[–]▶ No.48499>>48520 >>48538 >>50682 >>50935 >>50986 >>63037 >>67741 >>82893 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
Lets have a good chuckle. Good god the eye.
▶ No.48512
you want bad art?
Just browse any porn thread
▶ No.48520>>48523
>>48499 (OP)
>that file size
▶ No.48523>>48525
>>48520
I don't know how someone makes a picture that bad with that many mgs.
▶ No.48525
>>48523
max size in mspaint, draw and color, save and png.
Ta-dah!
▶ No.48528
▶ No.48538
>>48499 (OP)
>gay
Found your problem.
▶ No.48575>>48609
Wish I still had some of NuDog's art to post. He drew lanky, weirdly-muscled guys with extra-long tubecocks and exaggerated clown feet.
▶ No.48586>>48679 >>50670
▶ No.48589
▶ No.48609>>48678 >>48685
>>48575
it was fair for it's day in a sea of MSPaint pics tbh
▶ No.48678
>>48609
From what I recall, as time went on, his penises and feet got increasingly outlandish.
▶ No.48679
>>48586
Goodness, that's terrible!
Somewhere, I have a copy of a CD my ex made about ten copies of, titled "Hot Fur." All but two were left on swag tables at FC one year with covers boasting about the incredible free porn contained therein. Mine reads, "Over 1,000 soul-destroying graven images." He found a big box full of floppies he was given in the late 90s, and found most of the art was really, really bad, so we spent a day selecting all the worst.
A lot of the very worst is signed Trigem. A year or so ago, I ran into Trigem on another board, and I saw some of his then-current art, which was just fine.
▶ No.48685
>>48609
That middle one, either his dick is four feet long and limp, or it's coming out of his chest.
▶ No.48695
▶ No.50666
>>48527
The third pic guy smile is awful but the rest is ok.
▶ No.50670>>50986
>>48586
Posting for the people in the back.
▶ No.50679>>50681
>>48527
Would anyone like a slice of blueberry pie?
▶ No.50681>>51444
>>50679
Even just that little slice of picture is shit. The cum and the muzzle are at two different angles, the liquid has no weight, the whole face looks 2d unless I assume we are looking sideways at a gigantic pyramid atop his nose.
How does Adiago fuck up so bad at literally everything?
▶ No.50682
>>48499 (OP)
c'mon that's not THAT bad
▶ No.50935
>>48499 (OP)
>Male braixen
STOP DOING THIS
▶ No.50940
I dug through an old archive someone gave me in 2006, and found these.
▶ No.50945>>50973 >>51071 >>83378
...and more shitty and bizarre stuff... Not everything in this archive was terrible. A lot is just old. There's some Roz Gibson, some Dark Natasha, some old Karabiner. But fuck, if there aren't some painful ones.
▶ No.50954>>50986
Half of this isn't even relatively bad. Have you people honestly never been to FA or dA?
▶ No.50973>>51093
>>50945
an archive eh? Mind uploading it to MEGA.nz?
▶ No.50986>>51130 >>83323
>>50954
This.
So far the only images that really belong here are
>>50670
>>48551
and
>>48499 (OP)
Everything else is mostly just below average to everyday bad.
▶ No.51052>>51093
>>50944
that middle one is straight up good
you should feel blessed to be able to consider that bad
▶ No.51071
>>50945
I can get behind the idea of pic 1, I like the outfit and the four arms. However, the species is just bad. Would look more "fitting" on something more "beastly" yet still retaining the feminine quality that can support the outfit. A fox? man thats bad.
▶ No.51093
>>50973
It was mostly very old (think 98-2004 or so) mediocre G-rated stuff, plus about 20 very common Karabiner pics and maybe 10 common DarkNatasha pics. And a few of Roz Gibson's less terrifying stuff. What I posted wasn't exactly supposed to be horrible, just odd. But...
>>51052
...I do have a CD I could pull out. My ex took the images on it from a box full of floppies he was given in the late 90s. We burned several copies, added hand-drawn labels titled "Hot Fur," boasting about hundreds of FREE hot furry porn images, and left them on swag tables at FC one year. My copy reads: "Hot Fur. Over 1400 blindness-inducing, soul-destroying graven images." We still laugh about what people must have thought when they loaded them up, especially if they had boner in hand.
