[ / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / film / firechan / girltalk / htg / imouto / srz / strek / traffick ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 12 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


A recognized Safe Space for liberty - if you're triggered and you know it, clap your hands!

File: 6facbfaf9a4ec8c⋯.jpg (17.34 KB, 206x305, 206:305, The_Red_Pill.jpg)

 No.60847

I've watched this movie with a good friend. Turns out it's a fine documentary, not at all a propaganda piece, nor another dull recantation of feminists being crazy and hypocritical. There's some very interesting facts in it about the court system, many of whom you'll probably already know but the events behind it are, as usual, more interesting than the statistics. That's one of the highlights of the film, but there's more.

What still doesn't convince me is that it's somehow a bad thing men are the "disposable" sex. In many cases, it is, but that men leave the sinking boat after women and children or that they protect them in wars is both natural and expedient. Better to direct the anger at the institution of the draft, at unjust wars and at degenerate pseudo-intellectuals who decry masculinity and try to take it away as a source of pride. In short, the French Revolution once again lies at the source of all evil.

 No.60854

File: 0e85c601e789b39⋯.jpg (45.34 KB, 536x625, 536:625, 0e85c601e789b39ccbf280612f….jpg)

>>60847

>many of whom

>referring to facts as "whom"

Is this a meme or are you just being really dumb while trying to sound smart?


 No.60857

File: acccdc7d1d24b00⋯.jpg (33.83 KB, 285x242, 285:242, Frodo Lives!.jpg)

>>60854

>Pointing out grammar mistakes

>In a Taiwanese Cartoon Enthusiast Community

English isn't even my first language. Fucking racist.


 No.60892

>>60847

Why shouldn't one decry masculinity? The prisons are filled with masculinity; the broken households that exist are largely the result of men being naturally promiscuous; health systems around the world are strained by male drunkenness, violence, and disorder; people of all ages are killed by men on the roads; men destroy stock markets with gambling, and men commit most of the terrorism and wage most of the wars

Even when men achieve, it's almost always in spite of their masculinity, and not because of it. Intellectual men, practically the only useful ones, are the most effeminate, and usually were bullied in their youth just for being clever.


 No.60913

File: e418ba99f51e889⋯.jpg (13.43 KB, 287x324, 287:324, shigmurai.jpg)

>>60892

>The prisons are filled with masculinity; the broken households that exist are largely the result of men being naturally promiscuous[…]

So basically, you think that black people are the epitome of masculinity. Sweden, is that you?

>Intellectual men, practically the only useful ones, are the most effeminate, and usually were bullied in their youth just for being clever.

That's a relatively recent phenomenon. In the past, nobles and kings were expected to be well educated and to be physically powerful and good fighters, and there was no cliché at all that philosophers and priests were weak. Plato was a two-times pancratio champion and a war veteran. Alexander the Great was tutored by Aristotle and was brave enough to try and conquer the world. Chinggis Khan was physically imposing, conquered the better part of the known world, but also wrote a legal code and somehow set up an infrastructure to keep his empire together. Timur was a cripple, but he was still described as physically powerful; he was also a masterful chessplayer and held personal talks with renown philosophers. Teddy Roosevelt is a fucking meme and can eat shit, goddamn leftist cunt. I'm sure the list could go on. And before you ask about the monks: These guys did heavy labor, too. They also obviously exercised a lot of willpower to stay abstinent. Saint Charbel used an old wooden log as a pillow and slept on the floor, even in winter. Effeminate? My ass.

As for the bullying, you can thank public schools for that - which, you know, didn't exist for the longest time. Even then, I know few incidents of bullying where smarts played a role. Awkwardness did, and it might correlate with intelligence, at least at that age, but the correlation was not as clear as you make it out to be. Some of the buffest kids in my school were very intelligent and some fucking dumb ones were weak as hell.


 No.60922

>>60913

No, I'm in Europe. The vast majority of criminals are men. Same in every society.

