/doomer/ - Doomers Club★

>There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror---that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.

We are animals, we are not enlighted creatures different from all the others and touched from God, we just have higher IQ. In a primal situation the levels of agression on a individual dictated his chances of survival and procreation, and because of it humanity as a whole developed it. We never evoluted as animals past the beggining of society, we still the same, same instincts, same standards for finding mates, same reactions in life or death situations, and like you or not, violence and agression are a fundamental and indivisable part of every human being.

>I believe in peaceful anarchy, but not in our time

I don't believe in peaceful anarchy in any time, any system that needs only 1 (one) smartass to break the rules and take advantage of others, is a system bound to fail. Even if you build a "smartass genociding foundation", the bloodbath will enrage the common citizens, the ones that follow the unspoken agreements, and in a few time your system colapses.

>Part of me really wants to do it, bomb football stadiums and derail trains

And you don't do it because your rational mind or your lack of willpower and confidence tells you not to. But not all people are that much influenced by those things, that's why an anarchic society would never work. Hell, I am not even the most transgressive person around, I'm kinda of a cuck, but even still I have already slipped in agrary reform movements even tough I don't believe that shit just to pick up some land. In the end we are just mamals, and unlike bees and ants, mamals group in societies because it benefits then and their offspring as individuals, not because of the protection of the said society itself. When his safety and the safety of the colectivety are conflicting, their instincts are to preserve thenselves and their kids, and the same applies to humans, the only ones that don't follow those rules being the ones that have put their personal morals above their instincts.

>so what if we make everyone be rational

A human is born, it grows up, it acquires knowledge, and at some point puts rationality above their primal instincts, women never do constantly evoluting it's rationality, until the day it dies. Every human pass trough that cicle, every human will feel the need of breaking current norms, and so on. Unless you pick a bunch of old people, freeze their ages, and stop then from having kids, that kind of society is unachiveable by nature.

>>9040 (OP)

>I really believe in the non aggression principle, I really do, I believe in peaceful anarchy, but not in our time

Yes, maybe one day, until then I'm egoist-illegalist. Shit will maybe hit the fan, who cares, the only thing I want is to feel excited when I will loot the boomer's shop and his car. While people will fight for spooky shit like politics, race, human rights (top kek), I will be there just to loot like an existence itself, like a nigger. I don't even need the stuff, I just want to loot and laugh at people bleeding out for their ideals on the pavement, got it? And then, maybe one day, maybe then we can sit down in our communities and talk about peaceful anarchy.

>If nothing can be saved, then what does violence accomplish?

>Do you guys like violence? If so, do you think it is practical, or is it just an emotional thing for you?

Nah but there option to kill money as well. Think about it, you don't have to enjoy the violence, you practice it, but you don't feel bad about it either. What if violence will be again a way how to survive in general population, and I'm not talking only about crime, I'm talking about protecting yourself etc.

AKs and tomahawks for everyone

let the mayhem begin

the great purge is long overdue

everyone against everyone

royal battle

until we are all crippled or dead

just like in technolyze

>>9040 (OP)

if you are going to do it, consider this

>high value target

>high value/symbolic location

>noble reason

>plan to escape so you can do it again

dont just be a r9k weenie and shoot up a yoga studio please.

>>9048

>We are animals, we are not enlighted creatures different from all the others and touched from God, we just have higher IQ. In a primal situation the levels of agression on a individual dictated his chances of survival and procreation, and because of it humanity as a whole developed it. We never evoluted as animals past the beggining of society, we still the same, same instincts, same standards for finding mates, same reactions in life or death situations, and like you or not, violence and agression are a fundamental and indivisable part of every human being.

brazilians in a nutshell

White people on the other hand:

>>9234

500 years ago our country was just thicc woods from all sides, habitated with natives that haven't even reached the bronze age yet. We only became independent from portugal in the XVIII century, and only left the monarchy to become a republic in the end of the XIX century. Most of our culture, values, and law system are copy pasted from portugal and other european countries. Even art and artistic movements, if I show you pictures of brazilian catholic churches you will think I'm posting european ones. If anything, I say we are not doing too bad, actually even better than some countries in the middle east and oriental side of the world that have millenials of history. If anything, I am proud of how we don't get too stuck up into "going back to the roots and give a middle finger to the eevil colonialist countries culture" and actually try to learn from the mistakes and good things done by other countries.

Also, I was talking about human instincts, not about their rationality and achievements past the centuries. Even nowadays the way and standards to wich people choose partners is still the same as the beggining of civilization, as animals, biologically speaking, we didn't change that much at all. If you don't insert into a kid the values of society, the knowledge we gathered during the story of mankind, and the morals of your social group, he will be no different than an animal.

Relevant again because >>12094

Though it tells us all we needed to know. Fascism, eco- or otherwise, is very old; the idea that righteous violence for the greater good (through domestic cleansing, imperialism, etc.) can bring about peace has not materialized, and will never materialize, most likely. It is an accessory to violence that is not believed in any genuine capacity, only out of convenience: the communists do not wish to help the poor, they simply hate the wealthy; the nazis, whatever truly racist ones there were, did not really care about the purity of their race, only the removal of designated foreigners from their presence. It is a very common tool of violent people, to adopt an apparently gentle habit that does not interfere with their real desires (Hitler being a vegetarian who loved animals).

There is such a thing as just violence. Besides self-defense, defending the weak is admirable, and there is nothing morally wrong to it. When pondering violence, question whether it comes from a place of personal strength and a desire to create life and preserve beauty, or from a place of personal weakness that seeks to destroy and sacrifice the future to ease the pain of living in the present.