These weren't sparklecritters or odd designs, they were drawings by people ho either had no artistic ability, or were beginning and weren't good yet. I'm sure some of the artists on there did improve a whole lot. Several of the worst were signed "Trigem," and when I mentioned this CD on another board a few years ago, that name was known and I got the impression he'd gotten much better. I'll go ahead and post a few samples from this abominable archive.
▶ No.51098>>51550
See what I mean?
"Roll Yer Own Graphics." Pssh. And someone's attempt at Tarot.
▶ No.51099>>51550
"Don't ask, he just finished puming them up." I assume they meant 'pumping'? The sketch version's text reads "Don't ask, I still haven't figured out how he walks."
I'm only into the Ds, and just choosing a few. I've never made an archive, but if there's a tutorial, and someone wants this shitshow for some laughs, I could put up the entire thing. It ranges from merely bleh to eye-searingly horrible. Lots of Trigem and Borni, and Don Sanders (who drew the "Roll Yer Own Graphics" picture).
▶ No.51127
>>51095
>Not sparklecritters or odd designs
That first one is clearly a "watermelon theme". It's good to see furries have been pulling that retarded garbage for at least 17 years now.
▶ No.51130>>51550
>>50986
>everything else is mostly just below average to everyday bad
Quit lowering your standards. It's pathetic.
▶ No.51444
>>50681
who knows
I think this one is hilarious
▶ No.51550>>51565 >>51575
>>51130
Nah, he's right mate. OP asked for really bad, not kinda bad.
>>51095
>>51096
>>51098
>>51099
This anon saved the thread
▶ No.51557>>63618 >>63620
EK Goya's art hasn't improved at all in 20 years. I'm pretty sure he's autistic or retarded or both.
▶ No.51565>>51574
>>51550
>OP asked for really bad
>not kinda bad
Keep your goddamn standards. The last thing you need is shit taste.
▶ No.51574>>51582
>>51565
>thinking it's shit isn't good enough
>you have to think it's as shitty as I do
▶ No.51575
>>51550
>This anon saved the thread
That'd be me, and I'm glad. I have over 1,400 pictures of that level, unfortunately. Someone thought highly enough of them, once upon a time, to give them to my ex (on a whole box full of floppies).
▶ No.51582
>>51574
>accepting shit
>having shit taste
▶ No.58911
I'm glad that I deleted all the shit I drew back then.
▶ No.59362>>59371 >>59373 >>59389 >>59390 >>61247 >>68916
I think I just found the worst artist on FurAffinity/Patreon.
▶ No.59373
>>59362
A weapon to surpass makarimorph
▶ No.59389>>59390 >>59528 >>65808
>>59362
this
fucking nigga
makes 60, SIXTY MOTHERFUCKING GREEN SMACKAROOS A MONTH
DRAWING THIS SHIT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
▶ No.59390>>59393
>>59371
>>59362
>>59389
I've never seen a stronger argument that I should be able to charge for my work despite not being amazing quality.
▶ No.59393
>>59390
Just don't gate your content and you won't have a problem
▶ No.59396
>tfw you know you couldn't draw as well as any of the images in this thread
that being said, if i did take up drawing i certainly wouldn't publish any of my work at this quality.
▶ No.59401
>>50944
>that last one
the perspective on the legs is fucked beyond belief, but otherwise it's not half bad. cover the lower body and it's honestly tight as fuck.
▶ No.59528>>59535
>>59389
I'm still waiting for the computer literate poors in India and Nigeria to catch on that they can make decent money with minimum effort drawing furry smut for westerners. Furry porn sweatshops in third world countries is going to become a thing, just wait.
▶ No.59535
>>59528
People don't buy the shoes, anon, they buy the BRAND NAME on the shoes.
Popufurs remain popufur because people can brag "Oh, look at this commission I got from such-and-such!" A retard from India who can barely speak English isn't going to get a fucking thing even if he's selling porn images at a cent apiece.
▶ No.60863>>60865
You want REALLY bad? Check out 'Cats and Cameras' lately? No amount of eye bleach can fix that wreck of what was once a decent comic... http://catsncameras.com/cnc/
▶ No.60865
>>60863
He had some decent artists, Hardiman probably being my favorite from what I remember before I stopped reading, but that shit is just desperation.
Goddamn, and I thought PitW wound up with a shit artist.
Kinda thankful it wasn't worse now.
▶ No.61247
>>59362
What is that third one supposed to be?
