No.6861
There was a thread on /v/ recently where anons compiled their ideas on how undertale could be fixed. If you want a tl;dr on it, the basic gestalt was "improve gameplay, better story, better visuals" but that's just the tip of the proverbial iceberg of discussion that happened
here's the archive
http://archive.is/hSXjb
and here's the thread if it's still up
>>>/v/16513251
<BO edit: Updated Archive>
http://archive.is/4GgCR
<Edit: there was a good post right as the thread was about to die and I just caught it in time, so here's an even more updated archive>
http://archive.is/Sz3hE
<again>
http://archive.is/rrDe8
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
Post last edited at
No.6862
>when you have this really cool character in your story but you realize you suck ass at writing dynamic characters so you write him but static for another character and shelve that first character for 99% of your story because writing static characters is easier
>when you don't write another dynamic character in your entire story because of this
can't suck at writing if you're writing a brick wall
Tony "Fox" Banks is a fucking faggot
*ftfy fag lol
(USER WAS BANNED FOR NIGS LOL) Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
Post last edited at
No.6863
There's kind of an issue if we're looking to /v/ for answers on what to do to "fix" undertale, considering a good deal of them are stuck in GAY THEORY limbo about the game.
(USER WAS BANNED FOR POISONING THE WELL ) Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6864
>>6863
>dude, just stop discussing it
go home mark
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6865
>>6864
No, I'm all for discussing it, I just don't think it's going to lead to something constructively productive. It would certainly be entertaining.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6866
>>6865
Well, if you read the thread, it sure as hell was productive.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
No.6867
last two posts made
I'm inclined to disagree with fd9152 because something felt off about the whole over world to me
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
