[ / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / egy / fur / polk / pone ][Options][ watchlist ]

/lit/ - Literature

Discussion of Literature

Catalog

You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

Liberate tuteme ex Excelsior!

Related boards:
[Philosophy] [History] [Cyberpunk]

With themes and topics of related boards we claim no expertise, but they are welcome here as well.

File (hide): 0cce69c9b9bd712⋯.jpg (184.92 KB, 649x1788, 649:1788, nice spooks nerd.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

 No.11977>>11993 >>12052 >>12486 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

The False Principle of Our Education:

What do we complain about then when we take a look at the shortcomings of our school education of today? About the fact that our schools still stand on the old principle, that of will-less knowledge. The new principle is that of the will as glorification of knowledge. Therefore no “Concordat between school and life,” but rather school is to be life and there, as outside of it, the self-revelation of the individual is to be the task. The universal education of school is to be an education for freedom, not for subservience: to be free, that is true life.

Now if the idea and impulse of modern times is free will, then pedagogy must hover in front as the beginning and the aim of the education of the free personality. Humanists, like realists, still limit themselves to knowledge, and at most, they look to free thought and make us into free thinkers by theoretical liberation. Through knowledge, however, we become only internally free, (a freedom moreover, that is never again to be given up); outwardly, with all freedom of conscience and freedom of thought, we can remain slaves and remain in subjection. And indeed, external freedom is for knowledge just that which the inner and true, the moral freedom, is for the will.

In this universal education, therefore, because the lowest and highest meet together in it, we come upon the true equality of all for the first time, the equality of free people: only freedom is equality.

Is Max saying that it doesn't matter wheter the knowlege is abstract or practical, because both are necessary for a free man?

 No.11986

In case you haven't noticed the educational systems pretty much everywhere both in their structures and in the curricula are non meant to create free people neither inwardly nor outwardly.


 No.11993>>11996

>>11977 (OP)

>Stirner

Obtuse mess, and really just more of the old and tired materialist-shtick.

>Can you SEE morality? No? Checkmate, Kant!

I can't say I didn't enjoy The Ego and its Own, but it was about a hundred pages too long and better as a collection of more or less related thoughts than as the systematic treatise it was meant to be.

Oh, and I really don't get why leftists think he's their friend. Yes, he said that wage labor is dehumanizing, but he would also be indifferent towards any kind of moral opposition to it as well as to the very concept or class interest.


 No.11996>>11997 >>12026 >>12105

File (hide): f41e1bc8c0ac0ac⋯.png (803.98 KB, 1720x2988, 430:747, Egoist Anarchism has never….png) (h) (u)

>>11993

The ego is the creative nothing. He makes any kind of property his own: manness, objects, causes. Max talked more about spooks, but these are not the only way others oppose him.


 No.11997>>12013

>>11996

I've read the book myself. I don't need the basics explained to me.


 No.12013>>12016

>>11997

So why are you saying he's materialist?


 No.12016>>12018

>>12013

I mean that in the metaphysical sense, not the ethical.


 No.12018

>>12016

I don't think he differentiated, but meant the ego is the basis for both.

Maybe it's not a significant difference. The way the consciousness takes credit is not so unlike the state thinking it's imposing its law.


 No.12026

>>11996

So in better future society we will turn into primitive animals living like cavemen?


 No.12052>>12063 >>12086 >>12454

>>11977 (OP)

The ego is a spook.


 No.12063

File (hide): 37283f7f0b307f4⋯.jpg (76.89 KB, 666x499, 666:499, v8ccqht.jpg) (h) (u)

>>12052

No, not at all


 No.12086

>>12052

>the nothing is a spook


 No.12105

>>11996

What's stopping me from burning all of his books and effectively erasing him from history?


 No.12160>>12161 >>12171

File (hide): d78907ba51e17f9⋯.jpg (430.27 KB, 600x900, 2:3, evaesthetic.jpg) (h) (u)

Is there anything that can't be construed as a spook?


 No.12161>>12171

>>12160

True communism.


 No.12171>>12263

>>12161

No. Communism is just another ideology that restricts the unique one.

>>12160

A spook is really just any idea that controls you, but especially ideologies or beliefs. Calling everything a spook is retarded memery.


 No.12263

>>12171

Stirner doesn't have a problem with describing his ideology, only with subordinating the unique to one.


 No.12454

>>12052

>le spooky man

ebin :-DDdD


 No.12465

>stirner tries to trespass on somebody's property

>his head gets blown off by several high velocity rounds

KEK


 No.12486

>>11977 (OP)

>Stealing nazi memes and putting it on 9gag then reposting it on 8ch

This is a whole new level of faggotry




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
19 replies | 3 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / egy / fur / polk / pone ][ watchlist ]