[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/islam/ - 8kun Masjid

أَشْهَدُ أَنْ لَا إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا ٱللَّٰهُ وَأَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا رَسُولُ ٱللَّٰهِ
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload1 per post.


Goodbye everyone!

f51941 No.23585 [Last50 Posts]

POLITICAL THREAD

To everyone claiming sunnism

Reminder that if you like many self-proclaimed "sunnis" of today reject the authority of our Sunni Leaders(eg Aal Sauud, Banu Hashim etc) or insult them in any way then you are not part of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah since you are rejecting one of its core principles.

Every group today claiming to be Sunni studies al aqidah al Tahawiyya(meaning it is accepted by both Asharis/Maturidis and Ahlulhadeeth/salafis). And here you find the article:

>72. We do not recognize rebellion against our Imam or those in charge of our affairs even if they are unjust, nor do we wish evil on them, nor do we withdraw from following them. We hold that obedience to them is part of obedience to Allah, The Glorified, and therefore obligatory as long as they do not order to commit sins. We pray for them right guidance and pardon from their wrongs.

The above is what sets Sunnis apart from the Khawarij who would rebel(=khuruuj) against the Muslim Leaders and accuse them of being kuffar. So just like it's essential for a sunni to accept the virtues of Abu Bakr(ra) in opposition to the shi'a, you also have to accept the above. This is such a fundamental part of us Sunnis that it was included with the articles of faith(belief in Allah, the angels, etc) and went on to be accepted as one of the most authoritative texts on orthodox creed. Thus if you disagree with one of these then you are no longer a part of the Sunni community.

Wa salaam

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
Post last edited at

959a89 No.23590

>>23585

I agree as long as we reject the vast bidah of Ibn al-Qayyim and reject most, if not all, of the works of Taqī ad-Dīn Ahmad ibn Taymiyyah. These two have caused great division and harm with their bidah.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.23591

Question: How does a given Household become accepted as "Sunni Leaders"?

At some historical point every current "Sunni Leader" Household overthrew a previous "Sunni Leader" Household. So if rebelling against a Sunni Household is illegitimate and a nullifier of one's membership in the sunni jaamat then are not all of these regimes of today similarly illegitimate? If not, then why not?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f51941 No.23592

>>23590

That's not really the topic. Nevertheless, I'm not salafi. But my problem with the modern "anti wahhabis" polemicists is that they become anti-Arab and anti-Saudi Arabia. So they let politics take over the discussion, even though both salafis and asharis should agree on politics since they both claim to be ahlussunah wal jamaa, even though they exclude on another when it comes to the subject of sifaat.

>are not all of these regimes of today similarly illegitimate? If not, then why not?

That's not the reality we deal with so it's not relevant. The modern leaders achieved power after foreign occupation(specifics differ between countries). But the key point like I said was that we do not condone or support rebellions against the muslim leaders.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f51941 No.23593

>>23592

second part directed to >>23591

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bd832d No.23594

>>23585

Hmm. Well, I follow the jurist and mufassir Abd-Allah ibn Ibadh. All this politics mess gives me a headache.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9f8461 No.23595

File: 481ca2ee11a36f6⋯.png (1.03 MB,1280x720,16:9,image.png)

>>23585

>You're a kaffir if you don't accept the authority of the Kings of Saudi Arabia but you're the khawarij

Gonna restrain myself since this is an Islamic board but the Madkhalis better not take over

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f51941 No.23596

>>23595

>muh madkhali boogeyman

Sorry but you're arguing against the established orthodox sunni view. The Madkhali tribe does not come into the picture.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

959a89 No.23597

>>23592

I have no idea what you're talking about tbh

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9f8461 No.23598

File: 98b1495acf083fd⋯.jpg (23.58 KB,243x277,243:277,DDygbjTUAAE9UGB.jpg)

>>23596

>>muh madkhali boogeyman

That's very rich coming from people who use the khawarij boogeyman so much, your murji rubbish better be backed by some dalil since as you know agreeing with a fatwa without knowing the dalil is not acceptable though blind following is tolerable to some extent for the laymen

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bd832d No.23599

>>23598

That pic gave me a chuckle.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f51941 No.23600

>>23595

>people who use the khawarij boogeyman so much

Well maybe if the khawairj stopped resurfacing we could stop having to write it into our aqeedah texts like Al Tahawi did 1200 years ago.

>better be backed by some dalil

Congratulations you know about the word dalil. Perhaps now you should try to figure out what it means. I'll give you a tip, I provided "dalil" when I quoted as proof a 1200 old text accepted by every sunni scholar since then.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.23601

>>23592

>That's not the reality we deal with so it's not relevant.

I think it is relevant, because if a state celebrates its own Revolution every year but then says Revolutions are haram, that is not a satisfactory argument.

>The modern leaders achieved power after foreign occupation(specifics differ between countries).

Unless these foreign occupiers were non-sunnis I don't think that makes any difference from a Sunni fiqh perspective.

>But the key point like I said was that we do not condone or support rebellions against the muslim leaders.

How does a given Household become accepted as "Sunni Leaders"?

What does "unless they order to commit sins" mean in your quote? Does this mean they can turn the country into a pig farm and brewery but so long as they don't forcefeed people khmar and khanzeer everything is fine?

The criticism I have seen from Mamlaka Saudiyyah of modern day khawarij state building projects is:

1.) They hide their face when performing hadd punishments.

This is done in south east asian muslim countries and was never an issue before.

2.) We don't know where the leaders live.

This smacks of the Mamlaka not accounting for the weapons of modern warfare. There argument is basically "tell the people you are fighting how to kill your leaders."

3.) They will "lose."

This becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy if muslim states not only refuse to help muslims, but actively cooperate with countries like Iran, America, and Russia that support Shia war against Sunnis.

I do wish that America gave most of Iraq to Saudis. But that wasn't what happened, America gave the country to Iran. And yes, Mamlaka Saudiyyah complained about it, but there was no action taken. Absolutey no Sunni country to this day entered Iraq and shielded our brothers who were being bombed and starved for the past thirty years.

The Sunnis of Iraq were loyal to Saddam Hussein despite his volatile unjust rule. Why have all the neighboring Sunni countries abandoned the Sunnis of Iraq to be destroyed by rawafid armies? Why is there no accountability here for the Sunni households that were content for the Iraqi people to be so desperate they accepted a radical group?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9f8461 No.23602

>>23600

The text is not what i'm disagreeing with and the dalil i'm asking for is about Al Saud not the scholars of this Ummah, besides if you want to extract and direct ruling from these texts you must realise that there are always exceptions, exceptions which Al Saud has broken many times.

My skepticism resides within you and how you apply this rule not what the scholars have said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f51941 No.23603

>>23601

>The criticism I have seen from Mamlaka Saudiyyah

None of what you mentioned is the primary issue. The khawarij in question make takfir of the rulers accusing them of hukm bi ghayr ma anzal Allah(ie the definition of the khawarij) and murder muslims(civilians, border guards, police officers, etc.) meanwhile a lot of their leaders are sitting protected by the mushrikun in the west.

>to be destroyed by rawafid armies?

The only ones fighting the rawafidh today are Saudi Arabia.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ed8108 No.23604

File: 558d56a2ed3e855⋯.jpg (32.9 KB,710x540,71:54,x19we3rzy8cz.jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9f8461 No.23605

>>23603

>(ie the definition of the khawarij)

That's not the definition of a khawarij lol, the khawarij make takfir for great sins.

And it's unironically what the "leaders" of the Muslim world do today except maybe for Saudi Arabia and countries who similarly apply shari'a.

By completely abolishing the shari'a and imposing man made laws they become kuffar by the consensus of scholars.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f51941 No.23606

>>23602

>The text is not what i'm disagreeing with

Clearly you are.

>is about Al Saud

They are the aimmah(leaders) of saudi arabia, ie a large portion of sunnis. Khuruj is haram as per sunni belief end of.

>there are always exceptions

Nothing valid to sunnism.

A historical fact we must not forget is that Aal Saud is far less oppressive than early leaders were in the time sunni creed was codified. So where's the exceptions? Nowhere.

The only way you can argue for khuruj against Saudi Arabia is to use the EXACT same LITERAL argument used by the khawarij to whom the refutation of al Tahawi was mentioned in the first place! As in, hukm bi ghayr ma anzal Allah. So tl;dr you are using the dalil of the khawairj not those of ahlus sunnah.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f51941 No.23607

>>23605

>the khawarij make takfir for great sins.

The definition of khawarij is that they rebelled against the muslim leaders. This was called "kharaja 'ala" -> thus they are called khawarij.

You mentioned rawafidh but then you ignored it after I pointed out that the only ones fighting them is Saudi Arabia. That's because ht, isis, al qaeda etc are all empty rhetoric when it comes to kuffar, and are only interested in murder muslims.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f51941 No.23608

>>23605

>By completely abolishing the shari'a and imposing man made laws they become kuffar by the consensus of scholars.

This applies to you as well:

>The only way you can argue for khuruj against Saudi Arabia is to use the EXACT same LITERAL argument used by the khawarij to whom the refutation of al Tahawi was mentioned in the first place! As in, hukm bi ghayr ma anzal Allah. So tl;dr you are using the dalil of the khawairj not those of ahlus sunnah.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9f8461 No.23610

File: 878c275b5a77505⋯.jpg (22.25 KB,748x420,187:105,20246075_1468017379955699_….jpg)

>>23608

>“…..And those who do not rule by what Allah has revealed are disbelievers(Kafiroon)” [5:44]

>"…..And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the wrongdoers." [5:45]

>"…..And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the defiantly disobedient."[5:47]

>"O [my] two companions of prison, are separate lords better or Allah , the One, the Prevailing?"

"You worship not besides Him except [mere] names you have named them, you and your fathers, for which Allah has sent down no authority. Legislation is not but for Allah . He has commanded that you worship not except Him. That is the correct religion, but most of the people do not know."

