No.94280
/liberty/, if you have not heard yet, thots that make money through private Snapchat and chaturbate and the like are now being reported to the IRS for avoiding to pay they're taxes.
Most of you may think that this is bad, given the nature of this board but I would say this is great for us and let me explain why:
Since these women are by and largely leftist, they support higher taxes. The only thing (and rather unsuprising I might add,) is that they haven't actually been paying them since they've been making they're money under the table. This should wake them up and hopefully get them stirred up about taxation or at least the IRS in general, and when pretty ladies that make people's pp hard are pissed at something, white knights are almost certain to follow in their footsteps.
It may seem contradictory to rat them out to the IRS but I think that it would be an overall win for libertarianism if we keep on doing this.
No.94281
>Most of you may think that this is bad
It's fine by me, I don't offer the enemy courtesies that he will not offer to me.
No.94282
>>94280
I could care less tbh, but this sounds oddly similar to the porn reporting going on in China right now.
No.94286
>>94280
I don't think they'll learn, but it's fine to see the same treatment they ask for others coming to them.
Also this >>94281
Anyway, I don't think it's right what they're doing to the thots, but just because I think something it's wrong and I don't endorse it, it doesn't mean I can't enjoy it if it happens.
No.94295
>>94286
So schnaudenfreude basically.
No.94306
>taxation is theft
>degeneracy is good
>females are liberated
>legitimize prostitution
>hours increased and wages cut
>fap to cuck porn
>Haven't you read le smart Jew book?
The LOLbertarian arguments everyone.
No.94343
>>94280
That's pretty funny.
No.94344
>>94306
Point to someone, anyone in this thread that advocated for points 2 through 7 in your list. Take your time, I'll wait.
No.94366
reporting people to the state to own the statists
i love theft now
No.94367
>>94366
Should we advocate for the police allowing murderers to go free just because their position as law enforcement is illegitimate? While it is preferable that theft does not occur and the state not exist, so long as the state does exist, and so long as theft does occur, it is only in our best interest that our enemies are the ones who feel these violations instead of us.
No.94400
>>94367
>murderers
>sex workers of unknown tax compliance.
Wew, lad. Never met libertarians?
No.94403
>>94400
You're completely avoiding the main point. We generally agree here that taxation is wrong, so we can accept that as a basis. With that in mind, it's not in our best interest to attempt to wield it as a political weapon. It would instead seem like the only reason it is failing is because of our interference with it. If the goal is cultural change, it is best to let the tax system fail on its own.
No.94404
>supporting roosh ever
i hate thots as much as the next guy, but come on.
No.94405
Loving how upset people are that some spergs refuse to let women game the system. Women gaming the system is probably one of the biggest reasons for the existence of the state as we now know it. Make the evil of the state hit home with women and you might find them grow weary of it for once.
No.94410
>>94404
I'll retract my statement after looking into it a little. Still don't like Roosh, but these thots deserve all they have coming to them.
No.94415
>>94403
>it's not in our best interest to attempt to wield it as a political weapon.
Care to explain why? The way I see it, as long as taxation exists its in our own interest to make sure it affects our enemies the most and our allies is the least. We can continue to educate people on taxation while simultaneously making tactical decisions with regards to day-to-day politics.
No.94418
>>94415
Not only this, but when you allow people to live double standards with regards to the law (tax for you, not for me) you allow their moral fibre to rot. Complicity in any crime breeds more crime.
No.94421
No.94423
>>94421
>being part of any kind of group for any reason in any kind of context is wrong
Tell me, have you rejected your family surname and disowned your parents yet?
No.94441
>>94421
>libertarians are individualists! You're not allowed to cooperate! Stop being effective!
>>>/pol/
No.94463
>Non-libertarian-capitalists : "There's an army of sex workers not paying taxes!"
<Libertarian capitalists : "That's terrible! How dare they engage in economic activity without my approval! Also, they're dodging their responsibility to support the expansion of the state!"
…the absolute state of /liberty/
No.94464
>>94463
No one in this thread said that.
No.94466
>>94280
These websites typically report this stuff to the IRS already.
No.94467
>>94464
>No one in this thread said that.
Hmm, let's check that.
