>>97224
It's easy to find online, it has a dub apparently which I don't know if it may or may not have effected my opinions on it. Voice-acting aside, I thought the writing was pretty bad. If you feel like watching it, go ahead, just come back here and tell me what you think. All I can say is that I don't recommend it, but I'm interested to know why people like it or might think it to be good.
>I think it’s pretty gross how sex-centric the fandom is.
It's difficult at times to even want to be associated with the fandom, I get found out without even saying much besides that I enjoy Tolkien-esque fantasy and what animals could think if they were like people. There's very much a stigma around it at least with people who use the internet, they either think that you want to write children's books and have a weird obsession with them, or they think you're a sexual degenerate who doesn't want to be human, or somewhere in-between. I think the problem is with how Furries present themselves, I've stopped calling myself a Furry altogether because most will have an immediate negative connotation to it, but still people figure out what sorts of themes I like and call me a Furry anyways.
>At least try to be subtle. It’s not like I wouldn’t fuck someone from an industry trade show.
I'm not one for casual sex anyway, I'm strictly celibate and seen as a black sheep in any group in terms of all my opinions and preferences. My aim is try and be what I think the Furry fandom or other people should be like.
>>97227
That's why I appreciate many more discussion threads or talk about anthro related media in general instead of just "what animals do you like?", etc. I would go to another site or place, but this is the only place where discussion seems worthwhile. All other anthro-related sites or content seems to devolve either into porn or becomes based off of emotion and fanfiction-tier.
>>97164
How do you think stories work for all of them? Obviously some things will come off more believably than others. I think it's important to keep in mind the level of personification and their actions, thoughts, etc, so they match up and don't feel lopsided or uncanny. And I think certain scenarios work better for different levels of anthropomorphism than others.
>>97170
Do you know of any more books like NIMH by chance? I swear there were a lot of similar ones, but I can't remember them. Like Mice society books, The Rescuers book is the only one that comes to mind.
>>97130
I very much enjoyed "The Cat Returns" although I wish more "cat-like" elements were incorporated or at least I feel they could've gotten away with it. Their society was very human-like or at least from what I remember. But at the same time, I'm glad they didn't make them too cat-like and have them come off feeling uncanny or forced. My favorites are ones that incorporate their animal traits or needs into the basics of their society.