[39:40]

>Have you seen those (hypocrites) who claim that they believe in that which has been sent down to you, and that which was sent down before you, and they wish to go for judgement (in their disputes) to the Taghut (false judges, etc.) while they have been ordered to reject them. But Shaitan (Satan) wishes to lead them far astray. [4:60]

>Ibn Taymiyyah (rh) said: “And it is known from the religion (of Islam) by necessity and by the consensus of all Muslims that whoever legalises to follow other than the religion of Islam or a Shariah other than the Shariah of Muhammad (SAW), he is a Kaafir. And his kufr is similar to that of the one who believes in some part of the book (Quran) and reject some of it.” [Majmua al-Fataawa (28/524)]

>Ibn Kathir (rh) said: “So Whosoever abandons the wise Shariah which was revealed upon Muhammad ibn Abdullah, the seal of the prophets, and goes to other abrogated Shariah for judgment, he becomes a Kaafir. So how about the one who goes to al-Yaasiq (man-made law) for judgment and gives it precedence (over the Shariah of Muhammad (SAW). Whosoever does this has become a Kaafir by the Ijma of the Muslims.” [Al-Bidayah Wan-Nihayah, (Vol. 13, p119)]

>“Thus, it has become in his sons a followed law to which they have been giving precedence over ruling by the book of Allah and the Sunnah of His messenger (SAW). Whoever does this is a Kaafir who must be FOUGHT until he returns to the rule of Allah and His messenger. So no one other than He should rule neither minorly or majorly" Tafseer Ibn Kathir, Vol 2, p.67

>Imaam Ahmad Shaakir said:

"The matter in these fabricated laws is clear with the clearness of the sun. It is clear Kufr and there is nothing hidden about it and there is no excuse for anyone who attributes themselves to Islaam, whoever they may be, to act according to it or to submit to it or to approve of it. So each person should beware and every person is responsible for himself. So the ‘Ulamaa should make the truth clear and tell what they have been ordered to tell without concealing anything.” – "Umdaat At-Tafseer Mukhtasar Tafseer Ibn Katheer of Ahmad Shaakir", Vol. 4/ 173-174

>Shaikh Muhammad Ibn Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen said: “The first type is when the Hukm of Allah is removed and replaced with another Taghuutee Hukm, so that the Hukm of the Shari’ah is eliminated between the people and he puts in its place another Hukm from the fabrication of the humans and they remove the laws of the Shari’ah concerning the Mu’amalah (i. e. the general actions between people) and they put in its place fabricated laws and this, without doubt, is Istib’daal (i.e. replacement) of the Shari’ah of Allah subhaanahuu wa-ta’ala, with other than it. And this is Kufr which removes one from the Milla because this person put himself at the level of the Creator because he shara’a (legislated) for the slaves of Allah that which Allah ta’ala did not give permission for and that is Shirk in His, ta’ala’s saying: “Or have they partners with Allâh (false gods), who have instituted for them a religion, which Allâh has not allowed?” (Ash-Shu’ara, 21) -

{“Fiqh Al-‘Ebaadaat”, #60}

>Shaikh ‘Abdul-‘Azeez Ibn ‘Abdullah Ibn Baaz said: “There is no Eeman for the one who believes the laws of the people and their opinions are superior to the Hukm of Allah and His Messenger or that they are equal to it or that they resemble it or who leaves it or replaces it with fabricated laws and institutions invented by people, even if he believes that the laws of Allah are more encompassing and more just.” [Wujoob Tah’keem Shari’ah Allah’ (pg. 16-17)]

Is Allah a khariji ?

Is Ibn Tayymiyah a khariji ?

Is Ibn Kathir a khariji ?

Is Ibn Baz a khariji ?

Is Ibn 'Uthaymeen a khariji ?

May all guide or destroy the murjia of this Ummah

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f51941 No.23611

So to summarize:

The original khawairj made takfir of the muslim leaders using the justification that they rule by other than what Allah revealed. As a response to this the Sunni scholars wrote in their aqeedah text REFUTING this saying we do not make KHURUJ on the aimmah.

Fast forward to the 21st century and what do we have? """"sunnis"""" using the exact literal argument by the khawarij to stipulate an "exception" to the REFUTATION OF THAT VERY ARGUMENT BY SUNNI SCHOLARS 1200!! years ago.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.23612

File: dbc2ffc3d43384b⋯.jpg (54.74 KB,899x506,899:506,salmansadr.jpg)

>>23603

>hukm bi ghayr ma anzal

>We hold that obedience to them is part of obedience to Allah, The Glorified, and therefore obligatory as long as they do not order to commit sins.

Surah Maidah 44-47.

>The only ones fighting the rawafidh today are Saudi Arabia.

Zaydis are not rejectors of the khilafah rashidun they are useful idiots of the Rawafid. The early Saudi States invaded and destroyed Karbala, because it was the right thing to do, now they sit with Muqtada who chased the Sunnis out of Baghdad with American support.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.23613

>>23607

>You mentioned rawafidh but then you ignored it

Check userids please.

>That's because ht, isis, al qaeda etc are all empty rhetoric when it comes to kuffar, and are only interested in murder muslims.

HT is rhetoric, that's all they ever claimed to be. The other groups do fight shia, you are not informed to say otherwise. AQ fights Shia in Syria and ISIS fights them in Iraq and Syria. We need facts straight.

This is an academic website that shows media releases from all these extreme groups.

www.jihadology.com

You can even search it by the group and it shows who is fighting who.

And yes, I give Saudi and some other countries credit for trying to help in Syria. Saudi was fighting Shia there too. I wish they'd done that in Iraq.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.23614

File: f0cc6b90bdbc41f⋯.jpg (16.32 KB,600x600,1:1,lqb.jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a400a5 No.23616

File: 3bf84ca8d65b90c⋯.gif (66.52 KB,200x200,1:1,IMG_4493.GIF)

Well we got a political thread finally.

ONE political thread.

NO personal insults / flames.

REPORT ad hominem, do NOT respond. This is a MASJID.

Besides that, feel free to have free speech of the islamopolitical variety.

Thank you.

-VOL

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f51941 No.23617

>>23610

Listen here you I didn't come to make the blind see or the deaf hear, but to point out that you and your ilk are as sunni as the "sunni" who makes takfir of Abu Bakr(ra).

I have summarized it well here, the idiocy of the modern day crypto-sunni khawarij >>23611

>>23613

>We need facts straight.

The facts are that muslim countries have weekly murders by these groups meanwhile iran is safe. Ashidda'u a'la al-mu'mineen.

no personal insults of other muslims

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
Post last edited at

9f8461 No.23621

>>23617

>Listen here you مارق ملعون, I didn't come to make the blind see or the deaf hear, but to point out that you and your ilk are as sunni as the "sunni" who makes takfir of Abu Bakr(ra).

What a spotless refutation

>NO personal insults / flames.

>REPORT ad hominem, do NOT respond. This is a MASJID.

My point is that shoehorning anyone that uses the non appliance of shari'a as proof against the rulers of today's iman is into this khawarij boogeyman is not smart.

Making takfir on the non-application of the shari'a for even one rule is halal and any Muslim who does so is 100% within their right, people conflict it with kharijism because it's so widesepread today so they suddenly stand back in fear insulting anyone who has enough courage to do so (takfir in this case).

Though i try to stay consistent and as i've said the non-appliance of shari'a is not what people hate Al Saud for, you're the one who went there.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f51941 No.23622

>>23621

>What a spotless refutation

I've written seven posts against you. All you're doing at this point is ignoring me and repeating your same argument copy pasted by the khawarij.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bd832d No.23625

>>23616

I do not envy you this task, brother.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d01790 No.23632

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d01790 No.23633

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.23655

>>23585

saudi arabia is not legitimate they are slaves of usa and israel and should be replaced by a true islamic state inshallah

madkhalis pls go

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b2b605 No.23657

>>23655

this makes sense on some level ^

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8cdac0 No.23673

Any ruler that does not rule by the Shari'a is a kafir full stop. Unfortunately, a lot of Muslim majority countries are not ruled by Shari'a, Tunis, Egypt, Jordan etc.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24072

Re: Kurdistan

Anything that takes away territory from Iran and Iraq should be be supported by Sunnis. A Kurdish state may start out as some gay murray bookchin zionist anarchist state but could become a religious sunni state in the future inshaAllah.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

660cf6 No.24075

>>24072

But aren't we hoping that Iraq will also become a religious sunni state in the future?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24076

>>24075

There are pockets of Sunnis around baghdad but they have been massacred and deported from our medieval capital of Baghdad. Baghdad is now jointly administered by USA and Iranian 12'er rafidis in Greenzone and Muqtada AsSadr's rafidi slum city known as Sadr city.

Iran and USA are too powerful in the region for sunnis to take back control in near future. Best thing would be a split of the country since it is basically a colony given to Iran by its secret friend, USA.

Three years ago I had hoped ISIS would be able to maintain peace with commie Kurds. But within a year the peace fell through. If commie kurds and Isis had ceasefire it would have been best. But USA promised big money to kurds to start fight with Isis.

So at this point there would have to be a split of the north of Iraq (kurd) and the rest (sunni) from the southeast controlled by USA and Shia death squads since they welcomed the invasion.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24077

>>24075

Short answer: not possible until al-ahzab Air Forces leave. This is Sunni vs al-ahzab not just sunni vs those who curse Companions and Wives of Prophet saw.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24078

File: e11bd4a240a505f⋯.jpg (38.43 KB,397x960,397:960,IMG_4662.JPG)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24081

>>24072

No, a state founded on falsehood can never succeed nor become a state of haqq.

It is based on secular democracy, the KDP is the largest party. Islamist parties have little traction and with the rise of nationalism there is little chance kurdistan will be islamist.

There is a reason why westerners support kurds, because they are secular, pro "womens rights" and pro lgbtq rights

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24087

>>24081

The Ottoman khilafah became a gayjew secular state. And now the soviet friendly sykes picot and colonized states have become more conservative in many ways. Things can change.

