>>296290
Not when you haven't seen said friend in ages, mate.
I don't get together with a mate I haven't seen in years, and then decide to bring someone they've got no history with, leaving you stuck as an awkward third wheel.
That's just a dick move.
No, leaving with her would be leaving. Following, after apologizing to the party-goers, would be perfectly understandable. It's what most decent people would do, after all, when a friend suddenly explodes like that.
Once again, you sound like an incredibly shitty friend.
When you've got as much shitty luck in a strange unfamiliar place as Gilda's had, I'm not going to say "Hey, fuck you, and all those years we've been friends. You're cast out. Goodbye, hope I never see you again". That's just being a massive fucking asshole.
And it sure as fuck doesn't fit no "element of loyalty" mark.
Gilda's a cunt, by all means, but you should never be so quick to abandon a friend. Otherwise, they aren't really your friends.
Gilda, Gustav, Greta, and Gabby, mate.
Also Grover, I guess.
Because the context of the statements should've made it obvious. Each line replies to a segment. You clearly had no issue following any other line, after all. You didn't mix up the "you sound like a shitty friend" bit to referring to Luna, did you?
Are you going to refute the lot, or what, mate. Or was this your intention from the start? Did you actually fully understand the context, but wanted to try to misinterpret it, in order to dodge the question?