The historical conception of masculinity might change over time. It would be wrong to talk about historical masculinity to try to debunk what I'm saying about the present. But I'm talking about contemporary masculinity, which would have told Plato to wrestle more and study less, because writing philosophy is for nerds. And masculine attitudes that certainly wouldn't help a monk be chaste, self-controlled, and detached from society.

>Even then, I know few incidents of bullying where smarts played a role. Awkwardness did, and it might correlate with intelligence

Anybody who is both intelligent and awkward becomes a bigger target than a person who is merely awkward in a general way.

Everybody knows to conceal their intelligence by having as few intellectual hobbies as possible.


 No.60923

File: 6a9dcd9debe070e⋯.png (187.56 KB, 360x270, 4:3, ClipboardImage.png)

>>60922

It's hard to explain the link between intelligence, social skills, masculinity, and bullying. Are nerdy hobbies bad because they convey intelligence or because they convey low social skills, or both?

Either way, the masculinity that is tied to the bullying that attacks the nerdy hobbies, is still attacking the intelligence as much as the low social skills. People would read more and do more intellectual stuff without it


 No.60924

>>60913

is that the actor toshiro mifune?


 No.60935

>>60922

And men are also the builders of civilisation, the producers, soldiers and innovators. That is a product of masculinity. The result of femininity is society is the welfare state, rampant feminism and unchecked migration from third world countries.


 No.60936

>philosophers and intellectuals are the effeminate

Only the shitty ones. Psychology is linked to biology, that's why physically fit men tend to be capitalists while leftists are 90% of the time effeminate manlets. Same with intellectuals, effeminate ones tend to be leftists, marxists and post-modernists, while right-wing intellectuals tend to be robust and masculine.


 No.60941

>>60935

What makes you think those things are the product of masculinity? Being the product of a man doesn't mean you're the product of masculinity. Women in these societies were giving birth and raising children constantly, and rarely educated, so could hardly have been soldiers, builders and innovators.

I'm not sure the most masculine societies had more civilisation and innovation; it seems to me they were the 'brutish' societies that went on terrible rampages. For example, the Vikings, the Mongols, the Muslims, the Romans, and so on. Civilised societies are, by definition, more restrained. And they are at least remembered as being more feminine than the surroundings: the Greeks, the British, the Italians, the Chinese


 No.60942

>>60941

Not that any of them were exactly feminine, or matriarchal; I only mean relative to the surrounding territories in that era. Compare Athens to Sparta.


 No.60943

>>60936

Physically strong men become more selfish and want policies that are in their interests; it's the same across poor and rich. In the old days where elections were decided on economics, plenty of strong working class men voted for leftist parties, or even communist parties.

In the modern day, nationalism and identity politics are more important. Since tribalism is part of masculinity, masculine men vote for right-wing, nationalist parties. But it doesn't mean they are very capitalist. In fact they want regulation, protectionism, and probably union rights.

To conclude with a generalisation, libertarians that I see are often the willing cuckolds of the super-rich, which fits with the theory, since they are neither robust nor masculine


 No.60957

>>60892

You want to blame masculinity for people in prison rather than criminals, a fucked up judicial system? Seems too simplistic for my taste.


 No.60960

>>60957

Makes as much sense as blaming all femininity for women's crimes.


 No.60961

>>60941

>I'm not sure the most masculine societies had more civilisation and innovation; it seems to me they were the 'brutish' societies that went on terrible rampages. For example, the Vikings

Oh boy. The Vikings weren't a civilization, they were pirates from Scandinavia. And Scandinavia was not much worse than other regions in Europe at the time. They had civil litigation, and Iceland never

>the Mongols

They were very civilized for the time. They had a legal code, they controlled a continent-wide empire, and they went on to rule many different people like the Chinese and the Indians. That isn't easy when you're dumb as fuck, but the Mongols weren't.

>the Muslims

Not a single political or cultural group, at least not after Timur entered the stage. And before that, they had their share of cultural achievements. Their economists were better than anything the West had to offer until about the 17th Century.