I don't think the "founders" (really zionist beggars) of Kurdland will become practicing en masse, but rather that their bizarre belief system of homosex and anarchy will have no traction in reality - therefore collapse - inshaAllah.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

660cf6 No.24095

>>23673

>>23655

Since you don't have the attention span to read the thread I'll quote the summary

>The only way you can argue for khuruj against Saudi Arabia is to use the EXACT same LITERAL argument used by the khawarij to whom the refutation of al Tahawi was mentioned in the first place! As in, hukm bi ghayr ma anzal Allah. So tl;dr you are using the dalil of the khawairj not those of ahlus sunnah.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24102

>>24087

This is wishful thinking, dont you know that if you give them part of iraq and iran they will want part of syria and turkey (sunnis) also? Pic related, how the americans plan to divide the middle east>>24087

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

660cf6 No.24103

>>24076

>to Iran by its secret friend, USA.

I have remarked on this before and it shows how naive the average sunni is. The american media, or rather the entire world, is focused on how the evil Saudi Arabia is spreading "wahhabism" and supporting al qaida(whose main objective is to get rid of Aal Saud), but meanwhile Iran's freaking OFFICIAL(!) foreign policy is to export terrorism in the name of "the islamic revolution" and irani military officials are on tv saying that they've conquered the four sunni capitals and are re-establishing their persian empire as we speak, but no one gives a sugar about this because Arabs are evil etc etc israel something something and that's how it goes.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f2a9f6 No.24104

>>24102

Idc about territorial integrity of Syria because it was created by France and is ruled by Alawi and 12'ers and Russia.

Idc about Turkey's territorial integrity because Erdogan is a giant fake out that didn't do anything good for the Ummah.

That being said I'm way more sympathetic to Turkish borders than Syrian ones, obviously.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24105

>>24104

http://syrianobserver.com/EN/Features/33314

you sound like a kurdish nationalist tbh

you want civil war among sunnis then you have bad intentions for sure

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24106

File: a7995b74697ed1a⋯.jpg (716.43 KB,900x1249,900:1249,Ralph_Peters_solution_to_M….jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

910c81 No.24108

File: 8f832bbc86979d4⋯.jpg (214.43 KB,994x1024,497:512,IMG_4669.JPG)

>>24105

Syria is already a civil war, if commie kurds fight Assad then ALHAMDULILLAH. Kurdistan would at this point hurt sunnis less than it will hurt shia. Sunnis have messed up so badly in the region that chaos actually helps us at this point. We have very little left to lose in the countries that have been targeted for shia takeover. The status quo is benefiting only Iran and their minions.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24109

>>24108

short term yes, but long term is the starvation of kurds and destruction of their cities

this will only bring more sunni deaths

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

34b184 No.24110

>>24109

I see your point. Let us both make dua that the muslims can emerge from this rafidi-salibi nightmare.

It's hard to think longterm when the rawafid are bringing in rafidis from around the world to fight in their death squads. Meanwhile naive Sunnis are terrified of their own mujahideen and governments are torturing them. Once again it is incumbent to ask: how did we get here? Total failure of sunni leaders worldwide who are paid off by Iran, Russia and America.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

660cf6 No.24111

>>24110

The sunni leaders are the only ones doing anything concrete to keep of the irani threat. If by "mujahideen" you mean the khariji groups then they are too busy murdering sunni security guards. al qaida etc will never ever be able to take on iran let alone america or russia.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1e4188 No.24112

Assalamualaikum brother i hope you are in good health.

Regarding on Al Saud government. Didnt the leader of the government of the prophet Muhammad (SAW) be chosen by musyawarrah (by discussion between votes of society and/or representatives)?

1) Since Saudi Arabia is a monarchy, wouldnt that be a deviation from the fundamental Islamic government?

Forgive my lack of references, but doesnt the prophet Muhammad (SAW) taught us to not fight anyone as long as it does not break the rules of Islam?

2) Hence in any kind of government, wouldnt it be logical to fight (not through physical abuse) a leader that does corruption or anything that breaks the rule as an honest Muslim?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

660cf6 No.24113

>>24112

wa aleykum assalam

1. No. There's nothing inherently unislamic about monarchy. Kingship is mentioned in the Quran as being the sunnah of some Prophets, and it was what the caliphate became quite early on, in the time of the sahaba(ra) even. If you say Aal Saud is wrong then you have to start invalidating the entire muslim history.

And as for the term khalifah itself then it has not come predefined with a bunch of law books. Linguistically a king can be a khalifah. And you see in hadiths mentioning khalifah, in some variations of the same hadiths it says ameer instead, which means the narrators did not undersand khalifah as being something inherently different.

The idea that only the one who has authority over the entire muslim world himself is the legitimate leader leads to circular reasoning if you think about it. Because who is the one who controls the muslim world then? The one to whom everyone gives bayah to. But who does everyone give bayah to? Well the one that controls the muslim world. But since no such one single person exist, and the only way for such a person to even come about is by one faction giving bayah before the rest of the world does, which again would make him illegitimate, it all invalidates itself and crumbles.

And we must also be a little bit realistic here. Because someone will perhaps bring a fatwa out of context, which is from a completely different time. And that person might say "well uhh the law of Allah does not change so it shouldn't matter" well no, but politics change, and the reality of the world changes. So political opinions and fatawa can not be just taken out of context. That's what isis are doing with ibn Taymiyya's fatwa which was specific to that circumstance so it's clearly a misuse.

2. There are explicit hadiths about not fighting a muslim leader even if he is oppressive, because it will just lead to even greater fitnah, and this was also the position the salaf took. Even though there were a lot of fitnah during that time the four imams for example did not call for wars and fight, and they prayed behind those oppressive leaders in salaat nonetheless without making takfir etc.

This is as far as rebellion goes. I'm not sure what you mean by without physical abuse. Instigating fitnah is just as bad.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

af3b52 No.24114

>>24111

>The sunni leaders are the only ones doing anything concrete to keep of the irani threat.

If sunni leaders want to help they would mobilize like they did during atheist invasion of afghanistan. Without the $﷼ from the leaders our mujahideen become "terrorists", because terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich. What drove the wedge between rulers and mujahideen was threats and $﷼ from Imperialist powers.

30 years - no help for our brothers in iraq.

Iran has internationally recruited irregular shia militias, why don't we have ONE sunni country with ONE internationally recruited irregular militia?

Give me legit answers, open up, or i write you off as arguing in bad faith.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

af3b52 No.24115

>>24113

>But since no such one single person exist, and the only way for such a person to even come about is by one faction giving bayah before the rest of the world does, which again would make him illegitimate, it all invalidates itself and crumbles.

>invalidates itself and crumbles

Weew.

Not an invalidation, whatsoever that some make bayah before others. Please read Osmanish history. Whole sunni world was never under Ottoman control, still the legitimacy grew and became widespread - from very humble origins!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

660cf6 No.24116

>>24114

>Give me legit answers

You're basically asking me how come Saudi Arabia doesn't mobilize a war against israel, america, iran, russia at the same time. Jeez I dunno man, tough question. Maybe because it would be suicide? But hey, that is what al qaida want, a complete mayhem in the muslim world since this according to them will bring forth al mahdi and you know how that narrative goes. But I think muslims should live in the real world and not the fantasy that HT and co. has set up.

As for shia then they're supported by the entire world and all shia are loyal to their leaders meanwhile sunnis compete with each other in who can display the most hatred for Arabs. The average sunni has bought into the shia propaganda.

>>24115

>Not an invalidation

You clearly did not understand my point. Re-read what came before that which you just quoted. I'm arguing against those who say that the only legitimate leader is the one who controls the entire muslim world, and since no such person exists, that must mean that none of the leaders of today are legitimate -> everyone should murder everyone in the muslim world. If you admit that you do not need to have the authority over everyone to be a legitimate leader the the discussion is over since there's nothing anymore to invalidate the legitimacy of the sunni leaders we have.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

af3b52 No.24117

>>24116

>You're basically asking me how come Saudi Arabia doesn't mobilize a war against israel, america, iran, russia at the same time. Jeez I dunno man, tough question.

No, I'm very aware of the reality of USrael dominance. I don't expect suicide from saudi, but do expect some fronts against Iran, Russia. That was a strawman then, brother.

>As for shia then they're supported by the entire world

True since their entire history is stabbing Islam in the back.

>and all shia are loyal to their leaders

Dude the last 40 years has seen the shia overthrow literally all their leaders and some of ours too. Syria: nusayri coup against UAR; Lebanon: they are loyal to a militia not the country's leaders who they assassinate; Iran: overthrew Shah; Yemen: revolution; Iraq collaboration with US and Iran to overthrow….

They are loyal only now since their leaders are revolutionaries dedicated to the cause of ruining Islam.

>The average sunni has bought into the shia propaganda.

Sadly true, ikhwan al-muflisoon is responsible for this shiaization of aswj too.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

660cf6 No.24118

>>24117

>but do expect some fronts against Iran, Russia.

I'm not sure what exactly you mean. But from experience most I talk to who say these kinds of things like "uhh saudis are puppets man they support israel blah blah" I ask them ok what should they do and they can't say anything concrete. They just expect miracles basically. But anyway I agree with your post.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24120

The ikhwan muslimeen did nothing wrong

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7338e9 No.24127

I have a quick question. Is Syrian Grand Mufti a sugare or sunni?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24128

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>24127

on paper he is sunni but most likely a shii or alawi doing taqiyya

here he is doing shia propaganda, ahlbayt tv is iranian sponsored

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1b269 No.24129

>>24127

He claims to be "sunni and shiite". In other words, he's a toolbag that trades in nonsense. And he's a criminal apostate that fights muslims.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1b269 No.24130

>>24128

I'm sure he has joined ithna ashariyya rawafid.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24131

File: dccf505fd44d0b1⋯.png (153.63 KB,750x991,750:991,IMG_4678.PNG)

One of the leading sons of mutah agrees with me that Kurdistan hurts shia. Just the fact that this self mutilating pig is against kurdistan should be a sign to support it. I'd love to see the commie kurds fighting the iraqi puppet army.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

76e4d1 No.24133

File: 87025923d4f83c2⋯.jpg (65.52 KB,596x283,596:283,israel_kurdistan.jpg)

1. I'm not "sunni" I'm muslim.

2. All of our "muslim leaders" like the Sauds are props installed by the British/Zionist governments to divide the ummah and exploit the land and it's resources.

