[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/pdfs/ - 8kun's largest library

Share pdfs

Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, swf, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


File: 82500d865e3681c⋯.jpg (382.17 KB,1181x1221,1181:1221,pol books 21 - march 2019.jpg)

0837fd No.11746

POLBOOKS #21

https://mega.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg

24 more books on the shelf

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

46cf59 No.11752

>>11746

>The Decline and Fall of Western Art

Excellent. Thank you for this one especially.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

984b1b No.11759

File: 541bcaae2d2f45b⋯.jpg (19.71 KB,297x475,297:475,finnz.jpg)

>>11746

thank you. I like "the decline and fall of western art". It's a nice and simple explanation of how things in the art world went sideways. A suggestion for the next pack is pic related.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1ccea7 No.11762

>>11746

>The white nationalist manifesto

>Written by gringer greg

>A literal homosexual who puts muh dick about white people

Who picks this shit?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e15a69 No.11763

>>11762

lol ok newfag we get it you're tough

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1ccea7 No.11766

>>11763

I'm the newfag for objecting to promoting books by child molesting fruits. Okay sure, go back to TRS.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e15a69 No.11767

>>11766

wew ok shmuli, now tell us how arktos is a Mossad front

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1ccea7 No.11768

>>11767

Greg is an open homosexual. Nice way to try and deflect. Would you happen to be one of his rent boys or do you think homos are part of white society? Couldn't be them trying to subvert whites in order to protect themselves from Islam or anything.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

26d346 No.11770

>>11746

Great books. Thank you. I just do not get why an open sodomite always get a pass..

I read his "way of men" and it just sucked.

But…whatever.

Thanks a lot for books

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

26d346 No.11771

>>11767

>sodomites are ok

TRSodomite? All right I do not need to know more.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1ccea7 No.11773

>>11770

He runs a website and does the media circus to get attention. He has close ties with TRS's Ghoul who fucked trannies and groomed children.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e15a69 No.11775

File: a53fad1de8c120e⋯.jpg (40.54 KB,500x500,1:1,cat yellow vest.jpg)

>>11768

95-99% of the people white advocates need to reach won't care too much that Johnson is privately gay. There will always be a tiny proportion of homos among our people. Johnson presents as thoughtful and reasonable and his framing of issues is effective, esp with educated normies. Market test his shit if you don't believe me.

It's true that dissident counter-cultures attract dysfunctional people at a higher rate than conformist cultures do. But most of this shit about pedophilia, grooming and fucking trannies is cointelpro bullshit, like that thread which provided "proof" that Arktos is a CIA front, or something. It's extremely tiresome and far gayer than Johnson will ever be, although it's hard to distinguish the spergs from the shills sometimes. Maybe you're a frustrated kid who feels an unearned sense of authority and wants to "clean up" the "movement". If so, you need to accept what you can and can't change and use your time (and ours) wisely, for the benefit of our people.

This is library, remember. What we do here is critique the content of books instead of engaging in superficial jewish-style attacks on authors.

>visible_disappointment.jpg

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6d5a32 No.11778

>wyatt is still around here

Jesus fuck.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

26d346 No.11783

>>11775

>jewish style attacks

Uhm no…I commented on contents of "way of men" in other thread quite completely.

And yes/….the subversiveness of the book and its low quality correlate with his sodomy.

This is not a discussion of Arktos.

Yes this is a library. And I am advising people not to read open sodomite's books for their low quality and for their subversive nature. I get that you do not have an issue with sodomites pushing their ideas. I do though. Pointing this out does not make me a "sperg". I commented on the quality and nature of the "way of men" extensively. Search for it if you want.

All I am saying we should have some standards.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7bc358 No.11786

>>11783

What is subversive about "The Way of Men"?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

54371e No.11788

>>11763

Johnson is a filthy being

(You're the only one flinging shit around here.)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e15a69 No.11790

File: 7c44ef24507753c⋯.jpg (95.58 KB,699x583,699:583,american thinker.jpg)

>>11783

Could it just be that you're already too advanced for Way of Men? For the normie numale it would be (is) very valuable, especially as opposed to nothing at all. What book(s) do you suggest as alternatives? Genuinely interested in anything positive you have to say about any books tbh.

As far as the sodomite question goes, it's primarily a matter of their contribution: their ideas and content, and whether they are useful. We like useful thing because they assist us in furthering our goals. Yes, it is sperging 101 if you can't disconnect the two issues and be pragmatic. Like I said, market test Johnson's material on an appropriate normie group: it works. But, as you seem pretty certain, perhaps there's a deeper analysis you haven't revealed. Maybe you could say, specifically, which ideas and narratives he pushes that qualify as sodomite subversion? Genuinely curious to learn from you.

tbh you're starting to make me wonder whether I haven't missed something. How far do we need to take this? Is everything published on/by Counter-Currents sodomite trash by virtue of its connection to Johnson? Are all authors who don't disassociate from him potential low-standard subversives who should be regarded with suspicion? I have enjoyed Guillaume Durocher's writing but maybe I need to stop. Should we ask Durocher to confirm somehow that he isn't a sodomite, or a pedophile, or that he wasn't groomed by Johnson? What level of evidence should we demand? Please enlighten me, fellow bookreader.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

cc75b6 No.11791

File: a76b0f2cf262039⋯.gif (392.32 KB,500x609,500:609,429f1a5bdb6150e5db1a049548….gif)

Great work as always.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

26d346 No.11814

>>11786

Reposting my stuff from other thread:

Masculine traits:strength, courage, mastery and honor. I agree. mostly however:

"Mastery is a man’s desire and ability to cultivate and

demonstrate proficiency and expertise in technics that aid

in the exertion of will over himself, over nature, over

women, and over other men."

