/pnd/ - Politics, News, Debate

Such a tactic was used during the gayvid-19 fraudemic. The government has constantly exposed people to dissonant information, such as "you are allowed to not wear a mask", "you are obligated to wear a mask", "you are free to chose whether to take or not a 'vaccine'", "you are obliged to take a 'vaccine'", "stay home", "don't stay home", "you can stay outside", "you are obliged to stay inside", "go to the parks", "do not go to the parks", "go to the beach", "do not go to the beach", "'vaccines' work", "'vaccines' do not work", "two 'vaccine' doses are enough", "two 'vaccine' doses aren't enough", "the curve will flatten in 2 weeks", "the curve will not flatten in two weeks", "the curve will flatten in one month", "the curve will not flatten in one month", "the fraudemic is over", "the fraudemic is not over", "'vacines' do not change your DNA", "'vaccines' change your DNA", "wear a mask", "do not wear a mask", etc, so that people's mind may attempt to trace a rationality between these dissonant information by assuming that the government is trustworthy and therefore what is says is true and rational, because it is basically one of the last resorts the mind of an ordinary person has in order to pursue a rationality within all the range of these dissonant information presented to them.

Shills may attempt to flood a person or comment section of a community with dissonant information so to specifically target that person or community so that they may incur the mental problems that can be derived from the assimilation of cognitive dissonance, like, for example, when a person is making a set of posts which shills do not like. Here are some examples of that technique being used. Notice the freaky images on the comment sections of these posts that are unrelated to the comments associated with them:

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/348281206

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/348061418

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/347946487

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/346786951

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/344209747

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/337693623

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/337245915

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/336403250

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/336476940

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/336295118

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/336124910

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/335179427

1.3- By making people's semantic memory to recall words based on phonetic resemblance rather than meaning. That is because schizophrenics appear to have a tendency to derive words from their semantic memory in that way

In certain "alt-right" communities, such as 4chan, shills tend to apply certain words that resemble another ones so that people may mentally transform them into resembling ones so that they may trace a meaning out of them based on the context they are being employed. Here is a list of them:

Meds - Medicine

Schizo - Schizophrenic (Ex: "Take your meds schizo" = "Take your medicines, schizophrenic")

Schitzo - Schizophrenic

Flaggot - Faggot

Sauce - Source

Em' - Them

Bread - Thread

That is to train a pattern on people; that may appear innocuous on people but by the point, it may become automatic on them, they may develop an inveterate tendency to recall stuff in a way that is similar to schizophrenics.

1.4- Shills appear to use neuro-linguistic programming to attempt to induce schizophrenia in people. Schizophrenics appear to miss certain words in messages that make them to be syntactically correct and make sense, and shills may purposefully miss words on texts and leave certain "informational gaps" on them, like, for example, by using the NLP Milton Meta-Model violations.

Schizophrenics also appear to tend to "jump" from unrelated topics in sentences, in a conspicuous way, probably because of their mental framework of making loose associations between information; shills replicate that tendency on messages.

Schizophrenics also appear to make an inappropriate usage of figures of language, so shills may attempt to make an inappropriate usage of figures of language.

1.5- By introducing new age stuff towards people: The brain has compartments, which are basically places in which the brain stores informations according to categories. In schizophrenia, certain information from certain categories appear to tend to "leak" to other categories, so schizophrenics may end up "mixing stuff".

The brain apparently needs to have well-consolidated compartments in order for it to be able to comprehend things through dialectics, and what new age ideas do is that they may end up mingling up people's brain categories to the extent that people's brain may get diluted, so to speak. Phrases such as the following are the kind of new age stuff that I am speaking about - Read them at your own risk; if you have schizophrenia or a tendency to develop it, maybe it is not recommended for you to read them:

"There is no difference between you and me; you are the universe. The universe vibrates into quantum energy that is ever-entangling within your cosmic heart"

"The cosmos lie within your unmanifested potential in your quantum soul that resonates with the vibrations of love of the trees of mother nature"

"You are the mirror of the universe, and by changing one's thoughts, one can change one's reality through loving-kindness vibrations that resonates with Gaia"

"The reflection of the everlasting animal spirit within crystals are in quantum resonance with the vibrations of love within the heart chakra of Earthlinks that are inprisioned within the unbound matrix of tridimensional galaxy portals"

"The chakras are manifestations of cave-indwelling spirits that astral travel through trees to manifest the quantum power of crystals that express the energy of divine compassion towards the ever-evolving symbiotic creatures of the Higgs Bosons matrix of the decadron entanglement of the structural dimension of reality"

1.6 - by making one to be overreactive and paranoid:

Sometimes shills may not threaten and gangstalk someone because they really want to inflict any harm on them but because they want to instill an einstellung/pattern of fear on them that in turn can be cultivated, harbored and hoarded and grow big to the extend one develops symptoms that are akin to schizophrenia - sense of persecution (may be true, but may be not), sense of persecution through farfetched mechanisms (quantum supercomputers, advanced technology, etc…) (may be true, but may not be), instead of one being focused on the present and face each situation as a new situation so to break all mental einstellungs/patterns and avoid them from forming on one's mind.

Another thing they may do is that they may send vague information to people so to make them to draw a meaningful out of them. That is because that entices people to exaggerate their perception about information so that they may be able to educe minimally meaningful information out of them, so that entrains on people a pattern of them to have exaggerated responses, not to mention the loose association aspect. Sometimes shill messages simply aren't supposed to make sense; they simply are made for one to suppose they make sense, that's it.

Schizophrenia-resembling symptoms appear to be developed within environments with lack of information that compels people to have an exaggerated perception, and in environments with excess of stimulae. Technology miss certain aspects that the brain may "ask" such as emotions and "human heat", so the human brain may attempt to compensate the lack of these aspects by developping an exaggerated perception. For example, apparently, there are people which pretend to deduce what emotions one may have experienced while writing a message just by the person writing a message, like by using a certain voice tone in their heads, and people may pretend texts have "emotions", when texts are simply texts.