3. Not even shia, but Iran is currently the only nominally muslim country I see that isn't subverted by Israeli interests. And they are absolutely right when it comes to Kurdistan

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24134

>>24131

commie kurds are bad news for everyone, in the long run it will hurt turks more than iran or iraqi rawafidh

reason im against kurdistan is the instability it will bring

saudi is next dont think the usa will stop there

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24135

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

wow new low

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24137

>>24133

>1

Do you curse the sahaba?

Do you curse the wives of the Prophet saw?

Do you think the 12 imams were created before Adam pbuh?

Do you think that being an imam is a better station than being a prophet?

If you answered yes to any of these questions you are not a muslim. If you answered no to any of them you are not a shii.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

76e4d1 No.24138

>>24137

I literally said I'm not shia though.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24139

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>24133

Iran cooperates with USrael in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are junior allies with Israel, Russia, US, etc. If you don't see that then you probably think pro-wrestling is real. Naive sunnis like you are the problem.

>>24134

The concept of "Turkey" is turkness. I don't see that as a desirable, justifiable, or even viable basis for organizing a state. Turkey can't come out on top as an ethnic state, if it wants to make itself relevant and serve as an alternative to commie kurds it must offer an islamic solution - an islamic raison de etat.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

76e4d1 No.24140

>>24139

Their beef is with Israel, not the US specifically, though they either don't understand that US interests are beholden to Israeli ones or that they are adamant about making the distinction between the two, considering the US's superior military might. They've always been willing to negotiate with the US on political matters. I don't believe the same could be said for Israel.

And it seems that their involvement in Afghanistan was minimal at best. Staying out of the way and talking a bit with Massoud's men hardly seems to be a gamechanger to me.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24141

>>24138

You also said you're not sunni just "muslim" so it's impossible to take you seriously. This is not kindergarten, we have to deal with the fact that there are deviant groups that ascribe themselves to Islam and distinguish ourselves from them.

Please don't take any offense, it seems like your heart is in the right place. Let me put it this way: if youre not sunni or ibadi then you should come clean and we can try to help you get back on track… More likely than not you are a self-hating Sunni who has been conditioned to disparage and doubt his own existence. We can help you if that's the problem too.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24142

>>24140

>beef is with israel not US

>They've always been willing to negotiate with the US on political matters

So what's with all the "Death to America" chanting, "Great Satan" stuff? Just hollow propaganda? Exactly.

>not a gamechanger

It wouldn't be if they didn't pretend to hate America as they help them conquer countries.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

76e4d1 No.24143

>>24141

I don't ascribe to a particular denomination or sect of Islam because the Prophet (pbuh) did not do so. The people who followed Muhammad (pbuh), and knew him personally referred to themselves as muslimeen and mumineen, not "sunnis" or "ibadis" or even as ahl as-sunnah.

>>24142

Israel is the real threat, America is merely their puppet in that regard. Same as most of Europe, same as the Saudis/Gulf states, same as the Kurds.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24144

File: 37d3dbb51469387⋯.jpg (70.19 KB,500x322,250:161,IMG_0965.JPG)

>>24143

How do you make salah?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

76e4d1 No.24145

>>24144

>How do you make salah?

As it is described in sahih hadith (bukhari and muslim)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

660cf6 No.24146

>>24143

>The people who followed Muhammad (pbuh), and knew him personally referred to themselves as muslimeen and mumineen, not "sunnis" or "ibadis" or even as ahl as-sunnah.

Yes and the companions(ra) transmitted what they knew to the next generation and to the next and the people who inherited this legacy became known as the four imaams in fiqh who make up ahlussunnah.

>As it is described in sahih hadith (bukhari and muslim)

You mean you read through the hadiths on prayer yourself and then wrote up how to do it? Seems more likely you learned it through fiqh manuals.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24147

File: 8b3cc224ef2a072⋯.jpg (98.26 KB,1024x745,1024:745,IMG_1768.JPG)

>>24145

>>24145

What do you reject from Sunni Islam besides the term?

there are reports of ibn umar and ibn abbas ra using term ASWJ.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

660cf6 No.24148

>>24147

The report from ibn Abbas(ra) is not authentic from what I've read. But it doesn't matter, ahlussunnah is used to ascribe oneself to the muslim community. But it appears he doesn't want that, which is understandable if he thinks that the entire muslim world is nothing but kuffar-puppets(which he's gotten from the irani propaganda machine). So talking about aqidah and salat isn't really going to change anything if he's on a political level with the rafidha.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5e9bb3 No.24149

Wait, so you reject a term for not being from time of prophet but accept ahadith from Imam Muslim and Imam Bukhari, Ahl as sunnah Imams that were born 200 years after Hijrah?

>>24148

I guess he's religiously orthodox (sunni) but politically shia. That'd be fine if this was 1400 years ago, but the Shia used the tragic fitna as a chance to change the religion - that's the problem. The mutazila used logic to change Islam and the shia used emotionalism to change Islam. The shia have been much more successful since emotionalism is inherently manipulative and caters to the lowest impulses of the people.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

5e9bb3 No.24150

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24154

>>24139

1. turkey isnt based on ethnicity, kurds, arabs, laz, greeks, assyrians all live in turkey and are considered turks

2. turkey does have an islamic solution they are becoming more islamic,

3. kurdistan does NOT offer 1 islamic solution, they will be even more secular than turkey

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f54989 No.24156

File: 5212963a0031fac⋯.png (198.01 KB,425x480,85:96,img_1136.png)

>>24154

What i see as half full you see as half empty and vice versa. We have similar views, so I don't want to quibble over different perceptions.

My main points are:

Kurdistan threatens three shia countries and only one sunni country.

The threat to Turkey is less because Kurds are same religion as Turks. This means if Turkey becomes a proper sharia state that fully rejects Ataturk faggotry it would make separatism less attractive.

Saudi is pro-Kurdistan, get on board already. There is a major realignment going on. Everyone has seen that the shia are worse than the kurdish commies and the zionists combined. Now everyone is starting to realize the Shia talk about filistine as they kill sunnis, they say death to America as they work hand in hand with them.

All the right people are crying about Kurdistan, including Nasrullat from HizbulShaytan.

We need a functional sunni version of Quds force and Basij that will protect muslims around the world. If the extremism of the current fighters bothers us then the words of Sunni Ulema against them carry ZERO WEIGHT unless they organize real mujahideen that march out and show the correct way to fight jihad.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24158

>>24156

The way I see it both saudi and iran are working for the interests of USA and Israel. Iran does it more covertly and in secret.

Saudi hosts american bases and helps them bomb muslims. The fact that al saud support kurdistan is not a good thing, in fact israel also supports kurdistan.

Obviously our support means nothing, but I think you are not seeing the full picture here. Its not as easy as kurd vs iran

its kurd + israel + saudi vs iran vs turkey and syria

I would include syria as a sunni state not shia even if its controlled by the rawafilth, the ppl who will suffer under kurdish commies and are right now are SUNNI ARABS not nusayris or majos pagans

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

660cf6 No.24159

>>24158

Saudi doesn't have any american bases

>bombs muslims

You mean irani backed houtis in Yemen?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

aa1a0a No.24160

File: 43430575b516607⋯.jpg (80.97 KB,479x423,479:423,IMG_1661.JPG)

>>24158

>The fact that al saud support kurdistan is not a good thing, in fact israel also supports kurdistan.

Bashar himself killed and displaced more sunnis in 6 years than Israel did in 60. When I hear the old hollow filistine slogans today I'm sad to say I think taqiyya. We have to accept that Saudi hands are somewhat tied when it comes to Israel. Detente with Israel is the best option we have now. Look at Lebanon: Sunnis are defenseless against a hezbollah puppet state that tortures those who fight Bashar and actively sends thousands of Hezbollah to help him… Look at Bahrain where Sunnis are literally under siege by a shia mob. I don't need to mention Iraq and Syria where we are killed by Shia and their superpower friends do I?

Shia don't make dawa to kuffar. Shia don't fight kuffar. Shia are only interested in toppling sunni countries and killing us.

>>24159

Saudi and other gulf countries help Iraqi puppet state against Sunnis. It's a big problem… they think they can appeal to Iraqis sense of Arabism when in reality the shia Iraqis are sugar-tier in everyway and can barely speak Arabic - listen to the mutah monkey Sistani speak. They're iranians pretending to be arabs. Meaningful sunnism is almost wiped out, soon there will be a billion useless ignorant sunnis with no heartland and an empire of sahaba-cursers.

The saudis also screwed up bigtime by supporting Sisi, now the Egyptian Shia are starting to show themselves with no fear. Look it up.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ca07d7 No.24161

>>24147

>What do you reject from Sunni Islam besides the term?

Functionally nothing

>>24149

>I guess he's…politically shia.

I wouldn't say that exactly. It's just that, as far as I can see, Iran's foreign policy is actually painting them simply as the least of all the evils in this conflict.

They helped out our brothers in Bosnia with their jihad against the Serbs.

They're the only ones Israel seriously considers a threat.

They're trying to unite themselves and the shia under one bloc while everyone else is busy killing themselves and fermenting further conflict at Israel's behest.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1aa5fb No.24162

File: 3465d3b864d8e34⋯.jpg (125.98 KB,720x960,3:4,IMG_4688.JPG)

>>24161

>iran

>least of the evils

Hello, Assadist friend.

you're probably a curious semi-genuine poltard soft-larping as a muslim. Or just a complete jahil. Either way please educate yourself.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c5fb04 No.24167

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24174

>>24160

Hey what happened to this:

"I was a staunch defender of the kingdom irl and online for many years but this is has finally broken my back. I'm done forever carrying water for them and support the death of House of Saud." ?

saudi and iran are equally bad, saudi represses sunni islamists movements and iran kills sunnis

saudi also helped usa against iraq and they do host bases until now

I can never side with israel, I would fight israel if it means siding with hezbollah

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24182

File: 037c28a94576c95⋯.jpg (117.24 KB,702x602,351:301,IMG_4073.JPG)

>>24174

Someone can hate house of Saud but realize Iran is a different league of worse.

