changes to facilitate the landmark agreement. Dr Rudd, ambassador to the US, also said Australia would remain “rock solid” with the US in the face of “challenges which lie ahead [that] are beyond our imagining”, referring to the prospect of war in the Middle East, Ukraine and China’s growing threat in the Indo-Pacific. Provisions to approve the transfer of Virginia-class submarines to Australia, which is expected to buy between three and five from the US in the early 2030s, remain bogged down in debate in congress as Republicans and Democrats thrash out an annual defence spending bill. “Waiting for weeks, months or even years for spare parts or stocks to be replenished is no longer viable … One of the many military lessons from Ukraine is that defence materiel depletes quickly in a conflict.”

>>19762239 Six US senators have demanded extra information on submarines before backing AUKUS - A bipartisan group of US senators has demanded the Pentagon release details on how much extra money it will need to provide Australia with nuclear powered submarines in the 2030s at the same time as satisfying the US Navy’s own expanding fleet requirements. In a further escalation of a months-long standoff between congress and the White House over how to proceed with AUKUS, the three-way security pact among the US, Australia and the UK, three Republican and three Democrat senators have insisted the Pentagon release an already- completed study on the US submarine base by the end of this month. “Congress must have a comprehensive understanding of the current status of the submarine industrial base as well as the future resource investments necessary to meet our nation’s requirements,” the senators wrote in a letter dated 12th October that was release by Senator John Wicker on Tuesday (Wednesday AEDT).

>>19769266 Anthony Albanese’s AUKUS meetings stifled by congress chaos - Anthony Albanese’s plans to meet with legislators and smooth over concerns about the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal during his four-day visit to Washington have not been locked in amid chaos and delays in appointing a new US Speaker of the House of Representatives. The Prime Minister, who is expected to strike new deals on critical minerals and clean energy with US President Joe Biden next week, will meet with key congress figures to help expedite legislative changes and make AUKUS fully operational. The leading candidate for Speaker of the House of Representatives, hardline Republican Jim Jordan, on Thursday (Friday AEDT) said that he still intended to seek the speakership despite failing in two floor votes this week to secure the required number of votes. The dysfunction in America’s second arm of government makes it unclear who Mr Albanese would meet, at least among Republicans, who have a majority in the House of Representatives but not the Senate.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822065

#32 - Part 33

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 6

>>19775706 Chinese spies target nuclear submarine secrets ‘as high priority’ - China is attempting to steal nuclear technology secrets from Britain and disrupt AUKUS, one of its most crucial security agreements, the head of MI5 has said. Ken McCallum, the director-general of the security service, warned about attempts to infiltrate the AUKUS pact, the nuclear submarine agreement with the US and Australia, developed to counter an increasingly provocative China. The trilateral initiative, which was announced by Boris Johnson in 2021, will equip the Royal Australian Navy with nuclear-powered vessels for the first time. It was seen as an attempt to check China’s growing military assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific region, where its naval force has more than tripled in two decades. China has accused the three western countries of going down a “dangerous path” over the deal which would “motivate an arms race, damage the international nuclear non-proliferation regime and harm regional stability and peace”. McCallum said: “If you saw the wider public Chinese reaction when the AUKUS alliance was announced, you can infer from that they were not pleased. “Given everything else you know about the way in which Chinese espionage and interference is taking place, it would be safe to assume that it would be a high priority for them to understand what’s happening inside AUKUS and seek to disrupt it if they were able to.”

>>19780628 Anthony Albanese to 'urge support' for AUKUS in Washington ahead of meeting with Joe Biden - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will be "urging support" for all legislation needed for the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine deal to go ahead during his four-day visit to Washington next week. As part of the trilateral agreement, Australia will receive at least three US-built Virginia class submarines and then begin building its own, with a US combat system. However, the necessary Congress approval has faced challenges. Ahead of his departure on Sunday, Mr Albanese told reporters in Canberra that foreign politicians should avoid intervening in legislation directly "but this is important". "Our AUKUS pact is absolutely critical, and I'll be having important meetings with members of Congress and Senate about the legislation that's required to ensure that AUKUS can continue to forge ahead," he said.

>>19785552 Donald Trump calls billionaire Anthony Pratt ‘red haired weirdo from Australia’ as he denies discussing submarines - Donald Trump has described Anthony Pratt, one of Australia’s richest men, as a “red haired weirdo” as he lashed out at extraordinary reports about their personal conversations. Earlier this month, reports suggested Trump had shared top-secret details of US nuclear submarines with Pratt, an Australian billionaire who runs the paper and packaging giant Visy. New recordings and documents - reported by Australia’s Nine newspapers and 60 Minutes programme as well as the New York Times – have shed extraordinary further light on Pratt’s relationship with Trump and other key global and Australian figures. The reports suggest Pratt spent hundreds of thousands dollars on memberships at Trump’s private Mar-a-Lago resort, helping him cultivate a close relationship with the president and leading to regular private conversations between the pair.

>>19785586 ‘Being rich is my superpower’: Tapes reveal Pratt’s pursuit of the powerful - Secret tapes have revealed Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt’s extraordinary private dealings with Donald Trump, a $1 million promised payment to Trump’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and financial dealings with then-Prince Charles in the hope he would become king. After recent allegations Trump had leaked classified US submarine fleet details to Pratt, the covert recordings reveal the billionaire claimed the former president also disclosed non-public details about US military action in Iraq and a private conversation with Iraq’s leader. The tapes, along with internal documents from Pratt’s company, Visy, and briefings from over a dozen sources in the United States and Australia, reveal how the packaging titan uses relationships with powerful figures to obtain an advantage in global business and politics. Pratt gained access to Trump by spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on membership and event fees at the ex-president’s private Florida club, Mar-a-Lago. Pratt is heard on the tapes simultaneously admiring and besmirching Trump and comparing him to a mafia figure “with balls” who uses henchmen to do his dirty work.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822067

#32 - Part 34

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 7

>>19785601 Video: Revealed: Donald Trump's leaked conversations with Anthony Pratt - Nick McKenzie discusses the leaked recordings, during which billionaire Anthony Pratt details the former president’s ‘outrageous’ private conversations. - The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age

>>19785607 Video: Donald Trump Spills Secrets - 60 minutes uncovers tape recordings of Australian Billionaire Anthony Pratt sharing the classified information former president Donald Trump told him. - 60 Minutes Australia

>>19785767 Anthony Albanese to lobby US Congress to back Joe Biden’s bill for AUKUS, Israel and Ukraine - Anthony Albanese will lobby US congress members to pass Joe Biden’s bill promising billions for the AUKUS submarine program and military aid for Israel and Ukraine, as he launches a four-week international blitz headlined by meetings with the US President in Washington and Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Beijing. Mr Albanese on Sunday confirmed he would be the first prime minister in seven years to visit China after Beijing agreed to review trade sanctions on Australian wine following the government’s decision allowing Chinese-firm Landbridge to continue operating the Port of Darwin. Mr Albanese, who will meet Mr Xi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing and attend the Shanghai International Import Expo between November 4 and November 7, flew out to Washington on Sunday for an official state visit and dinner at the White House. Amid escalating wars in the Middle East and Ukraine and ahead of high-level meetings with Mr Biden and top US officials, Mr Albanese said he would urge the US President at their ninth meeting since the election to “remain focused on the Indo-Pacific ­region” as a counterbalance to Beijing. “We do have strategic competition in this region,” he said.

>>19792290 Albanese, Biden to tighten alliance at ‘Love Shack’ dinner - United States President Joe Biden has arranged for band The B52s to perform at a state dinner for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, in a sign of the effort being made in Washington DC to welcome the Australian leader on a visit that has been undercut by chaos in Congress. The new wave band, known for hits such as Love Shack and Rock Lobster, will be the star act at the dinner on the south lawn of the White House when more than 100 guests join the two leaders and their partners on Wednesday night. Albanese, an avowed fan of 1980s music, has been tight-lipped about the event after arriving in the US capital on Sunday night with a stated mission to use four days of meetings to cement the AUKUS defence pact, act on climate change and deepen cooperation on the supply of critical minerals. But the state dinner is being watched closely as a guide to the relationship between Biden and Albanese and how their personal ties will influence the next phase of the AUKUS alliance, which assumes the US will sell several nuclear-powered submarines to Australia and transfer technology to help build a new fleet in South Australia.

>>19792299 PM plays down fears submarine pact could be put on back-burner - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has played down concerns that time is running out to pass a raft of legislation to facilitate the AUKUS submarine pact, as he embarks on a four-day blitz to lobby members of a divided Congress paralysed by Republican infighting. Hours after landing in Washington for a highly anticipated meeting with US President Joe Biden on Wednesday, Albanese said US politicians from all sides understood the value of AUKUS and wanted “to get it right”. Diplomats and politicians fear that unless AUKUS progresses over the next few months, the plan could be put on the back-burner once America enters a volatile election year in which Donald Trump is attempting a return to the White House. Multiple pieces of legislation still need to be passed to make AUKUS a reality, including laws to enable US Virginia-class submarines to be transferred to Australia; a bill that would categorise Australia as a “domestic source” for military production under the US Defence Production Act; and a $3.4 billion White House funding request to strengthen the US Navy’s industrial base amid concerns from some Republicans that AUKUS could stretch it to “breaking point”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822072

#32 - Part 35

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 8

>>19792368 PM won’t increase Australia’s $3bn AUKUS pledge to boost US, UK industry - Anthony Albanese will not increase Australia’s $3bn commitment to boost US and British submarine industrial bases, as he launches a three-day blitz of meetings with US Congress members to lock-in legislative support for the AUKUS nuclear submarine pact. The Prime Minister, whose hopes of delivering a rare address to a joint session of Congress was blown-up by the ugly Republican fight over the US House of Representatives Speakership, said he believed Australia’s existing funding for AUKUS was “appropriate”. Amid a messy internal Republican struggle to appoint a new Speaker following the departure of Kevin McCarthy, Mr Albanese is expected to deliver a major speech advocating key AUKUS legislative changes at the US State Department on Friday (AEDT). Mr Albanese is due to meet key congressmen from the influential Friends of Australia Caucus on Thursday morning local time, including Democrat Joe Courtney and Republican Mike Gallagher, both keen supporters of AUKUS.

>>19798348 ‘Internal politics’: Pratt told me nothing about subs he gleaned from Trump, says Albanese - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared he was never told by Australian businessman Anthony Pratt about sensitive nuclear submarine information that former president Donald Trump allegedly shared in an alleged risk to national security. But Albanese has refused to weigh into the scandal engulfing the billionaire packaging tycoon, telling reporters in Washington ahead of a dinner with President Joe Biden, he wasn’t “going to comment on US internal politics”. The response comes after a joint investigation by this masthead and 60 Minutes uncovered separate audio recordings of Pratt talking about his relationship with “mafia”-like Donald Trump and his claim of a $US1 million payment to Trump’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani. The covert recordings also reveal that Pratt had claimed Trump disclosed non-public details about US military action in Iraq and a private conversation with Iraq’s leader. Trump has dismissed those accounts, posting on social media that the stories “about a red haired weirdo from Australia, named Anthony Pratt, is Fake News.”

>>19798362 Anthony Albanese Tweet: (7 January 2021) Democracy is precious and cannot be taken for granted - the violent insurrection in Washington is an assault on the rule of law and democracy. Donald Trump has encouraged this response and must now call on his supporters to stand down.

>>19798362 Video: (7 January 2021) Anthony Albanese blames Donald Trump for US Capitol violence - sbs.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822075

#32 - Part 36

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 9

>>19606895 AUKUS consensus is collapsing under weight of Labor blunders - "Committing to Morrison’s AUKUS is the most consequential decision of the Albanese government. The Parliamentary Budget Office estimates it will cost $50bn between 2027 and 2033 alone. Our navy, already under-resourced, will have to make painful savings. Splintering a bottle of champagne over the snout of an Attack-class French sub in the early 2030s would plainly have been a simpler option with less stress for other defence assets. The whole fleet would have been a bargain at a trifling $90bn compared with the half-trillion-dollar price tag for the Loch Ness monster alternative arriving in the 2050s." - Bob Carr, longest-serving premier of NSW and former Australian foreign minister - theaustralian.com.au

>>19805035 ‘All downhill from here, my darling’: PM’s one regret about US state dinner - The White House was adorned with a large Australian flag. The decor inside was inspired by the shared landscapes of both countries. And guests arrived to a band playing an instrumental version of Crowded House’s hit Don’t Dream It’s Over. Five months after abruptly cancelling a much-anticipated trip to Australia to deal with a looming debt crisis in Washington, US President Joe Biden gave Prime Minister Anthony Albanese the highest diplomatic honour reserved for an ally: a lavish state dinner. After a day filled with ceremony and diplomacy - a 21-gun salute on the White House south lawn; a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office - the two world leaders reconvened in the evening for a glitzy black-tie event with more than 300 guests to celebrate their enduring alliance. And as the leaders prepared to give a toast before dinner was served, Albanese joked that he “only had one regret about tonight, which is I’m not quite sure how I top this for date night with Jodie, at any time, anywhere in the future”. “It’s all downhill from here, my darling,” he told her.

>>19805051 Albanese and Biden stress importance of AUKUS pact amid global tensions - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Joe Biden have presented a united front amid current global uncertainty after holding talks in Washington. Albanese arrived at the White House on Wednesday (Thursday AEDT) as a military band played and 4000 guests watched from the South Lawn. The pair later held a press conference during which they reiterated the importance of the Australian-United States alliance in what Biden said was a difficult time, with ongoing conflict in the Middle East. It was part of a state visit intended to bolster American ties in the Pacific against the backdrop of fighting between Israel and Hamas. The US President said AUKUS was not a threat to China but about maintaining stability in the Indo Pacific region. "It is about maintaining stability, stability in the straits, the Indian Ocean, the whole area. "It is going to increase the prospects for long-term peace rather than anything else."

>>19805059 Albanese quotes Biden’s late son in White House speech - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has backed the “moral clarity” of United States President Joe Biden in his response to the conflict in the Middle East, in an address at the White House that amplifies Australian support at a time of American concern about the rise of China. Albanese cited words spoken by Biden’s late soldier son to highlight the strength of the alliance between the two countries, two weeks before he visits Beijing for talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Quoting an American talking about his time in the Iraq war, Albanese cited a soldier saying: “You know when there’s an Australian with you, they’ll always have your back.” He will then tell the crowd at the White House that the remark came from Major Beau Biden. The president’s son died of cancer in 2015, at the age of 46. Biden told the story of his son’s remark when he visited Australia as vice-president in 2016.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822077

#32 - Part 37

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 1

>>19487613 Video: No vote for Voice tips over 50 per cent as Coalition leads Labor on Newspoll primary vote - The Coalition has leapt ahead of Labor on primary votes for the first time since last year’s election and ­Anthony Albanese has dipped into negative territory, as support for the voice dropped further following the ­referendum date announcement and the official launch of a six-week ­campaign. An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian shows ­support for an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government falling to 38 per cent and those intending to vote No rising to 53 per cent. This marks the first time that ­opposition to a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice to parliament and executive ­government has achieved an outright majority.

>>19493285 Anthony Albanese is burning through his political capital as the voice falters - "The political damage has begun. Anthony Albanese can no longer take comfort in the Yes campaign’s ability to win over ­undecided voters. Even if it did, it appears this won’t be enough. It now also has to convince a significant number of voters to change their minds. There are only six weeks to make up significant ground as support for the voice referendum ­continues to retreat. Something remarkable is going to have to happen, if it’s not already too late." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19493287 Victorian Liberal leader John Pesutto confirms he’ll say No on Indigenous voice to parliament - John Pesutto has declared he will vote No in next month’s referendum, arguing that the objectives of the voice can be achieved without changing the Constitution. The Victorian Opposition Leader, in announcing his position, said he wanted a positive outcome for First Nations people and said this sentiment was shared between Yes and No voters alike. “Putting aside whether one supports or opposes the voice, I ­believe the objectives of the voice can be achieved without constitutional change,” Mr Pesutto said.

>>19493306 Warring Indigenous groups unite against voice - The Yes campaign in Tasmania is being cruelled by power struggles between warring Indigenous groups whose opposition to the voice is driven by fear their rivals will control it. Yes campaigners are most ­confident in the left-leaning south, but No sentiment is fuelled by bitter conflict between Indigenous groups, particularly in the more conservative north and northwest. The longstanding peak Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre, ­associated with prominent family groups, is battling what it claims are attempts by “tick-a-box” Indigenous people to gain influence and control over land and organisations. Hostility between the TAC and newer, regional-based Aboriginal corporations is most acute in the northwest, where the Circular Head Aboriginal Corporation has growing influence. The two groups are often at loggerheads - over Aboriginal identity, voting rights and land access - but are in furious agreement on one issue: the voice is no good.

>>19499246 Opponents to an Indigenous voice to parliament concede their campaign is ‘low-key’ - Opponents of an Indigenous voice to parliament are running a “low-key” ground campaign that’s “not as flash” as the Yes side, according to leading No spokesman Warren Mundine, with the focus on reaching voters through social media platforms such as TikTok rather than door-knocking and holding daily public events. As the official campaign enters its second week, Mr Mundine declared the No camp’s greatest campaigning technique was to let supporters knock on doors and talk with Australians because “they can’t answer the questions”.

>>19499267 Indigenous voice to parliament: Say Yes to embrace future of hope for our First Nations - "With the date of the referendum set, many Australians are now turning their attention to the choice they will make in just six weeks. On October 14, Australians will be asked a simple question: Do you support a change to the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice? Yes or no. The choice is simple: we can take the next step forward as a nation by embracing practical reconciliation or we can choose to close the door on recognition for Indigenous Australians. Embracing this moment, and choosing yes for constitutional recognition through a voice is our best chance of addressing the injustices of the past, and create structural change that will ensure Indigenous communities are listened to, so we can get better results." - Linda Burney, Indigenous Australians Minister - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822081

#32 - Part 38

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 2

>>19505142 Marcia Langton says the government must explain what happens if the Indigenous voice to parliament vote fails - Indigenous leader Marcia Langton has urged the Albanese government to lay out what the future holds for Aboriginal Australians in the event of a No vote for the voice referendum on October 14, fearing it could give governments a mandate to “do nothing and to make our lives worse”. Declaring this was Australia’s “one chance” to achieve constitutional recognition, leading Yes campaigners joined with Professor Langton on Wednesday in warning they would not work with Peter Dutton on a second “voiceless” referendum if the poll next month failed because it was not what they wanted.

>>19505149 Langton makes emotional plea to voters as Yes campaigners face threats - Indigenous leader Marcia Langton has claimed death threats and abuse are being aimed at the key advocates for a Yes vote at the October 14 referendum, in an emotional call on voters to save lives by voting for change. Langton said there was “nothing to fear” from the Indigenous Voice and warned voters against the “deceit” of No campaigners who had claimed the outcome would divide the country on race. But she called on the government to prepare for the aftermath of the national ballot by setting out how it would ensure consultation with First Nations people, saying a No vote would be falsely seen as a “mandate to do nothing” that would entrench disadvantage and cost lives.

>>19511644 Indigenous voice to parliament: Noel Pearson’s caution over welcome to country - Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has called for Australia to scale back use of welcome to country in the wake of the upcoming referendum, noting that the practice can often be overdone. The prominent Yes campaigner on Friday said Australia was still learning about when the ceremony should and should not be used, saying there was a need to develop a consensus on the most appropriate practices. “People often don’t know what to do. We’ve got to adopt a sensible approach to these things,” he said. “When someone opens a meeting, that’s fine. But … every speaker then subsequently does the welcome and it cuts into the meeting, I can tell you.”

>>19511677 Even the left now calling out ‘elite’ grip on voice to parliament - Much like other social media platforms, Reddit forums in Australia skew to the young and to the left. With the average age of a Reddit user estimated at 23, it’s no surprise that political discussions often lean towards green-left perspectives. Nevertheless, recent discussions about the upcoming voice referendum have revealed a surprising mix of viewpoints within this demographic. And what is intriguing is the number of individuals expressing a No stance for reasons that do not neatly align with traditional or conservative ideals. “What a waste of time and money. Voting NO on this nonsense. Imagine if they put $364m into social services in Alice Springs,” wrote one commenter in r/AusFinance, a subreddit of nearly half a million members engaged in discussions about financial issues in Australia. Left-leaning No voters do not appear to oppose the voice because they are diehard constitutional conservatives, or because they lack compassion. It’s not about being racist either. Their frustration stems from the perception that the Labor government is not adequately addressing the issues that matter to them most, and is instead focusing on the higher-order matter of constitutional change. And if there is one overarching theme that emerges from these discussions, it is that there is a divide in Australia, but it is defined by class and asset ownership - not race.

>>19511755 Qantas flights for Indigenous voice to parliament opponents urged in ‘spirit’ of fair go - Incoming Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson is being urged to restore the airline’s damaged reputation by ensuring the national carrier matches its “offer to the Yes camp with free flights for No supporters”. Former deputy prime minister John Anderson - a long-serving transport minister in the Howard government and leading critic of the voice to parliament – warned that Qantas had played a key role in dividing the nation by straying into the realm of social and political activism. Mr Anderson called on Ms Hudson to go back to the drawing board and extend the same hospitality for Yes campaigners - who are receiving free flights that Qantas expects to cost up to $500,000 – to supporters of the No campaign.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822085

#32 - Part 39

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 3

>>19518014 Palmer launches court bid to force AEC to count ‘X’ as ‘No’ in Voice vote - Mining magnate Clive Palmer and United Australia Party Senator Ralph Babet have launched a Federal Court bid to force the Australian Electoral Commission to count crosses on Voice referendum ballot papers as a vote against the proposal. The urgent court challenge comes just five weeks before the historic Voice to parliament referendum on October 14. The Electoral Commission has made clear that a tick will be counted as a Yes vote but a cross, which may be ambiguous, will not be counted as a No vote on Voice referendum ballot papers, consistent with legal advice that has been provided for decades. Opposition leader Peter Dutton has previously claimed this would give the Yes campaign an advantage.

>>19518077 The latest poll for the Voice to Parliament shows Yes trailing No by greatest margin yet - With 34 days until polling day, advocates for a Voice to Parliament would almost certainly be wishing they were in a stronger position right now. From extremely high levels of support a year ago, when the referendum question hadn't been finalised and the Voice was a vague concept in people's minds, support has fallen a long way. The latest poll from RedBridge, published on Saturday, estimates 61 per cent of Australians are opposed to the Voice, while 39 per cent are in favour. It’s the single lowest poll result we've seen for Yes (worse than the 38 per cent in Newspoll this week because that poll included 9 per cent undecided), albeit from a pollster which has tended to produce poorer numbers for Yes than other polls. With this new data point, along with Newspoll and Essential polls published this week, Yes is sitting at an average of 43.7 per cent across the polls. No is sitting more than 12 percentage points ahead on 56.3 per cent.

>>19518144 Labor voters abandon Albanese’s bid to establish a Voice to Parliament - Aussies are abandoning the Prime Minister on the Voice to Parliament, with new polling revealing just 39 per cent of the nation plans to vote Yes in the upcoming referendum. The latest poll from RedBridge, released today, marks the lowest poll result for the Yes campaign so far - with an overwhelming 61 per cent planning to vote No. The poll was conducted in the first week of September, following Anthony Albanese’s announcement the referendum would be held on October 14. Unlike some other polls, RedBridge requires voters to make a choice between Yes and No, rather than allowing them to reply that they are undecided. The poll also found that Labor voters are deserting the party line, with 57 per cent of its supporter base planning to vote Yes and 43 per cent No. By contrast, the RedBridge poll found that 87 per cent of Coalition supporters were planning to vote in line with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s No camp.

>>19523142 Anthony Albanese ‘not sorry’ after parking voice campaign for world stage - Anthony Albanese has defended his decision to be out of the country for an entire week of the voice referendum campaign, which he has described as “a once-in-a-generation chance to bring our country together”. The Prime Minister, who attended the ASEAN, East Asia and G20 summits and squeezed in a side trip to the Philippines, refused to take questions during the trip on the foreign affairs implications of an Indigenous voice to parliament. Mr Albanese, who was due to arrive back in Canberra on Monday morning, said it was vital that Australia was represented at such international forums.

>>19523154 Pearson says Dutton’s second referendum is a ‘mirage’ - and hopes the Voice isn’t ‘unrequited’ - Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has attacked Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s proposed second referendum and expressed optimism that the public will accept Indigenous Australians’ outstretched hand of friendship by backing the Voice. Dutton said last Sunday that if the Voice referendum failed, and he won the next election, he would call another referendum to recognise Indigenous Australians but exclude a constitutional Voice. The Coalition’s Indigenous affairs spokeswoman and leading No campaigner, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, days later failed to declare support for the idea, which Pearson claimed had eviscerated the Coalition’s reconciliation plans and proved it was not Dutton who set party policy.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822086

#32 - Part 40

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 4

>>19529127 Voters continue to turn against the Voice - and Albanese along with it - Support for the Indigenous Voice has slumped to 43 per cent after the opening week of the formal campaign for the referendum, with NSW and Victorian voters shifting against the proposal and putting it on track for defeat on October 14. Voters have swung against the Voice for the fifth month in a row and are backing the No case in every state except Tasmania, despite a forceful campaign by Yes supporters to assure sceptical voters they had nothing to fear from the change. An exclusive survey also shows that Labor has lost core support and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has suffered a fall in his net performance rating to minus 7 per cent, driving this measure into negative territory for the first time since the election. Albanese retains a clear advantage over Opposition Leader Peter Dutton as preferred prime minister, ahead by 43 to 28 per cent, but this has narrowed from 46 to 25 per cent one month ago. The survey, conducted by Resolve Strategic, shows that 35 per cent of voters support the Voice and 49 per cent oppose it when asked about the government proposal for change, with another 16 per cent undecided.

>>19529135 Tasmania the lone state in support of Voice: poll - Tasmania is currently the only state with a majority in support of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament proposal, according to the Resolve Political Monitor survey, published in Nine newspapers on Monday. With just under five weeks until polling day, 56 per cent of poll respondents in the island state said they were in support of the Voice, with 43 per cent against the proposal. Speaking at a Yes23 event in southern Tasmania on Sunday, Tasmanian Elder and Yes campaigner Rodney Dillon said an unsuccessful referendum would equate to Australia accepting permanent disadvantage of Indigenous peoples. "By having a 'No' vote I think that we're saying that it's OK for people to live 10 years less. It's OK for kids to stay in that prison system and become career criminals. It's OK for the housing standards of Aboriginals right around the country to stay like it is," he said. The Aboriginal Heritage Council chair and Tasmanian Regional Aboriginal Communities Alliance (TRACA) co-founder said the Voice would be the "greatest step this country will make in my lifetime", saying he was not prepared to "keep accepting what happened in the past".