A conspicuous example on how technology may have exaggerated people's perceptions are liberals. notice how liberals tend to suppose that:

1- words can be "racist"

2- images can be "racist"

3- information can be "racist"

4- texts can have emotions such as "hate" such as in "hate speech"

At the same time, technology tends to provide people quick and intense emotions/neurotransmitters, so technology for sure make people more schizophrenic. Certain social media are basically fabrics of schizophrenia-resembling symptoms because they expose people to quick intense emotions and unrelated nonsense all the time

1.7 - By making people to see things that "aren't there":

I have noticed that shills were used to make posts on 4chan asking people questions like "what he must be feeling" and "what he must be thinking" when referring to images. The true is that one cannot know what one is thinking neither what one is feeling; one may presume it based on intuition and body language, but actually quite few people in that world actually may have clarivoyant powers to do that, such as by "powers of the mind", so these posts only entrain people to develop a pattern of seeing things that "aren't there", which appears to be a characteristic some schizophrenic individuals appear to have.

Inducing schizophrenia appears to be basically inducing cognitive patterns that are akin to the ones that may be experienced by schizophrenics: Sensory overload, loose associations, "jumping", missing information, etc… It must be possible they can be trained just as the so-called cognitive biases, which aren't anything but inveterate and persistent mental patterns, as per the common usage of the term, which in turn can be either trained or weakened through mental efforts. For example, one can train the cognitive bias called pareidolia by attempting to recognize figures and shapes from clouds.

One reason shills may attempt to induce schizophrenia on people appears to be to make them more vulnerable to brainwashing, including the MK-ULTRA style of brainwashing, because it appears that schizophrenia renders someone very open to external impressions; also to take people away from the political sphere, and to make them to not be able to realize that sometimes their solutions are more down-to-earth and simpler than what they think, because schizophrenics appear to have a tendency that goes in contrary to what "down-to-earth" is, that is basically the property of one being centered on one's basic needs and immediate reality, so, for example, instead of someone thinking that for one to solve one's problems it is just necessary for the person to take simple and incisive actions, one may think one needs to do something that appears to be very sophisticated, such as, for example, having to combat third dimensional annunaki reptilians from pegasus who make time-travelling space shifting portals who astral travel during people's REM sleep to extract their adhrenachrome to infiltrate deep bunkers in the hollow earth frequented by the humanoid deep state.

Certain so-called "conspiracy theories" have that aforementioned schizophrenia-resembling feature, and it is very likely that any bioluminescent agencies may be behind certain so-called "conspiracy theories" for the aforementioned sakes.

Redpill 2 - Behavioral modulation through carpings, patronizing behavior, directed targettings:

Shills make petty carpings about people's behavior and attempt to harness their behavior by making petty demands about their behavior expecting people will narrow down their behavior so that they may have less ability to speak the truth and expecting that their discussions will stay at mediocre levels. For example, there is a term that is used by shills that are "Tl;dr", which means "Too long; didn't read", which is a way of detracting people by implying they haven't read what they have written due to the length of it. A person that has respect for others and elegance will simply not use that kind of comment, and, by the way, nobody is obligated to read what one has written. They may as well make detracting comments like "Don't write too much intelligently; I'm low IQ", so that discussions may stay at low intellectual levels, "Don't be so philosophical", so that discussions may stay at low philosophical levels, "You write the way members from another community X write; therefore (insert detracting comment here)", so to signalize people from certain communities are not welcome into a community, and comments like "You should make posts in an X way" and "I preferred when you made posts in a way X".

They also tend to be detracting, questioning, patronizing, fault-finding towards people's actions. For that sake, they may nitpick people's actions and distort them so that they may be more easily nitpicked and criticizable. They may keep throwing captious questionings towards your actions so that it may appear that your actions are wrong, like by making petty questionings and demanding "impossible" proofs while evading the realm of common sense.

Another way they attempt to manipulate people is by sending messages in a community that target its members in general. It works that way: shills have algorithms to evaluate the posts of a community, and based on that, these algorithms are able to educe information that is usable for "intelligence" purposes, such as psychological profiles, people's opinions, etc…

What shills do is that they evaluate the overall opinions of a community at a given time based on the activities of members of that community, and based on that they attempt to counter these behaviors, such as speaking in contrary to them and making posts directed to members of the community. For example, if members of a community are speaking against people who mutilate children's genitals (X), the shills may manufacture a news like "feds are having growing concerns about growing hate against X people", "speaking against X can be considered terrorism, says specialists in terrorism", "white supremacy terrorists are speaking against X", "growing concerns as speaking against X raises", "specialist says that speaking against X may be illegal", "people who speak about X are as dangerous as terrorists, says specialists", then post that in an "alt-right" community so to intimidate people. that can be done by them using their human puppets to make posts on social medias about the subject of these news so to make it appear that these news and its rumors have some authenticity and veracity.

Whenever shills want to push something X towards people, they invent that X is "discriminated" by society. For example, if they want to push blood harvesting, they may launch news like "why there is such a stigma in blood harvesting?" and "white supremacists are against blood harvesting" when there may be actually no stigmas about blood harvesting and neither "white supremacists" may be concerned about it. They may presume people that are against what they want to push are the purportedly bad people such as "terrorists", "white supremacists", etc, so that people may become afraid of opposing what they want to push and may accept them more easily when that thing is proposed/implemented.

