/liberty/ - Liberty

1

>>70529

/pol/ is an anti-capitalist board since capitalism is jewry, Shlomo.

>KIKES KIKES KIKES KIKES KISE KISKE

Everything antisemites ever say. Press them on it, they'll call you a kike. Show them that your ancestors were all nordic from 1212 onward, they'll say you just got rused by kikes.

There is no talking to you guys.

>>70526

National Socialism is still socialism. They just want free gibs for the ingroup instead of everyone.

>>70533

The concept of conquering land for Germans was just that. It started with unifying all German ethnicities but it turned into stealing resources for the greater good of the folk. The one pointing the finger was the real kike all along. After all, it's not really theft if you're taking it from goyim (non-germans).

>>70523

Are crypto-authoritarians?

>>70524

Nazis aren't socialists and never were. They solely used socialist imaginary and rhetoric to fool the working class to further their own agenda.

>>70526

>communism is an inherently evil ideology

>it's evil wanting everyone to be free and not beholden to the proprietarian whose sole concern furthering his greed/insane servitude to capital

Man, I can only imagine what you think is good. Probably similar to 19th century slave masters.

>>70533

gibsmedats isn't worker control of the means of production

>>70544

>>it's evil wanting everyone to be free

Slavery is freedom amirite?

>the proprietarian whose sole concern furthering his greed/insane servitude to capital

The communists sure do seemed concerned with their own wealth and capital. Maybe it's because the communists are just Mammon's worshippers among the plebians.

>>70561

>Slavery is freedom amirite?

Says the Capitalist.

>Maybe it's because the communists are just Mammon's worshippers among the plebians.

I didn't realize abolitionists of the religion of money were secretly worshipers of its god.

>>70544

>Nazis aren't socialists and never were. They solely used socialist imaginary and rhetoric to fool the working class to further their own agenda.

That's the beauty of a movement that was always deeply involved in propaganda: It gives plausible deniability to everyone who doesn't want to be associated with it. Hitler only tried to manipulate workers, he was a tool of the corporations! Hitler only payed lipservice to the entrepreneurs, he was a socialist! Hitler was an atheist and a Christian, a simple man and the messiah, a worker and a nobleman…

It's damn confusing when you go by the official characterizations, but you can deal with it. And one way to do so is to look at his actual policies:

>Taking on loans

>Price controls

>Production quotas

>Retributive confiscation

>Nationalizations

>Monopolization of the unions

>Restrictions on the transfer of land

I could go on. None of these policies are laissez-faire; together, they point at him being in charge of the economy, not the "plutocrats"; all of them align with his pro-socialist rhetoric, of the economy being there for everyone and not for the aggrandizement of the few and all of that stuff. His actions speak a very clear language.

>>70565

>I didn't realize abolitionists of the religion of money were secretly worshipers of its god.

You want to abolish money, sure, but only so that you can have more free shit. Which is bound to fail, mind you. Just explain to me how to solve the calculation-problem when there is no money at all. Before you can do that, your proposal is not even worthy of consideration.

>>70565

>Says the Capitalist

<I know you are but what am I

ouch, damn you got me there wtf I hate freedom now

>>70523

Says the filthy amaerican barbarian. Take your McDonald's, garbage pop music and cancerous hollywood "entertainment" back to you retarded "nation". I don't want this shit here and it will be banned as soon as the glorirous communist party wins the elections and we currently have 16 elected members on the parliamente.Peopel are slowly waking up, my country will not sucumb to the retardation and faggotry that is the american "logic". Fuck USA and your globalism.

Capitalism is organized crime. It's not an ideology, not a theorie, not an idea, it's downright organized crime. And all the faggots that suck american cock and put us on NATO will be the first to get killed.

>>70595

good bait, you had me there for a second

>>70573

>Hitler only tried to manipulate workers, he was a tool of the corporations! Hitler only payed lipservice to the entrepreneurs, he was a socialist!

Looking at the actual evidence it's very clear who Hitler was. Especially considering he purged the people who actually leaned towards Socialism in the party.

>And one way to do so is to look at his actual policies:

Wow, look at that, literally none of those are workers control of the MoP.

>together, they point at him being in charge of the economy, not the "plutocrats"

Who do you think those policies were for?

>You want to abolish money, sure, but only so that you can have more free shit

I didn't know removing a parasitic leach was considered having more free shit.

> Just explain to me how to solve the calculation-problem when there is no money at all.

Prove to me the calculation-problem exists at all without pointing to a state that existed before modern computers and the internet.

>>70588

You're the one saying slavery in the form of wage-labor is the highest expression of freedom.

>>70606

>Looking at the actual evidence it's very clear who Hitler was. Especially considering he purged the people who actually leaned towards Socialism in the party.

All commies killed other commies. Stalin and Mao regularly purged their own ranks, the Khmer Rouge made a manhunt on themselves, and during the revolutions in Spain and Russia, the commies attacked their own allies. What you said is like claiming that someome can't be a violent gangster because he just shot a nigger.

>I didn't know removing a parasitic leach was considered having more free shit.

Empty rhetorics. Are you the same guy who shitposts about the public goods problem?

>Prove to me the calculation-problem exists at all without pointing to a state that existed before modern computers and the internet.

The calculation-problem is about economic calculation being impossible without prices. Not just hard; impossible.

Really not sure if this isn't bait.

>>70609

>arguben i don't like are shitpost and if i diagree with me u cannot read

>also there is only one non-ancrap in existence

lmao

>>70544

>worker control of the means of production

That is comparable with the definition of capitalism, since people have control of their human capital used in production in exchange for a wage or share of the profits.

>>70682

>comparable

*compatible