>>6322
Human Rights are generally concerned with saying that a government is required to provide goods and services to everyone, like water, or refuge. Those are "positive rights", in that, you have to give them to someone. Other theories, like, Natural Rights, or rights that you have in the bible, have nothing to do with the idea of "Human Rights". In that, these rights are not a list of things that you would be entitled too, like Human Rights.
The biggest issue with the idea of Human Rights is that it has to be enforced on the world by a higher world-government that is above all smaller governments. That uses it's theory of "Human Rights" to threaten and wage economic and conventional wars against all other nations in the world. It's incompatible with the idea that the government of a nation has sovereignty over that nation. So if you think that the king is the sovereign of his nation, that isn't compatible with some kind of organization like the UN.