>>19529150 Army of under-18 Yes campaigners hoping to turn referendum tide - The Yes campaign is hoping an army of under-18 volunteers can help convince the adults in their lives to back the Indigenous voice, as support for No strengthens in the polls. In Sydney’s inner city, mirrored across the country, students have learned the tricks of the trade in leafleting, door knocking and campaigning to try and convince swing voters to put a Yes on the ballot. A vote, to their chagrin, they cannot cast themselves. “We still have the power to talk to people around us about why they should vote Yes,” said 17-year-old Rosanna Cartwright, who is juggling her International Baccalaureate with door knocks and leafleting. The youth drive - U18 For Yes23 - drew on Yes23’s materials, tweaking them for under-18 campaigners, and has since created a national platform for ­students across Australia to download the body of leaflets or register to volunteer.

>>19529155 No campaign against an Indigenous voice to parliament stronger on TikTok while Yes23 targets Facebook, Instagram and Twitter - Opponents of an Indigenous voice to parliament say social media has been crucial in “levelling the playing field” at next month’s referendum, as new data shows the No campaign’s TikTok videos are most likely to reach young women in Australia’s biggest cities. But the Yes campaign’s following on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are much larger than Fair Australia’s, with Yes23 insiders saying engagement on their posts was double that of the No camp’s. “On social media platforms, we are reaching millions of Australians each week,” a Yes23 campaign spokeswoman said. “On the ground, our 35,000 volunteers are out in force every day, at train stations, shopping centres, knocking on doors and holding community forums.” Declaring Fair Australia’s TikTok videos were “no doubt putting pressure on the Yes campaign”, the No Camp clocked up nine million video views on the platform between August 24 and last Thursday and has been averaging one million views a day since the ­referendum date was announced by Anthony Albanese on August 30.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822088

#32 - Part 41

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 5

>>19534922 Voice ‘can be refined’, Noel Pearson tells Indigenous No groups - Local Aboriginal groups should not assume their state will have only two representatives on the voice to parliament, with “ample opportunity” to “refine” its design, says Indigenous leader Noel Pearson. The prominent Yes campaigner on Monday urged Indigenous groups not to oppose the voice out of concern its size or voting system would disenfranchise them, as its final form was yet to be decided. “I would just urge our people to not put the cart in front of the horse - there will be ample opportunity to get the design right after the referendum,” the Cape York leader said, as he rallied the Yes campaign in Tasmania.

>>19534951 No campaign’s ‘fear, doubt’ strategy revealed - The campaign to sink the Voice has instructed volunteers to use fear and doubt rather than facts to trump arguments used by the Yes camp. In an online training session, the national campaigning chief for leading No activist group Advance, Chris Inglis, detailed the anti-Voice movement’s core strategy of playing on voters’ emotions. Inglis instructed volunteers not to identify themselves upfront as No campaigners as they make hundreds of thousands of calls to persuadable voters, but instead to raise reports of financial compensation to Indigenous Australians if the Voice referendum were to succeed.

>>19534980 Video: Claims made by No voice case based on racism, stupidity: Marcia Langton - Indigenous leader Marcia Langton says No campaigners in the voice referendum are using racist tactics but she doesn’t believe the majority of Australians are racist, after comments she made at the weekend sparked outrage. The Bunbury Herald reported on Tuesday that Professor Langton told a forum on Sunday: “Every time the No cases raise their arguments, if you start pulling it apart you get down to base racism - I’m sorry to say that’s where it lands - or sheer stupidity.” Deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley demanded Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney condemn the comments, which she said “accused No voters of opposing the referendum because of ‘base racism … or sheer stupidity’, but Professor Langton told Nine newspapers she was not calling No voters racist and stupid. “I’m saying the claims being made by the No case are based in racism and stupidity - and appeal to racism and stupidity,” Professor Langton told Nine. “And they are appealing to Australians to frighten them into adopting highly racist and stupid beliefs. I am not a racist, and I don’t believe that the majority of Australians are racist. I do believe that the no campaigners are using racist tactics.”

>>19534996 Video: Marcia Langton labels No voters ‘racist, stupid’ in exclusive footage - Sky News host Sharri Markson has obtained exclusive footage of prominent Voice campaigner Marcia Langton accusing Australians voting No in the referendum of “base racism” or “sheer stupidity”. The professor’s controversial comments were made during a forum hosted by Edith Cowan University after being asked why so many Australians were undecided on the referendum. “Every time the No cases raise their arguments, if you start pulling it apart you get down to base racism - I’m sorry to say that’s where it lands - or sheer stupidity,” Professor Langton said. “If you look at any reputable fact-checker, every one of them says the No case is substantially false. They are lying to you.” Ms Markson obtained the footage after the professor’s comments were splashed on the front page of the Bunbury Herald on Tuesday.

>>19541754 Does Marcia Langton’s dismissal of No case signal the death knell of the Indigenous voice? - "Will Marcia Langton’s dismissal of the referendum No case as either “base racism or sheer stupidity” be the Indigenous voice’s campaign death knell as was Hillary Clinton’s dismissal of Donald Trump’s supporters as a “basket of deplorables” in her US Presidential election campaign? Will it be seen as Mark Latham’s aggressive handshake of a much older John Howard during the dying days of the 2004 election campaign? It is too early judge, just as the full extent of Clinton’s gaffe was not recognised until later, but, as the Yes campaign for the Indigenous Voice to Parliament flounders, loses momentum and is given up for being lost there cannot have been a worse intervention. If the referendum fails there will be fingers pointed to the statements of the Yes supporter and architect of indigenous voice proposals on Sunday as an emotional turning point just as was Clinton’s dismissal of at least half of Trump’s supporters. This will be especially the case if Yes campaigners are looking for someone to blame for the failure." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822090

#32 - Part 42

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 6

>>19541800 Indigenous voice to parliament: Marcia Langton has no one to blame but herself - "It is easy to understand why Marcia Langton is seeking to play down and clarify her comments about the No campaign against the referendum for an Indigenous voice to parliament being built on “base racism” or “sheer stupidity” - she has created a furore which is damaging the Yes campaign and for which she will be blamed. And, she has no one to blame but herself. The problem for Langton is that she has dropped an incendiary claim into a febrile political atmosphere which is directly working against the latter-day Yes campaign tactics of treating No voters with respect and seeking to claw back failing support from so-called “soft No voters”. Langton is a respected campaigner for Indigenous rights, a forceful academic and lawyer who is true to herself and has never taken prisoners. But, she is not a politician used to campaigning and has unleashed a furore which will only serve to strengthen opposition to the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government and has provided political ammunition to Peter Dutton and the Coalition." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19541817 Video emerges of Marcia Langton saying ‘hard No voters’ are ‘spewing racism’ - Professor Marcia Langton has been filmed saying "hard No voters" of the Voice to Parliament are "spewing racism", after earlier defending her remarks at a forum. Sky News Australia Political Editor Andrew Clennell revealed on Wednesday another video has surfaced of the professor labelling those against the Voice "racist".

>>19548454 Yes campaigners told to accuse No camp of vilifying Aboriginal people - Trade union campaigners are being instructed to tell Australians the No side is vilifying Aboriginal people in the Voice to parliament referendum campaign, which has sparked another intense political feud over racism allegations. Yes campaigners accuse their opponents of sparking the viciousness of the Voice debate. A Victorian Trades Hall Council “key messages” document shows its thousands of volunteers are being told to convince voters that the anti-Voice movement punches down on Indigenous Australians. “Call out the tactic and who’s behind it: Point to their motivation Creating division (eg by vilifying Aboriginal people); Distracting (eg by insisting on ludicrous detail),” the document states. The union training sheet tells campaigners to claim the No campaign is driven by a desire to “divide the working class”, “safeguard mining interests” and “sell newspapers with shock”, before recommending a comparison with the same-sex marriage plebiscite.

>>19548476 Indigenous voice to parliament: Marcia Langton has form in ‘racism’ attacks - Prominent Indigenous campaigner for the voice to parliament, Marcia Langton, has previously described Jacinta Price and her mother Bess as the “coloured help” for conservative think tanks and accused one in every five voters at the upcoming referendum of “spewing racism”. In an article published in the Saturday Paper on August 25, 2018, Professor Langton said Senator Price and her mother – a former member of the NT parliament – had appeared to be “sincere in their comments about the impact of violence on their own lives”. But she said their “failure to extend sympathy to other Aboriginal victims raises questions about their motives”. “Leaving aside appearances on mainstream television, many of Bess Price’s speaking engagements have been at the invitation of the rightwing think tanks,” Professor Langton wrote.

>>19548487 No alternative: Jacinta Price’s Indigenous voice to parliament pitch - Jacinta Price hopes a No vote at the referendum will mean governments take greater accountability for improving the lives of First ­Nations people, warning a voice will only become “yet another ­battle ground for many Aboriginal voices to disagree, fall out and ­create division”. In a draft version of her speech to the National Press Club in Canberra obtained by The Australian, the opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman will on Thursday say a voice to parliament will “undermine the importance of the Aboriginal members of parliament” who are “fighting to affect real change via the democratic structures by which they were elected”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822091

#32 - Part 43

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 7

>>19548513 Indigenous Australians benefit from colonisation, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price tells press club - Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says colonial settlement has delivered a “positive impact” for First Nations people and has backed the abolition of stand-alone Indigenous Australians ministers. In a National Press Club speech that lacked substantive detail on how the Coalition would Close the Gap if the October 14 referendum goes down, Senator Price said she remained cautious of Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s plan to legislate regional and local voices. On the impact of colonial settlement on Indigenous Australians, Senator Price said colonisation has had a positive effect providing Aboriginal people with “running water and readily available food”. “Everything that my grandfather had when he was growing up because he first saw white fellas in his early adolescence we now have. Otherwise he would have had to live off the land, provide for his family,” Senator Price said. “Aboriginal Australians … have the same opportunities as all other Australians in this country. We certainly have one of the greatest systems around the world in terms of the democratic structure in comparison to other countries.”

>>19548520 Price says colonialism has been good for Indigenous Australians - The Opposition’s Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says colonisation has been good for Indigenous Australians, as she failed to support the Coalition policy of local and regional Voices in a fierce, provocative speech met with cheers by her frontbench colleagues. In a National Press Club address that challenged widely held views of Indigenous and intergenerational disadvantage, Price claimed political leaders had been unwilling to apply common-sense approaches to Indigenous policy issues for fear of being branded racists. The 42-year-old has become one of the most important figures in the Voice debate since Dutton gave her the Indigenous affairs portfolio in April. Yes campaigners believe she has been key in convincing Australians the Indigenous community is split on the Voice, and the National Party leader David Littleproud described her speech as one of the most powerful he had ever heard.

>>19555745 ‘Treaty not needed, we were never at war’, says Indigenous voice to parliament No campaigner Jacinta Price - No campaigner and opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has rejected a treaty with First ­Nations people because they were never at war with British colonists and declared as “fantasy” the idea of a utopian society before colonisation. Speaking at The Great Voice Debate hosted by The Australian in Canberra on Thursday, Senator Price warned Australians to not accept a “romanticism” of Aboriginal culture and traditions as pushed by elite Indigenous activists. She said there was too much violence and sexual misconduct in remote communities, with women at risk because the issue was being downplayed.

>>19555788 Ailing Dodson puts faith in ‘goodness of Australians’ - Senator Pat Dodson was not going to see a doctor on March 31. He was due at the Winnunga Aboriginal medical service in Canberra for a Covid jab. To describe the timing of that appointment as fortuitous is a massive understatement. Once there, Dodson told doctor Eric Sambaiew he had been feeling sick. That was an understatement too. The father of reconciliation was staring at death. Sambaiew sent Dodson straight to the emergency department at Canberra hospital, where he was found to have a life-threatening infection on his oesophagus and Hodgkin’s lymphoma, a cancer of the lymphatic system. He has been absent from parliament and public life since, though Dodson told The Australian he hopes he will soon be well enough to join the campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament.

>>19555843 Pat Dodson: Indigenous voice to parliament a battle of principles - Pat Dodson, the father of reconciliation, has conceded the No case in the referendum debate has been “effective” and that a lack of detail has made promoting the voice more difficult, as Yes23 prepares to launch a more aggressive campaign to claim victory. The Western Australia Labor senator, who is seriously ill and has so far been unable to campaign for Yes23, said the October 14 referendum to constitutionally enshrine a voice to parliament and executive government was “a contest of Australia’s integrity and honesty, and its future”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822093

#32 - Part 44

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 8

>>19555945 South Australia’s Indigenous voice to parliament Yes numbers ‘not adding up’ - The No campaign is increasingly convinced that South Australians will reject the voice to parliament despite Yes campaigners hailing the state as a must-win at the ­October 14 referendum. With the national Yes campaign officially launched by ­Anthony Albanese in Adelaide’s northern suburbs on August 30 framed around an appeal to the state’s progressive political traditions, there has been little sign since of the public groundswell needed to deliver a Yes win in SA. Opposition Leader David Speirs told The Weekend Australian that he believed the state’s Yes vote was “in freefall” and that he would almost bet his house on a No victory.

>>19555995 Video: Indigenous voice to parliament: Libs and Nats bolster No campaign, as Yes23 launches new ad - Liberal and Nationals divisions across the country have agreed to co-ordinate resources with the No campaign and boost volunteer stocks, as Yes23 launches a nationwide advertising blitz to claw back voters ahead of the ­October 14 voice referendum. In a major boost for the No campaign, The Weekend Australian can reveal that all Liberal Party state divisions and the Nationals have pledged to actively support members who volunteer and hand out on referendum day and at pre-poll booths. With Yes23 boasting around 40,000 volunteers - bolstered by union and ALP members - the number of No volunteers is now expected to be significantly higher than the 15,000 anti-voice supporters who have already pledged to hand out and actively campaign at polling booths.

>>19556052 Referendum offers us the chance to choose hope over spread of fear and confusion - "Tens of thousands of Australians will gather in every major Australian city this weekend to walk in visible support of a Yes vote in the October 14 referendum. Thousands more will be wearing T-shirts and badges as they knock on doors to talk to their fellow citizens in suburbs across the country to explain what is being asked in the referendum, and encouraging them to vote yes. Our campaign has just over four weeks left to run. There is so much positivity in the conversations on the ground - you’ll see it again in the walks this weekend - that we are optimistic Australians will choose Yes." - Dean Parkin, campaign director of Yes23 - theaustralian.com.au

>>19561548 A surprise voice seeks end to separatism - Australian democracy is about to be shaken up. It has been a nasty week on the campaign trail and in parliament, where the voice is in trouble. But something else is emerging - an assertion that rejecting the voice is the gateway to a better destiny for Indigenous peoples. If the voice is rejected on October 14 much can be attributed to indigenous senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, who is turning into a new and powerful figure on our landscape – among both Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples – and whose vision is a systemic rejection of the orthodoxy surrounding the voice and Indigenous political power.

>>19561603 Thousands rally in Adelaide in Yes campaign event ahead of Voice to Parliament referendum - Thousands of Voice to Parliament supporters have gathered in Adelaide in one of the Yes campaign's biggest South Australian events ahead of the referendum. The Yes campaign said the turnout demonstrated there was "overwhelming" backing for the Voice in South Australia, a state supporters have described as pivotal to its hopes of referendum success. Supporters gathered in Victoria Square before marching through central Adelaide, with musician Paul Kelly also performing for the crowd. Similar rallies are being held across the country this weekend, with most taking place on Sunday.

>>19561661 Indigenous leader Noel Pearson slams divisive politics in Voice - Indigenous leader and lawyer Noel Pearson has welcomed a substantial change for the Yes campaign as he says it moves out of the realm of politics and into the hands of the people. Speaking at a community gathering in Redfern, in Sydney, on Saturday morning, he said the Yes campaign would focus on a message of unity in the lead up to the Voice to Parliament referendum. “We’re so very pleased that the politics of division and anger and suspicion and fear generated by politicians is now behind us,” he told the crowd in Sydney’s inner west. “We’ve got the next four weeks to have conversations with our fellow Australians about the power of listening.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822096

#32 - Part 45

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 9

>>19561705 Don’t be distracted by ‘controversy bombs’, Pearson urges Yes campaign - The Yes camp will use rallies for 50,000 people and concerts in capital cities on Sunday to try and draw a line under a messy opening fortnight, after the Voice referendum campaign became mired in a verbal crossfire about racism and the impact of colonisation. Voice co-architect Noel Pearson said at a Yes23 rally in Sydney’s Redfern that the campaign would need to avoid “controversy bombs” over the remaining four weeks to referendum day on October 14, as he dismissed comments by Coalition frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price that British colonisation had no lasting negative impacts on Indigenous Australians.

>>19561768 Why the Indigenous voice to parliament is a Thatcher-esque project - "Earlier this week I received an email from a constituent named Les. Les is a retiree and shared with me how he is being squeezed with rising medicine, food and power costs. He didn’t hold back in asking me why I was advocating for the voice when so many Australians were hurting financially. It was a legitimate question to ask. I think many Australians are asking: why should we vote Yes in this referendum when the economy is so tight? Surely there are better priorities. My answer to Les, and the many who share his view, is that the voice gives us the means to tackle the economic challenges facing so many Indigenous communities. By tackling these challenges we also can make our economy and the budget stronger." - Julian Leeser, Liberal member for Berowra in Sydney - theaustralian.com.au

>>19566036 ‘History is calling us’: Yes campaign ramps up as thousands join in rallies across Australia - Thousands of supporters of the Voice to Parliament have taken to the streets across the country, with a crucial message for Aussies that “history is calling us” ahead of the October referendum. Supporters of the Yes campaign turned out in record numbers on Sunday afternoon across major cities including Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Canberra. It marks one of the biggest campaign pushes for the Yes vote since the referendum date was announced. Minister for Indigenous Australians told a roaring crowd in Melbourne’s CBD that “history is calling us” and that “each and every one of you can help answer the call from generations of Indigenous people.”

>>19566045 Video: Leading No campaigner Warren Mundine claims a treaty process will be more successful if No vote wins - Leading No campaigner Warren Mundine has backed a treaty process, claiming it's more likely to succeed if the No vote is successful. Mr Mundine, a Bundjalung man, also called for the date of Australia Day to be changed. Speaking on the ABC's Insiders program, Mr Mundine said there should be multiple, individual treaties, recognising Aboriginal nations. "We've got to recognise Aboriginal culture, Aboriginal culture is our First Nations and the first thing we learn about life is one nation cannot talk about another nation's country," he said.

>>19566056 OPINION: The movie that erased my doubts about the Voice - "I had reservations about the Voice until seeing a movie. I’ve long opposed a charter of rights because it might steer policymaking away from parliament and into courts. If there was someone on the Labor side who might have needed assurance the Voice would not do this, it might have been me. But not after the opening scene of High Ground. This 2020 movie, directed by Stephen Johnson, is set in Arnhem Land in the early 1920s. It is about race relations on the Australian frontier. It opens with Aboriginal people at a waterhole, an oasis of palms and running water. This peace is shattered by fire from repeater rifles. When it stops, the only sound is the flight of waterfowl and the buzzing of flies around black corpses. Blood runs in the sand. My response to the terrifying scene that opened High Ground went like this: “The survivors of this are saying that all they want is a pipeline to parliament called the Voice. That’s all? Only access? Just give it to them. No argument. No delay.” Metaphorically, the gunshots still echo. Only one group suffered massacres and now it’s time to make amends. High Ground’s footage is dramatised, but it’s not fake. Doubters might stream it on SBS On Demand, where they can also find Rachel Perkins’ The Australian Wars. It’s time to let kindness have its day in public policy." - Bob Carr, former foreign affairs minister and NSW’s longest serving premier - theage.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822099

#32 - Part 46

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 10

>>19566073 Anthony Albanese has miscalculated and the Indigenous voice to parliament could be doomed - "Anthony Albanese is letting down Indigenous Australians because of a lack of real leadership and a failure in his duty, not only to Indigenous people but also to the nation. The Prime Minister has miscalculated on the political strategy for the October 14 referendum for an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government, having already lost enormous public goodwill and designing a debate without substance. As a result, public support for the Yes campaign has slumped and the referendum already could be doomed to failure. There has been an inability to explain how the voice would work and, in the absence of substance, the vacuum has filled with trivia and invective. Indigenous Australians have been given what looks like a false hope and the nation has been delivered division." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19570657 No campaigner Warren Mundine walks back support for treaties should Voice referendum fail - Leading No campaigner Warren Mundine has walked back his previous support for treaty processes should the Voice referendum fail, while also hurling accusations that the Yes campaign are launching “racial attacks and abuse”. While Mundine previously claimed treaties were more likely to be progressed if a No vote was successful, when asked to clarify his position, the No advocate instead referred to “Native Title and land rights”. “These things have huge commercial outcomes for Aboriginal people in regard to jobs, in regards to training, and in regard to running their own business, and it's done a tremendous job for Aboriginal communities,” Mr Mundine told Sky News on Monday. “That’s what I’m talking about.”

>>19575597 Video: Anthony Albanese says ‘racist pigs’ abuse hurled at Indigenous voice to parliament opponents was ‘nasty’ - Anthony Albanese has condemned “nasty behaviour wherever it occurs” after No campaigners were labelled “racist pigs” and “racist dogs”, conceding some of the tone of the voice referendum debate has been unfortunate. As leading No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price declared the Prime Minister had to take responsibility for the racism and division in Australia, Mr Albanese urged voters to be respectful and debate the referendum question before them. Peter Dutton also urged Australians to participate in the voice debate respectfully, lashing the “deeply disturbing” protest. Video taken by South Australian Liberal senator Alex Antic walking into Fair Australia’s No campaign launch in Adelaide on Monday evening shows protesters yelling “racist dog”, “racist pig” and “crazy wankers”. Senator Price and Indigenous leader Warren Mundine were the headline speakers of the event. “I condemn nasty behaviour wherever it occurs,” Mr Albanese said.

>>19575624 Video: Jacinta Price breaks down in tears at packed out No rally as she describes the Voice as the 'biggest gaslighting event' in Australia's history - Wild scenes of jubilation erupted during a raucous No campaign rally in the must-win state of South Australia on Tuesday night. More than 1,000 people, many wearing 'No' supporter T-shirts, packed into the Adelaide Convention Centre to hear leading campaigners including Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Nyunggai Warren Mundine AO. South Australian Senator Kerrynne Liddle was also in attendance to rail against the Voice to Parliament, which would enshrine a Indigenous-led advisory body into the Constitution. In an emotional speech, Senator Price broke down in tears when she spoke of her role as a 'vessel' for Indigenous people who she said had been ignored by mainstream politics and media. 'I was a vessel for the women sitting in that room, the cousin of a young girl murdered, hanging from a tree,' she said, referencing her address at the National Press Club last week.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822100

#32 - Part 47

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 11

>>19575654 Video: Voice opponent Jacinta Nampijinpa Price breaks down at Adelaide No campaign event - A leading opponent of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament has broken down in tears while delivering an address at a No campaign event in Adelaide, also accusing supporters of the Yes campaign of "bullying" and "gaslighting". Coalition Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price told about 1,000 attendees of the event that she and her fellow Indigenous politicians already provide a voice for their people in federal parliament. Senator Price became emotional as she recalled speaking on behalf of them, including at a National Press Club speech last week. "I was a vessel for the women sitting in that room, the cousin of a young girl murdered hanging from a tree, the old woman in the middle of chemo who came to my office seeking to be heard because native title have written her and her family out of the history books," she said. "Her days are coming to an end and she just wanted her voice to be heard."

>>19575725 AFLW 2023: Gillon McLachlan apologises to Brisbane Lions fan forced to remove a T-shirt showing support for the Yes movement - AFL chief executive Gillon McLachlan has apologised to an AFL Women’s fan who was forced to remove a T-shirt showing support for the Yes movement at a game at Springfield on Sunday. The Brisbane Lions fan, named Michelle, has detailed her account of attempting to enter the ground while wearing the shirt and said security at the ground made her take it off, claiming it was making a “political statement”. The AFL conditions of entry contained in the terms and conditions of tickets includes policies relating to political statements. “That was a mistake by the security guard - that should not have happened,” McLachlan said.

>>19575743 LGBT groups call for advisory board amid NSW government faith council establishment - Sydney’s LGBT community is ­demanding Premier Chris Minns keeps his promise to set up a voice-like advisory council for gay and trans people, after he set up a similar body for religious leaders who have promised to use it to push Labor on policy priorities. The state government last week announced the establishment of a “milestone” NSW Faith Affairs Council to advise ministers on policy that could affect ­religious communities, such as - one faith leader suggested – changes to voluntarily-assisted dying or conversion practices. LGBT groups, although welcoming the move to give ­religious figures a forum, want the government to ensure a similar olive branch will be extended to them.

>>19581483 Anthony Albanese has no regrets sending Australians to polls for referendum - Anthony Albanese says if he had his time over, he would still be holding the Voice to Parliament referendum despite the debate turning “nasty and divisive” at times. When Mr Albanese claimed victory in May last year, the first thing he committed the Labor government to was implementing the Uluru Statement from the Heart “in full”, with a referendum on enshrining an Indigenous Voice to Parliament the first step. But, with just more than three weeks until Australians vote in the first referendum since 1999, debate has at-times taken an ugly turn. When asked whether he would still make the same commitment to hold the referendum if he had his time again knowing now how “nasty and divisive” the debate would become – Mr Albanese was emphatic. “Yes because when are we going to get this done (otherwise)? It’s been 122 years,” he told 2SM radio.

>>19581498 Indigenous voice to parliament’s Yes campaign ‘not about separatism’, says Noel Pearson - Noel Pearson has declared Indigenous Australia will not return to “assimilation” as the co-architect of the Indigenous voice moved to counter No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s calls for an end to separatism. The Cape York leader expressed concerns the debate over the Indigenous voice to parliament was sending the country backward into old territory where assimilationist ideas were accepted. He argues for an alternative concept of unity in which Indigenous people have a special but not separate place in the nation’s story, a reference to John Howard’s landmark speech on constitutional recognition in 2007. “It’s too late for us now to be talking about assimilation. We’re not gonna turn into whitefellas tomorrow,” Mr Pearson said. “Our children are gonna remain Aboriginal. And I think we can accept that I think Australians accept that. You can’t turn the clock back. It’s gonna be an enriching thing for the country when we do this.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822102

#32 - Part 48

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 12

>>19581536 Anti-Voice rallies organised by pro-Putin conspiracy theorist - Rallies opposing the Indigenous Voice to parliament planned around Australia this weekend are being organised by a pro-Kremlin activist and anti-vaccination campaigner living in the Russian consulate in Sydney. The official No campaign has distanced itself from the latest iteration of the “world freedom rallies”, which have long been organised by Simeon Boikov, who is also known online as “the Aussie Cossack”. While posters for the rallies were originally framed around opposing Australian aid to Ukraine and an array of conspiracy theories, they have now been rebranded as anti-Voice events and are expected to draw crowds in the thousands. A spokesman for the major No outfit, Fair Australia, said the events scheduled for Saturday were “not supported, endorsed or funded by us in any way”.