>the Romans, and so on.

The Romans weren't civilized?! I mean, they were cruel, but uncivilized? What the fuck?

Also:

>Greeks

>Effeminate

The guys that had a city where the lower class was hunted for sport, and that boycotted the olympic games when eye gouging was made illegal in wrestling, were effeminate?

>China

>Civilized

Up until a certain point, then they were just going through the motions. China also saw constant peasant uprisings, had some of the most brutal wars of all time, and made it a national sport to bury scholars alive after each dynasty. I cannot say I understood your standards, but I'm still pretty sure that China neither qualifies as civilized nor as effeminate by them.

>>60943

The working class, peasants and soldiers are uneducated. They vote for whatever is popular at the moment. That often means following the middle-class, like with communism. Really, that movement was never grassroots, it was always an intellectual movement that sometimes attracted the support of one of the more numerous classes. In the case of Russia, that was pretty much everyone but the working class, by the way. Never believe a commie.

And please don't equate nationalism with tribalism. Nationalism has something to do with home and kinship to the same extent that playing CS:GO has something to do with a duel to the death. Nor is it opposed to communism. Commies, natsocs and fascists are competitors, not enemies.


 No.61047

>>60913

>In the past, nobles and kings were expected to be well educated and to be physically powerful and good fighters

How deep in the past is this?


 No.61328

>thread about how men are systematically targetted on the basis of sex, especially in courts

>woman shows up and points to incarceration rates as a reason men deserve their higher incarceration rates

>on /liberty/

Like pottery.


 No.61340

>>61328

Whomst are you referring to exactly?


 No.61429

>>60961

Way to massively miss the point, repeatedly.

Consider being a bit more honest in the future


 No.61430

>>61340

He's making shit up


 No.61435

>>60892

Femininity is so completely defective and useless that it's a taboo to acknowledge it. In fact it's fucking terrifying to explore how useless women are.

Here's a start: when have you seen a team of women accomplish ANYTHING? They can't do it. They can't form goals and cooperate.

That's why there's still "GET WOMEN TO CODE" programs when anyone can buy a computer. Women could buy computers and develop software for the past 40 years, and they just don't, because they can't. It's not in their nature to seek out goals and cooperate to achieve them.


 No.61438

File: 05a29ea76815d08⋯.png (20.52 KB, 476x311, 476:311, women university facts.png)

File: 71bcb7b5c5ec1da⋯.jpg (54.67 KB, 496x340, 124:85, women workforce usa.jpg)

>>61435

Women form goals and co-operate all the time; just because it isn't for the NASA space programme doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

Femininity promotes useful values like empathy, tolerance and non-violence; they're often seen as superior values than the male ones


 No.61439

>>60941

The Vikings were extremely effeminate compared to other cultures. Fuck, Lady Gray tea was named after them.


 No.61443

>>61441

> Without a father figure in the picture kids are significantly more likely to grow up to be horrendous fuck-ups.

Fair comparison


 No.61444

>>61441

>Careers dominated by women?

Not the question. The question is which careers do they or can they do.

>Busywork, useless bureaucratic idiocy or feely-feels retardation.

So you're a brainless sissy retard.


 No.61446

File: 6c49af50e38f42c⋯.jpg (61.12 KB, 693x1023, 21:31, I have no ass and I must s….jpg)

>>61438

>Femininity promotes useful values like empathy, tolerance and non-violence; they're often seen as superior values than the male ones

Out of mild curiousity, how's the female vote working out in Europe? Or even anywhere for that matter?


 No.61450

>>61446

Modern societies are much better than previous civilisations because of those values.


 No.61457

>>61450

Oh, it's better is it?

> empathy

It's a feeling, not an actual line of thought, in case you haven't gotten around to noticing.

>tolerance

Answer the question, how is the female vote working out in Europe?

> non-violence

My fucking ass. Women have always been the ones to vote for bigger government, for bigger welfare states, and the importation of low IQ immigrants (who commit more crime, in case you haven't noticed that fine detail either). Their vote is ruining entire civilizations, you know why?