>saudi and iran are equally bad, saudi represses sunni islamists movements and iran kills sunnis

False equivalence.

>saudi also helped usa against iraq and they do host bases until now

Saudi was against the war from beginning which is a huge credit since Saddam was a threat to them. They realized he was better than Iran.

>I can never side with israel, I would fight israel if it means siding with hezbollah

Well, hezbollah are the border guards for Israel so you'll never have the chance.

Pic related, sunni brother hanged by Iran for being sunni. His daughter now orphaned.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9f28b2 No.24191

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d6fefa No.24196

>>24191

what was the pic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

354f70 No.24204

>>24128

Can you prove it or are you talking out of your ass?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24208

File: b729b6a1f5a61da⋯.jpg (83.48 KB,750x553,750:553,IMG_4745.JPG)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

354f70 No.24209

>>24208

Thats funny, because it's the sunni countries that are pro-america

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24211

>>24209

It's amazing how people will lie to themselves just to maintain their own false narratives. Alright you've torn the face off your strawman. No one ever said SUNNI PUPPETS are anti-US. Iran is not either - it's just indifferent towards the zionist project and hypocritical for its harsh PR against it. In Iran the war against Israel is just an abstraction like the "War on Drugs", it's a campaign issue at home and pablum for its client states & shia slums of the Arab world. We can denounce sunni puppet states all day for being US lapdogs but most countries in the world are, including Iran. Remember when Iran mourned 9/11 and helped US invade two countries???

Israel is the political iron lung for Tehran. The Shia are degenerates that love to use Palestinians in their passion play for political points.

Every muppet knows that southern Iraq is basically controlled by Iran. Why would America hand out Iraq and Afghanistan (to some extent) to Iran?

The answer: America NEEDS Iran. America needs secterian heretic Shias who will serve as a meat canon of shrieking self-mutilating idolators against a Sunni uprising. Iran has been used against Sunnis for hundreds of years. The Ottomans that selflessly sent shipments of food to starving Irishmen had to contend with the same problem that we face today.

Shias and Anti-American cheerleaders of the Shias will always point out how America puts sanctions on Iran, shot a nuclear scientist, etc. These facts and the empty rethoric of Iran (speech without action i.e. 'Marg bar Amrika') make it seem (especially to laymen and conspiracy freaks) that Iran is indeed the enemy of America. While the ongoing collaboration between these countries against Sunnis debunks it.

So the only correct stance to take is the middle path, which is that although the old guard Iranians might sincerely hate America and that Neocon scum is not keen on the mullahs, it is a dysfunctional relationship rather than truly hostile. They are like an abusive husband (USA+ISRAEL) and a bitch wife (Iran) that are going to stay together for the sake of the kids(Shia statelets in the sunni heartland).

Alliances between states do not require meetings, ambassador exchanges or declarations of support. Mutually understood interests that the parties act upon are sufficient. Clearly the relationship between Iran and USA is undeniable now on the ground so the theatre has become absolutely absurd…. remember when Netanyahu was in Washington DC talking about another "holocaust" and this time with "Persian bazaars" LOL.

Tldr: Iran's strategy is to give enough support to shia militias to destabilize sunni communities, pay lip service to being anti-Zionist AND leave enough funds for tacky dresses, nose jobs, and transgender surgeries.

Also, Iran was historically a sunni scholarly bastion and for political reasons 500 years ago their religion was forcibly changed. Since then they have no islamic intellectual value, their 'religion' is sugar-tier.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f19c6d No.24212

>>24211

Also don't forget how Iran never participated in a single war against Israel.

Saudi even risked putting an Oil embargo against US (literally the only country that has put any kind of sanction against US) and its allies, knowing that US could invade it. Still Saudi is the villain that even so-called Sunnis criticize all the time, and suddenly Iran which hasn't done jacksugar for Islamic cause apart from fueling civil wars in Sunni countries is the "best" muslim country.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24213

File: 7b3c722d20b3087⋯.jpg (219.74 KB,1024x1024,1:1,IMG_0588.JPG)

>>24212

Yes. How about when the shehes say that "there is no anti-US sunni state so we should support Iran."

Well, Saddam had major faults but at least he was sunni and anti-US imperialism. The shia conspired with America to invade his country and then lynched him…

Same with the Taliban in Afghanistan.

So their argument really is "Iran killed all the anti-US sunnis so we might as well work with Iran." Nope. Rot in Hell.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c089cd No.24216

>>24211

>>24212

Hmm. What about their use of Hezbollah as a proxy in Lebanon?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24222

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>24216

The very people - Iranian clients - that have been in geographic/materiel position to attack Israel for decades are waging war on their sunni citizenry. If Bashar hadn't been a (for lack of better term) abject wuss he would have opened a way for volunteers to establish a front against Israel at some point during his long tenure. Turning the Golan heights into an exurb of Gaza City would have made him a popular leader throughout the entire world. In large part he was simply not sufficiently anti-zionist for Muslims or zionist enough for Jews.

Syrians will tell you what would happen to them if they were to try taking arms and fighting Israel: the regime would arrest them. So if you were a Syrian, Assad was the first obstacle you encountered on the path to Jerusalem. Bashar is panicked enough since the uprising to import fighters from around the world… Why he didn't do that earlier against Israel just shows he's unfit.

Hezbollah only fights Israel when Israel enters Lebanese territory. Which means they haven't fought Israel in 11 years and when they did it was just a week-long skirmish. That's it. The main purpose of hezbollah is to kill sunnis in Iraq and Syria. Mainstream and well-known formerly pro-Hezbollah islamic scholars like Yusuf Qaradawi have admitted that they were wrong to support Hezbollah.

For your own sake and for the ummah you must not be naive. You must not be deceived by the totally exposed taqiyyah of the 12'er rawafid.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24223

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Shia slaughtering Sunnis in Syria.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24224

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Shia slaughtering Sunnis in Iraq.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8e423d No.24233

>>24222

Israel isn't exactly weak; it's no wonder there hasn't been a serious effort against them since the 70's: They've used all those American tax dollars and AIPAC lobbyists over the decades to great effect. Assad and every other country is more concerned with preserving their own slice of clay over fighting Israel.

But really, this just reinforces the idea for me that there is no "good side" in this crapheap of a conflict. I'm just settling for anyone that even marginally opposes Israel at this point; something Iran at least has the appearance of doing unlike Daesh, the Salafi oil barons and their assortment of US funded and CIA-trained militias.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24234

>>24233

Proto-Isis actually sent some people to attack Israel almost a decade ago and they were killed by hezbollah. That's when Zarqawi called them the border guards of Israel. No one is saying that there should be a conventional war against Israel at this point in time. Assad should have just let volunteers come to open irregular fronts.

Qatar and Turkey support HAMAS…..And the argument that isis doesnt do anything against Israel falls pretty flat when you look at a map. "The Arab rulers shoot you in the back before the Israeli shoots you in the chest."

It seems like you're more anti-zionist than pro-muslim. And it also seems like you'll justify how shia talk big against Israel and then don't attack. Also, besides USA the biggest zionist country is Russia. Russia will never let its shia pets touch Israel.

>their assortment of US funded and CIA-trained militias.

You mean the FSA? The tiny militia with no anti-aircraft capabilities that has been wiped out? You're really going to compare that to the SAA, Iranian military, and shia militias that span the whole middle east? You're not genuine, whatsoever.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24236

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Tufayli, Founder of Hezbollah: Hezbollah Now is Just Border Guards for Israel

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24237

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Tufayli exposes Iran and America using shia as useful idiots against muslim.

Elsewhere he has said Shia need to stop killing Sunnis on Russian and American behalf or Sunnis will eventually wake up and wipe them out. He's right.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

589504 No.24271

>>24234

>Proto-Isis actually sent some people to attack Israel almost a decade ago and they were killed by hezbollah. That's when Zarqawi called them the border guards of Israel.

When exactly did Al-Qaeda ever attack or try to attack Israel?

>And the argument that isis doesnt do anything against Israel falls pretty flat when you look at a map.

How so? They're too busy blowing up civilians of all religions, fighting literally every one besides Israel and getting handily btfo'd in the process. That's what the maps say.

The Daesh Khawarij and Al-Qaeda are the same dog, it's just that one still has it's leash.

>Also, besides USA the biggest zionist country is Russia. Russia will never let its shia pets touch Israel.

Proof? Honest question, Is Russia supplying billions of rubles worth of money and materiel to Israel?

>It seems like you're more anti-zionist than pro-muslim.

I see two major barriers preventing a unified ummah. The zionists are one. Unfortunately, muslims themselves are another. We don't have our priorities straight. Lines in the sand, drawn up a hundred years ago by British and French oath breakers at the behest of their zionist friends. Cutting deals with any disgruntled sheikh or would be king, carving up the corpse of the Ottoman empire to secure oil for themselves and land for the rich zionists embedded in their governments. That's where the real loyalties lie. Not to Allah swt, not to the deen or to further the station of our brothers.

Hell, at least the Israelis have the excuse of not being muslim. Saudi and the rest of the gulf states don't even have that excuse. All that oil money, squandered on hotels and beachfront properties and expensive cars and making Masjid al-haram look like something out of a dystopian sci-fi novel, while muslims elsewhere starve and suffer. But they certainly have enough cash to spare to drop bombs on masjids and hospitals in Yemen and fund their lackey groups to do the same everywhere else.

Iran and Assad may not be the answer, but you cannot convince me that the Sauds are any better.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

589504 No.24272

But you know what? That's not even the Sauds fault that muslims find themselves in this situation. It's the culture. It's a new era of jahilliyah and backwardness.

Where does the practice of Bacha bazi fit in Islam? Of retaliatory rape of a criminal's family? Of honor killings?

>Indeed, Allah will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves. And when Allah intends for a people ill, there is no repelling it. And there is not for them besides Him any patron.