>>19587705 Clive Palmer loses bid to force AEC to count ‘X’ as ‘No’ in Voice vote - Mining magnate Clive Palmer and United Australia Party senator Ralph Babet have lost a Federal Court bid to force the Australian Electoral Commission to count crosses on Voice referendum ballot papers as a vote against the proposal. In a judgment delivered late on Wednesday night after an urgent court hearing, Federal Court Justice Steven Rares said an “X” was “inherently ambiguous” and could not be counted as a No vote in the historic referendum on October 14. Rares said that “a cross is used in daily life both as a means of selecting one of two or more choices and as indicating a negative choice”. “Often one is asked to select a choice with a cross and … this was an early form of voting after Federation,” he said. “The use of a cross placed in the answer to the single question on the ballot paper for the referendum (namely, ‘Do you approve this proposed alteration?’) is inherently ambiguous as to the intention that the voter is intending to convey as to the proposal”. Rares said a tick was unambiguous. “Unlike a cross, which has more than one signification as either a disapproval or a selection of an answer, being approval, the tick both approves or selects the affirmative as the voter’s answer,” he said. “A tick signifies assent or approval. It is not a symbol that conveys a negative response.”

>>19587714 1.2 million postal votes could delay voice count - A record 1.2 million Australians have applied for postal votes and millions more are expected to vote at prepoll booths in the two-weeks ahead of Anthony Albanese’s voice referendum, potentially delaying a final result in the event of a tight count. The Australian Electoral Commission has also put a call out for workers to staff booths across the country, particularly in rural and remote areas, with 63,000 out of a required 100,000 confirmed. After rolls were closed on Monday night, AEC Commissioner Tom Rogers on Thursday said more than 17.6 million Australians were eligible to cast their vote on October 14. Mr Rogers said the surge in postal applications could impact the count if the result is close.

>>19587731 Voice politics don’t belong in our concert halls - "Across the country, concertgoers have been hijacked by orchestras that have used the opportunity of a captive audience to campaign openly for the Yes vote in the upcoming referendum. When my husband and I recently attended one of the dozen or so Sydney Symphony Orchestra concerts we enjoy each year, we were shocked that the usual acknowledgment of country was followed by a statement read out by an orchestra musician that the SSO supported the Uluru Statement from the Heart and the Yes vote, and by implication exhorted us to do the same. To put it mildly, we were displeased by this blatant politicking in a most inappropriate place. When we enter the concert hall and take our seats, most of us are keenly aware that it offers us one of the last refuges where we as individuals of all backgrounds, faiths and political persuasions can come together and experience a human connection that transcends politics and borders on the sublime. Let us fight to preserve that sacred quality. We need it now more than ever." - Dr Rachael Kohn AO, award-winning producer and broadcaster, presenter of The Spirit of Things and The Ark on ABC Radio - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822106

#32 - Part 49

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 13

>>19597168 'I'm with you': US rapper MC Hammer throws support behind Voice to Parliament sparking fiery debate on Twitter - MC Hammer, famed for his 90s smash hit U Can't Touch This, has thrown his support behind the Yes vote ahead of the Voice referendum - but the move has sparked fiery debate on social media. The American rapper said he had spent time reading articles and "getting up to speed" on the Voice to Parliament referendum, which is just three weeks away. Hammer took to X overnight to back the proposal, telling his 3.1 million followers: "I'm with you. Australia it's time. Repair the breach. #Yes2023." He pointed out Australia "has no treaty with its Indigenous people and has done little in comparison to other British dominions like Canada, New Zealand and the United States to include and uplift its First Nations people". Hammer also referred to prominent Yes campaigner Professor Megan Davis and credited her efforts in educating people on the importance of Indigenous constitutional recognition. Quoting Ms Davis, Hammer said: "A successful referendum will set a precedent that will be 'really useful for other indigenous populations around the world in relation to recognition'."

>>19601872 Hundreds of anti-Voice protesters rally in Sydney, Melbourne - Anti-Voice rallies in Sydney and Melbourne today were much smaller in scale than the official Yes campaign marches last weekend. Several hundred people gathered in Sydney’s Hyde Park on Saturday for the rally, with some carrying “Vote No” signs associated with the formal No campaign, despite attempts by the campaign to disassociate themselves from the rally. In Melbourne, neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell gatecrashed the end of the No rally with a group of people wearing black masks, unfurling a banner on the steps of Victoria’s state parliament that read “Voice = anti-white”. The group performed a Nazi salute and were heckled by other protesters, who were largely drawn from the anti-lockdown rallies that filled the city’s streets during the pandemic but have since dwindled in numbers to about 500 on Saturday. The rallies, which were held in cities around the country, were organised by pro-Kremlin activist and anti-vaccination campaigner Simeon Boikov, who is known online as “the Aussie Cossack”.

>>19606805 No vote gains more ground amid a loss of support for Peter Dutton - National support for the Indigenous voice to parliament has failed to gain the expected campaign momentum heading into the final weeks before the October 14 referendum, with only slightly more than a third of surveyed voters now saying they will vote yes. But the further decline in support has also coincided with a sharp fall in Liberal leader Peter Dutton’s approval ratings following a heated political debate over race, with satisfaction in the ­Opposition Leader’s performance now at a record low. According to an exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian, 36 per cent of surveyed voters say they intend to vote yes. This reflects a two-point fall in the past three weeks and a continuation of the erosion in support since the beginning of the year.

>>19606828 RedBridge poll finds voters don’t think Voice to Parliament is a top-5 priority - Hardly any Australians rank the Voice as the top priority issue for the federal government, according to a new poll that has also found support for the referendum has fallen to 38 per cent. The latest RedBridge poll, taken last week, found that despite Yes23 and the Uluru Dialogue stepping up their advertising spend, support for the Voice is still falling. The poll found that nationally the percentage of people planning to vote for the Voice has dropped by another percentage point since the start of the month. The last RedBridge poll, taken at the start of September, found support had fallen 5 per cent to 39 per cent in the month since its previous survey.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822107

#32 - Part 50

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 14

>>19611589 Video: Uluru statement a ‘symbolic declaration of war’, says Warren Mundine - The Uluru Statement from the Heart, which first proposed a Voice to parliament, is a symbolic declaration of war against modern Australia, according to leading No campaigner Nyunggai Warren Mundine. In a firebrand speech to the National Press Club on Tuesday, less than three weeks before Australians will vote in a historic referendum, Mundine claimed the Yes campaign is built on a “litany of lies”, as he disputed the claim that 80 per cent of Australia’s first people back the Voice proposal and that Indigenous Australians aren’t listened to by policymakers. Uluru Dialogue co-chair Megan Davis hit back at Mundine’s characterisation of the document, released in 2017. “The Uluru Statement from the Heart was an expression of peace and love to the Australian people, it is about belonging and unifying the nation and I find it really repugnant the notion it could be associated at all with the language of the declaration of war,” she told the ABC.

>>19617030 Leading Yes campaigner for Voice to Parliament Noel Pearson makes impassioned Press Club plea - Leading Yes campaigner and Indigenous academic Noel Pearson has made an impassioned speech to the National Press Club, pleading for Australians to support the Voice to Parliament in a show of "unity". On October 14 the country will head to the polls to vote on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament - a referendum Mr Pearson described as "the largest mirror we will ever look into as a nation". "[Twenty-four million] people will look into the mirror on October 14 and see ourselves like we never have before," he told the Press Club. Mr Pearson said the love of country should be why Australians vote Yes to the constitutional amendment. "I say today - it is the love of country that is our driving motivation for the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Australian constitution," Mr Pearson said. "I've come to see - it is the love of our country that joins us all as Australians. "I said it's not the same as patriotism, because there's nothing political about this love of country."

>>19617036 Noel Pearson says Indigenous voice to parliament referendum is test of Australia’s democracy - Prominent Yes campaigner Noel Pearson has declared the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum will be a test of Australia’s democracy and a No vote will ensure cultural wars – including a debate on whether Aboriginal people are worthwhile – will continue indefinitely. In a speech to the National Press Club titled “for the love of country”, the Cape York leader conceded supporters of a voice were filled with hope and terror about the outcome on October 14 but said “out of naivety or faith” Indigenous people wanted to ask Australians if they “supported a better future”. “This really is a test of whether our democracy can sustain a discourse for good,” Mr Pearson said in a sometimes emotional appeal to voters.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822109

#32 - Part 51

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 15

>>19617051 Stand delivers as Liberals’ opposition to Indigenous voice to parliament pays off - There has been no sadder place in the world these past few years than the Liberal Party stand at the Perth Royal Show. Perched opposite the Police Pavilion and just a few metres down from the Agriculture Hall of Fame, the pop-up tent has long been a forlorn sight at the annual show as the party suffered through humiliating state and federal election defeats. This year, however, the MPs, staffers and volunteers manning the stand have noticed a distinct change in mood. More and more people have approached the stand this week - grabbing the Liberal-branded show bags stuffed with notebooks, fridge magnets and a mini Australian flag – than have done so for years. Amid petting the farm animals, watching the woodchopping competitions and perusing overpriced show bags, punters from across the Perth metropolitan area have taken time to stop in and engage with the party. “It’s fair to say that the level of engagement and the number of people voluntarily coming up and wanting to talk with us is vastly different to 12 months ago,” says one Liberal staffer who has been manning the stand. The key difference, they say, is the voice. Liberal senator Michaelia Cash has been one of the opposition’s loudest voices on the referendum. She told The Australian the “overwhelming feedback” from the Royal Show tent was praise for the party’s stance on the referendum. “I’ve spent a lot of time talking directly with Western Australians about the referendum and it is clear to me that they want the best for Indigenous Australians, but many have failed to be convinced the voice is the best way to go about it,” she said.

>>19623862 Video: ‘Vote for best voice’: Julia Gillard launches UK Yes campaign - Former Australian prime minister Julia Gillard has told a London audience of how the family stories of indigenous people are imbued with “trauma and exclusion,” and accused the country of failing to listen to the voice of “those who can make the biggest difference.” Launching the Yes campaign for the indigenous voice to parliament referendum in Britain’s capital early this morning (AEST), Ms Gillard urged a yes vote because: “What the voice will ensure is that we always hear, that we always have, the best, best voice telling us what needs to be done by our nation next.” Ms Gillard who celebrates her 62nd birthday later this week said a female indigenous counterpart born in the same year would have been at real risk of being part of the Stolen Generation, taken from her family for no reason with documents showing it was for no reason other than “being aboriginal”. She said if the woman wasn’t taken from her family, then she would know of people who were.

>>19623889 Video: Australian expats at world’s largest AEC voting booth urged to vote Yes - Former prime minister Julia Gillard has urged a large contingent of expat Australians to make their vote count at next month’s referendum, saying an Indigenous Voice to Parliament enshrined in the constitution would ensure future generations listen to those who have suffered from a century of policies imposed on them. Gillard, who made a point of mentioning her 62nd birthday this week, told a crowd of around 150 Australians gathered for the Yes23 campaign launch in London, that an Aboriginal woman born in 1961 had been largely failed by governments of all stripes and had likely suffered “generational trauma”. The UK-based Gillard joined youth advocate Yasmin Poole, Irish social rights campaigner Tiernan Brady and a drag queen called Karla Bear, who sang John Farnham’s anthemic hit You’re The Voice in Camden ahead of early voting in the UK capital beginning next week. More than 15,000 people - both Australian citizens living in the UK and holidaymakers – are expected to vote at the High Commission in London, making the booth the largest run by the Australian Electoral Commission anywhere in the world.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822111

#32 - Part 52

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 16

>>19623899 The Voice changes Australian law and risks reparations - "Former ALP president later turned Liberal, Nyunggai Warren Mundine, has declared the Uluru Statement from the Heart a declaration of war against modern Australia. Immediately other Indigenous Australians disagreed. But this week I was privileged to receive a detailed legal opinion on the implications of the Uluru statement for modern Australia from Terence Cole, KC, one of Australia’s best known jurists having been a judge on the NSW Supreme Court and presiding over a number of royal commissions. Cole does not endorse Mundine’s war prediction but warns Australians about the future reparations they may face and the fundamental changes that implementation of the Uluru statement would bring to the Australia’s legal system. He concludes: “The potential for great and irremediable harm to Australian society means that The Voice should never be incorporated in the constitution.” Cole points out that some Indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders want much more than recognition. They want the constitution changed to incorporate their Uluru claimed rights so that in the future, those Uluru rights cannot be abolished. And already three demands of the Uluru statement have accepted entirely by our Prime Minister - the Voice body, a Makarrata commission and “truth telling about our history”. Cole concludes that when asked to vote to amend the constitution to incorporate the Voice, Australians need to understand that some will use it to support the demands for recognition of coexisting sovereignty, a Makarrata commission designed to produce a treaty, monetary compensation for past events, and a rewriting of Australian history. Cole might not attach Mundine’s description of Uluru as a “declaration of war” but he shows how the proposed changes to property rights will create deep divisions among the population." - Robert Gottliebsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19623907 Albanese government says far-right influencers are infiltrating the campaign against an Indigenous voice to parliament - Senior government minister Murray Watt has accused far-right influencers of “appearing to hijack the No campaign”, as Fair Australia dismisses Yes camp warnings Warren Mundine was “encouraging violence” through a controversial tweet. Both sides of the voice referendum debate have accused each other of violence and abuse, with a clash between Yes and No supporters outside a No campaign event in Brisbane on Wednesday night the latest confrontation on the campaign trail. A member of the local chapter of the Proud Boys Ben Shand, known as the Dusty Bogan, was at the event headlined by Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Mr Mundine. Government sources said this appeared to be part of a larger pattern of infiltration of the Proud Boys in the official No campaign, with Mr Shand asking his followers to “jump on the bandwagon boys” and volunteer for Fair Australia.

>>19631056 Indigenous voice to parliament: Clive Palmer pays out $2m to say No - Clive Palmer will spend $2m promoting the No vote, including a final-week advertising blitz in South Australia and Tasmania, amid rising concerns that Yes23’s $50m war chest could fall short in swinging enough votes for a come-from-behind victory in the voice referendum. Yes23, No and third-party organisations are on track to spend more than $30m on advertising ahead of the October 14 referendum, with the bulk of funding quarantined for a final two-week push to win over soft and undecided voters. “We’re spending the money to put our point of view forward. We’re targeting Tasmania and South Australia. We’ll be advertising in all the states but will be ­focusing on them. It’s cheaper to spend advertising in Tassie and South Australia,” Mr Palmer said. “I think the No case will win. My prediction is 30 per cent Yes when we get to the polling date. If you look at it in the proper context, the most important thing in Australia is not Yes or No at the moment, it’s the cost-of-living and how the average Australian is going to make his way.” The UAP founder, who confirmed he had not consulted with Indigenous leaders, said his campaign reflected a “personal view” and was not associated with the official No campaign.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822112

#32 - Part 53

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 17

>>19637799 ‘Blak sovereignty’ leaders switch to Yes, isolating Lidia Thorpe - Key opponents of the Indigenous Voice have switched sides in the final weeks of the referendum to back the Yes case after rising fears that a No victory would align them with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton or One Nation leader Pauline Hanson. The moves reveal the concerns among “progressive No” activists who initially rejected the Voice in favour of stronger action - such as a treaty first – but have moved away from the hardline stance taken by Indigenous senator Lidia Thorpe. But Thorpe said the Blak Sovereignty movement, which she leads, was “growing exponentially” and would continue to oppose the Voice, saying she would not switch sides despite calls from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for her support. Melbourne activist Tarneen Onus Browne said they were a “hard No” and actively campaigned against the Voice until changing their mind when they saw the risk of a No victory. “It is dangerous to those of us in Indigenous communities because of the racism and discrimination it amps up, and I hope to never see another community group be put in danger of right-wing conservatives in a national vote,” they said. Onus Browne is a community organiser for Warriors of the Aboriginal Resistance and made headlines five years ago for telling an Invasion Day rally they hoped Australia would “burn to the ground” – a remark they said was about the need for total change to the political system. “I agree with much of what the progressive No represents, not the racist No - they are two very different campaigns,” they said.

>>19637818 Black Peoples Union rallies to say No to the Voice - The radical No vote to an Indigenous Voice to Parliament found its own voice in Canberra on Saturday, with the revolutionary Black Peoples Union holding a meeting to reject moderation and reconciliation in favour of a “reckoning” with Australia’s past and political foundation. Keiran Stewart-Assheton, a Wani-Wandi man of the Yuin Nation and national president of the BPU, wants voters to reject the Voice, which would embed an Indigenous-led advisory body into the Constitution, in favour of a revolution to overthrow the liberal foundations of modern Australia. Speaking before the meeting, Mr Stewart-Assheton said he wanted to replace the current political structure with the governance models that existed in First Nations communities before European settlement, what he terms a “proto-communist” model. “Our systems governments are very different, the closest I suppose in similarity would be some form of communism or socialism, but ultimately it’s not those either,” he said. “It’s very much its own thing that hasn’t been properly documented and labelled in English.”

>>19637828 Indigenous voice to parliament referendum fatigue is kicking in on the final run home - As Australians fire up barbecues and stock eskies for the footy finals long weekend, Yes and No campaigners will have a brief reprieve from the gruelling slog of the voice referendum campaign trail. The 16-month trek towards constitutionally enshrining a voice to parliament and executive government has worked against the Yes campaign. For many Yes campaigners, who reflect on polls last year showing emphatic support for an Indigenous voice, time has become the enemy. ALP and Yes23 campaigners are not giving up. Backed by more than 40,000 volunteers, a $20m advertising blitz and a ground game assisted by unions and activist groups, the Yes side is working to pull off a come-from-behind win. The stakes for Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton are high. Whoever lands on the losing side will carry residual damage all the way to the 2025 election.

>>19650010 Anthony Albanese says one-on-one conversations will be key to a Yes victory for an Indigenous voice to parliament - Anthony Albanese insists undecided Australians will arrive at a Yes vote “pretty comfortably” during one-on-one conversations about the Indigenous voice to parliament, saying this will be the key to a referendum win on October 14. With no signs of a turnaround in the polls less than two weeks before polling day, the Prime Minister said the voice “isn‘t a radical proposal, nor is it a conservative proposal, it’s a mainstream proposal” while attempting to contrast a “negative” No campaign with a “positive” Yes campaign. Mr Albanese hit out at disinformation as he declared the voice won’t advise the Reserve Bank of Australia or where Australia’s nuclear-powered submarines are located, despite Indigenous leaders and Yes campaigners previously saying it could. Both sides of the referendum said they were confident they’d be able to effectively man booths to engage voters for the final sprint, with prepoll open in all states and territories from Tuesday October 3.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822115

#32 - Part 54

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 18

>>19650029 Voice campaign gets ugly as early voting begins - Special Minister of State Don Farrell has urged anyone who feels threatened during the voice referendum to contact police, as Yes and No campaigners trade barbs over which side has more extremists. Ahead of pre-polling commencing on Monday, No campaigners have written to the Australian Electoral Commission complaining their volunteers were worried about their safety standing at booths. But a Labor spokeswoman described the Advance Australia letter as a “cynical attempt by the No campaign to distract from the extreme and dangerous far-right influencers they’ve attracted”. “If Advance Australia are aware of threatening or criminal behaviour they should report it to the police,” the spokeswoman said. “The No campaign only focus on creating fear, they offer no solutions and no progress.” The Albanese government last week accused far-right influencers of hijacking the No campaign after a member of the Proud Boys and neo-Nazi Tom Sewell attended their rallies.

>>19650055 Albanese looking to blame Dutton for his voice misjudgment - "In the final two weeks of the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum campaign, Anthony Albanese is refining a new political narrative aimed at minimising culpability for his misjudgment and maximising blame for Peter Dutton The Prime Minister’s apparent intent, in prudent political expectation or perhaps even anticipation of a defeat for the referendum, is to argue he was misled on the vital issue of bipartisanship by the Coalition and betrayed by the craven political opportunism of the Opposition Leader. A deflection, in case of defeat, away from his own miscalculation that bipartisanship on a referendum no longer counted because things had changed and the Australian public was more inclined to listen to the elites of business, sport and religion than to leaders of political parties. If there is a yes vote, it will not matter what is being said now about Dutton and the lack of bipartisanship… but if there is a no vote, Albanese will be the one under pressure for a failed political campaign that has caused potential damage to Australian society and the Labor government." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19656285 Video: No campaigners warn against complacency at Perth event as Voice referendum draws closer - More than 1,000 people have gathered at an event in Perth to hear leaders of the No campaign warn against complacency ahead of the referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament. With the polls already open for early voting and less than a fortnight until referendum day, Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Nyunggai Warren Mundine were greeted like rock stars at the event on Monday night. Speaking to the crowd at the Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre, Mr Mundine warned volunteers and campaigners for the No camp not to get complacent. "The battle is not over yet, we've still got to get out there and fight every day," he said. The room was a sea of orange "No" posters, hats, and T-shirts, which featured the slogan "Vote no to a Voice of division". Senator Nampijinpa Price was greeted with a standing ovation when she addressed the audience. "It's such a pleasure being back here in Western Australia in Perth, you guys are absolutely bringing it," the Northern Territory senator for the Country Liberal Party said.

>>19656295 Yes23 warned by AEC on ‘potentially misleading’ purple signs - The Australian Electoral Commission has warned the Yes23 Voice campaign that some of its signs could be potentially misleading and demanded it move them away from polling stations. Some Yes23 signs - which say “Vote YES” – use the same purple colour as the commission’s signs, which have the words “voting centre” on them and are used to inform voters about polling booth locations for the Voice referendum. The commission said in a statement late on Monday, the first day of early voting, that it had become aware of signs that could “potentially mislead voters”, who might see the official purple colours and become confused about whether a Yes vote was perhaps mandatory, or encouraged, by authorities. “To be absolutely clear - the signs were erected by the Yes23 campaign, not the AEC,” the statement said. “When we were alerted to this signage, the AEC requested the Yes23 campaign to rectify the situation by ensuring their signs are not placed in the proximity of AEC voting centre signs. “The Yes23 campaign has agreed to comply with this request.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822118

#32 - Part 55

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 19

>>19656309 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s Voice plea as he urges voters to drown out misinformation - Anthony Albanese has pleaded with the thousands of undecided voters to drown out the “absurd” conspiracy theories and vote Yes, as Australians begin to vote in the Voice to parliament referendum. The Prime Minister, insistent that a Yes vote will prevail on October 14 despite polls pointing towards a defeat, says he is confident Australians will look at the question before them and accept the “very modest request”. It comes as early voting centres open across the country, with the Australian Electoral Commission confirming 124,000 people in Victoria, Tasmania, WA and the NT voted on the first day of operations. Mr Albanese said he was hopeful that undecided and “soft no” voters could tune out the “full sweep of misinformation”, citing examples of claims made regarding the Reserve Bank, private land ownership, and the United Nations. “The idea that the Voice will have a say on the Reserve Bank determination of interest rates is quite frankly absurd, just absurd,” he said on the hustings in Tasmania.

>>19664314 Indigenous voice to parliament Yes case can’t escape its own fatal contradictions - "Whichever side wins the voice referendum - Yes or No - the tone leaders of both sides take on the night of the vote count and immediately after will be of great consequence for Australia. We don’t have to come together on policy, for bipartisanism in support of bad policy is disastrous. But we should acknowledge that most people who participated in this debate, on both sides, did so with goodwill towards the nation and goodwill towards Indigenous Australians. This in fact is why the Yes campaign was so grievously misled by the early polling that showed overwhelming support for the voice. These polls didn’t accurately measure support for changing the Constitution. They measured instead the pure goodwill to Indigenous Australians. It has been a fatal slander by the Yes case to argue goodwill to Indigenous Australians requires everyone to vote Yes, that people voting No can be motivated only by ignorance or malice - a typical identity politics false binary. The whole Yes construct that this is a campaign by the marginalised against the powerful is colossally absurd and a complete reversal of the truth. This is a campaign of massive institutional power – the government, the ABC, the richest corporations, trade unions – all attempting to browbeat and morally coerce the Australian people into voting Yes. A No vote will be a magnificent declaration of independence by voters." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19664325 Close the Gap? No camp’s lack of vision is staggering - "With voting on the referendum to establish a voice to parliament under way, now is the time for those who are planning to vote No to reconsider and vote Yes, ignoring the shrill calls to war and rage, and embrace this simple, modest, low-risk constitutional change that will enlarge and uplift our nation, and reconcile us with the past. The voice to parliament and government will be an Indigenous consultative body tasked with providing information, suggestions and feedback to policymakers about matters that affect Indigenous Australians so we can improve the health, employment, education, housing, justice and safety outcomes of Indigenous Australians. The No camp is led by populist reactionary conservatives, many of whom have been propagating lies and misinformation about the voice, and some have peddled unadulterated racism. It has been sickening to observe organisations such as CPAC Australia provide a platform for bigotry. And dangerous to see them attack the integrity of the Australian Electoral Commission. This referendum is about recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians in the Constitution and establishing an advisory body to improve policy outcomes. It is about listening to and respecting them and their unique place in the story of this continent. It is an act of reconciliation. And it offers a chance for all of us to embrace change for a better future for all Australians." - Troy Bramston - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822121

#32 - Part 56

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 20

>>19664349 Marcia Langton and Tom Calma say the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum has been shaped by our racist history - Key voice architects say the ­referendum campaign has tapped into “a deep well of historical ­racism” and warn that Indigenous people will need to work “very closely” with politicians in the event of a Yes vote to ensure voice legislation “realises their ambitions for greater control over their lives”. In an article for world-leading medical journal The Lancet, Marcia Langton and Tom Calma join fellow Indigenous academics Ian Anderson, Yin Paradies and Ray Lovett in cautioning a No vote will have a “profoundly negative effect” on Indigenous Australians who have worked on reconciliation for nearly two decades. “We posit that this is partly ­because the referendum process taps into a deep well of historical racism that originated on the Australian frontier when Indigenous peoples ‘were violently dispossessed from their lands by the British’,” they say in the September 28 Lancet article, quoting Indigenous activist and human rights lawyer Hannah McGlade. “This history has shaped the 2023 referendum and an increasingly divisive campaign between those advocating a Yes and a No position. The voice referendum process creates a substantial cultural load for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Indigenous peoples are being asked, and expected, to engage in conversations around this topic and, often, are then challenged to defend their position.”