Let me give you a hint champ, those values aren't thrown around by most women because they've actually looked into the literature behind such principles, they're thrown around because for them it's a matter of feelings. Most do not have any true standing ethics, they just simply go with their feelings or whatever they find is popular.

Modern societies aren't fucking better because of "empathy", hell it's a coin that flips both ways. Tolerance? Shit, they certainly don't display a tolerance of the right in most cases, they certainly didn't tend to tolerate the idea of me having a right to discriminate against people based on whatever criteria I wished to discriminate on. And non-violence? Like I said above, give me a fucking break.


 No.61458

>>61457

>but muh taxes

Hurr durr


 No.61464

>>61459

I actually read in the newspaper some time ago that historically, female leaders were much more often warmongers than their male counterparts.


 No.61467

Anons pretty sure you've all fallen for a troll.


 No.61468

File: a2f4b3f0899a783⋯.png (92.8 KB, 615x410, 3:2, ClipboardImage.png)

>>61459

How dare anyone help starving children in Africa, tolerate certain things, or avoid violence.

By the way, you are seriously ignorant from the last paragraph. Stunningly ignorant of the basic facts about violence. Men are MUCH more likely to commit violent acts than women and it's not even close.


 No.61469

>>61467

Hurr anyone that speaks truth in my alt-rite circle-jerk board is a troll


 No.61471

>>61468

Women assaulting men is tolerated, so men wouldn't report domestic violence as much, that's why they're underrepresented in the statistics.

Also consider that women are more prone to psychological abuse than men are.


 No.61472

File: bf5bdc01ceef433⋯.png (85.88 KB, 444x244, 111:61, ClipboardImage.png)

>>61471

>I'm right I just know it!!


 No.61473

>>61472

Basically even


 No.61474

>>61473

>>61472

Compared to men abusing women twice as much


 No.61477

>>61459

Children are far more likely to live with a single mother than a single father (men abandon women)


 No.61478

>>61476

I get tired when annoying cunts just completely and deliberately miss the point of everything.


 No.61479

File: 9a328c14505b32d⋯.png (134.43 KB, 684x410, 342:205, ClipboardImage.png)

…but women vote for programmes that give welfare to the pooor!!

t. libertarian retard


 No.61482

File: 4368956e7c13a6b⋯.jpg (560.84 KB, 963x1486, 963:1486, men domestic abuse.jpg)

File: 66c6f41dcbf568a⋯.png (403.8 KB, 1409x4759, 1409:4759, trans suicide.png)

>>61458

Right back at you, you fucking parasite. Either have an argument or fuck off you retard.

>>61468

>How dare anyone help starving children in Africa,

Yeah, c'mon guys! Let's destabilize their markets and make them entirely dependent on foreign aid! It's not like leaders of African nations like Mugabe haven't exploited this mechanism over and over again to screw over their people!

> tolerate certain things

Fuck tolerance, fuck the niggers in Africa and fuck you. It's because of this bullshit empathetic "tolerace" first impulse of women that we end up having trans people. An entire group of people who actually need genuine psychological help are now fed bullshit about how they can be whatever the fuck they want to be, how gender is made up and everything i nbetween, and they're told this all the way until they commit suicide when they realize that life just doesn't work that way.

>avoid violence

Again, they are the often the ones demanding expansion of the state, which is one of the most, if not the most, violent institutions in human history. Fuck off.

>Stunningly ignorant of the basic facts about violence.

You are so disingenuous that it's fucking hilarious. You didn't prove him wrong, he's actually entirely correct.


 No.61484

>>61480

>something something, DIVORCE LAWS FAVOURS WOMEN SO THEY DESERVE IT, something something, IT'S ALL WOMEN'S FAULT

Yeah, they all chose to be lone women with dependents


 No.61487

>>61482

Yes, saving children from imminent starvation will turn the entire continent into lazy parasites. We have to just let them starve!

