>>202661
I think there should be limitations concerning time and place. I don't think a person should be allowed to walk into a church in the middle of service and scream "Hail Satan" over and over again nor do I believe a person should be allowed to walk into an elementary school and give speeches on how they like to fuck little girls.
I do think people should be able to say whatever insane thing comes into their minds in a public space. And I mean "public" in the sense of things like city parks or the steps of a courthouse, not "public" as in the aisle of a Walmart or on the server of Twitter. Public spaces are bound to the First Amendment, while private companies have "terms of service" or "company policy".
I think any physical consequence from speech in a public space, such as arrest or violent actions against the speaker, is a violation of the First Amendment. But, someone yelling back at you isn't a violation, since they have equal First Amendment rights and can also speak. However, a company or private place should be allowed to physically remove - either bodily or through bans - speech that violates its terms of service or general decorum.
>How would you deal with unpopular stuff
Me personally, I just shrug and walk away if I don't agree. People are entitled to their opinions and I'm not going to waste my time standing around arguing with someone who gets up on a soapbox at the park. He/She has just as much right to be there as I do.
>how should we deal with the censorship by authorities?
Open and unceasing rebellion against that "authority". Through voice, protest, assembly, petition, etc. Give an inch, they'll take a mile.