Also, whenever they want to push something towards people, they may attempt to increase the complexity in which people regard that thing. By that i mean with what complexity one mentally regards something one knows and how lenghty is that view. The more lengthy is the view about something in a person's mind, the more appeased someone tends to be in relation to that thing. For example, if shills want people to avoid using radios, they may attempt to make it appear that radio devices are complicated to use so that people's mind may recruit an array of complex and lengthy information whenever people think of using radios, which diminishes their motivations to use radios. Another example is that school serves to appease people and make them meek and docile, because it tends to push on peoples throats lengthy explanations about events that could otherwise be explained in cogent, short, and concise manners - in that case, in case people are supposed to take actions based on the knowledge provided to them at school, people would likely to get indecise and confuse because their minds would keep attempting to search for red herrings in their minds that have little actual importance to the decision they are supposed to take and are void in actual significance altought they may be tangentially related to the decision they are supposed to take, due to school conditioning. So whenever the elite may want to push something towards people, they may do that by making lengthy articles and media reports about that thing so to paint it as something complex (even more complex than the way it may actually be). Notice all the relativizations and rationalizations they attempt to make towards heinous activities such as assassinating babies on the womb of their mothers and cutting children genitals as if people should even have a "democratical discussion" about them and let these things to be done.

(By the way, there must be other factors as to why lenghty and complex explanations may appease people)

They also have access to people's electronical devices, which facilitates them to attempt to make posts directed at people from a community, and they use algorithms for that - people who put too much emphasis on websites as being "honeypots" and "intelligence" assets sometimes are too oblivious to the fact that shills and bioluminescent individuals may not necessarily need these things in order to monitor people because they already have access to people's electronic devices for that sake.\nshills may presume they know you, what you do, what is inside your house, what are your intentions, what are you doing, and stuff like what is your relationship status (married, single, etc), where you live (rural zone, city, apartment, etc), so to attempt to intimidate you and make you to refrain from certain activities, which is also a technique of behavioral modulation. That is a cointelpro-style technique.

Redpill 3 - How shills threaten you:

They write messages that are supposed to be interpreted as threats but technically are not. When doing that, they "miss" certain elements in their messages that make them to have a sense for the sake of the people who reach them drawing a meaning out of the informational emptiness produced by that "missing" of elements. For example, instead of saying "Do not do that or we will kill you", they may say "Do not do that or", and instead of saying "We will kidnap your family", they may say "We will take them". In the first sentence, the informational emptiness is at the word "or", and in the second it is in the words "We" and "Them" which are pronouns that are not referring to anyone.

They may also send suggestive images directed to you, such as gore, images representing people pointing out a gun to someone (including the person who may see it on a screen), telling there is someone persecuting/gangstalking you, that there is someone dead at your basement, and say some cryptic obscure stuff that may make allusions to forms of persecution and demises so that people may draw a meaning out of them in such a way they may appear to be threats.

They may use uncertainty rather than certainty so to see how people will react to the messages they send to them because messages with "informational emptinesses" compel people to trace a meaning out of them and that enables the shills to assess people's mental framework; maybe because uncertainty may generate more fear than certainty.

They may threaten people that way (using "informational emptinesses") so to threaten people without being legally accountable for threatening people, as these kinds of messages they use aren't technically threats due to their lack of information, precision, and certainty.

>>295998

Examples:

Examples:

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349734302/#349734498

">>349734302

I am the ghost of the GAN dog:

YOU WILL NOT POST THIS AGAIN"

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349716716/#349716824

">>349716716

Take your leave or we'll take you."

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349715738/#349715986

">>349715738

Why do you persist?"

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349715738/#349716224

">>349716115

You have nothing to gain and everything to lose."

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349714738/#349714803

">>349714738

You think the law will protect you?"

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349714738/#349714936

">>349714738

Every time you post this, our focus on you increases."

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349714738/#349715079

">>349714738

Fuck you schizo, you're next"

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349714738/#349715181

"Do not make thus thread again. You are warned.

Sincerely,

janny"

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349714738/#349715215

">>349714942

What if you will drown, but not really?"

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349714738/#349715322

">>349714803

>>349715215" -> Cartoon that represents a frog taking off the parts of the brain of someone that is splitted in half.

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349714205/#349714248

">>349714205

Curiosity killed the cat."

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349714205/#349714252

"Fedniggers COMING IN"

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349712426/#349712509

"STOP POSTING THIS. YOU'VE BEEN WARNED."

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349712426/#349712626

">>349712426

You have no one left."

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349712426/#349713032

">>349712426

We warned you."

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349711939/#349712104

">>349711939

You are arrogant, you will learn the hard way."

Exercise: Find informational gaps that were left in the above messages.

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349710542/#349710593

">>349710542

You cannot escape your consequences."

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349710542/#349710827

"Put me in the screenshot bitch!!! I won't ask again!" -> Contains an image of a cartoon that represents a girl choking another in the neck.

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349710542/#349711110

">>349710921

You are ignorant, we are the law."

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349709586/#349709726

">>349709586

Why throw away their lives so recklessly?"

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349709586/#349709737

"In the last thread they literally threatened to take my children

What do?" -> The government agent technically didn't threatened to kidnap the person's children, but as I say, these messages are intended to have certain vagueness so that the person reading it may fill in his mind the informational gaps within it. In that case, the person has taken the expression "you will never see" as "kidnap" and the word "them" as "children", but it could be anything else. It seems the mind tends to trace the worst of the outcomes in face of the unknown sometimes, and the way people fill the informational gaps appear to depend pretty much on their mental framework - in the case of that person, he was receiving threats from government agents from a considerable time, so it was expectable that he faced the message as a threat.

Basically that is what happened according my explanation.

Here is the threat:

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/349708924/#349709033

>>349708924

You will never see them again.

In relation to false flags: When people are preparing a false flag, they may set up a camera staff to film it so that they may leak footage about the false flag to the media, so what you can do to avoid a false flag is to search for people that suspiciously appear to be prepared to film stuff on events - such as protests - and whenever you see people like that, you can alert people at the situation about their existence and you can also film the situation so that in case a false flag arises, you have a footage about it.

