[–]▶ a76746 (1) No.153153>>153230 >>153251 >>153269 >>153626 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
Darwin being both an anti-racialist and part of the British aristocracy has always been a bit suspicious. I think that Lamarck might be a bit more correct than high-school biology would have us believe, in Darwinism you have to deal with the hand you are given whether it be your environment or genetics in Lamarckism you control your own destiny. I propose a compromise between these two extreme that compromise is eugenics, in eugenics we manipulate our species destiny through the chaos of random mutations. Darwinism is what we rely on in the wild but once we can provide basic needs for our species we rely on Lamarckism to control our civilization.
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 0ac387 (1) No.153154 >>153224
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 1400a5 (3) No.153165 >>153225 >>153318 >>153356
>the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated
wat
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ c9a5f9 (2) No.153224 >>153318
>>153154
>anthropomorphous apes
Nice bantz. Pretty sure Darwin would have lurked here.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ c9a5f9 (2) No.153225 >>153228 >>153318
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 1400a5 (3) No.153228 >>153231 >>153318
>>153225
Oh, i thought he meant those when he said savage races. I guess by savage races he meant various shitskins.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 4f20cb (1) No.153230 >>153309
>>153153 (OP)
The problem with eugenics is that it is based on feelings. Whomever is in charge decides what constitutes "good genetics" and enacts policy according to those feelings. Then, when someone else inevitably takes control, the rules are changed based on the new feelings.
Survival of the fittest is superior to genetic manipulation because it is natural. Nature is brutal but fair. If you have the ability to adapt to your surroundings and fight for survival in the environment in which you were born, then you earn the right to breed. You can't think of us as wolves or birds or things of the like. We adapt by changing our environment. We don't see well in the dark, so we invented the fucking light bulb. We don't have claws or sharp teeth, so we invented the M1 Abrams. As a species, we've already earned our place in the world because we are the fittest. What you do as an individual is up to you.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 32eaec (1) No.153231 >>153235 >>153318 >>153321
>>153228
Yeah, he's essentially saying a nigger is less than savage, not even human. In his day, savage was a technical term for primitive, uncivilized, and illiterate peoples, but not beyond saving.
It's probably clear to you, but his use of Australian refers to the Abbo, not these good cunts.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 1400a5 (3) No.153235 >>153318
>>153231
Yeah, i got what he was referring to when he said Australian. Abbos really do look disgusting and subhuman even when compared to some niggers.
Not sure what to say about eugenics. I don't know much about any modern theories and practices, but historically, it seems not that reliable
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 1c21a0 (1) No.153251
>>153153 (OP)
>I think that Lamarck might be a bit more correct than high-school biology would have us believe
In modern biology, Lamarckism isn't dismissed as readily as it once was. This isn't a secret.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics
At a very high level, "using" traits increases their heritability.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ c71c1e (1) No.153269
>>153153 (OP)
>in eugenics we manipulate our species destiny through the chaos of random mutations
It's called "artificial selection" and it's the first chapter of Darwin's book, which you obvious haven't even started to read.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 47a42f (1) No.153289
New genetics is giving now credit to Lamarck due to epigenetic and its heritables mutations. Darwin was partially right (we adapt), but we can develop new traits too and give them to our children.
In short, don't fall for their tricks.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 3d4088 (1) No.153309 >>153348
>>153230
“Survival of the fittest” doesn’t work in modern industrial society since we have removed ourselves from the evolutionary pressures of our natural environment. As a consequence, we keep people alive who, in nature, would be unable to pass on their genes. In order to maintain the genetic fitness of our people, it should be a top priority for us to try and eradicate inheritable illnesses and genetic disease to the best of our abilities through eugenics, otherwise we will be weighed down my genetic dead ends multiplying unnecessarily.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ de3ff7 (4) No.153318 >>153319 >>153356
>>153165
>>153224
>>153225
>>153228
>>153231
>>153235
Seriously, anons? You guys are wrong.