I mean all of them look like he took a shit and traced it and then coloured it somewhat but that one... jesus
▶ No.62455>>62499
the ass on this character was apparently acceptable
▶ No.62487>>62488 >>65806
>>48551
man i really hate his art.
▶ No.62488
>>62487
Good ol' sameface.
▶ No.62499>>62555 >>63040
>>62455
Looks like the artist made a simple mistake early on in the sketch and perhaps without noticing, decided to commit to it.
Also, could somebody please explain what the appeal of black eyeballs is supposed to be? I feel like its sole purpose is teenage visual shorthand for "this character is so badass that its eyes are the opposite color they're supposed to be."
▶ No.62555>>63040 >>63184
>>62499
Honestly I find them really attractive if they're done well, which isn't the case for either of those pics. But I have a thing for corruption and sinister appearances, so I guess that's just how it works. It's not so much about looking badass or unique, I just enjoy when it looks kinda evil.
▶ No.63037
>>48499 (OP)
>tfw this artist is coloring your sketches without asking
▶ No.63040>>63184
>>62555
>>62499
I'm in the same boat as tripsanon.
They can look great when used well.
Personally I think black or otherwise off-color sclera work best as a subtle way to show off some kind of corruption or other taint when you don't want something too pronounced like devil horns/wings, a halo, a big glowing aura, or whatever.
It's just a bit of a pet peeve of mine when people try to use it solely for cosmetic purposes and just have everyone ignore it though.
It may be more subtle than other forms of displaying corruption or whatever, but it's still going to be obvious up close.
▶ No.63182
▶ No.63184
>>63040
>>62555
I can think of an instance when it was used well on a moral character.
▶ No.63202>>63203
>>63201
It's a good thing autists like you will never have real kids; one can easily see you going to full infant-drowning level when you don't get what you want the first time.
▶ No.63203
>>63202
I'm not even that Anon; I just wanted to be smarmy and literal. Next time, watch who you yell at about equating 0s and 1s to selective breeding.
▶ No.63566>>63620
http://www.furaffinity.net/gallery/kurtis496/ There's something... just a LITTLE bit off about this guy's art.
▶ No.63618
>>51557
that 2nd pick is fucking ungodly
▶ No.63620
>>63566
Good find. Same pose in almost every pic, that's an artist of limited imagination and limited interests. Also doesn't seem to realize that the ballsack isn't attached directly to the anus.
>>63611
He's like a human version of Webdriver Torso.
>>51557
Likely autism, but it hasn't bombed his art skill potential as much as others with the disorder. Still, after 20 years he's still using printer paper and colored pencils bought at the dollar store. Didn't notice it was the Playboy logo in the background at first, thought it was some kind of fairy wings.
▶ No.64176>>65180
I'm just too stupid to comprehend why this character has branches in it's head, I guess.
▶ No.64177>>65180
▶ No.64190
>>63706
I think the coloring is what makes this one so ugly. It's not terribly drawn just really badly colored.
▶ No.64243
>>63611
This guy is one of many autistic furs (I mean real autism, not internet autism) with a 110% G-rated fetish on which he is hyperfocused. He has a zillion characters, each from a different city, all of them scuba divers. He has a handful of poses, but most are the same. I'm not sure if he still does, but he used to reply to every comment on one of his posts with, "What's your favorite part of (character's) scuba gear?" He's one of those harmless oddities in the fandom, and not by far the worst or weirdest stuff around.
There are a whole bunch of people who have (and either draw or commission) one and ONLY one fetish. Sometimes it's just asses or titjobs, but there's Norithics, who draws otherwise normally-proportioned characters with huge, inexplicably balloon-like breasts, butts and genitals. And then there's some guy on IB (forget the name offhand, I have him blocked because he's shitty at tagging) whose fetish is forced circumcision, both male and female.
▶ No.65180>>65181
>>64177
Do you really find that bad or do you just hate the guy who made it
>>64176
It's a chinese dragon thing, according to a google search they're supposed to be the horns of a stag beetle
▶ No.65181
>>65180
At a glance, I see 3 differing perspectives on her ass and legs alone.
▶ No.65225>>65234 >>65278
>>65177
I have honestly seen much worse. I kind of like it! Source?
▶ No.65234>>65235
>>65225
Please raise your standards
▶ No.65235
>>65234
In here? Either you give the source out or shut your mouth, I fap on whatever I want.
▶ No.65236>>65286
▶ No.65278
>>65225
>Source?
PROTIP: check the filename, then search it on FurAffinity.
