/pnd/ - Politics, News, Debate

>le baste jew maymay

There are far more based white people out there than jews. I follow the "No Jews Allowed" policy. If you're a kike, then take a hike. I don't care what you say, I do not trust you.

>>166751

He's not a so-called "honest jew" anymore. He claims that his position never changed, and that he always pushed the Holocaust-lite narrative, but that's a lie that can be verified by looking back at his older work.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/KeC1k9gYoMjz/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/JV0FPnCTHRSB/

He's also close with Mark Weber, who also now claims the Holocaust occurred to an extent. Weber is of course the traitor who worked with Andrew E. Allen to hijack and destroy the IHR.

>>166819

I should also add that David McCalden, the sodomite ADL spy who died of GRIDS (mentioned on page 2 of the Spotlight report) was who brought Cole onto the revisionist scene to begin.

>>166728

In his insatiable lust for attention he was willing to point out the Holohoax fraud. In his his lust to remain alive, and employed, I understand he has recanted, again.

4ffc5c is Mike Enoch

>>166728

Cole had a hit out out on him, ordered by the Jewish Defense League. He agreed to pay them off and go into hiding, which he did for twenty years. If this was a psyop he got the shit end of the deal.

Cole was on several talk shows in the 80s and did a great job of getting talking points out there, not pulling any punches or making fake claims. His Auschwitz documentary that exposed Crema One as a fake gas chamber is still used by revisionisets today, and an excellent, factual peice of debunking.

Watch his speech at the 1994 IHR conference and see what you think of him

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iP-BUXdoQGc

He's entertaining, informed, and explains exactly how Holohoaxer arguments work.

Here's an excerpt from his Auschwitz documentary. See what you think

https://archive.org/details/auschwitz-tour-guide-caught-lying

>>167151

If not for McCalden's benefactor, Andrew E. Allen, the IHR would exist today.

>You know how someone is absolutely not a jewish plant? They fact-check the holocaust.

Unless of course they're infiltrators, trying to destroy Holocaust revisionism. Allen, who again orchestrated the IHR's destruction co-starred in three out of the four videos McCalden produced. Mark Weber also gave some decent talks over the years, and wrote some OK articles, as he had to, to be come the IHR's director.

Even Hal Turner, one of the most obvious plants ever occasionally trafficked in revisionism.

>The IHR was fundamental to revisionist work in the 70s, 80s, and 90s, which he helped fund and organize.

Which is why subversives had to destroy it.

>Watch any IHR conference video on the internet.

Look at the dates of those conferences, almost every single video is from before Weber took over, and none are from the past 15 years or so.

In 2013, Weber received $1 million from the Jean Farrell estate, which he jew'd back in the '90s. In the years since then has the IHR done more than a million dollars worth of Holohoax advocacy? Of course not.

Now, they're a news aggregator that's rarely updated. They sell a handful of books, none of which deny the Holocaust, while sitting on the copyrights to the entire Noontide Press/IHR catalogue, making sure none of the works are republished. They also carry tapes by people like Fred Leuchter, who've since disavowed Weber and Co.

I read one of the zombie IHR's year end reports, and Weber was patting himself on the back because an "independently produced video" had received hundreds of thousands of views. It was a talk from the early 2000s, with the still image of the map of Germany, that had been uploaded by a random account years before. I'm sure that's not where the millions went.

>>167149

Not psyop, just a jew being a jew.

No one has done more for the revisionist cause than Faurisson, here's what he had to say about Cole in the 1995:

>"I never suspected D. Cole of being a mole and I still do not think he ever was a mole. He is uncontrollable even by himself.

>As soon as I met him, in September 1992 at our Institute for Historical Review's office (California), I felt that there was something seriously wrong with the gentleman. By watching his general behaviour and his words, I quickly realized that he had no real control of his nerves and of his ideas. He did not look more serious than Jerry Lewis. He was prone to exaggeration, bluff and even lie. I thought that it would be naive to trust such a person.

>Unfortunately many revisionists did not seem to perceive those dangerous defects. I suppose that some revisionists considered that, anyway, having on our side a young Jew would be good for the cause. Three or four times I contemplated the possibility of publishing something (especially on D. Cole's videos) to warn my friends and other people about the danger of trusting such a man. I renounced because, knowing D. Cole as I knew him, I was convinced that sooner or later he would betray his true nature to everyone by an even more spectacular lie and by an even more serious hysterical outburst than usual.

http://aaargh.codoh.com/engl/FaurisArch/RF950612.html

A fax from Faurisson to CODOH's Bradley Smith:

>Thank you for your 15 February fax sent at 3.54 a.m. I am upset to see that my dear friend Bradley is upset. Let me explain you the whole « entrapment » story as I see it. But, first, trust me when I say that, most probably, I feel more upset than you do, since, in my country, I encounter every day great difficulties that you do not have in your own rather free up to now country. Moreover, I am overworked. People consult me from many countries in different languages and, now, for several days, I had to devote my time to this Strufhof lie which discredits, not our enemies, but ourselves.

