[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abdl / fur / leftpol / newbrit / strek / trap / v9k / vore ][Options][ watchlist ]

/pone/ - My Little Pony

All things pony, spoilered R34 is allowed (18+).
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

Rules and Info: https://8ch.net/pone/rules.html - Archive: https://8ch.archive.horse/pone/ - USE THE CATALOG: https://8ch.net/pone/catalog.html - Hate Spoilered Images? https://8ch.net/pone/spoilerscript.html

File (hide): 6d18437cdfe5bae⋯.jpg (1.09 MB, 1840x2176, 115:136, 1510537171599.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

50d8a5 (2) No.300056>>300077 >>300123 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

What do ya guys think of this /mlp/ studie?

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1363460717731932

We getting psychoanalyst next kek?

1ea9ba (2) No.300058>>300066

>gamergate

>antifeminist movement

Stopped reading there. It's obvious this person doesn't know what they're talking about.


6a808b (3) No.300066>>300068 >>300074 >>300075 >>300104

File (hide): 649c80c8d58339d⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 55.51 KB, 480x576, 5:6, brenna-harvey.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 24c1c90ee18aab6⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 1.91 MB, 2430x3240, 3:4, John Bailey.jpg) (h) (u)

>>300058

Same. But I kept on going to see what happened next and… you are exactly right. "Gamergate, … emerged from CLAIMS that a woman game developer was using her sexuality as a way to gain unfair favor from game reviewers and journalists" see the key word there is "CLAIMS", these are not claims they are facts this shit really happened.

This article clearly shows the ignorance or bias of the writers, I'm leaning far on the side of bias mostly from the last paragraph quickly shifting talking points to anti-feminism. Also notice the keywords "FUTURE RESEARCH MIGHT INVESTIGATE" meaning everything past this point is complete speculation. Isn't it sad that half of that conclusion page is just nothing at all pulled from the mind of one or both of the writers. (And now that I researched the writers it is both the writers taking shit out of there ass and putting it on paper.)

LOL NVM just researched the bitch behind this dumpster fire, she is a Feminist.

Student at University of Connecticut FOR FUCKING 11 YEARS, has a B.A. in Sociology and English, M.A in Sociology and has gone back once again for a degree in Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. She has to have well over $500,000 in student loan debt alone. She loves improve comedy. https://seateaimprov.com/members/brenna-harvey/

https://wgss.uconn.edu/current-graduate-students/

Oh but isn't that interesting the women is the second name credited lets look at the man behind the work.

Mates just feast your eyes on this MAN OF A MAN JOHN BAILEY. Doesn't that face just say "I did all the work on this paper and made whatever she wrote fit into it and I wanted to put her on as first credit but she insisted multiple times.(only because she didn't want to get caught plagiarizing)" (also is likely to have $500,000 student loan debt btw)

http://sociology.rutgers.edu/people/graduate-profiles

Anyways that was kinda fun to laugh at for, what is perhaps, a little bit longer than this deserves but oh well.


da7500 (2) No.300068

>>300066 (checked)

Wew lads


f0177d (1) No.300074

File (hide): f9ee244d8cc28df⋯.gif (305.19 KB, 500x319, 500:319, laughingsluts.gif) (h) (u)

>>300066

WALKING

FUCKING

STEREOTYPE


eebe7c (3) No.300075>>300077 >>300093

>>300066

That's all well and good. But do you think this will hurt the fandom in anyway? More importantly will it hurt forums/communities like /mlp/ and /pone/? That's all I wanna really know.


22ca2b (1) No.300077>>300083

>>300056 (OP)

>collectively positions their sexuality as shameful

Well, that's true. A bunch of ugly virgins who like penises and are constantly fearful of the degeneration of manliness is a self-loathing bunch if ever there was one. Story at eleven.

>citing Judith Butler

It never ceases to amaze me how that cheap hack gets so much respect from supposedly intellectual circles.

>the production of stigmatized sexual identities

The author completely misses the irony inherent in this statement.

>We argue for further research

This is how pomos beg universities to pay them for reaffirming opinions that they already hold.

