/pnd/ - Politics, News, Debate

>>189969

>>189970

WN 1.0 didn't realize this. They thought that they could sell people on neo-Nazism by convincing them that it wasn't racist: "Look, here's some Black National Socialists!" - "We don't want White supremacy, just racial separatism!".

This is wrong. Their goal here is to sell people on National Socialism by leaving out the race aspect. This is putting the cart before the horse. Even if they succeeded, you'd just get a lot of confused kids who liked swastikas but didn't have anything against the Blacks. When people say that Hitler was based and redpilled, they do so with the full awareness that he was, well, based and redpilled. If you just want to produce people who like National Socialism, you're falling prey to Goodhart's law. [1]

Consider how you got redpilled: did you start to ask questions about the economic policy of Nazi Germany, obscure occult movements of the 1900s, and the JQ, or did you just read about how the media has been covering up the fact that Blacks are more violent and have most likely been lying about everything else too? [2]

What we need is for people to get comfortable being racist. It's only through racism that the White race will be able to organize and fight for its own interests. Whether they then think Hitler is a swell guy is ultimately unimportant - "libertarianism with racist characteristics" would completely unironically be a perfectly fine way to run a society. (This is why National Bolshevism is utterly retarded - it puts the economic theories before the racism)

They don't have to conceptualize it that way, but they do have to be it. If they think their racism is ironic, it doesn't matter. Racism is still racism - it's a performative act of language that takes back our dominion in our own homelands, one "nigger" at a time: if you have one guy "ironically" saying the N-word, then the ten other White guys around him are going to realize this is a safe space for their racism, and the Blacks are going to realize this isn't a place they're welcome. [3]

Why do you the Jews put such tremendous efforts into suppressing the N-word? Why can you, relatively unmolested, talk about racial IQ gaps, but be viciously attacked whenever you say the N-word, even in a non-racist context?

Why is "I'm going to say the N-word" a fantastic meme, but all of the "redpill" videos with Hitler speeches set to dramatic music a giant fucking waste of effort?

Why is /pol/ tremendously successful, but attempts to translate it into real-world political parties such utter failures?

Why is the only popular /pol/ propaganda video With Open Gates?

What is it with /pol/ and (full) anonymity?

The answer is, it's not a symbol, it's just an idea, and that idea is racism. When you have a symbol, like the Black Sun, people can attack it, call it racist, and smear it with all sorts of unsavory figures. When all you have is an idea, they have to engage with it at face value. There's no way to insult an anon, you have to engage with their ideas. When people do this, we win. When we put symbols to the ideas, they attack the symbols, and we lose.

This is why With Open Gates was the best propaganda video we ever made. There's no ideology or symbols in it, just pure, unadulterated racism and hatred for immigrants.

(I say this completely sincerely; the only emotion a reasonable man should feel watching it is disgust, anger, and hatred)

So, how do we do this? How do we get people to be comfortable with an idea they, at its very core, have been inoculated to reject?

There's two prongs to the strategy: the private and the public. The public is the material which shapes the views of the broader society. The private is the material that an individual consumes and engages with as part of his redpill journey - private conversations and YouTube videos fitted to his particular point in the overton window, basically.

There, the trick is to avoid getting them to put up their defense mechanisms. When you say certain combination of words, their brain locks up. It's like your friend's phone: when you have it, you can use it relatively freely, but if you hit the lock button just once, you'll have to give it back.

In other words, we have to advocate for racism, but with better optics. It's not "racism," it's "group differences," "informal heuristics," "Bayesian statistical reasoning," or "ethnic self-interests". Not only is it OK to be White, it's OK to fight for White self-interests.

Meanwhile, the goal of the public redpills are to make the job of the private's easier. We have to wear down his defense mechanisms. (That's also why "they just call all White people Nazis, it doesn't mean anything" is such a great meme). If you see, all around you, a constant stream of racial slurs and calls for genocide and terrorism, that guy expressing skepticism about immigration suddenly doesn't seem so bad anymore. That's why Tarrant had great optics despite being a mass shooter and a terrorist, and why the Jews spent so much time and effort on taking down his video: even if people would have watched it and found it appalling, a little bit of their defense mechanisms would forever have died.

Hail victory.

1: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." ~Charles Goodhart

2: See left-wing trap ContraPoints video where "she" criticizes the leftist version of wignats (1:37–2:25):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuN6GfUix7c&t=97

Observe how Tabby is an almost exact carbon copy of our wignats:

>The character Tabby represents a lot of what I think is wrong about leftist strategy: the indifference to optics, the undisguised hostility to the ideologically impure, the sectarian nitpicking, the alternation between extreme optimism (“a communist revolution can happen in the United States and it will go well if it does”) and extreme pessimism (“neoliberal propaganda has so tight a grip on the general public that why should we even bother trying to appeal to them?”), the blurring of lines between recognizing the necessity of violence in certain situations and the aesthetic celebration of violence as an end in itself. ~ContraPoints

3: Innuendo Studios (leftist) made a great video on /pol/:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMabpBvtXr4

Edited for brevity:

>Not only can you not tell the difference between a bigot who doesn't know they're a bigot, and a bigot who knows, but won't tell you; there is no line dividing the two.

>I don't know if they believe it, but in that moment, they believe they believe it. How many layers of irony are they on? 9 times out of 10, it doesn't matter.

>We are what we pretend to be.

>>190864

Don't worry, along with Clearview AI (formerly Smartcheckr), he's still fighting the good fight and making sure our cops and law enforcement (who we love) have the facial recognition tools they need.

Douglass is always at the forefront of all the great struggles against jewry, whether it's destroying privacy, getting Jared Kushner elected president, or begging google to take down jew watch,

>>191059

> lol, it's funny you think that sentence can exist.

I meant it more in a way that if you make up abhorrent acts they didn't do, it puts them in a position they can easily refute you (which they constantly succeeded in doing at stormfront, even normies were doing it in the opposing views section). On the other hand I found some of pic related to be very redpilling on jews, most of what USA consumes for news information is jewish drivel calling that out is the truth.

>>191066

> arguing in these online sections will always distill down to key markers or key words.

> No real indepth discussion will take place here because it is neither completely anonymous nor is it tied to the real.

Yes very true. It serves as a good enough (dis)information vector though.

How do we stop the Great Reset?