Some false flags may actually be done through deepfake technology, such as fake school shootings, but the problem with that is that if feds keep doing that, they may leak deepfake technology to enemy countries which could compromise the spy assets of their countries (unless they use declassified technology), and doing that could also vitiate the usage of deepfake technology and have a backfire on them, such as people perceiving some stuff are made-up by deepfakes and becoming suspicious at video footages, so certain people may need to brainwash and convince certain people to do certain crimes for them, so they may attempt to find some naive delusional straggler teenagers to do certain services for them. Nonetheless, never undermine the usage of deepfake technology.

A way to predict false flags is by checking sources of information. The government shills may instill certain notions on people through the mainstream media so that when certain events happen, they may not react with too much shock to them and be more open to accept the mainstream narrative about it. For example, if governments are planning a false flag against people who protest "vaccine" tyranny, news sources may launch news saying that a "terrorist attack" may emerge from the side of "antivaxxers"; if the government wants to make a false flag to attack the Middle East, they may say through the media that "ISIS-K can attack within 6-12 months". When they do not announce the events they want to happen, whenever these events happen, people may get shocked and people will seek explanations for these events that aren't always the government narrative, so that may break people's MK-ULTRA conditioning to always take the narratives from the government by making them realize they can take narratives by themselves without the government. When the elite announces its plans, whenever events happen, people's minds will pop up through its cognitive heuristics mechanisms explanations to the events that are according to the government narrative. That is because the mind tends to pop up the information that is available to it. That tendency is called "availability heuristic". One can influence one's decisions by instilling certain notions in that person's mind. For example, if the government wants people to pick up knives when certain event X happens, it may produce films about people picking knives when X happens and making sneaky comments about picking a knife when X happens, like making celebrities to pick up a knife with a background that contains a symbol related to X; if the government wants to make kids leftist, they may assume they are providing "unbiased" education for kids while only providing them leftist material so that naturally kids will develop leftist ideas because these are the unique ones that are available in their minds.

Shills also want to dissipate certain groups, and for that sake, they may attempt to generate discord and acrimonious discussions among its members, and also introduce on groups certain people and topics which may be reacted with contempt and despise by the sames so that the members of that group may develop an aversion for the group so that people may get disengaged from them. For example, it is said that British shills have used Satanism so to de-integrate Nationalistic groups. Apparently, COINTELPRO shills are using "LGBT for Trump" stuff to attempt to do the same thing with the Donald Trump USA fanbase.

These techniques are related to COINTELPRO stuff. In case you do not know what COINTELPRO is, it is worth to give a search about what it means. It is basically an "intelligence" program to persecute dissidents and cease political movements. You can find cool articles related to that topic on the website national-justice.com. You can search for that term there, and by reading articles related to that ye can familiarize thyself with it.

In relation to shills making it appear members of a community have mental problems: It is a method that was used in the past by certain political regimes, so to frame political dissidents as having psychological problems so to isolate them from society, like bringing them to mental wards. In that technique, it can be alleged that the person purportedly with a mental problem is a danger to society and therefore has to be isolated from it. Alleging someone or a community is dangerous to a society is a way of attempting to get rid of a political dissident as well.

What shills are doing is that they are framing "alt-right" individuals as having mental problems so that way they may open a precedent to persecute its members and the community. For that, they are using words with a positive emotional charge associated with them and associating them with labels about people's supposed mental problems in the 4chan "alt-right" community, e.g "Based Schizo" ("Based" is a term that has a specific meaning in certain "alt-right" communities, that can be translated to "unabashed", thas a positive emotional charge associated with it, and "Schizo" has a negative emotional charge associated with it because people tend to interpret it as "schizophrenic"), "Comfy Schizo thread", "Sweet Schizo thread", etc… So that people, especially naive teenagers, may endorse these labels as if they were a good thing so that that may open a precedent, make them to discredit themselves, and make them to look crazy for endorsing these labels.

It is worthy to notice that when shills generally frame people as having mental problems, they generally use a language that technically doesn't label people as having mental problems and may be syntactically incorrect, but that people may interpret them in a way it may appear that they are framing people as having mental problems (similar to the technique they use to threaten people). For example, instead of saying "Take your medicaments, schizophrenic.", shills may say "Take your meds schizo", which is technically a syntactically incorrect phrase that doesn't make sense but that tends to leave an impression on people that it has a meaning "Take your medicaments, schizophrenic". That may be because the policies of their workplace do not allow them to provide unlicensed nonconsensual psychological diagnostics for people, and the law may also not allow that, so they may use that trick so to avoid being accountable for doing what they do.

There is a component of gaslighting in shills framing dissidents as having mental problems after they make certain posts. When shills do that, they want to imply that people's actions are driven by their supposed mental problems, and their intention by doing that is to make people to question their reality, that is something that gaslighting does; doing that is pretending that a person and his/her alleged mental problem are two separated entities, so that may produce a schizoid tendency on the person who falls for that kind of gaslighting, I suppose, because schizophrenia, as suggested by its etymology, refers to a split personality. Another way that labeling people as having mental problems is gaslighting is that people may imply that the people who labeled them as having mental problems were assuming that their supposed mental problems automatically makes their opinions invalid when the reality is that one's mental condition does not make one's claims to be invalid.

Shills want "alt-right" members to think that their actions are driven by personal motifs and psychological problems because that way they are gaslighting people and undermining their drives. They may say one is acting one way because one is allegedly "schizophrenic", "narcissistic", "autistic", "paranoid", etc…

Bioluminescent agencies are behind a lot of memes, meme pages, meme channels, meme groups, including certain "alt-right" ones, like the ones who tend to get mainstream. For example, take the example of the memes of John Cena speaking Chinese that went mainstream: They were a "white humor" version of "alt-right" memes and they were probably sponsored by certain Western governments and bioluminescent agencies so that they may frame on people a certain notion about China. Whenever certain memes get mainstream, question thyself who may be interested in sponsoring them. Certain content simply cannot get a certain engagement and traction in natural ways, so to speak, on platforms such as Gaytube.