>I knew what you meant by « back-room politics ». I wrote : « What "back-room politics" are you talking about ? », meaning that, for Roques and myself, it is not a question of « back-room politics » but a clear and public reaction to a lie published in a journal. You took the responsibility of publishing something you thought was true but which happened to be a lie. You did not see that this « entrapment » of six people in the Struthof « gas chamber » in order to facilitate a robbery was a figment of David Cole's imagination.

>I leave it to psychanalysts to study such an invention coming from a Jew who was supposedly « entrapped » by « guards » (« bad guys ») in a « gas chamber » and whose belongings, left in his car, were robbed.

>In his manner and in his way, D. Cole seems to reproduce the stereotype of « Nazi » guards entrapping Jews in gas chambers and seizing all their belongings that had been left, on the Birkenau « Rampe », in railway cars or in lorries. He gets out of the Struthof « gas chamber » as a survivor and then makes publicity and money out of his extraordinary adventure by selling a video in which he « tells it all » on « the notorious gas chambers including his entrapment and robbery by the bad guys » at Struthof. This is the way he puts it in his advertisement. It looks like the usual phantasmagoria and the usual Shoah-business. Sorry, but I do not wish to see anyone judaizing revisionism by putting in it Jewish stories.

>About D. Cole being allegedly « appointed » by the WJC for visiting the gas chamber normally closed to tourists, Roques, first, told me the story in a long letter and then, when I phoned to Mordrel to check it, Mordrel told me that this was « perfectly right ». But, please, no confusion here ! Roques made a clear distinction between the essential (the alleged entrapment in order to rob D. Cole) and the unessential (the alleged appointment of D. Cole by the WJC). He specified that the first was « for publication » and the second « not for publication ».

And speaking of Faurisson, in 2011, while still in hiding, Cole released letters linking him to Chomsky, and kvetched about Chomsky (correctly) calling Elie Wiesel "one of the major frauds of our time".

https://web.archive.org/web/20110216123506/http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/02/13/noam-chomsky-calls-elie-wiesel-%E2%80%9Cone-of-the-major-frauds-of-our-time%E2%80%9D/

>>167170

>If not for McCalden's benefactor, Andrew E. Allen, the IHR would exist today.

The IHR *does* exist today.

You can still contact them and purchase their books and media.

http://www.ihr.org

The last IHR event was in 2011. They didn't stop having conferences because it was taken down from the inside. They stopped because Antifa thugs started attacking their events.

>The IHR was fundamental to revisionist work in the 70s, 80s, and 90s, which he helped fund and organize.

>>Which is why subversives had to destroy it.

McCalden didn't infilrtrate the IHR and subvert it. He founded it.

You are so wrong on every point that I can't help think it's on purpose. I notice you're not posting links to any revisionist material, or posting any of your own. You're just attacking revisionists.

Pretty sure you're just jewish.

>>167179

Under Willis Carto - the actual founder, not McCalden - the IHR was the biggest revisionist think tank, as well as the biggest publisher of revisionist material. Understandably, they owned the rights to many important works, all of which (as well as the warehouses full of books) were awarded to Weber when he took control.

In 2020, the IHR carries 8 works relating to the Holohoax, only two of which are books - Finkelstein's 'Holocaust Industry' and Rassinier's 'The Real Eichmann Trial', with only the latter even disputing the hoax. The rest of the titles are CDs and DVDs, three of which are by revisionists who disavowed Weber and called for his resignation - Leuchter, Faurisson, and Berg. The rest are by Weber and Cole.

Strange how, as you said, there were so many great talks about the Holohoax given at IHR events, yet Weber only saw six as worthy of making available.

There's also a "Third Reich" section which is mainly David Irving books. What's interesting about it is that the first two items on the page are by Leon Degrelle: The book and DVD versions. of 'Epic: Story of the Waffen SS' (translated by John de Nugent, who wrote extensively about the subversive nature of Mark Weber and his "best friend" Jared Taylor). At one point, they carried an updated version of Degrelle's 'Campaign in Russia', I believe with a different title. The only difference between this and the 1985 version is that it removed the original foreword by Ted O'Keefe, who, like every "revisionist" besides Cole, ended up splitting with Weber.

Upon his exit from the IHR, O'Keefe blew the whistle on their plan to sell the Liberty Lobby's mailing list (which they obtained via the aforementioned lawsuits with Carto) to the ADL, releasing the emails to back it up.