>>19664382 Yes campaign can’t distract from real issue of voice’s power - "With voting now open and the Yes and No campaigns in full throttle, replete with exaggerations, distortions and racist claims, there is almost no focus on the central issue of the referendum - the constitutional power of the voice in representing the Indigenous peoples. For many people the voice is seen in both First Nations terms and in racial terms. After 30 years of debate in this nation about racial issues this is hardly a surprise. Voice advocates are anxious to argue the issue is not about race. For the Yes case, that’s an electoral necessity. Advocates say, correctly, the voice is a body that represents First Nations people as the Indigenous people of Australia. But surely there are two truths here - it is about First Nations people and it is about race. Isn’t this how most Australians see the issue? When leading No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says the voice is dividing the country “along fractures of race”, that resonates with many people who have reservations about the way race is now embraced in our society as a celebratory badge of group identity. The point for the referendum is that the voice is contentious at multiple levels and around its core principles. If the voice fails, the judgment will be that such a contentious proposal in its design should never have been advanced short of a convention and bipartisanship support." - Paul Kelly - theaustralian.com.au

>>19664399 Jacinta Nampijinpa Price embarks on Indigenous voice to parliament referendum unity drive - A busy cafe run by Vietnamese-Australians was an ideal setting for Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s message about a united yet diverse nation living with the sinister threat of racial divide. In the office district of West Perth on Tuesday morning, Senator Nampijinpa Price worked the coffee machine with members of the Luong family at Epic Cafe, later saying: “I mean, they are an example of the Australian story, and as I keep saying to Australians around the country, it doesn’t matter whether we were here 60,000 years ago or six months ago: you are Australian, it doesn’t matter your racial heritage.” Yes advocates thought they would own the concept of bringing Australians closer together in this referendum. But Senator Nampijinpa Price has taken it from them and it appeared to be working on undecided voters and Hard Nos alike. The first-term politician received a rapturous reception at Perth’s biggest convention centre the previous night as she walked on stage to the sound of husband Colin Lillie singing the opening lines of his country rock song, Renegade: “I’m the bringer of change.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822123

#32 - Part 57

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 21

>>19664413 Bizarre road sign vandals popping up in one state - Police are hunting for vandals who defaced speed limit road signs to read ‘No’ across regional South Australia in another mark of a growing ugliness in the Voice to parliament referendum campaign. Motorists across the state reported the altered signs, with the 110 speed limit figure vandalised to read “No” in an apparent reference to the campaign, now in its final two weeks before the October 14 vote. A Department of Transportation spokesman confirmed on Wednesday at least two speed signs, one on the Barrier Highway at Burra and another on Worlds End Highway at Robertson had been vandalised. “Road signs and infrastructure are very important for driver safety,” the spokesman said. “Maintenance crews are currently checking other signage in the area for vandalism. “Defacing road infrastructure is a criminal offence which carries a maximum penalty of $5000 or one year imprisonment.” A South Australian Police spokesman said the police were aware of the vandalism and were investigating.

>>19672517 Dutton, Price want Indigenous spending audited - A row over federal spending is clouding the final phase of the referendum on the Indigenous Voice to parliament, with No campaigners demanding an audit of the money spent on First Australians and a former federal minister backing the call. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton linked the spending to the Voice debate by saying the money should be checked to ensure it was going to the “most deserving” people, hours after leading No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price called for the audit. But Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney said she had made changes in June to address an audit that highlighted what she called the “clearly deficient” safeguards in place during nine years of Coalition government. Former Indigenous affairs minister Amanda Vanstone argued for a complete audit to discover where the spending was doing most good and where it was not working, after days of debate over total federal and state outlays worth about $33.4 billion. “I don’t think anyone could genuinely say that Indigenous people are getting value for money,” said Vanstone, who was responsible for Indigenous affairs during the Howard government.

>>19672524 Indigenous voice to parliament: Yet another audit is not the answer, Yes camp says - The Yes campaign has hit back at the latest calls from Peter Dutton and Jacinta Price for an audit of ­Indigenous spending, noting that the Coalition conducted almost two dozen such examinations ­during its time in government. Speaking to reporters in Perth on Wednesday morning, Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin said Mr Dutton and the Coalition had offered nothing to deliver real change for Indigenous Australians. “Peter Dutton was a senior cabinet minister in a government over nine years, and they conducted 22 audits into the Indigenous Affairs space … The result was a widening … in many key areas at the Closing the Gap targets for ­Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people,” he said. “What Peter Dutton is proposing is more of the same. That is what a No vote will give all Australians in this campaign, it’ll get us nowhere with respect to progress in Indigenous Affairs, and more of the failed outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.”

>>19672552 Marcus Stewart, Blair Cottrell and ECAJ say Indigenous voice to parliament No campaign target of far-right - Indigenous leader Marcus Stewart says it is concerning that far-right activist Blair Cottrell was supporting the No campaign, triggering a rebuke from voice to parliament opponents who say the Yes case is “gratefully receiving” support from the Communist Party of Australia. The Executive Council of Australian Jewry also denounced “the paranoid, demented mind of the antisemite” after footage emerged of a man handing out flyers at an anti-voice event in Brisbane that says “every aspect of the Aboriginal voice to parliament is Jewish”. A No campaign spokesman completely rejected the suggestion it had been “hijacked” by anyone, including Proud Boy members and neo-Nazis, amid calls from Mr Stewart to ensure voice opponents were protecting volunteers on polling booths “from these nasty characters”. Mr Cottrell, a high-profile extremist and former United Patriots Front leader, last week reposted The Australian’s story headlined ‘Far-right ‘hijacking’ Indigenous voice to parliament No campaign, says Labor’ with: “Of course we are.” “It’s politics. Everybody is trying to infiltrate everything in politics. Actually, the ‘far-right’ (read: white Australian workers with access to the internet) has been significantly less successful at infiltrating Australian politics than international Judaism and its leftist rhetoric, which has penetrated every level of social life and is the only reason we’re having this referendum in the first place.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822125

#32 - Part 58

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 22

>>19672573 Video: Senator Lidia Thorpe accuses police of failing to protect her after Neo-Nazi racist abuse - Independent senator Lidia Thorpe has said the Australian Federal Police (AFP) have failed to protect her after becoming the target of far-right extremist racist abuse. A warning that this story contains offensive images that may cause distress to our audience. The Indigenous senator was tagged in a video of a masked Neo-Nazi burning an Aboriginal flag while performing a Nazi salute this week. In Melbourne on Thursday, she stood in front of the Royal Exhibition Building and described the upcoming Voice to Parliament referendum as an "act of genocide against my people". Senator Thorpe made allegations that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the AFP are not doing enough to protect her from the far right. "His violent force that he has sent to protect me can't even protect me, refuse to protect the Blak sovereign woman because the police are part of the problem in this country," she said.

>>19672594 Video: Lidia Thorpe blames PM for Nazi video - Progressive No campaigner Lidia Thorpe has vowed to speak out in the final nine days of the voice referendum campaign and says she’s not scared, after releasing a video of a masked man threatening her, burning an Aboriginal flag and doing the Nazi salute. The independent senator’s defiance came as Anthony Albanese, senior ministers and Peter Dutton denounced the “quite horrific” and “unhinged” video, which Senator Thorpe blamed on the Prime Minister. The Australian Federal Police is investigating the video, which has been taken down from X, and the account that posted it has been deactivated.

>>19679087 Regardless of referendum result, Jacinta Price will be biggest winner - "Regardless of whether the October 14 referendum succeeds or fails, the biggest winner will be Jacinta Nampijinpa Price. The 42-year-old Indigenous woman, a mother of four, has made her mark on the country so quickly and so profoundly it’s hard to imagine national politics without her. Indeed, if the Liberal parliamentary party is smart, it will move her to the lower house and start testing her for the leadership. The party should be planning for the day when Liberals and the country are led by the first female Indigenous prime minister. Not because Price is female. Nor because she is Indigenous. But because after a challenging time she is already leading a large part of the country on a new path. After the referendum, Price’s talents will be needed to bring an end to a long era of separatism, welfarism and victimhood. Price could become the pre-eminent politician of our time if she slays these old agendas that many fear will be embedded for generations to come if the voice is inserted into the Constitution." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19679141 Indigenous voice to parliament: The ball is in your court, Australia - "When I was a little girl, I remember hiding under the bed so I wouldn’t be taken from my mum. You wouldn’t know how terrifying that was for a kid, even now. I grew up in an Australia where being Aboriginal was frankly unfair and cruel. Many of my childhood memories have stayed with me through my life. I remember how lucky I felt to be scouted at a young age. And I have never forgotten this simple thought: if the 1967 referendum had happened three years later, I wouldn’t have been able to leave Australia without permission; maybe I wouldn’t have won Wimbledon. But the ’67 referendum did happen. We did it then, let’s do it again. I’ve been on this journey of constitutional recognition for a long time and this is the last chance of my lifetime. I know how far our country has come, together. I know we can take the next step, together. I believe in the simple goodness of every Australian heart. In particular I say to Australians from my generation, the people who gave me such wonderful and warm support on the biggest stage: stand with me now to help Australia grab this great opportunity. You’ve cheered for me. Now, please, vote with me: vote Yes." - Evonne Goolagong Cawley, former tennis world No.1 and a Wiradjuri woman - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822127

#32 - Part 59

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 23

>>19679310 Video: Voice to Parliament Referendum: TV icon Ray Martin says ‘d*ckheads and dinosaurs’ Australians will vote no - Veteran TV journalist Ray Martin has labelled Australians who vote no as “d… heads and dinosaurs” in an extraordinary spray at an event in Prime Minister Anthony Albanese‘s Sydney electorate of Grayndler. The Nine TV presenter, who is of indigenous heritage, took the stage at a Yes rally on September 28 at Marrickville’s Factory Theatre in Sydney’s inner west, where he took aim at the No side’s campaign slogan: “If you don’t know, vote no”. “What that slogan is saying is if you’re a dinosaur or d… head who can’t be bothered reading, then vote No,” Martin told attendees. “If you don’t know, find out what you don’t know.” A video of the speech was uploaded to social media platform TikTok, gaining thousands of views and almost two hundred comments. Laughter and cheering can be heard from the crowd after the remarks.

>>19679378 Video: Ray Martin stands by ‘dinosaurs and dickheads’ comment that lashed No campaign - Veteran journalist Ray Martin has stood by his scathing comments attacking the No campaign after he accused its key slogan of being “nonsensical” and likened it to being a “dinosaur or a dickhead who can’t be bothered reading” the referendum proposal. The five-time gold Logie winner was interviewed on Channel 9’s A Current Affair program by host Ally Langdon on Thursday night and during the interview she asked if he regretted the comments. “No, I don’t,” Martin said. “I think this is a really important referendum and I would never call No voters dinosaurs or anything else.” Langdon refuted these claims and said, “But you did call them dinosaurs and another word.” Martin repeatedly rejected Langdon’s comments. “No I didn’t. What I said I found offensive was this slogan, this stupid slogan, if you don’t know, vote No. “That’s just an endorsement of ignorance, if you don’t know find out what you don’t know.”

>>19679432 Dutton attacks Ray Martin over Voice as Jacinta Price weighs in against ABC - Coalition leader Peter Dutton has taken aim at prominent broadcaster Ray Martin for suggesting the No side’s Voice slogan is aimed at “dickheads”, as Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price railed against alleged bias at the ABC. Dutton raised Martin’s comments during an interview on Sydney radio station 2GB this Thursday and referred to the former presenter on five occasions. “People aren’t stupid, they aren’t dinosaurs,” the federal opposition leader said. “The prime minister preaches inclusiveness and tolerance and all of the woke agenda that they’re pushing out. “But the prime minister was actually at the speech that Ray Martin made, right? And he praised it on ABC Radio the next day to say that it was a great speech.” In an interview on ABC Radio Adelaide on Thursday, Price, the federal opposition’s Indigenous Affairs spokeswoman, claimed the national broadcaster, a common target for conservatives, had treated her as a token conservative. “If you’re a conservative Aboriginal woman, as far as the ABC is concerned, you are controversial or not part of the status quo,” she said. “You’re generally made to feel it’s unacceptable.”

>>19685067 Video: Support for the Voice to Parliament continues to dwindle, just a week out from the referendum. - According to a Roy Morgan poll, 46 per cent of Australians intend to vote No, while 37 per cent of people would vote Yes and 17 per cent of voters remain undecided. Victoria and Tasmania are the only states where people are inclined to vote Yes in the referendum. Queensland saw the largest amount of 'no' responses. The majority of men across the country say they are against the Voice - citing fears of losing land.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822128

#32 - Part 60

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 24

>>19685172 Support for ‘No’ case now at 46% well ahead of ‘Yes’ case on 37% as early referendum voting starts - The latest Roy Morgan poll shows 46% of Australians (up 2% in a week) now say they will vote ‘No’ to establish an ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice’ compared to only 37% (down 2%) say they would vote ‘Yes’ and a further 17% (unchanged) are ‘Undecided’ on how they would vote. Respondents around Australia were asked: “Next month’s (Asked on September 25-30, 2023) / This month’s (Asked on October 1, 2023) referendum proposes a law to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. At the referendum to be held on October 14, will you vote yes, no, or are you undecided?” If ‘Undecided’ respondents are removed the split in favour of the ‘No’ vote is 56% (up 3% in a week) cf. 44% (down 3%). However, past experience with surveys conducted before previous referenda shows that ‘Undecided’ voters are far more likely to end up as a ‘No’ rather than a ‘Yes’ vote meaning the actual figure is likely to be a larger majority in favour of ‘No’ than indicated here.

>>19685360 Indigenous voice to parliament won’t fix crisis in Northern Territory, say John Howard and Tony Abbott - John Howard and Tony Abbott have declared the Northern Territory is a failed state because of its inability to provide basic services to remote communities, including education, and believe a voice to parliament will not improve practical outcomes for Indigenous people in central Australia. The former Liberal prime ministers, who implemented the Coalition’s 2007 intervention into the Northern Territory, which ­included grog bans and placing military personnel in some ­remote communities, said little had changed for Indigenous Australians in the 15 years since the Coalition government’s action. Mr Howard said changes to the Constitution to include an ­Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government would be tied up for years would not do anything to address the problems facing Aboriginal children in the Northern Territory. Mr Abbott said a Yes vote for the voice would only “entrench Indigenous separatism” that had not helped disadvantaged communities.

>>19685520 Indigenous voice to parliament division was predicted by former High Court chief justice Harry Gibbs - A three-decade old warning sounded by former high court chief justice Harry Gibbs on the dangers of enshrining special rights for ­Aboriginal people in the Constitution has been seized upon by the Coalition as evidence a successful referendum next Saturday would permanently divide the nation. Gibbs, chief justice from 1981 to 1987, was deeply concerned about the potential for the constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians to split the nation along racial lines. As founding president of the Samuel Griffith Society, established in 1992, Gibbs wrote Australia Day messages to members and, in 1993, one year after the Mabo case, he expressed alarm that even a simple statement ­recognising Indigenous Australians in the Constitution could have far-reaching consequences. “The most dangerous change that could be made would be to ­include in the constitution a provision giving special rights to the Aboriginal people,” he said. Gibbs warned that “nothing could do more to divide the Australian nation than a constitutional change that gave the Aboriginal people special rights and privileges based solely on race”. “The Aboriginal people, like all other peoples in Australia, are not a uniform group. Some have successfully integrated into 20th ­century society; others are successfully living a traditional mode of life, albeit a modified one; ­others unfortunately are greatly in need of help, which various governments have tried without much success to give them,” he said. “Those in need should be succoured, but that does not mean that all those who are of Aboriginal race should be given special constitutional rights which would not be enjoyed by other Australians, even by those in equal need.”

>>19685549 Indigenous voice to parliament: Migrants ‘unaware’ voting is imminent - A large proportion of the migrant community in a part of Sydney’s inner west doesn’t know the voice referendum is approaching, says Strathfield MP Jason Yat-sen Li, as he makes a final pitch to multicultural Australians on the voice. Mr Yat-Sen Li, who earlier this year highlighted the extent of voice misinformation circulating in Chinese migrant communities, said he had had to build a compelling narrative for Yes among the large Chinese diaspora and other multicultural groups in his electorate. The Labor MP says many migrants, including his parents, have not had an opportunity to engage deeply with 65,000 years of Indigenous history, making some people susceptible to misinformation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822130

#32 - Part 61

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 25

>>19685600 Key voice battleground South Australia is ‘leaning to no’, campaign volunteers say - At a South Australian shopping centre, Philip Colebatch is handing out flyers for the Indigenous voice to parliament no campaign. And as the campaign heads into its final days, he’s getting a “sniff” from voters he’s talking to that “it’s leaning to no”. “I just get the nods and the winks,” he says. South Australia has become a key battleground state in the lead up to the voice referendum. On Friday - just over a week from the vote - all state and territory leaders descended on Adelaide, including the sole Liberal, Tasmania’s Jeremy Rockcliff. They all support the federal voice to parliament. But polling for South Australia has dipped below a winnable level, and according to people on the ground, many people are voting no. Another no campaigner, Alistair Crooks, says the shopping centre crowds are fairly polarised - and his years on polling booths have taught him you can’t always take them at their word. He, too, has heard more support for the no campaign, “but that’s skewed,” he says. “It’s older people who’ve got the time to come down here. The young are still working. I don’t think we can read anything too much into it.”

>>19685699 Voice to Parliament: Hard No for WA as referendum vote looms - Fifty-four per cent of West Australians are now hard No voters and won’t be changing their minds in the final week of polling for the referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament. Final polling for WA by Fair Australia shows a total of 59 per cent of people plan to vote No compared with 36 per cent who plan to vote Yes. Five per cent remain unsure. But significantly, the proportion of hard No and hard Yes voters stands at 54-31. Fair Australia, part of the No camp and led by senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, polled 637 people. WA Liberal senator Michaelia Cash said it was clear West Australians were “hardening” their resolve to vote No.

>>19685753 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese casts Voice vote in home electorate of Marrickville - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has cast his vote early in the historic Voice to Parliament referendum with the company of his son from his home electorate of Marrickville. Mr Albanese was in the inner-western Sydney suburb on Saturday morning where he emphatically dropped his ballot, presumably with a ‘Yes’ vote, into the ballot box at the Marrickville Town Hall early polling station. He was met by a small crowd who had turned out to cast their own vote ahead of the official Voice vote day on October 14. Volunteers, both with the ‘Yes’ campaign and the Electoral Commission, were all smiles as the nation’s leader entered the polling area, accompanied by his son Nathan. “Yes for recognition, Yes for listening, Yes for better outcomes,” Mr Albanese wrote in a social media post, accompanied by a photo of he and his son voting.

>>19691563 Anthony Albanese confirms his government will walk away from the Indigenous voice to parliament altogether if No vote succeeds - Anthony Albanese says his government will walk away from the Indigenous voice to parliament altogether if the referendum is voted down next weekend, warning that trying to improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people won’t be as effective without a constitutionally enshrined advisory body. The Prime Minister also questioned why the Coalition had the position of an Indigenous Australians spokesperson, held by Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, if they didn’t want to listen to Aboriginal people. Mr Albanese hit out at what he said was a deliberate strategy by the No campaign to confuse voters, including “absurd debates” over whether the voice will advise the Reserve Bank of Australia on interest rates or the length of the Uluru Statement from the Heart. “That is all a conscious decision to wreck and to confuse,” Mr Albanese told ABC’s Insiders program.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822132

#32 - Part 62

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 26

>>19691573 Anthony Albanese says Voice won’t be legislated if referendum fails - Anthony Albanese has defiantly ruled out legislating a Voice to parliament if the referendum fails next weekend, saying it would be “inappropriate”. When asked if he would “walk away altogether” from the Voice in the event of a No vote, the Prime Minister responded: “correct”. “Indigenous Australians have said they want a Voice that’s enshrined (in the constitution),” he told ABC’s Insiders. “What they don’t want to do is what they’ve done time and time again, which is to part of establishing representative organisations, only to see, for opportunistic reasons, a government to come in and just abolish it.” On Saturday, Australians will head to the polls to vote in the first referendum since 1999, where they will be asked whether they agree to enshrine an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice in the constitution. Already, about two million people, including the Prime Minister, have voted in pre-polling. All published polls have the referendum on track to fail, but Mr Albanese says he remains hopeful that Australians will come together and vote Yes.

>>19699247 Video: Labor’s stocks fall, support for the Indigenous voice to parliament hits new low: Newspoll - Support for the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government has weakened further heading into the final week of the campaign, with just a third of voters now backing the proposed constitutional change amid a critical loss of support among younger voters. The Albanese government has also suffered electorally, with Labor’s primary vote slipping to its lowest level since the election and Anthony Albanese’s personal approval rating dipping to a new low as his lead over Liberal leader Peter Dutton narrows to its tightest margin. An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian shows support for the voice falling a further two points in the past fortnight to 34 per cent as Australians prepare to cast their vote this coming weekend.

>>19699269 Albanese has spent his and Labor’s political capital on a debate which has divided the country - "For Anthony Albanese, the voice referendum can’t be over soon enough. Not only has the Prime Minister failed to energise the nation into supporting his key election pledge, Labor is suffering pre-fallout damage as a consequence. Albanese has expended his political capital on a debate that has divided the country and ­assisted in driving down the Labor Party’s electoral stocks. Albanese is now paying a political price. Labor’s primary vote has dipped to its lowest level since the election at 34 per cent. Albanese’s approval ratings are now also at their weakest point. While these are early warning signs for the government that its focus must shift, Peter Dutton isn’t reaping electoral rewards as a result. The Coalition’s primary vote has improved, but only to the point that it has returned to its election-losing level of 36 per cent. And while the leadership margin has narrowed to its tightest since the election, Albanese still remains comfortably ahead of the Liberal leader as preferred prime minister. Albanese, however, cannot escape his attachment to the broader rejection of the voice at a time when the primary focus for most Australians is on their household budget." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19699279 Paul Keating makes case for voice to improve Indigenous lives - Paul Keating has given his full support to the referendum to provide constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians through a voice to parliament and government, as the campaign enters its final week. The former prime minister, who negotiated the Native Title Act in response to the High Court’s Mabo judgement with Indigenous leaders, told The Australian that a constitutionally enshrined advisory body would lead to systematic improvement in policy results across the board. Mr Keating said his seven-month negotiation with Indigenous leaders on the complex issues of native title through 1993 showed that a standing advisory body could significantly enhance the policymaking process and increase living standards for Indigenous Australians. “A voice can dramatically improve outcomes,” he said in a statement provided exclusively to The Australian. “The idea of a ‘voice’ has been tried and it worked. For this demonstration and a host of other reasons, I will be voting ‘yes’ on Saturday.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822134

#32 - Part 63

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 27

>>19699287 A voice can dramatically improve outcomes for Indigenous Australia, former PM Paul Keating writes - "A voice can dramatically improve outcomes. How can such a claim be reasonably asserted? It can be asserted because we have already had demonstration of a “voice” in respect of deeply complex issues once before, and the overall outcome was sharply enhanced. The voice, on that occasion, was the concentrated consultation employed over a period of seven months between the commonwealth and Aboriginal and ­Islander people in respect of ­Native Title, indeed the only structured consultation by government that Indigenous Australians have been party to since the referendum in 1967. The long and tortuous seven months of extended consultation through the native title process was the first and so far only example of a “voice” in the full throat of its advisory mandate but as it turned out, a mandate that went a long way to settling perhaps the primary Indigenous grievance; the theft of their estate. That “voice” also went ­beyond the matter of land. In the consequence, I set up the inquiry into the Stolen Generations under former High Court judge Ronald Wilson, as my government also did the Indigenous Land Fund with $2bn allocated to buy back pastoral leases, allowing native title to revive. Thirty years on, Indigenous people now enjoy title to approximately 55 per cent of the Australian continent and when all the cases are heard, more likely two- thirds of the national land mass. The idea of a “voice” has been tried, and it worked big time. For this and a host of other reasons, I will be voting Yes on Saturday." - Paul Keating - theaustralian.com.au

>>19699303 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese urges Aussies to ‘Vote Yes’ in opinion piece - Anthony Albanese has appealed to all Australians in an article for news.com.au ahead of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum. Urging Aussies to vote Yes at Saturday’s referendum, Mr Albanese says: “When governments listen to people, they make better decisions, they save money and they get better results. That’s why we consult doctors and health care workers about health policy, it’s why we talk to farmers about agriculture policy, it’s why we ask scientists about science policy. The one area where governments from both sides of politics have consistently failed to listen, sometimes even failed to ask, is when it comes to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. We know the consequences this has had for Indigenous Australians: an 8 year gap in life expectancy, an infant mortality rate twice as high, communities where children are suffering from diseases that have been eliminated nearly everywhere else in the world. On October 14, you can vote Yes to change this. You can make a powerful statement about Australia’s history and take positive action for Australia’s future - and all you have to do is write one word: Yes.” - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese - news.com.au

>>19699323 Corporate Australia has ‘misread national mood’ on voice - Simon Fenwick, one of the top five donors to the No campaign, has hit out at corporate Australia for misreading the national mood on the Voice to parliament, warning that conservative viewpoints were being deliberately stamped out of the nation’s boardrooms. The 53-year-old who left Brisbane in the mid-1990s for London and New York where he helped start up the multibillion-dollar fund management firm International Value Advisers has voiced alarm at what he believes is a growing gulf between corporate Australia and the average Australian. He warned there was a double standard, where wealthy donors to progressive causes did not face the same stigma or backlash as conservative donors and that start-ups he was working with had been targeted because of his stance on the referendum.

>>19699336 ANZ, CBA, Westpac and NAB donate about $7m to Indigenous voice to parliament Yes vote - The big four banks have donated around $7m to the Yes campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament, sparking claims from the Coalition the case for change was “made by our elites, for our elites and funded by our elites”. The extent of the donations have been revealed to federal parliament for the first time just days out from Saturday’s referendum, with Westpac contributing $1.75m, National Australia Bank donating $1.5m and Commonwealth Bank providing $2m. The ANZ’s roughly $2m donation was confirmed during a parliamentary committee on bank closures in regional Australia last month. If ANZ’s donation was exactly $2m, the total amount from the major banks would equate to $7.25m.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822138

#32 - Part 64

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 28

>>19706372 Liberals hit back at Anthony Albanese’s Indigenous voice to parliament misinformation claims - Senior Liberal frontbenchers have hit back at Anthony Albanese’s claim that misinformation was undermining the voice referendum amid dwindling support for the government’s proposal. Mr Albanese has repeatedly blasted misinformation he said was being peddled by the No campaign to wreck the referendum and confuse voters. He said misinformation and disinformation were preventing voters from considering the “very simple” referendum question before them. He has pointed to misinformation, disinformation and conspiracy theories when asked why the voice was losing support, including among Labor voters. Five repeated claims by Mr Albanese include that it is “nonsense” that the voice would advise the RBA or on nuclear submarines, that the length of the Uluru Statement from the Heart was just one page, that the detail on the voice was simple, and that the voice referendum had nothing to do with treaty. Opposition legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash told The Australian there was “little in the PM’s claims which is supported by the facts” and Mr Albanese was unable to rule out issues that the voice would advise on. “If anyone is dealing in misinformation, it is the Prime Minister himself,” she said. “He certainly cannot rule out issues the voice will advise on and it is clear that the Uluru statement contained much more material than the single page he claims.”

