/islam/ - 8kun Masjid

The christian cult is entirely dedicated to trying to defy God and blaspheme against everything divine and holy. From the obvious things, like the christians constantly blaspheming and insulting ALLAH and the Prophet, to the seemingly small things, like choice in diet. To remain devout to satan it is important that the christian lives and breathes blasphemy and sacrilege.

So regarding their blasphemy and specifically their obsession with pork and trying to use it to defile what is holy, have you ever thought about why this is? Why they eat pork claiming it is to spite Muslims? And in fact trying to force Muslims to eat pork as well? Yet eating pork is just one of many things declared prohibited. So why single out this act?

The answer becomes clear by looking at who exactly specifically singled out eating pork as making them angry, and who specifically has been mentioned to kill herds of pigs in such ways as to prevent the consumption of their meats. Now I am of course referring to God and Jesus of the bible. God is quoted in Isaiah 65 as saying he gets angry by pork-eating, and Jesus killing the herds of pigs through drowning(thereby ensuring their flesh will not be consumed) is well-known.

So when christians then go on to eat pork, and breed pigs in the millions, and use pigs in acts of sacrilige, who are they really intending to harm? It can only be the God of Jesus and Jesus himself.

Or viewed from another angle, every time a christian engages in his satanic pig-antics claiming it is to spite Muslims, they are in fact admitting that Jesus is Muslim, and that the religion of God is Islam.

>>42504

‘But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them–bring them here and kill them in front of me.'

Luke 19:27

Anyway, religious Muslims are considered saved in Judaism, we fall under the category of B'nai Noach as Islām already includes the 7 Noachide laws.

We're also considered saved in Christanity as Jesus promised the thief on the cross heaven for only saying he was innocent (Luke 23:41).

>>42504

Literally by your FIRST point you admit that you're polytheists that worship several gods, since Jesus is not the god of the old testament that ordered everyone to be stoned for trivial matters.

So christians by their own admission:

>polytheists

Muslims:

>Monotheists

The self-professed polytheists and idolators that call themselves "christians" are breaking the greatest commandment of all. The reason why they don't describe Jesus quoting the OT is they admit he's not even in there! He's a new idol, born from a woman his father was not married to, incarnated to suckle on another man's bride's breasts, that probably was underaged as customary for jewish virgins at the time. Yet, there is not much point in going into details beyond that about traits of their idols. They'd have to prove polytheism to be valid first, since without that it doesn't matter how zeus lived his life, if he murdered 2000 pigs for no reason and was tempted by satanic orgies for 40 days and was a literal disgraced curse or what.

But even if we overlook their polytheism, they're still shameless liars and hypocrites. For example they go on about how their idol will come and subjugate all people through force, yet say he's good because he failed to murder anyone in round 1. He's only going to genocide people in the future! Well that changes everything, how nice of him.

And then they go on about how the disciples were so virtuous for being martyred in the name of christ(even though they're made up accounts centuries after the facts), yet for other people, that reflects poorly on them?

Polytheists of the cross just can't keep themselves from lying and contradicting themselves every time they open their mouths. There simply is no way you can describe the idol of the NT as a good being, let alone a true god, without lying shamelessly.

>>42504

If you want to use NT as an argument, at least post NT in Aramaic the language of Jesus (AS) not some Greek, Latin bullcrap, assuming you have the original, you also have to be able to tell us the biography of Mark, Luke and John, if they indeed really existed, and no we don't believe Paul is a prophet, so we'll disregard anything written by this person.

Otherwise we won't take NT seriously, since it's probably not the same Injeel that was revealed by Allah to Jesus (AS).