>>300075

No, gender-based deconstruction never hurt anything, as it is completely impotent. /mlp/ and /pone/ are already dying anyway.


eebe7c (3) No.300083>>300091

>>300077

>/mlp/ and /pone/ are already dying anyway.

Aight good to know.


da7500 (2) No.300091>>300140

File (hide): 1a1cafb290317e4⋯.png (114.2 KB, 420x180, 7:3, 1370427502982.png) (h) (u)

>>300083

>not knowing this already

Who do you work for?

Why are you here?


6a808b (3) No.300093

>>300075

Just this one reseach paper probably not, if a shit ton of papers where comming out about this shit then, I would still have to say probably not, the only people it would "affect" are the people within thier own communities(aka SJW types) but those people are already not comming to places like these for the most part and, I think, the people that gather to communities like this are not gonna be swayed from comming here, they already have the opinions that make them predisposed to comming to places like this.

And do I think it will hurt specifically the fandom? No, Not from this single paper. A shit ton of papers? still probably not. If there is a response it will be something like, the people already on the fringe of leaving, and they agree with these opinions, will leave, there would maybe be some hubub and drama followed by everyone being autistic and getting distracted by the cute ponies, and everything goes back to normal.

Now the worst response I could think of (which wouldn't happen this is just kind of an interesting thought experiment for me) is a large portion of the fandom leaves and creates nu-brony, and the best descriptor that I can think up of is "Minimalist Fans/Fandom", something like "Sure you can like it BUT DON'T LIKE IT TOO MUCH." Cultural Marxism injected just enough but not all the way so people can still feel like they have freedoms. The nu-bronys would always fight, in an seemly ironic way, with bronys to get them to stop liking the show so much because "You could turn into one of those 4channers and start hating women and jerking off to anything, you sexual deviant."


9d66bb (6) No.300104>>300122

File (hide): f4d0bc86b5cbf4c⋯.png (119.49 KB, 615x348, 205:116, Screenshot_3.png) (h) (u)

File (hide): 9acf251625ccd0f⋯.png (266.33 KB, 552x543, 184:181, 9acf251625ccd0f8091268c637….png) (h) (u)

>>300066

You didn't need to do all that research.

They tell you in the article, straight up, that they have an 'explicitly pro-feminist stance'. This is comical.


1ea9ba (2) No.300111>>300112 >>300122

Anybody want to participate in another study? I dont know if the offer is still available but I picked up this buisness card two weeks ago at Nightmare Nights.

A sociology major named Zack Palmer wants to conduct 1 hour interviews via skype and can be contacted at zpalmer@purdue.edu


603af5 (1) No.300112>>300122

>>300111

The results will either be a cringefest or a laugh riot. Somebody here needs to do this.


6a808b (3) No.300122

>>300104

It wasn't much research, like 10 mins or so. It is still fun for me to look into the people behind this shit.

>>300111

>>300112

Sounds like fun someone do this and just fuck with the ass.


56c9b3 (2) No.300123>>300130 >>300133

>>300056 (OP)

The paper is stuck behind a paywall, and I sure as hell ain't handing out any shekels to read feminist propaganda. Is there a pirated version available?


d8db3d (1) No.300130>>300139 >>300146 >>300171

>>300123

Funny how they're doing that to (((academic papers))). Almost like they're trying to profit on it. Really makes you think, hun?


9d66bb (6) No.300133>>300147 >>300171

File (hide): 2ebce1519faeae0⋯.jpg (501.1 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p1.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 6e29b7c9c744309⋯.jpg (804.08 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p2.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 2a5664064e5a9b5⋯.jpg (839.98 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p3.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 0f53be7500e293a⋯.jpg (841.13 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p4.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 2cc542835975e71⋯.jpg (746.93 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p5.jpg) (h) (u)

>>300123

Don't worry, I didn't pay for it

There's some fuckery about having to have verified university access or something, I don't know


