/hypno/ - Hypnochan

ignore rushed spelling

You were fighting off so many thoughts of cock and cum, you couldn't even type out your post!

Just listen to B4mb1, K31, Msj, they can help you.

Face it asshole, the face of any board is shaped by it's users, and I guess alot of us happen to be cock craving whores. If you don't want to accept yourself, I hope someone ties you up and forces you to listen to B4mb1 for 24 hours!

So post some other shit instead of bitching about it, nigga

Agree with op. Faggot loosers everywhere.

alternatives?

/mind/ was supposed to be a non-sissy alternative, but few people seem to have gravitated over there.

>>48059

Is it really surprising that being hypnotised attracts submissives, and that being a hypnotist attracts dominants?

Seriously, your best bet is to work on your dominant side and develop your own hypnotic skills.

the whole scene was invented by cock craving men mainly newfapchan comes to mind, now you think it was about normal hypnosis first, just lol

Gas the sissies, hypnowar now!

Everybody has his or her own source of dopamine.

>>48062

>tfw reading this makes me rock hard

I'm too far gone at this point

Honestly I just come here for the manly stuff and even then there's not much. It'd be nice if there was a subsection that catered to just that for gay and straight men. Most hypno here is sissy stuff, which is OK, good for them… But it is a bit overwhelming.

>>48062

The irony of these posts accusing other posters of psychological projection.

>>48116

HEHEHE!

404 no more…

>>48172

bc op is rite

>>48172

It will stay up, because this board sadly has no sign of any moderation going on.

>>48172

1. hypno has no mod

2. OP is right to some extent

you are free to make a non-sissy hypno board and moderate it - i'm a fan of the gay shit but i would also like to be able to filter it out sometimes

>>48302

>i'm a fan of the gay shit but i would also like to be able to filter it out sometimes

While I don't necessarily disagree with you, you can literally filter it. Filter keywords, and tists that you know exclusively (or almost exclusively do sissy stuff. That said, I do understand you'd probably be left with like 4 threads that get posted in about once a month, so I still understand the frustration.

>>48305

it would be good if there were a tagging system or something

if you use empornium, or like how steam games have categories, you know what i mean

>>48059

I know what you mean, but it's not our fault that most hypnodommes try to sissify their followers for some weird reason.

>>48316

It's almost like there is a correlation between the focus of LGBT rights as the Progressive narrative for the past decade and the explosion of males identifying as gay/bi, sissy and trannies. I don't know what to make of all of this, so I'm just gonna blame the jews.

>>48319

For fuck's sake m8 you've self selected a group of blatant degenerates by posting on a site like this and involving yourself with a fetish like this

>>48302

typical reddit crying for (((better moderation)))

>>48319

It's also the massive dose of porn that boys are exposed to, thanks to the internet.

Boys watch clip after clip of dicks pounding cunts.

Dicks, dicks, dicks and more dicks on screen making girls scream, so boys start to want some as well.

Although anon is not wrong: everyone knows (((who))) owns and controls the porn industry.

>>48391

Excellent detective work. Really passes for a fully fleshed out argument. The number of pirates is also inversely correlated with the increase in brain cancer. #criticalthinking

>>48394

there is solid logical reasoning behind the idea that watching cocks while pleasuring oneself leads to pavlovian conditioning to enjoy seeing those things

do you want to explain WHY you disagree?

>>48399

There's solid logical reasoning why we're all just in a simulation.

>>48401

so logic is wrong? or what?

also, the simulation argument is only true if you accept the premises, which you can rebuff quite easily

>>48391

Some of the sissy hypno has stuff in it about porn turning you faggy. I suppose it's because people are starting to think that's what's going on. Let me add some to this discussion.

When I was younger, a teen, first seeing some softcore pictures of porn stars and obviously being attracted to glamour models and stuff, I didn't want to look at anything hardcore. I refused to look at dick. I sincerely believed, even when I was a kid, and I heard about porn, I used to say that it's gay. Looking at guys and their dicks! I really did think guys watching it must be a little gay.

When I first got the internet at home, I was eager to seek out pictures of girls I liked, and also, I had seen some pictures and maybe some interviews of pornstars on Sky TV, so I wanted to see more of them, but not hardcore. However, I eventually got drawn into watching it, and it did give me a thrill. I started to reason that even though it's guys you are looking at, you are getting a kick out of putting yourself in their place, sort of thing. However, I did find myself at times finding the dicks attractive. I would struggle to pretend I hated them, but some videos in particular really brought some cock lust out in me. Which has led me to believe I had a Bi side somewhere in me. And now I've been a hypno addict for three years.

Have you seen imagefap? You go on the home page, and 99% of the featured profiles are shemale aspirants, crossdressers, etc. It really does make you think, is this the end result of porn addiction? And all these heavy addicts have all gone down that same route? Because, if some people were trans or something, but that many!? If some people were trans, it would seem reasonable, but at that amount, it makes you think, what is going on? I don't think these people, at least not most of them, are natural trans types, to me it looks more like they have just gone that way.

Speaking for myself, I've spoke to people on here before that say I've just been brainwashed, but there have been signs of me being a trans person right throughout my life. I think I only got into this hypno in the first place because of what I was like naturally.

>>48403

Yes, logic is wrong. Great job.

>also, the simulation argument is only true if you accept the premises, which you can rebuff quite easily

Please, try do so.

>>48405

It doesn't mean that you're necessarily trans just because you get off sexually to the thought. You could just be an autogynephile (scary Greek suffix word alert!). Which, okay. Good for you. Not everything needs to be pathologized.

If you really don't care to go through actually living/the day to day of the opposite sex/you want to be recognized as your birth sex, I doubt you're actually trans.

>>48410

Self-correction.

try *to* do so.

>>48401

By simulation, do you mean the "duuude *hits bong* what if we are like, living in the Matrix lmao" baby tier philosophy, or the meaningless symbol and information hell described by Jean Baudrillard?

>>48410

are you fucking retarded?

the original paper doesn't even argue if you disagree with the premises

>>48411

Without going into too much detail, it's not purely a sexual thing. There are other ways about me that are feminine. I'm thinking maybe I'm some kind of half male, half female personality! But I may end up going one way more than the other in future. I'll just go with how I feel and be sincere!