Humans have cognitive mechanisms which tend to attribute a certain emotional weight to things, meaning they are mechanisms of pondering, and what memes may do is that they may screw these mechanisms on people who are used to get exposed to them because memes tend to provide instantaneous rushes of intense emotions and they tend to portray things in a way that they are not, meaning that they tend to have a conspicuously high coefficient of lack of verissimilitude with reality. one thing shills may do is that they may flood comment sections with a lot of content that tend to evoke strong instantaneous emotions so to imbue/overload people with these emotions. it is not salutable to be imbued with emotions in that way, because in real life the tendency is that people will not pass through situations which provide as much as emotional stimulae as these content, so what may happen is that people may enjoy less real life and seek refuge in an unrealistic life so to attain pleasure, which is the internet life with memes and instant gratifications, and that is a form the elites use to make people to be wanting (lacking) of motivation. humans in that state may begin to resort themselves to "memetics" in order for them to shape their views about reality, and that renders them vulnerable to acquire a view of world that is distant from reality and be manipulated by individuals who know how to use "memetics" to manipulate people, such as bioluminescent individuals.

If you are living in a very tyrannical state with a lot of ideologically-driven agents, you can use hypnosis and some psychological tricks to create an alternative persona in your brain for you to play it in real life if necessary. If ideologically-driven agents are spying your devices, you can watch content in a way that it can convey an image about you the way you may want them to have. For example, if you want to appear a liberal you can watch liberal videos; if you want to appear a black person, you watch video from black people, etc… If they watch whatever you watch, you can also play content on your device in such a way to attempt to influence them psychologically. For example, you can make them to watch communist propaganda 24/7 by playing communist propaganda 24/7 in your devices. You can also create slides of cute babies and domestic animals such as cats so to appease the spirits of the ideologically driven agents spying you, because these people are effeminate and have motherly instincts (even males). you can also play bizarre and grotesque stuff. The content you play in your computer is left for you creativity.

You can use these techniques to make you and your community safe because the government agents do not treat people equally (of course, because of the ideologically-driven criminals there). For example, if you are a Christian at a protest against "vaccines", government agents may attempt to spank you depending on the country you are in, but if you pose yourself as a Satanic Black gay "trans" woman vegan refugee you will likely be treated better. It is better to make a group called "Satanic gay antivaxxers" while being an Antivaxxer Catholic than "Antivaxxer Catholics" while being an Antivaxxer Catholic. The unique problem with that is that people may not be acquainted with that technique so they may really think you are Satanic gay so they may distance themselves from your group.

You should view labels just as grounds. Certain grounds tend to receive more attacks and are damaged, while others tend to be attacked less and are less damaged, so you should spread your ideas and act from the grounds of your enemies so that the unique way your enemies may have to denigrate you would be by attacking their own ground. The "alt-right" endorsing labels the evil government agents put at them is like soldiers gathering on a battleground for them to be attacked by their enemies, and that is not a wise thing to do and something "alt-right" individuals appear to not have perceived.

When evil entities do that sort of thing to pretend to combat supposed evils on communities, their plan is to do that so to end up attempting to combat these communities as a whole and its members in matters that are not tangent at all with the purported evils they pretend to combat. That generally involves a reasoning on the part of these entities that consists of making faulty attributions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_bias) and generalizations towards the members of these communities and the communities themselves involving the excuse of combatting purported evils e.g "Member X from a community Z did something racist; therefore the community Z is entirely racist"; "Member X from community Z did something racist therefore he/she is racist and must be combatted", "Member X from community Z did something racist, therefore we must combat the whole community, even the members who aren't racist and speak things we do not like", etc… One technique evil agents use to attempt to taint "alt-right" communities is by them speaking on behalf of its members in a way that denigrates them, e.g by saying "We are racist", "We love Ted Kaczinsky", "They are speaking about us" (referring to criminal activities), so beware of every poster on "alt-right" communities that speak on behalf of the community as a whole and use the words "we" and "us" for that sake.

Another reason why certain evil government agents may endorse what they pretend to combat is that they themselves may endorse what they pretend to combat, and by pretending to combat these things is a way they find a legal loophole to endorse these things while being government agents, including governments themselves. Many governments that have a "racist" and "antisemitic" historical today pretend that they combat "racism" and "antisemitism" while eventually secretly funding agents and organizations that are "racist" and "antisemitic". It is the sneaky trick of combatting what one endorses.

One thing that evil entities do is that they have to keep up a bad image about "alt-right" communities because they need them to attempt to destroy these communities. For example, since the Christchurch mosque alleged shooting, certain agents have kept continually posing themselves as "alt-right" members while calling the supposed perpetrator of that event, Brenton Tarrant, a "saint". These agents are also behind many so-called "white supremacist", "racist", "homophobic" activities in "alt-right" communities. These attitudes give material for the media and "academics" to defame the "alt-right" community.

The truth is that evil individuals are not willing to combat the things they pretend to combat, such as "racism", "homophobia", etc, because if they do that then they would not have any excuses left to attempt to destruct the righteous. Evil is essentially reactionary because it cannot constroy anything, just destroy, so it has to wait for stuff to be construed so that then they may attempt to destroy them; it is pretty much like a kid that another kid has to ensconce his toys from him otherwise he would want to destroy them, whereas the righteous can stand up for one's positive and eternal principles. Evil doesn't hold any positive values, it always acts upon combating purported evils, therefore eliminating the purported evils that evil pretends to combat such as "white supremacy", "racism", etc, would incur into the deactivation of evil. Evil has to have strawmen to combat, even if these strawmen were created by evil itself, so that it may keep itself active.