9d66bb (6) No.300134>>300147 >>300171

File (hide): ba262088b87e0f0⋯.jpg (809.38 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p6.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): e8942d68a53261d⋯.jpg (750.18 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p7.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 3aa22841c207a3d⋯.jpg (657.21 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p8.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 22739cc73187df4⋯.jpg (696.43 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p9.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): cab082a46bc6481⋯.jpg (690.04 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p10.jpg) (h) (u)


9d66bb (6) No.300135>>300147 >>300171

File (hide): d827b871313d486⋯.jpg (674.2 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p11.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 444f8ab1c3506ae⋯.jpg (737.78 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p12.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 023221f02ab731d⋯.jpg (714.27 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p13.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): edbf55309fd229f⋯.jpg (718.23 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p14.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 1a80b80bdebde32⋯.jpg (774.13 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p15.jpg) (h) (u)


9d66bb (6) No.300136>>300147 >>300171

File (hide): 738cf61793bc618⋯.jpg (702.85 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p16.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 16a8f8a48517a0b⋯.jpg (688.39 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p17.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): a3fde2be79e05f1⋯.jpg (172.67 KB, 1843x2764, 1843:2764, p18.jpg) (h) (u)


2bdad3 (1) No.300138

Wish I'd seen this thread sooner before the kind anon above dumped the images.

I have institutional access and downloaded the full pdf:

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/67172309319815168/379784179635847168/1363460717731932.pdf

Kind of useless now, but could be a bit handier to have than a bunch of jpgs


c98f57 (1) No.300139

File (hide): cd1e1f3460f9604⋯.png (11.66 KB, 250x250, 1:1, 1510097382281.png) (h) (u)

>>300130

>All the IEEE, ANSI and ISO standards are paywalled

Really gets the noggin joggin


50d8a5 (2) No.300140>>300142

File (hide): 99bf1ac088ef073⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 194.72 KB, 800x571, 800:571, 23453255.png) (h) (u)

>>300091

>Who do you work for?

>Why are you here?

CIA obv. Na just doesn't feel like its dying to me. We getting 2 more seasons and another movie. Mby that means it's dead to some of you. But it doesn't to me… That's all I was getting at. I'm "Gayhorse" the one that spearheaded the raid on 9GAG some days ago. See: https://ibb.co/ija82b

I also write extreme mlp scat/diaper/pee greentexts. Guess I could have just said a was an oldfag, but for some reason I felt like typing a lil. kek


9d66bb (6) No.300142>>300144

>>300140

>9gag raid

>look how epic I am for writing shock greentexts

You could've just said 'I'm cancer embodied and I love talking about myself', it would've been a whole lot easier.


eebe7c (3) No.300144

>>300142

Your hurting my feelings m8. Can't a fag talk about himself atleast once? Its' been a harsh day. Im'a go cry in my pillow now. lol


0bdb4e (1) No.300145

Bullshit


876dc9 (2) No.300146

>>300130

>Almost like they're trying to profit on it.

Of course they are trying to profit off of it. Universities make a good chunk of money selling acedemic materials to students. It's not just them either. Engines like ProQuest and EBSCO Host make their money collecting articles and selling them to the universities first. "Non-profit" or not, acedemia is an industry.


876dc9 (2) No.300147


56c9b3 (2) No.300171

>>300133

>>300134

>>300135

>>300136

Thank you, anon. So they acknowledge that part our love for pony stems from a disgust for 3DPD, yet they blame "patriarchy" rather than even considering that maybe we have a point about feminism rendering relationships with modern women a risky, if not outright impossible, affair for all but the top 10% alpha chads. Yup, about what I was expecting from a progressive psychology major. What would they say about anons who've gone so far as to make tulpas of their waifus? Are they "victims" of patriarchy too, or disgusting male pigs who use "lonliness" as an excuse to "further objectify women"? How do they factor in all the gay cloppers and the popularity of trap pones? To be fair, it would be amusing to see them try psychoanalyzing Taxman's project to use occult magic to open a portal to Equestria and make waifus real.

>>300130

You're preaching to the choir, m8.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
28 replies | 11 images | 15 UIDs | Page ???
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abdl / fur / leftpol / newbrit / strek / trap / v9k / vore ][ watchlist ]