I hope you don't mind FA staff members tinkering with your accounts. You may notice things such as> tags on your submissions you did not put in> you are watching accounts you are unfamiliar with>accounts you were watching are no longer being watche

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

File (hide): 46181cdfc2110ad⋯.png (32.47 KB, 730x290, 73:29, sqhdyatxf.png) (h) (u)

▶Anonymous 09/04/17 (Mon) 16:33:58 No.42685>>42714 >>42718 >>42763 >>42989 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

I hope you don't mind FA staff members tinkering with your accounts. You may notice things such as

> tags on your submissions you did not put in

> you are watching accounts you are unfamiliar with

>accounts you were watching are no longer being watched

Lulz doesn't mind, they think since you use FA for free that FA can do whatever the fuck they want. That is until a popufur brings this up and whines then they will suddenly object, naturally.

But we already know they monitor PMs heavily so they can ban any dissentors, so this fails to surprise me.

▶Anonymous 09/04/17 (Mon) 16:49:41 No.42690>>42696

File (hide): 18e0a6296dc1ef5⋯.png (110.03 KB, 382x491, 382:491, ClipboardImage.png) (h) (u)

And what sparks this topic?

▶Anonymous 09/04/17 (Mon) 16:55:44 No.42692

Name an alternative that allows people to rake in dosh easy,is moderated better, doesn't monitor you, and is better designed.

▶Anonymous 09/04/17 (Mon) 17:05:32 No.42696

It's some kind of abstract avatarfagging at this point if you're the guy who made those blogpost tier threads back in the day with nonsensical explosm comics as the OP pictures. But anyway why don't you post this here >>17051

Also >>42690

▶Anonymous 09/04/17 (Mon) 18:03:29 No.42714>>42731 >>42744

>>42685 (OP)

Well, yeah. FA is it's owner's property, and these acts do not violate their ToA, and they get to decide what the ToA says anyway. If you don't like their service, why use it?

▶Anonymous 09/04/17 (Mon) 18:14:19 No.42718

>>42685 (OP)

They do this to me all the time. I wonder I have a watch to an SJW type of furry.

▶Anonymous 09/04/17 (Mon) 18:39:35 No.42731

>>42714

t. Cuck

▶Anonymous 09/04/17 (Mon) 19:37:42 No.42744

>>42714

Pussy.

▶Anonymous 09/04/17 (Mon) 21:34:18 No.42758>>42988

> tags on your submissions you did not put in

Good. Maybe that means they're getting ready to finally add a blacklist system, and they're making sure that the bulk of certain submissions have consistent tags. I'm sick of having to do gymnastics to maneuver around cringey shit.

▶Anonymous 09/04/17 (Mon) 21:51:30 No.42763

>>42685 (OP)

Lulz.net will suck FA's cock any day, but besides that...

▶Anonymous 09/05/17 (Tue) 10:47:10 No.42988

>>42758

This. The other two things are gay but this is good.

▶Anonymous 09/05/17 (Tue) 10:59:56 No.42989>>43204

>>42685 (OP)

>accounts you were watching are no longer being watched

I noticed this, and asked about why this happens, and it's apparently some bug. Why would an admin want to remove a watch from your list?

▶Anonymous 09/06/17 (Wed) 18:47:35 No.43204

>>42989

>and it's apparently some bug.

How odd... YouTube said the same thing. Must be quite a prevalent (((bug))) common to a number of software products.

/fur/ - Furry★

General

WebM

Theme

User JS

Do not paste code here unless you absolutely trust the source or have read it yourself!

Favorites

Customize Formatting

Filters