▶ No.65286>>65298
>>65236
>Hating on leskarmory
I can probably guess who made this post
▶ No.65298
>>65286
Are you mentally challenged? The art and OC is absolutely horrible
▶ No.65335
>It's a "let's force ourselves to try and defend the shitty art" thread now
for fuck's sake
▶ No.65344>>65804
▶ No.65417>>65915
So taurinfox returned and boy, he did not keep up his drawing in his time away.
▶ No.65558>>66763 >>67914 >>82952
Sometimes you come across weird accounts like this.
▶ No.65804
>>65344
Not even close to be bad enough.
Did you notice how shitty artists have the most output?
There was a guy who kept taking porn pics, putting a color filter over them and then slapping the heads of cartoon characters on the women. But the whole stuff seems to be deleted from Paheal and Rule34.
▶ No.65806
>>62487
Better than Twokinds, where the eyes float off the character's forehead more and more.
▶ No.65808
>>59389
>>59371
Yeah that shows us we should fucking go there, no matter what we post. Why whining about being sellouts and crap like that?
I'd not even offer any specials. I'd be like: Pay shit, or not. That keeps me drawing.
And people will pay. And yes, that actually WOULD keep me drawing because I'm sick of doing it for nothing while assholes like this earn 60 bucks a month. I could do a pub crawl with that.
▶ No.65812>>65814 >>65826 >>65910 >>94321
This is the only submission on their account.
▶ No.65814
>>65812
That seems pretty good for what it is.
▶ No.65826
>>65812
Interesting but creepy if you stare too long.
▶ No.65910
>>65812
Well why would you submit anything else at that point?
▶ No.65915
>>65417
Maybe he had a stroke.
▶ No.66371
>>66362
immediately laughed upon seeing this
▶ No.66392>>66393 >>66394 >>66395 >>66406 >>66762 >>67237 >>67283
I found this in a zip file.
▶ No.66393
▶ No.66395
>>66392
laughed my ass off when I found it.
▶ No.66397>>67078
>>66394
This face is so meme worthy, lol!
▶ No.66406>>66407 >>66409
>>66392
Fuck off Wolfspider ""anon""
The only reason you found that was because you were looking for more Mowgli zooscat, you sick fuck
▶ No.66407
▶ No.66409>>66412
>>66406
Yeah! Way to go, Anon! Show that guy that others and their weird fetishes aren't welcome here! Keep fighting the good fight!
t. cockvore enthusiast
▶ No.66412
>>66409
>notices your hungy doodleslit
owo what's this
▶ No.66762
>>66392
His dick looks like a baseball bat.
▶ No.66763
>>65558
The one on the right looks kind of like Morty.
▶ No.66782
Their FA profile is a bunch of copypasted Bible verses.
▶ No.67078
>>66394
>>66397
GOD IS DEAD AND WE KILLED HIM
▶ No.67237>>67283
>>66392
What the fuck happened to Mowgli?
▶ No.67283>>68916
>>67237
>>66392
How does someone manage to fuck up tracing this bad?
▶ No.67708
the way how candychameleon draws ballsacks deserves an honorable mention for this thread
▶ No.67914
>>65558
Dear god this is some shitty art.
▶ No.67958>>67966 >>67973 >>67982 >>67983 >>68916
Not sure what to make of this artist...
▶ No.67966
>>67958
You should be making as big of distance between you as possible
▶ No.67982
>>67958
Reminds me of those retarded "kid claymation" videos. Similar quality, which is obviously shit.
▶ No.67983>>68015 >>68034
>>67958
You should post his gory "art" as well so we know explicitly why to stay away.
▶ No.68015>>68034
▶ No.68081
>>68034
I mean, it was a ghost lawnmower. What did he expect to happen to his penis?
▶ No.68806>>68968 >>74015 >>82955
what the fuck is it with artists and making assholes so far away from the base of the tail
▶ No.68916>>68924 >>70790
>>59362
What am I even looking at?
>>67283
nightmare_goggles.jpeg
>>67958
>Registeel jacking off
That is genius
▶ No.68924
>>68916
>some anon on /v/ got that charizard pic as one of their top Google Images results for "Ouch"
Really activates the almonds.
