/gamergatehq/ - GamerGate Headquarters

>>319361

> She

Anon please, Anita is not Feminist Frequency and the sooner people stop talking as though the organisation is a solo operation, or even suggesting she does anything more than sit in front of a camera or stand behind a podium, the better.

Also, for $5000, you get the reward of having given them $5000? That's a good joke.

Don't get baited.

Anita's moved beyond games and into general cultural criticism. Go after her if you want to, but this really has nothing to do with what GG is "about."

>>319372

My goal in posting this as OP was awareness, because Anita and Fem Freq has been responsible for a lot of the media smear and unfair reporting we've been subjected to thanks to their incestuous relationship with the reporters who write about them. We should be aware that she's shifted focus slightly off games, and we should remain vigilant as she slides back in, because in 2016 in this project's FAQ, she addresses the unfinished video game series and that she'll finish it this year.

>You're still making videos for Tropes vs. Women in Video Games. How do I know you'll be able to finish this series on time?

>Although the scope of Tropes vs. Women in Video Games expanded significantly due to both the intense backlash and the overwhelming support the project received, we’re well into the second and final season of the series, which we plan to wrap up by the end of 2016. As far as Ordinary Women goes, we've shot all the live-action video and the animators are already hard at work, so we're confident about delivering them on time.

>>319359

McIntosh is NOT off the hook, anon.

He may be crying permavirgin tears that he won't be getting Anita's pussy. But he's gonna try elsewhere. He's still pushing his pro-feminist, pro-Islamic views. That still makes McIntosh a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER to both gamers, and the United States Constitution.

>>319371

But anon, it's a really good deal! You get the $100 reward, two $250 rewards, and a $500 reward. That's a $1,100 value yours for only the low price of $5,000.

>>319378

Well, gee OP, I guess I won't give her $5000 then. Thanks for the heads up! I'll ignore the fact that you suck cocks.

I like that Anita has moved onto her new scam before she's even finished shitting out the last videos for her last scam.

I hope she gets arrested for illegal scamming.

>>319356

>project under it's goal

>deadline approaching

>all of a sudden "HORRIBLE HARASSMENT FROM GAMERGATE FELLOW XERS DONATE NOW TO STOP THE MUH SOGGY KNEES"

Calling it now.

Maybe if we keep giving her more attention, she'll fade away.

Law of averages says that this approach has to work sometime, right? Right.

>>319356

I wish I'd tracked the metrics over the past few days. Every night or so I average the money donated per day.

So far it's slowed. Noticeably. At one point it was on track to reach 165k at the end of the campaign - now barely over 130k.

Did anyone log this?

When did she start commenting on cosplay? What are you talking about?

>>319359

Wait, what? When did this happen?

Sage cuz unrelated lazy request for story-time

>>319417

That's usually the way crowdfunding works though. You have a large initial burst followed by a trickle of donations then another spike near the end. The game is rigged here though. You know that Anita comes close to failure there will be a deluge of articles from the usual suspects in the press about how you gotta give Anita your money or your a racist/sexist/whateverist.

>>319414

Piss off.

>>319420

I think it'll be with this new series.

Probably bashing both the men ogling cosplayers and women wearing skimpy outfits of characters– due to men and not by their own volition.

>>319414

"OMG guise just shut up and let me - er i mean - HER get away with another scam!!!"

Its amazing that you think anyone believes you.

>>319438

Again, where does this come from? The new project doesn't seem to have anything to do with that. I need a source.

If she's stupid enough to start ragging on cosplay, she's going to piss off an ass load of women. That's definitely a female dominated hobby, and they're not going to be brain washed enough not to tell her to fuck off.

>>319464

And radical Islamism.

>>319432

Strewth. Thing is, they already raked the pockets of their readers for International Women's Day. At this rate Anita would need a bomb threat to get anyone's attention for Please Give Me Money Day.

>>319471

I really need to know what song that is.

>>319470

>Unfortunately, there's enough tumbler infecting /cgl/ to make the response mixed, especially anyone who plays pretend dress-up as a gem or related fandumbs.

I don't think Tumblr gives a fuck about Anita anymore. It did back in 2012, but that has seriously waned to the point she's a non-entity. If she starts telling actual women how to dress, good luck with that. It's going to turn the female weeb audience against her that didn't care about GamerGate.

>>319501

https://soundcloud.com/shokkbutt/ruining-songs-forever

>>319517

thanks

>>319359

what movie is this lol

>>319594

nvm, am idiot

>>319359

Haha thats quite amusing.

Josh created Anitas persona and made her famous.

But in the end she became so famous that she couldnt be seen in a relationship with a nobody like him.

>>319463

Generally the name coming off something either means there's a dispute among people/ideas(that can include project direction/being pushed out), that a person has left or there's some outstanding legal issue.