If evil individuals were really interested in combatting the things they pretend to combat, they would attempt to do that in easygoing and diplomatic ways, but what they do is that they use these strawmen to inflict harm on the righteous in ways that are not related at all with combatting what they pretend to combat. For example, instead of them attempting to educate people about stuff like "racism", "implicit racial bias", providing diversity of information to people so that they may get exposed to alternate views, attempting to debate with people in honest ways, contracting "educated" people to educate people in obscure topics (such as the ones the government has actively refused to give a transparency to them, such as deadly injections), pointing out the cognitive biases that may lead people to think in certain ways, these evil individuals do things such as attempting to induce schizophrenia on individuals, calling people schizophrenics, threatening people, offending people, spreading illegal content on communities, making DDOS attacks towards communities, etc…

Tyrannical states may have strawmen to combat such as "the capital" and "White Supremacy" because tyrannical states are unwilling to take accountability for their errors, so strawmen serve for them to throw their faults and frailties on them - ideal tyrannical states are the ones in which pose themselves as perfect and blame on their enemies everything that is purportedly bad. For example, whenever a crime happens, a government may blame "White Supremacy" for it instead of assuming that the criminal justice system may need to pass through certain reforms; a government may steal its population with the excuse of combatting "the capital"; a government may enslave citizens with the excuse of a virus it has released itself, or it may just invent that there is a virus so to enslave people - in that case, that involves a psychological operation that consists of entraining people to blindly believe in the government - governments may use the unknown and obscure reasons such as "national security" and "national secrecy" for that sake and avoiding giving transparency to people about events.

Strawmen also serve for governments to intrude themselves in affairs they want through a technique that can be called "Action, Reaction, Solution". In that technique, an agent does an action that in its turn generates a reaction in a target public, and then, upon the reaction of that public, the agent offers a solution for the action that he/she has committed. For example, if a government wants to implement a digital cash system in a country, it may simulate bombings in banks, use the media to instill terror in the population about these events, and then come up with the idea of a digital cash system as a solution for that problem among the generated terror, and then find a patsy for these actions, such as "White Supremacy".

There is a psychological mechanism the "Action, Reaction, Solution" technique explores, that is the fact that, when someone is presented with two or more options to take, one will tend to choose the most pleasurable option (or the least worse, from another perspective), so what governments may do is that they may pick up a bad thing they want to push towards people, and then present something even worse than that thing they will pose as a consequence of not choosing what they want to push so that naturally, people will choose the least worse option, and once they accept that option, they will tend to forget the liberties they were used to relish before choosing that option, because, for them, they have chosen as a rational decision the least worse option among the options presented. For example, if one wants to hang a banner in the house of someone, in case that person asks to the owner of the house for one to do that, the owner may refuse it, but if the person offers to hang a banner that is way more huge than the banner one wants to hang on the house and then offers to hang the banner one wants, then the chances of the owner acquiescing to the request are bigger, because, for the house owner, it is better to hang a small banner in the house than a bigger one - the acceptance happens due to a perceptive contrast between things in one's mental framework. Another example is that a government may release a virus, pose it as deadly, and then offer people to stay locked in their homes so to avoid dying - likely people will naturally choose the option of locking themselves in case they trust the government, and then the tendency is that they may forget with time the liberty they had to stay outside their homes and then staying locked will become the "new normal" for them.

Strawmen also serve for government agents to attempt to patronize and behavior engineer people's behavior. For example, they may identify the government dissidents as a strawman, such as "White Supremacist", expect government dissidents will endorse that label, and then they may manufacture reports about that strawman and then share them in government dissident communities, such as "Studies show White Supremacists are getting extreme and may need to undergo psychological treatment", expecting that based on these reports government dissidents may alter their behavior, such as becoming more meek - that involves a technique that can be called "manufacturing information".

The strawmen serve for evil governments to stay active all the time patronizing people and attempting to interfere in their lives, and without strawmen, evil governments would succumb, and that is the reason why evil governments harbor enemies for themselves (even when they do not exist and when the governments themselves fuel them).

The solution for you to avoid being treated as a strawman of the (evil) government(s) is just by you acting as if you belong to groups the governments endorse and act for causes the government endorses, and not endorsing the labels they give to you. The redpill number 7 provides a solution to that.

Redpill 15 - The war for language and monopolization of language:

Evil individuals pretend to use a language with a positive emotional charge attached to them to attribute them to the things they endorse, such as "love", "compassion", "sympathy", "diversity", "tolerance", while attributing words with a negative emotional charge attached to them to the things they do not endorse, such as "hatred", "bigotry", "intolerance". The mechanism it explores is the framing effect, that is the fact that people may regard things differently depending on the way they are presented - the mechanism behind the framing effect is association - so what evil individuals do is that they basically associate emotions to things the way they want people to regard to these things.

That language that uses emotions as forms of communication can be called "emotional language". Emotional language serves as a way for individuals to pass emotions to each other in quicker ways than by the usage of facts, which facilitates the intercommunication of a group. It compels individuals to dissociate themselves with the individuals who are using emotional language so that they may be able to comprehend the language being used, which creates a schizophrenia-like tendency in people who are used to receive and send information through that kind of language. That is because emotions are "subjective", so the unique way of knowing what someone means by a word that denotes an emotion is by attempting to "put oneself in one's shoes" or "empathizing" with them, which is a form of dissociation, in which, in turn, is associated with a characteristic of schizophrenia. For example, whenever someone refers to something as "love", that means something which someone loves; whenever someone refers to something as "hatred", that means something in which one feels hate, but that word in its turn it cannot be used as a factual description for anything. It is common, however, to see liberals using emotional language as factually descriptive language, as they have schizophrenia-resembling features and schizophrenics appear to have problems with figurative language and its usage, so one may often notice liberals speaking stuff like "That place is full of hatred", "I wanna share compassion with you", "Your hate speech is full of bigotry, but our love wins over your intolerance through compassion" as if messages like these had much of a factual descriptive accuracy and validity. Liberals may go further and use words that ascribe emotions as if they were principles by themselves or bad by themselves. For example, liberals often preach about "love", "kindness", "tolerance", while speaking against things like "hate", "intolerance", even though it is possible to "love" "hate", "love" "intolerance", "tolerate" "hate", "tolerate" "intolerance", "hate" "kindness", "hate" "tolerance", not "tolerate" "love", and not "tolerate" "tolerance". In that case, "love" means what the liberals loves and "hate" and the liberals hate, and liberals put their desires above everything as if they were deities themselves. That is because there is a tendency for evil individuals to take themselves as deities, just like in the scriptures it says that once one eats the fruits of knowledge one will become like a god (something like that).