▶ No.68968>>82955
>>68806
I've been wondering that too
▶ No.69026
>>69012
I wanna be a cboy and have my clitoris rubbed owo
▶ No.69028
▶ No.69084>>69088
>there are hundreds of thousands of people that will see nothing wrong with the placement of tail and orifices in this pic
>most of those same people will wonder why so many people shit on furry art as being universally shit all around
>there will be people entering this thread just to defend this
>doubly so just because of the previous line, out of spite
>in a 'shit on bad art and point out the flaws" thread
Really makes the pictures appear in the head
▶ No.69088>>74017
>>69084
Anatomy problems aside, the thing that irks me most about this is when artists make detailed areas really dark (suggesting night) and then surround the character with pure white, so that you can't see any of the details due to the contrasting brightnesses. Making backgrounds dark if the character is dark is a simple courtesy I wish more artist would realize.
▶ No.69113>>69118
Top part. Looks worse the longer you look.
▶ No.69118
>>69113
looks like he halfassedly aligned layers in photoshop and called it a day, nothing actually looks anchored, just looks like pieces dragged and dropped into place lol
▶ No.69748>>69751 >>69752 >>69755 >>69761 >>70783
Every day we stray further from God's light.
▶ No.69751
>>69748
>GURGLE
>GLORP
>DIGEST
▶ No.69755
>>69748
>>69748
The console wars have gone too far.
▶ No.69761
▶ No.69773
This thread just keeps getting worse. I love it.
▶ No.70776>>70787
Secretden's animations are hilariously bad. Ugly characters, gross-looking coloring, poor animation timing, and bad ideas. Someone with more patience than skill.
▶ No.70782
▶ No.70783
>>69748
Fucking vore fetish sound effects man
▶ No.70787
>>70776
Oh, god, he's doing the QUALITY thing where background objects change shape as they move as a really cheap way of making them move... on the characters in the foreground.
▶ No.70790
>>68916
Get rid of the hair and charizard would look nice.
▶ No.71194
When you spend 5 hours shading the fur and tree bark and <5 seconds figuring out where the penis is supposed to go.
▶ No.71249>>71253 >>71345 >>72158 >>72166 >>72341
>>68813
Maybe you draws is the better! Can you show us them? No, because you nobody! Prat!
▶ No.71253
>>71249
Hi bbmbbf, hope you're doing well you stupid spic
▶ No.71345
>>71249
Go back to FagAffinity Bbmbbf, you talentless fagnigger.
▶ No.71749>>71752
Are you all nutts? This is a pretty decent art!
▶ No.71752>>71813
>>71749
Hi bbmbbf you're not fooling anyone retard
▶ No.71813
▶ No.71840
bbmbbf never drew his Palcomix shit himself, considering how his garbage OCs look.
Prove me wrong.
▶ No.72127>>72142
Why won't you try draw something like that for yourselves huh
▶ No.72142
>>72127
I'd rather draw something good :^)
▶ No.72158
▶ No.72166
>>71249
He's shit, total shit. Literally anyone here, with enough practice, can draw better than he can because palcomix is stuck in this perpetual mediocrity, by being completely unable to improve his art for some goddamn reason, not unlike dobson.
But you want to know the ironic thing? Despite being crap, palcomix still manages to be a better artist than you, bbmbbf :^)
▶ No.72341
▶ No.72979>>73062 >>73334
>>72963
>pawsru
I thought they were dead.
On the same note fchan is still not dead.
▶ No.73061
I mean, this is basically my entire problem with all of this.
▶ No.73062
>>72979
Earlier this year pawsru.org was resurrected. I don't know who did it or how ,but it's up and running last time I checked.
▶ No.73073>>73080
>when the artist just has no fucking clue how to draw tits
▶ No.73080>>73082
>>73073
Looks like they're taking notes from Rob Liefled.
▶ No.73082>>73094
>>73080
>doesn't know that liefield got better
▶ No.73094
>>73082
>don't tell Scotty, Scotty doesn't know
▶ No.73334
▶ No.74015>>82955
>>68806
I don't get it either. It's not something that's hard to get right (or move and modify if you don't) and it's not like finding a reference is that hard, not like you really need one for knowing roughly where it should be. Almost as bad is when artists seem to refuse to draw them in NSFW art when they're already drawing an animal (anthro or feral) with an animal dick anyways.
▶ No.74017
>>69088
This is the type of advice I wish people gave more often. Obviously it's something you should play around with as an artist, but it's not something I think I've seen all that much. Hell, not only could a darker background help the presentation of a drawing, but it could even help when you're in the middle of drawing something like this. Hell, I think I'm guilty of finishing a drawing with a background that's way too bright; not sure how bad the background was on my last drawing like that, though. Wasn't white, though, that's for sure.
