>>12
I don't want to focus sorely on Ted, he's a focus because he's the main anarcho-primitivist philosopher.
I agree that he indeed did a terrible decision on doing such small-scale terrorist attacks, but I think it made a huge impact on some people (after all, we are here on a luddite board). I don't know what else he could do. He was frustrated by technology, and he couldn't fight it, but he had to do something at least. In his manifesto he outlines how his favourite wilderness path (some river, I believe) was ruined by technological machines (in the form of cutting down trees and making asphalt roads).
I also agree that we should limit our use of technology, but I have some more «radical» views. I consider post-agricultural society the starting point of human degeneration. If you'd like me to add more to that, ask away.
>>13
I think he's very trustable, sorely due to the fact that he actually admitted to that, and it being a technological problem… To say some controversy, I think (and many people do as well) that homosexuality has some roots in nature, but the widespread adptation of it is highly a technological problem.
>So stop idolizing him
I don't know who to else idolize, to be honest. Zerzan is an absolute fuckwit, and a retarded anarcho-communist. He thinks that [b]natural[/b] hunter-gatherer societies were non-patriarchal and everyone was equal! Of course, Ted runs him to the ground in his essay (https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-the-truth-about-primitive-life-a-critique-of-anarchoprimitivism.pdf).