This world has grown SOFT and WEAK. With its suited politicians and political animalism, the republican animals move to their fodder to chew up the mash called 'politics'. They gobble it up. They are comfortable like lemmings, consuming the mash without knowing its poison. These political carnivores eat each other up; they have no discipline. What's the matter with the world and immigration being rampant and the rise of ideologies? The matter is democracy feeds off how bankrupt civilization has become. They have even been content to be called 'one of the animals' and 'on par with animals' without understanding the implications of these terms.
Suit-wearing parliamentarians. Their worship of 'economics' while having an economic union that regulates increasingly, their political fanaticism with being so-called 'socialists', 'social democrats', 'conservatives', 'green partisans', 'communists'; aka the will of NOTHING aka the will of ideology. They choose to be something else rather than human. How is it our fault they do this to themselves? They have destroyed communities and destroyed the identity of nation. They have profaned the sacred and virtuous office of kingship, that of monarchy, with their pandering as the political class.
<"You're wild, absolutely CRAZY; how could you say that, OP?"
It might seem wild, but nature is a cruel beast.
>REGICIDE & TYRANNY
This is the go-to complaint for the political class. How about it? We have all learned the names of tyranny and justification for regicide. We have the name of tyranny so in-grained in our mind, that monarchy becomes the evil government and the virtues of aristocracy and democracy triumph in comparison. As monarchists, we all recognize that monarchy is the best of governments, and tyranny has the potential worst, as we tend to balance the good with the bad. However, these political animals are utopians. They want the best all the time. I would argue we have forgotten the 'tyranny' of republicanism in this day and age. We only memorized the name of 'tyranny', but we forgot the so-called 'tyranny' of republicans.
>OLIGARCHY & PLUTOCRACY
Oligarchy is the extended 'naughty word' for aristocracy. We might be surprised to know that oligarchs and aristocrats can become 'like tyrants'. This is the most prominent abuse in the world today. With social contract theory and economic ideals above spiritual reality, there is the abuse of immigrants as justified members of "The People" and people question the ethnicity of monarchs; in the world today, there is a Muslim mayor of London. How could this be excusable? Social contract theory, and the idea of 'choosing leaders', has evolved into 'leaders choosing their people'. We need the check and balance of a tyrant to whip these parliamentarians into shape. They talk about regicide lightly, but the whip will inflict a LASH. It doesn't merely kill as much as it punishes evil-doers. We need a bit of tyranny to whip the world back into shape with the parliamentarians postponing Brexit with their insufferable arrogance. These are aristocrats who LOVE hierarchy until it comes to them being subordinate to a higher authority aka a king, and their solution to this is political mechanism over monarchy with OLIGARCHY.
>ANARCHY & COMMUNISM
These unruly animals want a despotism of turning everyone into manual labors. GIVE THEM THE COSSACK'S WHIP!
>WE HAVE FANCIED OLIGARCHY AND ANARCHY
Anarchy and oligarchy have proven worse for being subversive nuisances on society. Everyone knows what tyranny looks like, but we have forgotten the appearance of oligarchy and anarchy. We have forgotten what their abuses look like. The 'aristocrats' and the political class love hierarchy and love their economic tyranny and regulations to benefit them over the lower classes and other businesses, forgoing the name of competition. While the anarchist and communist wants to turn the world into a collectivized worker ant hivemind of the Proletariat. We believe that 'voting will resolve this', but that is a LIE.
Consider this: Voting and what constitutes these 'representative governments' constitute 'THE PEOPLE'. However, not all of the PEOPLE are equal. How much of the vote constitutes the Rich? How much of the vote constitutes the Poor? In aristocracy, it is the Rich over the Poor. In democracy, it is the Poor over the Rich. In oligarchy, it is the Rich without hierarchy above them, without responsibilities, and without good principles and abuse. In anarchy, it is the rule of the poor without responsibilities, without hierarchy, and without good principles.