>>94281
>if you are a tax-dodging sex worker, you are the enemy
>>94367
>being a sex worker and/or tax evader is literally worse than murder
>>94415
>if you are a tax-dodging sex worker, you are the enemy
>>94418
>people not paying taxes is the rot of morals! THE DOWNFALL OF SOCIETEH!!!
Yeah. "No one." I wonder if it's the same "no one," or different "no ones."
No.94469
>>94467
>calling whores whores is statism
>schadenfreude at whores' expense is statism
Back to C4SS with you.
No.94486
>>94469
<Libertarian capitalists : "That's terrible! How dare they engage in economic activity without my approval! "
…of course, despite your minimization NOW, it kinda went hella beyond that.
No.94502
>>94463
>making up shit libertarians never said, because you get BTFO in arguments by shit they did say
The absolute state of /nupol/…
No.94503
>>94486
</pol/: whores should be exempt from taxation!
Oh sweety…
No.94511
>>94467
The very first proof of your thesis here was someone saying "well, I don't care if statists get smashed by the government, they wouldn't help me." not "lol I don't like whores" so I don't even want to read the rest of them. Try harder, my friend.
Also for the record: Taxes are extortion and tax fraud and tax evasion are crimes of bureaucracy and are, therefore, not legitimate crimes.
>>94486
>hella
>>94503
>sweety
Stop being gay.
No.94514
>>94511
>The very first proof of your thesis here was someone saying "well, I don't care if statists get smashed by the government, they wouldn't help me." not "lol I don't like whores"
<of course, "being a whore" is proof of statism, while facilitating government force is "not statist" in this persons' construction, meaning it's a completely meaningless slur which means… "sex worker."
lol.
I guess "Libertarian capitalists" will do anything to enforce market regulations and/or expand taxes.
No.94516
>>94467
>if you are a tax-dodging sex worker, you are the enemy
only if they consume more welfare than they pay in taxes, which being women they most likely do
No.94518
No.94523
>>94395
what the fuck is an SW?
>>94411
accurate
No.94527
>>94514
Get out of here slut. You can't simultaneously want taxes and expect to be exempt from them.
No.94528
No.94530
>>94523
>>94528
fuck im slow, it's sex worker.
No.94558
>>94527
BEING NEKKID IS ADVOCATING A TAX INCREASE! SO IS POSTING THINGS I DON'T LIKE ON THE INTERNET!!
No.94561
Consequentialist ancap master race reporting in. The least bad tax policy is to lower the rates and widen the base. If everyone has skin in the game, they'll be more concerned about government taxing them and influencing their lives, thus making transition to a libertarian order easier.
No.94562
>>94558
>if I misspell it with capslock on maybe it will stop being true
How dense do you have to be to not realize that e-begging whores living off gibs like getting free shit, and support policies that involve the government giving free shit away?
No.94622
>>94562
>A VOLUNTARY TRANSACTION CONTRACTED BETWEEN TWO PARTIES IS WELFARE GIBS AND PROOF OF STATISM!!
t. ancap
No.94630
>>94562
>incel flag
no surprise there
No.94639
>>94622
He's a redpilled on economics conservatard, not an ancap though. He's all in for imposing religion, race spooks and using generalist assumptions on individuals to justify his position and only economic literacy prevent him from being a hard-on poltard and wanting a socialist state to enforce that presumably.
No.94641
>>94639
Religion and race spooks don't need to be "imposed," the market simply puts pressures on people to adopt productive and desirable behaviors. Adn as long as you're not supreme autismo, there's nothing stopping you from using both individualist judgement and generalist assumptions about demographics to judge people. I am individualist when I decide whether or not my coworker is an asshole. But when deciding whether it's a good idea to move to a house on MLK Jr Boulevard, it's far more expedient to make use of demographics and generalist assumptions rather than interviewing each of my neighbors individually.
No.94697
>>94639
>He's a redpilled on economics conservatard
<doesn't even communism
Yeah.
Bluntly, I doubt it even goes that far. Xe's something-pilled on… kicking black people out of xir establishment, which technically violates even the most basic principles of libertarian market theory (will sell for X + "lol psych" = fraud).
Basically, a /pol/tard with shit for theory with a jack-the-ripper relationship to women and an eagerness to lie and make shit up to shut down voluntary market transactions… OTHER PEOPLE'S voluntary market transactions.
It's… sad.
No.94838
>>94639
Spooks could not exist even if imposed.