Transgenderism isn't caused by scientific abnormalities in the brain and the hormones. It's caused by one thing, and that's tolerance. We need to treat them like shit until they kill themselves

Paying taxes is just as traumatic as being beaten up and mugged


 No.61489

>>61486

Probably because men have worse criminal records.

>>61488

You're just a pissy cunt with personality problems.


 No.61493

File: 8f23bacfd4a1184⋯.jpg (2.15 MB, 1970x1430, 197:143, transdilation.jpg)

>>61479

You mean women vote to use a violent institution to steal money out of my pocket and give it to the unproductive and those just plain unwilling to work? Gosh, they really are fucking heroes. It almost seems like they're being used by the state to expand it's power through creating an entirely dependent portion of the population but gosh darn it, women voted for it and lord knows they have a streak for economic intelligence and intellectual integrity.

>>61484

You don't even have an argument do you? You just sling shit around like a fucking retard, not even registering other people's arguments.

>>61487

>Yes, saving children from imminent starvation will turn the entire continent into lazy parasites. We have to just let them starve!

You're not saving them, you retard. You've destabilized their economies. Again, look at Mugabe and what he's done to Zimbabwe thanks to the nations reliance on foreign aid and then fuck off.

>Transgenderism isn't caused by scientific abnormalities in the brain and the hormones.

This has to be a joke post. This can't actually be a genuine post by someone with proper mental functioning. You are either some dude with a boi pussy, trying not to regret being a total faggot, or you really are just pulling all our fucking legs for some thought experiment.

> It's caused by one thing, and that's tolerance. We need to treat them like shit until they kill themselves

Or maybe just not lie to them and get them the actual help they need as opposed to sitting on our virtue signalling asses, making their situation far worse?

>Paying taxes is just as traumatic as being beaten up and mugged

If you refuse to pay taxes, it might just end up that way.

>


 No.61495

>>61490

Men have worse criminal records because they commit much more crime

See >>61479

I'm sure victim surveys will show this too. You're in an even deeper hole than the people that say black people do no more crime than other parts of the population.

>>61493

>pls don't give me food when i'm starving, how will i get a job!!! just let me die! pls!


 No.61496

>>61493

You seriously need to get off the alt-rite deluded internet circle-jerk. Believe it or not, it's an incredibly widespread view that transgenderism is caused by brain and hormone differences. Maybe you should read a book, you retard.

>tolerance makes the situation worse

Yes, because that makes sense. I bet the ones from intolerant families are the happiest.

> If you refuse to pay taxes, it might just end up that way.

But it's not 99% of the time, when people are sane.


 No.61498

>>61495

You don't even have an argument, fuck off

>>61496

>You seriously need to get off the alt-rite deluded internet circle-jerk

You seriously need to make an argument. No shit, that it's caused by deficiencies in the brain and the hormones. Just call it what it is.

>Yes, because that makes sense. I bet the ones from intolerant families are the happiest.

If I have a schizophrenic friend, and he tells me there are demons after him. Should I go ahead and tell him that this is fine? That I should tolerate his point of view and tell him that his view that the CIA are sending demons after him are not anymore legit than any other lines of thought? C'mon, I know you've got some sort of functional problem, but you don't have downs syndrome now do you?

>But it's not 99% of the time, when people are sane.

You mean when people fall in line with the demands of the violent government, right? I don't understand why you would have a problem with men committing crimes like theft when the government somehow gets a free pass.

You're actually fucking retarded. Consider suicide as a possible career option.


 No.61500

File: 28aceaf8779f7fc⋯.jpg (48.22 KB, 720x678, 120:113, 20257960_503885823288734_4….jpg)

Guys, can we take a chill pill? I understand whatsherface pissed you off but losing your temper/losing face on a Chinese shadow puppet program isn't really worth the time and effort y'all are investing into this.

Seriously though, take a 10 minute breather.