It's easy and accurate to blame the zionists and the west for our troubles, but they wouldn't even be an issue if we still had our deen.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

660cf6 No.24273

Rawafidh still keeping up with the taqiyya.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ca6f79 No.24274

>>24273

He could be a poltard. To quote a wise brother from here who made an observation:

''We tend to get /pol/acks pretending to be Shi'a because they've latched on to Shi'a as allies to the West while Sunni are the enemy. They have no idea how it really works and, when pressed enough, they expose themselves as knowing nothing about Islam except what they've learned

from memes.''

Speaking of memes.

>bacha bazi

Outlawed by Taliban, encouraged by American-Shia government.

>honor killing

From European colonial law, antithesis of sharia trial and haram from sahih hadith.

>retaliatory rape

Alleged to have happened twice. No proof, likely fake news.

>our deen

Says the guy who refuses to call himself sunni. What deen are you even talking about? Some people think deen means cursing sahaba, worshipping infallible imams made of light, damning wives of prophet to Hell, praying 3x a day, and making temporary marriages. And you are happy to stand among those people, fine, don't be expected to be taken seriously.

And I'm anti-12'er. Some shia are fine like the Zaydis. They just had a political disagreement with ahl us sunnah. That's cool. They didn't use politics as a chance to change the deen like the 12'ers did.

12'ers made up their own definition of ahl ul bayt where they reject the wives despite clearly in Quran the wives are ahl al bayt. And they reject most of the progeny of Hassan and Hussein. For instance where did the evil rawafid split from zaydi shia?

Zayd ibn Ali ibn Hussein Ibn Ali was abandoned by his fighters because he told them to stop cursing the sahaba and how much he loved the sahaba. They said he was no longer Imam and left him to die alone. That's how rawafid 12'er shia treat ahl ul bayt. Then they said they took a new Imam, Jaafar. They lie and didn't claim him until after his death. His grandfather was Abu Bakr! They believe their Imam cursed his own grandfather to hell. And this is when they began wholesale fabrication of their religion and Jaafar's students like Imam Malik and Imam Hanifa warned the people against them and their lies and considered them outside Islam.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6ccdb9 No.24275

>>24271

>I hate liberal sunni countries

>I hate conservative sunni countries

>I hate radical/extreme sunni fighting groups

>>24161

>I reject functionally nothing from Sunnism

Umm ok.

>>24271

>I only care about Israel, I wish it was the 90's again.

>I don't like the clocktower in Mecca, the saudis should give away more money. But if they give away money they're just spreading their evil version of Islam… evil saudis always evil!!

>>24272

>I'm anti-sykes picot, the radical sunnis who are also anti-sykes picot are dogs!!!

And Russia is not so wealthy to support Israel as liberally as US does with cash but they do it in other ways. In raw bodies. 1 million plus Israelis are full RUSSIAN CITIZENS. Russian is #2 language in country. Israel is Club Med for American and Russian Jews, wake the Hell up. Even Goddamned Iran forced Russia out of their Iranian airbase lastyear because they hardly trust Russia.

This name fag admittedly a cool islamic mongol name just screams poltard.

>deen

Wow. To some "Deen" means waiting outside a cave in Iraq with Vimto and dates for some hiding Imam in a cocoon… that's their deen. You need to describe matters in precise terms or refrain from discussing this issues.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

446019 No.24306

>>24271

>Hell, at least the Israelis have the excuse of not being muslim. Saudi and the rest of the gulf states don't even have that excuse. All that oil money, squandered on hotels and beachfront properties and expensive cars and making Masjid al-haram look like something out of a dystopian sci-fi novel, while muslims elsewhere starve and suffer. But they certainly have enough cash to spare to drop bombs on masjids and hospitals in Yemen and fund their lackey groups to do the same everywhere else.

>Iran and Assad may not be the answer, but you cannot convince me that the Sauds are any better.

this

>>24274

>Some shia are fine like the Zaydis

then why do u supporting bombing them in yemen? arent they considered muslim civilians ?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3df5c0 No.24307

>>24306

Because they have accepted 12'er leadership becoming a proud proxy and many have become 12'ers. And if they weren't fought in yemen they'd be sent to syria and iraq to fight sunnis there just the same as how Iran sends poor shia from india and elsewhere to kill sunnis in those lands.

Just because we consider the zaydis to be a kind of muslims doesn't mean we let them take over a sunni government. Why don't you ask them to extend sunnis the same courtesy?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

446019 No.24311

>>24307

seems like your making up excuses to justify killing MUSLIM civilians

I agree that houthis are terrorists but still, it sounds a lot like what assadists say

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

923dca No.24313

>>24274

>Outlawed by Taliban, encouraged by American-Shia government.

>From European colonial law, antithesis of sharia trial and haram from sahih hadith.

honor killing was around since the time of jahilliyah? I'm not disagreeing that it's haram, I'm just pointing out that it's become a part of the culture

>Alleged to have happened twice. No proof, likely fake news.

I dunno, Reuters seems like one of the more reliable outlets to me

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-pakistan-rape/pakistani-council-orders-revenge-rape-of-16-year-old-girl-idUSKBN1AC1DL

Of course they were punished for it, but it's troubling that it was even culturally acceptable to begin with

>Says the guy who refuses to call himself sunni. What deen are you even talking about? Some people think deen means cursing sahaba, worshiping infallible imams made of light, damning wives of prophet to Hell, praying 3x a day, and making temporary marriages. And you are happy to stand among those people, fine, don't be expected to be taken seriously.

I disdain the label sunni because I see myself as simply muslim, not identifying with any sect. Although I disagree with the muslims that refer to themselves as shia on many matters, both political and theological, they are still my brothers in Islam. I don't see our differences as something worth killing each other over. I understand that sounds naive, but I sincerely believe that we as muslims should be better than to destroy ourselves over such petty squabbles. What's going on is no different than what happened to those before us. The christians had the same schisms, fought the same battles between themselves. As have others before them. Such labels only serve to divide us, weaken us, and strengthen our enemies.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

446019 No.24314

>>24313

shias are untrustworthy but so are saudis imo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

923dca No.24315

File: baff0163a8fd0c9⋯.jpg (170.03 KB,728x546,4:3,mecca-construction-plans-f….jpg)

File: 7af19b00354e0c6⋯.jpg (307.42 KB,1024x643,1024:643,ISL_FON-003.jpg)

>>24275

>I hate liberal sunni countries

>I hate conservative sunni countries

>I hate radical/extreme sunni fighting groups

>I'm anti-sykes picot, the radical sunnis who are also anti-sykes picot are dogs!!!

Are any of them truly acting in the interest of Islam or muslims as a whole? Any of them at all? I'm throwing Iran in there too, fyi. Perhaps their actions are only benefiting shia muslims as a whole.

I mean Malaysia seems ok, but they seem quite far removed from the mess in the ME.

>I don't like the clocktower in Mecca, the saudis should give away more money. But if they give away money they're just spreading their evil version of Islam… evil saudis always evil!!

First off, money's just a tool, and I just don't agree with how they're using it. Second, don't tell me that pic related (construction plan) looks good. It's aesthetically hideous. And so is that clocktower. They're totally fine with this, but not with cemeteries housing the sahabah and his family as well as his mother's grave? I highly doubt the prophet (pbuh) would've approved of his own mother's grave getting set on fire and bulldozed.

https://web.archive.org/web/20110713063137/http://islamicamagazine.com/?p=424

Having graves around and near places of prayer is not the same as actually praying to them.

And if Russia loves Israel so much, why do they continue to support Assad, when Israel would love to see his regime toppled as per the agenda lined out in the clean break report?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

923dca No.24316

>>24275

>This name fag just screams poltard

Please don't lump me in with that white nationalist hugbox. Yes, I admit, I sometimes browse there and post on occasion, but that's only because I can't help saying something when I see something truly ignorant said about Islam. Besides, on rare occasions, (even rarer still since the US election) I sometimes see an actual intelligent and informed discussion.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b1804a No.24319

>>24316

Please focus your posting here so we can grow the community. We have a commie thread, a trini thread, etc. We have a pol thread too somewhere.

I realize it takes all kinds to have an ummah so I'm not mad at you. What I will say is:

1) I don't think that Mecca projection is accurate at all, looks like agitprop, they'll probably do a lot more underground too. They need to keep expanding the masjid surely you agree.

I like the clocktower. And the Prophet saws would not want building mosques on top of graveyards which is what was going on in Baqi. No graves were disturbed, just the improper structures.

2.) Israel is not a centralized hivemind. There are currents in Israel that are pro-Assad and currents that are anti-Assad. Israel is at the end of the day highly opportunistic and there is a huge confluence of factors at play both in their land and abroad.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

03555c No.24449

>>24370

BO please ban this kafir christian pork

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c2bb17 No.24835

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

What do Muslims think of the Frankfurt School and Cultural Marxism? Is it just another plot by Zionists to destroy our values?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

446019 No.24838

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c2bb17 No.24839

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>24838

They don't even try to hide it.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7cc010 No.24877

File: 053fc4710ea85b3⋯.png (1.33 MB,1003x772,1003:772,frodo_loves_you.PNG)

>>24315

That picture on the left looks like Gondor in Return of the King

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

38ddaf No.24990

Writing from a Chechen brother in Syria

http://www.chechensinsyria.com/?p=25526

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

465e67 No.25006

File: be38a3f20810c2d⋯.jpg (37.55 KB,598x337,598:337,IMG_4899.JPG)

>24990

Tandeem Dowla made a grave mistake declaring a Caliphate in one day. They also clearly slipped into Kharijism. They should have just been a local acting and defensive minded Emirate. Their abuse of prisoners and attacks on Europe can not be justified by Islam - only revenge. And yes I understand they were pushed to madness by 30 years of bombing and war - remember just nine months gives US soldiers "ptsd."