Considering the stuff he's tweeting and so on, I'm guessing he was pushed out or there's a legal issue and he's taking pot-shots at her. In any case, I'd be happier if this Jack Thompson/Hillary Clinton wanna-be would just shut up, and try to ruin something else so society at large can see just how shitty of a person she really is.

>>319894

>Considering the stuff he's tweeting and so on, I'm guessing he was pushed out or there's a legal issue and he's taking pot-shots at her.

Examples? All I can see is Bernie Sanders stuff with Hilldog bashing mixed in.

>>319463

> https://archive.is/6ha9v

Its amazing how much they have to scratch the bottom of the barrel to find women who have actually contributed to humanity.

>>319901

>All I can see is Bernie Sanders stuff with Hilldog bashing mixed in.

>Hilldog bashing

Well well, seems ol' josh fullmac has gone MISOGYNIST

Should we signal-boost the fact that an anti-gamer is also hating on what could be the first female POTUS?

I say we should, then laugh when all of tumblr declares a jihad on josh

>>319894

If anything I'd say it's because he's a huge fucking target. You can tear Mcintosh's idea to shreds and ridicule him for days and he can't shield himself by crying misogyny. Well, he can try, and has done so before, but it doesn't work. He's a huge weight around Anita's neck since you can target his ideas and damage Anita's brand by proxy. The only surprise is that she didn't ditch him sooner.

>>320039

I wonder if he dropped her though, if the "ruined things between her and Joss" thing is true. McIntosh has been at this shit for years and I wonder if over the years shit went south and he just bailed under the impression he could restart with someone else. That Anita's new project seems to have floundered and she's been reduced to asking Tim Schafer and the Cards Against Humanity guy for cash donations seems to suggest she's trying to strike it out on her own and floundering.

Or maybe he's still there and she just wants to make people forget the "puppet" angle, who the fuck knows.

>>319901

It grosses me out to think this slime supports the same candidate I do.

Hasn't anyone told him that not supporting Hillary makes him a misogynist?

>>319464

>staying silent more often than not means complicit approval

That's SJW logic right there. "Either you agree with us or you're enabling the patriarchy"

>>320096

I'd almost like to be charitable here. If I saw someone I don't like doing a charity drive just to fuck with me, like I saw literal Nazis funding African refugee camps to prevent genocide or some shit, it would seem utilitarian to me to act triggered, sperg out and keep the money flowing, because really, why the fuck not if it saves lives are being saved, right?

I absolutely don't believe that's what Anita's game is, though, she sees money flowing and gets triggered over it not being to her. The classy, neutral option would just be to say publicly "Hey, a charity drive? Shit, I can't argue with that like can with this binders full of death threats!", never mind that TB and the like have multiple longboxes of them. But that doesn't feed her narrative, does it?

>>319456

>If she's stupid enough to start ragging on cosplay, she's going to piss off an ass load of women.

Her 'male gaze' shtick should have pissed off a lot of lesbians but it never did.

As long as the general point shes making is that men are evil she can support that with completely insulting arguments and nobody seems to care.

What happens if she doesn't reach her goal? Will everyone get their money back from their stupidity by donating to her?

>>320256

>What happens if she doesn't reach her goal?

"Oh noes you guys, I was totes HARASSED! Please donate to my shit while there's still time!"

Come on, man, you should KNOW this.

>>320274

She already did that with the Mary Sue and complaining that Amazing Atheist was harassing her for having a competing charity for women to mock her. Yes, she complained that donating to women's charities was a form of harassment.

>>320275

>Yes, she complained that donating to women's charities was a form of harassment.

We've "known" it since august 2014 and the TFYC thing, though.

>>320278

Well this money went towards stuff like women suffering overseas. So it was even more asinine in this case, but I guess she had to dig up some of that "harassment" somehow.

>>320275

>>320274

>Giving money to women other than Anita is sexism and harassment

The media's got to start noticing her hypocritical behavior eventually, right?

1 week to go and already she reached 60% of her scammed goal. One of them donated $7500.

>>320441

can you ID the perp?

>>320726

>we are the feminist illuminati

why would you admit this?

>>320759

out in the open it looks like a joke.

>>320726

Wow, they're not even trying to hide it anymore.

>>320981

This anon's got it. Take solace in the fact that

1. The amount of contributors/supporters/followers this this project is an abysmal fraction of the Tropes

2. The fact that she only reached that goal thanks to big/corporate/corrupt money.

3. That the fact that those big money/corporate supporters spread the word of this project out to their multitude of followers and it still barely scraped by with outside support

>>320987

>implying anita will ever deliver

>>319357

>Ordinary Women: Daring to Defy History

So it's about modern feminists pretending women have been persecuted forever, despite all evidence?

