/pnd/ - Politics, News, Debate

Also,

Anglo Saxons are the Sons of Isaac, sac-son, The descendants of Abraham the race chosen by god to lead the world in righteousness, the true Israelites, actual Hebrews. The people who claim to be Israelites today are descended from the Talmudic tribes to the east.

The Sons of Isaac were evicted by Assyrians 700BC, See Isaiah (OT) and were known as Scythians who settled most of Europe.

https://youtu.be/-_pBwpOoLo0

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIt4m30BuEpDowcM8aGSDpQ

I just had a thought and this seems like the most appropriate thread to say it. You ever notice how there are very few to almost no venomous animals in colder climates? It feels like the hotter the climate the more animals rely on toxins rather than strength. Would this have any correlation to the difference between northern europeans and middle easterners? I feel like this could somewhat explain partly why the jewish race is so manipulative. Where the europeans are more like a polar bear, and middle easterners are more like venomous snakes and scorpions. Maybe this could be partly where the term "cold-blooded" came from, as most venomous animals are ectotherms.

>>136846

Video related says there are more venomous animals in warmer climates because there are more animals in colder climates; if you take snakes for example, the proportion of venomous snakes to non-venomous snakes in colder climates and warmer climates is the same but since snakes, along with most venomous animals, are ectotherms simply being in a warmer climate means there are more snakes weather venomous or not.

Really, Shlomo? I thought it's clear that you jews resemble Neanderthals almost to a t.

Let's see:

Permafrown and excessive brow ride

Chode nose

Mild prognathicism

Large, protruding ears

Apelike facial structure so many of your tribe have, e.g. Rebecca Sugar, Ron Perlman, etc.

Disgusting skin, I don't know what it is, but there's something that differentiates jewish skin from white skin, like jewish skin sags early and is more prone to moles and marks.

Stocky bodies, e.g. Henry Kissinger

There's probably more That I'm missing that links you with Neanderthals. And of course not all jews have this caveman phenotype, but it's so common. Other phenotypes are the scrawny rat, the "reptile", and the almost-white-but-something-I-can't-put-my-finger-on-is-off look.

>>136831

Jesus was an Englishman. White Rastafarianism when?

also, aryans were cro-magnons from the Caucus mountains, the garden of eden is somewhere in the mountains.

>>136858

There is no evidence Jesus existed

>>136856

This. I am pretty sure that Western Europeans are Cro-Magnon.

>>136858

Read Prose Edda. You will see that 'the bible' is simply a rip off that has been mangled of our own mythologies, gods and legends. The jews took it and basically destroyed it with the 'morality' of their part nigger bloodlines.

>>136883

>asking for proof of no evidence

You're a special kind of retarded aren't you?

>>136856

The only race not linked with neanderthals is africans and the fact they're the most pure homo sapien of all of us yet behave the way they do would lead anyone to toy with the idea that the portion of neanderthal in the rest of us that elevates us above them.

Giving that your assumption of jews having the highest concentration of neanderthal in their genetics is true their behavior of being cooperative and have the highest average IQ of any race making them able to nonviolently place themselves at the highest points of society it just further reinforces that the more neanderthal you have in you the better in modern society. Meanwhile the more homo sapien you have in you the more quick to anger and violence you are with a lower average IQ, the fact that homo sapiens pillaged, murdered, and raped neanderthals to extinction is a showcase of that. I imagine if neanderthals weren't killed off when brawn over brain was more rewarded and had developed technologicially along with us instead that they would have left us in the dust as all the races with neanderthal DNA in them have left the race that doesn't in the dust.

>>136831

Saxon comes from the root of Scythian. They originate from the caucuses and went on to form the population groups of Greeks, Romans, Germanic, etc.

Asha Logos has a good series on this history.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLru9zi8j7G3Nsz03pkBzFdv_1tRxdCMJo

>>136966

Please stop taking it up the ass for the kikes anon. The jews are part nigger. They are the only genetic land bridge between niggers and humanity. They are the least peaceful most violent terrorist killers that have ever existed and are a literal plague on the entire planet much like their nigger fore bearers.

