[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1917 / 8teen / had / hikki / htg / leftpol / monarchy / sw ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


WARNING! Free Speech Zone - all local trashcans will be targeted for destruction by Antifa.

File: 666d2690cae4ffe⋯.png (115.92 KB, 1181x717, 1181:717, 666d2690cae4ffec3bbbe2873c….png)

 No.72691

If you shit in the woods and they're privately owned, but the private owner has banned restrooms, then is it an NAP violation? Assume the woods are fenced in and that either the animals or something the single shit doesn't effect is the reason for the privatization.

Better question for deeper noggin' turning. If the NAP is violated and no one knows/will find out, was the NAP violated? What if no one cares?

 No.72692

>>72691

Does it matter if NAP was violated, not was it violated*


 No.72695

Depends on who owns the bear


 No.72696

If it is an emergency shit, I see no violation. The owner should have had adequate facilities.


 No.72697

>>72696

The fault would be with the trespasser, and the fact that an invitation on to someone else's property does not constitute a guarantee of restroom facilities.


 No.72702

>>72691

>NAP

>-Non Aggression Principle

>Aggression

>-Aggression is a response by an individual that delivers something unpleasant to another person.


 No.72703

>>72702

>-Some definitions include that the individual must intend to harm another person. Predatory or defensive behavior between members of different species may not be considered aggression in the same sense.


 No.72741

>>72691

judge decides whether NAP was violated


 No.72743

>>72702

TIL shouting violates the NAP


 No.72799

>>72743

remember, you're forgetting the clause that aggression should be responded to proportionally. no mcnuke strawball badmouse le 70 iq face scenarios.


 No.72826


 No.72855

>>72799

Ayy lmao


 No.72856

>>72697

>>72696

The more important question is does it matter if the NAP is violated if no one knows?




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1917 / 8teen / had / hikki / htg / leftpol / monarchy / sw ]