>>64580
Look, if you pull the banana out of your ass for two seconds and stop being euphoric, you might realize what I'm saying. Here, I put it in a logical format for your simple materialistic brain.
If the government nor the market provide it, then either the good/service was never actually wanted/needed by other than a few eccentrics or the Black Market will provide it. You seriously misunderstand how government control works in the first place, anon. Budget cuts and Government don't work well together in the first place because once something is codified in law, getting it removed involves removing every aspect from the ground up and fighting a losing battle to get rid of it. This can be seen in Obamacare- the whole point was to codify it in law because it would increase government's power over the healthcare industry, raise theft revenue via fines, and as long as it was passed through, getting it removed would be a pain in the ass when your opponents realize they also get a chunk of those fines for themselves. Government doesn't know how to shrink, which is what you're suggesting.
Even in the unlikely scenario that government maliciously and rapidly shrunk their stranglehold in an effort to kill off Black Market business, the "market failure" you're experiencing is a short-lived scramble to re-stabilize a desired good/service and is short lived. If the federal government suddenly eliminated all funding for police forces tomorrow, the police force would still exist. It would either be taken over at the state level (as it's almost entirely run in the first place) or county level, and if that weren't the case, private security would fill in the gap in a matter of weeks or at worst months at worst (the time it would likely take a state or county to set up and train a proper police force anyways ). During such a transition time, firearm sales would be higher-than-average (market correcting mechanism), people wouldn't be getting ticketed for petty crimes (market wins), and serious crimes still wouldn't get dealt with most of the time (same as under government). The only way for government to "win the game" against Agorism is to hold on and consolidate their power further, and even then their inefficiency means that the Agorists will win, it might just take longer. For the state to give up a good or service as a result of black market action as you implied here >>64574 is to prove the Agorist correct and decrease the overarching power of the state, even if it does it temporarily. When people get a taste of freedom, they don't like going back. That's why many citizens won't let their politicians ban companies like Uber, or they'll continue to use ridesharing even after it's made illegal. That's why congress, the IRS, and the federal reserve are scared of Bitcoin becoming more mainstream. People are greedy as fuck, agorists are just there to provide a better service on the most legitimate front possible- in person and under the table.