>>45242
>Reminder that FA has banned Nazi content, despite being a completely non-political uniform fetish
I haven't seen this. The recent update only said it would be banning hateful promotional artwork for ideologies like nazism and fascism.
>banning actual Nazi groups
fine by me.
>protecting Antifa groups (the latter being a legitimate domestic terrorist group)
"Terrorist" is a meaningless buzzword to shut down people you don't like. besides, the government's claims ot who does and doesn't qualify as terrorists is laughable, coming from the same entity who thought abolitionists also fit into that same category, its worth pointing out that their word means jack shit. Question your leaders.
>>45307
>Fiction has to correspond to reality
You deserve rape.
>>45310
>Your identity is considered bourgeois because of the exorbitant amount of medical fees that you have to pay for
Holy shit, the ideology. "Bourgeois" means to represent the traits of capitalists (owners of the means of production) it has nothing to do with how much money you make.
>LGBT identity promoted and sponsored by multi-million dollar corporations
It's IDpol to sell more commodities to the people, if the inverse were true and nazism was the prevailing ideology you would expect to see pro-nazi commodities being sold.
>A communist society was designed for a heterosexual cis family in mind
Communism is uninterested in your petty cultural squabbles. What matters is the economic conditions.
>>45318
>They're saying that you can't hit them over it.
Enh, fuck libs. I say we stop the nazifags before they can move any further.
>your organization redefines "violence" and "nazi" to justify their act of violence against others
>organization
lmao nice strawman, faggot. Its a decentralized collective. Oh, but this isn't at all like nazifags redefining violence to "censoring muh free speech on non-government property" and declaring anyone who disagrees with them as a "commie" who needs to be shot?
>I think that them being anti-capitalist is stupid because capitalism funded them and their culture in the first place
>>45321
>I think that them being anti-capitalist is stupid because capitalism funded them and their culture in the first place
What kind of argument is that? By that logic you can't claim slavery was bad because all the clothes you wear and food you eat was produced by slaves.
>Several gay immigrants like Harry Hays moved to America because they didn't have success in their socialist country
Who are you talking about?
>A communist or socialist society would never make LGBT people vocal or relevant because heterosexual cis family is objectively more beneficial.
It's going to be less obnoxious about pride parades because nobody will give a shit because they won't have a soapbox to stand on once its normalized, but it's not going to marginalize them.