 No.61523

File: 831a239c541d553⋯.png (37.24 KB, 394x370, 197:185, shigs.png)

Guys. It's a fact that men commit more crime than women. There are some exceptions:

>VERY light theft

>Riding without a ticket

>Domestic violence

Maybe also fraud, but I doubt that because fraud is often committed by shady businesses and business is still the domain of men.

Men are more aggressive, more ambitious, they have a higher pressure to succeed, a higher pressure to assert themselves (also physically), and they are more confrontational in general. They are also physically stronger; criminals don't pick fights with people that are bigger and to a women, almost every man is bigger. Men are also more likely to be socially or emotionally isolated, as study after study has shown, and having no social anchors is one of the biggest criminovalent factors of all. All in all, there is every reason to assume, even without looking at the statistics, that men tend to be more at risk to become criminals. The statistics confirm that further, and we're not just talking about official statistics here, but also research on the dark field, the crimes that never get the attention of the police.

That doesn't mean men tend to be worse people. The exact same character trait can drive one person to greatness and the other to crime.

>>61493

That was one of the worst things I've ever seen. Holy shit…


 No.61534

>>61499

Nah, that's one thing they do get right. If your suicide attempt actually kills you, you don't get to enjoy being the centre of attention while your friends and family tell you how special you are and how much you mean to them.

>>61523

>VERY light theft

Light, sure, but they more than make up for it with volume. I work at a supermarket, and we only have two security cameras in the entire store. Guess what they're pointed at. It's not the cash registers, it's not the electronics, it's the makeup. They just can't be trusted to behave themselves without constant supervision.


 No.61600

>>61497

>>61498

>hurr my opinions are true because I think they are

https://thinkprogress.org/study-suggests-anti-trans-parents-may-literally-be-killing-their-kids-a2f06075c288

By which method are the huge numbers of female violent offenders, who must be out there somewhere, randomly being completely exonerated from their crimes? You just made it up (like every single claim you make) because you don't actually care at all about the truth.


 No.61602

>>61498

There is zero 'delusion' involved in transgenderism. Everybody understands that sex is not gender. So what is your excuse to behave harmfully towards transgender people, greatly increasing their risk of suicide?


 No.61610

File: 94a21b3666276ce⋯.jpg (97.06 KB, 676x416, 13:8, men vs women victim survey.jpg)

Here is a survey of people who have been victimized, reporting the gender of their offenders. This takes place before the misandristic judicial system can let all the women off


 No.61683

File: 463c814fa624e03⋯.jpg (58.29 KB, 1024x768, 4:3, dilbert.jpg)

>>61438

Your cooked stats are meaningless. Males have a track record of running civilizations that runs back thousands of years. If you're so much better than males, just let us segregate ourselves again.

>inb4 bullshit

Roasts need to build up giant structures of extrinsic motivation and false metrics so they can intermix with males and pretend to be equally productive.

And then those rotten structures get so weighed down with menstrual insanity that the men just can't take all the lies and garbage and just leave, and then those piles of female waste immediately collapse.


 No.61784

>>60847

The reason it's a "bad thing" Is because it was a sacrifice willingly given under a social contract that the man was in charge and the man of the house. In the same way he put his life on the line to defend the women and children, and waited his turn to ensure their safety in the event of a tragedy that required it, men were the patriarchs of society. A man had a wife and they had children, which the mother took care of, and the husband provided for.

Now we have men as disposable not just in war and on sinking ships, which would be acceptable if men were given the rewards they'd earn for those things, but they are also disposable as fathers, where mothers can take kids, leave, and then suck the money out of him like a vampire, refusing to even let him see his kids, all with legal backing enforced by the threat of violence, and the placement as head of the house taken away, with women being given rights above and beyond a man's, including the option to kill a man's child before it's born with no input from him.

Men are even disposable as lovers thanks to jewish pop culture brainwashing, turning women into sluts who can't stay with a man to save their lives (which it would if they could), and men into "players" with no sense of responsibility. This hedonism destroys civilizations. But don't "slutshame" anyone.