>>136856

This, Aryans are Cro-Magnons, it's kikes who are the Neanderthals. OP trying to make whites believe that they are kikes only gets further confirmed by first reply ITT, where they are supposed to be da real jeez and descendants of the most disgusting, vile scoundrel in existence, (((Abraham))).

>>137008

>But Jews have the highist IQ

If we're going to make shit up, the Chinese actually have even higher IQs than the Jews.

>>136966

>homo sapien

I'm sure you meant homo erectus.

>>137029

No I meant homo sapien, homo erectus had been extinct for millions of years before neanderthals went extinct. You're the only one trying to make shit up because you choose to view the world through the clouded lens of identity politics where you refuse to see the negative aspects of homo sapiens because you are one or refuse to admit a superior aspect of the jews because you're not one. Someone that chooses to view the world objectively removes their own biases from the situation because shockingly thats a requirement to see the world how it truly is.

idk all the shit OP is spewing about Atlantis but I can track my family pedigree to the year 200 and confirm there are obvious genetic differences.

>>137046

Failure to state features sry:

165 professional IQ test administered several times growing up

Supplementary nipples

Math bump (occipital bun)

>>137047

supernumerary nipples**

>>137047

>>137050

Mind enlightening us on how your third nipple is relevant to this thread at all?

>>137051

Its is an example of a neanderthal trait common in my family that is not common in homo erectus' offspring. There are often many genetic abnormalities on the abdomen and especially the milk line of neanderthals offspring.

Also since I can validate that in the year 196 my family was in Finland and interbred with other royal families who maintained residence in Northern Europe. I am making the point that there is someone is this chat who can validate… haha… we walk among you.

>>137051

>Supplementary nipples

Third nipple is considered to be the mark of Cain and many Europeans were killed by the (((Catholics))) during the 2,000 year occupation of Europe by the jews for this distinctive feature. If they found it on you, you were dragged off to the inquisition and killed. Over the time of the occupation over 100 million Europeans have been slaughtered by the jews.

>>137055

Well when you ascribe literally every other identity than your own as being jews whether its catholics or africans the potential death toll is only limited by the amount of human deaths.

>>137061

I see no difference between you and terry davis warning me about the dangers of the cia niggers that are running the world and hiding behind every corner. I see the varying levels of cognitive decline we witnessed throughout his life on boards like this all the time and until the day he died he felt he was compelling people to see the world in the way he did just like you do.

>>137062

DNA testing could sort this shit out REAL QUICK anon.

I think people might be surprised at what it reveals about who is running what.

Fine. Do you think the world is in 'great shape' because the kikes monopoly on its systems.

They destroy everything they touch without fail. Now they are 'in charge' of the entire planet…what do you gather will happen? Hmmmm?

>Jews are anti-social, destructive, intolerant, mean-spirited, deceitful, et cetera. They wish to destroy, rule and kill, rob whoever gets in their way. To facilitate them getting what they want, they have developed a perverted, unnatural, destructive, evil lifestyle.

>Even though they live off the non-Jews as parasites, they still hate them and wish to destroy them. Jews hate nature and the natural order, because it’s pure and beautiful, and also because it’s bigger and stronger than they are, and they feel that they can not fully control it. Nature’s beauty and harmony stands in stark contrast to their squalidness and ugliness, and that makes them hate it all the more.

>Jews are destroyers. They are anti-humans. The anti-human Jew hates and wants to destroy all non-Jews. He will also destroy even other Jews who are less destructive and evil than he is, if they get in his way.

>Apparently, the wickedness of the Jew is genetically based. Jews are destroyers. They are anti-humans. By the act of circumcision, the Jew shows his hatred towards nature and the natural order. By this bloody, cruel, senseless act, he shows his cruelty and sadism, and that he will stop at nothing to obtain his ends. Surely the Jews are also behind the Islamic circumcision, which serves as an ideal cover and distraction from their own wickedness in this regard.