▶ No.82893
▶ No.82952
>>65558
I think this is the worst in the thread. LOL, those girls with giant pink ribbons hanging down (I checked his FA account, he likes his girls with either giant peens or giant clits).
▶ No.82955>>82956
>>74015
>>68806
>>68968
Artist who's had to study anatomy here. This is my take on it, take it for what you will.
The answer lies in the fact that on humans, the anus appears to be placed lower than on animals.
The anus is placed right below the coccyx on mammals. Whereas for animals a tail preoccupies that area, humans have nothing there, and it gives the illusion that the anus is lower on the butt than on, say, a dog. The tail and anus muscles are also often shared on lots of mammals,whereas for humans there's no tail to be shared with.
This is a long-winded way of saying that on humans the anus both appears (and to a lesser extent, is) a bit lower than on other animals. And given that furries are also bipedal and share more in common the anatomy of humans than they do with animals (excluding ferals), it's not too strange for the anus to look to be a bit lower.
That being said though, sometimes people do still draw them lower than they ought to be. Sometimes people will draw the dick-in-butthole first and then draw the ass and body around it, which can lead to placement issues. I think that's more than often the case; artists will start with a poor foundation for their drawing and conform everything around that shaky foundation. Which is why you can end up with super-hyper-rendered drawings that still have vaginas that are halfway up a character's belly.
▶ No.82956
>>82955
>Sometimes people will draw the dick-in-butthole first and then draw the ass and body around it
Related: MANY artists, when attempting to draw two characters having gay sex, will position them in the same way out of habit and practice as they will male/female. And of course, the anus is not in the same place as a vagina.
This is particularly egregious with depictions of missionary-style penetration, with the positioning implying that either the top's penis is hanging three inches below his crotch (or is ten inches long and bends at a 90-degree angle), or is penetrating an anus located at the bottom's testicles. A typical position for straight sex, with the woman laying flat on her back, legs spread, simply WILL NOT WORK for anal. Either you have to raise the bottom up with a pillow placed under the butt, or fold his legs until his knees touch his ears.
Here's a picture illustrating exactly what I mean. WHERE is the top's penis going?? You can clearly see that it aligns with the base of the bottom's penis, which is NOT where the anus is.
▶ No.83181>>83189
Have more hideous muscle art. Man, they must've gotten another dose of that mutant ooze.
▶ No.83183
>>48527
>First image
Didn't know porky had a sona
▶ No.83189>>83194 >>83371
>>83181
Kinda pisses me off how bad the muscles are, because I'm seeing a lot of good in there buried under it.
▶ No.83194
>>83189
>I'm seeing a lot of good in there buried under it
>hyper-sized, circumcised human dicks
I hope you mean something else.
▶ No.83227
>when you can't be assed to do proper shading
▶ No.83323>>83371
>>50986
I haven't been on /fur/ in a while, and in my absence it seems like it has become hugely popular on here to hate on art that's average. Or even above average. Time and time again you'll see people making comments in threads like "HA! No, that artist's stuff is a dumpster fire." When it's... really not that bad.
I don't know what prompted this shift, but it's kind of annoying.
▶ No.83332
▶ No.83371>>83391
>>83189
Yeah, I like muscle when it's done right, and the Turtles would be A-OK with more muscle. But my goodness, is that ever bad. I saw it and instantly knew where it had to appear.
>>83323
I agree, though I try to focus on *really* bad art. Go up and look at post 65558 to see some of the absolute worst in this thread. The guy's 'sona (the gray winged thing) has the most bizarre backstory I've ever come across: some miners in England unearthed a mammoth diamond, which, on the spot, they carved into a "muscle god with wings and a 20" penis," which then came to life. And thanked them by flexing for them.
▶ No.83378
>>50945
>First pic
I kind of like where it was going, but could be redeemed somewhat.
First fix: Remove those awful pink things on the head, what are they supposed to be? Hair?
Second fix: Change the species. I'd go with something bigger than a fox to justify the extra arms, maybe a reptile or if it's something furred, a wolf? Maybe something alien altogether.
Third fix: Change up the proportions to make the body make more sense.