>Rather than heroes, leaders and innovators, women are often depicted and treated as secondary characters in history, objects of affections, damsels to be rescued, or merely the wives, mothers and assistants to the men who achieved important things.

Catherine the Great, Maria Theresa, Queen Elizabeth… shit, I can never remember their names, but those two ladies that ruled the Mongol Empire. These are among, if not THE, most important people of their time, in MASSIVE SWATHES of the world.

>With your help, we can bring their stories to life and give these incredible women the attention they deserve.

I'm probably a bit biased as a grand strategy fag, but those ladies get plenty of attention. I know more about Maria Theresa than I do about the Archduke or his heir at the outset of World War One, and they had much bigger effect on recent history.

Also, implicit in showing the defiance of gender stereotypes is actually reinforcing the existence of those stereotypes, simply so that they CAN be defied.

>>319360

>Given how rarely female leaders and innovators seem to show up in the stories we tell about historical greatness, it might be easy to conclude that women haven't really done that many extraordinary things.

Bullshit. Women have always traditionally wielded social power, which is less visible simply because it's done behind closed doors with a word and a gesture, instead of right out in the open with an army (of not-women) who will die mostly to prevent the number of healthy, young, idealistic men in your peasantry from reaching an uncontrollable threshold.

What a load of shit. I probably have better stuff to do though, so I might come back later at a loose end.

>>320981

>CAH supports Anita

>the new deck only just came in the mail the other day

Fuck.

>>320987

That bold text on "smashing the patriarchy" is completely cringe inducing.

>>321006

>Catherine the Great, Maria Theresa, Queen Elizabeth… shit, I can never remember their names, but those two ladies that ruled the Mongol Empire. These are among, if not THE, most important people of their time, in MASSIVE SWATHES of the world.

That's not brave. Being called a liar on the internet because I lied is brave. Getting huge piles of money is brave. Siccing my legions of followers on anyone who questions me is brave. Having the entire western world's media praise me for being lazy and embarrassing is brave.

Stop harassing me. Help, help, Patreon!

>>321010

CAH founder is one of the many examples of SJW induced Stockholm Syndrome. They bullied and harassed him and even falsely accused him of rape, until he had to either go over to their side or lose his livelihood and social life.

Has Anita actually done anything good for women?

If you read the new fundraiser's description, she still spends way too much time talking about how she raised a lot of money on Kickstarter, like it's her only accomplishment.

It's the only one with concrete evidence. The rest are just vague statements about making the world a better place.

4 years later, one would expect a sizable list of people, charities, or organizations that she has actually contributed to. Why aren't those written in the description?

Has she actually done any?

The only thing I can remember is that she does a lot of paid public speaking. Again, just money for her, but no measurable way to tell if it actually helped anybody.

>>321088

You might want to spread this info around.

Just took this off my wishlist. Fuck that game.

>>321092

>judging games on anything but fun

>ever

don't be an ideologue you piece of shit

>>321095

>judging games

Nonsense. I judge the developers.

>>321088

Where is that? The end credits in the actual game? How many other people does he name? If it's those two among like a dozen or more people, I'm not too concerned.

That said that game looks like total dogshit and exactly what the two of them would be 'involved in'. God and for $20, at that? When are you people going to learn…

>>321087

>The only thing I can remember is that she does a lot of paid public speaking.

It proves that she's right on the money when she says no one listens to women's voices. Specifically, the money she's on is something like five grand plus travel expenses per speaking engagement.

>>321173

>five grand

I thought it was 20

>>321088

Thread's gone now. Wonder if the SJW mods who deleted it are the same ones who tried to erase Hatred from Steam?

1 day and 19 hours left and already she's at 86%.

I really wish she fails and hopefully goes to jail for scams.

>>321314

watch it suddenly jump from 86% to 100% in the last hour.

>>321315

I can't believe how effortlessly this campaign downplays competing coverage several of these women have had in recent years. I greatly enjoyed COSMOS' episode on female astronomers and other scientists.

Several female scientists HAVE been snubbed. Hard. Some of them were overlooked because a more important person stole their work or ignored them until after they died THEN stole the work. Others faced social challenges. My grandmother was dissuaded from attending college for higher math because it was the 1930's and it just wasn't "done."

But are those women forgotten? No. Were they ordinary women? HELL no.

I do not trust Anita Sarkeesian to portray the truth. Many women contributed greatly to science despite social norms. ALL of the women she intends to cover are extra-ordinary people. The title is inaccurate at best.