>Jews are truly anti-human and anti-nature. Jews are intensely selfish, intolerant and anti-social, et cetera. They are full of hate, greed, malice, et cetera. Naturally, other people, i.e. the non-Jews, don’t like being bulldozed aside, robbed and murdered by the Jews, and will sooner or later resist. That is where the lies and deceit of the Jews come into place.

- Bobby Fischer on the jews

>"The fact is that the Jews were known only as destroyers in ancient history, not creators. They have developed no science, have produced no art, have built no great cities, and alone have no talent for the finer things of civilized life. The Jews claim to be the torchbearers of civilization, but thorough their parasitic habits have deteriorated or destroyed every nation in which they have existed in large numbers."

~ Charles A. Weisman (Jew)

>“Jewish history has been tragic to the Jews and no less tragic to the neighboring nations who have suffered them. Our major vice of old as of today is parasitism. We are a people of vultures living on the labor and good fortune of the rest of the world.”

~ Samuel Roth (Jew), “Jews Must Live,” page 18.

>"We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own."

(You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155).

>>137066

I don't accept your paranoid delusions of any one group running the entire planet and the fact that you see no need to dial that back whatsoever after being compared to terry davis speaks for itself. He could cite questionably sourced quotes about the horrors of the CIA until the cows come home and it wouldn't convince me they're running the world because a belief like that stems from a schizophrenic mind.

>>137040

Sorry, but nogs actually are hybridized with *at least* three other ancient and primitive hominids, and it is quite likely that one of them was erectus. It is in a similar fashion as the races outside Africa mixed with either Neanderthal or Denisovans (Australian abos mixed with another primitive unknown species as well).

>>137069

DNA TESTING WOULD SOLVE THIS REAL FAST ANON

Surely you wouldn't object to this?

>>137078

How many millions of years are you planning on looking back, do you want to compare africans to fish because they originated from the ocean if you go back far enough? I'm talking about the relatively recent in comparison extinction of the neanderthals a mere 40 thousand years ago in which we haven't changed much physically since then only technologically. A homo sapien raised in isolation today would turn out the same as one raised in isolation back then.

>>137046

Anywhere between 150,000 years to 500,000 years. Nogs have archaic and primitive DNA that no other race "naturally" has (unless they interbreed with nogs), and the same is true of abos.

I don't understand why this factual statement bothers you so much.

>>137080

Subjecting the entire population to the whims of mentally ill people in order to ease the minds of those mentally ill people is retarded whether its schizophrenics or trannies. Nobody should be forced to have their DNA taken and stored for god knows what purpose in the future because of your delusions any more than a female MMA fighter should be forced to get the shit beaten out of them by a man because of that mans delusions over their gender identity.

>>137085

Thanks for these two posts, it's much appreciated. I always like to collect these types of images.

>>137086

So you reject the premise…and reject the proof that would prove me wrong or you correct once and for all? Seems like you are afraid and that you have 'something to hide'. Your DNA isn't even your own…it is just fucking data…not a car or house that you can possess.

>>137087

Me too anon…post them if you got 'em, right? I love this stuff as well.

>>137085

Do you think whatever you consider "human" to be arrived here on a space ship or something? We ALL originated from the ocean, it could even be argued we all originated from the first living cell.

>>137088

Its data that identifies you personally and makes you who you are, as a schizo I'd think you'd be the last person to suggest forcing everyone to have their DNA on file. Of course in this imaginary scenario I'm sure you wouldn't be the one subjected to that same treatment right?

>>137090

Ok crazy…does that mean that 'you own' all the DNA and alleles that you share with everyone else who has similar DNA. It is fucking coded information. Just because my computer runs code doesn't fucking mean I own random strangers computers because they run the same code. It doesn't mean that I own Microsoft either because their code runs on my machine. Arguably what I DO WITH THE CODE (in terms of creation) is mine and does not belong to my neighbor or to Microsoft.

YOU DON'T FUCKING OWN OR HAVE ANY 'RIGHT' TO YOUR DNA ANON. It is code that no one owns. What you have done WITH THE CODE is arguably yours…but the DNA, not yours. When you object to having your DNA tested you are simply being retarded since it is shed off your body and into the environment by the BOATLOAD. If you can't 'contain it all' (you can't) then it is not your possession (it wasn't yours in the first place). It is not you and you are not it. Whoever collects it stores it classifies it…it becomes theirs if they do something with it. You THINK, erroneously, that it belongs to you or something equally retarded…but all it is is long strands of amino acids that you can never, ever, ever 'own'.

