fbd36a No.41281
A National Geographic article in the March 2020 issue about the Nigerian girls who returned after being captured by Boko Haram and are now studying at the American University of Nigeria. It implies that women abandoning education to get married is bad, and studying in foreign, European universities is good, as is gaining proficiency in English, and the girls who unable to do this and go to Europe are implied to be unlucky.
It also shows how these girls are breaking off from an ancient, maybe centuries old tradition of marrying early just to get an education, and how this is encouraged by their Christian pastor.
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
687204 No.41286
If women choose to forgo higher education in order to get married, then good for them. Boko Haram didn't exactly give them a choice, though. Claiming a woman as property is antithetical to Islam.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
7692ee No.41293
>>41286
Explicitly disenjoining the sunnahs of marriage is an attack on Islam.
Explicitly enjoining the abandonment of Muslim countries for the life of this world is an attack on Islam.
Explicitly enjoining migration to the most immoral places on the planet is an attack on Islam.
You're literally at war and you just shot at the wrong side.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
88c613 No.41294
>>41293
Siding with groups like Boko Haram is an attack on Islam.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
09385f No.41297
>>41294
>>41286
It's not about boko haram or terrorist groups, let me explain it's more complex than that, the country is essentially christians fighting a propaganda and military war on muslim africans. Boko haram is just a representation of those grievances.
>Nigeria is an ex british colony
>anglo puts divided people in an artificial country so it in-fights
>niger & benue rivers splits the country in 3 natural borders
>north is basically fulani muslim
>south is ijaw christian
>country is about 60% muslim, 40% christian
>christians hold disproportionate amount of power
>christians hold the niger delta, which is fertile and fossil fuel rich
>often christian tribes randomly kill the fulani muslim, not just in nigeria but bordering countries
>that's why in 2015 an islamic state was declared in muslim majority regions near lake chad
>and why ISIS / boko haram are allied
>they are the only ones who filled that vacuum of muslim oppression
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
7eeb6a No.41299
>>41297
Boko Haram means 'western education is haram'. The group was started by Muhammad Yusuf. At first they held gatherings and talks at a Mosque and were completely non-violent. They disliked the new education system and wanted a return to Islamic education. Then the Nigerian government killed Muhammad Yusuf and destroyed their Mosque. The remaining members got angry about this and went into the jungle and took up arms. Their current leader is slightly crazy and has no qualms with killing women, children, and other non-combatants. They say they are willing to sign a cease fire deal, but only if their crazy leader will not be punished.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
ce6151 No.41304
>>41299
The intent of a group vs what it becomes can be radically different. Boko Haram may have started out with good intentions, but then they kidnapped a bunch of young girls and forced them into marriage - which is an absolute wrong.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
7eeb6a No.41305
>>41304
As I said, the current leader of Boko Haram is crazy. They also recently ambushed and killed a group of villagers during Ramadan right as they were about to break their fast. Most of their followers are probably just ignorant, they just listen to what their superiors say and don't really know that much about Islam. They consider all outsiders to be kufar, so their blood is halal (according to them).
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
69cb03 No.41314
>>41305
New IP.
Assalaamu 'Alaikum Wa Rahmatullah, my brother. I wasn't disagreeing with you. I was just continuing the discussion.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
edc89d No.41315
>>41294
anti-western cultural indoctrination=boko haram???
Thanks for the waswas akhi
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
02cb47 No.41316
Assalaamu 'Alaikum
Yes, Boko Haram is designated a terrorist organization by the United States (but, honestly, what Muslim group outside the US isn't considered a terrorist organization by the US?) and, in accordance with board policy and site rules, BH may be discussed as pertains to its history and structure and activities. However, the line is drawn at declarations of allegiance, links to or requests for how to donate any form of aid, and any other activities that may be perceived as giving aid or comfort to what is currently considered an enemy of the United States.
That said … carry on.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
09385f No.41317
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
nobody support terrorism or extremism
but it's not like boko haram are the only ones to blame
the violence of christisn is 10x worse
the focus on boko haram is just fear of islam takeover
because imagine christians randomly shoot muslim fulani villagers and kill all their animals, which are their source of livelihood , money food transport, ect,, imagine if a nazi come kill your family and burn all your money, car and house
this is extreme christian racist terrorism on muslims not reported on media
video is what they do to muslims but nobody knows it
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fbd36a No.41322
What I find utterly ridiculous is not that the West kills vastly more civilians than these "terrorists", or that they think that this is justified (why wouldn't they?), but that these *Muslims* are so, so afraid of allying with these "terrorists", and showing the slightest support for them is almost dangerous to a person socially and sometimes physically, even in Muslim countries, but allying with these genocidal NATO people is seen as safe and just a "controversial opinion".
I'm not endorsing or disparaging ISIS or Boko Haram, but I cannot fathom how and why a Muslim can support the West against these groups. I'm a 100% sure that the only reason a Muslim will chose the West over these guys is because they are afraid.
ISIS has killed 5000 people. America has killed 2000000 people in the Iraq War alone. It would take about 400 groups like ISIS to inflict similar damage.
You could argue that the death count is low because they lack firepower, and to a certain extent you're right, but that doesn't excuse the obvious practical damage done and the kufri ideologies perpetrated. And no matter how much you try to paint ISIS as a genocidal group killing everyone, they are definitely better than any group from the West as far as Islam is concerned, since they implement Shariah law to the letter, even though some actions they do may be deemed un-Islamic.
And I'm still waiting to see scholarly refutations of ISIS's books, such as fiqh al dimaa. It seems strange with the effort being put in against them and all the ulema that no one would point out the flaws in their texts from a sharia perspective. I have seen refutation of their actions, just not of their theory.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
7eeb6a No.41323
>>41322
Boko Haram isn't implementing Sharia law to the letter. They are a criminal gang who's version of Sharia is 'do what I say or I will kill you'. Most of their victims are Muslims who live in that part of the country. They use hit and run style tactics to indiscriminately attack Muslim civilians, trying to force the government into a peace deal where their insane leader doesn't get into any trouble. Most of their fighters know little if anything about Islam.
Just because they declared themselves to be allied with ISIS doesn't mean they are anything like them. If you want to be pro-ISIS that is one thing, but Boko Haram in its current form is something completely different.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
fbd36a No.41324
>>41323
I wasn't trying to be pro any group. I was just trying to say that literally any native group is better than the West, since at least that group will have to stay at the places they conquer, so their fortune is tied to the fortune of that place providing an incentive for development, even if that group were literally kaffirs that didn't even call themselves Muslims. Unlike the West, who just slaughter and take what they want and then go back home.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
09385f No.41325
>>41323
Initially when their leader pledged to IS he was accepted until he started doing things against islam so IS fired him, so a part of boko is still with IS but another with loyal to their ex leader. But that leader still claims to be part of IS, even if IS reject him. So there's two types of boko haram now.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
8521e0 No.41334
>>41325
Lmao, what could he have possibly done that even ISIS had to condemn it?
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
5eb386 No.41339
>>41334
Enslaving muslims I think.
ISIS does not believe muslims who live in kaffir lands deserve to be punished.
It might surprise you but they are very bureaucratic.
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
