>>24798
>the amount of time I spent in school
I think that's just how education works. It can take someone a relatively long span of time to just learn the basics. That's what school is, learning the basics, which is simply the gateway to attaining more advanced/specialized/useful knowledge in college. If you think of it that way, the time you spend in school was spent preparing you for higher learning. In short, it would have been useful if you had been diligent and used it as it was intended to be used.
Also, I took a couple of optional classes that thought me how to take care of myself as an adult. If someone wanted to be a photographer they would take the optional classes that related to photograph, which would help them get into a college that specialized in that field of study. There were classes like that for almost any profession you could think of. Very useful if you chose to make use of them.
I'm guessing you didn't go to college. That's fine, neither did I (not yet, anyways). But calling school a prison, and teachers youth exploiting monsters is just too absurd (ignore this if you're just an interloper, and not the guy I originally replied to).
>even remember
Which is based on retention, which the quality of can be vastly different from person to person. How often did you study, pay attention in class, and do homework?
The problem with this 'discussion' is that the subject is highly subjective.
>misconstrues the facts
Q.E.D.
Sounds subjective, so who's interpretation is correct? And how do they know for a fact that their interpretation of the "facts" is correct?
>too small a sample of what is considered school
You expected me to cover the expanse of something as subjective as "what is considered school" in my post? Unreasonable. I simply named one useful skill I was taught in school. I don't know what else you expect me to say.
Wasn't trying to make this into an argument, just wanted to understand the guy I was replying to. But whatever.