>>19706380 Voice holds promise of hope for our most vulnerable - "Australia faces a moment in history where the decision we make about whether to recognise Indigenous Australians in the Constitution with an advisory body to parliament and government will have profound implications for this generation and the next. The constitutional referendum proposed is both an act of recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians as the first people of this continent with respect for their 60,000 years of continuing culture and also the establishment of a mechanism to improve policy outcomes. A Yes vote gives hope, opportunity and agency to the pressing need to close the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. A No vote gets us nowhere. The No camp has not put forward an agreed, coherent or compelling alternative plan to improve policy outcomes for Indigenous Australians that also fosters responsibility and accountability. It is confused and divided on questions of recognition, treaties and advisory bodies. There is a yearning deep within the Australian soul for reconciliation. There is, as Noel Pearson says, a whispering in our hearts about unfinished business. We have an opportunity, with the eyes of the world on us and our consciences telling us there is another way. These are the better angels of our nature and it is time we heed their call. In the final analysis, constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians through a voice to parliament is a sensible, logical and rational step for a mature nation. It is not radical or revolutionary. It is modest, simple and straightforward. If we vote Yes, it can make a real difference. If we vote No, nothing will change. We have two paths ahead of us. We must take the right one and vote Yes." - Troy Bramston - theaustralian.com.au - https://qresear.ch/?q=Troy+Bramston

>>19720209 Australians to reject Indigenous Voice in referendum - final YouGov poll - Australians are set to overwhelmingly say 'No' to a proposal to constitutionally recognise the country's Indigenous people in a referendum on Saturday, one of the final opinion polls ahead of the vote showed. Australians have to vote 'Yes' or 'No' to a question asking whether they agree to alter the 122-year-old constitution to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island people, and create a body, called the Voice to Parliament, that can provide advice to the government. More than 4 million people have already cast their ballot after early voting began on Oct. 2. With less than two days to go before voting day on Oct. 14, those opposed to the proposal lead the 'Yes' camp by 56% to 38%, according to the final poll by YouGov published on Thursday. Some 6% of those polled were undecided. Yougov polled 1,519 voters for the survey. "Our final poll indicates a sweeping ‘No’ victory - with nearing six in 10 voters intending to cast a ‘No’ vote," said Amir Daftari, YouGov Director of Polling and Academic research. "Our detailed analysis indicates that it is very unlikely that 'Yes' will win anywhere apart from a number of inner metropolitan seats.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822142

#32 - Part 65

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 29

>>19720215 Voice referendum: Patrick Dodson says nation faces path akin to post-apartheid South Africa if Yes fails - Patrick Dodson says Australia will need to take a path similar to South Africa following the abolishment of apartheid if the voice referendum is voted down and must develop a new way of ascertaining the views of Indigenous people. The father of reconciliation said he was hopeful an Indigenous voice to parliament would be legislated by the next election, due in 2025, if the Yes vote won while issuing several stark warnings three days out from polling day, including that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people “can’t live in your own country and not be recognised”. The West Australian senator, who has lost his beard and is still recovering from cancer, gave his only public speech during the voice referendum campaign to the National Press Club on Wednesday. “If we say No … we’re going to have to look in the mirror and say who the hell are we, what have we done, and now what are we going to do about it?” Senator Dodson said.

>>19720229 Noel Pearson urges voters to consider future generations at last-ditch Yes campaign rally for the Voice - Prominent Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has compared the politicisation of the Voice to Parliament referendum to vandalism, in a last-minute pitch to voters. Speaking at a Yes event in central Perth today, the co-architect of the Uluru Statement From the Heart attempted to appeal to undecided voters. "My last pitch, on behalf of this referendum campaign, is to say to those Australians who are undecided, who are still thinking about yes or no - don't slam the door on the children," he said. "This is not about Noel Pearson or Patrick Dodson, or Jacinta Price or Warren Mundine - we are the past, the children are the future, we're doing this for them." Australians will vote on Saturday on whether an Indigenous Voice to Parliament should be enshrined in the constitution. The Voice would be an independent body advising parliament and government about matters affecting the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, but would have no legal power to enforce its recommendations.

>>19720267 Defeated voice is a victory for the status quo - "In two days, after 15 years of work under seven prime ministers, Australians will vote on a proposal that came from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. We are not putting this proposal to politicians but taking it as a request to the Australian people. We chose the people over the politicians whose solutions have continuously, tragically, failed despite best intentions. We chose the Australian people because we had - and still have – faith in everyday Australians. Although many politicians undoubtedly come with good intentions, as a group there’s no denying they have proven incapable of delivering meaningful change for Indigenous communities on the ground. Our positive campaign with its message of hope has had its challenges, particularly in a year in which Australians have struggled making ends meet in a once-in-a-generation cost-of-living crisis. This weekend, your vote counts. Enough people writing three letters on to a ballot paper will propel Australia a step further along the path of reconciliation. To a future where we get more done for Indigenous people, together. We have faith that Australians know Yes is the right response to the invitation of Indigenous Australians on this question, and that is the answer they will give." - Dean Parkin, director of the Yes23 campaign - theaustralian.com.au

>>19720280 Keep clothing neutral or face vote ban: AEC - The Australian Electoral Commission has urged voters not to wear any clothing that could be construed as campaign material as they go to vote in the voice referendum. “The rules surrounding what people can or cannot wear into a polling place in a referendum are the same as for elections,” a statement from the AEC reads. “Campaigning is not allowed inside the polling place or within six metres of the entrance. “Our staff will take a commonsense approach to conversations with voters regarding these matters - to either cover up or to make sure people behave appropriately when inside the polling place. “The AEC understands that passions are often high around referendum events, and people want to proudly display their voting intentions – either way – when coming to vote. Please don’t fall foul of the law,” the statement appeals. “Simply wear or display campaign material outside the polling place instead.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822144

#32 - Part 66

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 30

>>19729093 The voice referendum is Australia’s chance to get it right - "Earlier this week, I had the privilege of meeting the Anangu women who painted the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Sitting with them in the red dirt in the centre of our continent, I thought about how remarkable their artwork is. Not only does it match the power of the words it surrounds, its greatest beauty is that leaves room for all of us to do what Australians have done so many times before: seize the chance for a better future. And we can do that by voting Yes. Yes means recognising Indigenous Australians as the original inhabitants of this continent. Yes means listening to them on matters that affect them so we get better outcomes. And as the Solicitor-General put it, Yes will enhance our democracy. Yes means rejecting the option of doing nothing. That is no option at all. Yes means recognising this is the best chance of a way forward we’ve ever had. And because Australians are a fair, compassionate and courageous people, I believe we’re ready to take this step together. With Yes, all Australians can win." - Anthony Albanese - theaustralian.com.au

>>19729112 Voice referendum Yes activists driven by revenge and retribution - "Our democratic system has been the source of our stability and progress for 122 years. A voice would be the most consequential change to our system in history. There is nothing “modest” about it. Whether you are an Indigenous Australian, were born Australian, or have come from around the world and become Australian, we are all Australians and are treated equally under the law. A voice will change this fundamental democratic principle conferring a privilege on one set of Australians based on ancestry. We all recognise the disadvantages facing Indigenous Australians, especially in remote communities. But a voice will not deliver improvements we desire. The voice will be more Canberra bureaucracy that hoovers up more taxpayer dollars. Thomas Mayo said the voice was “a black political force to be reckoned with”. Teela Reid said the voice was “the first step in redistributing power”. The longer version of the Uluru Statement mentions the goals of “self-government”, “self-determination”, “reparations” and “a financial settlement”. Does this sound like a “gracious request”?" - Peter Dutton - theaustralian.com.au

>>19729130 On the voice referendum, we’ve nothing to lose, and everything to gain - "For the first time in more than half a century, Australians can vote to heal our country. On your ballot paper is a 92-word vision for recognition, a modest request to be heard. On Saturday, Australians must collectively pause, for a moment, to think about our country, its deep past and its future. This is a nation-building moment, a chance to make a change of profound symbolism, a change that also delivers a practical benefit. And it can be achieved with just a few words. With these words we are poised to accept the great richness of our history and the truth of our nation’s foundation from which we’ve been hiding for more than 200 years. These words are a question to every Australian. At its heart, you must decide this: do you believe that in being Australian you are part of human history on this continent, a history that traces our combined experience, 2500 generations, 65,000 years. Hopelessness is a fair description of life for a great many Indigenous people. Helping us to take responsibility for our communities is precisely what the voice will do. It will speak to parliament, but it will also bring an eye and ear to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. The voice will face the truth. It can’t succeed without facing it. We’ve nothing to lose in giving it a chance, and everything to gain." - Rachel Perkins, co-chair of Yes23 and proud Arrernte and Kalkadoon woman - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822149

#32 - Part 67

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 31

>>19729143 On voice referendum day, don’t let this dangerous proposition tear us apart - "There are any number of reasons why Australians should vote No to the voice. It is a proposal that lacks any detail or evidence as to how it would work. Legal experts have repeatedly warned about the inherent risks and the unknowns of how it may be interpreted by the High Court. The government has made empty promises about its form, they have lied about how many Indigenous Australians support the voice, and they have failed to explain that this proposal has come from only a small number of people, not all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. For me, the reason to vote No is even more simple: I don’t want to see our country divided along the lines of race. Since the 1967 referendum, this country has grown increasingly more unified. The prominence of race in our social discourse fell rapidly, our multicultural character has shone through, and we have become a beacon around the world as a place accepting of all. We need to be real about the fact “the gap” is more about place than race, and acknowledge that it is widest in remote and rural Australia, in communities where English is not a first language, where education levels are low, food and clean water are scarcer, unemployment is higher, and medical care flies in once a week. The voice, and its proponents, ignore that reality. The voice is a dangerous proposal. It is full of legal risks, unknowns and empty promises. It is the first step in dividing our country, when we should be working towards unity. By voting No, Australians are saying that we want to remain unified, that we want to solve our problems together, and that we want to be one together, not two divided." - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, CLP Senator for the Northern Territory - theaustralian.com.au

>>19729190 Indigenous voice to parliament: it’s time to embrace this chance for good of the nation - "Six years ago, 250 Indigenous elders and leaders gathered at Uluru after the most extensive consultations with First Nations people this country has ever seen. After more than a decade of discussion about constitutional recognition, long supported by both sides of parliament, the First Nations people gathered at Uluru for the National Convention finally had their say. In the Uluru Statement from the Heart they called for constitutional recognition through a voice. Not symbolism. But structural change that will help improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and move our great country forward together. At its core the Uluru Statement from the Heart is a statement of hope – a gracious request for all Australians to walk together to a better future. On Saturday, Australians have the opportunity to accept that generous invitation and give Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people a greater say in their future." - Linda Burney, federal Minister for Indigenous Australians - theaustralian.com.au

>>19729226 Low voter turnout threatens No victory - No and Yes campaigners have warned of a record low voter turnout between 80 and 85 per cent, which could narrow the final voice referendum result amid an expected final week swing to Yes. Ahead of Saturday’s referendum, senior No campaign figures have tempered expectations of a landslide result due to rising fears that up to two-in-ten Australians will snub Anthony Albanese’s vote to constitutionally enshrine an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government. The No campaign, which will have 25,000 volunteers manning booths across the country supported by Liberal and Nationals party members, remains concerned that low voter turnout could deliver a closer than expected final result. Last year’s 2022 federal election recorded an 89.82 per cent voter turnout, which was the lowest turnout since compulsory voting was introduced ahead of the 1925 federal election. The 1999 Republic referendum registered a 95.1 per cent turnout, which was three per cent higher than turnouts for the 1988 and 1977 referendums. With many voters not engaged and focused on cost-of-living pressures, the Yes camp believes voter turnout could fall below 85 per cent. Combined with an expected final week swing, Yes campaigners were hopeful of a closer result but still believed they would ultimately fall short. No campaigners on Friday were urging supporters to get out and vote to ensure that turnout doesn’t plunge as low as 80 per cent.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822152

#32 - Part 68

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 32

>>19733764 Tears and calls to action as Australians decide the fate of the voice referendum - Anthony Albanese has issued a tearful last pitch to voters to support the voice in one of his final pit stops along the referendum campaign trail in his Sydney electorate of Grayndler. In a longwinded and emotionally-wrought address that evoked the legacy of civil rights activist Martin Luther King, the Prime Minister called on Australians to “unite” behind the voice and be on the “right side of history”. Mr Albanese stopped to take selfies with constituents and patted dogs outside voting booths at Balmain Public School before lashing sections of the media for “extraordinary ignorance” and criticised the No campaign for “stoking division”. Dressed in his signature campaign battle armour of an akubra hat and Yes T-shirt, Mr Albanese fought back tears as he spoke about how some critics had called on Australians to boo the welcome to country at the AFL and NRL grand finals. “We must do better. We can do better,” he said. “This is not a radical proposition. This is a hand outstretched of friendship from the First Australians to every Australian, just asking for it to be grasped in that spirit of reconciliation and friendship.”

>>19733778 Voice referendum: Double trouble for the Yes camp - Yes campaigners in Queensland and Western Australia are ­bracing for a bruising defeat at Saturday’s referendum, despite a flurry of volunteer-driven last-minute action in the outlying states. In published polling on support for the voice referendum, the two jurisdictions – which make up about 30 per cent of the national voting population – have consistently remained at the bottom of the national tally. The Yes campaign has mobilised about 70,000 volunteers nationwide - eclipsing the 25,000 estimated by the No side - and Yes23 director and Quandamooka man from Queensland’s Minjerribah Dean Parkin issued a final plea to voters to back the proposal. “A very simple act by all Queenslanders and West Australians in voting Yes can lead to a practical change for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples across the country,” he said. A Labor volunteer working on the Yes campaign told The Weekend Australian the result would “go down the gurgler” in those two states, a prediction backed by No campaign insiders. “If we get 40 per cent in Queensland it would be a good result … and in WA, the cultural heritage laws really stuffed us over there,” the volunteer said.

>>19733828 In Peter Dutton country, No holds its ground as voters question a lack of detail - The No campaign is confident it will secure victory in the Voice to parliament referendum, with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton suggesting a record number of Australians could oppose the constitutional change. While Dutton did not invite media to attend a polling place when he voted in his electorate of Dickson on Saturday afternoon, prominent No campaigner Nyunggai Warren Mundine was out on the hustings and the opposition’s Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price was on Saturday afternoon due to fly from Alice Springs to Brisbane, where the official No campaign will gather to watch the vote count. The federal opposition leader told Channel Seven’s Weekend Sunrise that Anthony Albanese’s decision to hold a referendum had divided the country. “I wrote to the prime minister in January of this year with 15 reasonable questions, he’s never replied to that letter. He’s never answered the queries that millions of Australians have,” he said. “He was told all year not to go down this path. If he was going to have a referendum, do it on recognition because 70, 80, 90 per cent of Australians would support recognition being enshrined in the Constitution, but he didn’t do that, and because the Voice is in there, people now it seems, in record numbers are going to vote against it.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822153

#32 - Part 69

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 33

>>19733848 PM war-games all outcomes ahead of Saturday night Voice speech - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will address the nation on Saturday night regardless of the outcome of the Voice to parliament referendum in a speech that will seek to knit the country back together after a bitterly fought and divisive referendum campaign. Albanese is expected to make the address from Canberra on Saturday evening as Yes and No votes are counted rather than attending an event hosted by the Yes campaign. The prime minister and his team have war-gamed all possible scenarios including a comprehensive No victory, a Yes victory and a close result in which postal votes play a key part. For example, if four states backed Yes but the national vote was close, or the national vote succeeded but the target of winning four states was still too close to call. A source in the No campaign who was not authorised to speak publicly said their event would look nothing like the typical election night event that major parties hold. In Melbourne, the No side will not have an event, reflecting the reluctance of the Victorian Liberal division to campaign on the Voice. “It will be very low-key. I think most MPs will be in their electorates, thanking their volunteers,” the source said.

>>19734009 No campaign confident of victory as Albanese remains hopeful - The campaign against the Indigenous Voice is confident of victory after voting closed on Saturday in the referendum to decide whether to enshrine the new body in the nation’s Constitution. The Yes campaign mobilised up to 70,000 volunteers and gained a powerful presence at polling stations around the country but privately conceded the numbers were against them. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese brushed off questions about a defeat for the Voice at a final event in Sydney on Saturday morning to back the change, saying he remained “very hopeful of a Yes vote”. “What I see is hope and optimism. That’s what this campaign has been about,” he said. “A Yes campaign that’s been positive. A Yes campaign that has spoken about the future. A Yes campaign that spoke about us embracing each other and enlarging our country. “And a No campaign that is based upon fear and us shrinking into ourselves. “I want to lead a country that is outward looking, that is confident. That’s why I said this is about respect for Indigenous Australians.”

>>19734087 PM'S VOICE REFERENDUM HAS BEEN LOST - Anthony Albanese’s $365m voice referendum has been rejected by Australians, with a majority of voters in all states and nationally on track to inflict a heavy defeat for the Yes campaign. Millions of Australians delivered an emphatic rejection of the Prime Minister’s referendum to constitutionally enshrine a voice to parliament and executive government following a bruising campaign between Yes23 and No. Yes campaigners and ALP strategists acknowledged the vote was lost inside an hour of counting, with NSW, Tasmania, Queensland and South Australia voters swinging hard towards No. No was also leading Yes in Victoria and was expected to claim a sizeable victory when counting begins in Western Australia. Yes campaigners, who needed a double majority including victory in four states and more than 50 per cent of the national vote, have conceded the heavy defeat. They will blame the result on the cost-of-living crisis and difficulties in engaging disconnected Australians on the merits of a constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament and executive government. With Yes trailing No in all states and the national majority, Mr Albanese will address the nation from parliament house after Yes23 concedes.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822156

#32 - Part 70

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 34

>>19739995 ‘We have given our all’: Albanese pledges unity after defeat on Voice - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called for a “new national purpose” to tackle Indigenous disadvantage after a resounding defeat for the Voice, with 59 per cent of voters rejecting the proposal at Saturday’s referendum. The campaign for change gained only 41 per cent of the national vote and lost in every state after years of debate over constitutional reform, igniting claims from the Yes camp that its rivals engaged in lies to fool the electorate. Albanese took responsibility for the result but told voters he was a “conviction politician” who honoured his promise to Indigenous leaders to embrace the Voice and take it to a referendum. “This moment of disagreement does not define us and it will not divide us,” he said. “We are not Yes voters or No voters, we are all Australians. And it is as Australians, together, that we must take our country beyond this debate without forgetting why we had it in the first place.” The prime minister sought to calm advocates for change who accused the No side of “horrible” tactics to destroy the Voice, which was proposed by Indigenous leaders in a statement at Uluru six years ago. “The Uluru Statement from the Heart was an invitation extended with humility, grace and optimism for the future,” Albanese said. “Tonight, we must meet this result with the same grace and humility.”

>>19740004 Voice lost, Albanese vows to focus on closing gap - Anthony Albanese’s $365m voice referendum has been rejected by a majority of voters in every state, after millions of Australians backed a No vote and torpedoed a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous advisory body. In a disastrous result for the Prime Minister that closely reflected The Australian’s Newspoll, the No vote was on track to claim majority support in NSW, Tasmania, South Australia, Queensland, Western Australia, Victoria and the Northern Territory. Yes23, which was prepared for defeat but not the scale of the loss, required a double majority including victory in four states and more than 50 per cent of the national vote. Late on Saturday night, the national vote showed No leading Yes by almost 60-to-40 per cent. Speaking at Parliament House after polls closed in WA, Mr Albanese said: “I absolutely respect the decision of the Australian people and the democratic process that has delivered it”.

>>19740015 Video: Tearful Anthony Albanese admits defeat in the Voice referendum - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has delivered an emotional speech declaring he “gave my word” to Indigenous Australians to hold the referendum, win or lose. Red-eyed and clearly rocked by the result, Mr Albanese said he never imagined it would be easy but conceded he was disappointed by the result. The No camp had the vote tied up by 7.25pm, with decisive victories being won in all major states. “My fellow Australians, at the outset, I want to say that while tonight’s result is not one that I had hoped for, I absolutely respect the decision of the Australian people,’’ he said. Asked why the No vote won, Mr Albanese appeared to lay the blame at the feet of the Liberal Party. “The analysis will go on for some time, no doubt. But the truth is that no referendum has succeeded without bipartisan support in this country,’’ he said. During the press conference, Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney openly wept as she urged Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people not to be defeated by the result. “I know the last few months have been rough,’’ she said. “Be proud of the 65,000 years of history and culture. We will carry on and we’ll move forward. This is not the end of reconciliation.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822161

#32 - Part 71

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 35

>>19740031 Voice referendum result reveals Australia’s city-country divide - The voice referendum has exposed the chasm between the nation’s inner-city electorates and the outer suburbs and regions, with the key metropolitan seats in capital cities defying the national trend by voting to embrace change. Despite the decisive national defeat of the voice, the proposition has exposed geographic divisions reflecting a major gulf in attitudes between those living in the heart of the nation’s capital cities and those in the rest of the country. The divide also reflects key differences in opinion between those living in more wealthy areas who were more likely to vote Yes, and opponents of change in the outer suburbs where cost of living pressures were more keenly felt. The Northern Territory - where Indigenous Australians represent about 30.8 per cent of the population according to the 2021 census - was on Saturday night returning a strong vote against the voice to parliament, with about 65 per cent of people voting No. In the Labor seat of Lingiari, more than 60 per cent of people were voting No while, in the Labor held seat of Solomon, which is home to Darwin, about 64 per cent of people were voting No.

>>19740040 Voice referendum result in Tasmania delivers Yes camp’s biggest shock - Tasmania has voted No in the voice referendum, 60pc to 40pc, shocking the Yes camp, which had seen the island state as a likely stronghold. The result was described as ‘heartbreaking’ by figures in the Yes campaign, which had the benefit of a pro-voice premier, in Liberal Jeremy Rockliff. No is leading in the northern electorate of Bass (62pc to 58pc), despite having a pro-voice Liberal federal MP, Bridget Archer, and in northwest Braddon (72pc to 28pc), and in sprawling Lyons (67pc to 32pc). Only in Hobart-based Clark (60pc to 40pc) and southern Franklin (51pc to 48pc) is the Yes campaign ahead. The result is devastating for the Yes campaign, which had seen Tasmania, as well as Victoria, as its strongest states and best chance of pulling off a national victory. Yes campaigners had to battle opposition to the voice by several peak Indigenous groups, including the Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre, Aboriginal Land Council of Tasmania and the Circular Head Aboriginal Corporation. The scale of the No win in Tasmania has shocked the Yes campaign, which had believed the island state was the most likely to vote Yes. However, ALCT chair and No advocate Michael Mansell told The Australian the results in Tasmania and nationally were unsurprising, reflecting Indigenous opposition to the voice.

>>19740043 Victoria votes against the Voice despite strong support in inner Melbourne - Victoria has rejected the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, with 55 per cent of the state voting No. With 74 per cent of the state vote counted on Sunday morning, Victoria returned a clear No vote, albeit by the lowest margin of the six states. The referendum was defeated nationally after NSW, South Australia, Queensland and Tasmania also rejected the proposal. Victoria was tipped by commentators to be the state with the highest level of support for the Voice, even as surveys found the Yes campaign consistently losing ground throughout 2023. Election analyst Antony Green told the ABC Melbourne had some of the highest Yes votes in the country in inner suburban electorates. But the city’s outer suburbs were favouring No. “What we’re seeing is the pattern of inner versus outer in both of the major capital cities,” Green said.

>>19740055 SA voters deliver a massive blow to the Voice to parliament -Every state in Australia rejected the Voice to parliament on Saturday but only one state said No in all of its electorates. South Australia recorded a whopping 64.4 per cent No vote, the second highest in the country after Queensland. Even the state’s inner-city seats delivered tight No victories, while inner-city electorates in Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane backed Constitutional change. Voters in the seat of Adelaide, held by Labor’s Steve Georganas, supported No with 50.4 per cent of the votes, the tightest margin in the state. The No wave broadened as the electorates moved away from the city’s core. Hindmarsh, held by Health Minister Mark Butler, takes in working-class Port Adelaide, the Adelaide Airport and the beach suburbs to the north, and voted 61.6 per cent for No. Regional and outer suburban South Australia delivered crushing blows to the Yes camp, with the seats of Grey, Spence and Barker all producing No percentages above 70 per cent.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822164

#32 - Part 72

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 36

>>19740086 How South Australia killed the voice to parliament - The failure of the Yes campaign to read the public mood resulted in complete humiliation in South Australia, with the state earmarked as a likely Yes delivering the second-biggest No vote in Australia with all 10 of its federal electorates rejecting the voice. Anthony Albanese and Yes tacticians placed so much store in the SA result that they started and ended their formal campaign in SA, the Prime Minister officially launching the Yes campaign in the northern suburb of Elizabeth on August 30 and ending with a photo shoot in the seaside beach suburb of Glenelg last Friday. Their thinking was that an appeal to SA’s progressive traditions as the first state to embrace female suffrage, land rights laws and the decriminalisation of homosexuality would help get the voice over the line. The complete reverse happened, with Saturday’s resounding result showing that the more South Australians saw and heard about the voice, the less they liked it. From a crowded field, how’s this for a statistic - in Elizabeth, where the Yes campaign was launched, the home of Jimmy Barnes and the former Holden factory, the No vote stands at 72 per cent, the highest in any Labor seat in Australia. The result echoes the analysis in The Australian a month ago that Yes tacticians were placing too much store on Adelaide’s inner-city, arts-loving liberal voters, ignoring the fact that SA’s suburban and regional population is much older and much poorer than in the eastern states.

>>19740101 Heritage laws debacle fuelled voice referendum failure in WA - The Western Australian government’s disastrous introduction of its Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act has been blamed for propelling the state to an emphatic rejection of the Indigenous Voice to parliament. The defeat of the referendum had already been confirmed well over an hour before polling centres in WA closed on Saturday and before an official post-vote after party by the Yes23 campaign in Perth had opened its doors. As results from WA finally began to filter in, it quickly became clear that WA had joined all other states and the Northern Territory in strongly rejecting the constitutional amendment. Just over 40 per cent of counted votes in WA were for Yes. WA’s new Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act came into force in July, just as debate about the Voice was heating up, and the new state-based laws immediately attracted a fierce backlash from across the community amid fears that it would significantly inhibit the rights of landowners. After less than a month, Premier Roger Cook announced that the act would be repealed. Polling since then had consistently shown that support for the Voice was lower in WA than in any other state.