There is no support system for men. There is no contract giving men anything. All contracts have been rewritten to give women everything and men nothing. Why on EARTH would someone who understands this want to put his life on the line for someone who will leave him, take half his stuff, and continue to bleed him dry to "maintain the lifestyle she's accustomed too" while not letting him see his own children? Why wouldn't he push her off the boat himself to get on the raft?

Of course, the MGTOWs are wrong. Despite all that, they are still wrong. There is hope. Men and women have worked together in pseudo harmony for 1000s of years. Sometimes women got a bum deal, but for the last few hundred, it's been absolutely great for women, with many protections in place to prevent abuse, because while women can be bloodsucking harpies, men can also be abusive cavemen.

We NEED the "patriarchy". Men and women need to be allowed to go back to their own place in society and be happy, without jewish tricks and feminist "all the benefits none of the risks" garbage. Studies show women AND men were happier with traditional relationships and gender norms. The issue is that info is never shown, and anyone who proposes the truth is laughed out of the room by ignorant people who have been taught all their life the "liberation" of "grrl power" will save the world!

We do need MRAs to push back against feminist nonsense and we need traditionalists to push back against hedonistic jewish lies. Men and women isn't a thing we can just stop because feminism ruined relationships. We need to go back to a time where men and women worked together to form strong households and loving families, and it IS still happening, and traditional families are spreading the word. Mainly activist "trad wives" who go out their and try and teach lost sluts and soon to be sluts that feminism lied to them, that being a woman is actually extremely satisfying on a biological and emotional level (women evolved to be mothers and wives, as men evolved to be providers and husbands) and that following the path their on will lead them to be miserable lonely 40-somethings with no kids and no reason to live.


 No.61788

>>61784

There is probably an aspect you are not seeing here.

A family is not only the husband, wife & kids.

The extended family (& kin (&tribe (&ethnic group) ) count too.

(Villages, Cities, County capitals, State capitals, Metropolitan areas, Greater Metropolitan areas, …)


 No.61797

>>61788

Absolutely. I agree with you wholeheartedly, but if one can't sustain a family, one can't sustain a community, and you can see that with community decay. The traditional "nuclear family" is the glue of civilization. It holds the family together, which holds the extended family and community together, which holds towns together, etc. etc.

By attacking the family (and religion, which helps loosen the family by replacing it with the state) they work to undermine the entire culture to weaken us, and it's worked wonderfully. Thankfully the water is starting to get too hot and more and more frogs are realizing if they don't jump out now they WILL be boiled. I didn't intend that as a pepe thing but it fits. The frogs in this case are the ones jumping out.


 No.61802

File: f50d6fe9aa2e8ab⋯.png (1.41 MB, 440x3784, 5:43, women only TV company.png)

>>61438

>Femininity promotes useful values like empathy, tolerance and non-violence; they're often seen as superior values than the male ones


 No.61807

>>61802

That's exactly what you'd expect from women that sought employment in a firm without men. Women that don't have issues would just deal with the fact that there are men in the business.


 No.61809

>>61807

Had to work with a majority of women at my first job. I'm never going to repeat that again. Some would have a fight with their boyfriend and then take it out on the few guys at work, and later go home to suck their man off like nothing happened. Others would use every opportunity to get their phones out or just slack off in general, and work as slowly as possible. Then there are the ones that always start verbal fights over nothing as soon as they come just because they enjoy the drama.

The few men we had were all great. I can't believe I was actually enjoying my time working with them as if my low skill entry level job didn't suck at all. I would rather scrape shit with my bare hands for a living over any opportunity to work with women in a high paying job.

Those cunts were even thinking of ganging up and asking the boss to cut the men's wages because we "do only half as much work". Good old Democracy.


 No.61816

>>61797

The extended family is the glue that props up the family.

In essence I'm saying that those further constructs are under attack too and have their own importance in underpinning the success of the family. (Synergy?)

"Network effect" would probably be the correct term. The more people are members of a tribe the more it profits from Network effects.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / film / firechan / girltalk / htg / imouto / srz / strek / traffick ]