▶ No.83391>>83406
>>83371
The guy's 'sona (the gray winged thing) has the most bizarre backstory I've ever come across: some miners in England unearthed a mammoth diamond, which, on the spot, they carved into a "muscle god with wings and a 20" penis," which then came to life. And thanked them by flexing for them
>bizarre backstory
>muscle god with wings
Is this a motherfucking JoJo reference??
▶ No.83406>>83462
>>83391
I don't think so. That's the description he gives, though. "a muscle god with wings and a 20" penis" is verbatim. In one of his FA posts, he says his Diamond God's penis can grow to 1,000,000 inches, and on another that it extends into outer space.
His character's wife, incidentally, is a doozie too. She's the Goddess of Power, Beauty and Space, is 26 septillion years old, and is the CEO of a hyper breast-themed magazine called "Maximum Stretch."
▶ No.83462>>83526
>>83406
>26 septillion years old
>Older than the actual Universe by a trillion times (and if set in the future, long past the stellar degeneration era, so no inhabitable planets or CEOs or magazines or anything at all but slowly evaporating black holes)
>Didn't even go for the "sex"tillion pun
Ugh.
▶ No.83483
>>83228
why'd I have to laugh at that wrestling shit
▶ No.83526>>83528 >>83763
>>83462
LOL. Really, his FA page is a riot. His "wife's", a bit less so but still odd. I wonder whether he and his "wife" are actually separate people, or just him roleplaying over two accounts.
▶ No.83528
>>83526
Let's go with the latter, because the idea that there are somehow TWO people in the world with that same kind of horrifying level of autism and same set of ridiculous fetishes is an unsettling one.
▶ No.83763>>83806
>>83526
>separate people
are you new to this? of course it's him
▶ No.83806
>>83763
Sadly, I've run into cases where there really were two people getting into the same crap together. I've even encountered it once in person, at a con. Yes, I think it's likely that this guy is RPing his wife, but I've learned that I never really know for sure.
I think neither most of the art, nor the bizarre concepts, is the worst part with this guy. The worst part for me is the "kids book" style faces. They inject an absolutely unique level of fucking creepiness to his stuff. It's like illustrations from some twisted self-published childrens' storybook. All it needs to drop cleanly into that slot is some religious symbols, say, every character wearing a big gold Cross necklace and having a golden halo, or similar.
▶ No.87454>>90641
how can someone of draw this face and not realize it looks bad.
▶ No.90635
>>90618
I want to be that boy
▶ No.90659
>>69024
looks accurate to me anon
▶ No.93259
Hoo boy, do I have a contender. This guy is apparently 35, he has a tenuous grasp of English, and I'm going to assume he's been drawing for much of his life and has never improved at all. This is supposed to be a kid in a high-chair, wearing a bib and eating ice cream. Or, per the artist: "Me eating ice cream and been messie and wear blue bip."
▶ No.93267>>93281
▶ No.93269
>>93260
I feel like this would make a good reaction image.
▶ No.93281>>93284
>>93267
Kayla-Na may be a shitty person, but her art's not terrible. Not great, but not terrible.
▶ No.93284>>93286
>>93281
I just got here to insult her as I always do.
▶ No.93286
>>93284
Fair enough, though calling her art shit here won't do what it should-- that is, pissing her off.
▶ No.93331
▶ No.93746>>93758 >>93763
>how you want your anatomy, fam?
>"All of it."
dude should just make concept art for horror movies
▶ No.93758
>>93746
Butterface except everything
▶ No.93793
>>93763
Holey smokes! I think we have a big winner with these, err, "Nailupz"... Fucking terrifying. I can't imagine even lesbians who enjoy the 'butch' type finding these anything but horrifying. Actually, I don't imagine there are many people of any type who do! They look like 'roid-users in their elderly days.
The worst part definitely is the fact that the artist can draw realistic anatomy.
▶ No.94159>>94173
not even science can explain this shit
▶ No.94173
>>94159
I expect that face to be a reaction image
▶ No.94321>>94395 >>95772
>>65812
Reminds me of that jesus restoration
The body and rest look fine. How can you fuck up a face this badly if the rest is decent.
▶ No.94395
>>94321
Maybe someone who just sucks at faces? Or maybe everything else was traced.
▶ No.95711
>>93763
I'm personally amazed only one of those anons referenced the Bogdanoffs
▶ No.95772>>95776
>>94321
The woman who attempted the restoration was 86 years old. That should tell you a lot right there (unless you're a complete, total, braindead brainlet.)
▶ No.95776
>>95772
Wasn’t she also nearly blind?