>During the following year I grew increasingly worried about LSF/IHR’s financial condition. In mid-May 2001, for the first time in my eleven-year tenure at LSF/IHR, staff paychecks were deferred [Exhibit 17]. On June 14, 2001, President Raven informed the staff that the Liberty Lobby, a defendant in the Carto case, would soon be bankrupt, and that LSF/IHR was prepared to sell a key Liberty Lobby asset, the Spotlight mailing list, to the highest bidder. He mentioning two possible buyers: the Anti-Defamation League and the Church of Scientology. When I protested that such a sale would badly damage IHR’s reputation, Raven defended it on the grounds that LSF/IHR’s "current situation is not sustainable," that without selling the list to ADL "the IHR has no future." He also strongly hinted that firing me and Eric Owens, another dissenting employee, was the only practical alternative [Exhibits 18 and 19].

>I was next told by Raven and Weber that my apprehensions at our evident readiness to sell the names of "patriots" (among them doubtless not a few revisionists) to hostile groups were groundless because there had been no offer from such groups. I continued to express my unalterable opposition to a possible sale to the ADL to President Raven and Director Weber, and alerted the LSF Board of Directors to the problem [Exhibits 20 and 21].

>Despite my efforts to restrain him, Owens broadcast emails (intended to be kept internal) from President Raven and Director Weber which made it clear that Raven was indeed countenancing the sale of the Spotlight list to the ADL [Exhibit 22]. Owens was fired, but the potentially gravely damaging emails soon reached the website of Willis Carto’s Free American Press site. I succeeded in having an emergency Board meeting called in order to prevent a sale of the Spotlight mailing list to the ADL and like organizations [Exhibits 23 and 24]. During this meeting the Board expressed its adamant opposition to the LSF’s selling the Spotlight list to the ADL

But, back to Degrelle. Carto had commissioned him to write a 14-volume series on Hitler titled 'The Hitler Century', with the first volume published by the IHR in 1987. By 1993, he had finished a total of 6, which were already being translated, but we only ended up with two - the first, and 'Hitler Democrat', published by Carto's Barnes Review in 2012. The rest of the series, and Degrelle himself were Weber's victims. The attached pdf is the foreword to 'Hitler Democrat', with pages 10-13 dealing with the IHR and 'The Hitler Century'.

>>167179

>>167191

>The last IHR event was in 2011. They didn't stop having conferences because it was taken down from the inside. They stopped because Antifa thugs started attacking their events.

They've actually had them since then. But since probably the mid-2000s, they were just Weber and Irving, maybe a couple others. By 2008, every major revisionist had denounced Weber and the corpse of the IHR.

It had nothing to do with Antifa, which barely existed pre-Trump. Not to mention that Weber's best friend (and fellow shabbos goy) Jared Taylor continued holding AmRen conferences until very recently, so I'm sure he and Rabbi Schiller could have given him some pointers.

Did Antifa also stop him from publishing The Journal of Historical Review? And why didn't they stop Carto from publishing his bimonthly, post-IHR journal The Barnes Review to this very day?

>You're just attacking revisionists.

No, I'm attacking so-called "revisionists" who say the Holocaust happened, just with a slightly lower death toll, and not at Auschwitz or in gas vans, but definitely at Treblinka. I'm mainly attacking someone who attacked and permanently maimed the revisionist cause, and who's been "attacked" by every major revisionist. Cole and Irving (his fellow Holocaustians) are the only people on his side anymore.

If you're actually interested in the facts, here's Michael Collins Piper's series on the IHR from 2008, and Fred Leuchter and Jim Rizoli's discussion of it from earlier this year.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/hS0wqVU7ehUf/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ttsQ8IqtwWu7/

But, maybe you're right? Maybe every single revisionist except Mark Weber and David Cole has it wrong? Maybe the Holocaust really did happen, and I'm the jew for saying it didn't? Or maybe you're just a TRSodomite who has some kind of autistic/homosexual attachment to Mark Weber?

Since 197c8b, made me waste the time to write the rest of that up, let's also talk about David Cole's unreleased anti-revisionist film "The 9th Circle". After the archives of the links started circulating, Cole DMCA'd the Internet Archive to have them removed, but the text of a Canyon News article was fortunately preserved in VHO's "Revisionist Clarion".

http://aaargh.vho.org/engl/actual/recla24.pdf (page 8)

>The Ninth Circle is the result of an unprecedented effort by a group of documentary filmmakers and Holocaust educators to infiltrate and expose the proceedings of the the Iran Holocaust denial conference. Beginning nearly a year earlier (in January 2006, when President Ahmadinejad announced his intention to hold the conference), a “mole” – an undercover investigator – began gaining the confidence of the Iranian government officials who were in charge of arranging the conference…winning their trust, and ultimately being rewarded with a personal invitation once the conference became a reality.