The coverage will likely be shoddy. I am genuinely angry extra-ordinary female scientists are going to be used as window dressing and bumper stickers on the Sarkeesian Express, let alone that she's guaranteed 200k to finish POST-production. You know what that says? She and her producers realized they couldn't make ends meet from festival showing licensing and DVD's. We're just buttering their toast because someone understood the series isn't worth a $10 DVD in Anita's con booth.

>>321323

It amazes me she still trades on "all the haters" when retweets and even direct tweet-at metrics are down across the board for FemFreq. Some jerk like Milo* gets hundreds of responses to his dinner snapshots and she can barely get 60k pageviews on a "hot new" video?

* He's a jerk. Either you like that or you don't.

>>321323

Doesn't this lying retard know that shitlibs reclassified "uppity" as a racial slur a couple decade ago? And that many of her opponents don't have penises?

I can't believe the Illuminati chose someone as incompetent and moronic as Sarkeesian to be the left's new god.

Now they stopped showing every individual's donation amounts.

She's just gonna donate the rest of the money herself. Let's hope she's not stupid enough to do it on the same IP address. You never know, there might be a Gator working for that website.

You're welcome.

>>319372

Please enlighten me, what is GG about, exactly?

12 hours left, $3000 to go.

She won.

>>321395

Not going to eat that. Its all over until breaks out again. I give you one hint: Next time, we will do it without plebbitors.

>>321434

You mean she scammed another 201K Dollars? She is already losing. First she waster her beuty and youth on Baget and Full Macintosh then she put one item of failure on her tracklist. Watching her is going to be like watching a cartoon. Soon that cartoon will have exactly the same plot a Electric Boom accident compillation has.

>>321079

>They bullied and harassed him and even falsely accused him of rape, until he had to either go over to their side or lose his livelihood and social life.

And as it always happens, he (almost) lost it all despite kneeling at their feet anyway.

This is why you never give these sociopaths an inch. They'll take everything.

>>321087

>Has Anita actually done anything good for women?

What is this, Rhetorical Question Hour? You should know by now.

>If you read the new fundraiser's description, she still spends way too much time talking about how she raised a lot of money on Kickstarter, like it's her only accomplishment.

Kikes can't help but brag, can they.

I can't possibly watch this. As someone with actual training in historical research, I don't want to pay any attention to these amateur revisionists, for the sake of my own well-being.

>>321434

and now she playing the VIVE as reward

https://www.twitch.tv/femfreq

>>321452

How is she already losing?

>>321480

>First she wasted her beauty and youth on Baget and Full Macintosh then she put one item of failure on her track list.

She is as ugly as sin nowadays. And noticed how significantly less people threw money at her than tropes vs women. If she fails to deliver all these videos, this will be another failure. And I also heard she doesn't have any kids.

>>321457

You don't have to. The problem with her project needing funding is twofold.

1) She needed money for post-production. The quality of her videos post-funding is well-known. Therefore we can conclude her project was already done before the fundraising video was cut.

2) She made a convenient list of historical figures she will be covering. The intuitive observer would simply type their names into Wikipedia and discover among other things that Ching Shih was a horrible pirate who sold other women into prostitution and Ada Lovelace couldn't count cards.

The sad thing is she has a brand and people who feel and don't think threw money at her as a gesture of progressive fealty.

>>321530

Needs photoshopping of that image. See if that triggers the feminazis.

>>321582

You get those numbers by having to pay college educated artfags an hourly wage drawing 24 pictures a second, the Skullgirls devs made a similar breakdown. No matter how ugly the art is, making it clean enough for a commercial release takes time. This is why most Western cartoons today are animated in Korea, and used to be animated in Japan. The first crafty nigger to make a non-shit studio in Africa paying African wages is gonna make a killing, ten year old spec PCs and half decent tablets, pump shit out for next to nothing. There's plenty of Commonwealth countries there that talk right good English, too, but they tend to have the higher standards of living, outside of Zimbabwe.

>>321315

Apparently there are a few sudden large jumps int he funding.

Wouldn't' surprise me if she paid it off herself.

I give her another month before she's asking for money again.

>>321729

Here's a breakdown of what shadiness we know of:

https://medium.com/@nuckable/ordinary-women-in-context-b9cba358a5e2

Includes nuggets like not disclosing their business and personal relationships with Seed and Spark, S&S personnel donating substantial amounts, all sorts.

>>321750

>As a man, am I allowed to be a feminist?

>Do you believe that women should have equal rights to men?

>Sure.

>Great. Then you're a feminist.

This is one of the most pernicious lies of feminism. A casual glance through any (any, fucking any) feminist book or website or blog reveals that they have a violent pathological hatred for men and boys, and that any pretenses they make towards equality are strictly for the cameras.

All western societies are gynocentric and treat women better than men. Gender equality would mean treating women as equals to men, which equals soggyknees in the eyes of these commie scum. Feminism is cancer.