>>137094

Emphasis on similar, nobody has the same DNA as you unless you have an identical twin and that just showcases the importance of your DNA to who you are as a person. Do you think everyone should be subjected to having their fingerprints taken and be put on file to be used as an identifier for whatever reason in the future?

>>137095

You're just arguing with a strawman, I never even talked about fucking anything.

>>137100

Not sure what you are not understanding about emergent code. The DNA is not 'you' anon. Therefore you have no right or possession of it.

You materialists are just kind of gross after a little while since your values are so twisted and without higher reasoning.

>>137100

You argument is that protohuman are the same as humans or that starfish are the same as humans or that chimpanzees are the same as humans all because we 'share a common ancestor' (summarized). If we share a common ancestor then a starfishes life or a cow or anything that has ever shared a common ancestor with us is just as valuable as your own life. It is just not true anon.

Do you hold a full funeral for every bit of roadkill you see on the roadside? Do you think when you are eating a juicy hamburger that it is the equivalent of your aunt shekleberg? Humans, who are more evolved than any other these creatures are worth more. Whites are worth more than niggers because niggers are just a stupid protohuman like a chimpanzee (unfortunately we don't keep them in zoos where they belong).

In truth black lives don't matter at all, anymore than a dogs life matters. They are not human and not possessed of any real faculty for higher reasoning or civilization or anything of importance.

The only reason that you would argue that a 'black life mattered' is because you think that something less evolved on the evolutionary scale was worth as much as something much more advanced and highly evolved. It is not true. Common ancestor or not, things that are less evolved are worth less given any honest means of measure.

>>137102

Have you ever seen the movie "Moon" from 2009? Thats a pretty good example of what would happen using your logic of your DNA not being yours and that anyone should be able to use it for whatever nefarious purpose they want.

We value human life over all others for the same reason piranha don't devour eachother during a feeding frenzy. the only difference between you and me is that I consider humans to be all homo sapiens and you have your own imaginary qualifiers for whos human and whos not that can only be found inside your own head.

>>137104

At the very least they are some kind of subspecies but their genetic distance qualifies them as a full separate species. It's disadvantageous on a genetic level, objectively, to be mixed race, especially white with black or Aus. abos.

>>137104

>your DNA not being yours

It is not. It is code. You can't own code anymore than you can own the air.

>anyone should be able to use it for whatever nefarious purpose they want.

WEAK you liar. I said anyone should be able to use code in any way they please. Do you think you can patent (whatever this means in reality) numbers, like the number 1 belongs to you exclusively and no one else can use it without getting your permission?

COMPLETELY RETARDED. You have got to be a subhuman of one flavor or another…or something crossed with one to advocate for this level of information death.

>>137172

You can own code and if you lived somewhere like a moon base where air is in short supply and had to be transported in you could own and sell air too. What point are you even trying to make here?

>>137361

Do you live on a moon base, you faggot?

You can own the strings of code YOU CREATIVELY PRODUCE and even this should not be legal if we are going to live in an advanced society. You can't own the letters that go into making the code. For example, you can't 'own' this sentence.

Your DNA is not something you had any hand in making. It is random chance at best. Therefore you cannot claim authorship of it or ownership over it since you did not create it. And you had better fucking start agreeing or you are laying the groundwork for slavery of your fellow human/humanoids (aka you are a kike or a nigger).

>>137365

If you're just going to move goalposts sure you can't own individual letters that make up code, and your point is?

The only one laying the groundwork for slavery is you claiming you can't own anything you didn't personally create, meaning your own body is not yours to own but your parents and if they want you to be their slave for your entire life then thats their prerogative because they own you. Of course thats not the case because you're the owner of your body despite not having created it just like you're the owner of your own DNA despite not creating it.