>>19740165 Queenslanders voted against the Voice to Parliament, more than any other state or territory in Australia - It only took a little over an hour for polls to close in the Sunshine State before the ABC's election analyst Antony Green came into frame. "It's absolutely clear that the No vote has won Queensland." More than 3.6 million Queenslanders were enrolled to vote in the referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament - and with more than 70 per cent of ballots counted, just three of the state's 30 federal electorates supported the proposal. Nationally, Queensland saw the strongest No vote of any state or territory, while the federal electorate of Maranoa also returned the largest No vote in Australia. The rural seat, which extends from Warwick, Dalby and Kingaroy to the NT border, saw 84 per cent of voters reject the Voice.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822168

#32 - Part 73

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 37

>>19740235 Indigenous Yes campaigners fall silent as they grieve referendum result - Indigenous Australian campaigners for the Voice to parliament say they will fall silent for a week as they grieve the outcome of the referendum, and have called for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags to be lowered to half mast to reflect the loss they feel. A statement by Indigenous Voice supporters, which the Yes23 campaign circulated on their behalf on Saturday night, labelled the referendum defeat a “bitter irony”. Indigenous Voice supporters said they would take a week of silence to “grieve this outcome and reflect on its meaning and significance”. It was not immediately clear whether the statement represented all Indigenous campaigners who had backed the Voice. Yes23 and the Uluru Dialogue said they endorsed the statement, and it was shared on social media by the NSW Aboriginal Land Council and the Central Land Council. “That people who have only been on this continent for 235 years would refuse to recognise those whose home this land has been for 60,000 and more years is beyond reason. It was never in the gift of these newcomers to refuse recognition to the true owners of Australia,” the statement said. “To our people we say: do not shed tears. This rejection was never for others to issue. The truth is that rejection was always ours to determine. The truth is that we offered this recognition and it has been refused. We now know where we stand in this, our own country. Always was. Always will be.” The Indigenous Voice advocates said they would not rest long but would “pack up the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Fly our flags low. Talk not of recognition and reconciliation.” They would “re-gather our strength and resolve, and when we determine a new direction for justice and our rights, let us once again unite. Let us convene in due course to carefully consider our path forward.”

>>19740312 Voice referendum result sees ‘recognition refused for the true owners of Australia’ - Indigenous leaders across Australia who supported the voice have lamented the defeated referendum as a “bitter irony” in that newcomers who had been on the continent for 235 years would “refuse recognition to the true owners of Australia”. “The referendum was a chance for newcomers to show a long-refused grace and gratitude and to acknowledge that the brutal dispossession of our people underwrote their every advantage in this country,” the leaders said. Yes23 campaign chief Dean Parkin earlier in the night declared supporters of an Indigenous voice to parliament weren’t able to cut through to Australians because of the “single largest misinformation campaign this country has ever seen”. The extraordinary claim came as fellow leading Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo blasted the “disgusting” No campaign following an emphatic defeat of the voice referendum pushed by Anthony Albanese and Indigenous leaders. Mr Mayo labelled Anthony Albanese courageous but said Mr Dutton led a “horrible’’ political campaign against the voice. “We put our faith in the Australian people. And, as I said, I think they were ready,” he said. “But there has been some really horrible political campaigning from Peter Dutton and his No campaign. It‘s been disgusting to be frank. We‘re gonna take stock now - Indigenous people, Indigenous leaders. One thing we do know is we’re never going to give up fighting for our rights, our rightful place in this country, for recognition and a Voice because, as I said, it was the right thing to do.”

>>19745124 Jacinta Price thanks nation for goodwill after voice referendum result - Opposition leader Peter Dutton says the defeated referendum is “good for our country” and paid tribute to Warren Mundine and Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price for leading the No campaign and enduring “personal and offensive attacks”. Mr Dutton said “what matters tomorrow (is) that this result doesn’t divide us”. He said he respected Yes voters’ decision, even though he thought the voice was divisive, and a bad idea. “This is the referendum Australia did not need to have,” he said. Senator Price thanked the Australian people for “believing in our great nation and the goodwill of this country”. “The vast majority of Australians want what’s best for everyone of us, including the most marginalised Indigenous Australians,” she said. Senator Price said Australians had said No to division, gaslighting, and bullying, and the idea that Australia was a racist country. “It’s time for Australians to believe that (we’re a great country), to be proud, to call ourselves Australian,” she said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822169

#32 - Part 74

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 38

>>19745129 Video: Voice referendum result heralds ‘new era,’ says Jacinta Price - The Coalition and the No campaign, piloted by Jacinta Price, have promised a “new era in Indigenous policy” that rejects the politics of grievance following the comprehensive defeat of the voice to parliament. Senator Price, the Opposition’s Indigenous Australians spokeswoman, said the result meant that Australians had “said No to grievance and the push from activists to suggest that we are a racist country.” She argued the defeat of the referendum offered a new opportunity for Australians to show that “we are one of the, if not the, greatest nation on the face of the earth - and it is time for Australians to believe that once again, to be proud to call ourselves Australian.” “Because until we can be proud, we can’t form a position where we can be strong to tackle our tough issues within our country,” she said. “For those of you who voted Yes, please know that we as a Coalition have always got the best interests of all Australians at heart. We want to make sure that we are fighting for a better future for all Australians.”

>>19745190 Video: Warren Mundine blasts journos at fiery post-Voice press conference in defence of Jacinta Price - Warren Mundine has blasted sections of the media for their treatment of fellow No campaigner and shadow Aboriginal Australians minister Jacinta Nampijinpa Price at a press conference Saturday, saying journalists needed to “wake up” to themselves. “Wake up to yourselves, people are committing suicides in these communities, people are being raped and beaten and this is the questions you come up with?”, Mr Mundine said after a series of questions about voting results in remote Aboriginal communities. “We’re about getting results - reducing suicides and instead of this nonsense that you people carry on with,” he said. “People need to stop turning a blind eye to the violence, abuse, coercive control and destructive behaviour that goes on in some Indigenous communities.” Mr Mundine continued, launching a broadside at the architecture behind the Voice, and particularly the contents of the longer form of the Uluru Statement from the Heart that became a major point of dispute during the campaign. “(The Voice) sees Indigenous Australians as trapped in victimhood and oppression. This is a lie. It includes a self-proclaimed history of Indigenous Australia, called Our Story. Written to shame Australians about their non-indigenous ancestors and Australia’s founding,” he said. “No nation has had a perfect beginning. Most have had bloody and brutal beginnings founded in invasion, conquest, revolution or war. I don’t judge a nation by the worst of its history, but how it seeks to become its better self.”

>>19745191 Video: ‘Wake up to yourselves’: Warren Mundine unleashes on reporters - Prominent No campaigner Warren Mundine lashed out at reporters following the Voice referendum defeat. About nine million Australians voted at one of the 7,100 polling places around the country on the referendum day. “Wake up to yourselves, people are committing suicides in these communities, people are being raped and beaten and this is the questions you come up with?” Mr Mundine said at a press conference on Saturday. “We’re about getting results - reducing suicides and instead of this nonsense that you people carry on with. “It’s about time we had a vote tonight that said Australians want to get things done - well stop talking about all this other nonsense … wake up to yourselves and tart asking real questions and making governments accountable.” - Sky News Australia

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822172

#32 - Part 75

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 39

>>19745195 ‘Ugly, Trumpian tactics’: Sydney lord mayor Clover Moore blasts ‘No’ camp - Sydney lord mayor Clover Moore has blasted the “ugly, Trumpian tactics” and “harmful misinformation” perpetuated by the ‘No’ campaign following the crushing defeat of the proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament. “It’s a sad, sad day,” the lord mayor said in a statement released on Sunday following the referendum defeat, adding that the outcome was “devastating and tragic”. “While I’m grateful that the vast majority of the City of Sydney accepted the generous invitation from First Nations communities, I share your profound disappointment and sadness at the overall result and the rejection of this opportunity to build a brighter future for all.” Moore confirmed Aboriginal flags would be flown at half mast this week across all council buildings in response to the referendum result. Flags will also be flown at half mast throughout Sydney’s Inner West Council from Monday. Mayor Darcy Byrne said the decision was “in recognition of what a sad event this is, and just to show respect. Imagine how a young indigenous person feels, waking up this morning, looking at that result.”

>>19745203 How the world reacted to the rejection of the Voice - The Australian public’s decision to vote against enshrining an Indigenous voice to parliament in the Constitution has made headlines around the world, with descriptions of a fraught and often “ill-tempered” referendum campaign. The result of all states rejecting the proposal, and roughly six in 10 voters, has sharpened global attention on the plight of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and their relationship with generations of federal governments. Human rights experts at the United Nations in Geneva had urged Australians to vote Yes before the poll, saying it would “pave the way to overcome the colonial legacy of systemic discrimination and inequalities” that had undermined the ability of Indigenous peoples to realise their rights to development and self-determination.

>>19745215 Eight reasons why the Yes case failed - "This is not an account of why the No case won the referendum. That will be written, triumphantly, by others. This is the story of why the Yes case was lost. It needs to be told now, while the disaster is fresh, if supporters of Indigenous recognition are to profit from our mistakes. Otherwise, excuses and distortions will cover the truth. It is quite straightforward to trace the causes for the implosion of the Yes case. Tragically, all were or should have been known to its leaders. But they were denied, derided or discounted. There were eight fundamental reasons for failure." - Greg Craven, constitutional lawyer and former vice-chancellor of the Australian Catholic University - theaustralian.com.au

>>19745243 Make no mistake, the No win was an act of insurrection - "If there were ever any doubts Australia had made the right decision on Saturday, they were quickly put to rest by a group of Indigenous leaders who released a statement later that evening. The statement blamed “newcomers” who had refused to acknowledge “that the brutal dispossession of our people underwrote their every advantage in this country”. “That people who have only been on this continent for 235 years would refuse to recognise those whose home this land has been for 60,000 and more years is beyond reason.” The oldest person in Australia is Catherina van der Linden, who celebrated her 111th birthday in August. She arrived as a hardworking migrant from The Netherlands in 1958 and has never dispossessed anyone or anything, as far as we know. The prosaic truth that no one currently alive occupied this continent much more than a century ago explains why many Australians regarded the voice as unjust. Saturday’s result was a repudiation of the black-armband approach to history. Australians outside the Tesla zone have told the elite they’ve had enough of the national guilt trip. They’re sick of the self-flagellating speeches, national apologies, welcome to country and all the other politically correct performances." - Nick Cater, senior fellow at the Menzies Research Centre - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822177

#32 - Part 76

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 40

>>19749368 Price pushes bipartisan action plan - Jacinta Price says there can be no return to the status quo in Indigenous policy following the referendum defeat and will seek to push the Albanese government towards a bipartisan effort aimed at “bringing Indigenous Australians into the fabric of this nation”. The Opposition Indigenous Affairs spokeswoman and face of the No campaign told The Aus­tralian that “if the government doesn’t want to undertake that responsibility you can expect that this is what I will challenge them on at the next election. I know that, throughout this process, I have had the support of my Coalition colleagues and I have their support going forward to … bring about a much more unified country.” She said the premise for the ­referendum was “supposedly about doing something different”. “We should not be doing the same things we have done for ­decades … we can’t accept that.” Acknowledging that people were suffering from “referendum fatigue”, Senator Price also revealed that her preference was not to take a second referendum for constitutional recognition to the next election as previously committed to by Peter Dutton. She stressed this would be determined by the Liberal and Nationals through their partyroom processes, but suggested that “what the partyroom will likely want to do is to respect the will of the Australian people”.

>>19749373 Voice referendum: Anthony Albanese says next steps ‘wont be developed in days’ amid pressure on treaty, truth-telling - Peter Dutton has demanded Anthony Albanese “come clean” on whether the government remains committed to establishing a Makarrata commission to oversee treaty and truth-telling following the voice referendum’s defeat, as the Prime Minister warns next steps towards reconciliation won’t be developed over days. The political stoush between the major parties over how to tackle disadvantage in Indigenous communities came as Greens First Nations spokeswoman Dorinda Dox cautioned Mr Albanese not to “abandon our people”. The government is reviewing Labor’s commitment to a Makarrata commission after the resounding No vote at the voice referendum and is facing pressure from Indigenous leaders, the Greens and crossbenchers to prioritise truth-telling. Mr Albanese said the Uluru Statement from the Heart – which asks for voice, treaty and truth – was developed over decades and a “new path” forward would be devised in a considered, constructive way.

>>19749377 After Australia said No on voice, Anthony Albanese to review Labor’s treaty pledge on treaty and truth-telling - Anthony Albanese will review Labor’s commitment to establish a Makarrata commission after the voice referendum failure, as Indigenous leaders, the Greens and crossbenchers increase pressure on the government to back truth-telling and treaty. In his first parliamentary showdown with Peter Dutton following Saturday’s referendum, the Prime Minister could not confirm whether his government would fully implement the Uluru Statement from the Heart without a constitutional voice. Ahead of rallying the troops at his first post-referendum Labor caucus meeting on Tuesday, Mr Albanese on Monday accepted personal “responsibility” for the crushing defeat but fell short of strongly endorsing treaty and truth-telling processes. The Australian understands the government will wait to consult with key Indigenous leaders following their week of silence before reviewing Labor’s pre-election pledge to fund a $27m Makarrata commission super­vising treaty-making and truth-telling. A senior government source on Monday suggested the resounding defeat of the voice referendum undermined remaining requests from the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which are treaty and truth-telling via a Makarrata commission.

>>19749397 Failed voice referendum shines light on division - "The societal split that emerged in the referendum duplicates what is happening in the UK, the US and other western democracies. But in Australia, it took a race-based referendum to understand just how deep the community division has become. Neither the prime minister nor business leaders understood the depth of the national division. Business leaders, PMs and/or their older children often live in the pockets of Australia that are totally different to the rest of the nation. Anthony Albanese represents the Sydney seat of Grayndler, where voters are disproportionately concerned with indigenous affairs, racism and the environment than the rest of Australia, which is far more concerned with economics and practical situations. There was a 75 per cent Yes vote in Grayndler. Albanese did not understand that his electorate is very different to the rest of the nation, where most ALP voters live." - Robert Gottliebsen - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822181

#32 - Part 77

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 41

>>19749421 After No vote, new leaders’ summit to seek new way to constitutional recognition - Indigenous leaders who have spent years working towards constitutional recognition are ­expected to regroup next Sunday to begin working on a response to the failed voice referendum. Voice supporters across the government and opposition said the dust had to settle before the country could consider what to do next on reconciliation. Many Indigenous leaders were participating in a week of silence. The Australian has been told the government will wait to learn the outcome of talks between the Indigenous leaders. Liberal MP Julian Leeser, who quit the opposition frontbench to campaign for the voice, said the country would need to reflect on what the No vote meant and move slowly towards any second referendum solely on constitutional recognition, as proposed by Peter Dutton. “We need to commit to the reconciliation process,” Mr Leeser told the ABC. “I think the one thing all sides agreed last night was that Indigenous disadvantage is the top issue. That’s around closing the gap, recommit to the closing the gap process.” Liberal senator Andrew Bragg said the Albanese government had “squandered a generational opportunity” through its referendum process and model, and there needed to be a recovery “from this shambles” before a conversation on reconciliation.

>>19749445 Video: ABC reporter says Indigenous communities to rethink whether ‘kindness is the best approach’ - An ABC journalist says the failure of the Voice referendum may cause Indigenous communities to rethink how they interact with the rest of Australia and whether “kindness is the best approach”. Indigenous leaders may no longer restrain their “black anger”, according to the ABC’s Indigenous Affairs reporter Isabella Higgins, who predicts a rise in “black sovereignty” and a rejection of the “Australian regime”. Asked about the mood among Indigenous Australians at the Yes event in Sydney’s inner-west on Saturday night following the result, Higgins said the community was “resilient” and had “risen from the ashes many times”. “They said, our communities won’t stop running if this is a No vote,” she said. “I think often in the community, it is well understood that black anger is not tolerated and so we see leaders pull in their rage, pull in their sadness and constantly use language of generosity, use graciousness to try and appeal to the Australian people. And after, this I think there will be a generation of leaders who have been burnt by this and who won’t be interested in doing that any more. I would not be surprised if more people pushed towards that message that comes from Lidia Thorpe about not engaging so much with mainstream Australia, not bowing to them, challenging the Australian regime,” she said.

>>19749474 Why Indigenous leaders have agreed to a vow of silence after Voice rejection - Some of Australia’s top Indigenous Voice campaigners began drafting a statement vowing a week of silence before polls closed on referendum day. The historic statement, which was not signed by any individuals, was released on Saturday evening after the referendum result became clear and called for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island flags to be lowered to half-mast for the week. “Now is not the time to dissect the reasons for this tragic outcome. This will be done in the weeks, years and decades to come. Now is the time for silence, to mourn and deeply consider the consequence of this outcome,” the statement said. “The truth is that we offered this recognition and it has been refused. We now know where we stand in this our own country.” A number of Voice figures are not fully comfortable with the silence. They believe the voices of the black leadership should be heard in the immediate aftermath of the result, to avoid the narrative about the loss being set only by the prime minister and other politicians. Sources abiding by the vow of silence said some leaders were frustrated that Albanese and other pro-Voice politicians were, in their view, downplaying the potential role of racism and misinformation in an attempt to minimise political fallout and allow the government to move on from the loss.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822183

#32 - Part 78

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 42

>>19749486 Voice referendum: Aboriginal groups speak up amid concerns about week of silence - A leading Indigenous human rights lawyer has rejected calls for a week of silence in the wake of the voice referendum, declaring now was the time to discuss a path to improving the lives of some of Australia’s most impoverished communities. As many Indigenous Australians grappled with the disappointment of Saturday’s result, some called for seven days of silence while others directed their anger towards the campaigning against the voice by independent senator Lidia Thorpe and the so-called “Progressive No” movement. Noongar human rights lawyer Hannah McGlade, an associate professor and member of the UN Permanent Forum for Indigenous Issues, told The Australian that the call for a week of silence was “ridiculous”. “They shouldn’t be telling other people how to behave. That’s part of the problem of Aboriginal affairs,” she said. “They can have silence if they want, but this is the time to talk about everything, I would have thought.” She urged the federal government to redouble its efforts around closing the gap in the wake of the referendum result, particularly on issues around Indigenous incarceration, suicide and child protection. “It can’t end here,” she said. “The Prime Minister and (Indigenous Australians Minister Linda) Burney should call a roundtable meeting urgently with Indigenous leaders, particularly those who have supported this campaign, to make sure that we don’t slip further behind.”

>>19749502 ‘Truth-telling must be priority’, say crossbenchers - Crossbenchers in the lower and upper houses say truth-telling must be prioritised by governments after the voice referendum’s resounding defeat, as Labor weighs up whether to maintain its full commitment to the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Victorian independent MP Zoe Daniel, whose electorate of Goldstein voted 56-44 for an Indigenous voice to parliament enshrined in the Constitution, said federal parliament should heed Indigenous Australians’ appeal to be listened to on policies to address disadvantage. The Greens are pushing for a $250m truth and justice commission after the father of reconciliation, Patrick Dodson, last week suggested the country would need to follow a path similar to post-apartheid South Africa if the referendum were rejected, pointing to its truth and reconciliation commission. “I agree with Senator Pat Dodson that we have reopened the scar around the sore that Indigenous Australia thought we were dealing with through the Apology, Wik and Mabo,” Ms Daniel said. “We do need truth-telling in some form, whether it be a truth and reconciliation commission as in South Africa. We must ask Indigenous Australia whether that is what they want and in what form.”

>>19749507 Voice referendum: ‘We have got to keep going’, says Mick Gooda - Indigenous leader Mick Gooda says there is a way forward for practical change in remote communities, despite the failed voice referendum, with Queensland’s Treaty Institute to begin work early next year. Mr Gooda, a member of the senior advisory group that designed the voice proposal and who was an architect of Queensland’s treaty laws, said he “felt sick” watching results come in on Saturday night, with 68.9 per cent of his home state voting No in the referendum. “It was a bit of a reality check, but then I thought, we have the legislation and the resources in place (for treaty and truth-telling). so we have something a bit positive” he told The Australian. “We’ve got to keep going, this treaty is once in a lifetime and so we are putting our heads down and making sure these things work.” Mr Gooda said even though the voice referendum had failed, treaties would give opportunities for Indigenous people to have a say on how health, housing and justice services were run in their communities. “That is what I am in there fighting for, exactly that,” he said. “We're just going ahead fullbore. We don’t have an option, we have to keep going. “We are working on having the Treaty Institute and truth-telling inquiry stood up early next year, as close to January as possible.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822186

#32 - Part 79

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 43

>>19755365 Indigenous voice to parliament: Labor hits pause on treaty and truth telling - Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles has retreated from his post-referendum commitment to the Uluru Statement from the Heart, as Labor refuses to endorse its election pledge on treaty and truth-telling. Under pressure from the Coalition and Greens, Anthony Albanese and Mr Marles on Tuesday would not re-commit to Labor’s $27m election promise to establish a Makarrata commission overseeing treaty-making and truth-telling processes. Following the crushing referendum defeat, Mr Marles on the weekend declared the government had “made clear we support the Uluru Statement from the Heart and (truth-telling) is part of it”. “The principal commitment to everything that’s contained in there we have made and we don’t move away from,” Mr Marles told the ABC on Sunday. Government sources have since confirmed that treaty and truth-telling commitments were under review pending consultation with Indigenous leaders following their week of silence.

>>19762073 Yoorrook Justice Commission to investigate injustices of Indigenous ‘land, sky and waters’ in Victoria - Victoria’s Aboriginal truth-telling body is preparing a campaign to get Indigenous Victorians “redress” for losing control of “land, sky and waters” in the wake of the voice referendum. Yoorrook Commission chair Eleanor Bourke, noting the “really challenging” months in the lead-up to the referendum that was defeated on the weekend, said it was time to look ahead. “Now that the referendum is over, we must find ways to move forward together,” Professor Bourke told The Australian. “Truth-telling and the work of the Yoorrook Justice Commission is more important than ever. Truth telling can help us come ­together. We can listen to each other with respect and hope and healing. Together we can find common ground and work towards a better shared future for everyone in this place we all call home.

>>19762095 NSW will push on with First Nations treaty despite Voice referendum's defeat - While the referendum on the Voice to Parliament suffered a resounding defeat on the weekend, states are pushing ahead with their own plans to implement one of the other main pillars of the Uluru Statement from the Heart: treaty. But while New South Wales has the biggest Indigenous population, it's the only state or territory not to have already started the treaty process. Treaties have been negotiated with Indigenous people in other former colonies around the world, including Canada, the United States, New Zealand, Norway, Finland, Greenland and Japan. NSW Premier Chris Minns has said he remained committed to kickstarting treaty discussions with Indigenous people in the state. So what might a treaty look like in NSW and what happens from here?

>>19762116 LNP’s David Crisafulli pulls support for treaty laws in Queensland after Indigenous voice to parliament vote fails - Queensland’s Liberal National Party has withdrawn support for state Indigenous treaty laws it helped pass this year that would pave the way for a truth-telling inquiry and hundreds of millions of dollars in reparations. In a spectacular retreat, Opposition Leader David Crisafulli announced he no longer backs the Palaszczuk government’s legislation that enables separate treaty deals with up to 150 First Nation groups across the state. Mr Crisafulli, who, polling suggests, is on track to win government at next year’s state election, has faced criticism over his support of the laws, including from the LNP membership and the federal opposition. His backdown comes days after Queensland delivered the strongest rejection of the voice, with 68.9 per cent voting no in the referendum, some 4 per cent higher than the next state against constitutional change, South Australia.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822188

#32 - Part 80

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 44

>>19762128 Time to stop the Indigenous voice to parliament vitriol and move on, says Warren Mundine - Leading No advocate Warren Mundine has said the “vitriol” and “hatred of people” in the days after the referendum result are the “worst I’ve seen”. Speaking to The Australian, Mr Mundine called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to “pour cold water” on the lingering post-vote attacks to “calm the situation down”. “We can’t go on as a country like this,” Mr Mundine said, referencing the egg attack on CLP senator Jacinta Price’s parents and threats to No voters across the country. “I know of people that are scared - the threats we’ve seen and things happening are just as bad as what happened during the campaign,” he said. He said attacks from Yes supporters pertaining to alleged misinformation and education of No voters showed they were “still attacking the public”. “I know that both Yes and No voters want to get things working for First Nations people struggling in terrible conditions - let’s put personal things aside, we can’t keep throwing rocks at each other,” he said.

>>19769156 Jacinta Price’s plan for Aboriginal child abuse royal commission savaged by Indigenous leaders - Nearly 100 of Australia’s leading Indigenous figures and organisations have condemned the ­Coalition’s call for a royal commission into child sex abuse in Aboriginal communities, breaking the “week of silence” and opening a national fracture on Indigenous policy five days after Saturday’s referendum defeat. A joint statement issued by the alliance - which includes the ­Coalition of Peaks, Reconciliation Australia, the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation and Professor Marcia Langton – warned the Coalition the safety of children “should not be politicised or used as a platform to advance a political position.”

>>19769183 Voice defeat delivers opening salvo against identity politics - "Probably for the first time anywhere an issue of identity politics has been put to the people and, here in Australia, resoundingly rejected. Given that the classic notion of the absolute equality of every human being - regardless of race, religion, gender and culture – is now under sustained assault, this should be the vote that rang round the world. Indeed it needs to, given the susceptibility of governments almost everywhere to bad policy based on muddled thinking about group rights and a misguided apology mania in what are the world’s least racist societies. The constitutional entrenchment of an Indigenous voice to the parliament and to the executive government would have given some Australians a greater say over how all Australians are governed, based on their declared identity as Aboriginal. In the immediate aftermath of the vote, the international reaction was of one pained surprise that Australians had somehow rejected rights for Aboriginal people, rather than just special ones. This simply shows the global pervasiveness of identity thinking - due to the left’s long march through the institutions – and reveals how seismic our vote could be; provided we appreciate the magnitude of what we’ve just done and have the self-confidence to build upon it." - Tony Abbott, 28th prime minister of Australia, 2013-15 - theaustralian.com.au

>>19769209 Annastacia Palaszczuk set to pull the pin on treaty plans - Queensland’s path to treaties with First Nations groups has collapsed, with Labor Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk warning the process cannot go ahead now the Liberal National Party opposition has withdrawn support. Just days after the state posted the biggest No vote of the voice referendum, Ms Palaszczuk moved to abandon laws - passed this year with the support of the LNP – enabling treaty deals and reparations for up to 150 Indigenous groups. After the LNP announced on Wednesday night it had backflipped on treaty, Ms Palaszczuk would only commit to going ahead with truth-telling hearings, due to begin early next year. “For the treaty process, you would need bipartisan support,’’ she said at a press conference. “I can’t predict what is going to happen in the future.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822192

#32 - Part 81

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 45

>>19775463 Victoria pushes ahead with a treaty despite other states going cold - Victoria will push ahead with a treaty process with the state’s Indigenous people despite Queensland and NSW slowing down plans for their own treaties. The resounding rejection of the federal Voice to parliament in the two northern states has prompted their leaders to reconsider plans to negotiate an agreement with local First Peoples and had fuelled speculation Victoria could follow suit. Victoria recorded the best result for the Yes campaign compared to all other states, but the referendum proposal was defeated as 55 per cent of the eligible population voted against it. Regional areas and Melbourne’s outer suburbs were more likely to have No majorities while Yes support was strongest across the inner city. Although other states are reconsidering their approach, the Allan government has committed to push ahead with the treaty process and early work on negotiations are underway before the formal process in early 2024.