Man should not exert his will over nature because the nature's laws are superior to human will. Maybe this was not meant this way but it kind of implies man can change nature(this is the basis of leftism)

Moreover the mastery here does not refer to self mastery which is an essential part of masculine archetypes as put by Evola - man the warrior and the ascetic. But I understand that sodomy itself is a negation of nature, the ultimate rejection of it an example of "man exerting his will upon nature in order to fullfil his hedonistic desires." So that's why sodomy and self-mastery do not go hand in hand because the sodomite is a slave of his passions.Man must be able to control himself before leading others.

Then the chapter "honor" makes little sense because of the lack of "mastery" Donovan considers mastery to be simply some ability to do something - set a fire, produce a weapon, play the music

Another chapter is moral relativist masturbation, as expected from the likes of the author.

>There is a difference between being a good man and

being good at being a man.

Being a good man has to do with ideas about morality,

ethics, religion, and behaving productively within a given

civilizational structure.

Being good at being a man is about being willing and

able to fulfill the natural role of men in a survival scenario.

A man who is more concerned with being a good man

than being good at being a man makes a very well-

behaved slave.

In other words: It makes no difference if you're immoral, lack self control as long as you fit the physical demands of being strong, courageous to do sth.

Then there is Bonobono masturbation society chapter which talks about how everyone fucks everyone and that chimpanzee model is the masculine way while Bonobono is more of feminine model (with mentioning a "fun fact" that homosexual intercourse is a part of bonobono)

tl dr He projects his perverse tendencies upon all men, his insights on masculinity are not that great, if not merely superficial. just put into a coat of being sophisticated (guys guys I know what virtus means…and so on) As I have said: Evola;s chapter of 10 pages in revolt against the modern world will tell you more than 200 pgs of "the way of men" The book has very few good points among the garbage put there. Nothing that would change you anyway, just confuse your worldview if you do not yet see through bullshit clearly. As you say you do not remember much from the book. Neither did I but I knew which chapters were troublesome for me.

>>11790

Look I have read the book and the bonobono degeneracy is subversive. Unrepentant sodomite is subversive. If he was a former sodomite with clear cut ideas I would have no problem probably. This is not the case.

Look man. If you want a good book, gram Codreanu instead of people who literally put their dicks into someone's shit.

>Genuinely interested in anything positive you have to say about any books tbh.

I would recommend:

For my legionaries

Revolt against the modern world

Homilies against the jews

Ride the Tiger

Metaphysics of war

Hammer of the patriot

Twilight over england

Men among the ruins

Jose Antonio primo de rivera - selected writings

Handbook for rightwing youth

And so on…those are books I have read and those are solid. Just because I dislike Greg…that does not mean I disregard all boks as "below the level" not at all. But the way of men simply has very little value and has problematic ideas pushed in that. Which I believe is caused by him being a sodomite. Ideas such as man subduing the nature by his own will (on part of their passion sodomites do exactly this) while disregarding the main point of morality and spiritual struggle. Then there is the bonobono degeneracy. I have notes from the book and I did not write down everything. Those arejust things that I can recapitulate more than 1 year after reading the book.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

26d346 No.11815

>>11814

Sorry for the terrible reddit format, it came out as this when I copied it from other thread.

>>11790

"Numale normie" won't read this garbage because they read even worse stuff. He wont read "reactionary literature". Of course…if by "numale normie" you mean a TRS pro-sodomite alt-righter. Then yes.

If you want to waste your time reading low quality books filled with degenerate ideas, be my guest. There are tons of good books in /pol/ collection so I will go after those.

All I am doing is warning other guys about this.

As your last question is concerned:

Again I want nothing to do with unrepentant sodomites and their "big tent" to impress normies by talking about buttsex and dildoes.

No thanks.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ab2f58 No.11817

>>11815

I agree with you on those books you listed, but they're intimidating as hell for a normie, especially evola, which not everybody is cut out to read. It's a question of getting the normie to take their first few steps AND in a way that's achievable for their ability level, AND not too jarring, considering their existing worldview. Giving them Way of Men or Johnson's manifesto is kind of like getting people started with historical revisionism by suggesting Buchanan's Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War. Some people can immediately go all in, but most need to do it gradually, especially if they're "educated." Anyway, we tend to look back at our first few steps and think it's cringey and lame, but how important are those first steps. So I tend to think variety is important, and as I said, I've seen Johnson convince a lot of educated-types.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a13c30 No.11818

>>11762

Criticizing achieves nothing. There are a million of those for every one who does anything.

Make a better pack yourself, that would be useful.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1bdb1b No.11864

>>11768

That's not even the worst thing about him. He promotes leftism and he's also just a shit philosopher in general.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]