Another implication of the usage of emotional language is that it entrains people to be very vulnerable to the framing effect and to perceive things not the way they see things but the way they suppose they perceive things, like, for example, through the description attributed to a real-life object one is seeing rather than the way one sees that real-life object. For example, if you present a man to an individual who has that feature and tells him/her that the man is a woman, the person will likely believe it because the person doesn't believe in what his/her eyes are seeing, but rather what he/she presumes he/she is seeing. The same would happen if a woman was presented to that person and someone told him/her that the woman is actually a man. That condition tends to increase one's coefficient of disconnection with reality, so people with such a condition may "live in their head" without much contact and feedback from reality.

Emotional language may be good for the communication between peers of a group because that compels people who eventually do not empathize themselves with that group to either "put themselves in their shoes", which creates empathy, which reduces one's chances of being harmed by "strangers", or to not comprehend the information that is being conveyed through emotional language, such as in case of having spies infiltrated on one's group. Therefore, the "alt-right" can strategically use emotional language in their favor. They just have to beware that that language is not a valid way of providing factual descriptions to things, so that they may avoid incurring the schizophrenia-resembling symptoms liberals have.

Here is a list of words that are pretty much "subjective", meaning they are pretty weak as factual descriptive elements of language, which you can use to attempt to "add an effect" to things through framing effect:

terrorist,criminal,stupid,fake,false,discriminatory,hateful,biased,rational,reasonable,valid,empathy,love,correct,wrong,fact,racism,homophobia,transphobia,fatphobia,ageism,ableism,bigotry,offensive,microaggression,agression,scandal,polemic,true,false,ridiculous,absurd,critical.

For example, if you want people to regard some event with awe, you call it a "scandal"; if you want people to regard something with discredit, you call something "ridiculous"; if you people to not make judgements of value about something, complain that doing so is "discriminatory" with an underlying assumption being "discriminatory" is bad, like using a certain voice tone to convey that notion.

The "alt-right" should use words in their favor and not limit themselves in their vocabulary usage just because the evil individuals tend to use words in a certain way. What evil individuals want is to monopolize certain words with a positive emotional charge attached to them for them and leave the words with a negative emotional charge attached to them to the "alt-right" so that they may appear to be "the bad boys". The "alt-right" should also consider using the same terms as the evil individuals so that there may be no "monopoly" or "privileged speech" by the side of these evil individuals. Here is a list of words the "alt-right" can consider using, like, for example, for the mere sake of demagogy (other than the list above):

"diversity", "equality", "compassion", "equity", "embrace", "inclusiveness", "representativeness", "love", "resilience", "non-conforming", "non-binary","LGBT","LGBTQ","LGBTQ","LGBTQ+", "embolden","solidarity","person of color","latinx","BIPOC","minority", "fact check","youth","sustainable","zero carbon","zero emissions","empathy","tolerance","reciprocity","democracy","kindness","struggle","affirmative action","empower", ("gender pronouns"), "binary", "educate yourself","impassioned","disseminate","overrepresented","misogyny","sexism","ableism","xenophobia","islamophobia","homophobia","antissemitism","silence is violence","deplatform", "hatred", "bigot", "defund","boycott","systematic","systemic","microaggression","privilege","heteronormativity","heteropatriarchy","patriarchy","unconscious bias","intersectionality","classism","ageism","fatophobia","hate","dismantle","oppressed","marginalized","underrepresented","appropriation","colonialism","pervasive","problematic","construct","climate change","deconstruct","normative","gendered","normalize","folks","hegemony","superstructure", "social construct"

Just beware: Using the same language as evil doesn't mean one has to aby by the standards of evil, such as in terms of ideology. In fact, one can compel evil individuals to aby to one's standards through the usage of emotional language, because emotional language compels individuals to either "put themselves in one's shoes" or to not comprehend what is pretended to be conveyed through it.

Redpill 16- Based NLP dictionary:

Discrimination: It is the contrary of equality. It has a negative emotional charge associated with it while the word "equality" has a positive one. It means the act or effect of causing or establishing a difference. It is a word that is used to prevent people from taking judgements of value, because it is necessary to differentiate things for the sake of making judgements of value, and also to prevent people from causing any changes in the world, because the perception of a change only exists when there is a perception of difference.

Liberalism: Liberation from all the moral clutches from G'd that prevents humans from engaging in infernal acts, and indulging oneself in unrestrained libertinism, licentiousness, salaciousness, lewdness, lasciviousness, promiscuity, fornication. When liberalism is taken to its ultimate consequences, a liberal is totally consummed by his most lower instincts and suffers a mental impairment that makes the person to have all the thoughts directed by one's lower instincts.

Extreme/Moderate/Under: Moderate means something that exceeds the boundaries of a virtue and becomes a vice, just like bravery may be considered the excess of the virtue of courage. Moderate means something that is a virtue. That may be used to refer to armed militias by the midia such as in "Moderate-rebel groups". "Under" means the lack of a virtue that generates a vice, just like craveness is the lack of the virtue of courage. The tendency is for humans to seek moderation that represents virtue, so when shils may want to downplay something, they may classify them as extreme and exaggerated, and when they want to bolster something, they classify them as "under" such as using the terms "underprivileged", "underrated", "undervalued", "underrepresented", "underestimated".

Privileged: Means someone is relishing from a concession that one does not deserve. It represents an excess.