I think the best thing for Ahl as Sunnah to do now is join with the best available options that fight the Shia Assadists in Sham and the Shia death squads in Iraq. That means FSA, Ahrar al Sham, Tahrir al Sham, etc and perhaps even the idiotic secular kurdish groups in certain regions.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c70ce1 No.25028

>>25006

haqq cannot mix with batil o madkhali deviant

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

91c54b No.25029

>>25028

The next time someone declares a khilafah in a flat open land I hope to Allah swt they have peer or near peer air defense capability and they are rational actors, not provocateurs. I hope they focus on local issues, diplomacy, and defense - not attack literally large part of world at same time! And war is very violent yes… new idea: don't film every single time you execute a prisoner! HasbunAllah wa niimal wakeel.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25042

Might be another problem with Alacrity. Making this post since, for some reason, it seems to fix those problems.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b54dcc No.25045

File: 184386c025aca4c⋯.png (185.79 KB,750x1011,250:337,IMG_4905.PNG)

File: 088f117cdd613c0⋯.jpg (61.2 KB,480x480,1:1,IMG_4906.JPG)

teeeeeest

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

382e7d No.25046

>>25035

>pretending to not realize the absurdity of this

It's not that absurd. The only reason Saudi doesn't fund ISIS is because they went independent after their break with Al-Qaeda, who do receive funding from them. Again, the Daesh Khawarij and Al-Qaeda are the same dog, it's just that one still has it's leash.

And that's not discounting the possibility that there may be individual sympathizers/covert funders within the Saudi establishment, even despite the border clashes they've had with Daesh.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b65a5e No.25047

>>25046

What post are you even replying to and why don't I see it? Just a delayed reply?

>It's not that absurd. The only reason Saudi doesn't fund ISIS is because they went independent after their break with Al-Qaeda, who do receive funding from them.

Wrong. Not even Qatar helps AQ or IS and they are the most liberal in their funding. This is Syria-girl level thinking ie " any sunni with a beard who is against Assad is AQ or ISIS ". Saudi (and Turkey) are favorable towards FSA and Ahrar al-Sham. That's it. They war against Daesh and they scheme, plot, and disrupt against HTS.

>Again, the Daesh Khawarij and Al-Qaeda are the same dog, it's just that one still has it's leash.

There is no central AQ for more than a decade, just some guys who have basically been absorbed into various national-based uprisings/insurgencies. You think you're being clever by using buzzwords like Daesh and AQ but you're clearly against any kind of legitimate Sunni military outfit such as Saudi Coalition in Yemen, Taliban, FSA, HTS, Ahrar al Sham etc. So… what's the deal? Do you even understand that even USA government officially says that AaS and Taliban are not "terrorists"?

You're an ignorant parasite who takes his religion from the shuyukh and imams of ahl as sunnah yet in matters of war takes the opinions of the rejectionist enemy. So the teachings passed on through ahl as sunnah and our ulema are haqq but our lives and property are worthless. I spit on your face, worthless dog.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b65a5e No.25048

Key points:

1) Saudi and Turkey are open about who they fund, stop watching Alex Jones and browsing /pol/ like Berke admitted he does

2) Ahrar and Daesh have fought eachother now for 3 years because ISIS was just another sunni fighting group but became khawarij when they made takfir on all muslims who refuse to make bayah to their day old caliphate. Saudi and Turkey would not fund two groups that fight one another. Notice how Berke admits this but then gives his own rhetorical spin to "well they would fund them if…." It's a totally bogus statement - that amounts to "if they weren't khawarij then they'd be funded…" WELL NO sh*t!!! They are khawarij, spare the rhetorics about "leashes."

3) Notice how Berke regurgitates mainstream/social media tropes and acts like "AQ" (kek) and Daesh are the only ones fighting Assad. There are many sunni groups in Syria that are good practicing muslims and have the backing of mainstream Sunni countries/scholars. Fighting jihad is not "radical" or "terrorist" it is part of Islam. What the khawarij do when they attack non-combatants and other muslims is fasad and dhulm not jihad. We can condemn the khawarij and distance ourselves from them and clarify the difference. That doesn't mean jihad stops.

Beware this ignorant worm named Berke! Guard your religion against him. He is a slavegirl of the Hezbollah and Russian Airforce.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b65a5e No.25049

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

28a10d No.25050

>>25047

>>25048

>There are many sunni groups in Syria that are good practicing muslims and have the backing of mainstream Sunni countries/scholars. Fighting jihad is not "radical" or "terrorist" it is part of Islam. What the khawarij do when they attack non-combatants and other muslims is fasad and dhulm not jihad. We can condemn the khawarij and distance ourselves from them and clarify the difference. That doesn't mean jihad stops.

Every single one of the groups of "good practicing muslims" you mentioned also attack non-combatants and other muslims. To be fair, so do Hezbollah and Assad. I see all these different groups claiming that they're practicing Jihad, but there's no unity or order to show for it, just more (haram) suicide attacks and more bodies.

Also, as a rule of thumb, I'd be wary of any group that colludes with the CIA.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d5df6e No.25051

Crypto-khariji ”sunnis” refuse to denounce isis, HT etc. as khawarij and instead only want to use the words ”terrorist” or ”fasiq”. Regarding the latter then it's because the word fasiq has been devalued to the point of meaning absolutely nothing, and this is unfortunately to be blamed on a lot of sunni scholars themselves. They(crypto-khariji ”sunnis”) want to place people murdering muslim parking enforcement officers on the same level as your neighbour Ahmed who grooms his beard in order to keep a job and feed his family.

As for the former label then it's due to popular western discourse. The khawarij who pretend to be sunnis in order to get a following don't see anything wrong with isis khariji ideology, but since these people live in the west and rely on their protection in order to wage war on the muslim countries, they can't very well support isis, so they denounce them as terrorists while believing that it's not actually a sin in Islam(meaning they are practicing taqiyya to win favour with mushrikuun).

So here you can see who the kuffar actually supports. The muslims who call themselves salafis who are loyal to Saudi Arabia are the most active in condemning isis etc., yet they are criticized by kuffar the most who invent conspiracy theories that it's actually saudi arabia and these salafis that fund isis(pretending to not realize the absurdity of this), meanwhile the crypto-khariji ”sunnis” are left free to propagate isis ideology. It's not surprising then that HT etc. have their headquarters in the west. Ironically, these mariquun try to use this as an argument against their opponents, saying that it(ie their not being tolerated in the Sunni countries) constitutes ”proof” that the muslim countries are more oppressive than the west, when in fact it only betrays their own allegiances. The fact of the matter is that Saudi Arabia and the modern Sunni countries are far, far more gentle against political dissidents than Muslim leaders have been in the past.

As for the arguments that no doubt are going to be presented by false sunnis then it's already been demonstrated above that their only argument is the exact same one used by the original khawarij which caused Sunnis to denounce them in the first place.

>>25046

>pretending to not realize the absurdity of this

Clearly the point went over your brain-matam induced-dead head. The main enemies to isis and al qaida are the Sunni countries who are apostates according to them. Only shia and kuffar(the most appropriate term for disbelievers as becomes painfully evident in cases like this) pretend it makes any sense for saudi arabia to fund them.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da6dcf No.25052

>>25050

>Every single one of the groups of "good practicing muslims" you mentioned also attack non-combatants and other muslims.

ههههههههههههههههههههههه

>To be fair, so do Hezbollah and Assad. I see all these different groups claiming that they're practicing Jihad, but there's no unity or order to show for it, just more (haram) suicide attacks and more bodies.

Now you say it's haram to do that kind of attack. You took that opinion from the Saudis who you accuse of secretly helping Daesh. You are very opportunistic in your criteria and harsh against Sunnis and especially mujahideen so perhaps you should go to Saudi or Egypt and teach the scholars about jihad. Or perhaps you should go to a frontline and show the brothers who fight what they are doing so wrong?

Either the entire Ummah is in error and you are the solution, or you should stop embarrassing yourself with your ignorance and attitude. Go back to /pol/.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25053

File: da0a15f7da36df5⋯.png (6.12 KB,543x100,543:100,log.png)

>>25047

>What post are you even replying to and why don't I see it?

The user deleted it himself. #25035

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d5df6e No.25055

>>25053

yes I deleted it myself so don't blame him. I re-posted it though after sleeping on it.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25058

>>25055

I only bring it up so that the staff is not accused.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

28a10d No.25060

>>25052

Are you implying that suicide attacks aren't haram?

(USER WAS TEMPBANNED FOR THIS POST)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f66383 No.25062

>>25060

Unlike you I'm not a Sheikh to make sweeping fatawah. So I would say there is ikhtilaf on the subject and it involves other factors. Attacks on civilians and women are always haram - but the legality of a so-called martyrdom attack against a military target is something scholars disagree about. Again, I don't know since I haven't studied the matter - if you want to know then ask a sheikh. Your Iranian masters support suicide bombing, that's for sure. They stopped temporarilly because they have the Russian Airforce.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

76a51b No.25064

>>25060

>implying (lol)

>concern trolling

>contributing nothing to board except the above

>being a namefag

You're taking a break.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c70ce1 No.25068

>>25051

>who are apostates according to them

hurr obey leader durr

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d5df6e No.25069

>>25068

What an intelligent response.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25071

>>25064

>being a namefag

That right there is enough for me.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d5df6e No.25138

>>25136

Spare us your rafidhi propaganda it's already been dealt with here.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d5df6e No.25143

>>25139

>I'm not a fan of houthis BUT…

Right.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da6dcf No.25144

>>25139

What's happening in Yemen is literally nothing compared to what is happening in Syria and Iraq against Sunnis. Yemen is a brushfire conflict, that's it. And it is manipulated by you RT/PressTV types to justify crimes against Sunnis and insurrection against Sunni leaders. You don't have a leg to stand on now stop.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da6dcf No.25146

File: 20a0d7e826b54cf⋯.jpg (82.32 KB,750x553,750:553,IMG_4933.JPG)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d5df6e No.25149

>>25148

>quotation marks around his own claim of being sunni

>repeating >>25146 unironically

go troll somewhere else

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da6dcf No.25151

>>25148

99% chance you are a larp. 1% you are a traitorous beer-chugging Assadist sunni cuck or some druze weirdo from syria pretending to be sunni. Either way, you're done here and if you violate ban all your posts will be wiped from board. Larpers here are shown no mercy, especially when they joke about being near a warzone involving muslims.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da6dcf No.25152

>>25149

Yeah, someone in friggin Syria is really upset about Yemen where like a handful of folks have died. Lol, bad larp.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da6dcf No.25155

>>25149

This faggot is now cheering barrelbombs and crying about Saudi attack on Houthis. All his posts have been wiped since he evaded his ban.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d5df6e No.25156

>>25155

good work

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8b69e4 No.25157

>>25155

So you ban me for "larping" which I reply to by evading my ban to prove that the ban was made on false accusations so you go ahead and delete all my posts which weren't that many because I'm a newfag that was trying to get more redpilled on islamic subjects.