>>137369

You are the one arguing for slavery. I am the one saying that you can only own what you create. Your parents didn't 'create' you. They had no say in the selection of your genes (whew I have to be careful about this since this might not be totally true for all of you at this point). The point is that if you are willing to argue that someone can own DNA then you are naturally making the argument for slavery via OWNERSHIP of something that someone did actually select at some later date when this is possible. By saying that no one can own DNA as a blanket statement we are disallowing people from owning others that they hypothetically 'created'. You are proposing that people should be allowed to own others or their own DNA at all and I am saying that no, no one is allowed to own something they did not create. Furthermore…even if a genetic scientist DID manipulate the DNA they did not CREATE it or its function and thus they do not own it. This is like you making the argument that you own numerals or something equally ridiculous. If you owned it you could forbid people to use them and you would be the sole person on the planet allowed to use numerals. That would be stupid and no one would buy that. EVER. Things are held in common trust like numerals, letters, DNA and the planet.

Also why is asking you if you live on the moon, "moving the goal post" that was YOUR EXAMPLE NOT MINE. If you don't actually live on the moon that it is hypothetical and not really an appropriate example for you to use. This has nothing to do with me 'moving a goal post' tho.

>>137377

Owning your own DNA isn't an advocation of slavery any more than owning your own body isn't an advocation of slavery.

Saying that parents don't create their children because they don't know the exact way that their genes will coalesce is the most asinine argument you've made yet. Does an artist not create their art because they don't exactly know how its going to turn out until its done? Do the 100 game developers not create their game because each individual can't know for sure how their work will interact with others until its done? Did elon musk and his team not create the cybertruck because he didn't know how shatter resistant the glass on it really was?

You moved goalposts by changing your point from "you can't own code" to "you can't own each individual letter in the code", mentioning the moon was just an aside as you also said "you can't own air" even though if there was any kind of scarcity like on a moon base you could indeed own and sell air.

Your opinion on ownership and creation is so hilariously flawed that its a wonder you can even read the shit you say and think "yeah that'll convince him I'm right", just goes to show the kind of mental illness thats required to frequent boards like this and believe the shit that comes out of them.

>>137008

It's actually hilarious how it's been demonstrated that Jews manipulated the tests' results to achieve these good scores. Easy to find on internet.

The Chinese barely did any better, skewing the results their own way.

Also, IQ tests often ignore the genetic make up of a current country's population: they don't pay attention to race. So the more niggers and sandniggers in your country, the worse the results.

oh fuck, this thread again. As someone who has worked on gene mapping on Neanderthal DNA, I can safely say that Neanderthal phenotypes are red hair and green eyes. Every other phenotype is lost to time.

Now stop with these stupid threads

>>137855

There is no Neanderthal DNA left. All you have are residual indication in modern population. How do you 'work on Neanderthal DNA then?

>>137397

Are you FUCKING SERIOUS? Even with pure European recessives there are millions if not billions of combinations; none of which are 'chosen' by the parents. How many of those are gifts a grandparent and great grandparents or traits of some long lost ancestor that were completely recessive. Do THEY OWN their children as well…give me a break. You might be intelligent anon but you can't work out the logical conclusion and can only address the issues right in front of you. You have no vision, anon.

>>137894

None of that is relevant to the fact that a man and a woman come together to create a child, they don't need to be intimately aware of the "millions if not billions" of combinations any more than an artist needs to know what the exact hue in the near limitless number of color variations there are when he mixes two paints together in order to be the creator of his art.

I don't think anyone owns their children, you're the only one that thinks just because someone creates something that means they own it and are now grasping at straws to try and deny that humans create other humans so your retarded idea doesn't advocate for slavery and fall apart.

Fucking stop.

There is no Aryan race.

>>136831

CI faggots on my board? It's more likely than you think.

Just in case you need an outside perspective on how retarded you look, see the Black Israelites.

>>150268

>Just in case you need an outside perspective on how retarded you look, see the Black Israelites.

In this post a jew tries to defend it's non-existent right as 'master' over its betters.

This doesn't work on us schlomo.

>>136831

That's true but it's not just the Saxons. The Magyar also descend from the Scythians.