>>19775516 After a bruising Voice vote, Aboriginal Victorians turn focus to treaty - Beyond the headline-grabbing claims and counter-claims of the Voice campaign, Victoria has been quietly progressing its ambition to treaty with its First Peoples. The process is intended to secure a series of treaties, both at statewide level and individually with First Nations groups recognised through their respective clans, language groups and relationship with Country. It will acknowledge the ongoing harms caused by dispossession and create a broad legal framework for greater self-determination. The loss of the Voice referendum has, for the foreseeable future, ended any prospect of constitutional recognition of Australia’s Indigenous people. It also reminds Ian Hamm, a Yorta Yorta man who has worked for decades in government and business to advance the interests of Aboriginal people, of a truism in Australian politics. “A wise head in politics said something to me many years ago,” he recalls. “We were just having a chat and he said ‘Ian, as much as it pains me to say this, there are no votes in black fellas. You won’t win an election on Aboriginal stuff, but you can damn sure lose one.’ That is what played out last weekend.”

>>19775546 ‘Has to serve his time’: Liberals oppose Yes campaigner’s cabinet return - Liberal MPs are pushing back against the prospect of Julian Leeser returning to the Coalition frontbench, arguing his resignation to campaign for the Voice to parliament should not be rewarded. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has cautiously tested the mood among trusted colleagues in recent weeks to gauge whether Leeser’s return would be accepted, according to two Liberal sources speaking on the condition of anonymity to detail private talks. Leeser quit his position as shadow attorney-general and Indigenous Australians spokesman in April after the Liberal Party forced frontbenchers to campaign for No. As someone who was intrinsically involved in the development of the Voice, Leeser moved to the backbench to campaign for Yes. Several sources said Liberals, particularly those in the party’s right flank who strongly opposed the Voice, had been urging Dutton to keep the Berowra MP on the backbench for the remainder of the parliamentary term.

>>19780518 Key land council ends voice silence with blast at No victory - The Central Land Council, which represents 24,000 remote Indigenous people, says Australia does not know itself. After a week of silence to grieve last Saturday’s failed referendum, the land council, comprising 90 elected delegates, has spoken about the resounding defeat of the proposal for an Indigenous voice to parliament. “On 14 October Australia voted NO. But Aboriginal people in all our Central Land Council communities voted YES,” the Central Land Council wrote in a statement issued on Saturday night. “In fact, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people all over remote Australia voted YES. “The referendum results tell us an important story: We as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are united. “We know who we are. We know what we need. And we know things need to change. But we live in a country that does not know itself.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822195

#32 - Part 82

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 46

>>19780537 Indigenous Yes campaigners divided on Voice response, draft reveals - Indigenous leaders are divided over the wording of a joint statement following the Voice referendum defeat, with several objecting to the tone of a draft open letter, which lays blame for the loss on the Coalition and is critical of No voters. The draft document, intended as the first collective response of Indigenous leaders supporting the Yes campaign after declaring a week of silence following the referendum defeat last Saturday, lays bare the grief and pain among the Yes campaign group and the broader Indigenous community. It says Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were “hurting and bewildered by what they feel is the viciousness of the repudiation of our peoples and rejection of our efforts to pursue reconciliation in good faith”. The document, dated October 20, a leaked copy of which has been obtained by this masthead, is the latest in a series of draft versions circulated among about 50 Indigenous people and organisations, including those associated with the Yes 23 and Uluru Dialogue campaigns. It is unclear who has written the statement or who would endorse it, but multiple sources confirmed to this masthead that, after the draft was circulated on an email chain on Friday, several Indigenous leaders declined to be part of it, saying they disagreed with the tone and some of the points made. Those who objected included Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner June Oscar, co-chairman of Queensland’s Interim Truth and Treaty Body Mick Gooda, and Coalition of the Peaks lead convener Pat Turner. They were contacted for comment.

>>19780543 ‘Declaration of war’: Mundine rejects criticism from Yes campaign - Leading No campaigner in the Voice referendum Nyunggai Warren Mundine has dismissed as ridiculous and racist a claim from Indigenous leaders for Yes that he is a puppet of right-wing think tanks, as Anthony Albanese declares the referendum created a new national awareness of the disadvantage confronting First Nations peoples. A draft document dated October 20 intended to be the first collective response of Indigenous leaders supporting the Yes campaign was to be released after a week of silence marking the referendum defeat. A leaked copy of the statement was published by this masthead on Sunday and had been circulated among about 50 Indigenous people and organisations, including those associated with the Yes 23 and Uluru Dialogue campaigns. The draft letter says Indigenous leaders Price, Senator Kerrynne Liddle, and Mundine who opposed the Voice to parliament “were just front people for three right-wing organisations”. “It is an old colonial tactic to use black people to fight black people,” the statement says. Mundine said he opposed the referendum because it was divisive between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. He said the draft letter “was a continuation of that”. “So much for reconciliation and uniting the country,” he said. “This is a declaration of war, metaphorically. This insulting idea that we’re some sort of puppet is just totally ridiculous. Saying that the No campaign had a racist base is just ridiculous.”

>>19780548 Victorian Nationals leader Peter Walsh challenges state truth-telling body - Victorian Nationals leader Peter Walsh has challenged the work of the Yoorrook Justice Commission, as he warned “the time for virtue-signalling is over”. The state shadow Indigenous Australians minister declined to comment specifically on the Aboriginal truth-telling body’s latest “land, sky and waters” inquiry but said he did not support the work of Yoorrook so far. “Their last report, on the justice system, one of the recommendations was for a totally stand-alone Indigenous court system. And our view is that we are all Victorians and we’re all equal before the law. We supported Indigenous courts for youth, which I think has delivered good outcomes, but as part of the current legal system of Victoria, we do not support a totally separate legal system.” The state Nationals leader said he could not take a stance on a potential treaty until he had all the detail. “It’s a bit like Albanese’s voice. A lot of people voted against it because they didn’t know what it was. And this time we have nothing before us that says anything about treaty.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822199

#32 - Part 83

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 47

>>19780557 ASIO chief Mike Burgess slaps down claims foreign governments were spreading ‘disinformation’ in Australia - The head of ASIO Mike Burgess has slapped down speculation the voice referendum was influenced by disinformation spread by foreign governments, adding that his organisation had no interest in policing misinformation or disinformation that is propagated by Australians. In what could also be seen as a veiled swipe at pending federal legislation to police speech on social media platforms, Mr Burgess said he hadn’t seen evidence China, Russia or any other governments were seeking to influence Australian opinion. “There‘s lots of people who claim it is there, during elections or referendums, people like to think it’s there, but we haven’t seen that,” he told The Australian at a Five Eyes conference near San Francisco last week. “We don’t see very much of that at all, but we’re on the look out for it”.

>>19784085 "DON’T FEEL SHEEPISH ABOUT STARING DOWN THE ABSURD" - "The Voice campaign stands out as one of the greatest herding scenarios since the first sheepdog trotted down a gangplank in old Sydney Town and started harassing terrified sheep way back when.? Much to the surprise of the dogs, however, more than one sheep has stood its ground and refused to be herded into the Yes pen.? This was not supposed to happen. When the dogs snapped at their hindquarters the flock was supposed to trot into the pen without question.? For daring to stare down the dogs, holding their ground and refusing to be cajoled and bullied, they have been branded as very bad, un-Australian sheep.? The extension of government power into our lives, the presumption that we will meekly submit to being told what we must accept without question, has been incremental? We are snowed in with faux science, directed to “do the right thing”, toe the line, feel the “vibe” - whatever that might be - and generally cop anything that Big Brother says is good for us.? Quite frankly, I’ve had a gutful of it." - Mike O'Connor - couriermail.com.au

>>19785746 Indigenous groups vow to be heard after ‘racist’ referendum result - The leaders of the Yes campaign have flagged their intention to establish an Indigenous voice despite the referendum’s defeat, as a week of silence ended with accu­sations of racism, dishonesty and ignorance towards No voters. In a statement released late on Sunday, a group that described itself as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders, community members and organisations that supported Yes said it was now clear that no constitutional change recognising Indigenous Australians would ever succeed. In a sign the Indigenous affairs debate will increasingly turn to treaty in the wake of the referendum defeat, the statement addressed the “occupation” of an Australia that belonged to Indigenous people. “We accept that the majority of non-Indigenous voting Australians have rejected recognition in the Australian Constitution. We do not for one moment accept that this country is not ours,” the statement said. “It is the legitimacy of the non-Indigenous occupation in this country that requires recognition, not the other way around. Our sovereignty has never been ceded.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822200

#32 - Part 84

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 48

>>19792233 Labor wants more to hear more Indigenous voices before it speaks up - Labor is refusing to make any new policy push in Indigenous affairs until it hears from Aboriginal leaders and groups that it believes either abstained from or privately disagree with a strident statement from Yes leaders declaring the reconciliation project all but dead. The government is now dealing with five responses from Indigenous collectives, land councils and organisations since the resounding defeat of the voice referendum on October 14. Four of the five statements published since referendum night refer to racism as a factor, three refer to misinformation or lies from the No campaign and none advocate for reconciliation. The Australian understands the government believes there could be more responses coming from leaders and groups that have different or specific points to make. For example, the government wants to hear from Pat Turner, the co-convener of Closing the Gap, about the practical measures built into that national agreement. The deal signed in 2020 by all levels of government is a promise to make decisions in partnership with Indigenous communities for better results. It was hailed as revolutionary at the time but a Productivity Commission report published in July found the states in particular were not holding up their end of the bargain. Ms Turner told The Australian on Monday that she wished to “let things settle down a bit more” before talking to the media about the future role of the Closing the Gap agreement.

>>19792246 Overwhelming No vote for Indigenous Voice called ’embarrassing’ - Australia’s failure to enshrine an Indigenous Voice in its founding document is an “embarrassing” moment and should push the country to deal with entrenched disadvantaged facing First Nations people, according to a leading Yes campaigner. Indigenous advocate Thomas Mayo said the overwhelmingly rejected Voice referendum on October 14 was a painful event for many Indigenous Australians. “I think it’s embarrassing. It’s hard for Australia to talk about human rights to other countries like China when we still have such a marginalised people,” Mr Mayo said on Tuesday. “We are one of the only ones who don’t have a treaty with Indigenous people, so it will be very difficult now as far as international relations.” Mr Mayo’s comments come after Indigenous leaders and organisations broke their week-long silence to grieve the No result on Monday in an open letter that condemned “a shameful act unknowingly committed by the majority of Australians”. While supporting the general feelings expressed by the letter, Mr Mayo added that he did not sign his name to it. “It’s a general statement of the feelings of Indigenous people,” he said. “There’s a lot of pain out there that such a modest proposal was rejected by the Australian people.”

>>19798315 Anonymous letter-writing Indigenous leaders to blame for Voice loss: Liddle - The Liberal Party’s sole Indigenous MP has questioned the courage of the authors of an anonymous letter censuring people who voted No in the Voice referendum. Coalition frontbencher Senator Kerrynne Liddle says she was astonished that key Yes campaigners did not have “the courage to put their names to a statement like this”, and urging the authors of the statement released on Sunday to accept responsibility for the democratic outcome. In an unpublished draft version of the open letter, revealed in this masthead on Sunday, Liddle was accused of being a “front person” for right-wing think tanks that “used black people to fight black people”. “I wasn’t a front person for anybody. I’m a proud Indigenous woman. I’m also a member of parliament and a contributing member of my community,” she said, adding that she had seen the draft that named her. “This wasn’t a political decision for me. I held this position way before I came into politics.” The former journalist and resources industry executive was involved in various Indigenous organisations before she was elected to the Senate last year and has opposed the Voice for years. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said in April her anti-Voice stance was influential in shaping his own views.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822202

#32 - Part 85

Australia / China Tensions - Part 1

>>19505156 Anthony Albanese agrees to visit China this year after seven-year freeze-out - Anthony Albanese has formally accepted an invitation to visit to Beijing this year - the first by an Australian Prime Minister since 2016 - during bilateral talks with Chinese Premier Li Qiang on the sidelines of the East Asia Summit in Jakarta. The Prime Minister raised with Mr Li the plight of Australians detained in China, including Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun, and called for the resumption of “unimpeded trade” between the countries. He said he also expressed Australia’s concerns over China’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong during the “frank and constructive” talks, and its disputed territorial claims in the South China Sea and over Taiwan. “Australia seeks to work towards productive and stable relations with China based on mutual benefit and respect,” Mr Albanese said after the meeting, which lasted about 50 minutes. He said he confirmed “I would accept an invitation and will visit China later this year at a mutually agreeable time”.

>>19511829 China moves to repair damage it caused to relations with Canberra - Anthony Albanese’s meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang on the sidelines of the East Asia Summit is another breakthrough moment in the slow restoration of the China-Australia relationship. Beijing is now primarily driving this rebalance through conciliatory words and actions that stand in stark contrast to its wolf warrior, wrecking ball behaviour of recent years, which led the relationship to crumble. Mr Li, in his meeting with the Prime Minister, spoke of a renewed relationship that “has continued to show a positive momentum of movement” and of his hopes “to work with you to further improve and grow the bilateral relationship”.

>>19535089 Top gun Daniel Duggan, seeks documents showing why he was deemed a high-risk inmate - The former US top gun accused of training Chinese military pilots has gone to court seeking to find out why he was initially deemed an “extreme high-risk restricted’’ prisoner, a designation usually reserved for terrorists. Daniel Edmund Duggan has two appeals lodged with the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal seeking documents from NSW prison authorities. The Australian citizen is trying to ascertain why he received such a high-level designation when he was first detained after being ­apprehended on a provisional ­arrest warrant last October. He does not face any charges in Australia but the US is seeking to extradite him to face charges ­alleging he helped train Chinese fighter pilots, and for money-laundering. The indictment relates mainly to his activities training Chinese pilots through a South African flying academy during a short-term contract more than 10 years ago. The US alleges the academy was a front group for China, training People’s Liberation Army pilots, and that Mr Duggan’s training breached US laws related to the exporting of defence services. Mr Duggan denies any wrongdoing, and his supporters say the pilots he trained were civilians.

>>19548631 Australia toughens ban on training 'certain foreign militaries' after pilot case - Australia will toughen laws stopping former defence staff from training "certain foreign militaries", introducing a penalty of 20 years prison and widening the ban to stop any Australians offering military training to countries seen as a national security risk. A series of cases where former military pilots living in Australia had worked for a South African flight school training Chinese pilots, which the United States alleges are Chinese military pilots, has prompted the crackdown.

>>19581567 Xi Jinping’s pick for foreign minister, Qin Gang, dismissed over love child - Xi Jinping’s pick for foreign minister, Qin Gang, was dismissed after only seven months because Beijing worried a love child with a Chinese television journalist made him vulnerable to American intelligence agencies. Senior Chinese officials have been told Mr Qin, 57, was abruptly removed from his job as China’s top diplomat because of “lifestyle issues”, a party euphemism for his widely discussed affair with Phoenix television host Fu Xiaotian. “The probe found that Qin had engaged in an extramarital affair that led to the birth of a child in the US,” the Wall Street Journal reported, citing sources familiar with the internal communist party investigation. “The investigation is continuing with Qin’s co-operation … and it is now focusing on whether the affair or other conduct by Qin might have compromised China’s national security.” The salacious dismissal is hugely embarrassing for Xi, who had overseen Qin’s unusually fast promotion. It has exposed huge gaps in Beijing’s vetting process, a problem underlined by the additional recent removal of China’s Defence Minister Li Shangfu.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822205

#32 - Part 86

Australia / China Tensions - Part 2

>>19587772 Scott Morrison to visit Taiwan, warns against ‘appeasing’ Beijing - Scott Morrison will travel to Taiwan in early October to show his support for the self-governed ­island, just weeks before Anthony Albanese visits China to patch up relations with Beijing. The former prime minister will visit Taipei for the October 11-12 Yushan Forum, where Tony Abbott branded China a “bully” and urged “solidarity with Taiwan” in a speech two years ago. Declaring that the region’s security would not be achieved through “appeasement”, Mr Morrison said his trip would present an “interesting contrast” to the Prime Minister’s upcoming visit to ­Beijing. He said Mr Albanese’s scheduled trip to China before the end of the year carried significant risks, and Beijing could use it to create the impression of “a backdown by Australia”. “I certainly don't think that’s what the intention is. But once you get on that plane and go there, well, they are controlling how that is represented, and their microphone is very big,” he said.

>>19601965 Solomon Islands PM snubs meeting with US president, praises China's 'global security initiative' in UN speech - Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare has declined a White House invitation to meet with US President Joe Biden at next week's Pacific leaders' summit. In a move that will further stoke Australian and US concerns over Mr Sogavare's perceived lean towards China, Mr Sogavare will return to Solomon Islands capital Honiara next week after delivering his speech to the United Nations General Assembly Friday night. United States authorities are reportedly disappointed by Mr Sogavare's decision to decline the invitation. He is the only Pacific leader to decline, apart from Vanuatu's new Prime Minster Sato Kilman, who has remained in Port Vila to navigate a brewing political crisis after taking power two weeks ago.

>>19601978 Solomon Islands PM shuns Joe Biden as Timor-Leste signs deal with China - The Unites States is disappointed Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare will not attend a Pacific Islands summit with US President Joe Biden next week, the White House said. Biden will host a second summit with leaders of the Pacific Islands Forum at the White House on Monday as part of his efforts to step up engagement with a region where the US is in a battle for influence with China. Sogavare’s withdrawal came after China and Timor-Leste announced on Saturday they had upgraded bilateral ties to a comprehensive strategic partnership, potentially giving Beijing more influence in the region while satisfying the young half-island nation’s desire for stronger ties with major economies.

>>19611675 Beijing-Timor ties signal critical moment in our region’s security - "There was a touch of Fidel Castro in Manasseh Sogavare’s speech at the UN last week. In a collarless Mao suit the Solomon Islands Prime Minister Sogavare delivered an ardent tirade against the “toxic mix of geopolitical power politics” afflicting the Pacific. China was lavishly praised for delivering a model of “South-South co-operation” that was “less restrictive, more responsive and aligned to our national needs”. The most worrying Sogavare line was a veiled reference to AUKUS. “We remain concerned on the development of military nuclear investment in the Pacific region and its potential to trigger a nuclear arms race and its implications for our nuclear-free status,” he said. That is, of course, breathtaking nonsense. Compare the Australian plan for eight nuclear-powered submarines arriving some time in the 2040s with China’s massive expansion of nuclear weapons to more than 1000 warheads, the Pentagon estimates, by the end of the 2020s. Note also that China’s interest in the Solomons has become more intense since AUKUS was announced. A People’s Republic of China military presence in the Solomons would horribly complicate Australia’s defence planning and threaten the activities of a new east coast submarine base location." - Peter Jennings - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822206

#32 - Part 87

Australia / China Tensions - Part 3

>>19611687 Taiwan lobbies Australian lawmakers on supporting its bid for Pacific trade pact - Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen on Tuesday called on Australia to support its bid to join a pan-Pacific free trade pact during a meeting with a group of visiting Australian lawmakers. Taiwan and China both applied in 2021 to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), but China says it opposes adding Taiwan, which it claims as its own territory. The CPTPP is a landmark trade pact agreed upon in 2018 by 11 countries including Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam. Britain was accepted as a member this year. Tsai, meeting a cross-party delegation at the presidential office in Taipei, noted that Australia was Taiwan's largest energy supplier and a major source of agricultural goods. "We look forward to the continued strengthening of economic and trade cooperation between Taiwan and Australia," Tsai said in comments released by her office. "We also hope that the Australian government and parliament will support Taiwan's accession to the CPTPP to jointly promote economic growth and sustainable development of the Indo-Pacific region."

>>19611699 On a visit to Taiwan, Australian lawmakers call for warmer relations with self-ruled island - On a visit to Taiwan, a delegation of six Australian lawmakers called Tuesday for warmer relations with the self-ruled island increasingly threatened by Beijing. The visit comes as Australia has been working at recalibrating its relationship with China, which had been tense in the past few years over disputes on the origin of COVID-19. China in response had imposed tariff barriers on several Australian exports, such as barley. Taiwan, with a population of 23 million compared to China’s 1.4 billion, has never been part of the People’s Republic of China and while increasingly isolated diplomatically and threatened militarily by Beijing, has maintained an international presence separate from the mainland. Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen said she was grateful for Australia’s role in regional security, citing its new partnership with the United States and the United Kingdom called AUKUS and the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue. “In recent years, Australia has continued to play an important role in upholding peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific,” she said. “It has also used major international gatherings to emphasize the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and support Taiwan’s international participation. For this, I want to express sincere gratitude.”

>>19617086 - Beijing has warned Anthony Albanese that the “provocative behaviour” of a bipartisan delegation of Australian politicians visiting Taiwan could stall negotiations over China’s crippling tariff on wine from Australia. Communist Party mouthpiece the Global Times said the Australian delegation – which is being jointly led by Labor MP Josh Wilson and Liberal MP Paul Fletcher – risked upsetting a “critical juncture” in Australia-China relations ahead of Prime Minister Albanese’s planned trip to Beijing. “The provocative behaviour of [the] Australian lawmakers is a test for Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese,” the party-state masthead editorialised. “By playing the Taiwan card, these MPs aim to create troubles in bilateral relations, seek international attention and gain political capital.” The warning was issued hours after the group of eight Australian politicians met with Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen late on Tuesday, part of a series of meetings with senior economic, foreign ministry and security officials in Taipei during the four-day trip.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822210

#32 - Part 88

Australia / China Tensions - Part 4

>>19617095 MPs’ Taiwan visit brings embarrassment, test to Australian government - "A cross-party delegation of six Australian lawmakers started their four-day visit to the island of Taiwan on Monday. At this critical juncture when China and Australia are endeavoring to improve their strained ties, the provocative behavior of Australian lawmakers is a test for Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. Looking back over the past three years, China-Australia relations have transitioned from a frozen winter to a warm spring, although each step has come with its ups and downs. China and Australia held a high-level dialogue earlier this month. The Australian government has recommenced the visa process for Chinese group travelers. China has dropped anti-dumping tariffs on Australian barley imports. Albanese will also reportedly pay a visit to China later this year. These series of positive signals are a result of the bottoming out of bilateral relations after being damaged by the previous Morrison government. Currently, the mutual trust between the two countries is still somewhat fragile, and the thawing of relations without trust can hardly be sustained. If China and Australia join hands, the improvement of ties is foreseeable, but if one side intentionally obstructs the process, it may add hurdles to this process. By playing the Taiwan card, these MPs aim to create troubles in bilateral relations, seek international attention and gain political capital." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>19637842 Scott Morrison hits back at China envoy over Taiwan comments - Scott Morrison has lashed China’s top diplomat in Australia, declaring the envoy has no right to tell Australian MPs they cannot travel to Taiwan or decide how Australia applies its One China policy. China’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, warned Australian politicians on Thursday - including the former prime minister – that MPs’ visits to Taipei undermined progress in stabilising ties between the countries. His comments, at a function in Sydney to mark 74 years of Communist Party rule over China, came just days after an Australian parliamentary delegation met with Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen in Taipei. “Their words, their actions on Taiwan will absolutely bring about a negative effect on the ongoing improvement of our relationship between China and Australia,” Mr Xiao said. The ambassador expressed concern over Mr Morrison’s scheduled Taiwan trip in early October, declaring even former prime ministers wear “political hats”. But Mr Morrison - whose government pushed back against surging Chinese coercion – said Australian MPs were free to travel where they chose. “The Chinese government in Beijing does not get to decide whether Australian members of parliament can visit Taiwan or not, nor do they get to tell Australians or the world what Australia’s One China policy means,” he told The Australian. “I’m very much looking forward to visiting Taiwan and ­celebrating their many achievements as a successful representative democracy that has built a highly sophisticated and remarkable market-based economy, which plays such an important role, both in our region and globally.”

>>19644829 After years of brutal repression, China's Communist Party tries to turn Xinjiang into a tourism hotspot - For several years, the region of Xinjiang has been shut off from most of the world's media, amid a highly secretive government campaign to stamp out extremism amongst the Uyghur population and other Muslim minorities. The crackdown came after decades of unrest, including riots in the capital Urumqi where hundreds were killed in 2009 and a car attack on pedestrians in Beijing's Tiananmen Square in 2013, that killed five. When a knife and explosive attack on Urumqi train station overshadowed President Xi Jinping's trip to the province in 2014, he ordered officials to "strike hard" against terrorism. Since then, a chorus of academics, researchers, journalists and legal scholars have meticulously documented widespread abuses at the hands of the government, including mass internment camps, forced labour and birth prevention policies. The United States has labelled the crackdown "genocide", but Australia hasn't used that word. For its part, China first denied the existence of the camps, before later insisting all of its "vocational centres" were closed in 2019. Now the province is moving to a state of "normalisation". The great rebranding of Xinjiang is in full swing.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822211

#32 - Part 89

Australia / China Tensions - Part 5

>>19664451 Daniel Duggan: US extradition case could be delayed due to fight over AFP and ASIO documents - Lawyers for an ex-US navy pilot accused of training Chinese airmen say delays in obtaining crucial material from the government mean an upcoming extradition hearing will have to be delayed. Daniel Edmund Duggan, 55, was arrested in October last year after the US government accused him of arms trafficking by providing military training to Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010 and 2012. He is also accused of money laundering while a US citizen. The father of six denies all the charges. Appearing at Downing Centre local court on Wednesday, Duggan’s lawyer Dennis Miralis said his client would seek to vacate an upcoming hearing on 23 November for the United States’ extradition application. The 55-year-old is trying to get hold of documents from government agencies such as the Australian federal police, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation and the US Department of Justice regarding the allegations against him. Miralis said the agencies had opposed handing over material to the former navy pilot, citing secrecy and the possibility of interference in international relations.

>>19664477 Bondi businessman accused of selling secrets to China can only be accused of plagiarism, lawyers argue - Lawyers for a Bondi businessman accused of selling Australian secrets to China say simple artificial intelligence tools used to check for plagiarism at universities verified his claim he only provided publicly available information. Alexander Csergo watched on via video link from Sydney’s Parklea prison on Wednesday as prosecutors told Downing Centre local court they would ask the federal attorney general’s department if it wanted to continue his case. Csergo has been held in prison on remand after he was arrested in Bondi in April. He was the first person in Australia to be charged with reckless foreign interference, an offence created as part of a suite of national security laws introduced in 2018. The 55-year-old is alleged to have swapped reports on business and politics with two Chinese handlers, known to him by their anglicised names of Ken and Evelyn, in exchange for envelopes of cash while he was living in Shanghai during the pandemic.