African-American: It is used to refer to American Blacks. It has the sense that Africans can be Americans. It would be the same thing as Chinese-Japanese, Spanish-Italian, Brazilian-European, etc…

Unvaccinated: Holds a negative sense attached to it. It is better to say "vaccine free", because "free" is related to freedom, and freedom has a positive emotional charge attached to it.

Freedom: There is only freedom when only is capable of choosing goodness (or the least worse, from another perspective), and G'd is the source of all goodness. Therefore, true freedom only exists on G'd. However, people use the words "freedom" and "liberty" as a rhetorical instrument. One can use the word "freedom" to refer to any actions as actions can only be executed when there is freedom to execute them (in that case it is refered to freedom in its most generic sense) e.g Freedom of speech, freedom of action, freedom to assassinate people, freedom to mutilate genitals, freedom to steal, etc…

Redpill 17- In a world where speaking the truth is illegal, speak the truth through lies:

Speaking the truth may, in thesis, make someone vulnerable to being persecuted by ideologically-driven agents, such as speaking obvious things. However, there are techniques that enable you to convey the truth but in a way that you do not speak the truth. That redpill is dedicated to speaking about these techniques:

17.1 - Speak the opposite of the truth: When you cannot state a fact X, deny the fact X expecting people will comprehend it as the negation of the negation of fact X (or simply fact X). That can be done when fact X is conspicuously undeniable because that makes people to realize the reality through a contrast effect in their mental framework, which may generate a humorous effect.

Humor is in the eyes of the beholder, and the way one will face a statement depends on the way one views reality. Therefore, it is erroneous for one to accuse another one of being purposefully humorous or pretending to convey the opposite of what one says so to pretend to persecute that person (such as by alleging one is making "hate speech"). Humor is a good weapon against tyrants and that is one reason the elite hates humor; they want humans to be attached to a language system where all people understand the same meanings from information so that they may well-define what should be spoken and what should not, when the reality is that language is dynamic so it is hard for tyrants to control it with assertiveness.

17.2 - Use fiction: The elite has been passing its ideas to the population through fiction for a long time, so you can do the same thing. Nobody can cavil that the fiction represents your views because it is "fiction", after all, and assuming fiction may be a weapon to convey ideas could put in check the whole elite apparatus of media. The elite simulates stuff on fiction that would be heinous in real-life, such as bombings, killings, etc and no government has yet whined about fiction being a bad influence for society… You can invent stories, fables, films, movies, etc…

17.3 - Speak about meanings in a tangential way and without assuming them as your opinions. E.g "Hello guys. Today we will speak about A. I wouldn't say A is B, but according person C A is B. I particularly disagree with C, although there are rumors that the alleged fact that A is B is D. In relation to that affirmation, I would not say that D is correct, but if you look at rumors that A is E, you will notice these rumors are wrong and they shall not be done. Not even assuming F is correct, although certain people may affirm F because of G, with which I also disagree. Is it possible that J? If yes, then would it be because of K or L? I particularly think J to be wrong.".

17.4 - Use codewords to substitute words and phrases. Examples:

"Speak the fruit"

"Don't take the cab"

"Cabs are made to fill you"

"shkasdhasjkasdh cut their genitals"

"shsdjkdsahds are behind (insert an agenda the elite has)"

"jsdhsdakjsdhkj invaded several countries in the Middle East with the excuse of combatting terrorism"

"A dock invaded several countries in the Middle East with the excuse of combatting terrorism"

These substitute words can be:

- Words that rhyme with the substituted words.

- Words that have a similar sense with the substituted words respective to them.

- Any words other than the words to be substituted.

- Any set of characters such as "dshuajsgdsjasdbahjfdsgnafadsjgdsafadsgdajfadsghadsfjadsgdasftywjugteyjqkwyefwghejfnthdkjansyjckfgaywjfbgajkcnfghj"

- An encryption that when decrypted becomes a substitute word (including another encryption itself). E.g: "HaEbLcLdO eWfOgRhLiRjD", "HaabEcbdLecfLgdhOi ejWkflOmgnRohpLqirRsjtDu"

- Words that can refer to different real-life things that can have their specific meaning sorted out through intuition according one's mental framework.

17.5 - Speak about things as if other people did these things. E.g - My mother told that (insert things the ideologically-driven agents pretend that you cannot speak about) are not women"; "The mother of my daughter of my father of my friend told that (insert something ideologically-driven agents pretend you cannot speak about)"; "The father of the father of the husband of the mother of the friend of the friend of the teacher of the cousin of the priest has told that there will be a major event today: (explain an event ideologically-driven agents do not want people to know they will happen, such as a plan they have)."

Note: It is good for the references to have a degree of uncertainty (e.g "The father of the friend of my friend told X" is better than "The father of Z told X")

17.6 - Miss certain words in a phrase so that people may complete it. E.g "The () invaded Afghanistan after the () flag was done by (), which was involved in () for the () agency, who was used to market () in ()"

17.7 - Use encryption.

Suggestions:

17.7.1 - Create an encryption methods that when decyphered can become many of thousands of different messages, and then combine with the person you want to send the message that the decryption number X of the message is the correct one. Use an algorithm to formulate these messages. These messages have to cover a whole spectrum of subjects and a whole spectrum of "radicality" (without being illegal, of course), so no one that decrypts it may be able to deduce what is the message you intended to pass, because there would be always messages similar to them.

17.7.2 - Create an encryption that on its turn leads to other encryptions that in turn may lead to the same previously unveiled encryptions or an image that may contain a hidden encryption or a local in which there is a hidden encryption and so on and so ofrth, like a maze of encryptions in a Cicada 3301 style.

You have to combine with the person you want to send a message a way that you can decrypt them and find the correct messages, and that has to be done in a way nobody knows other than you and the person you want to send the message, and the decryption has and identification of the correct message has to be done that way as well.

>>295990

>G'd

jew detected