>>319415
>Source
<on twitter
of course; there isn't a link to said twitter because i am too lazy to find a confirmed link to something 'i have heard said once'. op is probably more motivated to do that.
similarly;
>the leaks
aren't included because i dont have a copy. How would you link that anyway? something like magnet:?xt=urn:btih:08F510A10C00079AA00046202B00B73CD337E31A&dn=%5Bponyleaks.mlp%5D+Fucking.Pony.Leaks&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969/s9/pictures/grognar.jpg ?
However, if you do have them; you now know that there _should_ be a picture of grogar somewhere in there if the rumours i heard were true
<haven't confirmed that part though
>>319423
he's probably that way because someone didn't say 'please' some time in his past