>>19679658 Anthony Albanese hits security turbulence: VIP plane at risk in Beijing - Anthony Albanese’s upcoming trip to Beijing has been thrown off course by security advice that he should avoid travelling in his RAAF jet because its systems could be hacked by Chinese spies. It’s understood a number of options are being considered, including using one or more of the RAAF’s smaller jets, or flying the Prime Minister’s plane to a nearby country and using a different aircraft for the final leg into Beijing. Mr Albanese’s primary aircraft for international trips is one of the air force’s seven KC-30A air-to-air refuellers that has been modified with VIP sleeping and working ­facilities, and a mix of business class and economy seats for staff and the media. It has advanced communication and navigation systems, and electronic self-­protection capabilities to shield against surface-to-air missiles. Multiple high-level sources said the security warnings had been issued. It was not yet clear how Mr Albanese would get to Beijing. The Prime Minister has said he will travel to China by the end of the year to restore bilateral ties at the invitation of Chinese President Xi Jinping. He is yet to release his travel dates but late October or early November are likely, coinciding with the 50th anniversary of Gough Whitlam’s historic visit to China.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822213

#32 - Part 90

Australia / China Tensions - Part 6

>>19712663 Cheng Lei ‘elated’ to return to her family after release from Chinese jail - Cheng Lei, the Australian journalist detained on national security charges by China, has returned to Australia, bringing to an end a three-year ordeal that saw put her at the centre of a bitter diplomatic dispute between Canberra and Beijing. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Cheng, a Melbourne mother-of-two, was elated to be home after years of negotiations with Chinese officials finally secured the release of the 48-year-old. Albanese confirmed on Wednesday she was met at Melbourne airport by Foreign Minister Penny Wong. “Her return brings an end to a very difficult few years for her family,” Albanese said. “The government has been seeking this for a long period of time and her return will be warmly welcomed not just by her family and friends but by all Australians.” Cheng’s release removes a key hurdle from Albanese’s visit to Beijing following years of hostility between Australia and its largest trading partner. “It will be this year,” he said. Cheng was detained in August 2020 at the height of tensions between Australia and China over human rights, trade disputes and COVID, leading her supporters to claim that she was a victim of arbitrary detention.

>>19712740 China worried security support for Timor would bring ‘overreaction’: Ramos-Horta - Timor-Leste President Jose Ramos-Horta says China has stopped short of forging greater links with Dili in supporting its military and police forces out of concern about how it would be received in Australia. The upgrading of diplomatic relations between South-East Asia’s youngest nation and Beijing last month elicited comparisons with China’s police co-operation deal with Solomon Islands, an agreement that triggered anxiety about China expanding its influence in the Pacific. Ramos-Horta has insisted that the new comprehensive strategic partnership signed by his Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao and Chinese President Xi Jinping is focused mostly on infrastructure development and on industries such as agriculture, and is no worry for Australia. “We could have had more Chinese support, for instance, in infrastructure to our defence forces, to our police force. And sometimes when I chat with the Chinese about increasing their support to our police force, like building our whole compound, they’d say they’d be willing to do it, but they would be concerned about the overreaction or potential overreaction in Australia and elsewhere,” he told ABC radio on Monday. “The Chinese are actually sensitive to the sensitivities of our neighbours. They are more respectful of Australia’s position than Australia is of the Chinese position.”

>>19720309 Cheng Lei’s release is a remarkable feat of diplomacy - Three years was three years too long for Cheng Lei. Three years of missed sunshine, three years of missed birthdays, three years without her children, now aged 12 and 14, who moved between primary and high school while she imagined what trees looked like in her three-metre cell. But it was a remarkable feat of diplomacy from the Department of Foreign Affairs negotiators and two Australian governments to extract the 48-year-old Melbourne mother of two from the world’s greatest exponent of arbitrary detention in that span of time. Cheng was released despite two daunting obstacles: she was born in China and the Australian government had limited hard leverage to use in her release. Australia had no Meng Wenzhou, the Huawei chief financial officer released by Canada to secure the release of Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor after three years in Chinese jails. That left Australian officials, foreign ministers, trade ministers and prime ministers imploring their Chinese counterparts to do the right thing, while hoping that the time would come when China’s use of Cheng as a diplomatic pawn would no longer be in the nation’s interests. The inflection point came when the Albanese government was elected last year. The Coalition government had weathered $20 billion in trade strikes, but with a new government in Canberra and no policy concessions from Australia, the position of rolling hostility became counterproductive for Beijing. Albanese now has a much-needed foreign policy win that he can claim through both persistence and circumstance.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822216

#32 - Part 91

Australia / China Tensions - Part 7

>>19720316 Australian TV anchor Cheng Lei deported by Chinese state security authorities after serving sentence - "Cheng Lei, an Australian national, who had worked for a Chinese media outlet, was deported from China, after serving a sentence of two years and 11 months for illegally providing state secrets to a foreign agency, China's Ministry of State Security announced on Wednesday. Cheng was born in June 1975, and was originally employed at a Chinese media outlet. In May 2020, Cheng was lured by a member from an overseas organization. In violation of the confidentiality agreement signed with her employer, she illegally provided the foreign organization the state secrets that she grasped during her work using her mobile phone, the ministry said. In August 2020, Beijing State Security Bureau took criminal measures against Cheng after an investigation. Cheng confessed the facts of the crime, and voluntarily pleaded guilty. The No.2 Intermediate People's Court of Beijing, through trial, sentenced Cheng to an imprisonment of two years and 11 months, plus deportation. Cheng did not appeal, according to the authorities." - GT staff reporters - globaltimes.cn

>>19720328, >>19720340 Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference on October 11, 2023 - "After a trial, the Beijing No.2 Intermediate People’s Court sentenced Cheng Lei to two years and 11 months of imprisonment and deportation for illegally providing state secrets to an overseas party. After serving her sentence, Cheng Lei was deported out of the country by the Beijing Municipal State Security Bureau in accordance with the law. I would like to stress that China’s judicial authorities tried the case and delivered the sentence in accordance with the law. The rights of the individual concerned under the law were fully protected, and Australia’s consular rights including the right to visit and the right to be notified were respected and implemented."

>>19720351 Chinese envoy eyes new start of China-Australia ties - China and Australia should not only maintain the steady and positive momentum of bilateral relations, but also go beyond stabilization to promote the continuous improvement and development, as the relations are at an important moment for a new start, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said on Wednesday. Xiao made the remarks at the Asia Briefing LIVE 2023 Organized by Asia Society Australia in Melbourne. Xiao said last year was a year of stability for China-Australia relations. This year is a year of exchanges, dialogue and improvement for China and Australia, said the ambassador, noting that the two countries have seen exchanges and visits in various fields and at various levels, and made positive progress in bilateral ties in 2023. - Xinhua - english.news.cn

>>19720377 Quad must engage with Taiwan, says Scott Morrison - Scott Morrison has called for Australia to update its “One China” policy to strengthen security ties with Taiwan - including through the Quad - in response to rising aggression from Beijing that threatens to upend the inter­national order. In an address in Taipei on Wednesday evening, the former prime minister said “no other place on the planet” was more central to “ the cause of liberty and democracy” than Taiwan. “When my government took the decision for Australia to swiftly provide lethal support to assist Ukraine … this was as much a decision to support Ukraine, as it was to demonstrate our alignment with a global Western resolve to resist the aggression of authoritarianism, especially given the tacit endorsement of the invasion by Beijing. I was as concerned about Beijing as I was about Moscow.” Mr Morrison said Australian and other liberal democracies needed to push back on Xi Jinping’s claims over Taiwan: “One can reasonably ask, if Taiwan, then what and who is next?”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822220

#32 - Part 92

Australia / China Tensions - Part 8

>>19755135 Video: ASIO director tells Five Eyes intelligence summit that alleged Chinese spy was removed from Australia - Australia's domestic intelligence chief has revealed a Chinese national was removed from the country after a foiled attempt to infiltrate a prestigious research institution. ASIO Director General Mike Burgess has revealed details of the alleged espionage last month, while meeting his Five Eyes counterparts in the United States this week. Mr Burgess says the spying plot against an unnamed Australian organisation was disrupted before any damage was done. "The plot involved a visiting professor - a genuine academic who had also been recruited by Chinese intelligence," Mr Burgess told reporters. "Their spymaster gave them money and a shopping list of intelligence requirements and sent them to Australia." The meeting in Silicon Valley is the first-ever public gathering of the Five Eyes intelligence partners, which includes Australia, the US, the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand. At the meeting, the domestic intelligence chiefs of Australia and the United States issued a scathing criticism of China, accusing it of intellectual property theft on an unprecedented scale. Mr Burgess said the decision to step outside their normally secretive meetings reflected the nature of the threat they were facing. "We recognise nations will spy, we recognise nations will seek strategic advantage," he said ahead of the summit. "But what we're talking about here, this is behaviour that goes beyond traditional espionage. "The Chinese government are engaged in the most sustained, sophisticated and scaled theft of intellectual property and expertise in human history.

>>19755159 Video: ASIO director says alleged Chinese spy was removed from Australia - Australia's domestic spy chief Mike Burgess has revealed an academic, recruited by Chinese Intelligence, was removed from the country after a foiled attempt to infiltrate a research institution. The ASIO boss detailed the case during an historic public meeting of five eyes partners in the US. - ABC News (Australia)

>>19762222 Australian businessman being used as ‘guinea pig’ for reckless foreign interference charge, lawyers say - More than six months after Sydney businessman Alexander Csergo was arrested on allegations he was providing sensitive material to Chinese agents, Australia’s attorney general has still not consented to his prosecution. Lawyers for Csergo say he is being used as a “guinea pig” on a never-before-proven charge, and will seek to have him released on bail after prosecutors secured more time to confirm the charge against him. Csergo, charged with one count of reckless foreign interference, is alleged to have swapped reports on business and politics with two Chinese handlers, known to him only by the anglicised names “Ken” and “Evelyn”, in exchange for envelopes of cash.

>>19762229 Fijian prime minister 'more comfortable dealing with traditional friends' like Australia than China - Fiji’s prime minister said Wednesday on a visit to Australia’s capital that his government was “more comfortable dealing with traditional friends” such as Australia as China pursues closer security ties in the Asia-Pacific region. Sitiveni Rabuka and Australia’s Anthony Albanese met during the Fijian’s first state visit to Australia since he most recently came to power in December last year. The 75-year-old former army colonel and coup leader had previously been Fiji’s prime minister from 1992 until 1999. Rabuka sided with Australia in what he described as the “rivalry” and “one-upmanship“ between the United States and China. “We’re more comfortable dealing with traditional friends, that we have similar systems of government, that our democracies are the same brand of democracy, coming out of the Westminster system,” Rabuka told reporters.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822223

#32 - Part 93

Australia / China Tensions - Part 9

>>19769319 Federal government will not cancel Chinese company Landbridge's Port of Darwin lease - The federal government has announced that it will not strip a Chinese company of the Darwin port lease, just weeks before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese visits Beijing. Mr Albanese said last year that the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet would review the 99-year lease held by the Australian subsidiary of Chinese company Landbridge. Landbridge is reported to have links to the People's Liberation Army of China, and the US Obama administration raised concerns with the Turnbull government after the Northern Territory awarded it to the company in 2015. In a statement, the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet said that there was "a robust regulatory system in place to manage risks to critical infrastructure" and that it "was not necessary to vary or cancel the lease." "Monitoring of security arrangements around the Port of Darwin will continue," it said. "Australians can have confidence that their safety will not be compromised, while ensuring that Australia remains a competitive destination for foreign investment." The federal government had accepted that advice, the department said.

>>19769341 Security experts criticise decision to leave Port of Darwin in Chinese hands - Defence experts have criticised a decision to leave a Chinese company’s 99-year lease of the Port of Darwin in place, warning that it leaves investment decisions on critical national infrastructure in the hands of a potential foreign adversary. The federal government announced on Friday afternoon that a review by key security agencies of the Darwin port lease had found “robust” systems were in place to manage the risks. The head of the Northern Australia strategic policy centre at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, John Coyne, and Australian Defence Association director Neil James both criticised the review for failing to examine the broader implications of a Chinese-owned company controlling a critical deep water port. Coyne said the issue with the Darwin port lease was not that it could open the door to spying but that the Landbridge lease left “future development in the hands of Landbridge and I don’t think their interests will align with ours”. “Beijing will be happy, it reinforces their capacity to invest in critical infrastructure. Did the government consider the broader impact on development in Darwin harbour and how the lease will affect that? If you keep asking the same agencies the same questions, you will get the same answers,” he said. “There is no doubt in Washington this won’t be well received either. It hardly shows that we are looking at national security holistically.”

>>19775719 Wife of jailed former Top Gun pilot calls on prime minister to intervene on one-year anniversary of arrest - The wife of a former US military pilot and Australian citizen arrested one year ago on charges of training Chinese airmen has called for the Albanese government to release him. Daniel Edmund Duggan, 55, was arrested on October 21, 2022, in regional New South Wales after the US government accused him of arms trafficking by providing military training to Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010 and 2012. He is also accused of money laundering while a US citizen. The father of six denies all the charges. Duggan's wife Saffrine today called on the government to set her husband free ahead of a court hearing on Monday in which his legal team will press for his extradition hearing, set for November 24, be vacated. She urged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to raise her husband's detention when he meets US President Joe Biden in Washington DC next week for talks. "We demand they reject the advice of faceless departmental bureaucrats in Canberra," she said. "We demand transparency and an end to the secrecy and deception that has marred this case from the beginning. And we ask that the prime minister deliver a message on his visit to the US, a message that he will not support the extradition of Dan Duggan."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822226

#32 - Part 94

Australia / China Tensions - Part 10

>>19775766 Anthony Albanese urged to halt Daniel Duggan’s US extradition during meeting with president - Showing that their home-baked cake had made it safely to school was important in itself, but the Duggan family had little inkling of the happy snap’s broader significance. The photograph of Daniel Duggan with his kids outside their country New South Wales school captured one of his last moments of freedom. “That (cake photo) is the last photo of Dan with us,” his wife, Saffrine, said, ahead of Saturday, the day which marks a year since her husband was arrested. “Every photo that I take or have since, there is one massive hole in our family - their father and my husband.” Duggan, a former US military pilot who became an Australian citizen in 2012, is accused of breaching US arms trafficking laws by training Chinese military pilots while working at a flight school more than a decade ago. Duggan has consistently denied the allegation. But if convicted, he faces up to 60 years in prison. “We feel that it’s been an act of violence and cruelty on our family to take away a beautiful man, my husband, under allegations that are clearly political, that we flatly deny, are unproven and are 12 years old,” Saffrine Duggan said. She holds hope his case could be raised when the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, meets with US president Joe Biden and other officials during a state visit next week. Any agreement for extradition to the US must be approved by the federal government, specifically the attorney general. “I ask the prime minister to deliver a message … that he will not support the extradition of my husband,” Saffrine Duggan said. “He belongs with us, in Australia.”

>>19780612 China agrees to lift ‘coercive’ tariffs on Australian wine - Beijing has agreed to review its crippling tariffs on Australian wine, a breakthrough for the Albanese government that leaves only the live lobster trade and a clutch of beef abattoirs on China’s trade blacklist ahead of Anthony Albanese’s trip to meet Xi Jinping. The Prime Minister unveiled the deal on Sunday as he revealed he would travel to Beijing and Shanghai from November 4 to 7 to meet with President Xi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang. “I look forward to visiting China, an important step towards ensuring a stable and productive relationship,” Prime Minister Albanese said in a statement. “I welcome the progress we have made to return Australian products, including Australian wine, to the Chinese market. Strong trade benefits both countries.” The trade win comes days after the Albanese government announced that it would allow Chinese company Landbridge to continue its controversial lease over the Port of Darwin.

>>19785776 PM entrapped in crisis of symbolism over outcome - "Anthony Albanese is now entrapped in a crisis of symbolism over outcome. It is a political crisis of his own making. Failure to secure strategically significant benefits in Washington on AUKUS will reflect a weakness of influence. A reluctance to raise the dominant issue of Chinese military aggression - in light of the Pentagon’s recent warning of China’s acceleration of nuclear capability – will be seen as weakness toward Beijing. Albanese, a damaged leader in the wake of the voice referendum, now seeks a narrative that elevates him as a leader that can traverse the chasm: a maintenance of US-Australian cultural and military hegemony against a restoration of Australia-China pragmatic relations. The US will be acutely aware of the fact that several days after standing for photos in the Rose Garden, Albanese will be standing in the same spot as Vladimir Putin last week, as a guest of the Chinese dictator. They will be wondering about Australia’s commitment as it urges the US not to repeat the Obama mistake of taking its eye off the Indo-Pacific. Meanwhile, average Australian families struggling with their ballooning mortgages will be wondering what it all means for them." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822228

#32 - Part 95

Australia / China Tensions - Part 11

>>19785789 Albanese government has failed strategic test in northern Australia - "Yet another review has defended the absurd 2015 Northern Territory decision to lease the Port of Darwin to a Chinese company for 99 years. The review released by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet last Friday points to a “robust regulatory system in place to manage risks to critical infrastructure”. The bigger picture is clear: China is becoming militarily aggressive in our region. Since the lease of the Port of Darwin, Beijing illegally took over disputed territory in the South China Sea, building new military air bases and sea ports. Chinese military power projects much further south to the Indonesian archipelago. Routine Chinese air and naval patrols and intelligence-gathering ships now operate in Australian waters. The Albanese government should have overturned the lease because we, and our key ally, the US, need that facility to expand and secure a larger military presence in the north. Albanese is not moving on the urgent work needed to strengthen our security in the north for the sake of promoting a content-free trip to Beijing to mark Gough Whitlam’s 1973 visit. China will not offer any concession on its military growth, threatening Taiwan or bullying neighbours. Publicly, the Chinese will afford Albanese every opportunity to indulge his hero worship of Whitlam’s visit half a century ago. The Chinese know how to gull foreign leaders - recall Emmanuel Macron’s fawning performance of a few months ago. The risk for Albanese is that the visit will make him look weaker on China in Australia by celebrating small concessions in trade and ignoring the big strategic changes sweeping the world." - Peter Jennings - theaustralian.com.au

>>19785888 Former US fighter pilot Daniel Duggan in ‘existential fight’ one year on - A former top gun fighting an extradition bid by the US will spend at least six more months in possible solitary confinement in a NSW maximum security prison, as his wife urges the Prime Minister to oppose the handover request during his visit t0 Washington. Downing Centre Local Court heard a date for Daniel Edmund Duggan’s extradition hearing was set for May next year, with his lawyer Dennis Miralis saying that further time in custody was necessary if they were to successfully fight the potential 65-year maximum-security prison term he faced if extradited to the US. The court heard Mr Duggan would make an application late next month to access a Department of Defence report which deals with Australian Defence Force members allegedly providing military services to China. Mr Miralis said that material was “critical” to his client’s ability to properly and successfully defend himself, and demonstrated the “political nature” of the US extradition request. His legal team are also hoping to get their hands on 430 documents from the AFP later this month which include communications between ASIO, the Department of Justice, the AFP and the FBI around their investigation of Mr Duggan.

>>19792379 Video: Microsoft to help Australia build 'cyber shield', Anthony Albanese announces in Washington - Tech giant Microsoft will help Australia build a "cyber shield" to fend off global online threats under a plan to sink billions of dollars into securing and expanding the national digital economy. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Microsoft president Brad Smith unveiled the plan at the Australian embassy in Washington, DC on the first day of the PM's official visit to the US. Microsoft says the project is part of its biggest investment in Australia in its 40-year history: a $5 billion plan to expand infrastructure and skills, with a focus on cloud technology and artificial intelligence. The company will work with the Australian Signals Directorate - the national agency responsible for cybersecurity and online warfare — to build the cyber shield, dubbed MACS (Microsoft-Australian Signals Directorate Cyber Shield). Without naming specific countries, Microsoft said it would have a focus on "defending against sophisticated nation-state cyber threats". Asked about the plan being aimed at countering the threat of China, Mr Albanese said it was "aimed at strengthening Australia".

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822230

#32 - Part 96

Australia / China Tensions - Part 12

>>19792384 Video: “Five Eyes” intelligence leaders warn of China’s global espionage campaign - War in the Middle East has the FBI tracking more potential threats of terrorism in the United States. Tonight, the bureau's director, Christopher Wray, tells us his main concern is not an organized attack but lone actors inspired by the violence. We met Wray, Wednesday, for an unprecedented interview that included him and the intelligence directors of our english-speaking allies. Together, they know more about the threats in the world than perhaps anyone. They're known as the Five Eyes and they have never appeared in an interview together. They're doing it now because they're alarmed by China which they say is the greatest espionage threat democracy has ever faced. - 60 Minutes USA

>>19792391 Five Eyes accustomed to fabricating, spreading lies about China: Chinese FM - The Chinese Foreign Ministry on Monday refuted the Five Eyes’ remarks hyping the “China espionage threat.” The so-called accusations are groundless, and full of slander and smears against China, said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning at a regular press briefing on Monday. “China doesn’t accept and firmly opposes it,” Mao said. China attaches great importance to and is committed to protecting intellectual property rights, and safeguarding international security. The “Five Eyes Alliance” is the world’s biggest intelligence association, which is accustomed to fabricating and spreading false information about China, Mao said. The US, with its technological advantages, unscrupulously conducts eavesdropping and spying on a global scale without distinction, even not sparing their own allies, Mao noted. - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>19792399 China-Australia ties ‘warming’ ahead of Albanese visit - China welcomes Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to visit China and attend the 6th China International Import Expo (CIIE) at the invitation of Chinese Premier Li Qiang, China's Foreign Ministry said on Monday. A sound and stable bilateral relationship serves fundamental interests of the two countries and their people, and it is conducive to regional and world peace and stability, it noted. Observers said the visit, adding to a flurry of consensuses and business exchanges between the two sides in recent days, marks another positive step toward repairing China-Australia relations, which have shown signs of thawing and improving since the beginning of this year. It also underscores Australia's desire to expand business ties with the world's second-largest consumer market and boost exports of products such as wine to cope with rising economic uncertainties and global headwinds. But moves to warm up bilateral economic ties are only the first step, and observers cautioned that Canberra needs to make more concrete efforts and show more sincerity to bring bilateral relations back to the right track. It is also of vital importance for Australia to be diplomatically independent from the US, and not to continue with what some describe as a "semi-decoupling" attempt with China, analysts noted. - GT staff reporters - globaltimes.cn

>>19792423 Police questioned on why they allowed Hong Kong officers to visit cyber centre - An Australian lawyer with a police bounty on his head in Hong Kong has questioned why officers from the Chinese territory were allowed into Australia for training, calling it "traumatising" for pro-democracy activists being targeted by Beijing. The Coalition is also grilling Australian Federal Police's top brass about why the Hong Kong officers were allowed to visit a cyber coordination centre in Australia, given ASIO head Mike Burgess recently accused China of "unprecedented" cyber espionage to obtain intellectual property. Six members of the Hong Kong Police Force recently completed Australian Institute of Police Management programs and toured AFP sites in Canberra and Perth. AFP commissioner Reece Kershaw defended the program, telling Senate estimates on Monday night that Australia needed to maintain cooperation with police in both China and Hong Kong to help crackdown on drug smuggling. "We do actually continually share intelligence with [China] … we are actually a net receiver of intelligence and that intelligence has led to protecting a lot of Australians from harm, particularly from illicit drugs," he said. "It's a challenging situation that we're faced with, with the complexity of the world we're in at the moment."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

afc5f0 No.19822232

#32 - Part 97

Australia / China Tensions - Part 13

>>19798327 Biden White House raises concerns about Chinese intimidation ahead of PM visit - Senior Biden administration officials have raised concerns about Chinese intimidation, coercion and maritime claims in the South China Sea, and warned that the world faces a “great deal of pain” if Beijing cuts off its dominant critical minerals supply chain. Joe Biden’s National Security Council strategic communications co-ordinator John Kirby on Wednesday (AEDT) rejected suggestions that conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine had shifted their focus away from the Indo-Pacific region. Ahead of Anthony Albanese travelling to Beijing on November 4 for meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, Mr Kirby said “President Biden believes it is important that we keep lines of communication open with China”. “We view China as a strategic competitor. It’s a competition that we need to succeed in. That means being able to co-operate where we can, communicate where we must, and obviously, as appropriate, work to counter some of the (People’s Republic of China) PRC’s intimidation, coercion, excessive maritime claims,” Mr Kirby said.

>>19798334 Anthony Albanese’s critical minerals funding boost for ‘unbreakable US alliance’ - Anthony Albanese will lift support to unlock Australia’s critical minerals deposits to $6bn, amid a high-stakes global contest to dig up, process and manufacture unprecedented volumes of minerals for clean energy, tech and defence products. The US, EU, China, India, Gulf States and Southeast Asian economic powerhouses are clamouring for access to Australia’s vast critical minerals resources to achieve net zero emissions, diversify away from fossil fuels and drive new artificial intelligence and defence tech advancements. In a major win for US President Joe Biden ahead of Thursday’s state dinner at the White House, the Prime Minister will on Wednesday (AEDT) announce his government is topping up its critical minerals financing measures by $2bn. Mr Albanese, who will unveil the funding boost at a roundtable in Washington to be hosted by ­Resources Minister Madeleine King and US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, said “Australia is committed to building sustainable and secure critical minerals supply chains with the US”.

>>19805097 ‘Trust but verify’: Biden warns Albanese on risks of dealing with China - United States President Joe Biden has warned Australia about the risks of dealing with China and vowed to press ahead with the AUKUS pact on nuclear-powered submarines, in a press conference with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese that emphasised America’s commitment to stability in Asia. Biden said his administration would take on China and present the US as a more reliable partner in the region, but he made it clear that this “extreme competition” did not mean he wanted conflict. The president made the remarks while standing with Albanese at a press conference in the rose garden of the White House after a ceremonial welcome and a meeting in the Oval Office to project the strength of the Australian alliance with the US. With Albanese due to visit Beijing within a fortnight to hold talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the comments in Washington sent the message that Australia could trust the US more than China. “Trust but verify is the phrase,” Biden said when asked if Australia could trust China. “China is having their own internal and external difficulties right now. “China’s economic growth is stagnant compared to what it was. China has engaged in activities, that Russia and many others have engaged in, in terms of intimidation with other countries.”

>>19805201 Video: Chinese gangsters accused of laundering $228m through business spruiked by ex-minister - A transnational crime syndicate is accused of laundering $228 million in dirty funds and tainted cryptocurrency via a money moving business spruiked by a former Howard government minister and allegedly secretly controlled by Chinese gangsters. On Wednesday morning, Australian Federal Police officers from Operation Avarus-Nightwolf swooped on seven suspected Melbourne members of what agents called the “Long River” – an Australia wide crime syndicate – accusing them of serious financial crime. Police suspect the syndicate laundered funds via the Changjiang remittance empire, which the crime group allegedly controlled and which was also used by unwitting members of the Chinese-Australian community to send billions of dollars abroad. Operation Avarus-Nightwolf is significant not only due to the amount of the funds allegedly laundered but the premise that underpins the police case: that a Chinese criminal organisation was brazen enough to set up an Australian government licensed international money moving service, with dozens of shopfronts across Australia, and recruit unwitting former Howard government immigration minister Gary Hardgrave as a spruiker in 2022.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]