/pnd/ - Politics, News, Debate

DNC operative detected.

Disregard leak.

Disregard this thread.

645534dfx32214fffff

>>299398

It's a good question. I think both sides could actually compromise on this issue, and it would end up mutually beneficial for everyone. Could be wrong, perhaps America no longer has any common sense or common ground anymore…..

>>299400

>I think both sides could actually compromise on this issue

This doesn't sound like the answer to your own question in your op.

To the woman: your body is your choice, but unfortunately you have someone else's body in your uterus. Do you let that person have his/her own choice?

To the man: your body is your choice if you choose to quarantine yourself, which I did and I am unvaxxed.

Listen lady, my name is Fred (last name omitted)

I just lost my business, my wife and my life savings because of the covid lockdown. I found two heads rolling around in my driveway this morning courtesy of the illegals roaming the streets here.

I don't give a flying fuck what you put in your snatch or what you choose to take out of it.

I want secure borders and honest accountable healthcare.

Fuck this thread and everyone in it.

Go back to /pol/ with this bullshit.

1- There is no "democratical debate" about assassinating babies. There's no democracy. A certain country is a Satanic Theocracy.

2- It is not "abortion". Aborting the life of someone is called assassination. Otherwise, someone could be frantically killing people on a spree because abortion is legal. "Abortion" is a euphemism; a figure of language. Schizophrenics are reported to have difficulties comprehending figures of language.

3- There aren't two options; that is a false dichotomy used in a neuro-linguistic programming fashion to shape people to see in two ways so that they can give up their values in a hypothetical situation that doesn't exist

4- The baby does not belong to the woman; the fetus doesn't become a human just because it went out of the womb; it is a human because it is a human. It grows like a human because it is neither a unicorn nor an elephant, just like a child grows into an adult.

5- What you likely meant is not a vaccine. Check the etymology of the word "vaccine": It came from the word "cow". You can call it "genetic therapy". The fact something Z has characteristic A doesn't mean it is X that also has a characteristic A (the fact vaccines are used in syringes doesn't mean that a liquid inserted in a syringe automatically become a vaccine).

https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/vaccination-propaganda-neurolinguistic-programming-used-for-evil-purposes/

6- You are attempting to make people give up their beliefs by introducing a hypothetical situation to them through a false dichotomy. That's NLP.

7- Inb4 is a shill technique to prevent people to come up with certain arguments.

8- The word "remember" used in this post presumes one knows already something when it is not true.

9- It is not difficult to answer this question as you say; it just a matter of not playing by thy standards, that is choosing the right to not be injected to a poison while at the same time defending individuals from assassination (that includes babies)

FED

>>299419

5- The fact something Z has a characteristic A doesn't mean that something X which also has characteristic A is Z*

Do schizophrenics live in a hypothetical world?

Do schizophrenics misuse figures of language?

Do trauma splits personality?

Is the etymology of the word "schizophrenia" rooted in the word "split"?

What explains Stockholm Syndrome?

What is identification with the aggressor?

If one's aggressor is against the person, will the person develop tendencies of going against oneself, self-mutilation and self-harm, and, ultimately, going against one's own nature?

Is going against one's nature going against nature itself?

Is going against nature evil and Satanic?

Why does the left use figures of language to describe the assassination of babies but not the assassination of humans e.g "abortion", "human rights", and "women's rights"?

Does the left do that to attenuate the perceptual gravity of assassinating babies?

Do schizophrenics tend to mix up categories, and confound characteristics of things with the things themselves?

If yes, could that have implications for them misusing figures of language?

If yes, could that make them less exigent in relation to the standards that make something fit into a category?

If yes, could it be of interest to governments to induce schizophrenia in individuals so that they may be more compliant?

If yes, would that make schizophrenics "mix stuff"?

If yes, would that enable the schizophrenic to have an increased thinking versatility which could enable him to come up with farfetched and creative ideas?

Why potential government dissidents were introduced to LSD, Drugs, Hippie culture, and New Age ideas since the 1960s?

Do drugs induce schizophrenia symptoms?

How could "conspiracy theories" induce schizophrenia in individuals?

How could "conspiracy theories" lead individuals to rabbit holes?

Who are the individuals prone to be interested in "conspiracy theories"?

Are individuals prone to become dissidents prone to be interested in "conspiracy theories"?

Who invented "conspiracy theories"?

Who termed the term "conspiracy theory"?

Who was behind the counterculture?

Are "conspiracy theories" a form of counterculture?

Why are the elites always pushing intrigues and theaters toward the people?

Do the intrigues of the elite leads to rabbit holes?

Do the intrigues of the elite make people waste their time?

If something X has characteristics A, B, C, is A X? Is B X? Is C X? Is A and B X? Is A and C X? Is B and C X? Or is it the synthesis of A, B, and C in a specific form altogether X?

Does the fact a vaccine is composed of a syringe (A) and a substance derived from a cow (B) make a syringe (A) with a poisonous substance (C) inside that doesn't come from a cow a vaccine?

Is comparing vaccine-free individuals with baby-assassination sympathizers a fair equivalence?

Is it possible that vaccine-free individuals are left in peace while at the same time the right for the life of babies is secured?

What is the importance of choice?

Does free choice imply freedom from consequences?

What is freedom?

Is freedom what goes according to G'd as G'd is the source of all goodnesses?

Is it the nature of humans to choose goodness over evilness?

Is it the nature of humans to choose pleasure over pain?

What is the relation between goodness and pleasure, and evilness and pain?

How can the words "freedom" and "choice" be used as rhetorical artifices for political goals?

-Y

I am killing this thread-

with the power of my mind.

I am going to mentally telepathically glitch the server.

It will be unavailable for 48 hrs.

>>299422

>with the power of my mind.

You please kill the viruses with the power of your mind to help >>299418

>Fred reopen his business.

>>299425

>viruses

Monoclonal antibodies and viral vector were not being studied as antivirals. Anyone still talking about virus is either a government disinfo shill or one sad sorry and uniformed sheeple.

>>299394

I find it sad Americans can no longer compromise on anything or make a hard political decision. This gives me all the proof I need to be ready for all out warfare.

Thanks.

>>299394

False equivalence. Pregnancy is not contagious.

>>299453

>pregnancy is not contagious

but hysteria is.

"herd poisoning" i believe is what huxley called it.

and just in time for an election.

enjoy whiplash because that's all we're ever going to get from our so called elected representative self government.

the lobby runs everything and the man behind the curtain is not a nice man at all.