>The result: the makers of The Ninth Circle were able to tape every moment of the conference…sometimes the “mole” was able to videotape openly, and sometimes, during the top-secret meetings, a hidden camera was used – a great risk, because, if caught, the undercover agent would have been at the mercy of Ahmadinejad’s secret police. The resulting footage will lead any viewer to a sobering conclusion: the Iran conference was about much more than “Holocaust denial”…it was about uniting hate-mongers of the world for an all-out assault against Jews.

>In The Ninth Circle, the footage of the Iran conference is used to anchor a wide-ranging look at what many see as a global resurgence of anti-Semitism.

>Included in the footage already shot: An in-depth interview with Mel Gibson's father Hutton Gibson (the only on-camera interview he's ever agreed to do) in which he addresses the questions that have been on everyone's mind since Mel's infamous Malibu traffic stop – questions regarding the role of anti-Semitism in Mel's upbringing, its role in Mel
s adult life, and Mel's views about Jews and Holocaust denial. To this day, Mel has refused to distance himself (or even discuss) his father's obsession with Holocaust denial and Jewish conspiracy theories…so the makers of The Ninth Circle simply asked Hutton Gibson point blank – what does Mel really think about your views?

>When Mel apologized for the anti-Semitic rant that followed his drunk driving arrest, he wondered aloud where his “vitriolic and harmful” words came from. After viewing the footage of Mel's father, the answer to that question is strikingly clear.

>Also included in The Ninth Circle: Footage of armed, paramilitary neo-Nazi units in Eastern Europe…many with ties to North American extremist groups;

>A shocking admission by an editor at one of the biggest newspapers in the U.S. that one of his star reporters helped popularize the anti-Semitic myth that Jewish employees who worked in the World Trade Center knew about 9/11 in advance and stayed home that day;

>Interviews with human rights activists in Latin America who are attempting to counter growing anti-Semitism in South and Central America;

>A devastating exposé of the acceptance of Holocaust denial and Jewish conspiracy theories among some of America's leading academics;

>Interviews with journalists regarding the French government's attempt to cover up the details of a crime ring in Paris that kidnapped, tortured, and killed Jews throughout 2006. Amazingly, some of these journalists willingly went along with the cover-up.

>This footage is just the tip of the iceberg in The Ninth Circle, a documentary that presents an unflinching look at a relevant, controversial, and very frightening topic.

It's unclear exactly what he was trying to do here, but whatever it was, one thing we can say for sure is that it was extremely jewish. Releasing the Gibson interview would have surely outed Stein as Cole. His book makes no mention of the film or his apparent infiltration of the conference in Tehran.

Keep in mind, after his outing, he threatened to release the Gibson interview as "The Gospel of Gibson", and then shut up about it soon after. Maybe he was after some kind of payout from the Gibsons? Pic related is the version of the Gibson story that appears in his book

>>167179

And to beat a dead horse. Dire Wolf (the guy in the webm) got his material from Judicial-Inc.biz. You can read the article here, a lot of it is word-for-word.

http://67.225.133.110/~gbpprorg/judicial-inc/frank_collins.htm

Even Judicial Inc called out Weber.

>Yes, indeed–boycott Irving but add Mark Weber and the IHR also until Weber is replaced by someone who represents the anti-holocaust views of Holocaust Revisionists. Why is Irving any worse than Mark Weber? Irving is no more of a shameless, duplicitous fraud than Mark Weber is.

>In case anyone is unaware of what Mark Weber did–Weber appeared on the Hannity & Colmes TV show early this year and told the world that "we do not deny the holocaust." Weber explains his cowardly position on the IHR website under the heading "The Holocaust Issue" on the separate page entitled: "About Us," See for yourself, folks. Weber was riding on the publicity generated by the revisionist conference in Teheran shortly before the TV show but then stabbed all revisionists in the back, especially those who took considerable risks to be at the conference in Teheran.

(Quoting the late Fritz Berg)

http://67.225.133.110/~gbpprorg/judicial-inc/10_9_irving_weber.htm

http://67.225.133.110/~gbpprorg/judicial-inc/w..hy_did_hannity_and_colmes_inter.htm

>>167282

Yes. They also blamed Germany for Katyn and displayed the fake jewish lampshade.

Nuremberg was a total sham. Carlos Porter has a great book 'Not Guilty at Nuremberg'.

Yesterday was the 30th anniversary of Dave McCalden's death.

Burn in hell, faggot.

By the way, H. Keith Thompson is who wrote 'Doenitz at Nuremberg: A Reappraisal', a book of upmost importance that we really need to get scanned. I think he also fucked Lee Harvey Oswald's mom, but I might be wrong about that one.

Kerry Bolton wrote a piece of Thompson - who's much more deserving of remembrance, that was published by McCalden's brother in anus, Greg Johnson.

https://counter-currents.com/2020/09/remembering-h-keith-thompson-2/

>>166728

Daily reminder