Darwin was referring to untermensch/subhumans as savages. When he mentioned the anthropomorphism apes he was talking about gorillas, chimps, and Bonobos. This is fairly obvious. Anthropomorphous ape was a very common the for these species, and it is, indeed, a fitting term.
I agree with you guys that nigs are not the same species as Europeans. But Darwin was not using the term anthropomorphous ape for niggers in that quote, and if you go around telling people he was you will just be embarrassing yourselves and our entire weltenshauung itself (because people will assume we are full of shit).
Damn…
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ de3ff7 (4) No.153319
>>153318
Anthropomorphous ape was a very common term for these species*
Sage for typo.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ de3ff7 (4) No.153321
>>153231
You, specifically seem to be most wrong.
Darwin specifically makes a major mistake in that quote when he actually includes abbos and nigs I'm humanity at the end of the quote. I mean, can you not read?
He also clearly shows he was talking about gorillas, chimps, etc. when he said anthropomorphous apes, because when he is talking about the future at the quote's end they are no longer exist, just as he said they would be eradicated.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 6c7b80 (3) No.153348 >>153352 >>153366
>>153309
True but we're fast approaching a reality where these illnesses can be removed by gene therapy. If this works then eugenics and survival of the fittest goes out the window, especially if we include robotics, exoskeletons, AI etc.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 523916 (1) No.153352 >>153353
>>153348
>Someone should waste such resources on defectives instead of using it to further enhance naturally superior people
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 6c7b80 (3) No.153353
>>153352
Where did I say that? Its reality, this technology and science exists and is being worked on. I don't support it but it is happening.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 71ac42 (1) No.153356 >>153434
>>153318
>When he mentioned the anthropomorphism apes he was talking about gorillas, chimps, and Bonobos.
That's what i thought at first too, which is why i said >>153165 . I mean, what's the point of killing those off?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 1ff583 (1) No.153362
Thinking you proceeded from something higher than you is superior than thinking you proceeded from something lower than you. It reminds you that your reason is not the one of mere body faculties and rather going down to earth makes you ascent intellectually. What a man believes he is he ends up being, imperfect particle of a God anytime better than most evolved animal. Because your reason alone that grows and improves, body withers and dies. Darwinism leads to getting most out of material hedonism, rather than looking at immaterial pleasures of intellect. There's no point in being a nigger in white clothes.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 005b2f (1) No.153366 >>153372
>>153348
>we should invoke literal voodoo and impossible magic to fix the genetic problems in niggers spics slants dune coons, and abbos and make them all white
>instead of simply slaughtering them and keeping their subhuman intelligences out of our fucking gene pool
1. All of the promises of genetic medicine in the early 2000s were proven wrong.
2. We have no fucking idea how to do any of this shit, nor will we ever.
3. Life extension will never exist. Whites will be exterminated before we figure out it, much less before it’s distributed to the white population.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 220cd5 (1) No.153372 >>153378 >>153610
>>153366
You don't even have to go far for the proofs our medicine is still shit, just look at the whole situation with Covid. A mere fucking incurable flu stirred up whole planet.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 3b8109 (1) No.153378 >>153379
>>153372
The chink flu fear mongering is worse than the virus.
Now in China they do pool party.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 5685cb (1) No.153379
>>153378
The chinese may have engineered a 'vaccine' and released it on their people without telling them. But as with all other nations the war of the government against the people continues.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ de3ff7 (4) No.153434
>>153356
He didn't mean they would be purposefully killed/eradicated. Just that it would, unfortunately, be the inevitable result of continued human development. He wasn't saying it was a good thing, or something desirous.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ 6c7b80 (3) No.153610
>>153372
The flu was a tool to impose new societal norms and wreck the economy retard. It wasn't legitimately the threat they were making it out to be. Covid is this decade's 9/11 of mass upheaval and change up.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
▶ de71f3 (1) No.153626
>>153153 (OP)
>Darwin being an anti-racialist
[citation needed]
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
