Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdfMax filesize is 16 MB.Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.
So much for that wall Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 13:20:58 No.70955
Ingenuity knows no barriers in the War on Drugs. The market always finds a way.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-15/trumps-border-wall-no-match-mexican-drug-shooting-bazooka
Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 13:54:38 No.70956
File: ece550a0d05ee7d⋯.jpg (33.33 KB, 450x304, 225:152, doom paul - you only had t….jpg)
>>70955
>"Legalize drugs! Do not engage in a war you cannot win!"
>Almost fifty years later
>Drug dealers have special forces, submarines, and cocaine bazookas
>Literally feed their enemies to tigers
>They wanted a war
>They got a war
>fools.bmp
Anonymous 11/23/17 (Thu) 15:28:31 No.71329
I'd like to see beaners try and launch themselves over the wall.
Anonymous 11/27/17 (Mon) 06:13:10 No.71625
lol. You fucking idiots.
>implying we want them to stop sending the drugs
>implying we give a fuck about them sending the drugs
>implying we don't want them to just stop coming here
lol. Fucking retards, I swear.
Anonymous 11/27/17 (Mon) 22:11:05 No.71673
>>71625
>t.butthurt
Anonymous 11/28/17 (Tue) 08:37:35 No.71711
>>70956
The war on drugs is very profitable for both sides.
Anonymous 11/28/17 (Tue) 08:51:35 No.71713
File: d0da0641908d0db⋯.jpg (167.96 KB, 1435x1559, 1435:1559, 1511767083157.jpg)
Do the majority of right-libertarians want the wall?
I'm friends with a few Ron Paul tier libertarians and they thought it was an idiotic idea.
Anonymous 11/28/17 (Tue) 09:11:43 No.71722
>>71713
The stefan molyneux types do but the consistent libertarians are usually against it.
Anonymous 11/28/17 (Tue) 15:08:05 No.71768
A wall would be cool but fuck paying for that shit. There's enough taxes as there is.
Anonymous 11/28/17 (Tue) 15:16:24 No.71769
in an ideal world there would be no state border for them to infringe upon, but right now we live under democratic socialism, meaning that immigration is not only a drain on the states coffers (and therefore the taxpayers) but also a hazard to voting
>>71768
this basically