You're basically admiting that you banned me for having a different opinion than the rest of the board. I dont think I broke any rule at this point but I guess this will be deleted as well. لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25158

>>25157

Evading a ban is worse than the original reason for your ban. If you are banned, then you are to appeal the ban.

If your ban appeal is refused, yet you feel the ban is still in error, then you can directly contact the Board Owner (islam@8chan.co) instead of evading the ban to further whine on the board.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8b69e4 No.25159

>>25158

Apologies for being a newfag then. I Still don't get how to talk to the board owner though.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25160

>>25159

The email address is in >>11001

islam@8chan.co

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da6dcf No.25161

>>25157

Take a selfie with timestamp and we'll believe you're a sunni who just happens to be a poltard who just happens to be in Syria. And btw, this reaction you're experiencing is your redpill, dog.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8b69e4 No.25162

>>25160

Thanks

>>25161

How about I give you my adress and name as well?

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0dd7f3 No.25163

>>25157

>i came to get redpill

No you came to "redpill" us on the virtues of Assad. Go back to /pol/ you fake syrian fake muslim. Why don't you tell us about the religion of your idol? Oh wait, it's a secret like scientology so you can't.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25164

>>25157

>I'm a newfag that was trying to get more redpilled on islamic subjects.

Well, I'll give you this hint: The regime of Bashar al-Assad isn't an Islamic subject.

However, since this is the politics thread and Assad is a political leader, it is fair game for discussion.

It is literally by Assad's hand that the Syrian migration crisis began. Since you're from /pol/, you are probably extremely anti-Syrian immigration into Europe - as is the standard /pol/ opinion - so why would you support Assad? Ignoring everything else - the politics of the region and everything - it is Assad who has driven millions of Syrians from their homes and into Europe. If you tow the /pol/ line, then you must be against Assad and his war against Muslims.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

c70ce1 No.25170

>>25157

you got exposed rafidhi…its over

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da50b5 No.25174

File: d4621ffeacc80f9⋯.png (482.04 KB,1080x1920,9:16,Screenshot_20171101-162838.png)

>>25164

Exept I never wanted to talk about assad in the first place.I was talking about the saudis in yemen but you derailed the conversation.

>since you're from /pol/

I usually ignore /pol/ because it's extremely vile,islamphobic,and delusional

>you are probably anti immigration

I'm not against it for the regular white gencoide meme. I'm against it because these people shouldn't be giving their resources to the degenerates in the west and instead help their own countries (or even immigrate to other muslim countries that's alright)

>so why would you support assad

I do because like a significant portion of sunnis (significant at least from my own experience) because assad is the safest and shortest road out of this mess and the only logical solution to a long-term semi stable syria.

>you must know that he has driven millions of migrants on his war on muslims

The war started because your western funded "free" "syrian" army. Assad is fighting them not the regular civilian like me. Those groups did just slightly less damage to the syrian population than the regime itself (im fact my area is still being shelled by them because apparently everyone in damascus is helping assad by living there)

At any rate this will probably be my last contribution to this threas mainly because my political stance as a sunni isn't welcome here and because of fear of another ban(given how bans are given for the slightest of things on other threads I read)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da6dcf No.25175

File: 3c47ffc55ee9c18⋯.jpg (71.49 KB,800x619,800:619,IMG_5007.JPG)

File: d3ba54a5ba7c14c⋯.jpg (57.85 KB,600x601,600:601,IMG_5008.JPG)

>>25174

You shoehorned in your claim to be in Syria and be a Sunni. If you were here to learn anything you would keep your goddamned dog mouth shut and not try to lecture us on your Nusayri master. Yes, ISIS - now sidelined - was better than Assad. Because ISIS commits WARCRIMES whereas Assad commits crimes against kids with signs, starvation, chemical weapons, civilian aerial bombing ie CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY you piece of filth. You are a lying larp and even if you were telling the truth you are a slave of the Nusayri cult and an enemy to not only Sunnis but all decent people in Syria and the world. The vast majority of Sunnis in Syria have been displaced, killed, or taken up arms. You are a useless jaban at best. I spit on your face.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25176

>>25174

Why would Sunnis support an Ahmadiyya regime?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25177

>>25174

> my political stance as a sunni isn't welcome here

This is the politics thread and ALL political viewpoints will be accepted in this thread - and only in this thread. It was created specifically for containment.

However, and before you continue playing the martyr, your political stance has nothing to do with being a Sunni. This board is predominantly Sunni with a smattering of Shi'a and an Ibadi. However, the Sunni majority are anti-Assad, so your political stance isn't "as a Sunni".

If you have an opinion, express it; but express it as yourself and don't try to hide behind Allah or play the martyr by crying "muh Sunni beliefs!" That won't work here.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da6dcf No.25179

>>25177

He said "la howla.." when he was banned on an imageboard, meanwhile millions are refugees and starving in his "home country…" this guy needs a lobotomy, it will improve his life.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da6dcf No.25180

>>25176

Actually, the nusayris are worse than the Ahamdis which are peaceful heretics (for now at least). The nusayris benefited from affirmative action and then attacked druze and christians and sunnis once they dominated the officer corps. They shattered the UAR which was an egyptian-syrian super state. And the ahmadis have an embarassing religion but they are relatively upfront about it, the nusayris have a fake religion that is so outrageous they're not allowed to talk about it. They run a spoils system/ patronage network and give money to corrupt ignorant and cowardly sunnis.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25183

>>25180

>Nusayris

So, the Alawi? Ah, yes, those. I recall reading some time last year that the Alawites had distanced themselves from Assad's regime.

Ah, yeah, BBC article about it:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35941679

I'm not sure how trustworthy the sources are, but there it is.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da6dcf No.25185

>>25174

>claims to live next to umayya masjid, be sunni

>ignores video in this thread of rafidis in umayya masjid cursing at sahaba

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e75f70 No.25207

>>25060

Why'd I get banned for this?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

da6dcf No.25208

>>25207

Low effort posting/concern trolling/being a namefag.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

cc3ddd No.25210

Sorry, I only believe in the Quran

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e75f70 No.25211

>>25208

I'm not trolling though. And what's wrong with being a namefag?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25212

>>25211

Namefags have always been treated with derision on the chans. It's a form of attention whoring.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e75f70 No.25215

>>25212

Yeah I get that, but I don't see how namefagging alone is worthy of a ban.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25216

>>25215

It isn't. See: >>25064

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e75f70 No.25225

I was just speaking my mind, not trying to lower the quality of discussion. I guess a ban is what goes for a rebuttal here.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

f9d680 No.25226

>>25225

You now have a choice to make:

1] Try to continue discussion, expressing your opinions, rebutting to others.

2] Whine about your very, very temporary ban.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2c5a93 No.25389

File: 944dbb5c17c544a⋯.png (253.01 KB,632x2616,79:327,NSDAP Muslims.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1da6f1 No.25460

File: 50942cb8f7d6f4a⋯.jpg (149.03 KB,1500x500,3:1,IMG_5265.JPG)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

7935fa No.25461

>>25460

uh

>rashidun

>majoos

whats the relationship again?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4c75d4 No.25464

>>25461

Majoos aka shias hate/curse first 3 Rashidun Caliphes while Sunnis revere them.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2c5a93 No.25682

We must secure the existence of our Ummah and a future for Muslim children

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9b6eea No.25686

>>25682

Indeed

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

b4e8e6 No.25729

>>25682

We do not need to secure anything. The future and existence of the Ummah is already secured in the hands of Allah

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

cb49b1 No.25874

>>25729

This comment is bad and you should feel bad.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

48027b No.26369

The crypto-khariji ”sunni”:

>muslim countries don't represent islam, they're all illegitimate dictatorships!

>isis does not represent islam, can't you see how all muslim countries denounce them?!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a9750c No.26370

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

22b084 No.26378

>>26369

>>26370

key word "muslim" here, when a leader does kufr this doesn't apply

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ac7c0f No.26382

>>25389

the story of Alois Brunner is undoubtedly interesting, he became hunted by the Mossad for years evading capture, they sent him a mail bomb which detonated and took out one of his eyes and a hand. He died of old age in Syria, having lived there as a military advisor to the elder Assad.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

848523 No.26383

>>26378

Who are your living scholars?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

48027b No.26385

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a9750c No.26390

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

3cd328 No.35940

Bump

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bf5bc9 No.37006

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bf5bc9 No.37007

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

bf5bc9 No.37009

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

1c8e76 No.44714

Bump

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d78785 No.44744

File: 939fe5f6efd4609⋯.jpg (31.36 KB,760x450,76:45,kapak_141428.jpg)

Pic rel, hail to the potential president of Turkey.

>Ali Babacan

>Served as a minister of economics when GDP was peaking.

>Doesnt speak out loudly but secretly hates Atatürk 🤬ry.

But his fatal flaw is he is kinda pro american. He supports bull🤬 sjw agreements for looking like a good neo liberal. (Just like Erdogan in early 2000s)

>>25060

Also get back to the ekşi sözlük, kemalisttard.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d78785 No.44745

>>24104

>Idc about Turkey's territorial integrity because Erdogan is a giant fake out that didn't do anything good for the Ummah.

You are wrong. Its better for turkey to get rulled by Erdogan rather getting ruled by a kemalist.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

d0ca24 No.44827

>>37007

it's wajib if they apostate, khurooj is haram if it is a muslim leader

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]