/liberty/ - Liberty

>>72295

No, thanks. I don't want to buy your cookies.

i do like diversity tbh

I believe you, but fuck off because you are a nigger, no niggers allowed this is a white board

>>72302

>this is a white board

This is a non-totalitarian board.

>>72336

fuck off moshe

>>72337

oy

>>72336

>This is a non-totalitarian board.

Also known as a white only board

>>72382

humans are mimetic. that is they project others on themselves. this ranges from empathy, to sports and 'we won'

theres more to national, cultural

interpreting shopenhauers psychological observations is possible. however to conclude what he concluded, would require you to eliminate all other possible reasons. wich he didnt do. also it would require you know all possible reasons. that sort of proof, empirical induction to the point absolute confidence, is something not actually feasible, because of knowledge problems.

aphorisms on the wisdom of life / 10

>>72295

I'm beginning to wonder if the influx of faggots is due to lack of response to, these faggots, or if it's like my crabposting on /n/ and is secretly just one or two autists going at it consistently. probably the latter.

>>72402

they're all me

>"Anti-racist" is a codeword for anti-white, "Diversity" is a codeword for white genocide

I agree wholeheartedly, I can even do you one better and tell you that behind it all are the scheming, backstabbing kikes. Now explain to me why that means I should give up my rights. Every single authoritarian government in history failed from the absolute monarchies to your infallible strongman Adolf Hitler, and they all made the exact same mistake of exiling or attempting to in the case of Hitler them rather than treating them like the fucking infestation of parasites they are and exterminating them. I have a feeling that if Hitler had won the war the "based" Jews he let serve in his army would automatically start undermining all of his accomplishments as soon as he assumed room temperature, and the ones that were sent to Madagascar would have found ways to get into mainland Africa and start the whole process of world domination over again. Hitler would have bought Europe a millenium at most, funny enough they even called it a "thousand year Reich". So tell me, please, why you think this time will be any different? They're called Zionist Occupied Governments for a reason.

>>72426

>Absolutist monarchy

>Authoritarian

What's it like to be sixteen?

>>72382

Projection of external qualities onto oneself still requires the preexistence of self, which is a thing that exists in and of itself, but is also knowable through observation. Conceiving of self entirely through self-directed observation without first conceiving of self as a thing-in-itself (will) to be overcome is completely banal–that you would lake any innate characteristics, but are defined by everything exterior. Moreover, he claims it to be the "cheapest" form of pride, not that it is an impossible form of pride. You're acting as though a value judgement can never be made regarding someone's character.

>>72488

for >>72401

>>72431

You haven't convinced me to give my rights up yet, maybe try again?

>>72382

Based Schopenhauer.

>>72426

>I agree wholeheartedly

Get off this board and fuck off back to /pol/

>>73061

Why would I convince you, if you're already convinced? At least that's what I get from your flag. If you had something against being coercively ruled, you'd have the ancap-flag. If you had something against coercive rule that went beyond a minimal state, and if you were properly informed, you'd be more opposed to democracy than absolutist monarchy.

>>72431

are not monarchies in arabic peninsula authoritarian?

>>73375

Doesn't change the fact that monarchies are not inherently more authoritarian than other forms of state. Given the prevailing ideology in Saudi Arabia, they'd be shit no matter what form of government they had.

>non-whites

>liberty

choose no more than ONE (1)

>>73460

there is famous nigger ancap vloger (thatguyt) and chink (pholosopher)

checkmate

>>73466

wtf i love africans now

>>73535

>Christian Anarchist poster

>Anti-White

>Gay

Yep, all checks out. Kill yourself, my man. God is Jewish and he loves The Chosen first and foremost.

>>73552

Make an argument any time, friendo.

>>73535

>marching with the Black Panthers on numerous occasions

Source?

White nationalists made me anti-white I hope you're happy I just wanted to play video games.

>>73134

>If you had something against being coercively ruled, you'd have the ancap-flag.

The God-ordained social covenant is not coercive

>>73585

The Panthers had little to do with the NOI, esp after they explicitly rejected racial seperatism

>>73795

It makes perfect sense to me. You must act like an individual, but you shouldn't forget about your tribe. It's not a black and white thing for me logically. When your tribe is in danger you go help your tribe, when you are in danger your tribe has your back. In order to have worth in your tribe you must be a valuable individual.

As much as Jews talk to others about individualism, they never forget each other so I think we should take example from the things they do because like it or not they are the most powerful people in the west.

However, personally I wish Jews practiced whatever they do in Israel, I see my own country as an extension of my own private property and I feel like their activities are threatening me, like, for example I can't claim "air" as my own, but that doesn't mean I enjoy it when a group of people agreed to all fart together and stink up the air I breathe.

>>73795

>I actually have mixed feelings towards nationalism. Does it make sense from a logical point of view? No but neither do many human behaviors.

I believe that there can be no genuine conflict between the good and the rational. If something is good, it's also rational. If it's truly and fully rational, then it must be good. This notion that the realm of is and ought are strictly divided is relatively recent. David Hume didn't so much discover as invent it, although that's not strictly true. Rather, Hume ruminated on a Zeitgeist that he was captured in.

I can recommend Ethica Thomistica and After Virtue on this topic, although take much of the latter with a grain of salt, if you decide to read it.

Now, as for nationalism itself, I also don't believe it's completely bad, just as every political ideology. Socialism, for example, is at least partially based on compassion. If it didn't give an outlet for the compassion that people have for the working poor, socialism wouldn't even have been experimented with. Likewise, nationalism has a core of virtue. If socialism is twisted compassion, then nationalism is twisted patriotism. A patriot loves his country like he would loves his parents, whereas nationalists love it like a child. It is love, but not the love that's due, which doesn't make much of a difference when you want to protect your country from a foreign aggressor, but does make a difference when you want to protect it from an internal change. Let's say these allegories are 80% fitting. I wouldn't overstretch them.

bump